UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C.
20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007
OR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from
to
COMMISSION FILE
NO. 1-32876
WYNDHAM WORLDWIDE
CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
DELAWARE
|
|
20-0052541
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
|
|
|
SEVEN SYLVAN WAY
PARSIPPANY, NEW JERSEY
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
|
07054
(Zip Code)
|
973-753-6000
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:
|
|
|
|
|
NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE
|
TITLE OF EACH CLASS
|
|
ON WHICH REGISTERED
|
WYN Common Stock, Par Value $.01
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE
ACT:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
(§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of Registrants
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
þ
|
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
|
|
Smaller reporting company
o
|
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a
smaller reporting company)
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the Registrants common stock
held by non-affiliates of the Registrant on June 30, 2007,
was $6,398,946,804. All executive officers and directors of the
Registrant have been deemed, solely for the purpose of the
foregoing calculation, to be affiliates of the
Registrant.
As of January 31, 2008, the Registrant had outstanding
177,020,748 shares of common stock.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Proxy Statement prepared for the 2008 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference into
Part III of this report.
PART I
Overview
As one of the worlds largest hospitality companies, we
offer individual consumers and business customers a broad suite
of hospitality products and services across various
accommodation alternatives and price ranges through our premier
portfolio of world-renowned brands. With more than 20 brands,
which include Wyndham Hotels and Resorts, Ramada, Days Inn,
Super 8, TripRewards, RCI, The Registry Collection, Endless
Vacation Rentals, Landal GreenParks, English Country Cottages,
Novasol, Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham, we
have built a significant presence in most major hospitality
markets in the United States and throughout the rest of the
world. For 2008, total spending by domestic and international
travelers in the United States is expected to be
$778 billion, an increase of approximately 5.2% from
projected full-year spending levels in 2007. Globally, travel
spending was expected to grow by 3.9% in 2007 to approximately
$4.8 trillion.
We operate primarily in the lodging, vacation exchange and
rentals, and vacation ownership segments of the hospitality
industry:
|
|
|
Through our lodging business, we franchise hotels in the
upscale, midscale and economy segments of the lodging industry
and provide hotel management services to owners of luxury,
upscale and midscale hotels;
|
|
|
Through our vacation exchange and rentals business, we provide
vacation exchange products and services and access to
distribution systems and networks to resort developers and
owners of intervals of vacation ownership interests, and we
market vacation rental properties primarily on behalf of
independent owners, vacation ownership developers and other
hospitality providers; and
|
|
|
Through our vacation ownership business, we market and sell
vacation ownership interests to individual consumers, provide
consumer financing in connection with the sale of vacation
ownership interests and provide management services at resorts.
|
We provide directly to individual consumers our high quality
products and services, including the various accommodations we
market, such as hotels, vacation resorts, villas and cottages,
and products we offer, such as vacation ownership interests. We
also provide valuable products and services to our business
customers, such as franchisees, hotel owners, affiliated resort
developers and prospective developers. These products and
services include marketing and central reservation systems,
inventory networks and distribution channels, back office
services and loyalty programs. We strive to provide value-added
products and services that are intended to both enhance the
travel experience of the individual consumer and drive revenue
to our business customers. The depth and breadth of our
businesses across different segments of the hospitality industry
provide us with the opportunity to expand our relationships with
our existing individual consumers and business customers in one
or more segments of our business by offering them additional or
alternative products and services from our other segments.
Historically, we have pursued what we believe to be
financially-attractive entrance points in the major global
hospitality markets to strengthen our portfolio of products and
services.
The largest portion of our revenues comes from fees we receive
in exchange for providing services and products. For example, we
receive fees in the form of royalties for our customers
utilization of our brands and for our provision of hotel and
resort management and vacation exchange and rentals services.
The remainder of our revenues comes from the proceeds received
from sales of products, such as vacation ownership interests and
related services.
1
Global
Operations
Our lodging, vacation exchange and rentals and vacation
ownership businesses all have operations outside of the United
States. During 2007, we derived 78% of our revenues in the
United States and 22% internationally and held 78% of our
long-lived assets in the United States and 22% internationally.
The table below provides our net revenues and long-lived assets
for the more significant countries in which we operate ($ in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
3,390
|
|
$
|
2,997
|
|
$
|
2,714
|
Netherlands
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
145
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
215
|
Australia
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
99
|
Other
|
|
|
402
|
|
|
377
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,360
|
|
$
|
3,842
|
|
$
|
3,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
3,721
|
|
$
|
3,690
|
|
$
|
3,478
|
Netherlands
|
|
|
402
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
383
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
270
|
Australia
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
30
|
Other
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,768
|
|
$
|
4,653
|
|
$
|
4,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
History
and Development
Previously, we were a wholly owned subsidiary of Cendant
Corporation (which changed its name to Avis Budget Group, Inc.
in September 2006). Cendant Corporation was created in December
1997 through the merger of CUC International, Inc., or CUC, and
HFS Incorporated, or HFS. Prior to the merger, HFS was a major
hospitality, real estate and car rental franchisor. At the time
of the merger, HFS franchised hotels worldwide through brands,
such as Ramada, Days Inn, Super 8, Howard Johnson and
Travelodge. Subsequent to the merger, Cendant took a number of
steps and completed a number of transactions to grow its
Hospitality Services business and to develop its Timeshare
Resorts (vacation ownership) business, including the following:
|
|
|
entry into the vacation ownership business with the acquisitions
of Wyndham Vacation Resorts (formerly Fairfield Resorts) and
WorldMark by Wyndham (formerly Trendwest Resorts) in 2001 and
2002, respectively;
|
|
|
entry into the vacation rentals business through the acquisition
of various brands, including Cuendet and the Holiday Cottages
group of brands, which includes Cottages 4 You, in 2001, Novasol
in 2002, and Landal GreenParks and Canvas Holidays in 2004;
|
|
|
commencement of the TripRewards loyalty program in 2003;
|
|
|
purchase of all remaining ownership rights to the Ramada brand
on a worldwide basis from Marriott International in 2004;
|
|
|
acquisition of the global Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand
(Wyndham brand), related vacation ownership
development rights and selected hotel management contracts in
October 2005; and
|
|
|
acquisition of the Baymont brand in April 2006.
|
Each of our lodging, vacation exchange and rentals and vacation
ownership businesses has a long operating history. Our lodging
business began operations in 1990 with the acquisition of the
Howard Johnson and Ramada brands, each of which opened its first
hotel in 1954. RCI, the best known brand in our vacation
exchange and rentals business, was established more than
30 years ago, and our vacation ownership brands, Wyndham
Vacation Resorts and Wyndham Resort Development Corporation,
which operates as WorldMark by Wyndham, began vacation ownership
operations in 1980 and 1989, respectively.
