UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31,
2010
OR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period from
to
COMMISSION FILE
NO. 001-32876
WYNDHAM WORLDWIDE
CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as
Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
DELAWARE
|
|
20-0052541
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
|
|
|
22 SYLVAN WAY
PARSIPPANY, NEW JERSEY
(Address of Principal
Executive Offices)
|
|
07054
(Zip Code)
|
(973) 753-6000
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:
|
|
|
|
|
NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE
|
TITLE OF EACH CLASS
|
|
ON WHICH REGISTERED
|
Common Stock, Par Value $0.01 per share
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:
None
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
(§ 229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be
contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by
reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form
10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer þ
|
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o
|
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the registrants common stock
held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30,
2010, was $3,597,669,466. All executive officers and directors
of the registrant have been deemed, solely for the purpose of
the foregoing calculation, to be affiliates of the
registrant.
As of January 31, 2011, the registrant had outstanding
173,261,203 shares of common stock.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Proxy Statement prepared for the 2011 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference into
Part III of this report.
PART I
FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report includes forward-looking statements, as
that term is defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) in its rules, regulations and releases.
Forward-looking statements are any statements other than
statements of historical fact, including statements regarding
our expectations, beliefs, hopes, intentions or strategies
regarding the future. In some cases, forward-looking statements
can be identified by the use of words such as may,
expects, should, believes,
plans, anticipates,
estimates, predicts,
potential, continue, or other words of
similar meaning. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks
and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those discussed in, or implied by, the
forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a
difference include, but are not limited to, general economic
conditions, our financial and business prospects, our capital
requirements, our financing prospects, our relationships with
associates, and those disclosed as risks under Risk
Factors in Part I, Item 1A of this report. We
caution readers that any such statements are based on currently
available operational, financial and competitive information,
and they should not place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements, which reflect managements
opinion only as of the date on which they were made. Except as
required by law, we disclaim any obligation to review or update
these forward-looking statements to reflect events or
circumstances as they occur.
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements
and other information with the SEC. Our SEC filings are
available to the public over the Internet at the SECs
website at
http://www.sec.gov.
Our SEC filings are also available on our website at
http://www.WyndhamWorldwide.com
as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed with or
furnished to the SEC. You may also read and copy any filed
document at the SECs public reference room in
Washington, D.C. at 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for further information about public reference rooms.
We maintain an Internet site at
http://www.WyndhamWorldwide.com.
Our website and the information contained on or connected to
that site are not incorporated into this Annual Report.
OVERVIEW
As one of the worlds largest hospitality companies, we
offer individual consumers and business customers a broad array
of hospitality services and products across various
accommodation alternatives and price ranges through our
portfolio of world-renowned brands. The hospitality industry is
a major component of the travel industry, which is one of the
largest retail industry segments of the global economy. Our
operations are grouped into three segments of the hospitality
industry: lodging, vacation exchange and rentals and vacation
ownership. With more than 20 brands, which include Wyndham
Hotels and Resorts, Ramada, Days Inn, Super 8, Howard Johnson,
Wyndham Rewards, Wingate by Wyndham, Microtel, RCI, The Registry
Collection, ResortQuest, Landal GreenParks, Novasol, Hoseasons,
cottages4you, James Villa Holidays, Wyndham Vacation Resorts and
WorldMark by Wyndham, we have built a significant presence in
most major hospitality markets in the U.S. and throughout
the rest of the world.
Approximately 60% of our revenues come from fees that we receive
in exchange for providing services. We refer to the businesses
that generate these fees as our fee-for-service
businesses. We receive fees: (i) in the form of royalties
for use of our brand names; (ii) for providing hotel and
resort management services; (iii) for providing property
management services to vacation ownership resorts; (iv) for
providing vacation exchange and rentals services; and
(v) for providing services under our Wyndham Asset
Affiliation Model (WAAM). The remainder of our
revenues comes primarily from proceeds received from the sale of
vacation ownership interests and related financing.
|
|
|
Our lodging business, Wyndham Hotel Group, is the worlds
largest hotel company based on the number of properties,
franchising in the upscale, midscale, economy and extended stay
segments of the lodging industry and providing hotel management
services globally for full-service hotels. This is predominantly
a fee-for-service business that provides recurring revenue
streams, requires low capital investment and produces strong
cash flow.
|
|
|
Our vacation exchange and rentals business, Wyndham
Exchange & Rentals, is the worlds largest
member-based vacation exchange network based on the number of
vacation exchange members and the worlds largest global
marketer of serviced vacation rental properties based on the
number of vacation rental properties marketed. Through this
business, we provide vacation exchange services and products and
access to distribution systems and networks to resort developers
and owners of intervals of vacation ownership interests, and we
market vacation rental properties primarily on behalf of
independent
|
1
|
|
|
owners, vacation ownership developers and other hospitality
providers. This is primarily a fee-for-service business that
provides stable revenue streams, requires low capital investment
and produces strong cash flow.
|
|
|
|
Our vacation ownership business, Wyndham Vacation Ownership, is
the worlds largest vacation ownership business based on
the number of resorts, units, owners and revenues. Through our
vacation ownership business, we develop and market vacation
ownership interests to individual consumers, provide consumer
financing in connection with the sale of vacation ownership
interests and provide property management services at resorts.
While the vacation ownership business has historically been
capital intensive, a central strategy for Wyndham Worldwide is
to leverage our scale and marketing expertise to pursue
low-capital requirement, fee-for-service business relationships
that produce strong cash flow. In 2010, we introduced our WAAM
which offers turn-key solutions for developers or banks in
possession of newly developed inventory, which we sell for a fee
through our extensive sales and marketing channels.
|
Our mission is to increase shareholder value by being the leader
in travel accommodations and welcoming our guests to iconic
brands and vacation destinations through our signature
Count On Me! service. Our strategies to achieve
these objectives are to:
|
|
|
Increase market share by delivering excellent service to drive
business customer, individual consumer and associate
satisfaction.
|
|
|
Grow cash flow and operating margins through superior execution
in all of our businesses.
|
|
|
Rebalance the Wyndham Worldwide portfolio to emphasize our
fee-for-service business models.
|
|
|
Attract, retain and develop human capital across our
organization.
|
|
|
Support and promote Wyndham Green and Wyndham Diversity
initiatives.
|
We strive to provide value-added services and products that are
intended to both enhance the travel experience of the individual
consumer and drive revenues to our business customers. The depth
and breadth of our businesses across different segments of the
hospitality industry provide us with the opportunity to expand
our relationships with our existing individual and business
customers in one or more segments of our business by offering
them additional or alternative services and products from our
other segments.
We expect to generate annual net cash provided by operating
activities less capital expenditures, equity investments and
development advances in the range of approximately
$600 million to $700 million annually beginning in
2011. This cash flow is expected to be utilized for
acquisitions, share repurchases and dividends.
Our lodging, vacation exchange and rentals and vacation
ownership businesses all have both domestic and international
operations. During 2010, we derived 74% of our revenues in the
U.S. and 26% internationally. For a discussion of our
segment revenues, profits, assets and geographical operations,
see Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements
included in this Annual Report.
History
and Development
Wyndham Worldwides corporate history can be traced back to
the 1990 formation of Hospitality Franchise Systems (which
changed its name to HFS Incorporated or HFS). HFS initially
began as a hotel franchisor that later expanded its hospitality
business and became a major real estate and car rental
franchisor. In December 1997, HFS merged with CUC International,
Inc., or CUC, to form Cendant Corporation (which changed
its name to Avis Budget Group, Inc. in September 2006).
In October 2005, Cendant determined to separate Cendant through
spin-offs into four separate companies, including a spin-off of
its Hospitality Services businesses to be re-named Wyndham
Worldwide Corporation. During July 2006, Cendant transferred to
its subsidiary, Wyndham Worldwide Corporation, all of the assets
and liabilities of Cendants Hospitality Services
businesses and on July 31, 2006, Cendant distributed all of
the shares of Wyndham Worldwide common stock to the holders of
Cendant common stock issued and outstanding on July 21,
2006, the record date for the distribution. The separation was
effective on July 31, 2006. On August 1, 2006, we
commenced regular way trading on the New York Stock
Exchange under the symbol WYN.
Each of our lodging, vacation exchange and rentals and vacation
ownership businesses has a long operating history. Our lodging
business began with the Howard Johnson and Ramada brands which
opened their first hotels in 1954. RCI, our vacation exchange
business, was established 37 years ago, and we have
acquired and grown some of the worlds most renowned
vacation rentals brands with histories starting as early as
Hoseasons in 1940, Landal GreenParks in 1954 and Novasol in
1968. Our vacation ownership brands, Wyndham Vacation Resorts
and WorldMark by Wyndham, began vacation ownership operations in
1980 and 1989, respectively.
2
Our portfolio of well-known hospitality brands was assembled
over the past twenty years. The following is a timeline of our
significant brand acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
1990:
|
Howard Johnson and Ramada (US)
|
|
1992:
|
Days Inn
|
|
1993:
|
Super 8
|
|
1995:
|
Knights Inn
|
|
1996:
|
Travelodge North America
Resort Condominiums International (RCI)
|
|
2001:
|
Cuendet
Holiday Cottages Group
Fairfield Resorts (now Wyndham Vacation Resorts)
|
|
2002:
|
Novasol
Trendwest Resorts (now WorldMark by Wyndham)
|
|
2004:
|
Ramada International
Landal GreenParks
|
|
2005:
|
Wyndham Hotels and Resorts
|
|
2006:
|
Baymont
|
|
2008:
|
Microtel Inn & Suites and Hawthorn Suites
|
|
2010:
|
Hoseasons
Tryp
ResortQuest
James Villa Holidays
|
The following is a description of the business of each of our
three business units, Wyndham Hotel Group, Wyndham
Exchange & Rentals and Wyndham Vacation Ownership and
the industries in which they compete.
WYNDHAM
HOTEL GROUP
Lodging
Industry
The global lodging market consists of over 140,000 hotels with
combined annual revenues over $312 billion, or
$2.2 million per hotel. The market is geographically
concentrated with the top 20 countries accounting for over 80%
of global rooms.
Companies in the lodging industry operate primarily under one of
the following business models:
|
|
|
FranchiseUnder the franchise model, a company
typically grants the use of a brand name to owners of hotels
that the company neither owns nor manages in exchange for
royalty fees that are typically equal to a percentage of room
sales. Since the royalty fees are a recurring revenue stream and
the cost structure is relatively low, the franchise model yields
high margins and steady, predictable cash flows. During 2010,
approximately 70% of the available hotel rooms in the
U.S. were affiliated with a brand compared to only 40% in
each of Europe and the Asia Pacific region.
|
|
|
ManagementUnder the management model, a company
provides professional oversight and comprehensive operations
support to lodging properties that it owns
and/or
lodging properties owned by a third party in exchange for
management fees, that are typically equal to a percentage of
hotel revenue, which may also include incentive fees based on
the financial performance of the properties.
|
|
|
OwnershipUnder the ownership model, a company owns
hotel properties and benefits financially from hotel revenues,
earnings and appreciation in the value of the property.
|
Performance in the lodging industry is measured by the following
key metrics:
|
|
|
average daily rate, or ADR;
|
|
|
average occupancy rate, or occupancy;
|
|
|
revenue per available room, or RevPAR, which is calculated by
multiplying ADR by the average occupancy rate; and
|
|
|
new room additions.
|
Demand in the global lodging industry is driven by, among other
factors, business and leisure travel, both of which are
significantly affected by the health of the economy. In a
prosperous economy, demand is typically high, which leads to
higher occupancy levels and permits increases in room rates.
This cycle continues and ultimately spurs new hotel development.
In a poor economy, demand deteriorates, which leads to lower
occupancy levels and reduced rates. Demand outside the
U.S. is also affected by demographics, airfare, trade and
tourism, affluence and the freedom to travel.
3
The U.S. is the most dominant sector of the global lodging
market with over 30% of global room revenues. The
U.S. lodging industry consists of over 51,000 hotels with
combined annual revenues of over $99 billion, or
$1.9 million per hotel. There are approximately
4.8 million guest rooms at these hotels, of which
3.4 million rooms are affiliated with a hotel chain. The
following table displays trends in the key performance metrics
for the U.S. lodging industry over the last six years and
for 2011 (estimate):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
Year
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
ADR
|
|
RevPAR*
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
ADR
|
|
RevPAR *
|
|
2005
|
|
|
63.0%
|
|
$91.05
|
|
$57.36
|
|
|
2.8 %
|
|
|
5.6 %
|
|
|
8.6 %
|
2006
|
|
|
63.1%
|
|
97.98
|
|
61.86
|
|
|
0.2 %
|
|
|
7.6 %
|
|
|
7.8 %
|
2007
|
|
|
62.8%
|
|
104.26
|
|
65.49
|
|
|
(0.5)%
|
|
|
6.4 %
|
|
|
5.9 %
|
2008
|
|
|
59.8%
|
|
107.30
|
|
64.13
|
|
|
(4.9)%
|
|
|
2.9 %
|
|
|
(2.1)%
|
2009
|
|
|
54.5%
|
|
98.17
|
|
53.49
|
|
|
(8.8)%
|
|
|
(8.5)%
|
|
|
(16.6)%
|
2010
|
|
|
57.6%
|
|
98.08
|
|
56.46
|
|
|
5.7 %
|
|
|
(0.1)%
|
|
|
5.6 %
|
2011E
|
|
|
59.0%
|
|
103.08
|
|
60.84
|
|
|
2.5 %
|
|
|
5.1 %
|
|
|
7.8 %
|
|
|
|
*:
|
|
RevPAR may not recalculate by
multiplying occupancy by ADR due to rounding
|
Sources: Smith
Travel Research Global (STR) (2005 to 2010);
PricewaterhouseCoopers (PWC) (2011). 2011 data is as
of January 2011.
The following table depicts trends in revenues and new rooms
added on a yearly basis for the U.S. lodging industry over
the last six years and for 2011 (estimate):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
New Rooms
|
|
Changes in
|
Year
|
|
($bn)
|
|
(000s)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
New Rooms
|
|
2005
|
|
$
|
122.6
|
|
|
83.4
|
|
|
7.9 %
|
|
|
2.6 %
|
2006
|
|
|
133.3
|
|
|
138.9
|
|
|
8.8 %
|
|
|
66.5 %
|
2007
|
|
|
139.4
|
|
|
146.0
|
|
|
4.5 %
|
|
|
5.1 %
|
2008
|
|
|
140.3
|
|
|
132.5
|
|
|
0.7 %
|
|
|
(9.2)%
|
2009
|
|
|
127.2
|
|
|
47.8
|
|
|
(9.4)%
|
|
|
(63.9)%
|
2010
|
|
|
136.9
|
|
|
29.0
|
|
|
7.7 %
|
|
|
(39.3)%
|
2011E
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
49.9
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
72.0 %
|
Sources:
STR (2005 to 2010); PWC (2011). 2011 data is estimated and
reflects data as of November 14, 2010.
The U.S. lodging industry experienced positive RevPAR
performance over the last year and is expected to continue to
grow in 2011, resulting from improving economic conditions. The
return of business travelers has made a significant contribution
to the recovery of lodging demand with major markets
experiencing the most significant gains. In addition,
decelerating supply growth resulting from lags in the new
construction pipeline also contributed to occupancy gains in
2010. The steepest declines in ADR occurred throughout 2009 and
stabilized in the second quarter of 2010. As a result of these
occupancy gains and ADR stabilization, the U.S. lodging
industry experienced positive RevPAR growth in the second
quarter of 2010 for the first time in eight consecutive
quarters. It is expected that U.S hotel demand will increase
3.3% in 2011 and as a result, it is anticipated that ADR will
increase across all segments as well. Beyond 2011, certain
industry experts project RevPAR in the U.S. to grow at a
7.3% compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) over the
next three years
(2012-2014).
Performance in the U.S. lodging industry is evaluated based
upon chain scale segments, which are defined as follows:
|
|
|
Luxurytypically offers first class appointments and
a full range of on-property amenities and services, including
restaurants, spas, recreational facilities, business centers,
concierges, room service and local transportation (shuttle
service to airport
and/or local
attractions).
|
|
|
Upscaletypically offers a full range of on-property
amenities and services, including restaurants, spas,
recreational facilities, business centers, concierges, room
service and local transportation (shuttle service to airport
and/or local
attractions).
|
|
|
Midscaletypically offers restaurants
(midscale with food and beverage) or limited
breakfast service (midscale without food and
beverage), vending, selected business services, partial
recreational facilities (either a pool or fitness equipment) and
limited transportation (airport shuttle).
|
|
|
Economytypically offers a limited breakfast and
airport shuttle.
|
These chain scale segments are expected to change in 2011. The
new categories by which the U.S. lodging industry will be
evaluated in 2011 and beyond will be: luxury,
upper-upscale,
upscale, upper-midscale, midscale and economy.
4
The following table sets forth the expected key metrics for each
chain scale segment and associated sub-segments within the
U.S. for 2010 as currently defined by STR:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Room
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
ADR
|
|
Demand
|
|
Supply
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
ADR
|
|
RevPAR
|
|
Luxury
|
|
Greater than $210
|
|
|
11.6%
|
|
|
3.5 %
|
|
|
7.8%
|
|
|
2.1%
|
|
|
10.1%
|
Upper upscale
|
|
$125 to $210
|
|
|
8.5%
|
|
|
2.0 %
|
|
|
6.4%
|
|
|
(0.6)%
|
|
|
5.7%
|
Upscale
|
|
$95 to $125
|
|
|
14.2%
|
|
|
6.4 %
|
|
|
7.3%
|
|
|
(1.5)%
|
|
|
5.7%
|
Midscale with
food-and-beverage
|
|
$65 to $95
|
|
|
3.5%
|
|
|
(0.8)%
|
|
|
4.4%
|
|
|
(1.0)%
|
|
|
3.3%
|
Midscale without
food-and-beverage
|
|
$65 to $95
|
|
|
9.2%
|
|
|
3.9 %
|
|
|
5.2%
|
|
|
(0.8)%
|
|
|
4.3%
|
Economy
|
|
Less than $65
|
|
|
5.3%
|
|
|
0.2 %
|
|
|
5.1%
|
|
|
(3.1)%
|
|
|
1.9%
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
7.7%
|
|
|
2.0 %
|
|
|
5.7%
|
|
|
(0.1)%
|
|
|
5.6%
|
The European lodging industry consists of over 50,000 hotels
with combined annual revenues over $117 billion, or
$2.3 million per hotel. There are approximately
3.8 million guest rooms at these hotels, of which
1.6 million rooms are affiliated with a hotel chain. The
Asia Pacific lodging industry consists of over 18,000 hotels
with combined annual revenues of approximately $80 billion,
or $4.3 million per hotel. There are approximately
2.5 million guest rooms at these hotels, of which over
940,000 are affiliated with a hotel chain. The following table
displays changes in the key performance metrics for the European
and Asia Pacific lodging industry during 2010 as compared to
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
Room
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region
|
|
Demand
|
|
Supply
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
ADR
|
|
RevPAR
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
6.4%
|
|
|
1.1%
|
|
|
5.2%
|
|
|
(1.8)%
|
|
|
3.3%
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
12.0%
|
|
|
2.8%
|
|
|
8.9%
|
|
|
11.4%
|
|
|
21.3%
|
Wyndham
Hotel Group Overview
Our lodging business, Wyndham Hotel Group, is the worlds
largest hotel company (based on number of properties) with one
of the industrys largest loyalty programs, Wyndham
Rewards. Over 88% of Wyndham Hotel Groups revenues are
derived from franchising activities. Wyndham Hotel Group
generally does not own any hotels. Therefore, its business model
is easily adaptable to changing economic environments due to low
operating cost structures, which in combination with recurring
fee streams yield high margins and predictable cash flows.
Capital requirements are relatively low and mostly limited to
technology expenditures to support core capabilities, and any
incentives we may employ to generate new business, such as key
money and development advance notes to assist franchisees and
hotel owners in converting to one of our brands or building a
new hotel branded under a Wyndham Hotel Group brand.
Wyndham Hotel Group comprises the following 15 brands, with
approximately 7,210 hotels representing over 612,700 rooms on
six continents and over 900 hotels representing approximately
102,700 rooms in the development pipeline as of
December 31, 2010. Wyndham Hotel Group franchises in most
segments of the industry and provides management services
globally for full-service hotels. The following describes these
15 widely-known lodging brands:
|
|
|
Days
Inn®
is a leading global brand in the economy segment with more
guest rooms than any other economy brand in the world with over
1,875 properties worldwide. Under its A Promise As Sure As
the Sun service culture, Days Inn
hotels®
offer value-conscious consumers free high-speed internet,
upgraded bath amenities and the Wyndham Rewards loyalty program.
Most hotels also offer free
Daybreak®
breakfast, restaurants and meeting rooms.
|
|
|
Super 8
Worldwide®
is a leading global brand in the economy segment with almost
2,175 properties in the U.S., Canada and China. Super 8 has
recently launched a brand refresh with new interior and exterior
design programs. Under its 8 point promise service
culture, Super 8 hotels offer complimentary
SuperStart®
breakfast, free high speed internet access, upgraded bath
amenities, free in-room coffee, kids under 17 stay free and free
premium cable or satellite TV as well as the Wyndham Rewards
loyalty program.
|
|
|
Microtel Inns &
Suites®
is an award winning economy chain of over 315 properties
predominantly located throughout North America. For nine
consecutive years, the brand has been ranked highest in
|
5
|
|
|
Overall Guest Satisfaction in its category by J.D. Power and
Associates, a distinction that no other company in any industry
has achieved. Microtel is also the only prototypical, all
new-construction brand in the economy segment. For guests, this
means a consistent experience featuring award-winning
contemporary guest rooms and public area designs. For
developers, Microtel provides hotel operators low cost of
construction combined with support and guidance from ground
break to grand opening as well as low cost of ongoing
operations. Positioned in the upper-end of the economy segment,
all properties offer complimentary continental breakfast, free
wired and wireless internet access, free local and long distance
calls and the Wyndham Rewards loyalty program.
|
|
|
|
Howard
Johnson®
is an iconic American hotel brand having pioneered hotel
franchising in 1954. Today, Howard Johnson has almost 475 hotels
in North America, Latin America, Asia and other international
markets. In North America, the brand operates in the midscale
and economy segments while internationally the brand includes
mid-scale and upscale hotels. The Howard Johnson brand targets
families and leisure travelers, providing complimentary
continental Rise and
Dine®
breakfast and high-speed internet access as well as the Wyndham
Rewards loyalty program.
|
|
|
Travelodge®
is a hotel chain with over 435 properties located across
North America. The brand operates primarily in the economy
segment in the U.S. and in the midscale with food and
beverage segment in Canada. Using its Sleepy Bear
brand ambassador, Travelodge targets leisure travelers with a
focus on those who prefer an active lifestyle of outdoor
activity and offers guests complimentary Bear
Bites®
continental breakfast and free high-speed internet access as
well as the Wyndham Rewards loyalty program.
|
|
|
Knights
Inn®
is a budget economy hotel chain with over 335 locations
across North America. Knights Inn hotels provide basic overnight
accommodations and complimentary breakfast for an affordable
price as well as the Wyndham Rewards loyalty program. For
operators, from first time owners to experienced hoteliers, the
brand provides a lower cost of entry and competitive terms while
still providing the extensive tools, systems and resources of
the Wyndham Hotel Group.
|
|
|
Ramada
Worldwide®
is a global midscale with food and beverage hotel chain with
nearly 900 properties located in 53 countries worldwide. Under
its Do Your Thing, Leave the Rest to Us, marketing
foundation and supported by the I AM service
culture, most Ramada hotels feature free wireless high-speed
internet access, meeting rooms, business services, fitness
facilities, upgraded bath amenities and the Wyndham Rewards
loyalty program. Most properties have an
on-site
restaurant/lounge, while other sites offer a complimentary
continental breakfast with food available in the Ramada Mart.
|
|
|
Baymont Inn &
Suites®
is a midscale without food and beverage hotel chain with
over 260 properties located across North America. The
brands commitment to providing hometown
hospitality means guests are offered fresh baked cookies,
complimentary breakfast and high-speed internet access as well
as the Wyndham Rewards loyalty program. Most hotels also offer
swimming pools and fitness centers.
|
|
|
Wyndham Hotels and
Resorts®
Family of Brands is a collection of brands, including our
flagship Wyndham Hotels and
Resorts®
brand, spanning across the upscale and midscale segments with an
aggregate of over 435 properties and featuring complementary
distribution and product offerings to provide business and
leisure travelers with more options. The Wyndham Hotels and
Resorts®
Family Brands consist of the following brands:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wyndham Hotels and
Resorts®an
upscale, full service brand of over 100 properties located in
key business and vacation destinations around the world.
Business locations feature meeting space flexible for large and
small meetings, as well as business centers and fitness centers.
The brand is tiered as follows: Wyndham Grand Collection,
comprised primarily of 4+Diamond hotels in resort or urban
destinations, offer a unique guest experience, sophisticated
design and distinct dining options; Wyndham Hotels and Resorts
offers customers amenities such as golf, tennis, beautiful
beaches
and/or spas;
and Wyndham Garden Hotels, generally located in corporate or
suburban areas, provide flexible space for small to midsize
meetings and relaxed dining options. Each tier offers our
signature Wyndham By
Request®
guest recognition loyalty program, which provides members
personalized benefits at every stay in addition to those offered
by the Wyndham Rewards loyalty program.
|
|
|
|
Wingate by
Wyndham®a
prototypical design hotel chain in the upper end of the midscale
without food and beverage segment with 165 properties in North
America. Each hotel offers amenities and services that make life
on the road more productive, all at a single rate. Guests enjoy
oversized rooms appointed with all the comforts and conveniences
of home and office. Each room is equipped with a flat screen TV,
high-speed internet access, in-room microwave and refrigerator.
The brand also offers complimentary hot breakfast, a
24-hour
business center with free printing, copying and faxing and
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
free access to a gym facility and the Wyndham Rewards loyalty
program, including Wyndham By
Request®.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tryp by
Wyndham®a
select-service, mid-priced hotel brand acquired on June 30,
2010, which is comprised of over 90 hotels located predominantly
throughout Europe and South America in key center city, airport
and business center markets. This brand caters to both business
and leisure travelers with varying accommodations suited for
different travel needs and preferences. Guests enjoy free
Internet in all rooms, free breakfast buffet with a special
emphasis on healthy, fresh ingredients and the full benefits of
the Wyndham Rewards loyalty program, including Wyndham By
Request®
during 2011.
|
|
|
|
Hawthorn Suites by
Wyndham®an
extended stay brand that provides an ideal atmosphere for
multi-night visits at over 75 properties predominantly in the
U.S. We believe this brand provides a solution for
longer-term travelers who typically seek accommodations at our
Wyndham Hotels and
Resorts®
or Wingate by
Wyndham®
properties. Each hotel offers an inviting and practical
environment for travelers with well appointed, spacious one and
two-bedroom suites and fully-equipped kitchens. Guests enjoy
free Internet in all rooms and common areas as well as
complimentary hot breakfast buffets and evening social hours as
well as the Wyndham Rewards loyalty program, including Wyndham
By
Request®.
|
|
|
|
Planet
Hollywood®
is a 4+Diamond, full-service, entertainment-based hotel
brand that will be located in key destination cities globally.
This brand was added to our portfolio of offerings in 2010 when
we entered into a 20 year affiliation relationship with
Planet Hollywood Resorts International, LLC to franchise this
brand and provide management services globally for branded
hotels. All hotels will offer multiple food and beverage
outlets, flexible meeting space and entertainment-based theming.
Guests will also enjoy the full benefits of the Wyndham Rewards
loyalty program, including Wyndham by Request during 2011. As of
December 31, 2010, we had no properties franchised or
managed by us under this affiliation arrangement.
|
|
|
Dream®
is a full-service, light-hearted brand with trend-setting
design for gateway cities and resort destinations. This brand
was added to our portfolio of offerings in January 2011 when we
entered into a 30 year affiliation relationship with
Chatwal Hotels & Resorts, LLC to franchise this brand
and provide management services globally for branded hotels. The
progressive service offerings will emulate those of luxury
hotels, but with a more relaxed point of view. Guests will also
enjoy the full benefits of the Wyndham Rewards loyalty program,
including Wyndham by Request during 2011. As of
December 31, 2010, we had no properties franchised or
managed by us under this affiliation arrangement.
|
|
|
Night®
is an affordably chic brand featuring innovative
designs. This brand was added to our portfolio of offerings in
January 2011 when we entered into a 30 year affiliation
relationship with Chatwal Hotels & Resorts, LLC to
franchise this brand and provide management services globally
for branded hotels. These hotels offer unique services such as
guest deejays in lounges, discounts for green motorists with
hybrid and electric cars and gourmet quick-serve food and
beverage options. Guests will also enjoy the full benefits of
the Wyndham Rewards loyalty program, including Wyndham by
Request during 2011. As of December 31, 2010, we had no
properties franchised or managed by us under this affiliation
arrangement.
|
7
The following table provides operating statistics for our 15
brands and for affiliated and non-proprietary hotels in our
system as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010. We
derived occupancy, ADR and RevPAR from information provided by
our franchisees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global
|
|
Rooms
|
|
# of
|
|
# of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brand
|
|
Segments
Served
(1)
|
|
Per Property
|
|
Properties
|
|
Rooms
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
ADR
|
|
RevPAR *
|
|
Days Inn
|
|
Economy
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
1,877
|
|
|
|
149,980
|
|
|
|
45.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
60.46
|
|
|
$
|
27.52
|
|
Super 8
|
|
Economy
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
2,174
|
|
|
|
136,267
|
|
|
|
49.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
55.54
|
|
|
$
|
27.41
|
|
Microtel
|
|
Economy
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
22,539
|
|
|
|
49.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
57.35
|
|
|
$
|
28.54
|
|
Howard Johnson
|
|
Economy
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
46,362
|
|
|
|
45.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
60.05
|
|
|
$
|
27.13
|
|
Travelodge
|
|
Economy
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
31,908
|
|
|
|
44.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
63.51
|
|
|
$
|
28.39
|
|
Knights Inn
|
|
Economy
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
20,335
|
|
|
|
37.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
42.28
|
|
|
$
|
15.76
|
|
Ramada
|
|
Midscale
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
896
|
|
|
|
119,042
|
|
|
|
49.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
73.45
|
|
|
$
|
36.43
|
|
Baymont
|
|
Midscale
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
21,933
|
|
|
|
46.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
60.60
|
|
|
$
|
28.19
|
|
Wyndham Hotels and Resorts
|
|
Upscale
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
28,311
|
|
|
|
55.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
109.23
|
|
|
$
|
60.10
|
|
Wingate by Wyndham
|
|
Midscale
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
15,066
|
|
|
|
57.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
79.09
|
|
|
$
|
45.56
|
|
Tryp by Wyndham
|
|
Midscale
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
13,692
|
|
|
|
62.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
92.47
|
|
|
$
|
57.86
|
|
Hawthorn Suites by Wyndham
|
|
Midscale
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
7,100
|
|
|
|
55.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
75.78
|
|
|
$
|
41.98
|
|
Other (2)
|
|
Upscale
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,207
|
|
|
|
612,735
|
|
|
|
48.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
64.85
|
|
|
$
|
31.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
RevPAR may not recalculate by
multiplying average occupancy rate by ADR due to rounding.
|
(1) |
|
The global segments served column
reflects the primary chain scale segments served using the STR
Global definition and method as of December 2010. STR Global is
U.S. centric and categorizes a hotel chain, or brand, based on
ADR in the U.S. We utilized these chain scale segments to
classify our brands both in the U.S. and internationally.
|
|
(2) |
|
Represents a property we manage
through a joint venture which is not branded under a Wyndham
Hotel Group brand; as such, operating statistics (such as
average occupancy rate, ADR and RevPAR) are not relevant.
|
The following table depicts our geographic distribution and key
operating metrics by region:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# of
|
|
|
# of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
Rooms
(1)
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
ADR
|
|
|
RevPAR *
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
5,909
|
|
|
|
457,126
|
|
|
|
46.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
61.41
|
|
|
$
|
28.49
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
467
|
|
|
|
37,171
|
|
|
|
51.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
92.27
|
|
|
$
|
47.34
|
|
Europe/Middle East/Africa
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
49,001
|
|
|
|
57.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
82.21
|
|
|
$
|
47.19
|
|
Asia/Pacific
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
55,232
|
|
|
|
53.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
53.05
|
|
|
$
|
28.10
|
|
Latin/South America
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
14,205
|
|
|
|
49.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
85.29
|
|
|
$
|
41.98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
7,207
|
|
|
|
612,735
|
|
|
|
48.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
64.85
|
|
|
$
|
31.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
RevPAR may not recalculate by
multiplying occupancy by ADR due to rounding.
|
(1) |
|
From time to time, as a result of
weather or other business interruption and ordinary wear and
tear, some of the rooms at these hotels may be taken out of
service for repair.
|
Our franchising business is designed to generate revenues for
our hotel owners through the delivery of room night bookings to
the hotel, the promotion of brand awareness among the consumer
base, global sales efforts, ensuring guest satisfaction and
providing outstanding service to hotel guests and our hotel
owners.
The sources of revenues from franchising hotels include
(i) ongoing franchise fees, which are comprised of royalty,
marketing and reservation fees, (ii) initial franchise
fees, which relate to services provided to assist a franchised
hotel to open for business under one of our brands and
(iii) other service fees. Royalty fees are intended to
cover the use of our trademarks and our operating expenses, such
as expenses incurred for franchise services, including quality
assurance and administrative support, and to provide us with
operating profits. Marketing and reservation fees are intended
to reimburse us for expenses associated with operating an
international, centralized, brand-specific reservations system,
access to third-party distribution channels, such as online
travel agents (OTAs), advertising and marketing
programs, global sales efforts, operations support, training and
other related services. We promote and sell our brands through
e-commerce
initiatives, including online paid search and banner advertising
as well as traditional media, including print and broadcast
advertising. Since franchise fees generally are based on
percentages of the franchised hotels gross room revenues,
expanding our portfolio of franchised hotels and growing RevPAR
at franchised hotels are important to our revenue growth. Other
service fees include fees derived from providing ancillary
services, which are intended to reimburse us for direct expenses
associated providing these services.
Our management business offers hotel owners the benefits of a
global brand and a full range of management, marketing and
reservation services. In addition to the standard franchise
services described below, our hotel management business provides
full-service hotel owners with professional oversight and
comprehensive operations support services such as hiring,
training and supervising the managers and employees who operate
the hotels as well
8
as annual budget preparation, financial analysis and extensive
food and beverage services. Revenues earned from our management
business include management and service fees. Management fees
are comprised of base fees, which typically are calculated based
on a specified percentage of gross revenues from hotel
operations, and incentive fees, which typically are calculated
based on a specified percentage of a hotels gross
operating profit. Service fees include fees derived from
accounting, design, construction and purchasing services and
technical assistance provided to managed hotels. In general, all
operating and other expenses are paid by the hotel owner and we
are reimbursed for our out-of-pocket expenses. We are also
required to recognize as revenue fees relating to payroll costs
for operational employees who work at certain of our managed
hotels. Although these costs are funded by hotel owners, we are
required to report these fees on a gross basis as both revenues
and expenses; there is no effect on our operating income.
We also earn revenues from the Wyndham Rewards loyalty program
when a member stays at a participating hotel. These revenues are
derived from a fee we charge based upon a percentage of room
revenues generated from such stay. These loyalty fees are
intended to reimburse us for expenses associated with
administering and marketing the program.
Reservation
Booking Channels
In 2010, hotels within our system sold 7.7% or approximately
77.7 million, of the one billion hotel room nights sold in
the U.S. and another 26.3 million hotel room nights
across other parts of the world. Over 95% of the hotels in our
system are in the economy and midscale segments of the global
lodging industry. Economy and midscale hotels are typically
located on highway roadsides for convenience to business and
leisure travelers. Therefore, the majority of hotel room nights
sold at these hotels is to guests who seek accommodations on a
walk-in basis, which we believe is attributable to the brand
reputation and recognition of the brand name.
For guests who book their hotel stay in advance, we booked on
behalf of hotels within our system a total of 32.0 million
room nights in 2010, which represents 41% of total bookings at
these hotels and includes 15.1 million room nights booked
through our Wyndham Rewards loyalty program.
Our most significant and fastest growing reservation channel is
the Internet, which includes proprietary websites for each of
our brands and for the Wyndham Rewards loyalty program, as well
as OTAs and other third-party Internet booking sources. In 2010,
we booked 17.4 million room nights through the Internet on
behalf of U.S. hotels within our system, representing 22.5% of
the total bookings at these hotels. Since 2005, bookings made
directly by customers on our brand websites have increased at a
five year CAGR of approximately 13.0%, and increased to over
7.8 million room nights in 2010, and bookings made through
OTAs and other third-party Internet booking sources increased at
a five year CAGR of approximately 19.0% to almost
9.6 million room nights in 2010.
Therefore, a key strategy for reservation delivery is the
continual investment in and optimization of our eCommerce
capabilities (websites, mobile and other online channels) as
well as the deployment of advertising spend to drive online
traffic to our proprietary eCommerce channels, including through
marketing agreements we have with travel related search websites
and affiliate networks. In addition, to ensure our franchisees
receive bookings from OTAs and other third-party Internet
sources, we provide direct connections between our central
reservations system and strategic third-party Internet booking
sources. These direct connections allow us to deliver more
accurate and consistent rates and inventory, send bookings
directly to our central systems without interference or delay
and reduce our franchise distribution costs.
Apart from the Internet, our call centers contributed almost
2.6 million room nights in 2010 which represents 3.4% of
the total bookings at the U.S. hotels within our system. We
maintain call centers in Saint John, Canada; Aberdeen, South
Dakota; and Manila, Philippines that handle bookings generated
through toll-free numbers for our brands.
Our global distribution partners, such as Sabre and Amadeus, and
global sales team also contributed a total of 2.5 million
room nights in 2010, which represents 3.2% of the total bookings
at the U.S. hotels within our system. Our global distribution
partners process reservations made by offline travel agents and
by any OTAs that do not have the ability to directly connect
with our reservation system. Our global sales team generates
sales from global and meeting planners, tour operators, travel
agents, government and military clients, and corporate and small
business accounts, to supplement the on-property sales efforts.
Loyalty
Program
The Wyndham Rewards program, which was introduced in 2003, has
grown steadily to become one of the lodging industrys
largest loyalty programs (based upon number of participating
properties). The diversity of our brands uniquely enables us to
meet our members leisure as well as business travel needs
across the greatest number of locations and a wide range of
price points. The Wyndham Rewards program is offered in the
U.S., Canada, Mexico, throughout Europe and in China. As of
December 31, 2010, there were 23.4 million members
enrolled in
9
the program of whom 8.1 million were active (members who
have either earned or redeemed within the last 18 months).
These members stay at our brands more often and drive
incremental room nights, higher ADR and a longer length of stay
than non-member guests.
Wyndham Rewards offers its members numerous ways to earn and
redeem points. Members accumulate points by staying in one of
almost 7,000 branded hotels participating in the program or by
purchasing everyday services and products using a co-branded
Wyndham Rewards credit card. Members also have the option to
earn points or airline miles with approximately 50 business
partners, including American Airlines, Continental Airlines,
Delta Airlines, US Airways, United Airlines, Southwest Airlines,
RCI, Endless Vacation Rentals, ResortQuest by Wyndham Vacation
Rentals, Alamo and National Car Rental, Avis Budget Group,
Amtrak, Aeromexico, Air China and BMI. When staying at one of
our franchised or managed hotels, Wyndham Rewards members may
elect to earn airline miles or rail points instead of Wyndham
Rewards points. Wyndham Rewards members have thousands of
options for redeeming their points including hotel stays,
airline tickets, resort vacations, car rentals, electronics,
sporting goods, movie and theme park tickets, and gift
certificates.
Additionally, the Wyndham ByRequest program, a unique program
featuring a communications package and personalized guest
amenities and services is offered exclusively at our Wyndham
Hotels and Resorts brand, Wingate by Wyndham brand and Hawthorn
by Wyndham brand, and will be offered at the Tryp by Wyndham,
Planet Hollywood, Dream and Night brands during 2011.
Marketing,
Sales and Revenue Management Services
Our brand marketing teams develop and implement global marketing
strategies for each of our hotel brands, including generating
consumer awareness of, and preference for each brand as well as
direct response activities designed to drive bookings through
our central reservation systems. While brand positioning and
strategy is generated from our U.S. headquarters, we have
seasoned marketing professionals positioned around the globe to
modify and implement these strategies on a local market level.
Our marketing efforts communicate the unique value proposition
of each of our individual brands, and are designed to build
consumer awareness and drive business to our hotels, either
directly or through our own reservation channels. We deploy a
variety of marketing strategies and tactics depending on the
needs of the specific brand and local market, including online
advertising, creative development, traditional media planning
and buying (radio, television and print), promotions,
sponsorships and direct marketing. Our Best Available Rate
guarantee gives consumers confidence to book directly with us by
providing the same rates regardless of whether they book through
our call centers, websites or other third party channel. In
addition, we leverage the strength of our Wyndham Rewards
program to develop meaningful marketing promotions and campaigns
to drive new and repeat business to hotels in our system. Our
Wyndham Rewards marketing efforts drive tens of millions of
consumer impressions through the programs channels and
through the programs partners channels.
Our global sales organization, strategically located throughout
the world, leverages the significant size of our portfolio and
our hotel brands to gain a larger share of business for each of
our hotels through relationship-based selling to a diverse range
of customers. Because our hotel portfolio meets the needs of all
types of travelers, we can find more complete solutions for a
client/company who may have travel needs ranging from economy to
upscale brands. We are able to accommodate travelers almost
anywhere business or leisure travelers go with our selection of
over 7,200 hotels throughout the world. The sales team is
deployed globally in key markets such as London, Mexico, Canada,
Korea, China, Singapore and throughout the U.S. in order to
leverage multidimensional customer needs for our hotels. The
global sales team also works with each hotel to identify the
hotels individual needs and then works to find the right
customers to stay with those brands and those hotels.
We offer revenue management services to help maximize revenues
of our hotel owners by improving rate and inventory management
capabilities and also coordinating all recommended revenue
programs delivered to our hotels in tandem with
e-commerce
and brand marketing strategies. Properties enrolled in our
revenue management services have experienced higher production
from call centers, websites and other channels, as well as
stronger RevPAR index performance. As a result, the almost 4,500
properties currently enrolled in the revenue management program
have experienced a 130 basis point improvement in RevPAR
index since enrolling in our revenue management services.
Property
Services
We continue to support our franchisees with a team of dedicated
support and service providers both field based and housed at our
corporate office. This team of industry veterans collaborates
with hotel owners on all aspects of their operations and creates
detailed and individualized strategies for success. By providing
key services, such as system integration, operations support,
training, strategic sourcing, and development planning and
construction, we are able to make a meaningful contribution to
the operations of the hotel resulting in more profits for our
hotel owners.
10
Our field services team, strategically dispersed worldwide,
integrates new properties into our system and helps existing
properties improve RevPAR performance and guest satisfaction.
Our training teams provide robust educational opportunities to
our hotel owners through instructor led, web-based and
electronic learning vehicles for a number of relevant topics.
Our strategic sourcing department helps franchisees control
costs by leveraging the buying power of the entire Wyndham
Worldwide organization to produce discounted prices on numerous
items necessary for the successful operation of a hotel, such as
linens and coffee. Our development planning and construction
team provides architectural and interior design guidance to
hotel owners to ensure compliance with brand standards,
including construction site visits and the creation of interior
design schemes.
We also provide hotel owners with property management system
software that synchronizes each hotels inventory with our
central reservations platform. These systems help hotel owners
manage their rooms inventory (room nights), rates (ADR) and
reservations, which leads to greater profits at the property
level and better enables us to deliver reservations at the right
price to our hotel owners.
Additionally, MyPortal, which is a property-focused intranet
website, is the key communication vehicle and a single access
point to all the information and tools available to help our
hotel owners manage their day-to-day activities.
New
Development
Our development team consists of 100 professionals dispersed
throughout the world, including in the U.S., China, U.K. and
Mexico. Our development efforts typically target existing
franchisees as well as hotel developers, owners of independent
hotels and owners of hotels leaving competitor brands.
Approximately 30% of the new rooms added in 2010 were with
franchisees or managed hotel owners already doing business with
us.
Our hotel management business gives us access to development
opportunities beyond pure play franchising transactions. When a
hotel owner is seeking both a brand and a manager for a
full-service hotel, we are able to couple these services in one
offering which we believe gives us a competitive advantage.
During 2010, our development team generated 732 applications for
new franchise
and/or
management agreements, of which 590, or 81%, resulted in new
franchise
and/or
management agreements. The difference is attributable to various
factors such as financing and agreement on contractual terms.
Once executed, about 70% of hotels open within the following six
months, while 10% open between six and 12 months and
another 10% open generally within 24 months. The remaining
may never open due to various factors such as financing.
As of December 31, 2010, we had approximately 102,700 rooms
pending opening in our development pipeline, of which 51% were
international and 55% were new construction.
In North America, we generally employ a direct franchise model
whereby we contract with and provide various services and
reservations assistance directly to independent owner-operators
of hotels. Under our direct franchise model, we principally
market our lodging brands to hotel developers, owners of
independent hotels and hotel owners who have the right to
terminate their franchise affiliations with other lodging
brands. We also market franchises to existing franchisees
because many own, or may own in the future, other hotels that
can be converted to one of our brands. Our standard franchise
agreement grants a franchisee the right to non-exclusive use of
the applicable franchise system in the operation of a single
hotel at a specified location, typically for a period of 15 to
20 years, and gives the franchisor and franchisee certain
rights to terminate the franchise agreement before its
conclusion under certain circumstances, such as upon the lapse
of a certain number of years after commencement of the
agreement. Early termination options in franchise agreements
give us flexibility to terminate franchised hotels if business
circumstances warrant. We also have the right to terminate a
franchise agreement for failure by a franchisee to bring its
property into compliance with contractual or quality standards
within specified periods of time, pay required franchise fees or
comply with other requirements of the franchise agreement.
Although we generally employ a direct franchise model in North
America, we expect to open and operate our first company-owned
hotel, The Wyndham Lake Buena Vista Hotel and Spa at Bonnet
Creek Resort, in late 2011. This hotel will be situated in our
Bonnet Creek vacation ownership resort near the Walt Disney
World®
resort in Florida and will enable us to leverage the synergies
of our companys hotel and vacation ownership components.
In other parts of the world, we employ a direct franchise model
or, where we are not yet ready to support the required
infrastructure for that region, we may employ a master franchise
model. Franchise agreements in regions outside of North America
may carry a lower fee structure based upon the breadth of
services we are prepared to provide in that particular region.
Under our master franchise model, we principally market our
lodging brands to third parties that assume the principal role
of franchisor, which entails selling individual franchise
agreements and providing quality assurance, marketing and
reservations support to franchisees. Since we provide only
limited services to master franchisors, the fees we receive in
connection with master franchise agreements are typically lower
than the fees we receive under a direct franchising model.
Master franchise agreements, which are individually
11
negotiated and vary among our different brands, typically
contain provisions that permit us to terminate the agreement if
the other party to the agreement fails to meet specified
development schedules. The terms of our master franchise
agreements generally are competitive with industry averages.
We also enter into affiliation relationships whereby we provide
our development, marketing and franchise services to brands
owned by our affiliated partners. These relationships give us
the ability to offer unique experiences to our guests and unique
brand concepts to developers seeking to do business with Wyndham
Hotel Group. Affiliation agreements typically carry lower
royalty fees since we do not incur costs associated with owning
the underlying intellectual property. Certain of these
affiliated relationships contain development targets whereby our
future development rights may be terminated upon failure to meet
the specified targets.
Strategies
Wyndham Hotel Group is strategically focused on the following
two objectives that we believe are essential to our business:
|
|
|
increasing our system size by adding new rooms and retaining the
properties that meet our performance criteria; and
|
|
|
strengthening our customer value proposition by driving revenues
to hotel owners operating under or affiliated with our brand
offerings.
|
To increase our system size, we intend to deploy specific
tactics to strengthen our leading position in the North America
market, which represents 88% of hotels in our global system. We
also expect to grow our system size outside North America, where
a relatively low percentage of hotels are branded. Our global
strategy generally focuses on pursuing new room growth
organically although we may consider the select acquisition of
brands that facilitate our strategic objectives. We intend to
increase the size of our system by deploying these primary
strategies:
|
|
|
targeting key markets globally where the Wyndham brand is
underrepresented and deploying a
hub-and-spoke
development strategy;
|
|
|
creating franchise conversion programs for our Super 8, Days Inn
and Ramada brands with a goal of reducing the average age of the
North America system;
|
|
|
spurring new construction growth in our Microtel and Wingate
brands by developing franchisee-financing options for
multi-unit
developers in North America;
|
|
|
introducing the Tryp by Wyndham brand to North America with
targeted development efforts in key markets and continuing to
increase its existing presence in Latin America and
Europe; and
|
|
|
targeting new construction and conversion opportunities in
China, the Middle East, United Kingdom and India for our
Wyndham, Ramada, Days Inn and Super 8 brands.
|
We recognize that the value we bring to hotel owners has a
direct impact on our ability to retain their property within our
system. This is why helping to make our franchisees and managed
hotels profitable, whether through incremental revenue, cost
efficiencies, operational excellence or better service, is a key
focus of Wyndham Hotel Group. We also believe that our ability
to attract new franchisees and hotel owners is greatly
influenced by demonstrating our value to existing franchisees
and hotel owners. We are enhancing this value through the launch
of a series of strategic initiatives in 2010, collectively known
as Apollo, with the goal of driving incremental
revenue to our franchised and managed hotels and strengthening
the value of our brands. These initiatives and other strategies
to strengthen our customer value proposition are:
|
|
|
improving consumer conversion on our brand web sites by
enhancing navigation, content, rate availability, and technology;
|
|
|
improving the overall content of our hotel brands across all web
channels;
|
|
|
optimizing rate information for hotel owners through all
distribution channels;
|
|
|
growing and strengthening our Wyndham Rewards loyalty
program; and
|
|
|
continuing the deployment of our exceptional service culture
tool, Count on Me!, into every aspect of the
business.
|
Seasonality
Franchise and management fees are generally higher in the second
and third quarters than in the first or fourth quarters of any
calendar year as a result of increased leisure travel and the
related ability to charge higher ADRs during the spring and
summer months.
12
Competition
Competition is robust among the lodging brand franchisors to
grow their franchise systems and retain their existing
franchisees. We believe existing and potential franchisees make
decisions based principally upon the perceived value and quality
of the brand and the services offered to franchisees. We further
believe that the perceived value of a brand name is, to some
extent, a function of the success of the existing hotels
franchised under the brands. We believe that existing and
prospective franchisees value a franchise based upon their views
of the relationship between the costs, including costs of
conversion and affiliation, to the benefits, including potential
for increased revenues and profitability, and upon the
reputation of the franchisor.
The ability of an individual franchisee to compete may be
affected by the location and quality of its property, the number
of competing properties in the vicinity, community reputation
and other factors. A franchisees success may also be
affected by general, regional and local economic conditions. The
potential negative effect of these conditions on our results of
operations is substantially reduced by virtue of the diverse
geographical locations of our franchised hotels and by the scale
of our franchisee base. Our franchise system is dispersed among
almost 5,600 franchisees, which reduces our exposure to any one
franchisee. No one franchisee accounts for more than 3% of our
franchised hotels or total segment revenues.
WYNDHAM
EXCHANGE & RENTALS
Vacation
Exchange and Rentals Industry
The over $60 billion global vacation exchange and rentals
industry is largely a fee-for-service business and has been a
growing segment of the hospitality industry. The industry offers
services and products to both leisure travelers and vacation
property owners. For leisure travelers, the industry offers
access to a range of fully-furnished vacation properties, which
include privately-owned vacation homes, villas, cottages,
apartments and condominiums, vacation ownership resorts,
inventory at hotels and resorts, boats and yachts. The industry
offers leisure travelers flexibility (subject to availability)
in time of travel and choice of lodging options in regions where
travelers may not typically have access to such choices. For
vacation property owners, affiliations with vacation exchange
companies allow owners of vacation intervals to exchange their
interests in vacation properties for vacation time at other
properties or for other various services and products.
Additionally, affiliation with vacation rental companies
provides property owners the ability to have their properties
marketed and rented and, in some instances, to transfer the
responsibility of managing such properties.
To participate in a vacation exchange, an owner generally
contributes their interval to an exchange companys network
and then indicates the particular resort or geographic area
where the owner would like to travel, the size of the unit
desired and the period during which the owner would like to
vacation. The exchange company then rates the owners
contributed intervals based upon a number of factors, including
the location and size of the unit or units, the quality of the
resort or resorts and the time period or periods during which
the intervals entitle the owner to vacation. An exchange may
then be completed based on these conditions. Exchange companies
generally derive revenues from owners of intervals by charging
exchange fees for facilitating exchanges and through annual
membership dues. In 2009, 72% of owners of intervals were
members of vacation exchange companies, and 54% of such owners
exchanged their intervals through such exchange companies.
The long-term trend in the vacation exchange industry has been
growth in the number of members of vacation exchange companies.
Current economic conditions have resulted in slower growth, but
we believe that an economic recovery will support a return to
stronger growth. In 2009, there were approximately
6.1 million members industry-wide who completed
approximately 3.3 million exchanges. Within the broader
long-term growth trend of the vacation exchange industry, there
is also a trend where timeshare developers are enrolling members
in private label clubs, where members have the option to
exchange within the club or through external exchange channels.
The club trend has a positive impact on the average number of
members, but a negative effect on the number of exchange
transactions per average member and revenue per member.
The vacation rental industry offers vacation property owners the
opportunity to rent their properties to leisure travelers for
periods of time. The vacation rental industry is not as
organized as the lodging industry in that the vacation rental
industry does not have global reservation systems or brands. The
industry is divided broadly into two segments. The first is the
serviced rental segment, where the homeowner provides their
property to an agent to rent, in a majority of cases, on an
exclusive basis and the agent receives a commission for
marketing the property, managing bookings and providing quality
assurance to the renter. The other segment of the industry is
the listing business, where there is no exclusive relationship
and the property owner pays a fixed fee for an online listing or
a directory listing with minimal additional services, typically
with no direct booking ability or quality assurance services.
Typically, serviced vacation rental companies collect rent in
advance and, after deducting the applicable commissions, remit
the net amounts due to the property owners
and/or
property managers. In addition to commissions, serviced vacation
rental companies may earn revenues from rental customers through
fees that are
13
incidental to the rental of the properties, such as fees for
travel services, local transportation,
on-site
services and insurance or similar types of products.
The global supply of vacation rental inventory is highly
fragmented with much of it being made available by individual
property owners. We believe that as of December 31, 2010,
there were approximately 1.3 million and 1.7 million
vacation properties available for rental in the U.S. and
Europe, respectively. In the U.S., the vacation properties
available for rental are primarily condominiums or stand-alone
houses. In Europe, the vacation properties available for rental
include individual homes and apartments, campsites and vacation
park bungalows. Individual owners of vacation properties in the
U.S. and Europe may own their properties as investments and
may sometimes use such properties for their own use for portions
of the year. We believe that the overall supply of vacation
rental properties has grown primarily because of the increasing
desire by existing owners of second homes to gain an earnings
stream evidenced by homes not previously offered for rent
appearing on the market.
We believe that the overall demand for vacation rentals has been
growing for the following reasons: (i) the consumer value
of renting a unit for an entire family; (ii) the increased
use of the Internet as a tool for facilitating vacation rental
transactions; and (iii) increased consumer awareness of
vacation rental options. The global demand per year for vacation
rentals is approximately 54 million vacation weeks,
34 million of which are rented by leisure travelers from
Europe. Demand for vacation rental properties is often regional
since many leisure travelers rent properties within driving
distance of their home. Some leisure travelers, however, travel
relatively long distances from their homes to vacation
properties in domestic or international destinations. Current
economic conditions have resulted in slower growth in the near
term, but we believe that long-term trends will support a return
to stronger growth.
