UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009
OR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period from
to
COMMISSION FILE
NO. 001-32876
WYNDHAM WORLDWIDE
CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as
Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
DELAWARE
|
|
20-0052541
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification Number)
|
|
|
|
22 SYLVAN WAY
PARSIPPANY, NEW JERSEY
(Address of Principal Executive
Offices)
|
|
07054
(Zip Code)
|
(973) 753-6000
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:
|
|
|
|
|
NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE
|
TITLE OF EACH CLASS
|
|
ON WHICH REGISTERED
|
Common Stock, Par Value $0.01 per share
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:
None
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
(§ 229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be
contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by
reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer þ
|
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the registrants common stock
held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30,
2009, was $2,135,260,065. All executive officers and directors
of the registrant have been deemed, solely for the purpose of
the foregoing calculation, to be affiliates of the
registrant.
As of January 31, 2010, the registrant had outstanding
178,821,742 shares of common stock.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Proxy Statement prepared for the 2010 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference into
Part III of this report.
PART I
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This report includes forward-looking statements, as
that term is defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission
in its rules, regulations and releases. Forward-looking
statements are any statements other than statements of
historical fact, including statements regarding our
expectations, beliefs, hopes, intentions or strategies regarding
the future. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be
identified by the use of words such as may,
expects, should, believes,
plans, anticipates,
estimates, predicts,
potential, continue, or other words of
similar meaning. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks
and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those discussed in, or implied by, the
forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a
difference include, but are not limited to, general economic
conditions, our financial and business prospects, our capital
requirements, our financing prospects, our relationships with
associates, and those disclosed as risks under Risk
Factors in Part I, Item 1A. of this report. We
caution readers that any such statements are based on currently
available operational, financial and competitive information,
and they should not place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements, which reflect managements
opinion only as of the date on which they were made. Except as
required by law, we disclaim any obligation to review or update
these forward-looking statements to reflect events or
circumstances as they occur.
OVERVIEW
As one of the worlds largest hospitality companies, we
offer individual consumers and business customers a broad suite
of hospitality products and services across various
accommodation alternatives and price ranges through our
portfolio of world-renowned brands. With more than 20 brands,
which include Wyndham Hotels and Resorts, Ramada, Days Inn,
Super 8, Wyndham Rewards, Wingate by Wyndham, Microtel, RCI, The
Registry Collection, Endless Vacation Rentals, Landal
GreenParks, Cottages4You, Novasol, Wyndham Vacation Resorts and
WorldMark by Wyndham, we have built a significant presence in
most major hospitality markets in the United States and
throughout the rest of the world.
The hospitality industry is a major component of the travel
industry, which is one of the largest retail industry segments
of the global economy. We operate primarily in the lodging,
vacation exchange and rentals, and vacation ownership segments
of the hospitality industry. Nearly 60% of our revenues come
from fees we receive in exchange for providing services and
products. We refer to these as our
fee-for-service
businesses. For example, we receive fees in the form of
royalties for our customers utilization of our brand names
and for our provision of hotel and resort management and
vacation exchange and rentals services. The remainder of our
revenues comes from the proceeds received from sales of vacation
ownership interests.
|
|
|
Our lodging business is the worlds largest hotel company
(based on number of properties), franchising in the upscale,
midscale, economy and extended stay segments of the lodging
industry and providing hotel management services for
full-service hotels globally. This is predominately a
fee-for-service
business that provides recurring revenue streams, requires low
capital investment and produces strong cash flow;
|
|
|
Our vacation exchange and rentals business is the worlds
largest vacation exchange network based on the number of
vacation exchange members and among the worlds largest
global marketers of vacation rental properties based on the
number of vacation rental properties marketed. Through this
business, we provide vacation exchange products and services and
access to distribution systems and networks to resort developers
and owners of intervals of vacation ownership interests, and we
market vacation rental properties primarily on behalf of
independent owners, vacation ownership developers and other
hospitality providers. This is primarily a
fee-for-service
business that provides stable revenue streams, requires low
capital investment and produces strong cash flow; and
|
|
|
We have the largest vacation ownership business in the world
when measured by the number of resorts, units, or owners.
Through our vacation ownership business, we develop, market and
sell vacation ownership interests to individual consumers,
provide consumer financing in connection with the sale of
vacation ownership interests and provide property management
services at resorts. While the vacation ownership business has
historically been capital intensive, a central strategy for
Wyndham Worldwide is to leverage our scale and marketing
expertise to pursue low-capital requirement,
fee-for-service
business relationships that produce strong cash flow.
|
1
Our mission is to be the leader in travel accommodations,
welcoming our guests to iconic brands and vacation destinations
through our signature Count On Me! service. We also
have a strong commitment to increasing shareholder value. Our
strategies to achieve these objectives are to:
|
|
|
Increase market share by delivering excellent service to drive
customer, consumer and associate satisfaction
|
|
|
Grow cash flow and operating margins through superior execution
in all of our businesses
|
|
|
Rebalance the Wyndham Worldwide portfolio to emphasize our
fee-for-service
business models
|
|
|
Attract, retain and develop human capital across our organization
|
|
|
Support and promote Wyndham Green and Wyndham Diversity
initiatives
|
We strive to provide value-added products and services that are
intended to both enhance the travel experience of the individual
consumer and drive revenues to our business customers. The depth
and breadth of our businesses across different segments of the
hospitality industry provide us with the opportunity to expand
our relationships with our existing individual consumers and
business customers in one or more segments of our business by
offering them additional or alternative products and services
from our other segments. Historically, we have pursued what we
believe to be financially-attractive entry points in the major
global hospitality markets to strengthen our portfolio of
products and services.
Our lodging, vacation exchange and rentals and vacation
ownership businesses all have both domestic and international
operations. During 2009, we derived 76% of our revenues in the
United States and 24% internationally. For a discussion of our
segment revenues, profits, assets and geographical operations,
see the notes to financial statements of this Annual Report. For
additional information concerning our business, see Item 2.
Properties, of this Annual Report.
History
and Development
Wyndham Worldwides corporate history can be traced back to
the 1990 formation of Hospitality Franchise Systems (which
changed its name to HFS Incorporated, or HFS). The company
initially began as a hotel franchisor that later expanded its
hospitality business and became a major real estate and car
rental franchisor. In December 1997, HFS merged with CUC
International, Inc., or CUC, to form Cendant Corporation
(which changed its name to Avis Budget Group, Inc. in September
2006).
During July 2006, Cendant transferred to Wyndham Worldwide all
of the assets and liabilities of Cendants Hospitality
Services (including Timeshare Resorts) businesses and, on
July 31, 2006, Cendant distributed all of the shares of
Wyndham Worldwide common stock to the holders of Cendant common
stock issued and outstanding on July 21, 2006, the record
date for the distribution. The separation was effective on
July 31, 2006. On August 1, 2006, we commenced
regular way trading on the New York Stock Exchange
under the symbol WYN.
Each of our lodging, vacation exchange and rentals and vacation
ownership businesses has a long operating history. Our lodging
business began with the Howard Johnson and Ramada brands which
opened their first hotels in 1954. RCI, the best known brand in
our vacation exchange and rentals business, was established
36 years ago, and our vacation ownership brands, Wyndham
Vacation Resorts and Wyndham Resort Development Corporation,
which operates as WorldMark by Wyndham, began vacation ownership
operations in 1980 and 1989, respectively.
Our well-known family of hospitality brands has been assembled
over a period of time. The following is a timeline of our
significant brand acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
1990:
|
Howard Johnson and Ramada (US)
|
1992: Days Inn
1993: Super 8
1995: Knights Inn
|
|
|
|
1996:
|
Travelodge North America
Resort Condominiums International (RCI)
|
|
2001:
|
Cuendet
Holiday Cottages Group
Fairfield Resorts (now Wyndham Vacation Resorts)
|
|
2002:
|
Novasol
Trendwest Resorts (now Worldmark by Wyndham)
|
|
2004:
|
Ramada International
Landal GreenParks
|
2005: Wyndham Hotels and Resorts
2006: Baymont
2
2008: Microtel Inn & Suites and Hawthorn Suites
WYNDHAM
HOTEL GROUP
Lodging
Industry
The global lodging market consists of almost 128,000 hotels with
combined annual revenues over $300 billion, or
$2.3 million per hotel. The market is geographically
concentrated, with the top 20 countries accounting for 80% of
global rooms.
Companies in the lodging industry operate primarily under one of
the following business models:
|
|
|
FranchiseUnder the franchise model, a company
typically grants the use of a brand name to owners of hotels
that the company neither owns nor manages in exchange for
royalty fees that are typically equal to a percentage of room
sales. Since the royalty fees are a recurring revenue stream and
the cost structure is relatively low, the franchise model yields
high margins and predictable cash flows. Owners of independent
hotels increasingly have been affiliating their hotels with
national lodging franchise brands as a means to remain
competitive. During 2009, approximately 69% of the available
hotel rooms in the U.S. were affiliated with a brand
compared to only 46% in Europe and 40% in the Asia Pacific
region. The 69% of U.S. hotel rooms affiliated with a brand
during 2009 represents an increase of 80 basis points from
2008 and 130 basis points from 2007.
|
|
|
Management Under the management model, a company
provides professional oversight and comprehensive operations
support to lodging properties that it owns
and/or
lodging properties owned by a third party in exchange for
management fees, which may include incentive fees based on the
financial performance of the properties.
|
|
|
OwnershipUnder the ownership model, a company owns
hotel properties and benefits financially from hotel revenues,
earnings and appreciation in the value of the property.
|
Performance in the lodging industry is measured by the following
key metrics:
|
|
|
average daily rate, or ADR;
|
|
|
average occupancy rate; and
|
|
|
revenue per available room, or RevPAR, which is calculated by
multiplying ADR by the average occupancy rate.
|
Demand in the global lodging industry is driven by, among other
factors, business and leisure travel, both of which are
significantly affected by the health of the economy. In a
prosperous economy, demand is typically high, which leads to
higher occupancy levels and permits increases in room rates.
This cycle continues and ultimately spurs new hotel development.
In a poor economy, demand deteriorates, which leads to lower
occupancy levels and reduced rates. Demand outside the
U.S. is also affected by demographics, airfare, trade and
tourism, affluence and the freedom to travel.
The U.S. is the most dominant sector of the global lodging
market with over 30% of the global room revenues. The
U.S. lodging industry consists of over 52,000 hotels with
combined annual revenues of almost $94 billion, or
$1.8 million per hotel. There are approximately
4.8 million guest rooms at these hotels, of which
3.3 million rooms are affiliated with a hotel chain. The
following table displays trends in the key performance metrics
for the U.S. lodging industry over the last six years and
for 2010 (estimate):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
Year
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
ADR
|
|
RevPAR
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
ADR
|
|
RevPAR
|
|
2004
|
|
|
61.4%
|
|
$86.29
|
|
$52.95
|
|
|
3.6 %
|
|
|
4.2 %
|
|
|
7.9 %
|
2005
|
|
|
63.1%
|
|
91.08
|
|
57.51
|
|
|
2.9 %
|
|
|
5.6 %
|
|
|
8.6 %
|
2006
|
|
|
63.3%
|
|
97.99
|
|
62.03
|
|
|
0.2 %
|
|
|
7.6 %
|
|
|
7.9 %
|
2007
|
|
|
63.1%
|
|
104.15
|
|
65.67
|
|
|
(0.4)%
|
|
|
6.3 %
|
|
|
5.9 %
|
2008
|
|
|
60.3%
|
|
106.92
|
|
64.47
|
|
|
(4.4)%
|
|
|
2.7 %
|
|
|
(1.8)%
|
2009
|
|
|
55.1%
|
|
97.51
|
|
53.71
|
|
|
(8.7)%
|
|
|
(8.8)%
|
|
|
(16.7)%
|
2010E
|
|
|
55.4%
|
|
95.43
|
|
52.90
|
|
|
0.6 %
|
|
|
(2.1)%
|
|
|
(1.5)%
|
Sources: Smith
Travel Research Global (STR) (2004 to 2009);
PricewaterhouseCoopers (2010). 2010 data is as of
January 25, 2010.
3
The following table depicts trends in revenues and new rooms
added on a yearly basis over the last six years and for 2010
(estimate):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
New Rooms
|
|
Changes in
|
Year
|
|
($bn)
|
|
(000s)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
New Rooms
|
|
2004
|
|
$
|
113.6
|
|
|
81.3
|
|
|
8.0 %
|
|
|
6.0 %
|
2005
|
|
|
122.6
|
|
|
83.4
|
|
|
7.9 %
|
|
|
2.6 %
|
2006
|
|
|
133.4
|
|
|
138.9
|
|
|
8.8 %
|
|
|
66.5 %
|
2007
|
|
|
139.4
|
|
|
146.1
|
|
|
4.5 %
|
|
|
5.2 %
|
2008
|
|
|
142.8
|
|
|
134.9
|
|
|
2.4 %
|
|
|
(7.7)%
|
2009
|
|
|
122.9
|
|
|
49.6
|
|
|
(13.9)%
|
|
|
(63.2)%
|
2010E
|
|
|
123.1
|
|
|
32.3
|
|
|
0.1%
|
|
|
(34.9)%
|
Sources: STR
(2004 to 2009); PricewaterhouseCoopers (2010). 2010 data is as
of January 25, 2010.
The U.S. lodging industry experienced negative RevPAR
performance over the last two years, reflecting challenging
economic conditions. The reduction in demand combined with a
rise in supply have caused ADR declines during 2009. According
to certain industry experts, the steepest declines in ADR appear
to have already occurred; however, expectations are that ADR
comparisons will remain negative in 2010 as supply growth is
still expected to outpace demand. Until demand and occupancy
rates show sustained positive growth in major markets, ADR is
unlikely to improve. Nonetheless, certain industry experts
expect the beginning of a recovery in travel to result in a 2.4%
increase in U.S. hotel demand in 2010, which we believe
will be predominately experienced in the luxury and upscale
segments. Beyond 2010, certain industry experts project RevPAR
in the U.S. to grow at an 8.0% compounded annual growth
rate (CAGR) over the next three years
(2011-2013).
Performance in the U.S. lodging industry is evaluated based
upon chain scale segments, which are defined as follows:
|
|
|
Luxurytypically offers first class appointments and
a full range of on-property amenities and services, including
restaurants, spas, recreational facilities, business centers,
concierges, room service and local transportation (shuttle
service to airport
and/or local
attractions).
|
|
|
Upscaletypically offers a full range of on-property
amenities and services, including restaurants, spas,
recreational facilities, business centers, concierges, room
service and local transportation (shuttle service to airport
and/or local
attractions).
|
|
|
Midscaletypically offers restaurants
(midscale with food and beverage) or limited
breakfast service (midscale without food and
beverage), vending, selected business services, partial
recreational facilities (either a pool or fitness equipment) and
limited transportation (airport shuttle).
|
|
|
Economytypically offers a limited breakfast and
airport shuttle.
|
The following table sets forth the key metrics for each chain
scale segment and associated subsegments within the
U.S. for 2009 as defined by STR:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Room
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
ADR
|
|
Demand
|
|
Supply
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
ADR
|
|
RevPAR
|
|
Luxury
|
|
Greater than $210
|
|
|
(0.6)%
|
|
|
8.9 %
|
|
|
(8.7)%
|
|
|
(16.3)%
|
|
|
(23.6)%
|
Upper upscale
|
|
$125 to $210
|
|
|
(2.6)%
|
|
|
4.8 %
|
|
|
(7.0)%
|
|
|
(11.5)%
|
|
|
(17.7)%
|
Upscale
|
|
$95 to $125
|
|
|
0.5 %
|
|
|
9.6 %
|
|
|
(8.4)%
|
|
|
(10.3)%
|
|
|
(17.8)%
|
Midscale with
food-and-beverage
|
|
$65 to $95
|
|
|
(11.6)%
|
|
|
(1.2)%
|
|
|
(10.5)%
|
|
|
(6.1)%
|
|
|
(16.0)%
|
Midscale without
food-and-beverage
|
|
$65 to $95
|
|
|
(3.5)%
|
|
|
7.0 %
|
|
|
(9.8)%
|
|
|
(5.5)%
|
|
|
(14.8)%
|
Economy
|
|
Less than $65
|
|
|
(7.7)%
|
|
|
1.2 %
|
|
|
(8.8)%
|
|
|
(6.8)%
|
|
|
(15.0)%
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
(5.8)%
|
|
|
3.2 %
|
|
|
(8.7)%
|
|
|
(8.8)%
|
|
|
(16.7)%
|
The European lodging industry consists of almost 43,000 hotels
with combined annual revenues over $101 billion, or
$2.4 million per hotel. There are approximately
3.3 million guest rooms at these hotels, of which
1.5 million rooms are affiliated with a hotel chain. The
Asia Pacific lodging industry consists of almost 15,000 hotels
with combined annual revenues over $54 billion, or
$3.7 million per hotel. There are approximately
2.1 million guest rooms at these hotels, of which over 830
thousand are affiliated with a hotel chain. The following table
4
displays changes in the key performance metrics for the European
and Asia Pacific lodging industry during 2009 as compared to
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
Room
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region
|
|
Demand
|
|
Supply
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
ADR
|
|
RevPAR
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
(6.2)%
|
|
|
1.2%
|
|
|
(7.2)%
|
|
|
(15.5)%
|
|
|
(21.7)%
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
(3.5)%
|
|
|
3.0%
|
|
|
(6.3)%
|
|
|
(12.6)%
|
|
|
(18.1)%
|
Wyndham
Hotel Group Overview
Our lodging business, Wyndham Hotel Group, is the worlds
largest hotel company (based on number of properties) with the
industrys largest loyalty program, Wyndham Rewards (based
on number of participating hotels). Over 86% of its revenues are
derived from franchising activities. Wyndham Hotel Group does
not own any hotels. Therefore, the business model is easily
adaptable to changing economic environments due to low operating
cost structures, which in combination with recurring fee streams
yield high margins and predictable cash flows. Capital
requirements are relatively low and mostly limited to technology
expenditures to support core capabilities and any incentives we
may employ to generate new business, such as key money and
development advance notes to assist franchisees and hotel owners
in converting to one of our brands or building a new hotel
branded under a Wyndham Hotel Group brand.
Hotel
Brands
Wyndham Hotel Group comprises 11 widely-known brands, over 7,100
hotels representing almost 597,700 rooms on six continents and
another 950 hotels representing 108,100 rooms in the development
pipeline as of December 31, 2009. Wyndham Hotel Group
franchises in all segments of the industry and provides
management services for full-service hotels globally. The
following describes our widely-known lodging brands:
|
|
|
Days
Inn®
is a leading global brand in the economy segment with more
guest rooms than any other economy brand in the world and over
1,850 properties worldwide. Under its Best Value under the
Sun marketing foundation, Days Inn
hotels®
offer value-conscious consumers free high speed internet as well
as the Wyndham Rewards loyalty program. Most hotels also offer
free
Daybreak®
breakfast, pools, restaurants and meeting rooms.
|
|
|
Super 8
Worldwide®
is a leading global brand in the economy segment with almost
2,140 properties in the U.S., Canada and China. Super 8 has
recently launched a brand refresh with a new logo and a fresh,
new interior and exterior design program. Guests can depend on
every Super 8 to deliver on the brands 8 point
promise, which includes complimentary
SuperStart®
breakfast, free high speed internet access, upgraded bath
amenities, free in-room coffee, kids under 17 stay free and free
premium cable or satellite TV as well as the Wyndham Rewards
loyalty program.
|
|
|
Microtel Inns &
Suites®
is an award winning economy chain of more than 310
properties predominately throughout North America. For an
unprecedented eight years in a row, the brand has been ranked
highest in Overall Guest Satisfaction in the Economy/Budget
Segment by J.D. Power and Associates, a distinction that no
other company in any industry has achieved. Microtel is also the
only prototypical, all new-construction brand in the economy
segment. For the guest, this means a consistent experience
featuring award-winning contemporary guest room and public area
designs. For developers, Microtel provides hotel operators low
cost of construction combined with support and guidance from
ground break to grand opening as well as low cost of ongoing
operations. Positioned in the upper-end of the economy segment,
all properties offer complimentary continental breakfast, free
wired and wireless internet access, free local and long distance
calls and the Wyndham Rewards loyalty program.
|
|
|
Howard
Johnson®
is an iconic American hotel brand having pioneered hotel
franchising in 1954. Today Howard Johnson has over 490 hotels in
North America, Latin America, Asia and other international
markets. In North America, the brand operates in the midscale
and economy segments while internationally the brand includes
mid-scale and upscale hotels. The Howard Johnson brand targets
families and leisure travelers, providing complimentary
continental Rise and
Dine®
breakfast and high speed internet access as well as the Wyndham
Rewards loyalty program.
|
|
|
Travelodge®
is hotel chain with 460 properties across North America. The
brand operates primarily in the economy segment in the
U.S. and in the midscale with food and beverage segment in
Canada. Using its Sleepy Bear brand ambassador,
Travelodge targets leisure travelers with a focus on those who
prefer an
|
5
|
|
|
active lifestyle of outdoor activity and offers guests
complimentary Bear
Bites®
continental breakfast and free high speed internet access as
well as the Wyndham Rewards loyalty program.
|
|
|
|
Knights
Inn®
is a budget economy hotel chain with over 340 locations
across North America. Knights Inn hotels provide basic overnight
accommodations and complimentary breakfast for an affordable
price as well as the Wyndham Rewards loyalty program. For
operators, from first time owners to experienced hoteliers, the
brand provides a lower cost of entry and competitive terms while
still providing the extensive tools, systems and resources of
the Wyndham Hotel Group.
|
|
|
Ramada
Worldwide®
is a global midscale with food and beverage hotel chain with
910 properties in 49 countries worldwide. Under its Do
Your Thing, Leave the Rest to Us, marketing foundation and
supported by the I AM service culture, all Ramada
hotels feature free wireless high-speed internet access, meeting
rooms, business services, fitness facilities, upgraded bath
amenities and the Wyndham Rewards loyalty program. Most
properties have an
on-site
restaurant/lounge, while other sites offer a complimentary
continental breakfast with food available in the Ramada Mart.
|
|
|
Baymont Inn &
Suites®
is a midscale without food and beverage hotel chain with 240
properties across North America. The brands commitment to
providing hometown hospitality means guests are
offered fresh baked cookies, complimentary breakfast and
high-speed internet access as well as the Wyndham Rewards
loyalty program. Most hotels also offer swimming pools and
fitness centers.
|
|
|
Wyndham Hotels and
Resorts®
and affiliated brands. The Wyndham Hotels and
Resorts family of brands is a collection of brands, including
our flagship Wyndham Hotels and
Resorts®
brand, spanning across the upscale and midscale segments with an
aggregate of nearly 350 properties and featuring complementary
distribution and product offerings to provide business and
leisure travelers with more options.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wyndham Hotels and
Resorts®an
upscale, full service brand of over 90 properties located in key
business and vacation destinations around the world. Business
locations feature meeting space flexible for large and small
meetings, as well as business centers and fitness centers. The
brand is tiered as follows: Wyndham Grand Collection, comprised
of 4+Diamond hotels in spectacular resort or urban destinations,
offer a unique guest experience, sophisticated design and
distinct dining options; Wyndham Hotels and Resorts offers
customers amenities such as golf, tennis, beautiful beaches and
spas; and Wyndham Garden Hotels, generally located in corporate
or suburban areas, provide flexible space for small to midsize
meetings and relaxed dining options. Each tier offers our
signature Wyndham By
Request®
guest recognition loyalty program, which provides members
personalized benefits at every stay in addition to those offered
by the Wyndham Rewards loyalty program.
|
|
|
|
Wingate by
Wyndham®
a prototypical design hotel chain in the upper end of the
midscale without food and beverage segment with almost 170
properties in North America. Each hotel offers amenities and
services that make life on the road more productive, all at a
single rate. Guests enjoy oversized rooms appointed with all the
comforts and conveniences of home and office. Each room is
equipped with a flat screen TV, high-speed internet access,
in-room microwave and refrigerator. The brand also offers
complimentary hot breakfast, a
24-hour
business center with free printing, copying and faxing and free
access to a gym facility and the Wyndham Rewards loyalty
program, including Wyndham By
Request®.
|
|
|
Hawthorn Suites by
Wyndham®
an extended stay brand that provides an ideal atmosphere for
multi-night visits at nearly 90 properties predominately in the
U.S. We believe this brand provides a solution for
longer-term travelers that typically seek accommodations at our
Wyndham Hotels and
Resorts®
or Wingate by
Wyndham®
properties. Each hotel offers an inviting and practical
environment for travelers with well appointed, spacious one and
two-bedroom suites and fully-equipped kitchens. Guests enjoy
free Internet in all rooms and common areas as well as
complimentary hot breakfast buffets and evening social hours as
well as the Wyndham Rewards loyalty program, including Wyndham
By
Request®.
|
6
The following table provides operating statistics for our 11
brands and for unmanaged, affiliated and managed non-proprietary
hotels in our system as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2009. We derived occupancy, ADR and RevPAR
from information provided by our franchisees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global
|
|
Rooms
|
|
|
# of
|
|
|
# of
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brand
|
|
Segments
Served (1)
|
|
Per Property
|
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
Rooms
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
ADR
|
|
|
RevPAR
|
|
|
Days Inn
|
|
Economy
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
1,858
|
|
|
|
149,633
|
|
|
|
44.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
62.24
|
|
|
$
|
27.95
|
|
Super 8
|
|
Economy
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
2,137
|
|
|
|
132,876
|
|
|
|
48.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
56.67
|
|
|
$
|
27.48
|
|
Microtel
|
|
Economy
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
22,376
|
|
|
|
49.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
56.72
|
|
|
$
|
27.79
|
|
Howard Johnson
|
|
Economy, Midscale & Upscale
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
492
|
|
|
|
46,748
|
|
|
|
42.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
61.22
|
|
|
$
|
25.86
|
|
Travelodge
|
|
Economy & Midscale
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
34,098
|
|
|
|
43.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
61.87
|
|
|
$
|
26.85
|
|
Knights Inn
|
|
Economy
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
21,061
|
|
|
|
37.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
42.46
|
|
|
$
|
15.79
|
|
Ramada
|
|
Midscale
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
910
|
|
|
|
118,880
|
|
|
|
47.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
74.55
|
|
|
$
|
35.04
|
|
Baymont
|
|
Midscale
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
20,459
|
|
|
|
45.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
62.46
|
|
|
$
|
28.25
|
|
Wyndham Hotels and Resorts
|
|
Upscale
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
24,517
|
|
|
|
52.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
114.56
|
|
|
$
|
60.21
|
|
Wingate by Wyndham
|
|
Midscale
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
15,239
|
|
|
|
53.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
83.16
|
|
|
$
|
44.54
|
|
Hawthorne Suites by Wyndham
|
|
Midscale
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
8,238
|
|
|
|
51.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
83.55
|
|
|
$
|
43.10
|
|
Unmanaged, Affiliated and Managed, Non- Proprietary
Hotels (2)
|
|
Luxury & Upper Upscale
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
3,549
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
7,114
|
|
|
|
597,674
|
|
|
|
46.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
65.52
|
|
|
$
|
30.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The global segments served column
reflects the primary chain scale segments served using the STR
Global definition and method. STR Global is U.S. centric and
categorizes a hotel chain, or brand, based on ADR in the U.S. We
utilized the STR chain scale segments to classify our brands
both in the U.S. and internationally.
|
(2) |
|
Represents (i) properties
affiliated with the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand for which
we receive a fee for reservation and/or other services provided
and (ii) properties managed under a joint venture. These
properties are not branded; as such, certain operating
statistics (such as average occupancy rate, ADR and RevPAR) are
not relevant.
|
The following table depicts our geographic distribution and key
operating metrics by region:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# of
|
|
|
# of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
Rooms (1)
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
ADR
|
|
|
RevPAR
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
6,006
|
|
|
|
465,293
|
|
|
|
45.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
62.31
|
|
|
$
|
28.11
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
38,174
|
|
|
|
51.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
84.13
|
|
|
$
|
43.69
|
|
Europe/Middle
East/Africa (2)
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
37,000
|
|
|
|
52.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
99.52
|
|
|
$
|
52.52
|
|
Asia/Pacific
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
42,219
|
|
|
|
49.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
51.08
|
|
|
$
|
25.01
|
|
Latin/South America
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
14,988
|
|
|
|
46.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
81.23
|
|
|
$
|
38.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
7,114
|
|
|
|
597,674
|
|
|
|
46.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
65.52
|
|
|
$
|
30.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
From time to time, as a result of
weather or other business interruption and ordinary wear and
tear, some of the rooms at these hotels may be taken out of
service for repair.
|
(2) |
|
Europe and Middle East include
affiliated properties/rooms and properties/rooms managed under a
joint venture. Some of these properties are not branded under a
Wyndham Hotel Group brand; as such, certain operating statistics
(such as average occupancy rate, ADR and RevPAR) are not
relevant and, therefore, have not been reflected in the table.
|
Our franchising business is designed to generate revenues for
our hotel owners through the delivery of room night bookings to
the hotel, the promotion of brand awareness among the consumer
base, global sales efforts, ensuring guest satisfaction and
providing outstanding customer service to our customers.
The sources of revenues from franchising hotels include initial
franchise fees, which relate to services provided to assist a
franchised hotel to open for business under one of our brands,
and ongoing franchise fees, which are comprised of royalty fees,
marketing, reservation and other related fees. Royalty fees are
intended to cover the use of our trademarks and our operating
expenses, such as expenses incurred for franchise services,
including quality assurance, hotel management systems and
administrative support, and to provide us with operating
profits. Marketing and reservation fees are intended to
reimburse us for expenses associated with operating a central
reservations system, advertising and marketing programs, global
sales efforts and other related services. We promote and sell
our brands through
e-commerce
initiatives, including online paid search and banner advertising
as well as traditional media, including print and broadcast
advertising. Because franchise fees generally are based on
percentages of the franchised hotels gross room revenues,
expanding our portfolio of franchised hotels and growing RevPAR
at franchised hotels are important to our revenue growth.
Our management business offers hotel owners the benefits of a
global brand and a full range of management, marketing and
reservation services. In addition to the standard franchise
services described below, our hotel management business provides
hotel owners with professional oversight and comprehensive
operations support
7
services such as hiring, training and supervising the managers
and employees that operate the hotels as well as annual budget
preparation, financial analysis and extensive food and beverage
services. We provide hotel management services primarily to
owners of upscale properties. Revenues earned from our
management business include management fees, service fees and
reimbursement revenues. Management fees are comprised of base
fees, which typically are calculated based on a specified
percentage of gross revenues from hotel operations, and
incentive fees, which typically are calculated based on a
specified percentage of a hotels gross operating profit.
Service fees include fees derived from accounting, design,
construction and purchasing services and technical assistance
provided to managed hotels. In general, all operating and other
expenses are paid by the hotel owner and we are reimbursed for
our
out-of-pocket
expenses. Reimbursement revenues are intended to cover expenses
incurred by the hotel management business on behalf of the
managed hotels, primarily consisting of payroll costs for the
hotels operational employees.
We also earn revenues from the Wyndham Rewards loyalty program
when a member stays at a participating hotel. These revenues are
derived from a fee we charge based upon a percentage of room
revenues generated from such stay. These loyalty fees are
intended to reimburse us for expenses associated with
administering and marketing the program.
Central
Reservations and Internet Bookings
In 2009, hotels within our system (either franchised under one
of our brands or managed) sold 8.0% or approximately
75.9 million, of the almost one billion hotel room nights
sold in the U.S. and another 22.0 million hotel room
nights across other parts of the world. Over 95% of our system
is located in the economy and midscale segments of the global
industry. Economy and midscale hotels are typically located on
highway roadsides for convenience to the business and leisure
travelers. Therefore, the majority of hotel room nights sold at
these hotels is to guests who seek accommodations on a walk-in
basis, which we believe is attributable to the brand reputation
and recognition of the brand name.
For guests who book their hotel stay in advance, we booked on
behalf of hotels within our system a total of 32.7 million
room nights in 2009, which represents 33% of total bookings at
these hotels and includes 17.6 million room nights booked
through our Wyndham Rewards loyalty program.
Our most significant and fastest growing reservation channel is
the Internet, which represents our proprietary websites for each
of our 11 brands and WyndhamRewards.com, as well as online
travel agents (OTAs) and other third-party Internet
booking sources such as Travelocity.com and Expedia.com. In
2009, we booked on behalf of hotels within our system,
15.5 million room nights through the Internet, which
represents 15.7% of the total bookings at these hotels. Since
2004, bookings made directly by customers on our brand websites
have been increasing at a five year CAGR of approximately 13.7%,
and increased to over 8.0 million room nights in 2009.
Therefore, a key strategy for reservation delivery is the
continual investment in and optimization of our websites as well
the deployment of advertising spend to drive online traffic to
our proprietary websites, including through marketing agreements
we have with travel related search websites and affiliate
networks. Since 2004, bookings made by our brands
customers through OTAs and other third-party Internet booking
sources increased at a five year CAGR of approximately 15.0% to
over almost 7.5 million room nights in 2009. To ensure we
receive these bookings, we provide direct connections between
our central reservations system and some third-party Internet
booking sources. Direct connections with our third party
agencies allow us to deliver more accurate and consistent rates
and inventory, send bookings directly to our central systems
without interference or delay and reduce our franchise
distribution costs.
Our call centers contributed almost 3.0 million room nights
in 2009, which represents 3.0% of the total bookings at the
hotels within our system. We maintain call centers in Saint
John, Canada; Aberdeen, South Dakota; and Manila, Philippines
that handle bookings generated through our toll-free brand
numbers.
Our global distribution partners, such as Sabre and Amadeus, and
global sales team also contributed a total of 2.3 million
room nights in 2009, which represents 2.4% of the total bookings
at the hotels within our system. Our global distribution
partners process reservations made by offline travel agents and
by any OTAs that do not have the ability to directly connect
with our reservation system. Our global sales team generates
sales from global and meeting planners, tour operators, travel
agents, government and military clients, and corporate and small
business accounts, to supplement the on-property sales efforts.
Loyalty
Program
The Wyndham Rewards program, which was introduced in 2003, has
grown steadily to become one of the lodging industrys
largest loyalty programs. The diversity of our 11 brands
uniquely enables us to meet our members leisure as well as
business travel needs across the greatest number of locations
and a wide range of price points. The Wyndham Rewards program is
offered in the U.S., Canada, U.K., Ireland, Germany, China and
most
8
recently has been expanded to Mexico and several countries in
Europe (including France, Italy and Switzerland). As of
December 31, 2009, there were 20.1 million members
enrolled in the program, of whom 7.1 million were active
(i.e., members that have earned or redeemed within the last
18 months). The Wyndham Rewards program has one of the
highest percentages of active members among competitive loyalty
programs according to SCORES 2009 Frequent Guest Report. These
members stay at our brands more often and drive incremental room
nights, higher ADR and a longer length of stay than non-member
guests.
Wyndham Rewards offers its members numerous ways to earn and
redeem points. Members accumulate points by staying in one of
almost 7,000 branded hotels participating in the program, and
have the option to earn points with more than 50 business
partners, including American Airlines, Continental Airlines,
Delta Airlines, US Airways, United Airlines, Southwest Airlines,
RCI, Endless Vacation Rentals, Avis Budget Group, Amtrak,
Aeromexico, Air China and BMI. When staying at one of our
franchised or managed hotels, Wyndham Rewards members may elect
to earn airline miles or rail points instead of Wyndham Rewards
points. Wyndham Rewards members have over 400 options to redeem
their points. Members may redeem their points for hotel stays,
airline tickets, resort vacations, car rentals, electronics,
sporting goods, movie and theme park tickets, and gift
certificates.
Additionally, the Wyndham ByRequest program, a unique program
featuring a communications package and personalized guest
amenities and services is offered exclusively at our Wyndham
Hotels and Resorts brand and, in early 2010, will be offered at
our Wingate by Wyndham and Hawthorn Suites by Wyndham hotels.
Marketing
Our brand marketing teams develop and implement global marketing
strategies for each of our 11 hotel brands, including generating
consumer awareness of and preference for each brand as well as
direct response activities designed to drive bookings through
our central reservation systems. We deploy a variety of
marketing strategies and tactics depending on the needs of the
specific brand and local market, including brand positioning,
creative development, offline and online media planning and
buying, promotions, sponsorships and direct marketing. While
brand positioning and strategy is driven out of our
U.S. headquarters, we have seasoned marketing professionals
positioned around the globe to modify and implement these
strategies on a local market level. In the U.S., all brands have
a national marketing program, and some brands also have regional
marketing cooperatives which foster collaboration among
franchisees and leverage the national marketing plan to drive
business to our properties at a local level.
Our marketing efforts communicate the unique value proposition
of each of our individual brands, and are designed to build
consumer awareness and drive business to our hotels, either
directly or through our own reservation channels. Our Best
Available Rate guarantee gives consumers confidence to book
directly with us by providing the same rates regardless of
whether they book through our call centers, websites or any
other channel.
In addition, we leverage the strength of our Wyndham Rewards
program to develop meaningful marketing promotions and campaigns
to drive new and repeat business. Our Wyndham Rewards marketing
efforts drive tens of millions of consumer impressions through
the programs channels and through the programs
partners channels.
Global
Sales
Our global sales organization, strategically located throughout
the world, leverages the significant size of our portfolio and
the 11 hotel brands to gain a larger share of business for each
of our hotels through relationship-based selling to a diverse
range of customers. Because our hotel portfolio meets the needs
of all types of travelers, we can find more complete solutions
for a client/company who may have travel needs ranging from
economy to upscale brands. We are able to accommodate travelers
almost anywhere business or leisure travelers go with our
selection of over 7,100 hotels throughout the world. The sales
team is deployed globally in key markets such as London, Mexico,
Canada, Korea, China, Singapore and throughout the U.S. in
order to leverage multidimensional customer needs for our
hotels. The global sales team also works with each hotel to
identify the hotels individual needs and then works to
find the right customers to stay with those brands and those
hotels.
Revenue
Management
We offer revenue management services to help maximize revenues
of our hotel owners and franchisees by improving rate and
inventory management capabilities and also coordinating all
recommended revenue programs delivered to our hotels in tandem
with
e-commerce
and brand marketing strategies. Properties enrolled in our
revenue management services have experienced higher production
from call centers, websites and other channels, as well as
stronger RevPAR index performance. As a result, the almost 2,500
properties currently enrolled in the revenue management program
have experienced a 150 basis point improvement in RevPAR
index.
9
Property
Services
We continue to support our franchisees with a team of dedicated
support and service providers both field based and housed at our
corporate office. This team of industry veterans collaborates
with hotel owners on all aspects of their operations and creates
detailed and individualized strategies for success. By providing
key services, such as system integration, operations support,
training, strategic sourcing, and development planning and
construction, we are able to make a meaningful contribution to
the operations of the hotel resulting in more profits for our
hotel owners.
Our field services team, strategically dispersed worldwide,
integrates new properties into our system and helps existing
properties improve RevPAR performance and guest satisfaction.
Our training teams provide robust educational opportunities to
our hotel owners through instructor led, web-based and
electronic learning vehicles for a number of relevant topics.
Our strategic sourcing department helps franchisees control
costs by leveraging the buying power of the entire Wyndham
Worldwide organization to produce discounted prices on numerous
items necessary for the successful operations of a hotel, such
as linens and coffee. Our development planning and construction
team provides architectural and interior design guidance to
hotel owners to ensure compliance with brand standards,
including construction site visits and the creation of interior
design schemes.
We also provide hotel owners with management systems that
synchronizes each hotels inventory with our central
reservations platform. These systems help hotel owners manage
their rooms inventory (room nights), rates (ADR) and
reservations, which leads to greater profits at the property
level and better enables us to deliver reservations at the right
price to our hotel owners.
Additionally, MyPortal, which is a property-focused intranet
website, is the key communication vehicle and a single access
point to all the information and tools available to help our
hotel owners manage their
day-to-day
activities.
New
Development
Our development team consists of over 100 professionals
dispersed throughout the world, including in the U.S., China, UK
and Mexico. Our development efforts typically target existing
franchisees as well as hotel developers, owners of independent
hotels and owners of hotels leaving competitor brands.
Approximately 22% of the new rooms added in 2009 were with
franchisees or managed hotel owners already doing business with
us.
Our hotel management business gives us access to development
opportunities beyond pure play franchising deals. When a hotel
owner is seeking both a brand and a manager for his full-service
hotel, we are able to couple these services in one offering,
which we believe gives us a competitive advantage.
During 2009, our development team generated 897 applications for
new franchise
and/or
management agreements, of which 721, or 80%, resulted in new
franchise
and/or
management agreements. The difference is attributable to various
factors such as financing and agreement on contractual terms.
Once executed, about 70% of hotels open within the following six
months, while 10% open between six and 12 months and
another 6% open generally within 24 months. The remaining
14% may never open due to various factors such as financing.
As of December 31, 2009, we had 108,069 rooms pending
opening in our development pipeline, of which 43% were
international and 51% were new construction.
In North America, we generally employ a direct franchise model
whereby we contract with and provide various services and
reservations assistance directly to independent owner-operators
of hotels. Under our direct franchise model, we principally
market our lodging brands to hotel developers, owners of
independent hotels and hotel owners who have the right to
terminate their franchise affiliations with other lodging
brands. We also market franchises to existing franchisees
because many own, or may own in the future, other hotels that
can be converted to one of our brands. Our standard franchise
agreement grants a franchisee the right to non-exclusive use of
the applicable franchise system in the operation of a single
hotel at a specified location, typically for a period of 15 to
20 years, and gives the franchisor and franchisee certain
rights to terminate the franchise agreement before its
conclusion under certain circumstances, such as upon the lapsing
of a certain number of years after commencement of the
agreement. Early termination options in franchise agreements
give us flexibility to eliminate or re-brand franchised hotels
if such properties become weak performers, even if there is no
contractual failure by the franchisee. We also have the right to
terminate a franchise agreement for failure by a franchisee to
bring its properties into compliance with contractual or quality
standards within specified periods of time, pay required
franchise fees or comply with other requirements of the
franchise agreement.
In other parts of the world, we employ a direct franchise model
or, where we are not yet ready to support the required
infrastructure for that region, we may employ a master franchise
model. Franchise agreements in regions outside of North America
typically carry a lower fee structure based upon the breadth of
services we provide for that particular region. Under our master
franchise model, we principally market our lodging brands to
third parties
10
that assume the principal role of franchisor, which entails
selling individual franchise agreements and providing quality
assurance, marketing and reservations support to franchisees.
Since we provide only limited services to master franchisors,
the fees we receive in connection with master franchise
agreements are typically lower than the fees we receive under a
direct franchising model. Master franchise agreements, which are
individually negotiated and vary among our different brands,
typically contain provisions that permit us to terminate the
agreement if the other party to the agreement fails to meet
specified development schedules. The terms of our master
franchise agreements generally are competitive with industry
averages within industry chain scale segments.
Strategies
Wyndham Hotel Group is strategically focused on the following
two objectives that we believe are essential to our business:
|
|
|
increasing our system size by adding new rooms and retaining the
properties that meet our performance criteria; and
|
|
|
strengthening our customer value proposition by driving revenues
to our franchised and managed hotels.
|
North America represents 84% of our global system. In North
America, we expect to maintain our leading position in the
economy segment and further expand our position in the midscale
and upscale segments by:
|
|
|
further clarify and strengthen each brands market position by
ensuring that each hotel in our system is branded properly based
upon its specific product and market considerations;
|
|
|
continuing to grow our Super 8, Days Inn, Howard Johnson,
Travelodge and Knights Inn systems by adding new properties
where the brand is currently underrepresented;
|
|
|
expanding the presence of the Microtel brand in the Midwest
regions;
|
|
|
expanding the presence of our Wyndham affiliated
brands Wingate by Wyndham and Hawthorn Suites by
Wyndham in targeted markets across the Northeast and
the West Coast;
|
|
|
growing the Ramada brand by converting 200+ room full-service
hotels in large, secondary markets, such as Newark, New Jersey
and Tampa, Florida;
|
|
|
expanding the presence of Baymont in the Midwest
regions; and
|
|
|
targeting key markets, such as San Francisco, Los Angeles,
Boston and Washington, D.C., where the Wyndham brand is
underrepresented.
|
Outside North America, a relatively low percentage of hotels are
branded; however, there has been an increasing trend towards
affiliation with a global brand. Since 2005, the branded market
outside North America has grown at a 2.4% CAGR, which when
compared to the overall market CAGR of 1.8% implies an increased
preference for branded hotels. Therefore, we expect the largest
growth to come from international regions where we will target
key cities globally in the UK, China and Mexico for the Wyndham,
Ramada, Days Inn and Super 8 brands. We expect to predominately
deploy direct franchising models and management agreements in
these markets but may seek a master franchising relationship in
international markets where we are not yet ready to support the
required infrastructure for that region. We also expect to use
management agreements for the Wyndham brand and for full-service
hotels under any of our other brands on a select basis. Our
strategy generally focuses on pursuing new room growth
organically although we may consider the select acquisition of
brands that facilitate our strategic objectives.
We recognize that the value we bring to hotel owners has a
direct impact on our ability to retain their property within our
system. This is why helping to make our franchisees and managed
hotels profitable, whether through incremental revenue, cost
efficiencies, operational excellence or better service, is a key
focus of Wyndham Hotel Group. We also believe that our ability
to attract new franchisees and hotel owners is greatly
influenced by demonstrating our value to existing franchisees
and hotel owners. For these reasons, weve just recently
launched a reprioritization of strategic initiatives with the
goal of strengthening our value proposition through delivering a
reservation experience that maximizes the value for both our
franchisees/hotel owners as well as the guests staying at our
properties.
Our efforts toward this goal will focus on the following
initiatives:
|
|
|
increasing occupancy levels and allowing for better pricing
opportunities by ensuring all our rate plans are consistently
available across all channels and by equipping franchisees with
more competitive rate information to enable them to make better
rate-setting decisions; and
|
11
|
|
|
driving bookings through online channels by improving the
consumer shopping experience on our brand websites, by enhancing
connectivity to online travel agents and by increasing product
exposure on OTA websites.
|
Additionally, to drive incremental revenue to our franchisees
and hotel owners, we intend to further develop our ability to
cross sell all our properties; strengthen our business-building
online marketing campaigns; and enhance our revenue management
and Wyndham Rewards offerings. The other key components of our
value proposition (cost efficiencies, operational excellence and
outstanding service) are accomplished through our
day-to-day
operations and Count on Me! service culture. The Count on Me!
service culture is the foundation of our business model that
gives our employees the tools and resources necessary to deliver
exceptional service and identifies the behaviors that ensure we
deliver a great experience. All employees of Wyndham Hotel Group
are trained in Count on Me! and all franchisees are trained in a
brand-specific service culture that is built around the tenets
of Count on Me! To drive cost efficiencies and operational
excellence at the property level, we have numerous service
offerings such as advantageous procurement pricing and hotel
management training that is tailored to a specific
propertys needs. We are currently working on exciting new
initiatives that will provide franchisees with lower cost
solutions to run their properties and ensure they have the right
systems in place to track their performance.
Seasonality
Franchise and management fees are generally higher in the second
and third quarters than in the first or fourth quarters of any
calendar year as a result of increased leisure travel and the
related ability to charge higher ADRs during the spring and
summer months.
Competition
Competition is robust among the lodging brand franchisors to
grow their franchise systems and retain their existing
franchisees. We believe existing and potential franchisees make
decisions based principally upon the perceived value and quality
of the brand and the services offered to franchisees. We believe
that the perceived value of a brand name is, to some extent, a
function of the success of the existing hotels franchised under
the brands. We believe that existing and prospective franchisees
value a franchise based upon their views of the relationship
between the costs, including costs of conversion and
affiliation, to the benefits, including potential for increased
revenues and profitability, and upon the reputation of the
franchisor.
The ability of an individual franchisee to compete may be
affected by the location and quality of its property, the number
of competing properties in the vicinity, community reputation
and other factors. A franchisees success may also be
affected by general, regional and local economic conditions. The
potential negative effect of these conditions on our results of
operations is substantially reduced by virtue of the diverse
geographical locations of our franchised hotels and by the scale
of our franchisee base. Our franchise system is dispersed among
almost 5,700 franchisees, which reduces our exposure to any one
franchisee. No one franchisee accounts for more than 2% of our
franchised hotels and 3% of our total revenues.
WYNDHAM
EXCHANGE AND RENTALS
Vacation
Exchange and Rentals Industry
The estimated $61 billion global vacation exchange and
rentals industry is largely a
fee-for-service
business and has been a growing segment of the hospitality
industry. The industry offers products and services to both
leisure travelers and vacation property owners. For leisure
travelers, the industry offers access to a range of
fully-furnished vacation properties, which include
privately-owned vacation homes, villas, cottages, apartments and
condominiums, vacation ownership resorts, inventory at hotels
and resorts, boats and yachts. The industry offers leisure
travelers flexibility (subject to availability) in time of
travel and choice of lodging options in regions where travelers
may not typically have access to such choices. For vacation
property owners, affiliations with vacation exchange companies
allow owners of vacation intervals to exchange their interests
in vacation properties for vacation time at other properties or
for other various products and services. Additionally,
affiliation with vacation rental companies provides property
owners the ability to have their properties marketed and rented
and, in some instances, to transfer the responsibility of
managing such properties.
The vacation exchange industry provides owners of intervals
flexibility through vacation exchanges. To participate in a
vacation exchange, an owner generally contributes their interval
to an exchange companys network and then indicates the
particular resort or geographic area where the owner would like
to travel, the size of the unit desired and the period during
which the owner would like to vacation. The exchange company
then rates the owners contributed intervals based upon a
number of factors, including the location and size of the unit
or units, the quality of the resort or resorts and the time
period or periods during which the intervals entitle the owner
to vacation. The owner may then request an exchange for a
vacation interval of equal or lesser rating compared to the
interval that
12
the owner contributed. Exchange companies generally derive
revenues from owners of intervals by charging exchange fees for
facilitating exchanges and through annual membership dues. In
2008, 77% of owners of intervals were members of vacation
exchange companies, and 55% of such owners exchanged their
intervals through such exchange companies.
The long-term trend in the vacation exchange industry has been
growth in the number of members of vacation exchange companies.
Current economic conditions have resulted in slower growth, but
we believe that an economic recovery will support a return to
stronger growth. In 2008, there were approximately
6.3 million members industry-wide who completed
approximately 3.5 million exchanges. Within the broader
long-term growth trend of the vacation exchange industry, there
is also a trend where timeshare developers are enrolling members
in private label clubs, where members have the option to
exchange within the club or through external exchange channels.
The club trend has a positive impact on the average number of
members, but an opposite effect on the number of exchange
transactions per average member and revenue per member.
The vacation rental industry offers vacation property owners the
opportunity to rent their properties to leisure travelers for
periods of time when the properties are unoccupied. The vacation
rental industry is not as organized as the lodging industry in
that the vacation rental industry does not have global
reservation systems or brands. The industry is divided broadly
into two segments. The first is the managed rental segment,
where the homeowner provides their property to an agent to rent,
in a majority of cases, on an exclusive basis and the agent
receives a commission for marketing the property, managing
bookings, and providing quality assurance to the renter. The
other segment of the industry is the listing business, where
there is no exclusive relationship and the property owner pays a
fixed fee for an online listing or a directory listing with
minimal additional services, typically with no direct booking
ability or quality assurance services. Typically, managed
vacation rental companies collect rent in advance and, after
deducting the applicable commissions, remit the net amounts due
to the property owners
and/or
property managers. In addition to commissions, managed vacation
rental companies earn revenues from rental customers through
fees that are incidental to the rental of the properties, such
as fees for travel services, local transportation,
on-site
services and insurance or similar types of products.
The global supply of vacation rental inventory is highly
fragmented with much of it being made available by individual
property owners. We believe that as of December 31, 2009,
there were approximately 1.3 million and 1.7 million
vacation properties available for rental in the United States
and Europe, respectively. In the United States, the vacation
properties available for rental are primarily condominiums or
stand-alone houses. In Europe, the vacation properties available
for rental include individual homes and apartments, campsites
and vacation park bungalows. Individual owners of vacation
properties in the United States and Europe may own their
properties as investments and may sometimes use such properties
for their own use for portions of the year. We believe that the
overall supply of vacation rental properties has grown primarily
because of the increasing desire by existing owners of second
homes to gain an earnings stream evidenced by homes not
previously offered for rent appearing on the market.