2
Prior to July 31, 2006, Cendant transferred to Wyndham
Worldwide all of the assets and liabilities of Cendants
Hospitality Services (including Timeshare Resorts) businesses
and, on July 31, 2006, Cendant distributed all of the
shares of Wyndham common stock to the holders of Cendant common
stock issued and outstanding on July 21, 2006, the record
date for the distribution. The separation was effective on
July 31, 2006. On August 1, 2006, we commenced
regular way trading on the New York Stock Exchange
under the symbol WYN.
Subsequent to our separation from Cendant, we further expanded
our presence in the Lodging industry by acquiring a 30% equity
interest in CHI Limited, a joint venture that provides
management services to luxury and upscale hotels in Europe, the
Middle East and Africa. As of December 31, 2007, we were
providing hotel management services to 14 hotels through this
joint venture, the majority of which have already been, or will
be in early 2008, re-branded as a Wyndham brand.
Industry
Overview
The hospitality industry is a major component of the travel
industry, which is the third-largest retail industry in the
United States after the automotive and food stores industries.
The general health of the hospitality industry is affected by
the performance of the U.S. economy. In 2007, the
U.S. economy experienced real GDP growth of approximately
2%. In 2008, U.S. real GDP is expected to grow by
approximately 2.5%, however, some economists believe that recent
increased default rates on sub-prime and adjustable rate
mortgages and the associated negative impact on credit and
housing markets may adversely affect 2008 GDP and may even lead
to a recession.
The hospitality industry includes the segments in which Wyndham
Worldwide operateslodging, vacation exchange and rentals,
and vacation ownership. In spite of the challenges faced by the
hospitality industry, including terrorism, pandemics and natural
disasters, the industry is growing. In 2007, domestic and
international travelers spent in the United States an estimated
$740 billion, which represents a nearly 5.7% increase from
2006.
Lodging
Industry
The $143 billion domestic lodging industry is a growing
segment of the hospitality industry. Companies in the lodging
industry generally operate in one or more of the various lodging
segments, including luxury, upscale, midscale and economy, and
generally operate under one or more business models, including
franchise, management
and/or
ownership. The lodging industry is an important component of the
U.S. hospitality industry. In 2007, the U.S. lodging
industry boasted approximately 49,000 properties, which
represented approximately 4.5 million guest rooms, which
are comprised of approximately 3.0 million rooms in
franchised hotels and approximately 1.5 million rooms in
independent hotels. According to PricewaterhouseCoopers
forecast, the U.S. lodging industry is expected to gross
$28.1 billion in pre-tax profits in 2007, which represents
a 5% increase from the prior year, followed by
$29.6 billion in 2008 and $32.5 billion in 2009. We
generally obtain our industry data from either
PricewaterhouseCoopers or Smith Travel Research. The most recent
data available from these sources was issued on February 8,
2008; however, such report was abridged and did not contain all
the industry data used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K,
including profits of the lodging industry. Therefore, the
lodging industry profits data contained herein reflects the most
recent data received from PricewaterhouseCoopers, which was the
August 2007 Hospitality Directions Report. We believe that the
lodging industry profits data may change when the December 2007
Hospitality Directions Report is released based upon a 20 basis
point reduction in the overall industry RevPAR growth from 5.7%
per the August 2007 report to 5.5% per PricewaterhouseCoopers
most recent forecast issued on February 8, 2008.
Growth in demand in the lodging industry is driven by two main
factors: (i) the general health of the travel and tourism
industry and (ii) the propensity for corporate spending on
business travel. Demand for lodging in the United States grew by
a 1.9% Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) for the five year
period from 2003 through 2007. During this five year period, the
industry added approximately 523,600 rooms.
3
Performance in the lodging industry is measured by certain key
metrics, such as average daily rate, or ADR, average occupancy
rate and revenue per available room, or RevPAR, which is
calculated by multiplying ADR by the average occupancy rate. In
2007, ADR in the United States was $103.46, which is 5.7% higher
than the rate in the prior year, the average occupancy rate was
63.2%, which is relatively unchanged versus the rate in the
prior year, and RevPAR was $65.38, which is 5.5% higher than
RevPAR in the prior year. The following table demonstrates the
trends in the key performance metrics:
Trends in
Performance Metrics in the United States since 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
Average Daily
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
Year
|
|
Rate
|
|
Rate
|
|
Rate (ADR)
|
|
in ADR
|
|
RevPAR
|
|
RevPAR
|
|
2003
|
|
|
59.2%
|
|
0.2 %
|
|
$
|
82.87
|
|
|
0.1%
|
|
$
|
49.08
|
|
|
0.5%
|
2004
|
|
|
61.4%
|
|
2.1 %
|
|
|
86.32
|
|
|
4.2%
|
|
|
52.96
|
|
|
7.9%
|
2005
|
|
|
63.1%
|
|
1.8 %
|
|
|
91.06
|
|
|
5.5%
|
|
|
57.48
|
|
|
8.5%
|
2006
|
|
|
63.3%
|
|
0.2 %
|
|
|
97.85
|
|
|
7.5%
|
|
|
61.95
|
|
|
7.8%
|
2007
|
|
|
63.2%
|
|
(0.1)%
|
|
|
103.46
|
|
|
5.7%
|
|
|
65.38
|
|
|
5.5%
|
2008E
|
|
|
62.9%
|
|
(0.3)%
|
|
|
109.24
|
|
|
5.6%
|
|
|
68.71
|
|
|
5.1%
|
Sources: Smith
Travel Research (2003 to 2006); PricewaterhouseCoopers (2007 to
2008). 2007 and 2008 data is as of December 2007.