The destinations where leisure travelers from Europe, the U.S.,
South Africa and Australia generally rent properties vary by
country of origin of the leisure travelers. Leisure travelers
from Europe generally rent properties in European destinations,
including the United Kingdom, Denmark, Ireland, Spain, France,
the Netherlands, Germany, Italy and Portugal. Demand from
European leisure travelers has recently been shifting beyond
traditional Western Europe, based on political stability across
Europe, increased accessibility of Eastern Europe and the
expansion of the European Union. Demand from U.S. leisure
travelers is focused on rentals in seaside destinations, such as
Hawaii, Florida and the Carolinas, in ski destinations such as
the Rocky Mountains, and in urban centers such as Las Vegas,
Nevada; and San Francisco, California. Demand is also
growing for destinations in Mexico and the Caribbean by leisure
travelers from the U.S.
Wyndham
Exchange & Rentals Overview
Wyndham Exchange & Rentals is largely a fee-for-service
business that provides vacation exchange services and products
to developers, managers and owners of intervals of vacation
ownership interests, and markets vacation rental properties. Our
vacation exchange and rentals business primarily derives its
revenues from fees which generate stable and predictable cash
flows. Our vacation exchange business, RCI, derives a majority
of its revenues from annual membership dues and exchange fees
for facilitating transactions. Our vacation exchange business
also derives revenues from ancillary services including
additional services provided to transacting members, programs
with affiliated resorts, club servicing and loyalty programs.
Our vacation rentals business primarily derives its revenues
from fees, which generally average between 15% and 45% of the
gross booking fees for non-proprietary inventory, except for
where we receive 100% of the revenues for properties that we own
or operate under long-term capital leases. Our vacation rentals
business also derives revenues from ancillary services delivered
to property owners and travelers. The revenues generated in our
vacation exchange and rentals business are substantially derived
from the direct customer relationships we have with our
3.8 million vacation exchange members, the affiliated
developers of over 4,000 resorts, our over 51,000 independent
property owners and our repeat vacation rentals customers. No
one external customer, developer or customer group accounts for
more than 2% of our vacation exchange and rentals revenues.
We are the worlds largest vacation exchange network based
on the number of vacation exchange members and the worlds
largest global marketers of vacation rental properties based on
the number of serviced vacation rental properties marketed. Our
vacation exchange and rentals business has access for specified
periods, in a majority of cases on an exclusive basis, to
approximately 97,000 vacation properties, which are comprised of
over 4,000 vacation ownership resorts around the world through
our vacation exchange business, and approximately 93,000
vacation rental properties with approximately 87,000 properties
located principally in Europe and approximately 6,000 located in
the U.S. Each year, our vacation exchange and rentals
business provides more than 4.9 million leisure-bound
families with vacation exchange and rentals services and
products. The properties available to leisure travelers through
our vacation exchange and rentals business include vacation
ownership condominiums, homes, villas, cottages, bungalows,
campgrounds, hotel rooms and suites, city apartments, fractional
private residences, luxury destination clubs and yachts. We
offer leisure travelers flexibility (subject to availability) as
to time of travel and a choice of lodging options in regions to
which such travelers may not typically have such ease of access,
and
14
we offer property owners marketing services, quality control
services and property management services ranging from
key-holding to full property maintenance for such properties.
Our vacation exchange and rentals business has over 150
worldwide offices. We market our services and products using ten
primary consumer brands and other related brands.
Vacation
Exchange
Through our vacation exchange business, RCI, we have
relationships with over 4,000 vacation ownership resorts in
approximately 100 countries. We have 3.8 million vacation
exchange members and generally retain more than 85% of members
each year, with the overall membership base currently stable and
expected to grow over time, and generate fees from members for
both annual membership subscriptions and transaction based
services. We acquire substantially all members of our exchange
programs indirectly. In substantially all cases, an affiliated
resort developer buys the initial term of an RCI membership on
behalf of the consumer when the consumer purchases a vacation
ownership interval. Generally, this initial term is either 1 or
2 years and entitles the vacation ownership interval
purchaser to receive periodicals published by RCI and to use the
applicable exchange program for an additional fee. The vacation
ownership interval purchaser generally pays for membership
renewals, or such member renewals are paid for on the
purchasers behalf by the developer. Additionally, such
purchaser generally pays any applicable fees for exchange
transactions.
RCI operates three worldwide exchange programs that have a
member base of vacation owners who are generally well-traveled
and who want flexibility and variety in their travel plans each
year. Our vacation exchange business three exchange
programs, which serve owners of intervals at affiliated resorts,
are
RCI®
Weeks, RCI
Points®
and The Registry
Collection®.
Participants in these vacation exchange programs pay annual
membership dues. For additional fees, participants are entitled
to exchange intervals for intervals at other properties
affiliated with our vacation exchange business. In addition,
certain participants may exchange intervals for other
leisure-related services and products. We refer to participants
in these three exchange programs as members.
The RCI Weeks exchange program is the worlds largest
vacation ownership exchange network and generally provides
members with the ability to trade week-long intervals in units
at their resorts for week-long intervals at the same resorts or
at comparable resorts. Additionally, with significant technology
enhancements that RCI made to its Weeks program in 2010, RCI
Weeks members are better able to understand the trading power
value of their vacation interval once deposited with RCI. Such
members can also combine deposited timeshare intervals which
allow them the ability to transact into higher-valued vacations
and receive a deposit credit if the value of their deposited
interval is greater than the interval that they have received by
exchange. See below under Internet for more information about
this comprehensive initiative.
The RCI Points exchange program, launched in 2000, is a global
points-based exchange network, which allocates points to
intervals that members cede to the exchange program. Under the
RCI Points exchange program, members may redeem their points for
the use of vacation properties in the exchange program or for
other services and products which may change from time to time,
such as airfare, car rentals, cruises, hotels and other
accommodations. When points are redeemed for these other
services and products, our vacation exchange business gains the
right to these points so it can rent vacation properties backed
by these points in order to recoup the expense of providing
other services and products. In 2010, RCI launched RCI Points
PlatinumSM membership, a premium level of membership and the
latest enhancement to its successful RCI Points exchange program
that offers exclusive exchange and lifestyle benefits to
subscribing members.
We believe that The Registry Collection exchange program is the
industrys largest and first global exchange network of
luxury vacation accommodations. The luxury vacation
accommodations in The Registry Collections network include
higher-end vacation ownership resorts, fractional ownership
resorts, condo-hotels and yachts. The Registry Collection
program allows members to exchange their intervals for the use
of other vacation properties within the network for a fee and
also offers access to other services and products, such as
cruises, yachts, adventure travel, hotels and other
accommodations. The members of The Registry Collection exchange
program often own greater than two-week intervals at affiliated
resorts.
Our vacation exchange business operates worldwide primarily in
the following regions: North America, Europe, Latin America,
Southern Africa, Asia, Pacific and the Middle East. We tailor
our strategies and operating plans for each of the geographical
environments where RCI has or seeks to develop a substantial
member base.
Vacation
Rentals
The vacation rental properties we market are principally
privately-owned villas, homes, cottages, bungalows, campgrounds,
apartments and condominiums that generally belong to independent
property owners. In addition to these properties, we market
inventory from our vacation exchange business and from other
sources. We generate fee income from marketing and renting these
properties to consumers. We currently make nearly
1.2 million vacation
15
rental bookings a year. We market vacation rental properties
under proprietary brand names, such as Landal GreenParks,
Hoseasons, Villas4You, cottages4you, English Country Cottages,
James Villa Holidays, Novasol, Dansommer, Cuendet, Canvas
Holidays, ResortQuest and Endless Vacation Rentals and through
select private-label arrangements. The following is a
description of some of our major vacation rental brands:
|
|
|
Novasol®
is one of continental Europes largest rental
companies, featuring properties in more than 20 European
countries including holiday homes in Denmark, Norway, Sweden,
France, Italy and Croatia, with over 29,000 exclusive holiday
homes available for rent through established brands such as
Novasol, Dansommer and Cuendet.
|
|
|
The Hoseasons Group operates a number of well-recognized
and established brands within the vacation rental market,
including Hoseasons, English Country Cottages, cottages4you,
Welcome Cottages and James Villa Holidays, and offers
unparalleled access to over 44,000 properties across the U.K.
and Europe.
|
|
|
Landal
GreenParks®
is one of Hollands leading holiday park companies,
with over 70 holiday parks offering approximately 11,000 holiday
park bungalows, villas and apartments in the Netherlands,
Germany, Belgium, Austria, Switzerland and the Czech Republic.
Every year more than 2 million guests visit Landals
parks, many of which offer dining, shopping and wellness
facilities.
|
|
|
Canvas Holidays is a specialist tour operator offering
luxury camping holidays in Europe at over 90 of the finest
European campsites with almost 3,000 accommodation units. It has
a wide choice of luxury accommodations spacious
lodges, comfortable mobile homes and the unique Maxi Tent, plus
an exciting range of childrens and family clubs.
|
|
|
ResortQuest is a leading provider of full-service,
wholly-owned vacation condominiums and home rentals in the
U.S. With more than 20 years of experience in the
industry, ResortQuest represents a portfolio of approximately
6,000 vacation rental properties in premier beach, ski, golf and
tennis resort destinations across North America from
ski-in/ski-out townhomes in Breckenridge, Colorado and Sundance
Film Festival lodging in Park City, Utah, to golf course villas
on Hilton Head Island in South Carolina and Gulf-front condos
along Floridas Emerald Coast.
|
Most of the rental activity under our brands takes place in
Europe and the U.S., although we have the ability to source and
rent inventory in approximately 100 countries. Our vacation
rentals business also has the opportunity to provide inventory
to our 3.8 million vacation exchange members.
Our vacation rentals business currently has relationships with
over 51,000 independent property owners in 32 countries,
including the Netherlands, United Kingdom, Germany, Denmark,
Sweden, France, Ireland, Belgium, Italy, Spain, Portugal,
Norway, Greece, Austria, Croatia, certain countries in Eastern
Europe, the U.S., the Pacific Rim and Latin America. Property
owners typically enter into one year or multi-year contracts
with our vacation rentals subsidiaries to market the rental of
their properties within our rental portfolio. Our vacation
rentals business also has an ownership interest in, or capital
leases under, approximately 10% of the properties in our Landal
GreenParks rental portfolio.
Customer
Development
In our vacation exchange business, we affiliate with vacation
ownership developers directly as a result of the efforts of our
in-house sales teams. Affiliated developers sign long-term
agreements each with a duration of up to 12 years. Our
members are acquired primarily through our affiliated developers
as part of the vacation ownership purchase process. In our
vacation rentals business, we primarily enter into exclusive
annual rental agreements with property owners. We market rental
properties online and offline to large databases of customers
which generate repeat bookings. Additional customers are sourced
through bookable websites and offline advertising and
promotions, and through the use of third-party travel agencies,
tour operators, and online distribution channels to drive
additional occupancy. We have a number of specific branded
websites, such as
http://www.cottages4you.co.uk
and
http://www.resortquest.com
as well as a new global portal highlighting all of our vacation
rental brands across product type and geography,
http://www.wyndhamvacationrentals.com,
to promote, sell and inform new customers about vacation
rentals. Given the diversified nature of our rental brands,
there is limited dependence on a single customer group or
business partner.
Loyalty
Program
Our U.S. vacation exchange business member loyalty
program is RCI Elite
Rewards®,
which offers a branded credit card, the RCI Elite Rewards credit
card. The card allows members to earn reward points that can be
redeemed for items related to our exchange programs, including
annual membership dues and exchange fees for transactions, and
other services and products offered by our vacation exchange
business or certain third parties, including airlines and
retailers.
16
Internet
Given the increasing interest of our members and rental
customers to transact on the Internet, we invest and will
continue to invest in cutting edge and innovative online
technologies to ensure that our members and rental customers
have access to similar information and services online that we
provide through our call centers. Through our comprehensive
http://www.RCI.com
initiative, we have launched enhanced search capabilities that
greatly simplify our search process and make it easier for a
member to find a desired vacation. We have also greatly expanded
our online content, including multiple resort pictures and
high-definition videos, to help educate members about potential
vacation options. Additionally, in 2010, we released a
significant series of technology enhancements to our members.
This new technology includes program enhancements for our RCI
Weeks Members that provide complete trading power transparency,
allowing members to better understand the trading power value of
the timeshare interval that they deposited with RCI and the
timeshare interval into which they want to exchange. Members
also have the ability to combine the timeshare intervals that
they have deposited with RCI for increased trading power and get
a deposit credit if the trading power value of their deposited
interval is greater than the interval that they have received by
exchange. We also have enhanced our ability to merchandise
offers through web only channels and have launched mobile
technologies such as applications for the
iPhone®
to access
http://www.RCI.com
functionality.
Over the last several years, we have improved our web
penetration for European rentals through enhancements that have
moved the majority of bookings online. As our online
distribution channels improve, members and rental customers will
shift from transacting business through our call centers to
transacting business online, which we expect will generate cost
savings. By offering our members and rental customers the
opportunity to transact business either through our call centers
or online, we offer our members and rental customers the ability
to use the distribution channel with which they are most
comfortable. Regardless of the distribution channel our members
and rental customers use, our goals are member and rental
customer satisfaction and retention.
Call
Centers
Our vacation exchange and rentals business also services its
members and rental customers through global call centers. The
requests that we receive at our global call centers are handled
by our vacation guides, who are trained to fulfill our
members and rental customers requests for vacation
exchanges and rentals. When our members and rental
customers primary choices are unavailable in periods of
high demand, our guides offer the next nearest match in order to
fulfill the members and rental customers needs. Call
centers are currently an important distribution channel and
therefore we invest resources and will continue to do so to
ensure that members and rental customers continue to receive a
high level of personalized customer service through our call
centers.
Marketing
We market to our members and rental customers through direct
mail and email, online distribution channels, brochures,
magazines and travel agencies. We recently launched a
comprehensive social media initiative including an RCI
application for the
iPhone®
and iPod
touch®,
a Facebook fan page, a Twitter account and the RCI Blog. Our
vacation exchange and rentals business has over 100 publications
involved in the marketing of the business. Our vacation exchange
and rentals business also publishes resort directories and other
periodicals related to the vacation and vacation ownership
industry and other travel-related services. We use our
publications not only for marketing, but also for member and
rental customer retention. Additionally, we promote our
offerings to owners of resorts and homes through publications,
trade shows, online and other marketing efforts.
Strategies
We intend to grow our vacation exchange and rentals business
profitability by focusing on five strategic themes:
|
|
|
Inspire world-class associate engagement and Count On
Me! service so that we will deliver better services and
products, resulting in improved customer satisfaction and
optimal business growth;
|
|
|
Invest in technology to improve the customer experience, grow
market share and reduce costs;
|
|
|
Offer more options to our guests by expanding into new
geographic markets and product lines;
|
|
|
Develop compelling new services and products by improving our
analytic process; and
|
|
|
Promote the benefits of timeshare and vacation rentals to new
customer segments.
|
Our plans generally focus on pursuing these strategies
organically. However, in appropriate circumstances, we will
consider opportunities to acquire businesses, both domestic and
international.
17
Seasonality
Vacation exchange and rentals revenues are generally higher in
the first and third quarters than in the second or fourth
quarters. Vacation exchange transaction revenues are normally
highest in the first quarter, which is generally when members of
RCI plan and book their vacations for the year. Rental
transaction revenues earned are usually highest in the third
quarter, when vacation rentals are highest. More than half of
our vacation rental customers book their reservations within
11 weeks of departure dates and more than 70% of our rental
customers book their reservations within 20 weeks of
departure dates, reflecting recent trends of bookings closer to
the travel date.
Competition
The vacation exchange and rentals business faces competition
throughout the world. Our vacation exchange business competes
with a third-party international exchange company, with regional
and local vacation exchange companies and with Internet-only
limited service exchanges. In addition, certain developers offer
exchanges through internal networks of properties, which can be
operated by us or by the developer, that offer owners of
intervals access to exchanges other than those offered by our
vacation exchange business. Our vacation rentals business faces
competition from a broad variety of professional vacation rental
managers and
rent-by-owner
channels that collectively use brokerage services, direct
marketing and the Internet to market and rent vacation
properties.
WYNDHAM
VACATION OWNERSHIP
Vacation
Ownership Industry
The global vacation ownership industry, which is also referred
to as the timeshare industry, is an important component of the
domestic and international hospitality industry. The vacation
ownership industry enables customers to share ownership of a
fully-furnished vacation accommodation. Typically, a vacation
ownership purchaser acquires either a fee simple interest in a
property, which gives the purchaser title to a fraction of a
unit, or a right to use a property, which gives the purchaser
the right to use a property for a specific period of time.
Generally, a vacation ownership purchasers fee simple
interest in or right to use a property is referred to as a
vacation ownership interest. For many vacation
ownership interest purchasers, vacation ownership is an
attractive vacation alternative to traditional lodging
accommodations at hotels or owning vacation properties. Owners
of vacation ownership interests are not subject to the variance
in room rates to which lodging customers are subject, and
vacation ownership units are, on average, more than twice the
size of traditional hotel rooms and typically have more
amenities, such as kitchens, than do traditional hotel rooms.
The vacation ownership concept originated in Europe during the
late 1960s and spread to the U.S. shortly thereafter. The
vacation ownership industry expanded slowly in the
U.S. until the mid-1980s. From the mid-1980s through 2007,
the vacation ownership industry grew at a double-digit CAGR,
although sales slowed by approximately 8% in 2008 and
experienced even greater declines in 2009 due to the global
recession and a significant disruption in the credit markets.
Based on research by the American Resort Development Association
or ARDA, a trade association representing the vacation ownership
and resort development industries, domestic sales of vacation
ownership interests were approximately $6.3 billion in 2010
compared to $6.5 billion in 2003. ARDA estimated that in
2009, there were approximately 8 million households that
owned one or more vacation ownership interests in the U.S.
Based on published industry data, we believe that the following
factors have contributed to the substantial growth, particularly
in North America, of the vacation ownership industry over the
past two decades:
|
|
|
inherent appeal of a timeshare vacation option as opposed to a
hotel stay;
|
|
|
improvement in quality of resorts and resort management and
servicing;
|
|
|
increased flexibility for owners of vacation ownership interests
made possible through owners affiliations with vacation
ownership exchange companies and vacation ownership
companies internal exchange programs;
|
|
|
entry of widely-known lodging and entertainment companies into
the industry; and
|
|
|
increased consumer confidence in the industry based on enhanced
consumer protection regulation of the industry.
|
Demographic factors explain, in part, the growth of the
industry. A 2010 study of recent vacation ownership purchasers
revealed that the average purchaser was 52 years of age and
had a median household income of $78,400. The average purchaser
in the U.S., therefore, is a baby boomer who has disposable
income and interest in purchasing vacation products. We believe
that baby boomers will continue to have a positive influence on
the vacation ownership industry.
18
According to information compiled by ARDA, four primary reasons
consumers cite for purchasing vacation ownership interests are:
(i) flexibility with respect to different locations, unit
sizes and times of year, (ii) the certainty of quality
accommodations, (iii) credibility of the timeshare company
and (iv) the opportunity to exchange into other resort
locations. According to a 2010 ARDA study, nearly 84% of owners
of vacation ownership interests expressed satisfaction with
owning timeshare. With respect to exchange opportunities, most
owners of vacation ownership interests can exchange vacation
ownership interests through exchange companies and through the
applicable vacation ownership companys internal network of
properties.
Wyndham
Vacation Ownership Overview
Wyndham Vacation Ownership, our vacation ownership business,
includes marketing and sales of vacation ownership interests,
consumer financing in connection with the purchase by
individuals of vacation ownership interests, property management
services to property owners associations and development
and acquisition of vacation ownership resorts. We operate our
vacation ownership business through our two primary brands,
Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham. In October
1999, WorldMark by Wyndham formed Wyndham Vacation Resorts Asia
Pacific Pty. Ltd., a New South Wales corporation, or Wyndham
Asia Pacific, as its direct wholly owned subsidiary for the
purpose of conducting sales, marketing and resort development
activities in the South Pacific. Wyndham Asia Pacific is
currently the largest vacation ownership business in Australia.
We have the largest vacation ownership business in the world as
measured by the number of vacation ownership resorts, vacation
ownership units and owners of vacation ownership interests and
by annual revenues associated with the sale of vacation
ownership interests. As of December 31, 2010, we have
developed or acquired over 160 vacation ownership resorts in the
U.S., Canada, Mexico, the Caribbean and the South Pacific that
represent approximately 20,500 individual vacation ownership
units and over 814,000 owners of vacation ownership interests.
During 2010, Wyndham Vacation Ownership expanded its portfolio
with the addition of resorts in Orlando, Florida; Myrtle Beach,
South Carolina; and Australia and added additional inventory at
locations in Orlando, Florida; Australia; and New Zealand.
In response to worldwide economic conditions impacting the
general availability of credit on which our vacation ownership
business has historically been reliant, we announced in late
2008 a plan to reduce our 2009 gross VOI sales by
approximately 40% in order to reduce our need to access the
asset-backed securities markets during 2009 and beyond, and also
significantly reduce costs and capital needs while enhancing
cash flow. Accordingly, during 2009, we recorded approximately
$1.3 billion in gross vacation ownership interest sales, a
reduction over 2008. In 2010, we recorded gross VOI sales
of $1.5 billion which includes $51 million of WAAM
sales.
Our primary vacation ownership brands, Wyndham Vacation Resorts
and WorldMark by Wyndham, operate vacation ownership programs
through which vacation ownership interests can be redeemed for
vacations through points- or credits-based internal reservation
systems that provide owners with flexibility (subject to
availability) as to resort location, length of stay, unit type
and time of year. The points-or credits-based reservation
systems offer owners redemption opportunities for other travel
and leisure products that may be offered from time to time, and
the opportunity for owners to use our products for one or more
vacations per year based on level of ownership. Our vacation
ownership programs allow us to market and sell our vacation
ownership products in variable quantities as opposed to the
fixed quantity of the traditional, fixed-week vacation
ownership, which is primarily sold on a weekly interval basis,
and to offer to existing owners upgrade sales to
supplement such owners existing vacation ownership
interests. Although we operate Wyndham Vacation Resorts and
WorldMark by Wyndham as separate brands, we have integrated
substantially all of the business functions of Wyndham Vacation
Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham, including consumer finance,
information technology, certain staff functions, product
development and certain marketing activities.
Our vacation ownership business derives a majority of its
revenues from sales of vacation ownership interests and derives
other revenues from consumer financing and property management.
Because revenues from sales of vacation ownership interests and
consumer finance in connection with such sales depend on the
number of vacation ownership units in which we sell vacation
ownership interests, increasing the number of such units is
important in achieving our revenue goals. Because revenues from
property management depend on the number of units we manage,
increasing the number of such units has a direct effect of
increasing our revenues from property management.
Sales and
Marketing of Vacation Ownership Interests
Vacation Ownership Interests, Portfolio of Resorts and
Maintenance Fees. The vacation ownership interests
that Wyndham Vacation Resorts markets and sells consist
primarily of undivided interests that entitle an owner to
ownership and usage rights that are not restricted to a
particular week of the year. As of December 31, 2010, over
519,000 owners held interests in Wyndham Vacation Resorts resort
properties. Wyndham Vacation Resorts properties
19
are located primarily in the U.S. and, as of
December 31, 2010, consisted of 76 resorts (six of which
are shared with WorldMark by Wyndham) that represented
approximately 13,200 units. During 2010, Wyndham Vacation
Resorts opened new properties in Orlando, Florida and Myrtle
Beach, South Carolina and added inventory at existing properties
in Orlando, Florida.
The majority of the resorts in which Wyndham Vacation Resorts
develops, markets and sells vacation ownership and other real
estate interests are destination resorts that are located at or
near attractions such as the Walt Disney
World®
Resort in Florida; the Las Vegas Strip in Nevada; Myrtle Beach
in South Carolina; Colonial
Williamsburg®
in Virginia; and the Hawaiian Islands. Most Wyndham Vacation
Resorts properties are affiliated with Wyndham Worldwides
vacation exchange business, RCI, which annually awards to the
top 25-35%
of RCI affiliated vacation ownership resorts throughout the
world, designations of an RCI Gold Crown
Resort®
winner or an RCI Silver Crown
Resort®
winner for exceptional resort standards and service levels.
Among Wyndham Vacation Resorts 76 resort properties, 57
have been awarded designations of an RCI Gold Crown Resort
winner or an RCI Silver Crown Resort winner.
After WorldMark by Wyndham or Wyndham Asia Pacific develops or
acquires resorts, it conveys the resorts to WorldMark, The Club
or WorldMark South Pacific Club, which we refer collectively as
the Clubs, as applicable. In exchange for the conveyances,
WorldMark by Wyndham or Wyndham Asia Pacific receives the
exclusive rights to sell the vacation credits associated with
the conveyed resorts and to receive the proceeds from the sales
of the vacation credits. Vacation ownership interests sold by
WorldMark by Wyndham and Wyndham Asia Pacific represent credits
in the Clubs which entitle the owner of the credits to reserve
units at the resorts that are owned and operated by the Clubs.
Although vacation credits, unlike vacation ownership interests
in Wyndham Vacation Resorts resort properties, do not constitute
deeded interests in real estate, vacation credits are regulated
in most jurisdictions by the same agency that regulates vacation
ownership interests evidenced by deeded interests in real
estate. As of December 31, 2010, approximately 295,000
owners held vacation credits in the Clubs.
WorldMark by Wyndham resorts are located primarily in the
Western U.S., Canada, Mexico and the South Pacific and, as of
December 31, 2010, consisted of 92 resorts (six of which
are shared with Wyndham Vacation Resorts) that represented
approximately 7,300 units. Of the WorldMark by Wyndham
resorts and units, Wyndham Asia Pacific has a total of 21
resorts with approximately 800 units. During 2010,
WorldMark by Wyndham opened new properties in Australia and
added inventory at existing properties located in Australia and
New Zealand.
The resorts in which WorldMark by Wyndham develops, markets and
sells vacation credits are primarily drive-to resorts. Most
WorldMark by Wyndham resorts are affiliated with Wyndham
Worldwides vacation exchange subsidiary, RCI. Among
WorldMark by Wyndhams 92 resorts, 62 have been awarded
designations of an RCI Gold Crown Resort winner or an RCI Silver
Crown Resort winner.
Owners of vacation ownership interests pay annual maintenance
fees to the property owners associations responsible for
managing the applicable resorts or to the Clubs. The annual
maintenance fee associated with the average vacation ownership
interest purchased ranges from approximately $400 to
approximately $900. These fees generally are used to renovate
and replace furnishings, pay operating, maintenance and cleaning
costs, pay management fees and expenses, and cover taxes (in
some states), insurance and other related costs. Wyndham
Vacation Ownership, as the owner of unsold inventory at resorts
or unsold interests in the Clubs, also pays maintenance fees in
accordance with the legal requirements of the states or
jurisdictions in which the resorts are located. In addition, at
certain newly-developed resorts, Wyndham Vacation Ownership
sometimes enters into subsidy agreements with the property
owners associations to cover costs that otherwise would be
covered by annual maintenance fees payable with respect to
vacation ownership interests that have not yet been sold.
Club Wyndham Plus. Wyndham Vacation Resorts
uses a points-based internal reservation system called Club
Wyndham Plus (formerly known as FairShare Plus) to provide
owners with flexibility (subject to availability) as to resort
location, length of stay, unit type and time of year. With the
launch of Club Wyndham Plus in 1991, Wyndham Vacation Resorts
became one of the first U.S. developers of vacation
ownership properties to move from traditional, fixed-week
vacation ownership to a points-based program. Owners of vacation
ownership interests in Wyndham Vacation Resorts properties that
are eligible to participate in the program may elect, and with
respect to certain resorts are obligated, to participate in Club
Wyndham Plus.
Wyndham Vacation Resorts currently offers two vacation ownership
programs, Club Wyndham Select and Club Wyndham Access. Club
Wyndham Select owners purchase an undivided interest at a select
resort and receive a deed to that resort, which becomes their
home resort. Club Wyndham Access owners do not
directly receive a deed, but own an interest in a perpetual
club. Through Club Wyndham Plus, Club Wyndham Access owners have
advanced reservation priority access to the multiple Wyndham
Vacation Resorts locations based on the amount of inventory
deeded to Club Wyndham Access. Both vacation ownership options
utilize Club Wyndham Plus as the internal exchange program to
expand owners vacation opportunities.
20
Owners who participate in Club Wyndham Plus assign their use
rights to a trust in exchange for the right to reserve in the
internal reservation system. The number of points that an owner
receives as a result of the assignment to the trust of the
owners use rights, and the number of points required to
take a particular vacation, is set forth on a published schedule
and varies depending on the resort location, length of stay,
unit type and time of year associated with the interests
assigned to the trust or requested by the owner, as applicable.
Participants in Club Wyndham Plus may choose (subject to
availability) the Wyndham Vacation Resorts resort properties,
length of stay, unit types and times of year, depending on the
number of points to which they are entitled and the number of
points required to take the vacations of their preference.
Participants in the program may redeem their points not only for
resort stays, but also for other travel and leisure products
that may be offered from time to time. Owners of vacation points
are able to borrow vacation points from the next year for use in
the current year. Wyndham Vacation Resorts offers various
programs that provide existing owners with the opportunity to
upgrade, or acquire additional vacation ownership
interests to increase the number of points such owners can use
in Club Wyndham Plus.
WorldMark, The Club and WorldMark South Pacific
Club. The Clubs provide owners of vacation credits
with flexibility (subject to availability) as to resort
location, length of stay, unit type and time of year. Depending
on how many vacation credits an owner has purchased, the owner
may use the vacation credits for one or more vacations annually.
The number of vacation credits that are required for each
days stay at a unit is listed on a published schedule and
varies depending upon the resort location, unit type, time of
year and the day of the week. Owners may also redeem their
credits for other travel and leisure products that may be
offered from time to time.
Owners of vacation credits are also able to purchase bonus time
from the Clubs for use when space is available. Bonus time gives
owners the opportunity to use available resorts on short notice
and at a reduced rate and to obtain usage beyond owners
allotments of vacation credits. In addition, WorldMark by
Wyndham offers owners the opportunity to upgrade, or
acquire additional vacation credits to increase the number of
credits such owners can use in the Clubs.
Owners of vacation credits can make reservations through the
Clubs, or may elect to join and exchange their vacation
ownership interests through Wyndhams vacation exchange
business, RCI, or other third-party international exchange
companies.
Property
Management
Program, Property and Club Management. In
exchange for management fees, Wyndham Vacation Resorts, itself
or through a Wyndham Vacation Resorts affiliate, manages Club
Wyndham Plus, the majority of property owners associations
at resorts in which Wyndham Vacation Resorts develops, markets
and sells vacation ownership interests, and property
owners associations at resorts developed by third parties.
On behalf of Club Wyndham Plus, Wyndham Vacation Resorts or its
affiliate manages the reservation system for Club Wyndham Plus
and provides owner services and billing and collections
services. The term of the trust agreement of Club Wyndham Plus
runs through December 31, 2025, and the term is
automatically extended for successive ten year periods unless a
majority of the members of the program vote to terminate the
trust agreement prior to the expiration of the term then in
effect. The term of the management agreement, under which
Wyndham Vacation Resorts manages the Club Wyndham Plus program,
is for five years and is automatically renewed annually for
successive terms of five years, provided the trustee under the
program does not serve notice of termination to Wyndham Vacation
Resorts at the end of any calendar year. On behalf of property
owners associations, Wyndham Vacation Resorts or its
affiliates generally provide day-to-day management for vacation
ownership resorts, including oversight of housekeeping services,
maintenance and refurbishment of the units, and provides certain
accounting and administrative services to property owners
associations.
We receive fees for such property management services which are
generally based upon total costs to operate such resorts. Fees
for property management services typically approximate 10% of
budgeted operating expenses. We incur certain reimbursable costs
which principally relate to the payroll costs for management of
the associations, club and resort properties where we are the
employer. Property management revenues were $405 million,
$376 million, and $346 million during 2010, 2009 and
2008, respectively. Property management revenue is comprised of
management fee revenue and reimbursable revenue. Management fee
revenues were $183 million, $170 million and
$159 million during 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively.
Reimbursable revenues were $222 million, $206 million,
and $187 million respectively during 2010, 2009, and 2008.
Reimbursable revenues are based upon cost with no added margin
and thus, have little or no impact on our operating income. The
terms of the property management agreements with the property
owners associations at resorts in which Wyndham Vacation
Resorts develops, markets and sells vacation ownership interests
vary; however, the vast majority of the agreements provide a
mechanism for automatic renewal upon expiration of the terms. At
some established sites, the property owners associations
have entered into property management agreements with
professional management companies other than Wyndham Vacation
Resorts or its affiliates.
21
In exchange for management fees, WorldMark by Wyndham, itself or
through a WorldMark by Wyndham affiliate, serves as the
exclusive property manager and servicing agent of the Clubs and
all resort units owned or operated by the Clubs. On behalf of
the Clubs, WorldMark by Wyndham or its affiliate provides
day-to-day management for vacation ownership resorts, including
oversight of housekeeping services, maintenance and
refurbishment of the units, and provides certain accounting and
administrative services. WorldMark by Wyndham or its affiliate
also manages the reservation system for the Clubs and provides
owner services and billing and collections services.
Sales and
Marketing Channels and Programs
Wyndham Vacation Ownership employs a variety of marketing
channels as part of Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by
Wyndham marketing programs to encourage prospective owners of
vacation ownership interests to tour Wyndham Vacation Ownership
properties and attend sales presentations at off-site sales
offices. Our resort-based sales centers also enable us to
actively solicit upgrade sales to existing owners of vacation
ownership interests while such owners vacation at our resort
properties. Sales of vacation ownership interests relating to
upgrades represented approximately 68%, 64% and 51% of our net
sales of vacation ownership interests during 2010, 2009 and
2008, respectively.
Wyndham Vacation Ownership uses a variety of marketing programs
to attract prospective owners, including sponsored contests that
offer vacation packages or gifts, targeted mailings, outbound
and inbound telemarketing efforts, and in association with
Wyndham Worldwide hotel brands, associated loyalty and other
co-branded marketing programs and events. Wyndham Vacation
Ownership also co-sponsors sweepstakes, giveaways and
promotional programs with professional teams at major sporting
events and with other third parties at other high-traffic
consumer events. Where permissible under state law, Wyndham
Vacation Ownership offers existing owners cash awards or other
incentives for referrals of new owners. New owner acquisition is
an important strategy for Wyndham Vacation Ownership in order to
continue to build our pool of lifetime buyers of
vacation ownership. New owners will enable Wyndham Vacation
Ownership to solicit upgrade sales in the future. During 2010,
we added approximately 22,000 new owners to our pool of
lifetime buyers which may ultimately become repeat
buyers of vacation ownership interests as they upgrade.
Wyndham Vacation Ownerships marketing and sales activities
are often facilitated through marketing alliances with other
travel, hospitality, entertainment, gaming and retail companies
that provide access to such companies present and past
customers through a variety of co-branded marketing offers.
Wyndham Vacation Ownerships resort-based sales centers,
which are located in popular travel destinations throughout the
U.S., generate substantial tour flow through providing local
offers. The sales centers enable Wyndham Vacation Ownership to
market to tourists already visiting destination areas. Wyndham
Vacation Ownerships marketing agents, which often operate
on the premises of the hospitality, entertainment, gaming and
retail companies with which Wyndham Vacation Ownership has
alliances within these markets, solicit local tourists with
offers relating to activities and entertainment in exchange for
the tourists visiting the local resorts and attending sales
presentations.
An example of a marketing alliance through which Wyndham
Vacation Ownership markets to tourists already visiting
destination areas is Wyndham Vacation Ownerships current
arrangement with Harrahs Entertainment in Las Vegas,
Nevada, which enables Wyndham Vacation Ownership to operate
concierge-style marketing kiosks throughout Harrahs Casino
that permit Wyndham Vacation Ownership to solicit patrons to
attend tours and sales presentations with Harrahs-related
rewards and entertainment offers, such as gaming chips, show
tickets and dining certificates. Wyndham Vacation Ownership also
operates its primary Las Vegas sales center within Harrahs
Casino and regularly shuttles prospective owners targeted by
such sales centers to and from Wyndham Vacation Ownerships
nearby resort property.
Wyndham Vacation Ownership offers a variety of entry-level
programs and products as part of its sales strategies. One such
program allows prospective owners to acquire one-years
worth of points or credits with no further obligations; another
such product is a biennial interest that provides for vacations
every other year. As part of its sales strategies, Wyndham
Vacation Ownership relies on its points/credits-based programs,
which provide prospective owners with the flexibility to buy
relatively small packages of points or credits, which can be
upgraded at a later date. To facilitate upgrades among existing
owners, Wyndham Vacation Ownership markets opportunities for
owners to purchase additional points or credits through periodic
marketing campaigns and promotions to owners while those owners
vacation at Wyndham Vacation Ownership resort properties.
Wyndham Vacation Ownerships resort-based sales centers
also enable Wyndham Vacation Ownership to actively market
upgrade sales to existing owners of vacation ownership interests
while such owners vacation at Wyndham Vacation Ownership resort
properties. In addition, we also operate a telesales program
designed to market upgrade sales to existing owners of our
products.
22
Purchaser
Financing
Wyndham Vacation Ownership offers financing to purchasers of
vacation ownership interests. By offering consumer financing, we
are able to reduce the initial cash required by customers to
purchase vacation ownership interests, thereby enabling us to
attract additional customers and generate substantial
incremental revenues and profits. Wyndham Vacation Ownership
funds and services loans extended by Wyndham Vacation Resorts
and WorldMark by Wyndham through our consumer financing
subsidiary, Wyndham Consumer Finance, a wholly owned subsidiary
of Wyndham Vacation Resorts based in Las Vegas, Nevada that
performs loan financing, servicing and related administrative
functions.
Wyndham Vacation Ownership typically performs a credit
investigation or other review or inquiry into every
purchasers credit history before offering to finance a
portion of the purchase price of the vacation ownership
interest. The interest rate offered to participating purchasers
is determined by an automated underwriting based upon the
purchasers credit score, the amount of the down payment
and the size of purchase. Wyndham Vacation Ownership uses a FICO
score which is a branded version of a consumer credit score
widely used within the U.S. by the largest banks and
lending institutions. FICO scores range from 300 850
and are calculated based on information obtained from one or
more of the three major U.S. credit reporting agencies that
compile and report on a consumers credit history. Our
weighted average FICO score on new originations for 2010 and
2009 was approximately 725, reflecting an approximate 30 point
increase since the Companys realignment in 2008. Wyndham
Vacation Ownership offers purchasers an interest rate reduction
if they participate in our pre-authorized checking programs,
pursuant to which our consumer financing subsidiary each month
debits a purchasers bank account or major credit card in
the amount of the monthly payment by a pre-authorized fund
transfer on the payment date.
During 2010, we generated new receivables of $983 million
on gross vacation ownership sales, net of WAAM sales, of
$1.4 billion, which amounts to 70% of vacation ownership
sales being financed. However, the 70% is prior to the receipt
of addenda cash. Addenda cash represents the cash received for
full payment of a loan within 15 to 60 days of origination.
After the application of addenda cash, approximately 56% of
vacation ownership sales are financed, with the remaining 44%
being cash sales.
Wyndham Vacation Ownership generally requires a minimum down
payment of 10% of the purchase price on all sales of vacation
ownership interests and offer consumer financing for the
remaining balance for up to ten years. While the minimum is
generally 10%, during 2010, our average down payment was
approximately 23% for financed sales of vacation ownership
interests. These loans are structured so that we receive equal
monthly installments that fully amortize the principal due by
the final due date.
Similar to other companies that provide consumer financing, we
historically securitize a majority of the receivables originated
in connection with the sales of vacation ownership interests. We
initially place the financed contracts into a revolving
warehouse securitization facility generally within 30 to
90 days after origination. Many of the receivables are
subsequently transferred from the warehouse securitization
facility and placed into term securitization facilities.
Servicing
and Collection Procedures
Our consumer financing subsidiary is responsible for the
maintenance of contract receivables files and all customer
service, billing and collection activities related to the
domestic loans we extend. We assess the performance of our loan
portfolio by monitoring numerous metrics including collections
rates, defaults by state residency and bankruptcies. Our
consumer financing subsidiary also manages the selection and
processing of loans pledged or to be pledged in our warehouse
and term securitization facilities. As of December 31,
2010, our loan portfolio was 95.4% current (i.e., not more than
30 days past due).
Strategies
Wyndham Vacation Ownership is strategically focused on the
following objectives that we believe are essential to our
business:
|
|
|
maximize cash flow;
|
|
|
further strengthening the financial profile of the business
through the continued development of our asset light business
model;
|
|
|
drive greater sales and marketing efficiencies at all
levels; and
|
|
|
delivering Count On Me! service to our customers,
partners and associates.
|
Manage for Cash Flow. We plan to increasingly
manage our business for cash flow by improving the quality of
our loan portfolio through maintaining more restrictive
financing terms for customers that fall within lower credit
classifications, seeking higher down payments at the time of
sale and strengthening the effectiveness of our collections
efforts. We will continue to streamline our balance sheet
through controlled development spending and selling through our
existing finished inventory. Additionally, we will continue to
generate recurring income
23
associated with (i) property management fees,
(ii) interest income from our large pool of receivables,
and (iii) upgrade sales from our deeply loyal customer base.
Wyndham Asset Affiliation Model
(WAAM). We also plan to expand our
fee-for-service timeshare sales model designed to capitalize
upon the large quantities of newly developed, nearly completed
or recently finished condominium or hotel inventory within the
current real estate market without assuming the significant cost
that accompanies new construction. This business model offers
turn-key solutions for developers or banks in possession of
newly developed inventory, which we sell for a fee through our
extensive sales and marketing channels. WAAM enables us to
expand our resort portfolio with little or no capital
deployment, while providing additional channels for new owner
acquisition and growth for our fee-for-service consumer
financing, servicing operations and property management
business. During 2010, we commenced sales in connection with two
WAAM projects one in South Carolina and another in
Florida and in early 2011, we signed two additional WAAM
projects one in Vermont and another on the Florida
Gulf coast. In 2010, we had $51 million in WAAM sales which
represents 3% of gross VOI sales. We expect to have WAAM sales
of approximately 15% to 20% of gross VOI sales within the next
several years.
Drive Greater Sales and Marketing
Efficiency. We plan to drive greater sales and
marketing efficiencies by aggressively applying strengthened
tour qualification standards. We expect to thus limit our
marketing activities to only the highest quality prospects both
in terms of such persons interest in purchasing our
products and their demonstrated ability to self-finance
and/or
qualify for our more restrictive financing terms.
We will continue to focus our efforts on current owners, who are
our most reliable marketing prospects and the most efficient
from a marketing standpoint, as well as highly qualified
prospect categories including certain existing Wyndham Hotel
Group customers and consumers affiliated with the Wyndham
Rewards and Wyndham By Request loyalty programs, for example. We
are also focusing our efforts on new owner acquisition as this
will continue to build our pool of lifetime buyers
of vacation ownership. We believe this market is underpenetrated
and estimate there are 53 million households which we
consider as potential purchasers of vacation ownership
interests. During 2010, we added approximately 22,000 new owners
to our pool of lifetime buyers. We will also seek to
develop and market mixed-use hotel and vacation ownership
properties in conjunction with the Wyndham brand. The mixed-use
properties would afford us access to both hotel clients in
higher income demographics for the purpose of marketing vacation
ownership interests and hotel inventory for use in our marketing
programs.
Delivering
Count On Me! Service
Wyndham Vacation Ownership is committed to providing exceptional
customer service to its owners and guests at every interaction.
We consistently monitor our progress by inviting service
feedback at key customer touch points, including point of sale,
post-vacation experience, and annual owner surveys, which gauge
service performance in a variety of areas and identify
improvement opportunities. The Companys service culture
also extends to associates, who make are committed to be
responsive, be respectful, and to deliver a great experience to
owners, guests, partners, our communities and each other.
Seasonality
We rely, in part, upon tour flow to generate sales of vacation
ownership interests; consequently, sales volume tends to
increase in the spring and summer months as a result of greater
tour flow from spring and summer travelers. Revenues from sales
of vacation ownership interests therefore are generally higher
in the second and third quarters than in other quarters. We
cannot predict whether these seasonal trends will continue in
the future.
Competition
The vacation ownership industry is highly competitive and is
comprised of a number of companies specializing primarily in
sales and marketing, consumer financing, property management and
development of vacation ownership properties. In addition, a
number of national hospitality chains develop and sell vacation
ownership interests to consumers.
TRADEMARKS
Our brand names and related trademarks, service marks, logos and
trade names are very important to the businesses that make up
our Wyndham Hotel Group, Wyndham Exchange & Rentals,
and Wyndham Vacation Ownership business units. Our subsidiaries
actively use or license for use all significant marks, and we
own or have exclusive licenses to use these marks. We register
the marks that we own in the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, as well as with other relevant authorities where we deem
appropriate, and seek to protect our marks from unauthorized use
as permitted by law.
24
EMPLOYEES
As of December 31, 2010, we had approximately
26,400 employees, including approximately
8,100 employees outside of the U.S. As of
December 31, 2010, our lodging business had approximately
4,000 employees, our vacation exchange and rentals business
had approximately 8,600 employees and our vacation
ownership business had approximately 13,300 employees.
Approximately 1% of our employees are subject to collective
bargaining agreements governing their employment with our
company. We believe that our relations with employees are good.
ENVIRONMENTAL
COMPLIANCE
Our compliance with laws and regulations relating to
environmental protection and discharge of hazardous materials
has not had a material impact on our capital expenditures,
earnings or competitive position, and we do not anticipate any
material impact from such compliance in the future.
Before you invest in our securities you should carefully
consider each of the following risk factors and all of the other
information provided in this report. We believe that the
following information identifies the most significant risks that
may impact us. However, the risks and uncertainties we face are
not limited to those set forth in the risk factors described
below. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to
us or that we currently believe to be immaterial may also
adversely affect our business. In addition, past financial
performance may not be a reliable indicator of future
performance and historical trends should not be used to
anticipate results or trends in future periods. If any of the
following risks and uncertainties develops into an actual event,
the event could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition or results of operations. In such case, the
trading price of our common stock could decline.
The
hospitality industry is highly competitive and we are subject to
risks relating to competition that may adversely affect our
performance.
We will be adversely impacted if we cannot compete effectively
in the highly competitive hospitality industry. Our continued
success depends upon our ability to compete effectively in
markets that contain numerous competitors, some of which may
have significantly greater financial, marketing and other
resources than we have. Competition may reduce fee structures,
potentially causing us to lower our fees or prices, which may
adversely impact our profits. New competition or existing
competition that uses a business model that is different from
our business model may put pressure on us to change our model so
that we can remain competitive.
Our
revenues are highly dependent on the travel industry and
declines in or disruptions to the travel industry, such as those
caused by economic slowdown, terrorism, acts of God and war may
adversely affect us.
Declines in or disruptions to the travel industry may adversely
impact us. Risks affecting the travel industry include: economic
slowdown and recession; economic factors, such as increased
costs of living and reduced discretionary income, adversely
impacting consumers and businesses decisions to use
and consume travel services and products; terrorist incidents
and threats (and associated heightened travel security
measures); political strife; acts of God (such as earthquakes,
hurricanes, fires, floods, volcanoes and other natural
disasters); war; pandemics or threat of pandemics (such as the
H1N1 flu); environmental disasters (such as the Gulf of Mexico
oil spill); increased pricing, financial instability and
capacity constraints of air carriers; airline job actions and
strikes; and increases in gasoline and other fuel prices.
We are
subject to operating or other risks common to the hospitality
industry.
Our business is subject to numerous operating or other risks
common to the hospitality industry including:
|
|
|
changes in operating costs, including inflation, energy, labor
costs (including minimum wage increases and unionization),
workers compensation and health-care related costs and
insurance;
|
|
|
changes in desirability of geographic regions of the hotels or
resorts in our business;
|
|
|
changes in the supply and demand for hotel rooms, vacation
exchange and rental services and vacation ownership services and
products;
|
|
|
seasonality in our businesses may cause fluctuations in our
operating results;
|
|
|
geographic concentrations of our operations and customers;
|
|
|
increases in costs due to inflation that may not be fully offset
by price and fee increases in our business;
|
25
|
|
|
availability of acceptable financing and cost of capital as they
apply to us, our customers, current and potential hotel
franchisees and developers, owners of hotels with which we have
hotel management contracts, our RCI affiliates and other
developers of vacation ownership resorts;
|
|
|
our ability to securitize the receivables that we originate in
connection with sales of vacation ownership interests;
|
|
|
the risk that purchasers of vacation ownership interests who
finance a portion of the purchase price default on their loans
due to adverse macro or personal economic conditions or
otherwise, which would increase loan loss reserves and adversely
affect loan portfolio performance; that if such defaults occur
during the early part of the loan amortization period we will
not have recovered the marketing, selling, administrative and
other costs associated with such vacation ownership interest;
such costs will be incurred again in connection with the resale
of the repossessed vacation ownership interest; and the value we
recover in a default is not, in all instances, sufficient to
cover the outstanding debt;
|
|
|
the quality of the services provided by franchisees, our
vacation exchange and rentals business, resorts with units that
are exchanged through our vacation exchange business
and/or
resorts in which we sell vacation ownership interests may
adversely affect our image and reputation;
|
|
|
our ability to generate sufficient cash to buy from third-party
suppliers the products that we need to provide to the
participants in our points programs who want to redeem points
for such products;
|
|
|
overbuilding in one or more segments of the hospitality industry
and/or in
one or more geographic regions;
|
|
|
changes in the number and occupancy and room rates of hotels
operating under franchise and management agreements;
|
|
|
changes in the relative mix of franchised hotels in the various
lodging industry price categories;
|
|
|
our ability to develop and maintain positive relations and
contractual arrangements with current and potential franchisees,
hotel owners, vacation exchange members, vacation ownership
interest owners, resorts with units that are exchanged through
our vacation exchange business
and/or
owners of vacation properties that our vacation rentals business
markets for rental;
|
|
|
the availability of and competition for desirable sites for the
development of vacation ownership properties; difficulties
associated with obtaining entitlements to develop vacation
ownership properties; liability under state and local laws with
respect to any construction defects in the vacation ownership
properties we develop; and our ability to adjust our pace of
completion of resort development relative to the pace of our
sales of the underlying vacation ownership interests;
|
|
|
our ability to adjust our business model to generate greater
cash flow and require less capital expenditures;
|
|
|
private resale of vacation ownership interests could adversely
affect our vacation ownership resorts and vacation exchange
businesses;
|
|
|
revenues from our lodging business are indirectly affected by
our franchisees pricing decisions;
|
|
|
organized labor activities and associated litigation;
|
|
|
maintenance and infringement of our intellectual property;
|
|
|
the bankruptcy or insolvency of any one of our customers could
impair our ability to collect outstanding fees or other amounts
due or otherwise exercise our contractual rights;
|
|
|
increases in the use of third-party Internet services to book
online hotel reservations; and
|
|
|
disruptions in relationships with third parties, including
marketing alliances and affiliations with
e-commerce
channels.
|
We may
not be able to achieve our growth objectives.
We may not be able to achieve our growth objectives for
increasing our cash flows, the number of franchised
and/or
managed properties in our lodging business, the number of
vacation exchange members in our vacation exchange business, the
number of rental weeks sold by our vacation rentals business and
the number of tours generated and vacation ownership interests
sold by our vacation ownership business.
We may be unable to identify acquisition targets that complement
our businesses, and if we are able to identify suitable
acquisition targets, we may not be able to complete acquisitions
on commercially reasonable terms. Our ability to complete
acquisitions depends on a variety of factors, including our
ability to obtain financing on acceptable terms and requisite
government approvals. If we are able to complete acquisitions,
there is no assurance
26
that we will be able to achieve the revenue and cost benefits
that we expected in connection with such acquisitions or to
successfully integrate the acquired businesses into our existing
operations.
Our
international operations are subject to risks not generally
applicable to our domestic operations.
Our international operations are subject to numerous risks
including exposure to local economic conditions; potential
adverse changes in the diplomatic relations of foreign countries
with the U.S.; hostility from local populations; restrictions
and taxes on the withdrawal of foreign investment and earnings;
government policies against businesses owned by foreigners;
investment restrictions or requirements; diminished ability to
legally enforce our contractual rights in foreign countries;
foreign exchange restrictions; fluctuations in foreign currency
exchange rates; local laws might conflict with U.S. laws;
withholding and other taxes on remittances and other payments by
subsidiaries; and changes in and application of foreign taxation
structures including value added taxes.
We are
subject to risks related to litigation filed by or against
us.
We are subject to a number of legal actions and the risk of
future litigation as described under Legal
Proceedings. We cannot predict with certainty the ultimate
outcome and related damages and costs of litigation and other
proceedings filed by or against us. Adverse results in
litigation and other proceedings may harm our business.
We are
subject to certain risks related to our indebtedness, hedging
transactions, our securitization of assets, our surety bond
requirements, the cost and availability of capital and the
extension of credit by us.
We are a borrower of funds under our credit facilities, credit
lines, senior notes and securitization financings. We extend
credit when we finance purchases of vacation ownership
interests. We use financial instruments to reduce or hedge our
financial exposure to the effects of currency and interest rate
fluctuations. We are required to post surety bonds in connection
with our development activities. In connection with our debt
obligations, hedging transactions, the securitization of certain
of our assets, our surety bond requirements, the cost and
availability of capital and the extension of credit by us, we
are subject to numerous risks including:
|
|
|
our cash flows from operations or available lines of credit may
be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and
interest, which could result in a default and acceleration of
the underlying debt;
|
|
|
if we are unable to comply with the terms of the financial
covenants under our revolving credit facility, including a
breach of the financial ratios or tests, such non-compliance
could result in a default and acceleration of the underlying
revolver debt and under other debt instruments that contain
cross-default provisions;
|
|
|
our leverage may adversely affect our ability to obtain
additional financing;
|
|
|
our leverage may require the dedication of a significant portion
of our cash flows to the payment of principal and interest thus
reducing the availability of cash flows to fund working capital,
capital expenditures or other operating needs;
|
|
|
increases in interest rates;
|
|
|
rating agency downgrades for our debt that could increase our
borrowing costs;
|
|
|
failure or non-performance of counterparties for foreign
exchange and interest rate hedging transactions;
|
|
|
we may not be able to securitize our vacation ownership contract
receivables on terms acceptable to us because of, among other
factors, the performance of the vacation ownership contract
receivables, adverse conditions in the market for vacation
ownership loan-backed notes and asset-backed notes in general
and the risk that the actual amount of uncollectible accounts on
our securitized vacation ownership contract receivables and
other credit we extend is greater than expected;
|
|
|
our securitizations contain portfolio performance triggers
which, if violated, may result in a disruption or loss of cash
flow from such transactions;
|
|
|
a reduction in commitments from surety bond providers may impair
our vacation ownership business by requiring us to escrow cash
in order to meet regulatory requirements of certain states;
|
|
|
prohibitive cost and inadequate availability of capital could
restrict the development or acquisition of vacation ownership
resorts by us and the financing of purchases of vacation
ownership interests; and
|
|
|
if interest rates increase significantly, we may not be able to
increase the interest rate offered to finance purchases of
vacation ownership interests by the same amount of the increase.
|
27
Economic
conditions affecting the hospitality industry, the global
economy and credit markets generally may adversely affect our
business and results of operations, our ability to obtain
financing and/or securitize our receivables on reasonable and
acceptable terms, the performance of our loan portfolio and the
market price of our common stock.