We believe that the overall demand for vacation rentals has been
growing for the following reasons: (i) the consumer value
of renting a unit for an entire family; (ii) the increased
use of the Internet as a tool for facilitating vacation rental
transactions; and (iii) increased consumer awareness of
vacation rental options. The global demand per year for vacation
rentals is approximately 54 million vacation weeks,
34 million of which are rented by leisure travelers from
Europe. Demand for vacation rental properties is often regional
since many leisure travelers rent properties within driving
distance of their home. Some leisure travelers, however, travel
relatively long distances from their homes to vacation
properties in domestic or international destinations. Current
economic conditions have resulted in slower growth in the near
term, but we believe that the long-term trends will support a
return to stronger growth.
The destinations where leisure travelers from Europe, the United
States, South Africa and Australia generally rent properties
vary by country of origin of the leisure travelers. Leisure
travelers from Europe generally rent properties in European
destinations, including the United Kingdom, Denmark, Ireland,
Spain, France, the Netherlands, Germany, Italy and Portugal.
Demand from European leisure travelers has recently been
shifting beyond traditional Western Europe, based on political
stability across Europe, increased accessibility of Eastern
Europe and the expansion of the European Union. Demand from
U.S. leisure travelers is focused on rentals in seaside
destinations, such as Hawaii, Florida and the Carolinas, in ski
destinations such as the Rocky Mountains, and in urban centers
such as Las Vegas, Nevada; San Francisco, California; and
New York City, New York. Demand is also growing for destinations
in Mexico and the Caribbean by leisure travelers from the United
States.
Wyndham
Exchange and Rentals Overview
Wyndham Exchange and Rentals is largely a
fee-for-service
business that provides vacation exchange products and services
to developers, managers and owners of intervals of vacation
ownership interests, and markets vacation rental properties. Our
vacation exchange and rentals business primarily derives its
revenues from fees which generate
13
stable and predictable cash flows. Our vacation exchange
business, RCI, derives a majority of its revenues from annual
membership dues and exchange fees for facilitating transactions.
Our vacation exchange business also derives revenues from
ancillary services, including additional services provided to
transacting members, programs with affiliated resorts, club
servicing, travel agency services and loyalty programs. Our
vacation rentals business primarily derives its revenues from
fees, which generally average between 20% and 45% of the gross
booking fees for non-proprietary inventory, except for where we
receive 100% of the revenues for properties that we own or
operate under long-term capital leases. Our vacation rentals
business also derives revenues from ancillary services delivered
on-site for
owned and managed properties. The revenues generated in our
vacation exchange and rentals business are substantially derived
from the direct customer relationships we have with our
3.8 million vacation exchange members, our nearly 46,000
independent property owners and the affiliated developers of
over 4,000 resorts. No one external customer, customer group or
developer accounts for more than 2% of our vacation exchange and
rentals revenues.
We are the worlds largest vacation exchange network as
measured by the number of vacation exchange members and among
the worlds largest global marketers of vacation rental
properties. Our vacation exchange and rentals business has
access for specified periods, in a majority of cases on an
exclusive basis, to over 65,000 vacation properties, which are
comprised of over 4,000 vacation ownership resorts around the
world through our vacation exchange business and approximately
61,000 vacation rental properties that are located principally
in Europe, which we believe makes us the worlds largest
marketer of European vacation rental properties as measured by
the number of managed properties marketed. Each year, our
vacation exchange and rentals business provides more than
4.5 million leisure-bound families with vacation exchange
and rentals products and services. The properties available to
leisure travelers through our vacation exchange and rentals
business include vacation ownership condominiums, houses,
villas, cottages, bungalows, campgrounds, hotel rooms and
suites, city apartments, fractional private residences, luxury
destination clubs and yachts. We offer leisure travelers
flexibility (subject to availability) as to time of travel and a
choice of lodging options in regions to which such travelers may
not typically have such ease of access, and we offer property
owners marketing services, quality control services and property
management services ranging from key-holding to full property
maintenance for such properties. Our vacation exchange and
rentals business has over 80 worldwide offices. We market our
products and services using eight primary consumer brands and
other related brands.
Vacation
Exchange
Through our vacation exchange business, RCI, we have
relationships with over 4,000 vacation ownership resorts in
approximately 100 countries. We have 3.8 million vacation
exchange members and generally retain more than 85% of members
each year, with the overall membership base stable or growing
over time, and generate fees from members for both annual
membership subscriptions and transaction based services. We
acquire substantially all members of our exchange programs
indirectly. In substantially all cases, an affiliated resort
developer buys the initial term of an RCI membership on behalf
of the consumer when the consumer purchases a vacation ownership
interval. Generally, this initial term is either 1 or
2 years and entitles the vacation ownership interval
purchaser to receive periodicals published by RCI and to use the
applicable exchange program for an additional fee. The vacation
ownership interval purchaser generally pays for membership
renewals and any applicable fees for exchange transactions.
RCI operates three worldwide exchange programs that have a
member base of vacation owners who are generally well-traveled
and who want flexibility and variety in their travel plans each
year. Our vacation exchange business three exchange
programs, which serve owners of intervals at affiliated resorts,
are
RCI®
Weeks, RCI
Points®
and The Registry
Collection®
programs. Participants in these vacation exchange programs pay
annual membership dues. For additional fees, participants are
entitled to exchange intervals for intervals at other properties
affiliated with our vacation exchange business. In addition,
certain participants may exchange intervals for other
leisure-related products and services. We refer to participants
in these three exchange programs as members. In
addition, the Endless
Vacation®
magazine is the official travel publication of our RCI Weeks and
RCI Points exchange programs for U.S. and Canadian members,
and certain members can obtain the benefits of participation in
our RCI Weeks and RCI Points exchange programs only through a
subscription to Endless Vacation magazine.
The RCI Weeks exchange program is the worlds largest
vacation ownership exchange network and generally provides
members with the ability to trade week-long intervals in units
at their resorts for week-long intervals of equal or lesser
rated units at the same resorts or at comparable resorts.
The RCI Points exchange program, launched in 2000, is a global
points-based exchange network, which allocates points to
intervals that members cede to the exchange program. Under the
RCI Points exchange program, members may redeem their points for
the use of vacation properties in the exchange program or for
other products and services which may change from time to time,
such as airfare, car rentals, cruises, hotels and other
accommodations. When points are redeemed for these other
products and services, our vacation exchange business
14
gains the right to these points so it can rent vacation
properties backed by these points in order to recoup the expense
of providing other products and services.
We believe that The Registry Collection exchange program is the
industrys first and largest global exchange network of
luxury vacation accommodations. The luxury vacation
accommodations in The Registry Collections network include
higher-end vacation ownership resorts, fractional ownership
resorts, condo-hotels and yachts. The Registry Collection allows
members to exchange their intervals for the use of other
vacation properties within the network for a fee and also offers
access to other products and services, such as cruises, yachts,
adventure travel, hotels and other accommodations. The members
of The Registry Collection exchange program often own greater
than two-week intervals at affiliated resorts.
Our vacation exchange business operates worldwide primarily in
the following regions: North America, Europe, Latin America, the
Caribbean, Southern Africa, Asia, Pacific, and the Middle East.
We tailor our strategies and operating plans for each of the
geographical environments where RCI has or seeks to develop a
substantial member base.
Vacation
Rentals
The rental properties we market are principally privately-owned
villas, cottages, bungalows and apartments that generally belong
to independent property owners. In addition to these properties,
we market inventory from our vacation exchange business and from
other sources. We generate fee income from marketing and renting
these properties to consumers. We currently make nearly
1.4 million vacation rental bookings a year. We market
rental properties under proprietary brand names, such as Landal
Green Parks, Novasol, Dansommer, Villas4You, cottages4you,
English Country Cottages, Canvas Holidays, Cuendet, Endless
Vacation Rentals by Wyndham Worldwide, and through select
private-label arrangements. The following is a description of
some of our major vacation rental brands:
|
|
|
Novasol®
is one of continental Europes largest rental companies,
featuring properties in more than 20 European countries
including holiday homes in Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France,
Italy and Croatia, with over 28,000 exclusive cottages available
for rent.
|
|
|
Holiday Cottages Group operates a number of
well-recognized and established brands within the vacation
rental market, including English Country Cottages, cottages4you
and Welcome Cottages, and offers unparalleled access to
approximately 17,000 properties across the U.K. and Europe.
|
|
|
Cuendet®
is a specialist in villa rentals in Italy since 1974 and offers
a collection of Tuscany villa rentals, castles, vacation villas
with swimming pools, farm houses, cottages and apartments
scattered throughout the most beautiful regions of Italy, with
2,000 villas available for rent.
|
|
|
Landal
GreenParks®
is one of Hollands leading holiday park companies, with
almost 70 holiday parks offering approximately 11,000 holiday
park bungalows, villas and apartments in the Netherlands,
Germany, Belgium, Austria, Switzerland and the Czech Republic.
Every year more than 2 million guests visit Landals
parks, many of which offer dining, shopping and wellness
facilities.
|
|
|
Canvas Holidays is a specialist tour operator offering
luxury camping holidays in Europe at almost 100 of the finest
European campsites with almost 3,000 accommodation units. It has
a wide choice of luxury accommodations spacious
lodges, comfortable mobile homes and the unique Maxi Tent, plus
an exciting range of childrens and family clubs.
|
Most of the rental activity under our brands takes place in
Europe, the United States and Mexico, although we have the
ability to source and rent inventory in approximately 100
countries. Our vacation rentals business also has the
opportunity to provide inventory to our 3.8 million
vacation exchange members.
Our vacation rentals business currently has relationships with
nearly 46,000 independent property owners in 26 countries,
including the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Germany, Denmark,
Sweden, France, Ireland, Belgium, Italy, Spain, Portugal,
Norway, Greece, Austria, Croatia, and certain countries in
Eastern Europe, the United States, the Pacific Rim and Latin
America. Property owners typically enter into one year or
multi-year contracts with our vacation rentals subsidiaries to
market the rental of their properties within our rental
portfolio. Our vacation rentals business also has an ownership
interest in, or capital leases under, the Landal GreenParks
brand for approximately 10% of the properties in our rental
portfolio.
Customer
Development
In our vacation exchange business, we affiliate with vacation
ownership developers directly as a result of the efforts of our
in-house sales teams. Affiliated developers sign long-term
agreements each with a duration of up to 10 years. Our
members are acquired primarily through our affiliated developers
as part of the vacation ownership
15
purchase process. In our vacation rentals business, we primarily
enter into exclusive annual rental agreements with property
owners. We market rental properties online and offline to large
databases of customers, which generate repeat bookings.
Additional customers are sourced through bookable websites and
offline advertising and promotions, and through the use of
third-party travel agencies, tour operators, and online
distribution channels to drive additional occupancy. We have
also developed specific branded websites, such as
cottages4you.co.uk and EVrentals.com, to promote, sell and
inform new customers about vacation rentals. Given the
diversified nature of our rental brands, there is limited
dependence on a single customer group or business partner.
Loyalty
Program
Our U.S. vacation exchange business member loyalty
program is RCI Elite
Rewards®,
which offers a branded credit card, the RCI Elite Rewards credit
card. The card allows members to earn reward points that can be
redeemed for items related to our exchange programs, including
annual membership dues and exchange fees for transactions, and
other products offered by our vacation exchange business or
certain third parties, including airlines and retailers.
Internet
Given the increasing interest of our members and rental
customers to transact on the Internet, we invest and will
continue to invest in cutting edge and innovative online
technologies to ensure that our members and rental customers
have access to similar information and services online that we
provide through our call centers. Through our comprehensive
RCI.com initiative, we have launched enhanced search
capabilities that greatly simplify our search process and make
it easier for a member to find a desired vacation. We have also
greatly expanded our online content, including multiple resort
pictures and high-definition videos, to help educate members
about potential vacation options. Over the last several years,
we have improved our web penetration for European rentals
through enhancements that have moved the majority of bookings
online. As our online distribution channels improve, members and
rental customers will shift from transacting business through
our call centers to transacting business online, which we expect
will generate cost savings. By offering our members and rental
customers the opportunity to transact business either through
our call centers or online, we offer our members and rental
customers the ability to use the distribution channel with which
they are most comfortable. Regardless of the distribution
channel our members and rental customers use, our goal is member
and rental customer satisfaction and retention.
Call
Centers
Our vacation exchange and rentals business services its members
and rental customers through global call centers. The requests
that we receive at our global call centers are handled by our
vacation guides, who are trained to fulfill our members
and rental customers requests for vacation exchanges and
rentals. When our members and rental customers
primary choices are unavailable in periods of high demand, our
guides offer the next nearest match in order to fulfill the
members and rental customers needs. Call centers are
currently a significant distribution channel and therefore we
invest resources and will continue to do so to ensure that
members and rental customers continue to receive a high level of
personalized customer service through our call centers.
Marketing
We market to our members and rental customers through direct
mail and email, online distribution channels, brochures,
magazines and travel agencies. Our vacation exchange and rentals
business has over 50 publications involved in the marketing of
the business. RCI publishes Endless Vacation magazine, a
travel publication that has a circulation of over
1.8 million. Our vacation exchange and rentals business
also publishes resort directories and other periodicals related
to the vacation and vacation ownership industry and other
travel-related services. We acquire rental customers through our
direct-to-consumer
marketing, internet marketing and third-party agent marketing
programs. We use our publications not only for marketing, but
also for member and rental customer retention. Additionally, we
promote our offerings to owners of resorts and homes through
publications, trade shows online and other marketing efforts.
Strategies
We intend to grow our vacation exchange and rentals business
profitability by focusing on three core strategies:
|
|
|
optimize and expand our vacation exchange business;
|
|
|
expand our rentals business; and
|
|
|
enhance our operating margins.
|
Our plans generally focus on pursuing these strategies
organically. However, in appropriate circumstances, we will
consider opportunities to acquire businesses, both domestic and
international.
16
Optimize and Expand Exchange. Our strategy
for optimizing and expanding our vacation exchange business
involves moving to more flexible offerings to maintain our
global leadership position in the marketplace. We intend to
accomplish this through enhancements to our base products,
including RCI Weeks and RCI Points, expanding our presence in
the luxury exchange segment via The Registry Collection, and
leveraging our extensive member database (currently
3.8 million members) and co-marketing partnerships to drive
additional revenues. We also plan to continue to expand our
online capabilities and maximize efficiencies by driving more
exchange transactions to the Internet. This will improve overall
member satisfaction and leverage our investment in information
technology to drive cost savings. In addition, we intend to
enhance our affiliate and member value propositions by adding
new affiliates to our current portfolio and expanding our
current affiliate relationships, and by improving marketing and
communications to our member base. We are also able to increase
our pricing over time and believe we can add value to products
and services to support higher pricing. Finally, in order to
provide member access to inventory to fuel transactions, we will
work more closely with our affiliates and members to secure a
broad range of inventory to meet our members needs.
Expand Rentals. Our strategy for expanding
our rentals business involves building upon our European
business model by growing in existing geographies, expanding in
high demand destination markets and effectively leveraging our
large consumer base. We will continue to grow our Novasol brand
in its current geographies and in Southern Europe, expand the
Landal GreenParks model organically by adding new franchise
parks and grow our Holiday Cottages Group of brands by targeting
the UK customer.
In the U.S., we will leverage our European rental expertise to
grow our presence in the vacation rental category, which is
currently fragmented and disorganized. We will consider
appropriate acquisition opportunities to help us build our
position in both the U.S. and European vacation rentals
markets.
Enhance Margins. We plan to continue to
reduce costs, improve efficiency and evaluate opportunities to
improve pricing and yield across all our businesses. In
exchange, we have a comprehensive program to improve internet
capabilities that, in addition to improving member satisfaction
and retention, is expected to reduce both marketing and
operating costs. In rentals, we will continue to leverage our
multiple European rental businesses where sales, marketing,
technology and operating synergies present themselves as we
continue to increase online share.
Seasonality
Vacation exchange and rentals revenues are generally higher in
the first and third quarters than in the second or fourth
quarters. Vacation exchange transaction revenues are normally
highest in the first quarter, which is generally when members of
RCI plan and book their vacations for the year. Rental
transaction revenues earned from booking vacation rentals to
rental customers are usually highest in the third quarter, when
vacation rentals are highest. More than half of our vacation
rental customers book their reservations within 11 weeks of
departure dates and more than 70% of our rental customers book
their reservations within 20 weeks of departure dates,
reflecting recent trends of bookings closer to the travel date.
Competition
The vacation exchange and rentals business faces competition
throughout the world. Our vacation exchange business competes
with a third-party international exchange company, with regional
and local vacation exchange companies and with Internet-only
limited service exchanges. In addition, certain developers offer
exchanges through internal networks of properties, which can be
operated by us or by the developer, that offer owners of
intervals access to exchanges other than those offered by our
vacation exchange business. Our vacation rentals business faces
competition from a broad variety of professional vacation rental
managers and
rent-by-owner
channels that collectively use brokerage services, direct
marketing and the Internet to market and rent vacation
properties.
WYNDHAM
VACATION OWNERSHIP
Vacation
Ownership Industry
The global vacation ownership industry, which is also referred
to as the timeshare industry, is a component of the domestic and
international hospitality industry. The vacation ownership
industry enables customers to share ownership of a
fully-furnished vacation accommodation. Typically, a vacation
ownership purchaser acquires either a fee simple interest in a
property, which gives the purchaser title to a fraction of a
unit, or a right to use a property, which gives the purchaser
the right to use a property for a specific period of time.
Generally, a vacation ownership purchasers fee simple
interest in or right to use a property is referred to as a
vacation ownership interest. For many vacation
ownership interest purchasers, vacation ownership is an
attractive vacation alternative to traditional lodging
accommodations at hotels or owning vacation properties. Owners
of vacation ownership interests are not subject to the variance
in room rates to which lodging customers are subject, and
vacation ownership units are, on
17
average, more than twice the size of traditional hotel rooms and
typically have more amenities, such as kitchens, than do
traditional hotel rooms.
The vacation ownership concept originated in Europe during the
late 1960s and spread to the United States shortly thereafter.
The vacation ownership industry expanded slowly in the United
States until the mid-1980s. From the mid-1980s through 2007, the
vacation ownership industry grew at a double-digit CAGR,
although sales slowed by approximately 8% in 2008 and
experienced even greater declines in 2009 due to the global
recession and a significant disruption in the credit markets.
Based on research by the American Resort Development Association
or ARDA, a trade association representing the vacation ownership
and resort development industries, domestic sales of vacation
ownership interests were approximately $9.7 billion in 2008
compared to $6.5 billion in 2003. ARDA estimated that in
2009, there were approximately 6.8 million households that
owned one or more vacation ownership interests in the United
States.
Based on published industry data, we believe that the following
factors have contributed to the substantial growth, particularly
in North America, of the vacation ownership industry over the
past two decades:
|
|
|
increased consumer confidence in the industry based on enhanced
consumer protection regulation of the industry;
|
|
|
entry of widely-known lodging and entertainment companies into
the industry;
|
|
|
inherent appeal of a timeshare vacation option as opposed to a
hotel stay;
|
|
|
increased flexibility for owners of vacation ownership interests
made possible through owners affiliations with vacation
ownership exchange companies and vacation ownership
companies internal exchange programs; and
|
|
|
improvement in quality of resorts and resort management and
servicing.
|
Demographic factors explain, in part, the growth of the
industry. A 2008 study of recent vacation ownership purchasers
revealed that the average purchaser was 53 years of age and
had a median household income of $73,000. The average purchaser
in the United States, therefore, is a baby boomer who has
disposable income and interest in purchasing vacation products.
We believe that baby boomers will continue to have a positive
influence on the vacation ownership industry.
According to information compiled by ARDA, the four primary
reasons consumers cite for purchasing vacation ownership
interests are: (i) flexibility with respect to different
locations, unit sizes and times of year, (ii) the certainty
of quality accommodations, (iii) credibility of the
timeshare company and (iv) the opportunity to exchange into
other resort locations. According to a 2008 ARDA study, nearly
85% of owners of vacation ownership interests expressed a
general level of satisfaction with owning timeshare. With
respect to exchange opportunities, most owners of vacation
ownership interests can exchange vacation ownership interests
through exchange companies and through the applicable vacation
ownership companys internal network of properties.
Wyndham
Vacation Ownership Overview
Wyndham Vacation Ownership, our vacation ownership business,
includes marketing and sales of vacation ownership interests,
consumer financing in connection with the purchase by
individuals of vacation ownership interests, property management
services to property owners associations, and development
and acquisition of vacation ownership resorts. We operate our
vacation ownership business through our two primary brands,
Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham. In October
1999, WorldMark by Wyndham formed Wyndham Vacation Resorts Asia
Pacific Pty. Ltd., a New South Wales corporation, or Wyndham
Asia Pacific, as its direct wholly owned subsidiary for the
purpose of conducting sales, marketing and resort development
activities in the South Pacific. Wyndham Asia Pacific is
currently the largest vacation ownership business in Australia.
We have the largest vacation ownership business in the world as
measured by the numbers of vacation ownership resorts, vacation
ownership units and owners of vacation ownership interests and
by annual revenues associated with the sale of vacation
ownership interests. As of December 31, 2009, we have
developed or acquired over 155 vacation ownership resorts in the
United States, Canada, Mexico, the Caribbean and the South
Pacific that represent approximately 20,000 individual vacation
ownership units and over 820,000 owners of vacation ownership
interests. During 2009, Wyndham Vacation Ownership expanded its
portfolio with the addition of resorts in San Francisco,
California; Prince Georges County, Maryland and
Sevierville, Tennessee and added additional inventory at
locations in Orlando, Florida; Steamboat Springs, Colorado;
Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin; Kauai, Hawaii; New Braunfels, Texas;
and Santa Fe, New Mexico.
In response to worldwide economic conditions impacting the
general availability of credit on which our vacation ownership
business has historically been reliant, we announced in late
2008 a plan to reduce our 2009 gross VOI sales by
approximately 40% in order to reduce our need to access the
asset-backed securities markets during
18
2009 and beyond, and also significantly reduce costs and capital
needs while enhancing cash flow. Accordingly, during 2009, we
recorded approximately $1.3 billion in gross vacation
ownership interest sales.
Our primary vacation ownership brands, Wyndham Vacation Resorts
and WorldMark by Wyndham, operate vacation ownership programs
through which vacation ownership interests can be redeemed for
vacations through points- or credits-based internal reservation
systems that provide owners with flexibility (subject to
availability) as to resort location, length of stay, unit type
and time of year. The points- or credits-based reservation
systems offer owners redemption opportunities for other travel
and leisure products that may be offered from time to time, and
the opportunity for owners to use our products for one or more
vacations per year based on level of ownership. Our vacation
ownership programs allow us to market and sell our vacation
ownership products in variable quantities as opposed to the
fixed quantity of the traditional, fixed-week vacation
ownership, which is primarily sold on a weekly interval basis,
and to offer to existing owners upgrade sales to
supplement such owners existing vacation ownership
interests. Although we operate Wyndham Vacation Resorts and
WorldMark by Wyndham as separate brands, we have integrated
substantially all of the business functions of Wyndham Vacation
Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham, including consumer finance,
information technology, certain staff functions, product
development and certain marketing activities.
Our vacation ownership business derives a majority of its
revenues from sales of vacation ownership interests and derives
other revenues from consumer financing and property management.
Because revenues from sales of vacation ownership interests and
consumer finance in connection with such sales depend on the
number of vacation ownership units in which we sell vacation
ownership interests, increasing the number of such units is
important to achieving our revenue goals. Because revenues from
property management depend on the number of units we manage,
increasing the number of such units has a direct effect of
increasing our revenues from property management.
Sales and
Marketing of Vacation Ownership Interests and Property
Management
Wyndham Vacation Ownership is often involved in the development
or acquisition of the resort properties in which it markets and
sells vacation ownership interests. Wyndham Vacation Ownership
also often acts as a property manager of such resorts and the
related clubs. From time to time, Wyndham Vacation Ownership
also sells home lots and other real estate interests at its
resort properties.
Vacation Ownership Interests, Portfolio of Resorts and
Maintenance Fees. The vacation ownership interests
that Wyndham Vacation Resorts markets and sells consist
primarily of undivided interests that entitles an owner to
ownership and usage rights that are not restricted to a
particular week of the year. As of December 31, 2009, over
515,000 owners held interests in Wyndham Vacation Resorts resort
properties. Wyndham Vacation Resorts properties are located
primarily in the United States and, as of December 31,
2009, consisted of 74 resorts (six of which are shared with
WorldMark by Wyndham) that represented approximately
12,900 units. During 2009, Wyndham Vacation Resorts opened
new properties in San Francisco, California; Prince
Georges County, Maryland and Sevierville, Tennessee and
added inventory at existing properties in Orlando, Florida;
Steamboat Springs, Colorado; Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin; and
Kauai, Hawaii.
The majority of the resorts in which Wyndham Vacation Resorts
develops, markets and sells vacation ownership and other real
estate interests are destination resorts that are located at or
near attractions such as the Walt Disney
World®
Resort in Florida; the Las Vegas Strip in Nevada; Myrtle Beach
in South Carolina; Colonial
Williamsburg®
in Virginia; and the Hawaiian Islands. Most Wyndham Vacation
Resorts properties are affiliated with Wyndham Worldwides
vacation exchange business, RCI, which awards to the top 10% of
RCI affiliated vacation ownership resorts throughout the world
designations of an RCI Gold Crown Resort or an RCI Silver Crown
Resort for exceptional resort standards and service levels.
Among Wyndham Vacation Resorts 74 resort properties, 53
have been awarded designations of an RCI Gold Crown Resort or an
RCI Silver Crown Resort.
After WorldMark by Wyndham or Wyndham Asia Pacific develops or
acquires resorts, it conveys the resorts to WorldMark, The Club
or WorldMark South Pacific Club, which we refer collectively as
the Clubs, as applicable. In exchange for the conveyances,
WorldMark by Wyndham or Wyndham Asia Pacific receives the
exclusive rights to sell the vacation credits associated with
the conveyed resorts and to receive the proceeds from the sales
of the vacation credits. Vacation ownership interests sold by
WorldMark by Wyndham and Wyndham Asia Pacific represent credits
in the Clubs which entitle the owner of the credits to reserve
units at the resorts that are owned and operated by the Clubs.
Although vacation credits, unlike vacation ownership interests
in Wyndham Vacation Resorts resort properties, do not constitute
deeded interests in real estate, vacation credits are regulated
in most jurisdictions by the same agency that regulates vacation
ownership interests evidenced by deeded interests in real
estate. As of December 31, 2009, over 305,000 owners held
vacation credits in the Clubs.
WorldMark by Wyndham resorts are located primarily in the
Western United States, Canada, Mexico and the South Pacific and,
as of December 31, 2009, consisted of 88 resorts (six of
which are shared with Wyndham
19
Vacation Resorts) that represented approximately
7,200 units. Of the WorldMark by Wyndham resorts and units,
Wyndham Asia Pacific has a total of 17 resorts with
approximately 760 units. During 2009, WorldMark by Wyndham
added inventory at existing properties located in Santa Fe,
New Mexico and Steamboat Springs, Colorado.
The resorts in which WorldMark by Wyndham develops, markets and
sells vacation credits are primarily drive-to resorts. Most
WorldMark by Wyndham resorts are affiliated with Wyndham
Worldwides vacation exchange subsidiary, RCI. Among
WorldMark by Wyndhams 88 resorts, 56 have been awarded
designations of an RCI Gold Crown Resort or an RCI Silver Crown
Resort.
Owners of vacation ownership interests pay annual maintenance
fees to the property owners associations responsible for
managing the applicable resorts or to the Clubs. The annual
maintenance fee associated with the average vacation ownership
interest purchased ranges from approximately $400 to
approximately $900. These fees generally are used to renovate
and replace furnishings, pay operating, maintenance and cleaning
costs, pay management fees and expenses, and cover taxes (in
some states), insurance and other related costs. Wyndham
Vacation Ownership, as the owner of unsold inventory at resorts
or unsold interests in the Clubs, also pays maintenance fees in
accordance with the legal requirements of the states or
jurisdictions in which the resorts are located. In addition, at
certain newly-developed resorts, Wyndham Vacation Ownership
sometimes enters into subsidy agreements with the property
owners associations to cover costs that otherwise would be
covered by annual maintenance fees payable with respect to
vacation ownership interests that have not yet been sold.
Club Wyndham Plus. Wyndham Vacation Resorts
uses a points-based internal reservation system called Club
Wyndham Plus (formerly known as FairShare Plus) to provide
owners with flexibility (subject to availability) as to resort
location, length of stay, unit type and time of year. With the
launch of Club Wyndham Plus in 1991, Wyndham Vacation Resorts
became one of the first U.S. developers of vacation
ownership properties to move from traditional, fixed-week
vacation ownership to a points-based program. Owners of vacation
ownership interests in Wyndham Vacation Resorts properties that
are eligible to participate in the program may elect, and with
respect to certain resorts are obligated, to participate in Club
Wyndham Plus.
Wyndham Vacation Resorts currently offers two vacation ownership
programs, Club Wyndham Select and Club Wyndham Access. Club
Wyndham Select owners purchase an undivided interest at a select
resort and receive a deed to that resort, which becomes their
home resort. Club Wyndham Access owners do not
directly receive a deed, but own an interest in a perpetual
club. Through Club Wyndham Plus, Club Wyndham Access owners have
advanced reservation priority access to the multiple Wyndham
Vacation Resorts locations based on the amount of inventory
deeded to Club Wyndham Access. Both vacation ownership options
utilize Club Wyndham Plus as the internal exchange program to
expand owners vacation opportunities.
Owners who participate in Club Wyndham Plus assign their rights
to use fixed weeks and undivided interests, as applicable, to a
trust in exchange for the right to reserve in the internal
reservation system. The number of points that an owner receives
as a result of the assignment to the trust of the owners
right to use fixed weeks or undivided interests, and the number
of points required to take a particular vacation, is set forth
on a published schedule and varies depending on the resort
location, length of stay, unit type and time of year associated
with the interests assigned to the trust or requested by the
owner, as applicable. Participants in Club Wyndham Plus may
choose (subject to availability) the Wyndham Vacation Resorts
resort properties, length of stay, unit types and times of year,
depending on the number of points to which they are entitled and
the number of points required to take the vacations of their
preference. Participants in the program may redeem their points
not only for resort stays, but also for other travel and leisure
products that may be offered from time to time. Owners of
vacation points are able to borrow vacation points from the next
year for use in the current year. Wyndham Vacation Resorts
offers various programs that provide existing owners with the
opportunity to upgrade, or acquire additional
vacation ownership interests to increase the number of points
such owners can use in Club Wyndham Plus.
WorldMark, The Club and WorldMark South Pacific
Club. The Clubs provide owners of vacation credits
with flexibility (subject to availability) as to resort
location, length of stay, unit type and time of year. Depending
on how many vacation credits an owner has purchased, the owner
may use the vacation credits for one or more vacations annually.
The number of vacation credits that are required for each
days stay at a unit is listed on a published schedule and
varies depending upon the resort location, unit type, time of
year and the day of the week. Owners may also redeem their
credits for other travel and leisure products that may be
offered from time to time.
Owners of vacation credits are also able to purchase bonus time
from the Clubs for use when space is available. Bonus time gives
owners the opportunity to use available resorts on short notice
and at a reduced rate and to obtain usage beyond owners
allotments of vacation credits. In addition, WorldMark by
Wyndham offers owners the opportunity to upgrade, or
acquire additional vacation credits to increase the number of
credits such owners can use in the Clubs.
20
Owners of vacation credits can make reservations through the
Clubs, or may elect to join and exchange their vacation
ownership interests through our vacation exchange business, RCI,
or other third-party international exchange companies.
Program, Property Management and Club
Management. In exchange for management fees,
Wyndham Vacation Resorts, itself or through a Wyndham Vacation
Resorts affiliate, manages Club Wyndham Plus, the majority of
property owners associations at resorts in which Wyndham
Vacation Resorts develops, markets and sells vacation ownership
interests, and property owners associations at resorts
developed by third parties. On behalf of Club Wyndham Plus,
Wyndham Vacation Resorts or its affiliate manages the
reservation system for Club Wyndham Plus and provides owner
services and billing and collections services. The term of the
trust agreement of Club Wyndham Plus runs through
December 31, 2025, and the term is automatically extended
for successive ten year periods unless a majority of the members
of the program vote to terminate the trust agreement prior to
the expiration of the term then in effect. The term of the
management agreement, under which Wyndham Vacation Resorts
manages the Club Wyndham Plus program, is for five years and is
automatically renewed annually. for successive terms of five
years, provided the trustee under the program does not serve
notice of termination to Wyndham Vacation Resorts at the end of
any calendar year. On behalf of property owners
associations, Wyndham Vacation Resorts or its affiliates
generally provide
day-to-day
management for vacation ownership resorts, including oversight
of housekeeping services, maintenance and refurbishment of the
units, and provides certain accounting and administrative
services to property owners associations. We receive fees
for such property management services which are generally based
upon total costs to operate such resorts. Such fees range
generally approximate 10%. The terms of the property management
agreements with the property owners associations at
resorts in which Wyndham Vacation Resorts develops, markets and
sells vacation ownership interests vary; however, the vast
majority of the agreements provide a mechanism for automatic
renewal upon expiration of the terms. At some established sites,
the property owners associations have entered into
property management agreements with professional management
companies other than Wyndham Vacation Resorts or its affiliates.
In exchange for management fees, WorldMark by Wyndham, itself or
through a WorldMark by Wyndham affiliate, serves as the
exclusive property manager and servicing agent of the Clubs and
all resort units owned or operated by the Clubs. On behalf of
the Clubs, WorldMark by Wyndham or its affiliate provides
day-to-day
management for vacation ownership resorts, including oversight
of housekeeping services, maintenance and refurbishment of the
units, and provides certain accounting and administrative
services. WorldMark by Wyndham or its affiliate also manages the
reservation system for the Clubs and provides owner services and
billing and collections services.
Sales and
Marketing Channels and Programs
Wyndham Vacation Ownership employs a variety of marketing
channels as part of Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by
Wyndham marketing programs to encourage prospective owners of
vacation ownership interests to tour Wyndham Vacation Ownership
properties and attend sales presentations at off-site sales
offices. Our resort-based sales centers also enable us to
actively solicit upgrade sales to existing owners of vacation
ownership interests while such owners vacation at our resort
properties. Sales of vacation ownership interests relating to
upgrades represented approximately 64%, 51% and 44% of our net
sales of vacation ownership interests during 2009, 2008 and
2007, respectively.
Wyndham Vacation Ownership uses a variety of marketing programs
to attract prospective owners, including sponsored contests that
offer vacation packages or gifts, targeted mailings, outbound
and inbound telemarketing efforts, and in association with
Wyndham Worldwide hotel brands and associated loyalty and
marketing programs. Wyndham Vacation Ownership also co-sponsors
sweepstakes, giveaways and promotional programs with
professional teams at major sporting events and with other third
parties at other high-traffic consumer events. Where permissible
under state law, Wyndham Vacation Ownership offers existing
owners cash awards or other incentives for referrals of new
owners.
Wyndham Vacation Ownerships marketing and sales activities
are often facilitated through marketing alliances with other
travel, hospitality, entertainment, gaming and retail companies
that provide access to such companies present and past
customers through a variety of co-branded marketing offers.
Wyndham Vacation Ownerships resort-based sales centers,
which are located in popular travel destinations throughout the
United States, generate substantial tour flow through providing
local offers. The sales centers enable Wyndham Vacation
Ownership to market to tourists already visiting destination
areas. Wyndham Vacation Ownerships marketing agents, which
often operate on the premises of the hospitality, entertainment,
gaming and retail companies with which Wyndham Vacation
Ownership has alliances within these markets, solicit local
tourists with offers relating to activities and entertainment in
exchange for the tourists visiting the local resorts and
attending sales presentations.
An example of a marketing alliance through which Wyndham
Vacation Ownership markets to tourists already visiting
destination areas is Wyndham Vacation Ownerships current
arrangement with Harrahs Entertainment in Las
21
Vegas, Nevada, which enables Wyndham Vacation Ownership to
operate concierge-style marketing kiosks throughout
Harrahs Casino that permit Wyndham Vacation Ownership to
solicit patrons to attend tours and sales presentations with
Harrahs-related rewards and entertainment offers, such as
gaming chips, show tickets and dining certificates. Wyndham
Vacation Ownership also operates its primary Las Vegas sales
center within Harrahs Casino and regularly shuttles
prospective owners targeted by such sales centers to and from
Wyndham Vacation Ownerships nearby resort property.
Wyndham Vacation Ownership offers a variety of entry-level
programs and products as part of its sales strategies. One such
program allows prospective owners to acquire one-years
worth of points or credits with no further obligations; another
such product is a biennial interest that provides for vacations
every other year. As part of its sales strategies, Wyndham
Vacation Ownership relies on its points/credits-based programs,
which provide prospective owners with the flexibility to buy
relatively small packages of points or credits, which can be
upgraded at a later date. To facilitate upgrades among existing
owners, Wyndham Vacation Ownership markets opportunities for
owners to purchase additional points or credits through periodic
marketing campaigns and promotions to owners while those owners
vacation at Wyndham Vacation Ownership resort properties.
Wyndham Vacation Ownerships resort-based sales centers
also enable Wyndham Vacation Ownership to actively solicit
upgrade sales to existing owners of vacation ownership interests
while such owners vacation at Wyndham Vacation Ownership resort
properties. In addition, we also operate a telesales program
designed to solicit upgrade sales to existing owners of our
products.
Purchaser
Financing
Wyndham Vacation Ownership offers financing to purchasers of
vacation ownership interests. By offering consumer financing, we
are able to reduce the initial cash required by customers to
purchase vacation ownership interests, thereby enabling us to
attract additional customers and generate substantial
incremental revenues and profits. Wyndham Vacation Ownership
funds and services loans extended by Wyndham Vacation Resorts
and WorldMark by Wyndham through our consumer financing
subsidiary, Wyndham Consumer Finance, a wholly owned subsidiary
of Wyndham Vacation Resorts based in Las Vegas, Nevada that
performs loan financing, servicing and related administrative
functions.
Wyndham Vacation Ownership typically performs a credit
investigation or other review or inquiry into every
purchasers credit history before offering to finance a
portion of the purchase price of the vacation ownership
interests. Wyndham Vacation Ownership offers purchasers with
good credit ratings an enhanced financing option. The interest
rate offered to participating purchasers is determined from
automated underwriting based upon the purchasers credit
score, the amount of the down payment and the size of purchase.
Wyndham Vacation Ownership offers purchasers an interest rate
reduction if they participate in their pre-authorized checking,
or PAC, programs, pursuant to which our consumer financing
subsidiary each month debits a purchasers bank account or
major credit card in the amount of the monthly payment by a
pre-authorized fund transfer on the payment date.
During 2009, we generated new receivables of $970 million
on gross vacation ownership sales of $1.3 billion, which
amounts to 74% of vacation ownership sales being financed.
However, the 74% is prior to the receipt of addenda cash.
Addenda cash represents the cash received for full payment of a
loan within 15 to 60 days of origination. After the
application of addenda cash, approximately 56% of vacation
ownership sales are financed, with the remaining 44% being cash
sales.
Wyndham Vacation Ownership generally requires a minimum down
payment of 10% of the purchase price on all sales of vacation
ownership interests and offer consumer financing for the
remaining balance for up to ten years. While the minimum is
generally 10%, during 2009, our average down payment was
approximately 20% for financed sales of vacation ownership
sales. These loans are structured so that we receive equal
monthly installments that fully amortize the principal due by
the final due date.
Similar to other companies that provide consumer financing, we
historically securitize a majority of the receivables originated
in connection with the sales of our vacation ownership
interests. We initially place the financed contracts into a
revolving warehouse securitization facility generally within 30
to 90 days after origination. Many of the receivables are
subsequently transferred from the warehouse securitization
facility and placed into term securitization facilities.
Servicing
and Collection Procedures
Our consumer financing subsidiary is responsible for the
maintenance of contract receivables files and all customer
service, billing and collection activities related to the
domestic loans we extend. We assess the performance of our loan
portfolio by monitoring numerous metrics including collections
rates, defaults by state residency and bankruptcies. Our
consumer financing subsidiary also places loans pledged in our
warehouse and term securitization facilities. As of
December 31, 2009, our loan portfolio was 94.9% current
(i.e., not more than 30 days past due).
22
Strategies
In accordance with our previously announced plans to reduce the
size and scope of our vacation ownership business we intend to:
|
|
|
|
|
pursue a multitude of strategies primarily designed to manage
our vacation ownership business for cash flow; and
|
|
|
|
drive greater sales and marketing efficiencies at all levels.
|
Manage for Cash Flow. We plan to increasingly
manage our business for cash flow by improving the quality of
our loan portfolio through maintaining more restrictive
financing terms for customers that fall within our lower credit
classifications, driving higher down payments at the time of
sale, and strengthening the effectiveness of our collections
efforts.
We also plan to continue our efforts to develop a
fee-for-service
timeshare sales model designed to capitalize upon the large
quantities of newly developed, nearly completed or recently
finished condominium or hotel inventory within the current real
estate market without assuming the significant cost that
accompanies new construction. The business model, which we call
the Wyndham Asset Affiliation Model (WAAM), will offer turn-key
solutions for developers or banks in possession of newly
developed inventory, which we will sell for a fee through our
extensive sales and marketing channels. This model may enable us
to expand our resort portfolio with little or no capital
deployment, while providing additional channels for new owner
acquisition and growth for our
fee-for-service
consumer financing, servicing operations and property management
business.
Drive Greater Sales and Marketing
Efficiency. We plan to drive greater sales and
marketing efficiencies by aggressively applying our strengthened
tour qualification standards through the use of a proprietary
lead screening model in order to limit our marketing activities
to only the highest quality prospects both in terms of such
persons interest in purchasing our products and their
demonstrated ability to self-finance
and/or
qualify for our restrictive financing terms.
We will continue to focus our efforts on current owners, our
most efficient and reliable marketing prospect, as well as
highly qualified prospect categories including certain existing
Wyndham Hotel Group customers and consumers affiliated with the
Wyndham Rewards and Wyndham By Request loyalty programs, for
example. We will also seek to develop and market mixed-use hotel
and vacation ownership properties in conjunction with the
Wyndham brand. The mixed-use properties would afford us access
to both hotel clients in higher income demographics for the
purpose of marketing vacation ownership interests and hotel
inventory for use in our marketing programs.
Seasonality
We rely, in part, upon tour flow to generate sales of vacation
ownership interests; consequently, sales volume tends to
increase in the spring and summer months as a result of greater
tour flow from spring and summer travelers. Revenues from sales
of vacation ownership interests therefore are generally higher
in the second and third quarters than in other quarters. We
cannot predict whether these seasonal trends will continue in
the future.
Competition
The vacation ownership industry is highly competitive and is
comprised of a number of companies specializing primarily in
sales and marketing, consumer financing, property management and
development of vacation ownership properties. In addition, a
number of national hospitality chains develop and sell vacation
ownership interests to consumers.
Trademarks
We own the trademarks Wyndham Vacation Ownership,
Wyndham Vacation Resorts, WorldMark by
Wyndham, and Club Wyndham Plus and related
trademarks and logos, and such trademarks and logos are material
to the businesses that are part of our vacation ownership
business. Our subsidiaries actively use these marks, and all of
the material marks are registered (or have applications pending)
with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office as well as with
the relevant authorities in major countries worldwide where
these businesses have significant operations. We own the
WorldMark trademark pursuant to an assignment
agreement with WorldMark, The Club. Pursuant to the assignment
agreement, WorldMark, The Club may request that the mark be
reassigned to it only in the event of a termination of the
WorldMark vacation ownership programs.
EMPLOYEES
As of December 31, 2009, we had approximately
24,600 employees, including approximately
7,800 employees outside of the U.S. As of
December 31, 2009, our lodging business had approximately
4,200 employees, our vacation exchange and rentals business
had approximately 7,400 employees and our vacation
ownership business
23
had approximately 12,500 employees. Approximately 1% of our
employees are subject to collective bargaining agreements
governing their employment with our company. We believe that our
relations with employees are good.
ENVIRONMENTAL
COMPLIANCE
Our compliance with laws and regulations relating to
environmental protection and discharge of hazardous materials
has not had a material impact on our capital expenditures,
earnings or competitive position, and we do not anticipate any
material impact from such compliance in the future.
Where You
Can Find More Information
We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements
and other information with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Our SEC filings are available to the public over the
Internet at the SECs website at
http://www.sec.gov.
Our SEC filings are also available on our website at
http://www.WyndhamWorldwide.com
as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed with or
furnished to the SEC. You may also read and copy any filed
document at the SECs public reference room in
Washington, D.C. at 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for further information about public reference rooms.
We maintain an Internet site at
http://www.WyndhamWorldwide.com.
Our website and the information contained on or connected to
that site are not incorporated into this annual report.
Before you invest in our securities you should carefully
consider each of the following risk factors and all of the other
information provided in this report. We believe that the
following information identifies the most significant risk
factors affecting us. However, the risks and uncertainties we
face are not limited to those set forth in the risk factors
described below. Additional risks and uncertainties not
presently known to us or that we currently believe to be
immaterial may also adversely affect our business. In addition,
past financial performance may not be a reliable indicator of
future performance and historical trends should not be used to
anticipate results or trends in future periods.
If any of the following risks and uncertainties develops into
actual events, these events could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
In such case, the trading price of our common stock could
decline.
The
hospitality industry is highly competitive and we are subject to
risks relating to competition that may adversely affect our
performance.
We will be adversely impacted if we cannot compete effectively
in the highly competitive hospitality industry. Our continued
success depends upon our ability to compete effectively in
markets that contain numerous competitors, some of which may
have significantly greater financial, marketing and other
resources than we have. Competition may reduce fee structures,
potentially causing us to lower our fees or prices, which may
adversely impact our profits. New competition or existing
competition that uses a business model that is different from
our business model may put pressure on us to change our model so
that we can remain competitive.
Our
revenues are highly dependent on the travel industry and
declines in or disruptions to the travel industry, such as those
caused by economic slowdown, terrorism, acts of God and war may
adversely affect us.
Declines in or disruptions to the travel industry may adversely
impact us. Risks affecting the travel industry include: economic
slowdown and recession; economic factors, such as increased
costs of living and reduced discretionary income, adversely
impacting consumers and businesses decisions to use
and consume travel services and products; terrorist incidents
and threats (and associated heightened travel security
measures); acts of God (such as earthquakes, hurricanes, fires,
floods and other natural disasters); war; pandemics or threat of
pandemics (such as the H1N1 flu); increased pricing, financial
instability and capacity constraints of air carriers; airline
job actions and strikes; and increases in gasoline and other
fuel prices.
We are
subject to operating or other risks common to the hospitality
industry.
Our business is subject to numerous operating or other risks
common to the hospitality industry including:
|
|
|
changes in operating costs, including inflation, energy, labor
costs (including minimum wage increases and unionization),
workers compensation and health-care related costs and
insurance;
|
|
|
changes in desirability of geographic regions of the hotels or
resorts in our business;
|
|
|
changes in the supply and demand for hotel rooms, vacation
exchange and rental services and vacation ownership products and
services;
|
|
|
seasonality in our businesses may cause fluctuations in our
operating results;
|
24
|
|
|
geographic concentrations of our operations and customers;
|
|
|
availability of acceptable financing and cost of capital as they
apply to us, our customers, current and potential hotel
franchisees and developers, owners of hotels with which we have
hotel management contracts, our RCI affiliates and other
developers of vacation ownership resorts;
|
|
|
our ability to securitize the receivables that we originate in
connection with sales of vacation ownership interests;
|
|
|
the risk that purchasers of vacation ownership interests who
finance a portion of the purchase price default on their loans
due to adverse macro or personal economic conditions or
otherwise, which would increase loan loss reserves and adversely
affect loan portfolio performance, each of which would
negatively impact our results of operations; that if such
defaults occur during the early part of the loan amortization
period we will not have recovered the marketing, selling,
administrative and other costs associated with such vacation
ownership interest; such costs will be incurred again in
connection with the resale of the repossessed vacation ownership
interest; and the value we recover in a default is not, in all
instances, sufficient to cover the outstanding debt;
|
|
|
the quality of the services provided by franchisees, our
vacation exchange and rentals business, resorts with units that
are exchanged through our vacation exchange business
and/or
resorts in which we sell vacation ownership interests may
adversely affect our image and reputation;
|
|
|
our ability to generate sufficient cash to buy from third-party
suppliers the products that we need to provide to the
participants in our points programs who want to redeem points
for such products;
|
|
|
overbuilding in one or more segments of the hospitality industry
and/or in
one or more geographic regions;
|
|
|
changes in the number and occupancy and room rates of hotels
operating under franchise and management agreements;
|
|
|
changes in the relative mix of franchised hotels in the various
lodging industry price categories;
|
|
|
our ability to develop and maintain positive relations and
contractual arrangements with current and potential franchisees,
hotel owners, vacation exchange members, vacation ownership
interest owners, resorts with units that are exchanged through
our vacation exchange business
and/or
owners of vacation properties that our vacation rentals business
markets for rental;
|
|
|
the availability of and competition for desirable sites for the
development of vacation ownership properties; difficulties
associated with obtaining entitlements to develop vacation
ownership properties; liability under state and local laws with
respect to any construction defects in the vacation ownership
properties we develop; and our ability to adjust our pace of
completion of resort development relative to the pace of our
sales of the underlying vacation ownership interests;
|
|
|
our ability to adjust our business model to generate greater
cash flow and require less capital expenditures;
|
|
|
private resale of vacation ownership interests could adversely
affect our vacation ownership resorts and vacation exchange
businesses;
|
|
|
revenues from our lodging business are indirectly affected by
our franchisees pricing decisions;
|
|
|
organized labor activities and associated litigation;
|
|
|
maintenance and infringement of our intellectual property;
|
|
|
the bankruptcy or insolvency of any one of our customers could
impair our ability to collect outstanding fees or other amounts
due or otherwise exercise our contractual rights;
|
|
|
increases in the use of third-party Internet services to book
online hotel reservations could adversely impact our
revenues; and
|
|
|
disruptions in relationships with third parties, including
marketing alliances and affiliations with
e-commerce
channels.
|
We may
not be able to achieve our growth objectives.
We may not be able to achieve our growth objectives for
increasing our cash flows, the number of franchised
and/or
managed properties in our lodging business, the number of
vacation exchange members acquired by our vacation exchange
business, the number of rental weeks sold by our vacation
rentals business and the number of quality tours generated and
vacation ownership interests sold by our vacation ownership
business.
25
We may be unable to identify acquisition targets that complement
our businesses, and if we are able to identify suitable
acquisition targets, we may not be able to complete acquisitions
on commercially reasonable terms. Our ability to complete
acquisitions depends on a variety of factors, including our
ability to obtain financing on acceptable terms and requisite
government approvals. If we are able to complete acquisitions,
there is no assurance that we will be able to achieve the
revenue and cost benefits that we expected in connection with
such acquisitions or to successfully integrate the acquired
businesses into our existing operations.
Our
international operations are subject to risks not generally
applicable to our domestic operations.
Our international operations are subject to numerous risks
including: exposure to local economic conditions; potential
adverse changes in the diplomatic relations of foreign countries
with the United States; hostility from local populations;
restrictions and taxes on the withdrawal of foreign investment
and earnings; government policies against businesses owned by
foreigners; investment restrictions or requirements; diminished
ability to legally enforce our contractual rights in foreign
countries; foreign exchange restrictions; fluctuations in
foreign currency exchange rates; local laws might conflict with
U.S. laws; withholding and other taxes on remittances and
other payments by subsidiaries; and changes in and application
of foreign taxation structures including value added taxes.
We are
subject to risks related to litigation filed by or against
us.
We are subject to a number of legal actions and the risk of
future litigation as described under Legal
Proceedings. We cannot predict with certainty the ultimate
outcome and related damages and costs of litigation and other
proceedings filed by or against us. Adverse results in
litigation and other proceedings may harm our business.
We are
subject to certain risks related to our indebtedness, hedging
transactions, our securitization of assets, our surety bond
requirements, the cost and availability of capital and the
extension of credit by us.