Performance in the lodging industry is also measured by revenues
earned by companies in the industry and by the number of new
rooms added on a yearly basis. In 2007, the lodging industry
earned revenues of $143 billion and added 141,200 new
rooms. The following table demonstrates trends in revenues and
new rooms:
Trends in
Revenues and New Rooms in the United States since 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Change in
|
|
New
|
|
Change in
|
Year
|
|
($bn)
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Rooms (000s)
|
|
New Rooms
|
|
2003
|
|
$
|
105.1
|
|
|
2.5%
|
|
|
76.6
|
|
|
12.0%
|
2004
|
|
|
113.9
|
|
|
8.3%
|
|
|
81.0
|
|
|
5.6%
|
2005
|
|
|
123.5
|
|
|
8.4%
|
|
|
84.0
|
|
|
3.8%
|
2006
|
|
|
133.4
|
|
|
8.0%
|
|
|
140.8
|
|
|
67.6%
|
2007
|
|
|
142.6
|
|
|
6.9%
|
|
|
141.2
|
|
|
0.3%
|
2008E
|
|
|
152.8
|
|
|
7.2%
|
|
|
143.9
|
|
|
1.9%
|
Sources: Smith
Travel Research (2003 to 2006); PricewaterhouseCoopers (2007 to
2008). 2007 and 2008 data is as of December 2007.
4
The lodging industry generally can be divided into four main
segments: (i) luxury; (ii) upscale, which also
includes upper upscale properties; (iii) midscale, which is
often further sub-divided into midscale with food and beverage
and midscale without food and beverage; and (iv) economy.
Luxury and upscale hotels typically offer a full range of
on-property amenities and services including restaurants, spas,
recreational facilities, business centers, concierges, room
service and local transportation (shuttle service to airport,
local attractions and shopping). Midscale segment properties
typically offer limited breakfast service, vending, selected
business services, partial recreational facilities (either a
pool or fitness equipment) and limited transportation (airport
shuttle). Economy properties typically offer a swimming pool and
airport shuttle. The following table sets forth the information
on ADR and supply and demand for each segment and associated
subsegments:
Lodging
Segments for Franchised Hotels (*)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007 Room
|
|
|
|
|
Average Daily
|
|
Rooms Sold
|
|
Change in
|
|
Supply
|
|
Change in
|
Segment (**)
|
|
Room Rate (ADR)
|
|
(Demand, 000s)
|
|
Demand
|
|
(000s)
|
|
Supply
|
|
Luxury
|
|
Greater than $195
|
|
|
56.2
|
|
|
2.3 %
|
|
|
78.8
|
|
|
2.3 %
|
Upper upscale
|
|
$120 to $195
|
|
|
390.5
|
|
|
1.3 %
|
|
|
548.0
|
|
|
1.2 %
|
Upscale
|
|
$90 to $120
|
|
|
285.6
|
|
|
1.9 %
|
|
|
411.8
|
|
|
3.1 %
|
Midscale with
food-and-beverage
|
|
$60 to $90
|
|
|
314.5
|
|
|
(1.8)%
|
|
|
531.4
|
|
|
(1.4)%
|
Midscale without
food-and-beverage
|
|
$60 to $90
|
|
|
461.4
|
|
|
2.8 %
|
|
|
702.2
|
|
|
3.6 %
|
Economy
|
|
Less than $60
|
|
|
422.0
|
|
|
1.3 %
|
|
|
736.9
|
|
|
1.2 %
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
We generally obtain our industry
data from either PricewaterhouseCoopers or Smith Travel
Research. The most recent data available from these sources was
issued on February 8, 2008; however, such report was abridged
and did not contain all the industry data used in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K, including segment information. Therefore,
the data contained in this table reflects the most recent
segment information received from PricewaterhouseCoopers, which
was the August 2007 Hospitality Directions Report. We believe
that the segment information may change when the December 2007
Hospitality Directions Report is released based upon a 20 basis
point reduction in the overall industry RevPAR growth from 5.7%
per the August 2007 report to 5.5% per PricewaterhouseCoopers
most recent forecast issued on February 8, 2008. In addition,
the segment mix may change by more or less than this 20 basis
point reduction.
|
|
|
|
(**) |
|
The economy segments
(upper economy, economy and lower economy) of our lodging
brands, while based on the Smith Travel Research chain-scale
segments represented in the table above, provide a greater
degree of differentiation to correspond with the price
sensitivities of our customers by brand. The
midscale segment of our lodging brands encompasses
both the Smith Travel Research midscale without food and
beverage and midscale with food and beverage
segments. See the System Performance and Distribution Table
below.
|
Typically, companies in the lodging industry operate under one
or more of the following three business models:
|
|
|
Franchise. Under the franchise model, a company typically
grants the use of a brand name to owners of hotels that the
company neither owns nor manages in exchange for royalty fees
that are typically equal to a percentage of room sales. Owners
of independent hotels increasingly have been affiliating their
hotels with national lodging franchise brands as a means to
remain competitive. In 2007, the share of hotel rooms in the
United States affiliated with a national lodging chain was
approximately 67%.
|
|
|
Management. Under the management model, a company
provides hotel management services to lodging properties that it
owns and/or
lodging properties owned by a third party in exchange for
management fees, which may include incentive fees based on the
financial performance of the properties.
|
|
|
Ownership. Under the ownership model, a company owns
properties and therefore benefits financially from hotel
revenues and any appreciation in the value of the properties.
|
Vacation
Exchange and Rentals Industry
The estimated $42.5 billion global vacation exchange and
rentals industry is a growing segment of the hospitality
industry. Industry providers offer products and services to both
leisure travelers and vacation property owners, including owners
of second homes and vacation ownership interests. The vacation
exchange and rentals industry offers leisure travelers access to
a range of fully-furnished vacation properties, which include
privately-owned vacation homes, apartments and condominiums,
vacation ownership resorts, inventory at hotels and resorts,
villas, cottages, boats and yachts. Providers offer leisure
travelers flexibility (subject to availability) as to time of
travel and a choice of lodging options in regions to which such
travelers may not typically have ease of access to such choices.