The future economic environment for the hospitality industry and
the global economy may continue to be challenged. The
hospitality industry has experienced and may continue to
experience significant downturns in connection with, or in
anticipation of, declines in general economic conditions. The
current economy has been characterized by higher unemployment,
lower family income, lower business investment and lower
consumer spending, leading to lower demand for hospitality
services and products. Declines in consumer and commercial
spending may adversely affect our revenues and profits.
Uncertainty in the equity and credit markets may negatively
affect our ability to access short-term and long-term financing
on reasonable terms or at all, which would negatively impact our
liquidity and financial condition. In addition, if one or more
of the financial institutions that support our existing credit
facilities fails, we may not be able to find a replacement,
which would negatively impact our ability to borrow under the
credit facilities. Disruptions in the financial markets may
adversely affect our credit rating and the market value of our
common stock. If we are unable to refinance, if necessary, our
outstanding debt when due, our results of operations and
financial condition will be materially and adversely affected.
While we believe we have adequate sources of liquidity to meet
our anticipated requirements for working capital, debt service
and capital expenditures for the foreseeable future, if our cash
flow or capital resources prove inadequate we could face
liquidity problems that could materially and adversely affect
our results of operations and financial condition.
Our liquidity as it relates to our vacation ownership contract
receivables securitization program could be adversely affected
if we were to fail to renew or replace our securitization
warehouse conduit facility on its renewal date or if a
particular receivables pool were to fail to meet certain ratios,
which could occur in certain instances if the default rates or
other credit metrics of the underlying vacation ownership
contract receivables deteriorate. Our ability to sell securities
backed by our vacation ownership contract receivables depends on
the continued ability and willingness of capital market
participants to invest in such securities. It is possible that
asset-backed securities issued pursuant to our securitization
programs could in the future be downgraded by credit agencies.
If a downgrade occurs, our ability to complete other
securitization transactions on acceptable terms or at all could
be jeopardized, and we could be forced to rely on other
potentially more expensive and less attractive funding sources,
to the extent available, which would decrease our profitability
and may require us to adjust our business operations
accordingly, including reducing or suspending our financing to
purchasers of vacation ownership interests.
Our
businesses are subject to extensive regulation and the cost of
compliance or failure to comply with such regulations may
adversely affect us.
Our businesses are heavily regulated by federal, state and local
governments in the countries in which our operations are
conducted. In addition, domestic and foreign federal, state and
local regulators may enact new laws and regulations that may
reduce our revenues, cause our expenses to increase
and/or
require us to modify substantially our business practices. If we
are not in compliance with applicable laws and regulations,
including, among others, those governing franchising, timeshare,
lending, privacy, marketing and sales, unfair and deceptive
trade practices, telemarketing, licensing, labor, employment,
health care, health and safety, accessibility, immigration,
gaming, environmental (including climate change), and
regulations applicable under the Office of Foreign Asset Control
and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (and local equivalents in
international jurisdictions), we may be subject to regulatory
investigations or actions, fines, penalties and potential
criminal prosecution.
We are
subject to risks related to corporate responsibility.
Many factors influence our reputation and the value of our
brands including perceptions of us held by our key stakeholders
and the communities in which we do business. Businesses face
increasing scrutiny of the social and environmental impact of
their actions and there is a risk of damage to our reputation
and the value of our brands if we fail to act responsibly or
comply with regulatory requirements in a number of areas such as
safety and security, sustainability, responsible tourism,
environmental management, human rights and support for local
communities.
We are
dependent on our senior management.
We believe that our future growth depends, in part, on the
continued services of our senior management team. Losing the
services of any members of our senior management team could
adversely affect our strategic and customer relationships and
impede our ability to execute our business strategies.
28
Our
inability to adequately protect and maintain our intellectual
property could adversely affect our business.
Our inability to adequately protect and maintain our trademarks,
trade dress and other intellectual property rights could
adversely affect our business. We generate, maintain, utilize
and enforce a substantial portfolio of trademarks, trade dress
and other intellectual property that are fundamental to the
brands that we use in all of our businesses. There can be no
assurance that the steps we take to protect our intellectual
property will be adequate. Any event that materially damages the
reputation of one or more of our brands could have an adverse
impact on the value of that brand and subsequent revenues from
that brand. The value of any brand is influenced by a number of
factors, including consumer preference and perception and our
failure to ensure compliance with brand standards.
Disasters,
disruptions and other impairment of our information technologies
and systems could adversely affect our business.
Any disaster, disruption or other impairment in our technology
capabilities could harm our business. Our businesses depend upon
the use of sophisticated information technologies and systems,
including technology and systems utilized for reservation
systems, vacation exchange systems, hotel/property management,
communications, procurement, member record databases, call
centers, operation of our loyalty programs and administrative
systems. The operation, maintenance and updating of these
technologies and systems is dependent upon internal and
third-party technologies, systems and services for which there
is no assurance of uninterrupted availability or adequate
protection.
Failure
to maintain the security of personally identifiable and other
information, non-compliance with our contractual or other legal
obligations regarding such information, or a violation of the
Companys privacy and security policies with respect to
such information, could adversely affect us.
In connection with our business, we and our service providers
collect and retain significant volumes of certain types of
personally identifiable and other information pertaining to our
customers, stockholders and employees. The legal, regulatory and
contractual environment surrounding information security and
privacy is constantly evolving and the hospitality industry is
under increasing attack by cyber-criminals in the U.S. and
other jurisdictions in which we operate. A significant actual or
potential theft, loss, fraudulent use or mis-use of
customer, stockholder, employee or our data by cybercrime or
otherwise, non-compliance with our contractual or other legal
obligations regarding such data or a violation of our privacy
and security policies with respect to such data could adversely
impact our reputation and could result in significant costs,
fines, litigation or regulatory action against us.
The
market price of our shares may fluctuate.
The market price of our common stock may fluctuate depending
upon many factors, some of which may be beyond our control,
including our quarterly or annual earnings or those of other
companies in our industry; actual or anticipated fluctuations in
our operating results due to seasonality and other factors
related to our business; changes in accounting principles or
rules; announcements by us or our competitors of significant
acquisitions or dispositions; the failure of securities analysts
to cover our common stock; changes in earnings estimates by
securities analysts or our ability to meet those estimates; the
operating and stock price performance of comparable companies;
overall market fluctuations; and general economic conditions.
Stock markets in general have experienced volatility that has
often been unrelated to the operating performance of a
particular company. These broad market fluctuations may
adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.
Your
percentage ownership in Wyndham Worldwide may be diluted in the
future.
Your percentage ownership in Wyndham Worldwide may be diluted in
the future because of equity awards that we expect will be
granted over time to our directors, officers and employees as
well as due to the exercise of options. In addition, our Board
may issue shares of our common and preferred stock, and debt
securities convertible into shares of our common and preferred
stock, up to certain regulatory thresholds without shareholder
approval.
Provisions
in our certificate of incorporation, by-laws and under Delaware
law may prevent or delay an acquisition of our Company, which
could impact the trading price of our common stock.
Our certificate of incorporation and by-laws and Delaware law
contain provisions that are intended to deter coercive takeover
practices and inadequate takeover bids by making such practices
or bids unacceptably expensive and to encourage prospective
acquirors to negotiate with our Board rather than to attempt a
hostile takeover. These provisions include a Board of Directors
that is divided into three classes with staggered terms;
elimination of the right of our stockholders to act by written
consent; rules regarding how stockholders may present proposals
or nominate directors for election at stockholder meetings; the
right of our Board to issue preferred stock without stockholder
approval; and limitations on the right of stockholders to remove
directors. Delaware law also imposes restrictions on mergers and
other business combinations between us and any holder of 15% or
more of our outstanding shares of common stock.
29
We cannot
provide assurance that we will continue to pay
dividends.
There can be no assurance that we will have sufficient surplus
under Delaware law to be able to continue to pay dividends. This
may result from extraordinary cash expenses, actual expenses
exceeding contemplated costs, funding of capital expenditures,
increases in reserves or lack of available capital. Our Board of
Directors may also suspend the payment of dividends if the Board
deems such action to be in the best interests of the Company or
stockholders. If we do not pay dividends, the price of our
common stock must appreciate for you to realize a gain on your
investment in Wyndham Worldwide. This appreciation may not occur
and our stock may in fact depreciate in value.
We are
responsible for certain of Cendants contingent and other
corporate liabilities.
Under the separation agreement and the tax sharing agreement
that we executed with Cendant (now Avis Budget Group) and former
Cendant units, Realogy and Travelport, we and Realogy generally
are responsible for 37.5% and 62.5%, respectively, of certain of
Cendants contingent and other corporate liabilities and
associated costs, including certain contingent and other
corporate liabilities of Cendant
and/or its
subsidiaries to the extent incurred on or prior to
August 23, 2006, including liabilities relating to certain
of Cendants terminated or divested businesses, the
Travelport sale, the Cendant litigation described in this
report, actions with respect to the separation plan and payments
under certain contracts that were not allocated to any specific
party in connection with the separation.
If any party responsible for the liabilities described above
were to default on its obligations, each non-defaulting party
(including Avis Budget) would be required to pay an equal
portion of the amounts in default. Accordingly, we could, under
certain circumstances, be obligated to pay amounts in excess of
our share of the assumed obligations related to such liabilities
including associated costs. On or about April 10, 2007,
Realogy Corporation was acquired by affiliates of Apollo
Management VI, L.P. and its stock is no longer publicly traded.
The acquisition does not negate Realogys obligation to
satisfy 62.5% of such contingent and other corporate liabilities
of Cendant or its subsidiaries pursuant to the terms of the
separation agreement. As a result of the acquisition, however,
Realogy has greater debt obligations and its ability to satisfy
its portion of these liabilities may be adversely impacted. In
accordance with the terms of the separation agreement, Realogy
posted a letter of credit in April 2007 for our and
Cendants benefit to cover its estimated share of the
assumed liabilities discussed above, although there can be no
assurance that such letter of credit will be sufficient to cover
Realogys actual obligations if and when they arise.
We may be
required to write-off all or a portion of the remaining value of
our goodwill or other intangibles of companies we have
acquired.
Under generally accepted accounting principles, we review our
intangible assets, including goodwill, for impairment at least
annually or when events or changes in circumstances indicate the
carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors that may be
considered a change in circumstances, indicating that the
carrying value of our goodwill or other intangible assets may
not be recoverable, include a sustained decline in our stock
price and market capitalization, reduced future cash flow
estimates and slower growth rates in our industry. We may be
required to record a significant non-cash impairment charge in
our financial statements during the period in which any
impairment of our goodwill or other intangible assets is
determined, negatively impacting our results of operations and
stockholders equity.
|
|
ITEM 1B.
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
None.
Our corporate headquarters is located in a leased office at 22
Sylvan Way in Parsippany, New Jersey, which lease expires in
2024. We also lease another Parsippany-based office, which lease
expires at the end of 2011. This lease is currently under review
related to our ongoing requirements. We have a leased office in
Virginia Beach, Virginia for our Employee Service Center, which
lease expires in 2014.
Wyndham
Hotel Group
The main corporate operations of our lodging business shares
office space at a building leased by Corporate Services in
Parsippany, New Jersey. Our lodging business also leases space
for its reservations centers
and/or data
warehouses in Aberdeen, South Dakota; Phoenix, Arizona; and
Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada pursuant to leases that expire
in 2016, 2012, and 2013, respectively. In addition, our lodging
business leases office space in Beijing, China expiring in 2011,
Shanghai, China expiring in 2013; Bangkok, Thailand expiring in
2011; Singapore expiring in 2011; Oakland Park, Florida expiring
in 2015; Boulder, Colorado expiring in 2011; Gurgaon, India
expiring in 2011; London, United Kingdom expiring in 2012; Dubai
UAE, expiring in 2012; Dallas, Texas expiring in 2013; Hong
Kong, China expiring in 2013; Mission Viejo, California expiring
in 2013; Mexico City expiring in
30
2014; Atlanta, Georgia expiring in 2015; and Rosemont, Illinois
expiring in 2015. All leases that are due to expire in 2011 are
presently under review related to our ongoing requirements.
Wyndham
Exchange & Rentals
Our vacation exchange and rental business has its main corporate
operations at a leased office in Parsippany, New Jersey, which
lease expires at the end of 2011. Our vacation exchange business
also owns five properties located in the following cities:
Carmel, Indiana; Cork, Ireland; Kettering, United Kingdom;
Mexico City, Mexico; and Albufeira, Portugal. Our vacation
exchange business also has one other leased office located
within the U.S. pursuant to a lease that expires in 2014
and 25 additional leased spaces in various countries outside the
U.S. pursuant to leases that expire generally between 1 and
3 years except for 3 leases that expire between 2014 and
2020. Our vacation rentals business operations are managed
in thirteen owned locations (United Kingdom locations in Earby,
Lowestoft and Kent; and U.S. locations in Breckenridge,
Colorado; Steamboat Springs, Colorado; Seacrest Beach, Florida;
Santa Rosa Beach, Florida; Miramar Beach, Florida; Destin,
Florida; and Hilton Head, South Carolina) and four main leased
locations pursuant to leases that expire in 2011, 2012, 2015,
and 2021, (Hellerup, Denmark; Dunfermline, United Kingdom;
Leidschendam, Netherlands; and Fort Walton Beach, Florida
in the U.S., respectively) as well as six smaller owned offices
and 116 smaller leased offices throughout Europe and the
U.S. The vacation exchange and rentals business also
occupies space in London, United Kingdom pursuant to a lease
that expires in 2012. All leases that are due to expire in 2011
are presently under review related to our ongoing requirements.
Wyndham
Vacation Ownership
Our vacation ownership business has its main corporate
operations in Orlando, Florida pursuant to several leases, which
expire beginning 2012. Our vacation ownership business also owns
a contact center facility in Redmond, Washington as well as
leased space in Springfield, Missouri, Las Vegas, Nevada and
Orlando, Florida with various expiration dates for this same
function. Our vacation ownership business leases space for
administrative functions in Redmond, Washington expiring in
2013; and various locations in Las Vegas, Nevada expiring
between 2012 and 2018. In addition, the vacation ownership
business leases approximately 80 marketing and sales offices, of
which approximately 70 are throughout the U.S. with various
expiration dates and 10 offices are in Australia expiring within
approximately two years. All leases that are due to expire in
2011 are presently under review related to our ongoing
requirements.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
We are involved in various claims and lawsuits arising in the
ordinary course of business, none of which, in the opinion of
management, is expected to have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations or financial condition. See Note 16
to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of
claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of our
business and Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for a description of our obligations regarding
Cendant contingent litigation.
PART II
|
|
ITEM 5.
|
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Market
Price of Common Stock
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange
(NYSE) under the symbol WYN. At
January 31, 2011, the number of stockholders of record was
6,224. The following table sets forth the quarterly high and low
closing sales prices per share of WYN common stock as reported
by the NYSE for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
25.94
|
|
|
$
|
20.28
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
27.59
|
|
|
|
20.14
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
28.27
|
|
|
|
20.12
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
31.08
|
|
|
|
27.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
8.71
|
|
|
$
|
2.92
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
12.90
|
|
|
|
4.75
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
16.32
|
|
|
|
10.51
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
21.20
|
|
|
|
15.45
|
|
31
Dividend
Policy
During 2010 and 2009, we paid a quarterly dividend of $0.12 and
$0.04, respectively, per share of Common Stock issued and
outstanding on the record date for the applicable dividend.
During February 2011, our Board of Directors authorized an
increase of quarterly dividends to $0.15 per share beginning
with the dividend expected to be declared during the first
quarter of 2011. Our dividend payout ratio is now approximately
28% of the midpoint of our estimated 2011 net income after
certain adjustments. We expect our dividend policy for the
future to at least mirror the rate of growth of our business.
The declaration and payment of future dividends to holders of
our common stock are at the discretion of our Board of Directors
and depend upon many factors, including our financial condition,
earnings, capital requirements of our business, covenants
associated with certain debt obligations, legal requirements,
regulatory constraints, industry practice and other factors that
our Board deems relevant. There can be no assurance that a
payment of a dividend will occur in the future.
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
Below is a summary of our Wyndham Worldwide common stock
repurchases by month for the quarter ended December 31,
2010:
ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Value of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as
|
|
|
that May Yet Be
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Average Price Paid
|
|
|
Part of Publicly
|
|
|
Purchased Under
|
Period
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Announced Plan
|
|
|
Plan
|
October 1 31, 2010
|
|
|
1,050,522
|
|
|
$
|
28.80
|
|
|
|
1,050,522
|
|
|
$
|
271,796,254
|
|
November 1 30, 2010
|
|
|
273,875
|
|
|
$
|
29.60
|
|
|
|
273,875
|
|
|
$
|
264,251,402
|
|
December 1 31,
2010(*)
|
|
|
236,900
|
|
|
$
|
30.48
|
|
|
|
236,900
|
|
|
$
|
258,388,612
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,561,297
|
|
|
$
|
29.20
|
|
|
|
1,561,297
|
|
|
$
|
258,388,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
Includes 74,200 shares
purchased for which the trade date occurred during December 2010
while settlement occurred during January 2011.
|
We expect to generate annual net cash provided by operating
activities less capital expenditures, equity investments and
development advances in the range of approximately
$600 million to $700 million annually beginning in
2011. A portion of this cash flow is expected to be returned to
our shareholders in the form of share repurchases and dividends.
On August 20, 2007, our Board of Directors authorized a
stock repurchase program that enables us to purchase up to
$200 million of our common stock. On July 22, 2010,
our Board of Directors increased the authorization for the stock
repurchase program by $300 million. During 2010, repurchase
capacity increased $40 million from proceeds received from
stock option exercises. Such repurchase capacity will continue
to be increased by proceeds received from future stock option
exercises.
During the period January 1, 2011 through February 18,
2011, we repurchased an additional 1.6 million shares at an
average price of $30.10. We currently have $212 million
remaining availability in our program. The amount and timing of
specific repurchases are subject to market conditions,
applicable legal requirements and other factors. Repurchases may
be conducted in the open market or in privately negotiated
transactions.
32
Stock
Performance Graph
The Stock Performance Graph is not deemed filed with the
Commission and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference
into any of our prior or future filings made with the
Commission.
The following line graph compares the cumulative total
stockholder return of our common stock against the S&P 500
Index and the S&P Hotels, Resorts & Cruise Lines
Index (consisting of Carnival plc, Marriott International Inc.,
Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. and Wyndham
Worldwide Corporation) for the period from August 1, 2006
to December 31, 2010. The graph assumes that $100 was
invested on August 1, 2006 and all dividends and other
distributions were reinvested.
COMPARISON
OF 53 MONTH CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
Among Wyndham Worldwide Corporation, the S&P 500 Index
and the S&P Hotels, Resorts & Cruise Lines
Index
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Total Return
|
|
|
|
8/06
|
|
|
12/06
|
|
|
12/07
|
|
|
12/08
|
|
|
12/09
|
|
|
12/10
|
|
|
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
100.53
|
|
|
$
|
74.17
|
|
|
$
|
20.96
|
|
|
$
|
65.80
|
|
|
$
|
99.69
|
|
S&P 500 Index
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
112.05
|
|
|
|
118.21
|
|
|
|
74.47
|
|
|
|
94.18
|
|
|
|
108.37
|
|
S&P Hotels, Resorts & Cruise Lines Index
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
126.79
|
|
|
|
111.05
|
|
|
|
57.61
|
|
|
|
89.79
|
|
|
|
137.62
|
|
33
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of or For The Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
3,851
|
|
|
$
|
3,750
|
|
|
$
|
4,281
|
|
|
$
|
4,360
|
|
|
$
|
3,842
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating and
other (a)
|
|
|
2,947
|
|
|
|
2,916
|
|
|
|
3,422
|
|
|
|
3,468
|
|
|
|
3,018
|
|
Goodwill and other impairments
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
1,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Separation and related costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income/(loss)
|
|
|
718
|
|
|
|
594
|
|
|
|
(830
|
)
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
577
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
563
|
|
|
|
493
|
|
|
|
(887
|
)
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
Provision for income
taxes (b)
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
(1,074
|
)
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
379
|
|
|
$
|
293
|
|
|
$
|
(1,074
|
)
|
|
$
|
403
|
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share
Data (c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
$
|
2.13
|
|
|
$
|
1.64
|
|
|
$
|
(6.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
|
|
$
|
1.78
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
2.13
|
|
|
$
|
1.64
|
|
|
$
|
(6.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
$
|
2.05
|
|
|
$
|
1.61
|
|
|
$
|
(6.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.20
|
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
2.05
|
|
|
$
|
1.61
|
|
|
$
|
(6.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.20
|
|
|
$
|
1.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per
share (d)
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized
assets (e)
|
|
$
|
2,865
|
|
|
$
|
2,755
|
|
|
$
|
2,929
|
|
|
$
|
2,608
|
|
|
$
|
1,841
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
9,416
|
|
|
|
9,352
|
|
|
|
9,573
|
|
|
|
10,459
|
|
|
|
9,520
|
|
Securitized
debt (f)
|
|
|
1,650
|
|
|
|
1,507
|
|
|
|
1,810
|
|
|
|
2,081
|
|
|
|
1,463
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
2,094
|
|
|
|
2,015
|
|
|
|
1,984
|
|
|
|
1,526
|
|
|
|
1,437
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
2,917
|
|
|
|
2,688
|
|
|
|
2,342
|
|
|
|
3,516
|
|
|
|
3,559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Statistics:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging (g)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
rooms (h)
|
|
|
612,700
|
|
|
|
597,700
|
|
|
|
592,900
|
|
|
|
550,600
|
|
|
|
543,200
|
|
RevPAR (i)
|
|
$
|
31.14
|
|
|
$
|
30.34
|
|
|
$
|
35.74
|
|
|
$
|
36.48
|
|
|
$
|
34.95
|
|
Vacation Exchange and
Rentals (j)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of members (in
000s) (k)
|
|
|
3,753
|
|
|
|
3,782
|
|
|
|
3,670
|
|
|
|
3,526
|
|
|
|
3,356
|
|
Exchange revenue per
member (l)
|
|
$
|
177.53
|
|
|
$
|
176.73
|
|
|
$
|
198.48
|
|
|
$
|
209.80
|
|
|
$
|
204.97
|
|
Vacation rental transactions (in
000s) (m)
|
|
|
1,163
|
|
|
|
964
|
|
|
|
936
|
|
|
|
942
|
|
|
|
914
|
|
Average net price per vacation
rental (n)
|
|
$
|
425.38
|
|
|
$
|
477.38
|
|
|
$
|
528.95
|
|
|
$
|
480.32
|
|
|
$
|
419.39
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Vacation Ownership Interest (VOI) sales (in
000s) (o)
|
|
$
|
1,464,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,315,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,987,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,993,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,743,000
|
|
Tours (p)
|
|
|
634,000
|
|
|
|
617,000
|
|
|
|
1,143,000
|
|
|
|
1,144,000
|
|
|
|
1,046,000
|
|
Volume Per Guest
(VPG) (q)
|
|
$
|
2,183
|
|
|
$
|
1,964
|
|
|
$
|
1,602
|
|
|
$
|
1,606
|
|
|
$
|
1,486
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes operating, cost of
vacation ownership interests, consumer financing interest,
marketing and reservation and general and administrative
expenses. During 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006, general and
administrative expenses include $54 million of a net
benefit, $6 million of a net expense, and $18 million,
$46 million and $32 million of a net benefit from the
resolution of and adjustment to certain contingent liabilities
and assets ($41 million, $6 million, $6 million,
$26 million and $30 million, net of tax),
respectively. During 2008, general and administrative expenses
include charges of $24 million ($24 million, net of
tax) due to currency conversion losses related to the transfer
of cash from our Venezuelan operations at our vacation exchange
and rentals business.
|
(b) |
|
The difference in our 2008
effective tax rate is primarily due to (i) the
non-deductibility of the goodwill impairment charge recorded
during 2008, (ii) charges in a tax-free zone resulting from
currency conversion losses related to the transfer of cash from
our Venezuelan operations at our vacation exchange and rentals
business and (iii) a non-cash impairment charge related to
the write-off of an investment in a non-performing joint venture
at our vacation exchange and rentals business. See
Note 7 Income Taxes for a detailed
reconciliation of our effective tax rate.
|
(c) |
|
This calculation is based on basic
and diluted weighted average shares of 178 million and
185 million, respectively, during 2010, 179 million
and 182 million, respectively, during 2009,
178 million during 2008 and 181 million and
183 million, respectively, during 2007. For all periods
prior to our date of Separation (July 31, 2006), weighted
average shares were calculated as one share of Wyndham common
stock outstanding for every five shares of Cendant common stock
outstanding as of July 21, 2006, the record date for the
distribution of Wyndham common stock. As such, during 2006, this
calculation is based on basic and diluted weighted average
shares of 198 million and 199 million, respectively.
|
(d) |
|
Prior to the third quarter of 2007,
we did not pay dividends.
|
(e) |
|
Represents the portion of gross
vacation ownership contract receivables, securitization
restricted cash and related assets that collateralize our
securitized debt. Refer to Note 8 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements for further information.
|
34
|
|
|
(f) |
|
Represents debt that is securitized
through bankruptcy-remote special purpose entities, the
creditors of which have no recourse to us.
|
(g) |
|
Baymont Inn & Suites was
acquired on April 7, 2006, U.S. Franchise Systems, Inc. and
its Microtel Inns & Suites and Hawthorn Suites hotel
brands were acquired on July 18, 2008 and the Tryp hotel
brand was acquired on June 30, 2010. The results of
operations of these businesses have been included from their
acquisition dates forward.
|
(h) |
|
Represents the number of rooms at
lodging properties at the end of the year which are under
franchise and/or management agreements. The amounts for 2009 and
2008 also included approximately 3,000 rooms affiliated with the
Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand for which we received a fee for
reservation and/or other services provided.
|
(i) |
|
Represents revenue per available
room and is calculated by multiplying the percentage of
available rooms occupied for the year by the average rate
charged for renting a lodging room for one day.
|
(j) |
|
Hoseasons Holdings Ltd. was
acquired on March 1, 2010, ResortQuest International, LLC
was acquired on September 30, 2010 and James Villa Holdings
Ltd. was acquired on November 30, 2010. The results of
operations of these businesses have been included from their
acquisition dates forward.
|
(k) |
|
Represents members in our vacation
exchange programs who pay annual membership dues. For additional
fees, such participants are entitled to exchange intervals for
intervals at other properties affiliated with our vacation
exchange business. In addition, certain participants may
exchange intervals for other leisure-related services and
products.
|
(l) |
|
Represents total revenue from fees
associated with memberships, exchange transactions,
member-related rentals and other servicing for the year divided
by the average number of vacation exchange members during the
year.
|
(m) |
|
Represents the number of
transactions that are generated in connection with customers
booking their vacation rental stays through us. One rental
transaction is recorded each time a standard one-week rental is
booked.
|
(n) |
|
Represents the net rental price
generated from renting vacation properties to customers and
other related rental servicing fees divided by the number of
rental transactions.
|
(o) |
|
Represents gross sales of VOIs
(including WAAM sales and tele-sales upgrades, which are a
component of upgrade sales) before the net effect of
percentage-of-completion
accounting and loan loss provisions.
|
(p) |
|
Represents the number of tours
taken by guests in our efforts to sell VOIs.
|
(q) |
|
Represents revenue per guest and is
calculated by dividing the gross VOI sales, excluding tele-sales
upgrades, which are a component of upgrade sales, by the number
of tours.
|
In presenting the financial data above in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles, we are required to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported.
See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Financial
Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources Critical
Accounting Policies, for a detailed discussion of the
accounting policies that we believe require subjective and
complex judgments that could potentially affect reported results.
Acquisitions
(2006 2010)
Between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2010, we
completed the following acquisitions, the results of operations
and financial position of which have been included beginning
from the relevant acquisition dates:
|
|
|
|
|
James Villa Holdings Ltd. (November 2010)
|
|
|
ResortQuest International, LLC (September 2010)
|
|
|
Tryp hotel brand (June 2010)
|
|
|
Hoseasons Holdings Ltd. (March 2010)
|
|
|
U.S. Franchise Systems, Inc. and its Microtel
Inns & Suites and Hawthorn Suites hotel brands (July
2008)
|
|
|
Baymont Inn & Suites brand (April 2006)
|
See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a
more detailed discussion of the acquisitions completed during
2010.
Charges
During 2010, we recorded (i) $30 million
($18 million, net of tax) of costs related to the early
extinguishment of debt, (ii) $9 million
($6 million, net of tax) of restructuring costs related to
a strategic realignment initiative committed to during 2010 at
our vacation exchange and rentals business and (iii) a
charge of $4 million ($3 million, net of tax) to
reduce the value of certain vacation ownership properties and
related assets that were no longer consistent with our
development plans.
During 2009, we recorded (i) a charge of $9 million
($7 million, net of tax) to reduce the value of certain
vacation ownership properties and related assets held for sale
that were no longer consistent with our development plans and
(ii) a charge of $6 million ($3 million, net of
tax) to reduce the value of an underperforming joint venture in
our hotel management business.
During 2008, we committed to various strategic realignment
initiatives targeted principally at reducing costs, enhancing
organizational efficiency, reducing our need to access the
asset-backed securities market and consolidating and
rationalizing existing processes and facilities. As a result, we
recorded $47 million ($29 million, net of tax) and
$79 million ($49 million, net of tax) of restructuring
costs during 2009 and 2008, respectively.
During 2008, we recorded a charge of $1,342 million
($1,337 million, net of tax) to impair goodwill related to
plans announced during the fourth quarter of 2008 to reduce our
VOI sales pace and associated size of our vacation ownership
business. In addition, during 2008, we recorded charges of
(i) $84 million ($58 million, net of tax) to
reduce the carrying value of certain long-lived assets based on
their revised estimated fair values and
(ii) $24 million
35
($24 million, net of tax) due to currency conversion losses
related to the transfer of cash from our Venezuelan operations
at our vacation exchange and rentals business.
See Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
further details on such charges.
During 2006, we recorded a non-cash charge of $65 million,
net of tax, to reflect the cumulative effect of accounting
changes as a result of our adoption of the real estate
time-sharing transactions guidance.
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
BUSINESS
AND OVERVIEW
We are a global provider of hospitality services and products
and operate our business in the following three segments:
|
|
|
|
|
Lodgingfranchises hotels in the upscale,
midscale, economy and extended stay segments of the lodging
industry and provides hotel management services for full-service
hotels globally.
|
|
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentalsprovides
vacation exchange services and products to owners of intervals
of vacation ownership interests (VOIs) and markets
vacation rental properties primarily on behalf of independent
owners.
|
|
|
|
Vacation Ownershipdevelops, markets and
sells VOIs to individual consumers, provides consumer financing
in connection with the sale of VOIs and provides property
management services at resorts.
|
Separation
from Cendant
On July 31, 2006, Cendant Corporation, currently known as
Avis Budget Group, Inc. (or former Parent),
distributed all of the shares of Wyndham common stock to the
holders of Cendant common stock issued and outstanding on
July 21, 2006, the record date for the distribution. On
August 1, 2006, we commenced regular way
trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
WYN.
Before our separation from Cendant, we entered into separation,
transition services and several other agreements with Cendant,
Realogy and Travelport to effect the separation and
distribution, govern the relationships among the parties after
the separation and allocate among the parties Cendants
assets, liabilities and obligations attributable to periods
prior to the separation. Under the Separation and Distribution
Agreement, we assumed 37.5% of certain contingent and other
corporate liabilities of Cendant or its subsidiaries which were
not primarily related to our business or the businesses of
Realogy, Travelport or Avis Budget Group, and Realogy assumed
62.5% of these contingent and other corporate liabilities. These
include liabilities relating to Cendants terminated or
divested businesses, the Travelport sale on August 22,
2006, taxes of Travelport for taxable periods through the date
of the Travelport sale, certain litigation matters, generally
any actions relating to the separation plan and payments under
certain contracts that were not allocated to any specific party
in connection with the separation.
As a result of the sale of Realogy on April 10, 2007,
Realogys senior debt credit rating was downgraded to below
investment grade. Under the Separation Agreement, if Realogy
experienced such a change of control and suffered such a ratings
downgrade, it was required to post a letter of credit in an
amount acceptable to us and Avis Budget Group to satisfy the
fair value of Realogys indemnification obligations for the
Cendant legacy contingent liabilities in the event Realogy does
not otherwise satisfy such obligations to the extent they become
due. On April 26, 2007, Realogy posted a $500 million
irrevocable standby letter of credit from a major commercial
bank in favor of Avis Budget Group and upon which demand may be
made if Realogy does not otherwise satisfy its obligations for
its share of the Cendant legacy contingent liabilities. The
letter of credit can be adjusted from time to time based upon
the outstanding contingent liabilities and has an expiration
date of September 2013, subject to renewal and certain
provisions. As such, the letter of credit has been reduced three
times, most recently to $133 million during September 2010.
The posting of this letter of credit does not relieve or limit
Realogys obligations for these liabilities.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Lodging
Our franchising business is designed to generate revenues for
our hotel owners through the delivery of room night bookings to
the hotel, the promotion of brand awareness among the consumer
base, global sales efforts, ensuring guest satisfaction and
providing outstanding customer service to both our customers and
guests staying at hotels in our system.
36
We enter into agreements to franchise our lodging brands to
independent hotel owners. Our standard franchise agreement
typically has a term of 15 to 20 years and provides a
franchisee with certain rights to terminate the franchise
agreement before the term of the agreement under certain
circumstances. The principal source of revenues from franchising
hotels is ongoing franchise fees, which are comprised of royalty
fees and other fees relating to marketing and reservation
services. Ongoing franchise fees typically are based on a
percentage of gross room revenues of each franchised hotel and
are intended to cover the use of our trademarks and our
operating expenses, such as expenses incurred for franchise
services, including quality assurance and administrative
support, and to provide us with operating profits. These fees
are recognized as revenue upon becoming due from the franchisee.
An estimate of uncollectible ongoing franchise fees is charged
to bad debt expense and included in operating expenses on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations. Lodging revenues also
include initial franchise fees, which are recognized as revenues
when all material services or conditions have been substantially
performed, which is either when a franchised hotel opens for
business or when a franchise agreement is terminated after it
has been determined that the franchised hotel will not open.
Our franchise agreements also require the payment of marketing
and reservations fees, which are intended to reimburse us for
expenses associated with operating an international,
centralized, brand-specific reservations system, access to
third-party distribution channels, such as online travel agents,
advertising and marketing programs, global sales efforts,
operations support, training and other related services. We are
contractually obligated to expend the marketing and reservation
fees we collect from franchisees in accordance with the
franchise agreements; as such, revenues earned in excess of
costs incurred are accrued as a liability for future marketing
or reservation costs. Costs incurred in excess of revenues are
expensed as incurred. In accordance with our franchise
agreements, we include an allocation of costs required to carry
out marketing and reservation activities within marketing and
reservation expenses. These fees are recognized as revenue upon
becoming due from the franchisee. An estimate of uncollectible
ongoing marketing and reservation fees is charged to bad debt
expense and included in marketing and reservation expenses on
the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Other service fees we derive from providing ancillary services
to franchisees are primarily recognized as revenue upon
completion of services. The majority of these fees are intended
to reimburse us for direct expenses associated with providing
these services.
We also provide management services for hotels under management
contracts, which offer all the benefits of a global brand and a
full range of management, marketing and reservation services. In
addition to the standard franchise services described below, our
hotel management business provides hotel owners with
professional oversight and comprehensive operations support
services such as hiring, training and supervising the managers
and employees that operate the hotels as well as annual budget
preparation, financial analysis and extensive food and beverage
services. Our standard management agreement typically has a term
of up to 20 years. Our management fees are comprised of
base fees, which are typically calculated, based upon a
specified percentage of gross revenues from hotel operations,
and incentive fees, which are typically calculated based upon a
specified percentage of a hotels gross operating profit.
Management fee revenues are recognized when earned in accordance
with the terms of the contract. We incur certain reimbursable
costs on behalf of managed hotel properties and report
reimbursements received from managed hotels as revenues and the
costs incurred on their behalf as expenses. Management fee
revenues are recorded as a component of franchise fee revenues
and reimbursable revenues are recorded as a component of service
fees and membership revenues on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations. The costs, which principally relate to payroll costs
for operational employees who work at the managed hotels, are
reflected as a component of operating expenses on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations. The reimbursements from
hotel owners are based upon the costs incurred with no added
margin; as a result, these reimbursable costs have little to no
effect on our operating income. Management fee revenues and
revenues related to payroll reimbursements were $5 million
and $77 million, respectively, during 2010, $4 million
and $85 million, respectively, during 2009 and
$5 million and $100 million, respectively, during 2008.
We also earn revenues from the Wyndham Rewards loyalty program
when a member stays at a participating hotel. These revenues are
derived from a fee we charge based upon a percentage of room
revenues generated from such stay. These loyalty fees are
intended to reimburse us for expenses associated with
administering and marketing the program. These fees are
recognized as revenue upon becoming due from the franchisee.
Within our Lodging segment, we measure operating performance
using the following key operating statistics: (i) number of
rooms, which represents the number of rooms at lodging
properties at the end of the year and (ii) revenue per
available room (RevPAR), which is calculated by multiplying the
percentage of available rooms occupied during the year by the
average rate charged for renting a lodging room for one day
Vacation
Exchange and Rentals
As a provider of vacation exchange services, we enter into
affiliation agreements with developers of vacation ownership
properties to allow owners of intervals to trade their intervals
for certain other intervals within our
37
vacation exchange business and, for some members, for other
leisure-related services and products. Additionally, as a
marketer of vacation rental properties, generally we enter into
contracts for exclusive periods of time with property owners to
market the rental of such properties to rental customers. Our
vacation exchange business derives a majority of its revenues
from annual membership dues and exchange fees from members
trading their intervals. Annual dues revenues represents the
annual membership fees from members who participate in our
vacation exchange business and, for additional fees, have the
right to exchange their intervals for certain other intervals
within our vacation exchange business and, for certain members,
for other leisure-related services and products. We recognize
revenues from annual membership dues on a straight-line basis
over the membership period during which delivery of
publications, if applicable, and other services are provided to
the members. Exchange fees are generated when members exchange
their intervals, which may include intervals at other properties
within our vacation exchange business or other leisure-related
services and products. Exchange fees are recognized as revenues,
net of expected cancellations, when the exchange requests have
been confirmed to the member. Our vacation rentals business
primarily derives its revenues from fees, which generally
average between 15% and 45% of the gross booking fees for
non-proprietary inventory, except for where we receive 100% of
the revenues for properties that we own or operate under
long-term capital leases. The majority of the time, we act on
behalf of the owners of the rental properties to generate our
fees. We provide reservation services to the independent
property owners and receive the
agreed-upon
fee for the service provided. We remit the gross rental fee
received from the renter to the independent property owner, net
of our
agreed-upon
fee. Revenues from such fees are recognized in the period that
the rental reservation is made, net of expected cancellations.
Cancellations for 2010, 2009 and 2008 each totaled less than 5%
of rental transactions booked. Upon confirmation of the rental
reservation, the rental customer and property owner generally
have a direct relationship for additional services to be
performed. We also earn rental fees in connection with
properties we manage, operate under long-term capital leases or
own and such fees are recognized when the rental customers
stay occurs, as this is the point at which the service is
rendered. Our revenues are earned when evidence of an
arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or the services have
been rendered, the sellers price to the buyer is fixed or
determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured.
Within our Vacation Exchange and Rentals segment, we measure
operating performance using the following key operating
statistics: (i) average number of vacation exchange
members, which represents members in our vacation exchange
programs who pay annual membership dues and are entitled, for
additional fees, to exchange their intervals for intervals at
other properties affiliated within our vacation exchange
business and, for certain members, for other leisure-related
services and products; (ii) exchange revenue per member,
which represents fees associated with memberships, exchange
transactions, member-related rentals and other services for the
year divided by the average number of vacation exchange members
during the year; (iii) vacation rental transactions, which
represents the number of transactions that are generated in
connection with customers booking their vacation rental stays
through us; and (iv) average net price per vacation rental,
which represents the net rental price generated from renting
vacation properties to customers and other related rental
servicing fees divided by the number of rental transactions.
Vacation
Ownership
We develop, market and sell VOIs to individual consumers,
provide property management services at resorts and provide
consumer financing in connection with the sale of VOIs. Our
vacation ownership business derives the majority of its revenues
from sales of VOIs and derives other revenues from consumer
financing and property management. Our sales of VOIs are either
cash sales or Company-financed sales. In order for us to
recognize revenues from VOI sales under the full accrual method
of accounting described in the guidance for sales of real estate
for fully constructed inventory, a binding sales contract must
have been executed, the statutory rescission period must have
expired (after which time the purchasers are not entitled to a
refund except for non-delivery by us), receivables must have
been deemed collectible and the remainder of our obligations
must have been substantially completed. In addition, before we
recognize any revenues from VOI sales, the purchaser of the VOI
must have met the initial investment criteria and, as
applicable, the continuing investment criteria, by executing a
legally binding financing contract. A purchaser has met the
initial investment criteria when a minimum down payment of 10%
is received by us. In accordance with the guidance for
accounting for real estate time-sharing transactions, we must
also take into consideration the fair value of certain
incentives provided to the purchaser when assessing the adequacy
of the purchasers initial investment. In those cases where
financing is provided to the purchaser by us, the purchaser is
obligated to remit monthly payments under financing contracts
that represent the purchasers continuing investment. If
all of the criteria for a VOI sale to qualify under the full
accrual method of accounting have been met, as discussed above,
except that construction of the VOI purchased is not complete,
we recognize revenues using the
percentage-of-completion
(POC) method of accounting provided that the
preliminary construction phase is complete and that a minimum
sales level has been met (to assure that the property will not
revert to a rental property). The preliminary stage of
development is deemed to be complete when the engineering and
design work is complete, the construction contracts have been
executed, the site has been cleared, prepared and excavated, and
the building foundation is complete. The completion percentage
is determined by the proportion of
38
real estate inventory costs incurred to total estimated costs.
These estimated costs are based upon historical experience and
the related contractual terms. The remaining revenues and
related costs of sales, including commissions and direct
expenses, are deferred and recognized as the remaining costs are
incurred.
We also offer consumer financing as an option to customers
purchasing VOIs, which are typically collateralized by the
underlying VOI. The contractual terms of Company-provided
financing agreements require that the contractual level of
annual principal payments be sufficient to amortize the loan
over a customary period for the VOI being financed, which is
generally ten years, and payments under the financing contracts
begin within 45 days of the sale and receipt of the minimum
down payment of 10%. An estimate of uncollectible amounts is
recorded at the time of the sale with a charge to the provision
for loan losses, which is classified as a reduction of vacation
ownership interest sales on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations. The interest income earned from the financing
arrangements is earned on the principal balance outstanding over
the life of the arrangement and is recorded within consumer
financing on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
We also provide
day-to-day-management
services, including oversight of housekeeping services,
maintenance and certain accounting and administrative services
for property owners associations and clubs. In some cases,
our employees serve as officers
and/or
directors of these associations and clubs in accordance with
their by-laws and associated regulations. We receive fees for
such property management services which are generally based upon
total costs to operate such resorts. Fees for property
management services typically approximate 10% of budgeted
operating expenses. Property management fee revenues are
recognized when earned in accordance with the terms of the
contract and is recorded as a component of service fees and
membership on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. We also
incur certain reimbursable costs, which principally relate to
the payroll costs for management of the associations, club and
resort properties where we are the employer. These costs are
reflected as a component of operating expenses on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations. Property management
revenues were $405 million, $376 million, and
$346 million during 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Property management revenue is comprised of management fee
revenue and reimbursable revenue. Management fee revenues were
$183 million, $170 million and $159 million
during 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively. Reimbursable revenues
were $222 million, $206 million, and $187 million
respectively during 2010, 2009, and 2008. Reimbursable revenues
are based upon cost with no added margin and thus, have little
or no impact on our operating income. During 2010, 2009 and
2008, one of the associations that we manage paid Wyndham
Exchange & Rentals $19 million, $19 million
and $17 million, respectively, for exchange services.
During 2010, 2009 and 2008, gross sales of VOIs were increased
by $0 and $187 million and reduced by $75 million,
respectively, representing the net change in revenues that was
deferred under the POC method of accounting. Under the POC
method of accounting, a portion of the total revenues from a
vacation ownership contract sale is not recognized if the
construction of the vacation resort has not yet been fully
completed. Such deferred revenues were recognized in subsequent
periods in proportion to the costs incurred as compared to the
total expected costs for completion of construction of the
vacation resort. As of December 31, 2009, all revenues that
were previously deferred under the POC method of accounting had
been recognized.
Within our Vacation Ownership segment, we measure operating
performance using the following key metrics: (i) gross VOI
sales (including tele-sales upgrades, which are a component of
upgrade sales) before deferred sales and loan loss provisions;
(ii) tours, which represents the number of tours taken by
guests in our efforts to sell VOIs; and (iii) volume per
guest, or VPG, which represents revenue per guest and is
calculated by dividing the gross VOI sales, excluding tele-sales
upgrades, which are a component of upgrade sales, by the number
of tours.
Other
Items
We record lodging-related marketing and reservation revenues,
Wyndham Rewards revenues, as well as hotel/property management
services revenues for both our Lodging and Vacation Ownership
segments, in accordance with guidance for reporting revenues
gross as a principal versus net as an agent, which requires that
these revenues be recorded on a gross basis.
Discussed below are our consolidated results of operations and
the results of operations for each of our reportable segments.
The reportable segments presented below represent our operating
segments for which separate financial information is available
and which is utilized on a regular basis by our chief operating
decision maker to assess performance and to allocate resources.
In identifying our reportable segments, we also consider the
nature of services provided by our operating segments.
Management evaluates the operating results of each of our
reportable segments based upon revenues and EBITDA,
which is defined as net income/(loss) before depreciation and
amortization, interest expense (excluding consumer financing
interest), interest income (excluding consumer financing
interest) and income taxes, each of which is presented on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations. We believe that EBITDA is
a useful measure of performance for our industry segments which,
when considered with GAAP measures, gives a more complete
understanding of our operating performance. Our presentation of
EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly-titled measures used
by other companies.
39
OPERATING
STATISTICS
The following table presents our operating statistics for the
years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. See Results of
Operations section for a discussion as to how these operating
statistics affected our business for the periods presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
% Change
|
|
Lodging
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
rooms (a)
|
|
|
612,700
|
|
|
|
597,700
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
RevPAR (b)
|
|
$
|
31.14
|
|
|
$
|
30.34
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Vacation Exchange and
Rentals (*)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of members (in
000s) (c)
|
|
|
3,753
|
|
|
|
3,782
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Exchange revenue per
member (d)
|
|
$
|
177.53
|
|
|
$
|
176.73
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation rental transactions (in
000s) (e)(f)
|
|
|
1,163
|
|
|
|
964
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Average net price per vacation
rental (f)(g)
|
|
$
|
425.38
|
|
|
$
|
477.38
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross VOI sales (in
000s) (h)(i)
|
|
$
|
1,464,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,315,000
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Tours (j)
|
|
|
634,000
|
|
|
|
617,000
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Volume Per Guest
(VPG) (k)
|
|
$
|
2,183
|
|
|
$
|
1,964
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
During the first quarter of 2010,
our vacation exchange and rentals business revised its operating
statistics in order to improve transparency and comparability
for our investors. The 2009 operating statistics have been
updated to be comparable to the current presentation.
|
(a) |
|
Represents the number of rooms at
lodging properties at the end of the period which are either
(i) under franchise and/or management agreements,
(ii) properties affiliated with the Wyndham Hotels and
Resorts brand for which we receive a fee for reservation and/or
other services provided and (iii) properties managed under
a joint venture. The amounts in 2010 and 2009 include 200 and
3,549 affiliated rooms, respectively.
|
(b) |
|
Represents revenue per available
room and is calculated by multiplying the percentage of
available rooms occupied during the period by the average rate
charged for renting a lodging room for one day. Includes the
impact from the acquisition of the Tryp hotel brand, which was
acquired on June 30, 2010; therefore, such operating
statistics for 2010 are not presented on a comparable basis to
the 2009 operating statistics.
|
(c) |
|
Represents members in our vacation
exchange programs who pay annual membership dues. For additional
fees, such participants are entitled to exchange intervals for
intervals at other properties affiliated with our vacation
exchange business. In addition, certain participants may
exchange intervals for other leisure-related services and
products.
|
(d) |
|
Represents total revenue generated
from fees associated with memberships, exchange transactions,
member-related rentals and other servicing for the period
divided by the average number of vacation exchange members
during the period.
|
(e) |
|
Represents the number of
transactions that are generated in connection with customers
booking their vacation rental stays through us. One rental
transaction is recorded each time a standard one-week rental is
booked.
|
(f) |
|
Includes the impact from the
acquisitions of Hoseasons (March 1, 2010), ResortQuest
(September 30, 2010) and James Villa Holidays
(November 30, 2010); therefore, such operating statistics
for 2010 are not presented on a comparable basis to the 2009
operating statistics.
|
(g) |
|
Represents the net rental price
generated from renting vacation properties to customers and
other related rental servicing fees divided by the number of
vacation rental transactions. Excluding the impact of foreign
exchange movements, the average net price per vacation rental
decreased 7%.
|
(h) |
|
Represents total sales of VOIs,
including sales under the WAAM, before the net effect of
percentage-of-completion
accounting and loan loss provisions. We believe that Gross VOI
sales provides an enhanced understanding of the performance of
our vacation ownership business because it directly measures the
sales volume of this business during a given reporting period.
|
(i) |
|
The following table provides a
reconciliation of Gross VOI sales to Vacation ownership interest
sales for the year ended December 31 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Gross VOI sales
|
|
$
|
1,464
|
|
|
$
|
1,315
|
|
Less: WAAM
sales (1)
|
|
|
(51)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross VOI sales, net of WAAM sales
|
|
|
1,413
|
|
|
|
1,315
|
|
Plus: Net effect of
percentage-of-completion
accounting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
Less: Loan loss provision
|
|
|
(340)
|
|
|
|
(449)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation ownership interest
sales (2)
|
|
$
|
1,072
|
|
|
$
|
1,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Represents
total sales of third party VOIs through our
fee-for-service
vacation ownership sales model designed to offer turn-key
solutions for developers or banks in possession of newly
developed inventory, which we will sell for a commission fee
through our extensive sales and marketing channels.
(2) Amounts
may not foot due to rounding.
|
|
|
(j) |
|
Represents the number of tours
taken by guests in our efforts to sell VOIs.
|
(k) |
|
VPG is calculated by dividing Gross
VOI sales (excluding tele-sales upgrades, which are non-tour
upgrade sales) by the number of tours. Tele-sales upgrades were
$29 million and $104 million during the year ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. We have excluded
non-tour upgrade sales in the calculation of VPG because
non-tour upgrade sales are generated by a different marketing
channel. We believe that VPG provides an enhanced understanding
of the performance of our vacation ownership business because it
directly measures the efficiency of this business tour
selling efforts during a given reporting period.
|
40
Year
Ended December 31, 2010 vs. Year Ended December 31,
2009
Our consolidated results comprised the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
3,851
|
|
|
$
|
3,750
|
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
3,133
|
|
|
|
3,156
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
718
|
|
|
|
594
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
563
|
|
|
|
493
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
379
|
|
|
$
|
293
|
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2010, our net revenues increased $101 million (3%)
principally due to:
|
|
|
a $109 million decrease in our provision for loan losses
primarily due to improved portfolio performance and mix,
partially offset by the impact to the provision from higher
gross VOI sales;
|
|
|
a $97 million increase in gross sales of VOIs, net of WAAM
sales, reflecting higher VPG and tour flow;
|
|
|
a $35 million increase in net revenues from rental
transactions and related services at our vacation exchange and
rentals business due to incremental revenues contributed from
our acquisitions of Hoseasons, ResortQuest and James Villa
Holidays and favorable pricing at our Landal GreenParks and U.K.
cottage businesses, partially offset by the unfavorable impact
of foreign exchange movements of $22 million;
|
|
|
$31 million of commissions earned on VOI sales under our
WAAM;
|
|
|
$29 million of incremental property management fees within
our vacation ownership business primarily as a result of growth
in the number of units under management;
|
|
|
a $28 million increase in net revenues in our lodging
business primarily due to a RevPAR increase of 3%, an increase
in ancillary revenues and other franchise fees and incremental
revenues contributed from the Tryp hotel brand acquisition,
partially offset by a decline in reimbursable revenues; and
|
|
|
an $8 million increase in ancillary revenues in our
vacation exchange and rentals business primarily due to
incremental revenues contributed from our acquisition of
ResortQuest.
|
Such increases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
a decrease of $187 million as a result of the absence of
the recognition of revenues previously deferred under the POC
method of accounting at our vacation ownership business;
|
|
|
a $35 million decrease in ancillary revenues at our
vacation ownership business primarily associated with a change
in the classification of revenues related to incidental
operations, which were misclassified on a gross basis during
periods prior to the third quarter of 2010, and classified on a
net basis within operating expenses commencing in the third
quarter of 2010; and
|
|
|
a $10 million reduction in consumer financing revenues due
primarily to a decline in our contract receivable portfolio.
|
Total expenses decreased $23 million (1%) principally
reflecting:
|
|
|
a decrease of $72 million of expenses related to the
absence of the recognition of revenues previously deferred at
our vacation ownership business, as discussed above;
|
|
|
a $54 million net benefit recorded during 2010 related to
the resolution of and adjustment to certain contingent
liabilities and assets primarily due to the settlement of the
IRS examination of Cendants tax years 2003 through 2006 on
July 15, 2010;
|
|
|
a $43 million decrease in marketing and reservation
expenses due to the change in tour mix in our vacation ownership
business and lower marketing overhead costs at lodging business;
|
|
|
$38 million of decreased costs related to organizational
realignment initiatives across our businesses (see Restructuring
Plans for more details);
|
41
|
|
|
a $34 million decrease in consumer financing interest
expense primarily related to a decrease in interest rates and
lower average borrowings on our securitized debt facilities;
|
|
|
the absence of non-cash charges of $15 million in 2009 at
our vacation ownership and lodging businesses to reduce the
carrying value of certain assets based upon their revised
estimated fair values;
|
|
|
the favorable impact of $15 million at our vacation
exchange and rentals business from foreign exchange transactions
and foreign currency hedging contracts;
|
|
|
$11 million of decreased expenses related to non-core
vacation ownership businesses;
|
|
|
a $9 million favorable impact on expenses related to
foreign currency translation at our vacation exchange and
rentals business;
|
|
|
$8 million decrease in payroll costs paid on behalf of
hotel owners in our lodging business;
|
|
|
$8 million primarily associated with a change in the
classification or revenue related to incidental operations,
which were misclassified on a gross basis during prior periods
and classified on a net basis within operating expenses during
the third and fourth quarters of 2010;
|
|
|
the absence of a $6 million net expense recorded during
2009 related to the resolution of and adjustment to certain
contingent liabilities and assets; and
|
|
|
$5 million of lower volume-related and marketing costs at
our vacation exchange and rentals business.
|
These decreases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
$43 million of incremental costs incurred from
acquisitions, of which $40 million is attributable to our
vacation exchange and rentals business;
|
|
|
$43 million of increased employee and other related
expenses primarily due to higher sales commission costs
resulting from increased gross VOI sales and rates;
|
|
|
$40 million of increased cost of VOI sales related to the
increase in gross VOI sales, net of WAAM sales;
|
|
|
$25 million of increased costs at our vacation ownership
business associated with maintenance fees on unsold inventory;
|
|
|
$24 million of increased costs in our lodging business
primarily associated with ancillary services provided to
franchisees and to enhance the international infrastructure to
support our growth strategies;
|
|
|
$22 million of costs at our vacation ownership business
related to our WAAM;
|
|
|
$22 million of incremental property management expenses at
our vacation ownership business primarily associated with the
growth in the number of units under management;
|
|
|
$16 million of higher corporate costs primarily related to
data security and information technology costs, employee-related
fees, the funding of the Wyndham charitable foundation and
higher professional fees, partially offset by the favorable
impact from foreign exchange contracts;
|
|
|
$15 million of increased deed recording costs at our
vacation ownership business;
|
|
|
$10 million of higher operating expenses at our lodging
business related to higher employee-related costs, higher IT
costs, and higher bad debt expenses on franchisees that are no
longer operating a hotel under one of our brands;
|
|
|
$10 million of increased litigation expenses primarily at
our vacation ownership business;
|
|
|
$7 million of acquisition costs incurred in connection with
our Hoseasons, Tryp hotel brand, ResortQuest and James Villa
Holidays acquisitions;
|
|
|
$6 million of costs at our lodging business related to our
strategic initiative to grow reservation contribution;
|
|
|
$5 million of higher operating expenses at our vacation
exchange and rentals business, which includes an unfavorable
impact from value added taxes; and
|
|
|
a $4 million non-cash charge to impair the value of certain
vacation ownership properties and related assets held for sale
that were no longer consistent with our development plans during
2010.
|
Other income, net increased $1 million during 2010 compared
to 2009. Interest expense increased $53 million during 2010
as compared to 2009 primarily as a result of (i) higher
interest on our long-term debt facilities primarily as a result
of our 2010 and May 2009 debt issuances (see
Note 13 Long-Term Debt and Borrowing
42
Arrangements), (ii) $16 million of early
extinguishment costs incurred during the first quarter of 2010
primarily related to our effective termination of an interest
rate swap agreement in connection with the early extinguishment
of our term loan facility, which resulted in the
reclassification of a $14 million unrealized loss from
accumulated other comprehensive income to interest expense on
our Consolidated Statement of Operations and
(iii) $14 million of costs incurred for the repurchase
of a portion of our 3.5% convertible notes during the third and
fourth quarters of 2010. Interest income decreased
$2 million during 2010 compared to 2009 due to decreased
interest earned on invested cash balances as a result of lower
rates earned on investments.
