Table of Contents

Exhibit 99.1

[                    ], 2006

Dear Cendant Corporation Stockholder:

I am pleased to inform you that the Board of Directors of Cendant Corporation has approved the distribution of all of the shares of common stock of Wyndham Worldwide Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Cendant, to Cendant stockholders. At the time of its distribution, Wyndham Worldwide will hold the assets and liabilities associated with Cendant’s Hospitality Services (including Timeshare Resorts) businesses, which include the lodging, vacation exchange and rental, and vacation ownership businesses, and will remain one of the preeminent providers of hospitality products and services in the world. Cendant’s Board of Directors also approved the distribution, which is expected to occur simultaneously with the Wyndham Worldwide distribution, of all of the shares of common stock of Realogy Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Cendant, to Cendant stockholders. At the time of its distribution, Realogy will hold the assets and liabilities associated with Cendant’s Real Estate Services businesses and will remain one of the preeminent providers of real estate and relocation services in the world. Upon each distribution, Cendant stockholders will own 100% of the common stock of each company being distributed.

These distributions are being made pursuant to a plan preliminarily approved by our Board on October 23, 2005 to separate Cendant into four independent, publicly traded companies: Cendant’s Hospitality Services (including Timeshare Resorts) (Wyndham Worldwide), Real Estate Services (Realogy), Travel Distribution Services (Travelport) and Vehicle Rental (Avis Budget Group) businesses. On April 24, 2006, we announced that as an alternative to distributing shares of Travelport to Cendant stockholders, Cendant was also exploring the sale of that company. On June 30, 2006, Cendant entered into an agreement to sell the Travel Distribution Services company to an affiliate of the Blackstone Group for $4,300 million in cash. A significant portion of the proceeds from the sale of Travelport will be used to reduce Wyndham Worldwide’s and Realogy’s initial indebtedness. Cendant’s Board of Directors believes that creating independent, focused companies and selling Travelport is the best way to unlock the full value of Cendant’s businesses for the benefit of Cendant, Cendant’s stockholders and each of the businesses, in both the short and long terms. In connection with the distribution of Wyndham Worldwide, the Cendant Board received an opinion from Evercore Group L.L.C. to the effect that, as of the date of the opinion, the Wyndham Worldwide distribution is fair, from a financial point of view, to the stockholders of Cendant. A copy of that opinion that Evercore delivered to the Cendant Board relating to the distribution of Wyndham Worldwide is attached to this information statement as Annex A.

The distribution of Wyndham Worldwide common stock will occur on [                    ], 2006 by way of a pro rata dividend to Cendant stockholders. Each Cendant stockholder will be entitled to receive one share of Wyndham Worldwide common stock (and a related preferred stock purchase right) for every five shares of Cendant common stock held by such stockholder at the close of business on [                    ], 2006, the record date of the distribution. The dividend will be issued in book-entry form only, which means that no physical stock certificates will be issued. No fractional shares of Wyndham Worldwide common stock will be issued. If you would otherwise have been entitled to a fractional share of Wyndham Worldwide common stock in the distribution, you will receive the net cash value of such fractional share instead.

Stockholder approval of the distribution is not required, nor are you required to take any action to receive your Wyndham Worldwide common stock. Following the distributions, you will own shares in Cendant, Wyndham Worldwide and Realogy. Wyndham Worldwide has applied to have its common stock listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “WYN,” and Realogy has applied to have its common stock listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “H.” Cendant’s common stock will continue to trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “CD,” and, in connection with the plan of separation, it is expected that Cendant will change its name to Avis Budget Group, Inc. and its symbol to “CAR.”

The enclosed information statement, which is being mailed to all Cendant stockholders, describes the distribution of Wyndham Worldwide common stock in detail and contains important information about

Table of Contents

Wyndham Worldwide. A separate information statement is being mailed to Cendant stockholders with respect to the distribution of Realogy common stock. We urge you to read this information statement carefully.

I want to thank you for your continued support of Cendant and we look forward to your support of Wyndham Worldwide and Realogy in the future.

Sincerely,

Henry R. Silverman

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

Table of Contents

[                    ], 2006

Dear Wyndham Worldwide Corporation Stockholder:

It is my pleasure to welcome you as a stockholder of our company, Wyndham Worldwide Corporation. As one of the world’s largest hospitality companies, we offer our individual consumers and business-to-business customers a broad suite of hospitality products and services across various accommodation alternatives and price ranges through our premier portfolio of world-renowned brands. With more than 20 brands, which include Wyndham Hotels and Resorts, Ramada, Days Inn, Super 8, TripRewards, RCI, Landal GreenParks, English Country Cottages, Novasol, Fairfield and Trendwest, we have a significant presence in most major hospitality and leisure markets in the United States and throughout the rest of the world. The hospitality products and services we offer include lodging, vacation exchange and rental services, and vacation ownership interests in vacation ownership resorts. We are the world’s largest lodging franchisor, vacation exchange network and vacation ownership business, and we are among the world’s largest global marketers of vacation rental properties.

We have applied to list our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “WYN” in connection with the distribution of our company’s common stock by Cendant Corporation.

I invite you to learn more about Wyndham Worldwide by reviewing the enclosed information statement. We look forward to our future as an independent, publicly traded company and to your support as a holder of Wyndham Worldwide common stock. We also look forward to welcoming you as a new or returning customer at one of our hotels, resorts or other vacation accommodations around the world.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Holmes

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Table of Contents

Preliminary Information Statement

(Subject to Completion, Dated July 12, 2006)

Information Statement

Distribution of

Common Stock of

WYNDHAM WORLDWIDE CORPORATION

by

CENDANT CORPORATION

to Cendant Corporation Stockholders

This information statement is being furnished in connection with the distribution by Cendant Corporation to its stockholders of all of its shares of common stock of Wyndham Worldwide Corporation, an already-existing, wholly owned subsidiary of Cendant that holds directly or indirectly the assets and liabilities associated with Cendant’s Hospitality Services (including Timeshare Resorts) businesses, which include Cendant’s lodging, vacation exchange and rental, and timeshare resorts businesses. To implement the distribution, Cendant will distribute all of its shares of our common stock on a pro rata basis to the holders of Cendant common stock. Each of you, as a holder of Cendant common stock, will receive one share of Wyndham Worldwide common stock (and a related preferred stock purchase right) for every five shares of Cendant common stock that you held at the close of business on [                    ], 2006, the record date for the distribution. The distribution will be effective as of [                    ], 2006. Immediately after the distribution is completed, Wyndham Worldwide will be an independent public company.

No vote of Cendant stockholders is required in connection with this distribution. We are not asking you for a proxy and you are requested not to send us a proxy. Cendant stockholders will not be required to pay any consideration for the shares of our common stock they receive in the distribution, and they will not be required to surrender or exchange shares of their Cendant common stock or take any other action in connection with the distribution.

All of the outstanding shares of our common stock are currently owned by Cendant. Accordingly, there currently is no public trading market for our common stock. We have filed an application to list our common stock under the ticker symbol “WYN” on the New York Stock Exchange. Assuming that our common stock is approved for listing, we anticipate that a limited market, commonly known as a “when-issued” trading market, for our common stock will develop on or shortly before the record date for the distribution and will continue up to and including through the distribution date, and we anticipate that “regular-way” trading of our common stock will begin on the first trading day following the distribution date.

In reviewing this information statement, you should carefully consider the matters described under the caption “ Risk Factors” beginning on page 30 of this information statement.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of any of the securities of Wyndham Worldwide Corporation, or determined whether this information statement is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

This information statement does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities.

The date of this information statement is [                    ], 2006.

This information statement was first mailed to Cendant stockholders on or about [                    ], 2006.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TRADEMARKS AND SERVICE MARKS

We own or have rights to use the trademarks, service marks and trade names that we use in conjunction with the operation of our business. Some of the more important trademarks that we own or have rights to use that appear in this information statement include “Wyndham Hotels and Resorts,” “Ramada,” “Days Inn,” “Super 8,” “TripRewards,” “RCI,” “Landal GreenParks,” “English Country Cottages,” “Novasol,” “Fairfield” and “Trendwest,” which may be registered in the United States and other jurisdictions. Each trademark, trade name or service mark of any other company appearing in this information statement is owned by such company.

INDUSTRY DATA

This information statement includes industry and trade association data, forecasts and information that we have prepared based, in part, upon data, forecasts and information obtained from independent trade associations, industry publications and surveys and other information available to us. Some data also is based on our good faith estimates, which are derived from management’s knowledge of the industry and independent sources. The primary sources for third-party industry data and forecasts are Smith Travel Research, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, World Travel and Tourism Council, Travel Industry Association of America and American Resort Development Association and other industry reports and articles. These third-party publications and surveys generally state that the information included therein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable and that the publications and surveys can give no assurance as to the accuracy or completeness of such information. We have not independently verified any of the data from third-party sources nor have we ascertained the underlying economic assumptions on which such data is based. Similarly, we believe our internal research is reliable, even though such research has not been verified by any independent sources.

Table of Contents

SUMMARY

This summary highlights selected information from this information statement relating to our company, our separation from Cendant and the distribution of our common stock by Cendant to its stockholders. For a more complete understanding of our business and the separation and distribution, you should carefully read the entire information statement.

Except as otherwise indicated or unless the context otherwise requires, the information included in this information statement, including the combined financial statements of the Wyndham Worldwide business of Cendant, which is comprised of the assets and liabilities used in managing and operating the Hospitality Services (including Timeshare Resorts) businesses of Cendant, assumes the completion of all the transactions referred to in this information statement in connection with the separation and distribution. Except as otherwise indicated or unless the context otherwise requires, “Wyndham Worldwide Corporation,” “Wyndham Worldwide,” “we,” “us,” “our” and “our company” refer to Wyndham Worldwide Corporation and its combined subsidiaries, and “Cendant Corporation” and “Cendant” refer to Cendant Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries. Unless otherwise indicated, information is presented as of March 31, 2006.

Our Company

As one of the world’s largest hospitality companies, we offer individual consumers and business-to-business customers a broad suite of hospitality products and services across various accommodation alternatives and price ranges through our premier portfolio of world-renowned brands. With more than 20 brands, which include Wyndham Hotels and Resorts, Ramada, Days Inn, Super 8, TripRewards, RCI, Landal GreenParks, English Country Cottages, Novasol, Fairfield and Trendwest, we have built a significant presence in most major hospitality markets in the United States and throughout the rest of the world. In 2006, total spending by domestic and international travelers in the United States is expected to reach $675 billion, an increase of approximately 5% from spending levels in 2005 and of approximately 16% from spending levels in 2000, which witnessed the highest ever levels of travel spending for any year prior to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. Globally, travel spending is expected to grow by 5% in 2006 to $4.5 trillion. Historically, we have pursued what we believe to be financially-attractive entrance points in the major global hospitality markets to strengthen our portfolio of products and services. Wyndham Worldwide is well positioned to compete in the major hospitality segments of this large and growing industry.

We operate primarily in the lodging, vacation exchange and rental, and vacation ownership segments of the hospitality industry:

Each of our lodging, vacation exchange and rental and vacation ownership businesses has a long operating history. Our lodging business began operations in 1990 with the acquisition of the Howard Johnson and Ramada brands, each of which opened its first hotel in 1954. RCI, the best known brand in our vacation exchange and rental business, was established more than 30 years ago, and our vacation ownership brands, Fairfield and Trendwest, began vacation ownership operations in 1980 and 1989, respectively.

1

Table of Contents

We provide directly to individual consumers our high quality products and services, including the various accommodations we market, such as hotels, vacation resorts, villas and cottages, and products we offer, such as vacation ownership interests. We also provide valuable products and services to our business-to-business customers, such as franchisees, affiliated resort developers and prospective developers. These products and services include marketing and central reservation systems, back office services and loyalty programs. We strive to provide value-added products and services that are intended both to enhance the travel experience of the individual consumer and to drive revenue to our business-to-business customers. The depth and breadth of our businesses across different segments of the hospitality industry provide us with the opportunity to expand our relationships with our existing individual consumers and business-to-business customers in one or more segments of our business by offering them additional or alternative products and services from our other segments.

The largest portion of our revenues comes from fees we receive in exchange for providing products and services. We receive fees, for example, as royalties for utilizing our brands and for providing property management and vacation exchange and rental services. The remainder of our revenues comes from the proceeds of sales of products, such as vacation ownership interests, and related services. The fees we earn by providing products and services and proceeds from sales of our products and services provide us with strong and stable cash flows. For the three months ended March 31, 2006 and the full year ended December 31, 2005, we generated revenues of $870 million and $3,471 million, respectively, and net income of $28 million and $431 million, respectively.

Our Business Segments

We operate our business in three segments: Wyndham Hotel Group, our lodging business, RCI Global Vacation Network, our vacation exchange and rental business, and Wyndham Vacation Ownership, our vacation ownership business. We believe that we are an industry leader in each of our business segments.

Wyndham Hotel Group

Wyndham Hotel Group, our lodging business, franchises hotels and provides property management services to owners of upscale branded hotels. Through steady organic growth and acquisitions of established lodging franchise systems over the past 15 years, our lodging business has become the world’s largest lodging franchisor as measured by the number of franchised hotels. Our lodging business has over 6,300 franchised hotels, which represent approximately 525,000 rooms on six continents. Our franchised hotels operate under one of our ten lodging brands, which are Wyndham Hotels and Resorts, Wingate Inn, Ramada, Baymont, Days Inn, Super 8, Howard Johnson, AmeriHost Inn, Travelodge and Knights Inn. The breadth and diversity of our lodging brands provide potential franchisees with a range of options for affiliating their properties with one or more of our brands. Our lodging business has a strong presence across the middle and economy segments of the lodging industry and a developing presence in the upscale segment, thus providing individual consumers who are traveling for leisure or business with options for hospitality products and services across various price ranges. We first entered the upscale segment of the domestic lodging industry in October 2005, when we acquired the franchise and property management businesses associated with the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand. We strengthened our position in the middle segment of the domestic lodging industry in April 2006, when we acquired the franchise business of Baymont Inn & Suites.

Throughout this information statement, we use the term “hotels” to apply to hotels, motels and/or other accommodations, as applicable. In addition, the term “franchise system” refers to a system through which a franchisor provides services to hotels whose independent owners pay to receive such services from the franchisor under the specific terms of a franchise agreement. The services provided through a franchise system typically include reservations, sales leads, marketing and advertising support, training, quality assurance inspections, operational support and information, pre-opening assistance, prototype construction plans, and national or regional conferences.

2

Table of Contents

Our franchised hotels represent approximately 10% of the U.S. hotel room inventory. In 2005, our franchised hotels sold 8.2%, or approximately 84.1 million, of the approximately one billion hotel rooms sold in the United States. Throughout this information statement, we refer to nights at hotel rooms as “hotel room nights.” In 2005, our franchised hotels sold approximately 19.5% of all hotel room nights sold in the United States in the economy and midscale segments. Our franchised hotels are dispersed throughout North America, which reduces our exposure to any one geographic region. Approximately 92% of the hotel rooms, or approximately 481,000 rooms, in our franchised hotels are located throughout North America, and approximately 8% of the hotel rooms, or approximately 44,000 rooms, are located outside of North America. In addition, our lodging franchises are dispersed among numerous franchisees, which reduces our exposure to any one lodging franchisee. Of our approximately 5,000 lodging franchisees, no one franchisee accounts for more than 2% of our franchised hotels. In connection with our acquisition of Wyndham Hotels and Resorts’ franchise business in October 2005, we acquired the related property management business and began offering hotel property management services.

Our lodging business derives a majority of its revenues from franchising hotels and derives additional revenues from property management. The sources of revenues from franchising hotels are initial franchise fees, which relate to services provided to assist a franchised hotel to open for business under one of our brands, and ongoing franchise fees, which are comprised of royalty fees and other fees relating to marketing and reservations. The sources of revenues from property management are management fees, incentive fees, service fees and reimbursement revenues. For the three months ended March 31, 2006 and the full year ended December 31, 2005, our lodging business, which is part of the business that Cendant currently refers to as the Hospitality Services business, contributed approximately 17% and 15% of our revenues, respectively, and approximately 23% and 26% of our combined segment EBITDA, respectively.

RCI Global Vacation Network

RCI Global Vacation Network, our vacation exchange and rental business, provides vacation exchange products and services to developers, managers and owners of intervals of vacation ownership interests, and markets vacation rental properties. We are the world’s largest vacation exchange network and among the world’s largest global marketers of vacation rental properties. Our vacation exchange and rental business has access for specified periods, in a majority of cases on an exclusive basis, to approximately 55,000 vacation properties, which are comprised of approximately 4,000 vacation ownership resorts around the world and approximately 51,000 vacation rental properties that are located principally in Europe, which we believe makes us one of the world’s largest marketers of European vacation rental properties as measured by the number of properties we market for rental. Each year, our vacation exchange and rental business provides more than four million leisure-bound families with vacation exchange and rental products and services. The properties available to leisure travelers through our vacation exchange and rental business include hotel rooms and suites, villas, cottages, bungalows, campgrounds, vacation ownership condominiums, city apartments, second homes, fractional private residences, luxury destination clubs and boats. We offer leisure travelers flexibility (subject to availability) as to time of travel and a choice of lodging options in regions to which such travelers may not typically have such ease of access, and we offer property owners marketing services, quality control services and property management services ranging from key-holding to full property maintenance for such properties. Our vacation exchange and rental business markets our products and services using seven primary brands and other related brands and operates through 50 worldwide offices. For the three months ended March 31, 2006 and the full year ended December 31, 2005, our vacation exchange and rental business, which is part of the business that Cendant currently refers to as the Hospitality Services business, contributed approximately 32% and 31% of our revenues, respectively, and approximately 42% and 37% of our combined segment EBITDA, respectively.

Throughout this information statement, we use the term “inventory” in the context of our vacation exchange and rental business to refer to intervals of vacation ownership interests and primarily independently owned

3

Table of Contents

properties, which include hotel rooms and suites, villas, cottages, bungalows, campgrounds, vacation ownership condominiums, city apartments, second homes, fractional private residences, luxury destination clubs and boats. In addition, throughout this information statement, we refer to intervals of vacation ownership interests as “intervals” and individuals who purchase vacation rental products and services from us as “rental customers.”