We are a borrower of funds under our credit facilities, credit
lines, senior notes and securitization financings. We extend
credit when we finance purchases of vacation ownership
interests. We use financial instruments to reduce or hedge our
financial exposure to the effects of currency and interest rate
fluctuations. We are required to post surety bonds in connection
with our development activities. In connection with our debt
obligations, hedging transactions, the securitization of certain
of our assets, our surety bond requirements, the cost and
availability of capital and the extension of credit by us, we
are subject to numerous risks including:
|
|
|
our cash flows from operations or available lines of credit may
be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and
interest, which could result in a default and acceleration of
the underlying debt;
|
|
|
if we are unable to comply with the terms of the financial
covenants under our revolving credit facility, including a
breach of the financial ratios or tests, such non-compliance
could result in a default and acceleration of the underlying
revolver debt and other debt that is cross-defaulted to these
financial ratios;
|
|
|
our leverage may adversely affect our ability to obtain
additional financing;
|
|
|
our leverage may require the dedication of a significant portion
of our cash flows to the payment of principal and interest thus
reducing the availability of cash flows to fund working capital,
capital expenditures or other operating needs;
|
|
|
increases in interest rates;
|
|
|
rating agency downgrades for our debt that could increase our
borrowing costs;
|
|
|
failure or non-performance of counterparties for foreign
exchange and interest rate hedging transactions;
|
|
|
we may not be able to securitize our vacation ownership contract
receivables on terms acceptable to us because of, among other
factors, the performance of the vacation ownership contract
receivables, adverse conditions in the market for vacation
ownership loan-backed notes and asset-backed notes in general,
the credit quality and financial stability of insurers of
securitizations transactions, and the risk that the actual
amount of uncollectible accounts on our securitized vacation
ownership contract receivables and other credit we extend is
greater than expected;
|
|
|
our securitizations contain portfolio performance triggers
which, if violated, may result in a disruption or loss of cash
flow from such transactions;
|
|
|
a reduction in commitments from surety bond providers may impair
our vacation ownership business by requiring us to escrow cash
in order to meet regulatory requirements of certain states;
|
26
|
|
|
prohibitive cost and inadequate availability of capital could
restrict the development or acquisition of vacation ownership
resorts by us and the financing of purchases of vacation
ownership interests; and
|
|
|
if interest rates increase significantly, we may not be able to
increase the interest rate offered to finance purchases of
vacation ownership interests by the same amount of the increase.
|
Current
economic conditions in the hospitality industry and in the
global economy generally, including ongoing disruptions in the
debt and equity capital markets, may adversely affect our
business and results of operations, our ability to obtain
financing
and/or
securitize our receivables on reasonable and acceptable terms,
the performance of our loan portfolio and the market price of
our common stock.
The global economy is currently undergoing a recession, and the
future economic environment may continue to be less favorable
than that of recent years. The hospitality industry has
experienced and may continue to experience significant downturns
in connection with, or in anticipation of, declines in general
economic conditions. The current economic downturn has been
characterized by higher unemployment, lower family income, lower
corporate earnings, lower business investment and lower consumer
spending, leading to lower demand for hospitality products and
services. Declines in consumer and commercial spending adversely
affect our revenues and profits. We are unable to predict the
likely duration and severity of the current adverse economic
conditions and disruptions in debt, equity and asset-backed
securities markets in the United States and other countries.
The global stock and credit markets have experienced significant
price volatility, dislocations and liquidity disruptions, which
have caused market prices of many stocks to fluctuate
substantially and the spreads on prospective and outstanding
debt financings to widen considerably. These circumstances have
materially impacted liquidity in the financial markets, making
terms for certain financings materially less attractive, and in
certain cases have resulted in the unavailability of certain
types of financing. This volatility and illiquidity has
negatively affected a broad range of mortgage and asset-backed
and other fixed income securities. As a result, the market for
fixed income and asset-backed securities has experienced
decreased liquidity, increased price volatility, credit
downgrade events, and increased defaults. These factors and the
continuing market disruption have an adverse effect on us, in
part because we, like many public companies, from time to time
raise capital in debt, equity and asset-backed securities
markets.
Our liquidity position may also be negatively affected if our
vacation ownership contract receivables portfolios do not meet
specified portfolio credit parameters. Our liquidity as it
relates to our vacation ownership contract receivables
securitization program could be adversely affected if we were to
fail to renew or replace any of the facilities on their renewal
dates or if a particular receivables pool were to fail to meet
certain ratios, which could occur in certain instances if the
default rates or other credit metrics of the underlying vacation
ownership contract receivables deteriorate. Our ability to sell
securities backed by our vacation ownership contract receivables
depends on the continued ability and willingness of capital
market participants to invest in such securities. Our ability to
engage in securitization transactions on favorable terms or at
all has been adversely affected by the disruptions in the
capital markets and other events, including actions by rating
agencies and deteriorating investor expectations. It is possible
that asset-backed securities issued pursuant to our
securitization programs could in the future be downgraded by
credit agencies. If a downgrade occurs, our ability to complete
other securitization transactions on acceptable terms or at all
could be jeopardized, and we could be forced to rely on other
potentially more expensive and less attractive funding sources,
to the extent available, which would decrease our profitability
and may require us to adjust our business operations
accordingly, including reducing or suspending our financing to
purchasers of vacation ownership interests.
In addition, continued uncertainty in the stock and credit
markets may negatively affect our ability to access additional
short-term and long-term financing on reasonable terms or at
all, which would negatively impact our liquidity and financial
condition. In addition, if one or more of the financial
institutions that support our existing credit facilities fails,
we may not be able to find a replacement, which would negatively
impact our ability to borrow under the credit facilities. These
disruptions in the financial markets also may adversely affect
our credit rating and the market value of our common stock. If
the current pressures on credit continue or worsen, we may not
be able to refinance, if necessary, our outstanding debt when
due, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
While we believe we have adequate sources of liquidity to meet
our anticipated requirements for working capital, debt servicing
and capital expenditures for the foreseeable future, if our
operating results worsen significantly and our cash flow or
capital resources prove inadequate, or if interest rates
increase significantly, we could face liquidity problems that
could materially and adversely affect our results of operations
and financial condition.
Our
businesses are subject to extensive regulation and the cost of
compliance or failure to comply with such regulations may
adversely affect us.
Our businesses are heavily regulated by federal, state and local
governments in the countries in which our operations are
conducted. In addition, domestic and foreign federal, state and
local regulators may enact new laws and regulations that may
reduce our revenues, cause our expenses to increase
and/or
require us to modify substantially our business practices. If we
are not in substantial compliance with applicable laws and
regulations,
27
including, among others, franchising, timeshare, lending,
privacy, marketing and sales, telemarketing, licensing, labor,
employment, health care, health and safety, accessibility,
immigration, gaming, environmental, including climate change,
and regulations applicable under the Office of Foreign Asset
Control and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (and local
equivalents in international jurisdictions), we may be subject
to regulatory actions, fines, penalties and potential criminal
prosecution.
We are
dependent on our senior management.
We believe that our future growth depends, in part, on the
continued services of our senior management team. Losing the
services of any members of our senior management team could
adversely affect our strategic and customer relationships and
impede our ability to execute our business strategies.
Our
inability to adequately protect and maintain our intellectual
property could adversely affect our business.
Our inability to adequately protect and maintain our trademarks,
trade dress and other intellectual property rights could
adversely affect our business. We generate, maintain, utilize
and enforce a substantial portfolio of trademarks, trade dress
and other intellectual property that are fundamental to the
brands that we use in all of our businesses. There can be no
assurance that the steps we take to protect our intellectual
property will be adequate. Any event that materially damages the
reputation of one or more of our brands could have an adverse
impact on the value of that brand and subsequent revenues from
that brand. The value of any brand is influenced by a number of
factors, including consumer preference and perception and our
failure to ensure compliance with brand standards.
Disruptions
and other impairment of our information technologies and systems
could adversely affect our business.
Any disaster, disruption or other impairment in our technology
capabilities could harm our business. Our businesses depend upon
the use of sophisticated information technologies and systems,
including technology and systems utilized for reservation
systems, vacation exchange systems, hotel/property management,
communications, procurement, member record databases, call
centers, operation of our loyalty programs and administrative
systems. The operation, maintenance and updating of these
technologies and systems is dependent upon internal and
third-party technologies, systems and services for which there
is no assurance of uninterrupted availability or adequate
protection.
Failure
to maintain the security of personally identifiable information
could adversely affect us.
In connection with our business, we and our service providers
collect and retain significant volumes of personally
identifiable information, including credit card numbers of our
customers and other personally identifiable information of our
customers, stockholders and employees. Our customers,
stockholders and employees expect that we will adequately
protect their personal information, and the regulatory
environment surrounding information security and privacy is
increasingly demanding, both in the United States and other
jurisdictions in which we operate. A significant theft, loss or
fraudulent use of customer, stockholder, employee or Company
data by cybercrime or otherwise could adversely impact our
reputation and could result in significant costs, fines and
litigation.
The
market price of our shares may fluctuate.
The market price of our common stock may fluctuate depending
upon many factors, some of which may be beyond our control,
including: our quarterly or annual earnings or those of other
companies in our industry; actual or anticipated fluctuations in
our operating results due to seasonality and other factors
related to our business; changes in accounting principles or
rules; announcements by us or our competitors of significant
acquisitions or dispositions; the failure of securities analysts
to cover our common stock; changes in earnings estimates by
securities analysts or our ability to meet those estimates; the
operating and stock price performance of comparable companies;
overall market fluctuations; and general economic conditions.
Stock markets in general have experienced volatility that has
often been unrelated to the operating performance of a
particular company. These broad market fluctuations may
adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.
Your
percentage ownership in Wyndham Worldwide may be diluted in the
future.
Your percentage ownership in Wyndham Worldwide may be diluted in
the future because of equity awards that we expect will be
granted over time to our directors, officers and employees as
well as due to the exercise of options issued. In addition, our
Board may issue shares of our common and preferred stock, and
debt securities convertible into shares of our common and
preferred stock, up to certain regulatory thresholds without
shareholder approval.
28
Provisions
in our certificate of incorporation, by-laws and under Delaware
law may prevent or delay an acquisition of our Company, which
could impact the trading price of our common stock.
Our certificate of incorporation and by-laws, and Delaware law
contain provisions that are intended to deter coercive takeover
practices and inadequate takeover bids by making such practices
or bids unacceptably expensive and to encourage prospective
acquirors to negotiate with our Board rather than to attempt a
hostile takeover. These provisions include: a Board of Directors
that is divided into three classes with staggered terms;
elimination of the right of our stockholders to act by written
consent; rules regarding how stockholders may present proposals
or nominate directors for election at stockholder meetings; the
right of our Board to issue preferred stock without stockholder
approval; and limitations on the right of stockholders to remove
directors. Delaware law also imposes restrictions on mergers and
other business combinations between us and any holder of 15% or
more of our outstanding common stock.
We cannot
provide assurance that we will continue to pay
dividends.
There can be no assurance that we will have sufficient surplus
under Delaware law to be able to continue to pay dividends. This
may result from extraordinary cash expenses, actual expenses
exceeding contemplated costs, funding of capital expenditures,
increases in reserves or lack of available capital. Our Board of
Directors may also suspend the payment of dividends if the Board
deems such action to be in the best interests of the Company or
stockholders. If we do not pay dividends, the price of our
common stock must appreciate for you to realize a gain on your
investment in Wyndham Worldwide. This appreciation may not
occur, and our stock may in fact depreciate in value.
We are
responsible for certain of Cendants contingent and other
corporate liabilities.
Under the separation agreement and the tax sharing agreement
that we executed with Cendant (now Avis Budget Group) and former
Cendant units, Realogy and Travelport, we and Realogy generally
are responsible for 37.5% and 62.5%, respectively, of certain of
Cendants contingent and other corporate liabilities and
associated costs, including taxes imposed on Cendant and certain
other subsidiaries and certain contingent and other corporate
liabilities of Cendant
and/or its
subsidiaries to the extent incurred on or prior to
August 23, 2006, including liabilities relating to certain
of Cendants terminated or divested businesses, the
Travelport sale, the Cendant litigation described in this report
under Cendant Litigation, actions with respect to
the separation plan and payments under certain contracts that
were not allocated to any specific party in connection with the
separation. In addition, each of us, Cendant, and Realogy may be
responsible for 100% of certain of Cendants tax
liabilities that will provide the responsible party with a
future, offsetting tax benefit.
If any party responsible for the liabilities described above
were to default on its obligations, each non-defaulting party
(including Avis Budget) would be required to pay an equal
portion of the amounts in default. Accordingly, we could, under
certain circumstances, be obligated to pay amounts in excess of
our share of the assumed obligations related to such liabilities
including associated costs. On or about April 10, 2007,
Realogy Corporation was acquired by affiliates of Apollo
Management VI, L.P. and its stock is no longer publicly traded.
The acquisition does not negate Realogys obligation to
satisfy 62.5% of such contingent and other corporate liabilities
of Cendant or its subsidiaries pursuant to the terms of the
separation agreement. As a result of the acquisition, however,
Realogy has greater debt obligations and its ability to satisfy
its portion of these liabilities may be adversely impacted. In
accordance with the terms of the separation agreement, Realogy
posted a letter of credit in April 2007 for our and
Cendants benefit to cover its estimated share of the
assumed liabilities discussed above, although there can be no
assurance that such letter of credit will be sufficient to cover
Realogys actual obligations if and when they arise.
The IRS has commenced an audit of Cendants taxable years
2003 through 2006, during which we were included in
Cendants tax returns. Our recorded tax liabilities for
these tax years represent our current best estimates of the
probable outcome for certain tax positions taken by Cendant for
which we would be responsible under the tax sharing agreement.
The rules governing taxation are complex and subject to varying
interpretations. Therefore, our tax accruals reflect a series of
complex judgments about future events and rely heavily on
estimates and assumptions. While we believe that the estimates
and assumptions supporting our tax accruals are reasonable, tax
audits and any related litigation could result in tax
liabilities for us that are materially different than those
reflected in our historical income tax provisions and recorded
assets and liabilities. Further, there can be no assurance that
the IRS will not propose adjustments to the returns for which we
may be responsible under the tax sharing agreement or that any
such proposed adjustments would not be material. The result of
an audit or litigation could have a material adverse effect on
our income tax provision
and/or net
income in the period or periods to which such audit or
litigation relates
and/or cash
flows in the period or periods during which taxes due must be
paid.
29
We may be
required to write-off a portion of the remaining goodwill value
of companies we have acquired.
Under generally accepted accounting principles, we review our
intangible assets, including goodwill, for impairment at least
annually or when events or changes in circumstances indicate the
carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors that may be
considered a change in circumstances, indicating that the
carrying value of our goodwill or other intangible assets may
not be recoverable, include a sustained decline in our stock
price and market capitalization, reduced future cash flow
estimates, and slower growth rates in our industry. We may be
required to record a significant non-cash impairment charge in
our financial statements during the period in which any
impairment of our goodwill or other intangible assets is
determined, negatively impacting our results of operations and
stockholders equity.
|
|
ITEM 1B.
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
None.
Our corporate headquarters is located in a leased office at 22
Sylvan Way in Parsippany, New Jersey, which lease expires in
2024. We also lease another Parsippany-based office, which lease
expires in 2011. We have a leased office in Virginia Beach,
Virginia for our Employee Service Center, which lease expires in
2014.
Wyndham
Hotel Group
The main corporate operations of our lodging business shares
office space at a building leased by Corporate Services in
Parsippany, New Jersey. Our lodging business also leases space
for its reservations centers
and/or data
warehouses in Aberdeen, South Dakota; Phoenix, Arizona; and
Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada pursuant to leases that expire
in 2016, 2011, and 2013, respectively. In addition, our lodging
business leases office space in Hong Kong, China expiring in
2010; Beijing, China expiring in 2010, Shanghai, China expiring
in 2010, London, United Kingdom expiring in 2012; Dubai UAE,
expiring in 2012, Atlanta, Georgia expiring in 2015; Dallas,
Texas expiring in 2013; Mission Viejo, CA expiring in 2013; and
Rosemont, Illinois expiring in 2015. All leases that are due to
expire in 2010 are presently under review related to our ongoing
requirements.
Wyndham
Exchange and Rentals
Our vacation exchange and rental business has its main corporate
operations at a leased office in Parsippany, New Jersey, which
lease expires in 2011. Our vacation exchange business also owns
five properties located in the following cities: Carmel,
Indiana; Cork, Ireland; Kettering, United Kingdom; Mexico City,
Mexico; and Albufeira, Portugal. Our vacation exchange business
also has one other leased office located within the United
States pursuant to a lease that expires in 2014 and 27
additional leased spaces in various countries outside the United
States pursuant to leases that expire generally between 1 and
3 years except for 3 leases that expire between 2013 and
2020. Our vacation rentals business operations are managed
in one owned location (Earby, United Kingdom) and three main
leased locations pursuant to leases that expire in 2015, 2012,
and 2010, (Leidschendam, Netherlands; Dunfermline, United
Kingdom; and Hellerup, Denmark, respectively) as well as six
smaller owned offices and 42 smaller leased offices throughout
Europe. The vacation exchange and rentals business also occupies
space in London, United Kingdom pursuant to a lease that expires
in 2012.
Wyndham
Vacation Ownership
Our vacation ownership business has its main corporate
operations in Orlando, Florida pursuant to several leases, which
expire beginning 2012. Our vacation ownership business also owns
a contact center facility in Redmond, Washington as well as
leased space in Springfield, Missouri, Las Vegas, Nevada and
Orlando, Florida with various expiration dates for this same
function. Our vacation ownership business leases space for
administrative functions in Redmond, Washington expiring in
2013; various locations in Las Vegas, Nevada expiring between
2010 and 2017; and Margate, Florida expiring in 2010. In
addition, the vacation ownership business leases approximately
80 marketing and sales offices, of which approximately 71 are
throughout the United States with various expiration dates and 9
offices are in Australia expiring within approximately two
years. All leases that are due to expire in 2010 are presently
under review related to our ongoing requirements.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
Wyndham
Worldwide Litigation
We are involved in claims and legal actions arising in the
ordinary course of our business including but not limited to:
for our lodging business breach of contract, fraud
and bad faith claims between franchisors and franchisees in
connection with franchise agreements and with owners in
connection with management contracts, as
30
well as consumer protection claims, fraud and other statutory
claims and negligence claims asserted in connection with alleged
acts or occurrences at franchised or managed properties; for our
vacation exchange and rentals business breach of
contract claims by both affiliates and members in connection
with their respective agreements, bad faith, and consumer
protection, fraud and other statutory claims asserted by members
and negligence claims by guests for alleged injuries sustained
at resorts; for our vacation ownership business
breach of contract, bad faith, conflict of interest, fraud,
consumer protection claims and other statutory claims by
property owners associations, owners and prospective
owners in connection with the sale or use of vacation ownership
interests, land or the management of vacation ownership resorts,
construction defect claims relating to vacation ownership units
or resorts and negligence claims by guests for alleged injuries
sustained at vacation ownership units or resorts; and for each
of our businesses, bankruptcy proceedings involving efforts to
collect receivables from a debtor in bankruptcy, tax claims,
employment matters involving claims of discrimination,
harassment and wage and hour claims, claims of infringement upon
third parties intellectual property rights and
environmental claims.
Cendant
Litigation
Under the Separation Agreement, we agreed to be responsible for
37.5% of certain of Cendants contingent and other
corporate liabilities and associated costs, including certain
contingent litigation. Since the Separation, Cendant settled the
majority of the lawsuits pending on the date of the Separation.
The pending Cendant contingent litigation that we deem to be
material is further discussed in Note 16 to the
consolidated financial statements.
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
|
Not applicable.
PART II
|
|
ITEM 5.
|
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER AND
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Market
Price of Common Stock
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange
(NYSE) under the symbol WYN. At
January 31, 2010, the number of stockholders of record was
6,453. The following table sets forth the quarterly high and low
closing sales prices per share of WYN common stock as reported
by the NYSE for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
8.71
|
|
|
$
|
2.92
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
12.90
|
|
|
|
4.75
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
16.32
|
|
|
|
10.51
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
21.20
|
|
|
|
15.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
24.94
|
|
|
$
|
19.25
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
24.21
|
|
|
|
17.91
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
20.55
|
|
|
|
14.88
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
15.29
|
|
|
|
2.98
|
|
Dividend
Policy
During 2009, we paid a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share on
each share of Common Stock issued and outstanding on the record
date for the applicable dividend. During February 2010, our
Board of Directors authorized an increase of future quarterly
dividends to $0.12 per share beginning with the dividend that is
expected to be declared during the first quarter of 2010. Our
dividend payout ratio is now approximately 30% with a 2%
dividend yield. Our dividend policy for the future will be to at
least mirror the rate of growth of our business. The declaration
and payment of future dividends to holders of our common stock
will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will
depend upon many factors, including our financial condition,
earnings, capital requirements of our business, covenants
associated with certain debt obligations, legal requirements,
regulatory constraints, industry practice and other factors that
our Board deems relevant. There can be no assurance that a
payment of a dividend will or will not occur in the future.
31
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
On August 20, 2007, our Board of Directors authorized a
stock repurchase program that enables us to purchase up to
$200 million of our common stock. We suspended such program
during the third quarter of 2008. On February 10, 2010, we
announced our plan to resume repurchases of our common stock
under such program.
We currently have $158 million remaining availability in
our program, which includes proceeds received from stock option
exercises. Such repurchase capacity will continue to be
increased by proceeds received from future stock option
exercises. The amount and timing of specific repurchases are
subject to market conditions, applicable legal requirements and
other factors. Repurchases may be conducted in the open market
or in privately negotiated transactions.
Securities
Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans as of
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities remaining
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities
|
|
|
Weighted-average
|
|
|
available for future issuance under
|
|
|
|
|
to be issued upon exercise
|
|
|
exercise price of
|
|
|
equity compensation plans
|
|
|
|
|
of outstanding options,
|
|
|
outstanding options,
|
|
|
(excluding securities reflected in
|
|
|
|
|
warrants and rights
|
|
|
warrants and rights
|
|
|
the first column)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans
approved by security holders
|
|
|
17.8
million (a)
|
|
|
$31.20 (b)
|
|
|
|
13.2
million (c
|
)
|
|
Equity compensation plans not
approved by security holders
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Consists of shares issuable upon
exercise of outstanding stock options, stock settled stock
appreciation rights and restricted stock units under the 2006
Equity and Incentive Plan (amended and restated as of
May 12, 2009).
|
(b) |
|
Consists of weighted-average
exercise price of outstanding stock options and stock settled
stock appreciation rights.
|
(c) |
|
Consists of shares available for
future grants under the 2006 Equity and Incentive Plan, as
amended on May 12, 2009.
|
32
Stock
Performance Graph
The Stock Performance Graph is not deemed filed with the
Commission and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference
into any of our prior or future filings made with the
Commission.
The following line graph compares the cumulative total
stockholder return of our common stock against the S&P 500
Index, the S&P Hotels, Resorts & Cruise Lines
Index (consisting of Carnival plc, Marriott International Inc.,
Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. and Wyndham
Worldwide Corporation) and a peer group (consisting of Marriott
International Inc., Choice Hotels International, Inc. and
Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc.) for the
period from August 1, 2006 to December 31, 2009. The
graph assumes that $100 was invested on August 1, 2006 and
all dividends and other distributions were reinvested.
COMPARISON
OF 41 MONTH CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
Among Wyndham Worldwide Corporation, The S&P 500 Index,
The S&P Hotels, Resorts & Cruise Lines Index And A
Peer Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Total Return
|
|
|
|
8/06
|
|
|
12/06
|
|
|
12/07
|
|
|
12/08
|
|
|
12/09
|
|
|
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
100.53
|
|
|
$
|
74.17
|
|
|
$
|
20.96
|
|
|
$
|
65.80
|
|
S&P 500 Index
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
112.05
|
|
|
|
118.21
|
|
|
|
74.47
|
|
|
|
94.18
|
|
S&P Hotels, Resorts & Cruise Lines Index
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
126.79
|
|
|
|
111.05
|
|
|
|
57.61
|
|
|
|
89.79
|
|
Peer Group
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
125.49
|
|
|
|
91.19
|
|
|
|
50.45
|
|
|
|
77.82
|
|
33
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of or For The Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
3,750
|
|
|
$
|
4,281
|
|
|
$
|
4,360
|
|
|
$
|
3,842
|
|
|
$
|
3,471
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating and
other (a)
|
|
|
2,916
|
|
|
|
3,422
|
|
|
|
3,468
|
|
|
|
3,018
|
|
|
|
2,720
|
|
Goodwill and other impairments
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
1,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Separation and related costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income/(loss)
|
|
|
594
|
|
|
|
(830
|
)
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
620
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
493
|
|
|
|
(887
|
)
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
626
|
|
Provision for income
taxes (b)
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
(1,074
|
)
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
431
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
293
|
|
|
$
|
(1,074
|
)
|
|
$
|
403
|
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
$
|
431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings/(Losses) per
Share (c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
$
|
1.64
|
|
|
$
|
(6.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
|
|
$
|
1.78
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
1.64
|
|
|
$
|
(6.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
$
|
1.61
|
|
|
$
|
(6.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.20
|
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
1.61
|
|
|
$
|
(6.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.20
|
|
|
$
|
1.44
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized
assets (d)
|
|
$
|
2,755
|
|
|
$
|
2,929
|
|
|
$
|
2,608
|
|
|
$
|
1,841
|
|
|
$
|
1,496
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
9,352
|
|
|
|
9,573
|
|
|
|
10,459
|
|
|
|
9,520
|
|
|
|
9,167
|
|
Securitized
debt (e)
|
|
|
1,507
|
|
|
|
1,810
|
|
|
|
2,081
|
|
|
|
1,463
|
|
|
|
1,135
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
2,015
|
|
|
|
1,984
|
|
|
|
1,526
|
|
|
|
1,437
|
|
|
|
907
|
|
Total stockholders/ invested
equity (f)
|
|
|
2,688
|
|
|
|
2,342
|
|
|
|
3,516
|
|
|
|
3,559
|
|
|
|
5,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Statistics:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging (g)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
rooms (h)
|
|
|
597,700
|
|
|
|
592,900
|
|
|
|
550,600
|
|
|
|
543,200
|
|
|
|
532,700
|
|
RevPAR (i)
|
|
$
|
30.34
|
|
|
$
|
35.74
|
|
|
$
|
36.48
|
|
|
$
|
34.95
|
|
|
$
|
31.00
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of members (in
000s) (j)
|
|
|
3,782
|
|
|
|
3,670
|
|
|
|
3,526
|
|
|
|
3,356
|
|
|
|
3,209
|
|
Annual dues and exchange revenues per
member (k)
|
|
$
|
120.22
|
|
|
$
|
128.37
|
|
|
$
|
135.85
|
|
|
$
|
135.62
|
|
|
$
|
135.76
|
|
Vacation rental transactions (in
000s) (l)
|
|
|
1,356
|
|
|
|
1,347
|
|
|
|
1,376
|
|
|
|
1,344
|
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
Average net price per vacation
rental (m)
|
|
$
|
423.04
|
|
|
$
|
463.10
|
|
|
$
|
422.83
|
|
|
$
|
370.93
|
|
|
$
|
359.27
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Vacation Ownership Interest (VOI) sales (in
000s) (n)
|
|
$
|
1,315,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,987,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,993,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,743,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,396,000
|
|
Tours (o)
|
|
|
617,000
|
|
|
|
1,143,000
|
|
|
|
1,144,000
|
|
|
|
1,046,000
|
|
|
|
934,000
|
|
Volume Per Guest
(VPG) (p)
|
|
$
|
1,964
|
|
|
$
|
1,602
|
|
|
$
|
1,606
|
|
|
$
|
1,486
|
|
|
$
|
1,368
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes operating, cost of
vacation ownership interests, consumer financing interest,
marketing and reservation and general and administrative
expenses. During 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006, general and
administrative expenses include $6 million of a net
expense, and $18 million, $46 million and
$32 million of a net benefit from the resolution of and
adjustment to certain contingent liabilities and assets
($6 million, $6 million, $26 million and
$30 million, net of tax), respectively. During 2008,
general and administrative expenses include charges of
$24 million ($24 million, net of tax) due to currency
conversion losses related to the transfer of cash from our
Venezuelan operations at our vacation exchange and rentals
business.
|
(b) |
|
The difference in our 2008
effective tax rate is primarily due to (i) the
non-deductibility of the goodwill impairment charge recorded
during 2008, (ii) charges in a tax-free zone resulting from
currency conversion losses related to the transfer of cash from
our Venezuelan operations at our vacation exchange and rentals
business and (iii) a non-cash impairment charge related to
the write-off of an investment in a non-performing joint venture
at our vacation exchange and rentals business. See
Note 7 Income Taxes for a detailed
reconciliation of our effective tax rate.
|
(c) |
|
This calculation is based on basic
and diluted weighted average shares of 179 million and
182 million, respectively, during 2009, 178 million
during 2008 and 181 million and 183 million,
respectively, during 2007. For all periods prior to our date of
Separation (July 31, 2006), weighted average shares were
calculated as one share of Wyndham common stock outstanding for
every five shares of Cendant common stock outstanding as of
July 21, 2006, the record date for the distribution of
Wyndham common stock. As such, during 2006, this calculation is
based on basic and diluted weighted average shares of
198 million and 199 million, respectively. During
2005, this calculation is based on basic and diluted weighted
average shares of 200 million.
|
(d) |
|
Represents the portion of gross
vacation ownership contract receivables, securitization
restricted cash and related assets that collateralize our
securitized debt. Refer to Note 8 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements for further information.
|
(e) |
|
Represents debt that is securitized
through bankruptcy-remote special purpose entities, the
creditors of which have no recourse to us.
|
(f) |
|
Represents Wyndham Worldwides
stand-alone stockholders equity since August 1, 2006
and Cendants invested equity (capital contributions and
earnings from operations less dividends) in Wyndham Worldwide
and accumulated other comprehensive income for 2005 through
July 31, 2006, our date of Separation.
|
34
|
|
|
(g) |
|
Wyndham Hotels and Resorts was
acquired on October 11, 2005, Baymont Inn &
Suites was acquired on April 7, 2006 and U.S. Franchise
Systems, Inc. and its Microtel Inns & Suites and
Hawthorn Suites hotel brands were acquired on July 18,
2008. The results of operations of these businesses have been
included from their acquisition dates forward.
|
(h) |
|
Represents the number of rooms at
lodging properties at the end of the year which are either
(i) under franchise and/or management agreements,
(ii) properties affiliated with the Wyndham Hotels and
Resorts brand for which we receive a fee for reservation and/or
other services provided and (iii) properties managed under
a joint venture. The amounts in 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006
include 3,549, 4,175, 6,856 and 4,993 affiliated rooms,
respectively.
|
(i) |
|
Represents revenue per available
room and is calculated by multiplying the percentage of
available rooms occupied for the year by the average rate
charged for renting a lodging room for one day.
|
(j) |
|
Represents members in our vacation
exchange programs who pay annual membership dues. For additional
fees, such members are entitled to exchange intervals for
intervals at other properties affiliated with our vacation
exchange business. In addition, certain members may exchange
intervals for other leisure-related products and services.
|
(k) |
|
Represents total revenues from
annual membership dues and exchange fees generated during the
year divided by the average number of vacation exchange members
during the year.
|
(l) |
|
Represents the number of
transactions that are generated in connection with customers
booking their vacation rental stays through us. In our European
vacation rentals businesses, one rental transaction is recorded
each time a standard one-week rental is booked; however, in the
United States one rental transaction is recorded each time a
vacation rental stay is booked, regardless of whether it is less
than or more than one week.
|
(m) |
|
Represents the net rental price
generated from renting vacation properties to customers divided
by the number of rental transactions.
|
(n) |
|
Represents gross sales of VOIs
(including tele-sales upgrades, which are a component of upgrade
sales) before deferred sales and loan loss provisions.
|
(o) |
|
Represents the number of tours
taken by guests in our efforts to sell VOIs.
|
(p) |
|
Represents revenue per guest and is
calculated by dividing the gross VOI sales, excluding tele-sales
upgrades, which are a component of upgrade sales, by the number
of tours.
|
In presenting the financial data above in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles, we are required to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported.
See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Financial
Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources Critical
Accounting Policies, for a detailed discussion of the
accounting policies that we believe require subjective and
complex judgments that could potentially affect reported results.
Acquisitions
(2005 2009)
Between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2009, we
completed the following acquisitions, the results of operations
and financial position of which have been included beginning
from the relevant acquisition dates:
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Franchise Systems, Inc. and its Microtel
Inns & Suites and Hawthorn Suites hotel brands (July
2008)
|
|
|
Baymont Inn & Suites brand (April 2006)
|
|
|
Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand (October 2005)
|
See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a
more detailed discussion of the acquisitions completed since
January 1, 2007.
Charges
During 2009, we recorded (i) a charge of $9 million
($7 million, net of tax) to reduce the value of certain
vacation ownership properties and related assets held for sale
that are no longer consistent with the Companys
development plans and (ii) a charge of $6 million
($3 million, net of tax) to reduce the value of an
underperforming joint venture in our hotel management business.
During 2008, we committed to various strategic realignment
initiatives targeted principally at reducing costs, enhancing
organizational efficiency, reducing our need to access the
asset-backed securities market and consolidating and
rationalizing existing processes and facilities. As a result, we
recorded $47 million ($29 million, net of tax) and
$79 million ($49 million, net of tax) of restructuring
costs during 2009 and 2008, respectively, of which
$88 million has been or is expected to be paid in cash.
During 2008, we recorded a charge of $1,342 million
($1,337 million, net of tax) to impair goodwill related to
plans announced during the fourth quarter of 2008 to reduce our
VOI sales pace and associated size of our vacation ownership
business. In addition, during 2008, we recorded charges of
(i) $84 million ($58 million, net of tax) to
reduce the carrying value of certain long-lived assets based on
their revised estimated fair values and
(ii) $24 million ($24 million, net of tax) due to
currency conversion losses related to the transfer of cash from
our Venezuelan operations at our vacation exchange and rentals
business.
See Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
further details on such charges.
During 2006, we recorded a non-cash charge of $65 million,
net of tax, to reflect the cumulative effect of accounting
changes as a result of our adoption of the real estate
time-sharing transactions guidance.
35
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
BUSINESS
AND OVERVIEW
We are a global provider of hospitality products and services
and operate our business in the following three segments:
|
|
|
|
|
Lodgingfranchises hotels in the upscale,
midscale, economy and extended stay segments of the lodging
industry and provides hotel management services for full-service
hotels globally.
|
|
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentalsprovides
vacation exchange products and services to owners of intervals
of vacation ownership interests (VOIs) and markets
vacation rental properties primarily on behalf of independent
owners.
|
|
|
|
Vacation Ownershipdevelops, markets and
sells VOIs to individual consumers, provides consumer financing
in connection with the sale of VOIs and provides property
management services at resorts.
|
Separation
from Cendant
On July 31, 2006, Cendant Corporation, currently known as
Avis Budget Group, Inc. (or former Parent),
distributed all of the shares of Wyndham common stock to the
holders of Cendant common stock issued and outstanding on
July 21, 2006, the record date for the distribution. On
August 1, 2006, we commenced regular way
trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
WYN.
Before our separation from Cendant, we entered into separation,
transition services and several other agreements with Cendant,
Realogy and Travelport to effect the separation and
distribution, govern the relationships among the parties after
the separation and allocate among the parties Cendants
assets, liabilities and obligations attributable to periods
prior to the separation. Under the Separation and Distribution
Agreement, we assumed 37.5% of certain contingent and other
corporate liabilities of Cendant or its subsidiaries which were
not primarily related to our business or the businesses of
Realogy, Travelport or Avis Budget Group, and Realogy assumed
62.5% of these contingent and other corporate liabilities. These
include liabilities relating to Cendants terminated or
divested businesses, the Travelport sale on August 22,
2006, taxes of Travelport for taxable periods through the date
of the Travelport sale, certain litigation matters, generally
any actions relating to the separation plan and payments under
certain contracts that were not allocated to any specific party
in connection with the separation.
As a result of the sale of Realogy on April 10, 2007,
Realogys senior debt credit rating was downgraded to below
investment grade. Under the Separation Agreement, if Realogy
experienced such a change of control and suffered such a ratings
downgrade, it was required to post a letter of credit in an
amount acceptable to us and Avis Budget Group to satisfy the
fair value of Realogys indemnification obligations for the
Cendant legacy contingent liabilities in the event Realogy does
not otherwise satisfy such obligations to the extent they become
due. On April 26, 2007, Realogy posted a $500 million
irrevocable standby letter of credit from a major commercial
bank in favor of Avis Budget Group and upon which demand may be
made if Realogy does not otherwise satisfy its obligations for
its share of the Cendant legacy contingent liabilities. The
letter of credit can be adjusted from time to time based upon
the outstanding contingent liabilities and has an expiration
date of September 2013, subject to renewal and certain
provisions. As such, on August 11, 2009, the letter of
credit was reduced to $446 million. The issuance of this
letter of credit does not relieve or limit Realogys
obligations for these liabilities.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Lodging
Our franchising business is designed to generate revenues for
our hotel owners through the delivery of room night bookings to
the hotel, the promotion of brand awareness among the consumer
base, global sales efforts, ensuring guest satisfaction and
providing outstanding customer service to both our customers and
guests staying at hotels in our system.
We enter into agreements to franchise our lodging brands to
independent hotel owners. Our standard franchise agreement
typically has a term of 15 to 20 years and provides a
franchisee with certain rights to terminate the franchise
agreement before the term of the agreement under certain
circumstances. The principal source of revenues from franchising
hotels is ongoing franchise fees, which are comprised of royalty
fees and other fees relating to marketing and reservation
services. Ongoing franchise fees typically are based on a
percentage of gross room revenues of each franchised hotel and
are recorded upon becoming due from the franchisee. An estimate
of uncollectible ongoing franchise fees is charged to bad debt
expense and included in operating expenses on the Consolidated
Statements of Operations. Lodging revenues also include initial
franchise fees, which are recognized as revenues when all
material services or conditions have been substantially
performed, which is either when a
36
franchised hotel opens for business or when a franchise
agreement is terminated after it has been determined that the
franchised hotel will not open.
Our franchise agreements also require the payment of fees for
certain services, including marketing and reservations. With
such fees, we provide our franchised properties with a suite of
operational and administrative services, including access to
(i) an international, centralized, brand-specific
reservations system; (ii) third-party distribution
channels, such as online travel agents; (iii) advertising;
(iv) our loyalty program; (v) global sales support;
(vi) operations support; (vii) training;
(viii) strategic sourcing; and (ix) design and
construction services. We are contractually obligated to expend
the marketing and reservation fees we collect from franchisees
in accordance with the franchise agreements; as such, revenues
earned in excess of costs incurred are accrued as a liability
for future marketing or reservation costs. Costs incurred in
excess of revenues are expensed as incurred. In accordance with
our franchise agreements, we include an allocation of costs
required to carry out marketing and reservation activities
within marketing and reservation expenses.
We also provide management services for hotels under management
contracts, which offer all the benefits of a global brand and a
full range of management, marketing and reservation services. In
addition to the standard franchise services described below, our
hotel management business provides hotel owners with
professional oversight and comprehensive operations support
services such as hiring, training and supervising the managers
and employees that operate the hotels as well as annual budget
preparation, financial analysis and extensive food and beverage
services. Our standard management agreement typically has a term
of up to 20 years. Our management fees are comprised of
base fees, which are typically calculated, based upon a
specified percentage of gross revenues from hotel operations,
and incentive fees, which are typically calculated based upon a
specified percentage of a hotels gross operating profit.
Management fee revenues are recognized when earned in accordance
with the terms of the contract. We incur certain reimbursable
costs on behalf of managed hotel properties and reports
reimbursements received from managed properties as revenues and
the costs incurred on their behalf as expenses. Management fee
revenues are recorded as a component of franchise fee revenues
and reimbursable revenues are recorded as a component of service
fees and membership revenues on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations. The costs, which principally relate to payroll costs
for operational employees who work at the managed hotels, are
reflected as a component of operating expenses on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations. The reimbursements from
hotel owners are based upon the costs incurred with no added
margin; as a result, these reimbursable costs have little to no
effect on our operating income. Management fee revenues and
revenues related to payroll reimbursements were $4 million
and $85 million, respectively, during 2009, $5 million
and $100 million, respectively, during 2008 and
$6 million and $92 million, respectively, during 2007.
We also earn revenues from administering the Wyndham Rewards
loyalty program. We charge our franchisee/managed hotel owner a
fee based upon a percentage of room revenues generated from
member stays at participating hotels. This fee is recorded upon
becoming due from the franchisee.
Within our Lodging segment, we measure operating performance
using the following key operating statistics: (i) number of
rooms, which represents the number of rooms at lodging
properties at the end of the year and (ii) revenue per
available room (RevPAR), which is calculated by multiplying the
percentage of available rooms occupied during the year by the
average rate charged for renting a lodging room for one day.
Vacation
Exchange and Rentals
As a provider of vacation exchange services, we enter into
affiliation agreements with developers of vacation ownership
properties to allow owners of intervals to trade their intervals
for certain other intervals within our vacation exchange
business and, for some members, for other leisure-related
products and services. Additionally, as a marketer of vacation
rental properties, generally we enter into contracts for
exclusive periods of time with property owners to market the
rental of such properties to rental customers. Our vacation
exchange business derives a majority of its revenues from annual
membership dues and exchange fees from members trading their
intervals. Annual dues revenues represents the annual membership
fees from members who participate in our vacation exchange
business and, for additional fees, have the right to exchange
their intervals for certain other intervals within our vacation
exchange business and, for certain members, for other
leisure-related products and services. We recognize revenues
from annual membership dues on a straight-line basis over the
membership period during which delivery of publications, if
applicable, and other services are provided to the members.
Exchange fees are generated when members exchange their
intervals for equivalent values of rights and services, which
may include intervals at other properties within our vacation
exchange business or other leisure-related products and
services. Exchange fees are recognized as revenues, net of
expected cancellations, when the exchange requests have been
confirmed to the member. Our vacation rentals business primarily
derives its revenues from fees, which generally average between
20% and 45% of the gross booking fees for non-proprietary
inventory, except for where we receive 100% of the revenues for
properties that we own or operate under long-term capital
leases. The majority of the time, we act on behalf of the owners
of the rental properties to generate our fees. We provide
reservation services to the independent
37
property owners and receive the
agreed-upon
fee for the service provided. We remit the gross rental fee
received from the renter to the independent property owner, net
of our
agreed-upon
fee. Revenues from such fees are recognized in the period that
the rental reservation is made, net of expected cancellations.
Cancellations for 2009, 2008 and 2007 each totaled less than 5%
of rental transactions booked. Upon confirmation of the rental
reservation, the rental customer and property owner generally
have a direct relationship for additional services to be
performed. We also earn rental fees in connection with
properties we own or operate under long-term capital leases and
such fees are recognized when the rental customers stay
occurs, as this is the point at which the service is rendered.
Our revenues are earned when evidence of an arrangement exists,
delivery has occurred or the services have been rendered, the
sellers price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and
collectibility is reasonably assured.
Within our Vacation Exchange and Rentals segment, we measure
operating performance using the following key operating
statistics: (i) average number of vacation exchange
members, which represents members in our vacation exchange
programs who pay annual membership dues and are entitled, for
additional fees, to exchange their intervals for intervals at
other properties affiliated within our vacation exchange
business and, for certain members, for other leisure-related
products and services; (ii) annual membership dues and
exchange revenue per member, which represents the total annual
dues and exchange fees generated for the year divided by the
average number of vacation exchange members during the year;
(iii) vacation rental transactions, which represents the
number of transactions that are generated in connection with
customers booking their vacation rental stays through us; and
(iv) average net price per vacation rental, which
represents the net rental price generated from renting vacation
properties to customers divided by the number of rental
transactions.
Vacation
Ownership
We develop, market and sell VOIs to individual consumers,
provide property management services at resorts and provide
consumer financing in connection with the sale of VOIs. Our
vacation ownership business derives the majority of its revenues
from sales of VOIs and derives other revenues from consumer
financing and property management. Our sales of VOIs are either
cash sales or seller-financed sales. In order for us to
recognize revenues from VOI sales under the full accrual method
of accounting described in the guidance for sales of real estate
for fully constructed inventory, a binding sales contract must
have been executed, the statutory rescission period must have
expired (after which time the purchasers are not entitled to a
refund except for non-delivery by us), receivables must have
been deemed collectible and the remainder of our obligations
must have been substantially completed. In addition, before we
recognize any revenues from VOI sales, the purchaser of the VOI
must have met the initial investment criteria and, as
applicable, the continuing investment criteria, by executing a
legally binding financing contract. A purchaser has met the
initial investment criteria when a minimum down payment of 10%
is received by us. In accordance with the guidance for
accounting for real estate time-sharing transactions, we must
also take into consideration the fair value of certain
incentives provided to the purchaser when assessing the adequacy
of the purchasers initial investment. In those cases where
financing is provided to the purchaser by us, the purchaser is
obligated to remit monthly payments under financing contracts
that represent the purchasers continuing investment. If
all of the criteria for a VOI sale to qualify under the full
accrual method of accounting have been met, as discussed above,
except that construction of the VOI purchased is not complete,
we recognize revenues using the
percentage-of-completion
method of accounting provided that the preliminary construction
phase is complete and that a minimum sales level has been met
(to assure that the property will not revert to a rental
property). The preliminary stage of development is deemed to be
complete when the engineering and design work is complete, the
construction contracts have been executed, the site has been
cleared, prepared and excavated, and the building foundation is
complete. The completion percentage is determined by the
proportion of real estate inventory costs incurred to total
estimated costs. These estimated costs are based upon historical
experience and the related contractual terms. The remaining
revenues and related costs of sales, including commissions and
direct expenses, are deferred and recognized as the remaining
costs are incurred.
We also offer consumer financing as an option to customers
purchasing VOIs, which are typically collateralized by the
underlying VOI. The contractual terms of seller-provided
financing agreements require that the contractual level of
annual principal payments be sufficient to amortize the loan
over a customary period for the VOI being financed, which is
generally ten years, and payments under the financing contracts
begin within 45 days of the sale and receipt of the minimum
down payment of 10%. An estimate of uncollectible amounts is
recorded at the time of the sale with a charge to the provision
for loan losses, which is classified as a reduction of vacation
ownership interest sales on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations. The interest income earned from the financing
arrangements is earned on the principal balance outstanding over
the life of the arrangement and is recorded within consumer
financing on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
We also provide
day-to-day-management
services, including oversight of housekeeping services,
maintenance and certain accounting and administrative services
for property owners associations and clubs. In some cases,
our employees serve as officers
and/or
directors of these associations and clubs in accordance with
their by-laws and associated regulations. Management fee
revenues are recognized when earned in accordance with the terms
of the
38
contract and is recorded as a component of service fees and
membership on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The
costs, which principally relate to the payroll costs for
management of the associations, clubs and the resort properties
where we are the employer, are reflected as a component of
operating expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Reimbursements are based upon the costs incurred with no added
margin and thus presentation of these reimbursable costs has
little to no effect on our operating income. Management fee
revenues and revenues related to reimbursements were
$170 million and $206 million, respectively, during
2009, $159 million and $187 million, respectively,
during 2008 and $146 million and $164 million,
respectively, during 2007. During 2009, 2008 and 2007, one of
the associations that we manage paid Wyndham Exchange and
Rentals $19 million, $17 million and $15 million,
respectively, for exchange services.
During 2009, 2008 and 2007, gross sales of VOIs were increased
by $187 million and reduced by $75 million and
$22 million, respectively, representing the net change in
revenues that was deferred under the percentage of completion
method of accounting. Under the percentage of completion method
of accounting, a portion of the total revenues from a vacation
ownership contract sale is not recognized if the construction of
the vacation resort has not yet been fully completed. Such
deferred revenues were recognized in subsequent periods in
proportion to the costs incurred as compared to the total
expected costs for completion of construction of the vacation
resort. As of December 31, 2009, all revenues that were
previously deferred under the percentage of completion method of
accounting had been recognized.
Within our Vacation Ownership segment, we measure operating
performance using the following key metrics: (i) gross VOI
sales (including tele-sales upgrades, which are a component of
upgrade sales) before deferred sales and loan loss provisions;
(ii) tours, which represents the number of tours taken by
guests in our efforts to sell VOIs; and (iii) volume per
guest, or VPG, which represents revenue per guest and is
calculated by dividing the gross VOI sales, excluding tele-sales
upgrades, which are a component of upgrade sales, by the number
of tours.
Other
Items
We record lodging-related marketing and reservation revenues,
Wyndham Rewards revenues, as well as hotel/property management
services revenues for both our Lodging and Vacation Ownership
segments, in accordance with guidance for reporting revenues
gross as a principal versus net as an agent, which requires that
these revenues be recorded on a gross basis.
Discussed below are our consolidated results of operations and
the results of operations for each of our reportable segments.
The reportable segments presented below represent our operating
segments for which separate financial information is available
and which is utilized on a regular basis by our chief operating
decision maker to assess performance and to allocate resources.
In identifying our reportable segments, we also consider the
nature of services provided by our operating segments.
Management evaluates the operating results of each of our
reportable segments based upon revenues and EBITDA,
which is defined as net income/(loss) before depreciation and
amortization, interest expense (excluding consumer financing
interest), interest income (excluding consumer financing
interest) and income taxes, each of which is presented on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations. We believe that EBITDA is
a useful measure of performance for our industry segments which,
when considered with GAAP measures, gives a more complete
understanding of our operating performance. Our presentation of
EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly-titled measures used
by other companies.
OPERATING
STATISTICS
The following table presents our operating statistics for the
years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. See Results of
Operations section for a discussion as to how these operating
statistics affected our business for the periods presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
rooms (a)
|
|
|
597,700
|
|
|
|
592,900
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
RevPAR (b)
|
|
$
|
30.34
|
|
|
$
|
35.74
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of members
(000s) (c)
|
|
|
3,782
|
|
|
|
3,670
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Annual dues and exchange revenues per
member (d)
|
|
$
|
120.22
|
|
|
$
|
128.37
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Vacation rental transactions (in
000s) (e)
|
|
|
1,356
|
|
|
|
1,347
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Average net price per vacation
rental (f)
|
|
$
|
423.04
|
|
|
$
|
463.10
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross VOI sales (in
000s) (g)
|
|
$
|
1,315,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,987,000
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
Tours (h)
|
|
|
617,000
|
|
|
|
1,143,000
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
Volume Per Guest
(VPG) (i)
|
|
$
|
1,964
|
|
|
$
|
1,602
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents the number of rooms at
lodging properties at the end of the period which are either
(i) under franchise and/or management agreements,
(ii) properties affiliated with Wyndham Hotels and Resorts
brand for which we receive a fee for reservation and/or other
services provided and (iii) properties managed under a
joint venture. The amounts in 2009 and 2008 include 3,549 and
4,175 affiliated rooms, respectively.
|
(b) |
|
Represents revenue per available
room and is calculated by multiplying the percentage of
available rooms occupied during the period by the average rate
charged for renting a lodging room for one day.
|
(c) |
|
Represents members in our vacation
exchange programs who pay annual membership dues. For additional
fees, such participants are entitled to exchange intervals for
intervals at other properties affiliated with our vacation
exchange business. In addition, certain participants may
exchange intervals for other leisure-related products and
services.
|
(d) |
|
Represents total revenue from
annual membership dues and exchange fees generated for the
period divided by the average number of vacation exchange
members during the period. Excluding the impact of foreign
exchange movements, annual dues and exchange revenues per member
decreased 3%.
|
(e) |
|
Represents the number of
transactions that are generated in connection with customers
booking their vacation rental stays through us. In our European
vacation rentals businesses, one rental transaction is recorded
each time a standard one-week rental is booked; however, in the
United States, one rental transaction is recorded each time a
vacation rental stay is booked, regardless of whether it is less
than or more than one week.
|
(f) |
|
Represents the net rental price
generated from renting vacation properties to customers divided
by the number of rental transactions. Excluding the impact of
foreign exchange movements the average net price per vacation
rental increased 1%.
|
(g) |
|
Represents gross sales of VOIs
(including tele-sales upgrades, which are a component of upgrade
sales) before deferred sales and loan loss provisions.
|
(h) |
|
Represents the number of tours
taken by guests in our efforts to sell VOIs.
|
(i) |
|
Represents gross VOI sales
(excluding tele-sales upgrades, which are a component of upgrade
sales) divided by the number of tours.