Our effective tax rate declined from 40.6% during 2009 to 32.7%
in 2010 primarily due to the benefit derived from the current
utilization of certain cumulative foreign tax credits, which we
were able to realize based on certain changes in our tax
profile, as well as the settlement of the IRS examination. We
expect our effective tax rate for 2011 to be approximately 39%.
See
Note 7-
Income Taxes for a detailed reconciliation of our effective tax
rate.
As a result of these items, our net income increased
$86 million as compared to 2009.
During 2011, we expect:
|
|
|
net revenues of approximately $4.0 billion to
$4.2 billion;
|
|
|
depreciation and amortization of approximately $180 million
to $190 million; and
|
|
|
interest expense, net, of approximately $135 million to
$145 million.
|
Following is a discussion of the results of each of our
segments, other income net and interest expense/income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
688
|
|
|
$
|
660
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
189
|
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
1,193
|
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
1,979
|
|
|
|
1,945
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Reportable Segments
|
|
|
3,860
|
|
|
|
3,757
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
922
|
|
|
|
849
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Corporate and
Other (a)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company
|
|
$
|
3,851
|
|
|
$
|
3,750
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
898
|
|
|
|
778
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
563
|
|
|
$
|
493
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Not meaningful.
|
(a) |
|
Includes the elimination of
transactions between segments.
|
Lodging
Net revenues and EBITDA increased $28 million (4%) and
$14 million (8%), respectively, during the year ended
December 31, 2010 compared to the same period during 2009.
On June 30, 2010, we acquired the Tryp hotel brand, which
resulted in the addition of 92 hotels and approximately 13,200
rooms in Europe and South America. Such acquisition contributed
incremental revenues of $5 million and EBITDA of
$1 million, which includes $1 million of costs
incurred in connection with the acquisition.
Excluding the impact of this acquisition, net revenues increased
$23 million reflecting:
|
|
|
a $10 million increase in international royalty, marketing
and reservation revenues primarily due to a 7% increase in
international rooms;
|
|
|
a $3 million increase in domestic royalty, marketing and
reservation revenues primarily due to a RevPAR increase of 1% as
a result of increased occupancy; and
|
|
|
an $18 million net increase in ancillary revenue primarily
associated with additional services provided to franchisees.
|
Such increases were partially offset by $8 million of lower
reimbursable revenues earned by our hotel management business in
2010. Although our portfolio of managed properties increased in
2010, these incremental revenues were more than offset by the
negative impact on revenues resulting from the properties under
management which left the system during 2009. The reimbursable
revenues recorded by our hotel management business primarily
43
relate to payroll costs that we pay on behalf of hotel owners,
and for which we are entitled to be fully reimbursed by the
hotel owner. As the reimbursements are made based upon cost with
no added margin, the recorded revenues are offset by the
associated expense and there is no resultant impact on EBITDA
Excluding the impact of the Tryp hotel brand acquisition, EBITDA
further reflects an increase in expenses of $10 million
(2%) primarily driven by:
|
|
|
$24 million of increased costs primarily associated with
ancillary services provided to franchisees and to enhance the
international infrastructure to support our growth strategies;
|
|
|
$6 million of costs incurred during 2010 relating to our
strategic initiative to grow reservation contribution;
|
|
|
$5 million of higher employee compensation expenses
compared to 2009;
|
|
|
$3 million of higher information technology costs; and
|
|
|
$2 million of higher bad debt expense primarily
attributable to receivables relating to terminated franchisees.
|
Such cost increases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
a decrease of $13 million in marketing-related expenses
primarily due to lower marketing overhead;
|
|
|
$8 million of lower payroll costs paid on behalf of hotel
owners, as discussed above;
|
|
|
the absence of a $6 million non-cash charge in the fourth
quarter of 2009 to impair the value of an underperforming joint
venture in our hotel management business; and
|
|
|
the absence of $3 million of costs recorded during the
first quarter of 2009 relating to organizational realignment
initiatives (see Restructuring Plan for more details).
|
As of December 31, 2010, we had approximately 7,210
properties and approximately 612,700 rooms in our system.
Additionally, our hotel development pipeline included over 900
hotels and approximately 102,700 rooms, of which 51% were
international and 55% were new construction as of
December 31, 2010.
We expect net revenues of approximately $675 million to
$725 million during 2011. In addition, as compared to 2010,
we expect our operating statistics during 2011 to perform as
follows:
|
|
|
RevPAR to be up 5-7%; and
|
|
|
number of rooms (including Tryp) to increase 1-3%.
|
Vacation
Exchange and Rentals
Net revenues and EBITDA increased $41 million (4%) and
$6 million (2%), respectively, during 2010 compared with
2009. A stronger U.S. dollar compared to other foreign
currencies unfavorably impacted net revenues and EBITDA by
$16 million and $7 million, respectively. Net revenues
from rental transactions and related services increased
$35 million primarily related to incremental contributions
from our acquisitions and ancillary revenues increased
$8 million, partially offset by a $2 million decline
in exchange and related service revenues. EBITDA further
reflects the favorable impact from foreign exchange transactions
and foreign exchange hedging contracts, partially offset by
incremental costs contributed from acquired businesses, an
increase in costs related to organizational realignment
initiatives and increased operating expenses.
On November 30, 2010, we acquired James Villa Holidays,
which resulted in the addition of approximately 2,300 villas and
unique vacation rental properties in over 50 destinations
primarily across Mediterranean locations. In addition, we
acquired ResortQuest during September 2010 and Hoseasons during
March 2010 which resulted in the addition of approximately 6,000
and over 15,000 vacation rental properties, respectively. Our
vacation exchange and rentals business now offers its leisure
travelers access to approximately 97,000 vacation properties
worldwide. Such acquisitions contributed incremental net
revenues of $43 million and an EBITDA loss of
$3 million, which includes $6 million of costs
incurred in connection with these acquisitions. Such
contributions include $6 million of ancillary revenues
generated from ResortQuest. ResortQuest and James Villa Holidays
were purchased subsequent to the third quarter vacation season,
which, based on historical seasonality, is the quarter in which
results derived from these vacation rentals are most favorable.
Net revenues generated from rental transactions and related
services increased $35 million (8%) during 2010 compared to
2009. Excluding the impact to net revenues from rental
transactions from our acquisitions and the unfavorable impact of
foreign exchange movements of $22 million, such increase
was $20 million (4%) during 2010, which was driven by a 4%
increase in average net price per vacation rental. Such increase
resulted from (i) favorable pricing on bookings made close
to arrival dates at our Landal GreenParks business,
(ii) higher pricing
44
at our U.K. and France destinations through our U.K. cottage
business, (iii) increased commissions on new properties at
our U.K. cottage business and (iv) a $10 million
increase primarily related to a change in the classification of
third-party sales commission fees to operating expenses, which
were misclassified as contra revenue in prior periods. Rental
transaction volume remained relatively flat during 2010 as
compared to 2009 as the favorable impact at our Novasol business
was offset by lower volume at our Landal GreenParks business.
Exchange and related service revenues, which primarily consist
of fees generated from memberships, exchange transactions,
member-related rentals and other member servicing, decreased
$2 million during 2010 compared with 2009. Excluding the
favorable impact of foreign exchange movements of
$6 million, exchange and related service revenues decreased
$8 million (1%) driven by a 1% decrease in the average
number of members primarily due to lower enrollments from
affiliated resort developers during 2010. Exchange revenue per
member remained relatively flat as higher transaction revenues
resulting from favorable pricing and the impact of a
$4 million increase related to a change in the
classification of third-party credit card processing fees to
operating expenses, which were misclassified as contra revenue
in prior periods, was offset by lower travel services fees
resulting from the outsourcing of our European travel services
to a third-party provider during the first quarter of 2010 and
lower exchange and subscription revenues, which we believe is
the result of the impact of club memberships and member
retention programs offered at multi-year discounts.
Ancillary revenues increased $8 million during 2010
compared to 2009. Excluding the impact to ancillary revenues
from the acquisition of ResortQuest, such increase was
$2 million, which relates to higher fees generated from
programs with affiliated resorts.
Excluding the impact from our acquisitions, EBITDA further
reflects a decrease in expenses of $11 million (1%)
primarily driven by:
|
|
|
the favorable impact of $15 million from foreign exchange
transactions and foreign exchange hedging contracts;
|
|
|
the favorable impact of foreign currency translation on expenses
of $9 million;
|
|
|
$5 million of lower volume-related and marketing
costs; and
|
|
|
$4 million of lower bad debt expense.
|
Such decreases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
a $14 million increase in expenses primarily resulting from
a change in the classification of third-party sales commission
fees and credit card processing fees to operating expenses,
which were misclassified as contra revenue in prior periods;
|
|
|
$5 million of increased operating expenses, which includes
an unfavorable impact from value added taxes; and
|
|
|
$3 million of higher costs related to organizational
realignment initiatives (see Restructuring Plan for more
details).
|
We expect net revenues of approximately $1.4 billion to
$1.5 billion during 2011. In addition, as compared to 2010,
we expect our operating statistics during 2011 to perform as
follows:
|
|
|
vacation rental transactions and average net price per vacation
rental to increase
18-20%;
|
|
|
average number of members to be flat; and
|
|
|
exchange revenue per member to be up to 1-3%.
|
Vacation
Ownership
Net revenues and EBITDA increased $34 million (2%) and
$53 million (14%), respectively, during the year ended
December 31, 2010 compared with the same period during 2009.
The increase in net revenues and EBITDA during the year ended
December 31, 2010 primarily reflects a decline in our
provision for loan losses, an increase in gross VOI sales,
incremental revenues associated with commissions earned on VOI
sales under our newly implemented WAAM and property management
revenues, partially offset by the absence of the recognition of
previously deferred revenues and related expenses during the
year ended December 31, 2009 and lower ancillary revenues.
The increase in EBITDA reflected the absence of costs incurred
in 2009 related to organizational realignment initiatives, lower
consumer financing interest expense, lower marketing expenses, a
decline in expenses related to our non-core businesses and
non-cash impairment charges. EBITDA was further impacted by
higher employee related expenses, increased costs of VOI sales,
increased costs
45
associated with maintenance fees on unsold inventory, increased
property management expenses, incremental WAAM related expenses,
higher deed recording costs and higher litigation expenses.
Gross sales of VOIs, net of WAAM sales, at our vacation
ownership business increased $97 million (7%) during the
year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the same period
during 2009, driven principally by an increase of 11% in VPG and
an increase of 3% in tour flow. VPG was positively impacted by
(i) a favorable tour flow mix resulting from the closure of
underperforming sales offices as part of the organizational
realignment and (ii) a higher percentage of sales coming
from upgrades to existing owners during the year ended
December 31, 2010 as compared to the same period during
2009 as a result of changes in the mix of tours. Tour flow
reflects the favorable impact of growth in our in-house sales
programs, partially offset by the negative impact of the closure
of over 25 sales offices during 2009 primarily related to our
organizational realignment initiatives. Our provision for loan
losses declined $109 million during the year ended
December 31, 2010 as compared to the same period during
2009. Such decline includes (i) $83 million primarily
related to improved portfolio performance and mix during the
year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to the same period
during 2009, partially offset by the impact to the provision
from higher gross VOI sales, and (ii) a $26 million
impact on our provision for loan losses from the absence of the
recognition of revenue previously deferred under the POC method
of accounting during the year ended December 31, 2009. Such
favorability was partially offset by a $35 million decrease
in ancillary revenues primarily associated with a change in the
classification of revenues related to incidental operations,
which were misclassified on a gross basis during prior periods
and classified on a net basis within operating expenses during
the second half of 2010.
In addition, net revenues and EBITDA comparisons were favorably
impacted by $31 million and $9 million, respectively,
during the year ended December 31, 2010 due to commissions
earned on VOI sales of $51 million under our WAAM. During
the first quarter of 2010, we began our initial implementation
of WAAM, which is our
fee-for-service
vacation ownership sales model designed to capitalize upon the
large quantities of newly developed, nearly completed or
recently finished condominium or hotel inventory within the
current real estate market without assuming the investment that
accompanies new construction. We offer turn-key solutions for
developers or banks in possession of newly developed inventory,
which we will sell for a commission fee through our extensive
sales and marketing channels. This model enables us to expand
our resort portfolio with little or no capital deployment, while
providing additional channels for new owner acquisition. In
addition, WAAM may allow us to grow our
fee-for-service
consumer finance servicing operations and property management
business. The commission revenue earned on these sales is
included in service fees and membership revenues on the
Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Under the POC method of accounting, a portion of the total
revenues associated with the sale of a VOI is deferred if the
construction of the vacation resort has not yet been fully
completed. Such revenues are recognized in future periods as
construction of the vacation resort progresses. There was no
impact from the POC method of accounting during the year ended
December 31, 2010 as compared to the recognition of
$187 million of previously deferred revenues during the
year ended December 31, 2009. Accordingly, net revenues and
EBITDA comparisons were negatively impacted by $161 million
(including the impact of the provision for loan losses) and
$89 million, respectively, as a result of the absence of
the recognition of revenues previously deferred under the POC
method of accounting. We do not anticipate any impact during
2011 on net revenues or EBITDA due to the POC method of
accounting as all such previously deferred revenues were
recognized during 2009. We made operational changes to eliminate
additional deferred revenues during 2010.
Our net revenues and EBITDA comparisons associated with property
management were positively impacted by $29 million and
$7 million, respectively, during the year ended
December 31, 2010 primarily due to growth in the number of
units under management, partially offset in EBITDA by increased
costs associated with such growth in the number of units under
management.
Net revenues were unfavorably impacted by $10 million and
EBITDA was favorably impacted by $24 million during the
year ended December 31, 2010 due to lower consumer
financing revenues attributable to a decline in our contract
receivable portfolio, more than offset in EBITDA by lower
interest costs during the year ended December 31, 2010 as
compared to the same period during 2009. We incurred interest
expense of $105 million on our securitized debt at a
weighted average interest rate of 6.7% during the year ended
December 31, 2010 compared to $139 million at a
weighted average interest rate of 8.5% during the year ended
December 31, 2009. Our net interest income margin increased
from 68% during the year ended December 31, 2009 to 75%
during the year ended December 31, 2010 due to:
|
|
|
a 179 basis point decrease in our weighted average interest
rate on our securitized borrowings;
|
|
|
$62 million of decreased average borrowings on our
securitized debt facilities; and
|
|
|
higher weighted average interest rates earned on our contract
receivable portfolio.
|
46
In addition, EBITDA was negatively impacted by $43 million
(4%) of increased expenses, exclusive of lower interest expense
on our securitized debt, higher property management expenses and
WAAM related expenses, primarily resulting from:
|
|
|
$43 million of increased employee and other related
expenses primarily due to higher sales commission costs
resulting from increased gross VOI sales and rates;
|
|
|
$40 million of increased cost of VOI sales related to the
increase in gross VOI sales, net of WAAM sales;
|
|
|
$25 million of increased costs associated with maintenance
fees on unsold inventory;
|
|
|
$15 million of increased deed recording costs; and
|
|
|
$10 million of increased litigation expenses.
|
Such increases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
the absence of $37 million of costs recorded during the
year ended December 31, 2009 relating to organizational
realignment initiatives (see Restructuring Plan for more
details);
|
|
|
$30 million of decreased marketing expenses due to the
change in tour mix;
|
|
|
$11 million of decreased expenses related to our non-core
businesses;
|
|
|
$8 million primarily associated with a change in the
classification of revenues related to incidental operations,
which were misclassified on a gross basis during prior periods
and classified on a net basis within operating expenses during
the second half of 2010, partially offset by increased costs
related to incentives awarded to owners; and
|
|
|
$5 million of lower non-cash charges to impair the value of
certain vacation ownership properties and related assets held
for sale that were no longer consistent with our development
plans.
|
Our active development pipeline consists of approximately
170 units in two U.S. States, a slight increase from
December 31, 2009.
We expect net revenues of approximately $1.9 billion to
$2.1 billion during 2011. In addition, as compared to 2010,
we expect our operating statistics during 2011 to perform as
follows:
|
|
|
gross VOI sales to be $1.5 billion to $1.6 billion
(including approximately $125 million to $175 million
related to WAAM); and
|
|
|
tours and VPG to increase 2-5%.
|
Corporate
and Other
Corporate and Other expenses decreased $49 million in 2010
compared to 2009. Such decrease primarily resulted from:
|
|
|
a $54 million net benefit recorded during 2010 related to
the resolution of and adjustment to certain contingent
liabilities and assets primarily due to the settlement of the
IRS examination of Cendants taxable years 2003 through
2006 on July 15, 2010;
|
|
|
the absence of a $6 million net expense recorded during
2009 related to the resolution of and adjustment to certain
contingent liabilities and assets;
|
|
|
$3 million of favorable impact from foreign exchange
hedging contracts;
|
|
|
$2 million resulting from the absence of severance recorded
during 2009; and
|
|
|
the absence of $1 million of costs recorded during 2009
relating to organizational realignment initiatives (see
Restructuring Plan for more details).
|
Such decreases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
$9 million of higher data security and information
technology costs;
|
|
|
$6 million of employee related expenses;
|
|
|
$3 million of funding for the Wyndham charitable
foundation; and
|
|
|
$3 million of higher professional fees.
|
47
We expect Corporate expenses of approximately $75 million
to $85 million during 2011. The increase in expenses
primarily reflects continued investment in information
technology and data security enhancements in response to the
increasingly aggressive global threat from cyber-criminals.
Interest
Expense/Interest Income/Provision for Income Taxes
Interest expense increased $53 million during 2010 compared
with 2009 as a result of:
|
|
|
an $18 million increase in interest incurred on our
long-term debt facilities, primarily related to our May 2009,
February 2010 and September 2010 debt issuances, partially
offset by the early extinguishment of our term loan facility;
|
|
|
our termination of an interest rate swap agreement related to
the early extinguishment of our term loan facility during the
first quarter of 2010, which resulted in the reclassification of
a $14 million unrealized loss from accumulated other
comprehensive income to interest expense on our Consolidated
Statement of Operations;
|
|
|
$14 million of costs incurred for the repurchase of a
portion of our 3.50% convertible notes during the third and
fourth quarters of 2010;
|
|
|
a $5 million decrease in capitalized interest primarily due
to lower development of vacation ownership inventory at our
vacation ownership business; and
|
|
|
an additional $2 million of costs, which are included
within interest expense on our Consolidated Statement of
Operations, recorded during the first quarter of 2010 in
connection with the early extinguishment of our term loan and
revolving foreign credit facilities.
|
Interest income decreased $2 million during 2010 compared
with 2009 due to decreased interest earned on invested cash
balances as a result of lower rates earned on investments.
Our effective tax rate declined from 40.6% during 2009 to 32.7%
during 2010 primarily due to the benefit derived from the
current utilization of certain cumulative foreign tax credits,
which we were able to realize based on certain changes in our
tax profile, as well as the settlement of the IRS examination.
48
OPERATING
STATISTICS
The following table presents our operating statistics for the
years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. See Results of
Operations section for a discussion as to how these operating
statistics affected our business for the periods presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
% Change
|
Lodging
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
rooms (a)
|
|
|
597,700
|
|
|
|
592,900
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
RevPAR (b)
|
|
$
|
30.34
|
|
|
$
|
35.74
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of members
(000s) (c)
|
|
|
3,782
|
|
|
|
3,670
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Annual dues and exchange revenues per
member (d)
|
|
$
|
120.22
|
|
|
$
|
128.37
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Vacation rental transactions (in
000s) (e)
|
|
|
1,356
|
|
|
|
1,347
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Average net price per vacation
rental (f)
|
|
$
|
423.04
|
|
|
$
|
463.10
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross VOI sales (in
000s) (g)
|
|
$
|
1,315,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,987,000
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
Tours (h)
|
|
|
617,000
|
|
|
|
1,143,000
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
Volume Per Guest
(VPG) (i)
|
|
$
|
1,964
|
|
|
$
|
1,602
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents the number of rooms at
lodging properties at the end of the period which are either
(i) under franchise and/or management agreements,
(ii) properties affiliated with Wyndham Hotels and Resorts
brand for which we receive a fee for reservation and/or other
services provided and (iii) properties managed under a
joint venture. The amounts in 2009 and 2008 include 3,549 and
4,175 affiliated rooms, respectively.
|
|
(b) |
|
Represents revenue per available
room and is calculated by multiplying the percentage of
available rooms occupied during the period by the average rate
charged for renting a lodging room for one day.
|
|
(c) |
|
Represents members in our vacation
exchange programs who pay annual membership dues. For additional
fees, such participants are entitled to exchange intervals for
intervals at other properties affiliated with our vacation
exchange business. In addition, certain participants may
exchange intervals for other leisure-related services and
products.
|
|
(d) |
|
Represents total revenue from
annual membership dues and exchange fees generated for the
period divided by the average number of vacation exchange
members during the period. Excluding the impact of foreign
exchange movements, annual dues and exchange revenues per member
decreased 3%.
|
|
(e) |
|
Represents the number of
transactions that are generated in connection with customers
booking their vacation rental stays through us. In our European
vacation rentals businesses, one rental transaction is recorded
each time a standard one-week rental is booked; however, in the
United States, one rental transaction is recorded each time a
vacation rental stay is booked, regardless of whether it is less
than or more than one week.
|
|
(f) |
|
Represents the net rental price
generated from renting vacation properties to customers divided
by the number of rental transactions. Excluding the impact of
foreign exchange movements the average net price per vacation
rental increased 1%.
|
|
(g) |
|
Represents gross sales of VOIs
(including tele-sales upgrades, which are a component of upgrade
sales) before deferred sales and loan loss provisions.
|
|
(h) |
|
Represents the number of tours
taken by guests in our efforts to sell VOIs.
|
|
(i) |
|
Represents gross VOI sales
(excluding tele-sales upgrades, which are a component of upgrade
sales) divided by the number of tours.
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2009 vs. Year Ended December 31,
2008
Our consolidated results comprised the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
3,750
|
|
|
$
|
4,281
|
|
|
$
|
(531
|
)
|
Expenses
|
|
|
3,156
|
|
|
|
5,111
|
|
|
|
(1,955
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income/(loss)
|
|
|
594
|
|
|
|
(830
|
)
|
|
|
1,424
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
493
|
|
|
|
(887
|
)
|
|
|
1,380
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
293
|
|
|
$
|
(1,074
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2009, our net revenues decreased $531 million (12%)
principally due to:
|
|
|
a $672 million decrease in gross sales of VOIs at our
vacation ownership businesses reflecting the planned reduction
in tour flow, partially offset by an increase in VPG;
|
49
|
|
|
a $93 million decrease in net revenues in our lodging
business primarily due to global RevPAR weakness and a decline
in reimbursable revenues and other franchise fees, partially
offset by incremental revenues contributed from the acquisition
of U.S. Franchise Systems, Inc. (USFS);
|
|
|
a $50 million decrease in net revenues from rental
transactions at our vacation exchange and rentals business due
to a decrease in the average net price per rental, including a
$60 million unfavorable impact of foreign exchange
movements;
|
|
|
a $41 million decrease in ancillary revenues at our
vacation exchange and rentals business from various sources,
including the impact from our termination of a low margin travel
service contract and a $4 million unfavorable impact of
foreign exchange movements; and
|
|
|
a $16 million decrease in annual dues and exchange revenues
due to a decline in exchange revenue per member, including a
$17 million unfavorable impact of foreign exchange
movements, partially offset by growth in the average number of
members.
|
Such decreases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
a net increase of $262 million in the recognition of
revenues previously deferred under the POC method of accounting
at our vacation ownership business;
|
|
|
a $37 million increase in ancillary revenues at our
vacation ownership business primarily associated with the usage
of bonus points/credits, which are provided as purchase
incentives on VOI sales, partially offset by a decline in fees
generated from other non-core businesses;
|
|
|
$30 million of incremental property management fees within
our vacation ownership business primarily as a result of rate
increases and growth in the number of units under
management; and
|
|
|
a $9 million increase in consumer financing revenues earned
on vacation ownership contract receivables due primarily to
higher weighted average interest rates earned on our contract
receivable portfolio.
|
Total expenses decreased $1,955 million (38%) principally
reflecting:
|
|
|
the absence of a non-cash charge of $1,342 million for the
impairment of goodwill at our vacation ownership business to
reflect reduced future cash flow estimates based on the expected
reduced sales pace;
|
|
|
a $272 million decrease in marketing and reservation
expenses at our vacation ownership business ($217 million)
resulting from the reduced sales pace and our lodging business
($55 million) resulting from lower marketing and related
spend across our brands as a result of a decline in related
marketing fees received;
|
|
|
$207 million of lower employee related expenses at our
vacation ownership business primarily due to lower sales
commission and administration costs;
|
|
|
$150 million of decreased cost of VOI sales due to the
expected decline in VOI sales;
|
|
|
the absence of $84 million of non-cash impairment charges
recorded across our three businesses during 2008;/
|
|
|
the favorable impact of foreign currency translation on expenses
at our vacation exchange and rentals business of
$58 million;
|
|
|
$51 million in cost savings primarily from overhead
reductions and benefits related to organizational realignment
initiatives at our vacation exchange and rentals business;
|
|
|
a decrease of $32 million of costs due to organizational
realignment initiatives primarily at our vacation ownership
business (see Restructuring Plan for more details);
|
|
|
the absence of a $24 million charge due to currency
conversion losses related to the transfer of cash from our
Venezuelan operations at our vacation exchange and rentals
business recorded during 2008;
|
|
|
$15 million of decreased payroll costs paid on behalf of
hotel owners in our lodging business; and
|
|
|
$9 million of lower volume-related expenses at our vacation
exchange and rentals business.
|
These decreases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
a net increase of $101 million of expenses related to the
recognition of revenues previously deferred at our vacation
ownership business, as discussed above;
|
|
|
$69 million of increased costs at our vacation ownership
business associated with maintenance fees on unsold inventory,
our trial membership marketing program, sales incentives awarded
to owners and increased litigation settlement reserves;
|
50
|
|
|
$29 million of losses from foreign exchange transactions
and the unfavorable impact from foreign exchange hedging
contracts at our vacation exchange and rentals business;
|
|
|
$26 million of incremental expenses at our lodging business
related to bad debt expense, remediation efforts on technology
compliance initiatives and our acquisition of USFS;
|
|
|
a $24 million unfavorable impact from the resolution of and
adjustment to certain contingent liabilities and assets recorded
during 2009 as compared to 2008;
|
|
|
$19 million of higher corporate costs primarily related to
employee incentive programs, severance, hedging activity and
additional rent associated with the consolidation of two leased
facilities into one, partially offset by cost savings
initiatives;
|
|
|
non-cash charges of $15 million at our vacation ownership
and lodging businesses to reduce the carrying value of certain
assets based on their revised estimated fair values;
|
|
|
$8 million of incremental costs at our vacation exchange
and rentals business related to marketing, IT and facility
operations;
|
|
|
an $8 million increase in consumer financing interest
expenses primarily related to an increase in interest rates,
partially offset by decreased average borrowings on our
securitized debt facilities; and
|
|
|
$6 million of incremental property management expenses at
our vacation ownership business associated with the growth in
the number of units under management, partially offset by cost
containment initiatives implemented during 2009.
|
Other income, net decreased $5 million primarily as a
result of a decline in net earnings from equity investments, the
absence of income associated with the assumption of a
lodging-related credit card marketing program obligation by a
third party and the absence of income associated with the sale
of a non-strategic asset at our lodging business, partially
offset by higher gains associated with the sale of non-strategic
assets at our vacation ownership business. Such amounts are
included within our segment EBITDA results. Interest expense
increased $34 million during 2009 as compared to 2008
primarily due to an increase in interest incurred on our
long-term debt facilities resulting from our May 2009 debt
issuances (see Note 13 Long-Term Debt and
Borrowing Arrangements) and lower capitalized interest at our
vacation ownership business due to lower development of vacation
ownership inventory. Interest income decreased $5 million
during 2009 compared to 2008 due to decreased interest earned on
invested cash balances as a result of lower rates earned on
investments. The difference between our 2009 effective tax rate
of 40.6% and 2008 effective tax rate of (21.1%) is primarily due
to the absence of impairment charges recorded during 2008, a
charge recorded during 2009 for the reduction of deferred tax
assets and the origination of deferred tax liabilities in a
foreign tax jurisdiction and the write-off of deferred tax
assets that were associated with stock-based compensation, which
were in excess of our pool of excess tax benefits available to
absorb tax deficiencies.
As a result of these items, our net income increased
$1,367 million as compared to 2008.
Following is a discussion of the results of each of our
segments, other income net and interest expense/income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
660
|
|
|
$
|
753
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
|
$
|
218
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
|
|
1,259
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
1,945
|
|
|
|
2,278
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
(1,074
|
)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Reportable Segments
|
|
|
3,757
|
|
|
|
4,290
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
849
|
|
|
|
(608
|
)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Corporate and
Other (a)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company
|
|
$
|
3,750
|
|
|
$
|
4,281
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
778
|
|
|
|
(635
|
)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
493
|
|
|
$
|
(887
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Not meaningful.
|
(a) |
|
Includes the elimination of
transactions between segments.
|
51
Lodging
Net revenues and EBITDA decreased $93 million (12%) and
$43 million (20%), respectively, during 2009 compared to
2008. The decrease in revenues primarily reflects a decline in
worldwide RevPAR and other franchise fees. EBITDA further
reflects lower marketing expenses, the absence of a non-cash
impairment charge recorded during 2008 and the impact of the
USFS acquisition, partially offset by higher bad debt expense.
The acquisition of USFS contributed incremental net revenues and
EBITDA of $11 million and $6 million, respectively.
Excluding the impact of this acquisition, net revenues declined
$104 million reflecting:
|
|
|
a $60 million decrease in domestic royalty, marketing and
reservation revenues primarily due to a RevPAR decline of 15%;
|
|
|
$15 million of lower reimbursable revenues earned by our
hotel management business;
|
|
|
a $14 million decrease in other franchise fees principally
related to lower termination and transfer volume;
|
|
|
a $12 million decrease in international royalty, marketing
and reservation revenues resulting from a RevPAR decrease of
19%, or 14% excluding the impact of foreign exchange movements,
partially offset by an 8% increase in international
rooms; and
|
|
|
a $3 million decrease in other revenues.
|
The RevPAR decline was driven by industry-wide occupancy and
rate declines. The $15 million of lower reimbursable
revenues earned by our property management business primarily
relates to payroll costs that we incur and pay on behalf of
hotel owners, for which we are entitled to be fully reimbursed
by the hotel owner. As the reimbursements are made based upon
cost with no added margin, the recorded revenues are offset by
the associated expense and there is no resultant impact on
EBITDA. Such amount decreased as a result of a reduction in
costs at our managed properties due to lower occupancy, as well
as a reduction in the number of hotels under management.
In addition, EBITDA was positively impacted by:
|
|
|
a decrease of $55 million in marketing and related expenses
primarily due to lower spend across our brands as a result of a
decline in related marketing fees received;
|
|
|
the absence of a $16 million non-cash impairment charge
recorded during 2008 (see Note 21 Restructuring and
Impairments for more details); and
|
|
|
$1 million of lower costs relating to organizational
realignment initiatives (see Restructuring Plan for more
details).
|
Such decreases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
$16 million of higher bad debt expense principally
resulting from operating cash shortfalls at managed hotels that
have experienced occupancy declines;
|
|
|
a non-cash charge of $6 million to impair the value of an
underperforming joint venture in our hotel management business;
|
|
|
$5 million of incremental costs due to remediation efforts
on technology compliance initiatives;
|
|
|
the absence of $2 million of income recorded during the
second quarter of 2008 relating to the assumption of a credit
card marketing program obligation by a third party; and
|
|
|
the absence of $2 million of income associated with the
sale of a non-strategic asset during the third quarter of 2008.
|
As of December 31, 2009, we had approximately 7,110
properties and 597,700 rooms in our system. Additionally, our
hotel development pipeline included approximately 950 hotels and
approximately 108,100 rooms, of which 43% were international and
51% were new construction as of December 31, 2009.
Vacation
Exchange and Rentals
Net revenues decreased $107 million (8%) while EBITDA
increased $39 million (16%), respectively, during 2009
compared to 2008. A stronger U.S. dollar compared to other
foreign currencies unfavorably impacted net revenues and EBITDA
by $81 million and $23 million, respectively. The
decrease in net revenues reflects a $50 million decrease in
net revenues from rental transactions and related services, a
$41 million decrease in ancillary revenues and a
$16 million decrease in annual dues and exchange revenues.
EBITDA further reflects favorability resulting from the absence
of $60 million of charges recorded during the fourth
quarter of 2008, $51 million in cost savings from overhead
reductions and benefits related to organizational realignment
initiatives
52
and $9 million of lower volume-related expenses, partially
offset by $29 million of losses from foreign exchange
transactions and the unfavorable impact from foreign exchange
hedging contracts.
Net revenues generated from rental transactions and related
services decreased $50 million (8%) during 2009 compared to
2008. Excluding the unfavorable impact of foreign exchange
movements, net revenues generated from rental transactions and
related services increased $10 million (2%) during 2009 as
rental transaction volume increased 1% primarily driven by
increased volume at (i) our Landal GreenParks business,
which benefited from enhanced marketing programs, and
(ii) our U.K. cottage business due to successful marketing
and promotional offers as well as increased functionality of its
new web platform. Such favorability was partially offset by
lower member rentals, which we believe was a result of members
reducing the number of extra vacations primarily due to the
downturn in the economy. Average net price per rental increased
1% primarily resulting from a change in the mix of various
rental offerings, with favorable impacts by our Landal
GreenParks and U.K. cottage businesses, partially offset by an
unfavorable impact at our Novasol and member rental businesses.
Annual dues and exchange revenues decreased $16 million
(3%) during 2009 compared to 2008. Excluding the unfavorable
impact of foreign exchange movements, annual dues and exchange
revenues increased $1 million driven by a 3% increase in
the average number of members primarily due to the enrollment of
approximately 135,000 members at the beginning of 2009 resulting
from our Disney Vacation Club affiliation, partially offset by a
3% decline in revenue generated per member. The decrease in
revenue per member was due to lower exchange transactions and
subscription fees, partially offset by the impact of higher
exchange transaction pricing. We believe that the lower revenue
per member reflects: (i) the economic uncertainty,
(ii) lower subscription fees due primarily to member
retention programs offered at multiyear discounts and
(iii) recent trends among timeshare vacation ownership
developers to enroll members in private label clubs, whereby the
members have the option to exchange within the club or through
RCI channels. Such trends have a positive impact on the average
number of members but an offsetting effect on the number of
exchange transactions per member.
A decrease in ancillary revenues of $41 million was driven
by:
|
|
|
$21 million from various sources, which include fees from
additional services provided to transacting members, fees from
our credit card loyalty program and fees generated from programs
with affiliated resorts;
|
|
|
$16 million in travel revenues primarily due to our
termination of a low margin travel service contract; and
|
|
|
$4 million due to the unfavorable translation effects of
foreign exchange movements.
|
In addition, EBITDA was positively impacted by a decrease in
expenses of $146 million (14%) primarily driven by:
|
|
|
the favorable impact of foreign currency translation on expenses
of $58 million;
|
|
|
$51 million in cost savings primarily from overhead
reductions and benefits related to organizational realignment
initiatives;
|
|
|
the absence of $36 million of non-cash impairment charges
recorded during the fourth quarter of 2008 (see
Note 21 Restructuring and Impairments for more
details);
|
|
|
the absence of a cash charge of $24 million recorded during
the fourth quarter of 2008 due to a currency conversion loss
related to the transfer of cash from our Venezuela operations;
|
|
|
$9 million of lower volume-related expenses; and
|
|
|
$3 million of lower costs relating to organizational
realignment initiatives (see Restructuring Plan for more
details).
|
Such decreases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
$29 million of losses from foreign exchange transactions
and the unfavorable impact from foreign exchange hedging
contracts;
|
|
|
$5 million of marketing and IT costs to support our
e-commerce
initiative to drive members to transact on the web; and
|
|
|
$3 million of higher facility operating costs.
|
Vacation
Ownership
Net revenues decreased $333 million (15%) while EBITDA
increased $1,461 million during 2009 compared to 2008.
53
During the fourth quarter of 2008, in response to an uncertain
credit environment, we announced plans to (i) refocus our
vacation ownership sales and marketing efforts, which resulted
in fewer tours, and (ii) concentrate on consumers with
higher credit quality beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008.
As a result, during December 2008, we recorded a non-cash
$1,342 million charge for the impairment of goodwill at our
vacation ownership business to reflect reduced future cash flow
estimates based on the expected reduced sales pace and
$66 million of costs relating to organizational realignment
initiatives (see Restructuring Plan for more details). In
addition, operating results for 2009 reflect decreased gross VOI
sales, a net increase in the recognition of previously deferred
revenues as a result of the completion of construction of
resorts under development, decreased marketing and
employee-related expenses, lower cost of VOI sales, higher
ancillary revenues and additional costs related to
organizational realignment initiatives.
Gross sales of VOIs at our vacation ownership business decreased
$672 million (34%) during 2009 compared to 2008, driven
principally by a 46% planned decrease in tour flow, partially
offset by an increase of 23% in VPG. Tour flow was negatively
impacted by the closure of over 85 sales offices since
October 1, 2008 related to our organizational realignment
initiatives. VPG was positively impacted by (i) a favorable
tour flow mix resulting from the closure of underperforming
sales offices as part of the organizational realignment and
(ii) a higher percentage of sales coming from upgrades to
existing owners during 2009 as compared to 2008 as a result of
changes in the mix of tours. Such results were partially offset
by a $37 million increase in ancillary revenues primarily
associated with the usage of bonus points/credits, which are
provided as purchase incentives on VOI sales, partially offset
by a decline in fees generated from other non-core businesses.
Under the POC method of accounting, a portion of the total
revenues associated with the sale of a vacation ownership
interest is deferred if the construction of the vacation resort
has not yet been fully completed. Such revenues will be
recognized in future periods as construction of the vacation
resort progresses. During 2009, we completed construction on
resorts where VOI sales were primarily generated during 2008,
resulting in the recognition of $187 million of revenues
previously deferred under the POC method of accounting compared
to $75 million of deferred revenues during 2008.
Accordingly, net revenues and EBITDA comparisons were positively
impacted by $225 million (including the impact of the
provision for loan losses) and $124 million, respectively,
as a result of the net increase in the recognition of revenues
previously deferred under the POC method of accounting.
Our net revenues and EBITDA comparisons associated with property
management were positively impacted by $30 million and
$24 million, respectively, during 2009 primarily due to
higher management fees earned as a result of rate increases and
growth in the number of units under management. In addition,
EBITDA was unfavorably impacted from increased costs associated
with the growth in the number of units under management,
partially offset by cost containment initiatives implemented
during 2009.
Net revenues and EBITDA comparisons were favorably impacted by
$9 million and $1 million, respectively, during 2009
due to an increase in net interest income primarily due to
higher weighted average interest rates earned on our contract
receivable portfolio, partially offset by higher interest costs
during 2009 as compared to 2008. We incurred interest expense of
$139 million on our securitized debt at a weighted average
interest rate of 8.5% during 2009 compared to $131 million
at a weighted average interest rate of 5.2% during 2008. Our net
interest income margin decreased from 69% during 2008 to 68%
during 2009 due to a 325 basis point increase in our
weighted average interest rate, partially offset by
$413 million of decreased average borrowings on our
securitized debt facilities and to higher weighted average
interest rates earned on our contract receivable portfolio.
In addition, EBITDA was positively impacted by $501 million
(33%) of decreased expenses, exclusive of incremental interest
expense on our securitized debt and lower property management
expenses, primarily resulting from:
|
|
|
$217 million of decreased marketing expenses due to the
reduction in our sales pace;
|
|
|
$207 million of lower employee-related expenses primarily
due to lower sales commission and administration costs;
|
|
|
$150 million of decreased cost of VOI sales due to the
planned reduction in VOI sales;
|
|
|
the absence of a $28 million non-cash impairment charge
recorded during 2008 due to our initiative to rebrand two of our
vacation ownership trademarks to the Wyndham brand; and
|
|
|
the absence of a $4 million non-cash impairment charge
recorded during 2008 related to the termination of a development
project.
|
Such decreases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
$37 million of costs relating to organizational realignment
initiatives (see Restructuring Plan for more details);
|
|
|
$29 million of increased costs associated with maintenance
fees on unsold inventory;
|
54
|
|
|
$25 million of increased costs related to sales incentives
awarded to owners;
|
|
|
$11 million of increased litigation settlement reserves;
|
|
|
a non-cash charge of $9 million to impair the value of
certain vacation ownership properties and related assets held
for sale that are no longer consistent with our development
plans; and
|
|
|
$4 million of increased costs related to our trial
membership marketing program.
|
Our active development pipeline consists of approximately
160 units in one U.S. state, a decline from
1,400 units as of December 31, 2008 primarily due to
our initiative to reduce our VOI sales pace.
Corporate
and Other
Corporate and Other expenses increased $46 million in 2009
compared to 2008. Such increase primarily includes:
|
|
|
a $24 million unfavorable impact from the resolution of and
adjustment to certain contingent liabilities and assets recorded
during 2009 as compared to 2008;
|
|
|
increased corporate expenses primarily due to $11 million
of employee incentive programs and severance, $9 million of
hedging activity and $5 million of other, including
additional rent associated with the consolidation of two leased
facilities into one, partially offset by $6 million of cost
savings initiatives; and
|
|
|
$1 million of costs relating to organizational realignment
initiatives (see Restructuring Plan for more details).
|
Other
Income, Net
Other income, net decreased $5 million during 2009 as
compared to 2008. Such decrease includes:
|
|
|
a $4 million decline in net earnings from equity
investments;
|
|
|
the absence of $2 million of income associated with the
assumption of a lodging-related credit card marketing program
obligation by a third party; and
|
|
|
the absence of $2 million of income associated with the
sale of a non-strategic asset at our lodging business.
|
Such decreases were partially offset by $2 million of
higher gains associated with the sale of non-strategic assets at
our vacation ownership business. Such amounts are included
within our segment EBITDA results.
Interest
Expense/Interest Income
Interest expense increased $34 million during 2009 compared
to 2008 as a result of (i) a $25 million increase in
interest incurred on our long-term debt facilities resulting
from our May 2009 debt issuances (see Note 13
Long-Term Debt and Borrowing Arrangements) and
(ii) $9 million of lower capitalized interest at our
vacation ownership business due to lower development of vacation
ownership inventory. Interest income decreased $5 million
during 2009 compared to 2008 due to decreased interest earned on
invested cash balances as a result of lower rates earned on
investments.
RESTRUCTURING
PLANS
2010
Restructuring
Plan
In connection with the recent implementation of significant
technology enhancements at our vacation exchange and rentals
business during 2010, we committed to a strategic realignment
initiative targeted at reducing costs, which will primarily
impact the operations at one of our call centers. Such plan
resulted in $9 million in restructuring costs during 2010
and will result in the termination of approximately
330 employees. The liability of $9 million is expected
to be paid out in cash primarily by the second quarter of 2011.
We anticipate additional restructuring costs of approximately
$2 million during the second quarter of 2011 primarily for
facility-related costs, which will be paid in cash over the life
of the remaining lease term. We anticipate annual net savings
from such initiative of $9 million.
2008
Restructuring
Plan
In response to a deteriorating global economy, during 2008, we
committed to various strategic realignment initiatives targeted
principally at reducing costs, enhancing organizational
efficiency, reducing our need to access the asset-backed
securities market and consolidating and rationalizing existing
processes and facilities. As a result, we
55
recorded $47 million and $79 million in restructuring
costs during 2009 and 2008 respectively. Such strategic
realignment initiatives included:
Lodging
We continued the operational realignment of our lodging
business, which began during 2008, to enhance its global
franchisee services, promote more efficient channel management
to further drive revenues at franchised locations and managed
properties and position the Wyndham brand appropriately and
consistently in the marketplace. As a result of these changes,
we recorded costs of $3 million and $4 million during
2009 and 2008, respectively, primarily related to the
elimination of certain positions and the related severance
benefits and outplacement services that were provided for
impacted employees.
Vacation
Exchange And Rentals
Our strategic realignment in our vacation exchange and rentals
business streamlined exchange operations primarily across its
international businesses by reducing management layers to
improve regional accountability. As a result of these
initiatives, we recorded restructuring costs of $6 million
and $9 million during 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Vacation
Ownership
Our vacation ownership business refocused its sales and
marketing efforts by closing the least profitable sales offices
and eliminating marketing programs that were producing prospects
with lower credit quality. Consequently, we have decreased the
level of timeshare development, reduced our need to access the
asset-backed securities market and enhanced cash flow. Such
realignment includes the elimination of certain positions, the
termination of leases of certain sales and administrative
offices, the termination of development projects and the
write-off of assets related to the sales and administrative
offices and cancelled development projects. These initiatives
resulted in costs of $37 million and $66 million
during 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Corporate &
Other
We identified opportunities at our corporate business to reduce
costs by enhancing organizational efficiency and consolidating
and rationalizing existing processes. As a result, we recorded
$1 million in restructuring costs during 2009.
Total
Company
During 2010, we reduced our liability with $11 million in
cash payments. The remaining liability of $11 million, all
of which is facility-related, is expected to be paid in cash by
September 2017. We began to realize the benefits of these
strategic realignment initiatives during the fourth quarter of
2008 and realized net savings from such initiatives of
approximately $160 million, during 2010. We anticipate net
savings from such initiatives to continue annually.
FINANCIAL
CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Financial
Condition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Change
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
9,416
|
|
|
$
|
9,352
|
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
6,499
|
|
|
|
6,664
|
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
2,917
|
|
|
|
2,688
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
Total assets increased $64 million from December 31,
2009 to December 31, 2010 due to:
|
|
|
a $95 million net increase in goodwill related to the
acquisitions of Hoseasons, the Tryp hotel brand, ResortQuest and
James Villa Holidays, partially offset by the impact of foreign
currency translation at our vacation exchange and rentals
business;
|
|
|
an $88 million increase in property and equipment primarily
related to capital expenditures for the maintenance and
enhancements to our information technology, construction of new
bungalows at our Landal GreenParks business and the acquisition
of ResortQuest, partially offset by the impact of depreciation
on property and equipment and the impact of foreign currency
translation at our vacation exchange and rentals business;
|
|
|
a $71 million increase in trademarks, net as a result of
the acquisitions of Hoseasons, the Tryp hotel brand, ResortQuest
and James Villa Holidays;
|
56
|
|
|
a $49 million increase in franchise agreements and other
intangibles, net, primarily related to the acquisitions of
Hoseasons, the Tryp hotel brand, ResortQuest and James Villa
Holidays, partially offset by the amortization of franchise
agreements at our lodging business;
|
|
|
a $21 million increase in trade receivables, net, primarily
due to the acquisitions of Hoseasons, ResortQuest and James
Villa Holidays and increased ancillary revenue at our lodging
business primarily related to additional services provided to
franchisees, partially offset by the impact of foreign currency
translation at our vacation exchange and rentals business and a
decline in ancillary revenues at our vacation ownership
business; and
|
|
|
a $12 million increase in other current assets due to
increased current escrow deposit restricted cash at our vacation
ownership business primarily related to higher VOI sales and
increased current securitized restricted cash resulting from the
timing of cash that we are required to set aside in connection
with additional vacation ownership contract receivables
securitizations, partially offset by a decline in assets
available for sale resulting from the sale of a vacation
ownership property and related assets that were no longer
consistent with our development plans.
|
Such increases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
a $126 million decrease in inventory primarily due to
increased VOI sales and a reduction in the development of
vacation ownership resorts;
|
|
|
a $99 million decrease in vacation ownership contract
receivables, net as a result of a decline in VOI sales financed;
|
|
|
a $26 million decrease in other non-current assets
primarily due to the settlement of a portion of our call options
in connection with the repurchase of our 3.50% convertible notes
and decreased deferred expenses related to sales incentives
awarded to owners at our vacation ownership business, partially
offset by an increase in the fair value of our call option
transaction entered into concurrent with the issuance of the
convertible notes, which is discussed in greater detail in
Note 13 Long-Term Debt and Borrowing
Arrangements and increased deferred financing costs as a result
of the debt issuances during 2010;
|
|
|
$12 million of decreased prepaid expenses due to declines
in prepaid commissions and prepaid marketing expenses at our
vacation ownership business; and
|
|
|
a $10 million decrease in deferred income taxes primarily
attributable to the utilization of alternative minimum tax
credits.
|
Total liabilities decreased $165 million primarily due to:
|
|
|
a $231 million decrease in due to former Parent and
subsidiaries primarily due to the settlement of the IRS
examination of Cendants taxable years 2003 through 2006;
|
|
|
a $116 million decrease in deferred income taxes primarily
attributable to an installment sale recognition adjustment
resulting from the IRS Settlement, partially offset by a change
in the expected timing of the utilization of alternative minimum
credits;
|
|
|
an $77 million decrease in deferred income primarily
resulting from the impact of the recognition of revenues related
to our vacation ownership trial membership marketing program and
lower deferred revenues at our vacation exchange and rentals
business, partially offset by increased deferred revenues at our
lodging business; and
|
|
|
a $17 million decrease in other non-current liabilities
primarily due to lower liability balances on certain financial
instruments and a decline in unrecognized tax liabilities.
|
Such decreases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
a $143 million net increase in our securitized vacation
ownership debt (see Note 13 Long-Term Debt and
Borrowing Arrangements);
|
|
|
a net increase of $79 million in our other long-term debt
primarily reflecting the issuances of our $250 million
5.75% senior unsecured notes and $250 million
7.375% senior unsecured notes, a $154 million net
increase in outstanding borrowings on our corporate revolver,
partially offset by the early extinguishment of our
$300 million term loan facility during March 2010, net
principal payments on our other long-term debt with operating
cash of $169 million, a $101 million decrease related
to the repurchase of a portion of our 3.50% convertible notes, a
$14 million net decrease in our derivative liability
related to the bifurcated conversion feature entered into
concurrent with the sale of our convertible notes, which is
discussed in greater detail in Note 13
Long-Term Debt and Borrowing Arrangements, and a $6 million
impact due to foreign currency translation;
|
57
|
|
|
a $40 million increase in accrued expenses and other
current liabilities primarily due to higher accrued employee
incentive compensation costs across all of our businesses,
higher accrued interest on our non-securitized long-term debt
and increased litigation expenses at our vacation ownership
business; and
|
|
|
a $14 million increase in accounts payable primarily due to
the acquisitions of Hoseasons, ResortQuest and James Villa
Holidays, partially offset by the timing of payments on accounts
payable across all of our businesses.
|
Total stockholders equity increased $229 million
primarily due to:
|
|
|
$379 million of net income generated during 2010;
|
|
|
$188 million related to the reversal of net deferred tax
liabilities primarily attributable to an installment sale
recognition adjustment resulting from the IRS settlement;
|
|
|
a $40 million impact resulting from the exercise of stock
options during 2010;
|
|
|
a change of $17 million in deferred equity compensation;
|
|
|
a $12 million increase to our pool of excess tax benefits
available to absorb tax deficiencies due to the vesting of
equity awards;
|
|
|
a $12 million impact resulting from (i) the
reclassification of an $8 million after-tax unrealized loss
associated with the termination of an interest rate swap
agreement in connection with the early extinguishment of our
term loan facility during the first quarter of 2010 (see
Note 13 Long-Term Debt and Borrowing
Arrangements) and (ii) $4 million of unrealized gains
on cash flow hedges, net of tax; and
|
|
|
$5 million of currency translation adjustments, net of a
tax benefit.
|
Such increases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
$237 million of treasury stock purchased through our stock
repurchase program;
|
|
|
$98 million for the repurchase of warrants; and
|
|
|
$89 million related to dividends.
|
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Currently, our financing needs are supported by cash generated
from operations and borrowings under our revolving credit
facility. In addition, certain funding requirements of our
vacation ownership business are met through the issuance of
securitized debt to finance vacation ownership contract
receivables. We believe that our net cash from operations, cash
and cash equivalents, access to our revolving credit facility
and continued access to the securitization and debt markets
provide us with sufficient liquidity to meet our ongoing needs.
During March 2010, we replaced our five-year $900 million
revolving credit facility with a $950 million revolving
credit facility that expires on October 1, 2013 and,
subsequently, increased the capacity of this facility to
$970 million in the fourth quarter of 2010. In October
2010, we renewed our
364-day,
non-recourse, securitized vacation ownership bank conduit
facility, with a term through September 2011 and total capacity
of $600 million.
We may, from time to time, depending on market conditions and
other factors, repurchase our outstanding indebtedness,
including our convertible notes, whether or not such
indebtedness trades above or below its face amount, for cash
and/or in
exchange for other securities or other consideration, in each
case in open market purchases
and/or
privately negotiated transactions.
CASH
FLOWS
During 2010 and 2009, we had a net change in cash and cash
equivalents of $1 million and $19 million,
respectively. The following table summarizes such changes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Cash provided by/(used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
635
|
|
|
$
|
689
|
|
|
$
|
(54
|
)
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(418
|
)
|
|
|
(109
|
)
|
|
|
(309
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
(219
|
)
|
|
|
(561
|
)
|
|
|
342
|
|
Effects of changes in exchange rate on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
Operating
Activities
During 2010, net cash provided by operating activities decreased
$54 million as compared to 2009, which principally reflects:
|
|
|
a $135 million increase in payments to former Parent and
subsidiaries primarily related to contingent tax liabilities,
including the net payment of $145 million
($155 million paid less $10 million received from
Realogy) to Cendant, who is the taxpayer, partially offset by
the absence of $37 million in payments made for contingent
litigation liabilities during 2009;
|
|
|
a $109 million decline in our provision for loan losses
primarily related to improved portfolio performance and mix and
the absence of the recognition of revenue previously deferred
under the POC method of accounting;
|
|
|
$78 million of lower cash inflows from trade receivables
primarily due to increased revenues at our vacation exchange and
rentals and lodging businesses, lower collections associated
with the 2009 planned reduction of ancillary revenues at our
vacation ownership business and lower cash inflows at our
vacation exchange and rentals business due to the outsourcing of
European travel services to a third party provider;
|
|
|
$45 million of lower cash inflows from other current assets
primarily due to the absence of the recognition of VOI sales
commissions and other costs during 2009 that had previously been
deferred under the POC method of accounting.
|
Such decreases in cash inflows were partially offset by
(i) a $233 million increase in deferred income
primarily related to the absence of the recognition of revenue
previously deferred under the POC method of accounting during
2009 and (ii) $63 million of lower investments in
inventory primarily related to the planned reduction in
development of resorts for VOI sales.