For vacation property owners, affiliations with vacation
exchange companies or vacation rental companies allow such
owners to exchange their interests in vacation properties for
vacation time at other properties or for other various products
and services. Additionally, such affiliation provides property
owners the ability to have
5
their properties marketed and rented, as desired and, with
respect to vacation properties for rental, to transfer the
responsibility of managing such properties.
The vacation exchange industry provides to owners of intervals
flexibility with respect to vacations through vacation
exchanges. Companies that offer vacation exchange services
include, among others RCI (our global vacation exchange business
and the worlds largest vacation exchange network),
Interval International, Inc. (a third-party exchange company),
and companies that develop vacation ownership resorts and market
vacation ownership interests and offer exchanges through
internal networks of properties. To participate in a vacation
exchange, an owner generally contributes intervals to an
exchange companys network and then indicates the
particular resort or geographic area to which the owner would
like to travel, the size of the unit desired and the period
during which the owner would like to vacation. The exchange
company then rates the owners contributed intervals based
upon a number of factors, including the location and size of the
unit or units, the quality of the resort or resorts and the time
period or periods during which the intervals entitle the owner
to vacation. The exchange company then generally offers the
owner a vacation with a comparable rating to the vacation that
the owner contributed. Exchange companies generally derive
revenues from owners of intervals by charging exchange fees for
exchanges and through annual membership dues. In 2006, 73% of
owners of intervals were members of vacation exchange companies,
and approximately two-thirds of such owners exchanged their
intervals through such exchange companies.
The overall trend in the vacation exchange industry is growth in
the number of members of vacation exchange companies. We believe
that the vacation exchange industry will be favorably impacted
by the growth in the premium and luxury segments of the vacation
ownership industry through the increased sales of vacation
ownership interests at high-end luxury resorts and the continued
development of vacation ownership properties and products around
the world. In 2006, there were more than five million members
industry-wide who completed approximately 3.5 million
exchanges. We believe that existing trends within the vacation
exchange industry reflect that timeshare vacation ownership
developers are selling more multiyear products, whereby the
members have access to the product every second or third year
and, in addition, are enrolling members in private label clubs,
whereby the members have the option to exchange within the club
or through external exchange channels. Such trends have a
positive impact on the average number of members but an
offsetting effect on the number of exchange transactions per
average member.
The vacation rental industry offers vacation property owners the
opportunity to rent their properties to leisure travelers for
periods of time when the properties are unoccupied. The vacation
rental industry is not as organized as the lodging industry in
that the vacation rental industry, we believe, has no global
rental companies and no vacation rental-specific global
reservation systems or brands. The global supply of vacation
rental inventory is highly fragmented with much of it being made
available by individual property owners (as contrasted with
commercial hospitality providers). Although these owners
sometimes rent their properties directly, with or without the
assistance of property managers and brokers, vacation rental
companies often assist in renting owners properties
without the benefit of globally recognized brands or
international marketing and reservation systems. Sales by
vacation rental companies are growing more rapidly than sales by
other suppliers of inventory in the vacation rental industry.
Typically, vacation rental companies collect rent in advance
and, after deducting the applicable commissions, remit the net
amounts due to the property owners
and/or
property managers. In addition to commissions, vacation rental
companies earn revenues from rental customers through fees that
are incidental to the rental of the properties, such as fees for
travel services, local transportation,
on-site
services and insurance or similar types of products.
We believe that as of December 31, 2007, there were
approximately 1.5 million and 2.7 million vacation
properties available for rental in the United States and Europe,
respectively. In the United States, the vacation properties
available for rental are primarily condominiums or stand-alone
houses. In Europe, the vacation properties available for rental
include individual homes and apartments, campsites and vacation
park bungalows. Individual owners of vacation properties in the
United States and Europe principally own their properties as
investments and often use such properties for portions of the
year.
We believe that the overall demand for vacation rentals has been
growing for the following reasons: (i) the continuing
growth of low-cost airline operations; (ii) the increased
use of the Internet as a tool for facilitating vacation rental
transactions; (iii) the emergence of attractive, low-cost
destinations, such as Eastern Europe and the Middle East; and
(iv) increasing awareness of vacation rental options among
Americans. The demand per year for vacation rentals in Europe,
the United States, South Africa and Australia is approximately
50 million vacation weeks, 32 million of which are
rented by leisure travelers from Europe. Demand for vacation
rental properties is often regional in that leisure travelers
who rent properties often live relatively close to such
properties. Some leisure travelers, however, travel relatively
long distances from their homes to vacation properties in
domestic or international destinations.
6
The destinations where leisure travelers from Europe, the United
States, South Africa and Australia generally rent properties
vary by country of origin of the leisure travelers. Leisure
travelers from Europe generally rent properties in European
destinations, including Spain, France, Italy and Portugal, which
are the most popular destinations for European leisure
travelers. Demand from European leisure travelers has recently
been shifting beyond traditional Western Europe, based on
political stability across Europe, increased accessibility of
Eastern Europe, expansion of the European Union and expansion of
tourism in southern Mediterranean destinations. Demand by
leisure travelers from the United States is focused on rentals
in traditional destinations, such as Florida; Las Vegas, Nevada;
San Francisco, California; and New York City.
We believe that the overall supply of vacation rental properties
has been growing as a result of the growth in ownership of
second homes and the increasing desire among many owners to rent
their properties for additional income. Growth in ownership of
second homes, however, could adversely affect demand for
vacation rental properties to the extent that owners of such
homes no longer are as likely to rent vacation properties as
such owners were before they bought second homes.
The
Vacation Ownership Industry
The $13 billion global vacation ownership industry, which
is also referred to as the timeshare industry, is one of the
fastest-developing segments of the domestic and international
hospitality industry. The vacation ownership industry enables
customers to share ownership of a fully-furnished vacation
accommodation. Typically, a vacation ownership purchaser
acquires either a fee simple interest in a property, which gives
the purchaser title to a fraction of a unit, or a right to use a
property, which gives the purchaser the right to use a property
for a specific period of time. Generally, a vacation ownership
purchasers fee simple interest in or right to use a
property is referred to as a vacation ownership
interest. For many vacation ownership interest purchasers,
vacation ownership is an attractive vacation alternative to
traditional lodging accommodations at hotels or owning vacation
properties. Owners of vacation ownership interests are not
subject to the variance in room rates to which lodging customers
are subject, and vacation ownership units are, on average, more
than twice the size of traditional hotel rooms and typically
have more amenities, such as kitchens, than do traditional hotel
rooms.