Through our vacation exchange business, RCI, we have relationships with approximately 4,000 vacation ownership resorts in more than 100 countries. Historically, our vacation exchange business consisted of the operation of worldwide exchange programs for owners of intervals. Today, our vacation exchange business also provides property management services and consulting services for the development of tourism-oriented real estate, loyalty programs, in-house and outsourced travel agency services, and third-party vacation club services. We operate our vacation exchange business, RCI, through three worldwide exchange programs: RCI Weeks, an exchange network of traditional, week-long intervals that is the world’s largest vacation ownership exchange network; RCI Points, a global points-based exchange network; and The Registry Collection, a global exchange network of luxury accommodations. Participants in these exchange programs pay annual membership dues. For additional fees, such participants are entitled to exchange intervals for intervals at other properties affiliated with our vacation exchange business. In addition, certain participants may exchange intervals for other leisure-related products and services. We refer to participants in these three exchange programs as “members.”

Our vacation exchange business, RCI, derives a majority of its revenues from annual membership dues and exchange fees for transactions. Our vacation exchange business also derives revenues from ancillary services, including travel agency services and loyalty programs.

The rental properties we market are principally privately-owned villas, cottages and bungalows that generally belong to property owners unaffiliated with us. In addition to these properties, we market inventory from our vacation exchange business to developers of vacation ownership properties and other sources. We market rental properties under proprietary brand names, such as Landal GreenParks, English Country Cottages, Novasol, Cuendet and Canvas Holidays, and through select private-label arrangements. Most of the rental activity under our brands takes place in Europe, the United States and Mexico, although we have the ability to source and rent inventory in approximately 100 countries. Our vacation rental business currently has relationships with approximately 35,000 independent property owners in more than 22 countries, including the United States, United Kingdom, Mexico, France, Ireland, The Netherlands, Belgium, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Germany, Greece, Austria, Croatia and certain countries in Eastern Europe and the Pacific Rim. We currently make over 1.4 million vacation rental bookings a year. Our vacation rental business also has the opportunity to market and provide inventory to the over three million owners of intervals who participate in our vacation exchange business. Our vacation rental business also has an ownership interest in, or capital leases for, approximately 9% of the properties in our rental portfolio.

Our vacation rental business primarily derives its revenues from fees, which generally range from approximately 25% to 50% of the gross rent charged. Our vacation rental business also derives revenues from travel insurance sales in Europe, transportation fees, property management fees and on-site revenue from ancillary services, including travel agency services.

Wyndham Vacation Ownership

Wyndham Vacation Ownership, our vacation ownership business, includes marketing and sales of vacation ownership interests, consumer financing in connection with the purchase by individuals of vacation ownership

4

Table of Contents

interests, property management services to property owners’ associations, and development and acquisition of vacation ownership resorts. We operate our vacation ownership business primarily through our two brands, Fairfield and Trendwest. We have the largest vacation ownership business in the world as measured by the numbers of vacation ownership resorts, vacation ownership units and owners of vacation ownership interests. We have developed or acquired over 140 vacation ownership resorts in the United States, Canada, Mexico, the Caribbean and the South Pacific that represent more than 18,000 individual vacation ownership units and over 750,000 owners of vacation ownership interests and other real estate interests.

We pride ourselves on the quality of the resorts in which we sell vacation ownership interests and on our customer service. We believe the quality of the resorts and our customer service result in a consistently high level of customer satisfaction as evidenced by the percentage of owners of vacation ownership interests who buy additional vacation ownership interests each year. In 2005, approximately 37% of our net sales of vacation ownership interests resulted from upgrade sales to existing owners of interests at our vacation ownership resorts.

Our portfolio of resorts includes a mix of destination resorts and drive-to resorts. The majority of the resorts in which Fairfield markets and sells vacation ownership interests are destination resorts that are located at or near attractions, such as the Walt Disney World^® Resort in Florida; the Las Vegas Strip in Nevada; Hawaii; Myrtle Beach in South Carolina; and Colonial Williamsburg^® in Virginia. Fairfield resorts are located primarily in the United States and, as of March 31, 2006, consisted of 72 resorts that represented approximately 13,300 units. As of March 31, 2006, there were approximately 500,000 owners of vacation ownership interests and other real estate interests in Fairfield resorts. The resorts in which Trendwest markets and sells vacation credits are primarily drive-to resorts that are located in closer proximity to regions in which our owners and prospective owners reside. Trendwest resorts are located primarily in the Western United States, Canada, Mexico and the South Pacific and, as of March 31, 2006, consisted of 69 resorts that represented approximately 4,900 units. As of March 31, 2006, there were over 250,000 owners of vacation credits in Trendwest resorts.

Our vacation ownership brands, Fairfield and Trendwest, operate vacation ownership programs through which vacation ownership interests can be redeemed for vacations through points-based internal reservation systems that provide owners with flexibility (subject to availability) as to resort location, length of stay, unit type and time of year. The points-based reservation systems offer owners redemption opportunities for a wide variety of travel and leisure products, including airfare, cruises, and specialized leisure activities and attractions, and the opportunity for owners to use our products for one or more vacations per year based on level of ownership. Our vacation ownership programs allow us to market and sell our vacation ownership products in variable quantities as opposed to the fixed quantity of the traditional, fixed-week vacation ownership, which is primarily sold on a weekly interval basis, and to offer to existing owners “upgrade” sales to supplement such owners’ existing vacation ownership interests. FairShare Plus, formed in 1991, is Fairfield’s points-based internal reservation system. Our Trendwest brand operates two points-based vacation ownership programs, WorldMark, the Club, formed in 1989, and WorldMark South Pacific Club, formed in 2000, which we refer to collectively as the Clubs.

Our vacation ownership business also provides consumer finance and property management services. We offer financing to the purchasers of vacation ownership interests. Providing consumer financing reduces the initial cash required by customers to purchase vacation ownership interests, thereby enabling us to attract additional customers and generate substantial incremental profits. Similar to other companies that provide consumer financing, we securitize a majority of the receivables originated in connection with selling products, which in our case are vacation ownership interests. As of March 31, 2006, we serviced a portfolio of approximately 236,000 loans that totaled $2,272 million in aggregate principal amount outstanding. Our property management business generally provides day-to-day management for vacation ownership resorts, including oversight of housekeeping services, maintenance and refurbishment of the units, and provides certain accounting and administrative services to property owners’ associations.

5

Table of Contents

Our vacation ownership business derives a majority of its revenues from the sales of vacation ownership interests and derives other revenues from consumer financing and property management. For the three months ended March 31, 2006 and the full year ended December 31, 2005, our vacation ownership business, which is the same business that Cendant currently refers to as the Timeshare Resorts business, contributed approximately 51% and 54% of our revenues, respectively, and approximately 35% and 37% of our combined segment EBITDA, respectively.

Our Strengths

We believe that the following competitive strengths differentiate us in the hospitality industry:

We believe that our brand names, which are some of the world’s most well-recognized brands in the hospitality industry, serve as the foundation for our industry-leading businesses. We believe that the strong market presence and familiarity of our brands attract customers to the products and services offered by our businesses. For our lodging business, our brand names include Wyndham Hotels and Resorts, Ramada, Days Inn, Super 8 and TripRewards. Hotels associated with our lodging brands operate in the upscale, middle and economy segments of the lodging industry and therefore provide leisure and business customers with options for hospitality products and services across various price ranges. For our vacation exchange and rental business, our brand names include RCI, which is a vacation exchange brand, and Landal GreenParks, English Country Cottages and Novasol, which are some of Europe’s best known vacation rental brands. For our vacation ownership business, our brand names include Fairfield and Trendwest, which benefit from high levels of customer satisfaction as evidenced by the volume of annual revenues resulting from upgrade sales to our existing owners of vacation ownership interests.

We believe that our industry leading positions across our business segments help us to attract customers and position us for continued growth. We are the world’s largest lodging franchise business as measured by the number of franchised hotels, vacation exchange company as measured by the numbers of exchanges per year and members, and vacation ownership business as measured by the numbers of vacation ownership resorts, vacation ownership units and owners of vacation ownership interests, and we are among the world’s largest global marketers of vacation rental properties.

We market a breadth of accommodations, including hotel rooms and suites, vacation ownership interests, villas, cottages, bungalows, campgrounds, vacation ownership condominiums, city apartments, second homes, fractional private residences, luxury destination clubs and boats. The diversity of our inventory provides individual consumers options with respect to accommodations, and our experience with such inventory has enabled us to build extensive expertise across a variety of accommodation categories. Individual consumers value having options with respect to accommodations, and our business-to-business customers value our expertise with respect to our accommodations. In addition to having a breadth of hospitality accommodations, we have a diverse customer base across our business segments. Our customers include our franchisees, members, rental customers and owners of vacation ownership interests, many of whom are potential purchasers of additional products and services from our businesses. Our loyalty programs encourage repeat business, which generally results in enhanced margins, as compared to the margins associated with new customer acquisitions. In addition, our franchisees and members, by the nature of our business models, provide a level of annuity-like revenue and earning streams.

6

Table of Contents

We believe that our breadth of lodging inventory helps to insulate us during periods of weakness in the overall travel sector because our lodging inventory has a significant presence in the economy and middle segments of the domestic lodging market, which tend to display relative strength at times when the broader travel sector experiences weakness and concurrent decreases in airline travel. This relative strength can be attributed in part to the drive-to nature of many of the properties that operate in the economy and the middle segments of the lodging industry. In addition, we believe that the geographic diversity of our businesses mitigates the risk that exogenous events, such as regional economic slowdowns, political unrest or natural disasters, will have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

We develop unique products and services to meet the needs of our franchisees, members, rental customers and owners of vacation ownership interests. We were one of the first vacation exchange companies to introduce a points-based vacation exchange system and one of the first vacation ownership companies to offer a points-based vacation ownership system. Our loyalty programs, including TripRewards and RCI Elite Rewards, are innovative in both their breadth of benefits and their development of ways participants can earn and use points. We believe that our innovation enables us to respond more effectively to changes in members’ and rental customers’ preferences for accommodation and vacation experiences, and our responses to these changing preferences help us to maintain and increase revenues and earnings.

We believe that our size and general scale allow us to (i) provide individual consumers choice of destinations and accommodation types across various price ranges on six continents, (ii) offer our business-to-business customers, including our franchisees, value-added global business solutions with respect to operations, services and technology, (iii) reduce our operational risk and (iv) generate operating efficiencies, including purchasing efficiencies, that enable us to provide products and services in a cost-effective manner and to acquire new individual consumers and business-to-business customers at a relatively low cost. The benefits of our size and scale provide us with increased profit margins and access to capital to execute our strategies to grow our business.

Our fee-for-service based businesses, lodging and vacation exchange and rental, and our vacation ownership business (which has a fee-for-service component) provide us with stable revenues and earnings from diverse sources, and strong and stable cash flows. Our lodging business derives revenues from franchise fees, including royalty fees, and property management fees. Our vacation exchange and rental business derives revenues from annual membership dues and exchange fees for transactions and from commissions and rental fees in connection with vacation rentals. Our vacation ownership business derives fee-based revenues from property management fees. The stable revenues and earnings we derive from these fee-based models provide us with strong and stable cash flows. In addition, the sales of vacation ownership interests by our vacation ownership business and the consumer financings of such sales augment our revenues, earnings and cash flows from fees.

We believe that our strong management team will effectively execute our growth strategies. Collectively, our chief executive officer and the chief executive officers of our lodging, vacation exchange and rental, and vacation ownership businesses have 60 years of combined experience in the hospitality industry, and our chief financial officer, general counsel and chief human resources officer

7

Table of Contents

have 30, 16 and 18 years of experience, respectively, in their respective fields. We believe that having a strong management team with extensive experience enables us to respond to changing market conditions and evolving preferences of our customers and is essential to our overall success and our future growth as a stand-alone hospitality company.

Our Strategy

Our company-wide business strategy includes generating new customers and selling additional products and services to our current customers by utilizing our unique range of inventory and offering improved products and services that enhance the value we provide to customers. We seek to generate new customers for our products and services by, for example, attracting additional leisure and business travelers in the upscale segment of the lodging industry to new and existing hotels franchised under the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand. We seek to sell to our current customers in one or more segments of the hospitality industry additional products and services from other segments by, for example, providing customers of our vacation exchange and rental business with access to inventory from our lodging business and by improving our products and services, including loyalty programs and property management services, to enhance the value we provide to customers. In addition, we seek to expand our international presence in the hotel and vacation ownership segments.

We expect to increase profits and cash flows in each of our three segments by successfully executing the following strategies:

Our Risks

We face a number of risks and uncertainties relating to our business and our separation from Cendant. Examples of the risks and uncertainties that we face include:

8

Table of Contents

For further discussion of these risks and other risks and uncertainties that we face, see “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

The Separation

Overview

On October 23, 2005, the Board of Directors of Cendant preliminarily approved a plan to separate Cendant into four independent, publicly traded companies—one for each of Cendant’s Hospitality Services (including Timeshare Resorts), Real Estate Services, Travel Distribution Services and Vehicle Rental businesses. The separation was to occur through distributions to Cendant’s stockholders of all of the shares of common stock of three subsidiaries of Cendant that hold or will hold the assets and liabilities, including the entities holding substantially all of the assets and liabilities, of the businesses other than the Vehicle Rental business, which will remain after the distributions. On April 24, 2006, Cendant announced that as an alternative to distributing shares of Travelport Inc., or Travelport, the Cendant subsidiary that holds directly or indirectly the assets and liabilities associated with Cendant’s Travel Distribution Services businesses, to Cendant stockholders, Cendant was also exploring the sale of Travelport. On June 30, 2006, Cendant entered into an agreement to sell Travelport to an affiliate of the Blackstone Group for $4,300 million in cash. Cendant expects the sale of Travelport to close in August 2006, subject to the satisfaction and/or waiver of certain conditions contained in the Travelport purchase agreement, and, promptly following the completion of the sale, Cendant will be obligated to contribute a significant portion of the proceeds to us and to Realogy, which will be used to reduce our and Realogy’s indebtedness. On [            ], 2006, the Board of Directors of Cendant approved the distributions of all

9

Table of Contents

of the shares of common stock of Wyndham Worldwide, a wholly owned subsidiary of Cendant that holds directly or indirectly the assets and liabilities of Cendant’s Hospitality Services (including Timeshare Resorts) businesses, and Realogy Corporation, or Realogy, a wholly owned subsidiary of Cendant that holds directly or indirectly the assets and liabilities associated with the Real Estate Services businesses of Cendant. Following the distributions, Cendant stockholders will own 100% of the common stock of Wyndham Worldwide and Realogy. In connection with the plan of separation, it is expected that Cendant will change its name to Avis Budget Group, Inc.

Before our separation from Cendant, we will enter into a Separation and Distribution Agreement and several other agreements with Cendant and Cendant’s other businesses to effect the separation and distribution and provide a framework for our relationships with Cendant and Cendant’s other businesses after the separation. These agreements will govern the relationships among us, Cendant, Realogy and Travelport subsequent to the completion of the separation plan and provide for the allocation among us, Cendant, Realogy and Travelport of Cendant’s assets, liabilities and obligations (including employee benefits and tax-related assets and liabilities) attributable to periods prior to our separation from Cendant. The Separation and Distribution Agreement, in particular, requires us to assume 37.5% (or 30% if the sale of Travelport is not completed) of certain contingent and other corporate liabilities of Cendant or its subsidiaries which are not primarily related to our business or the businesses of Realogy, Travelport or Cendant’s Vehicle Rental business, and Realogy will assume 62.5% (or if the sale of Travelport is not completed, Realogy and Travelport will each assume 50% and 20%, respectively) of such contingent and other corporate liabilities. The parties to the Separation and Distribution Agreement agreed that following completion of the separation plan, Cendant, which will consist of the Vehicle Rental business, will not retain any contingent or other corporate liabilities incurred prior to the completion of the separation plan that are not primarily related to the Vehicle Rental business because the Vehicle Rental company is expected to have more total debt, both secured and unsecured, and/or lower credit ratings, than us, Realogy and Travelport. These contingent and other corporate liabilities of Cendant or its subsidiaries include liabilities relating to (i) Cendant’s terminated or divested businesses, (ii) liabilities relating to the Travelport sale, including, in general (but subject to certain exceptions), liabilities for taxes of Travelport for taxable periods through the date of the Travelport sale, (iii) certain litigation matters as more fully described in the section “Business— Employees, Properties and Facilities, Government Regulation and Legal Proceedings—Legal Proceedings—Legal—Cendant Corporate Litigation,” (iv) generally any actions with respect to the separation plan or the distributions brought by any third party and (v) payments under certain identified contracts (or portions thereof) that were not allocated to any specific party in connection with the separation.

Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, we expect to incur approximately $1,360 million of debt prior to our separation from Cendant, all the proceeds of which will be transferred to Cendant to repay a portion of Cendant’s corporate debt (including its existing asset-linked facility relating to certain of the assets of Cendant’s Hospitality Services (including Timeshare Resorts) businesses). In addition, prior to our separation from Cendant, each of Realogy and Travelport (prior to its separation) will incur debt and will transfer such proceeds to Cendant. With the aggregate proceeds received from each of us, Realogy and Travelport, along with cash on hand at Cendant (available to be utilized to repay its corporate debt), Cendant has agreed to repay all of its outstanding corporate indebtedness and, with respect to the amount transferred by Travelport, to repay other corporate obligations and to fund the actual and estimated cash expenses borne by Cendant relating to the separation (other than those primarily related to its vehicle rental business). We refer to these payments to be made by Cendant as the Separation Payments. The amount of debt we will incur was based on future estimates of our ability to service the debt relative to the other separated companies and our ability to maintain an investment grade credit rating. The Separation and Distribution Agreement provides for an adjustment in the amount of indebtedness we will incur in connection with our separation in the event that the sum of the borrowings transferred by us, Realogy and Travelport to Cendant, together with the cash at Cendant then available to be utilized to repay its corporate debt, is less than or more than the amount necessary to enable Cendant to make the Separation Payments. See “The Separation—Incurrence of Debt for a further description of this adjustment.”