Investing
Activities
During 2010, net cash used in investing activities increased
$309 million as compared with to 2009, which principally
reflects:
|
|
|
higher acquisition-related payments of $236 million
primarily related to the acquisitions of James Villa Holidays,
Hoseasons, ResortQuest and the Tryp hotel brand;
|
|
|
an increase of $32 million in property and equipment
additions primarily due to the new construction of bungalows at
our Landal GreenParks business and improvements of technology
used to drive members to the websites of our vacation exchange
and rentals business, partially offset by the absence of 2009
leasehold improvements related to the consolidation of two
leased facilities into one;
|
|
|
an increase of $27 million in cash outflows from
securitized restricted cash primarily due to the timing of cash
that we are required to set aside in connection with additional
vacation ownership contract receivable securitizations; and
|
|
|
an increase of $21 million in cash outflows from escrow
deposits restricted cash primarily due to timing differences
between our deeding and sales processes for certain VOI sales.
|
Such increases in cash outflows were partially offset by a
$15 million increase in proceeds from asset sales primarily
related to the sale of certain vacation ownership and vacation
exchange and rentals properties that were no longer consistent
with our development plans.
Financing
Activities
During 2010, net cash used in financing activities decreased
$342 million as compared to 2009, which principally
reflects:
|
|
|
$448 million of higher net proceeds related to securitized
vacation ownership debt due to better advance rates;
|
|
|
$317 million of higher net proceeds related to
non-securitized borrowings;
|
|
|
$69 million of higher net proceeds resulting from the
settlement of a portion of our 2009 convertible note hedge and
warrant transactions;
|
|
|
$40 million of higher proceeds received in connection with
stock option exercises during 2010;
|
59
|
|
|
$34 million of higher proceeds related to issuances of
notes; and
|
|
|
$14 million of higher tax benefits resulting from the
exercise and vesting of equity awards.
|
Such increases in cash inflows were partially offset by:
|
|
|
$250 million related to the repurchase of a portion of our
convertible notes;
|
|
|
$235 million spent on our stock repurchase program;
|
|
|
$57 million of additional dividends paid to shareholders;
|
|
|
$23 million of tax withholdings related to the net share
settlement of vested restricted stock units; and
|
|
|
$14 million of incremental debt issuance costs primarily
related to our new $970 million revolving credit facility.
|
Convertible Debt. We utilized some of our cash flow
to retire a portion of our convertible debt and settle a related
portion of call options (Call Options) and warrants
(Warrants). During 2010, we repurchased
approximately 50%, or $114 million face value, of our
$230 million 3.50% convertible notes that had a carrying
value of $239 million ($101 million for the portion of
convertible notes, including the unamortized discount, and
$138 million for the related bifurcated conversion feature)
for $250 million. Concurrent with the repurchase, we
settled (i) a portion of the Call Options for proceeds of
$136 million and (ii) a portion of the Warrants with
payments of $98 million. As a result of these transactions,
we made net payments of $212 million and incurred total
losses of $14 million during 2010. This transaction reduced
the number of Warrants related to the convertible transaction by
approximately 9 million and, as such, we had approximately
9 million Warrants outstanding as of December 31,
2010. As the Warrants had a dilutive effect when our common
stock price exceeds the Warrant strike price of $19.90 per
share, this transaction will result in reduced future share
dilution if our common stock price continues to exceed the
Warrant strike price. In addition, this transaction is expected
to create economic value as we believe that our common stock
price will increase, resulting in a benefit that will exceed the
cost of purchasing these Warrants.
On February 9, 2011, we announced a tender offer to
repurchase any and all of our outstanding 3.50% Convertible
Notes Convertible Notes) due May 2012. For each
$1,000 principal amount of such Convertible Notes, the cash
purchase price is equal to the sum of (i) the
15-day
Average Volume Weighted Average Price (VWAP) of the
stock and (ii) a fixed cash amount of $50.00. Concurrent
with the original offering of the Convertible Notes, we
(i) purchased Call Options on our common stock with a
strike price equal to the per share conversion price of the
Convertible Notes to offset our exposure to cash payments upon
conversion of any Convertible Notes and (ii) sold Warrants
on our common stock with a strike price of approximately $20 per
share which may be settled in net shares or cash at our option.
We have entered into agreements for a partial Call Option and
Warrant termination (Partial Termination Agreements)
with each of the three banks that is a counterparty with respect
to the Call Options and Warrants. Under the Partial Termination
Agreements, we may, upon consummation of the offer, elect to
terminate, in the aggregate or on a ratable basis among the
three bank counterparties, a percentage of the Call Options and
Warrants equivalent to the percentage of the outstanding
aggregate principal amount of the Convertible Notes acquired
through the offer.
We would need approximately $290 million to purchase all of
the Convertible Notes outstanding as of February 8, 2011,
assuming a purchase price of $2,504.87 per $1,000 principal
amount of Convertible Notes, based upon an assumed Average VWAP
of $30.85, which was the closing price per share of our common
stock on the New York Stock Exchange on February 8, 2011,
and assuming that the purchase of Convertible Notes pursuant to
the offer is settled on March 10, 2011. If we exercise our
rights under the Partial Termination Agreements, we may receive
proceeds as a result of the termination of the Call Options. We
intend to use a combination of cash on hand and borrowings under
our existing revolving credit facility, or other debt
financings, to pay for all Convertible Notes that we purchase in
the offer and any costs associated with the Partial Termination
Agreements. As of December 31, 2010, the $266 million
Convertible Notes consisted of $104 million of debt
($116 million face amount, net of $12 million of
unamortized discount) and a derivative liability with a fair
value of $162 million related to the Bifurcated Conversion
Feature.
We utilized the proceeds from our September 2010 debt issuance
to reduce our outstanding indebtedness including repaying
borrowings under our revolving credit facility and for general
corporate purposes. For further detailed information about such
borrowings, see Note 13 Long-Term Debt and
Borrowing Arrangements.
We utilized the proceeds from our February 2010 debt issuance to
pay down our revolving foreign credit facility and to reduce the
outstanding balance of our term loan facility. The remainder of
the term loan facility balance was repaid with borrowings under
our revolving credit facility. For further detailed information
about such borrowings, see Note 13 Long-Term
Debt and Borrowing Arrangements.
60
Capital
Deployment
We are focusing on optimizing cash flow and seeking to deploy
capital for the highest possible returns. Ultimately, our
business objective is to transform our cash and earnings
profile, primarily by rebalancing the cash streams to achieve a
greater proportion of EBITDA from our
fee-for-service
businesses. We intend to continue to invest in select capital
improvements and technological improvements in our lodging,
vacation ownership, vacation exchange and rentals and corporate
businesses. In addition, we may seek to acquire additional
franchise agreements, hotel/property management contracts and
exclusive agreements for vacation rental properties on a
strategic and selective basis, either directly or through
investments in joint ventures.
During 2010, we spent $177 million on capital expenditures,
equity investments and development advances primarily on
(i) information technology maintenance and enhancement
projects, (ii) construction of new bungalows at our Landal
GreenParks business, and (iii) equity investments and
development advances. During 2011, we anticipate spending
approximately $200 million to $225 million on capital
expenditures, equity investments and development advances
including approximately $50 million related to the
completion of our Wyndham Lake Buena Vista Hotel and Spa located
within our Bonnet Creek vacation ownership resort. In addition,
we spent $129 million relating to vacation ownership
development projects (inventory) during 2010. We anticipate
spending on average approximately $130 million annually
from 2011 through 2014 on vacation ownership development
projects (approximately $80 million to $90 million
during 2011), including ones currently under development. We
believe that our vacation ownership business currently has
adequate finished inventory on our balance sheet to support
vacation ownership sales through 2012. We expect that the
majority of the expenditures that will be required to pursue our
capital spending programs, strategic investments and vacation
ownership development projects will be financed with cash flow
generated through operations. Additional expenditures are
financed with general unsecured corporate borrowings, including
through the use of available capacity under our
$970 million revolving credit facility.
Share
Repurchase Program
We expect to generate annual net cash provided by operating
activities less capital expenditures, equity investments and
development advances in the range of approximately
$600 million to $700 million annually in 2011. A
portion of this cash flow is expected to be returned to our
shareholders in the form of share repurchases. On
August 20, 2007, our Board of Directors authorized a stock
repurchase program that enabled us to purchase up to
$200 million of our common stock. Under such program, we
repurchased 2,155,783 shares at an average price of $26.89
for a cost of $58 million and repurchase capacity increased
$13 million from proceeds received from stock option
exercises as of December 31, 2009. On July 22, 2010,
our Board of Directors increased the authorization for the stock
repurchase program by $300 million. During the year ended
December 31, 2010, we repurchased 9,270,419 shares at
an average price of $25.52 for a cost of $237 million and
repurchase capacity increased $40 million from proceeds
received from stock option exercises. Such repurchase capacity
will continue to be increased by proceeds received from future
stock option exercises. As of December 31, 2010, we
repurchased a total of 11,426,202 shares at an average
price of $25.78 for a cost of $295 million under our
current authorization and had $258 million remaining
availability in our program.
During the period January 1, 2011 through February 18,
2011, we repurchased an additional 1.6 million shares at an
average price of $30.10 for a cost of $49 million and
repurchase capacity increased $3 million from proceeds
received from stock option exercises. We currently have
$212 million remaining availability in our program. The
amount and timing of specific repurchases are subject to market
conditions, applicable legal requirements and other factors.
Repurchases may be conducted in the open market or in privately
negotiated transactions.
Contingent
Tax Liabilities
On July 15, 2010, Cendant and the IRS agreed to settle the
IRS examination of Cendants taxable years 2003 through
2006. During such period, we and Realogy were included in
Cendants tax returns. The agreement with the IRS closes
the IRS examination for tax periods prior to the date of
Separation, July 31, 2006. During September 2010, we
received $10 million in payment from Realogy and paid
$155 million for all such tax liabilities, including the
final interest payable, to Cendant who is the taxpayer. We made
such payment from cash flow generated through operations and the
use of available capacity under our $970 million revolving
credit facility.
As a result of the agreement with the IRS, we (i) reversed
$190 million in net deferred tax liabilities allocated from
Cendant on the Separation Date with a corresponding increase to
stockholders equity and (ii) recognized a
$55 million gain ($42 million, net of tax) with a
corresponding decrease to general and administrative expenses
during the third quarter of 2010. During the fourth quarter of
2010, we recorded a $2 million reduction to deferred tax
assets allocated from Cendant on the Separation Date with a
corresponding decrease to stockholders equity. As of
December 31, 2010, our accrual for outstanding Cendant
contingent tax liabilities was $58 million, which relates
to legacy state and foreign tax issues that are expected to be
resolved in the next few years.
61
Financial
Obligations
Our indebtedness consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Securitized vacation ownership
debt: (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes
|
|
$
|
1,498
|
|
|
$
|
1,112
|
|
Bank conduit
facility (b)
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securitized vacation ownership debt
|
|
$
|
1,650
|
|
|
$
|
1,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00% senior unsecured notes (due December
2016) (c)
|
|
$
|
798
|
|
|
$
|
797
|
|
Term
loan (d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
Revolving credit facility (due October
2013) (e)
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.875% senior unsecured notes (due May
2014) (f)
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
3.50% convertible notes (due May
2012) (g)
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
7.375% senior unsecured notes (due March
2020) (h)
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.75% senior unsecured notes (due February
2018) (i)
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation ownership bank
borrowings (j)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
Vacation rentals capital
leases (k)
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
Other
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
2,094
|
|
|
$
|
2,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents debt that is securitized
through bankruptcy-remote special purpose entities
(SPEs), the creditors of which have no recourse to
us for principal and interest.
|
(b) |
|
Represents a
364-day,
$600 million, non-recourse vacation ownership bank conduit
facility, with a term through September 2011, whose capacity is
subject to our ability to provide additional assets to
collateralize the facility. As of December 31, 2010, the
total available capacity of the facility was $448 million.
|
(c) |
|
The balance as of December 31,
2010 represents $800 million aggregate principal less
$2 million of unamortized discount.
|
(d) |
|
The term loan facility was fully
repaid during March 2010.
|
(e) |
|
The revolving credit facility has a
total capacity of $970 million, which includes availability
for letters of credit. As of December 31, 2010, we had
$28 million of letters of credit outstanding and, as such,
the total available capacity of the revolving credit facility
was $788 million.
|
(f) |
|
Represents senior unsecured notes
we issued during May 2009. The balance as of December 31,
2010 represents $250 million aggregate principal less
$9 million of unamortized discount.
|
(g) |
|
Represents convertible notes issued
by us during May 2009, which includes debt principal, less
unamortized discount, and a liability related to a bifurcated
conversion feature. During the third and fourth quarters of
2010, we repurchased a portion of our 3.50% convertible notes
(see Note 13 Long-term Debt and Borrowing
Arrangements for further details). The following table details
the components of the convertible notes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Debt principal
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
|
$
|
230
|
|
Unamortized discount
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt less discount
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
Fair value of bifurcated conversion
feature (*)
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible notes
|
|
$
|
266
|
|
|
$
|
367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) We
also have an asset with a fair value equal to the bifurcated
conversion feature, which represents cash-settled call options
that we purchased concurrent with the issuance of the
convertible notes.
|
|
|
(h) |
|
Represents senior unsecured notes
we issued during February 2010. The balance as of
December 31, 2010 represents $250 million aggregate
principal less $3 million of unamortized discount.
|
(i) |
|
Represents senior unsecured notes
we issued during September 2010. The balance as of
December 31, 2010 represents $250 million aggregate
principal less $3 million of unamortized discount.
|
(j) |
|
Represents a
364-day, AUD
213 million, secured, revolving foreign credit facility,
which was paid down and terminated during March 2010.
|
(k) |
|
Represents capital lease
obligations with corresponding assets classified within property
and equipment on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
|
2010
Debt Issuances
During 2010, we issued senior unsecured notes, closed four term
securitizations and a new revolving credit facility, repurchased
a portion of our 3.50% convertible notes and renewed our
securitized vacation ownership bank conduit facility. For
further detailed information about such debt, see
Note 13 Long-Term Debt and Borrowing
Arrangements.
62
Capacity
As of December 31, 2010, available capacity under our
borrowing arrangements was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
|
Capacity
|
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
Capacity
|
|
|
Securitized vacation ownership debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes
|
|
$
|
1,498
|
|
|
$
|
1,498
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Bank conduit
facility (a)
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securitized vacation ownership
debt (b)
|
|
$
|
2,098
|
|
|
$
|
1,650
|
|
|
$
|
448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00% senior unsecured notes (due December 2016)
|
|
$
|
798
|
|
|
$
|
798
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility (due October
2013) (c)
|
|
|
970
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
816
|
|
9.875% senior unsecured notes (due May 2014)
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.50% convertible notes (due May 2012)
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.375% senior unsecured notes (due March 2020)
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.75% senior unsecured notes (due February 2018)
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation rentals capital leases
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
2,920
|
|
|
$
|
2,094
|
|
|
|
826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Issuance of letters of
credit (c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
798
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The capacity of this facility is
subject to our ability to provide additional assets to
collateralize additional securitized borrowings.
|
(b) |
|
These outstanding borrowings are
collateralized by $2,865 million of underlying gross
vacation ownership contract receivables and related assets.
|
(c) |
|
The capacity under our revolving
credit facility includes availability for letters of credit. As
of December 31, 2010, the available capacity of
$816 million was further reduced to $788 million due
to the issuance of $28 million of letters of credit.
|
Vacation
Ownership Contract Receivables and Securitizations
We pool qualifying vacation ownership contract receivables and
sell them to bankruptcy-remote entities. Vacation ownership
contract receivables qualify for securitization based primarily
on the credit strength of the VOI purchaser to whom financing
has been extended. Vacation ownership contract receivables are
securitized through bankruptcy-remote SPEs that are consolidated
within our Consolidated Financial Statements. As a result, we do
not recognize gains or losses resulting from these
securitizations at the time of sale to the SPEs. Income is
recognized when earned over the contractual life of the vacation
ownership contract receivables. We service the securitized
vacation ownership contract receivables pursuant to servicing
agreements negotiated on an arms-length basis based on market
conditions. The activities of these SPEs are limited to
(i) purchasing vacation ownership contract receivables from
our vacation ownership subsidiaries; (ii) issuing debt
securities
and/or
borrowing under a conduit facility to fund such purchases; and
(iii) entering into derivatives to hedge interest rate
exposure. The bankruptcy-remote SPEs are legally separate from
us. The receivables held by the bankruptcy-remote SPEs are not
available to our creditors and legally are not our assets.
Additionally, the creditors of these SPEs have no recourse to us
for principal and interest.
The assets and debt of these vacation ownership SPEs are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Securitized contract receivables, gross
|
|
$
|
2,703
|
|
|
$
|
2,591
|
|
Securitized restricted cash
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
Interest receivables on securitized contract receivables
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Other
assets (a)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total SPE
assets (b)
|
|
|
2,865
|
|
|
|
2,755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized term notes
|
|
|
1,498
|
|
|
|
1,112
|
|
Securitized conduit facilities
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
Other
liabilities (c)
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total SPE liabilities
|
|
|
1,672
|
|
|
|
1,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPE assets in excess of SPE liabilities
|
|
$
|
1,193
|
|
|
$
|
1,222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Primarily includes interest rate
derivative contracts and related assets.
|
(b) |
|
Excludes deferred financing costs
of $22 million and $20 million as of December 31,
2010 and 2009, respectively, related to securitized debt.
|
(c) |
|
Primarily includes interest rate
derivative contracts and accrued interest on securitized debt.
|
63
In addition, we have vacation ownership contract receivables
that have not been securitized through bankruptcy-remote SPEs.
Such gross receivables were $641 million and
$860 million as of December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. A summary of total vacation ownership receivables
and other securitized assets, net of securitized liabilities and
the allowance for loan losses, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
SPE assets in excess of SPE liabilities
|
|
$
|
1,193
|
|
|
$
|
1,222
|
|
Non-securitized contract receivables
|
|
|
641
|
|
|
|
598
|
|
Secured contract
receivables (*)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(362
|
)
|
|
|
(370
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total, net
|
|
$
|
1,472
|
|
|
$
|
1,712
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
As of December 31, 2009, such
receivables collateralized our secured, revolving foreign credit
facility, which was paid down and terminated during March 2010.
|
Covenants
The revolving credit facility is subject to covenants including
the maintenance of specific financial ratios. The financial
ratio covenants consist of a minimum consolidated interest
coverage ratio of at least 3.0 to 1.0 as of the measurement date
and a maximum consolidated leverage ratio not to exceed 3.75 to
1.0 on the measurement date. The consolidated interest coverage
ratio is calculated by dividing consolidated EBITDA (as defined
in the credit agreement) by consolidated interest expense (as
defined in the credit agreement), both as measured on a trailing
12 month basis preceding the measurement date. As of
December 31, 2010, our consolidated interest coverage ratio
was 8.0 times. Consolidated interest expense excludes, among
other things, interest expense on any securitization
indebtedness (as defined in the credit agreement). The
consolidated leverage ratio is calculated by dividing
consolidated total indebtedness (as defined in the credit
agreement and which excludes, among other things, securitization
indebtedness) as of the measurement date by consolidated EBITDA
as measured on a trailing 12 month basis preceding the
measurement date. As of December 31, 2010, our consolidated
leverage ratio was 2.0 times. Covenants in this credit facility
also include limitations on indebtedness of material
subsidiaries; liens; mergers, consolidations, liquidations and
dissolutions; sale of all or substantially all of our assets;
and sale and leaseback transactions. Events of default in this
credit facility include failure to pay interest, principal and
fees when due; breach of a covenant or warranty; acceleration of
or failure to pay other debt in excess of $50 million
(excluding securitization indebtedness); insolvency matters; and
a change of control.
The 6.00% senior unsecured notes, 9.875% senior
unsecured notes, 7.375% senior unsecured notes and
5.75% senior unsecured notes contain various covenants
including limitations on liens, limitations on potential sale
and leaseback transactions and change of control restrictions.
In addition, there are limitations on mergers, consolidations
and potential sale of all or substantially all of our assets.
Events of default in the notes include failure to pay interest
and principal when due, breach of a covenant or warranty,
acceleration of other debt in excess of $50 million and
insolvency matters. The convertible notes do not contain
affirmative or negative covenants, however, the limitations on
mergers, consolidations and potential sale of all or
substantially all of our assets and the events of default for
our senior unsecured notes are applicable to such notes. Holders
of the convertible notes have the right to require us to
repurchase the convertible notes at 100% of principal plus
accrued and unpaid interest in the event of a fundamental
change, defined to include, among other things, a change of
control, certain recapitalizations and if our common stock is no
longer listed on a national securities exchange.
As of December 31, 2010, we were in compliance with all of
the financial covenants described above.
Each of our non-recourse, securitized term notes and the bank
conduit facility contain various triggers relating to the
performance of the applicable loan pools. If the vacation
ownership contract receivables pool that collateralizes one of
our securitization notes fails to perform within the parameters
established by the contractual triggers (such as higher default
or delinquency rates), there are provisions pursuant to which
the cash flows for that pool will be maintained in the
securitization as extra collateral for the note holders or
applied to accelerate the repayment of outstanding principal to
the noteholders. As of December 31, 2010, all of our
securitized loan pools were in compliance with applicable
contractual triggers.
Liquidity
Risk
Our vacation ownership business finances certain of its
receivables through (i) an asset-backed bank conduit
facility and (ii) periodically accessing the capital
markets by issuing asset-backed securities. None of the
currently outstanding asset-backed securities contains any
recourse provisions to us other than interest rate risk related
to swap counterparties (solely to the extent that the amount
outstanding on our notes differs from the forecasted
amortization schedule at the time of issuance).
64
We believe that our bank conduit facility, with a term through
September 2011 and capacity of $600 million, combined with
our ability to issue term asset-backed securities, should
provide sufficient liquidity for our expected sales pace and we
expect to have available liquidity to finance the sale of VOIs.
We also believe that we will be able to renew our bank conduit
facility at or before the maturity date.
Our $970 million revolving credit agreement, which expires
in October 2013, contains a provision that is a condition of an
extension of credit. The provision, which was standard market
practice for issuers of our rating and industry at the time of
our revolver renewal, allows the lenders to withhold an
extension of credit if the representations and warranties we
made at the time we executed the revolving credit facility
agreement are not true and correct in all material respects
including if a development or event has or would reasonably be
expected to have a material adverse effect on our business,
assets, operations or condition, financial or otherwise. The
application of the material adverse effect provision contains
exclusions for the impact resulting from disruptions in, or the
inability of companies engaged in businesses similar to those
engaged in by us and our subsidiaries to consummate financings
in, the asset backed securities or conduit market.
Some of our vacation ownership developments are supported by
surety bonds provided by affiliates of certain insurance
companies in order to meet regulatory requirements of certain
states. In the ordinary course of our business, we have
assembled commitments from thirteen surety providers in the
amount of $1.2 billion, of which we had $343 million
outstanding as of December 31, 2010. The availability,
terms and conditions, and pricing of such bonding capacity is
dependent on, among other things, continued financial strength
and stability of the insurance company affiliates providing such
bonding capacity, the general availability of such capacity and
our corporate credit rating. If such bonding capacity is
unavailable or, alternatively, if the terms and conditions and
pricing of such bonding capacity are unacceptable to us, the
cost of development of our vacation ownership units could be
negatively impacted.
Our liquidity position may also be negatively affected by
unfavorable conditions in the capital markets in which we
operate or if our vacation ownership contract receivables
portfolios do not meet specified portfolio credit parameters.
Our liquidity as it relates to our vacation ownership contract
receivables securitization program could be adversely affected
if we were to fail to renew or replace our conduit facility on
its annual expiration date or if a particular receivables pool
were to fail to meet certain ratios, which could occur in
certain instances if the default rates or other credit metrics
of the underlying vacation ownership contract receivables
deteriorate. Our ability to sell securities backed by our
vacation ownership contract receivables depends on the continued
ability and willingness of capital market participants to invest
in such securities.
As of December 31, 2010, we had $448 million of
availability under our asset-backed bank conduit facility. Any
disruption to the asset-backed or commercial paper markets could
adversely impact our ability to obtain such financings.
Our senior unsecured debt is rated BBB- by Standard and
Poors (S&P). During February 2010,
S&P assigned a stable outlook to our senior
unsecured debt. During February 2010, Moodys Investors
Service upgraded our senior unsecured debt rating to Ba1 and
during September 2010, assigned a positive outlook.
A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold
securities and is subject to revision or withdrawal by the
assigning rating organization. Reference in this report to any
such credit rating is intended for the limited purpose of
discussing or referring to aspects of our liquidity and of our
costs of funds. Any reference to a credit rating is not intended
to be any guarantee or assurance of, nor should there be any
undue reliance upon, any credit rating or change in credit
rating, nor is any such reference intended as any inference
concerning future performance, future liquidity or any future
credit rating.
As a result of the sale of Realogy on April 10, 2007,
Realogys senior debt credit rating was downgraded to below
investment grade. Under the Separation Agreement, if Realogy
experienced such a change of control and suffered such a ratings
downgrade, it was required to post a letter of credit in an
amount acceptable to us and Avis Budget Group to satisfy the
fair value of Realogys indemnification obligations for the
Cendant legacy contingent liabilities in the event Realogy does
not otherwise satisfy such obligations to the extent they become
due. On April 26, 2007, Realogy posted a $500 million
irrevocable standby letter of credit from a major commercial
bank in favor of Avis Budget Group and upon which demand may be
made if Realogy does not otherwise satisfy its obligations for
its share of the Cendant legacy contingent liabilities. The
letter of credit can be adjusted from time to time based upon
the outstanding contingent liabilities and has an expiration
date of September 2013, subject to renewal and certain
provisions. As such, the letter of credit has been reduced three
times, most recently to $133 million during September 2010.
The posting of this letter of credit does not relieve or limit
Realogys obligations for these liabilities.
65
Seasonality
We experience seasonal fluctuations in our net revenues and net
income from our franchise and management fees, commission income
earned from renting vacation properties, annual subscription
fees or annual membership dues, as applicable, and exchange
transaction fees and sales of VOIs. Revenues from franchise and
management fees are generally higher in the second and third
quarters than in the first or fourth quarters, because of
increased leisure travel during the summer months. Revenues from
rental income earned from vacation rentals are generally highest
in the third quarter, when vacation rentals are highest.
Revenues from vacation exchange transaction fees are generally
highest in the first quarter, which is generally when members of
our vacation exchange business plan and book their vacations for
the year. Revenues from sales of VOIs are generally higher in
the third quarter than in other quarters. The seasonality of our
business may cause fluctuations in our quarterly operating
results. As we expand into new markets and geographical
locations, we may experience increased or different seasonality
dynamics that create fluctuations in operating results different
from the fluctuations we have experienced in the past.
Separation
Adjustments and Transactions with Former Parent and
Subsidiaries
Transfer
of Cendant Corporate Liabilities and Issuance of Guarantees to
Cendant and Affiliates
Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, upon the
distribution of our common stock to Cendant shareholders, we
entered into certain guarantee commitments with Cendant
(pursuant to the assumption of certain liabilities and the
obligation to indemnify Cendant, Realogy and Travelport for such
liabilities) and guarantee commitments related to deferred
compensation arrangements with each of Cendant and Realogy.
These guarantee arrangements primarily relate to certain
contingent litigation liabilities, contingent tax liabilities,
and Cendant contingent and other corporate liabilities, of which
we assumed and are responsible for 37.5%, while Realogy is
responsible for the remaining 62.5%. The amount of liabilities
which we assumed in connection with the Separation was
$78 million and $310 million as of December 31,
2010 and 2009, respectively. These amounts were comprised of
certain Cendant corporate liabilities which were recorded on the
books of Cendant as well as additional liabilities which were
established for guarantees issued at the date of Separation
related to certain unresolved contingent matters and certain
others that could arise during the guarantee period. Regarding
the guarantees, if any of the companies responsible for all or a
portion of such liabilities were to default in its payment of
costs or expenses related to any such liability, we would be
responsible for a portion of the defaulting party or
parties obligation. We also provided a default guarantee
related to certain deferred compensation arrangements related to
certain current and former senior officers and directors of
Cendant, Realogy and Travelport. These arrangements, which are
discussed in more detail below, have been valued upon the
Separation in accordance with the guidance for guarantees and
recorded as liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. To
the extent such recorded liabilities are not adequate to cover
the ultimate payment amounts, such excess will be reflected as
an expense to the results of operations in future periods.
The $78 million of Separation related liabilities is
comprised of $1 million for litigation matters,
$58 million for tax liabilities, $15 million for
liabilities of previously sold businesses of Cendant,
$3 million for other contingent and corporate liabilities
and $1 million of liabilities where the calculated
guarantee amount exceeded the contingent liability assumed at
the date of Separation. In connection with these liabilities,
$47 million is recorded in current due to former Parent and
subsidiaries and $30 million is recorded in long-term due
to former Parent and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010
on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. We are indemnifying Cendant
for these contingent liabilities and therefore any payments
would be made to the third party through the former Parent. The
$1 million relating to guarantees is recorded in other
current liabilities as of December 31, 2010 on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet. The actual timing of payments
relating to these liabilities is dependent on a variety of
factors beyond our control. See Contractual Obligations for the
estimated timing of such payments. In addition, as of
December 31, 2010, we have $4 million of receivables
due from former Parent and subsidiaries primarily relating to
income taxes, which is recorded in other current assets on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet. Such receivables totaled
$5 million as of December 31, 2009.
Following is a discussion of the liabilities on which we issued
guarantees:
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent litigation liabilities We assumed 37.5%
of liabilities for certain litigation relating to, arising out
of or resulting from certain lawsuits in which Cendant is named
as the defendant. The indemnification obligation will continue
until the underlying lawsuits are resolved. We will indemnify
Cendant to the extent that Cendant is required to make payments
related to any of the underlying lawsuits. As the
indemnification obligation relates to matters in various stages
of litigation, the maximum exposure cannot be quantified. Due to
the inherently uncertain nature of the litigation process, the
timing of payments related to these liabilities cannot
reasonably be predicted, but is expected to occur over several
years. Since the Separation, Cendant settled a majority of these
lawsuits and we assumed a portion of the related indemnification
obligations. For each settlement, we paid 37.5% of the aggregate
settlement amount to Cendant. Our payment obligations under the
settlements were greater or less than our accruals, depending
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
on the matter. As a result of settlements and payments to
Cendant, as well as other reductions and accruals for
developments in active litigation matters, our aggregate accrual
for outstanding Cendant contingent litigation liabilities was
$1 million as of December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent tax liabilities Prior to the Separation,
we and Realogy were included in the consolidated federal and
state income tax returns of Cendant through the Separation date
for the 2006 period then ended. We are generally liable for
37.5% of certain contingent tax liabilities. In addition, each
of us, Cendant and Realogy may be responsible for 100% of
certain of Cendants tax liabilities that will provide the
responsible party with a future, offsetting tax benefit.
|
On July 15, 2010, Cendant and the IRS agreed to settle the
IRS examination of Cendants taxable years 2003 through
2006. The agreements with the IRS close the IRS examination for
tax periods prior to the Separation Date. The agreements with
the IRS also include a resolution with respect to the tax
treatment of our timeshare receivables, which resulted in the
acceleration of our unrecognized deferred tax liabilities as of
the Separation Date. In connection with reaching agreement with
the IRS to resolve the contingent federal tax liabilities at
issue, we entered into an agreement with Realogy to clarify each
partys obligations under the tax sharing agreement. Under
the agreement with Realogy, among other things, the parties
specified that we have sole responsibility for taxes and
interest associated with the acceleration of timeshare
receivables income previously deferred for tax purposes, while
Realogy will not seek any reimbursement for the loss of a step
up in basis of certain assets.
During September 2010, we received $10 million in payment
from Realogy and paid $155 million for all such tax
liabilities, including the final interest payable, to Cendant
who is the taxpayer. The agreement with the IRS and the net
payment of $145 million resulted in (i) the reversal
of $190 million in net deferred tax liabilities allocated
from Cendant on the Separation Date with a corresponding
increase to stockholders equity during the third quarter
of 2010; and (ii) the recognition of a $55 million
gain ($42 million, net of tax) with a corresponding
decrease to general and administrative expenses during the third
quarter of 2010. During the fourth quarter of 2010, we recorded
a $2 million reduction to deferred tax assets allocated
from Cendant on the Separation Date with a corresponding
decrease to stockholders equity. As of December 31,
2010, our accrual for outstanding Cendant contingent tax
liabilities was $58 million, which relates to legacy state
and foreign tax issues that are expected to be resolved in the
next few years.
|
|
|
|
|
Cendant contingent and other corporate
liabilities We have assumed 37.5% of corporate
liabilities of Cendant including liabilities relating to
(i) Cendants terminated or divested businesses;
(ii) liabilities relating to the Travelport sale, if any;
and (iii) generally any actions with respect to the
Separation plan or the distributions brought by any third party.
Our maximum exposure to loss cannot be quantified as this
guarantee relates primarily to future claims that may be made
against Cendant. We assessed the probability and amount of
potential liability related to this guarantee based on the
extent and nature of historical experience.
|
|
|
|
Guarantee related to deferred compensation
arrangements In the event that Cendant, Realogy
and/or
Travelport are not able to meet certain deferred compensation
obligations under specified plans for certain current and former
officers and directors because of bankruptcy or insolvency, we
have guaranteed such obligations (to the extent relating to
amounts deferred in respect of 2005 and earlier). This guarantee
will remain outstanding until such deferred compensation
balances are distributed to the respective officers and
directors. The maximum exposure cannot be quantified as the
guarantee, in part, is related to the value of deferred
investments as of the date of the requested distribution.
|
See Item 1A. Risk Factors for further information related
to contingent liabilities.
Transactions
with Avis Budget Group, Realogy and Travelport
Prior to our Separation from Cendant, we entered into a
Transition Services Agreement (TSA) with Avis Budget
Group, Realogy and Travelport to provide for an orderly
transition to becoming an independent company. Under the TSA,
Cendant agreed to provide us with various services, including
services relating to human resources and employee benefits,
payroll, financial systems management, treasury and cash
management, accounts payable services, telecommunications
services and information technology services. In certain cases,
services provided by Cendant under the TSA were provided by one
of the separated companies following the date of such
companys separation from Cendant. Such services were
substantially completed as of December 31, 2007. During
each of 2010, 2009 and 2008, we recorded $1 million of
expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations related to
these agreements.
67
Contractual
Obligations
The following table summarizes our future contractual
obligations for the twelve month periods beginning on
January 1st of each of the years set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Securitized
debt (a)
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
|
$
|
324
|
|
|
$
|
203
|
|
|
$
|
195
|
|
|
$
|
182
|
|
|
$
|
523
|
|
|
$
|
1,650
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
1,354
|
|
|
|
2,094
|
|
Interest on securitized and long-term
debt (b)
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
Other purchase
commitments (c)
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
477
|
|
Contingent
liabilities (d)
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (e)
|
|
$
|
791
|
|
|
$
|
1,012
|
|
|
$
|
612
|
|
|
$
|
618
|
|
|
$
|
338
|
|
|
$
|
2,324
|
|
|
$
|
5,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents debt that is securitized
through bankruptcy-remote SPEs, the creditors to which have no
recourse to us for principal and interest.
|
(b) |
|
Estimated using the stated interest
rates on our long-term debt and the swapped interest rates on
our securitized debt.
|
(c) |
|
Primarily represents commitments
for the development of vacation ownership properties. Total
includes approximately $100 million of vacation ownership
development commitments, which we may terminate at minimal to no
cost.
|
(d) |
|
Primarily represents certain
contingent litigation liabilities, contingent tax liabilities
and 37.5% of Cendant contingent and other corporate liabilities,
which we assumed and are responsible for pursuant to our
separation from Cendant.
|
(e) |
|
Excludes $23 million of our
liability for unrecognized tax benefits associated with the
guidance for uncertainty in income taxes since it is not
reasonably estimatable to determine the periods in which such
liability would be settled with the respective tax authorities.
|
In addition to the above and in connection with our separation
from Cendant, we entered into certain guarantee commitments with
Cendant (pursuant to our assumption of certain liabilities and
our obligation to indemnify Cendant, Realogy and Travelport for
such liabilities) and guarantee commitments related to deferred
compensation arrangements with each of Cendant and Realogy.
These guarantee arrangements primarily relate to certain
contingent litigation liabilities, contingent tax liabilities,
and Cendant contingent and other corporate liabilities, of which
we assumed and are responsible for 37.5% of these Cendant
liabilities. Additionally, if any of the companies responsible
for all or a portion of such liabilities were to default in its
payment of costs or expenses related to any such liability, we
are responsible for a portion of the defaulting party or
parties obligation. We also provide a default guarantee
related to certain deferred compensation arrangements related to
certain current and former senior officers and directors of
Cendant and Realogy. These arrangements were valued upon our
separation from Cendant with the assistance of third-party
experts in accordance with guidance for guarantees and recorded
as liabilities on our balance sheet. To the extent such recorded
liabilities are not adequate to cover the ultimate payment
amounts, such excess will be reflected as an expense to our
results of operations in future periods. See Separation
Adjustments and Transactions with former Parent and Subsidiaries
discussion for details of guaranteed liabilities.
Other
Commercial Commitments and Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements
Purchase Commitments. In the normal course of business,
we make various commitments to purchase goods or services from
specific suppliers, including those related to vacation
ownership resort development and other capital expenditures.
Purchase commitments made by us as of December 31, 2010
aggregated $477 million. Individually, such commitments
range as high as $97 million related to the development of
a vacation ownership resort. The majority of the commitments
relate to the development of vacation ownership properties
(aggregating $241 million; $101 million of which
relates to 2011 and $45 million of which relates to 2012).
Standard Guarantees/Indemnifications. In the ordinary
course of business, we enter into agreements that contain
standard guarantees and indemnities whereby we indemnify another
party for specified breaches of or third-party claims relating
to an underlying agreement. Such underlying agreements are
typically entered into by one of our subsidiaries. The various
underlying agreements generally govern purchases, sales or
outsourcing of assets or businesses, leases of real estate,
licensing of trademarks, development of vacation ownership
properties, access to credit facilities, derivatives and
issuances of debt securities. While a majority of these
guarantees and indemnifications extend only for the duration of
the underlying agreement, some survive the expiration of the
agreement. We are not able to estimate the maximum potential
amount of future payments to be made under these guarantees and
indemnifications as the triggering events are not predictable.
In certain cases we maintain insurance coverage that may
mitigate any potential payments.
Other Guarantees/Indemnifications. In the ordinary course
of business, our vacation ownership business provides guarantees
to certain owners associations for funds required to
operate and maintain vacation ownership properties in excess of
assessments collected from owners of the VOIs. We may be
required to fund such excess as a result of unsold Company-owned
VOIs or failure by owners to pay such assessments. These
guarantees extend for the duration of the underlying subsidy or
similar agreement (which generally approximate one year and are
renewable at our discretion on an annual basis) or until a
stipulated percentage (typically 80% or higher) of related VOIs
are sold. The maximum potential future payments that we could be
required to make under these guarantees
68
was approximately $373 million as of December 31,
2010. We would only be required to pay this maximum amount if
none of the owners assessed paid their assessments. Any
assessments collected from the owners of the VOIs would reduce
the maximum potential amount of future payments to be made by
us. Additionally, should we be required to fund the deficit
through the payment of any owners assessments under these
guarantees, we would be permitted access to the property for our
own use and may use that property to engage in revenue-producing
activities, such as rentals. During 2010, 2009 and 2008, we made
payments related to these guarantees of $12 million,
$10 million and $7 million, respectively. As of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, we maintained a liability in
connection with these guarantees of $17 million and
$22 million, respectively, on our Consolidated Balance
Sheets.
From time to time, we may enter into a hotel management
agreement that provides the hotel owner with a minimum return.
Under such agreement, we would be required to compensate for any
shortfall over the life of the management agreement up to a
specified aggregate amount. Our exposure under these guarantees
is partially mitigated by our ability to terminate any such
management agreement if certain targeted operating results are
not met. Additionally, we are able to recapture a portion or all
of the shortfall payments and any waived fees in the event that
future operating results exceed targets. As of December 31,
2010, the maximum potential amount of future payments to be made
under these guarantees is $16 million with an annual cap of
$3 million or less. As of both December 31, 2010 and
2009, we maintained a liability in connection with these
guarantees of less than $1 million on our Consolidated
Balance Sheets.
As part of our WAAM, we may guarantee to purchase from the
developer inventory associated with the developers resort
property for a percentage of the original sale price if certain
future conditions exist. The maximum potential future payments
that we could be required to make under these guarantees was
approximately $15 million as of December 31, 2010. As
of December 31, 2010, we have no recognized liabilities in
connection with these guarantees.
Securitizations. We pool qualifying vacation ownership
contract receivables and sell them to bankruptcy-remote entities
all of which are consolidated into the accompanying Consolidated
Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2010.
Letters of Credit. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009,
we had $28 million and $31 million, respectively, of
irrevocable standby letters of credit outstanding, which mainly
support development activity at our vacation ownership business.
Critical
Accounting Policies
In presenting our financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles, we are required to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported
therein. Several of the estimates and assumptions we are
required to make relate to matters that are inherently uncertain
as they pertain to future events. However, events that are
outside of our control cannot be predicted and, as such, they
cannot be contemplated in evaluating such estimates and
assumptions. If there is a significant unfavorable change to
current conditions, it could result in a material adverse impact
to our consolidated results of operations, financial position
and liquidity. We believe that the estimates and assumptions we
used when preparing our financial statements were the most
appropriate at that time. Presented below are those accounting
policies that we believe require subjective and complex
judgments that could potentially affect reported results.
However, the majority of our businesses operate in environments
where we are paid a fee for a service performed, and therefore
the results of the majority of our recurring operations are
recorded in our financial statements using accounting policies
that are not particularly subjective, nor complex.
Vacation Ownership Revenue Recognition. Our sales of VOIs
are either cash sales or seller-financed sales. In order for us
to recognize revenues of VOI sales under the full accrual method
of accounting described in the guidance for sales of real estate
for fully constructed inventory, a binding sales contract must
have been executed, the statutory rescission period must have
expired (after which time the purchasers are not entitled to a
refund except for non-delivery by us), receivables must have
been deemed collectible and the remainder of our obligations
must have been substantially completed. In addition, before we
recognize any revenues on VOI sales, the purchaser of the VOI
must have met the initial investment criteria and, as
applicable, the continuing investment criteria, by executing a
legally binding financing contract. A purchaser has met the
initial investment criteria when a minimum down payment of 10%
is received by us. In accordance with the requirements of the
guidance for real estate time-sharing transactions we must also
take into consideration the fair value of certain incentives
provided to the purchaser when assessing the adequacy of the
purchasers initial investment. In those cases where
financing is provided to the purchaser by us, the purchaser is
obligated to remit monthly payments under financing contracts
that represent the purchasers continuing investment. The
contractual terms of seller-provided financing arrangements
require that the contractual level of annual principal payments
be sufficient to amortize the loan over a customary period for
the VOI being financed, which is generally ten years, and
payments under the financing contracts begin within 45 days
of the sale and receipt of the minimum down payment of 10%.
69
If all of the criteria for a VOI sale to qualify under the full
accrual method of accounting have been met, as discussed above,
except that construction of the VOI purchased is not complete,
we recognize revenues using the POC method of accounting
provided that the preliminary construction phase is complete and
that a minimum sales level has been met (to assure that the
property will not revert to a rental property). The preliminary
stage of development is deemed to be complete when the
engineering and design work is complete, the construction
contracts have been executed, the site has been cleared,
prepared and excavated, and the building foundation is complete.
The completion percentage is determined by the proportion of
real estate inventory costs incurred to total estimated costs.
These estimated costs are based upon historical experience and
the related contractual terms. The remaining revenues and
related costs of sales, including commissions and direct
expenses, are deferred and recognized as the remaining costs are
incurred. Until a contract for sale qualifies for revenue
recognition, all payments received are accounted for as
restricted cash and deposits within other current assets and
deferred income, respectively, on the Consolidated Balance
Sheets. Commissions and other direct costs related to the sale
are deferred until the sale is recorded. If a contract is
cancelled before qualifying as a sale, non-recoverable expenses
are charged to the current period as part of operating expenses
on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Changes in costs
could lead to adjustments to the POC status of a project, which
may result in difference in the timing and amount of revenues
recognized from the construction of vacation ownership
properties. This policy is discussed in greater detail in
Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Allowance for Loan Losses. In our Vacation Ownership
segment, we provide for estimated vacation ownership contract
receivable cancellations at the time of VOI sales by recording a
provision for loan losses as a reduction of VOI sales on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations. We assess the adequacy of
the allowance for loan losses based on the historical
performance of similar vacation ownership contract receivables.
We use a technique referred to as static pool analysis, which
tracks defaults for each years sales over the entire life
of those contract receivables. We consider current defaults,
past due aging, historical write-offs of contracts and consumer
credit scores (FICO scores) in the assessment of borrowers
credit strength and expected loan performance. We also consider
whether the historical economic conditions are comparable to
current economic conditions. If current conditions differ from
the conditions in effect when the historical experience was
generated, we adjust the allowance for loan losses to reflect
the expected effects of the current environment on the
collectability of our vacation ownership contract receivables.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. With regard to the
goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets recorded
in connection with business combinations, we annually (during
the fourth quarter of each year subsequent to completing our
annual forecasting process) or, more frequently if circumstances
indicate impairment may have occurred that would more likely
than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its
carrying amount, review the reporting units carrying
values as required by the guidance for goodwill and other
intangible assets. We evaluate goodwill for impairment using the
two-step process prescribed in the guidance. The first step is
to compare the estimated fair value of any reporting unit within
the company that have recorded goodwill with the recorded net
book value (including the goodwill) of the reporting unit. If
the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is higher than
the recorded net book value, no impairment is deemed to exist
and no further testing is required. If, however, the estimated
fair value of the reporting unit is below the recorded net book
value, then a second step must be performed to determine the
goodwill impairment required, if any. In this second step, the
estimated fair value from the first step is used as the purchase
price in a hypothetical acquisition of the reporting unit.
Purchase business combination accounting rules are followed to
determine a hypothetical purchase price allocation to the
reporting units assets and liabilities. The residual
amount of goodwill that results from this hypothetical purchase
price allocation is compared to the recorded amount of goodwill
for the reporting unit, and the recorded amount is written down
to the hypothetical amount, if lower. In accordance with the
guidance, we have determined that our reporting units are the
same as our reportable segments.
Quoted market prices for our reporting units are not available;
therefore, management must apply judgment in determining the
estimated fair value of these reporting units for purposes of
performing the annual goodwill impairment test. Management uses
all available information to make these fair value
determinations, including the present values of expected future
cash flows using discount rates commensurate with the risks
involved in the assets. Inherent in such fair value
determinations are certain judgments and estimates relating to
future cash flows, including our interpretation of current
economic indicators and market valuations, and assumptions about
our strategic plans with regard to our operations. To the extent
additional information arises, market conditions change or our
strategies change, it is possible that our conclusion regarding
whether existing goodwill is impaired could change and result in
a material effect on our consolidated financial position or
results of operations. In performing our impairment analysis, we
develop our estimated fair values for our reporting units using
a combination of the discounted cash flow methodology and the
market multiple methodology.
The discounted cash flow methodology establishes fair value by
estimating the present value of the projected future cash flows
to be generated from the reporting unit. The discount rate
applied to the projected future cash flows to arrive at the
present value is intended to reflect all risks of ownership and
the associated risks of realizing the stream of projected future
cash flows. The discounted cash flow methodology uses our
projections of financial
70
performance for a five-year period. The most significant
assumptions used in the discounted cash flow methodology are the
discount rate, the terminal value and expected future revenues,
gross margins and operating margins, which vary among reporting
units.
We use a market multiple methodology to estimate the terminal
value of each reporting unit by comparing such reporting unit to
other publicly traded companies that are similar from an
operational and economic standpoint. The market multiple
methodology compares each reporting unit to the comparable
companies on the basis of risk characteristics in order to
determine the risk profile relative to the comparable companies
as a group. This analysis generally focuses on quantitative
considerations, which include financial performance and other
quantifiable data, and qualitative considerations, which include
any factors which are expected to impact future financial
performance. The most significant assumption affecting our
estimate of the terminal value of each reporting unit is the
multiple of the enterprise value to earnings before interest,
tax, depreciation and amortization.
To support our estimate of the individual reporting unit fair
values, a comparison is performed between the sum of the fair
values of the reporting units and our market capitalization. We
use an average of our market capitalization over a reasonable
period preceding the impairment testing date as being more
reflective of our stock price trend than a single day,
point-in-time
market price. The difference is an implied control premium,
which represents the acknowledgment that the observed market
prices of individual trades of a companys stock may not be
representative of the fair value of the company as a whole.
Estimates of a companys control premium are highly
judgmental and depend on capital market and macro-economic
conditions overall. We evaluate the implied control premium for
reasonableness.
Based on the results of our impairment evaluation performed
during the fourth quarter of 2010, we determined that no
impairment charge of goodwill was required as the fair value of
goodwill at our lodging and vacation exchange and rentals
reporting units was substantially in excess of the carrying
value.
Based on the results of our impairment evaluation performed
during the fourth quarter of 2008, we recorded a non-cash
$1,342 million charge for the impairment of goodwill at our
vacation ownership reporting unit, where all of the goodwill
previously recorded was determined to be impaired. As of
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, our accumulated goodwill
impairment loss was $1,342 million ($1,337 million,
net of tax).
The aggregate carrying values of our goodwill and other
indefinite-lived intangible assets were $1,481 million and
$731 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2010
and $1,386 million and $660 million, respectively, as
of December 31, 2009. As of December 31, 2010, our
goodwill is allocated between our lodging ($300 million)
and vacation exchange and rentals ($1,181 million)
reporting units and other indefinite-lived intangible assets are
allocated between our lodging ($625 million) and vacation
exchange and rentals ($106 million) reporting units. We
continue to monitor the goodwill recorded at our lodging and
vacation exchange and rentals reporting units for indicators of
impairment. If economic conditions were to deteriorate more than
expected, or other significant assumptions such as estimates of
terminal value were to change significantly, we may be required
to record an impairment of the goodwill balance at our lodging
and vacation and exchange and rentals reporting units.
We also evaluate the recoverability of our other long-lived
assets, including property and equipment and amortizable
intangible assets, if circumstances indicate impairment may have
occurred, pursuant to guidance for impairment or disposal of
long-lived assets. This analysis is performed by comparing the
respective carrying values of the assets to the current and
expected future cash flows, on an undiscounted basis, to be
generated from such assets. Property and equipment is evaluated
separately within each segment. If such analysis indicates that
the carrying value of these assets is not recoverable, the
carrying value of such assets is reduced to fair value.
Business Combinations. A component of our growth strategy
has been to acquire and integrate businesses that complement our
existing operations. We account for business combinations in
accordance with the guidance for business combinations and
related literature. Accordingly, we allocate the purchase price
of acquired companies to the tangible and intangible assets
acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair
values at the date of purchase. The difference between the
purchase price and the fair value of the net assets acquired is
recorded as goodwill.
In determining the fair values of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in a business combination, we use various
recognized valuation methods including present value modeling
and referenced market values (where available). Further, we make
assumptions within certain valuation techniques including
discount rates and timing of future cash flows. Valuations are
performed by management or independent valuation specialists
under managements supervision, where appropriate. We
believe that the estimated fair values assigned to the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed are based on reasonable
assumptions that marketplace participants would use. However,
such assumptions are inherently uncertain and actual results
could differ from those estimates
Accounting for Restructuring Activities. During 2010, we
committed to a strategic realignment initiative targeted at
reducing costs, which will impact operations at one of the call
centers in our vacation exchange and
71
rentals business and result in the termination of approximately
330 employees. During 2008, we committed to restructuring
actions and activities associated with strategic realignment
initiatives targeted principally at reducing costs, enhancing
organizational efficiency, reducing our need to access the
asset-backed securities market and consolidating and
rationalizing existing processes and facilities, which are
accounted for under the guidance for post employment benefits
and costs associated with exit and disposal activities. Our
restructuring actions require us to make significant estimates
in several areas including: (i) expenses for severance and
related benefit costs; (ii) the ability to generate
sublease income, as well as our ability to terminate lease
obligations; and (iii) contract terminations. The amounts
that we have accrued as of December 31, 2010 represent our
best estimate of the obligations that we incurred in connection
with these actions, but could be subject to change due to
various factors including market conditions and the outcome of
negotiations with third parties. Should the actual amounts
differ from our estimates, the amount of the restructuring
charges could be materially impacted.
Income Taxes. We recognize deferred tax assets and
liabilities based on the differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and
liabilities. We regularly review our deferred tax assets to
assess their potential realization and establish a valuation
allowance for portions of such assets that we believe will not
be ultimately realized. In performing this review, we make
estimates and assumptions regarding projected future taxable
income, the expected timing of the reversals of existing
temporary differences and the implementation of tax planning
strategies. A change in these assumptions could cause an
increase or decrease to our valuation allowance resulting in an
increase or decrease in our effective tax rate, which could
materially impact our results of operations.
For tax positions we have taken or expect to take in our tax
return, we apply a more likely than not threshold, under which,
we must conclude a tax position is more likely than not to be
sustained, assuming that the position will be examined by the
appropriate taxing authority that has full knowledge of all
relevant information, in order to recognize or continue to
recognize the benefit. In determining our provision for income
taxes, we use judgment, reflecting our estimates and
assumptions, in applying the more likely than not threshold.
Adoption
of Accounting Pronouncements
During 2011, we will adopt recently issued guidance related to
the accounting for multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements.
For detailed information regarding these standards and the
impact thereof on our financial statements, see Note 2 to
our Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
ITEM 7A.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
We use various financial instruments, particularly swap
contracts and interest rate caps to manage and reduce the
interest rate risk related to our debt. Foreign currency
forwards and options are also used to manage and reduce the
foreign currency exchange rate risk associated with our foreign
currency denominated receivables, payables and forecasted
royalties, forecasted earnings and cash flows of foreign
subsidiaries and other transactions.
We are exclusively an end user of these instruments, which are
commonly referred to as derivatives. We do not engage in
trading, market making or other speculative activities in the
derivatives markets. More detailed information about these
financial instruments is provided in Note 15 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements. Our principal market
exposures are interest and foreign currency rate risks.
|
|
|
Our primary interest rate exposure as of December 31, 2010
was to interest rate fluctuations in the United States,
specifically LIBOR and asset-backed commercial paper interest
rates due to their impact on variable rate borrowings and other
interest rate sensitive liabilities. In addition, interest rate
movements in one country, as well as relative interest rate
movements between countries can impact us. We anticipate that
LIBOR and asset-backed commercial paper rates will remain a
primary market risk exposure for the foreseeable future.
|
|
|
We have foreign currency rate exposure to exchange rate
fluctuations worldwide and particularly with respect to the
British pound and Euro. We anticipate that such foreign currency
exchange rate risk will remain a market risk exposure for the
foreseeable future.
|
We assess our market risk based on changes in interest and
foreign currency exchange rates utilizing a sensitivity
analysis. The sensitivity analysis measures the potential impact
in earnings, fair values and cash flows based on a hypothetical
10% change (increase and decrease) in interest and foreign
currency exchange rates. We have approximately $3.7 billion
of debt outstanding as of December 31, 2010. Of that total,
$330 million was issued as variable rate debt and has not
been synthetically converted to fixed rate debt via an interest
rate swap. A hypothetical 10% change in our effective weighted
average interest rate would not generate a material change in
interest expense.