The vacation ownership concept originated in Europe during the
late 1960s and spread to the United States shortly thereafter.
The vacation ownership industry expanded slowly in the United
States until the mid-1980s; since then, the vacation ownership
industry has grown at a double-digit CAGR. The American Resort
Development Association, or ARDA, indicates that sales of
vacation ownership interests grew in excess of 16% CAGR from
1995 to 2006. Based on ARDA research, domestic sales of vacation
ownership interests were approximately $10 billion in 2006
compared to $4.2 billion in 2000 and $1.9 billion in
1995. ARDA estimated that on January 1, 2007, there were
approximately 4.4 million households that owned one or more
vacation ownership interests in the United States.
Based on published industry data, we believe that the following
factors have contributed to the substantial growth, particularly
in North America, of the vacation ownership industry over the
past two decades:
|
|
|
increased consumer confidence in the industry based on enhanced
consumer protection regulation of the industry;
|
|
|
entry of lodging and entertainment companies into the industry,
including Marriott International, Inc., The Walt Disney Company,
Hilton Hotels Corporation, Global Hyatt Corporation, and
Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc.;
|
|
|
increased flexibility for owners of vacation ownership interests
made possible through owners affiliations with vacation
ownership exchange companies and vacation ownership
companies internal exchange programs; and
|
|
|
improvement in quality of resorts and resort management and
servicing.
|
Demographic factors explain, in part, the growth of the
industry. A 2006 study of recent vacation ownership purchasers
revealed that the average purchaser was 52 years of age and
had a median household income of $74,000.
7
The average purchaser in the United States, therefore, is a baby
boomer who has disposable income and interest in purchasing
vacation products. We expect that baby boomers will continue to
have a positive influence on the future growth of the vacation
ownership industry.
According to information compiled by the ARDA, the four primary
reasons consumers cite for purchasing vacation ownership
interests are: (i) flexibility with respect to different
locations, unit sizes and times of year, (ii) the certainty
of quality accommodations, (iii) credibility of the
timeshare company and (iv) the opportunity to exchange into
other resort locations. According to a 2006 ARDA study, nearly
80% of owners of vacation ownership interests indicated high
levels of satisfaction. With respect to exchange opportunities,
most owners of vacation ownership interests can exchange
vacation ownership interests through exchange companies and
through the applicable vacation ownership companys
internal network of properties.
WYNDHAM
HOTEL GROUP
Throughout this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
we use the term hotels to apply to hotels, motels
and/or other
accommodations, as applicable. In addition, the term
franchise system refers to a system through which a
franchisor licenses a brand and provides services to hotels
whose independent owners pay to receive such license and
services from the franchisor under the specific terms of a
franchise or similar agreement. The services provided through a
franchise system typically include reservations, sales leads,
marketing and advertising support, training, quality assurance
inspections, operational support and information, pre-opening
assistance, prototype construction plans, and national or
regional conferences.
Overview
Wyndham Hotel Group, our lodging business, franchises hotels and
provides hotel management services to owners of luxury, upscale
and midscale hotels. Through steady organic growth and
acquisitions of established lodging franchise systems over the
past 17 years, our lodging business has become the
worlds largest lodging franchisor as measured by the
number of franchised hotels. Our lodging business has over 6,500
franchised hotels, which represents over 550,000 rooms on six
continents. Our lodging business has a strong presence across
the economy and midscale segments of the lodging industry and a
developing presence in the upscale segment, thus providing
individual consumers who are traveling for leisure or business
with options across various price ranges. Our franchised hotels
operate under one of our ten lodging brands, which are Wyndham
Hotels and Resorts, Wingate by Wyndham, Ramada, Baymont, Days
Inn, Super 8, Howard Johnson, AmeriHost Inn, Travelodge and
Knights Inn. The breadth and diversity of our lodging brands
provide potential franchisees with a range of options for
affiliating their properties with one or more of our brands. Our
franchised hotels represent approximately 10% of the
U.S. hotel room inventory. In 2007, our franchised hotels
sold 8.3%, or approximately 85.8 million, of the one
billion hotel room nights sold in the United States. In 2007,
our franchised hotels sold approximately 18.8% of all hotel room
nights sold in the United States in the economy and midscale
segments. Our franchised hotels are dispersed internationally,
which reduces our exposure to any one geographic region.
Approximately 80% of the hotel rooms, or approximately 443,000
rooms, in our franchised hotels are located throughout the
United States, and approximately 20% of the hotel rooms, or
approximately 108,000 rooms, are located outside of the United
States. In addition, our franchise systems are dispersed among
numerous franchisees, which reduces our exposure to any one
lodging franchisee. Of our approximately 5,400 lodging
franchisees, no one franchisee accounts for more than 2% of our
franchised hotels. Our lodging business franchises under two
models. In North America, we generally employ a direct franchise
model whereby we contract with and provide services and
assistance with reservations directly to independent
owner-operators of hotels. In other parts of the world, we
employ either a direct franchise model or a master franchise
model whereby we contract with a qualified, experienced third
party to build a franchise enterprise in such third partys
country or region.
Our lodging business provides our franchised hotels with a suite
of operational and administrative services, including access to
a central reservations system, advertising, promotional and
co-marketing programs, referrals, technology, training and
volume purchasing. We also provide our franchisees, as well as
our managed hotels, with the TripRewards loyalty program, which
is the worlds largest hotel rewards program as measured by
the number of participating hotels. As of December 31,
2007, we were providing hotel management services to 32 hotels
associated with either the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand or
the CHI joint venture. Our hotel management business offers
owners of hotels professional oversight and comprehensive
operations support. We expect to expand our hotel management
business by strategically entering into hotel management
agreements with new and existing hotels.