10

Table of Contents

In addition, following the completion of the sale of Travelport, Cendant will be obligated, pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, to contribute a significant portion of the cash proceeds from such sale to us and Realogy. Assuming Cendant receives $4,300 million in gross cash proceeds from such sale and contributes to us approximately $760 million from such sale, we estimate that following our utilization of such cash proceeds to reduce a portion of the approximately $1,360 million of indebtedness we expect to incur at the time of our separation, our indebtedness would be reduced to approximately $600 million. The actual amount of our remaining indebtedness may be more or less than the amount provided above depending on various adjustments, including, without limitation, purchase price adjustments based on the levels of cash, working capital and certain other expenses at Travelport at the time of its sale, the application of sale proceeds that have priority over contributions to us and the amount outstanding at the time of our distribution under Cendant’s asset-linked facility relating to certain assets of Cendant’s Hospitality Services (including Timeshare Resorts) businesses. The Travelport sale is subject to customary conditions precedent, including the receipt of requisite governmental approvals and the absence of any material adverse effect with respect to Travelport. In the event the Travelport sale is not consummated, we will not receive any proceeds and therefore our indebtedness will not be reduced. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Agreements with Cendant, Wyndham Worldwide and Travelport—Separation and Distribution Agreement—Sale of Travelport.”

Cendant’s Board believes that the plan of separation, including the sale of Travelport, is the best way to unlock the full value of Cendant’s businesses in both the short and long terms, which the Cendant Board does not believe has been fully recognized by the investment community. Cendant believes that the consummation of the separation plan should not only enhance each distributed company’s strength, but also improve each company’s strategic, operational and financial flexibility. In addition, a significant amount of the proceeds from the sale of Travelport will be used to reduce our and Realogy’s initial indebtedness. Although there can be no assurance, Cendant believes that over time following the separation, the common stock of the publicly traded companies should have a higher aggregate market value, on a fully distributed basis and assuming the same market conditions, than if Cendant were to remain under its current configuration. Cendant expects that such value increase in the common stock should enhance the value of equity-based compensation for the employees of the publicly traded companies and should permit the publicly traded companies to effect future acquisitions with their own common stock in a manner that preserves capital with less dilution of the existing stockholders’ interests than would occur by issuing pre-distribution Cendant common stock, in each case, resulting in a real and substantial benefit for the companies. Further, the Cendant Board believes that the separation should allow each separated company to maintain a sharper focus on its core business and growth opportunities, which should allow each separated company to be better able to make the changes to its business necessary for it to respond to developments in the industry in which it operates. See “The Separation—Reasons for the Separation,” included elsewhere in this information statement.

The Cendant Board has received an opinion from Evercore Group L.L.C., or Evercore, to the effect that, as of the date of such opinion, the distribution of Wyndham Worldwide is fair, from a financial point of view, to the stockholders of Cendant. The Cendant Board also has received an opinion from Duff & Phelps, LLC, or Duff & Phelps, to the effect that Wyndham Worldwide and Cendant each will be solvent and adequately capitalized immediately after the distribution and that Cendant has sufficient surplus under Delaware law to declare the dividends of Wyndham Worldwide and Realogy common stock.

The distribution of our common stock as described in this information statement is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions. See “The Separation—Conditions to the Distribution,” included elsewhere in this information statement. Furthermore, we cannot provide any assurance that the sale of Travelport will be completed.

11

Table of Contents

Prior to the distribution, we will hold directly or indirectly the assets and liabilities of Cendant’s Hospitality Services (including Timeshare Resorts) businesses as a result of an internal reorganization implemented by Cendant. Our headquarters are located at Seven Sylvan Way, Parsippany, New Jersey 07054, and our general telephone number is (973) 496-8900. We maintain an Internet site at http://www.wyndhamworldwide.com. Our website and the information contained on that site, or connected to that site, are not incorporated by reference into this information statement.

12

Table of Contents

Questions and Answers about Wyndham Worldwide and the Separation

13

Table of Contents

Will Wyndham Worldwide incur any debt?

14

Table of Contents

15

Table of Contents

16

Table of Contents

17

Table of Contents

18

Table of Contents

Cendant Corporation

Investor Relations

9 West 57^th Street

New York, New York 10019

Tel: (212) 413-1800

Fax: (212) 413-1909

www.cendant.com

After the separation, if you have any questions relating to our common stock, you should contact:

Wyndham Worldwide Corporation

Investor Relations

Seven Sylvan Way

Parsippany, New Jersey 07054

Tel: (973) 496-8900

Fax: (973) 496-8906

www.wyndhamworldwide.com

After the separation, if you have any questions relating to the distribution of our shares, you should contact:

Mellon Investor Services LLC

480 Washington Boulevard

Jersey City, New Jersey 07310

Tel: (800) 589-9469

www.melloninvestor.com

19

Table of Contents

Summary of the Separation

The following is a summary of the material terms of the separation and other related transactions.

20

Table of Contents

21

Table of Contents

22

Table of Contents

480 Washington Boulevard

Jersey City, New Jersey 07310

Tel: (800) 589-9469

www.melloninvestor.com

Incurrence of debt

23

Table of Contents

24

Table of Contents

25

Table of Contents

Summary Historical and Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Data

The following table presents our summary historical and unaudited pro forma combined financial data, as well as certain unaudited operating statistics. The combined statement of income data for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and the combined balance sheet data as of March 31, 2006 have been derived from our unaudited combined condensed financial statements included elsewhere in this information statement. The historical combined statement of income data for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005 and the historical combined balance sheet data as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 have been derived from our audited combined financial statements, included elsewhere in this information statement. The combined balance sheet data as of December 31, 2003 is derived from our unaudited combined financial statements and, in the opinion of our management, include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the information set forth in this information statement.

The unaudited pro forma combined financial data have been derived from our historical combined financial statements and adjusted to give effect to the following separation transactions:

In addition, such financial data also reflects an adjustment eliminating intercompany balances approximating $1,159 million due from Cendant.

The unaudited pro forma combined financial data have been further adjusted to give effect to the following post separation adjustments for the sale of Travelport, which transaction is expected to close following our separation from Cendant:

26

Table of Contents

The unaudited pro forma combined condensed balance sheet data assume that the distribution and related transactions occurred on March 31, 2006 and the unaudited pro forma combined condensed statement of income data assume that the distribution and related transactions occurred on January 1, 2005 for both the pro forma statement of income data presented for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and for the pro forma statement of income data presented for the year ended December 31, 2005. The pro forma adjustments are based upon available information and assumptions that we believe are reasonable; however, such adjustments are subject to change based upon the finalization of the terms of the separation and the underlying separation agreements. Additional discussion relating to certain of the pro forma adjustments listed above can be found within the Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Condensed Financial Statements section of the information statement.

The unaudited pro forma combined condensed statement of income data do not reflect non-recurring pre-tax charges directly related to our separation (which are currently estimated to be in the range of $70 million to $110 million), which will impact net income within the 12 months following our separation, the majority of which will be non-cash. Included within such range is an estimated $50 million to $60 million relating to the acceleration of certain Cendant equity awards.

27

Table of Contents

28

Table of Contents

29

Table of Contents

RISK FACTORS

You should carefully consider each of the following risk factors and all of the other information set forth in this information statement. The risk factors generally have been separated into three groups: (i) risks relating to our business, (ii) risks relating to the separation and (iii) risks relating to our common stock. Based on the information currently known to us, we believe that the following information identifies the most significant risk factors affecting our company in each of these categories of risks. However, the risks and uncertainties our company faces are not limited to those set forth in the risk factors described below. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial may also adversely affect our business. In addition, past financial performance may not be a reliable indicator of future performance and historical trends should not be used to anticipate results or trends in future periods.

If any of the following risks and uncertainties develops into actual events, these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. In such case, the trading price of our common stock could decline.

Risks Relating to Our Business

The hospitality industry is highly competitive, and we are subject to risks relating to competition that may adversely affect our performance.

We may lose business, which would adversely affect our performance, if we cannot compete effectively in the highly competitive hospitality industry. Our continued success depends, in large part, upon our ability to compete effectively in markets that contain numerous competitors, some of which may have significantly greater financial, marketing and other resources than we have.

Our businesses face the following competitive risks, and if such risks materialize, the performance of our businesses may be adversely affected:

The weakening or unavailability of our intellectual property rights could adversely affect our business.

The weakening or unavailability of our trademarks, trade dress and other intellectual property rights could adversely affect our business. Our intellectual property rights are fundamental to the brands that we use in all of our businesses, and we believe the strength of these brands gives us a competitive advantage. We generate, maintain, utilize and enforce a substantial portfolio of trademarks, trade dress and other intellectual property rights. We use our intellectual property rights to protect the goodwill of our brand names, promote our brand

30

Table of Contents

name recognition, protect our proprietary technology and development activities, enhance our competitiveness and otherwise support our business goals and objectives. However, there can be no assurance that the steps we take to obtain, maintain and protect our intellectual property rights will be adequate. Our intellectual property rights may fail to provide us with significant competitive advantages, particularly in foreign jurisdictions that do not have, or do not enforce, strong intellectual property rights.

We are subject to operating or other risks common to the hospitality industry.

In addition to the other risks relating to our business identified in the “Risk Factors” section of this information statement, our business is subject to the following operating or other risks common to the hospitality industry:

We may not be able to achieve our objectives for growth in the number of franchised and managed properties, vacation exchange members acquired, rental weeks sold and vacation ownership interests sold.

There can be no assurance that we will be successful in achieving our objectives for increasing the number of franchised and managed properties in our lodging business, the number of vacation exchange members

31

Table of Contents

acquired by our vacation exchange business, the number of rental weeks sold by our vacation rental business and the number of tours generated and vacation ownership interests sold by our vacation ownership business. The reasons we may not achieve our growth objectives include, but are not limited to:

Disruptions and other impairment of our information technologies and systems could adversely affect our business.

Any disruption or other impairment in our technology capabilities could harm our business. Our businesses depend upon the use of sophisticated information technologies and systems, including technology and systems utilized for reservation systems, vacation exchange systems, property management, communications, procurement, member record databases, call centers, operation of our loyalty programs and administrative systems. The operation of these technologies and systems is dependent upon third-party technologies, systems and services for which there is no assurance of continued or uninterrupted availability and operational and maintenance support by the applicable third-party vendors on commercially reasonable terms. We cannot assure you that we will be able to continue to operate effectively and maintain our information technologies and systems.

In addition, our information technologies and systems are expected to require refinements and enhancements on an ongoing basis, and we expect that advanced new technologies and systems will continue to be introduced. There can be no assurance that we will be able to replace existing technologies and systems or obtain or introduce new technologies and systems as quickly as our competitors or in a cost-effective manner. Also, there can be no assurance that we will achieve the benefits anticipated or required from any new technology or system that we may seek to implement or that we will be able to devote financial resources to new technologies and systems in the future. In addition, our information technologies and systems are vulnerable to damage or interruption from various causes, including: (i) acts of God and other natural disasters, war and acts of terrorism; (ii) power losses, computer systems failures, Internet and telecommunications or data network failures, operator error, losses of and corruption of data and similar events; and (iii) computer viruses, penetration by individuals seeking to disrupt operations or misappropriate information and other physical or electronic breaches of security. We maintain certain disaster recovery capabilities for critical functions in most of our businesses, including certain disaster recovery services from SunGard Data Systems Inc. and International Business Machines Corporation. We are also currently in the process of adding disaster recovery capabilities to our recently acquired franchise and management businesses of Wyndham Hotels and Resorts and portions of our vacation ownership business. However, there can be no assurance that these capabilities will successfully prevent a disruption to or material adverse effect on our businesses or operations in the event of a disaster or other business interruption. Any extended interruption in our technologies or systems could significantly curtail our ability to conduct our business and generate revenue. Additionally, our business interruption insurance may be insufficient to compensate us for losses that may occur.

Our international operations are subject to risks not generally experienced by our U.S. operations.

Our international operations are subject to risks not generally experienced by our U.S. operations, and if such risks materialize, our profitability may be adversely affected. Such risks include, but are not limited to:

32

Table of Contents

We are subject to risks from laws of various international jurisdictions that limit the right and ability of non-U.S. entities to pay dividends and remit earnings to affiliated companies, unless specified conditions have been met. In addition, we may incur substantial tax liabilities, which would adversely affect our profitability, if we repatriate any of the cash generated by our international operations back to the United States.

We are subject to certain risks related to litigation filed by or against us, and adverse results may harm our business.

We cannot predict with certainty the cost of defense, the cost of prosecution or the ultimate outcome of litigation and other proceedings filed by or against us, including remedies or damage awards, and adverse results in such litigation and other proceedings may harm our business. Such litigation and other proceedings may include, but are not limited to, actions relating to intellectual property, commercial arrangements, employment and labor law, personal injury, death, property damage or other harm resulting from acts or omissions by individuals or entities outside of our control, including franchisees, property owners, resorts with units that are exchanged through our vacation exchange business and resorts in which we sell vacation ownership interests. In the case of intellectual property litigation and proceedings, adverse outcomes could include the cancellation, invalidation or other loss of material intellectual property rights used in our business and injunctions prohibiting our use of business processes or technology that is subject to third-party patents or other third-party intellectual property rights.

We generally are not liable for the actions of our franchisees, owners and resorts with units that are exchanged through our vacation exchange business, and resorts in which we sell vacation ownership interests; however, there is no assurance that we would be insulated from liability in all cases.

We are subject to certain risks related to our indebtedness, our securitization of assets, the extension of credit by us and the cost and availability of capital.

In connection with our debt obligations or the securitization of certain of our assets, as applicable, we are subject to the following risks, among others:

33

Table of Contents

The financial results of our vacation ownership business may be affected by the cost and availability of capital for the development or acquisition of vacation ownership resorts by us, for the financing of purchases of vacation ownership interests and for the renovation and maintenance of properties by vacation ownership resorts. The cost of capital affects the costs of developing or acquiring new properties because property owners generally have to borrow funds to develop or acquire new properties and affects the costs of renovation because property owners generally have to borrow funds to renovate properties.

The profitability of our vacation ownership business from our financing of customers’ purchases of vacation ownership interests may be adversely affected by interest rate risk and risks associated with customer default.

In connection with our vacation ownership business, we generally provide financing at a fixed interest rate for significant portions of the aggregate purchase prices of vacation ownership interests we sell to customers. If interest rates were to increase significantly, we may not increase the interest rate offered to finance purchases of vacation ownership interests by the same amount of the interest rate increase. As a result, the spread between our rate of borrowing and the interest rate we charge our customers would decrease, and such decrease would adversely affect our profitability from financing activities. Conversely, if interest rates were to decrease and remain at historically low levels for extended periods, the likelihood of early prepayments would increase as customers may seek alternative financing sources. If customers prepaid their loans and refinanced at lower interest rates, our profitability from financing activities would decrease.

Our principal source of funding cash requirements for the vacation ownership business is borrowing against and selling the vacation ownership contract receivables that arise from our financing of customers’ purchases of vacation ownership interests. When we finance the sale of a vacation ownership interest, we receive contract receivables at a fixed interest rate. We have revolving credit facilities under which we borrow against the vacation ownership contract receivables until the receivables qualify to be securitized. Once the vacation ownership contract receivables qualify to be securitized, we sell them and use the proceeds of the sales to repay our revolving credit facilities and, as a result of such repayment, replenish our ability to borrow under the revolving credit facilities to finance new vacation ownership contract receivables.

Our revolving credit facilities are, and are expected to continue to be, at variable interest rates. Any significant increase in interest rates on our borrowing against vacation ownership contract receivables or significant increase in prepayment rates on the current vacation ownership contract receivables could have a material adverse effect on the cost of borrowing under our credit facilities. Any adverse change in the securitization markets or significant declines in the credit qualities of our vacation ownership contract receivables could result in our having insufficient borrowing availability under our credit facilities to maintain our operations at current levels.

In addition, we face certain credit risks related to our consumer financing of vacation ownership interests. Purchasers of vacation ownership interests who finance a portion of the purchase price present a risk of default.

34

Table of Contents

The average expected cumulative gross default rate of our portfolio of vacation ownership contract receivables is approximately 16.3%. The actual rate of such defaults may exceed our average expected cumulative gross default rate as a result of various factors, some of which are beyond our control, including general economic conditions. Consequently, the profitability of our vacation ownership business may be adversely affected. Despite the risk of default for purchasers of vacation ownership interests, we do not verify all potential purchasers’ credit histories prior to offering each potential purchaser the opportunity to finance a portion of the purchase price of the vacation ownership interests, but, in some instances, we obtain credits scores from potential purchasers who wish to obtain financing on more favorable terms. To reduce the potential adverse effect on Wyndham Worldwide caused by purchasers of vacation ownership interests who finance a portion of their purchases but subsequently default, we obtain security interests in the vacation ownership interests purchased by our customers, but the value we recover from the secured vacation ownership interests is not, in all instances, sufficient to cover the outstanding debt.

Our debt rating may suffer a downgrade, which may restrict our access to capital markets.

After giving effect to our separation, our syndicated credit facilities have been rated BBB and Baa2 by Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s, respectively. As a result of global economic and political events or natural disasters, it is possible that the rating agencies may downgrade the rating and/or outlook for many of the companies in the hospitality industry, including our company, and a downgrade could increase our borrowing costs and therefore could adversely affect our financial results. In addition, it is possible that rating agencies may downgrade our rating and our outlook for the company based on our results of operations and financial condition. A downgrade in our credit rating could, in particular, increase our costs of capital under our credit facilities and the amounts of collateral required by our letters of credit. Pricing of any amounts drawn under our syndicated bank credit facilities includes a spread to LIBOR that increases as our ratings from Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s decrease. The amounts of collateral required by our letters of credit may increase as a result of a downgrade in our credit rating. A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities and is subject to revision or withdrawal by the assigning rating organization. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating.

We are subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk.

Changes in foreign currency exchange rates and in international monetary and tax policies could have a materially adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. We are subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk and risks associated with changes in international monetary and tax policies in connection with doing business abroad, principally in the United Kingdom, Western Continental Europe, South Africa, Mexico, Venezuela and Singapore. We may seek to mitigate our foreign exchange rate risk through strategic structuring of international business entities, swap agreements and borrowings denominated in foreign currencies, but we cannot assure that these strategies will be successful.