The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables,
accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current
liabilities approximate carrying values due to the short-term
nature of these assets. We use a discounted
72
cash flow model in determining the fair values of vacation
ownership contract receivables. The primary assumptions used in
determining fair value are prepayment speeds, estimated loss
rates and discount rates. We use a duration-based model in
determining the impact of interest rate shifts on our debt and
interest rate derivatives. The primary assumption used in these
models is that a 10% increase or decrease in the benchmark
interest rate produces a parallel shift in the yield curve
across all maturities.
We use a current market pricing model to assess the changes in
the value of our foreign currency derivatives used by us to
hedge underlying exposure that primarily consist of the
non-functional current assets and liabilities of us and our
subsidiaries. The primary assumption used in these models is a
hypothetical 10% weakening or strengthening of the
U.S. dollar against all our currency exposures as of
December 31, 2010. The gains and losses on the hedging
instruments are largely offset by the gains and losses on the
underlying assets, liabilities or expected cash flows. As of
December 31, 2010, the absolute notional amount of our
outstanding foreign exchange hedging instruments was
$480 million. A hypothetical 10% change in the foreign
currency exchange rates would result in an immaterial change in
the fair value of the hedging instrument as of December 31,
2010. Such a change would be largely offset by an opposite
effect on the underlying assets, liabilities and expected cash
flows.
Our total market risk is influenced by a wide variety of factors
including the volatility present within the markets and the
liquidity of the markets. There are certain limitations inherent
in the sensitivity analyses presented. While probably the most
meaningful analysis, these shock tests are
constrained by several factors, including the necessity to
conduct the analysis based on a single point in time and the
inability to include the complex market reactions that normally
would arise from the market shifts modeled.
We used December 31, 2010 market rates on outstanding
financial instruments to perform the sensitivity analysis
separately for each of our market risk exposures
interest and foreign currency rate instruments. The estimates
are based on the market risk sensitive portfolios described in
the preceding paragraphs and assume instantaneous, parallel
shifts in interest rate yield curves and exchange rates.
|
|
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
See Financial Statements and Financial Statement Index
commencing on
page F-1
hereof.
|
|
ITEM 9.
|
CHANGE
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
None.
|
|
ITEM 9A.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our management, with
the participation of our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of
our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined
in
Rules 13a-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered
by this report. Based on such evaluation, our Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded
that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure controls and
procedures are effective.
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting. Our management is responsible for establishing
and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting, as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
under the Exchange Act. Our management assessed the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2010. In making this assessment,
management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in
Internal Control Integrated Framework. Based
on this assessment, our management believes that, as of
December 31, 2010, our internal control over financial
reporting is effective. Our independent registered public
accounting firm has issued an attestation report on the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting,
which is included within their audit opinion on
page F-2.
|
|
|
ITEM 9B.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
None.
73
PART III
|
|
ITEM 10.
|
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
Identification
of Directors.
Information required by this item is included in the Proxy
Statement under the caption Election of Directors
and is incorporated by reference in this report.
Identification
of Executive Officers.
The following provides information for each of our executive
officers.
Stephen P. Holmes, 54, has served as the Chairman of our Board
of Directors and as our Chief Executive Officer since our
separation from Cendant in July 2006. Mr. Holmes was a
Director since May 2003 of the already-existing, wholly owned
subsidiary of Cendant that held the assets and liabilities of
Cendants hospitality services (including timeshare
resorts) businesses before our separation from Cendant and has
served as a Director of Wyndham Worldwide since the separation
in July 2006. Mr. Holmes was Vice Chairman and director of
Cendant and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Cendants Travel Content Division from December 1997 until
our separation from Cendant in July 2006. Mr. Holmes was
Vice Chairman of HFS Incorporated, from September 1996 until
December 1997 and was a director of HFS from June 1994 until
December 1997. From July 1990 through September 1996,
Mr. Holmes served as Executive Vice President, Treasurer
and Chief Financial Officer of HFS.
Geoffrey A. Ballotti, 49, has served as President and Chief
Executive Officer, Wyndham Exchange & Rentals, since
March 2008. Prior to joining Wyndham Exchange &
Rentals, from October 2003 to March 2008, Mr. Ballotti was
President, North America Division of Starwood Hotels and Resorts
Worldwide. From 1989 to 2003, Mr. Ballotti held leadership
positions of increasing responsibility at Starwood Hotels and
Resorts Worldwide including President of Starwood North America,
Executive Vice President, Operations, Senior Vice President,
Southern Europe and Managing Director, Ciga Spa, Italy. Prior to
Starwood Hotels and Resorts Worldwide, Mr. Ballotti was a
Banking Officer in the Commercial Real Estate Group at the Bank
of New England.
Eric A. Danziger, 56, has served as President and Chief
Executive Officer, Wyndham Hotel Group, since December 2008.
From August 2006 to December 2008, Mr. Danziger was Chief
Executive Officer of WhiteFence, Inc., an online site for home
services firm. From June 2001 to August 2006, Mr. Danziger
was President and Chief Executive Officer of ZipRealty, a real
estate brokerage. From April 1998 to June 2001,
Mr. Danziger was President and Chief Operating Officer of
Carlson Hotels Worldwide. From June 1996 to August 1998,
Mr. Danziger was President and CEO of Starwood Hotels and
Resorts Worldwide. From September 1990 to June 1996,
Mr. Danziger was President of Wyndham Hotels and Resorts.
Franz S. Hanning, 57, has served as President and Chief
Executive Officer, Wyndham Vacation Ownership, since our
separation from Cendant in July 2006. Mr. Hanning was the
Chief Executive Officer of Cendants Timeshare Resort Group
from March 2005 until our separation from Cendant in July 2006.
Mr. Hanning served as President and Chief Executive Officer
of Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. (formerly known as Fairfield
Resorts, Inc.) from April 2001, when Cendant acquired Fairfield
Resorts, Inc., to March 2005 and as President and Chief
Executive Officer of Wyndham Resort Development Corporation
(formerly known as Trendwest Resorts, Inc.) from August 2004 to
March 2005. Mr. Hanning joined Fairfield Resorts, Inc. in
1982 and held several key leadership positions with Fairfield
Resorts, Inc., including Regional Vice President, Executive Vice
President of Sales and Chief Operating Officer.
Thomas G. Conforti, 52, has served as our Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer since September 2009. From
December 2002 to September 2008, Mr. Conforti was Chief
Financial Officer of DineEquity, Inc. Earlier in his career,
Mr. Conforti held a number of general management, financial
and strategic roles over a ten-year period in the Consumer
Products Division of the Walt Disney Company. Mr. Conforti
also held numerous finance and strategy roles within the College
Textbook Publishing Division of CBS and the Soft Drink Division
of Pepsico.
Scott G. McLester, 48, has served as our Executive Vice
President and General Counsel since our separation from Cendant
in July 2006. Mr. McLester was Senior Vice President, Legal
for Cendant from April 2004 until our separation from Cendant in
July 2006. Mr. McLester was Group Vice President, Legal for
Cendant from March 2002 to April 2004, Vice President, Legal for
Cendant from February 2001 to March 2002 and Senior Counsel for
Cendant from June 2000 to February 2001. Prior to joining
Cendant, Mr. McLester was a Vice President in the Law
Department of Merrill Lynch in New York and a partner with the
law firm of Carpenter, Bennett and Morrissey in Newark, New
Jersey.
Mary R. Falvey, 50, has served as our Executive Vice President
and Chief Human Resources Officer since our separation from
Cendant in July 2006. Ms. Falvey was Executive Vice
President, Global Human Resources for
74
Cendants Vacation Network Group from April 2005 until our
separation from Cendant in July 2006. From March 2000 to April
2005, Ms. Falvey served as Executive Vice President, Human
Resources for RCI. From January 1998 to March 2000,
Ms. Falvey was Vice President of Human Resources for
Cendants Hotel Division and Corporate Contact Center
group. Prior to joining Cendant, Ms. Falvey held various
leadership positions in the human resources division of Nabisco
Foods Company.
Thomas F. Anderson, 46, has served as our Executive Vice
President and Chief Real Estate Development Officer since our
separation from Cendant in July 2006. From April 2003 until July
2006, Mr. Anderson was Executive Vice President, Strategic
Acquisitions and Development of Cendants Timeshare Resort
Group. From January 2000 until February 2003, Mr. Anderson
was Senior Vice President, Corporate Real Estate for Cendant
Corporation. From November 1998 until December 1999,
Mr. Anderson was Vice President of Real Estate Services,
Coldwell Banker Commercial. From March 1995 to October 1998,
Mr. Anderson was General Manager of American Asset
Corporation, a full service real estate developer based in
Charlotte, North Carolina. From June 1990 until February 1995,
Mr. Anderson was Vice President of Commercial Lending for
BB&T Corporation in Charlotte, North Carolina.
Nicola Rossi, 44, has served as our Senior Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer since our separation from Cendant in
July 2006. Mr. Rossi was Vice President and Controller of
Cendants Hotel Group from June 2004 until our separation
from Cendant in July 2006. From April 2002 to June 2004,
Mr. Rossi served as Vice President, Corporate Finance for
Cendant. From April 2000 to April 2002, Mr. Rossi was
Corporate Controller of Jacuzzi Brands, Inc., a bath and
plumbing products company, and was Assistant Corporate
Controller from June 1999 to March 2000.
Compliance
with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.
The information required by this item is included in the Proxy
Statement under the caption Section 16(a) Beneficial
Ownership Reporting Compliance and is incorporated by
reference in this report.
Code of
Ethics.
The information required by this item is included in the Proxy
Statement under the caption Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics and is incorporated by reference in this report.
Corporate
Governance.
The information required by this item is included in the Proxy
Statement under the caption Governance of the
Company and is incorporated by reference in this report.
|
|
ITEM 11.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
The information required by this item is included in the Proxy
Statement under the captions Compensation of
Directors, Executive Compensation and
Committees of the Board and is incorporated by
reference in this report.
|
|
ITEM 12.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
Securities
Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans as of
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Available for Future Issuance Under
|
|
|
|
|
to be Issued Upon Exercise
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans
|
|
|
|
|
of Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
(Excluding Securities Reflected in
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
the First Column)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans
approved by security holders
|
|
|
11.7
million (a)
|
|
|
$29.66 (b)
|
|
|
|
15.1
million (c
|
)
|
|
Equity compensation plans not
approved by security holders
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Consists of shares issuable upon
exercise of outstanding stock options, stock settled stock
appreciation rights and restricted stock units under the 2006
Equity and Incentive Plan, as amended.
|
(b) |
|
Consists of weighted-average
exercise price of outstanding stock options and stock settled
stock appreciation rights.
|
(c) |
|
Consists of shares available for
future grants under the 2006 Equity and Incentive Plan, as
amended.
|
The remaining information required by this item is included in
the Proxy Statement under the caption Ownership of Company
Stock and is incorporated by reference in this report.
75
|
|
ITEM 13.
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
|
The information required by this item is included in the Proxy
Statement under the captions Related Party
Transactions and Governance of the Company and
is incorporated by reference in this report.
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
|
The information required by this item is included in the Proxy
Statement under the captions Disclosure About Fees
and Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services and
is incorporated by reference in this report.
PART IV
|
|
ITEM 15.
|
EXHIBITS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
ITEM 15(A)(1) FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
See Financial Statements and Financial Statements Index
commencing on
page F-1
hereof.
ITEM 15(A)(3) EXHIBITS
See Exhibit Index commencing on
page G-1
hereof.
The agreements included or incorporated by reference as exhibits
to this report contain representations and warranties by each of
the parties to the applicable agreement. These representations
and warranties were made solely for the benefit of the other
parties to the applicable agreement and (i) were not
intended to be treated as categorical statements of fact, but
rather as a way of allocating the risk to one of the parties if
those statements prove to be inaccurate; (ii) may have been
qualified in such agreement by disclosures that were made to the
other party in connection with the negotiation of the applicable
agreement; (iii) may apply contract standards of
materiality that are different from
materiality under the applicable securities laws;
and (iv) were made only as of the date of the applicable
agreement or such other date or dates as may be specified in the
agreement. We acknowledge that, notwithstanding the inclusion of
the foregoing cautionary statements, we are responsible for
considering whether additional specific disclosures of material
information regarding material contractual provisions are
required to make the statements in this report not misleading.
76
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
WYNDHAM WORLDWIDE CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ STEPHEN
P. HOLMES
|
Stephen P. Holmes
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Date: February 22, 2011
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ STEPHEN
P. HOLMES
Stephen
P. Holmes
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
February 22, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ THOMAS
G. CONFORTI
Thomas
G. Conforti
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
February 22, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ NICOLA
ROSSI
Nicola
Rossi
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
February 22, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ MYRA
J. BIBLOWIT
Myra
J. Biblowit
|
|
Director
|
|
February 22, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ JAMES
E. BUCKMAN
James
E. Buckman
|
|
Director
|
|
February 22, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ GEORGE
HERRERA
George
Herrera
|
|
Director
|
|
February 22, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ THE
RIGHT HONOURABLE
BRIAN MULRONEY
The
Right Honourable Brian Mulroney
|
|
Director
|
|
February 22, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ PAULINE
D.E. RICHARDS
Pauline
D.E. Richards
|
|
Director
|
|
February 22, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ MICHAEL
H. WARGOTZ
Michael
H. Wargotz
|
|
Director
|
|
February 22, 2011
|
77
INDEX TO
ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
F-1
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Wyndham Worldwide
Corporation
Parsippany, New Jersey
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation and subsidiaries (the
Company) as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and
the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2010. We also have
audited the Companys internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Companys
management is responsible for these financial statements, for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting,
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on these financial statements and an opinion on the
Companys internal control over financial reporting based
on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement and whether effective internal
control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audits of the financial statements included
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial
reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a
material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the
assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed by, or under the supervision of, the
companys principal executive and principal financial
officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected
by the companys board of directors, management, and other
personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over
financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or
improper management override of controls, material misstatements
due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a
timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the
effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting
to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Wyndham Worldwide Corporation and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2010, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. Also, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all
material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on the criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Parsippany, New Jersey
February 21, 2011
F-2
WYNDHAM
WORLDWIDE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In millions, except per share
data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service fees and membership
|
|
$
|
1,706
|
|
|
$
|
1,613
|
|
|
$
|
1,705
|
|
Vacation ownership interest sales
|
|
|
1,072
|
|
|
|
1,053
|
|
|
|
1,463
|
|
Franchise fees
|
|
|
461
|
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
Consumer financing
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
435
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
Other
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
3,851
|
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
|
|
4,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
1,587
|
|
|
|
1,501
|
|
|
|
1,622
|
|
Cost of vacation ownership interests
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
Consumer financing interest
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
Marketing and reservation
|
|
|
531
|
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
|
830
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
561
|
|
Goodwill and other impairments
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
1,426
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
3,133
|
|
|
|
3,156
|
|
|
|
5,111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income/(loss)
|
|
|
718
|
|
|
|
594
|
|
|
|
(830
|
)
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
563
|
|
|
|
493
|
|
|
|
(887
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
379
|
|
|
$
|
293
|
|
|
$
|
(1,074
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings/(losses) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
2.13
|
|
|
$
|
1.64
|
|
|
$
|
(6.05
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
|
2.05
|
|
|
|
1.61
|
|
|
|
(6.05
|
)
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-3
WYNDHAM
WORLDWIDE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions, except share
data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
156
|
|
|
$
|
155
|
|
Trade receivables, net
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
Vacation ownership contract receivables, net
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
354
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,752
|
|
|
|
1,740
|
|
Long-term vacation ownership contract receivables, net
|
|
|
2,687
|
|
|
|
2,792
|
|
Non-current inventory
|
|
|
833
|
|
|
|
953
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
1,041
|
|
|
|
953
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,481
|
|
|
|
1,386
|
|
Trademarks, net
|
|
|
731
|
|
|
|
660
|
|
Franchise agreements and other intangibles, net
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
451
|
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
9,416
|
|
|
$
|
9,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized vacation ownership debt
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
|
$
|
209
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
Due to former Parent and subsidiaries
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
579
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,575
|
|
|
|
1,885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term securitized vacation ownership debt
|
|
|
1,427
|
|
|
|
1,298
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
2,083
|
|
|
|
1,840
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
1,021
|
|
|
|
1,137
|
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
Due to former Parent and subsidiaries
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
6,499
|
|
|
|
6,664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 16)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, authorized
6,000,000 shares, none issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value, authorized
600,000,000 shares, issued 209,943,159 shares in 2010
and 205,891,254 shares in 2009
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost36,555,242 shares in 2010 and
27,284,823 shares in 2009
|
|
|
(1,107
|
)
|
|
|
(870
|
)
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
3,892
|
|
|
|
3,733
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(315
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
2,917
|
|
|
|
2,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
9,416
|
|
|
$
|
9,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-4
WYNDHAM
WORLDWIDE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
379
|
|
|
$
|
293
|
|
|
$
|
(1,074
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income/(loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of goodwill and other assets
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
1,426
|
|
Non-cash interest
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Non-cash restructuring
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Net change in assets and liabilities, excluding the impact of
acquisitions and dispositions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Vacation ownership contract receivables
|
|
|
(202
|
)
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
|
|
(786
|
)
|
Inventory
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
Due to former Parent and subsidiaries, net
|
|
|
(179
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
(315
|
)
|
|
|
87
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
689
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment additions
|
|
|
(167
|
)
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
Net assets acquired, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(236
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
Equity investments and development advances
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
Proceeds from asset sales
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
(Increase)/decrease in securitization restricted cash
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
(Increase)/decrease in escrow deposit restricted cash
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(418
|
)
|
|
|
(109
|
)
|
|
|
(319
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from securitized borrowings
|
|
|
1,697
|
|
|
|
1,406
|
|
|
|
1,923
|
|
Principal payments on securitized borrowings
|
|
|
(1,554
|
)
|
|
|
(1,711
|
)
|
|
|
(2,194
|
)
|
Proceeds from non-securitized borrowings
|
|
|
1,525
|
|
|
|
822
|
|
|
|
2,183
|
|
Principal payments on non-securitized borrowings
|
|
|
(1,837
|
)
|
|
|
(1,451
|
)
|
|
|
(1,681
|
)
|
Proceeds from note issuances
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of convertible notes
|
|
|
(250
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from/(purchase of) call options
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of warrants/(repurchase of warrants)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends to shareholders
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
Capital contribution from former Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(235
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Proceeds from stock option exercises
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(219
|
)
|
|
|
(561
|
)
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of changes in exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
156
|
|
|
$
|
155
|
|
|
$
|
136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-5
WYNDHAM
WORLDWIDE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Earnings/
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
(Accumulated
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit)
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(857
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,652
|
|
|
$
|
525
|
|
|
$
|
194
|
|
|
$
|
3,516
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,074
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax benefit of $107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax benefit of $12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Pension liability adjustment, net of tax benefit $0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,170
|
)
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Issuance of shares for RSU vesting
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Cash transfer from former Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Change in excess tax benefit on equity awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(870
|
)
|
|
|
3,690
|
|
|
|
(578
|
)
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
2,342
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax of $31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on cash flow hedges, net of tax of $10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension liability adjustment, net of tax benefit of $1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
Issuance of warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Issuance of shares for RSU vesting
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Change in excess tax benefit on equity awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(870
|
)
|
|
|
3,733
|
|
|
|
(315
|
)
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
2,688
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax benefit of $16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of unrealized loss on cash flow hedge, net of
tax benefit of $6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on cash flow hedges, net of tax of $2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Issuance of shares for RSU vesting
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Reversal of net deferred tax liabilities from former Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
Repurchase of warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(237
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(237
|
)
|
Change in excess tax benefit on equity awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2010
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,107
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,892
|
|
|
$
|
(25
|
)
|
|
$
|
155
|
|
|
$
|
2,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-6
WYNDHAM
WORLDWIDE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise noted, all amounts are in millions, except
per share amounts)
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation (Wyndham or the
Company) is a global provider of hospitality
services and products. The accompanying Consolidated Financial
Statements include the accounts and transactions of Wyndham, as
well as the entities in which Wyndham directly or indirectly has
a controlling financial interest. The accompanying Consolidated
Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. All intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In presenting the Consolidated Financial Statements, management
makes estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported
and related disclosures. Estimates, by their nature, are based
on judgment and available information. Accordingly, actual
results could differ from those estimates. In managements
opinion, the Consolidated Financial Statements contain all
normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation
of annual results reported.
Business
Description
The Company operates in the following business segments:
|
|
|
Lodgingfranchises hotels in the upscale,
midscale, economy and extended stay segments of the lodging
industry and provides hotel management services for full-service
hotels globally.
|
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentalsprovides
vacation exchange services and products to owners of intervals
of vacation ownership interests (VOIs) and markets
vacation rental properties primarily on behalf of independent
owners.
|
|
|
Vacation Ownershipdevelops, markets and
sells VOIs to individual consumers, provides consumer financing
in connection with the sale of VOIs and provides property
management services at resorts.
|
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Principles
of Consolidation
When evaluating an entity for consolidation, the Company first
determines whether an entity is within the scope of the guidance
for consolidation of variable interest entities
(VIE) and if it is deemed to be a VIE. If the entity
is considered to be a VIE, the Company determines whether it
would be considered the entitys primary beneficiary. The
Company consolidates those VIEs for which it has determined that
it is the primary beneficiary. The Company will consolidate an
entity not deemed either a VIE or qualifying special purpose
entity (QSPE) upon a determination that it has a
controlling financial interest. For entities where the Company
does not have a controlling financial interest, the investments
in such entities are classified as
available-for-sale
securities or accounted for using the equity or cost method, as
appropriate.
Revenue
Recognition
Lodging
The Companys franchising business is designed to generate
revenues for its hotel owners through the delivery of room night
bookings to the hotel, the promotion of brand awareness among
the consumer base, global sales efforts, ensuring guest
satisfaction and providing outstanding customer service to both
its customers and guests staying at hotels in its system.
The Company enters into agreements to franchise its lodging
brands to independent hotel owners. The Companys standard
franchise agreement typically has a term of 15 to 20 years
and provides a franchisee with certain rights to terminate the
franchise agreement before the term of the agreement under
certain circumstances. The principal source of revenues from
franchising hotels is ongoing franchise fees, which are
comprised of royalty fees and other fees relating to marketing
and reservation services. Ongoing franchise fees typically are
based on a percentage of gross room revenues of each franchised
hotel and are recognized as revenue upon becoming due from the
franchisee. An estimate of uncollectible ongoing franchise fees
is charged to bad debt expense and included in operating
expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Lodging
revenues also include initial franchise fees, which are
recognized as revenues when all material services or conditions
have been substantially performed, which is either when a
franchised hotel opens for business or when a franchise
agreement is terminated after it has been determined that the
franchised hotel will not open.
F-7
The Companys franchise agreements also require the payment
of marketing and reservation fees, which are intended to
reimburse the Company for expenses associated with operating an
international, centralized, brand-specific reservations system,
access to third-party distribution channels, such as online
travel agents, advertising and marketing programs, global sales
efforts, operations support, training and other related
services. The Company is contractually obligated to expend the
marketing and reservation fees it collects from franchisees in
accordance with the franchise agreements; as such, revenues
earned in excess of costs incurred are accrued as a liability
for future marketing or reservation costs. Costs incurred in
excess of revenues are expensed as incurred. In accordance with
its franchise agreements, the Company includes an allocation of
costs required to carry out marketing and reservation activities
within marketing and reservation expenses. Marketing and
reservation fees are recognized as revenue upon becoming due
from the franchisee. An estimate of uncollectible ongoing
marketing and reservation fees is charged to bad debt expense
and included in marketing and reservation expenses in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Other service fees the Company derives from providing ancillary
services to franchisees are primarily recognized as revenue upon
completion of services.
The Company also provides management services for hotels under
management contracts, which offer all the benefits of a global
brand and a full range of management, marketing and reservation
services. In addition to the standard franchise services
described below, the Companys hotel management business
provides hotel owners with professional oversight and
comprehensive operations support services such as hiring,
training and supervising the managers and employees that operate
the hotels as well as annual budget preparation, financial
analysis and extensive food and beverage services. The
Companys standard management agreement typically has a
term of up to 20 years. The Companys management fees
are comprised of base fees, which are typically calculated based
upon a specified percentage of gross revenues from hotel
operations, and incentive fees, which are typically calculated
based upon a specified percentage of a hotels gross
operating profit. Management fee revenues are recognized when
earned in accordance with the terms of the contract and recorded
as a component of franchise fee revenues on the Consolidated
Statements of Operations. Management fee revenues were
$5 million, $4 million and $5 million during
2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company is also required
to recognize as revenue fees relating to payroll costs for
operational employees who work at certain of the Companys
managed hotels. Although these costs are funded by hotel owners,
the Company is required to report these fees on a gross basis as
both revenues and expenses. The revenues are recorded as a
component of service fees and membership revenues while the
offsetting expenses is reflected as a component of operating
expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. There is
no effect on the Companys operating income. Revenues
related to these payroll costs were $77 million,
$85 million and $100 million in 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
The Company also earns revenues from its Wyndham Rewards loyalty
program when a member stays at a participating hotel. These
revenues are derived from a fee the Company charges based upon a
percentage of room revenues generated from such stay. This fee
is recognized as revenue upon becoming due from the franchisee.
Vacation
Exchange and Rentals
As a provider of vacation exchange services, the Company enters
into affiliation agreements with developers of vacation
ownership properties to allow owners of intervals to trade their
intervals for certain other intervals within the Companys
vacation exchange business and, for some members, for other
leisure-related services and products. Additionally, as a
marketer of vacation rental properties, generally the Company
enters into contracts for exclusive periods of time with
property owners to market the rental of such properties to
rental customers. The Companys vacation exchange business
derives a majority of its revenues from annual membership dues
and exchange fees from members trading their intervals. Annual
dues revenues represent the annual membership fees from members
who participate in the Companys vacation exchange business
and, for additional fees, have the right to exchange their
intervals for certain other intervals within the Companys
vacation exchange business and, for certain members, for other
leisure-related services and products. The Company recognizes
revenues from annual membership dues on a straight-line basis
over the membership period during which delivery of
publications, if applicable, and other services are provided to
the members. Exchange fees are generated when members exchange
their intervals, which may include intervals at other properties
within the Companys vacation exchange business or other
leisure-related services and products. Exchange fees are
recognized as revenues, net of expected cancellations, when the
exchange requests have been confirmed to the member. The
Companys vacation rentals business primarily derives its
revenues from fees, which generally average between 15% and 45%
of the gross booking fees for non-proprietary inventory, except
for where it receives 100% of the revenues for properties that
it owns or operates under long-term capital leases. The majority
of the time, the Company acts on behalf of the owners of the
rental properties to generate the Companys fees. The
Company provides reservation services to the independent
property owners and receives the
agreed-upon
fee for the service provided. The Company remits the gross
rental fee received from the renter to the independent property
owner, net of the Companys
agreed-upon
fee. Revenues from such fees are recognized in the period that
the rental reservation is made, net of expected cancellations.
Cancellations for 2010, 2009 and 2008 each
F-8
totaled less than 5% of rental transactions booked. Upon
confirmation of the rental reservation, the rental customer and
property owner generally have a direct relationship for
additional services to be performed. The Company also earns
rental fees in connection with properties it manages, operates
under long-term capital leases or owns and such fees are
recognized when the rental customers stay occurs, as this
is the point at which the service is rendered. The
Companys revenues are earned when evidence of an
arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or the services have
been rendered, the sellers price to the buyer is fixed or
determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured.
Vacation
Ownership
The Company develops, markets and sells VOIs to individual
consumers, provides property management services at resorts and
provides consumer financing in connection with the sale of VOIs.
The Companys vacation ownership business derives the
majority of its revenues from sales of VOIs and derives other
revenues from consumer financing and property management. The
Companys sales of VOIs are either cash sales or
Company-financed sales. In order for the Company to recognize
revenues of VOI sales under the full accrual method of
accounting described in the guidance for sales of real estate
for fully constructed inventory, a binding sales contract must
have been executed, the statutory rescission period must have
expired (after which time the purchasers are not entitled to a
refund except for non-delivery by the Company), receivables must
have been deemed collectible and the remainder of the
Companys obligations must have been substantially
completed. In addition, before the Company recognizes any
revenues on VOI sales, the purchaser of the VOI must have met
the initial investment criteria and, as applicable, the
continuing investment criteria, by executing a legally binding
financing contract. A purchaser has met the initial investment
criteria when a minimum down payment of 10% is received by the
Company. In accordance with the guidance for accounting for real
estate time-sharing transactions, the Company must also take
into consideration the fair value of certain incentives provided
to the purchaser when assessing the adequacy of the
purchasers initial investment. In those cases where
financing is provided to the purchaser by the Company, the
purchaser is obligated to remit monthly payments under financing
contracts that represent the purchasers continuing
investment. If all of the criteria for a VOI sale to qualify
under the full accrual method of accounting have been met, as
discussed above, except that construction of the VOI purchased
is not complete, the Company recognizes revenues using the
percentage-of-completion
(POC) method of accounting provided that the
preliminary construction phase is complete and that a minimum
sales level has been met (to assure that the property will not
revert to a rental property). The preliminary stage of
development is deemed to be complete when the engineering and
design work is complete, the construction contracts have been
executed, the site has been cleared, prepared and excavated, and
the building foundation is complete. The completion percentage
is determined by the proportion of real estate inventory costs
incurred to total estimated costs. These estimated costs are
based upon historical experience and the related contractual
terms. The remaining revenues and related costs of sales,
including commissions and direct expenses, are deferred and
recognized as the remaining costs are incurred.
The Company also offers consumer financing as an option to
customers purchasing VOIs, which are typically collateralized by
the underlying VOI. The contractual terms of Company-provided
financing agreements require that the contractual level of
annual principal payments be sufficient to amortize the loan
over a customary period for the VOI being financed, which is
generally ten years, and payments under the financing contracts
begin within 45 days of the sale and receipt of the minimum
down payment of 10%. An estimate of uncollectible amounts is
recorded at the time of the sale with a charge to the provision
for loan losses, which is, classified as a reduction of vacation
ownership interest sales on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations. The interest income earned from the financing
arrangements is earned on the principal balance outstanding over
the life of the arrangement and is recorded within consumer
financing on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Company also provides
day-to-day-management
services, including oversight of housekeeping services,
maintenance and certain accounting and administrative services
for property owners associations and clubs. In some cases,
the Companys employees serve as officers
and/or
directors of these associations and clubs in accordance with
their by-laws and associated regulations. The Company receives
fees for such property management services which are generally
based upon total costs to operate such resorts. Fees for
property management services typically approximate 10% of
budgeted operating expenses. Property management fee revenues
are recognized when earned in accordance with the terms of the
contract and is recorded as a component of service fees and
membership on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The
Company also incurs certain reimbursable costs, which
principally relate to the payroll costs for management of the
associations, club and resort properties where the Company is
the employer. These costs are reflected as a component of
operating expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Property management revenues were $405 million,
$376 million and $346 million during 2010, 2009 and
2008, respectively. Property management revenue is comprised of
management fee revenue and reimbursable revenue. Management fee
revenues were $183 million, $170 million and
$159 million during 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively.
Reimbursable revenues were $222 million, $206 million
and $187 million respectively during 2010, 2009, and 2008.
Reimbursable revenues are based upon cost with no added margin
and thus, have little or no impact on the Companys
operating income. During 2010, 2009 and 2008, one of the
associations that the Company
F-9
manages paid Wyndham Exchange & Rentals
$19 million, $19 million and $17 million,
respectively, for exchange services.
During 2010, 2009 and 2008, gross sales of VOIs were increased
by $0 and $187 million and reduced by $75 million,
respectively, representing the net change in revenues that was
deferred under the POC method of accounting. Under the POC
method of accounting, a portion of the total revenues from a
vacation ownership contract sale is not recognized if the
construction of the vacation resort has not yet been fully
completed. Such deferred revenues were recognized in subsequent
periods in proportion to the costs incurred as compared to the
total expected costs for completion of construction of the
vacation resort. As of December 31, 2009, all revenues that
were previously deferred under the POC method of accounting had
been recognized.
The Company records lodging-related marketing and reservation
revenues, Wyndham Rewards revenues, as well as hotel/property
management services revenues for the Companys Lodging and
Vacation Ownership segments, in accordance with the guidance for
gross versus net presentation, which requires that these
revenues be recorded on a gross basis.
Income
Taxes
The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities using
the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets
and liabilities are calculated based upon the temporary
differences between the financial statement and income tax bases
of assets and liabilities using currently enacted tax rates.
These differences are based upon estimated differences between
the book and tax basis of the assets and liabilities for the
Company as of December 31, 2010 and 2009.
The Companys deferred tax assets are recorded net of a
valuation allowance when, based on the weight of available
evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of
the recorded deferred tax assets will not be realized in future
periods. Decreases to the valuation allowance are recorded as
reductions to the Companys provision for income taxes and
increases to the valuation allowance result in additional
provision for income taxes. The realization of the
Companys deferred tax assets, net of the valuation
allowance, is primarily dependent on estimated future taxable
income. A change in the Companys estimate of future
taxable income may require an addition to or reduction from the
valuation allowance.
For tax positions the Company has taken or expects to take in a
tax return, the Company applies a more likely than not
threshold, under which the Company must conclude a tax position
is more likely than not to be sustained, assuming that the
position will be examined by the appropriate taxing authority
that has full knowledge of all relevant information, in order to
recognize or continue to recognize the benefit. In determining
the Companys provision for income taxes, the Company uses
judgment, reflecting its estimates and assumptions, in applying
the more likely than not threshold.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers highly-liquid investments purchased with
an original maturity of three months or less to be cash
equivalents.
Restricted
Cash
The largest portion of the Companys restricted cash
relates to securitizations. The remaining portion is comprised
of cash held in escrow related to the Companys vacation
ownership business and cash held in all other escrow accounts.
Securitizations: In accordance with the contractual requirements
of the Companys various vacation ownership contract
receivable securitizations, a dedicated lockbox account, subject
to a blocked control agreement, is established for each
securitization. At each month end, the total cash in the
collection account from the previous month is analyzed and a
monthly servicer report is prepared by the Company, which
details how much cash should be remitted to the noteholders for
principal and interest payments, and any cash remaining is
transferred by the trustee back to the Company. Additionally, as
required by various securitizations, the Company holds an
agreed-upon
percentage of the aggregate outstanding principal balances of
the VOI contract receivables collateralizing the asset-backed
notes in a segregated trust (or reserve) account as credit
enhancement. Each time a securitization closes and the Company
receives cash from the noteholders, a portion of the cash is
deposited in the reserve account. Such amounts were
$138 million and $133 million as of December 31,
2010 and 2009, respectively, of which $77 million and
$69 million is recorded within other current assets as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively and
$61 million and $64 million is recorded within other
non-current assets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
F-10
Escrow Deposits: Laws in most U.S. states require the
escrow of down payments on VOI sales, with the typical
requirement mandating that the funds be held in escrow until the
rescission period expires. As sales transactions are
consummated, down payments are collected and are subsequently
placed in escrow until the rescission period has expired.
Depending on the state, the rescission period can be as short as
three calendar days or as long as 15 calendar days. In certain
states, the escrow laws require that 100% of VOI purchaser funds
(excluding interest payments, if any), be held in escrow until
the deeding process is complete. Where possible, the Company
utilizes surety bonds in lieu of escrow deposits. Escrow deposit
amounts were $42 million and $19 million as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, of which
$42 million and $19 million is recorded within other
current assets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
Receivable
Valuation
Trade
receivables
The Company provides for estimated bad debts based on their
assessment of the ultimate realizability of receivables,
considering historical collection experience, the economic
environment and specific customer information. When the Company
determines that an account is not collectible, the account is
written-off to the allowance for doubtful accounts. The
following table illustrates the Companys allowance for
doubtful accounts activity during 2010, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
Bad debt expense
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
Write-offs
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
Translation and other adjustments
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
185
|
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation
ownership contract receivables
In the Companys vacation ownership segment, the Company
provides for estimated vacation ownership contract receivable
defaults at the time of VOI sales by recording a provision for
loan losses as a reduction of vacation ownership interest sales
on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company
assesses the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses based on
the historical performance of similar vacation ownership
contract receivables. The Company uses a technique referred to
as static pool analysis, which tracks defaults for each
years sales over the entire life of those contract
receivables. The Company considers current defaults, past due
aging, historical write-offs of contracts and consumer credit
scores (FICO scores) in the assessment of borrowers credit
strength and expected loan performance. The Company also
considers whether the historical economic conditions are
comparable to current economic conditions. If current conditions
differ from the conditions in effect when the historical
experience was generated, the Company adjusts the allowance for
loan losses to reflect the expected effects of the current
environment on the collectability of the Companys vacation
ownership contract receivables.
Loyalty
Programs
The Company operates a number of loyalty programs including
Wyndham Rewards, RCI Elite Rewards and other programs. Wyndham
Rewards members primarily accumulate points by staying in hotels
franchised under one of the Companys lodging brands.
Wyndham Rewards and RCI Elite Rewards members accumulate points
by purchasing everyday services and products from the various
businesses that participate in the program.
Members may redeem their points for hotel stays, airline
tickets, rental cars, resort vacations, electronics, sporting
goods, movie and theme park tickets, gift certificates, vacation
ownership maintenance fees and annual membership dues and
exchange fees for transactions. The points cannot be redeemed
for cash. The Company earns revenue from these programs
(i) when a member stays at a participating hotel, from a
fee charged by the Company to the franchisee, which is based
upon a percentage of room revenues generated from such stay or
(ii) based upon a percentage of the members spending
on the credit cards and such revenues are paid to the Company by
a third-party issuing bank. The Company also incurs costs to
support these programs, which primarily relate to marketing
expenses to promote the programs, costs to administer the
programs and costs of members redemptions.
As members earn points through the Companys loyalty
programs, the Company records a liability of the estimated
future redemption costs, which is calculated based on
(i) an estimated cost per point and (ii) an estimated
redemption rate of the overall points earned, which is
determined through historical experience, current trends and the
use of an actuarial analysis. Revenues relating to the
Companys loyalty programs are recorded in other revenues
in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and amounted to
$77 million, $82 million and $94 million, while
total
F-11
expenses amounted to $48 million, $59 million, and
$81 million in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The
points liability as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 amounted
to $36 million and $44 million, respectively, and is
included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities and
other non-current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Inventory
Inventory primarily consists of real estate and development
costs of completed VOIs, VOIs under construction, land held for
future VOI development, vacation ownership properties and
vacation credits. The Company applies the relative sales value
method for relieving VOI inventory and recording the related
cost of sales. Under the relative sales value method, cost of
sales is calculated as a percentage of net sales using a
cost-of-sales percentage ratio of total estimated development
cost to total estimated VOI revenue, including estimated future
revenue and incorporating factors such as changes in prices and
the recovery of VOIs generally as a result of contract
receivable defaults. The effect of such changes in estimates
under the relative sales value method are accounted for on a
retrospective basis through corresponding current-period
adjustments to inventory and cost of sales. Inventory is stated
at the lower of cost, including capitalized interest, property
taxes and certain other carrying costs incurred during the
construction process, or net realizable value. Capitalized
interest was $5 million, $10 million and
$19 million in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. During
2009, the Company transferred $55 million from property,
plant and equipment to inventory related to a mixed-use project.
During 2010, the Company transferred $66 million from
inventory to property, plant and equipment related to a
mixed-use project.
Advertising
Expense
Advertising costs are generally expensed in the period incurred.
Advertising expenses, recorded primarily within marketing and
reservation expenses on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations, were $77 million, $74 million and
$110 million in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Use
of Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements
requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and
expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
in the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes.
Although these estimates and assumptions are based on the
Companys knowledge of current events and actions the
Company may undertake in the future, actual results may
ultimately differ from estimates and assumptions.
Derivative
Instruments
The Company uses derivative instruments as part of its overall
strategy to manage its exposure to market risks primarily
associated with fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates
and interest rates. Additionally, the Company has a bifurcated
conversion feature related to its convertible notes and
cash-settled call options that are considered derivative
instruments. As a matter of policy, the Company does not use
derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. All derivatives
are recorded at fair value either as assets or liabilities.
Changes in fair value of derivatives not designated as hedging
instruments and of derivatives designated as fair value hedging
instruments are recognized currently in earnings and included
either as a component of other revenues or net interest expense,
based upon the nature of the hedged item, in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations. The effective portion of changes in
fair value of derivatives designated as cash flow hedging
instruments is recorded as a component of other comprehensive
income. The ineffective portion is reported currently in
earnings as a component of revenues or net interest expense,
based upon the nature of the hedged item. Amounts included in
other comprehensive income are reclassified into earnings in the
same period during which the hedged item affects earnings.
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment (including leasehold improvements) are
recorded at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and
amortization. Depreciation, recorded as a component of
depreciation and amortization on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations, is computed utilizing the straight-line method over
the lesser of the lease term or estimated useful lives of the
related assets. Amortization of leasehold improvements, also
recorded as a component of depreciation and amortization, is
computed utilizing the straight-line method over the estimated
benefit period of the related assets or the lease term, if
shorter. Useful lives are generally 30 years for buildings,
up to 20 years for leasehold improvements, from 20 to
30 years for vacation rental properties and from three to
seven years for furniture, fixtures and equipment.
The Company capitalizes the costs of software developed for
internal use in accordance with the guidance for accounting for
costs of computer software developed or obtained for internal
use. Capitalization of software developed for internal use
commences during the development phase of the project. The
Company generally amortizes software developed or obtained for
internal use on a straight-line basis, from three to five
years,
F-12
commencing when such software is substantially ready for use.
The net carrying value of software developed or obtained for
internal use was $133 million and $131 million as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Capitalized
interest was $2 million in each of 2010, 2009 and 2008.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
The Company has goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible
assets recorded in connection with business combinations. The
Company annually (during the fourth quarter of each year
subsequent to completing the Companys annual forecasting
process) or, more frequently if circumstances indicate
impairment may have occurred that would more likely than not
reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying
amount, reviews the reporting units carrying values as
required by the guidance for goodwill and other indefinite-lived
intangible assets. The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment
using the two-step process prescribed in this guidance. The
first step is to compare the estimated fair value of any
reporting unit within the company that have recorded goodwill
with the recorded net book value (including the goodwill) of the
reporting unit. If the estimated fair value of the reporting
unit is higher than the recorded net book value, no impairment
is deemed to exist and no further testing is required. If,
however, the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is below
the recorded net book value, then a second step must be
performed to determine the goodwill impairment required, if any.
In this second step, the estimated fair value from the first
step is used as the purchase price in a hypothetical acquisition
of the reporting unit. Purchase business combination accounting
rules are followed to determine a hypothetical purchase price
allocation to the reporting units assets and liabilities.
The residual amount of goodwill that results from this
hypothetical purchase price allocation is compared to the
recorded amount of goodwill for the reporting unit, and the
recorded amount is written down to the hypothetical amount, if
lower. In accordance with the guidance, the Company has
determined that its reporting units are the same as its
reportable segments.
The Company has three reporting units, all of which contained
goodwill prior to the 2008 annual goodwill impairment test. See
Note 5 Intangible Assets and
Note 21 Restructuring and Impairments for
information regarding the goodwill impairment recorded as a
result of the annual 2008 impairment test. Such 2008 annual
goodwill impairment test impaired the goodwill of the
Companys vacation ownership reporting unit to $0. As of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company had
$300 million and $297 million, respectively, of
goodwill at its lodging reporting unit and $1,181 million
and $1,089 million, respectively, of goodwill at its
vacation exchange and rentals reporting unit.
The Company also evaluates the recoverability of its other
long-lived assets, including property and equipment and
amortizable intangible assets, if circumstances indicate
impairment may have occurred, pursuant to guidance for
impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. This analysis is
performed by comparing the respective carrying values of the
assets to the current and expected future cash flows, on an
undiscounted basis, to be generated from such assets. Property
and equipment is evaluated separately within each segment. If
such analysis indicates that the carrying value of these assets
is not recoverable, the carrying value of such assets is reduced
to fair value.
Accounting
for Restructuring Activities
During 2010, the Company committed to a strategic realignment
initiative targeted at reducing costs, which will primarily
impact operations at one of the call centers in the
Companys vacation exchange and rentals business and result
in the termination of approximately 330 employees. Such
initiative resulted in $9 million of restructuring costs.
During 2008, the Company committed to restructuring actions and
activities associated with strategic realignment initiatives
targeted principally at reducing costs, enhancing organizational
efficiency, reducing the Companys need to access the
asset-backed securities market and consolidating and
rationalizing existing processes and facilities, which are
accounted for under the guidance for post employment benefits
and costs associated with exit and disposal activities. The
Companys restructuring actions require it to make
significant estimates in several areas including:
(i) expenses for severance and related benefit costs;
(ii) the ability to generate sublease income, as well as
its ability to terminate lease obligations; and
(iii) contract terminations. The amounts that the Company
has accrued as of December 31, 2010 represent its best
estimate of the obligations incurred in connection with these
actions, but could be subject to change due to various factors
including market conditions and the outcome of negotiations with
third parties. Should the actual amounts differ from the
Companys estimates, the amount of the restructuring
charges could be materially impacted.
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income
Accumulated other comprehensive income consists of accumulated
foreign currency translation adjustments, accumulated unrealized
gains and losses on derivative instruments designated as cash
flow hedges and pension related costs. Foreign currency
translation adjustments exclude income taxes related to
indefinite investments in foreign subsidiaries. Assets and
liabilities of foreign subsidiaries having
non-U.S.-dollar
functional currencies are translated at exchange rates at the
Consolidated Balance Sheet dates. Revenues and expenses are
translated at
F-13
average exchange rates during the periods presented. The gains
or losses resulting from translating foreign currency financial
statements into U.S. dollars, net of hedging gains or
losses and taxes, are included in accumulated other
comprehensive income on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Gains
or losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are
included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Stock-Based
Compensation
In accordance with the guidance for stock-based compensation,
the Company measures all employee stock-based compensation
awards using a fair value method and records the related expense
in its Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company uses
the modified prospective transition method, which requires that
compensation cost be recognized in the financial statements for
all awards granted after the date of adoption as well as for
existing awards for which the requisite service has not been
rendered as of the date of adoption and requires that prior
periods not be restated.
As of December 31, 2008, the Company had an APIC Pool
balance of $4 million on its Consolidated Balance Sheet.
During March 2009, the Company utilized its APIC Pool related to
the vesting of restricted stock units (RSUs), which
reduced the balance to $0 on its Consolidated Balance Sheet.
During May 2009, the Company recorded a $4 million charge
to its provision for income taxes on its Consolidated Statement
of Operations related to additional vesting of RSUs. During
2010, the Company increased its APIC Pool by $12 million
due to the vesting of equity awards. As of December 31,
2010, the Companys APIC Pool balance was $12 million.
Equity
Earnings And Other Income
The Company applies the equity method of accounting when it has
the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and
financial policies of an investee. The Company recorded
$1 million, $1 million and $4 million of net
earnings from such investments during 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, in other income, net on the Consolidated
Statements of Operations. In addition, during 2010, the Company
recorded $6 million of income primarily related to gains
associated with the sale of non-strategic assets at its vacation
ownership business. During 2009, the Company recorded
$5 million of income primarily related to gains associated
with the sale of non-strategic assets at its vacation ownership
and vacation exchange and rentals businesses. During 2008, the
Company recorded $7 million of income primarily associated
with the assumption of a lodging-related credit card marketing
program obligation by a third-party and the sale of a
non-strategic asset by the Companys lodging business. Such
amounts were recorded within other income, net on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Transfers and Servicing. In June 2009, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued guidance on
transfers and servicing of financial assets. The guidance
eliminates the concept of a Qualifying Special
Purpose Entity, changes the requirements for derecognizing
financial assets, and requires additional disclosures in order
to enhance information reported to users of financial statements
by providing greater transparency about transfers of financial
assets, including securitization transactions, and an
entitys continuing involvement in and exposure to the
risks related to transferred financial assets. The guidance is
effective for interim or annual reporting periods beginning
after November 15, 2009. The Company adopted the guidance
on January 1, 2010, as required. See
Note 8 Vacation Ownership Contract Receivables
for additional disclosure required by such guidance.
Consolidation. In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance
that modifies how a company determines when an entity that is
insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting
(or similar rights) should be consolidated. The guidance
clarifies that the determination of whether a company is
required to consolidate an entity is based on, among other
things, an entitys purpose and design and a companys
ability to direct the activities of the entity that most
significantly impact the entitys economic performance. The
guidance requires an ongoing reassessment of whether a company
is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity,
additional disclosures about a companys involvement in
VIEs and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that
involvement. The guidance is effective for interim or annual
reporting periods beginning after November 15, 2009. The
Company adopted the guidance on January 1, 2010, as
required. See Note 8 Vacation Ownership
Contract Receivables for additional disclosure required by such
guidance regarding the consolidation of the Companys
bankruptcy remote special purpose entities (SPEs)
associated with its vacation ownership contract receivables
securitizations.
Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements. In October
2009, the FASB issued guidance on multiple-deliverable revenue
arrangements, which requires an entity to apply the relative
selling price allocation method in order to estimate selling
prices for all units of accounting, including delivered items,
when vendor-specific objective evidence or acceptable
third-party evidence does not exist. The guidance is effective
for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in
fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010 and shall
be applied on a prospective basis. Earlier application is
permitted as of the beginning of an entitys fiscal year.
The Company will adopt the guidance
F-14
on January 1, 2011, as required, and it believes the
guidance will not have a material impact on the Companys
Consolidated Financial Statements.
The computation of basic and diluted earnings per share
(EPS) is based on the Companys net
income/(loss) available to common stockholders divided by the
basic weighted average number of common shares and diluted
weighted average number of common shares, respectively.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and
diluted EPS (in millions, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
379
|
|
|
$
|
293
|
|
|
$
|
(1,074
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
Stock options and
RSUs (a)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants (b)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings/(losses) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
2.13
|
|
|
$
|
1.64
|
|
|
$
|
(6.05
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
|
2.05
|
|
|
|
1.61
|
|
|
|
(6.05
|
)
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes unvested dilutive RSUs
which are subject to future forfeitures.
|
|
(b) |
|
Represents the dilutive effect of
warrants to purchase shares of the Companys common stock
related to the May 2009 issuance of the Companys
convertible notes (See Note 13 Long
Term Debt and Borrowing Arrangements).
|
The computations of diluted EPS for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 do not include
approximately 4 million, 9 million and 13 million
stock options and stock-settled stock appreciation rights
(SSARs), respectively, as the effect of their
inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. Additionally, for the
year ended December 31, 2009, the computation of diluted
EPS does not include warrants to purchase approximately
18 million shares of the Companys common stock
related to the May 2009 issuance of the Companys
Convertible Notes (see Note 13 Long
Term Debt and Borrowing Arrangements) as the effect of their
inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.
Dividend
Payments
During each of the quarterly periods ended March 31,
June 30, September 30 and December 31, 2010, the
Company paid cash dividends of $0.12 per share ($86 million
in the aggregate). During each of the quarterly periods ended
March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31,
2009 and 2008 the Company paid cash dividends of $0.04 per share
($29 million and $28 million in the aggregate during
2009 and 2008, respectively).
Stock
Repurchase Program
On August 20, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors
authorized a stock repurchase program that enables it to
purchase up to $200 million of its common stock. Under such
program, the Company repurchased 2,155,783 shares at an
average price of $26.89 for a cost of $58 million and
repurchase capacity increased $13 million from proceeds
received from stock option exercises as of December 31,
2009. On July 22, 2010, the Companys Board of
Directors increased the authorization by $300 million.
During 2010, the Company repurchased 9,270,419 shares at an
average price of $25.52 for a cost of $237 million and
repurchase capacity increased $40 million from proceeds
received from stock option exercises. As of December 31,
2010, the Company repurchased a total of 11,426,202 shares
at an average price of $25.78 for a cost of $295 million
under its current authorization and had $258 million
remaining availability in its program.
Assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations
were recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of the
respective acquisition dates based upon their estimated fair
values at such dates. The results of operations of businesses
acquired by the Company have been included in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations since their respective dates of
acquisition. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated
fair values of the underlying assets acquired and liabilities
assumed was allocated to goodwill. In certain circumstances, the
allocations of the excess purchase price are based upon
preliminary estimates and assumptions. Accordingly, the
allocations may be subject to revision when the Company receives
final information, including appraisals and other analyses. Any
revisions to the fair values during the allocation period, which
may be significant, will be recorded by the Company as further
adjustments to the purchase price allocations. Although the
Company has substantially
F-15
integrated the operations of its acquired businesses, additional
future costs relating to such integration may occur. These costs
may result from integrating operating systems, relocating
employees, closing facilities, reducing duplicative efforts and
exiting and consolidating other activities. These costs will be
recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as adjustments to
the purchase price or on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations as expenses, as appropriate.
2010
Acquisitions
Hoseasons Holdings Ltd. On March 1, 2010, the
Company completed the acquisition of Hoseasons Holdings Ltd.
(Hoseasons), a European vacation rentals business,
for $59 million in cash, net of cash acquired. The purchase
price allocation resulted in the recognition of $38 million
of goodwill, $30 million of definite-lived intangible
assets with a weighted average life of 18 years and
$16 million of trademarks, all of which were assigned to
the Companys Vacation Exchange and Rentals segment.
Management believes that this acquisition offers a strategic fit
within the Companys European rentals business and an
opportunity to continue to grow the Companys
fee-for-service
businesses.
Tryp. On June 30, 2010, the Company completed the
acquisition of the Tryp hotel brand (Tryp) for
$43 million in cash. The purchase price allocation resulted
in the recognition of $3 million of goodwill,
$3 million of franchise agreements with a weighted average
life of 20 years and $36 million of trademarks, all of
which were assigned to the Companys Lodging segment. This
acquisition increases the Companys footprint in Europe and
Latin America and management believes it presents enhanced
growth opportunities for its lodging business in North America.
ResortQuest International, LLC. On September 30,
2010, the Company completed the acquisition of ResortQuest
International, LLC (ResortQuest), a
U.S. vacation rentals business, for $54 million in
cash, net of cash acquired. The preliminary purchase price
allocation resulted in the recognition of $14 million of
goodwill, $15 million of definite-lived intangible assets
with a weighted average life of 12 years and
$9 million of trademarks, all of which were assigned to the
Companys Vacation Exchange and Rentals segment. Management
believes that this acquisition provides the Company with an
opportunity to build a growth platform in the U.S. rentals
market.
James Villa Holdings Ltd. On November 30, 2010, the
Company completed the acquisition of James Villa Holdings Ltd.
(James Villa Holidays), a European vacation rentals
business, for $76 million in cash, net of cash acquired.
The preliminary purchase price allocation resulted in the
recognition of $52 million of goodwill, $26 million of
definite-lived intangible assets with a weighted average life of
15 years and $10 million of trademarks, all of which
were assigned to the Companys Vacation Exchange and
Rentals segment. Management believes that this acquisition is
consistent with the Companys strategy to invest in
fee-for-service
businesses and strengthens its presence in the European rentals
market.