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2009 vs. Year Ended December 31,
2008
Our consolidated results comprised the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
3,750
|
|
|
$
|
4,281
|
|
|
$
|
(531
|
)
|
Expenses
|
|
|
3,156
|
|
|
|
5,111
|
|
|
|
(1,955
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income/(loss)
|
|
|
594
|
|
|
|
(830
|
)
|
|
|
1,424
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
493
|
|
|
|
(887
|
)
|
|
|
1,380
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
293
|
|
|
$
|
(1,074
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2009, our net revenues decreased $531 million (12%)
principally due to:
|
|
|
a $672 million decrease in gross sales of VOIs at our
vacation ownership businesses reflecting the planned reduction
in tour flow, partially offset by an increase in VPG;
|
|
|
a $93 million decrease in net revenues in our lodging
business primarily due to global RevPAR weakness and a decline
in reimbursable revenues and other franchise fees, partially
offset by incremental revenues contributed from the acquisition
of U.S. Franchise Systems, Inc. (USFS);
|
|
|
a $50 million decrease in net revenues from rental
transactions at our vacation exchange and rentals business due
to a decrease in the average net price per rental, including a
$60 million unfavorable impact of foreign exchange
movements;
|
|
|
a $41 million decrease in ancillary revenues at our
vacation exchange and rentals business from various sources,
including the impact from our termination of a low margin travel
service contract and a $4 million unfavorable impact of
foreign exchange movements; and
|
|
|
a $16 million decrease in annual dues and exchange revenues
due to a decline in exchange revenue per member, including a
$17 million unfavorable impact of foreign exchange
movements, partially offset by growth in the average number of
members.
|
Such decreases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
a net increase of $262 million in the recognition of
revenues previously deferred under the
percentage-of-completion
method of accounting at our vacation ownership business;
|
|
|
a $37 million increase in ancillary revenues at our
vacation ownership business primarily associated with the usage
of bonus points/credits, which are provided as purchase
incentives on VOI sales, partially offset by a decline in fees
generated from other non-core businesses;
|
|
|
$30 million of incremental property management fees within
our vacation ownership business primarily as a result of rate
increases and growth in the number of units under
management; and
|
40
|
|
|
a $9 million increase in consumer financing revenues earned
on vacation ownership contract receivables due primarily to
higher weighted average interest rates earned on our contract
receivable portfolio.
|
Total expenses decreased $1,955 million (38%) principally
reflecting:
|
|
|
the absence of a non-cash charge of $1,342 million for the
impairment of goodwill at our vacation ownership business to
reflect reduced future cash flow estimates based on the expected
reduced sales pace;
|
|
|
a $272 million decrease in marketing and reservation
expenses at our vacation ownership business ($217 million)
resulting from the reduced sales pace and our lodging business
($55 million) resulting from lower marketing and related
spend across our brands as a result of a decline in related
marketing fees received;
|
|
|
$207 million of lower employee related expenses at our
vacation ownership business primarily due to lower sales
commission and administration costs;
|
|
|
$150 million of decreased cost of VOI sales due to the
expected decline in VOI sales;
|
|
|
the absence of $84 million of non-cash impairment charges
recorded across our three businesses during 2008;
|
|
|
the favorable impact of foreign currency translation on expenses
at our vacation exchange and rentals business of
$58 million;
|
|
|
$51 million in cost savings primarily from overhead
reductions and benefits related to organizational realignment
initiatives at our vacation exchange and rentals business;
|
|
|
a decrease of $32 million of costs due to organizational
realignment initiatives primarily at our vacation ownership
business (see Restructuring Plan for more details);
|
|
|
the absence of a $24 million charge due to currency
conversion losses related to the transfer of cash from our
Venezuelan operations at our vacation exchange and rentals
business recorded during 2008;
|
|
|
$15 million of decreased payroll costs paid on behalf of
hotel owners in our lodging business; and
|
|
|
$9 million of lower volume-related expenses at our vacation
exchange and rentals business.
|
These decreases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
a net increase of $101 million of expenses related to the
recognition of revenues previously deferred at our vacation
ownership business, as discussed above;
|
|
|
$69 million of increased costs at our vacation ownership
business associated with maintenance fees on unsold inventory,
our trial membership marketing program, sales incentives awarded
to owners and increased litigation settlement reserves;
|
|
|
$29 million of losses from foreign exchange transactions
and the unfavorable impact from foreign exchange hedging
contracts at our vacation exchange and rentals business;
|
|
|
$26 million of incremental expenses at our lodging business
related to bad debt expense, remediation efforts on technology
compliance initiatives and our acquisition of USFS;
|
|
|
a $24 million unfavorable impact from the resolution of and
adjustment to certain contingent liabilities and assets recorded
during 2009 as compared to 2008;
|
|
|
$19 million of higher corporate costs primarily related to
employee incentive programs, severance, hedging activity and
additional rent associated with the consolidation of two leased
facilities into one, partially offset by cost savings
initiatives;
|
|
|
non-cash charges of $15 million at our vacation ownership
and lodging businesses to reduce the carrying value of certain
assets based on their revised estimated fair values;
|
|
|
$8 million of incremental costs at our vacation exchange
and rentals business related to marketing, IT and facility
operations;
|
|
|
an $8 million increase in consumer financing interest
expenses primarily related to an increase in interest rates,
partially offset by decreased average borrowings on our
securitized debt facilities; and
|
|
|
$6 million of incremental property management expenses at
our vacation ownership business associated with the growth in
the number of units under management, partially offset by cost
containment initiatives implemented during 2009.
|
Other income, net decreased $5 million primarily as a
result of a decline in net earnings from equity investments, the
absence of income associated with the assumption of a
lodging-related credit card marketing program obligation by a
third party and the absence of income associated with the sale
of a non-strategic asset at
41
our lodging business, partially offset by higher gains
associated with the sale of non-strategic assets at our vacation
ownership business. Such amounts are included within our segment
EBITDA results. Interest expense increased $34 million
during 2009 as compared to 2008 primarily due to an increase in
interest incurred on our long-term debt facilities resulting
from our May 2009 debt issuances (see Note 13
Long-Term Debt and Borrowing Arrangements) and lower capitalized
interest at our vacation ownership business due to lower
development of vacation ownership inventory. Interest income
decreased $5 million during 2009 compared to 2008 due to
decreased interest earned on invested cash balances as a result
of lower rates earned on investments. The difference between our
2009 effective tax rate of 40.6% and 2008 effective tax rate of
(21.1%) is primarily due to the absence of impairment charges
recorded during 2008, a charge recorded during 2009 for the
reduction of deferred tax assets and the origination of deferred
tax liabilities in a foreign tax jurisdiction and the write-off
of deferred tax assets that were associated with stock-based
compensation, which were in excess of our pool of excess tax
benefits available to absorb tax deficiencies. We expect our
effective tax rate for 2010 to be approximately 38%. See
Note 7-
Income Taxes for a detailed reconciliation of our effective tax
rate.
As a result of these items, our net income increased
$1,367 million as compared to 2008.
During 2010, we expect:
|
|
|
net revenues of approximately $3.5 billion to
$3.9 billion;
|
|
|
depreciation and amortization of approximately $180 million
to $185 million; and
|
|
|
interest expense, net, of approximately $130 million to
$140 million.
|
Following is a discussion of the results of each of our
segments, other income net and interest expense/income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
660
|
|
|
$
|
753
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
|
$
|
218
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
|
|
1,259
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
1,945
|
|
|
|
2,278
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
(1,074
|
)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Reportable Segments
|
|
|
3,757
|
|
|
|
4,290
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
849
|
|
|
|
(608
|
)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Corporate and
Other (a)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company
|
|
$
|
3,750
|
|
|
$
|
4,281
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
778
|
|
|
|
(635
|
)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
493
|
|
|
$
|
(887
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Not meaningful.
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes the elimination of
transactions between segments.
|
Lodging
Net revenues and EBITDA decreased $93 million (12%) and
$43 million (20%), respectively, during 2009 compared to
2008. The decrease in revenues primarily reflects a decline in
worldwide RevPAR and other franchise fees. EBITDA further
reflects lower marketing expenses, the absence of a non-cash
impairment charge recorded during 2008 and the impact of the
USFS acquisition, partially offset by higher bad debt expense.
The acquisition of USFS contributed incremental net revenues and
EBITDA of $11 million and $6 million, respectively.
Excluding the impact of this acquisition, net revenues declined
$104 million reflecting:
|
|
|
a $60 million decrease in domestic royalty, marketing and
reservation revenues primarily due to a RevPAR decline of 15%;
|
|
|
$15 million of lower reimbursable revenues earned by our
hotel management business;
|
|
|
a $14 million decrease in other franchise fees principally
related to lower termination and transfer volume;
|
|
|
a $12 million decrease in international royalty, marketing
and reservation revenues resulting from a RevPAR decrease of
19%, or 14% excluding the impact of foreign exchange movements,
partially offset by an 8% increase in international
rooms; and
|
|
|
a $3 million decrease in other revenues.
|
42
The RevPAR decline was driven by industry-wide occupancy and
rate declines. The $15 million of lower reimbursable
revenues earned by our property management business primarily
relates to payroll costs that we incur and pay on behalf of
hotel owners, for which we are entitled to be fully reimbursed
by the hotel owner. As the reimbursements are made based upon
cost with no added margin, the recorded revenues are offset by
the associated expense and there is no resultant impact on
EBITDA. Such amount decreased as a result of a reduction in
costs at our managed properties due to lower occupancy, as well
as a reduction in the number of hotels under management.
In addition, EBITDA was positively impacted by:
|
|
|
a decrease of $55 million in marketing and related expenses
primarily due to lower spend across our brands as a result of a
decline in related marketing fees received;
|
|
|
the absence of a $16 million non-cash impairment charge
recorded during 2008 (see Note 21 Restructuring and
Impairments for more details); and
|
|
|
$1 million of lower costs relating to organizational
realignment initiatives (see Restructuring Plan for more
details).
|
Such decreases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
$16 million of higher bad debt expense principally
resulting from operating cash shortfalls at managed hotels that
have experienced occupancy declines;
|
|
|
a non-cash charge of $6 million to impair the value of an
underperforming joint venture in our hotel management business;
|
|
|
$5 million of incremental costs due to remediation efforts
on technology compliance initiatives;
|
|
|
the absence of $2 million of income recorded during the
second quarter of 2008 relating to the assumption of a credit
card marketing program obligation by a third party; and
|
|
|
the absence of $2 million of income associated with the
sale of a non-strategic asset during the third quarter of 2008.
|
As of December 31, 2009, we had approximately 7,110
properties and 597,700 rooms in our system. Additionally, our
hotel development pipeline included approximately 950 hotels and
approximately 108,100 rooms, of which 43% were international and
51% were new construction as of December 31, 2009.
We expect net revenues of approximately $620 million to
$670 million during 2010. In addition, as compared to 2009,
we expect our operating statistics during 2010 to perform as
follows:
|
|
|
RevPAR to be flat to down 3%
|
|
|
number of rooms to increase 1-3%
|
Vacation
Exchange and Rentals
Net revenues decreased $107 million (8%) while EBITDA
increased $39 million (16%), respectively, during 2009
compared to 2008. A stronger U.S. dollar compared to other
foreign currencies unfavorably impacted net revenues and EBITDA
by $81 million and $23 million, respectively. The
decrease in net revenues reflects a $50 million decrease in
net revenues from rental transactions and related services, a
$41 million decrease in ancillary revenues and a
$16 million decrease in annual dues and exchange revenues.
EBITDA further reflects favorability resulting from the absence
of $60 million of charges recorded during the fourth
quarter of 2008, $51 million in cost savings from overhead
reductions and benefits related to organizational realignment
initiatives and $9 million of lower volume-related
expenses, partially offset by $29 million of losses from
foreign exchange transactions and the unfavorable impact from
foreign exchange hedging contracts.
Net revenues generated from rental transactions and related
services decreased $50 million (8%) during 2009 compared to
2008. Excluding the unfavorable impact of foreign exchange
movements, net revenues generated from rental transactions and
related services increased $10 million (2%) during 2009 as
rental transaction volume increased 1% primarily driven by
increased volume at (i) our Landal business, which
benefited from enhanced marketing programs, and (ii) our
U.K. cottage business due to successful marketing and
promotional offers as well as increased functionality of its new
web platform. Such favorability was partially offset by lower
member rentals, which we believe was a result of members
reducing the number of extra vacations primarily due to the
downturn in the economy. Average net price per rental increased
1% primarily resulting from a change in the mix of various
rental offerings, with favorable impacts by our Landal
Greenparks and U.K. cottage businesses, partially offset by an
unfavorable impact at our Novasol and member rental businesses.
43
Annual dues and exchange revenues decreased $16 million
(3%) during 2009 compared to 2008. Excluding the unfavorable
impact of foreign exchange movements, annual dues and exchange
revenues increased $1 million driven by a 3% increase in
the average number of members primarily due to the enrollment of
approximately 135,000 members at the beginning of 2009 resulting
from our Disney Vacation Club affiliation, partially offset by a
3% decline in revenue generated per member. The decrease in
revenue per member was due to lower exchange transactions and
subscription fees, partially offset by the impact of higher
exchange transaction pricing. We believe that the lower revenue
per member reflects: (i) the economic uncertainty,
(ii) lower subscription fees due primarily to member
retention programs offered at multiyear discounts and
(iii) recent trends among timeshare vacation ownership
developers to enroll members in private label clubs, whereby the
members have the option to exchange within the club or through
RCI channels. Such trends have a positive impact on the average
number of members but an offsetting effect on the number of
exchange transactions per member.
A decrease in ancillary revenues of $41 million was driven
by:
|
|
|
$21 million from various sources, which include fees from
additional services provided to transacting members, fees from
our credit card loyalty program and fees generated from programs
with affiliated resorts;
|
|
|
$16 million in travel revenues primarily due to our
termination of a low margin travel service contract; and
|
|
|
$4 million due to the unfavorable translation effects of
foreign exchange movements.
|
In addition, EBITDA was positively impacted by a decrease in
expenses of $146 million (14%) primarily driven by:
|
|
|
the favorable impact of foreign currency translation on expenses
of $58 million;
|
|
|
$51 million in cost savings primarily from overhead
reductions and benefits related to organizational realignment
initiatives;
|
|
|
the absence of $36 million of non-cash impairment charges
recorded during the fourth quarter of 2008 (see
Note 21 Restructuring and Impairments for more
details);
|
|
|
the absence of a cash charge of $24 million recorded during
the fourth quarter of 2008 due to a currency conversion loss
related to the transfer of cash from our Venezuela operations;
|
|
|
$9 million of lower volume-related expenses; and
|
|
|
$3 million of lower costs relating to organizational
realignment initiatives (see Restructuring Plan for more
details).
|
Such decreases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
$29 million of losses from foreign exchange transactions
and the unfavorable impact from foreign exchange hedging
contracts;
|
|
|
$5 million of marketing and IT costs to support our
e-commerce
initiative to drive members to transact on the web; and
|
|
|
$3 million of higher facility operating costs.
|
We expect net revenues of approximately $1.1 billion to
$1.2 billion during 2010. In addition, as compared to 2009,
we expect our operating statistics during 2010 to perform as
follows:
|
|
|
vacation rental transactions to be flat and average net price
per vacation rental to increase
2-5%
|
|
|
average number of members as well as annual dues and exchange
revenues per member to be flat
|
Vacation
Ownership
Net revenues decreased $333 million (15%) while EBITDA
increased $1,461 million during 2009 compared to 2008.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, in response to an uncertain
credit environment, we announced plans to (i) refocus our
vacation ownership sales and marketing efforts, which resulted
in fewer tours, and (ii) concentrate on consumers with
higher credit quality beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008.
As a result, during December 2008, we recorded a non-cash
$1,342 million charge for the impairment of goodwill at our
vacation ownership business to reflect reduced future cash flow
estimates based on the expected reduced sales pace and
$66 million of costs relating to organizational realignment
initiatives (see Restructuring Plan for more details). In
addition, operating results for 2009 reflect decreased gross VOI
sales, a net increase in the recognition of previously deferred
revenues as a result
44
of the completion of construction of resorts under development,
decreased marketing and employee-related expenses, lower cost of
VOI sales, higher ancillary revenues and additional costs
related to organizational realignment initiatives.
Gross sales of VOIs at our vacation ownership business decreased
$672 million (34%) during 2009 compared to 2008, driven
principally by a 46% planned decrease in tour flow, partially
offset by an increase of 23% in VPG. Tour flow was negatively
impacted by the closure of over 85 sales offices since
October 1, 2008 related to our organizational realignment
initiatives. VPG was positively impacted by (i) a favorable
tour flow mix resulting from the closure of underperforming
sales offices as part of the organizational realignment and
(ii) a higher percentage of sales coming from upgrades to
existing owners during 2009 as compared to 2008 as a result of
changes in the mix of tours. Such results were partially offset
by a $37 million increase in ancillary revenues primarily
associated with the usage of bonus points/credits, which are
provided as purchase incentives on VOI sales, partially offset
by a decline in fees generated from other non-core businesses.
Under the
percentage-of-completion
(POC) method of accounting, a portion of the total
revenues associated with the sale of a vacation ownership
interest is deferred if the construction of the vacation resort
has not yet been fully completed. Such revenues will be
recognized in future periods as construction of the vacation
resort progresses. During 2009, we completed construction on
resorts where VOI sales were primarily generated during 2008,
resulting in the recognition of $187 million of revenues
previously deferred under the POC method of accounting compared
to $75 million of deferred revenues during 2008.
Accordingly, net revenues and EBITDA comparisons were positively
impacted by $225 million (including the impact of the
provision for loan losses) and $124 million, respectively,
as a result of the net increase in the recognition of revenues
previously deferred under the POC method of accounting. We do
not anticipate any impact during 2010 on revenues due to the POC
method of accounting as all such previously deferred revenues
were recognized during 2009 and no additional deferred revenues
are anticipated during 2010.
Our net revenues and EBITDA comparisons associated with property
management were positively impacted by $30 million and
$24 million, respectively, during 2009 primarily due to
higher management fees earned as a result of rate increases and
growth in the number of units under management. In addition,
EBITDA was unfavorably impacted from increased costs associated
with the growth in the number of units under management,
partially offset by cost containment initiatives implemented
during 2009.
Net revenues and EBITDA comparisons were favorably impacted by
$9 million and $1 million, respectively, during 2009
due to an increase in net interest income primarily due to
higher weighted average interest rates earned on our contract
receivable portfolio, partially offset by higher interest costs
during 2009 as compared to 2008. We incurred interest expense of
$139 million on our securitized debt at a weighted average
interest rate of 8.5% during 2009 compared to $131 million
at a weighted average interest rate of 5.2% during 2008. Our net
interest income margin decreased from 69% during 2008 to 68%
during 2009 due to a 325 basis point increase in our
weighted average interest rate, partially offset by
$413 million of decreased average borrowings on our
securitized debt facilities and to higher weighted average
interest rates earned on our contract receivable portfolio.
In addition, EBITDA was positively impacted by $501 million
(33%) of decreased expenses, exclusive of incremental interest
expense on our securitized debt and lower property management
expenses, primarily resulting from:
|
|
|
$217 million of decreased marketing expenses due to the
reduction in our sales pace;
|
|
|
$207 million of lower employee-related expenses primarily
due to lower sales commission and administration costs;
|
|
|
$150 million of decreased cost of VOI sales due to the
planned reduction in VOI sales;
|
|
|
the absence of a $28 million non-cash impairment charge
recorded during 2008 due to our initiative to rebrand two of our
vacation ownership trademarks to the Wyndham brand; and
|
|
|
the absence of a $4 million non-cash impairment charge
recorded during 2008 related to the termination of a development
project.
|
Such decreases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
$37 million of costs relating to organizational realignment
initiatives (see Restructuring Plan for more details);
|
|
|
$29 million of increased costs associated with maintenance
fees on unsold inventory;
|
|
|
$25 million of increased costs related to sales incentives
awarded to owners;
|
|
|
$11 million of increased litigation settlement reserves;
|
45
|
|
|
a non-cash charge of $9 million to impair the value of
certain vacation ownership properties and related assets held
for sale that are no longer consistent with our development
plans; and
|
|
|
$4 million of increased costs related to our trial
membership marketing program.
|
Our active development pipeline consists of approximately
160 units in one U.S. state, a decline from
1,400 units as of December 31, 2008 primarily due to
our initiative to reduce our VOI sales pace.
We expect net revenues of approximately $1.7 billion to
$2.0 billion during 2010. In addition, as compared to 2009,
we expect our operating statistics during 2010 to perform as
follows:
|
|
|
gross VOI sales to be flat
|
|
|
tours to decline 3-6%
|
|
|
VPG to increase 5-8%
|
Corporate
and Other
Corporate and Other expenses increased $46 million in 2009
compared to 2008. Such increase primarily includes:
|
|
|
a $24 million unfavorable impact from the resolution of and
adjustment to certain contingent liabilities and assets recorded
during 2009 as compared to 2008;
|
|
|
increased corporate expenses primarily due to $11 million
of employee incentive programs and severance, $9 million of
hedging activity and $5 million of other, including
additional rent associated with the consolidation of two leased
facilities into one, partially offset by $6 million of cost
savings initiatives; and
|
|
|
$1 million of costs relating to organizational realignment
initiatives (see Restructuring Plan for more details).
|
Other
Income, Net
Other income, net decreased $5 million during 2009 as
compared to 2008. Such decrease includes:
|
|
|
a $4 million decline in net earnings from equity
investments;
|
|
|
the absence of $2 million of income associated with the
assumption of a lodging-related credit card marketing program
obligation by a third party; and
|
|
|
the absence of $2 million of income associated with the
sale of a non-strategic asset at our lodging business.
|
Such decreases were partially offset by $2 million of
higher gains associated with the sale of non-strategic assets at
our vacation ownership business. Such amounts are included
within our segment EBITDA results.
Interest
Expense/Interest Income
Interest expense increased $34 million during 2009 compared
to 2008 as a result of (i) a $25 million increase in
interest incurred on our long-term debt facilities resulting
from our May 2009 debt issuances (see Note 13
Long-Term Debt and Borrowing Arrangements) and
(ii) $9 million of lower capitalized interest at our
vacation ownership business due to lower development of vacation
ownership inventory. We expect these trends of higher interest
incurred on our long-term debt facilities and lower capitalized
interest to continue into 2010 and anticipate an increase of
interest expense of $25 million to $35 million in full
year 2010 as compared to full year 2009 as a result of a full
year effect of our May 2009 debt issuances and a continued
decline in development of vacation ownership inventory. Interest
income decreased $5 million during 2009 compared to 2008
due to decreased interest earned on invested cash balances as a
result of lower rates earned on investments.
46
OPERATING
STATISTICS
The following table presents our operating statistics for the
years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007. See Results of
Operations section for a discussion as to how these operating
statistics affected our business for the periods presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Lodging (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
rooms (b)
|
|
|
592,900
|
|
|
|
550,600
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
RevPAR (c)
|
|
$
|
35.74
|
|
|
$
|
36.48
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of members
(000s) (d)
|
|
|
3,670
|
|
|
|
3,526
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Annual dues and exchange revenues per
member (e)
|
|
$
|
128.37
|
|
|
$
|
135.85
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Vacation rental transactions (in
000s) (f)
|
|
|
1,347
|
|
|
|
1,376
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Average net price per vacation
rental (g)
|
|
$
|
463.10
|
|
|
$
|
422.83
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross VOI sales (in
000s) (h)
|
|
$
|
1,987,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,993,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tours (i)
|
|
|
1,143,000
|
|
|
|
1,144,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume Per Guest
(VPG) (j)
|
|
$
|
1,602
|
|
|
$
|
1,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes Microtel Inns &
Suites and Hawthorn Suites by Wyndham hotel brands, which were
acquired on July 18, 2008. Therefore, the operating
statistics for 2008 are not presented on a comparable basis to
the 2007 operating statistics. On a comparable basis (excluding
the Microtel Inns & Suites and Hawthorn Suites by
Wyndham hotel brands from the 2008 amounts), the number of rooms
would have increased 2% and RevPAR would have declined 2%.
|
|
(b) |
|
Represents the number of rooms at
lodging properties at the end of the period which are either
(i) under franchise and/or management agreements,
(ii) properties affiliated with Wyndham Hotels and Resorts
brand for which we receive a fee for reservation and/or other
services provided and (iii) properties managed under a
joint venture. The amounts in 2008 and 2007 include 4,175 and
6,856 affiliated rooms, respectively.
|
|
(c) |
|
Represents revenue per available
room and is calculated by multiplying the percentage of
available rooms occupied during the period by the average rate
charged for renting a lodging room for one day.
|
|
(d) |
|
Represents members in our vacation
exchange programs who pay annual membership dues. For additional
fees, such participants are entitled to exchange intervals for
intervals at other properties affiliated with our vacation
exchange business. In addition, certain participants may
exchange intervals for other leisure-related products and
services.
|
|
(e) |
|
Represents total revenues from
annual membership dues and exchange fees generated for the
period divided by the average number of vacation exchange
members during the period.
|
|
(f) |
|
Represents the number of
transactions that are generated in connection with customers
booking their vacation rental stays through us. In our European
vacation rentals businesses, one rental transaction is recorded
each time a standard one-week rental is booked; however, in the
United States, one rental transaction is recorded each time a
vacation rental stay is booked, regardless of whether it is less
than or more than one week.
|
|
(g) |
|
Represents the net rental price
generated from renting vacation properties to customers divided
by the number of rental transactions. Excluding the impact of
foreign exchange movements, such increase was 6%.
|
|
(h) |
|
Represents gross sales of VOIs
(including tele-sales upgrades, which are a component of upgrade
sales) before deferred sales and loan loss provisions.
|
|
(i) |
|
Represents the number of tours
taken by guests in our efforts to sell VOIs.
|
|
(j) |
|
Represents gross VOI sales
(excluding tele-sales upgrades, which are a component of upgrade
sales) divided by the number of tours.
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2008 vs. Year Ended December 31,
2007
Our consolidated results comprised the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
4,281
|
|
|
$
|
4,360
|
|
|
$
|
(79
|
)
|
Expenses
|
|
|
5,111
|
|
|
|
3,650
|
|
|
|
1,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income/(loss)
|
|
|
(830
|
)
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
(1,540
|
)
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(887
|
)
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
(1,542
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
(1,074
|
)
|
|
$
|
403
|
|
|
$
|
(1,477
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
During 2008, our net revenues decreased $79 million (2%)
principally due to:
|
|
|
a $150 million increase in our provision for loan losses at
our vacation ownership business;
|
|
|
a net increase of $48 million in deferred revenues under
the
percentage-of-completion
method of accounting at our vacation ownership business;
|
|
|
a $34 million decrease in ancillary revenues at our
vacation ownership business associated with bonus points/credits
that are provided as purchase incentives on VOI sales;
|
|
|
an $8 million decrease in annual dues and exchange revenues
due to a decline in revenue generated per member, partially
offset by growth in the average number of members; and
|
|
|
a $6 million decrease in gross sales of VOIs at our
vacation ownership businesses due to our strategic realignment
initiatives.
|
Such decreases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
a $68 million increase in consumer financing revenues
earned on vacation ownership contract receivables due primarily
to growth in the portfolio;
|
|
|
a $42 million increase in net revenues from rental
transactions primarily due to an increase in the average net
price per rental, including the favorable impact of foreign
exchange movements, and the conversion of two of our Landal
parks from franchised to managed;
|
|
|
$36 million of incremental property management fees within
our vacation ownership business primarily as a result of growth
in the number of units under management; and
|
|
|
a $28 million increase in net revenues in our lodging
business due to higher international royalty, marketing and
reservation revenues, incremental net revenues generated from
the July 2008 acquisition of USFS, increased revenues from our
Wyndham Rewards loyalty program and incremental hotel management
reimbursable revenues, partially offset by lower domestic
royalty, marketing and reservation revenues.
|
The total net revenues increase at our vacation exchange and
rentals business includes the favorable impact of foreign
currency translation of $16 million.
Total expenses increased $1,461 million principally
reflecting:
|
|
|
a non-cash charge of $1,342 million for the impairment of
goodwill at our vacation ownership business as a result of
organizational realignment plans (see Restructuring Plan for
more details) announced during the fourth quarter of 2008 which
reduced future cash flow estimates by lowering our expected VOI
sales pace in the future based on the expectation that access to
the asset-backed securities market will continue to be
challenging;
|
|
|
non-cash charges of $84 million across our three businesses
to reduce the carrying value of certain assets based on their
revised estimated fair values;
|
|
|
the recognition of $79 million of costs at our lodging,
vacation exchange and rentals and vacation ownership businesses
relating to organizational realignment initiatives;
|
|
|
$28 million of a lower net benefit related to the
resolution of and adjustment to certain contingent liabilities
and assets;
|
|
|
a $28 million increase in operating and administrative
expenses at our vacation exchange and rentals business primarily
related to increased resort services expenses resulting from the
conversion of two of our Landal parks from franchised to
managed, increased volume-related expenses due to growth, higher
employee incentive program expenses and increased consulting
costs;
|
|
|
charges of $24 million due to currency conversion losses
related to the transfer of cash from our Venezuelan operations
at our vacation exchange and rentals business;
|
|
|
$21 million of increased consumer financing interest
expense;
|
|
|
a $20 million increase in operating and administrative
expenses at our lodging business primarily related to increased
payroll costs paid on behalf of and for which we are reimbursed
by the hotel owners, increased expenses related to ancillary
services provided to franchisees and increased expenses
resulting from the USFS acquisition, partially offset by savings
from cost containment initiatives and lower employee incentive
program expenses;
|
|
|
an $18 million increase in depreciation and amortization
primarily reflecting increased capital investments over the past
two years;
|
48
|
|
|
the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation on
expenses at our vacation exchange and rentals business of
$18 million; and
|
|
|
an $8 million increase in operating and administrative
expenses at our vacation ownership business primarily related to
increased costs related to property management services,
partially offset by lower employee related expenses.
|
These increases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
$85 million of decreased cost of sales at our vacation
ownership business primarily due to increased estimated
recoveries associated with the increase in our provision for
loan losses, as discussed above;
|
|
|
$49 million of decreased costs at our vacation ownership
business primarily related to sales incentives awarded to
owners, lower maintenance fees on unsold inventory, the absence
of costs associated with the repair of one of our completed VOI
resorts and the absence of a net charge related to a prior
acquisition;
|
|
|
$23 million of increased deferred expenses related to the
net increase in deferred revenues at our vacation ownership
business, as discussed above;
|
|
|
$16 million of favorable hedging on foreign exchange
contracts at our vacation exchange and rentals business;
|
|
|
$16 million of decreased separation and related costs;
|
|
|
$16 million in cost savings from overhead reductions at our
vacation exchange and rentals business;
|
|
|
the absence of $7 million of severance related expenses
recorded at our vacation exchange and rentals business during
2007; and
|
|
|
$6 million of lower corporate costs primarily related to
cost containment initiatives implemented during 2008 and lower
legal and professional fees.
|
Other income, net increased $4 million due to
(i) higher net earnings primarily from equity investments,
(ii) income associated with the assumption of a
lodging-related credit card marketing program obligation by a
third-party and (iii) income associated with the sale of
certain assets. Such increases were partially offset by the
absence of a pre-tax gain recorded during 2007 on the sale of
certain vacation ownership properties and related assets.
Interest expense increased $7 million during 2008 compared
to 2007 as a result of (i) lower capitalized interest at
our vacation ownership business due to lower development of
vacation ownership inventory and (ii) higher interest paid
on our long-term debt facilities due to an increase in our
revolving credit facility balance. Interest income increased
$1 million during 2008 compared to 2007.
The difference between our 2008 effective tax rate of (21.1%)
and 2007 effective tax rate of 38.5% is primarily due to:
|
|
|
the non-deductibility of the goodwill impairment charge recorded
during 2008;
|
|
|
charges in a tax-free zone resulting from currency conversion
losses related to the transfer of cash from our Venezuelan
operations at our vacation exchange and rentals
business; and
|
|
|
a non-cash impairment charge related to the write-off of an
investment in a non-performing joint venture at our vacation
exchange and rentals business.
|
See Note 7 Income Taxes for a detailed
reconciliation of our effective tax rate.
As a result of these items, our net income decreased
$1,477 million as compared to 2007.
49
Following is a discussion of the results of each of our
segments, other income net and interest expense/income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
753
|
|
|
$
|
725
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
218
|
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
1,259
|
|
|
|
1,218
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
2,278
|
|
|
|
2,425
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(1,074
|
)
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Reportable Segments
|
|
|
4,290
|
|
|
|
4,368
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(608
|
)
|
|
|
894
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Corporate and
Other (a)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company
|
|
$
|
4,281
|
|
|
$
|
4,360
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(635
|
)
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(887
|
)
|
|
$
|
655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Not meaningful.
|
(a) |
|
Includes the elimination of
transactions between segments.
|
Lodging
Net revenues increased $28 million (4%) and EBITDA
decreased $5 million (2%), respectively, during 2008
compared to 2007 primarily reflecting higher international
royalty, marketing and reservation revenues, incremental net
revenues generated from the July 2008 acquisition of USFS,
increased revenues from our Wyndham Rewards loyalty program and
incremental hotel management reimbursable revenues, partially
offset by lower domestic royalty, marketing and reservation
revenues. Such net revenues increase was more than offset in
EBITDA by increased expenses, particularly associated with a
strategic change in direction related to our Howard Johnson
brand, ancillary services provided to franchisees, incremental
hotel management reimbursable revenues, the acquisition of USFS
and organizational realignment initiatives, partially offset by
savings from cost containment initiatives.
The acquisition of USFS contributed incremental net revenues and
EBITDA of $12 million and $3 million, respectively.
Apart from this acquisition, the increase in net revenues
includes:
|
|
|
$17 million of incremental international royalty, marketing
and reservation revenues resulting from international RevPAR
growth of 2%, or 1% excluding the impact of foreign exchange
movements, and a 13% increase in international rooms;
|
|
|
$10 million of incremental revenues generated by our
Wyndham Rewards loyalty program primarily due to increased
member stays;
|
|
|
$8 million of incremental reimbursable revenues earned by
our hotel management business; and
|
|
|
a $16 million increase in other revenues primarily due to
fees generated upon execution of franchise contracts and
ancillary services that we provide to our franchisees.
|
Such increases were partially offset by a decrease of
$35 million in domestic royalty, marketing and reservation
revenues due to a domestic RevPAR decline of 5% and incremental
development advance note amortization, which is recorded net
within revenues. The domestic RevPAR decline was principally
driven by an overall decline in industry occupancy levels, while
the international RevPAR growth was principally driven by price
increases, partially offset by a decline in occupancy levels.
The $8 million of incremental reimbursable revenues earned
by our hotel management business primarily relates to payroll
costs that we incur and pay on behalf of hotel owners, for which
we are fully reimbursed by the hotel owner. As the
reimbursements are made based upon cost with no added margin,
the recorded revenues are offset by the associated expense and
there is no resultant impact on EBITDA.
EBITDA further reflects:
|
|
|
a $16 million non-cash impairment charge primarily due to a
strategic change in direction related to our Howard Johnson
brand that is expected to adversely impact the ability of the
properties associated with the franchise agreements acquired in
connection with the acquisition of the brand during 1990 to
maintain compliance with brand standards;
|
|
|
$15 million of increased costs primarily associated with
ancillary services provided to franchisees, as discussed
above; and
|
50
|
|
|
$4 million of costs relating to organizational realignment
initiatives (see Restructuring Plan for more details).
|
Such cost increases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
$10 million of savings from cost containment initiatives;
|
|
|
$2 million of income associated with the assumption of a
lodging-related credit card marketing program obligation by a
third-party;
|
|
|
$2 million of income associated with the sale of a
non-strategic asset;
|
|
|
$2 million of lower employee incentive program expenses
compared to 2007; and
|
|
|
a net decrease of $1 million in marketing expenses
primarily relating to lower marketing spend across our brands,
partially offset by incremental expenditures in our Wyndham
Rewards loyalty program.
|
As of December 31, 2008, we had 7,043 properties and
approximately 592,900 rooms in our system. Additionally, our
hotel development pipeline included approximately 990 hotels and
approximately 110,900 rooms, of which 42% were international and
55% were new construction as of December 31, 2008.
Vacation
Exchange and Rentals
Net revenues increased $41 million (3%) and EBITDA
decreased $45 million (15%) during 2008 compared to 2007.
The increase in net revenues primarily reflects a
$42 million increase in net revenues from rental
transactions and related services and a $7 million increase
in ancillary revenues, which includes $5 million of
favorability related to an adjustment recorded during the second
quarter of 2007 that reduced Asia Pacific consulting revenues,
partially offset by an $8 million decrease in annual dues
and exchange revenues. EBITDA reflects $36 million of
non-cash charges to reduce the carrying value of certain assets
based on their revised estimated fair values, $24 million
of charges due to currency conversion losses related to the
transfer of cash from our Venezuelan operations and
$9 million of costs relating to organizational realignment
initiatives, partially offset by $16 million in cost
savings from overhead reductions, $16 million of favorable
hedging on foreign exchange contracts and the absence of
$7 million of severance-related expenses recorded during
2007. Net revenues and expense increases include
$16 million and $18 million, respectively, of currency
translation impact from a weaker U.S. dollar compared to
other foreign currencies.
Net revenues generated from rental transactions and related
services increased $42 million (7%) during 2008 compared to
2007. Excluding the favorable impact of foreign exchange
movements, net revenues generated from rental transactions and
related services increased $21 million (4%) during 2008
driven by (i) the conversion of two of our Landal parks
from franchised to managed, which contributed an incremental
$20 million to revenues, and (ii) a 2% increase in the
average net price per rental primarily resulting from increased
pricing at our Landal and Novasol European vacation rentals
businesses. These increases were partially offset by a 2%
decline in rental transaction volume primarily driven by lower
rental volume at our other European cottage businesses as well
as lower member rentals, which we believe was a result of
customers altering their vacation decisions primarily due to the
downturn in North America and other worldwide economies. The
decline in rental transaction volume was partially offset by
increased rentals at our Landal business, which benefited from
enhanced marketing programs.
Annual dues and exchange revenues decreased $8 million (2%)
during 2008 compared to 2007. Excluding the unfavorable impact
of foreign exchange movements, annual dues and exchange revenues
declined $5 million (1%) driven by a 5% decline in revenue
generated per member, partially offset by a 4% increase in the
average number of members. The decrease in revenue per member
was driven by lower exchange transactions per member, partially
offset by the impact of favorable exchange transaction pricing
driven by transaction mix. We believe that lower transactions
reflect: (i) recent heightened economic uncertainty and
(ii) recent trends among timeshare vacation ownership
developers to enroll members in private label clubs, whereby the
members have the option to exchange within the club or through
RCI channels. Such trends have a positive impact on the average
number of members but an offsetting effect on the number of
exchange transactions per average member. An increase in
ancillary revenues of $7 million was driven by (i) the
$5 million Asia Pacific adjustment, as discussed above, and
(ii) $4 million from various sources, which include
fees from additional services provided to transacting members,
club servicing revenues, fees from our credit card loyalty
program and fees generated from programs with affiliated
resorts, partially offset by $2 million due to the
unfavorable translation effects of foreign exchange movements.
EBITDA further reflects an increase in expenses of
$86 million (9%) primarily driven by:
|
|
|
charges of $24 million due to currency conversion losses
related to the transfer of cash from our Venezuelan operations;
|
|
|
non-cash impairment charges of $21 million due to trademark
and fixed asset write downs resulting from a strategic change in
direction and reduced future investments in a vacation rentals
business;
|
51
|
|
|
$18 million of increased resort services expenses as a
result of the conversion of two of our Landal parks from
franchised to managed, as discussed above;
|
|
|
the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation on
expenses of $18 million;
|
|
|
a non-cash impairment charge of $15 million due to the
write-off of our investment in a non-performing joint venture;
|
|
|
$9 million of costs relating to organizational realignment
initiatives (see Restructuring Plan for more details);
|
|
|
a $4 million increase in volume-related expenses, which was
substantially comprised of incremental costs to support growth
in rental transaction volume at our Landal business, as
discussed above, higher rental inventory fulfillment costs and
increased staffing costs to support member growth;
|
|
|
$4 million of higher employee incentive program expenses
compared to 2007; and
|
|
|
$2 million of consulting costs on researching the
improvement of web-based search and booking functionalities.
|
Such increases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
$16 million of favorable hedging on foreign exchange
contracts;
|
|
|
$16 million in cost savings from overhead reductions;
|
|
|
the absence of $7 million of severance-related expenses
recorded during 2007; and
|
|
|
$3 million of lower marketing expenses primarily due to
timing.
|
Vacation
Ownership
Net revenues and EBITDA decreased $147 million (6%) and
$1,452 million, respectively, during 2008 compared to 2007.
During October 2008, we announced plans to refocus our vacation
ownership sales and marketing efforts on consumers with higher
credit quality beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008. As a
result, operating results reflect costs related to realignment
initiatives and decreased gross VOI sales. Results also reflect
a higher provision for loan losses, partially offset by growth
in consumer finance income, as well as lower cost of sales and
decreased employee-related expenses.
During December 2008, we announced an acceleration of our
initiatives to increase cash flow and reduce our need to access
the asset-backed securities market by reducing the sales pace of
our vacation ownership business. We expect gross sales of VOIs
during 2009 of approximately $1.2 billion (a decrease of
approximately 40% from 2008). In addition, management performed
its annual goodwill impairment test in accordance with the
guidance for goodwill and other intangible assets during the
fourth quarter of 2008. We used a discounted cash flow model and
incorporated assumptions that we believe marketplace
participants would utilize. Management concluded that an
adjustment was appropriate and, as such, during 2008, we
recorded a non-cash $1,342 million charge for the
impairment of goodwill at our vacation ownership business to
reflect reduced future cash flow estimates based on the
expectation that access to the asset-backed securities market
will continue to be challenging.
Gross sales of VOIs at our vacation ownership business decreased
$6 million during 2008 compared to 2007, as tour flow and
VPG remained relatively unchanged. An increase in upgrades was
more than offset by a decrease in sales to new customers. The
positive impact to tour flow from the continued growth of our
in-house sales programs, albeit slower than during 2007 due to
the impact of negative economic conditions faced during 2008,
was offset by the closure of over 50 sales offices. The positive
impact to VPG from a favorable tour mix and higher pricing was
offset by a decrease in sales to new customers. We believe that
the positive impact to upgrades resulted from increased pricing,
a larger owner base, new resorts and more units. Net revenues
were favorably impacted by $36 million of incremental
property management fees primarily as a result of growth in the
number of units under management. Such revenues increase was
more than offset by (i) an increase of $150 million in
our provision for loan losses during 2008 as compared to 2007
primarily due to a higher estimate of uncollectible receivables
as a percentage of VOI sales financed and (ii) a
$34 million decrease in ancillary revenues associated with
bonus points/credits that are provided as purchase incentives on
VOI sales. The trend of higher uncollectible receivables as a
percentage of VOI sales financed has continued since the fourth
quarter of 2007 as the strains of the overall economy appear to
be negatively impacting the borrowers in our portfolio,
particularly those with lower credit scores. While the continued
impact of the economy is uncertain, we have taken measures that,
over time, should leave us with a smaller portfolio that has a
stronger credit profile. See Critical Accounting Policies for
more information regarding our allowance for loan losses.
52
Under the
percentage-of-completion
method of accounting, a portion of the total revenues associated
with the sale of a vacation ownership interest is deferred if
the construction of the vacation resort has not yet been fully
completed. Such revenues will be recognized in future periods as
construction of the vacation resort progresses. Our sales mix
during 2008 included higher sales generated from vacation
resorts where construction was still in progress, resulting in
net deferred revenues under the
percentage-of-completion
method of accounting of $75 million during 2008 compared to
$22 million during 2007. Accordingly, net revenues and
EBITDA comparisons were negatively impacted by $48 million
(after deducting the related provision for loan losses) and
$25 million, respectively, as a result of the net increase
in deferred revenues under the
percentage-of-completion
method of accounting. We anticipate a net benefit of
approximately $150 million to $200 million from the
recognition of previously deferred revenues as construction of
these resorts progresses, partially offset by continued sales
generated from vacation resorts where construction is still in
progress.
Net revenues and EBITDA comparisons were favorably impacted by
$68 million and $47 million, respectively, during 2008
due to net interest income of $295 million earned on
contract receivables during 2008 as compared to
$248 million during 2007. Such increase was primarily due
to growth in the portfolio, partially offset in EBITDA by higher
interest expenses during 2008. We incurred interest expense of
$131 million on our securitized debt at a weighted average
rate of 5.2% during 2008 compared to $110 million at a
weighted average rate of 5.4% during 2007. Our net interest
income margin during 2008 was 69%, unchanged as compared to
2007, due to increased securitizations completed after
December 31, 2007, offset by a 20 basis point decrease
in interest rates, as described above, and a decline in advance
rates (i.e., the percentage of receivables securitized).
EBITDA was also positively impacted by $43 million (2%) of
decreased expenses, exclusive of incremental interest expense on
our securitized debt, primarily resulting from:
|
|
|
$85 million of decreased cost of sales primarily due to
increased estimated recoveries associated with the increase in
our provision for loan losses, as discussed above;
|
|
|
$36 million of decreased costs related to sales incentives
awarded to owners;
|
|
|
$25 million of lower employee-related expenses;
|
|
|
$9 million of reduced costs associated with maintenance
fees on unsold inventory;
|
|
|
the absence of $9 million of separation and related costs
recorded during 2007;
|
|
|
the absence of $2 million of costs recorded during the
first quarter of 2007 associated with the repair of one of our
completed VOI resorts; and
|
|
|
the absence of a $2 million net charge recorded during 2007
related to a prior acquisition.
|
Such decreases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
$66 million of costs relating to organizational realignment
initiatives (see Restructuring Plan for more details);
|
|
|
$33 million of increased costs related to the property
management services, as discussed above;
|
|
|
a $28 million non-cash impairment charge due to our
initiative to rebrand two of our vacation ownership trademarks
to the Wyndham brand; and
|
|
|
a $4 million non-cash impairment charge related to the
termination of a development project.
|
In addition, EBITDA was negatively impacted by the absence of an
$8 million pre-tax gain on the sale of certain vacation
ownership properties during 2007 that were no longer consistent
with our development plans. Such gain was recorded within other
income, net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Our active development pipeline consists of approximately
1,400 units in 6 U.S. states, Washington D.C. and four
foreign countries, a decline from 4,000 units as of
December 31, 2007 primarily due to the completion of some
of the 2007 pipeline units in addition to our initiative to
reduce our VOI sales pace. We expect the pipeline to support
both new purchases of vacation ownership and upgrade sales to
existing owners.
Corporate
and Other
Corporate and Other expenses increased $15 million during
2008 compared to 2007. Such increase includes $28 million
of a lower net benefit related to the resolution of and
adjustment to certain contingent liabilities and assets,
partially offset by (i) the absence of $7 million of
separation and related costs recorded during 2007 primarily
relating to consulting and legal services and (ii) a
$6 million decrease in corporate costs primarily related to
cost containment initiatives implemented during 2008 and lower
legal and professional fees.
53
Other
Income, Net
During 2008, other income, net increased $4 million due to:
|
|
|
$7 million of higher net earnings primarily from equity
investments;
|
|
|
$2 million of income associated with the assumption of a
lodging-related credit card marketing program obligation by a
third-party;
|
|
|
$2 million of income associated with the sale of a
non-strategic asset at our lodging business; and
|
|
|
a $1 million gain on the sale of assets.
|
Such increases were partially offset by the absence of an
$8 million pre-tax gain on the sale of certain vacation
ownership properties and related assets during 2007. Such
amounts are included within our segment EBITDA results.
Interest
Expense/Interest Income
Interest expense increased $7 million during 2008 compared
to 2007 as a result of (i) a $4 million decrease in
capitalized interest at our vacation ownership business due to
lower development of vacation ownership inventory and
(ii) a $3 million increase in interest incurred on our
long-term debt facilities. Interest income increased
$1 million during 2008 compared to 2007.
RESTRUCTURING
PLAN
In response to a deteriorating global economy, during 2008, we
committed to various strategic realignment initiatives targeted
principally at reducing costs, enhancing organizational
efficiency, reducing our need to access the asset-backed
securities market and consolidating and rationalizing existing
processes and facilities. As a result, we recorded
$47 million and $79 million in restructuring costs
during 2009 and 2008 respectively. Such strategic realignment
initiatives included:
Lodging
We continued the operational realignment of our lodging
business, which began during 2008, to enhance its global
franchisee services, promote more efficient channel management
to further drive revenues at franchised locations and managed
properties and position the Wyndham brand appropriately and
consistently in the marketplace. As a result of these changes,
we recorded costs of $3 million and $4 million during
2009 and 2008, respectively, primarily related to the
elimination of certain positions and the related severance
benefits and outplacement services that were provided for
impacted employees.
Vacation
Exchange and Rentals
Our strategic realignment in our vacation exchange and rentals
business streamlined exchange operations primarily across its
international businesses by reducing management layers to
improve regional accountability. As a result of these
initiatives, we recorded restructuring costs of $6 million
and $9 million during 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Vacation
Ownership
Our vacation ownership business refocused its sales and
marketing efforts by closing the least profitable sales offices
and eliminating marketing programs that were producing prospects
with lower credit quality. Consequently, we have decreased the
level of timeshare development, reduced our need to access the
asset-backed securities market and enhanced cash flow. Such
realignment includes the elimination of certain positions, the
termination of leases of certain sales and administrative
offices, the termination of development projects and the
write-off of assets related to the sales and administrative
offices and cancelled development projects. These initiatives
resulted in costs of $37 million and $66 million
during 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Corporate &
Other
We identified opportunities at our corporate business to reduce
costs by enhancing organizational efficiency and consolidating
and rationalizing existing processes. As a result, we recorded
$1 million in restructuring costs during 2009.
54
Total
Company
As a result of these strategic realignments, during 2009, we
recorded $47 million of incremental restructuring costs
related to such realignments, including a reduction of
approximately 370 employees (all of whom were terminated as
of December 31, 2009) and reduced our liability with
$50 million in cash payments and $15 million in other
non-cash items. The remaining liability of $22 million is
expected to be paid in cash; $3 million of
personnel-related by December 2010 and $19 million of
primarily facility-related by September 2017. We began to
realize the benefits of these strategic realignment initiatives
during the fourth quarter of 2008 and realized net savings from
such initiatives of approximately $160 million, during
2009. We anticipate net savings from such initiatives to
continue annually.
FINANCIAL
CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Financial
Condition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
9,352
|
|
|
$
|
9,573
|
|
|
$
|
(221
|
)
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
6,664
|
|
|
|
7,231
|
|
|
|
(567
|
)
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
2,688
|
|
|
|
2,342
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
Total assets decreased $221 million from December 31,
2008 to December 31, 2009 due to:
|
|
|
a $173 million decrease in vacation ownership contract
receivables, net from decreased VOI sales;
|
|
|
an $85 million decrease in property and equipment, which
includes the termination of certain property development
projects and the write-off of related assets in connection with
our organizational realignment initiatives within our vacation
ownership business;
|
|
|
an $81 million decrease in other current assets primarily
due to the recognition of VOI sales commissions that were
previously deferred and a decline in other receivables at our
vacation ownership business related to lower revenues from
ancillary services, decreased current securitized restricted
cash resulting from the timing of cash that we are required to
set aside in connection with additional vacation ownership
contract receivables securitizations and the amortization of
deferred financing costs related to our 2008 bank conduit
facility at our vacation ownership business, partially offset by
increased assets available for sale resulting from certain
vacation ownership properties and related assets that are no
longer consistent with our development plans;
|
|
|
a $56 million decrease in trade receivables, net, primarily
due to a decline in ancillary revenues at our vacation ownership
business and the termination of a low margin travel service
contract at our vacation exchange and rentals business;
|
|
|
a $35 million decrease in prepaid expenses due to lower
prepaid commissions, lower bonus points/credits that are
provided as purchase incentives on VOI sales and decreased
marketing activity related to the reduced sales pace at our
vacation ownership business; and
|
|
|
a $25 million decrease in franchise agreements and other
intangibles, net, primarily related to the amortization of
franchise agreements at our lodging business.
|
Such decreases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
a $154 million increase in other non-current assets
primarily due to the $176 million call option transactions
we entered into concurrent with the sale of the convertible
notes, which is discussed in greater detail in
Note 13 Long-Term Debt and Borrowing
Arrangements;
|
|
|
a $41 million increase in deferred income taxes primarily
attributable to a change in the expected timing of the
utilization of alternative minimum tax credits, partially offset
by utilization of net operating loss carryforwards;
|
|
|
a $33 million net increase in goodwill related to the
impact of currency translation at our vacation exchange and
rentals business; and
|
|
|
an increase of $19 million in cash and cash equivalents,
which is discussed in further detail in Liquidity and
Capital Resources Cash Flows.
|
Total liabilities decreased $567 million primarily due to:
|
|
|
a $303 million net decrease in our securitized vacation
ownership debt (see Note 13 Long-Term Debt and
Borrowing Arrangements);
|
55
|
|
|
a $299 million decrease in deferred income primarily
resulting from the recognition of previously deferred revenues
due to the continued construction of VOI resorts;
|
|
|
a $59 million decrease in accrued expenses and other
current liabilities primarily due to a decrease in accrued
restructuring liabilities at our vacation ownership business
related to payments made during 2009, lower accrued construction
costs related to decreased vacation ownership development and
timing between the deeding and sales processes for certain VOI
sales at our vacation ownership business, partially offset by
increased litigation settlement reserves at our vacation
ownership business and higher accrued incentive compensation
primarily across our businesses;
|
|
|
a $56 million decrease in accounts payable primarily due to
the impact of the reduced sales pace at our vacation ownership
business and the timing of payments on accounts payable at
corporate related to the consolidation of two leased facilities
into one; and
|
|
|
a $37 million decrease in due to former Parent and
subsidiaries resulting from the payment of a contingent
litigation liability (see Separation Adjustments and
Transactions with Former Parent and Subsidiary).
|
Such decreases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
a $171 million increase in deferred income taxes primarily
attributable to utilization of alternative minimum tax credits
and movement in other comprehensive income; and
|
|
|
a net increase of $31 million in our other long-term debt
primarily reflecting a $176 million derivative liability
related to the bifurcated conversion feature entered into
concurrent with our May 2009 debt issuances, whose proceeds were
primarily utilized to reduce the principal amount outstanding
under our revolving credit facility, partially offset by
additional net principal payments on our revolving credit
facility with operating cash of $145 million.
|
Total stockholders equity increased $346 million
primarily due to:
|
|
|
$293 million of net income generated during 2009;
|
|
|
a change of $36 million in deferred equity compensation;
|
|
|
$25 million of currency translation adjustments;
|
|
|
$18 million of unrealized gains on cash flow
hedges; and
|
|
|
$11 million related to the issuance of warrants to certain
counterparties concurrent with the sale of convertible notes
during May 2009.
|
Such increases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
$30 million related to dividends; and
|
|
|
a $4 million decrease to our pool of excess tax benefits
available to absorb tax deficiencies due to the vesting of
equity awards.
|
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Currently, our financing needs are supported by cash generated
from operations and borrowings under our revolving credit
facility. In addition, certain funding requirements of our
vacation ownership business are met through the issuance of
securitized and other debt to finance vacation ownership
contract receivables. We believe that access to our revolving
credit facility and our current liquidity vehicles, as well as
continued access to the securitization and debt markets
and/or other
financing vehicles, will provide us with sufficient liquidity to
meet our ongoing needs. If we are unable to access these
markets, it will negatively impact our liquidity position and
may require us to further adjust our business operations. See
Liquidity Risk for a discussion of the current and anticipated
impact on our securitizations program from the adverse
conditions present in the United States asset-backed securities
and commercial paper markets.