Several of our businesses are subject to extensive regulation, and the cost of compliance or failure to comply with such regulations may adversely affect our profitability.

The cost of compliance or failure to comply with the extensive regulations to which several of our businesses are subject may adversely affect our profitability. Our businesses are regulated by the states or provinces (including local governments) and countries in which our operations are conducted and in which our franchised and managed properties, resorts with units that are exchanged through our vacation exchange business, accommodations for our vacation rental business and resorts in which we sell vacation ownership interests are, in each case, located, marketed or sold. If we are not in substantial compliance with applicable laws and regulations, we may be subject to regulatory actions, fines, penalties and potential criminal prosecution. In addition, a significant number of purchasers of vacation ownership interests could have rescission rights, which could require us to return all funds received from rescinding purchasers in exchange for the return of their vacation ownership interests to us.

35

Table of Contents

Our businesses are subject, for example, to privacy laws and regulations enacted in the United States and other jurisdictions around the world that govern the collection and use of personal data of our customers and our ability to contact our customers and prospective customers, including through telephone or facsimile. Our vacation ownership business, for example, is subject to U.S. federal privacy regulation, including the federal Telemarketing Sales Rule with its “do not call” and “do not fax” provisions, and state privacy regulations. Many states have laws and regulations regarding the sale of vacation ownership properties, such as real estate licensing laws, travel sale licensing laws, anti-fraud laws, telemarketing laws, telephone solicitation laws, including “do not call” and “do not fax” regulations and restrictions on the use of predictive dialers, prize, gift and sweepstakes laws, and labor laws. Violations of certain provisions of these laws may limit the ability of our vacation ownership business to market, sell and finance vacation ownership interests. In addition, our vacation ownership business could be subject to damages and administrative enforcement actions. Any of these results could adversely affect the profitability of our vacation ownership business. The United States and other jurisdictions are in the process of considering passing additional laws and regulations to protect the privacy of customers and prospective customers. In addition, our vacation ownership business is subject to risks arising from the requirement under Australian law that all persons conducting vacation ownership sales and marketing and vacation ownership club activities hold an Australian Financial Services License, which subjects holders to several rules and regulations. In light of these and any future laws and regulations, there can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to market our services efficiently and maintain our rate of sales growth.

Liability arising under environmental laws, ordinances and regulations may adversely affect the results of our vacation ownership business, and non-compliance with such laws, ordinances and regulations may subject us to penalties from environmental violations, and we would have to take whatever steps are necessary to achieve compliance. We may incur costs in connection with environmental clean-up if hazardous or toxic substances are found at resorts we own or manage or resorts we previously owned or managed or may acquire in the future. Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, the current or previous owner, manager or operator of real property may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances, including asbestos, located on or in, or emanating from, such property, for related costs of investigation and property damage or for the cost of removal of underground storage tanks. Environmental laws, ordinances and regulations often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of hazardous or toxic substances.

For a detailed description of the regulations to which we are subject, see “Business—Employees, Properties and Facilities, Government Regulation and Legal Proceedings—Legal Proceedings.”

The cost of compliance or failure to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 may adversely affect our business.

As a new reporting company under the Exchange Act, we will be subject to certain provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which may result in higher compliance costs and may adversely affect our financial results and our ability to attract and retain qualified members of our Board of Directors or qualified executive officers. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act affects corporate governance, securities disclosure, compliance practices, internal audits, disclosure controls and procedures and financial reporting and accounting systems. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, for example, requires companies subject to the reporting requirements of the U.S. securities laws to do a comprehensive evaluation of its and its consolidated subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting. The failure to comply with Section 404, when we are required to comply, may result in investors’ losing confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, which may result in a decrease in the market value of our common stock, prevent us from providing the required financial information in a timely manner, which could materially and adversely impact our business, our financial condition and the market value of our common stock, prevent us from otherwise complying with the standards applicable to us as a public company and subject us to adverse regulatory consequences.

36

Table of Contents

Seasonality of our businesses may cause fluctuations in our gross revenues and net earnings.

We experience seasonal fluctuations in our gross revenues and net earnings from our franchise and management fees, exchange fees for transactions, commission income earned from renting vacation properties and sales of vacation ownership interests. Revenues from franchise and management fees are generally higher in the second and third quarters than in the first or fourth quarters because of increased leisure travel during the summer months. Vacation exchange transaction revenues are normally highest in the first quarter, which is generally when members of RCI plan and book their vacations for the year. Rental transaction revenues earned from booking vacation rentals to non-member customers is usually highest in the third quarter, when vacation rentals are highest. Revenues from sales of vacation ownership interests are generally higher in the second and third quarters than in other quarters. The seasonality of our business may cause fluctuations in our quarterly operating results. As we expand into new markets and geographical locations, we may experience increased or different seasonality dynamics that create fluctuations in operating results different from the fluctuations we have experienced in the past.

Our revenues are highly dependent on the travel industry and declines in or disruptions to the travel industry, such as those caused by terrorism, acts of God or war, may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operation.

Declines in or disruptions to the travel industry may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operation. Our revenues and profits, and in turn our financial condition, may be significantly adversely affected by exogenous events that generally adversely affect the travel industry. Such events include terrorist incidents and threats (and heightened travel security measures instituted in response to such incidents and threats), acts of God (such as earthquakes, hurricanes, fires, floods and other natural disasters), war, bird flu and other pandemics, the financial instability of many of the air carriers, airline job actions and strikes, and increases in gas and other fuel prices. The occurrence or worsening of any of these types of events could result in a decrease in overall travel and consequently in a decrease in travel by non-local visitors to locations in which franchised and managed properties, resorts with units that are exchanged through our vacation exchange business, properties that are rented through our vacation rental businesses and resorts in which we sell vacation ownership interests have a presence. These types of events may also result in a general economic downturn, which may reduce the amount of discretionary spending that our customers have available for travel and vacations. In addition, from time to time, hurricanes or other adverse weather events may reduce the number of rooms available in our lodging business or the number of units available in resorts in which we exchange and sell intervals or interests, as applicable.

Our businesses may be adversely affected by a deterioration in general economic conditions or a weakening of one or more of the industries in which we operate.

A prolonged economic slowdown, significant price increases, adverse events relating to the travel and leisure industry and local, regional and national economic conditions and factors, such as unemployment, fuel prices, recession and macroeconomic factors, could hurt our operations and therefore adversely affect our results. The risks associated with our businesses are more acute during periods of economic slowdown or recession because such periods may be accompanied by decreased discretionary consumer and corporate spending. A weakening of one or more of the lodging, vacation exchange and rental, and vacation ownership industries could also hurt our operations and therefore adversely affect our results.

We are dependent on our senior management, and a loss of any of our senior managers may adversely affect our business and results of operations.

We believe that our future growth depends, in part, on the continued services of our senior management team. Losing the services of any members of our senior management team could adversely affect our strategic and customer relationships and impede our ability to execute our growth strategies. We do not currently maintain key person life insurance policies for our executive officers.

37

Table of Contents

There may be risks associated with completing future acquisitions that we may decide to do.

If we pursue strategic acquisitions, there may be risks associated with them. We may be unable to identify acquisition targets that complement our businesses, and if we are able to identify suitable acquisition targets, we may not be able to complete acquisitions of such targets on commercially reasonable terms. Our ability to complete acquisitions depends on a variety of factors, including our ability to obtain financing on acceptable terms and requisite government approvals. If we are able to complete acquisitions, there is no assurance that we will be able to achieve the revenue and cost benefits that we expected in connection with such acquisitions or to successfully integrate the acquired businesses into our existing operations.

We are subject to risks relating to the concentration of a significant portion of the resorts in which we sell vacation ownership interests, our sales offices and the customers of our vacation ownership business in certain vacation areas and areas where our customers live, as applicable.

The concentration of a significant portion of the resorts in which we sell vacation ownership interests and of our sales offices in certain vacation areas and the concentration of a significant number of the customers of our vacation ownership business in certain geographic regions, in each case, may result in our results of operations being more sensitive to local and regional economic conditions and other factors, including competition, natural disasters such as hurricanes, and economic downturns, than our results of operations would be absent such geographic concentrations. Many sales offices and resorts in which we sell vacation ownership interests, for example, are concentrated in the Southeastern United States, a region that is prone to hurricanes. Local and regional economic conditions and other factors may differ materially from prevailing conditions in other parts of the world.

Florida, Nevada and California are examples of areas with concentrations of sales offices. For the twelve months ending December 31, 2005, approximately 14%, 14% and 12% of our vacation ownership interest sales revenue was generated in sales offices located in Florida, Nevada and California, respectively. In addition, as of March 31, 2006, approximately 27% of our outstanding vacation ownership contract receivables portfolio relates to customers who reside in California.

The private resale of vacation ownership interests could adversely affect our vacation ownership resorts and vacation exchange businesses.

The private resale of vacation ownership interests could adversely affect the sales and operations of our vacation ownership business and new member acquisition by our vacation exchange business. We sell vacation ownership interests to buyers for purposes of leisure and not for investment. We believe that the number of private resale of vacation ownership interests by buyers is presently limited and that any sales of vacation ownership interests are typically at prices substantially below the original purchase price. The availability of vacation ownership interests for resale may make ownership of vacation ownership interests less attractive to prospective buyers.

Moreover, as the vacation ownership industry grows, the number of private resales of vacation ownership interests may increase. An increase in the supply of vacation ownership interests available for resale may divert demand for or depress the market price of vacation ownership interests we sell. In addition, private resales of vacation ownership interests may adversely impact our vacation exchange business’ new member acquisition because purchases made through resales may not result in enrollment in our vacation exchange programs.

Revenues from our lodging business are indirectly affected by our franchisees’ pricing decisions.

Revenues from our lodging business are dependent upon the revenues of our franchisees and therefore on our franchisees’ pricing decisions, which affect our franchisees’ revenues. Pricing decisions on individual room rates are made by each individual franchisee. Although we can assist franchisees in understanding how best to take advantage of opportunities in their respective markets, we have no power to compel or command pricing decisions on the part of franchisees. The ability of an individual franchisee to maintain and increase room rates is a function of the franchisee’s ability to market the hotel property locally and maintain the property in a manner necessary for the franchised hotel to compete for guests effectively.

38

Table of Contents

Risks Relating to the Separation

We may be unable to achieve some or all of the benefits that we expect to achieve from our separation from Cendant.

As a stand alone, independent public company, we believe that our business will benefit from, among other things, allowing our management to design and implement corporate policies and strategies that are based primarily on the characteristics of our business, allowing us to focus our financial resources wholly on our own operations and implement and maintain a capital structure designed to meet our own specific needs. However, by separating from Cendant there is a risk that our company may be more susceptible to market fluctuations and other adverse events than we would have been were we still a part of the current Cendant. As part of Cendant we were able to enjoy certain benefits from Cendant’s operating diversity, purchasing and borrowing leverage, available capital for investments and opportunities to pursue integrated strategies with Cendant’s other businesses. As such, we may not be able to achieve some or all of the benefits that we expect to achieve as a stand alone, independent hospitality company.

We have no operating history as a separate public company, and our historical and pro forma financial information is not necessarily representative of the results we would have achieved as a separate publicly traded company and may not be a reliable indicator of our future results.

The historical and pro forma financial information included in this information statement does not necessarily reflect the financial condition, results of operations or cash flows that we would have achieved as a separate publicly traded company during the periods presented or those that we will achieve in the future primarily as a result of the following factors:

39

Table of Contents

We may be unable to make, on a timely or cost-effective basis, the changes necessary to operate as an independent company, and we may experience increased costs after the separation or as a result of the separation.

Following the completion of our separation, Cendant and the other separated companies will be contractually obligated to provide to us only those services specified in the Transition Services Agreement and the other agreements we enter into with Cendant and the other separated companies in preparation for the separation. The Transition Services Agreement expiration date varies by service provided and is generally less than one year from the date of our separation, with the exception of certain services such as information technology services and telecommunications services, which will transition over varying periods (up to two years with respect to information technology services, and until certain third-party contracts expire with respect to telecommunications services). We may be unable to replace in a timely manner or on comparable terms the services or other benefits that Cendant previously provided to us that are not specified in the Transition Services Agreement or the other agreements. Also, upon the expiration of the Transition Services Agreement or other agreements, many of the services that are covered in such agreements will be provided internally or by unaffiliated third parties, and we expect that in some instances, we will incur higher costs to obtain such services than we incurred under the terms of such agreements. In addition, if Cendant or the other separated companies do not continue to perform effectively the transition services and the other services that are called for under the Transition Services Agreement and other agreements, we may not be able to operate our business effectively and our profitability may decline. Furthermore, after the expiration of the Transition Services Agreement and the other agreements, we may be unable to replace in a timely manner or on comparable terms the services specified in such agreements.

We may have received better terms from unaffiliated third parties than the terms we received in our agreements with Cendant and the other separated companies.

The agreements related to our separation from Cendant and the other separated companies, including the Separation and Distribution Agreement, Tax Sharing Agreement, Transition Services Agreement and the other agreements, were negotiated in the context of our separation from Cendant while we were still part of Cendant and, accordingly, may not reflect terms that would have resulted from arm’s-length negotiations among unaffiliated third parties. The terms of the agreements we negotiated in the context of our separation related to, among other things, allocation of assets, liabilities, rights, indemnifications and other obligations among Cendant, the other separated companies and us. We may have received better terms from unaffiliated third parties because such parties may have competed with other potential suppliers to win our business. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions.”

We will be responsible for certain of Cendant’s contingent and other corporate liabilities.

Under the Separation and Distribution Agreement and other agreements, subject to certain exceptions contained in the Tax Sharing Agreement, we and Realogy will each assume and be responsible for 37.5% and 62.5%, respectively, of certain of Cendant’s contingent and other corporate liabilities including those relating to unresolved tax and legal matters and associated costs and expenses. However, in the event that the sale of Travelport is not completed, we, Realogy and Travelport will each assume and be responsible for 30%, 50% and 20%, respectively, of these contingent and other liabilities, and Travelport will have no responsibility. More specifically, we generally will assume and be responsible for the payment of our share of (i) all taxes imposed on Cendant and certain other subsidiaries and (ii) certain contingent and other corporate liabilities of Cendant and/or its subsidiaries to the extent incurred on or prior to the earlier of (x) December 31, 2006 or (y) the date of the separation of Travelport from Cendant. These contingent and other corporate liabilities include liabilities relating to, arising out of or resulting from (i) certain of Cendant’s terminated or divested businesses, including among others, Cendant’s former PHH and Marketing Services (Affinion) businesses, (ii) liabilities relating to the Travelport sale, including, in general (but subject to certain exceptions), liabilities for taxes of Travelport for taxable periods through the date of the Travelport sale, (iii) the Securities Action, the PRIDES Action and the ABI Actions (for a further description of these litigation matters, see “Business—Employees, Properties and Facilities, Government Regulation and Legal Proceedings—Legal Proceedings—Legal—Cendant Corporate

40

Table of Contents

Litigation”), (iv) generally any actions with respect to the separation plan or the distributions made or brought by any third party and (v) payments under certain identified contracts (or portions thereof) that were not allocated to any specific party in connection with the separation. However, in almost all cases, contingent and other corporate liabilities do not include liabilities that are specifically related to the business of one of the four separated companies which will be allocated 100% to the relevant company, including any liabilities related to the business disclosure in a separated company’s registration statement on Form 10 or similar disclosure document filed or distributed in connection with the separation plan. Assuming our separation from Cendant occurred on March 31, 2006 and the sale of Travelport is completed, we would have recorded liabilities of $321 million relating to our assumption of Cendant’s contingent and other corporate liabilities, which are reflected on our pro forma balance sheet. (See “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements.”) This amount does not reflect liabilities that may be required to be established in connection with the guarantees we expect to provide Cendant in connection with the separation. Any such liabilities, which could be material, will reflect the fair value of the guarantees, which is currently being determined.

If any party responsible for such liabilities were to default in its payment, when due, of any such assumed obligations related to any such contingent corporate liability, each non-defaulting party (including Avis Budget Group, Inc.) would be required to pay an equal portion of the amounts in default. Accordingly, we may, under certain circumstances, be obligated to pay amounts in excess of our share of the assumed obligations related to such contingent and other corporate liabilities including associated costs and expenses.

Many lawsuits are currently outstanding against Cendant, some of which relate to accounting irregularities arising from some of the CUC International, Inc. business units acquired when HFS Incorporated merged with CUC to form Cendant. While Cendant has settled many of the principal lawsuits relating to the accounting irregularities, these settlements do not encompass all litigation associated with the accounting irregularities. We do not believe that it is feasible to predict or determine the final outcome or resolution of these unresolved proceedings. Although we will share any costs and expenses arising out of this litigation with Realogy (and with Travelport if the sale of Travelport is not completed), an adverse outcome from such unresolved proceedings or liabilities or other proceedings for which we have assumed partial liability under the Separation and Distribution Agreement could be material with respect to our earnings in any given reporting period.

Additionally, Realogy (and not us) will act as the managing party and will manage and assume control of most legal matters related to the contingent and other corporate liabilities and assets of Cendant. Furthermore, assuming the sale of Travelport is completed, Realogy will have full control of most decisions relating to the settlement, resolution or disposition of most legal matters relating to contingent and other corporate liabilities (including certain tax-related matters) and assets and we will be responsible for 37.5% of any payments made in respect of such matters.

For a more detailed description of the Separation and Distribution Agreement and treatment of certain historical Cendant contingent and other corporate liabilities, see “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Agreements with Cendant—The Separation and Distribution Agreement.”

As part of our separation from Cendant, we will incur substantial debt with external lenders, which could subject us to various restrictions and decrease our profitability.