Intangible assets consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Unamortized Intangible Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
1,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks (a)
|
|
$
|
731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized Intangible Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchise
agreements (b)
|
|
$
|
634
|
|
|
$
|
318
|
|
|
$
|
316
|
|
|
$
|
630
|
|
|
$
|
298
|
|
|
$
|
332
|
|
Other (c)
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
798
|
|
|
$
|
358
|
|
|
$
|
440
|
|
|
$
|
724
|
|
|
$
|
333
|
|
|
$
|
391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Comprised of various trade names
(including the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts, Ramada, Days Inn,
RCI, Landal GreenParks, Baymont Inn & Suites, Microtel
and Hawthorn trade names) that the Company has acquired and
which distinguishes the Companys consumer services. These
trade names are expected to generate future cash flows for an
indefinite period of time.
|
|
(b) |
|
Generally amortized over a period
ranging from 20 to 40 years with a weighted average life of
33 years.
|
|
(c) |
|
Includes customer lists and
business contracts, generally amortized over a period ranging
from 7 to 20 years with a weighted average life of
19 years.
|
F-16
Goodwill
In accordance with the guidance for goodwill and other
intangible assets, the Company tests goodwill for potential
impairment annually (during the fourth quarter of each year
subsequent to completing the Companys annual forecasting
process) and between annual tests if an event occurs or
circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the
fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount.
The process of evaluating goodwill for impairment involves the
determination of the fair value of the Companys reporting
units as described in Note 2 Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies. Because quoted market prices
for the Companys reporting units are not available,
management must apply judgment in determining the estimated fair
value of these reporting units for purposes of performing the
annual goodwill impairment test. Management uses all available
information to make these fair value determinations, including
the present values of expected future cash flows using discount
rates commensurate with the risks involved in the assets.
Inherent in such fair value determinations are certain judgments
and estimates relating to future cash flows, including the
Companys interpretation of current economic indicators and
market valuations, and assumptions about the Companys
strategic plans with regard to its operations. Due to the
uncertainties associated with such estimates, actual results
could differ from such estimates. In performing its impairment
analysis, the Company developed the estimated fair values for
its reporting units using a combination of the discounted cash
flow methodology and the market multiple methodology.
The discounted cash flow methodology establishes fair value by
estimating the present value of the projected future cash flows
to be generated from the reporting unit. The discount rate
applied to the projected future cash flows to arrive at the
present value is intended to reflect all risks of ownership and
the associated risks of realizing the stream of projected future
cash flows. The discounted cash flow methodology uses the
Companys projections of financial performance for a
five-year period. The most significant assumptions used in the
discounted cash flow methodology are the discount rate, the
terminal value and expected future revenues, gross margins and
operating margins, which vary among reporting units.
The Company uses a market multiple methodology to estimate the
terminal value of each reporting unit by comparing such
reporting unit to other publicly traded companies that are
similar to it from an operational and economic standpoint. The
market multiple methodology compares each reporting unit to the
comparable companies on the basis of risk characteristics in
order to determine the risk profile relative to the comparable
companies as a group. This analysis generally focuses on
quantitative considerations, which include financial performance
and other quantifiable data, and qualitative considerations,
which include any factors which are expected to impact future
financial performance. The most significant assumption affecting
the Companys estimate of the terminal value of each
reporting unit is the multiple of the enterprise value to
earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization.
To support the Companys estimate of the individual
reporting unit fair values, a comparison is performed between
the sum of the fair values of the reporting units and the
Companys market capitalization. The Company uses an
average of its market capitalization over a reasonable period
preceding the impairment testing date as being more reflective
of the Companys stock price trend than a single day,
point-in-time
market price. The difference is an implied control premium,
which represents the acknowledgment that the observed market
prices of individual trades of a companys stock may not be
representative of the fair value of the company as a whole.
Estimates of a companys control premium are highly
judgmental and depend on capital market and macro-economic
conditions overall. The Company concluded that the implied
control premium estimated from its analysis is reasonable.
During the fourth quarters of 2010 and 2009, the Company
performed its annual goodwill impairment test and determined
that no impairment was required as the fair value of goodwill at
its lodging and vacation exchange and rentals reporting units
was substantially in excess of the carrying value.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, after estimating the fair
values of the Companys three reporting units as of
December 31, 2008, the Company determined that its lodging
and vacation exchange and rentals reporting units passed the
first step of the goodwill impairment test, while the vacation
ownership reporting unit did not pass the first step.
As described in Note 2 Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies, the second step of the goodwill impairment
test uses the estimated fair value of the Companys
vacation ownership segment from the first step as the purchase
price in a hypothetical acquisition of the reporting unit. The
significant hypothetical purchase price allocation adjustments
made to the assets and liabilities of the vacation ownership
segment in this second step calculation were in the areas of:
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Adjusting the carrying value of Vacation Ownership Contract
Receivables to their estimated fair values,
|
|
|
(2)
|
Adjusting the carrying value of customer related intangible
assets to their estimated fair values,
|
F-17
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Adjusting the carrying value of debt to the estimated fair
value, and
|
|
|
(4)
|
Recalculating deferred income taxes under the guidance for
income tax accounting, after considering the likely tax basis a
hypothetical buyer would have in the assets and liabilities.
|
As a result of the above analysis, during the fourth quarter of
2008 the Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge of
$1,342 million ($1,337 million, net of tax)
representing a write-off of the entire amount of the vacation
ownership reporting units previously recorded goodwill.
Such impairment was a result of plans that the Company announced
during (i) October 2008, in which it refocused its vacation
ownership sales and marketing efforts on consumers with higher
credit quality commencing in the fourth quarter of 2008, which
reduced future revenue and growth rates, and (ii) December
2008, in which it decided to eliminate the vacation ownership
reporting units reliance of the asset-backed securities
market by reducing its VOI sales pace from $2.0 billion
during 2008 to $1.3 billion during 2009. As of
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Companys
accumulated goodwill impairment loss was $1,342 million
($1,337 million, net of tax).
Other
Intangible Assets
During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company recorded
(i) a $16 million non-cash impairment charge primarily
due to a strategic change in direction related to the
Companys Howard Johnson brand that is expected to
adversely impact the ability of the properties associated with
the franchise agreements acquired in connection with the
acquisition of the brand during 1990 to maintain compliance with
brand standards and (ii) an $8 million non-cash
impairment charge to reduce the value of an unamortized
trademark due to a strategic change in direction and reduced
future investments in a vacation rentals business. See
Note 21 Restructuring and Impairments for more
information.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
during 2010
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
297
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
300
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
1,089
|
|
|
|
104
|
(b)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
1,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company
|
|
$
|
1,386
|
|
|
$
|
107
|
|
|
$
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Relates to the acquisition of the
Tryp hotel brand (see Note 4 Acquisitions).
|
|
(b) |
|
Relates to the acquisition of
Hoseasons, ResortQuest and James Villa Holidays (see
Note 4 Acquisitions).
|
Amortization expense relating to all intangible assets was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Franchise agreements
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Other
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (*)
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Included as a component of
depreciation and amortization on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations.
|
Based on the Companys amortizable intangible assets as of
December 31, 2010, the Company expects related amortization
expense over the next five years as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
2012
|
|
|
29
|
|
2013
|
|
|
28
|
|
2014
|
|
|
28
|
|
2015
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
6.
|
Franchising
and Marketing/Reservation Activities
|
Franchise fee revenues of $461 million, $440 million
and $514 million on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations for 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, include
initial franchise fees of $8 million, $9 million and
$11 million, respectively.
F-18
As part of ongoing franchise fees, the Company receives
marketing and reservation fees from its lodging franchisees,
which generally are calculated based on a specified percentage
of gross room revenues. Such fees totaled $196 million,
$186 million and $218 million during 2010, 2009 and
2008, respectively, and are recorded within the franchise fees
line item on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. As
provided for in the franchise agreements, all of these fees are
to be expended for marketing purposes or the operation of an
international, centralized, brand-specific reservation system
for the respective franchisees. Additionally, the Company is
required to provide certain services to its franchisees,
including access to an international, centralized,
brand-specific reservations system, advertising, promotional and
co-marketing programs, referrals, technology, training and
volume purchasing.
The number of lodging properties and rooms in operation by
market sector is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Properties
|
|
Rooms
|
|
Properties
|
|
Rooms
|
|
Properties
|
|
Rooms
|
|
Economy
(a)
|
|
|
5,482
|
|
|
|
387,202
|
|
|
|
5,469
|
|
|
|
387,357
|
|
|
|
5,432
|
|
|
|
389,697
|
|
Midscale
(b)
|
|
|
1,623
|
|
|
|
197,022
|
|
|
|
1,540
|
|
|
|
182,251
|
|
|
|
1,515
|
|
|
|
177,284
|
|
Upscale
(c)
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
28,311
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
24,517
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
21,724
|
|
Unmanaged, Affiliated and Managed, Non-Proprietary Hotels
(d)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
3,549
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
4,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,207
|
|
|
|
612,735
|
|
|
|
7,114
|
|
|
|
597,674
|
|
|
|
7,043
|
|
|
|
592,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Comprised of the Days Inn, Super 8,
Howard Johnson Inn, Howard Johnson Express, Travelodge, Microtel
and Knights Inn lodging brands.
|
|
(b) |
|
Primarily includes Wingate by
Wyndham, Hawthorn by Wyndham, Ramada Worldwide, Howard Johnson
Plaza, Howard Johnson Hotel, Baymont Inn & Suites, and
Tryp by Wyndham lodging brands.
|
|
(c) |
|
Comprised of the Wyndham Hotels and
Resorts lodging brand.
|
|
(d) |
|
Represents properties/rooms
affiliated with the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand for which
the Company receives a fee for reservation and/or other services
provided and properties managed under a joint venture. These
properties are not branded under a Wyndham Hotel Group brand.
|
The number of lodging properties and rooms changed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Properties
|
|
Rooms
|
|
Properties
|
|
Rooms
|
|
Properties
|
|
Rooms
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
|
7,114
|
|
|
|
597,674
|
|
|
|
7,043
|
|
|
|
592,880
|
|
|
|
6,544
|
|
|
|
550,576
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
492
|
|
|
|
54,171
|
|
|
|
486
|
|
|
|
46,528
|
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
|
55,125
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
92
|
(a)
|
|
|
13,236
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
388
|
(b)
|
|
|
29,547
|
(b)
|
Terminations
|
|
|
(491
|
)
|
|
|
(52,346
|
)
|
|
|
(415
|
)
|
|
|
(41,734
|
)
|
|
|
(427
|
)
|
|
|
(42,368
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
|
7,207
|
|
|
|
612,735
|
|
|
|
7,114
|
|
|
|
597,674
|
|
|
|
7,043
|
|
|
|
592,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Relates to the Tryp hotel brand,
which was acquired on June 30, 2010.
|
|
(b) |
|
Relates to Microtel and Hawthorn,
which were acquired on July 18, 2008.
|
The Company may, at its discretion, provide development advances
to certain of its franchisees or hotel owners in its managed
business in order to assist such franchisees/hotel owners in
converting to one of the Companys brands, building a new
hotel to be flagged under one of the Companys brands or in
assisting in other franchisee expansion efforts. Provided the
franchisee/hotel owner is in compliance with the terms of the
franchise/management agreement, all or a portion of the
development advance may be forgiven by the Company over the
period of the franchise/management agreement, which typically
ranges from 10 to 20 years. Otherwise, the related
principal is due and payable to the Company. In certain
instances, the Company may earn interest on unpaid franchisee
development advances, which was not significant during 2010,
2009 or 2008. The amount of such development advances recorded
on the Consolidated Balance Sheets was $55 million and
$53 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. These amounts are classified within the other
non-current assets line item on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
During 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded
$5 million, $5 million and $4 million,
respectively, related to the forgiveness of these advances. Such
amounts are recorded as a reduction of franchise fees on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations. During 2010, 2009 and
2008, the Company recorded $2 million, $4 million and
$0, respectively, of bad debt expense on these development
advances within its lodging business. Such expense is recorded
within operating expenses on the Consolidated Statement of
Operations.
F-19
The income tax provision consists of the following for the year
ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
State
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
State
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
25
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
184
|
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
|
$
|
187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax income/(loss) for domestic and foreign operations
consisted of the following for the year ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
443
|
|
|
$
|
390
|
|
|
$
|
(928
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
563
|
|
|
$
|
493
|
|
|
$
|
(887
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current and non-current deferred income tax assets and
liabilities, as of December 31, are comprised of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Current deferred income tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities and deferred income
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts and vacation ownership contract
receivables
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
Alternative minimum tax credit carryforward
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
Valuation allowance
(*)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred income tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Unamortized servicing rights
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Installment sales of vacation ownership interests
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
Other
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current net deferred income tax asset
|
|
$
|
179
|
|
|
$
|
189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Non-current deferred income tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
Foreign tax credit carryforward
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
Alternative minimum tax credit carryforward
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Tax basis differences in assets of foreign subsidiaries
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
Accrued liabilities and deferred income
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Valuation allowance
(*)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred income tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
547
|
|
Installment sales of vacation ownership interests
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
869
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
1,296
|
|
|
|
1,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current net deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
1,021
|
|
|
$
|
1,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
During 2010, the Companys
valuation allowance was reduced by $32 million, primarily
due to the current utilization of certain cumulative foreign tax
credits, which the Company was able to realize based on certain
changes in its tax profile.
|
As of December 31, 2010, the Companys net operating
loss carryforwards primarily relate to state net operating
losses which are due to expire at various dates, but no later
than 2030. No provision has been made for U.S. federal
deferred income taxes on $323 million of accumulated and
undistributed earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2010 since it is the present intention of
management to reinvest the undistributed earnings indefinitely
in those foreign operations. The determination of the amount of
unrecognized U.S. federal deferred income tax liability for
unremitted earnings is not practicable.
The Companys effective income tax rate differs from the
U.S. federal statutory rate as follows for the year ended
December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Federal statutory rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State and local income taxes, net of federal tax benefits
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
Taxes on foreign operations at rates different than U.S. federal
statutory rates
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
Taxes on foreign income, net of tax credits
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
Foreign tax credits
|
|
|
(3.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IRS examination settlement
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.7
|
%
|
|
|
40.6
|
%
|
|
|
(21.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys effective tax rate declined from 40.6% in
2009 to 32.7% in 2010 primarily due to the benefit derived from
the current utilization of certain cumulative foreign tax
credits, which the Company was able to realize based on certain
changes in its tax profile, as well as the settlement of the IRS
examination. The difference between the Companys 2009
effective tax rate of 40.6% and 2008 effective tax rate of
(21.1%) is primarily due to the absence of impairment charges
recorded during 2008, a charge recorded during 2009 for the
reduction of deferred tax assets and the origination of deferred
tax liabilities in a foreign tax jurisdiction and the write-off
of deferred tax assets that were associated with stock-based
compensation, which were in excess of the Companys pool of
excess tax benefits available to absorb tax deficiencies.
F-21
The following table summarizes the activity related to the
Companys unrecognized tax benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
Decreases related to tax positions taken during a prior period
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Increases related to tax positions taken during the current
period
|
|
|
5
|
|
Decreases as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute of
limitations
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
25
|
|
Increases related to tax positions taken during a prior period
|
|
|
1
|
|
Increases related to tax positions taken during the current
period
|
|
|
2
|
|
Decreases as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute of
limitations
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
25
|
|
Increases related to tax positions taken during a prior period
|
|
|
2
|
|
Increased related to tax positions taken during the current
period
|
|
|
5
|
|
Decreases as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute of
limitations
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Decreases related to tax positions taken during a prior period
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The gross amount of the unrecognized tax benefits at
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 that, if recognized, would
affect the Companys effective tax rate was
$22 million, $25 million and $25 million,
respectively. The Company recorded both accrued interest and
penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of
provision for income taxes on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations. The Company also accrued potential penalties and
interest of $1 million, $3 million and less than
$1 million related to these unrecognized tax benefits
during 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. As of
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company had recorded
a liability for potential penalties of $2 million,
$3 million and $2 million, respectively, and interest
of $4 million, $5 million and $3 million,
respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company
does not expect the unrecognized tax benefits to change
significantly over the next 12 months.
The Company files U.S., state, and foreign income tax returns in
jurisdictions with varying statutes of limitations. The 2007
through 2010 tax years generally remain subject to examination
by federal tax authorities. The 2006 through 2010 tax years
generally remain subject to examination by many state tax
authorities. In significant foreign jurisdictions, the 2002
through 2010 tax years generally remain subject to examination
by their respective tax authorities. The statute of limitations
is scheduled to expire within 12 months of the reporting
date in certain taxing jurisdictions and the Company believes
that it is reasonably possible that the total amount of its
unrecognized tax benefits could decrease by $0 to
$2 million.
The Company made cash income tax payments, net of refunds, of
$103 million, $113 million and $68 million during
2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Such payments exclude income
tax related payments made to or refunded by former Parent.
As of December 31, 2010, the Company had $41 million
of foreign tax credits with a full valuation allowance of
$41 million. The foreign tax credits primarily expire
between 2015 and 2018, and the valuation allowance on these
credits will be reduced when and if the Company determines that
these credits are more likely than not to be realized.
As discussed below, the IRS commenced an audit of Cendants
taxable years 2003 through 2006, during which the Company was
included in Cendants tax returns.
During the third quarter of 2010, the Company reached an
agreement, along with Cendant, with the IRS that resolves and
pays Cendants outstanding contingent tax liabilities
relating to the examination of the federal income tax returns
for Cendants taxable years 2003 through 2006. The Company
received $10 million in payment from Cendants former
real estate services business (Realogy), who was
responsible for 62.5% of the liability as per the Separation
Agreement, and paid $155 million for all such tax
liabilities including the final interest payable to Cendant, who
is the taxpayer. As a result, the Companys accrual for
outstanding Cendant contingent tax liabilities was
$58 million as of December 31, 2010. Such amount was
primarily related to legacy state and foreign tax issues. See
Note 22 Separation Adjustments and Transactions
with Former Parent and Subsidiaries for more detailed
information.
F-22
|
|
8.
|
Vacation
Ownership Contract Receivables
|
The Company generates vacation ownership contract receivables by
extending financing to the purchasers of VOIs. Current and
long-term vacation ownership contract receivables, net as of
December 31, consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Current vacation ownership contract receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized
|
|
$
|
266
|
|
|
$
|
244
|
|
Non-securitized
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
Secured(*)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current vacation ownership contract receivables, net
|
|
$
|
295
|
|
|
$
|
289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term vacation ownership contract receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized
|
|
$
|
2,437
|
|
|
$
|
2,347
|
|
Non-securitized
|
|
|
576
|
|
|
|
546
|
|
Secured
(*)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,013
|
|
|
|
3,127
|
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(326
|
)
|
|
|
(335
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term vacation ownership contract receivables, net
|
|
$
|
2,687
|
|
|
$
|
2,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
As of December 31, 2009, such
receivables collateralized the Companys
364-day, AUD
213 million, secured, revolving foreign credit facility,
which was paid down and terminated during March 2010 (see
Note 13 Long-Term Debt and Borrowing
Arrangements).
|
Principal payments that are contractually due on the
Companys vacation ownership contract receivables during
the next twelve months are classified as current on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets. Principal payments due on the
Companys vacation ownership contract receivables during
each of the five years subsequent to December 31, 2010 and
thereafter are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized
|
|
|
Securitized
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
266
|
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
$
|
331
|
|
2012
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
357
|
|
2013
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
397
|
|
2014
|
|
|
339
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
422
|
|
2015
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
433
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,137
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
1,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,703
|
|
|
$
|
641
|
|
|
$
|
3,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2010, 2009 and 2008 the Companys securitized
vacation ownership contract receivables generated interest
income of $336 million, $333 million and
$321 million, respectively.
During 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company originated vacation
ownership contract receivables of $983 million,
$970 million and $1,607 million, respectively, and
received principal collections of $781 million,
$771 million and $821 million, respectively. The
weighted average interest rate on outstanding vacation ownership
contract receivables was 13.1%, 13.0% and 12.7% as of
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The activity in the allowance for loan losses related to
vacation ownership contract receivables is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses as of December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
(320
|
)
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(450
|
)
|
Contract receivables written off, net
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses as of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
(383
|
)
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(449
|
)
|
Contract receivables written-off, net
|
|
|
462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses as of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
(370
|
)
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(340
|
)
|
Contract receivables written off, net
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses as of December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
(362
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-23
Credit
Quality for Financed Receivables and the Allowance for Credit
Losses
The basis of the differentiation within the identified class of
financed VOI contract receivable is the consumers FICO
score. A FICO score is a branded version of a consumer credit
score widely used within the U.S. by the largest banks and
lending institutions. FICO scores range from 300 850
and are calculated based on information obtained from one or
more of the three major U.S. credit reporting agencies that
compile and report on a consumers credit history. The
Company updates its records for all active VOI contract
receivables, regardless of balance, on a rolling monthly basis
so as to ensure that all VOI contract receivables are scored at
least every six months. The Company groups all VOI contract
receivables into four different categories: FICO scores ranging
from 700 to 850, 600 to 699, Below 600, and No Score (primarily
comprised of consumers for whom a score is not readily
available, including consumers declining access to FICO scores
and non U.S. residents). The following table details an
aged analysis of financing receivables using the most recently
updated FICO scores (based on the update policy described above):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
700+
|
|
|
600-699
|
|
|
<600
|
|
|
No Score
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$
|
1,415
|
|
|
$
|
990
|
|
|
$
|
426
|
|
|
$
|
356
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,187
|
|
31 60 days
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
61 90 days
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
91 120 days
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,437
|
|
|
$
|
1,037
|
|
|
$
|
501
|
|
|
$
|
369
|
(
|
*)
|
|
$
|
3,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
700+
|
|
|
600-699
|
|
|
<600
|
|
|
No Score
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$
|
1,386
|
|
|
$
|
1,048
|
|
|
$
|
527
|
|
|
$
|
313
|
|
|
$
|
3,274
|
|
31 60 days
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
61 90 days
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
91 120 days
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,402
|
|
|
$
|
1,093
|
|
|
$
|
633
|
|
|
$
|
323
|
(*)
|
|
$
|
3,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
The total no score contract
receivables balances of $369 million and $323 million
as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, includes
$309 million and $271 million, respectively, of
contract receivables at Wyndham Vacation Resorts Asia Pacific.
|
The Company ceases to accrue interest on VOI contract
receivables once the contract has remained delinquent for
greater than 90 days. At greater than 120 days, the
VOI contract receivable is written off to the allowance for
credit losses. The Company did not have a material number of
impaired VOI contract receivables nor did it have a material
number of modified VOI contract receivables as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009.
Vacation
Ownership Contract Receivables and Securitizations
The Company pools qualifying vacation ownership contract
receivables and sells them to bankruptcy-remote entities.
Vacation ownership contract receivables qualify for
securitization based primarily on the credit strength of the VOI
purchaser to whom financing has been extended. Vacation
ownership contract receivables are securitized through
bankruptcy-remote SPEs that are consolidated within the
Companys Consolidated Financial Statements. As a result,
the Company does not recognize gains or losses resulting from
these securitizations at the time of sale to the SPEs. Income is
recognized when earned over the contractual life of the vacation
ownership contract receivables. The Company services the
securitized vacation ownership contract receivables pursuant to
servicing agreements negotiated on an arms-length basis based on
market conditions. The activities of these SPEs are limited to
(i) purchasing vacation ownership contract receivables from
the Companys vacation ownership subsidiaries;
(ii) issuing debt securities
and/or
borrowing under a conduit facility to fund such purchases; and
(iii) entering into derivatives to hedge interest rate
exposure. The bankruptcy-remote SPEs are legally separate from
the Company. The receivables held by the bankruptcy-remote SPEs
are not available to creditors of the Company and legally are
not assets of the Company. Additionally, the creditors of these
SPEs have no recourse to the Company for principal and interest.
F-24
The assets and debt of these vacation ownership SPEs are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Securitized contract receivables, gross
(a)
|
|
$
|
2,703
|
|
|
$
|
2,591
|
|
Securitized restricted
cash(b)
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
Interest receivables on securitized contract receivables
(c)
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Other assets
(d)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total SPE assets
(e)
|
|
|
2,865
|
|
|
|
2,755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized term notes
(f)
|
|
|
1,498
|
|
|
|
1,112
|
|
Securitized conduit facilities
(f)
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
Other liabilities
(g)
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total SPE liabilities
|
|
|
1,672
|
|
|
|
1,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPE assets in excess of SPE liabilities
|
|
$
|
1,193
|
|
|
$
|
1,222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Included in current
($266 million and $244 million as of December 31,
2010 and 2009, respectively) and non-current
($2,437 million and $2,347 million as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively) vacation
ownership contract receivables on the Companys
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
|
|
(b) |
|
Included in other current assets
($77 million and $69 million as of December 31,
2010 and 2009, respectively) and other non-current assets
($61 million and $64 million as of December 31,
2010 and 2009, respectively) on the Companys Consolidated
Balance Sheets.
|
|
(c) |
|
Included in trade receivables, net
on the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheets.
|
|
(d) |
|
Primarily includes interest rate
derivative contracts and related assets; included in other
non-current assets on the Companys Consolidated Balance
Sheets.
|
|
(e) |
|
Excludes deferred financing costs
of $22 million and $20 million as of December 31,
2010 and 2009, respectively, related to securitized debt.
|
|
(f) |
|
Included in current
($223 million and $209 million as of December 31,
2010 and 2009, respectively) and long-term ($1,427 million
and $1,298 million as of December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively) securitized vacation ownership debt on the
Companys Consolidated Balance Sheets.
|
|
(g) |
|
Primarily includes interest rate
derivative contracts and accrued interest on securitized debt;
included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities
($3 million and $4 million as of December 31,
2010 and 2009, respectively) and other non-current liabilities
($19 million and $22 million as of December 31,
2010 and 2009, respectively) on the Companys Consolidated
Balance Sheets.
|
In addition, the Company has vacation ownership contract
receivables that have not been securitized through
bankruptcy-remote SPEs. Such gross receivables were
$641 million and $860 million as of December 31,
2010 and 2009, respectively. A summary of total vacation
ownership receivables and other securitized assets, net of
securitized liabilities and the allowance for loan losses, is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
SPE assets in excess of SPE liabilities
|
|
$
|
1,193
|
|
|
$
|
1,222
|
|
Non-securitized contract receivables
|
|
|
641
|
|
|
|
598
|
|
Secured contract receivables
(*)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(362
|
)
|
|
|
(370
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total, net
|
|
$
|
1,472
|
|
|
$
|
1,712
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
As of December 31, 2009, such receivables collateralized
the Companys secured, revolving foreign credit facility,
which was paid down and terminated during March 2010. |
Inventory, as of December 31, consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Land held for VOI development
|
|
$
|
131
|
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
VOI construction in process
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
Completed inventory and vacation credits
|
|
|
821
|
|
|
|
836
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventory
|
|
|
1,181
|
|
|
|
1,307
|
|
Less: Current portion
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current inventory
|
|
$
|
833
|
|
|
$
|
953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory that the Company expects to sell within the next
twelve months is classified as current on the Companys
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
F-25
|
|
10.
|
Property
and Equipment, net
|
Property and equipment, net, as of December 31, consisted
of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
159
|
|
|
$
|
164
|
|
Building and leasehold improvements
|
|
|
572
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
Capitalized software
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
|
397
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
Vacation rental property capital leases
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,878
|
|
|
|
1,686
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(837
|
)
|
|
|
(733
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,041
|
|
|
$
|
953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded depreciation
and amortization expense of $145 million, $150 million
and $154 million, respectively, related to property and
equipment.
Other current assets, as of December 31, consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Securitization restricted cash
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
Non-trade receivables, net
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
Escrow deposit restricted cash
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Deferred vacation ownership costs
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Other
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
245
|
|
|
$
|
233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.
|
Accrued
Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities, as of
December 31, consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Accrued payroll and related
|
|
$
|
219
|
|
|
$
|
188
|
|
Accrued taxes
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
Accrued legal settlements
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Accrued advertising and marketing
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Accrued other
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
619
|
|
|
$
|
579
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-26
|
|
13.
|
Long-Term
Debt and Borrowing Arrangements
|
The Companys indebtedness consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Securitized vacation ownership debt:
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes
|
|
$
|
1,498
|
|
|
$
|
1,112
|
|
Bank conduit facility
(b)
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securitized vacation ownership debt
|
|
|
1,650
|
|
|
|
1,507
|
|
Less: Current portion of securitized vacation ownership debt
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term securitized vacation ownership debt
|
|
$
|
1,427
|
|
|
$
|
1,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00% senior unsecured notes (due December 2016)
(c)
|
|
$
|
798
|
|
|
$
|
797
|
|
Term
loan(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
Revolving credit facility (due October 2013)
(e)
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.875% senior unsecured notes (due May 2014)
(f)
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
3.50% convertible notes (due May 2012)
(g)
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
7.375% senior unsecured notes (due March 2020)
(h)
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.75% senior unsecured notes (due February 2018)
(i)
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation ownership bank borrowings
(j)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
Vacation rentals capital leases
(k)
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
Other
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
2,094
|
|
|
|
2,015
|
|
Less: Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
2,083
|
|
|
$
|
1,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents debt that is securitized
through bankruptcy remote SPEs, the creditors of which have no
recourse to the Company for principal and interest.
|
|
(b) |
|
Represents a
364-day,
$600 million, non-recourse vacation ownership bank conduit
facility, with a term through September 2011 whose capacity is
subject to the Companys ability to provide additional
assets to collateralize the facility. As of December 31,
2010, the total available capacity of the facility was
$448 million.
|
|
(c) |
|
The balance as of December 31,
2010 represents $800 million aggregate principal less
$2 million of unamortized discount.
|
|
(d) |
|
The term loan facility was fully
repaid during March 2010.
|
|
(e) |
|
The revolving credit facility has a
total capacity of $970 million, which includes availability
for letters of credit. As of December 31, 2010, the Company
had $28 million of letters of credit outstanding and, as
such, the total available capacity of the revolving credit
facility was $788 million.
|
|
(f) |
|
Represents senior unsecured notes
issued by the Company during May 2009. The balance at
December 31, 2010 represents $250 million aggregate
principal less $9 million of unamortized discount.
|
|
(g) |
|
Represents convertible notes issued
by the Company during May 2009, which includes debt principal,
less unamortized discount, and a liability related to a
bifurcated conversion feature. During the third and fourth
quarters of 2010, the Company repurchased a portion of its 3.50%
convertible notes. The following table details the components of
the convertible notes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Debt principal
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
|
$
|
230
|
|
Unamortized discount
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt less discount
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
Fair value of bifurcated conversion feature
(*)
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible notes
|
|
$
|
266
|
|
|
$
|
367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) The
Company also has an asset with a fair value equal to the
bifurcated conversion feature, which represents cash-settled
call options that the Company purchased concurrent with the
issuance of the convertible notes.
|
|
|
(h) |
|
Represents senior unsecured notes
issued by the Company during February 2010. The balance as of
December 31, 2010 represents $250 million aggregate
principal less $3 million of unamortized discount.
|
|
(i) |
|
Represents senior unsecured notes
issued by the Company during September 2010. The balance as of
December 31, 2010 represents $250 million aggregate
principal less $3 million of unamortized discount.
|
|
(j) |
|
Represents a
364-day, AUD
213 million, secured, revolving foreign credit facility,
which was paid down and terminated during March 2010.
|
|
(k) |
|
Represents capital lease
obligations with corresponding assets classified within property
and equipment on the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheets.
|
Covenants
The revolving credit facility is subject to covenants including
the maintenance of specific financial ratios. The financial
ratio covenants consist of a minimum consolidated interest
coverage ratio of at least 3.0 to 1.0 as of the
F-27
measurement date and a maximum consolidated leverage ratio not
to exceed 3.75 to 1.0 on the measurement date. The consolidated
interest coverage ratio is calculated by dividing consolidated
EBITDA (as defined in the credit agreement) by consolidated
interest expense (as defined in the credit agreement), both as
measured on a trailing 12 month basis preceding the
measurement date. Consolidated interest expense excludes, among
other things, interest expense on any securitization
indebtedness (as defined in the credit agreement). The
consolidated leverage ratio is calculated by dividing
consolidated total indebtedness (as defined in the credit
agreement and which excludes, among other things, securitization
indebtedness) as of the measurement date by consolidated EBITDA
as measured on a trailing 12 month basis preceding the
measurement date. Covenants in this credit facility also include
limitations on indebtedness of material subsidiaries; liens;
mergers, consolidations, liquidations and dissolutions; sale of
all or substantially all of the Companys assets; and sale
and leaseback transactions. Events of default in this credit
facility include failure to pay interest, principal and fees
when due; breach of a covenant or warranty; acceleration of or
failure to pay other debt in excess of $50 million
(excluding securitization indebtedness); insolvency matters; and
a change of control.
The 6.00% senior unsecured notes, 9.875% senior
unsecured notes, 7.375% senior unsecured notes and
5.75% senior unsecured notes contain various covenants
including limitations on liens, limitations on potential sale
and leaseback transactions and change of control restrictions.
In addition, there are limitations on mergers, consolidations
and potential sale of all or substantially all of the
Companys assets. Events of default in the notes include
failure to pay interest and principal when due, breach of a
covenant or warranty, acceleration of other debt in excess of
$50 million and insolvency matters. The Convertible Notes
do not contain affirmative or negative covenants; however, the
limitations on mergers, consolidations and potential sale of all
or substantially all of the Companys assets and the events
of default for the Companys senior unsecured notes are
applicable to such notes. Holders of the Convertible Notes have
the right to require the Company to repurchase the Convertible
Notes at 100% of principal plus accrued and unpaid interest in
the event of a fundamental change, defined to include, among
other things, a change of control, certain recapitalizations and
if the Companys common stock is no longer listed on a
national securities exchange.
As of December 31, 2010, the Company was in compliance with
all of the financial covenants described above.
Each of the Companys non-recourse, securitized term notes
and the bank conduit facility contain various triggers relating
to the performance of the applicable loan pools. For example, if
the vacation ownership contract receivables pool that
collateralizes one of the Companys securitization notes
fails to perform within the parameters established by the
contractual triggers (such as higher default or delinquency
rates), there are provisions pursuant to which the cash flows
for that pool will be maintained in the securitization as extra
collateral for the note holders or applied to accelerate the
repayment of outstanding principal to the noteholders. As of
December 31, 2010, all of the Companys securitized
loan pools were in compliance with applicable contractual
triggers.
Maturities
and Capacity
The Companys outstanding debt as of December 31, 2010
matures as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
234
|
|
2012
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
624
|
|
2013
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
368
|
|
2014
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
447
|
|
2015
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
1,354
|
|
|
|
1,877
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,650
|
|
|
$
|
2,094
|
|
|
$
|
3,744
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As debt maturities of the securitized vacation ownership debt
are based on the contractual payment terms of the underlying
vacation ownership contract receivables, actual maturities may
differ as a result of prepayments by the vacation ownership
contract receivable obligors.
F-28
As of December 31, 2010, available capacity under the
Companys borrowing arrangements was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
|
Capacity
|
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
Capacity
|
|
|
Securitized vacation ownership debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes
|
|
$
|
1,498
|
|
|
$
|
1,498
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Bank conduit facility
(a)
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securitized vacation ownership debt
(b)
|
|
$
|
2,098
|
|
|
$
|
1,650
|
|
|
$
|
448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00% senior unsecured notes (due December 2016)
|
|
$
|
798
|
|
|
$
|
798
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility (due October 2013)
(c)
|
|
|
970
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
816
|
|
9.875% senior unsecured notes (due May 2014)
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.50% convertible notes (due May 2012)
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.375% senior unsecured notes (due March 2020)
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.75% senior unsecured notes (due February 2018)
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation rentals capital leases
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
2,920
|
|
|
$
|
2,094
|
|
|
|
826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Issuance of letters of credit
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
798
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The capacity of this facility is
subject to the Companys ability to provide additional
assets to collateralize additional securitized borrowings.
|
|
(b) |
|
These outstanding borrowings are
collateralized by $2,865 million of underlying gross
vacation ownership contract receivables and related assets.
|
|
(c) |
|
The capacity under the
Companys revolving credit facility includes availability
for letters of credit. As of December 31, 2010, the
available capacity of $816 million was further reduced to
$788 million due to the issuance of $28 million of
letters of credit.
|
Securitized
Vacation Ownership Debt
As previously discussed in Note 8 Vacation
Ownership Contract Receivables, the Company issues debt through
the securitization of vacation ownership contract receivables.
Sierra Timeshare
2010-1
Receivables Funding, LLC. On March 12, 2010, the
Company closed a series of term notes payable, Sierra Timeshare
2010-1
Receivables Funding LLC, in the initial principal amount of
$300 million. These borrowings bear interest at a coupon
rate of 4.48% and are secured by vacation ownership contract
receivables. As of December 31, 2010, the Company had
$174 million of outstanding borrowings under these term
notes.
Premium Yield Facility
2010-A
LLC. On June 14, 2010, the Company closed a
securitization facility, Premium Yield Facility
2010-A LLC,
in the initial principal amount of $185 million. These
borrowings bear interest at a coupon rate of 6.08% and are
secured by vacation ownership contract receivables. As of
December 31, 2010, the Company had $155 million of
outstanding borrowings under this facility.
Sierra Timeshare
2010-2
Receivables Funding, LLC. On July 23, 2010, the Company
closed a series of term notes payable, Sierra Timeshare
2010-2
Receivables Funding LLC, in the initial principal amount of
$350 million. These borrowings bear interest at a weighted
average coupon rate of 4.11% and are secured by vacation
ownership contract receivables. As of December 31, 2010,
the Company had $266 million of outstanding borrowings
under these term notes.
Sierra Timeshare
2010-3
Receivables Funding, LLC. On October 21, 2010, the
Company closed a series of term notes payable, Sierra Timeshare
2010-3
Receivables Funding LLC, in the initial principal amount of
$300 million. These borrowings bear interest at a weighted
average coupon rate of 3.67% and are secured by vacation
ownership contract receivables. As of December 31, 2010,
the Company had $277 million of outstanding borrowings
under these term notes.
As of December 31, 2010, the Company had $626 million
of outstanding borrowings under term notes entered into prior to
January 1, 2010.
The Companys securitized debt includes fixed and floating
rate term notes for which the weighted average interest rate was
6.6%, 8.1% and 5.8% during the years ended December 31,
2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
On October 1, 2010, the Company renewed its
364-day,
$600 million, non-recourse, securitized vacation ownership
bank conduit facility with a term through September 2011. This
facility bears interest at variable rates based on commercial
paper rates and LIBOR rates plus a spread. The bank conduit
facility had a weighted average interest rate of 7.1%, 9.6% and
4.1% during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and
2008, respectively.
F-29
As of December 31, 2010, the Companys securitized
vacation ownership debt of $1,650 million is collateralized
by $2,865 million of underlying gross vacation ownership
contract receivables and related assets. Additional usage of the
capacity of the Companys Bank conduit facility is subject
to the Companys ability to provide additional assets to
collateralize such facility. The combined weighted average
interest rate on the Companys total securitized vacation
ownership debt was 6.7%, 8.5% and 5.2% during 2010, 2009 and
2008, respectively.
Other
6.00% Senior Unsecured Notes. The Companys
6.00% notes, with face value of $800 million, were
issued in December 2006 for net proceeds of $796 million.
The notes will mature on December 1, 2016 and are
redeemable at the Companys option at any time, in whole or
in part, at the appropriate redemption prices plus accrued
interest through the redemption date. These notes rank equally
in right of payment with all of the Companys other senior
unsecured indebtedness.
Term Loan. During July 2006, the Company entered into a
five-year $300 million term loan facility bearing interest
at LIBOR plus a spread and with a maturity date of July 7,
2011. This facility was fully repaid during March 2010. The
weighted average interest rate during 2010, 2009 and 2008 was
5.3%, 5.7% and 6.2%, respectively.
Revolving Credit Facility. On March 29, 2010, the
Company replaced its five-year $900 million revolving
credit facility with a $950 million revolving credit
facility that expires on October 1, 2013. During the fourth
quarter of 2010, the total capacity of this facility was
increased to $970 million. This facility is subject to a
fee of 50 basis points based on total capacity and bears
interest at LIBOR plus 250 basis points. The interest rate
of this facility is dependent on the Companys credit
ratings. As of December 31, 2010, the Company had
$154 million of outstanding borrowings and $28 million
of outstanding letters of credit and, as such, the total
available remaining capacity was $788 million.
9.875% Senior Unsecured Notes. On May 18, 2009,
the Company issued senior unsecured notes, with face value of
$250 million and bearing interest at a rate of 9.875%, for
net proceeds of $236 million. Interest began accruing on
May 18, 2009 and is payable semi-annually in arrears on May
1 and November 1 of each year, commencing on November 1,
2009. The notes will mature on May 1, 2014 and are
redeemable at the Companys option at any time, in whole or
in part, at the stated redemption prices plus accrued interest
through the redemption date. These notes rank equally in right
of payment with all of the Companys other senior unsecured
indebtedness.
3.50% Convertible Notes. On May 19, 2009, the
Company issued convertible notes (Convertible Notes)
with face value of $230 million and bearing interest at a
rate of 3.50%, for net proceeds of $224 million. The
Company accounted for the conversion feature as a derivative
instrument under the guidance for derivatives and bifurcated
such conversion feature from the Convertible Notes for
accounting purposes (Bifurcated Conversion Feature).
The fair value of the Bifurcated Conversion Feature on the
issuance date of the Convertible Notes was recorded as original
issue discount for purposes of accounting for the debt component
of the Convertible Notes. Therefore, interest expense greater
than the coupon rate of 3.50% will be recognized by the Company
primarily resulting from the accretion of the discounted
carrying value of the Convertible Notes to their face amount
over the term of the Convertible Notes. As such, the effective
interest rate over the life of the Convertible Notes is
approximately 10.7%. Interest began accruing on May 19,
2009 and is payable semi-annually in arrears on May 1 and
November 1 of each year, commencing on November 1, 2009.
The Convertible Notes will mature on May 1, 2012. Holders
may convert their notes to cash subject to (i) certain
conversion provisions determined by the market price of the
Companys common stock; (ii) specified distributions
to common shareholders; (iii) a fundamental change (as
defined below); and (iv) certain time periods specified in
the purchase agreement. The Convertible Notes had an initial
conversion reference rate of 78.5423 shares of common stock
per $1,000 principal amount (equivalent to an initial conversion
price of approximately $12.73 per share of the Companys
common stock), subject to adjustment, with the principal amount
and remainder payable in cash. The Convertible Notes are not
convertible into the Companys common stock or any other
securities under any circumstances.
On May 19, 2009, concurrent with the issuance of the
Convertible Notes, the Company entered into convertible note
hedge and warrant transactions (Warrants) with
certain counterparties. The Company paid $42 million to
purchase cash-settled call options (Call Options)
that are expected to reduce the Companys exposure to
potential cash payments required to be made by the Company upon
the cash conversion of the Convertible Notes. Concurrent with
the purchase of the Call Options, the Company received
$11 million of proceeds from the issuance of Warrants to
purchase shares of the Companys common stock.
If the market price per share of the Companys common stock
at the time of cash conversion of any Convertible Notes is above
the strike price of the Call Options (which strike price was the
same as the equivalent initial conversion price of the
Convertible Notes of approximately $12.73 per share of the
Companys common stock), such Call Options
F-30
will entitle the Company to receive from the counterparties in
the aggregate the same amount of cash as it would be required to
issue to the holder of the cash converted notes in excess of the
principal amount thereof.
Pursuant to the Warrants, the Company sold to the counterparties
Warrants to purchase in the aggregate up to approximately
18 million shares of the Companys common stock. The
Warrants had an exercise price of $20.16 (which represented a
premium of approximately 90% over the Companys closing
price per share on May 13, 2009 of $10.61) and are expected
to be net share settled, meaning that the Company will issue a
number of shares per Warrant corresponding to the difference
between the Companys share price at each Warrant
expiration date and the exercise price of the Warrant. The
Warrants may not be exercised prior to the maturity of the
Convertible Notes.
The purchase of Call Options and the sale of Warrants are
separate contracts entered into by the Company, are not part of
the Convertible Notes and do not affect the rights of holders
under the Convertible Notes. Holders of the Convertible Notes
will not have any rights with respect to the purchased Call
Options or the sold warrants. The Call Options meet the
definition of derivatives under the guidance for derivatives. As
such, the instruments are marked to market each period. In
addition, the derivative liability associated with the
Bifurcated Conversion Feature is also marked to market each
period. The Warrants meet the definition of derivatives under
the guidance; however, because these instruments have been
determined to be indexed to the Companys own stock, their
issuance has been recorded in stockholders equity in the
Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet and is not subject to
the fair value provisions of the guidance.
During the third and fourth quarters of 2010, the Company
repurchased a portion of its Convertible Notes with a carrying
value of $239 million ($101 million for the portion of
Convertible Notes, including the unamortized discount, and
$138 million for the related Bifurcated Conversion Feature)
for $250 million, which resulted in a loss of
$11 million during 2010. Such Convertible Notes had a face
value of $114 million. Concurrent with the repurchase, the
Company settled (i) a portion of the Call Options for
proceeds of $136 million, which resulted in an additional
loss of $3 million and (ii) a portion of the Warrants
with payments of $98 million. As a result of these
transactions, the Company made net payments of $212 million
and incurred total losses of $14 million during the third
and fourth quarters of 2010 and reduced the number of shares
related to the Warrants to approximately 9 million as of
December 31, 2010.
The agreements for such transactions contain anti-dilution
provisions that require certain adjustments to be made as a
result of all quarterly cash dividend increases above $0.04 per
share that occur prior to the maturity date of the Convertible
Notes, Call Options and Warrants. During March 2010, the Company
increased its quarterly dividend from $0.04 per share to $0.12
per share. As a result of the dividend increase and required
adjustments, as of December 31, 2010, the Convertible Notes
have a conversion reference rate of 79.5745 shares of
common stock per $1,000 principal amount (equivalent to a
conversion price of approximately $12.57 per share of the
Companys common stock), the conversion price of the Call
Options is $12.57 and the exercise price of the Warrants is
$19.90.
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the $266 million and
$367 million Convertible Notes consist of $104 million
and $191 million of debt ($116 million and
$230 million face amount, net of $12 million and
$39 million of unamortized discount), respectively, and a
derivative liability with a fair value of $162 million and
$176 million, respectively, related to the Bifurcated
Conversion Feature. The Call Options are derivative assets
recorded at their fair value of $162 million and
$176 million within other non-current assets in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2010 and
2009, respectively.
7.375% Senior Unsecured Notes. On February 25,
2010, the Company issued senior unsecured notes, with face value
of $250 million and bearing interest at a rate of 7.375%,
for net proceeds of $247 million. Interest began accruing
on February 25, 2010 and is payable semi-annually in
arrears on March 1 and September 1 of each year, commencing on
September 1, 2010. The notes will mature on March 1,
2020 and are redeemable at the Companys option at any
time, in whole or in part, at the stated redemption prices plus
accrued interest through the redemption date. These notes rank
equally in right of payment with all of the Companys other
senior unsecured indebtedness.
5.75% Senior Unsecured Notes. On September 20,
2010, the Company issued senior unsecured notes, with face value
of $250 million and bearing interest at a rate of 5.75%,
for net proceeds of $247 million. Interest began accruing
on September 20, 2010 and is payable semi-annually in
arrears on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing on
February 1, 2011. The notes will mature on February 1,
2018 and are redeemable at the Companys option at any
time, in whole or in part, at the stated redemption prices plus
accrued interest through the redemption date. These notes rank
equally in right of payment with all of the Companys other
senior unsecured indebtedness.
Vacation Ownership Bank Borrowings. On June 24,
2009, the Company closed on a
364-day, AUD
193 million, secured, revolving foreign credit facility
with a term through June 2010. On July 7, 2009, an
additional bank joined the Companys
364-day,
secured, revolving foreign credit facility, which provided an
additional AUD 20 million of capacity, increasing the total
capacity of the facility to AUD 213 million. This facility
was paid down and terminated during March 2010. The weighted
average interest rate was 9.9%, 6.8% and 8.1% during 2010, 2009
and 2008, respectively.
F-31
Vacation Rental Capital Leases. The Company leases
vacation homes located in European holiday parks as part of its
vacation exchange and rentals business. The majority of these
leases are recorded as capital lease obligations under generally
accepted accounting principles with corresponding assets
classified within property, plant and equipment on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets. The vacation rentals capital lease
obligations had a weighted average interest rate of 4.5% during
2010, 2009 and 2008.
Other. The Company also maintains other debt facilities
which arise through the ordinary course of operations. This debt
primarily reflects borrowings used to fund property renovations
at one of the Companys vacation rentals businesses.
Early
Extinguishment of Debt
In connection with the early extinguishment of the term loan
facility during the first quarter of 2010, the Company
effectively terminated a related interest rate swap agreement,
which resulted in the reclassification of a $14 million
unrealized loss from accumulated other comprehensive income to
interest expense during the first quarter of 2010 on the
Companys Consolidated Statement of Operations. The Company
incurred an additional $2 million of costs during the first
quarter of 2010 in connection with the early extinguishment of
its term loan and revolving foreign credit facilities, which is
also included within interest expense on the Companys
Consolidated Statement of Operations. The Companys
revolving foreign credit facility was paid down with a portion
of the proceeds from the 7.375% senior unsecured notes. The
remaining proceeds were used, in addition to borrowings under
the Companys revolving credit facility, to pay down the
Companys term loan facility.
In connection with the repurchase of a portion of the
Convertible Notes and the settlement of the Call Options during
the third and fourth quarters of 2010, the Company incurred a
loss of $14 million during 2010, which is included within
interest expense on the Companys Consolidated Statement of
Operations.
Interest
Expense
In addition to the charges the Company incurred related to the
early extinguishment of debt, interest expense incurred in
connection with the Companys other debt was
$144 million, $126 million and $101 million
during 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. All such amounts are
recorded within the interest expense line item on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations. Cash paid related to such
interest expense was $125 million, $99 million and
$100 million during 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Such
amounts exclude cash payments related to early extinguishment of
debt costs.
Interest expense is partially offset on the Consolidated
Statements of Operations by capitalized interest of
$7 million, $12 million and $21 million during
2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Cash paid related to consumer financing interest expense was
$90 million, $112 million and $117 million during
2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The guidance for fair value measurements requires additional
disclosures about the Companys assets and liabilities that
are measured at fair value. The following table presents
information about the Companys financial assets and
liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis
as of December 31, 2010, and indicates the fair value
hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized by the Company to
determine such fair values. Financial assets and liabilities
carried at fair value are classified and disclosed in one of the
following three categories:
Level 1: Quoted prices for identical instruments in active
markets.
Level 2: Quoted prices for similar instruments in active
markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in
markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose
inputs are observable or whose significant value driver is
observable.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs used when little or no market
data is available.
In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall
into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such
cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the
fair value measurement falls has been determined based on the
lowest level input (closest to Level 3) that is
significant to the fair value measurement. The Companys
assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair
value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and
considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
F-32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measure on a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recurring Basis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible Notes related Call Options
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
available-for-sale
(b)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
179
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bifurcated Conversion Feature
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
201
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measure on a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recurring Basis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible Notes related Call Options
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
available-for-sale
(b)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
189
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bifurcated Conversion Feature
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Included in other current assets
and other non-current assets on the Companys Consolidated
Balance Sheet.
|
|
(b) |
|
Included in other non-current
assets on the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet.
|
(c) |
|
Included in long-term debt, accrued
expenses and other current liabilities, and other non-current
liabilities on the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet.
|
The Companys derivative instruments primarily consist of
the Call Options and Bifurcated Conversion Feature related to
the Convertible Notes, pay-fixed/receive-variable interest rate
swaps, interest rate caps, foreign exchange forward contracts
and foreign exchange average rate forward contracts (see
Note 15 Financial Instruments for more detail).
For assets and liabilities that are measured using quoted prices
in active markets, the fair value is the published market price
per unit multiplied by the number of units held without
consideration of transaction costs. Assets and liabilities that
are measured using other significant observable inputs are
valued by reference to similar assets and liabilities. For these
items, a significant portion of fair value is derived by
reference to quoted prices of similar assets and liabilities in
active markets. For assets and liabilities that are measured
using significant unobservable inputs, fair value is derived
using a fair value model, such as a discounted cash flow model.
F-33
The following table presents additional information about
financial assets which are measured at fair value on a recurring
basis for which the Company has utilized Level 3 inputs to
determine fair value as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
Bifurcated
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
Asset-Call
|
|
|
Conversion
|
|
|
Available-For-
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Feature
|
|
|
Sale
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
Issuance of Convertible Notes
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
(176
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
Convertible Notes activity
(*)
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
|
$
|
(162
|
)
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Represents the change in value
related to the Companys repurchase of a portion of its
Bifurcated Conversion Feature and the settlement of a
corresponding portion of the Call Options (see
Note 13 Long-Term Debt and Borrowing
Arrangements).
|
The fair value of financial instruments is generally determined
by reference to market values resulting from trading on a
national securities exchange or in an
over-the-counter
market. In cases where quoted market prices are not available,
fair value is based on estimates using present value or other
valuation techniques, as appropriate. The carrying amounts of
cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, trade receivables,
accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current
liabilities approximate fair value due to the short-term
maturities of these assets and liabilities. The carrying amounts
and estimated fair values of all other financial instruments are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Fair
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Value
|
|
Amount
|
|
Value
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation ownership contract receivables, net
|
|
$
|
2,982
|
|
|
$
|
2,782
|
|
|
$
|
3,081
|
|
|
$
|
2,809
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
(a)
|
|
|
3,744
|
|
|
|
3,871
|
|
|
|
3,522
|
|
|
|
3,405
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forwards
(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps and caps
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
Convertible Notes related Call Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
As of December 31, 2010 and
2009, includes $162 million and $176 million,
respectively, related to the Bifurcated Conversion Feature
liability.
|
(b) |
|
Instruments are in a net loss
position as of December 31, 2010 and a net gain position as
of December 31, 2009.
|
(c) |
|
Instruments are in net loss
positions as of December 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009.
|
The weighted average interest rate on outstanding vacation
ownership contract receivables was 13.1%, 13.0% and 12.7% as of
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The
estimated fair value of the vacation ownership contract
receivables as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 was
approximately 93% and 91% respectively, of the carry value.
In accordance with the guidance for long-lived assets held for
sale, during 2010 and 2009, vacation ownership properties
consisting primarily of undeveloped land with an approximate
carrying amount of $7 million and $36 million were
written down to $3 million and $27 million (their
estimated fair value less selling costs), respectively. Such
write down resulted in an impairment charge of $4 million
and $9 million during 2010 and 2009, respectively. In
accordance with the guidance for equity method investments,
during 2009, an investment in a joint venture with a carrying
amount of $19 million was written down to its fair value of
$13 million. Such write down resulted in an impairment
charge of $6 million during 2009. These impairment charges
are included in goodwill and other impairments on the
Companys Consolidated Statements of Operations.
F-34
|
|
15.
|
Financial
Instruments
|
The designation of a derivative instrument as a hedge and its
ability to meet the hedge accounting criteria determine how the
change in fair value of the derivative instrument will be
reflected in the Consolidated Financial Statements. A derivative
qualifies for hedge accounting if, at inception, the derivative
is expected to be highly effective in offsetting the underlying
hedged cash flows or fair value and the hedge documentation
standards are fulfilled at the time the Company enters into the
derivative contract. A hedge is designated as a cash flow hedge
based on the exposure being hedged. The asset or liability value
of the derivative will change in tandem with its fair value.
Changes in fair value, for the effective portion of qualifying
hedges, are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income
(AOCI). The derivatives gain or loss is
released from AOCI to match the timing of the underlying hedged
cash flows effect on earnings.
The Company reviews the effectiveness of its hedging instruments
on an ongoing basis, recognizes current period hedge
ineffectiveness immediately in earnings and discontinues hedge
accounting for any hedge that it no longer considers to be
highly effective. The Company recognizes changes in fair value
for derivatives not designated as hedges or those not qualifying
for hedge accounting in current period earnings. Upon
termination of cash flow hedges, the Company releases gains and
losses from AOCI based on the timing of the underlying cash
flows, unless the termination results from the failure of the
intended transaction to occur in the expected timeframe. Such
untimely transactions require the Company to immediately
recognize in earnings gains and losses previously recorded in
AOCI.