During October 2009, we renewed our
364-day,
non-recourse, securitized vacation ownership bank conduit
facility with a term through October 2010. The capacity for this
facility was reduced from $943 million to
$600 million, which is consistent with our plan to reduce
vacation ownership interest sales and our projected future
funding needs. The outstanding balance on our previous bank
conduit facility was repaid on October 8, 2009. We have
begun discussions with lenders to renew our revolving credit
facility, which expires on July 7, 2011. We expect to renew
such facility during the first or second quarter of 2010.
56
CASH
FLOWS
During 2009 and 2008, we had a net change in cash and cash
equivalents of $19 million and ($74) million,
respectively. The following table summarizes such changes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Cash provided by/(used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
689
|
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
|
$
|
580
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(109
|
)
|
|
|
(319
|
)
|
|
|
210
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
(561
|
)
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
(727
|
)
|
Effects of changes in exchange rate on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
(74
|
)
|
|
$
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Activities
During 2009, net cash provided by operating activities increased
$580 million as compared to 2008, which principally
reflects:
|
|
|
$587 million of lower originations of vacation ownership
contract receivables primarily related to a decrease in VOI
sales that were financed by consumers;
|
|
|
$138 million of lower investments in inventory primarily
related to lower development of resorts for VOI sales;
|
|
|
$89 million primarily due to higher collection of trade
receivables during 2009 as compared to 2008, as well as lower
originations of trade receivables resulting from lower ancillary
revenues;
|
|
|
$70 million primarily due to lower litigation settlements
during 2009 and the timing of accounts payable and accrued
expenses at corporate, partially offset by payments of
restructuring charges primarily related to our vacation
ownership business; and
|
|
|
$66 million primarily related to lower prepaid commissions
resulting from lower VOI sales.
|
The impact from lower originations of vacation ownership
contract receivables and investments in inventory resulted from
our plan to reduce gross VOI sales during 2009 in order to
reduce our need to access the asset-backed securities markets.
Such increases in net cash provided by operating activities were
partially offset by a $402 million reduction of deferred
revenues related to VOI sales under the percentage of completion
method of accounting.
Investing
Activities
During 2009, net cash used in investing activities decreased
$210 million as compared to 2008, which principally
reflects:
|
|
|
the absence of our 2008 USFS acquisition-related payment of
$135 million;
|
|
|
a net change in cash flows from securitized restricted cash of
$52 million primarily due to the timing of cash that we are
required to set aside in connection with vacation ownership
contract receivable securitizations;
|
|
|
$52 million decrease in property and equipment additions
across our business units, partially offset by higher leasehold
improvements related to the consolidation of two leased
facilities into one; and
|
|
|
lower development advances of $5 million within our lodging
business.
|
Such decreases in cash outflows were partially offset by lower
escrow deposits restricted cash inflows of $33 million
primarily due to lower VOI sales and timing differences between
our deeding and sales processes.
Financing
Activities
During 2009, net cash used in financing activities increased
$727 million as compared to 2008, which principally
reflects (i) $671 million of higher net payments
related to non-securitized borrowings and
(ii) $34 million of higher net payments related to
securitized vacation ownership debt. We utilized the proceeds
from our May 2009 debt issuances, as well as operating cash, to
reduce the principal amount outstanding under our revolving
credit facility and other non-securitized borrowings. For
further detailed information about such borrowings, see
Note 13 Long-Term Debt and Borrowing
Arrangements. Concurrent with the sale of the convertible notes,
we entered into convertible note hedge and warrant transactions
with certain counterparties that resulted in a net cash
57
outflow of $31 million. Such net cash outflows were
partially offset by the absence of $15 million spend on our
stock repurchase program during 2008.
Capital
Deployment
We intend to continue to invest in selected capital improvements
and technological improvements in our lodging, vacation
ownership, vacation exchange and rentals and corporate
businesses. In addition, we may seek to acquire additional
franchise agreements, hotel/property management contracts and
exclusive agreements for vacation rental properties on a
strategic and selective basis, either directly or through
investments in joint ventures. We are focusing on cash flow and
seeking to deploy capital for the highest possible returns.
Ultimately, our business objective is to transform our cash and
earnings profile, primarily by rebalancing the cash streams to
achieve a greater proportion of EBITDA from our
fee-for-service
businesses.
We spent $148 million on capital expenditures, equity
investments and development advances during 2009 including
$108 million on the improvement of technology and
maintenance of technological advantages and routine
improvements, as well as $27 million of leasehold
improvements related to the consolidation of two leased
facilities into one, which we occupied during the first quarter
of 2009, and $13 million of equity investments and
development advances. We anticipate spending approximately
$175 million to $200 million on capital expenditures,
equity investments and development advances during 2010. In
addition, we spent $189 million relating to vacation
ownership development projects during 2009. We believe that our
vacation ownership business will have adequate inventory through
2012 and thus we plan to sell the vacation ownership inventory
that is currently on our balance sheet and complete vacation
ownership projects currently under development. As a result, we
anticipate spending approximately $120 million to
$130 million during 2010. We expect that the majority of
the expenditures that will be required to pursue our capital
spending programs, strategic investments and vacation ownership
development projects will be financed with cash flow generated
through operations. Additional expenditures are financed with
general unsecured corporate borrowings, including through the
use of available capacity under our $900 million revolving
credit facility.
Share
Repurchase Program
On August 20, 2007, our Board of Directors authorized a
stock repurchase program that enables us to purchase up to
$200 million of our common stock. We suspended such program
during the third quarter of 2008. On February 10, 2010, we
announced our plan to resume repurchases of our common stock
under such program.
We currently have $158 million remaining availability in
our program, which includes proceeds received from stock option
exercises. Such repurchase capacity will continue to be
increased by proceeds received from future stock option
exercises. The amount and timing of specific repurchases are
subject to market conditions, applicable legal requirements and
other factors. Repurchases may be conducted in the open market
or in privately negotiated transactions.
Contingent
Tax Liabilities
The rules governing taxation are complex and subject to varying
interpretations. Therefore, our tax accruals reflect a series of
complex judgments about future events and rely heavily on
estimates and assumptions. While we believe that the estimates
and assumptions supporting our tax accruals are reasonable, tax
audits and any related litigation could result in tax
liabilities for us that are materially different than those
reflected in our historical income tax provisions and recorded
assets and liabilities. The result of an audit or litigation
could have a material adverse effect on our income tax
provision, net income,
and/or cash
flows in the period or periods to which such audit or litigation
relates.
The IRS has commenced an audit of Cendants taxable years
2003 through 2006, during which we were included in
Cendants tax returns. Our recorded tax liabilities in
respect of such taxable years represent our current best
estimates of the probable outcome with respect to certain tax
provisions taken by Cendant for which we would be responsible
under the tax sharing agreement. We believe that the accruals
for tax liabilities are adequate for all open years based on an
assessment of many factors including past experience and
interpretations of tax law applied to the facts of each matter;
however, the outcome of the tax audits is inherently uncertain.
There can be no assurance that the IRS will not propose
adjustments to the returns for which we would be responsible
under the tax sharing agreement or that any such proposed
adjustments would not be material. Any determination by the IRS
or a court that imposed tax liabilities on us under the tax
sharing agreement in excess of our tax accruals could have a
material adverse effect on our income tax provision, net income,
and/or cash
flows, which is the result of our obligations under the
Separation and Distribution Agreement, as discussed in
Note 22 Separation Adjustments and Transactions
with Former Parent and Subsidiaries. The IRS examination is
progressing and we currently expect that the IRS examination may
be completed during the second or third quarter of 2010. As part
of the anticipated completion of the pending IRS examination, we
are working with the IRS through other former Cendant companies
to resolve outstanding audit and tax sharing issues. At present,
we believe the recorded liabilities are adequate to address
58
claims, though there can be no assurance of such an outcome with
the IRS or the former Cendant companies until the conclusion of
the process. A failure to so resolve this examination and
related tax sharing issues could have a material adverse effect
on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
As of December 31, 2009, we had $272 million of tax
liabilities pursuant to the Separation and Distribution
Agreement, which are recorded within due to former Parent and
subsidiaries on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. We expect the
payment on a majority of these liabilities to occur during the
second or third quarter of 2010. We expect to make such payment
from cash flow generated through operations and the use of
available capacity under our $900 million revolving credit
facility.
Financial
Obligations
Our indebtedness consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Securitized vacation ownership
debt (a):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes
|
|
$
|
1,112
|
|
|
$
|
1,252
|
|
Previous bank conduit
facility (b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
2008 bank conduit
facility (c)
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securitized vacation ownership debt
|
|
$
|
1,507
|
|
|
$
|
1,810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00% senior unsecured notes (due December
2016) (d)
|
|
$
|
797
|
|
|
$
|
797
|
|
Term loan (due July 2011)
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
Revolving credit facility (due July
2011) (e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
576
|
|
9.875% senior unsecured notes (due May
2014) (f)
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.50% convertible notes (due May
2012) (g)
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation ownership bank
borrowings (h)
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
Vacation rentals capital leases
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
Other
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
2,015
|
|
|
$
|
1,984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents debt that is securitized
through bankruptcy-remote special purpose entities
(SPEs), the creditors of which have no recourse to
us.
|
(b) |
|
Represents the outstanding balance
of our previous bank conduit facility which was repaid on
October 8, 2009.
|
(c) |
|
Represents a
364-day,
$600 million, non-recourse vacation ownership bank conduit
facility, with a term through October 2010, whose capacity is
subject to our ability to provide additional assets to
collateralize the facility. As of December 31, 2009, the
total available capacity of the facility was $205 million.
|
(d) |
|
The balance as of December 31,
2009 represents $800 million aggregate principal less
$3 million of unamortized discount.
|
(e) |
|
The revolving credit facility has a
total capacity of $900 million, which includes availability
for letters of credit. As of December 31, 2009, we had
$31 million of letters of credit outstanding and, as such,
the total available capacity of the revolving credit facility
was $869 million.
|
(f) |
|
Represents senior unsecured notes
we issued during May 2009. Such balance represents
$250 million aggregate principal less $12 million of
unamortized discount.
|
(g) |
|
Represents cash convertible notes
we issued during May 2009. Such balance includes
$191 million of debt ($230 million aggregate principal
less $39 million of unamortized discount) and a liability
with a fair value of $176 million related to a bifurcated
conversion feature. Additionally, as of December 31, 2009,
our convertible note hedge call options are recorded at their
fair value of $176 million within other non-current assets
in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
|
(h) |
|
Represents a
364-day, AUD
213 million, secured, revolving foreign credit facility,
which expires in June 2010.
|
2009
Debt Issuances
During 2009, we closed five term securitizations and a secured,
revolving foreign credit facility. Additionally, we issued
senior unsecured and convertible notes and renewed our
securitized vacation ownership bank conduit facility. For
further detailed information about such debt, see
Note 13 Long-Term Debt and Borrowing
Arrangements.
59
Capacity
As of December 31, 2009, available capacity under our
borrowing arrangements was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
|
Capacity
|
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
Capacity
|
|
|
Securitized vacation ownership debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes
|
|
$
|
1,112
|
|
|
$
|
1,112
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
2008 bank conduit facility
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securitized vacation ownership
debt (a)
|
|
$
|
1,712
|
|
|
$
|
1,507
|
|
|
$
|
205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00% senior unsecured notes (due December 2016)
|
|
$
|
797
|
|
|
$
|
797
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Term loan (due July 2011)
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility (due July
2011) (b)
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
900
|
|
9.875% senior unsecured notes (due May 2014)
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.50% convertible notes (due May 2012)
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation ownership bank
borrowings (c)
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Vacation rentals capital
leases (d)
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
2,979
|
|
|
$
|
2,015
|
|
|
|
964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Issuance of letters of
credit (b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
These outstanding borrowings are
collateralized by $2,755 million of underlying gross
vacation ownership contract receivables and related assets. The
capacity of this facility is subject to our ability to provide
additional assets to collateralize additional securitized
borrowings.
|
(b) |
|
The capacity under our revolving
credit facility includes availability for letters of credit. As
of December 31, 2009, the available capacity of
$900 million was further reduced by $31 million for
the issuance of letters of credit.
|
(c) |
|
These borrowings are collateralized
by $262 million of underlying gross vacation ownership
contract receivables. The capacity of this facility is subject
to maintaining sufficient assets to collateralize these secured
obligations.
|
(d) |
|
These leases are recorded as
capital lease obligations with corresponding assets classified
within property and equipment on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
|
Vacation
Ownership Contract Receivables and Securitizations
We pool qualifying vacation ownership contract receivables and
sell them to bankruptcy-remote entities. Vacation ownership
contract receivables qualify for securitization based primarily
on the credit strength of the VOI purchaser to whom financing
has been extended. Vacation ownership contract receivables are
securitized through bankruptcy-remote SPEs that are consolidated
within our Consolidated Financial Statements. As a result, we do
not recognize gains or losses resulting from these
securitizations at the time of sale to the SPEs. Income is
recognized when earned over the contractual life of the vacation
ownership contract receivables. We continue to service the
securitized vacation ownership contract receivables pursuant to
servicing agreements negotiated on an arms-length basis based on
market conditions. The activities of these SPEs are limited to
(i) purchasing vacation ownership contract receivables from
our vacation ownership subsidiaries; (ii) issuing debt
securities
and/or
borrowing under a conduit facility to fund such purchases; and
(iii) entering into derivatives to hedge interest rate
exposure. The securitized assets of these bankruptcy-remote SPEs
are not available to pay our general obligations. Additionally,
the creditors of these SPEs have no recourse to us.
The assets and debt of these vacation ownership SPEs are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Securitized contract receivables, gross
|
|
$
|
2,591
|
|
|
$
|
2,748
|
|
Securitized restricted cash
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
Interest receivables on securitized contract receivables
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Other
assets (a)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securitized
assets (b)
|
|
|
2,755
|
|
|
|
2,929
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized term notes
|
|
|
1,112
|
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
Securitized conduit facilities
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
558
|
|
Other
liabilities (c)
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securitized liabilities
|
|
|
1,533
|
|
|
|
1,857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized assets in excess of securitized liabilities
|
|
$
|
1,222
|
|
|
$
|
1,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Primarily includes interest rate
derivative contracts and related assets.
|
(b) |
|
Excludes deferred financing costs
related to securitized debt.
|
(c) |
|
Primarily includes interest rate
derivative contracts and accrued interest on securitized debt.
|
60
In addition, we have vacation ownership contract receivables
that have not been securitized through bankruptcy-remote SPEs.
Such gross receivables were $860 million and
$889 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. A summary of total vacation ownership receivables
and other securitized assets, net of securitized liabilities and
the allowance for loan losses, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Securitized assets in excess of securitized liabilities
|
|
$
|
1,222
|
|
|
$
|
1,072
|
|
Non-securitized contract receivables
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
|
690
|
|
Secured contract
receivables (*)
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(370
|
)
|
|
|
(383
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total, net
|
|
$
|
1,712
|
|
|
$
|
1,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Such receivables collateralize our
secured, revolving foreign credit facility, whose balance was
$153 million and $159 million as of December 31,
2009 and 2008, respectively.
|
Covenants
The revolving credit facility and unsecured term loan are
subject to covenants including the maintenance of specific
financial ratios. The financial ratio covenants consist of a
minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio of at least 3.0 to
1.0 as of the measurement date and a maximum consolidated
leverage ratio not to exceed 3.5 to 1.0 on the measurement date.
The consolidated interest coverage ratio is calculated by
dividing Consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the credit
agreement) by Consolidated Interest Expense (as defined in the
credit agreement), both as measured on a trailing 12 month
basis preceding the measurement date. As of December 31,
2009, our interest coverage ratio was 8.5 times. Consolidated
Interest Expense excludes, among other things, interest expense
on any Securitization Indebtedness (as defined in the credit
agreement). The consolidated leverage ratio is calculated by
dividing Consolidated Total Indebtedness (as defined in the
credit agreement and which excludes, among other things,
Securitization Indebtedness) as of the measurement date by
Consolidated EBITDA as measured on a trailing 12 month
basis preceding the measurement date. As of December 31,
2009, our leverage ratio was 2.1 times. Covenants in these
credit facilities also include limitations on indebtedness of
material subsidiaries; liens; mergers, consolidations,
liquidations and dissolutions; sale of all or substantially all
assets; and sale and leaseback transactions. Events of default
in these credit facilities include failure to pay interest,
principal and fees when due; breach of covenants; acceleration
of or failure to pay other debt in excess of $50 million
(excluding securitization indebtedness); insolvency matters; and
a change of control.
The 6.00% senior unsecured notes and 9.875% senior
unsecured notes contain various covenants including limitations
on liens, limitations on potential sale and leaseback
transactions and change of control restrictions. In addition,
there are limitations on mergers, consolidations and potential
sale of all or substantially all of our assets. Events of
default in the notes include failure to pay interest and
principal when due, breach of a covenant or warranty,
acceleration of other debt in excess of $50 million and
insolvency matters. The Convertible Notes do not contain
affirmative or negative covenants, however, the limitations on
mergers, consolidations and potential sale of all or
substantially all of our assets and the events of default for
our senior unsecured notes are applicable to such notes. Holders
of the Convertible Notes have the right to require us to
repurchase the Convertible Notes at 100% of principal plus
accrued and unpaid interest in the event of a fundamental
change, defined to include, among other things, a change of
control, certain recapitalizations and if our common stock is no
longer listed on a national securities exchange.
The vacation ownership secured bank facility contains covenants
including a consumer loan coverage ratio that requires that the
aggregate principal amount of consumer loans that are current on
payments must exceed 75% of the aggregate principal amount of
all consumer loans in the applicable loan portfolio. If the
aggregate principal amount of current consumer loans falls below
this threshold, we must pay the bank syndicate cash to cover the
shortfall. This ratio is also used to set the advance rate under
the facility. The facility contains other typical restrictions
and covenants including limitations on mergers, partnerships and
certain asset sales.
As of December 31, 2009, we were in compliance with all of
the covenants described above including the required financial
ratios.
Each of our securitized term notes and the 2008 bank conduit
facility contains various triggers relating to the performance
of the applicable loan pools. If the vacation ownership contract
receivables pool that collateralizes one of our securitization
notes fails to perform within the parameters established by the
contractual triggers (such as higher default or delinquency
rates), there are provisions pursuant to which the cash flows
for that pool will be maintained in the securitization as extra
collateral for the note holders or applied to amortize the
outstanding principal held by the noteholders. As of
December 31, 2009, all of our securitized pools were in
compliance with applicable triggers.
61
Liquidity
Risk
Our vacation ownership business finances certain of its
receivables through (i) an asset-backed bank conduit
facility and (ii) periodically accessing the capital
markets by issuing asset-backed securities. None of the
currently outstanding asset-backed securities contains any
recourse provisions to us other than interest rate risk related
to swap counterparties (solely to the extent that the amount
outstanding on our notes differs from the forecasted
amortization schedule at the time of issuance).
Throughout 2008 and most of 2009, the asset-backed securities
market in the United States suffered adverse market conditions.
During 2009, access to the term securitization market began to
improve, as demonstrated by the closing of five term
securitization transactions, which are discussed in further
detail in Note 13 Long-Term Debt and Borrowing
Arrangements. As a result of adverse market conditions, during
2009 and 2008, our cost of securitized borrowings increased due
to increased spreads over relevant benchmarks.
As planned, our vacation ownership business reduced its sales
pace of VOIs from $2.0 billion during 2008 to
$1.3 billion during 2009. Accordingly, we believe that the
2008 bank conduit facility, with a term through October 2010 and
capacity of $600 million, should provide sufficient
liquidity for the lower expected sales pace and we expect to
have available liquidity to finance the sale of VOIs. The
outstanding balance on our previous bank conduit facility was
repaid on October 8, 2009.
Our Wyndham Vacation Resorts Asia Pacific Pty Ltd. operations
are funded by a
364-day
secured, revolving foreign credit facility with a total capacity
of AUD 213 million. We closed on a facility with capacity
of AUD 193 million during June 2009 and an additional bank
joined the facility during July 2009, increasing the capacity to
AUD 213 million (see Note 13 Long-Term
Debt and Borrowing Arrangements). This facility had a total of
$153 million outstanding as of December 31, 2009 and
is secured by vacation ownership contract receivables, as well
as a standard Wyndham Worldwide Corporation guaranty.
Some of our vacation ownership developments are supported by
surety bonds provided by affiliates of certain insurance
companies in order to meet regulatory requirements of certain
states. In the ordinary course of our business, we have
assembled commitments from thirteen surety providers in the
amount of $1.3 billion, of which we had $526 million
outstanding as of December 31, 2009. The availability,
terms and conditions, and pricing of such bonding capacity is
dependent on, among other things, continued financial strength
and stability of the insurance company affiliates providing such
bonding capacity, the general availability of such capacity and
our corporate credit rating. If such bonding capacity is
unavailable or, alternatively, if the terms and conditions and
pricing of such bonding capacity are unacceptable to us, the
cost of development of our vacation ownership units could be
negatively impacted.
Our liquidity position may also be negatively affected by
unfavorable conditions in the capital markets in which we
operate or if our vacation ownership contract receivables
portfolios do not meet specified portfolio credit parameters.
Our liquidity as it relates to our vacation ownership contract
receivables securitization program could be adversely affected
if we were to fail to renew or replace our conduit facility on
its annual expiration date or if a particular receivables pool
were to fail to meet certain ratios, which could occur in
certain instances if the default rates or other credit metrics
of the underlying vacation ownership contract receivables
deteriorate. Our ability to sell securities backed by our
vacation ownership contract receivables depends on the continued
ability and willingness of capital market participants to invest
in such securities.
As of December 31, 2009, we had $205 million of
availability under our asset-backed bank conduit facility. To
the extent that the recent increases in funding costs in the
securitization and commercial paper markets persist, they will
negatively impact the cost of such borrowings. A continued
disruption to the asset-backed or commercial paper markets could
adversely impact our ability to obtain such financings.
Our senior unsecured debt is rated BBB- by Standard and
Poors (S&P). During February 2010,
S&P assigned a stable outlook to our senior
unsecured debt. During April 2009, Moodys Investors
Service (Moodys) downgraded our senior
unsecured debt rating to Ba2 (and our corporate family rating to
Ba1) with a stable outlook. A security rating is not
a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities and is subject
to revision or withdrawal by the assigning rating organization.
Currently, we expect no (i) material increase in interest
expense
and/or
(ii) material reduction in the availability of bonding
capacity from the aforementioned downgrade or negative outlook;
however, a further downgrade by Moodys
and/or
S&P could impact our future borrowing
and/or
bonding costs and availability of such bonding capacity.
As a result of the sale of Realogy on April 10, 2007,
Realogys senior debt credit rating was downgraded to below
investment grade. Under the Separation Agreement, if Realogy
experienced such a change of control and suffered such a ratings
downgrade, it was required to post a letter of credit in an
amount acceptable to us and Avis Budget Group to satisfy the
fair value of Realogys indemnification obligations for the
Cendant legacy contingent liabilities in the event Realogy does
not otherwise satisfy such obligations to the extent they become
due. On
62
April 26, 2007, Realogy posted a $500 million
irrevocable standby letter of credit from a major commercial
bank in favor of Avis Budget Group and upon which demand may be
made if Realogy does not otherwise satisfy its obligations for
its share of the Cendant legacy contingent liabilities. The
letter of credit can be adjusted from time to time based upon
the outstanding contingent liabilities and has an expiration
date of September 2013, subject to renewal and certain
provisions. As such, on August 11, 2009, the letter of
credit was reduced to $446 million. The issuance of this
letter of credit does not relieve or limit Realogys
obligations for these liabilities.
Seasonality
We experience seasonal fluctuations in our net revenues and net
income from our franchise and management fees, commission income
earned from renting vacation properties, annual subscription
fees or annual membership dues, as applicable, and exchange
transaction fees and sales of VOIs. Revenues from franchise and
management fees are generally higher in the second and third
quarters than in the first or fourth quarters, because of
increased leisure travel during the summer months. Revenues from
rental income earned from vacation rentals are generally highest
in the third quarter, when vacation rentals are highest.
Revenues from vacation exchange transaction fees are generally
highest in the first quarter, which is generally when members of
our vacation exchange business plan and book their vacations for
the year. Historically, revenues from sales of VOIs were
generally higher in the second and third quarters than in other
quarters. We expect such trend to continue during 2010. However,
during 2009, as the economy continued to stabilize, revenues
from sales of VOIs were highest during the third and fourth
quarters. The seasonality of our business may cause fluctuations
in our quarterly operating results. As we expand into new
markets and geographical locations, we may experience increased
or different seasonality dynamics that create fluctuations in
operating results different from the fluctuations we have
experienced in the past.
Separation
Adjustments and Transactions with Former Parent and
Subsidiaries
Transfer
of Cendant Corporate Liabilities and Issuance of Guarantees to
Cendant and Affiliates
Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, upon the
distribution of our common stock to Cendant shareholders, we
entered into certain guarantee commitments with Cendant
(pursuant to the assumption of certain liabilities and the
obligation to indemnify Cendant, Realogy and Travelport for such
liabilities) and guarantee commitments related to deferred
compensation arrangements with each of Cendant and Realogy.
These guarantee arrangements primarily relate to certain
contingent litigation liabilities, contingent tax liabilities,
and Cendant contingent and other corporate liabilities, of which
we assumed and are responsible for 37.5%, while Realogy is
responsible for the remaining 62.5%. The amount of liabilities
which we assumed in connection with the Separation was
$310 million and $343 million as of December 31,
2009 and 2008, respectively. These amounts were comprised of
certain Cendant corporate liabilities which were recorded on the
books of Cendant as well as additional liabilities which were
established for guarantees issued at the date of Separation
related to certain unresolved contingent matters and certain
others that could arise during the guarantee period. Regarding
the guarantees, if any of the companies responsible for all or a
portion of such liabilities were to default in its payment of
costs or expenses related to any such liability, we would be
responsible for a portion of the defaulting party or
parties obligation. We also provided a default guarantee
related to certain deferred compensation arrangements related to
certain current and former senior officers and directors of
Cendant, Realogy and Travelport. These arrangements, which are
discussed in more detail below, have been valued upon the
Separation in accordance with the guidance for guarantees and
recorded as liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. To
the extent such recorded liabilities are not adequate to cover
the ultimate payment amounts, such excess will be reflected as
an expense to the results of operations in future periods.
The $310 million of Separation related liabilities is
comprised of $5 million for litigation matters,
$272 million for tax liabilities, $23 million for
liabilities of previously sold businesses of Cendant,
$8 million for other contingent and corporate liabilities
and $2 million of liabilities where the calculated
guarantee amount exceeded the contingent liability assumed at
the date of Separation. In connection with these liabilities,
$245 million is recorded in current due to former Parent
and subsidiaries and $63 million is recorded in long-term
due to former Parent and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2009 on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. We are indemnifying
Cendant for these contingent liabilities and therefore any
payments would be made to the third party through the former
Parent. The $2 million relating to guarantees is recorded
in other current liabilities as of December 31, 2009 on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet. The actual timing of payments
relating to these liabilities is dependent on a variety of
factors beyond our control. See Contractual Obligations for the
estimated timing of such payments. In addition, as of
December 31, 2009, we have $5 million of receivables
due from former Parent and subsidiaries primarily relating to
income taxes, which is recorded in other current assets on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet. Such receivables totaled
$3 million as of December 31, 2008.
63
Following is a discussion of the liabilities on which we issued
guarantees:
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent litigation liabilities We assumed 37.5%
of liabilities for certain litigation relating to, arising out
of or resulting from certain lawsuits in which Cendant is named
as the defendant. The indemnification obligation will continue
until the underlying lawsuits are resolved. We will indemnify
Cendant to the extent that Cendant is required to make payments
related to any of the underlying lawsuits. As the
indemnification obligation relates to matters in various stages
of litigation, the maximum exposure cannot be quantified. Due to
the inherently uncertain nature of the litigation process, the
timing of payments related to these liabilities cannot
reasonably be predicted, but is expected to occur over several
years. Since the Separation, Cendant settled a majority of these
lawsuits and we assumed a portion of the related indemnification
obligations. For each settlement, we paid 37.5% of the aggregate
settlement amount to Cendant. Our payment obligations under the
settlements were greater or less than our accruals, depending on
the matter. On September 7, 2007, Cendant received an
adverse ruling in a litigation matter for which we retained a
37.5% indemnification obligation. The judgment on the adverse
ruling was entered on May 16, 2008. On May 23, 2008,
Cendant filed an appeal of the judgment and, on July 1,
2009, an order was entered denying the appeal. As a result of
the denial of the appeal, Realogy and we determined to pay the
judgment. On July 23, 2009, we paid our portion of the
aforementioned judgment ($37 million). Although the
judgment for the underlying liability for this matter has been
paid, the phase of the litigation involving the determination of
fees owed the plaintiffs attorneys remains pending.
Similar to the contingent liability, we are responsible for
37.5% of any attorneys fees payable. As a result of
settlements and payments to Cendant, as well as other reductions
and accruals for developments in active litigation matters, our
aggregate accrual for outstanding Cendant contingent litigation
liabilities was $5 million as of December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
Contingent tax liabilities Prior to the Separation,
we were included in the consolidated federal and state income
tax returns of Cendant through the Separation date for the 2006
period then ended. We are generally liable for 37.5% of certain
contingent tax liabilities. In addition, each of us, Cendant and
Realogy may be responsible for 100% of certain of Cendants
tax liabilities that will provide the responsible party with a
future, offsetting tax benefit. We will pay to Cendant the
amount of taxes allocated pursuant to the Tax Sharing Agreement,
as amended during the third quarter of 2008, for the payment of
certain taxes. As a result of the amendment to the Tax Sharing
Agreement, we recorded a gross up of our contingent tax
liability and have a corresponding deferred tax asset of
$34 million as of December 31, 2009.
|
During the first quarter of 2007, the IRS opened an examination
for Cendants taxable years 2003 through 2006 during which
we were included in Cendants tax returns. As of
December 31, 2009, our accrual for outstanding Cendant
contingent tax liabilities was $272 million. This liability
will remain outstanding until tax audits related to taxable
years 2003 through 2006 are completed or the statutes of
limitations governing such tax years have passed. Balances due
to Cendant for these pre-Separation tax returns and related tax
attributes were estimated as of December 31, 2006 and have
since been adjusted in connection with the filing of the
pre-Separation tax returns. These balances will again be
adjusted after the ultimate settlement of the related tax audits
of these periods. We believe that the accruals for tax
liabilities are adequate for all open years based on an
assessment of many factors including past experience and
interpretations of tax law applied to the facts of each matter;
however, the outcome of the tax audits is inherently uncertain.
Such tax audits and any related litigation, including disputes
or litigation on the allocation of tax liabilities between
parties under the Tax Sharing Agreement, could result in
outcomes for us that are different from those reflected in our
historical financial statements.
The IRS examination is progressing and we currently expect that
the IRS examination may be completed during the second or third
quarter of 2010. As part of the anticipated completion of the
pending IRS examination, we are working with the IRS through
other former Cendant companies to resolve outstanding audit and
tax sharing issues. At present, we believe that the recorded
liabilities are adequate to address claims, though there can be
no assurance of such an outcome with the IRS or the former
Cendant companies until the conclusion of the process. A failure
to so resolve this examination and related tax sharing issues
could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition,
results of operations or cash flows.
|
|
|
|
|
Cendant contingent and other corporate
liabilities We have assumed 37.5% of corporate
liabilities of Cendant including liabilities relating to
(i) Cendants terminated or divested businesses;
(ii) liabilities relating to the Travelport sale, if any;
and (iii) generally any actions with respect to the
Separation plan or the distributions brought by any third party.
Our maximum exposure to loss cannot be quantified as this
guarantee relates primarily to future claims that may be made
against Cendant. We assessed the probability and amount of
potential liability related to this guarantee based on the
extent and nature of historical experience.
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantee related to deferred compensation
arrangements In the event that Cendant, Realogy
and/or
Travelport are not able to meet certain deferred compensation
obligations under specified plans for certain current and former
officers and directors because of bankruptcy or insolvency, we
have guaranteed such obligations (to the extent relating to
amounts deferred in respect of 2005 and earlier). This guarantee
will remain outstanding until such deferred compensation
balances are distributed to the respective officers and
directors. The maximum exposure cannot be quantified as the
guarantee, in part, is related to the value of deferred
investments as of the date of the requested distribution.
|
See Item 1A. Risk Factors for further information related
to contingent liabilities.
Transactions
with Avis Budget Group, Realogy and Travelport
Prior to our Separation from Cendant, we entered into a
Transition Services Agreement (TSA) with Avis Budget
Group, Realogy and Travelport to provide for an orderly
transition to becoming an independent company. Under the TSA,
Cendant agreed to provide us with various services, including
services relating to human resources and employee benefits,
payroll, financial systems management, treasury and cash
management, accounts payable services, telecommunications
services and information technology services. In certain cases,
services provided by Cendant under the TSA were provided by one
of the separated companies following the date of such
companys separation from Cendant. Such services were
substantially completed as of December 31, 2007. During
2009, 2008 and 2007, we recorded $1 million,
$1 million and $13 million, respectively, of expenses
in the Consolidated Statements of Operations related to these
agreements.
Separation
and Related Costs
During 2007, we incurred costs of $16 million in connection
with executing the Separation, consisting primarily of expenses
related to the rebranding initiative at our vacation ownership
business and certain transitional expenses.
Contractual
Obligations
The following table summarizes our future contractual
obligations for the twelve month periods beginning on January
1st of each of the years set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Securitized
debt (a)
|
|
$
|
209
|
|
|
$
|
505
|
|
|
$
|
169
|
|
|
$
|
182
|
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
|
$
|
256
|
|
|
$
|
1,507
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
877
|
|
|
|
2,015
|
|
Interest on securitized and long-term debt
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
821
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
334
|
|
Other purchase
commitments (b)
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
519
|
|
Contingent
liabilities (c)
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (d)
|
|
$
|
1,040
|
|
|
$
|
1,241
|
|
|
$
|
838
|
|
|
$
|
345
|
|
|
$
|
549
|
|
|
$
|
1,493
|
|
|
$
|
5,506
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents debt that is securitized
through bankruptcy-remote SPEs, the creditors to which have no
recourse to us.
|
(b) |
|
Primarily represents commitments
for the development of vacation ownership properties. Total
includes approximately $100 million of vacation ownership
development commitments, which we may terminate at minimal to no
cost.
|
(c) |
|
Primarily represents certain
contingent litigation liabilities, contingent tax liabilities
and 37.5% of Cendant contingent and other corporate liabilities,
which we assumed and are responsible for pursuant to our
separation from Cendant.
|
(d) |
|
Excludes $25 million of our
liability for unrecognized tax benefits associated with the
guidance for uncertainty in income taxes since it is not
reasonably estimatable to determine the periods in which such
liability would be settled with the respective tax authorities.
|
In addition to the above and in connection with our separation
from Cendant, we entered into certain guarantee commitments with
Cendant (pursuant to our assumption of certain liabilities and
our obligation to indemnify Cendant, Realogy and Travelport for
such liabilities) and guarantee commitments related to deferred
compensation arrangements with each of Cendant and Realogy.
These guarantee arrangements primarily relate to certain
contingent litigation liabilities, contingent tax liabilities,
and Cendant contingent and other corporate liabilities, of which
we assumed and are responsible for 37.5% of these Cendant
liabilities. Additionally, if any of the companies responsible
for all or a portion of such liabilities were to default in its
payment of costs or expenses related to any such liability, we
are responsible for a portion of the defaulting party or
parties obligation. We also provide a default guarantee
related to certain deferred compensation arrangements related to
certain current and former senior officers and directors of
Cendant and Realogy. These arrangements were valued upon our
separation from Cendant with the assistance of third-party
experts in accordance with guidance for guarantees and recorded
as liabilities on our balance sheet. To the extent such recorded
liabilities are not adequate to cover the ultimate payment
amounts, such excess will be reflected as an expense to our
results of operations in future periods. See Separation
Adjustments and Transactions with former Parent and Subsidiaries
discussion for details of guaranteed liabilities.
65
Other
Commercial Commitments and Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements
Purchase Commitments. In the normal course of business,
we make various commitments to purchase goods or services from
specific suppliers, including those related to vacation
ownership resort development and other capital expenditures.
Purchase commitments made by us as of December 31, 2009
aggregated $519 million. Individually, such commitments
range as high as $97 million related to the development of
a vacation ownership resort. The majority of the commitments
relate to the development of vacation ownership properties
(aggregating $308 million; $104 million of which
relates to 2010 and $69 million of which relates to 2011).
Standard Guarantees/Indemnifications. In the ordinary
course of business, we enter into agreements that contain
standard guarantees and indemnities whereby we indemnify another
party for specified breaches of or third-party claims relating
to an underlying agreement. Such underlying agreements are
typically entered into by one of our subsidiaries. The various
underlying agreements generally govern purchases, sales or
outsourcing of assets or businesses, leases of real estate,
licensing of trademarks, development of vacation ownership
properties, access to credit facilities, derivatives and
issuances of debt securities. While a majority of these
guarantees and indemnifications extend only for the duration of
the underlying agreement, some survive the expiration of the
agreement. We are not able to estimate the maximum potential
amount of future payments to be made under these guarantees and
indemnifications as the triggering events are not predictable.
In certain cases we maintain insurance coverage that may
mitigate any potential payments.
Other Guarantees/Indemnifications. In the ordinary course
of business, our vacation ownership business provides guarantees
to certain owners associations for funds required to
operate and maintain vacation ownership properties in excess of
assessments collected from owners of the VOIs. We may be
required to fund such excess as a result of unsold Company-owned
VOIs or failure by owners to pay such assessments. These
guarantees extend for the duration of the underlying subsidy or
similar agreement (which generally approximate one year and are
renewable at our discretion on an annual basis) or until a
stipulated percentage (typically 80% or higher) of related VOIs
are sold. The maximum potential future payments that we could be
required to make under these guarantees was approximately
$360 million as of December 31, 2009. We would only be
required to pay this maximum amount if none of the owners
assessed paid their assessments. Any assessments collected from
the owners of the VOIs would reduce the maximum potential amount
of future payments to be made by us. Additionally, should we be
required to fund the deficit through the payment of any
owners assessments under these guarantees, we would be
permitted access to the property for our own use and may use
that property to engage in revenue-producing activities, such as
rentals. During 2009, 2008 and 2007, we made payments related to
these guarantees of $10 million, $7 million and
$5 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2009 and
2008, we maintained a liability in connection with these
guarantees of $22 million and $37 million,
respectively, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
From time to time, we may enter into a hotel management
agreement that provides the hotel owner with a minimum return.
Under such agreement, we would be required to compensate for any
shortfall over the life of the management agreement up to a
specified aggregate amount. Our exposure under these guarantees
is partially mitigated by our ability to terminate any such
management agreement if certain targeted operating results are
not met. Additionally, we are able to recapture a portion or all
of the shortfall payments and any waived fees in the event that
future operating results exceed targets. As of December 31,
2009, the maximum potential amount of future payments to be made
under these guarantees is $16 million with an annual cap of
$3 million or less. As of both December 31, 2009 and
2008, we maintained a liability in connection with these
guarantees of less than $1 million on our Consolidated
Balance Sheets.
Securitizations. We pool qualifying vacation ownership
contract receivables and sell them to bankruptcy-remote entities
all of which are consolidated into the accompanying Consolidated
Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2009.
Letters of Credit. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008,
we had $31 million and $33 million, respectively, of
irrevocable standby letters of credit outstanding, which mainly
support development activity at our vacation ownership business.
Critical
Accounting Policies
In presenting our financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles, we are required to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported
therein. Several of the estimates and assumptions we are
required to make relate to matters that are inherently uncertain
as they pertain to future events. However, events that are
outside of our control cannot be predicted and, as such, they
cannot be contemplated in evaluating such estimates and
assumptions. If there is a significant unfavorable change to
current conditions, it could result in a material adverse impact
to our consolidated results of operations, financial position
and liquidity. We believe that the estimates and assumptions we
used when preparing our financial statements were the most
appropriate at that time. Presented below are those accounting
policies that we believe require subjective and
66
complex judgments that could potentially affect reported
results. However, the majority of our businesses operate in
environments where we are paid a fee for a service performed,
and therefore the results of the majority of our recurring
operations are recorded in our financial statements using
accounting policies that are not particularly subjective, nor
complex.
Vacation Ownership Revenue Recognition. Our sales of VOIs
are either cash sales or seller-financed sales. In order for us
to recognize revenues of VOI sales under the full accrual method
of accounting described in the guidance for sales of real estate
for fully constructed inventory, a binding sales contract must
have been executed, the statutory rescission period must have
expired (after which time the purchasers are not entitled to a
refund except for non-delivery by us), receivables must have
been deemed collectible and the remainder of our obligations
must have been substantially completed. In addition, before we
recognize any revenues on VOI sales, the purchaser of the VOI
must have met the initial investment criteria and, as
applicable, the continuing investment criteria, by executing a
legally binding financing contract. A purchaser has met the
initial investment criteria when a minimum down payment of 10%
is received by us. In accordance with the requirements of the
guidance for real estate time-sharing transactions we must also
take into consideration the fair value of certain incentives
provided to the purchaser when assessing the adequacy of the
purchasers initial investment. In those cases where
financing is provided to the purchaser by us, the purchaser is
obligated to remit monthly payments under financing contracts
that represent the purchasers continuing investment. The
contractual terms of seller-provided financing arrangements
require that the contractual level of annual principal payments
be sufficient to amortize the loan over a customary period for
the VOI being financed, which is generally ten years, and
payments under the financing contracts begin within 45 days
of the sale and receipt of the minimum down payment of 10%.
If all of the criteria for a VOI sale to qualify under the full
accrual method of accounting have been met, as discussed above,
except that construction of the VOI purchased is not complete,
we recognize revenues using the
percentage-of-completion
method of accounting provided that the preliminary construction
phase is complete and that a minimum sales level has been met
(to assure that the property will not revert to a rental
property). The preliminary stage of development is deemed to be
complete when the engineering and design work is complete, the
construction contracts have been executed, the site has been
cleared, prepared and excavated, and the building foundation is
complete. The completion percentage is determined by the
proportion of real estate inventory costs incurred to total
estimated costs. These estimated costs are based upon historical
experience and the related contractual terms. The remaining
revenues and related costs of sales, including commissions and
direct expenses, are deferred and recognized as the remaining
costs are incurred. Until a contract for sale qualifies for
revenue recognition, all payments received are accounted for as
restricted cash and deposits within other current assets and
deferred income, respectively, on the Consolidated Balance
Sheets. Commissions and other direct costs related to the sale
are deferred until the sale is recorded. If a contract is
cancelled before qualifying as a sale, non-recoverable expenses
are charged to the current period as part of operating expenses
on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Changes in costs
could lead to adjustments to the percentage of completion status
of a project, which may result in difference in the timing and
amount of revenues recognized from the construction of vacation
ownership properties. This policy is discussed in greater detail
in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Allowance for Loan Losses. In our Vacation Ownership
segment, we provide for estimated vacation ownership contract
receivable cancellations at the time of VOI sales by recording a
provision for loan losses as a reduction of VOI sales on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations. We assess the adequacy of
the allowance for loan losses based on the historical
performance of similar vacation ownership contract receivables.
We use a technique referred to as static pool analysis, which
tracks defaults for each years sales over the entire life
of those contract receivables. We consider current defaults,
past due aging, historical write-offs of contracts, consumer
credit scores (FICO scores) in the assessment of borrowers
credit strength and expected loan performance. We also consider
whether the historical economic conditions are comparable to
current economic conditions. If current conditions differ from
the conditions in effect when the historical experience was
generated, we adjust the allowance for loan losses to reflect
the expected effects of the current environment on the
collectability of our vacation ownership contract receivables.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. With regard to the
goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets recorded
in connection with business combinations, we annually (during
the fourth quarter of each year subsequent to completing our
annual forecasting process) or, more frequently if circumstances
indicate impairment may have occurred that would more likely
than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its
carrying amount, reviews the reporting units carrying
values as required by the guidance for goodwill and other
intangible assets. We evaluate goodwill for impairment using the
two-step process prescribed in the guidance. The first step is
to compare the estimated fair value of any reporting unit within
the company that have recorded goodwill with the recorded net
book value (including the goodwill) of the reporting unit. If
the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is higher than
the recorded net book value, no impairment is deemed to exist
and no further testing is required. If, however, the estimated
fair value of the reporting unit is below the recorded net book
value, then a second step must be performed to determine the
goodwill impairment required, if any. In this second step, the
estimated fair value from the first step is used as the purchase
price in a hypothetical acquisition of the reporting unit.
Purchase business
67
combination accounting rules are followed to determine a
hypothetical purchase price allocation to the reporting
units assets and liabilities. The residual amount of
goodwill that results from this hypothetical purchase price
allocation is compared to the recorded amount of goodwill for
the reporting unit, and the recorded amount is written down to
the hypothetical amount, if lower. In accordance with the
guidance, we have determined that our reporting units are the
same as our reportable segments.
Quoted market prices for our reporting units are not available;
therefore, management must apply judgment in determining the
estimated fair value of these reporting units for purposes of
performing the annual goodwill impairment test. Management uses
all available information to make these fair value
determinations, including the present values of expected future
cash flows using discount rates commensurate with the risks
involved in the assets. Inherent in such fair value
determinations are certain judgments and estimates relating to
future cash flows, including our interpretation of current
economic indicators and market valuations, and assumptions about
our strategic plans with regard to our operations. To the extent
additional information arises, market conditions change or our
strategies change, it is possible that our conclusion regarding
whether existing goodwill is impaired could change and result in
a material effect on our consolidated financial position or
results of operations. In performing our impairment analysis, we
develop our estimated fair values for our reporting units using
a combination of the discounted cash flow methodology and the
market multiple methodology.
The discounted cash flow methodology establishes fair value by
estimating the present value of the projected future cash flows
to be generated from the reporting unit. The discount rate
applied to the projected future cash flows to arrive at the
present value is intended to reflect all risks of ownership and
the associated risks of realizing the stream of projected future
cash flows. The discounted cash flow methodology uses our
projections of financial performance for a five-year period. The
most significant assumptions used in the discounted cash flow
methodology are the discount rate, the terminal value and
expected future revenues, gross margins and operating margins,
which vary among reporting units.
We use a market multiple methodology to estimate the terminal
value of each reporting unit by comparing such reporting unit to
other publicly traded companies that are similar from an
operational and economic standpoint. The market multiple
methodology compares each reporting unit to the comparable
companies on the basis of risk characteristics in order to
determine the risk profile relative to the comparable companies
as a group. This analysis generally focuses on quantitative
considerations, which include financial performance and other
quantifiable data, and qualitative considerations, which include
any factors which are expected to impact future financial
performance. The most significant assumption affecting our
estimate of the terminal value of each reporting unit is the
multiple of the enterprise value to earnings before interest,
tax, depreciation and amortization.
To support our estimate of the individual reporting unit fair
values, a comparison is performed between the sum of the fair
values of the reporting units and our market capitalization. We
use an average of our market capitalization over a reasonable
period preceding the impairment testing date as being more
reflective of our stock price trend than a single day,
point-in-time
market price. The difference is an implied control premium,
which represents the acknowledgment that the observed market
prices of individual trades of a companys stock may not be
representative of the fair value of the company as a whole.
Estimates of a companys control premium are highly
judgmental and depend on capital market and macro-economic
conditions overall. We evaluate the implied control premium for
reasonableness.
Based on the results of our impairment evaluation performed
during the fourth quarter of 2009, we determined that no
impairment charge of goodwill was required as the fair value of
goodwill at our lodging and vacation exchange and rentals
reporting units was substantially in excess of the carrying
value.
Based on the results of our impairment evaluation performed
during the fourth quarter of 2008, we recorded a non-cash
$1,342 million charge for the impairment of goodwill at our
vacation ownership reporting unit, where all of the goodwill
previously recorded was determined to be impaired. As of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, our accumulated goodwill
impairment loss was $1,342 million ($1,337 million,
net of tax).
The aggregate carrying values of our goodwill and other
indefinite-lived intangible assets were
$1,386 million and $660 million, respectively, as
of December 31, 2009 and $1,353 million and
$660 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2008.
As of December 31, 2009, our goodwill is allocated between
our lodging ($297 million) and vacation exchange and
rentals ($1,089 million) reporting units and other
indefinite-lived intangible assets are allocated between our
lodging ($587 million) and vacation exchange and rentals
($73 million) reporting units. We continue to monitor the
goodwill recorded at our lodging and vacation exchange and
rentals reporting units for indicators of impairment. If
economic conditions were to deteriorate more than expected, or
other significant assumptions such as estimates of terminal
value were to change significantly, we may be required to record
an impairment of the goodwill balance at our lodging and
vacation and exchange and rentals reporting units.
We also evaluate the recoverability of our other long-lived
assets, including property and equipment and amortizable
intangible assets, if circumstances indicate impairment may have
occurred, pursuant to guidance for
68
impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. This analysis is
performed by comparing the respective carrying values of the
assets to the current and expected future cash flows, on an
undiscounted basis, to be generated from such assets. Property
and equipment is evaluated separately within each segment. If
such analysis indicates that the carrying value of these assets
is not recoverable, the carrying value of such assets is reduced
to fair value.
Business Combinations. A component of our growth strategy
has been to acquire and integrate businesses that complement our
existing operations. We account for business combinations in
accordance with the guidance for business combinations and
related literature. Accordingly, we allocate the purchase price
of acquired companies to the tangible and intangible assets
acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair
values at the date of purchase. The difference between the
purchase price and the fair value of the net assets acquired is
recorded as goodwill.
In determining the fair values of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in a business combination, we use various
recognized valuation methods including present value modeling
and referenced market values (where available). Further, we make
assumptions within certain valuation techniques including
discount rates and timing of future cash flows. Valuations are
performed by management or independent valuation specialists
under managements supervision, where appropriate. We
believe that the estimated fair values assigned to the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed are based on reasonable
assumptions that marketplace participants would use. However,
such assumptions are inherently uncertain and actual results
could differ from those estimates
Accounting for Restructuring Activities. During 2008, we
committed to restructuring actions and activities associated
with strategic realignment initiatives targeted principally at
reducing costs, enhancing organizational efficiency, reducing
our need to access the asset-backed securities market and
consolidating and rationalizing existing processes and
facilities, which are accounted for under the guidance for post
employment benefits and costs associated with exit and disposal
activities. Our restructuring actions require us to make
significant estimates in several areas including:
(i) expenses for severance and related benefit costs;
(ii) the ability to generate sublease income, as well as
our ability to terminate lease obligations; and
(iii) contract terminations. The amounts that we have
accrued as of December 31, 2009 represent our best estimate
of the obligations that we expect to incur in connection with
these actions, but could be subject to change due to various
factors including market conditions and the outcome of
negotiations with third parties. Should the actual amounts
differ from our estimates, the amount of the restructuring
charges could be materially impacted.