Our lodging business derives the majority of its revenues from
franchising hotels. The sources of revenues from franchising
hotels are initial franchise fees, which relate to services
provided to assist a franchised hotel to open for
8
business under one of our brands, and ongoing franchise fees,
which are comprised of royalty fees, marketing and reservation
fees and other related fees. The royalty fees are intended to
cover the use of our trademarks and our operating expenses, such
as expenses incurred for franchise services, including quality
assurance and administrative support, and to provide us with
operating profits. The marketing and reservation fees are
intended to reimburse us for expenses associated with operating
a central reservations system, advertising and marketing
programs and other related services. Because franchise fees
generally are based on percentages of the franchisees
gross room revenues, expanding our portfolio of franchised
hotels and growing RevPAR at franchised hotels are important to
our revenue growth.
We also earn revenue providing hotel management services, which
revenues include management fees, service fees and reimbursement
revenues. Our management fees are comprised of base fees, which
typically are calculated based upon a specified percentage of
gross revenues from hotel operations, and incentive fees, which
typically are calculated based upon a specified percentage of a
hotels gross operating profit. Service fees include fees
derived from accounting, design, construction and purchasing
services and technical assistance provided to managed hotels.
Reimbursement revenues are intended to cover expenses incurred
by the hotel management business on behalf of the managed
hotels, primarily consisting of payroll costs for operational
employees who work at the hotels. Revenues from our lodging
business represented approximately 17%, 17% and 15% of total
company net revenues during 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
EBITDA from our lodging business represented approximately 25%,
28% and 26% of total company EBITDA during 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. Please see Note 19 to the Consolidated and
Combined Financial Statements for a discussion of our results of
operations by segment and geographic region.
We also earn revenue from the TripRewards program when a member
stays at a participating hotel. These revenues are derived from
a fee charged to the franchisee/managed property owner based
upon a percentage of room revenue generated from such stay.
Lodging
Brands
We franchise ten widely-known lodging brands:
|
|
|
Wyndham Hotels and Resorts. The Wyndham Hotels and
Resorts brand was founded in 1981, and we acquired the brand in
2005. Wyndham Hotels and Resorts serves the upscale segment of
the lodging industry with 79 hotels and 20,953 rooms located in
the United States, the Caribbean, Mexico, the United Kingdom and
Canada. There are also 9 hotels and 3,337 rooms located in
Mexico that are affiliated with the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts
brand. Wyndham Hotels and Resorts offers signature programs,
which include: Wyndham ByRequest, a guest recognition program
that provides returning guests with personalized accommodations
and Meetings ByRequest, which is designed to help groups plan
meetings and features
24-hour
turnaround on all correspondence between the groups
meeting planner and Wyndhams meetings manager, 100% wired
or wireless Internet connectivity and catering options.
|
|
|
Wingate by Wyndham. We created and launched the Wingate
Inn brand in 1995 and opened the first hotel a year later. We
renamed the Wingate Inn brand to Wingate by Wyndham in 2007. The
all-new-construction Wingate by Wyndham brand serves the upper
midscale segment of the lodging industry and franchises 152
hotels with 13,944 rooms located in the United States and
Canada. Wingate by Wyndham hotels currently offer all-inclusive
pricing that includes the price of the room; complimentary wired
and wireless high-speed Internet access, faxes and photocopies,
deluxe continental breakfast, local calls and access for
long-distance calls; and access to a
24-hour
self-service business center equipped with computers with
high-speed Internet access, a fax, a photocopier and a printer.
Each hotel features a boardroom and meeting rooms with
high-speed Internet access, a fitness room with a whirlpool and,
at most locations, a swimming pool. Wingate by Wyndham hotels
currently do not offer food and beverage services.
|
|
|
Ramada Worldwide. The Ramada brand was founded in 1954.
We licensed the United States and Canadian trademark rights to
the Ramada brand prior to acquiring the rights in 2002 and
acquired the ownership rights to the brand on a worldwide basis
in 2004. The Ramada brand serves the midscale and upscale
segments of the lodging industry in the United States, Germany,
the United Kingdom, Canada, China and other international
regions. In North America, we serve the midscale segment through
Ramada, Ramada Hotel, Ramada Plaza and Ramada Limited, and
internationally we serve the midscale and upscale segments of
the lodging industry through Ramada Resort, Ramada Hotel and
Resort, Ramada Hotel and Suites, Ramada Plaza and Ramada Encore.
Ramada Worldwide franchises 874 hotels with 106,978 rooms
globally.
|
|
|
Baymont Franchise Systems. Founded in 1976 under the
Budgetel Inns brands, the system was converted in 1999 to the
Baymont Inn & Suites brand. We acquired the brand in
April 2006. Baymont Franchise
|
9
|
|
|
Systems primarily serves the midscale segment of the lodging
industry and franchises 193 hotels with 16,592 rooms located in
the United States. Following the closing of our acquisition of
the franchise business of Baymont Inn & Suites, we
announced our intent to consolidate the AmeriHost-branded
properties with our newly acquired Baymont-branded properties to
create a more significant midscale brand. This consolidation is
substantially complete. Baymont Inn & Suites rooms feature
oversized desks, ergonomic chairs and task lamps, voicemail,
free local calls, in-room coffee maker, iron and ironing board,
hair dryer and shampoo, television with premium channels,
pay-per-view
movies
and/or
satellite movies and video games. Most locations feature
high-speed Internet access, a swimming pool, airport shuttle
service and a fitness center. Baymont hotels currently do not
offer food and beverage services.
|
|
|
|
Days Inns Worldwide. The Days Inn brand was created by
Cecil B. Day in 1970, when the lodging industry consisted of
only a dozen national brands. We acquired the brand in 1992.
Days Inns Worldwide serves the upper economy segment of the
lodging industry with 1,883 hotels with 153,333 rooms in the
United States, Canada, China, the United Kingdom and other
international regions. In the United States, we serve the upper
economy segment of the lodging industry through Days Inn, Days
Hotel, Days Suites, DAYSTOP and Days Inn Business Place, and
internationally, we serve the upper economy segment of the
lodging industry through Days Hotels, Days Inn and Days Serviced
Apartments. Many properties offer
on-site
restaurants, lounges, meeting rooms, banquet facilities,
exercise centers and a complimentary continental breakfast and
newspaper each morning. Each Days Suites room provides separate
living and sleeping areas, with a telephone and television in
each area. Each Days Inn Business Place room currently offers
high-intensity lighting, a large desk, a microwave/refrigerator
unit, a coffeemaker, an iron and ironing board, and snacks and
beverages.
|
|
|
Super 8 Motels. The first motel operating under the Super
8 brand opened in October 1974. We acquired the brand in 1993.