In connection with our separation, we have entered into borrowing arrangements for a total of $2,000 million, which is comprised of a $300 million term loan facility, an $800 million interim loan facility and a $900 million revolving credit facility. At or prior to the distribution, we expect to draw approximately $1,360 million against those facilities, and issue approximately $70 million in letters of credit, leaving approximately $570 million available to provide liquidity for additional letters of credit and for working capital and ongoing corporate needs. All of the approximately $1,360 million of debt we expect to incur will be transferred to Cendant solely to repay a portion of Cendant’s corporate debt (including its existing asset-linked facility relating to certain of the assets of Cendant’s Hospitality Services (including Timeshare Resorts) businesses). The Separation and Distribution Agreement provides for an adjustment in the amount of indebtedness we will incur in

41

Table of Contents

connection with our separation in the event that the sum of the borrowings transferred by us, Realogy and Travelport to Cendant, together with the cash at Cendant then available to be utilized to repay its corporate debt, is less than or more than the amount necessary to enable Cendant to make the Separation Payments. In the event that such amounts are less than the amount necessary to enable Cendant to make the Separation Payments, then any insufficiency will result in an upward adjustment in the amount of indebtedness incurred by Travelport, but only to the extent that Travelport is able to obtain such additional debt financing on commercially reasonable terms. Thereafter, if there is still an insufficiency, we will be required to incur additional indebtedness equal to such remaining insufficiency up to $100 million and transfer such additional amounts to Cendant and, to the extent the remaining insufficiency is in excess of $100 million, we and Realogy would be required to incur additional indebtedness equal to 37.5% and 62.5%, respectively, of such excess and transfer such amounts to Cendant.

Although Cendant has agreed to sell Travelport for $4,300 million in cash (which purchase price is subject to adjustment), and upon such sale, we estimate that approximately $760 million of such proceeds will be contributed to us, which we will use to reduce certain of our outstanding indebtedness, we cannot assure you that a sale of Travelport will be completed or as to the timing of the completion of such sale or the amount of proceeds that we expect to receive from such sale. In addition, following any such reduction of our indebtedness, if our Board of Directors deems it appropriate, we may incur additional debt and use the proceeds from such additional debt for general corporate purposes, such as to repurchase shares of our common stock. Subject to market conditions, we intend to replace the interim loan facility in its entirety with a combination of public, senior unsecured medium-term (a duration of between 3 and 10 years), non-convertible, fixed and/or floating rate bonds. In the event of a sale of Travelport, we intend to use a portion of the proceeds contributed to us to pay down the interim facility; in addition, the receipt of such proceeds would likely result in our issuing a proportionally smaller amount of the bonds described above. The remainder of the proceeds from a sale of Travelport, if any, will be used to repay other debt. We cannot assure you that we will be able to refinance the interim loan facility on terms that are reasonable to us. These financing arrangements will contain customary restrictions, covenants and events of default. The terms of these financing arrangements and any future indebtedness may impose various restrictions and covenants on us (such as tangible net worth requirements) that could limit our ability to respond to market conditions, provide for capital investment needs or take advantage of business opportunities. In addition, our financing costs may be higher than they were as part of Cendant. For a more detailed discussion of these borrowings and our liquidity following the separation, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources—Financial Obligations—Pro Forma Indebtedness Following Separation.”

We cannot give you any assurance as to when or if the completion of the sale of Travelport will occur or the extent to which we will receive any cash proceeds from such sale to reduce our indebtedness.

Upon the completion of the sale of Travelport, we will have the right under the Separation and Distribution Agreement to receive a portion of the cash proceeds (after giving effect to certain tax liabilities and other expenses incurred by Cendant in connection with the sale and the repayment of any Travelport indebtedness) and we will have the obligation to use such cash proceeds to reduce our indebtedness. We cannot give you any assurance as to when or if the sale of Travelport will be completed. The completion of the sale of Travelport is subject to certain customary conditions precedent and some, including the receipt of requisite regulatory approvals and the absence of any material adverse effect with respect to Travelport, may be outside of Cendant’s and Travelport’s control. If the sale is not completed by December 31, 2006, all of the shares of common stock of Travelport will be distributed to Cendant’s stockholders rather than sold. In such an event, our expected indebtedness would not be reduced below approximately $1,360 million (as such amount may be adjusted as described elsewhere in this information statement) and the prevailing market price of our common stock may be materially adversely affected. The amount of our indebtedness that would be reduced is dependent upon the tax liabilities, expenses and Travelport debt repayments that may arise in connection with such a sale, the amounts of which are presently uncertain. Upon the completion of the sale of Travelport, our right to receive a portion of the proceeds is a contractual right under the Separation and Distribution Agreement and we may be required to take action to enforce our rights under the Separation and Distribution Agreement to receive all of the proceeds that we believe we are entitled to receive.

42

Table of Contents

The ownership by our executive officers and some of our directors of shares of common stock, options or other equity awards of Cendant or any of the other separated companies may create, or may create the appearance of, conflicts of interest.

Because of their current or former positions with Cendant, substantially all of our executive officers, including our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, and some of our non-employee director nominees own shares of Cendant and Realogy common stock and options to purchase shares of Cendant and Realogy common stock or other equity awards. Following Cendant’s distribution of Realogy (and Travelport, if the sale of Travelport is not completed) to its stockholders, these officers and non-employee directors will own shares of common stock and options to purchase shares of common stock and other equity awards in these companies. The individual holdings of common stock and options to purchase common stock and other equity awards of Cendant and Realogy (and Travelport, if the sale of Travelport is not completed) may be significant for some of these persons compared to these persons’ total assets. Even though our Board will consist of a majority of directors who are independent from Cendant and Realogy (and Travelport, if the sale of Travelport is not completed), the other separated companies and our company, and our executive officers who are currently employees of Cendant will cease to be employees of Cendant upon consummation of the separation, ownership by our directors and officers, after our separation, of common stock or options to purchase common stock and other equity awards of Cendant, Realogy and Travelport creates, or may create the appearance of, conflicts of interest when these directors and officers are faced with decisions that could have different implications for Cendant or Realogy (or Travelport, if the sale of Travelport is not completed) than the decisions have for us.

After the separation, certain of our executive officers and directors may have actual or potential conflicts of interest because of their positions in Cendant and the other separated companies.

Six of our directors or director nominees, Messrs. Holmes (who is also our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer), Buckman, Herrera and Mulroney and Mses. Biblowit and Richards, will continue as directors of Cendant until the time of the completion of Cendant’s plan of separation. Upon completion of Cendant’s plan of separation, these six directors will resign from Cendant’s Board. These common directors could create, or appear to create, potential conflicts of interest when our or Cendant’s management and directors face decisions that could have different implications for us and Cendant. For example, potential conflicts of interest could arise in connection with the resolution of any dispute between us and Cendant regarding the terms of the agreements governing the separation and the relationship thereafter between us and Cendant. Potential conflicts of interest could also arise if we and/or Cendant enter into any commercial arrangements with each other in the future. In addition, conflicts of interest may arise with regard to the allocation of the common directors’ time between us and Cendant.

If the distribution, together with certain related transactions, were to fail to qualify as a reorganization for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code, then our stockholders and/or we and Cendant might be required to pay U.S. federal income taxes.

The distribution is conditioned upon Cendant’s receipt of an opinion of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, special tax counsel, substantially to the effect that the distribution, together with certain related transactions, should qualify as a reorganization for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code. The opinion of Skadden Arps will be based on, among other things, certain assumptions as well as on the accuracy of certain factual representations and statements that we and Cendant make to Skadden Arps. In rendering its opinion, Skadden Arps also will rely on certain covenants that we and Cendant enter into, including the adherence by Cendant and us to certain restrictions on our future actions. If any of the representations or statements that we or Cendant make are, or become, inaccurate or incomplete, or if we or Cendant breach any of our covenants, the distribution and such related transactions, might not qualify as a reorganization for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code. You should note that Cendant does not intend to seek a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, as to the U.S. federal income tax treatment of the distribution and such related transactions. The opinion of Skadden Arps

43

Table of Contents

is not binding on the IRS or a court, and there can be no assurance that the IRS will not challenge the validity of the distribution and such related transactions, as a reorganization for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code or that any such challenge ultimately will not prevail.

If the distribution, together with certain related transactions, were to fail to qualify as a reorganization for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code, then Cendant would recognize gain in an amount equal to the excess of (i) the fair market value of the Wyndham Worldwide common stock distributed to the Cendant stockholders over (ii) Cendant’s tax basis in such common stock. Under the terms of the Tax Sharing Agreement, in the event the distribution were to fail to qualify as a reorganization and (i) such failure was not the result of actions taken after the distribution by Cendant, us or any of the other separated companies, we and Realogy would be responsible for 37.5% and 62.5% (or 30% and 50% and Travelport would be responsible for 20% if the sale of Travelport is not completed), respectively, of any taxes imposed on Cendant as a result thereof and (ii) such failure was the result of actions taken after the distribution by one of the separated companies, the party responsible for such failure would be responsible for all taxes imposed on Cendant as a result thereof. In addition, each Cendant stockholder who received Wyndham Worldwide common stock in the distribution generally would be treated as having received a taxable distribution in an amount equal to the fair market value of the Wyndham Worldwide common stock received (including any fractional share sold on behalf of the stockholder), which would be taxable as a dividend to the extent of the stockholder’s ratable share of Cendant’s current and accumulated earnings and profits (as increased to reflect any current income including any gain recognized by Cendant on the taxable distribution). The balance, if any, of the distribution would be treated as a nontaxable return of capital to the extent of the Cendant stockholder’s tax basis in its Cendant stock, with any remaining amount being taxed as capital gain.

Wyndham Worldwide and Cendant might not be able to engage in desirable strategic transactions and equity issuances following the distribution.

Wyndham Worldwide’s and Cendant’s ability to engage in significant stock transactions could be limited or restricted after the distribution in order to preserve the tax-free nature of the distribution to Cendant. Even if the distribution, together with certain related transactions, otherwise qualifies as a reorganization for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code, it would be taxable to Cendant (but not to Cendant stockholders) under Section 355(e) of the Code, if the distribution were deemed to be part of a plan (or series of related transactions) pursuant to which one or more persons acquired directly or indirectly stock representing a 50% or greater interest, by vote or value, in the stock of either Cendant or Wyndham Worldwide. Current U.S. federal income tax law creates a presumption that the distribution would be taxable to Cendant, but not to its stockholders, if either Wyndham Worldwide or Cendant were to engage in, or enter into an agreement to engage in, a transaction that would result in a 50% or greater change, by vote or value, in Wyndham Worldwide’s or Cendant’s stock ownership during the four-year period that begins two years before the date of the distribution, unless it is established that the transaction is not pursuant to a plan or series of transactions related to the distribution. Treasury regulations currently in effect generally provide that whether an acquisition transaction and a distribution are part of a plan is determined based on all of the facts and circumstances, including, but not limited to, specific factors described in the Treasury regulations. In addition, the Treasury regulations provide several “safe harbors” for acquisition transactions that are not considered to be part of a plan. These rules may prevent Wyndham Worldwide and Cendant from entering into transactions which might be advantageous to their respective stockholders, such as issuing equity securities to satisfy financing needs or acquiring businesses or assets with equity securities. Thus, even if the distribution, together with certain related transactions, were to qualify as a reorganization for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code, if acquisitions of Cendant stock or Wyndham Worldwide common stock after the distribution were to cause Section 355(e) of the Code to apply, Cendant would recognize taxable gain as described above, but the distribution would be tax free to each Cendant stockholder (except for cash received in lieu of a fractional share of Wyndham Worldwide common stock).

Under the Tax Sharing Agreement, there are restrictions on Wyndham Worldwide’s ability to take actions that could cause the distribution to fail to qualify as a tax-free transaction, including, in certain cases, redeeming

44

Table of Contents

equity securities, selling or otherwise disposing of a substantial portion of its assets or acquiring businesses or assets with equity securities, in each case, for a period of 24 months from the day after the distribution. Moreover, the Tax Sharing Agreement generally provides that Wyndham Worldwide will be responsible for any taxes imposed on Cendant or Wyndham Worldwide as a result of the failure of the distribution, together with certain related transactions, to qualify as a reorganization for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code if such failure is attributable to certain post-distribution actions taken by or in respect of Wyndham Worldwide (including its subsidiaries) or its stockholders, such as the acquisition of Wyndham Worldwide by a third party at a time and in a manner that would cause such failure. See “The Separation—Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Distribution” and “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Agreements with Cendant, Realogy and Travelport—Tax Sharing Agreement.”

Risks Relating to Our Common Stock

There is no existing market for our common stock and a trading market that will provide you with adequate liquidity may not develop for our common stock. In addition, once our common stock begins trading, the market price of our shares may fluctuate widely.

There is currently no public market for our common stock. It is anticipated that on or prior to the record date for the distribution, trading of shares of our common stock will begin on a “when-issued” basis and will continue up to and including through the distribution date. However, there can be no assurance that an active trading market for our common stock will develop as a result of the distribution or be sustained in the future.

We cannot predict the prices at which our common stock may trade after the distribution. The market price of our common stock may fluctuate widely, depending upon many factors, some of which may be beyond our control, including:

Stock markets in general have experienced volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of a particular company. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.

45

Table of Contents

A failure by Cendant to complete the sale of Travelport may materially adversely affect the prevailing market price of our common stock.

In the event that Cendant fails to complete the sale of Travelport, we would not receive any of the approximately $760 million of gross cash proceeds we expect to receive upon the completion of the sale. In such event, our initial debt would not be reduced, and the prevailing market price of our common stock may be materially adversely affected.

Investors may be unable to accurately value our common stock.

Investors often value companies based on the stock prices and results of operations of other comparable companies. Currently, no public hospitality company exists with combined size, scale and product offerings directly comparable to ours. As such, investors may find it difficult to accurately value our common stock, which may cause our common stock to trade below its true value.

Substantial sales of common stock may occur in connection with this distribution, which could cause our stock price to decline.

The shares of our common stock that Cendant distributes to its stockholders generally may be sold immediately in the public market. Following the distribution, we believe (based on information as of January 26, 2006) that Barclays Global Investors, N.A. will beneficially own 8.88% of our common stock (see “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management”). Although we have no actual knowledge of any plan or intention on the part of any 5% or greater stockholder to sell our common stock following the separation, it is possible that some Cendant stockholders, including possibly some of our large stockholders, will sell our common stock received in the distribution for reasons such as that our business profile or market capitalization as an independent company does not fit their investment objectives. Moreover, index funds tied to the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index, the Russell 1000 Index and other indices hold shares of Cendant common stock. To the extent our common stock is not included in these indices after the distribution, certain of these index funds will likely be required to sell the shares of our common stock that they receive in the distribution. The sales of significant amounts of our common stock or the perception in the market that this will occur may result in the lowering of the market price of our common stock.

Your percentage ownership in Wyndham Worldwide may be diluted in the future.

Your percentage ownership in Wyndham Worldwide may be diluted in the future because of equity awards that we expect will be granted to our directors, officers and employees and the accelerated vesting of other equity awards. Prior to the separation and record date for the distribution, we expect Cendant will approve the Wyndham Worldwide Corporation 2006 Equity and Incentive Plan, or the Plan, which will provide for the grant of equity based awards, including restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock options, stock appreciation rights and other equity-based awards to our directors, officers and other employees, advisors and consultants. It is expected that no more than 43.5 million shares of our common stock will be available for grants pursuant to the Plan, which include (i) shares which may be used for purposes of satisfying our obligations under our Non-Employee Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, Savings Restoration Plan and Officer Deferred Compensation Plan and (ii) approximately 29 million shares necessary to implement the issuance of equity awards relating to our common stock granted pursuant to equitable adjustments of Cendant equity awards, or the Equitable Adjustment Awards. The Equitable Adjustment Awards will become vested on the earlier of (i) the date on which such units would have vested in accordance with the terms of the existing vesting schedule or (ii) the 30th day following the completion of the second of the distributions pursuant to Cendant’s separation plan (or, if applicable, following a simultaneous distribution of us and Realogy).

For a more detailed description of the Plan and the Equitable Adjustment Awards, see “Management— Employee Benefit Plans.”

46

Table of Contents

The Executive Committee of our Board of Directors will not consist of a majority of independent directors.

We have established an Executive Committee of the Board that consists of our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, one other non-independent member and one independent member of our Board. Under our by-laws, the Executive Committee shall have and may exercise all of the powers of the Board of Directors when the Board is not in session, including the power to authorize the issuance of stock, except that the Executive Committee shall have no power to (1) alter, amend or repeal the by-laws or any resolution or resolutions of the Board of Directors or (2) take any other action which legally may be taken only by the Board. Accordingly, even though the Board has determined that five out of its seven members are independent, significant actions by the Board may be effected by a committee of directors, the majority of whom are not independent.

Our stockholder rights plan and provisions in our certificate of incorporation and by-laws and of Delaware law may prevent or delay an acquisition of our company, which could decrease the trading price of our common stock.

Our certificate of incorporation, by-laws and Delaware law contain provisions that are intended to deter coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids by making such practices or bids unacceptably expensive to the raider and to encourage prospective acquirors to negotiate with our Board rather than to attempt a hostile takeover. These provisions include, among others:

Delaware law also imposes some restrictions on mergers and other business combinations between us and any holder of 15% or more of our outstanding common stock. For more information, see “Description of Capital Stock—Anti-takeover Effects of Our Certificate of Incorporation and By-laws and Delaware Law.”

We expect our Board of Directors to adopt a stockholder rights plan prior to the distribution which provides, among other things, that when specified events occur, our stockholders will be entitled to purchase from us a newly created series of junior preferred stock. The preferred stock purchase rights are triggered by the earlier to occur of (i) ten business days (or a later date determined by our Board before the rights are separated from our common stock) after the public announcement that a person or group has become an “acquiring person” by acquiring beneficial ownership of 15% or more of our outstanding common stock or (ii) ten business days (or a later date determined by our Board before the rights are separated from our common stock) after a person or group begins a tender or exchange offer that, if completed, would result in that person or group becoming an acquiring person. The issuance of preferred stock pursuant to the stockholder rights plan would cause substantial dilution to a person or group that attempts to acquire us on terms not approved by our Board of Directors. For a more detailed description of our rights plan, see “Description of Capital Stock—Rights Plan.”

We believe these provisions protect our stockholders from coercive or otherwise unfair takeover tactics by requiring potential acquirors to negotiate with our Board and by providing our Board with more time to assess any acquisition proposal. These provisions are not intended to make our company immune from takeovers. However, these provisions apply even if the offer may be considered beneficial by some stockholders and could delay or prevent an acquisition that our Board determines is not in the best interests of our company and our stockholders.