Income Taxes. We recognize deferred tax assets and
liabilities based on the differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and
liabilities. We regularly review our deferred tax assets to
assess their potential realization and establish a valuation
allowance for portions of such assets that we believe will not
be ultimately realized. In performing this review, we make
estimates and assumptions regarding projected future taxable
income, the expected timing of the reversals of existing
temporary differences and the implementation of tax planning
strategies. A change in these assumptions could cause an
increase or decrease to our valuation allowance resulting in an
increase or decrease in our effective tax rate, which could
materially impact our results of operations.
Changes
in Accounting Policies
During 2009, we adopted standards related to the following:
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
|
|
Determining Fair Value Under Market Activity Decline
|
|
Financial Instruments
|
We will adopt recently issued standards, related to the
following, as required:
|
|
|
Transfers and Servicing
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
Multiple-Deliverable
Revenue Arrangements
|
For detailed information regarding these standards and the
impact thereof on our financial statements, see Note 2 to
our Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
ITEM 7A.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
We use various financial instruments, particularly swap
contracts and interest rate caps to manage and reduce the
interest rate risk related to our debt. Foreign currency
forwards and options are also used to manage and reduce the
foreign currency exchange rate risk associated with our foreign
currency denominated receivables, payables and forecasted
royalties, forecasted earnings and cash flows of foreign
subsidiaries and other transactions.
We are exclusively an end user of these instruments, which are
commonly referred to as derivatives. We do not engage in
trading, market making or other speculative activities in the
derivatives markets. More detailed
69
information about these financial instruments is provided in
Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Our
principal market exposures are interest and foreign currency
rate risks.
|
|
|
Our primary interest rate exposure as of December 31, 2009
was to interest rate fluctuations in the United States,
specifically LIBOR and asset-backed commercial paper interest
rates due to their impact on variable rate borrowings and other
interest rate sensitive liabilities. In addition, interest rate
movements in one country, as well as relative interest rate
movements between countries can impact us. We anticipate that
LIBOR and asset-backed commercial paper rates will remain a
primary market risk exposure for the foreseeable future.
|
|
|
We have foreign currency rate exposure to exchange rate
fluctuations worldwide and particularly with respect to the
British pound and Euro. We anticipate that such foreign currency
exchange rate risk will remain a market risk exposure for the
foreseeable future.
|
We assess our market risk based on changes in interest and
foreign currency exchange rates utilizing a sensitivity
analysis. The sensitivity analysis measures the potential impact
in earnings, fair values and cash flows based on a hypothetical
10% change (increase and decrease) in interest and foreign
currency exchange rates. We have approximately $3.5 billion
of debt outstanding as of December 31, 2009. Of that total,
$558 million was issued as variable rate debt and has not
been synthetically converted to fixed rate debt via an interest
rate swap. A hypothetical 10% change in our effective weighted
average interest rate would not generate a material change in
interest expense.
The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables,
accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current
liabilities approximate carrying values due to the short-term
nature of these assets. We use a discounted cash flow model in
determining the fair values of vacation ownership contract
receivables. The primary assumptions used in determining fair
value are prepayment speeds, estimated loss rates and discount
rates. We use a duration-based model in determining the impact
of interest rate shifts on our debt and interest rate
derivatives. The primary assumption used in these models is that
a 10% increase or decrease in the benchmark interest rate
produces a parallel shift in the yield curve across all
maturities.
We use a current market pricing model to assess the changes in
the value of our foreign currency derivatives used by us to
hedge underlying exposure that primarily consist of the
non-functional current assets and liabilities of us and our
subsidiaries. The primary assumption used in these models is a
hypothetical 10% weakening or strengthening of the
U.S. dollar against all our currency exposures as of
December 31, 2009. The gains and losses on the hedging
instruments are largely offset by the gains and losses on the
underlying assets, liabilities or expected cash flows. As of
December 31, 2009, the absolute notional amount of our
outstanding foreign exchange hedging instruments was
$709 million. A hypothetical 10% change in the foreign
currency exchange rates would result in an increase or decrease
of approximately $20 million in the fair value of the
hedging instrument as of December 31, 2009. Such a change
would be largely offset by an opposite effect on the underlying
assets, liabilities and expected cash flows.
Our total market risk is influenced by a wide variety of factors
including the volatility present within the markets and the
liquidity of the markets. There are certain limitations inherent
in the sensitivity analyses presented. While probably the most
meaningful analysis, these shock tests are
constrained by several factors, including the necessity to
conduct the analysis based on a single point in time and the
inability to include the complex market reactions that normally
would arise from the market shifts modeled.
We used December 31, 2009 market rates on outstanding
financial instruments to perform the sensitivity analysis
separately for each of our market risk exposures
interest and foreign currency rate instruments. The estimates
are based on the market risk sensitive portfolios described in
the preceding paragraphs and assume instantaneous, parallel
shifts in interest rate yield curves and exchange rates.
|
|
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
See Financial Statements and Financial Statement Index
commencing on
page F-1
hereof.
|
|
ITEM 9.
|
CHANGE
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
Not applicable
|
|
ITEM 9A.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our management, with
the participation of our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of
our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined
in Rules
13a-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
as amended (the Exchange Act)) as of the end of the
period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, our
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
have concluded that, as of the end of such period, our
disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting. Our management is responsible for establishing
and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting, as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
under the Exchange Act. Our management assessed the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2009. In making this assessment,
management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in
Internal Control Integrated Framework. Based
on this assessment, our management believes that, as of
December 31, 2009, our internal control over financial
reporting is effective. Our independent registered public
accounting firm has issued an attestation report on the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting,
which is included within their audit opinion on
page F-2.
|
|
|
ITEM 9B.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
Not applicable
PART III
|
|
ITEM 10.
|
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
Identification
of Directors.
Information required by this item is included in the Proxy
Statement under the caption Election of Directors
and is incorporated by reference in this report.
Identification
of Executive Officers.
The following provides information for each of our executive
officers.
Stephen P. Holmes, 53, has served as our Chairman of the Board
of Directors and as our Chief Executive Officer since our
separation from Cendant in July 2006. Mr. Holmes was a
director since May 2003 of the already-existing, wholly owned
subsidiary of Cendant that held the assets and liabilities of
Cendants hospitality services (including timeshare
resorts) businesses before our separation from Cendant and has
served as a director of Wyndham Worldwide since the separation
in July 2006. Mr. Holmes was Vice Chairman and Director of
Cendant and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Cendants Travel Content Division from December 1997 until
our separation from Cendant in July 2006. Mr. Holmes was
Vice Chairman of HFS Incorporated, from September 1996 until
December 1997 and was a director of HFS from June 1994 until
December 1997. From July 1990 through September 1996,
Mr. Holmes served as Executive Vice President, Treasurer
and Chief Financial Officer of HFS.
Geoffrey A. Ballotti, 48, has served as President and Chief
Executive Officer, Wyndham Exchange and Rentals, since March
2008. Prior to joining Wyndham Exchange and Rentals, from
October 2003 to March 2008, Mr. Ballotti was President,
North America Division of Starwood Hotels and Resorts Worldwide.
From 1989 to 2003, Mr. Ballotti held leadership positions
of increasing responsibility at Starwood Hotels and Resorts
Worldwide including President of Starwood North America,
Executive Vice President, Operations, Senior Vice President,
Southern Europe and Managing Director, Ciga Spa, Italy. Prior to
Starwood Hotels and Resorts Worldwide, Mr. Ballotti was a
Banking Officer in the Commercial Real Estate Group at the Bank
of New England.
Eric A. Danziger, 55, has served as President and Chief
Executive Officer, Wyndham Hotel Group, since December 2008.
From August 2006 to December 2008, Mr. Danziger was Chief
Executive Officer of WhiteFence, Inc., an online site for home
services firm. From June 2001 to August 2006, Mr. Danziger
was President and Chief Executive Officer of ZipRealty, a real
estate brokerage. From April 1998 to June 2001,
Mr. Danziger was President and Chief Operating Officer of
Carlson Hotels Worldwide. From June 1996 to August 1998,
Mr. Danziger was President and CEO of Starwood Hotels and
Resorts Worldwide. From September 1990 to June 1996,
Mr. Danziger was President of Wyndham Hotels and Resorts.
Franz S. Hanning, 56, has served as President and Chief
Executive Officer, Wyndham Vacation Ownership, since our
separation from Cendant in July 2006. Mr. Hanning was the
Chief Executive Officer of Cendants Timeshare Resort Group
from March 2005 until our separation from Cendant in July 2006.
Mr. Hanning served as President and Chief Executive Officer
of Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. (formerly known as Fairfield
Resorts, Inc.) from April 2001, when Cendant acquired Fairfield
Resorts, Inc., to March 2005 and as President and Chief
Executive Officer of Wyndham Resort Development Corporation
(formerly known as Trendwest Resorts, Inc.) from August 2004 to
March 2005. Mr. Hanning joined Fairfield Resorts, Inc. in
1982 and held several key leadership
71
positions with Fairfield Resorts, Inc., including Regional Vice
President, Executive Vice President of Sales and Chief Operating
Officer.
Thomas G. Conforti, 51, has served as our Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer since September 2009. From
December 2002 to September 2008, Mr. Conforti was Chief
Financial Officer of DineEquity, Inc. Earlier in his career,
Mr. Conforti held a number of general management, financial
and strategic roles over a ten-year period in the Consumer
Products Division of the Walt Disney Company. Mr. Conforti
also held numerous finance and strategy roles within the College
Textbook Publishing Division of CBS and the Soft Drink Division
of Pepsico.
Scott G. McLester, 47, has served as our Executive Vice
President and General Counsel since our separation from Cendant
in July 2006. Mr. McLester was Senior Vice President, Legal
for Cendant from April 2004 until our separation from Cendant in
July 2006. Mr. McLester was Group Vice President, Legal for
Cendant from March 2002 to April 2004, Vice President, Legal for
Cendant from February 2001 to March 2002 and Senior Counsel for
Cendant from June 2000 to February 2001. Prior to joining
Cendant, Mr. McLester was a Vice President in the Law
Department of Merrill Lynch in New York and a partner with the
law firm of Carpenter, Bennett and Morrissey in Newark, New
Jersey.
Mary R. Falvey, 49, has served as our Executive Vice President
and Chief Human Resources Officer since our separation from
Cendant in July 2006. Ms. Falvey was Executive Vice
President, Global Human Resources for Cendants Vacation
Network Group from April 2005 until our separation from Cendant
in July 2006. From March 2000 to April 2005, Ms. Falvey
served as Executive Vice President, Human Resources for RCI.
From January 1998 to March 2000, Ms. Falvey was Vice
President of Human Resources for Cendants Hotel Division
and Corporate Contact Center group. Prior to joining Cendant,
Ms. Falvey held various leadership positions in the human
resources division of Nabisco Foods Company.
Thomas F. Anderson, 45, has served as our Executive Vice
President and Chief Real Estate Development Officer since our
separation from Cendant in July 2006. From April 2003 until July
2006, Mr. Anderson was Executive Vice President, Strategic
Acquisitions and Development of Cendants Timeshare Resort
Group. From January 2000 until February 2003, Mr. Anderson
was Senior Vice President, Corporate Real Estate for Cendant
Corporation. From November 1998 until December 1999,
Mr. Anderson was Vice President of Real Estate Services,
Coldwell Banker Commercial. From March 1995 to October 1998,
Mr. Anderson was General Manager of American Asset
Corporation, a full service real estate developer based in
Charlotte, North Carolina. From June 1990 until February 1995,
Mr. Anderson was Vice President of Commercial Lending for
BB&T Corporation in Charlotte, North Carolina.
Nicola Rossi, 43, has served as our Senior Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer since our separation from Cendant in
July 2006. Mr. Rossi was Vice President and Controller of
Cendants Hotel Group from June 2004 until our separation
from Cendant in July 2006. From April 2002 to June 2004,
Mr. Rossi served as Vice President, Corporate Finance for
Cendant. From April 2000 to April 2002, Mr. Rossi was
Corporate Controller of Jacuzzi Brands, Inc., a bath and
plumbing products company, and was Assistant Corporate
Controller from June 1999 to March 2000.
Compliance
with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.
The information required by this item is included in the Proxy
Statement under the caption Section 16(a) Beneficial
Ownership Reporting Compliance and is incorporated by
reference in this report.
Code of
Ethics.
The information required by this item is included in the Proxy
Statement under the caption Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics and is incorporated by reference in this report.
Corporate
Governance.
The information required by this item is included in the Proxy
Statement under the caption Governance of the
Company and is incorporated by reference in this report.
|
|
ITEM 11.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
The information required by this item is included in the Proxy
Statement under the captions Compensation of
Directors, Executive Compensation and
Committees of the Board and is incorporated by
reference in this report.
72
|
|
ITEM 12.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
The information required by this item is included in the Proxy
Statement under the caption Ownership of Company
Stock and is incorporated by reference in this report.
|
|
ITEM 13.
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
|
The information required by this item is included in the Proxy
Statement under the captions Related Party
Transactions and Governance of the Company and
is incorporated by reference in this report.
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
|
The information required by this item is included in the Proxy
Statement under the captions Disclosure About Fees
and Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services and
is incorporated by reference in this report.
PART IV
|
|
ITEM 15.
|
EXHIBITS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
|
|
ITEM 15
|
(A)(1)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
See Financial Statements and Financial Statements Index
commencing on
page F-1
hereof.
See Exhibit Index commencing on
page G-1
hereof.
In reviewing the agreements included as exhibits to this report,
please be advised that the agreements are included to provide
you with information regarding their terms and are not intended
to provide any other factual or disclosure information about us
or the other parties to the agreements. The agreements generally
contain representations and warranties by each of the parties to
the applicable agreement. These representations and warranties
have been made solely for the benefit of the other parties to
the applicable agreement and:
|
|
|
should not in all instances be treated as categorical statements
of fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk to one of
the parties if those statements prove to be inaccurate;
|
|
|
may apply standards of materiality in a way that is different
from what may be viewed as material to you or other investors;
|
|
|
have been qualified by disclosures that were made to the other
party in connection with the negotiation of the applicable
agreement, which disclosures are not necessarily reflected in
the agreement; and
|
|
|
were made only as of the date of the applicable agreement or
such other date or dates as may be specified in the agreement
and are subject to more recent developments.
|
Accordingly, these representations and warranties may not
describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were
made or at any other time. Additional information about us may
be found elsewhere in this report and our other public filings,
which are available without charge through the SECs
website at
http://www.sec.gov.
73
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
WYNDHAM WORLDWIDE CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ STEPHEN
P. HOLMES
|
Stephen P. Holmes
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Date: February 19, 2010
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ STEPHEN
P. HOLMES
Stephen
P. Holmes
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
February 19, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ THOMAS
G. CONFORTI
Thomas
G. Conforti
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
February 19, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ NICOLA
ROSSI
Nicola
Rossi
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
February 19, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ MYRA
J. BIBLOWIT
Myra
J. Biblowit
|
|
Director
|
|
February 19, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ JAMES
E. BUCKMAN
James
E. Buckman
|
|
Director
|
|
February 19, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ GEORGE
HERRERA
George
Herrera
|
|
Director
|
|
February 19, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ THE
RIGHT HONOURABLE
BRIAN MULRONEY
The
Right Honourable Brian Mulroney
|
|
Director
|
|
February 19, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ PAULINE
D.E. RICHARDS
Pauline
D.E. Richards
|
|
Director
|
|
February 19, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ MICHAEL
H. WARGOTZ
Michael
H. Wargotz
|
|
Director
|
|
February 19, 2010
|
74
INDEX TO
ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
F-1
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Wyndham Worldwide
Corporation
Parsippany, New Jersey
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation and subsidiaries (the
Company) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and
the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2009. We also have
audited the Companys internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria
established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. The Companys management is responsible for
these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal
control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
included in the accompanying Managements Annual Report on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on these financial statements and an
opinion on the Companys internal control over financial
reporting based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement and whether effective internal
control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audits of the financial statements included
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial
reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a
material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the
assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed by, or under the supervision of, the
companys principal executive and principal financial
officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected
by the companys board of directors, management, and other
personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over
financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or
improper management override of controls, material misstatements
due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a
timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the
effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting
to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Wyndham Worldwide Corporation and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. Also, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all
material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on the criteria
established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Parsippany, New Jersey
February 19, 2010
F-2
WYNDHAM
WORLDWIDE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In millions, except per share
data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service fees and membership
|
|
$
|
1,613
|
|
|
$
|
1,705
|
|
|
$
|
1,619
|
|
Vacation ownership interest sales
|
|
|
1,053
|
|
|
|
1,463
|
|
|
|
1,666
|
|
Franchise fees
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
Consumer financing
|
|
|
435
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
Other
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
|
|
4,281
|
|
|
|
4,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
1,501
|
|
|
|
1,622
|
|
|
|
1,632
|
|
Cost of vacation ownership interests
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
Consumer financing interest
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
Marketing and reservation
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
|
830
|
|
|
|
831
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
519
|
|
Separation and related costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Goodwill and other impairments
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
1,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
3,156
|
|
|
|
5,111
|
|
|
|
3,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income/(loss)
|
|
|
594
|
|
|
|
(830
|
)
|
|
|
710
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
493
|
|
|
|
(887
|
)
|
|
|
655
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
293
|
|
|
$
|
(1,074
|
)
|
|
$
|
403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings/(losses) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.64
|
|
|
$
|
(6.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1.61
|
|
|
|
(6.05
|
)
|
|
|
2.20
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
155
|
|
|
$
|
136
|
|
Trade receivables, net
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
Vacation ownership contract receivables, net
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,740
|
|
|
|
1,914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term vacation ownership contract receivables, net
|
|
|
2,792
|
|
|
|
2,963
|
|
Non-current inventory
|
|
|
953
|
|
|
|
905
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
953
|
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,386
|
|
|
|
1,353
|
|
Trademarks, net
|
|
|
660
|
|
|
|
661
|
|
Franchise agreements and other intangibles, net
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
9,352
|
|
|
$
|
9,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized vacation ownership debt
|
|
$
|
209
|
|
|
$
|
294
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
672
|
|
Due to former Parent and subsidiaries
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
579
|
|
|
|
638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,885
|
|
|
|
2,169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term securitized vacation ownership debt
|
|
|
1,298
|
|
|
|
1,516
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,840
|
|
|
|
1,815
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
1,137
|
|
|
|
966
|
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
311
|
|
Due to former Parent and subsidiaries
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
6,664
|
|
|
|
7,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 16)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, authorized
6,000,000 shares, none issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value, authorized
600,000,000 shares, issued 205,891,254 shares in 2009
and 204,645,505 shares in 2008
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
3,733
|
|
|
|
3,690
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(315
|
)
|
|
|
(578
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost27,284,823 shares in 2009 and
2008
|
|
|
(870
|
)
|
|
|
(870
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
2,688
|
|
|
|
2,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
9,352
|
|
|
$
|
9,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-4
WYNDHAM
WORLDWIDE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
293
|
|
|
$
|
(1,074
|
)
|
|
$
|
403
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income/(loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
449
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
305
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Impairment of goodwill and other assets
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
1,426
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Non-cash interest
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Non-cash restructuring
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in assets and liabilities, excluding the impact of
acquisitions and dispositions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Vacation ownership contract receivables
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
|
|
(786
|
)
|
|
|
(835
|
)
|
Inventory
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
|
|
(322
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
|
|
146
|
|
Due to former Parent and subsidiaries, net
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
(315
|
)
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
689
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment additions
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
Net assets acquired, net of cash acquired, and
acquisition-related payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
Equity investments and development advances
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
Proceeds from asset sales
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
(Increase)/decrease in securitization restricted cash
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
Decrease in escrow deposit restricted cash
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(109
|
)
|
|
|
(319
|
)
|
|
|
(255
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from securitized borrowings
|
|
|
1,406
|
|
|
|
1,923
|
|
|
|
2,636
|
|
Principal payments on securitized borrowings
|
|
|
(1,711
|
)
|
|
|
(2,194
|
)
|
|
|
(2,018
|
)
|
Proceeds from non-securitized borrowings
|
|
|
822
|
|
|
|
2,183
|
|
|
|
1,403
|
|
Principal payments on non-securitized borrowings
|
|
|
(1,451
|
)
|
|
|
(1,681
|
)
|
|
|
(1,339
|
)
|
Proceeds from note issuance
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of call options
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of warrants
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends to shareholders
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Capital contribution from former Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(526
|
)
|
Proceeds from stock option exercises
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(561
|
)
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of changes in exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
155
|
|
|
$
|
136
|
|
|
$
|
210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-5
WYNDHAM
WORLDWIDE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Earnings/
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
(Accumulated
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit)
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2007
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
3,566
|
|
|
$
|
156
|
|
|
$
|
184
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(349
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,559
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax of $15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax benefit of $12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension liability adjustment, net of tax of $1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
413
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Issuance of share for RSU vesting
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Cumulative effect, adoption of guidance for uncertainty in
income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(508
|
)
|
|
|
(508
|
)
|
Cash transfer from former Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Tax adjustment from former Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Change in excess tax benefit on equity awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3,652
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(857
|
)
|
|
|
3,516
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,074
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax benefit of $107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax benefit of $12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension liability adjustment, net of tax benefit $0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,170
|
)
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Issuance of shares for RSU vesting
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Cash transfer from former Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Change in excess tax benefit on equity awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3,690
|
|
|
|
(578
|
)
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(870
|
)
|
|
|
2,342
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax of $31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on cash flow hedges, net of tax of $10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension liability adjustment, net of tax benefit of $1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
Issuance of warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Issuance of shares for RSU vesting
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Change in excess tax benefit on equity awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
3,733
|
|
|
$
|
(315
|
)
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(870
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-6
WYNDHAM
WORLDWIDE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise noted, all amounts are in millions, except
per share amounts)
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation is a global provider of
hospitality products and services. The accompanying Consolidated
Financial Statements include the accounts and transactions of
Wyndham, as well as the entities in which Wyndham directly or
indirectly has a controlling financial interest. The
accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. All intercompany
balances and transactions have been eliminated in the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In presenting the Consolidated Financial Statements, management
makes estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported
and related disclosures. Estimates, by their nature, are based
on judgment and available information. Accordingly, actual
results could differ from those estimates. In managements
opinion, the Consolidated Financial Statements contain all
normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation
of annual results reported.
Business
Description
The Company operates in the following business segments:
|
|
|
Lodgingfranchises hotels in the upscale,
midscale, economy and extended stay segments of the lodging
industry and provides hotel management services for full-service
hotels globally.
|
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentalsprovides
vacation exchange products and services to owners of intervals
of vacation ownership interests (VOIs) and markets
vacation rental properties primarily on behalf of independent
owners.
|
|
|
Vacation Ownershipdevelops, markets and
sells VOIs to individual consumers, provides consumer financing
in connection with the sale of VOIs and provides property
management services at resorts.
|
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Principles
of Consolidation
When evaluating an entity for consolidation, the Company first
determines whether an entity is within the scope of the guidance
for consolidation of variable interest entities
(VIE) and if it is deemed to be a VIE. If the entity
is considered to be a VIE, the Company determines whether it
would be considered the entitys primary beneficiary. The
Company consolidates those VIEs for which it has determined that
it is the primary beneficiary. The Company will consolidate an
entity not deemed either a VIE or qualifying special purpose
entity (QSPE) upon a determination that it has a
controlling financial interest. For entities where the Company
does not have a controlling financial interest, the investments
in such entities are classified as
available-for-sale
securities or accounted for using the equity or cost method, as
appropriate.
Revenue
Recognition
Lodging
The Companys franchising business is designed to generate
revenues for its hotel owners through the delivery of room night
bookings to the hotel, the promotion of brand awareness among
the consumer base, global sales efforts, ensuring guest
satisfaction and providing outstanding customer service to both
its customers and guests staying at hotels in its system.
The Company enters into agreements to franchise its lodging
brands to independent hotel owners. The Companys standard
franchise agreement typically has a term of 15 to 20 years
and provides a franchisee with certain rights to terminate the
franchise agreement before the term of the agreement under
certain circumstances. The principal source of revenues from
franchising hotels is ongoing franchise fees, which are
comprised of royalty fees and other fees relating to marketing
and reservation services. Ongoing franchise fees typically are
based on a percentage of gross room revenues of each franchised
hotel and are recorded upon becoming due from the franchisee. An
estimate of uncollectible ongoing franchise fees is charged to
bad debt expense and included in operating expenses on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations. Lodging revenues also
include initial franchise fees, which are recognized as revenues
when all material services or conditions have been substantially
performed, which is either when a franchised hotel opens for
business or when a franchise agreement is terminated after it
has been determined that the franchised hotel will not open.
F-7
The Companys franchise agreements also require the payment
of fees for certain services, including marketing and
reservations. With such fees, the Company provides its
franchised properties with a suite of operational and
administrative services, including access to (i) an
international, centralized, brand-specific reservations system,
(ii) third-party distribution channels, such as online
travel agents, (iii) advertising, (iv) its loyalty
program, (v) global sales support, (vi) operations
support, (vii) training, (viii) strategic sourcing and
(ix) design and construction services. The Company is
contractually obligated to expend the marketing and reservation
fees it collects from franchisees in accordance with the
franchise agreements; as such, revenues earned in excess of
costs incurred are accrued as a liability for future marketing
or reservation costs. Costs incurred in excess of revenues are
expensed as incurred. In accordance with its franchise
agreements, the Company includes an allocation of costs required
to carry out marketing and reservation activities within
marketing and reservation expenses.
The Company also provides management services for hotels under
management contracts, which offer all the benefits of a global
brand and a full range of management, marketing and reservation
services. In addition to the standard franchise services
described below, the Companys hotel management business
provides hotel owners with professional oversight and
comprehensive operations support services such as hiring,
training and supervising the managers and employees that operate
the hotels as well as annual budget preparation, financial
analysis and extensive food and beverage services. The
Companys standard management agreement typically has a
term of up to 20 years. The Companys management fees
are comprised of base fees, which are typically calculated based
upon a specified percentage of gross revenues from hotel
operations, and incentive fees, which are typically calculated
based upon a specified percentage of a hotels gross
operating profit. Management fee revenues are recognized when
earned in accordance with the terms of the contract. The Company
incurs certain reimbursable costs on behalf of managed hotel
properties and reports reimbursements received from managed
properties as revenues and the costs incurred on their behalf as
expenses. Management fee revenues are recorded as a component of
franchise fee revenues and reimbursable revenues are recorded as
a component of service fees and membership revenues on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations. The costs, which
principally relate to payroll costs for operational employees
who work at the managed hotels, are reflected as a component of
operating expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The reimbursements from hotel owners are based upon the costs
incurred with no added margin; as a result, these reimbursable
costs have little to no effect on the Companys operating
income. Management fee revenues and revenues related to payroll
reimbursements were $4 million and $85 million,
respectively, during 2009, $5 million and
$100 million, respectively, during 2008 and $6 million
and $92 million, respectively, during 2007.
The Company also earns revenues from administering its Wyndham
Rewards loyalty program. The Company charges its
franchisee/managed hotel owner a fee based upon a percentage of
room revenues generated from member stays at participating
hotels. This fee is recorded upon becoming due from the
franchisee.
Vacation
Exchange and Rentals
As a provider of vacation exchange services, the Company enters
into affiliation agreements with developers of vacation
ownership properties to allow owners of intervals to trade their
intervals for certain other intervals within the Companys
vacation exchange business and, for some members, for other
leisure-related products and services. Additionally, as a
marketer of vacation rental properties, generally the Company
enters into contracts for exclusive periods of time with
property owners to market the rental of such properties to
rental customers. The Companys vacation exchange business
derives a majority of its revenues from annual membership dues
and exchange fees from members trading their intervals. Annual
dues revenues represent the annual membership fees from members
who participate in the Companys vacation exchange business
and, for additional fees, have the right to exchange their
intervals for certain other intervals within the Companys
vacation exchange business and, for certain members, for other
leisure-related products and services. The Company recognizes
revenues from annual membership dues on a straight-line basis
over the membership period during which delivery of
publications, if applicable, and other services are provided to
the members. Exchange fees are generated when members exchange
their intervals for equivalent values of rights and services,
which may include intervals at other properties within the
Companys vacation exchange business or other
leisure-related products and services. Exchange fees are
recognized as revenues, net of expected cancellations, when the
exchange requests have been confirmed to the member. The
Companys vacation rentals business primarily derives its
revenues from fees, which generally average between 20% and 45%
of the gross booking fees for non-proprietary inventory, except
for where it receives 100% of the revenues for properties that
it owns or operates under long-term capital leases. The majority
of the time, the Company acts on behalf of the owners of the
rental properties to generate the Companys fees. The
Company provides reservation services to the independent
property owners and receives the
agreed-upon
fee for the service provided. The Company remits the gross
rental fee received from the renter to the independent property
owner, net of the Companys
agreed-upon
fee. Revenues from such fees are recognized in the period that
the rental reservation is made, net of expected cancellations.
Cancellations for 2009, 2008 and 2007 each totaled less than 5%
of rental transactions booked. Upon confirmation of the rental
reservation, the rental customer and property owner generally
have a direct relationship for additional services to be
performed. The Company also earns rental fees in connection with
properties it owns or operates under long-term capital leases
and such fees are recognized when the rental
F-8
customers stay occurs, as this is the point at which the
service is rendered. The Companys revenues are earned when
evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or the
services have been rendered, the sellers price to the
buyer is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably
assured.
Vacation
Ownership
The Company develops, markets and sells VOIs to individual
consumers, provides property management services at resorts and
provides consumer financing in connection with the sale of VOIs.
The Companys vacation ownership business derives the
majority of its revenues from sales of VOIs and derives other
revenues from consumer financing and property management. The
Companys sales of VOIs are either cash sales or
Company-financed sales. In order for the Company to recognize
revenues of VOI sales under the full accrual method of
accounting described in the guidance for sales of real estate
for fully constructed inventory, a binding sales contract must
have been executed, the statutory rescission period must have
expired (after which time the purchasers are not entitled to a
refund except for non-delivery by the Company), receivables must
have been deemed collectible and the remainder of the
Companys obligations must have been substantially
completed. In addition, before the Company recognizes any
revenues on VOI sales, the purchaser of the VOI must have met
the initial investment criteria and, as applicable, the
continuing investment criteria, by executing a legally binding
financing contract. A purchaser has met the initial investment
criteria when a minimum down payment of 10% is received by the
Company. In accordance with the guidance for accounting for real
estate time-sharing transactions, the Company must also take
into consideration the fair value of certain incentives provided
to the purchaser when assessing the adequacy of the
purchasers initial investment. In those cases where
financing is provided to the purchaser by the Company, the
purchaser is obligated to remit monthly payments under financing
contracts that represent the purchasers continuing
investment. If all of the criteria for a VOI sale to qualify
under the full accrual method of accounting have been met, as
discussed above, except that construction of the VOI purchased
is not complete, the Company recognizes revenues using the
percentage-of-completion
method of accounting provided that the preliminary construction
phase is complete and that a minimum sales level has been met
(to assure that the property will not revert to a rental
property). The preliminary stage of development is deemed to be
complete when the engineering and design work is complete, the
construction contracts have been executed, the site has been
cleared, prepared and excavated, and the building foundation is
complete. The completion percentage is determined by the
proportion of real estate inventory costs incurred to total
estimated costs. These estimated costs are based upon historical
experience and the related contractual terms. The remaining
revenues and related costs of sales, including commissions and
direct expenses, are deferred and recognized as the remaining
costs are incurred.
The Company also offers consumer financing as an option to
customers purchasing VOIs, which are typically collateralized by
the underlying VOI. The contractual terms of Company-provided
financing agreements require that the contractual level of
annual principal payments be sufficient to amortize the loan
over a customary period for the VOI being financed, which is
generally ten years, and payments under the financing contracts
begin within 45 days of the sale and receipt of the minimum
down payment of 10%. An estimate of uncollectible amounts is
recorded at the time of the sale with a charge to the provision
for loan losses, which is, classified as a reduction of vacation
ownership interest sales on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations. The interest income earned from the financing
arrangements is earned on the principal balance outstanding over
the life of the arrangement and is recorded within consumer
financing on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Company also provides
day-to-day-management
services, including oversight of housekeeping services,
maintenance and certain accounting and administrative services
for property owners associations and clubs. In some cases,
the Companys employees serve as officers
and/or
directors of these associations and clubs in accordance with
their by-laws and associated regulations. Management fee
revenues are recognized when earned in accordance with the terms
of the contract and is recorded as a component of service fees
and membership on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The
costs, which principally relate to the payroll costs for
management of the associations, clubs and the resort properties
where the Company is the employer, are reflected as a component
of operating expenses on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations. Reimbursements are based upon the costs incurred
with no added margin and thus presentation of these reimbursable
costs has little to no effect on the Companys operating
income. Management fee revenues and revenues related to
reimbursements were $170 million and $206 million,
respectively, during 2009, $159 million and
$187 million, respectively, during 2008 and
$146 million and $164 million, respectively, during
2007. During 2009, 2008 and 2007, one of the associations that
the Company manages paid Wyndham Exchange and Rentals
$19 million, $17 million and $15 million,
respectively, for exchange services.
During 2009, 2008 and 2007, gross sales of VOIs were increased
by $187 million and reduced by $75 million and
$22 million, respectively, representing the net change in
revenues that was deferred under the percentage of completion
method of accounting. Under the percentage of completion method
of accounting, a portion of the total revenues from a vacation
ownership contract sale is not recognized if the construction of
the vacation resort has not yet been fully completed. Such
deferred revenues were recognized in subsequent periods in
proportion to the costs
F-9
incurred as compared to the total expected costs for completion
of construction of the vacation resort. As of December 31,
2009, all revenues that were previously deferred under the
percentage of completion method of accounting had been
recognized.
The Company records lodging-related marketing and reservation
revenues, Wyndham Rewards revenues, as well as hotel/property
management services revenues for the Companys Lodging and
Vacation Ownership segments, in accordance with the guidance for
gross versus net presentation, which requires that these
revenues be recorded on a gross basis.
Income
Taxes
The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities using
the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets
and liabilities are calculated based upon the temporary
differences between the financial statement and income tax bases
of assets and liabilities using currently enacted tax rates.
These differences are based upon estimated differences between
the book and tax basis of the assets and liabilities for the
Company as of December 31, 2009 and 2008.
The Companys deferred tax assets are recorded net of a
valuation allowance when, based on the weight of available
evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of
the recorded deferred tax assets will not be realized in future
periods. Decreases to the valuation allowance are recorded as
reductions to the Companys provision for income taxes and
increases to the valuation allowance result in additional
provision for income taxes. The realization of the
Companys deferred tax assets, net of the valuation
allowance, is primarily dependent on estimated future taxable
income. A change in the Companys estimate of future
taxable income may require an addition to or reduction from the
valuation allowance.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers highly-liquid investments purchased with
an original maturity of three months or less to be cash
equivalents.
Restricted
Cash
The largest portion of the Companys restricted cash
relates to securitizations. The remaining portion is comprised
of cash held in escrow related to the Companys vacation
ownership business and cash held in all other escrow accounts.
Securitizations: In accordance with the contractual requirements
of the Companys various vacation ownership contract
receivable securitizations, a dedicated lockbox account, subject
to a blocked control agreement, is established for each
securitization. At each month end, the total cash in the
collection account from the previous month is analyzed and a
monthly servicer report is prepared by the Company, which
details how much cash should be remitted to the noteholders for
principal and interest payments, and any cash remaining is
transferred by the trustee back to the Company. Additionally, as
required by various securitizations, the Company holds an
agreed-upon
percentage of the aggregate outstanding principal balances of
the VOI contract receivables collateralizing the asset-backed
notes in a segregated trust (or reserve) account as credit
enhancement. Each time a securitization closes and the Company
receives cash from the noteholders, a portion of the cash is
deposited in the reserve account. Such amounts were
$133 million and $155 million as of December 31,
2009 and 2008, respectively, of which $69 million and
$80 million is recorded within other current assets as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively and
$64 million and $75 million are recorded within other
non-current assets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Escrow Deposits: Laws in most U.S. states require the
escrow of down payments on VOI sales, with the typical
requirement mandating that the funds be held in escrow until the
rescission period expires. As sales transactions are
consummated, down payments are collected and are subsequently
placed in escrow until the rescission period has expired.
Depending on the state, the rescission period can be as short as
three calendar days or as long as 15 calendar days. In certain
states, the escrow laws require that 100% of VOI purchaser funds
(excluding interest payments, if any), be held in escrow until
the deeding process is complete. Where possible, the Company
utilizes surety bonds in lieu of escrow deposits. Escrow deposit
amounts were $19 million and $30 million as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, of which
$19 million and $28 million are recorded within other
current assets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, and $2 million is recorded within other
non-current assets as of December 31, 2008 on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
F-10
Receivable
Valuation
Trade
receivables
The Company provides for estimated bad debts based on their
assessment of the ultimate realizability of receivables,
considering historical collection experience, the economic
environment and specific customer information. When the Company
determines that an account is not collectible, the account is
written-off to the allowance for doubtful accounts. The
following table illustrates the Companys allowance for
doubtful accounts activity during 2009, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
|
$
|
98
|
|
Bad debt expense
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
Write-offs
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
Translation and other adjustments
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation
ownership contract receivables
In the Companys vacation ownership segment, the Company
provides for estimated vacation ownership contract receivable
defaults at the time of VOI sales by recording a provision for
loan losses as a reduction of vacation ownership interest sales
on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company
assesses the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses based on
the historical performance of similar vacation ownership
contract receivables. The Company uses a technique referred to
as static pool analysis, which tracks defaults for each
years sales over the entire life of those contract
receivables. The Company considers current defaults, past due
aging, historical write-offs of contracts, consumer credit
scores (FICO scores) in the assessment of borrowers credit
strength and expected loan performance. The Company also
considers whether the historical economic conditions are
comparable to current economic conditions. If current conditions
differ from the conditions in effect when the historical
experience was generated, the Company adjusts the allowance for
loan losses to reflect the expected effects of the current
environment on the collectability of the Companys vacation
ownership contract receivables.
Loyalty
Programs
The Company operates a number of loyalty programs including
Wyndham Rewards, RCI Elite Rewards and other programs. Wyndham
Rewards members primarily accumulate points by staying in hotels
franchised under one of the Companys lodging brands.
Wyndham Rewards and RCI Elite Rewards members accumulate points
by purchasing everyday products and services from the various
businesses that participate in the program.
Members may redeem their points for hotel stays, airline
tickets, rental cars, resort vacations, electronics, sporting
goods, movie and theme park tickets, gift certificates, vacation
ownership maintenance fees and annual membership dues and
exchange fees for transactions. The points cannot be redeemed
for cash. The Company earns revenue from these programs
(i) when a member stays at a participating hotel, from a
fee charged by the Company to the franchisee, which is based
upon a percentage of room revenues generated from such stay or
(ii) based upon a percentage of the members spending
on the credit cards and such revenues are paid to the Company by
a third-party issuing bank. The Company also incurs costs to
support these programs, which primarily relate to marketing
expenses to promote the programs, costs to administer the
programs and costs of members redemptions.
As members earn points through the Companys loyalty
programs, the Company records a liability of the estimated
future redemption costs, which is calculated based on (i) a
cost per point and (ii) an estimated redemption rate of the
overall points earned, which is determined through historical
experience, current trends and the use of an actuarial analysis.
Revenues relating to the Companys loyalty programs are
recorded in other revenues in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations and amounted to $82 million, $94 million
and $87 million, while total expenses amounted to
$59 million, $81 million and $71 million in 2009,
2008 and 2007, respectively. The points liability as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008 amounted to $44 million and
$50 million, respectively, and is included in accrued
expenses and other current liabilities and other non-current
liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Inventory
Inventory primarily consists of real estate and development
costs of completed VOIs, VOIs under construction, land held for
future VOI development, vacation ownership properties and
vacation credits. Inventory is stated at the lower of cost,
including capitalized interest, property taxes and certain other
carrying costs incurred during the construction process, or net
realizable value. Capitalized interest was $10 million,
$19 million and $23 million in
F-11
2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. During 2009, the Company
transferred $55 million from property, plant and equipment
to inventory related to a mixed-use project.
Advertising
Expense
Advertising costs are generally expensed in the period incurred.
Advertising expenses, recorded primarily within marketing and
reservation expenses on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations, were $74 million, $110 million and
$112 million in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Use
of Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements
requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and
expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
in the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes.
Although these estimates and assumptions are based on the
Companys knowledge of current events and actions the
Company may undertake in the future, actual results may
ultimately differ from estimates and assumptions.
Derivative
Instruments
The Company uses derivative instruments as part of its overall
strategy to manage its exposure to market risks primarily
associated with fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates
and interest rates. Additionally, the Company has a bifurcated
conversion feature related to its convertible notes and
cash-settled call options that are considered derivative
instruments. As a matter of policy, the Company does not use
derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. All derivatives
are recorded at fair value either as assets or liabilities.
Changes in fair value of derivatives not designated as hedging
instruments and of derivatives designated as fair value hedging
instruments are recognized currently in earnings and included
either as a component of other revenues or net interest expense,
based upon the nature of the hedged item, in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations. The effective portion of changes in
fair value of derivatives designated as cash flow hedging
instruments is recorded as a component of other comprehensive
income. The ineffective portion is reported currently in
earnings as a component of revenues or net interest expense,
based upon the nature of the hedged item. Amounts included in
other comprehensive income are reclassified into earnings in the
same period during which the hedged item affects earnings.
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment (including leasehold improvements) are
recorded at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and
amortization. Depreciation, recorded as a component of
depreciation and amortization on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations, is computed utilizing the straight-line method over
the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Amortization
of leasehold improvements, also recorded as a component of
depreciation and amortization, is computed utilizing the
straight-line method over the estimated benefit period of the
related assets or the lease term, if shorter. Useful lives are
generally 30 years for buildings, up to 20 years for
leasehold improvements, from 20 to 30 years for vacation
rental properties and from three to seven years for furniture,
fixtures and equipment.
The Company capitalizes the costs of software developed for
internal use in accordance with the guidance for accounting for
costs of computer software developed or obtained for internal
use. Capitalization of software developed for internal use
commences during the development phase of the project. The
Company amortizes software developed or obtained for internal
use on a straight-line basis, from three to five years,
commencing when such software is substantially ready for use.
The net carrying value of software developed or obtained for
internal use was $131 million and $130 million as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
The Company has goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible
assets recorded in connection with business combinations. The
Company annually (during the fourth quarter of each year
subsequent to completing the Companys annual forecasting
process) or, more frequently if circumstances indicate
impairment may have occurred that would more likely than not
reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying
amount, reviews the reporting units carrying values as
required by the guidance for goodwill and other indefinite-lived
intangible assets. The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment
using the two-step process prescribed in this guidance. The
first step is to compare the estimated fair value of any
reporting unit within the company that have recorded goodwill
with the recorded net book value (including the goodwill) of the
reporting unit. If the estimated fair value of the reporting
unit is higher than the recorded net book value, no impairment
is deemed to exist and no further testing is required. If,
however, the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is below
the recorded net book value, then a second step must be
performed to determine the goodwill impairment required, if any.
In this second step, the estimated fair value from the first
step is used as the purchase price in a hypothetical acquisition
of the reporting unit. Purchase business combination accounting
rules are followed to determine a hypothetical purchase price
F-12
allocation to the reporting units assets and liabilities.
The residual amount of goodwill that results from this
hypothetical purchase price allocation is compared to the
recorded amount of goodwill for the reporting unit, and the
recorded amount is written down to the hypothetical amount, if
lower. In accordance with the guidance, the Company has
determined that its reporting units are the same as its
reportable segments.
The Company has three reporting units, all of which contained
goodwill prior to the 2008 annual goodwill impairment test. See
Note 5 Intangible Assets and
Note 21 Restructuring and Impairments for
information regarding the goodwill impairment recorded as a
result of the annual 2008 impairment test. Such 2008 annual
goodwill impairment test impaired the goodwill of the
Companys vacation ownership reporting unit to $0. As of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had
$297 million of goodwill at its lodging reporting unit and
$1,089 million and $1,056 million, respectively, of
goodwill at its vacation exchange and rentals reporting unit.
The Company also evaluates the recoverability of its other
long-lived assets, including property and equipment and
amortizable intangible assets, if circumstances indicate
impairment may have occurred, pursuant to guidance for
impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. This analysis is
performed by comparing the respective carrying values of the
assets to the current and expected future cash flows, on an
undiscounted basis, to be generated from such assets. Property
and equipment is evaluated separately within each segment. If
such analysis indicates that the carrying value of these assets
is not recoverable, the carrying value of such assets is reduced
to fair value.
Accounting
for Restructuring Activities
During 2008, the Company committed to restructuring actions and
activities associated with strategic realignment initiatives
targeted principally at reducing costs, enhancing organizational
efficiency, reducing the Companys need to access the
asset-backed securities market and consolidating and
rationalizing existing processes and facilities, which are
accounted for under the guidance for post employment benefits
and costs associated with exit and disposal activities. The
Companys restructuring actions require it to make
significant estimates in several areas including:
(i) expenses for severance and related benefit costs;
(ii) the ability to generate sublease income, as well as
its ability to terminate lease obligations; and
(iii) contract terminations. The amounts that the Company
has accrued as of December 31, 2009 represent its best
estimate of the obligations that it expects to incur in
connection with these actions, but could be subject to change
due to various factors including market conditions and the
outcome of negotiations with third parties. Should the actual
amounts differ from the Companys estimates, the amount of
the restructuring charges could be materially impacted.
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income
Accumulated other comprehensive income consists of accumulated
foreign currency translation adjustments, accumulated unrealized
gains and losses on derivative instruments designated as cash
flow hedges and pension related costs. Foreign currency
translation adjustments exclude income taxes related to
indefinite investments in foreign subsidiaries. Assets and
liabilities of foreign subsidiaries having
non-U.S.-dollar
functional currencies are translated at exchange rates at the
Consolidated Balance Sheet dates. Revenues and expenses are
translated at average exchange rates during the periods
presented. The gains or losses resulting from translating
foreign currency financial statements into U.S. dollars,
net of hedging gains or losses and taxes, are included in
accumulated other comprehensive income on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets. Gains or losses resulting from foreign currency
transactions are included in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations.
Stock-Based
Compensation
In accordance with the guidance for stock-based compensation,
the Company measures all employee stock-based compensation
awards using a fair value method and records the related expense
in its Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company uses
the modified prospective transition method, which requires that
compensation cost be recognized in the financial statements for
all awards granted after the date of adoption as well as for
existing awards for which the requisite service has not been
rendered as of the date of adoption and requires that prior
periods not be restated. Because the Company was allocated
stock-based compensation expense for all outstanding employee
stock awards prior to the adoption of the guidance for
stock-based compensation, the adoption of such guidance did not
have a material impact on the Companys results of
operations.
During 2008 and 2007, the Companys pool of excess tax
benefits available to absorb tax deficiencies (APIC
Pool) decreased by $3 million and increased by
$7 million, respectively, due to the exercise and vesting
of equity awards. As a result of such activity, the Company
recorded a corresponding decrease to additional paid-in capital
of $3 million and an increase to additional paid-in capital
of $7 million on its Consolidated Balance Sheets as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007. As of December 31, 2008,
the Company had an APIC Pool balance of $4 million on its
Consolidated Balance Sheet. During March 2009, the Company
utilized its APIC Pool related to the vesting of restricted
stock units (RSUs), which reduced the balance to $0
on its Consolidated Balance Sheet. During May
F-13
2009, the Company recorded a $4 million charge to its
provision for income taxes on its Consolidated Statement of
Operations related to additional vesting of RSUs.
Equity
Earnings and Other Income
The Company applies the equity method of accounting when it has
the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and
financial policies of an investee. The Company recorded
$2 million and $6 million of net earnings and
$1 million of net losses from such investments during 2009,
2008 and 2007, respectively, in other income, net on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations. In addition, during 2009,
the Company recorded $4 million of income primarily related
to higher gains associated with the sale of non-strategic assets
at its vacation ownership and vacation exchange and rentals
businesses. During 2008, the Company recorded $5 million of
income primarily associated with the assumption of a
lodging-related credit card marketing program obligation by a
third-party and the sale of a non-strategic asset by the
Companys lodging business. During 2007, the Company
recorded a pre-tax gain of $8 million related to the sale
of certain vacation ownership properties and related assets that
were no longer consistent with the Companys development
plans. Such amounts were recorded within other income, net on
the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. In September
2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued guidance for fair value measurements,
which enhances existing guidance for measuring assets and
liabilities at fair value. The guidance defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands
disclosure about fair value measurements. The guidance explains
the definition of fair value as the price that would be received
to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
The guidance clarifies the principle that fair value should be
based on the assumptions market participants would use when
pricing the asset or liability and establishes a fair value
hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those
assumptions. In February 2008, the FASB issued guidance which
permits companies to partially defer the effective date of the
guidance for one year for nonfinancial assets and liabilities
that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a nonrecurring basis. The Company adopted the
guidance, as required, on January 1, 2008, for financial
assets and financial liabilities (see Note 14
Fair Value). On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the
guidance, as required, for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial
liabilities. There was no material impact on the Companys
Consolidated Financial Statements resulting from such adoption.
Determining Fair Value Under Market Activity Decline. In
April 2009, the FASB issued guidance on determining fair value
when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability
have significantly decreased and identifying transactions that
are not orderly. The guidance clarifies the objective and method
of fair value measurement even when there has been a significant
decrease in market activity for the asset being measured. The
guidance is effective for interim or annual reporting periods
ending after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted the
guidance on June 30, 2009, as required, and there was no
material impact on the Companys Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Financial Instruments. In April 2009, the FASB issued
guidance for interim disclosures about fair value of financial
instruments, which amended existing guidance. The guidance
requires disclosures about fair value of financial instruments
in interim as well as in annual financial statements. The
guidance is effective for interim or annual reporting periods
ending after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted the
guidance on June 30, 2009, as required (see
Note 14 Fair Value).
Transfers and Servicing. In June 2009, the FASB issued
guidance on transfers and servicing of financial assets. The
guidance eliminates the concept of a QSPE, changes
the requirements for derecognizing financial assets, and
requires additional disclosures in order to enhance information
reported to users of financial statements by providing greater
transparency about transfers of financial assets, including
securitization transactions, and an entitys continuing
involvement in and exposure to the risks related to transferred
financial assets. The guidance is effective for interim or
annual reporting periods beginning after November 15, 2009.
The Company will adopt the guidance on January 1, 2010, as
required. The Company believes the adoption of this guidance
will not have any impact on its Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Consolidation. In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance
that modifies how a company determines when an entity that is
insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting
(or similar rights) should be consolidated. The guidance
clarifies that the determination of whether a company is
required to consolidate an entity is based on, among other
things, an entitys purpose and design and a companys
ability to direct the activities of the entity that most
significantly impact the entitys economic performance. The
guidance requires an ongoing reassessment of whether a company
is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity,
additional disclosures about a companys involvement in
variable interest entities and any significant changes in risk
exposure due to that involvement. The
F-14
guidance is effective for interim or annual reporting periods
beginning after November 15, 2009. The Company will adopt
the guidance on January 1, 2010, as required. The Company
believes the adoption of this guidance will not have a material
impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements. In October
2009, the FASB issued guidance on multiple-deliverable revenue
arrangements, which requires an entity to apply the relative
selling price allocation method in order to estimate selling
prices for all units of accounting, including delivered items,
when vendor-specific objective evidence or acceptable
third-party evidence does not exist. The guidance is effective
for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in
fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010 and shall
be applied on a prospective basis. Earlier application is
permitted as of the beginning of an entitys fiscal year.
The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption
of this guidance on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
The computation of basic and diluted earnings per share
(EPS) is based on the Companys net
income/(loss) available to common stockholders divided by the
basic weighted average number of common shares and diluted
weighted average number of common shares, respectively.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and
diluted EPS (in millions, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
293
|
|
|
$
|
(1,074
|
)
|
|
$
|
403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
Stock options and restricted stock units
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings/(losses) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.64
|
|
|
$
|
(6.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1.61
|
|
|
|
(6.05
|
)
|
|
|
2.20
|
|
The computations of diluted EPS for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 do not include
approximately 9 million, 13 million and
10 million stock options and stock-settled stock
appreciation rights (SSARs), respectively, as the
effect of their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.