Changes in interest rates and foreign exchange rates expose the
Company to market risk. The Company also uses cash flow hedges
as part of its overall strategy to manage its exposure to market
risks associated with fluctuations in interest rates and foreign
currency exchange rates. As a matter of policy, the Company only
enters into transactions that it believes will be highly
effective at offsetting the underlying risk, and the Company
does not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.
The Company uses the following derivative instruments to
mitigate its foreign currency exchange rate and interest rate
risks:
Foreign
Currency Risk
The Company uses freestanding foreign currency forward contracts
and foreign currency forward contracts designated as cash flow
hedges to manage its exposure to changes in foreign currency
exchange rates associated with its foreign currency denominated
receivables, forecasted earnings of foreign subsidiaries and
forecasted foreign currency denominated vendor payments. The
Company primarily hedges its foreign currency exposure to the
British pound and Euro. The impact of the cash flow hedges did
not have a material impact on the Companys results of
operations, financial position and cash flows during the years
ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. The fluctuations in
the value of the freestanding forward contracts do, however,
largely offset the impact of changes in the value of the
underlying risk that they are intended to hedge. The impact of
the freestanding forward contracts was a loss of
$19 million, a gain of $7 million and a loss of
$31 million, which were included in operating expense on
the Companys Consolidated Statements of Operations during
the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The impact of the freestanding forward contracts
was not material to the Companys financial position or
cash flows during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009
and 2008. The pre-tax amount of gains or losses reclassified
from other comprehensive income to earnings resulting from
ineffectiveness or from excluding a component of the forward
contracts gain or loss from the effectiveness calculation
for cash flow hedges during the years ended December 31,
2010, 2009 and 2008 was not material. The amount of gains or
losses the Company expects to reclassify from other
comprehensive income to earnings over the next 12 months is
not material.
Interest
Rate Risk
A portion of the debt used to finance the Companys
operations is also exposed to interest rate fluctuations. The
Company uses various hedging strategies and derivative financial
instruments to create a desired mix of fixed and floating rate
assets and liabilities. Derivative instruments currently used in
these hedging strategies include swaps and interest rate caps.
The derivatives used to manage the risk associated with the
Companys floating rate debt include freestanding
derivatives and derivatives designated as cash flow hedges. In
connection with its qualifying cash flow hedges, the Company
recorded net pre-tax gains of $5 million, $27 million
and net pre-tax loss of $39 million during the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, to other
comprehensive income. The pre-tax amount of gains or losses
resulting from ineffectiveness or from excluding a component of
the derivatives gain or loss from the effectiveness
calculation for cash flow hedges was not material during the
years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. In connection
with the early extinguishment of the term loan facility during
the first quarter of 2010 (See Note 13
Long-Term Debt and Borrowing Arrangements), the Company
effectively terminated the interest rate swap agreement, which
resulted in the reclassification of a $14 million
unrealized loss from AOCI to interest expense on the
Companys
F-35
Consolidated Statement of Operations during the year ended
December 31, 2010. The amount of losses that the Company
expects to reclassify from other comprehensive income to
earnings during the next 12 months is not material. The
impact of the freestanding derivatives was a gain of
$14 million, $7 million and a loss of $5 million
(of which $6 million, $7 million and $5 million
was included in consumer financing interest expense and
$8 million, $0 and $0 was included in interest expense),
during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively on the Companys Consolidated Statements of
Operations. The freestanding derivatives had an immaterial
impact on the Companys financial position and cash flows
during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008.
The following table summarizes information regarding the
Companys derivative instruments as of December 31,
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
Accrued exp. & other current liabs.
|
|
|
12
|
|
Convertible Notes related
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Call Options
(*)
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bifurcated Conversion Feature
(*)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
$
|
173
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
See Note 13
Long-Term Debt and Borrowing Arrangements for further detail.
|
The following table summarizes information regarding the
Companys derivative instruments as of December 31,
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
Accrued exp. & other current liabs.
|
|
|
2
|
|
Convertible Notes related
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Call Options
(*)
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bifurcated Conversion Feature
(*)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
$
|
184
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
See Note 13
Long-Term Debt and Borrowing Arrangements for further detail.
|
Credit
Risk and Exposure
The Company is exposed to counterparty credit risk in the event
of nonperformance by counterparties to various agreements and
sales transactions. The Company manages such risk by evaluating
the financial position and creditworthiness of such
counterparties and by requiring collateral in instances in which
financing is provided. The Company mitigates counterparty credit
risk associated with its derivative contracts by monitoring the
amounts at risk with each counterparty to such contracts,
periodically evaluating counterparty creditworthiness and
financial position, and where possible, dispersing its risk
among multiple counterparties.
As of December 31, 2010, there were no significant
concentrations of credit risk with any individual counterparty
or groups of counterparties. However, approximately 19% of the
Companys outstanding vacation ownership contract
receivables portfolio relates to customers who reside in
California. With the exception of the financing provided to
customers of its vacation ownership businesses, the Company does
not normally require collateral or other security to support
credit sales.
F-36
Market
Risk
The Company is subject to risks relating to the geographic
concentrations of (i) areas in which the Company is
currently developing and selling vacation ownership properties,
(ii) sales offices in certain vacation areas and
(iii) customers of the Companys vacation ownership
business; which in each case, may result in the Companys
results of operations being more sensitive to local and regional
economic conditions and other factors, including competition,
natural disasters and economic downturns, than the
Companys results of operations would be absent such
geographic concentrations. Local and regional economic
conditions and other factors may differ materially from
prevailing conditions in other parts of the world. Florida and
Nevada are examples of areas with concentrations of sales
offices. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2010,
approximately 15%, 13% and 10% of the Companys VOI sales
revenues were generated in sales offices located in Florida,
Nevada and California, respectively.
Included within the Consolidated Statements of Operations is
approximately 10%, 11% and 11% of net revenues generated from
transactions in the state of Florida in each of 2010, 2009 and
2008, respectively, and approximately 8%, 8% and 10% of net
revenues generated from transactions in the state of California
in each of 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
|
|
16.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Commitments
Leases
The Company is committed to making rental payments under
noncancelable operating leases covering various facilities and
equipment. Future minimum lease payments required under
noncancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2010 are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncancelable
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
Year
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
2012
|
|
|
56
|
|
2013
|
|
|
40
|
|
2014
|
|
|
31
|
|
2015
|
|
|
29
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company incurred total rental
expense of $79 million, $77 million and
$93 million, respectively.
Purchase
Commitments
In the normal course of business, the Company makes various
commitments to purchase goods or services from specific
suppliers, including those related to vacation ownership resort
development and other capital expenditures. Purchase commitments
made by the Company as of December 31, 2010 aggregated
$477 million. Individually, such commitments range as high
as $97 million related to the development of a vacation
ownership resort. The majority of the commitments relate to the
development of vacation ownership properties (aggregating
$241 million; $101 million of which relates to 2011
and $45 million of which relates to 2012).
Letters
of Credit
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company had
$28 million and $31 million, respectively, of
irrevocable letters of credit outstanding, which mainly support
development activity at the Companys vacation ownership
business.
Surety
Bonds
Some of the Companys vacation ownership developments are
supported by surety bonds provided by affiliates of certain
insurance companies in order to meet regulatory requirements of
certain states. In the ordinary course of the Companys
business, it has assembled commitments from thirteen surety
providers in the amount of $1.2 billion, of which the
Company had $343 million outstanding as of
December 31, 2010. The availability, terms and conditions,
and pricing of such bonding capacity is dependent on, among
other things, continued financial strength and stability of the
insurance company affiliates providing such bonding capacity,
the general availability of such
F-37
capacity and the Companys corporate credit rating. If such
bonding capacity is unavailable or, alternatively, the terms and
conditions and pricing of such bonding capacity may be
unacceptable to the Company, the cost of development of the
Companys vacation ownership units could be negatively
impacted.
Litigation
The Company is involved in claims, legal proceedings and
governmental inquiries related to the Companys business.
Wyndham
Worldwide Litigation
The Company is involved in claims and legal actions arising in
the ordinary course of its business including but not limited
to: for its lodging business breach of contract,
fraud and bad faith claims between franchisors and franchisees
in connection with franchise agreements and with owners in
connection with management contracts, negligence, breach of
contract, fraud, privacy, consumer protection and other
statutory claims asserted in connection with alleged acts or
occurrences at franchised or managed properties; for its
vacation exchange and rentals business breach of
contract, fraud and bad faith claims by affiliates and customers
in connection with their respective agreements, negligence,
breach of contract, fraud, privacy, consumer protection and
other statutory claims asserted by members and guests for
alleged injuries sustained at affiliated resorts and vacation
rental properties; for its vacation ownership
business breach of contract, bad faith, conflict of
interest, fraud, privacy, consumer protection and other
statutory claims by property owners associations, owners
and prospective owners in connection with the sale or use of
VOIs or land, or the management of vacation ownership resorts,
construction defect claims relating to vacation ownership units
or resorts and negligence, breach of contract, fraud, privacy,
consumer protection and other statutory claims by guests for
alleged injuries sustained at vacation ownership units or
resorts; and for each of its businesses, bankruptcy proceedings
involving efforts to collect receivables from a debtor in
bankruptcy, employment matters involving claims of
discrimination, harassment and wage and hour claims, claims of
infringement upon third parties intellectual property
rights, tax claims and environmental claims.
The Company believes that it has adequately accrued for such
matters with reserves of $38 million as of
December 31, 2010. Such amount is exclusive of matters
relating to the Companys separation from its Parent
(Separation). For matters not requiring accrual, the
Company believes that such matters will not have a material
adverse effect on its results of operations, financial position
or cash flows based on information currently available. However,
litigation is inherently unpredictable and, although the Company
believes that its accruals are adequate
and/or that
it has valid defenses in these matters, unfavorable results
could occur. As such, an adverse outcome from such proceedings
for which claims are awarded in excess of the amounts accrued,
if any, could be material to the Company with respect to
earnings or cash flows in any given reporting period. However,
the Company does not believe that the impact of such litigation
should result in a material liability to the Company in relation
to its consolidated financial position or liquidity.
Cendant
Litigation
Under the Separation Agreement, the Company agreed to be
responsible for 37.5% of certain of Cendants contingent
and other corporate liabilities and associated costs, including
certain contingent litigation. Since the Separation, Cendant
settled the majority of the lawsuits pending on the date of the
Separation. See also Note 22 Separation
Adjustments and Transactions with Former Parent and Subsidiaries
regarding contingent litigation liabilities resulting from the
Separation.
Guarantees/indemnifications
Standard
Guarantees/Indemnifications
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into
agreements that contain standard guarantees and indemnities
whereby the Company indemnifies another party for specified
breaches of or third-party claims relating to an underlying
agreement. Such underlying agreements are typically entered into
by one of the Companys subsidiaries. The various
underlying agreements generally govern purchases, sales or
outsourcing of assets or businesses, leases of real estate,
licensing of trademarks, development of vacation ownership
properties, access to credit facilities, derivatives and
issuances of debt securities. While a majority of these
guarantees and indemnifications extend only for the duration of
the underlying agreement, some survive the expiration of the
agreement. The Company is not able to estimate the maximum
potential amount of future payments to be made under these
guarantees and indemnifications as the triggering events are not
predictable. In certain cases the Company maintains insurance
coverage that may mitigate any potential payments.
F-38
Other
Guarantees/Indemnifications
In the ordinary course of business, the Companys vacation
ownership business provides guarantees to certain owners
associations for funds required to operate and maintain vacation
ownership properties in excess of assessments collected from
owners of the VOIs. The Company may be required to fund such
excess as a result of unsold Company-owned VOIs or failure by
owners to pay such assessments. These guarantees extend for the
duration of the underlying subsidy or similar agreement (which
generally approximate one year and are renewable at the
discretion of the Company on an annual basis) or until a
stipulated percentage (typically 80% or higher) of related VOIs
are sold. The maximum potential future payments that the Company
could be required to make under these guarantees was
approximately $373 million as of December 31, 2010.
The Company would only be required to pay this maximum amount if
none of the owners assessed paid their assessments. Any
assessments collected from the owners of the VOIs would reduce
the maximum potential amount of future payments to be made by
the Company. Additionally, should the Company be required to
fund the deficit through the payment of any owners
assessments under these guarantees, the Company would be
permitted access to the property for its own use and may use
that property to engage in revenue-producing activities, such as
rentals. During 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company made payments
related to these guarantees of $12 million,
$10 million and $7 million, respectively. As of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company maintained a
liability in connection with these guarantees of
$17 million and $22 million, respectively, on its
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
From time to time, the Company may enter into a hotel management
agreement that provides the hotel owner with a minimum return.
Under such agreement, the Company would be required to
compensate for any shortfall over the life of the management
agreement up to a specified aggregate amount. The Companys
exposure under these guarantees is partially mitigated by the
Companys ability to terminate any such management
agreement if certain targeted operating results are not met.
Additionally, the Company is able to recapture a portion or all
of the shortfall payments and any waived fees in the event that
future operating results exceed targets. As of December 31,
2010, the maximum potential amount of future payments to be made
under these guarantees is $16 million with an annual cap of
$3 million or less. As of both December 31, 2010 and
2009, the Company maintained a liability in connection with
these guarantees of less than $1 million on its
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
As part of the Wyndham Asset Affiliation Model, the Company may
guarantee to purchase from the developer inventory associated
with the developers resort property for a percentage of
the original sale price if certain future conditions exist. The
maximum potential future payments that the Company could be
required to make under these guarantees was approximately
$15 million as of December 31, 2010. As of
December 31, 2010, the Company has no recognized
liabilities in connection with these guarantees.
See Note 22 Separation Adjustments and
Transactions with Former Parent and Subsidiaries for contingent
liabilities related to the Companys Separation.
|
|
17.
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income
|
The components of AOCI are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Gains/(Losses)
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
on Cash Flow
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Hedges, Net
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007, net of tax of $47
|
|
$
|
217
|
|
|
$
|
(26
|
)
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
194
|
|
Period change
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008, net of tax benefit of $72
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
Period change
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2009, net of tax benefit of $32
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
138
|
|
Current period change
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
12
|
(*)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2010, net of tax benefit of $40
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Primarily represents the
reclassification of an after-tax unrealized loss associated with
the termination of an interest rate swap agreement in connection
with the early extinguishment of the term loan facility (see
Note 13 Long-Term Debt and Borrowing
Arrangements).
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments exclude income taxes
related to investments in foreign subsidiaries where the Company
intends to reinvest the undistributed earnings indefinitely in
those foreign operations.
|
|
18.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
The Company has a stock-based compensation plan available to
grant non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options,
SSARs, restricted stock, RSUs and other stock or cash-based
awards to key employees, non-employee directors, advisors and
consultants. Under the Wyndham Worldwide Corporation 2006 Equity
and Incentive Plan, which was amended and restated as a result
of shareholders approval at the May 12, 2009 annual
meeting of
F-39
shareholders and further amended as a result of
shareholders approval at the May 13, 2010 annual
meeting of shareholders, a maximum of 36.7 million shares
of common stock may be awarded. As of December 31, 2010,
15.1 million shares remained available.
Incentive
Equity Awards Granted by the Company
The activity related to incentive equity awards granted by the
Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 consisted of
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSUs
|
|
SSARs
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Average
|
|
Number
|
|
Average
|
|
|
of RSUs
|
|
Grant Price
|
|
of SSARs
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
$
|
9.60
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
$
|
21.70
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1.9
|
(b)
|
|
|
22.97
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
(b)
|
|
|
22.84
|
|
Vested/exercised
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)(c)
|
|
|
11.61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
11.70
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
32.99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2010
(a)
|
|
|
6.9
|
(d)
|
|
|
12.35
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
(e)
|
|
|
21.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Aggregate unrecognized compensation
expense related to SSARs and RSUs was $62 million as of
December 31, 2010 which is expected to be recognized over a
weighted average period of 2.4 years.
|
(b) |
|
Primarily represents awards granted
by the Company on February 24, 2010.
|
(c) |
|
The intrinsic value of RSUs vested
during 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $73 million,
$12 million and $18 million, respectively.
|
(d) |
|
Approximately 6.5 million RSUs
outstanding as of December 31, 2010 are expected to vest
over time.
|
(e) |
|
Approximately 1.2 million of
the 2.2 million SSARs were exercisable as of
December 31, 2010. The Company assumes that the unvested
SSARs are expected to vest over time. SSARs outstanding as of
December 31, 2010 had an intrinsic value of
$22 million and have a weighted average remaining
contractual life of 3.7 years.
|
During 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company issued incentive equity
awards totaling $45 million, $27 million and
$60 million, respectively, to the Companys key
employees and senior officers in the form of RSUs and SSARs. The
2010 and 2008 awards will vest ratably over a period of four
years. A portion of the 2009 awards will vest over a period of
three years and the remaining portion will vest ratably over a
period of four years.
The fair value of SSARs granted by the Company during 2010, 2009
and 2008 was estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the weighted average
assumptions outlined in the table below. Expected volatility is
based on both historical and implied volatilities of
(i) the Companys stock and (ii) the stock of
comparable companies over the estimated expected life of the
SSARs. The expected life represents the period of time the SSARs
are expected to be outstanding and is based on the
simplified method, as defined in Staff Accounting
Bulletin 110. The risk free interest rate is based on
yields on U.S. Treasury strips with a maturity similar to
the estimated expected life of the SSARs. The projected dividend
yield was based on the Companys anticipated annual
dividend divided by the twelve-month target price of the
Companys stock on the date of the grant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SSARs Issued on
|
|
|
2/24/2010
|
|
2/27/2009
|
|
12/1/2008
|
|
5/2/2008
|
|
2/29/2008
|
|
Grant date fair value
|
|
$
|
8.66
|
|
|
$
|
2.02
|
|
|
$
|
2.21
|
|
|
$
|
7.27
|
|
|
$
|
6.74
|
|
Grant date strike price
|
|
$
|
24.84
|
|
|
$
|
3.69
|
|
|
$
|
4.33
|
|
|
$
|
23.82
|
|
|
$
|
22.17
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
53.0%
|
|
|
|
81.0%
|
|
|
|
84.4%
|
|
|
|
34.4%
|
|
|
|
35.9%
|
|
Expected life
|
|
|
4.25 yrs.
|
|
|
|
4.00 yrs.
|
|
|
|
4.25 yrs.
|
|
|
|
4.25 yrs.
|
|
|
|
4.25 yrs.
|
|
Risk free interest rate
|
|
|
2.07%
|
|
|
|
1.95%
|
|
|
|
1.48%
|
|
|
|
3.05%
|
|
|
|
2.37%
|
|
Projected dividend yield
|
|
|
2.10%
|
|
|
|
1.60%
|
|
|
|
3.70%
|
|
|
|
0.67%
|
|
|
|
0.72%
|
|
Stock-Based
Compensation Expense
The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of
$39 million, $37 million and $35 million during
2010, 2009 and 2008 respectively, related to the incentive
equity awards granted by the Company. The Company recognized
$15 million of a tax benefit during 2010, $10 million
of a net tax benefit during 2009 and $14 million of a tax
benefit during 2008 for stock-based compensation arrangements on
the Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of
December 31, 2008, the Company had a $4 million APIC
Pool balance. During March 2009, the Company utilized its APIC
Pool related to the vesting of RSUs, which reduced the balance
to $0. During May 2009, the Company recorded a $4 million
charge to its provision for income taxes related to additional
vesting of RSUs. During 2010, the Company increased its APIC
Pool by $12 million due to the vesting of RSUs and exercise
of stock options.
F-40
The Company withheld $24 million, $1 million and
$6 million of taxes for the net share settlement of
incentive equity awards during 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. Such amounts are included in other, net within
financing activities on the Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows.
Incentive
Equity Awards Conversion
Prior to August 1, 2006, all employee stock awards (stock
options and RSUs) were granted by Cendant. At the time of
Separation, a portion of Cendants outstanding equity
awards were converted into equity awards of the Company at a
ratio of one share of the Companys common stock for every
five shares of Cendants common stock. As a result, the
Company issued approximately 2 million RSUs and
approximately 24 million stock options upon completion of
the conversion of existing Cendant equity awards into Wyndham
equity awards. On August 1, 2006, all 2 million
converted RSUs vested and, as such, there are no converted RSUs
outstanding as of such date. As of December 31, 2010, there
were 2.6 million converted stock options outstanding.
The activity related to the converted stock options for the year
ended December 31, 2010 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Average
|
|
|
of Options
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
$
|
33.90
|
|
Exercised (a)
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
19.89
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
42.98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31,
2010 (b)
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
36.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Stock options exercised during
2010, 2009 and 2008 had an intrinsic value of $13 million,
$0 and $600,000, respectively.
|
(b) |
|
As of December 31, 2010, the
Company had 600,000 outstanding in the money stock
options with an aggregate intrinsic value of $1.8 million.
All 2.6 million options were exercisable as of
December 31, 2010. Options outstanding and exercisable as
of December 31, 2010 have a weighted average remaining
contractual life of 1.1 years.
|
The following table summarizes information regarding the
outstanding and exercisable converted stock options as of
December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Average
|
Range of Exercise Prices
|
|
of Options
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
$10.00 $19.99
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
19.78
|
|
$20.00 $29.99
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
27.99
|
|
$30.00 $39.99
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
38.55
|
|
$40.00 & above
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
40.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Options
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
36.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.
|
Employee
Benefit Plans
|
Defined
Contribution Benefit Plans
Wyndham sponsors a domestic defined contribution savings plan
and a domestic deferred compensation plan that provide certain
eligible employees of the Company an opportunity to accumulate
funds for retirement. The Company matches the contributions of
participating employees on the basis specified by each plan. The
Companys cost for these plans was $21 million,
$19 million and $25 million during 2010, 2009 and
2008, respectively.
In addition, the Company contributes to several foreign employee
benefit contributory plans which also provide eligible employees
with an opportunity to accumulate funds for retirement. The
Companys contributory cost for these plans was
$16 million, $14 million and $13 million during
2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Defined
Benefit Pension Plans
The Company sponsors defined benefit pension plans for certain
foreign subsidiaries. Under these plans, benefits are based on
an employees years of credited service and a percentage of
final average compensation or as otherwise described by the
plan. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Companys
net pension liability of $11 million and $10 million,
respectively, is fully recognized as other non-current
liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of
December 31, 2010, the Company recorded $1 million and
$2 million, respectively, within AOCI on the Consolidated
Balance Sheet as an unrecognized prior service credit and
unrecognized loss. As of December 31, 2009, the Company
recorded $1 million and $2 million, respectively,
within accumulated other
F-41
comprehensive income on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as an
unrecognized prior service credit and unrecognized loss.
The Companys policy is to contribute amounts sufficient to
meet minimum funding requirements as set forth in employee
benefit and tax laws plus such additional amounts that the
Company determines to be appropriate. The Company recorded
pension expense of $2 million during each of 2010, 2009 and
2008. In addition, during 2008, the Company recorded a
$1 million net gain on curtailments of two defined benefit
pension plans.
The reportable segments presented below represent the
Companys operating segments for which discrete financial
information is available and which are utilized on a regular
basis by its chief operating decision maker to assess
performance and to allocate resources. In identifying its
reportable segments, the Company also considers the nature of
services provided by its operating segments. Management
evaluates the operating results of each of its reportable
segments based upon revenues and EBITDA, which is
defined as net income/(loss) before depreciation and
amortization, interest expense (excluding consumer financing
interest), interest income (excluding consumer financing
interest) and income taxes, each of which is presented on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company believes that
EBITDA is a useful measure of performance for the Companys
industry segments which, when considered with GAAP measures, the
Company believes gives a more complete understanding of the
Companys operating performance. The Companys
presentation of EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly-titled
measures used by other companies.
Year
Ended or as of December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
Vacation
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
and Rentals
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Other(b)
|
|
Total
|
|
Net
revenues (a)
|
|
$
|
688
|
|
|
$
|
1,193
|
|
|
$
|
1,979
|
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,851
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
189
|
(c)
|
|
|
293
|
(d)
|
|
|
440
|
(e)
|
|
|
(24
|
)(f)
|
|
|
898
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
Segment assets
|
|
|
1,659
|
|
|
|
2,578
|
|
|
|
4,893
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
9,416
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
Year
Ended or as of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
Vacation
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
and Rentals
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Other(b)
|
|
Total
|
|
Net
revenues (a)
|
|
$
|
660
|
|
|
$
|
1,152
|
|
|
$
|
1,945
|
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,750
|
|
EBITDA (g)
|
|
|
175
|
(h)
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
387
|
(e)
|
|
|
(71
|
)(f)
|
|
|
778
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
Segment assets
|
|
|
1,564
|
|
|
|
2,358
|
|
|
|
5,152
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
9,352
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
Vacation
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
and Rentals
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Other(b)
|
|
Total
|
|
Net
revenues (a)
|
|
$
|
753
|
|
|
$
|
1,259
|
|
|
$
|
2,278
|
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,281
|
|
EBITDA (g)
|
|
|
218
|
(i)
|
|
|
248
|
(j)
|
|
|
(1,074
|
)(k)
|
|
|
(27
|
)(f)
|
|
|
(635
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
Segment assets
|
|
|
1,628
|
|
|
|
2,331
|
|
|
|
5,574
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
9,573
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Transactions between segments are
recorded at fair value and eliminated in consolidation.
Inter-segment net revenues were not significant to the net
revenues of any one segment.
|
(b) |
|
Includes the elimination of
transactions between segments.
|
(c) |
|
Includes $1 million
($1 million, net of tax) related to costs incurred in
connection with the Companys acquisition of the Tryp hotel
brand during June 2010.
|
(d) |
|
Includes (i) restructuring
costs of $9 million ($6 million, net of tax) and
(ii) $6 million ($5 million, net of tax) related
to costs incurred in connection with the Companys
acquisitions of Hoseasons during March 2010, ResortQuest during
September 2010 and James Villa Holidays during November 2010.
|
(e) |
|
Includes a non-cash impairment
charge of $4 million ($3 million, net of tax) and
$9 million ($7 million, net of tax) during the twelve
months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, to
reduce the value of certain vacation ownership properties and
related assets held for sale that are no longer consistent with
the Companys development plans.
|
F-42
|
|
|
(f) |
|
Includes $78 million,
$64 million and $45 million of corporate costs during
2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $54 million of a net
benefit, $6 million of a net expense and $18 million
of net benefit related to the resolution of and adjustment to
certain contingent liabilities and assets during 2010, 2009 and
2008, respectively.
|
(g) |
|
Includes restructuring costs of
$3 million, $6 million, $37 million and
$1 million for Lodging, Vacation Exchange and Rentals,
Vacation Ownership and Corporate and Other during 2009 and
$4 million, $9 million and $66 million for
Lodging, Vacation Exchange and Rentals and Vacation Ownership
during 2008.
|
(h) |
|
Includes a non-cash impairment
charge of $6 million ($3 million, net of tax) to
reduce the value of an underperforming joint venture in the
Companys hotel management business.
|
(i) |
|
Includes a non-cash impairment
charge of $16 million ($10 million, net of tax)
primarily due to a strategic change in direction related to the
Companys Howard Johnson brand that is expected to
adversely impact the ability of the properties associated with
the franchise agreements acquired in connection with the
acquisition of the brand during 1990 to maintain compliance with
brand standards.
|
(j) |
|
Includes (i) non-cash
impairment charges of $36 million ($28 million, net of
tax) due to trademark and fixed asset write downs resulting from
a strategic change in direction and reduced future investments
in a vacation rentals business and the write-off of the
Companys investment in a non-performing joint venture and
(ii) charges of $24 million ($24 million, net of
tax) due to currency conversion losses related to the transfer
of cash from the Companys Venezuelan operations.
|
(k) |
|
Includes (i) a non-cash
goodwill impairment charge of $1,342 million
($1,337 million, net of tax) as a result of organizational
realignment plans announced during the fourth quarter of 2008
which reduced future cash flow estimates by lowering the
Companys expected VOI sales pace in the future based on
the expectation that access to the asset-backed securities
market will continue to be challenging, (ii) a non-cash
impairment charge of $28 million ($17 million, net of
tax) due to the Companys initiative to rebrand its
vacation ownership trademarks to the Wyndham brand and
(iii) a non-cash impairment charge of $4 million
($3 million, net of tax) related to the termination of a
development project.
|
Provided below is a reconciliation of EBITDA to income/(loss)
before income taxes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
898
|
|
|
$
|
778
|
|
|
$
|
(635
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before income taxes
|
|
$
|
563
|
|
|
$
|
493
|
|
|
$
|
(887
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The geographic segment information provided below is classified
based on the geographic location of the Companys
subsidiaries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States
|
|
|
Netherlands
|
|
|
Kingdom
|
|
|
Countries
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Year Ended or As of December 31, 2010
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
2,864
|
|
|
$
|
242
|
|
|
$
|
174
|
|
|
$
|
571
|
|
|
$
|
3,851
|
|
Net long-lived assets
|
|
|
2,595
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
3,693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended or As of December 31, 2009
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
2,863
|
|
|
$
|
209
|
|
|
$
|
143
|
|
|
$
|
535
|
|
|
$
|
3,750
|
|
Net long-lived assets
|
|
|
2,468
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
3,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended or As of December 31, 2008
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
3,244
|
|
|
$
|
297
|
|
|
$
|
179
|
|
|
$
|
561
|
|
|
$
|
4,281
|
|
Net long-lived assets
|
|
|
2,579
|
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
3,468
|
|
|
|
21.
|
Restructuring
and Impairments
|
2010
Restructuring Plan
During 2010, the Company committed to a strategic realignment
initiative targeted at reducing costs, which will primarily
impact the operations at one of the call centers at the
Companys vacation exchange and rentals business. In
connection with this initiative, the Company recorded
$9 million of restructuring costs during 2010 related to
the planned termination of approximately 330 employees. As
of December 31, 2010, the Company had a liability of
$9 million, which is expected to be paid in cash primarily
by the second quarter of 2011.
2008
Restructuring Plan
During 2008, the Company committed to various strategic
realignment initiatives targeted principally at reducing costs,
enhancing organizational efficiency, reducing the Companys
need to access the asset-backed securities market and
consolidating and rationalizing existing processes and
facilities. During 2010, the Company reduced its liability with
$11 million in cash payments. The remaining liability of
$11 million, all of which is facility-related, is expected
to be paid in cash by September 2017. During 2009, the Company
recorded $47 million of incremental restructuring costs and
reduced its liability with $50 million in cash payments and
$15 million of other non-cash items. During 2008, the
Company recorded $79 million of restructuring costs, of
which $16 million was paid in cash.
F-43
Total restructuring costs by segment for the year ended
December 31, 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
Facility
|
|
|
Asset Write-offs/
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related
(a)
|
|
|
Related
(b)
|
|
|
Impairments
(c)
|
|
|
Termination
(d)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents severance benefits
resulting from reductions of approximately 370 in staff. The
Company formally communicated the termination of employment to
all 370 employees, representing a wide range of employee
groups. As of December 31, 2009, the Company had terminated
all of these employees.
|
(b) |
|
Primarily related to the
termination of leases of certain sales offices.
|
(c) |
|
Primarily related to the write-off
of assets from sales office closures and cancelled development
projects.
|
(d) |
|
Primarily represents costs incurred
in connection with the termination of a property development
contract.
|
Total restructuring costs by segment for the year ended
December 31, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
Facility
|
|
|
Asset Write-offs/
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related
(a)
|
|
|
Related
(b)
|
|
|
Impairments
(c)
|
|
|
Termination
(d)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents severance benefits
resulting from reductions of approximately 4,500 in staff. The
Company formally communicated the termination of employment to
substantially all 4,500 employees, representing a wide
range of employee groups. As of December 31, 2008, the
Company had terminated approximately 900 of these employees.
|
(b) |
|
Primarily related to the
termination of leases of certain sales offices.
|
(c) |
|
Primarily related to the write-off
of assets from sales office closures and cancelled development
projects.
|
(d) |
|
Primarily represents costs incurred
in connection with the termination of an outsourcing agreement
at the Companys vacation exchange and rentals business.
|
The activity related to the restructuring costs is summarized by
category as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability as of
|
|
|
|
Opening
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
Non-cash
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Personnel-Related
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
Facility-Related
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Asset Impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Terminations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23
|
)
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability as of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability as of
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
Non-cash
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Personnel-Related
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
(34
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
Facility-Related
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
18
|
|
Asset Impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Terminations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
(50
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability as of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability as of
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
Non-cash
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Personnel-Related
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
(*)
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
Facility-Related
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Contract Terminations
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Represents severance benefits
resulting from a reduction of approximately 330 in staff,
primarily representing employees at a call center.
|
F-44
Impairments
During 2010, the Company recorded a non-cash charge of
$4 million to impair the value of certain vacation
ownership properties and related assets held for sale that are
no longer consistent with the Companys development plans.
During 2009, the Company recorded $15 million of charges to
reduce the carrying value of certain assets based on their
revised estimated fair values. Such amount includes (i) a
non-cash charge of $9 million to impair the value of
certain vacation ownership properties and related assets held
for sale that are no longer consistent with the Companys
development plans and (ii) a non-cash charge of
$6 million to impair the value of an underperforming joint
venture in the Companys hotel management business.
During 2008, the Company recorded a charge to impair goodwill
recorded at the Companys vacation ownership reporting
unit. See Note 5 Intangible Assets for further
information. In addition, the Company recorded charges to reduce
the carrying value of certain assets based on their revised
estimated fair values. Such charges were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
1,342
|
|
Indefinite-lived intangible assets
|
|
|
36
|
|
Definite-lived intangible assets
|
|
|
16
|
|
Long-lived assets
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The impairment of indefinite-lived intangible assets represents
(i) charge of $28 million to impair the value of
trademarks related to rebranding initiatives at the
Companys vacation ownership business (see
Note 5 Intangible Assets for more information)
and (ii) a charge of $8 million to impair the value of
a trademark due to a strategic change in direction and reduced
future investments in a vacation rentals business. The
impairment of definite-lived intangible assets represents a
charge due to a strategic change in direction related to the
Companys Howard Johnson brand that is expected to
adversely impact the ability of the properties associated with
the franchise agreements acquired in connection with the
acquisition of the brand during 1990 to maintain compliance with
brand standards. The impairment of long-lived assets represents
(i) a charge of $15 million to impair the value of the
Companys investment in a non-performing joint venture of
the Companys vacation exchange and rentals business,
(ii) a charge of $13 million to impair the value of
fixed assets related to the vacation rentals business discussed
above and (iii) a charge of $4 million related to the
termination of a vacation ownership development project.
|
|
22.
|
Separation
Adjustments and Transactions with Former Parent and
Subsidiaries
|
Transfer
of Cendant Corporate Liabilities and Issuance of Guarantees to
Cendant and Affiliates
Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, upon the
distribution of the Companys common stock to Cendant
shareholders, the Company entered into certain guarantee
commitments with Cendant (pursuant to the assumption of certain
liabilities and the obligation to indemnify Cendant and Realogy
and travel distribution services (Travelport) for
such liabilities) and guarantee commitments related to deferred
compensation arrangements with each of Cendant and Realogy.
These guarantee arrangements primarily relate to certain
contingent litigation liabilities, contingent tax liabilities,
and Cendant contingent and other corporate liabilities, of which
the Company assumed and is responsible for 37.5% while Realogy
is responsible for the remaining 62.5%. The amount of
liabilities which were assumed by the Company in connection with
the Separation was $78 million and $310 million as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. These amounts
were comprised of certain Cendant corporate liabilities which
were recorded on the books of Cendant as well as additional
liabilities which were established for guarantees issued at the
date of Separation related to certain unresolved contingent
matters and certain others that could arise during the guarantee
period. Regarding the guarantees, if any of the companies
responsible for all or a portion of such liabilities were to
default in its payment of costs or expenses related to any such
liability, the Company would be responsible for a portion of the
defaulting party or parties obligation. The Company also
provided a default guarantee related to certain deferred
compensation arrangements related to certain current and former
senior officers and directors of Cendant, Realogy and
Travelport. These arrangements, which are discussed in more
detail below, have been valued upon the Separation in accordance
with the guidance for guarantees and recorded as liabilities on
the Consolidated Balance Sheets. To the extent such recorded
liabilities are not adequate to cover the ultimate payment
amounts, such excess will be reflected as an expense to the
results of operations in future periods.
As a result of the sale of Realogy on April 10, 2007,
Realogys senior debt credit rating was downgraded to below
investment grade. Under the Separation Agreement, if Realogy
experienced such a change of control and suffered such a ratings
downgrade, it was required to post a letter of credit in an
amount acceptable to the Company
F-45
and Avis Budget Group to satisfy the fair value of
Realogys indemnification obligations for the Cendant
legacy contingent liabilities in the event Realogy does not
otherwise satisfy such obligations to the extent they become
due. On April 26, 2007, Realogy posted a $500 million
irrevocable standby letter of credit from a major commercial
bank in favor of Avis Budget Group and upon which demand may be
made if Realogy does not otherwise satisfy its obligations for
its share of the Cendant legacy contingent liabilities. The
letter of credit can be adjusted from time to time based upon
the outstanding contingent liabilities and has an expiration
date of September 2013, subject to renewal and certain
provisions. As such, the letter of credit has been reduced three
times, most recently to $133 million during September 2010.
The posting of this letter of credit does not relieve or limit
Realogys obligations for these liabilities.
As of December 31, 2010, the $78 million of Separation
related liabilities is comprised of $1 million for
litigation matters, $58 million for tax liabilities,
$15 million for liabilities of previously sold businesses
of Cendant, $3 million for other contingent and corporate
liabilities and $1 million of liabilities where the
calculated guarantee amount exceeded the contingent liability
assumed at the date of Separation. In connection with these
liabilities, $47 million is recorded in current due to
former Parent and subsidiaries and $30 million is recorded
in long-term due to former Parent and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2010 on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The
Company will indemnify Cendant for these contingent liabilities
and therefore any payments would be made to the third party
through the former Parent. The $1 million relating to
guarantees is recorded in other current liabilities as of
December 31, 2010 on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The
actual timing of payments relating to these liabilities is
dependent on a variety of factors beyond the Companys
control. In addition, as of December 31, 2010, the Company
has $4 million of receivables due from former Parent and
subsidiaries primarily relating to income taxes, which is
recorded in other current assets on the Consolidated Balance
Sheet. Such receivables totaled $5 million as of
December 31, 2009.
Following is a discussion of the liabilities on which the
Company issued guarantees.
|
|
|
Contingent litigation liabilities The Company assumed
37.5% of liabilities for certain litigation relating to, arising
out of or resulting from certain lawsuits in which Cendant is
named as the defendant. The indemnification obligation will
continue until the underlying lawsuits are resolved. The Company
will indemnify Cendant to the extent that Cendant is required to
make payments related to any of the underlying lawsuits. As the
indemnification obligation relates to matters in various stages
of litigation, the maximum exposure cannot be quantified. Due to
the inherently uncertain nature of the litigation process, the
timing of payments related to these liabilities cannot
reasonably be predicted, but is expected to occur over several
years. Since the Separation, Cendant settled a majority of these
lawsuits and the Company assumed a portion of the related
indemnification obligations. For each settlement, the Company
paid 37.5% of the aggregate settlement amount to Cendant. The
Companys payment obligations under the settlements were
greater or less than the Companys accruals, depending on
the matter. As a result of settlements and payments to Cendant,
as well as other reductions and accruals for developments in
active litigation matters, the Companys aggregate accrual
for outstanding Cendant contingent litigation liabilities was
$1 million as of December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
Contingent tax liabilities Prior to the Separation, the
Company and Realogy were included in the consolidated federal
and state income tax returns of Cendant through the Separation
date for the 2006 period then ended. The Company is generally
liable for 37.5% of certain contingent tax liabilities. In
addition, each of the Company, Cendant and Realogy may be
responsible for 100% of certain of Cendants tax
liabilities that will provide the responsible party with a
future, offsetting tax benefit.
|
On July 15, 2010, Cendant and the IRS agreed to settle the
IRS examination of Cendants taxable years 2003 through
2006. The agreements with the IRS close the IRS examination for
tax periods prior to the Separation Date. The agreements with
the IRS also include a resolution with respect to the tax
treatment of the Companys timeshare receivables, which
resulted in the acceleration of unrecognized deferred tax
liabilities as of the Separation Date. In connection with
reaching agreement with the IRS to resolve the contingent
federal tax liabilities at issue, the Company entered into an
agreement with Realogy to clarify each partys obligations
under the tax sharing agreement. Under the agreement with
Realogy, among other things, the parties specified that the
Company has sole responsibility for taxes and interest
associated with the acceleration of timeshare receivables income
previously deferred for tax purposes, while Realogy will not
seek any reimbursement for the loss of a step up in basis of
certain assets.
During September 2010, the Company received $10 million in
payment from Realogy and paid $155 million for all such tax
liabilities, including the final interest payable, to Cendant,
who is the taxpayer. The agreement with the IRS and the net
payment of $145 million resulted in (i) the reversal
of $190 million in net deferred tax liabilities allocated
from Cendant on the Separation Date with a corresponding
increase to stockholders equity during the third quarter
of 2010; and (ii) the recognition of a $55 million
gain ($42 million, net of tax) with a corresponding
decrease to general and administrative expenses during the
F-46
third quarter of 2010. During the fourth quarter of 2010, the
Company recorded a $2 million reduction to deferred tax
assets allocated from Cendant on the Separation Date with a
corresponding decrease to stockholders equity. As of
December 31, 2010, the Companys accrual for
outstanding Cendant contingent tax liabilities was
$58 million, which relates to legacy state and foreign tax
issues that are expected to be resolved in the next few years.
|
|
|
Cendant contingent and other corporate liabilities The
Company has assumed 37.5% of corporate liabilities of Cendant
including liabilities relating to (i) Cendants
terminated or divested businesses; (ii) liabilities
relating to the Travelport sale, if any; and
(iii) generally any actions with respect to the Separation
plan or the distributions brought by any third party. The
Companys maximum exposure to loss cannot be quantified as
this guarantee relates primarily to future claims that may be
made against Cendant. The Company assessed the probability and
amount of potential liability related to this guarantee based on
the extent and nature of historical experience.
|
|
|
Guarantee related to deferred compensation arrangements
In the event that Cendant, Realogy
and/or
Travelport are not able to meet certain deferred compensation
obligations under specified plans for certain current and former
officers and directors because of bankruptcy or insolvency, the
Company has guaranteed such obligations (to the extent relating
to amounts deferred in respect of 2005 and earlier). This
guarantee will remain outstanding until such deferred
compensation balances are distributed to the respective officers
and directors. The maximum exposure cannot be quantified as the
guarantee, in part, is related to the value of deferred
investments as of the date of the requested distribution.
|
Transactions
with Avis Budget Group, Realogy and Travelport
Prior to the Companys Separation from Cendant, it entered
into a Transition Services Agreement (TSA) with Avis
Budget Group, Realogy and Travelport to provide for an orderly
transition to becoming an independent company. Under the TSA,
Cendant agreed to provide the Company with various services,
including services relating to human resources and employee
benefits, payroll, financial systems management, treasury and
cash management, accounts payable services, telecommunications
services and information technology services. In certain cases,
services provided by Cendant under the TSA were provided by one
of the separated companies following the date of such
companys separation from Cendant. Such services were
substantially completed as of December 31, 2007. During
each of 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded
$1 million of expenses in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations related to these agreements.
|
|
23.
|
Selected
Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)
|
Provided below is selected unaudited quarterly financial data
for 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
144
|
|
|
$
|
178
|
|
|
$
|
203
|
|
|
$
|
163
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
497
|
|
Corporate and
Other (a)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
886
|
|
|
$
|
963
|
|
|
$
|
1,065
|
|
|
$
|
937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
(b)
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
80
|
(c)
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
103
|
(d)
|
|
|
32
|
(e)
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
123
|
(f)
|
|
|
131
|
|
Corporate and
Other (a)(g)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
Less: Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
50
|
(h)
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
47
|
(i)
|
|
|
34
|
(i)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
|
$
|
156
|
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.53
|
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
0.51
|
|
|
|
0.84
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted shares
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
F-47
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes the elimination of
transactions between segments.
|
(b) |
|
Includes $1 million
($1 million, net of tax) related to costs incurred in
connection with the Companys acquisition of the Tryp hotel
brand during June 2010.
|
(c) |
|
Includes $4 million
($3 million, net of tax) related to costs incurred in
connection with the Companys acquisition of Hoseasons
during March 2010.
|
(d) |
|
Includes $1 million
($1 million, net of tax) related to costs incurred in
connection with the Companys acquisition of ResortQuest
during September 2010.
|
(e) |
|
Includes (i) $9 million
($6 million, net of tax) of restructuring costs and
(ii) $1 million ($1 million, net of tax) related
to costs incurred in connection with the Companys
acquisition of James Villa Holidays during November 2010.
|
(f) |
|
Includes non-cash impairment
charges of $4 million ($3 million, net of tax) to
reduce the value of certain vacation ownership properties and
related assets held for sale that are no longer consistent with
the Companys development plans.
|
(g) |
|
Includes $2 million
($1 million, net of tax) of a net expense, $1 million,
net of tax, of a net benefit, $52 million
($38 million, net of tax) of a net benefit and
$3 million ($3 million, net of tax) of a net benefit
related to the resolution of and adjustment to certain
contingent liabilities and assets during the first, second,
third and fourth quarter, respectively, and corporate costs of
$18 million, $14 million, $23 million and
$23 million during the first, second, third and fourth
quarter, respectively.
|
(h) |
|
Includes $16 million
($10 million, net of tax) of costs incurred for the early
extinguishment of the Companys revolving foreign credit
facility and term loan facility during March 2010.
|
(i) |
|
Includes $11 million
($6 million, net of tax) and $3 million
($2 million, net of tax) of costs incurred for the
repurchase of a portion of the Companys Convertible Notes
during the third and fourth quarter, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
154
|
|
|
$
|
174
|
|
|
$
|
183
|
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
462
|
|
|
|
467
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
Corporate and
Other (a)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
901
|
|
|
$
|
920
|
|
|
$
|
1,016
|
|
|
$
|
913
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA (b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
(c)
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
Vacation
Ownership (d)
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
Corporate and
Other (a)(e)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
Less: Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
104
|
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
$
|
0.58
|
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
0.57
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted shares
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes the elimination of
transactions between segments.
|
(b) |
|
Includes restructuring costs of
(i) $3 million, $4 million, $35 million and
$1 million for Lodging, Vacation Exchange and Rentals,
Vacation Ownership and Corporate and Other, respectively, during
the first quarter, (ii) $2 million and $1 million
for Vacation Exchange and Rentals and Vacation Ownership,
respectively, during the second quarter and
(iii) $1 million for Vacation Ownership during the
fourth quarter. The after-tax impact of such costs was
(i) $27 million during the first quarter,
(ii) $2 million during the second quarter and
(iii) $1 million during the fourth quarter.
|
(c) |
|
Includes a non-cash impairment
charge of $6 million ($3 million, net of tax) to
reduce the value of an underperforming joint venture in the
Companys hotel management business.
|
(d) |
|
Includes non-cash impairment
charges of $5 million ($4 million, net of tax),
$3 million ($2 million, net of tax) and
$1 million ($1 million, net of tax) during the first,
second and fourth quarter, respectively, to reduce the value of
certain vacation ownership properties and related assets held
for sale that are no longer consistent with the Companys
development plans.
|
(e) |
|
Includes a net expense related to
the resolution of and adjustment to certain contingent
liabilities and assets of $4 million ($2 million, net
of tax), $0 ($2 million, net of tax) and $2 million
($2 million, net of tax) during the first, second and third
quarter, respectively, and corporate costs of $17 million,
$19 million, $13 million and $15 million during
the first, second, third and fourth quarter, respectively.
|
Tender
Offer
On February 9, 2011, the Company announced a tender offer
to repurchase any and all of its outstanding
3.50% Convertible Notes due May 2012.
F-48
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Separation and Distribution Agreement by and among Cendant
Corporation, Realogy Corporation, Wyndham Worldwide Corporation
and Travelport Inc., dated as of July 27, 2006
(incorporated by reference to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 31, 2006)
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Separation and Distribution Agreement by
and among Cendant Corporation, Realogy Corporation, Wyndham
Worldwide Corporation and Travelport Inc., dated as of
August 17, 2006 (incorporated by reference to the
Registrants
Form 10-Q
filed November 14, 2006)
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated
by reference to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws (incorporated by reference to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Indenture, dated December 5, 2006, between Wyndham
Worldwide Corporation and U.S. Bank National Association, as
Trustee, respecting Senior Notes due 2016 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed February 1, 2007)
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Form of 6.00% Senior Notes due 2016 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed February 1, 2007)
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Indenture, dated November 20, 2008, between Wyndham
Worldwide Corporation and U.S. Bank National Association, as
Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the
Registrants
Form S-3
filed November 25, 2008)
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated May 18, 2009, between
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation and U.S. Bank National
Association, as Trustee, respecting Senior Notes due 2014
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed May 19, 2009)
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
Form of Senior Notes due 2014 (included within Exhibit 4.4)
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
Second Supplemental Indenture, dated May 19, 2009, between
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation and U.S. Bank National
Association, as Trustee, respecting Convertible Notes due 2012
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed May 19, 2009)
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Form of Convertible Notes due 2012 (included within
Exhibit 4.6)
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
Third Supplemental Indenture, dated February 25, 2010,
between Wyndham Worldwide Corporation and U.S. Bank National
Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed February 26, 2010)
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
Form of Note due 2020 (included within Exhibit 4.8)
|
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated September 20, 2010,
between Wyndham Worldwide Corporation and U.S. Bank National
Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed September 23, 2010)
|
|
|
|
4.11
|
|
Form of Note due 2018 (included within Exhibit 4.10)
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Employment Agreement with Stephen P. Holmes, dated as of
July 31, 2006 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed July 7, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement with Stephen P.
Holmes, dated December 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants
Form 10-K
filed February 27, 2009)
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement with Stephen P.
Holmes, dated as of November 19, 2009 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrants
Form 10-K
filed February 19, 2010)
|
G-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Employment Agreement with Franz S. Hanning, dated as of
November 19, 2009 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrants
Form 10-K
filed February 19, 2010)
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Employment Agreement with Geoffrey A. Ballotti, dated as of
March 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrants
Form 10-K
filed February 27, 2009)
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement with Geoffrey A.
Ballotti, dated December 31, 2008 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrants
Form 10-K
filed February 27, 2009)
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement with Geoffrey A.
Ballotti, dated December 16, 2009 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrants
Form 10-K
filed February 19, 2010)
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Employment Agreement with Eric A. Danziger, dated as of
November 17, 2008 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrants
Form 10-K
filed February 19, 2010)
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Letter Agreement with Eric A. Danziger, dated December 1,
2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the
Registrants
Form 10-K
filed February 19, 2010)
|
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement with Eric A.
Danziger, dated December 16, 2009 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Registrants
Form 10-K
filed February 19, 2010)
|
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
Employment Agreement with Thomas G. Conforti, dated as of
September 8, 2009 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants
Form 10-Q
filed November 5, 2009)
|
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation 2006 Equity and Incentive Plan
(Amended and Restated as of May 12, 2009) (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed May 18, 2009)
|
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
Amendment to the Wyndham Worldwide Corporation 2006 Equity and
Incentive Plan (Amended and Restated as of May 12, 2009)
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed May 18, 2010)
|
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
Form of Award Agreement for Restricted Stock Units (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Registrants
Form 10-K
filed February 19, 2010)
|
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Form of Award Agreement for Stock Appreciation Rights
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the
Registrants
Form 10-K
filed February 19, 2010)
|
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
Form of Cash-Based Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants
Form 10-Q
filed May 7, 2009)
|
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation Savings Restoration Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
Amendment Number One to Wyndham Worldwide Corporation Savings
Restoration Plan, dated December 31, 2008 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Registrants
Form 10-K
filed February 27, 2009)
|
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation Non-Employee Directors Deferred
Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
First Amendment to Wyndham Worldwide Corporation Non-Employee
Directors Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.48 to the Registrants
Form 10-K
filed March 7, 2007)
|
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
Amendment Number Two to the Wyndham Worldwide Corporation
Non-Employee Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, dated
December 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.20 to the Registrants
Form 10-K
filed February 27, 2009)
|
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation Officer Deferred Compensation Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
G-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
Amendment Number One to Wyndham Worldwide Corporation Officer
Deferred Compensation Plan, dated December 31, 2008
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the
Registrants
Form 10-K
filed February 27, 2009)
|
|
|
|
10.24
|
|
Transition Services Agreement among Cendant Corporation, Realogy
Corporation, Wyndham Worldwide Corporation and Travelport Inc.,
dated as of July 27, 2006 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 31, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.25
|
|
Tax Sharing Agreement among Cendant Corporation, Realogy
Corporation, Wyndham Worldwide Corporation and Travelport Inc.,
dated as of July 28, 2006 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 31, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.26
|
|
Amendment, executed July 8, 2008 and effective as of
July 28, 2006 to Tax Sharing Agreement, entered into as of
July 28, 2006, by and among Avis Budget Group, Inc.,
Realogy Corporation and Wyndham Worldwide Corporation
(incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrants
Form 10-Q
filed August 8, 2008)
|
|
|
|
10.27
|
|
Agreement, dated as of July 15, 2010, between Wyndham
Worldwide Corporation and Realogy Corporation clarifying Tax
Sharing Agreement, dated as of July 28, 2006, among Realogy
Corporation, Cendant Corporation, Wyndham Worldwide Corporation
and Travelport, Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 21, 2010)
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of March 29, 2010, among Wyndham
Worldwide Corporation, the lenders party to the agreement from
time to time, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as syndication agent,
The Bank of Nova Scotia, Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, The
Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands
Branch, as co-documentation agents, and Bank of America, N.A.,
as administrative agent, for the lenders (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants
Form 10-Q
filed April 30, 2010)
|
|
|
|
10.29
|
|
Form of Declaration of Vacation Owner Program of WorldMark, the
Club (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the
Registrants
Form 10-12B
filed May 11, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.30
|
|
Management Agreement, dated as of January 1, 1996, by and
between Fairshare Vacation Owners Association and Fairfield
Communities, Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.25 to the Registrants
Form 10-12B
filed May 11, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.31
|
|
Second Amended and Restated FairShare Vacation Plan Use
Management Trust Agreement, dated as of March 14, 2008
by and among Fairshare Vacation Owners Association, Wyndham
Vacation Resorts, Inc., Fairfield Myrtle Beach, Inc., such other
subsidiaries and affiliates of Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc.
and such other unrelated third parties as may from time to time
desire to subject property interests to this
Trust Agreement (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants From
10-Q filed
May 8, 2008)
|
|
|
|
10.32
|
|
First Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated FairShare
Vacation Plan Use Management Trust Agreement, effective as
of March 16, 2009, by and between the Fairshare Vacation
Owners Association and Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the
Registrants
Form 10-Q
filed May 7, 2009)
|
|
|
|
10.33
|
|
Second Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated FairShare
Vacation Plan Use Management Trust Agreement, effective as
of February 15, 2010, by and between the Fairshare Vacation
Owners Association and Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrants
Form 10-Q
filed April 30, 2010)
|
|
|
|
10.34
|
|
Amended and Restated Indenture and Servicing Agreement, dated as
of October 1, 2010, by and among Sierra Timeshare Conduit
Receivables Funding II, LLC, as Issuer, Wyndham Consumer
Finance, Inc., as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, as Trustee and U.S. Bank National Association, as
Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1
to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed October 5, 2010)
|
|
|
|
12*
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
|
G-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
101.INS XBRL Instance document**
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document**
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document**
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document**
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document**
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
Document**
|
|
|
|
21.1*
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
|
|
|
|
23.1*
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
|
31.1*
|
|
Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer pursuant
to
Rule 13(a)-14
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Rule 13(a)-14
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
|
|
|
32*
|
|
Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
of the United States Code
|
* Filed herewith
** Furnished with this report
G-4