We cannot assure you that we will pay any dividends.

There can be no assurance that we will have sufficient surplus under Delaware law to be able to pay any dividends. This may result from extraordinary cash expenses, actual expenses exceeding contemplated costs, funding of capital expenditures, or increases in reserves. If we do not pay dividends, the price of our common stock that you receive in the distribution must appreciate for you to receive a gain on your investment in Wyndham Worldwide. This appreciation may not occur.

47

Table of Contents

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Forward-looking statements in our public filings or other public statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements or other public statements. These forward-looking statements were based on various facts and were derived utilizing numerous important assumptions and other important factors, and changes in such facts, assumptions or factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include the information concerning our future financial performance, business strategy, projected plans and objectives. Statements preceded by, followed by or that otherwise include the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “projects,” “estimates,” “plans,” “may increase,” “may fluctuate” and similar expression or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “should,” “would,” “may” and “could” are generally forward looking in nature and not historical facts. You should understand that the following important factors could affect our future results and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in such forward-looking statements:

48

Table of Contents

Other factors not identified above, including the risk factors described in the “Risk Factors” section of this information statement, may also cause actual results to differ materially from those projected by our forward-looking statements. Most of these factors are difficult to anticipate and are generally beyond our control.

You should consider the areas of risk described above, as well as those set forth under the heading “Risk Factors” above, in connection with considering any forward-looking statements that may be made by us and our businesses generally. Except for our ongoing obligations to disclose material information under the federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to release publicly any revisions to any forward-looking statements, to report events or to report the occurrence of unanticipated events unless we are required to do so by law.

49

Table of Contents

THE SEPARATION

General

On October 23, 2005, the Board of Directors of Cendant preliminarily approved a plan to separate Cendant into four independent, publicly traded companies—one for each of Cendant’s Hospitality Services (including Timeshare Resorts), Real Estate Services, Travel Distribution Services and Vehicle Rental businesses. As preliminarily approved, the separation was to occur through distributions to Cendant stockholders of all of the shares of common stock of three subsidiaries of Cendant that hold or will hold the assets and liabilities, including the entities holding substantially all of the assets and liabilities, of the businesses other than the Vehicle Rental business which will remain after the distributions.

After preliminarily approving the separation plan, the Cendant Board established a separation committee of its Board to meet regularly to assist with and oversee the separation process. The members of the separation committee are Robert W. Pittman, Martin L. Edelman and Sheli Z. Rosenberg.

Since October 23, 2005, the Cendant Board and the separation committee met numerous times with and without members of Cendant’s senior management team to discuss the separation. In these meetings, the Cendant Board and the separation committee considered, among other things, the benefits to the businesses and to Cendant stockholders that are expected to result from the separation (see “—Reasons for the Separation”), the capital allocation strategies and dividend policies for the separated companies, the allocation of Cendant’s existing assets, liabilities and businesses among the separated companies, the terms of certain commercial relationships among the separated companies that will exist following the separation, the corporate governance arrangements that will be in place at each company following the separation and the appropriate members of senior management at each company following the separation.

On April 24, 2006, Cendant announced that as an alternative to distributing shares of Travelport to Cendant stockholders, Cendant was also exploring the sale of Travelport. On June 30, 2006, Cendant entered into an agreement to sell Travelport to an affiliate of the Blackstone Group for $4,300 million in cash. Cendant expects the sale of Travelport to close in August 2006, subject to the satisfaction and/or waiver of certain conditions contained in the Travelport purchase agreement, and, promptly following the completion of such sale, Cendant will be obligated, pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, to contribute a significant portion of the cash proceeds from such sale to us and Realogy.

In furtherance of this plan, on [                    ], 2006, the Cendant Board approved the distributions of all of the shares of our and Realogy’s common stock held by Cendant to holders of Cendant common stock. The distributions of the shares of our common stock are being made in furtherance of the separation plan. On [                    ], 2006, the distribution date, each Cendant stockholder will receive one share of our common stock (and a related preferred stock purchase right) for every five shares of Cendant common stock and one share of Realogy’s common stock (and a related preferred stock purchase right) for every four shares of Cendant common stock held at the close of business on the record date, as described below. Following the distribution, Cendant stockholders will own 100% of our and Realogy’s common stock. You will not be required to make any payment, surrender or exchange your shares of Cendant common stock or take any other action to receive your shares of our and Realogy’s common stock. In connection with the plan of separation, it is expected that Cendant will change its name to Avis Budget Group, Inc.

Furthermore, the distribution of our common stock as described in this information statement is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions. For a more detailed description of these conditions, see “—Conditions to the Distribution.”

Internal Reorganization Prior to Our Distribution

Prior to our distribution, Cendant will implement an internal reorganization that will result in Wyndham Worldwide, a Delaware corporation and an already-existing, wholly owned subsidiary of Cendant, holding the assets and liabilities, including the entities holding substantially all of the assets and liabilities, of Cendant’s Hospitality Services (including Timeshare Resorts) businesses.

50

Table of Contents

The Number of Shares You Will Receive

For every five shares of Cendant common stock that you owned at the close of business on [                    ], 2006, the record date, you will receive one share of our common stock (and a related preferred stock purchase right) on the distribution date. Cendant will not distribute any fractional shares of our common stock to its stockholders. Instead, the distribution agent will aggregate fractional shares into whole shares, sell the whole shares in the open market at prevailing market prices and distribute the aggregate net cash proceeds of the sales pro rata (based on the fractional share such holder would otherwise be entitled to receive) to each holder who otherwise would have been entitled to receive a fractional share in the distribution. The distribution agent, in its sole discretion, without any influence by Cendant or us, will determine when, how, through which broker-dealer and at what price to sell the whole shares. Any broker-dealer used by the distribution agent will not be an affiliate of either Cendant or us. Recipients of cash in lieu of fractional shares will not be entitled to any interest on the amounts of payment made in lieu of fractional shares.

When and How You Will Receive the Dividend

Cendant will distribute the shares of our common stock on [                    ], 2006, the distribution date. Mellon Investor Services, which currently serves as the transfer agent and registrar for Cendant’s common stock, will serve as transfer agent and registrar for our common stock and as distribution agent in connection with the distribution.

If you own Cendant common stock as of the close of business on the record date, the shares of Wyndham Worldwide common stock that you are entitled to receive in the distribution will be issued electronically, as of the distribution date, to you or to your bank or brokerage firm on your behalf by way of direct registration in book-entry form. Registration in book-entry form refers to a method of recording stock ownership when no physical share certificates are issued to stockholders, as is the case in this distribution. If you sell shares of Cendant common stock in the “regular-way” market up to and including through the distribution date, you will be selling your right to receive shares of our common stock in the distribution.

Commencing on or shortly after the distribution date, if you hold physical stock certificates that represent your shares of Cendant common stock and you are the registered holder of the Cendant shares represented by those certificates, the distribution agent will mail to you an account statement that indicates the number of shares of our common stock that have been registered in book-entry form in your name. If you have any questions concerning the mechanics of having shares of our common stock registered in book-entry form, we encourage you to contact Mellon Investor Services at the address set forth on page 23 of this information statement.

Most Cendant stockholders hold their shares of Cendant common stock through a bank or brokerage firm. In such cases, the bank or brokerage firm would be said to hold the stock in “street name” and ownership would be recorded on the bank or brokerage firm’s books. If you hold your Cendant common stock through a bank or brokerage firm, your bank or brokerage firm will credit your account for the shares of our common stock that you are entitled to receive in the distribution. If you have any questions concerning the mechanics of having shares of our common stock held in “street name,” we encourage you to contact your bank or brokerage firm.

Mellon Investor Services, as distribution agent, will not deliver any fractional shares of our common stock in connection with the distribution. Instead, Mellon Investor Services will aggregate all fractional shares and sell them on behalf of the holders who otherwise would be entitled to receive fractional shares. The aggregate net cash proceeds of these sales, which generally will be taxable for U.S. federal income tax purposes, will be distributed pro rata (based on the fractional shares such holder would otherwise be entitled to receive) to each holder who otherwise would have been entitled to receive a fractional share in the distribution. See “—Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Distribution” below for an explanation of the tax consequences of the distribution. If you physically hold Cendant common stock certificates and are the registered holder, you will receive a check from the distribution agent in an amount equal to your pro rata share of the aggregate net cash

51

Table of Contents

proceeds of the sales. We estimate that it will take approximately two weeks from the distribution date for the distribution agent to complete the distributions of the aggregate net cash proceeds. If you hold your Cendant stock through a bank or brokerage firm, your bank or brokerage firm will receive on your behalf your pro rata share of the aggregate net cash proceeds of the sales and will electronically credit your account for your share of such proceeds.

Results of the Separation

After our separation from Cendant, we will be a separate, publicly traded company. Immediately following the distribution, we expect to have approximately 7,769 stockholders of record, based on the number of registered stockholders of Cendant common stock on June 29, 2006, and approximately 200 million shares of our common stock outstanding. The actual number of shares to be distributed will be determined on the record date and will reflect any exercise of Cendant options between the date the Cendant Board declares the dividend for the distribution and the record date for the distribution.

Before our separation from Cendant, we will enter into a Separation and Distribution Agreement and several other agreements with Cendant’s other businesses to effect the separation and provide a framework for our relationships with Cendant’s other businesses after the separation. These agreements will govern the relationship among us, Cendant, Realogy and Travelport subsequent to the completion of the separation plan and provide for the allocation among us, Cendant, Realogy and Travelport of Cendant’s assets, liabilities and obligations (including employee benefits and tax-related assets and liabilities) attributable to periods prior to our separation from Cendant. The Separation and Distribution Agreement, in particular, requires Wyndham Worldwide to assume certain of Cendant’s contingent and other corporate liabilities and establishes the amount of the debt that each separated company will initially incur to repay Cendant’s corporate debt and, in the case of Travelport only, to repay other corporate obligations and to fund the actual and estimated cash expenses borne by Cendant relating to the separation.

For a more detailed description of these agreements, see “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions,” included elsewhere in this information statement.

The distribution will not affect the number of outstanding shares of Cendant common stock or any rights of Cendant stockholders.

Incurrence of Debt

Under the Separation and Distribution Agreement, we, Realogy and Travelport have agreed to take certain actions so that we, Realogy and Travelport, and not Cendant, will bear economic responsibility for general liabilities and obligations of Cendant (including costs and expenses and corporate indebtedness) other than those that relate primarily to Cendant’s Vehicle Rental business. To effect this arrangement, each of us, Realogy and Travelport anticipate entering into, borrowing facilities at the time of or, in the case of Travelport, prior to its respective separation from Cendant, the cash proceeds of which will be transferred to Cendant to repay Cendant’s corporate debt and, with respect to the amount transferred by Travelport, to repay other corporate obligations and to fund the actual and estimated cash expenses borne by Cendant relating to the separation. For these purposes, Realogy is expected to borrow approximately $2,225 million at the time of its separation and we expect to borrow approximately $1,360 million at the time of our separation. The allocation of debt among the parties was based upon estimates of the relative future ability of each party to service its debt, each party’s ability to maintain acceptable debt ratings and the possibility that Travelport may be sold rather than separated. We anticipate that Cendant will repay its corporate indebtedness at or around the time of our separation.

The Separation and Distribution Agreement provides for an adjustment in the amount of indebtedness we will incur in connection with our separation in the event that the sum of the borrowings transferred by us, Realogy and Travelport to Cendant, together with the cash at Cendant then available to be utilized to repay its

52

Table of Contents

corporate debt, is less than or more than the amount necessary to enable Cendant to make the Separation Payments. Any insufficiency resulting from comparing the sum of the borrowings transferred by us, Realogy and Travelport to Cendant, together with the cash at Cendant then available to be utilized to repay its corporate debt, to the amount necessary to enable Cendant to make the Separation Payments will result in an upward adjustment to the amount of indebtedness allocated to Travelport to the extent that Travelport is able to obtain such additional debt financing on commercially reasonable terms; as a result, such additional amount of Travelport indebtedness will be repaid out of the proceeds of the Travelport sale (if such a sale is thereafter completed) and therefore will reduce the amount of residual proceeds available for distribution to us and Realogy (see “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Agreements with Cendant, Realogy and Travelport—Separation and Distribution Agreement”). Any additional insufficiency beyond the additional amount of indebtedness that Travelport could incur on commercially reasonable terms will be satisfied through the incurrence of additional indebtedness by us equal to such remaining insufficiency up to $100 million, and we will transfer such additional amounts to Cendant. To the extent the remaining insufficiency is in excess of $100 million, we and Realogy would be required to incur additional indebtedness equal to 37.5% and 62.5%, respectively, of such excess and transfer such amounts to Cendant. In the event that the borrowings transferred by us, Realogy and Travelport, together with Cendant’s cash, result in an excess in the amounts necessary to enable Cendant to make the Separation Payments, measured at the time of our separation, then such excess (a “priority excess”) will be allocated between us and Realogy in the manner described in the next paragraph below.

Any cash costs and expenses related to the plan of separation incurred by Cendant following the date of the adjustment described above that have not otherwise been included in the estimated costs and expenses through the completion of the plan of separation for the purposes of the adjustment will be treated as contingent liabilities under the Separation and Distribution Agreement and therefore borne 37.5% by us and 62.5% by Realogy (or if the sale of Travelport is not completed, we will assume 30%, Realogy will assume 50% and Travelport will assume 20%). If the amount of cash costs and expenses estimated to be incurred prior to the completion of the plan of separation for the above-described adjustment exceeds the actual cash costs and expenses incurred by Cendant, such excess (a “Cendant excess amount”) will be allocated in the following manner: (i) in the event that a priority excess exists, all or a portion of the Cendant excess amount will be allocated to us and Realogy on a 37.5% and 62.5% basis, respectively, up to the amount of the priority excess and (ii) any remaining Cendant excess amount will be treated as a contingent asset to which we will be entitled to 37.5% and Realogy will be entitled to 62.5% (or if the sale of Travelport is not completed, we will be entitled to 30%, Realogy will be entitled to 50% and Travelport will be entitled to 20%).

In addition, following the completion of the sale of Travelport, Cendant will be obligated, pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, to contribute a significant portion of the cash proceeds from such sale to us and Realogy. Assuming Cendant receives $4,300 million in gross cash proceeds from such sale and contributes to us approximately $760 million from such sale, we estimate that the approximately $1,360 million of indebtedness we expect to incur at the time of our separation would be reduced to approximately $600 million. The actual amount of our remaining indebtedness may be more or less than the amount provided above depending on various adjustments, including, without limitation, purchase price adjustments based on the levels of cash, working capital and certain other expenses at Travelport at the time of its sale, the application of sale proceeds that have priority over contributions to us and the amount outstanding at the time of our distribution under Cendant’s asset-linked facility relating to certain assets of Cendant’s Hospitality Services (including Timeshare Resorts) businesses (for a detailed description of the use of proceeds from the sale of Travelport, see “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Agreements with Cendant, Realogy and Travelport—Separation and Distribution Agreement”).

Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Distribution

The following is a summary of certain U.S. federal income tax consequences of the distribution. This summary is based on the Code, Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder and on judicial and administrative interpretations of the Code, all as in effect on the date of this information statement, and is subject to changes in

53

Table of Contents

these or other governing authorities, any of which may have a retroactive effect. This summary assumes that the distribution will be consummated in accordance with the Separation and Distribution Agreement and as described in this information statement. This summary is for general information only and does not purport to be a complete description of the consequences of the distribution nor does it address the effects of any state, local or foreign tax laws on the distribution. The tax treatment of a Cendant stockholder may vary depending upon that stockholder’s particular situation, and certain stockholders (including, but not limited to, insurance companies, tax-exempt organizations, financial institutions, broker-dealers, partners in partnerships that hold stock in Cendant, pass-through entities, traders in securities who elect to apply a mark-to-market method of accounting, stockholders who hold their Cendant stock as part of a “hedge,” “straddle,” “conversion,” or “constructive sale transaction,” individuals who received Cendant common stock upon the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation and non-U.S. stockholders) may be subject to special rules not discussed below. The summary assumes that the Cendant stockholders hold their Cendant common stock as capital assets within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code.

Each stockholder is urged to consult its tax advisor as to the specific tax consequences of the distribution to that stockholder, including the effect of any state, local or foreign tax laws and of changes in applicable tax laws.

The distribution is conditioned upon Cendant’s receipt of an opinion of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP substantially to the effect that the distribution, together with certain related transactions, should qualify as a reorganization for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code. The opinion of Skadden Arps will be based on, among other things, certain assumptions as well as on the accuracy of certain factual representations and statements that we and Cendant make to Skadden Arps. In rendering its opinion, Skadden Arps also will rely on certain covenants that we and Cendant enter into, including the adherence by Cendant and us to certain restrictions on our future actions.

If any of the representations or statements that we or Cendant make are, or become, inaccurate or incomplete, or if we or Cendant breach any of our covenants, the distribution, together with certain related transactions, might not qualify as a reorganization for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code. You should note that Cendant does not intend to seek a ruling from the IRS as to the U.S. federal income tax treatment of the distribution. The opinion of Skadden Arps is not binding on the IRS or a court, and there can be no assurance that the IRS will not challenge the validity of the distribution and related transactions as a reorganization for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code or that any such challenge ultimately will not prevail.

The Distribution

Assuming that the distribution, together with certain related transactions, qualifies as a reorganization for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code, the following describes certain U.S. federal income tax consequences to us, Cendant and Cendant stockholders:

54

Table of Contents

U.S. Treasury regulations require certain Cendant stockholders who receive our common stock in the distribution to attach their U.S. federal income tax returns for the year in which the stock is received a detailed statement setting forth such data as may be appropriate to demonstrate the applicability of Section 355 of the Code to the distribution. Within a reasonable period of time after the distribution, Cendant will provide to our stockholders, either directly or through our stockholders’ banks or brokerage firms, the information necessary to comply with this requirement.

Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences if the Distribution Were Taxable

An opinion of counsel represents counsel’s best legal judgment and is not binding on the IRS or any court. If the IRS were to assert successfully that the distribution was taxable, the above consequences would not apply and both Cendant and holders of Cendant common stock who received shares of our common stock in the distribution could be subject to tax, as described below. In addition, future events that may or may not be within Cendant’s or our control, including extraordinary purchases of Cendant common stock or our common stock, could cause the distribution not to qualify as tax free to Cendant and/or holders of Cendant common stock. Depending on the circumstances, we may be required to indemnify Cendant for some or all of the taxes and losses resulting from the distribution and certain related transactions not qualifying as a reorganization for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Agreements with Cendant, Realogy and Travelport—Tax Sharing Agreement.”

If the distribution were to fail to qualify as a reorganization, then:

55

Table of Contents

Even if the distribution, together with certain related transactions, otherwise qualifies as a reorganization for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code, it could be taxable to Cendant under Section 355(e) of the Code if one or more persons were to acquire directly or indirectly stock representing a 50% or greater interest by vote or value, in Cendant or us during the four-year period beginning on the date which is two years before the date of the distribution, as part of a plan or series of related transactions that includes the distribution. If such an acquisition of our stock or Cendant’s stock were to trigger the application of Section 355(e), Cendant would recognize taxable gain as described above, but the distribution would be tax-free to each Cendant stockholder.

In connection with the distribution, we, Cendant and the other separated companies will enter into a Tax Sharing Agreement pursuant to which we and the other separated companies each will agree to be responsible for certain liabilities and obligations following the distribution. Our indemnification obligations will include a covenant to indemnify Cendant for any losses that it and its subsidiaries incur as a result of any action, misrepresentation or omission by us or one of our subsidiaries that causes the distribution of our common stock by Cendant to fail to qualify as a reorganization for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 368(a)(1)D and 355 of the Code. We also will be responsible for 37.5% (or 30% if the sale of Travelport is not completed) of any taxes resulting from the failure of the distribution, together with certain related transactions, to qualify as such a reorganization for U.S. federal income tax purposes, which failure is not due to the actions, misrepresentations or omissions of us, any of the other separated companies or our respective subsidiaries. In addition, even if we were not contractually required to indemnify Cendant for tax liabilities if the distribution, together with certain related transactions, were to fail to qualify as such a reorganization for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we nonetheless could be legally liable under applicable tax law for such liabilities if Cendant were to fail to pay them. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Agreements with Cendant Corporation, Realogy and Travelport—Tax Sharing Agreement” for a more detailed discussion of the Tax Sharing Agreement between Cendant and us.

The foregoing is a summary of certain U.S. federal income tax consequences of the distribution under current law and is for general information only. The foregoing does not purport to address all U.S. federal income tax consequences or tax consequences that may arise under the tax laws of other jurisdictions or that may apply to particular categories of stockholders. Each Cendant stockholder should consult its tax advisor as to the particular tax consequences of the distribution to such stockholder, including the application of U.S. federal, state, local and foreign tax laws, and the effect of possible changes in tax laws that may affect the tax consequences described above.

Market for Common Stock

There is currently no public market for our common stock. A condition to the distribution is the listing on the NYSE of our common stock. We have applied to list our common stock on the NYSE under the symbol “WYN.”

Trading Between the Record Date and Distribution Date

Beginning on or shortly before the record date and continuing up to and including through the distribution date, there will be two markets in Cendant common stock: a “regular-way” market and an “ex-distribution” market. Shares of Cendant common stock that trade on the regular way market will trade with an entitlement to shares of our common stock distributed pursuant to the distribution. Shares that trade on the ex-distribution market will trade without an entitlement to shares of our common stock distributed pursuant to the distribution. Therefore, if you sell shares of Cendant common stock in the “regular-way” market up to and including through the distribution date, you will be selling your right to receive shares of Wyndham Worldwide common stock in the distribution. If you own shares of Cendant common stock at the close of business on the record date and sell those shares on the “ex-distribution” market up to and including through the distribution date, you will still receive the shares of our common stock that you would be entitled to receive pursuant to your ownership of the shares of Cendant common stock.

56

Table of Contents

Furthermore, beginning on or shortly before the record date and continuing up to and including through the distribution date, there will be a “when-issued” market in our common stock. “When-issued” trading refers to a sale or purchase made conditionally because the security has been authorized but not yet issued. The “when-issued” trading market will be a market for shares of our common stock that will be distributed to Cendant stockholders on the distribution date. If you owned shares of Cendant common stock at the close of business on the record date, you would be entitled to shares of our common stock distributed pursuant to the distribution. You may trade this entitlement to shares of our common stock, without the shares of Cendant common stock you own, on the “when-issued” market. On the first trading day following the distribution date, “when issued” trading with respect to our common stock will end and “regular-way” trading will begin.

Conditions to the Distribution

We expect that the distribution will be effective on [                    ], 2006, the distribution date, provided that, among other conditions described in this information statement, the following conditions shall have been satisfied or, if permissible under the Separation and Distribution Agreement, waived by Cendant:

The fulfillment of the foregoing conditions does not create any obligation on Cendant’s part to effect the distribution, and the Cendant Board has reserved the right, in its sole discretion, to amend, modify or abandon the distribution and related transactions at any time prior to the distribution date. Cendant has the right not to complete the distribution if, at any time, the Cendant Board determines, in its sole discretion, that the distribution is not in the best interests of Cendant or its stockholders or that market conditions are such that it is not advisable to separate the Hospitality Services (including Timeshare Resorts) businesses from Cendant.

57

Table of Contents

Reasons for the Separation

The Cendant Board regularly reviews the various businesses that Cendant conducts to ensure that Cendant’s resources are properly being put to use in a manner that is in the best interests of Cendant and its stockholders. Over the last several years, Cendant has achieved increased revenues and earnings. During that time, however, Cendant has found that any real or perceived negative issue at any one of its business units has usually obscured the performance of Cendant as a whole. To this end, the Cendant Board evaluated a number of strategic alternatives to increase value and concluded that a separation would be the most feasible and the most financially attractive approach. The Cendant Board believes that creating independent, focused companies and selling Travelport is the best way to unlock the full value of Cendant’s businesses in both the short and long terms. There will be one company for each of Cendant’s Hospitality Services (including Timeshare Resorts), Real Estate Services and Vehicle Rental businesses (and Travel Distribution Services if Travelport is not sold).

Cendant believes that the separation of its businesses provides each separated company, including us, with certain opportunities and benefits. The following are some of the opportunities and benefits that the Cendant Board considered in preliminarily approving the separation:

58

Table of Contents

The Cendant Board considered a number of other potentially negative factors in evaluating the separation, including the decreased capital available for investment, the loss of synergies from operating as one company, potential disruptions to the businesses as a result of the separation, the potential impact of the separation on the anticipated credit ratings of the separated companies, risks associated with refinancing Cendant’s debt, risks of being unable to achieve the benefits expected to be achieved by the separation and the reaction of Cendant stockholders to the separation, the risk that the plan of execution might not be completed and the one-time and on-going costs of the separation. The Cendant Board concluded that the potential benefits of the separation outweighed these factors.

In view of the wide variety of factors considered in connection with the evaluation of the separation and the complexity of these matters, the Cendant Board did not find it useful to, and did not attempt to, quantify, rank or otherwise assign relative weights to the factors considered. The individual members of the Cendant Board likely may have given different weights to different factors.

The Cendant Board has received an opinion from Evercore to the effect that, as of the date of such opinion, the distribution of the shares of Wyndham Worldwide common stock is fair, from a financial point of view, to the stockholders of Cendant. In addition, the Cendant Board also has received an opinion from Duff & Phelps to the effect that Wyndham Worldwide and Cendant each will be solvent and adequately capitalized immediately after the distribution and that Cendant has sufficient surplus under Delaware law to declare the dividends of Wyndham Worldwide and Realogy common stock.

Opinion of Evercore Group L.L.C.

On June 26, 2006, Evercore delivered its oral opinion to the Cendant Board, which opinion was subsequently confirmed in writing, that the distribution of the shares of Wyndham Worldwide common stock to the holders of shares of Cendant common stock was fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders. Evercore provided the fairness opinion for the information and assistance of the Cendant Board in connection with the Board’s consideration of whether to declare the distribution. In determining its conclusion of fairness, Evercore evaluated the merits of the distribution relative to the alternative of preserving the status quo. The fairness opinion does not constitute a recommendation to any Cendant stockholder as to how such holder should respond to the distribution and therefore does not constitute a recommendation as to whether such holder should hold or sell shares of Cendant common stock or shares of Wyndham Worldwide common stock. A copy of the fairness opinion that Evercore delivered to the Cendant Board is attached to this information statement as Annex A. Stockholders are encouraged to read the opinion in its entirety. The following is a summary of Evercore’s opinion and the methodology that Evercore used to render its opinion.

For purposes of the fairness opinion and the analyses underlying the fairness opinion, Evercore assumed and relied upon, without assuming any responsibility for independent verification of, the accuracy and completeness of publicly available information and of the information supplied or otherwise made available to, discussed with or reviewed by Evercore. To enable Evercore to perform the analyses underlying the fairness opinion, members of Cendant’s management provided Evercore with certain financial projections (including Cendant’s outlook with respect to the long-term growth prospects of Cendant’s businesses) relating to Cendant and Wyndham Worldwide. Evercore assumed that the financial projections were reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best available estimates and good faith judgments of the future competitive, operating and regulatory

59

Table of Contents

environments and financial performances of Cendant and Wyndham Worldwide. Additionally, Evercore relied upon the assessments of Cendant’s management with respect to the business, operational and strategic risks, incremental costs and incremental cost savings arising from the distribution.

Evercore did not make or assume any responsibility for making any independent valuation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities of Cendant or any of its subsidiaries, and Evercore was not furnished with any such valuations or appraisals. In addition, Evercore did not evaluate the solvency or fair value of Cendant or any of its subsidiaries or of Wyndham Worldwide or any of its subsidiaries under any state or federal laws relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or similar matters. For the purposes of its analyses, Evercore assumed that the distribution, together with certain related transactions, would qualify as a reorganization for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code and, accordingly, that, for U.S. federal income tax purposes: (x) no income, gain or loss would be recognized by Cendant stockholders as a result of the receipt of Wyndham Worldwide common stock pursuant to the distribution, except with respect to any cash received in lieu of fractional shares of Wyndham Worldwide common stock and (y) no gain or loss would be recognized by Cendant or Wyndham Worldwide upon the distribution of Wyndham Worldwide common stock and no amount would be includible in the income of Wyndham Worldwide or Cendant as a result of the distribution and certain related transactions other than taxes arising out of internal restructuring transactions undertaken in connection with the separation and with respect to any “excess loss account” or “intercompany transaction” required to be taken into account by Cendant under Treasury regulations relating to consolidated federal income tax returns which were assumed to be not in excess of the aggregate amounts estimated by the management of Cendant and provided to Evercore in connection with its analysis. Evercore assumed that all necessary governmental and regulatory and other approvals or consents (contractual or otherwise) for the distribution had been or would be timely obtained or made and that no restrictions would be imposed or costs incurred (other than costs in the amounts estimated by management of Cendant and provided to Evercore in connection with its analysis) that would have an adverse effect on Cendant and its subsidiaries or on Wyndham Worldwide and its subsidiaries following the distribution. Evercore further assumed that the distribution would comply with all applicable U.S. federal and state laws and foreign laws, including, without limitation, laws relating to the payment of dividends, bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, fraudulent conveyance, fraudulent transfer and other similar laws affecting the rights of creditors. Evercore is not a legal, regulatory, accounting or tax expert. Evercore assumed the accuracy and completeness of assessments by Cendant and its advisors with respect to legal, regulatory, accounting and tax matters.

Evercore was not authorized to solicit, and did not solicit, any proposals from any third parties for the acquisition of Cendant or Wyndham Worldwide, and Evercore did not make any determination as to whether any such proposals could be obtained if solicited. Other than the alternative of preserving the status quo, Evercore did not consider and therefore Evercore’s fairness opinion does not address the relative merits of the distribution as compared to other business strategies that might have been available to Cendant and the underlying business decision of Cendant to proceed with the distribution.

Evercore’s fairness opinion does not express any view as to the prices at which the shares of Cendant common stock or the shares of Wyndham Worldwide common stock will trade following the distribution. The actual values of and prices at which the shares of Cendant common stock and the shares of Wyndham Worldwide common stock will trade following the distribution will depend on a variety of factors including, without limitation, prevailing interest rates, dividend rates, market conditions, general economic conditions and other factors that generally influence the prices of securities. Evercore’s fairness opinion does not address whether the aggregate market value of the outstanding shares of Cendant common stock and the outstanding shares of Wyndham Worldwide common stock following the distribution will exceed the aggregate market value of the outstanding shares of Cendant common stock at any time prior to the distribution or the aggregate market value of the outstanding shares of Cendant common stock in the absence of the distribution. The shares of Cendant common stock and the shares of Wyndham Worldwide common stock may, after the distribution, initially trade at prices below those at which they would trade on a fully distributed basis.

60

Table of Contents

Evercore’s fairness opinion was necessarily based on economic, market and other conditions as in effect on, and the information made available to Evercore as of, the date of delivery of the fairness opinion. It should be understood that subsequent developments may affect Evercore’s fairness opinion and that Evercore does not have any obligation to update, revise or reaffirm its fairness opinion.

In arriving at its opinion, Evercore has, among other things (i) reviewed certain publicly available business and financial information relating to Cendant and Wyndham Worldwide that it deemed to be relevant; (ii) reviewed certain internal financial statements and other non-public financial and operating data relating to Cendant and Wyndham Worldwide that were prepared and furnished to Evercore by the management of Cendant; (iii) reviewed certain financial projections relating to Cendant and Wyndham Worldwide that were provided by and approved for use in connection with Evercore’s opinion by the management of Cendant; (iv) discussed the past and current operations, financial projections and current financial condition of Cendant and Wyndham Worldwide with the management of Cendant; (v) compared certain financial information for Cendant and Wyndham Worldwide with similar information for other relevant companies the securities of which are publicly traded; (vi) reviewed the financial terms of certain publicly available transactions that Evercore deemed comparable to the distribution; (vii) reviewed the historical market prices and trading activity for the shares of Cendant common stock; (viii) reviewed the contemplated allocation of indebtedness and other liabilities to Cendant and Wyndham Worldwide following the distribution (including the potential allocation of proceeds arising from a sale of Travelport); (ix) reviewed a draft of the Form 10 registration statement filed by Wyndham Worldwide in connection with the distribution in substantially final form and assumed that its final form would not vary in any respect material to Evercore’s analysis; and (x) performed other examinations and analyses and considered other factors that Evercore deemed appropriate.

Set forth below is a summary of the material information and analyses presented by Evercore to the Cendant Board in connection with rendering Evercore’s opinion. The following summary, however, does not purport to be a complete description of the analyses performed by Evercore. The order in which the analyses are described and the results of these analyses do not represent the relative importance of or weight given to these analyses by Evercore. Except as otherwise noted, Evercore’s analyses were based on market data as it existed on or before June 21, 2006, and are not necessarily indicative of current market conditions.

In connection with the delivery of its opinion, Evercore reviewed the stock price performance of Cendant common stock as compared to that of the S&P 500 index over the last five years. This analysis demonstrated that both Cendant and Cendant including the value received by Cendant stockholders in the spin-off of PHH Corporation have underperformed the S&P 500 index over the last one-, two-, three-, four- and five-year time periods. Evercore also reviewed the historical forward price / earnings multiple of Cendant common stock as compared to that of the S&P 500 index since 2001, and noted that Cendant has been valued at a discount to this index throughout the timeframe under consideration.

Evercore also analyzed the enterprise value / 2006 EBITDA multiples and the price / 2006 earnings multiples for selected publicly-traded companies that participate in the same industries as Wyndham Worldwide, Realogy, Travelport and Avis Budget Group. Evercore calculated the mean and median for the selected companies underlying each of the different industry groupings. Evercore noted that the mean P/E multiples for each of the underlying industry groupings were higher than Cendant’s P/E multiple. Evercore also noted that the mean enterprise value to EBITDA multiples were higher for three of the four industry groupings than Cendant’s comparable multiple, and that Dollar Thrifty Group, the only selected industry participant for Avis Budget, had a lower enterprise value to EBITDA multiple than Cendant. Evercore also compared selected Wall Street research analyst estimates for the sum-of-the-parts value for Cendant common stock to Cendant’s current share price, and noted that each of the analysts have sum-of-the-parts values that were in excess of the current stock price.

Evercore also estimated the sum-of-the-parts value for Cendant common stock. This analysis included an estimate of the values for each of Wyndham Worldwide, Realogy, Travelport and Avis Budget Group, in each case assuming, among other things, that such securities were fully and widely distributed among investors and

61

Table of Contents

subject only to normal trading activity. This analysis was based on enterprise value / 2006 EBITDA multiples and 2006 EBITDA estimates for Wyndham Worldwide, Realogy and Travelport, and a price / 2006 earnings multiple and 2006 net income estimate for Avis Budget Group. The analysis generally indicated that the sum-of-the-parts value was greater than the current market value for Cendant common stock.

Evercore also reviewed selected Wall Street research analyst commentary relating to the separation plan that has been published subsequent to the announcement of the plan. Additionally, Evercore compared the enterprise value / 2006 EBITDA multiple and the price / 2006 earnings multiple for Cendant using the stock price and financial projection estimates as of the day prior to the announcement of the separation plan (October 21, 2005), to the same multiples using the current stock price and current financial projection estimates. This analysis demonstrated that these valuation multiples for Cendant were higher in the current time period than prior to the announcement of the separation plan.