Additionally, for the year ended December 31, 2009, the
computation of diluted EPS does not include warrants to purchase
approximately 18 million shares of the Companys
common stock related to the May 2009 issuance of the
Companys Convertible Notes (see Note 13
Long-Term Debt and Borrowing Arrangements) as the effect of
their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.
Dividend
Payments
During each of the quarterly periods ended March 31,
June 30, September 30 and December 31, 2009 and 2008
the Company paid cash dividends of $0.04 per share
($29 million and $28 million in the aggregate during
2009 and 2008, respectively). During each of the quarterly
periods ended September 30 and December 31, 2007, the
Company paid cash dividends of $0.04 per share ($14 million
in the aggregate).
Assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations
were recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of the
respective acquisition dates based upon their estimated fair
values at such dates. The results of operations of businesses
acquired by the Company have been included in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations since their respective dates of
acquisition. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated
fair values of the underlying assets acquired and liabilities
assumed was allocated to goodwill. In certain circumstances, the
allocations of the excess purchase price are based upon
preliminary estimates and assumptions. Accordingly, the
allocations may be subject to revision when the Company receives
final information, including appraisals and other analyses. Any
revisions to the fair values during the allocation period, which
may be significant, will be recorded by the Company as further
adjustments to the purchase price allocations. Although the
Company has substantially integrated the operations of its
acquired businesses, additional future costs relating to such
integration may occur. These costs may result from integrating
operating systems, relocating employees, closing facilities,
reducing duplicative efforts and exiting and consolidating other
activities. These costs will be recorded on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets as adjustments to the purchase price or on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations as expenses, as
appropriate.
F-15
2008
Acquisition
U.S. Franchise Systems, Inc. On July 18, 2008,
the Company completed the acquisition of U.S. Franchise
Systems, Inc., which included its Microtel Inns &
Suites (Microtel) hotel brand, a chain of economy
hotels, and Hawthorn Suites (Hawthorn) hotel brand,
a chain of extended-stay hotels (collectively USFS).
Management believes that this acquisition solidifies the
Companys presence in the economy lodging segment and
represents the Companys entry into the all-suites,
extended stay market. The allocation of the purchase price is
summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Cash consideration
|
|
$
|
131
|
|
Transaction costs and expenses
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
|
135
|
|
Less: Historical value of assets acquired in excess of
liabilities assumed
|
|
|
57
|
|
Less: Fair value adjustments
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess purchase price over fair value of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the fair values of the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with the
Companys acquisition of USFS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
5
|
|
Trademarks
(a)
|
|
|
83
|
|
Franchise agreements
(b)
|
|
|
34
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Non-current deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents indefinite-lived
Microtel and Hawthorn trademarks.
|
|
(b) |
|
Represents franchise agreements
with a weighted average life of 20 years.
|
The goodwill, none of which is deductible for tax purposes, was
assigned to the Companys Lodging segment. This acquisition
was not significant to the Companys results of operations,
financial position or cash flows.
2007
Acquisitions
During 2007, the Company acquired four individually
non-significant businesses for aggregate consideration of
$15 million in cash, net of cash acquired of
$5 million. The goodwill resulting from the allocation of
the purchase prices of these acquisitions aggregated
$5 million, all of which is expected to be deductible for
tax purposes. The goodwill was allocated to the Vacation
Ownership segment. These acquisitions also resulted in
$14 million of other intangible assets.
F-16
Intangible assets consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Unamortized Intangible Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
1,386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks
(a)
|
|
$
|
660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized Intangible Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchise agreements
(b)
|
|
$
|
630
|
|
|
$
|
298
|
|
|
$
|
332
|
|
|
$
|
630
|
|
|
$
|
278
|
|
|
$
|
352
|
|
Trademarks
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Other (d)
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
724
|
|
|
$
|
333
|
|
|
$
|
391
|
|
|
$
|
724
|
|
|
$
|
307
|
|
|
$
|
417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Comprised of various trade names
(including the worldwide Wyndham Hotels and Resorts, Ramada,
Days Inn, RCI, Landal GreenParks, Baymont Inn &
Suites, Microtel and Hawthorn trade names) that the Company has
acquired and which distinguishes the Companys consumer
services. These trade names are expected to generate future cash
flows for an indefinite period of time.
|
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Generally amortized over a period
ranging from 20 to 40 years with a weighted average life of
33 years.
|
|
(c) |
|
As of December 31, 2008,
comprised of definite-lived trademarks, which were fully
amortized and written-off as of March 31, 2009.
|
|
(d) |
|
Includes customer lists and
business contracts, generally amortized over a period ranging
from 7 to 20 years with a weighted average life of
16 years.
|
Goodwill
In accordance with the guidance for goodwill and other
intangible assets, the Company tests goodwill for potential
impairment annually (during the fourth quarter of each year
subsequent to completing the Companys annual forecasting
process) and between annual tests if an event occurs or
circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the
fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount.
The process of evaluating goodwill for impairment involves the
determination of the fair value of the Companys reporting
units as described in Note 2 Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies. Because quoted market prices
for the Companys reporting units are not available,
management must apply judgment in determining the estimated fair
value of these reporting units for purposes of performing the
annual goodwill impairment test. Management uses all available
information to make these fair value determinations, including
the present values of expected future cash flows using discount
rates commensurate with the risks involved in the assets.
Inherent in such fair value determinations are certain judgments
and estimates relating to future cash flows, including the
Companys interpretation of current economic indicators and
market valuations, and assumptions about the Companys
strategic plans with regard to its operations. Due to the
uncertainties associated with such estimates, actual results
could differ from such estimates. In performing its impairment
analysis, the Company developed the estimated fair values for
its reporting units using a combination of the discounted cash
flow methodology and the market multiple methodology.
The discounted cash flow methodology establishes fair value by
estimating the present value of the projected future cash flows
to be generated from the reporting unit. The discount rate
applied to the projected future cash flows to arrive at the
present value is intended to reflect all risks of ownership and
the associated risks of realizing the stream of projected future
cash flows. The discounted cash flow methodology uses the
Companys projections of financial performance for a
five-year period. The most significant assumptions used in the
discounted cash flow methodology are the discount rate, the
terminal value and expected future revenues, gross margins and
operating margins, which vary among reporting units.
The Company uses a market multiple methodology to estimate the
terminal value of each reporting unit by comparing such
reporting unit to other publicly traded companies that are
similar to it from an operational and economic standpoint. The
market multiple methodology compares each reporting unit to the
comparable companies on the basis of risk characteristics in
order to determine the risk profile relative to the comparable
companies as a group. This analysis generally focuses on
quantitative considerations, which include financial performance
and other quantifiable data, and qualitative considerations,
which include any factors which are expected to impact future
financial performance. The most significant assumption affecting
the Companys estimate of the terminal value of each
reporting unit is the multiple of the enterprise value to
earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization.
To support the Companys estimate of the individual
reporting unit fair values, a comparison is performed between
the sum of the fair values of the reporting units and the
Companys market capitalization. The Company uses an
average of its market capitalization over a reasonable period
preceding the impairment testing date as being
F-17
more reflective of the Companys stock price trend than a
single day,
point-in-time
market price. The difference is an implied control premium,
which represents the acknowledgment that the observed market
prices of individual trades of a companys stock may not be
representative of the fair value of the company as a whole.
Estimates of a companys control premium are highly
judgmental and depend on capital market and macro-economic
conditions overall. The Company concluded that the implied
control premium estimated from its analysis is reasonable.
During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Company performed its
annual goodwill impairment test and determined that no
impairment was required as the fair value of goodwill at its
lodging and vacation exchange and rentals reporting units was
substantially in excess of the carrying value.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, after estimating the fair
values of the Companys three reporting units as of
December 31, 2008, the Company determined that its lodging
and vacation exchange and rentals reporting units passed the
first step of the goodwill impairment test, while the vacation
ownership reporting unit did not pass the first step.
As described in Note 2 Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies, the second step of the goodwill impairment
test uses the estimated fair value of the Companys
vacation ownership segment from the first step as the purchase
price in a hypothetical acquisition of the reporting unit. The
significant hypothetical purchase price allocation adjustments
made to the assets and liabilities of the vacation ownership
segment in this second step calculation were in the areas of:
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Adjusting the carrying value of Vacation Ownership Contract
Receivables to their estimated fair values,
|
(2) Adjusting the carrying value of customer related
intangible assets to their estimated fair values,
(3) Adjusting the carrying value of debt to the estimated
fair value, and
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
Recalculating deferred income taxes under the guidance for
income tax accounting, after considering the likely tax basis a
hypothetical buyer would have in the assets and liabilities.
|
As a result of the above analysis, during the fourth quarter of
2008 the Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge of
$1,342 million ($1,337 million, net of tax)
representing a write-off of the entire amount of the vacation
ownership reporting units previously recorded goodwill.
Such impairment was a result of plans that the Company announced
during (i) October 2008, in which it refocused its vacation
ownership sales and marketing efforts on consumers with higher
credit quality beginning the fourth quarter of 2008, which
reduced future revenue and growth rates, and (ii) December
2008, in which it decided to eliminate the vacation ownership
reporting units reliance of the asset-backed securities
market by reducing its VOI sales pace from $2.0 billion
during 2008 to $1.3 billion during 2009. As of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Companys accumulated
goodwill impairment loss was $1,342 million
($1,337 million, net of tax).
Other
Intangible Assets
During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company recorded
(i) a $16 million non-cash impairment charge primarily
due to a strategic change in direction related to the
Companys Howard Johnson brand that is expected to
adversely impact the ability of the properties associated with
the franchise agreements acquired in connection with the
acquisition of the brand during 1990 to maintain compliance with
brand standards and (ii) an $8 million non-cash
impairment charge to reduce the value of an unamortized
trademark due to a strategic change in direction and reduced
future investments in a vacation rentals business. See
Note 21 Restructuring and Impairments for more
information.
As of December 31, 2007, the Company had $31 million
of unamortized vacation ownership trademarks recorded on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet, including its FairShare Plus and
WorldMark trademarks. During the first quarter of 2008, the
Company recorded a $28 million impairment charge due to the
Companys initiative to rebrand FairShare Plus and
WorldMark to the Wyndham brand. The remaining $3 million
was reclassified to amortized trademarks and was $1 million
as of December 31, 2008. Such amount was fully amortized
and written-off as of March 31, 2009.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Balance as of
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2009
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
297
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
297
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
1,056
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
1,089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company
|
|
$
|
1,353
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
1,386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-18
Amortization expense relating to all intangible assets was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Franchise agreements
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Other
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (*)
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Included as a component of
depreciation and amortization on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations.
|
Based on the Companys amortizable intangible assets as of
December 31, 2009, the Company expects related amortization
expense over the next five years as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
2011
|
|
|
25
|
|
2012
|
|
|
24
|
|
2013
|
|
|
23
|
|
2014
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
6.
|
Franchising
and Marketing/Reservation Activities
|
Franchise fee revenues of $440 million, $514 million
and $523 million on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations for 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, includes
initial franchise fees of $9 million, $11 million and
$8 million, respectively.
As part of ongoing franchise fees, the Company receives
marketing and reservation fees from its lodging franchisees,
which generally are calculated based on a specified percentage
of gross room revenues. Such fees totaled $186 million,
$218 million and $227 million during 2009, 2008 and
2007, respectively, and are recorded within the franchise fees
line item on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. As
provided for in the franchise agreements, all of these fees are
to be expended for marketing purposes or the operation of an
international, centralized, brand-specific reservation system
for the respective franchisees. Additionally, the Company is
required to provide certain services to its franchisees,
including access to an international, centralized,
brand-specific reservations system, advertising, promotional and
co-marketing programs, referrals, technology, training and
volume purchasing.
The number of lodging properties and rooms in operation by
market sector is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
Rooms
|
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
Rooms
|
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
Rooms
|
|
|
Economy
(a)
|
|
|
5,469
|
|
|
|
387,357
|
|
|
|
5,432
|
|
|
|
389,697
|
|
|
|
5,081
|
|
|
|
366,205
|
|
Midscale
(b)
|
|
|
1,540
|
|
|
|
182,251
|
|
|
|
1,515
|
|
|
|
177,284
|
|
|
|
1,363
|
|
|
|
156,562
|
|
Upscale
(c)
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
24,517
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
21,724
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
20,953
|
|
Unmanaged, Affiliated and Managed, Non-Proprietary Hotels
(d)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
3,549
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
4,175
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
6,856
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,114
|
|
|
|
597,674
|
|
|
|
7,043
|
|
|
|
592,880
|
|
|
|
6,544
|
|
|
|
550,576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Comprised of the Days Inn, Super 8,
Howard Johnson Inn, Howard Johnson Express, Travelodge, Microtel
and Knights Inn lodging brands.
|
|
(b) |
|
Includes Wingate by Wyndham,
Hawthorn, Ramada Worldwide, Howard Johnson Plaza, Howard Johnson
Hotel, Baymont Inn & Suites and AmeriHost Inn lodging
brands.
|
|
(c) |
|
Comprised of the Wyndham Hotels and
Resorts lodging brand.
|
|
(d) |
|
Represents properties/rooms
affiliated with the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand for which
the Company receives a fee for reservation and/or other services
provided and properties managed under a joint venture. These
properties are not branded under a Wyndham Hotel Group brand.
|
F-19
The number of lodging properties and rooms changed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
Rooms
|
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
Rooms
|
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
Rooms
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
|
7,043
|
|
|
|
592,880
|
|
|
|
6,544
|
|
|
|
550,576
|
|
|
|
6,473
|
|
|
|
543,234
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
486
|
|
|
|
46,528
|
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
|
55,125
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
49,857
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
388
|
(*)
|
|
|
29,547
|
(*)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminations
|
|
|
(415
|
)
|
|
|
(41,734
|
)
|
|
|
(427
|
)
|
|
|
(42,368
|
)
|
|
|
(403
|
)
|
|
|
(42,515
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
|
7,114
|
|
|
|
597,674
|
|
|
|
7,043
|
|
|
|
592,880
|
|
|
|
6,544
|
|
|
|
550,576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Relates to Microtel and Hawthorn,
which were acquired on July 18, 2008.
|
The Company may, at its discretion, provide development advances
to certain of its franchisees or hotel owners in its managed
business in order to assist such franchisees/hotel owners in
converting to one of the Companys brands, building a new
hotel to be flagged under one of the Companys brands or in
assisting in other franchisee expansion efforts. Provided the
franchisee/hotel owner is in compliance with the terms of the
franchise/management agreement, all or a portion of the
development advance may be forgiven by the Company over the
period of the franchise/management agreement, which typically
ranges from 10 to 20 years. Otherwise, the related
principal is due and payable to the Company. In certain
instances, the Company may earn interest on unpaid franchisee
development advances, which was not significant during 2009,
2008 or 2007. The amount of such development advances recorded
on the Consolidated Balance Sheets was $53 million at both
December 31, 2009 and 2008. These amounts are classified
within the other non-current assets line item on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets. During 2009, 2008 and 2007, the
Company recorded $5 million, $4 million and
$3 million, respectively, related to the forgiveness of
these advances. Such amounts are recorded as a reduction of
franchise fees on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
During 2009, the Company recorded $4 million of bad debt
expense within its lodging management business to reflect
collectability concerns regarding development advance notes
provided to three managed properties in periods prior to 2009.
Such expense is recorded within operating expenses on the
Consolidated Statement of Operations.
The income tax provision consists of the following for the year
ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
State
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
State
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
|
$
|
187
|
|
|
$
|
252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax income/(loss) for domestic and foreign operations
consisted of the following for the year ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
390
|
|
|
$
|
(928
|
)
|
|
$
|
567
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
493
|
|
|
$
|
(887
|
)
|
|
$
|
655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-20
Current and non-current deferred income tax assets and
liabilities, as of December 31, are comprised of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Current deferred income tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities and deferred income
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts and vacation ownership contract
receivables
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Alternative minimum tax credit carryforward
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation
allowance (*)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred income tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Unamortized servicing rights
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Installment sales of vacation ownership interests
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
Other
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current net deferred income tax asset
|
|
$
|
189
|
|
|
$
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred income tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
Foreign tax credit carryforward
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
Alternative minimum tax credit carryforward
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
Tax basis differences in assets of foreign subsidiaries
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
Accrued liabilities and deferred income
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
Other
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Valuation
allowance (*)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred income tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
547
|
|
|
|
509
|
|
Installment sales of vacation ownership interests
|
|
|
869
|
|
|
|
950
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
1,416
|
|
|
|
1,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current net deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
1,137
|
|
|
$
|
966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
The valuation allowance of
$86 million as of December 31, 2009 primarily relates
to foreign tax credits and net operating loss carryforwards. The
valuation allowance will be reduced when and if the Company
determines that the deferred income tax assets are more likely
than not to be realized.
|
As of December 31, 2009, the Companys net operating
loss carryforwards primarily relate to state net operating
losses which are due to expire at various dates, but no later
than 2029. No provision has been made for U.S. federal
deferred income taxes on $276 million of accumulated and
undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2009 since it is the present intention of
management to reinvest the undistributed earnings indefinitely
in those foreign operations. The determination of the amount of
unrecognized U.S. federal deferred income tax liability for
unremitted earnings is not practicable.
The Companys effective income tax rate differs from the
U.S. federal statutory rate as follows for the year ended
December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Federal statutory rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State and local income taxes, net of federal tax benefits
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
Taxes on foreign operations at rates different than U.S. federal
statutory rates
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
Taxes on repatriated foreign income, net of tax credits
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Release of guarantee liability related to income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40.6
|
%
|
|
|
(21.1
|
)%
|
|
|
38.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-21
The difference between the Companys 2009 effective tax
rate of 40.6% and 2008 effective tax rate of (21.1%) is
primarily due to the absence of impairment charges recorded
during 2008, a charge recorded during 2009 for the reduction of
deferred tax assets and the origination of deferred tax
liabilities in a foreign tax jurisdiction and the write-off of
deferred tax assets that were associated with stock-based
compensation, which were in excess of the Companys pool of
excess tax benefits available to absorb tax deficiencies.
The following table summarizes the activity related to the
Companys unrecognized tax benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
Decreases related to tax positions taken during a prior period
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Increases related to tax positions taken during the current
period
|
|
|
5
|
|
Decreases as a result of a lapse of the applicable statue of
limitations
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
25
|
|
Increases related to tax positions taken during a prior period
|
|
|
1
|
|
Increases related to tax positions taken during the current
period
|
|
|
2
|
|
Decreases as a result of a lapse of the applicable statue of
limitations
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The gross amount of the unrecognized tax benefits at both
December 31, 2009 and 2008 that, if recognized, would
affect the Companys effective tax rate was
$25 million. The Company recorded both accrued interest and
penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits of
$3 million and less than $1 million as a component of
provision for income taxes on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations during 2009 and 2008, respectively. As of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had recorded a
liability for potential penalties of $3 million and
$2 million, respectively, and interest of $5 million
and $3 million, respectively, on the Consolidated Balance
Sheets.
The Company files U.S., state, and foreign income tax returns in
jurisdictions with varying statutes of limitations. The 2006
through 2009 tax years generally remain subject to examination
by federal tax authorities. The 2005 through 2009 tax years
generally remain subject to examination by many state tax
authorities. In significant foreign jurisdictions, the 2001
through 2009 tax years generally remain subject to examination
by their respective tax authorities. The statute of limitations
is scheduled to expire within 12 months of the reporting
date in certain taxing jurisdictions and the Company believes
that it is reasonably possible that the total amount of its
unrecognized tax benefits could decrease by $0 to
$11 million.
The Company made cash income tax payments, net of refunds, of
$113 million, $68 million and $83 million during
2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Such payments exclude income
tax related payments made to or refunded by former Parent.
As of December 31, 2009, the Company had $67 million
of foreign tax credits with a full valuation allowance of
$67 million, which arose from the filing of pre-separation
income tax returns. The foreign tax credits primarily expire in
2015 and the valuation allowance on these credits will be
reduced when and if the Company determines that these credits
are more likely than not to be realized.
As discussed below, the IRS has commenced an audit of
Cendants taxable years 2003 through 2006, during which the
Company was included in Cendants tax returns.
The rules governing taxation are complex and subject to varying
interpretations. Therefore, the Companys tax accruals
reflect a series of complex judgments about future events and
rely heavily on estimates and assumptions. The Company believes
that the accruals for tax liabilities are adequate for all open
years based on an assessment of many factors including past
experience and interpretations of tax law applied to the facts
of each matter; however, the outcome of the tax audits is
inherently uncertain. While the Company believes that the
estimates and assumptions supporting its tax accruals are
reasonable, tax audits and any related litigation could result
in tax liabilities for the Company that are materially different
than those reflected in the Companys historical income tax
provisions and recorded assets and liabilities. The result of an
audit or related litigation, including disputes or litigation on
the allocation of tax liabilities between parties under the Tax
Sharing Agreement, could have a material adverse effect on the
Companys income tax provision, net income,
and/or cash
flows in the period or periods to which such audit or litigation
relates.
The Companys recorded tax liabilities in respect of such
taxable years represent the Companys current best
estimates of the probable outcome with respect to certain tax
positions taken by Cendant for which the Company would be
responsible under the tax sharing agreement. As discussed above,
however, the rules governing taxation are complex and subject to
varying interpretation. There can be no assurance that the IRS
will not propose adjustments to the returns for which the
Company would be responsible under the tax sharing agreement or
that any such proposed adjustments would not be material. Any
determination by the IRS or a court that imposed tax
F-22
liabilities on the Company under the tax sharing agreement in
excess of the Companys tax accruals could have a material
adverse effect on the Companys income tax provision, net
income,
and/or cash
flows. See Note 22 Separation Adjustments and
Transactions with Former Parent and Subsidiaries for more
information related to contingent tax liabilities.
|
|
8.
|
Vacation
Ownership Contract Receivables
|
The Company generates vacation ownership contract receivables by
extending financing to the purchasers of VOIs. Current and
long-term vacation ownership contract receivables, net as of
December 31, consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Current vacation ownership contract receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized
|
|
$
|
244
|
|
|
$
|
253
|
|
Non-securitized
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
Secured (*)
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current vacation ownership contract receivables, net
|
|
$
|
289
|
|
|
$
|
291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term vacation ownership contract receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized
|
|
$
|
2,347
|
|
|
$
|
2,495
|
|
Non-securitized
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
|
641
|
|
Secured (*)
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,127
|
|
|
|
3,312
|
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(335
|
)
|
|
|
(349
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term vacation ownership contract receivables, net
|
|
$
|
2,792
|
|
|
$
|
2,963
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Such receivables collateralize the
Companys
364-day, AUD
213 million, secured, revolving foreign credit facility
(see Note 13 Long-Term Debt and Borrowing
Arrangements).
|
Principal payments that are contractually due on the
Companys vacation ownership contract receivables during
the next twelve months are classified as current on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets. Principal payments due on the
Companys vacation ownership contract receivables during
each of the five years subsequent to December 31, 2009 and
thereafter are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized
|
|
|
Securitized
|
|
|
Secured
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
244
|
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
324
|
|
2011
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
341
|
|
2012
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
2013
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
402
|
|
2014
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,176
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
1,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,591
|
|
|
$
|
598
|
|
|
$
|
262
|
|
|
$
|
3,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2009 and 2008 the Companys securitized vacation
ownership contract receivables generated interest income of
$333 million and $321 million, respectively.
During 2009, 2008 and 2007, the Company originated vacation
ownership contract receivables of $970 million,
$1,607 million and $1,608 million, respectively, and
received principal collections of $771 million,
$821 million and $773 million, respectively. The
weighted average interest rate on outstanding vacation ownership
contract receivables was 13.0%, 12.7% and 12.5% as of
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
F-23
The activity in the allowance for loan losses related to
vacation ownership contract receivables is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses as of January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
(278
|
)
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(305
|
)
|
Contract receivables written-off, net
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses as of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
(320
|
)
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(450
|
)
|
Contract receivables written off, net
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses as of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
(383
|
)
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(449
|
)
|
Contract receivables written-off, net
|
|
|
462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Loan Losses as of December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
(370
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation
Ownership Contract Receivables and Securitizations
The Company pools qualifying vacation ownership contract
receivables and sells them to bankruptcy-remote entities.
Vacation ownership contract receivables qualify for
securitization based primarily on the credit strength of the VOI
purchaser to whom financing has been extended. Vacation
ownership contract receivables are securitized through
bankruptcy-remote special purpose entities (SPEs)
that are consolidated within the Consolidated Financial
Statements. As a result, the Company does not recognize gains or
losses resulting from these securitizations at the time of sale
to the SPEs. Income is recognized when earned over the
contractual life of the vacation ownership contract receivables.
The Company continues to service the securitized vacation
ownership contract receivables pursuant to servicing agreements
negotiated on an arms-length basis based on market conditions.
The activities of these SPEs are limited to (i) purchasing
vacation ownership contract receivables from the Companys
vacation ownership subsidiaries; (ii) issuing debt
securities
and/or
borrowing under a conduit facility to fund such purchases; and
(iii) entering into derivatives to hedge interest rate
exposure. The securitized assets of these bankruptcy-remote SPEs
are not available to pay the Companys general obligations.
Additionally, the creditors of these SPEs have no recourse to
the Company.
Inventory, as of December 31, consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Land held for VOI development
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
|
$
|
141
|
|
VOI construction in process
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
Completed inventory and vacation credits (*)
|
|
|
836
|
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventory
|
|
|
1,307
|
|
|
|
1,319
|
|
Less: Current portion
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current inventory
|
|
$
|
953
|
|
|
$
|
905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Includes estimated recoveries of
$156 million at both December 31, 2009 and 2008.
Vacation credits relate to both the Companys vacation
ownership and vacation exchange and rentals businesses.
|
Inventory that the Company expects to sell within the next
twelve months is classified as current on the Companys
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
F-24
|
|
10.
|
Property
and Equipment, net
|
Property and equipment, net, as of December 31, consisted
of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
164
|
|
|
$
|
164
|
|
Building and leasehold improvements
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
475
|
|
Capitalized software
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
Vacation rental property capital leases
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,686
|
|
|
|
1,648
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(733
|
)
|
|
|
(610
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
953
|
|
|
$
|
1,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2009, 2008 and 2007, the Company recorded depreciation
and amortization expense of $150 million, $154 million
and $139 million, respectively, related to property and
equipment.
Other current assets, as of December 31, consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Non-trade receivables, net
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
Deferred vacation ownership costs
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Securitization restricted cash
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
Escrow deposit restricted cash
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Other
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
233
|
|
|
$
|
314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.
|
Accrued
Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities, as of
December 31, consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Accrued payroll and related
|
|
$
|
188
|
|
|
$
|
169
|
|
Accrued taxes
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
Accrued advertising and marketing
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
Accrued other
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
579
|
|
|
$
|
638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-25
|
|
13.
|
Long-Term
Debt and Borrowing Arrangements
|
The Companys indebtedness consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Securitized vacation ownership debt:
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes
|
|
$
|
1,112
|
|
|
$
|
1,252
|
|
Previous bank conduit facility
(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
2008 bank conduit facility
(c)
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securitized vacation ownership debt
|
|
|
1,507
|
|
|
|
1,810
|
|
Less: Current portion of securitized vacation ownership debt
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term securitized vacation ownership debt
|
|
$
|
1,298
|
|
|
$
|
1,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00% senior unsecured notes (due December 2016)
(d)
|
|
$
|
797
|
|
|
$
|
797
|
|
Term loan (due July 2011)
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
Revolving credit facility (due July 2011)
(e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
576
|
|
9.875% senior unsecured notes (due May 2014)
(f)
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.50% convertible notes (due May 2012)
(g)
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation ownership bank borrowings
(h)
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
Vacation rentals capital leases
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
Other
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
2,015
|
|
|
|
1,984
|
|
Less: Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
1,840
|
|
|
$
|
1,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents debt that is securitized
through bankruptcy remote SPEs, the creditors of which have no
recourse to the Company.
|
|
(b) |
|
Represents the outstanding balance
of the Companys previous bank conduit facility which was
repaid on October 8, 2009.
|
|
(c) |
|
Represents a
364-day,
$600 million, non-recourse vacation ownership bank conduit
facility, with a term through October 2010 whose capacity is
subject to the Companys ability to provide additional
assets to collateralize the facility. As of December 31,
2009, the total available capacity of the facility was
$205 million.
|
|
(d) |
|
The balance as of December 31,
2009 represents $800 million aggregate principal less
$3 million of unamortized discount.
|
|
(e) |
|
The revolving credit facility has a
total capacity of $900 million, which includes availability
for letters of credit. As of December 31, 2009, the Company
had $31 million of letters of credit outstanding and, as
such, the total available capacity of the revolving credit
facility was $869 million.
|
|
(f) |
|
Represents senior unsecured notes
issued by the Company during May 2009. Such balance represents
$250 million aggregate principal less $12 million of
unamortized discount.
|
|
(g) |
|
Represents cash convertible notes
issued by the Company during May 2009. Such balance includes
$191 million of debt ($230 million aggregate principal
less $39 million of unamortized discount) and a liability
with a fair value of $176 million related to a bifurcated
conversion feature. Additionally, as of December 31, 2009, the
Companys convertible note hedge call options are recorded
at their fair value of $176 million within other
non-current assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
|
|
(h) |
|
Represents a
364-day, AUD
213 million, secured, revolving foreign credit facility,
which expires in June 2010.
|
Covenants
The revolving credit facility and unsecured term loan are
subject to covenants including the maintenance of specific
financial ratios. The financial ratio covenants consist of a
minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio of at least 3.0 to
1.0 as of the measurement date and a maximum consolidated
leverage ratio not to exceed 3.5 to 1.0 on the measurement date.
The consolidated interest coverage ratio is calculated by
dividing Consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the credit
agreement) by Consolidated Interest Expense (as defined in the
credit agreement), both as measured on a trailing 12 month
basis preceding the measurement date. As of December 31,
2009, the Companys interest coverage ratio was 8.5 times.
Consolidated Interest Expense excludes, among other things,
interest expense on any Securitization Indebtedness (as defined
in the credit agreement). The consolidated leverage ratio is
calculated by dividing Consolidated Total Indebtedness (as
defined in the credit agreement and which excludes, among other
things, Securitization Indebtedness) as of the measurement date
by Consolidated EBITDA as measured on a trailing 12 month
basis preceding the measurement date. As of December 31,
2009, the Companys leverage ratio was 2.1 times. Covenants
in these credit facilities also include limitations on
indebtedness of material subsidiaries; liens; mergers,
consolidations, liquidations and dissolutions; sale of all or
substantially all assets; and sale and leaseback transactions.
Events of default in these credit facilities include failure to
pay interest, principal and fees when due; breach of covenants;
acceleration of or failure to pay other debt in excess of
$50 million (excluding securitization indebtedness);
insolvency matters; and a change of control.
The 6.00% senior unsecured notes and 9.875% senior
unsecured notes contain various covenants including limitations
on liens, limitations on potential sale and leaseback
transactions and change of control restrictions. In addition,
there are limitations on mergers, consolidations and potential
sale of all or substantially all of the Companys assets.
Events of default in the notes include failure to pay interest
and principal when due, breach of a
F-26
covenant or warranty, acceleration of other debt in excess of
$50 million and insolvency matters. The Convertible Notes
do not contain affirmative or negative covenants; however, the
limitations on mergers, consolidations and potential sale of all
or substantially all of the Companys assets and the events
of default for the Companys senior unsecured notes are
applicable to such notes. Holders of the Convertible Notes have
the right to require the Company to repurchase the Convertible
Notes at 100% of principal plus accrued and unpaid interest in
the event of a fundamental change, defined to include, among
other things, a change of control, certain recapitalizations and
if the Companys common stock is no longer listed on a
national securities exchange.
The vacation ownership secured bank facility contains covenants
including a consumer loan coverage ratio that requires that the
aggregate principal amount of consumer loans that are current on
payments must exceed 75% of the aggregate principal amount of
all consumer loans in the applicable loan portfolio. If the
aggregate principal amount of current consumer loans falls below
this threshold, the Company must pay the bank syndicate cash to
cover the shortfall. This ratio is also used to set the advance
rate under the facility. The facility contains other typical
restrictions and covenants including limitations on mergers,
partnerships and certain asset sales.
As of December 31, 2009, the Company was in compliance with
all of the covenants described above including the required
financial ratios.
Each of the Companys securitized term notes and the 2008
bank conduit facility contains various triggers relating to the
performance of the applicable loan pools. If the vacation
ownership contract receivables pool that collateralizes one of
the Companys securitization notes fails to perform within
the parameters established by the contractual triggers (such as
higher default or delinquency rates), there are provisions
pursuant to which the cash flows for that pool will be
maintained in the securitization as extra collateral for the
note holders or applied to amortize the outstanding principal
held by the noteholders. As of December 31, 2009, all of
the Companys securitized pools were in compliance with
applicable triggers.
Maturities
and Capacity
The Companys outstanding debt as of December 31, 2009
matures as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
209
|
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
|
$
|
384
|
|
2011
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
2012
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
557
|
|
2013
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
2014
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
436
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
877
|
|
|
|
1,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,507
|
|
|
$
|
2,015
|
|
|
$
|
3,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As debt maturities of the securitized vacation ownership debt
are based on the contractual payment terms of the underlying
vacation ownership contract receivables, actual maturities may
differ as a result of prepayments by the vacation ownership
contract receivable obligors.
F-27
As of December 31, 2009, available capacity under the
Companys borrowing arrangements was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
|
Capacity
|
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
Capacity
|
|
|
Securitized vacation ownership debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes
|
|
$
|
1,112
|
|
|
$
|
1,112
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
2008 bank conduit facility
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securitized vacation ownership debt
(a)
|
|
$
|
1,712
|
|
|
$
|
1,507
|
|
|
$
|
205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00% senior unsecured notes (due December 2016)
|
|
$
|
797
|
|
|
$
|
797
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Term loan (due July 2011)
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility (due July 2011)
(b)
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
900
|
|
9.875% senior unsecured notes (due May 2014)
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.50% convertible notes (due May 2012)
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation ownership bank borrowings
(c)
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Vacation rentals capital leases
(d)
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
2,979
|
|
|
$
|
2,015
|
|
|
|
964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Issuance of letters of credit
(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
These outstanding borrowings are
collateralized by $2,755 million of underlying gross
vacation ownership contract receivables and related assets. The
capacity of this facility is subject to the Companys
ability to provide additional assets to collateralize additional
securitized borrowings.
|
|
(b) |
|
The capacity under the
Companys revolving credit facility includes availability
for letters of credit. As of December 31, 2009, the
available capacity of $900 million was further reduced by
$31 million for the issuance of letters of credit.
|
|
(c) |
|
These borrowings are collateralized
by $262 million of underlying gross vacation ownership
contract receivables. The capacity of this facility is subject
to maintaining sufficient assets to collateralize these secured
obligations.
|
|
(d) |
|
These leases are recorded as
capital lease obligations with corresponding assets classified
within property and equipment on the Companys Consolidated
Balance Sheets.
|
Cash paid related to consumer financing interest expense was
$112 million, $117 million and $102 million
during December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Securitized
Vacation Ownership Debt
As previously discussed in Note 8Vacation Ownership
Contract Receivables, the Company issues debt through the
securitization of vacation ownership contract receivables.
Special Asset Facility
2009-A,
LLC. On March 13, 2009, the Company closed a term
securitization transaction, Special Asset Facility
2009-A, LLC,
involving the issuance of $46 million of investment grade
asset-backed notes which are secured by vacation ownership
contract receivables. These borrowings bear interest at a coupon
rate of 9.0% and were issued at a price of 95% of par. As of
December 31, 2009, the Company has $10 million of
outstanding borrowings under these term notes.
Sierra Timeshare
2009-1
Receivables Funding, LLC. On May 28, 2009, the Company
closed a series of term notes payable, Sierra Timeshare
2009-1
Receivables Funding, LLC, in the initial principal amount of
$225 million. These borrowings bear interest at a coupon
rate of 9.8% and are secured by vacation ownership contract
receivables. As of December 31, 2009, the Company has
$131 million of outstanding borrowings under these term
notes.
Sierra Timeshare 2009-B Receivables Funding, LLC. On
June 1, 2009, the Company closed a term securitization
transaction, Sierra Timeshare 2009-B Receivables Funding, LLC,
in the initial principal amount of $50 million. These
borrowings bear interest at a coupon rate of 9.0% and are
secured by vacation ownership contract receivables. As of
December 31, 2009, the Company had $30 million of
outstanding borrowings under these term notes.
Sierra Timeshare
2009-3
Receivables Funding, LLC. On September 24, 2009, the
Company closed a series of term notes payable, Sierra Timeshare
2009-3
Receivables Funding, LLC, in the initial principal amount of
$175 million. These borrowings bear interest at a coupon
rate of 7.62% and are secured by vacation ownership contract
receivables. As of December 31, 2009, the Company had
$140 million of outstanding borrowings under these term
notes.
Sierra Timeshare
2009-2
Receivables Funding, LLC. On October 7, 2009, the
Company closed a series of term notes payable, Sierra Timeshare
2009-2
Receivables Funding, LLC, in the initial principal amount of
$175 million. These borrowings bear interest at a coupon
rate of 4.52% and are secured by vacation ownership contract
F-28
receivables. As of December 31, 2009, the Company had
$132 million of outstanding borrowings under these term
notes.
As of December 31, 2009, the Company had $669 million
of outstanding borrowings under term notes entered into prior to
January 1, 2009.
The Companys securitized debt includes fixed and floating
rate term notes for which the weighted average interest rate was
8.1%, 5.8% and 5.2% during the years ended December 31,
2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
On November 10, 2008, the Company closed on a
364-day,
$943 million, non-recourse, securitized vacation ownership
bank conduit facility with a term through November 2009. Such
facility was renewed during October 2009 through October 2010
and its capacity was reduced to $600 million. This facility
bears interest at variable commercial paper rates plus a spread.
The previous bank conduit facility ceased operating as a
revolving facility as of October 29, 2008 and was repaid on
October 8, 2009. The two bank conduit facilities, on a
combined basis, had a weighted average interest rate of 9.6%,
4.1% and 5.9% during the years ended December 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007, respectively.
As of December 31, 2009, the Companys securitized
vacation ownership debt of $1,507 million is collateralized
by $2,755 million of underlying gross vacation ownership
contract receivables and related assets. Additional usage of the
capacity of the Companys 2008 bank conduit facility is
subject to the Companys ability to provide additional
assets to collateralize such facility. The combined weighted
average interest rate on the Companys total securitized
vacation ownership debt was 8.5%, 5.2% and 5.4% during 2009,
2008 and 2007, respectively.
Other
6.00% Senior Unsecured Notes. The Companys
6.00% notes, with face value of $800 million, were
issued in December 2006 for net proceeds of $796 million.
The notes will mature on December 1, 2016 and are
redeemable at the Companys option at any time, in whole or
in part, at the appropriate redemption prices plus accrued
interest through the redemption date. These notes rank equally
in right of payment with all of the Companys other senior
unsecured indebtedness.
Term Loan. During July 2006, the Company entered into a
five-year $300 million term loan facility which bears
interest at LIBOR plus a spread and matures on July 7,
2011. During July 2006, the Company entered into an interest
rate swap agreement and, as such, the interest rate was fixed at
6.2%. During December 2007, the Company entered into a forward
starting interest rate swap agreement which commenced in July
2009. As a result, the interest rate is fixed at 5.3% as of
December 31, 2009 and the weighted average interest rate
during 2009 was 5.7%.
Revolving Credit Facility. During July 2006, the Company
entered into a five-year $900 million revolving credit
facility which currently bears interest at LIBOR plus 87.5 to
100 basis points and expires on July 7, 2011. The
interest rate of this facility is dependent on the
Companys credit ratings and the outstanding balance of
borrowings on this facility.
9.875% Senior Unsecured Notes. On May 18, 2009,
the Company issued senior unsecured notes, with face value of
$250 million and bearing interest at a rate of 9.875%, for
net proceeds of $236 million. Interest began accruing on
May 18, 2009 and is payable semi-annually in arrears on May
1 and November 1 of each year, commencing on November 1,
2009. The notes will mature on May 1, 2014 and are
redeemable at the Companys option at any time, in whole or
in part, at the stated redemption prices plus accrued interest
through the redemption date. These notes rank equally in right
of payment with all of the Companys other senior unsecured
indebtedness.
3.50% Convertible Notes. On May 19, 2009, the
Company issued convertible notes (Convertible Notes)
with face value of $230 million and bearing interest at a
rate of 3.50%, for net proceeds of $224 million. The
Company accounted for the conversion feature as a derivative
instrument under the guidance for derivatives and bifurcated
such conversion feature from the Convertible Notes for
accounting purposes (Bifurcated Conversion Feature).
The fair value of the Bifurcated Conversion Feature on the
issuance date of the Convertible Notes was recorded as original
issue discount for purposes of accounting for the debt component
of the Convertible Notes. Therefore, interest expense greater
than the coupon rate of 3.50% will be recognized by the Company
primarily resulting from the accretion of the discounted
carrying value of the Convertible Notes to their face amount
over the term of the Convertible Notes. As such, the effective
interest rate over the life of the Convertible Notes is
approximately 10.7%. Interest began accruing on May 19,
2009 and is payable semi-annually in arrears on May 1 and
November 1 of each year, commencing on November 1, 2009.
The Convertible Notes will mature on May 1, 2012. Holders
may convert their notes to cash subject to (i) certain
conversion provisions determined by the market price of the
Companys common stock; (ii) specified distributions
to common shareholders; (iii) a fundamental change (as
defined below); and (iv) certain time periods specified in
the purchase agreement. The Convertible Notes have an initial
conversion reference rate of 78.5423 shares of common stock
per $1,000 principal amount (equivalent to an initial conversion
price of approximately $12.73 per share of the Companys
common stock), subject to adjustment, with the principal
F-29
amount and remainder payable in cash. The Convertible Notes are
not convertible into the Companys common stock or any
other securities under any circumstances.
On May 19, 2009, concurrent with the issuance of the
Convertible Notes, the Company entered into convertible note
hedge and warrant transactions with certain counterparties. The
Company paid $42 million to purchase cash-settled call
options (Call Options) that are expected to reduce
the Companys exposure to potential cash payments required
to be made by the Company upon the cash conversion of the
Convertible Notes. Concurrent with the purchase of the Call
Options, the Company received $11 million of proceeds from
the issuance of warrants to purchase shares of the
Companys common stock.
If the market price per share of the Companys common stock
at the time of cash conversion of any Convertible Notes is above
the strike price of the Call Options (which strike price is the
same as the equivalent initial conversion price of the
Convertible Notes of approximately $12.73 per share of the
Companys common stock), such Call Options will entitle the
Company to receive from the counterparties in the aggregate the
same amount of cash as it would be required to issue to the
holder of the cash converted notes in excess of the principal
amount thereof.
Pursuant to the warrant transactions, the Company sold to the
counterparties warrants to purchase in the aggregate up to
approximately 18 million shares of the Companys
common stock. The warrants have an exercise price of $20.16
(which represents a premium of approximately 90% over the
Companys closing price per share on May 13, 2009 of
$10.61) and are expected to be net share settled, meaning that
the Company will issue a number of shares per warrant
corresponding to the difference between the Companys share
price at each warrant expiration date and the exercise price of
the warrant. The warrants may not be exercised prior to the
maturity of the Convertible Notes.
The purchase of Call Options and the sale of warrants are
separate contracts entered into by the Company, are not part of
the Convertible Notes and do not affect the rights of holders
under the Convertible Notes. Holders of the Convertible Notes
will not have any rights with respect to the purchased Call
Options or the sold warrants. The Call Options meet the
definition of derivatives under the guidance for derivatives. As
such, the instruments are marked to market each period. In
addition, the derivative liability associated with the
Bifurcated Conversion Feature is also marked to market each
period. As of December 31, 2009, the $367 million
Convertible Notes consist of $191 million of debt
($230 million face amount, net of $39 million of
unamortized discount) and a derivative liability with a fair
value of $176 million related to the Bifurcated Conversion
Feature. The Call Options are derivative assets recorded at
their fair value of $176 million within other non-current
assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31,
2009. The warrants meet the definition of derivatives under the
guidance; however, because these instruments have been
determined to be indexed to the Companys own stock, their
issuance has been recorded in stockholders equity in the
Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet and is not subject to
the fair value provisions of the guidance.
The Convertible Notes, Call Options and warrants have
anti-dilution provisions that can result in adjustments to:
(i) the conversion rate and conversion price with respect
to the Convertible Notes and (ii) the strike price and the
number of options and warrants with respect to the Call Options
and warrants. The anti-dilution adjustments are required for,
among other things, all quarterly cash dividend increases above
$0.04 per share that occur prior to the maturity date of the
Convertible Notes, Call Options and warrants. These
anti-dilution adjustments will mirror each other as they are
made to the Convertible Notes, Call Options and warrants.
Vacation Ownership Bank Borrowings. On June 24,
2009, the Company closed on a
364-day, AUD
193 million, secured, revolving foreign credit facility
with a term through June 2010. On July 7, 2009, an
additional bank joined the Companys
364-day,
secured, revolving foreign credit facility, which provided an
additional AUD 20 million of capacity, increasing the total
capacity of the facility to AUD 213 million. This facility
is used to support the Companys vacation ownership
operations in the South Pacific and bears interest at Australian
BBSY plus a spread. The weighted average interest rate was 6.8%,
8.1% and 7.2% during 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The AUD
213 million facility has an advance rate for new borrowings
of approximately 70%. These secured borrowings are
collateralized by $262 million of underlying gross vacation
ownership contract receivables as of December 31, 2009. The
capacity of this facility is subject to maintaining sufficient
assets to collateralize these secured obligations.
Vacation Rental Capital Leases. The Company leases
vacation homes located in European holiday parks as part of its
vacation exchange and rentals business. The majority of these
leases are recorded as capital lease obligations under generally
accepted accounting principles with corresponding assets
classified within property, plant and equipment on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets. The vacation rentals capital lease
obligations had a weighted average interest rate of 4.5% during
2009, 2008 and 2007.
Other. The Company also maintains other debt facilities
which arise through the ordinary course of operations. This debt
primarily reflects mortgage borrowings related to a vacation
ownership office building and borrowings used to fund property
renovations at one of the Companys vacation rentals
businesses.
F-30
Interest expense incurred in connection with the Companys
other debt was $124 million, $99 million and
$96 million during 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. All
such amounts are recorded within the interest expense line item
on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Cash paid related
to such interest expense was $99 million, $100 million
and $89 million during 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Interest expense is partially offset on the Consolidated
Statements of Operations by capitalized interest of
$10 million, $19 million and $23 million during
2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The guidance for fair value measurements requires additional
disclosures about the Companys assets and liabilities that
are measured at fair value. The following table presents
information about the Companys financial assets and
liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis
as of December 31, 2009, and indicates the fair value
hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized by the Company to
determine such fair values. Financial assets and liabilities
carried at fair value are classified and disclosed in one of the
following three categories:
Level 1: Quoted prices for identical instruments in active
markets.
Level 2: Quoted prices for similar instruments in active
markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in
markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose
inputs are observable or whose significant value driver is
observable.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs used when little or no market
data is available.
In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall
into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such
cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the
fair value measurement falls has been determined based on the
lowest level input (closest to Level 3) that is
significant to the fair value measurement. The Companys
assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair
value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and
considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measure on a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recurring Basis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments
(a)
|
|
$
|
184
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
Securities
available-for-sale
(b)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
189
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments
(c)
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Included in other current assets
and other non-current assets on the Companys Consolidated
Balance Sheet.
|
|
(b) |
|
Included in other non-current
assets on the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet.
|
(c) |
|
Included in accrued expenses and
other current liabilities, other non-current liabilities and
long-term debt on the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet.
|
The Companys derivative instruments primarily consist of
the Call Options and Bifurcated Conversion Feature related to
the Convertible Notes, pay-fixed/receive-variable interest rate
swaps, interest rate caps, foreign exchange forward contracts
and foreign exchange average rate forward contracts (see
Note 15 Financial Instruments for more detail).
For assets and liabilities that are measured using quoted prices
in active markets, the fair value is the published market price
per unit multiplied by the number of units held without
consideration of transaction costs. Assets and liabilities that
are measured using other significant observable inputs are
valued by reference to similar assets and liabilities. For these
items, a significant portion of fair value is derived by
reference to quoted prices of similar assets and liabilities in
active markets. For assets and liabilities that are measured
using significant unobservable inputs, fair value is derived
using a fair value model, such as a discounted cash flow model.
F-31
The following table presents additional information about
financial assets which are measured at fair value on a recurring
basis for which the Company has utilized Level 3 inputs to
determine fair value as of December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
Bifurcated
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
Asset-Call
|
|
|
Conversion
|
|
|
Available-For-
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Feature
|
|
|
Sale
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2009
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
Issuance of Convertible Notes
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
|
$
|
(176
|
)
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of financial instruments is generally determined
by reference to market values resulting from trading on a
national securities exchange or in an
over-the-counter
market. In cases where quoted market prices are not available,
fair value is based on estimates using present value or other
valuation techniques, as appropriate. The carrying amounts of
cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, trade receivables,
accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current
liabilities approximate fair value due to the short-term
maturities of these assets and liabilities. The carrying amounts
and estimated fair values of all other financial instruments are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation ownership contract receivables, net
|
|
$
|
3,081
|
|
|
$
|
2,809
|
|
|
$
|
3,254
|
|
|
$
|
2,666
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
debt (a)
|
|
|
3,522
|
|
|
|
3,405
|
|
|
|
3,794
|
|
|
|
2,759
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange
forwards (b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps and
caps (c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
Convertible Notes related Call Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
As of December 31, 2009,
includes the $176 million Bifurcated Conversion Feature
liability.
|
(b) |
|
Instruments are in a net gain
position as of December 31, 2009 and a net loss position as
of December 31, 2008.
|
(c) |
|
Instruments are in net loss
positions as of December 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008.
|
The weighted average interest rate on outstanding vacation
ownership contract receivables was 13.0%, 12.7% and 12.5% as of
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The
estimated fair value of the vacation ownership contract
receivables as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 was
approximately 91% and 82% respectively, of the carry value. The
primary reason for the fair value being lower than the carrying
value related to the volatile credit markets in 2009 and the
latter part of 2008. Although the outstanding vacation ownership
contract receivables had weighted average interest rates of
13.0% and 12.7% as of December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, the estimated market rate of return for a
portfolio of contract receivables of similar characteristics in
market conditions for 2009 and 2008 exceeded 14% and 15%,
respectively.
In accordance with the guidance for long-lived assets held for
sale, during 2009, vacation ownership properties consisting
primarily of undeveloped land with an approximate carrying
amount of $36 million were written down to $27 million
(their estimated fair value less selling costs). Such write down
resulted in an impairment charge of $9 million during 2009.
In accordance with the guidance for equity method investments,
during 2009, an investment in a joint venture with a carrying
amount of $19 million was written down to its fair value of
$13 million. Such write down resulted in an impairment
charge of $6 million during 2009. These impairment charges
are included in goodwill and other impairments on the
Companys Consolidated Statements of Operations.
F-32
|
|
15.
|
Financial
Instruments
|
Risk
Management
Following is a description of the Companys risk management
policies:
Foreign
Currency Risk
The Company uses foreign currency forward contracts to manage
its exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates
associated with its foreign currency denominated receivables,
forecasted earnings of foreign subsidiaries and forecasted
foreign currency denominated vendor costs. The Company primarily
hedges its foreign currency exposure to the British pound and
Euro. The forward contracts utilized by the Company do not
qualify for hedge accounting treatment under the guidance for
hedging. The fluctuations in the value of these forward
contracts do, however, largely offset the impact of changes in
the value of the underlying risk that they are intended to
hedge. The impact of these forward contracts was not material to
the Companys results of operations, financial position or
cash flows during 2009, 2008 and 2007. The pre-tax amount of
gains or losses reclassified from other comprehensive income to
earnings resulting from ineffectiveness or from excluding a
component of the forward contracts gain or loss from the
effectiveness calculation for cash flow hedges 2009, 2008 and
2007 was not material. The amount of gains or losses the Company
expects to reclassify from other comprehensive income to
earnings over the next 12 months is not material.
Interest
Rate Risk
The debt used to finance much of the Companys operations
is also exposed to interest rate fluctuations. The Company uses
various hedging strategies and derivative financial instruments
to create a desired mix of fixed and floating rate assets and
liabilities. Derivative instruments currently used in these
hedging strategies include swaps and interest rate caps.