Super 8 Motels serves the economy segment of the lodging
industry. Super 8 Motels franchises 2,081 hotels with 128,587
rooms located in the United States, Canada and China. Super 8
motels currently provide complimentary continental breakfast.
Participating motels currently allow pets and offer local calls
for free, fax and copy services, microwaves, suites, guest
laundry, exercise facilities, cribs, rollaway beds and pools.
|
|
|
Howard Johnson International. The Howard Johnson brand
was founded in 1925 by entrepreneur Howard Dearing Johnson as an
ice cream stand within an apothecary shop and the first hotel
operating under the brand opened in 1954. We acquired the brand
in 1990. Howard Johnson serves the midscale segment of the
lodging industry through Howard Johnson Plaza and Howard Johnson
Hotel and the economy segment of the lodging industry through
Howard Johnson Inn and Howard Johnson Express. Howard Johnson
franchises 471 hotels with 45,781 rooms located in the United
States, China, Mexico and other international regions.
Participating hotels offer standard business amenities, a
25-inch
television and free access for long-distance calls.
|
|
|
AmeriHost Franchise Systems. The first AmeriHost Inn
hotel opened in 1989. We acquired the brand in 2000. AmeriHost
Franchise Systems serves the midscale segment of the lodging
industry through AmeriHost Inn and AmeriHost Inn &
Suites. AmeriHost Franchise Systems franchises 28 hotels with
1,943 rooms located in the United States. In April 2006,
following the closing of our acquisition of the franchise
business of Baymont Inn & Suites, we announced our
intent to consolidate the AmeriHost-branded properties with our
newly acquired Baymont-branded properties to create a more
significant midscale brand. This consolidation is nearing
completion. AmeriHost hotels do not offer food and beverage
services.
|
|
|
Travelodge Hotels. In 1935, founder Scott King
established his first motor court operating under the Travelodge
brand. We acquired the brand (in North America only) in 1996.
Travelodge Hotels franchises 494 hotels with 36,876 rooms
located in the United States, Canada and Mexico. Travelodge
Hotels serves the economy segment of the lodging industry in the
United States through Travelodge, Travelodge Suites and
Thriftlodge hotels and serves the midscale segment of the
lodging industry in Canada and Mexico through Travelodge and
Thriftlodge hotels.
|
|
|
Knights Franchise Systems. The Knights Inn brand was
created in 1972. We acquired the brand in 1995. Knights
Franchise Systems serves the lower economy segment of the
lodging industry with 268 hotels with 18,733 rooms located in
the United States and Canada.
|
10
System
Performance and Distribution
The following table provides operating statistics for our brands
and for unmanaged, affiliated and managed non-proprietary
hotels. The table includes information as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2007. We derived occupancy, ADR and
RevPAR from information we received from our franchisees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue Per
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
|
Primary
|
|
Rooms
|
|
|
# of
|
|
|
# of
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
Daily Rate
|
|
|
Room
|
|
Brand
|
|
Segment
Served (1)
|
|
Per Property
|
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
Rooms (2)
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
(ADR)
|
|
|
(RevPAR)
|
|
|
Wyndham Hotels and
Resorts
|
|
Upscale
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
20,953
|
|
|
|
63.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
112.42
|
|
|
$
|
71.88
|
|
Wingate by Wyndham
|
|
Upper Midscale
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
13,944
|
|
|
|
64.2
|
%
|
|
|
90.23
|
|
|
|
57.96
|
|
Ramada
|
|
Upscale & Midscale
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
874
|
|
|
|
106,978
|
|
|
|
55.1
|
%
|
|
|
78.88
|
|
|
|
43.48
|
|
Baymont
|
|
Midscale
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
16,592
|
|
|
|
52.7
|
%
|
|
|
66.60
|
|
|
|
35.09
|
|
AmeriHost Inn
|
|
Midscale
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
1,943
|
|
|
|
48.5
|
%
|
|
|
67.09
|
|
|
|
32.51
|
|
Days Inn
|
|
Upper Economy
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
1,883
|
|
|
|
153,333
|
|
|
|
52.5
|
%
|
|
|
63.37
|
|
|
|
33.24
|
|
Super 8
|
|
Economy
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
2,081
|
|
|
|
128,587
|
|
|
|
56.2
|
%
|
|
|
58.35
|
|
|
|
32.80
|
|
Howard Johnson
|
|
Midscale & Economy
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
45,781
|
|
|
|
48.4
|
%
|
|
|
64.34
|
|
|
|
31.12
|
|
Travelodge
|
|
Upper & Lower Economy
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
|
36,876
|
|
|
|
50.3
|
%
|
|
|
66.60
|
|
|
|
33.52
|
|
Knights Inn
|
|
Lower Economy
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
18,733
|
|
|
|
41.1
|
%
|
|
|
43.53
|
|
|
|
17.88
|
|
Unmanaged, Affiliated
and Managed,
Non-Proprietary
Hotels (3)
|
|
Luxury & Upper Upscale
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
6,856
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
6,544
|
|
|
|
550,576
|
|
|
|
53.7
|
%
|
|
|
67.96
|
|
|
|
36.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The economy segments
discussed here, while based on the Smith Travel Research
chain-scale segments represented in the table on page 4 of
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
provide a greater degree of differentiation to correspond with
the price sensitivities of our customers by brand. The
midscale segment discussed here encompasses both the
Smith Travel Research midscale without food and
beverage and midscale with food and beverage
segments.
|
(2) |
|
From time to time, as a result of
hurricanes, other adverse weather events and ordinary wear and
tear, some of the rooms at these hotels may be taken out of
service for repair and renovation and therefore may be
unavailable.
|
(3) |
|
Represents (i) properties
affiliated with the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand for which
we receive a fee for reservation and/or other services provided
and (ii) properties managed under the CHI Limited joint
venture. These properties are not branded; as such, certain
operating statistics (such as average occupancy rate, ADR and
RevPAR) are not relevant. Eight of the managed properties are
scheduled to be re-branded to a Wyndham brand during early 2008.