In addition, Evercore reviewed the 2006 revenue and EBITDA contribution by business unit for Cendant under its current configuration as compared to Cendant pro forma for the distribution and noted that Wyndham Worldwide would be expected to contribute approximately 19% of 2006 revenue and 29% of 2006 EBITDA if Cendant were to remain under its current configuration. Evercore also analyzed the leverage profile and estimated interest expense of Cendant as compared to Wyndham Worldwide, Realogy, Travelport and Avis Budget Group on standalone bases and in the aggregate and noted that the estimated 2006 interest expense costs for the standalone companies in aggregate are expected to be higher than for Cendant under its current configuration. Evercore also reviewed the proposed allocation of contingent and other corporate liabilities as part of the separation plan among Wyndham Worldwide, Realogy, Travelport and Avis Budget Group. Additionally, Evercore reviewed the recurring corporate overhead costs for Cendant under its current configuration as compared to that of the aggregate for Wyndham Worldwide, Realogy, Travelport and Avis Budget Group on standalone bases and noted that the expected costs for the standalone companies in aggregate are not materially higher than for Cendant under its current configuration. Evercore also reviewed the estimated non-recurring costs relating to the separation plan, which are expected to be approximately $1,100 million excluding approximately $100 million of accrued interest costs.

Evercore also compared Wyndham Worldwide’s 2006 revenue, 2006 EBITDA, 2006 EBITDA margin and 2003-2005 EBITDA growth rates to the same statistics for the median of the S&P 500 index and selected publicly-traded companies that participate in the same industry as Wyndham Worldwide and noted that Wyndham Worldwide, as compared to the selected industry participants, generally has lower 2006 revenue and 2006 EBITDA, has similar 2006 EBITDA margins, and has similar 2003-2005 revenue and EBITDA growth rates. Evercore also compared the trading multiples for the median of the S&P 500 index to selected publicly-traded companies that participate in the same industry as Wyndham Worldwide, and noted that the selected industry participants trade at higher multiples, on average, than the S&P 500 index with respect to enterprise value / 2006 EBITDA, and price / 2006 earnings.

Evercore also performed an analysis of selected spin-off transactions, none of which were deemed directly comparable to the distribution. The analysis included all transactions where (i) the spin-off was announced after January 1, 2000, (ii) the spun-off company had an equity value greater than $1 billion, and (iii) 100% of the stock of the spun-off company was distributed in the transaction. Cendant’s spin-off of PHH Corporation was one of the transactions considered in this analysis. The analysis generally indicated that the parent company common stock price outperformed the S&P 500 index, on average, on the day of announcement and for the period between announcement and the day of the spin-off, relative to the parent company common stock price prior to the announcement of the transaction. The analysis also generally indicated that the parent company common stock price and the fractional share of the spun-off company common stock price reflecting the spin-off ratio generally outperformed the S&P 500 index, on average, over the one month-, three month-, six month- and 12 month- periods following date of the spin-off, relative to the parent company common stock price prior to the announcement of the transaction. Evercore also noted that Cendant, and Cendant including the fractional share in PHH Corporation, underperformed the S&P 500 index throughout the measurement period.

62

Table of Contents

As part of the precedent spin-off analysis, Evercore also reviewed the results of selected academic and Wall Street research analyst studies on the share price performance of both parent company common stock and spun-off company common stock over certain periods of time. These studies generally indicated, among other things, that the mean stock price performance of the parent company common stock and the spun-off company common stock outperformed selected control groups.

The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process and is not necessarily susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. No company utilized in Evercore’s analysis as a comparison is directly comparable to Cendant or Wyndham Worldwide, and no precedent transaction is directly comparable to the distribution or the separation plan. Selecting portions of the analyses or of the summary described above, without considering the analyses as a whole, could create an incomplete view of the processes underlying Evercore’s opinion. In arriving at its fairness determination, Evercore considered the results of all the analyses performed and did not attribute any particular weight to any factor or analysis considered by it. Rather, Evercore made its determination as to fairness on the basis of its experience and professional judgment after considering the results of all the analyses.

Cendant engaged Evercore to act as a financial advisor to the Cendant Board in connection with the distribution of shares of Wyndham Worldwide common stock to holders of Cendant common stock based on Evercore’s qualifications, experience and reputation and Evercore’s knowledge of Cendant’s businesses. In addition, Evercore has been engaged by Cendant as an adviser in connection with other parts of the separation plan and the potential sale of Travelport. Evercore is an internationally recognized investment banking firm and is regularly engaged in the valuation of businesses in connection with mergers and acquisitions, leveraged buyouts, competitive biddings, private placements and valuations for corporate and other purposes.

The Evercore engagement letter with Cendant provides that, for its services, Evercore is entitled to receive from Cendant a fee of $14.5 million payable in three equal installments, each of which is payable upon the consummation of a distribution contemplated by the separation plan or, in the event that Travelport is sold rather than distributed, upon the closing of such sale. Evercore will also receive a fee, the amount of which is not yet determined, which will replace the fee. In 2005, Evercore received a $500,000 retainer fee from Cendant in connection with its engagement for this transaction. The engagement letter also provides that Evercore will be reimbursed for its reasonable expenses and be indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of Evercore’s engagement.

Opinion of Duff & Phelps, LLC

Duff & Phelps, LLC was engaged by Cendant to provide to the Cendant Board a written opinion as to the sufficiency of the surplus of Cendant under Delaware law to make the distributions of Wyndham Worldwide common stock and Realogy common stock and as to the solvency and capitalization of each of Cendant, Wyndham Worldwide and Realogy after giving effect to the distributions. On October 23, 2005, Duff & Phelps made a presentation to the Cendant Board summarizing its preliminary conclusions, based on information available to Duff & Phelps as of October 23, 2005, with respect to the solvency and capitalization of each of Cendant, Wyndham Worldwide and Realogy and with respect to the surplus of Cendant. On June 26, 2006, Duff & Phelps made a definitive presentation to the Cendant Board and delivered a written opinion to the Cendant Board to the effect that:

Duff & Phelps’ opinion is attached to this information statement as Annex B. The opinion sets forth, among other things, the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the review

63

Table of Contents

undertaken by Duff & Phelps in connection with the opinion. You should read the opinion carefully and in its entirety. Duff & Phelps’ opinion was delivered for the benefit of Cendant, Wyndham Worldwide and Realogy and their respective boards of directors.

In preparing its opinion, Duff & Phelps undertook a number of investigations and analyses that it deemed appropriate, including meetings with senior management regarding the history, current operations, future outlook and “contingent and other liabilities” of each of Cendant, Wyndham Worldwide and Realogy; analyses of financial, market and transaction information on public companies deemed comparable to each of Cendant, Wyndham Worldwide and Realogy and on transactions deemed comparable to the separation of each of Wyndham Worldwide and Realogy from Cendant; and a review of industry information and trends germane to each of Cendant’s and Wyndham Worldwide’s businesses. In addition, in preparing its opinion, Duff & Phelps reviewed Cendant’s annual reports, filings with the SEC and audited and unaudited historical financial statements; certain internally prepared financial reports, including financial projections for Cendant, Wyndham Worldwide and Realogy; and presentations delivered to the Cendant Board by certain of Cendant’s other financial advisors.

Duff & Phelps noted that its opinion was based on discussions with management of Cendant and Cendant’s Hospitality Services (including Timeshare Resorts) and Real Estate Services businesses and on market conditions and the operating performance and financial condition of each of Cendant and Cendant’s Hospitality Services (including Timeshare Resorts) and Real Estate Services businesses as such market conditions, operating performance and financial condition existed as of June 26, 2006. Duff & Phelps relied upon the accuracy and completeness of all of the financial, accounting, tax and other information discussed with Duff & Phelps or reviewed by Duff & Phelps and assumed such accuracy and completeness for purposes of expressing its opinion. In that regard, Duff & Phelps assumed with Cendant’s consent, that certain internal analyses and forecasts for Cendant and Cendant’s Hospitality Services (including Timeshare Resorts) and Real Estate Services businesses prepared by management of Cendant and Cendant’s Hospitality Services (including Timeshare Resorts) and Real Estate Services businesses have been prepared on a basis reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of Cendant and Cendant’s Hospitality Services (including Timeshare Resorts) and Real Estate Services businesses. Duff & Phelps noted that nothing has come to its attention in the course of its engagement by the Cendant Board which would lead Duff & Phelps to believe that any information provided to Duff & Phelps or assumptions made by Duff & Phelps are insufficient or inaccurate in any material respect or that it is unreasonable for Duff & Phelps to use and rely upon such information or make such assumptions. Duff & Phelps also noted that it did not make an independent evaluation or appraisal of the assets and liabilities, including “contingent and other liabilities,” of Cendant and Cendant’s Hospitality Services (including Timeshare Resorts) and Real Estate Services businesses and Duff & Phelps was not furnished with any such evaluation or appraisal.

Cendant specifically requested that Duff & Phelps determine whether, as of the date of the distributions and after giving effect to the distributions:

64

Table of Contents

Under Delaware law, distributions may be paid out of surplus, which is defined under Delaware law as the excess, if any, at any given time, of the net assets of the corporation (which is the amount by which total assets exceeds total liabilities) over the amount of the corporation’s capital. For the purposes of preparing its preliminary conclusions and final conclusions, Duff & Phelps defined the following terms and phrases as follows:

For the purposes of preparing its opinion, Duff & Phelps conducted “balance sheet tests” to determine whether, as of the date of the distributions and after giving effect to the distributions, (i) the fair saleable value and the present fair saleable value, as applicable, of the assets of each of Cendant, Wyndham Worldwide and Realogy would exceed, as applicable, the sum of the respective liabilities, including all contingent and other liabilities, or the amount that would be required to pay its respective probable liabilities, including all contingent and other liabilities, on the respective existing debt of each of Cendant, Wyndham Worldwide and Realogy as such liabilities become absolute and matured; (ii) the sum of the assets of each of Cendant, Wyndham Worldwide and Realogy, as applicable, at fair valuation would be greater than the respective expected debts of each of Cendant, Wyndham Worldwide and Realogy at fair valuation; and (iii) the fair saleable value of the assets of Cendant would exceed the value of its liabilities, including all contingent and other liabilities, by an amount that

65

Table of Contents

is greater than its stated capital amount pursuant to Section 154 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. Duff & Phelps has tailored the balance sheet tests so as to enable Duff & Phelps to reach a conclusion with respect to each of the determinations that Duff & Phelps has been requested to make. As the first part of a balance sheet test, Duff & Phelps used various methodologies, including a discounted cash flow analysis and an analysis of the trading multiples for comparable, public companies and companies involved in merger and acquisition transactions, to estimate the enterprise values of each of Cendant, Wyndham Worldwide and Realogy, as applicable. As the second part of a balance sheet test, Duff & Phelps compared the enterprise values of each of Cendant, Wyndham Worldwide and Realogy, as applicable, to the respective liabilities, including all contingent and other liabilities, expected to be allocated to each of Cendant, Wyndham Worldwide and Realogy, as applicable. As part of its opinion, Duff & Phelps determined that, based on information available to it on June 26, 2006, as of the date of the distributions and after giving effect to the distributions on the terms described to Duff & Phelps, each of Cendant, Wyndham Worldwide and Realogy, as applicable, would pass the balance sheet tests.

For the purposes of preparing its opinion, Duff & Phelps conducted “capital adequacy tests” to determine whether, after giving effect to the distributions, each of Cendant, Wyndham Worldwide and Realogy, as applicable, would not have an unreasonably small amount of capital for the respective businesses in which it is engaged or is proposed to be engaged following the consummation of the distributions, based on discussions with management of Cendant, Wyndham Worldwide or Realogy, as applicable. The capital adequacy test involves the analysis of detailed cash flow projections for each of Cendant, Wyndham Worldwide and Realogy and an analysis of the respective debt capacities and abilities to access the capital markets of each of Cendant, Wyndham Worldwide and Realogy to estimate current and projected sources of capital to operate its respective businesses and an analysis of current and projected capital needs of each of Cendant, Wyndham Worldwide and Realogy. As part of the capital adequacy test, Duff & Phelps compared the ability of each of Cendant, Wyndham Worldwide and Realogy to satisfy its respective current and projected, as applicable, capital needs from its respective current and projected, as applicable, capital sources. Duff & Phelps also compared the respective current and projected, as applicable, capital needs of each of Cendant, Wyndham Worldwide and Realogy to the capital needs of similar publicly traded companies.

For the purposes of preparing its opinion, Duff & Phelps conducted “cash flow tests” to determine whether, after giving effect to the distributions, each of Cendant, Wyndham Worldwide and Realogy would be able to pay its respective liabilities, including all contingent and other liabilities, as they become absolute and matured. As part of the cash flow tests, Duff & Phelps analyzed detailed cash flow projections of the payment of liabilities, including all contingent and other liabilities, by each of Cendant, Wyndham Worldwide and Realogy and analyzed the ability of each of Cendant, Wyndham Worldwide and Realogy to produce free cash flow, sell assets and access the capital markets to meet its respective liabilities. In addition, Duff & Phelps analyzed various cash flow coverage ratios based on the projections.

As part of both the cash flow and capital adequacy tests, Duff & Phelps conducted sensitivity analyses using financial assumptions that represent reasonable downside scenarios versus the base case financial assumptions that Duff & Phelps analyzed. Duff & Phelps compared the assumptions under these sensitivity analyses to company-specific or industry performance metrics under historical industry “shocks” or economic downturns. Based on these analyses, Duff & Phelps assessed the ability of each of Cendant, Wyndham Worldwide and Realogy to weather a future industry shock or economic downturn. As part of its opinion, Duff & Phelps concluded that, based on information available to Duff & Phelps on June 26, 2006, it is highly likely each of Cendant, Wyndham Worldwide and Realogy could weather a disruption or downturn in its respective businesses.

As part of its opinion, Duff & Phelps determined that, based on information available to it on June 26, 2006, after giving effect to the distributions on the terms described to Duff & Phelps, each of Cendant, Wyndham Worldwide and Realogy would pass the capital adequacy and cash flow tests.

The preparation of an opinion of the type described above is a complex process and is not necessarily susceptible to a summary description. Selecting portions of the summary set forth above, without considering the

66

Table of Contents

summary as a whole, could create an incomplete view of the processes underlying Duff & Phelps’ opinion. In addition, analyses underlying opinions of the type described above are based upon forecasts of future results and therefore are not necessarily indicative of actual future results or financial condition. Because such analyses, which are based upon numerous factors or events beyond the control of the parties or their respective advisors, are inherently subject to uncertainty, none of Cendant, Wyndham Worldwide, Realogy or Duff & Phelps or any other person assumes responsibility if future results or financial condition are different from those forecast.

Cendant selected Duff & Phelps to advise the Cendant Board on the above-described matters because Duff & Phelps is a nationally recognized, independent financial advisory firm that has substantial experience in providing fairness and solvency opinions in connection with transactions similar to the distributions.

Duff & Phelps has provided certain financial advisory services to Cendant and its affiliates from time to time in connection with certain financial reporting requirements for which services Duff & Phelps has received compensation. During the past two years, Cendant paid Duff & Phelps $507,000 (which excludes any amounts paid in connection with the separation as described below) for these services. Duff & Phelps also may provide certain services to Cendant, Wyndham Worldwide, Realogy and their respective affiliates in the future for which services Duff & Phelps expects to receive compensation.

The Duff & Phelps engagement letter with Cendant provides that, for its services, Duff & Phelps is entitled to receive from Cendant a fee of $1.2 million due and payable as follows: $200,000 upon execution of the engagement letter, $400,000 on October 31, 2005 and an aggregate of $600,000 (in three equal installments) upon notice that Duff & Phelps is prepared to deliver its respective opinions in connection with our distribution and the distributions of Realogy and Travelport (or, in the event of a sale of Travelport, upon the closing of such sale). The engagement letter also provides that Duff & Phelps be reimbursed for its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses and be indemnified against various liabilities.

Reason for Furnishing this Information Statement

This information statement is being furnished solely to provide information to Cendant stockholders who are entitled to receive shares of Wyndham Worldwide common stock in the distribution. The information statement is not, and is not to be construed as, an inducement or encouragement to buy, hold or sell any of our securities. We believe that the information in this information statement is accurate as of the date set forth on the cover. Changes may occur after that date and neither Cendant nor we undertake any obligation to update such information except in the normal course of our respective public disclosure obligations.

67

Table of Contents

DIVIDEND POLICY

The declaration and payment of future dividends to holders of our common stock will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon many factors, including our financial condition, earnings, capital requirements of our businesses, covenants associated with certain debt obligations, legal requirements, regulatory constraints, industry practice and other factors that our Board deems relevant. There can be no assurance that we will continue to pay any dividend if we commence the payment of dividends.

68

Table of Contents

CAPITALIZATION

The following table, which should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the combined historical financial statements and accompanying notes, included elsewhere in this information statement, sets forth our cash and cash equivalents, secured assets and combined capitalization as of March 31, 2006 on an historical basis and on a pro forma basis after giving effect to the following planned transactions:

In addition, such financial data also reflects an adjustment eliminating intercompany balances approximating $1,159 million due from Cendant.

The following Separation Pro Forma amounts have been further adjusted to give effect to the following post separation adjustments for the sale of Travelport, which transaction is expected to close following our separation from Cendant:

69

Table of Contents

The pro forma adjustments are based upon available information and assumptions that we believe are reasonable; however, such adjustments are subject to change based upon the finalization of the terms of the separation and the underlying separation agreements. The pro forma adjustments do not reflect estimates for any contingent assets and liabilities that we may be entitled to receive upon either positive or negative resolution of certain unresolved matters.

70

Table of Contents

SELECTED HISTORICAL COMBINED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table presents our selected historical combined financial data and operating statistics. The combined statement of income data for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 and the combined balance sheet data as of March 31, 2006 have been derived from our unaudited combined condensed financial statements, included elsewhere in this information statement. The combined statement of income data for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005 and the combined balance sheet data as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 have been derived from our audited combined financial statements, included elsewhere in this information statement. The combined statement of income data for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the combined balance sheet data as of December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 have been derived from unaudited combined financial statements that are not included in this information statement. Such unaudited combined financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the audited combined financial statements and, in the opinion of our management, include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the information set forth in this information statement.

The selected historical combined financial data and operating statistics presented below should be read in conjunction with our combined financial statements and accompanying notes and “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” included elsewhere in this information statement. Our historical combined financial information may not be indicative of our future performance and does not necessarily reflect what our financial position and results of operations would have been had we operated as a separate, stand-alone entity during the periods presented, including changes that will occur in our operations and capitalization as a result of the separation and distribution from Cendant. Refer to “Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Condensed Financial Statements” for a further description of the anticipated changes.

71

Table of Contents