The derivatives used to manage the risk associated with the
Companys floating rate debt include freestanding
derivatives and derivatives designated as cash flow hedges. In
connection with its qualifying cash flow hedges, the Company
recorded a net pre-tax gain of $28 million during 2009 and
a net pre-tax loss of $38 million and $22 million
during 2008 and 2007, respectively, to other comprehensive
income. The pre-tax amount of gains or losses reclassified from
other comprehensive income to consumer financing interest or
interest expense resulting from ineffectiveness or from
excluding a component of the derivatives gain or loss from
the effectiveness calculation for cash flow hedges was
insignificant during 2009, 2008 and 2007. The amount of losses
that the Company expects to reclassify from other comprehensive
income to earnings during the next 12 months is not
material. The freestanding derivatives had an immaterial impact
on the Companys results of operations, financial position
and cash flows during 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The following table summarizes information regarding the
Companys derivative instruments as of December 31,
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
Accrued exp. & other current liabs.
|
|
|
2
|
|
Convertible Notes related Call
Options (*)
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bifurcated Conversion
Feature (*)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
$
|
184
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
See Note 13
Long-Term Debt and Borrowing Arrangements for further detail.
|
F-33
The following table summarizes information regarding the
Companys derivative instruments as of December 31,
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
Accrued exp. & other current liabs.
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit
Risk and Exposure
The Company is exposed to counterparty credit risk in the event
of nonperformance by counterparties to various agreements and
sales transactions. The Company manages such risk by evaluating
the financial position and creditworthiness of such
counterparties and by requiring collateral in instances in which
financing is provided. The Company mitigates counterparty credit
risk associated with its derivative contracts by monitoring the
amounts at risk with each counterparty to such contracts,
periodically evaluating counterparty creditworthiness and
financial position, and where possible, dispersing its risk
among multiple counterparties.
As of December 31, 2009, there were no significant
concentrations of credit risk with any individual counterparty
or groups of counterparties. However, approximately 19% of the
Companys outstanding vacation ownership contract
receivables portfolio relates to customers who reside in
California. With the exception of the financing provided to
customers of its vacation ownership businesses, the Company does
not normally require collateral or other security to support
credit sales.
Market
Risk
The Company is subject to risks relating to the geographic
concentrations of (i) areas in which the Company is
currently developing and selling vacation ownership properties,
(ii) sales offices in certain vacation areas and
(iii) customers of the Companys vacation ownership
business; which in each case, may result in the Companys
results of operations being more sensitive to local and regional
economic conditions and other factors, including competition,
natural disasters and economic downturns, than the
Companys results of operations would be absent such
geographic concentrations. Local and regional economic
conditions and other factors may differ materially from
prevailing conditions in other parts of the world. Florida and
Nevada are examples of areas with concentrations of sales
offices. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2009,
approximately 16% and 12% of the Companys VOI sales
revenues were generated in sales offices located in Florida and
Nevada, respectively.
Included within the Consolidated Statements of Operations is
approximately 11% of net revenues generated from transactions in
the state of Florida in each of 2009, 2008 and 2007 and
approximately 8%, 10% and 10% of net revenues generated from
transactions in the state of California in each of 2009, 2008
and 2007, respectively.
F-34
|
|
16.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Commitments
Leases
The Company is committed to making rental payments under
noncancelable operating leases covering various facilities and
equipment. Future minimum lease payments required under
noncancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2009 are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncancelable
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
Year
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
2011
|
|
|
59
|
|
2012
|
|
|
45
|
|
2013
|
|
|
33
|
|
2014
|
|
|
25
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2009, 2008 and 2007, the Company incurred total rental
expense of $77 million, $93 million and
$79 million, respectively.
Purchase
Commitments
In the normal course of business, the Company makes various
commitments to purchase goods or services from specific
suppliers, including those related to vacation ownership resort
development and other capital expenditures. Purchase commitments
made by the Company as of December 31, 2009 aggregated
$519 million. Individually, such commitments range as high
as $97 million related to the development of a vacation
ownership resort. The majority of the commitments relate to the
development of vacation ownership properties (aggregating
$308 million; $104 million of which relates to 2010
and $69 million of which relates to 2011).
Letters
of Credit
As of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the
Company had $31 million and $33 million, respectively,
of irrevocable letters of credit outstanding, which mainly
support development activity at the Companys vacation
ownership business.
Surety
Bonds
Some of the Companys vacation ownership developments are
supported by surety bonds provided by affiliates of certain
insurance companies in order to meet regulatory requirements of
certain states. In the ordinary course of the Companys
business, it has assembled commitments from thirteen surety
providers in the amount of $1.3 billion, of which the
Company had $526 million outstanding as of
December 31, 2009. The availability, terms and conditions,
and pricing of such bonding capacity is dependent on, among
other things, continued financial strength and stability of the
insurance company affiliates providing such bonding capacity,
the general availability of such capacity and the Companys
corporate credit rating. If such bonding capacity is unavailable
or, alternatively, the terms and conditions and pricing of such
bonding capacity may be unacceptable to the Company, the cost of
development of the Companys vacation ownership units could
be negatively impacted.
Litigation
The Company is involved in claims, legal proceedings and
governmental inquiries related to the Companys business.
See Part I, Item 3, Legal Proceedings for
a description of claims and legal actions arising in the
ordinary course of the Companys business. See also
Note 22 Separation Adjustments and Transactions
with Former Parent and Subsidiaries regarding contingent
litigation liabilities resulting from the Companys
separation from its former Parent (Separation).
The Company believes that it has adequately accrued for such
matters with reserves of $25 million as of
December 31, 2009. Such amount is exclusive of matters
relating to the Separation. For matters not requiring accrual,
the Company believes that such matters will not have a material
adverse effect on its results of operations, financial position
or cash flows based on information currently available. However,
litigation is inherently unpredictable and, although the Company
believes that its accruals are adequate
and/or that
it has valid defenses in these matters, unfavorable resolutions
could occur. As such, an adverse outcome from such unresolved
proceedings
F-35
for which claims are awarded in excess of the amounts accrued,
if any, could be material to the Company with respect to
earnings or cash flows in any given reporting period. However,
the Company does not believe that the impact of such unresolved
litigation should result in a material liability to the Company
in relation to its consolidated financial position or liquidity.
Guarantees/Indemnifications
Standard
Guarantees/Indemnifications
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into
agreements that contain standard guarantees and indemnities
whereby the Company indemnifies another party for specified
breaches of or third-party claims relating to an underlying
agreement. Such underlying agreements are typically entered into
by one of the Companys subsidiaries. The various
underlying agreements generally govern purchases, sales or
outsourcing of assets or businesses, leases of real estate,
licensing of trademarks, development of vacation ownership
properties, access to credit facilities, derivatives and
issuances of debt securities. While a majority of these
guarantees and indemnifications extend only for the duration of
the underlying agreement, some survive the expiration of the
agreement. The Company is not able to estimate the maximum
potential amount of future payments to be made under these
guarantees and indemnifications as the triggering events are not
predictable. In certain cases the Company maintains insurance
coverage that may mitigate any potential payments.
Other
Guarantees/Indemnifications
In the ordinary course of business, the Companys vacation
ownership business provides guarantees to certain owners
associations for funds required to operate and maintain vacation
ownership properties in excess of assessments collected from
owners of the VOIs. The Company may be required to fund such
excess as a result of unsold Company-owned VOIs or failure by
owners to pay such assessments. These guarantees extend for the
duration of the underlying subsidy or similar agreement (which
generally approximate one year and are renewable at the
discretion of the Company on an annual basis) or until a
stipulated percentage (typically 80% or higher) of related VOIs
are sold. The maximum potential future payments that the Company
could be required to make under these guarantees was
approximately $360 million as of December 31, 2009.
The Company would only be required to pay this maximum amount if
none of the owners assessed paid their assessments. Any
assessments collected from the owners of the VOIs would reduce
the maximum potential amount of future payments to be made by
the Company. Additionally, should the Company be required to
fund the deficit through the payment of any owners
assessments under these guarantees, the Company would be
permitted access to the property for its own use and may use
that property to engage in revenue-producing activities, such as
rentals. During 2009, 2008 and 2007, the Company made payments
related to these guarantees of $10 million, $7 million
and $5 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2009
and 2008, the Company maintained a liability in connection with
these guarantees of $22 million and $37 million,
respectively, on its Consolidated Balance Sheets.
From time to time, the Company may enter into a hotel management
agreement that provides the hotel owner with a minimum return.
Under such agreement, the Company would be required to
compensate for any shortfall over the life of the management
agreement up to a specified aggregate amount. The Companys
exposure under these guarantees is partially mitigated by the
Companys ability to terminate any such management
agreement if certain targeted operating results are not met.
Additionally, the Company is able to recapture a portion or all
of the shortfall payments and any waived fees in the event that
future operating results exceed targets. As of December 31,
2009, the maximum potential amount of future payments to be made
under these guarantees is $16 million with an annual cap of
$3 million or less. As of both December 31, 2009 and
2008, the Company maintained a liability in connection with
these guarantees of less than $1 million on its
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
See Note 22 Separation Adjustments and
Transactions with Former Parent and Subsidiaries for contingent
liabilities related to the Companys Separation.
F-36
|
|
17.
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income
|
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Gains/(Losses)
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
on Cash Flow
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Hedges, Net
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2007, net of tax of $43
|
|
$
|
191
|
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
184
|
|
Period change
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007, net of tax of $47
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
Period change
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008, net of tax benefit of $72
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
Current period change
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2009, net of tax benefit of $32
|
|
$
|
166
|
|
|
$
|
(27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments exclude income taxes
related to investments in foreign subsidiaries where the Company
intends to reinvest the undistributed earnings indefinitely in
those foreign operations.
|
|
18.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
The Company has a stock-based compensation plan available to
grant non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options,
SSARs, restricted stock, RSUs and other stock or cash-based
awards to key employees, non-employee directors, advisors and
consultants. Under the Wyndham Worldwide Corporation 2006 Equity
and Incentive Plan, which was amended and restated as a result
of shareholders approval at the May 12, 2009 annual
meeting of shareholders, a maximum of 36.7 million shares
of common stock may be awarded. As of December 31, 2009,
13.2 million shares remained available.
Incentive
Equity Awards Granted by the Company
The activity related to incentive equity awards granted by the
Company for the year ended December 31, 2009 consisted of
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSUs
|
|
|
SSARs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
of RSUs
|
|
|
Grant Price
|
|
|
of SSARs
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2009
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
$
|
25.34
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
$
|
27.40
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
6.6
|
(b)
|
|
|
4.15
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
(b)
|
|
|
3.69
|
|
Vested/exercised
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
25.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
17.15
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
30.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31,
2009 (a)
|
|
|
8.3
|
(c)
|
|
|
9.60
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
(d)
|
|
|
21.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Aggregate unrecognized compensation
expense related to SSARs and RSUs was $59 million as of
December 31, 2009 which is expected to be recognized over a
weighted average period of 2 years.
|
(b) |
|
Primarily represents awards granted
by the Company on February 27, 2009.
|
(c) |
|
Approximately 7.8 million RSUs
outstanding as of December 31, 2009 are expected to vest
over time.
|
(d) |
|
Approximately 810,000 of the
2.1 million SSARs were exercisable as of December 31,
2009. The Company assumes that the unvested SSARs are expected
to vest over time. SSARs outstanding as of December 31,
2009 had an intrinsic value of $9.6 million and have a
weighted average remaining contractual life of 4.1 years.
|
On February 27, 2009, the Company approved its annual grant
of incentive equity awards totaling $24 million to the
Companys key employees and senior officers in the form of
RSUs and SSARs. Such awards will vest ratably over a period of
three years. On May 12, 2009, July 23, 2009,
September 8, 2009 and November 2, 2009, the Company
approved grants of incentive equity awards totaling
$3 million to the Companys newly hired key employees
and senior officers in the form of RSUs. A portion of such
awards will vest over a period of three years and the remaining
portion will vest ratably over a period of four years.
The fair value of SSARs granted by the Company on
February 27, 2009 was estimated on the date of grant using
the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the weighted average
assumptions outlined in the table below. Expected volatility is
based on both historical and implied volatilities of
(i) the Companys stock and (ii) the stock of
comparable companies over the estimated expected life of the
SSARs. The expected life represents the period of time the SSARs
are expected to be outstanding and is based on the
simplified method, as defined in Staff Accounting
Bulletin 110. The risk free interest rate is based on
yields on U.S. Treasury strips with a maturity similar to
the estimated expected life of the SSARs. The projected dividend
yield was based on the Companys anticipated annual
dividend divided by the twelve-month target price of the
Companys stock on the date of the grant.
F-37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SSARs Issued on
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Grant date fair value
|
|
$
|
2.02
|
|
Grant date strike price
|
|
$
|
3.69
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
81.0%
|
|
Expected life
|
|
|
4.00 yrs.
|
|
Risk free interest rate
|
|
|
1.95%
|
|
Projected dividend yield
|
|
|
1.60%
|
|
Stock-Based
Compensation Expense
The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of
$37 million, $35 million and $26 million during
2009, 2008 and 2007 respectively, related to the incentive
equity awards granted by the Company. The Company recognized
$10 million of a net tax benefit during 2009 and
$14 million and $10 million of a tax benefit during
2008 and 2007, respectively, for stock-based compensation
arrangements on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of
January 1, 2009, the Company had a $4 million APIC
Pool balance. During March 2009, the Company utilized its APIC
Pool related to the vesting of RSUs, which reduced the balance
to $0. During May 2009, the Company recorded a $4 million
charge to its provision for income taxes related to additional
vesting of RSUs.
Incentive
Equity Awards Conversion
Prior to August 1, 2006, all employee stock awards (stock
options and RSUs) were granted by Cendant. At the time of
Separation, a portion of Cendants outstanding equity
awards were converted into equity awards of the Company at a
ratio of one share of the Companys common stock for every
five shares of Cendants common stock. As a result, the
Company issued approximately 2 million RSUs and
approximately 24 million stock options upon completion of
the conversion of existing Cendant equity awards into Wyndham
equity awards. As of December 31, 2009, there were
7.4 million converted stock options and no converted RSUs
outstanding.
The activity related to the converted stock options for the year
ended December 31, 2009 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
of Options
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2009
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
$
|
35.08
|
|
Exercised (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)
|
|
|
37.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31,
2009 (b)
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
33.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Stock options exercised during 2009
and 2008 had an intrinsic value of zero and $600,000,
respectively.
|
(b) |
|
As of December 31, 2009, the
Companys outstanding in the money stock
options had an aggregate intrinsic value of $900,000. All
7.4 million options were exercisable as of
December 31, 2009. Options outstanding and exercisable as
of December 31, 2009 have a weighted average remaining
contractual life of 1.2 years.
|
The following table summarizes information regarding the
outstanding and exercisable converted stock options as of
December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Range of Exercise Prices
|
|
of Options
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
$10.00 $19.99
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
$
|
19.77
|
|
$20.00 $29.99
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
27.62
|
|
$30.00 $39.99
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
37.46
|
|
$40.00 & above
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
43.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Options
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
33.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.
|
Employee
Benefit Plans
|
Defined
Contribution Benefit Plans
Wyndham sponsors a domestic defined contribution savings plan
and a domestic deferred compensation plan that provide certain
eligible employees of the Company an opportunity to accumulate
funds for retirement. The Company matches the contributions of
participating employees on the basis specified by each plan. The
Companys cost for these plans was $19 million,
$25 million and $23 million during 2009, 2008 and
2007, respectively.
F-38
In addition, the Company contributes to several foreign employee
benefit contributory plans which also provide eligible employees
with an opportunity to accumulate funds for retirement. The
Companys contributory cost for these plans was
$14 million, $13 million and $11 million during
2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Defined
Benefit Pension Plans
The Company sponsors defined benefit pension plans for certain
foreign subsidiaries. Under these plans, benefits are based on
an employees years of credited service and a percentage of
final average compensation or as otherwise described by the
plan. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Companys
net pension liability of $10 million and $7 million,
respectively, is fully recognized as other non-current
liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of
December 31, 2009, the Company recorded $1 million and
$2 million, respectively, within accumulated other
comprehensive income on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as an
unrecognized prior service credit and unrecognized loss. As of
December 31, 2008, the Company recorded $1 million and
$2 million, respectively, within accumulated other
comprehensive income on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as an
unrecognized prior service credit and unrecognized gain.
The Companys policy is to contribute amounts sufficient to
meet minimum funding requirements as set forth in employee
benefit and tax laws plus such additional amounts that the
Company determines to be appropriate. The Company recorded
pension expense of $2 million during each of 2009, 2008 and
2007. In addition, during 2008, the Company recorded a
$1 million net gain on curtailments of two defined benefit
pension plans.
The reportable segments presented below represent the
Companys operating segments for which separate financial
information is available and which are utilized on a regular
basis by its chief operating decision maker to assess
performance and to allocate resources. In identifying its
reportable segments, the Company also considers the nature of
services provided by its operating segments. Management
evaluates the operating results of each of its reportable
segments based upon revenues and EBITDA, which is
defined as net income/(loss) before depreciation and
amortization, interest expense (excluding consumer financing
interest), interest income (excluding consumer financing
interest) and income taxes, each of which is presented on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company believes that
EBITDA is a useful measure of performance for the Companys
industry segments which, when considered with GAAP measures, the
Company believes gives a more complete understanding of the
Companys operating performance. The Companys
presentation of EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly-titled
measures used by other companies.
Year
Ended or as of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
Vacation
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
|
and Rentals
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Other (b)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net
revenues (a)
|
|
$
|
660
|
|
|
$
|
1,152
|
|
|
$
|
1,945
|
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,750
|
|
EBITDA (c)
|
|
|
175
|
(d)
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
387
|
(e)
|
|
|
(71
|
)(f)
|
|
|
778
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
Segment assets
|
|
|
1,564
|
|
|
|
2,358
|
|
|
|
5,152
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
9,352
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
Year
Ended or as of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
Vacation
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
|
and Rentals
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Other (b)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net
revenues (a)
|
|
$
|
753
|
|
|
$
|
1,259
|
|
|
$
|
2,278
|
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,281
|
|
EBITDA (c)
|
|
|
218
|
(g)
|
|
|
248
|
(h)
|
|
|
(1,074
|
)(i)
|
|
|
(27
|
)(f)
|
|
|
(635
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
Segment assets
|
|
|
1,628
|
|
|
|
2,331
|
|
|
|
5,574
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
9,573
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
F-39
Year
Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
Vacation
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
|
and Rentals
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Other(b)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net
revenues (a)
|
|
$
|
725
|
|
|
$
|
1,218
|
|
|
$
|
2,425
|
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,360
|
|
EBITDA (j)
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)(f)
|
|
|
883
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Transactions between segments are
recorded at fair value and eliminated in consolidation.
Inter-segment net revenues were not significant to the net
revenues of any one segment.
|
(b) |
|
Includes the elimination of
transactions between segments.
|
(c) |
|
Includes restructuring costs of
$3 million, $6 million, $37 million and
$1 million for Lodging, Vacation Exchange and Rentals,
Vacation Ownership and Corporate and Other during 2009 and
$4 million, $9 million and $66 million for
Lodging, Vacation Exchange and Rentals and Vacation Ownership
during 2008.
|
(d) |
|
Includes a non-cash impairment
charge of $6 million ($3 million, net of tax) to
reduce the value of an underperforming joint venture in the
Companys hotel management business.
|
(e) |
|
Includes a non-cash impairment
charge of $9 million ($7 million, net of tax) to
reduce the value of certain vacation ownership properties and
related assets held for sale that are no longer consistent with
the Companys development plans.
|
(f) |
|
Includes $64 million,
$45 million and $55 million of corporate costs during
2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, $6 million of a net
expense and $18 million and $46 million of net benefit
related to the resolution of and adjustment to certain
contingent liabilities and assets during 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
|
(g) |
|
Includes a non-cash impairment
charge of $16 million ($10 million, net of tax)
primarily due to a strategic change in direction related to the
Companys Howard Johnson brand that is expected to
adversely impact the ability of the properties associated with
the franchise agreements acquired in connection with the
acquisition of the brand during 1990 to maintain compliance with
brand standards.
|
(h) |
|
Includes (i) non-cash
impairment charges of $36 million ($28 million, net of
tax) due to trademark and fixed asset write downs resulting from
a strategic change in direction and reduced future investments
in a vacation rentals business and the write-off of the
Companys investment in a non-performing joint venture and
(ii) charges of $24 million ($24 million, net of
tax) due to currency conversion losses related to the transfer
of cash from the Companys Venezuelan operations.
|
(i) |
|
Includes (i) a non-cash
goodwill impairment charge of $1,342 million
($1,337 million, net of tax) as a result of organizational
realignment plans announced during the fourth quarter of 2008
which reduced future cash flow estimates by lowering the
Companys expected VOI sales pace in the future based on
the expectation that access to the asset-backed securities
market will continue to be challenging, (ii) a non-cash
impairment charge of $28 million ($17 million, net of
tax) due to the Companys initiative to rebrand its
vacation ownership trademarks to the Wyndham brand and
(iii) a non-cash impairment charge of $4 million
($3 million, net of tax) related to the termination of a
development project.
|
(j) |
|
Includes separation and related
costs of $9 million and $7 million for Vacation
Ownership and Corporate and Other, respectively.
|
Provided below is a reconciliation of EBITDA to income/(loss)
before income taxes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
778
|
|
|
$
|
(635
|
)
|
|
$
|
883
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before income taxes
|
|
$
|
493
|
|
|
$
|
(887
|
)
|
|
$
|
655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The geographic segment information provided below is classified
based on the geographic location of the Companys
subsidiaries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States
|
|
|
Netherlands
|
|
|
Kingdom
|
|
|
Countries
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Year Ended or As of December 31, 2009
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
2,863
|
|
|
$
|
209
|
|
|
$
|
143
|
|
|
$
|
535
|
|
|
$
|
3,750
|
|
Net long-lived assets
|
|
|
2,468
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
3,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended or As of December 31, 2008
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
3,244
|
|
|
$
|
297
|
|
|
$
|
179
|
|
|
$
|
561
|
|
|
$
|
4,281
|
|
Net long-lived assets
|
|
|
2,579
|
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
3,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
3,390
|
|
|
$
|
228
|
|
|
$
|
206
|
|
|
$
|
536
|
|
|
$
|
4,360
|
|
F-40
|
|
21.
|
Restructuring
and Impairments
|
Restructuring
During 2008, the Company committed to various strategic
realignment initiatives targeted principally at reducing costs,
enhancing organizational efficiency, reducing the Companys
need to access the asset-backed securities market and
consolidating and rationalizing existing processes and
facilities. During 2009, the Company recorded $47 million
of incremental restructuring costs and reduced its liability
with $50 million in cash payments and $15 million of
other non-cash items. The remaining liability of
$22 million is expected to be paid in cash; $3 million
of personnel-related by December 2010 and $19 million of
primarily facility-related by September 2017. During 2008, the
Company recorded $79 million of restructuring costs
($4 million at Lodging, $9 million at Vacation
Exchange and Rentals and $66 million at Vacation
Ownership), of which $16 million was paid in cash.
Total restructuring costs by segment for the year ended
December 31, 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
Facility
|
|
|
Asset Write-offs/
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related (a)
|
|
|
Related (b)
|
|
|
Impairments (c)
|
|
|
Termination (d)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents severance benefits
resulting from reductions of approximately 370 in staff. The
Company formally communicated the termination of employment to
all 370 employees, representing a wide range of employee
groups. As of December 31, 2009, the Company had terminated
all of these employees.
|
(b) |
|
Primarily related to the
termination of leases of certain sales offices.
|
(c) |
|
Primarily related to the write-off
of assets from sales office closures and cancelled development
projects.
|
(d) |
|
Primarily represents costs incurred
in connection with the termination of a property development
contract.
|
Total restructuring costs by segment for the year ended
December 31, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
Facility
|
|
|
Asset Write-offs/
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related (a)
|
|
|
Related (b)
|
|
|
Impairments (c)
|
|
|
Termination (d)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents severance benefits
resulting from reductions of approximately 4,500 in staff. The
Company formally communicated the termination of employment to
substantially all 4,500 employees, representing a wide
range of employee groups. As of December 31, 2008, the
Company had terminated approximately 900 of these employees.
|
(b) |
|
Primarily related to the
termination of leases of certain sales offices.
|
(c) |
|
Primarily related to the write-off
of assets from sales office closures and cancelled development
projects.
|
(d) |
|
Primarily represents costs incurred
in connection with the termination of an outsourcing agreement
at the Companys vacation exchange and rentals business.
|
The activity related to the restructuring costs is summarized by
category as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability as of
|
|
|
|
Opening
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
Non-cash
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Personnel-Related
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
Facility-Related
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Asset Impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Terminations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23
|
)
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability as of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability as of
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
Non-cash
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Personnel-Related
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
(34
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
Facility-Related
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
18
|
|
Asset Impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Terminations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
(50
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairments
During 2009, the Company recorded $15 million of charges to
reduce the carrying value of certain assets based on their
revised estimated fair values. Such amount includes (i) a
non-cash charge of $9 million to impair the value of
certain vacation ownership properties and related assets held
for sale that are no longer consistent with the Companys
development plans and (ii) a non-cash charge of
$6 million to impair the value of an underperforming joint
venture in the Companys hotel management business.
During 2008, the Company recorded a charge to impair goodwill
recorded at the Companys vacation ownership reporting
unit. See Note 5 Intangible Assets for further
information. In addition, the Company recorded charges to reduce
the carrying value of certain assets based on their revised
estimated fair values. Such charges were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
1,342
|
|
Indefinite-lived intangible assets
|
|
|
36
|
|
Definite-lived intangible assets
|
|
|
16
|
|
Long-lived assets
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The impairment of indefinite-lived intangible assets represents
(i) charge of $28 million to impair the value of
trademarks related to rebranding initiatives at the
Companys vacation ownership business (see
Note 5 Intangible Assets for more information)
and (ii) a charge of $8 million to impair the value of
a trademark due to a strategic change in direction and reduced
future investments in a vacation rentals business. The
impairment of definite-lived intangible assets represents a
charge due to a strategic change in direction related to the
Companys Howard Johnson brand that is expected to
adversely impact the ability of the properties associated with
the franchise agreements acquired in connection with the
acquisition of the brand during 1990 to maintain compliance with
brand standards. The impairment of long-lived assets represents
(i) a charge of $15 million to impair the value of the
Companys investment in a non-performing joint venture of
the Companys vacation exchange and rentals business,
(ii) a charge of $13 million to impair the value of
fixed assets related to the vacation rentals business discussed
above and (iii) a charge of $4 million related to the
termination of a vacation ownership development project.
|
|
22.
|
Separation
Adjustments and Transactions with Former Parent and
Subsidiaries
|
Transfer
of Cendant Corporate Liabilities and Issuance of Guarantees to
Cendant and Affiliates
Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, upon the
distribution of the Companys common stock to Cendant
shareholders, the Company entered into certain guarantee
commitments with Cendant (pursuant to the assumption of certain
liabilities and the obligation to indemnify Cendant and
Cendants former real estate services (Realogy)
and travel distribution services (Travelport) for
such liabilities) and guarantee commitments related to deferred
compensation arrangements with each of Cendant and Realogy.
These guarantee arrangements primarily relate to certain
contingent litigation liabilities, contingent tax liabilities,
and Cendant contingent and other corporate liabilities, of which
the Company assumed and is responsible for 37.5% while Realogy
is responsible for the remaining 62.5%. The amount of
liabilities which were assumed by the Company in connection with
the Separation was $310 million and $343 million as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. These amounts
were comprised of certain Cendant corporate liabilities which
were recorded on the books of Cendant as well as additional
liabilities which were established for guarantees issued at the
date of Separation related to certain unresolved contingent
matters and certain others that could arise during the guarantee
period. Regarding the guarantees, if any of the companies
responsible for all or a portion of such liabilities were to
default in its payment of costs or expenses related to any such
liability, the Company would be responsible for a portion of the
defaulting party or parties obligation. The Company also
provided a default guarantee related to certain deferred
compensation arrangements related to certain current and former
senior officers and directors of Cendant, Realogy and
Travelport. These arrangements, which are discussed in more
detail below, have been valued upon the Separation in accordance
with
F-42
the guidance for guarantees and recorded as liabilities on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets. To the extent such recorded
liabilities are not adequate to cover the ultimate payment
amounts, such excess will be reflected as an expense to the
results of operations in future periods.
As a result of the sale of Realogy on April 10, 2007,
Realogys senior debt credit rating was downgraded to below
investment grade. Under the Separation Agreement, if Realogy
experienced such a change of control and suffered such a ratings
downgrade, it was required to post a letter of credit in an
amount acceptable to the Company and Avis Budget Group to
satisfy the fair value of Realogys indemnification
obligations for the Cendant legacy contingent liabilities in the
event Realogy does not otherwise satisfy such obligations to the
extent they become due. On April 26, 2007, Realogy posted a
$500 million irrevocable standby letter of credit from a
major commercial bank in favor of Avis Budget Group and upon
which demand may be made if Realogy does not otherwise satisfy
its obligations for its share of the Cendant legacy contingent
liabilities. The letter of credit can be adjusted from time to
time based upon the outstanding contingent liabilities and has
an expiration date of September 2013, subject to renewal and
certain provisions. As such, on August 11, 2009, the letter
of credit was reduced to $446 million. The issuance of this
letter of credit does not relieve or limit Realogys
obligations for these liabilities.
The $310 million of Separation related liabilities is
comprised of $5 million for litigation matters,
$272 million for tax liabilities, $23 million for
liabilities of previously sold businesses of Cendant,
$8 million for other contingent and corporate liabilities
and $2 million of liabilities where the calculated
guarantee amount exceeded the contingent liability assumed at
the date of Separation. In connection with these liabilities,
$245 million is recorded in current due to former Parent
and subsidiaries and $63 million is recorded in long-term
due to former Parent and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2009 on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company is
indemnifying Cendant for these contingent liabilities and
therefore any payments would be made to the third party through
the former Parent. The $2 million relating to guarantees is
recorded in other current liabilities as of December 31,
2009 on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The actual timing of
payments relating to these liabilities is dependent on a variety
of factors beyond the Companys control. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis
Contractual Obligations for the estimated timing of such
payments. In addition, as of December 31, 2009, the Company
has $5 million of receivables due from former Parent and
subsidiaries primarily relating to income taxes, which is
recorded in other current assets on the Consolidated Balance
Sheet. Such receivables totaled $3 million as of
December 31, 2008.
Following is a discussion of the liabilities on which the
Company issued guarantees.
|
|
|
Contingent litigation liabilities The Company assumed
37.5% of liabilities for certain litigation relating to, arising
out of or resulting from certain lawsuits in which Cendant is
named as the defendant. The indemnification obligation will
continue until the underlying lawsuits are resolved. The Company
will indemnify Cendant to the extent that Cendant is required to
make payments related to any of the underlying lawsuits. As the
indemnification obligation relates to matters in various stages
of litigation, the maximum exposure cannot be quantified. Due to
the inherently uncertain nature of the litigation process, the
timing of payments related to these liabilities cannot
reasonably be predicted, but is expected to occur over several
years. Since the Separation, Cendant settled a majority of these
lawsuits and the Company assumed a portion of the related
indemnification obligations. For each settlement, the Company
paid 37.5% of the aggregate settlement amount to Cendant. The
Companys payment obligations under the settlements were
greater or less than the Companys accruals, depending on
the matter. On September 7, 2007, Cendant received an
adverse ruling in a litigation matter for which the Company
retained a 37.5% indemnification obligation. The judgment on the
adverse ruling was entered on May 16, 2008. On May 23,
2008, Cendant filed an appeal of the judgment and, on
July 1, 2009, an order was entered denying the appeal. As a
result of the denial of the appeal, Realogy and the Company
determined to pay the judgment. On July 23, 2009, the
Company paid its portion of the aforementioned judgment
($37 million). Although the judgment for the underlying
liability for this matter has been paid, the phase of the
litigation involving the determination of fees owed the
plaintiffs attorneys remains pending. Similar to the
contingent liability, the Company is responsible for 37.5% of
any attorneys fees payable. As a result of settlements and
payments to Cendant, as well as other reductions and accruals
for developments in active litigation matters, the
Companys aggregate accrual for outstanding Cendant
contingent litigation liabilities was $5 million as of
December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
Contingent tax liabilities Prior to the Separation, the
Company was included in the consolidated federal and state
income tax returns of Cendant through the Separation date for
the 2006 period then ended. The Company is generally liable for
37.5% of certain contingent tax liabilities. In addition, each
of the Company, Cendant and Realogy may be responsible for 100%
of certain of Cendants tax liabilities that will provide
the responsible party with a future, offsetting tax benefit. The
Company will pay to Cendant the amount of taxes allocated
pursuant to the Tax Sharing Agreement, as amended during the
third quarter of 2008, for the payment of certain taxes. As a
result of the amendment to the Tax Sharing Agreement, the
Company recorded a gross up of its contingent tax liability and
has a corresponding deferred tax asset of $34 million as of
December 31, 2009.
|
F-43
During the first quarter of 2007, the IRS opened an examination
for Cendants taxable years 2003 through 2006 during which
the Company was included in Cendants tax returns. As of
December 31, 2009, the Companys accrual for
outstanding Cendant contingent tax liabilities was
$272 million. This liability will remain outstanding until
tax audits related to taxable years 2003 through 2006 are
completed or the statutes of limitations governing such tax
years have passed. Balances due to Cendant for these
pre-Separation tax returns and related tax attributes were
estimated as of December 31, 2006 and have since been
adjusted in connection with the filing of the pre-Separation tax
returns. These balances will again be adjusted after the
ultimate settlement of the related tax audits of these periods.
The Company believes that the accruals for tax liabilities are
adequate for all open years based on an assessment of many
factors including past experience and interpretations of tax law
applied to the facts of each matter; however, the outcome of the
tax audits is inherently uncertain. Such tax audits and any
related litigation, including disputes or litigation on the
allocation of tax liabilities between parties under the Tax
Sharing Agreement, could result in outcomes for the Company that
are different from those reflected in the Companys
historical financial statements.
The IRS examination is progressing and the Company currently
expects that the IRS examination may be completed during the
second or third quarter of 2010. As part of the anticipated
completion of the pending IRS examination, the Company is
working with the IRS through other former Cendant companies to
resolve outstanding audit and tax sharing issues. At present,
the Company believes that the recorded liabilities are adequate
to address claims, though there can be no assurance of such an
outcome with the IRS or the former Cendant companies until the
conclusion of the process. A failure to so resolve this
examination and related tax sharing issues could have a material
adverse effect on the Companys financial condition,
results of operations or cash flows.
|
|
|
Cendant contingent and other corporate liabilities The
Company has assumed 37.5% of corporate liabilities of Cendant
including liabilities relating to (i) Cendants
terminated or divested businesses; (ii) liabilities
relating to the Travelport sale, if any; and
(iii) generally any actions with respect to the Separation
plan or the distributions brought by any third party. The
Companys maximum exposure to loss cannot be quantified as
this guarantee relates primarily to future claims that may be
made against Cendant. The Company assessed the probability and
amount of potential liability related to this guarantee based on
the extent and nature of historical experience.
|
|
|
Guarantee related to deferred compensation arrangements
In the event that Cendant, Realogy
and/or
Travelport are not able to meet certain deferred compensation
obligations under specified plans for certain current and former
officers and directors because of bankruptcy or insolvency, the
Company has guaranteed such obligations (to the extent relating
to amounts deferred in respect of 2005 and earlier). This
guarantee will remain outstanding until such deferred
compensation balances are distributed to the respective officers
and directors. The maximum exposure cannot be quantified as the
guarantee, in part, is related to the value of deferred
investments as of the date of the requested distribution.
|
Transactions
with Avis Budget Group, Realogy and Travelport
Prior to the Companys Separation from Cendant, it entered
into a Transition Services Agreement (TSA) with Avis
Budget Group, Realogy and Travelport to provide for an orderly
transition to becoming an independent company. Under the TSA,
Cendant agreed to provide the Company with various services,
including services relating to human resources and employee
benefits, payroll, financial systems management, treasury and
cash management, accounts payable services, telecommunications
services and information technology services. In certain cases,
services provided by Cendant under the TSA were provided by one
of the separated companies following the date of such
companys separation from Cendant. Such services were
substantially completed as of December 31, 2007. During
2009, 2008 and 2007, the Company recorded $1 million,
$1 million and $13 million, respectively, of expenses
in the Consolidated Statements of Operations related to these
agreements.
Separation
and Related Costs
During 2007, the Company incurred costs of $16 million in
connection with executing the Separation, consisting primarily
of expenses related to the rebranding initiative at the
Companys vacation ownership business and certain
transitional expenses.
F-44
|
|
23.
|
Selected
Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)
|
Provided below is selected unaudited quarterly financial data
for 2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
154
|
|
|
$
|
174
|
|
|
$
|
183
|
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
462
|
|
|
|
467
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
Corporate and
Other (a)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
901
|
|
|
$
|
920
|
|
|
$
|
1,016
|
|
|
$
|
913
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA (b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
(c)
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
Vacation
Ownership (d)
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
Corporate and Other
(a)(e)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
Less: Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
104
|
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
$
|
0.58
|
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
0.57
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted shares
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes the elimination of
transactions between segments.
|
(b) |
|
Includes restructuring costs of
(i) $3 million, $4 million, $35 million and
$1 million for Lodging, Vacation Exchange and Rentals,
Vacation Ownership and Corporate and Other, respectively, during
the first quarter, (ii) $2 million and $1 million
for Vacation Exchange and Rentals and Vacation Ownership,
respectively, during the second quarter and
(iii) $1 million for Vacation Ownership during the
fourth quarter. The after-tax impact of such costs was
(i) $27 million during the first quarter,
(ii) $2 million during the second quarter and
(iii) $1 million during the fourth quarter.
|
(c) |
|
Includes a non-cash impairment
charge of $6 million ($3 million, net of tax) to
reduce the value of an underperforming joint venture in the
Companys hotel management business.
|
(d) |
|
Includes non-cash impairment
charges of $5 million ($4 million, net of tax),
$3 million ($2 million, net of tax) and
$1 million ($1 million, net of tax) during the first,
second and fourth quarter, respectively, to reduce the value of
certain vacation ownership properties and related assets held
for sale that are no longer consistent with the Companys
development plans.
|
(e) |
|
Includes a net expense related to
the resolution of and adjustment to certain contingent
liabilities and assets of $4 million ($2 million, net
of tax), $0 ($2 million, net of tax) and $2 million
($2 million, net of tax) during the first, second and third
quarter, respectively, and corporate costs of $17 million,
$19 million, $13 million and $15 million during
the first, second, third and fourth quarter, respectively.
|
F-45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
170
|
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
|
$
|
213
|
|
|
$
|
170
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
|
621
|
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
|
492
|
|
Corporate and
Other (a)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,012
|
|
|
$
|
1,132
|
|
|
$
|
1,226
|
|
|
$
|
911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA (b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
(d)
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)(e)
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
7
|
(c)
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
(1,321
|
)(f)
|
Corporate and Other
(a)(g)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
(1,280
|
)
|
Less: Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before income taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
(1,345
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
98
|
|
|
$
|
142
|
|
|
$
|
(1,356
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.55
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
(7.63
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
0.55
|
|
|
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
(7.63
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted shares
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes the elimination of
transactions between segments.
|
(b) |
|
Includes restructuring costs of
(i) $4 million and $2 million for Lodging and
Vacation Exchange and Rentals, respectively, during the third
quarter and (ii) $7 million and $66 million for
Vacation Exchange and Rentals and Vacation Ownership,
respectively, during the fourth quarter. The after-tax impact of
such cost was (i) $4 million during the third quarter
and (ii) $45 million during the fourth quarter.
|
(c) |
|
Includes a non-cash impairment
charge of $28 million ($17 million, net of tax) due to
the Companys initiative to rebrand its vacation ownership
trademarks to the Wyndham brand.
|
(d) |
|
Includes a non-cash impairment
charge of $16 million ($10 million, net of tax)
primarily due to a strategic change in direction related to the
Companys Howard Johnson brand that is expected to
adversely impact the ability of the properties associated with
the franchise agreements acquired in connection with the
acquisition of the brand during 1990 to maintain compliance with
brand standards.
|
(e) |
|
Includes (i) non-cash
impairment charges of $36 million ($28 million, net of
tax) due to trademark and fixed asset write downs resulting from
a strategic change in direction and reduced future investments
in a vacation rentals business and the write-off of the
Companys investment in a non-performing joint venture and
(ii) charges of $24 million ($24 million, net of
tax) due to currency conversion losses related to the transfer
of cash from the Companys Venezuelan operations.
|
(f) |
|
Includes (i) a non-cash
goodwill impairment charge of $1,342 million
($1,337 million, net of tax) as a result of organizational
realignment plans announced during the fourth quarter of 2008
which reduced future cash flow estimates by lowering the
Companys expected VOI sales pace in the future based on
the expectation that access to the asset-backed securities
market will continue to be challenging and (ii) a non-cash
impairment charge of $4 million ($3 million, net of
tax) related to the termination of a development project.
|
(g) |
|
Includes a net benefit (expense)
related to the resolution of and adjustment to certain
contingent liabilities and assets of $(3) million
($(3) million, net of tax), $7 million
($4 million, net of tax), $(1) million
($(2) million, net of tax) and $14 million
($7 million, net of tax) during the first, second, third
and fourth quarter, respectively, and corporate costs of
$10 million, $15 million, $10 million and
$10 million during the first, second, third and fourth
quarter, respectively.
|
The Company has evaluated subsequent events through
February 19, 2010, the date on which the financial
statements were issued.
F-46
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Separation and Distribution Agreement by and among Cendant
Corporation, Realogy Corporation, Wyndham Worldwide Corporation
and Travelport Inc., dated as of July 27, 2006
(incorporated by reference to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 31, 2006)
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Separation and Distribution Agreement by
and among Cendant Corporation, Realogy Corporation, Wyndham
Worldwide Corporation and Travelport Inc., dated as of
August 17, 2006 (incorporated by reference to the
Registrants
Form 10-Q
filed November 14, 2006)
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated
by reference to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws (incorporated by reference to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Indenture, dated December 5, 2006, between Wyndham
Worldwide Corporation and U.S. Bank National Association, as
Trustee, respecting Senior Notes due 2016 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed February 1, 2007)
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Form of 6.00% Senior Notes due 2016 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed February 1, 2007)
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Indenture, dated November 20, 2008, between Wyndham
Worldwide Corporation and U.S. Bank National Association, as
Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the
Registrants
Form S-3
filed November 25, 2008)
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated May 18, 2009, between
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation and U.S. Bank National
Association, as Trustee, respecting Senior Notes due 2014
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed May 19, 2009)
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
Form of Senior Notes due 2014 (included within Exhibit 4.4)
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
Second Supplemental Indenture, dated May 19, 2009, between
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation and U.S. Bank National
Association, as Trustee, respecting Convertible Notes due 2012
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed May 19, 2009)
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Form of Convertible Notes due 2012 (included within
Exhibit 4.6)
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Employment Agreement with Stephen P. Holmes, dated as of
July 31, 2006 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed July 7, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement with Stephen P.
Holmes, dated December 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants
Form 10-K
filed February 27, 2009)
|
|
|
|
10.3*
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement with Stephen P.
Holmes, dated as of November 19, 2009
|
|
|
|
10.4*
|
|
Employment Agreement with Franz S. Hanning, dated as of
November 19, 2009
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Employment Agreement with Geoffrey A. Ballotti, dated as of
March 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrants
Form 10-K
filed February 27, 2009)
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement with Geoffrey A.
Ballotti, dated December 31, 2008 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrants
Form 10-K
filed February 27, 2009)
|
|
|
|
10.7*
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement with Geoffrey A.
Ballotti, dated December 16, 2009
|
|
|
|
10.8*
|
|
Employment Agreement with Eric A. Danziger, dated as of
November 17, 2008
|
|
|
|
10.9*
|
|
Letter Agreement with Eric A. Danziger, dated December 1,
2008
|
G-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10*
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement with Eric A.
Danziger, dated December 16, 2009
|
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
Employment Agreement with Thomas G. Conforti, dated as of
September 8, 2009 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants
Form 10-Q
filed November 5, 2009)
|
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
Employment Agreement with Virginia M. Wilson (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement with Virginia M.
Wilson, dated December 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrants
Form 10-K
filed February 27, 2009)
|
|
|
|
10.14*
|
|
Termination and Release Agreement with Virginia M. Wilson,
effective as of November 13, 2009
|
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation 2006 Equity and Incentive Plan
(Amended and Restated as of May 12, 2009) (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed May 18, 2009)
|
|
|
|
10.16*
|
|
Form of Award Agreement for Restricted Stock Units
|
|
|
|
10.17*
|
|
Form of Award Agreement for Stock Appreciation Rights
|
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
Form of Cash-Based Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants
Form 10-Q
filed May 7, 2009)
|
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation Savings Restoration Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
Amendment Number One to Wyndham Worldwide Corporation Savings
Restoration Plan, dated December 31, 2008 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Registrants
Form 10-K
filed February 27, 2009)
|
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation Non-Employee Directors Deferred
Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
First Amendment to Wyndham Worldwide Corporation Non-Employee
Directors Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.48 to the Registrants
Form 10-K
filed March 7, 2007)
|
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
Amendment Number Two to the Wyndham Worldwide Corporation
Non-Employee Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, dated
December 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.20 to the Registrants
Form 10-K
filed February 27, 2009)
|
|
|
|
10.24
|
|
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation Officer Deferred Compensation Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.25
|
|
Amendment Number One to Wyndham Worldwide Corporation Officer
Deferred Compensation Plan, dated December 31, 2008
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the
Registrants
Form 10-K
filed February 27, 2009)
|
|
|
|
10.26
|
|
Transition Services Agreement among Cendant Corporation, Realogy
Corporation, Wyndham Worldwide Corporation and Travelport Inc.,
dated as of July 27, 2006 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 31, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.27
|
|
Tax Sharing Agreement among Cendant Corporation, Realogy
Corporation, Wyndham Worldwide Corporation and Travelport Inc.,
dated as of July 28, 2006 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 31, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
Amendment, executed July 8, 2008 and effective as of
July 28, 2006 to Tax Sharing Agreement, entered into as of
July 28, 2006, by and among Avis Budget Group, Inc.,
Realogy Corporation and Wyndham Worldwide Corporation
(incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrants
Form 10-Q
filed August 8, 2008)
|
G-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.29
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of July 7, 2006, among Wyndham
Worldwide Corporation, as Borrower, certain financial
institutions as lenders, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as
Administrative Agent, Citicorp USA, Inc., as Syndication Agent,
Bank of America, N.A., The Bank of Nova Scotia and The Royal
Bank of Scotland PLC, as Documentation Agents, and Credit
Suisse, Cayman Islands Branch, as Co-Documentation Agent
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to the
Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed July 12, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.30
|
|
Form of Declaration of Vacation Owner Program of WorldMark, the
Club (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the
Registrants
Form 10-12B
filed May 11, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.31
|
|
Management Agreement, dated as of January 1, 1996, by and
between Fairshare Vacation Owners Association and Fairfield
Communities, Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.25 to the Registrants
Form 10-12B
filed May 11, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.32
|
|
Second Amended and Restated FairShare Vacation Plan Use
Management Trust Agreement, dated as of March 14, 2008
by and among Fairshare Vacation Owners Association, Wyndham
Vacation Resorts, Inc., Fairfield Myrtle Beach, Inc., such other
subsidiaries and affiliates of Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc.
and such other unrelated third parties as may from time to time
desire to subject property interests to this
Trust Agreement (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants From
10-Q filed
May 8, 2008)
|
|
|
|
10.33
|
|
First Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated FairShare
Vacation Plan Use Management Trust Agreement, effective as
of March 16, 2009, by and between the Fairshare Vacation
Owners Association and Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the
Registrants
Form 10-Q
filed May 7, 2009)
|
|
|
|
10.34
|
|
Indenture and Servicing Agreement, dated as of November 7,
2008, by and among Sierra Timeshare Conduit Receivables Funding
II, LLC, as Issuer, Wyndham Consumer Finance, Inc., as Servicer,
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee and U.S. Bank
National Association, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed November 12, 2008)
|
|
|
|
10.35
|
|
Amendment No. 1, dated as of October 23, 2009, to the
Indenture and Servicing Agreement, dated as of November 7,
2008, by and among Sierra Timeshare Conduit Receivables Funding
II, LLC, as Issuer, Wyndham Consumer Finance, Inc., as Servicer,
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee and U.S. Bank
National Association, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed October 28, 2009)
|
|
|
|
10.36
|
|
Indenture and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 27,
2004, by and among Cendant Timeshare
2004-1
Receivables Funding, LLC (nka Sierra Timeshare
2004-1
Receivables Funding, LLC), as Issuer, and Fairfield Acceptance
Corporation Nevada (nka Wyndham Consumer Finance,
Inc.), as Servicer, and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as
Trustee, and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Collateral
Agent (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Cendant
Corporations Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 dated
August 2, 2004)
|
|
|
|
10.37
|
|
First Supplement to Indenture and Servicing Agreement, dated as
of June 16, 2006, by and among Sierra Timeshare
2004-1
Receivables Funding, LLC, as Issuer, Wyndham Consumer Finance,
Inc., as Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee,
and U.S. Bank National Association, as Collateral Agent, to the
Indenture and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 27, 2004
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18(a) to the
Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed June 26, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.38
|
|
Indenture and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 11,
2005, by and among Cendant Timeshare
2005-1
Receivables Funding, LLC (nka Sierra Timeshare
2005-1
Receivables Funding, LLC), as Issuer, Cendant Timeshare Resort
Group-Consumer Finance, Inc. (nka Wyndham Consumer Finance,
Inc.), as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
Trustee, and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Collateral
Agent (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Cendant
Corporations Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated August 17, 2005)
|
|
|
|
10.39
|
|
First Supplement to Indenture and Servicing Agreement, dated as
of June 16, 2006, by and among Sierra Timeshare
2005-1
Receivables Funding, LLC, as Issuer, Wyndham Consumer Finance,
Inc., as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank National Association, as
Trustee, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Collateral
Agent, to the Indenture and Servicing Agreement dated as of
August 11, 2005 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.19(a) to the Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed June 26, 2006)
|
G-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.40
|
|
Indenture and Servicing Agreement, dated as of July 11,
2006, by and among Sierra Timeshare
2006-1
Receivables Funding, LLC, as Issuer, Wyndham Consumer Finance,
Inc., as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
Trustee, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Collateral Agent
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to the
Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed July 12, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.41
|
|
Indenture and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 23,
2007, by and among Sierra Timeshare
2007-1
Receivables Funding, LLC, as Issuer, Wyndham Consumer Finance,
Inc., as Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee
and as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed May 25, 2007)
|
|
|
|
10.42
|
|
Indenture and Servicing Agreement, dated as of November 1,
2007, by and among Sierra Timeshare
2007-2
Receivables Funding, LLC, as Issuer, Wyndham Consumer Finance,
Inc., as Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee
and Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed November 6, 2007)
|
|
|
|
10.43
|
|
Indenture and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2008,
by and among Sierra Timeshare
2008-1
Receivables Funding, LLC, as Issuer, Wyndham Consumer Finance,
Inc., as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
Trustee and U.S. Bank National Association, as Collateral Agent
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed May 7, 2008)
|
|
|
|
10.44
|
|
Indenture and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 28,
2009, by and among Sierra Timeshare
2009-1
Receivables Funding, LLC, as Issuer, Wyndham Consumer Finance,
Inc., as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
Trustee, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Collateral Agent
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed June 3, 2009)
|
|
|
|
10.45
|
|
Indenture and Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 7,
2009, by and among Sierra Timeshare
2009-2
Receivables Funding LLC, as the
2009-2
Issuer, Wyndham Consumer Finance, Inc., as Servicer, U.S. Bank
National Association, as the
2009-2
Trustee and the
2009-2
Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2
to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed October 7, 2009)
|
|
|
|
10.46
|
|
Indenture and Servicing Agreement, dated as of
September 24, 2009, by and among Sierra Timeshare
2009-3
Receivables Funding LLC, as the
2009-3
Issuer, Wyndham Consumer Finance, Inc., as Servicer, U.S. Bank
National Association, as the
2009-3
Trustee and the
2009-3
Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed October 7, 2009)
|
|
|
|
12*
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
|
|
|
|
21.1*
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
|
|
|
|
23.1*
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
|
31.1*
|
|
Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer pursuant
to
Rule 13(a)-14
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Rule 13(a)-14
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
|
|
|
32*
|
|
Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
of the United States Code
|
* Filed herewith
G-4