|
The following table provides a summary description of our system
size (including managed non-proprietary hotels) by geographic
region as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Revenue
|
|
|
|
# of
|
|
|
# of
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
Average Daily
|
|
|
Per Available
|
|
Region
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
Rooms (1)
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Rate (ADR)
|
|
|
Room (RevPAR)
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
5,629
|
|
|
|
443,261
|
|
|
|
52.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
65.02
|
|
|
$
|
34.34
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
|
35,640
|
|
|
|
58.4
|
%
|
|
|
89.22
|
|
|
|
52.09
|
|
Europe
(2)
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
27,179
|
|
|
|
61.1
|
%
|
|
|
92.60
|
|
|
|
56.59
|
|
Asia/Pacific
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
26,957
|
|
|
|
57.1
|
%
|
|
|
55.20
|
|
|
|
31.51
|
|
Latin/South America
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
13,111
|
|
|
|
43.8
|
%
|
|
|
63.43
|
|
|
|
27.77
|
|
Middle
East/Africa (2)
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
4,428
|
|
|
|
61.1
|
%
|
|
|
100.10
|
|
|
|
61.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
6,544
|
|
|
|
550,576
|
|
|
|
53.7
|
%
|
|
|
67.96
|
|
|
|
36.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
From time to time, as a result of
hurricanes, other adverse weather events and ordinary wear and
tear, some of the rooms at these hotels may be taken out of
service for repair and renovation and therefore may be
unavailable.
|
(2) |
|
Europe and Middle East include
affiliated properties/rooms and properties/rooms managed under
the CHI Limited joint venture. These properties are not branded;
as such, certain operating statistics (such as average occupancy
rate, ADR and RevPAR) are not relevant and, therefore, have not
been reflected in the table. Eight of the managed properties are
scheduled to be re-branded to a Wyndham brand during early 2008.
|
Franchise
Development
Under our direct franchise model, we principally market our
lodging brands to independent hotel owners and to hotel owners
who have the right to terminate their franchise affiliations
with other lodging brands. We also market franchises under our
lodging brands to existing franchisees because many own, or may
own in the future, other hotels that can be converted to one of
our brands. Under our master franchise model, we principally
market our lodging brands to third parties that assume the
principal role of franchisor, which entails selling individual
franchise
11
agreements and providing quality assurance, marketing and
reservations support to franchisees. As part of our franchise
development strategy, we employ national and international sales
forces that we compensate in part through commissions. Because
of the importance of existing franchised hotels to our sales
strategy, a significant part of our franchise development
efforts is to ensure that our franchisees provide quality
services to maintain the satisfaction of customers.
Franchise
Agreements
Our standard franchise agreement grants a franchisee the right
to non-exclusive use of the applicable franchise system in the
operation of a single hotel at a specified location, typically
for a period of 15 to 20 years, and gives the franchisor
and franchisee certain rights to terminate the franchise
agreement before the conclusion of the term of the agreement
under certain circumstances, such as upon designated
anniversaries of the franchised hotels opening or the date
of the agreement. Early termination options in franchise
agreements give us flexibility to eliminate or re-brand
franchised hotels if such properties become weak performers,
even if there is no contractual failure by the franchisees. We
also have the right to terminate a franchise agreement for
failure by a franchisee to (i) bring its properties into
compliance with contractual or quality standards within
specified periods of time, (ii) pay required franchise fees
or (iii) comply with other requirements of its franchise
agreement.
Master franchise agreements, which are individually negotiated
and vary among our different brands, typically contain
provisions that permit us to terminate the agreement if the
other party to the agreement fails to meet specified development
schedules. Our master franchise agreements generally are
competitive with industry averages within industry segments.
Sales and
Marketing of Hotel Rooms
We use the marketing/reservation fees that our franchisees pay
to us to promote our brands through media advertising, direct
marketing, direct sales, promotions and publicity. A portion of
the funds contributed by the franchisees of any one particular
brand is used to promote that brand, whereas the remainder of
the funds is allocated to support the cost of multibrand
promotional efforts and to our marketing and global sales team,
which includes, among others, our worldwide sales, public
relations and direct marketing teams.
In 2007, the efforts of our global sales team contributed
approximately 12% of the annual hotel room nights sold at our
franchised and managed hotels. To supplement the global sales
teams efforts, our public relations team extends the reach
and frequency of our paid advertising by generating extensive,
unpaid exposure for our brands in trade and consumer media
including USA TODAY, The New York Times,
Lodging Hospitality, Hotel/Motel Management and
other widely-read publications.
In addition to the traditional sales efforts, we plan to develop
and market mixed-use hotel and vacation ownership properties in
conjunction with Wyndhams vacation ownership business. The
mixed-use properties would generate room revenues at the managed
hotel and increased spending at the hotel restaurants and
facilities by visiting timeshare guests.
Central
Reservations
In 2007, we booked on behalf of our franchised and managed
hotels approximately 4.3 million rooms by telephone,
approximately 12.5 million rooms through the Internet and
approximately 2.7 million rooms through global distribution
systems, with a combined value of approximately
$1.5 billion in bookings. Additionally, our global sales
team generated leads for bookings from group and meeting
planners, tour operators, travel agents, government and military
clients, and corporate and small business accounts. We maintain
contact centers in Saint John and Fredericton, New Brunswick,
Canada; Aberdeen, South Dakota; and Manila, Philippines that
handle bookings generated through our toll-free brand numbers.
We maintain numerous brand websites to process online room
reservations, and we utilize global distribution systems to
process reservations generated by travel agents and third-party
Internet booking sources, including Orbitz.com, CheapTickets.com
and Travelocity.com. To ensure we receive bookings by travel
agents and third-party Internet booking sources, we also provide
direct connections between our central reservations system and
some third-party Internet booking sources. The majority of hotel
room nights are sold by our franchisees to guests who seek
accommodations on a walk-in basis or through calls made directly
to hotels, which we believe is attributable in part to the
strength of our lodging brands.
Since 2003, bookings made directly by customers on our brand
websites have been increasing at a CAGR (over the five year
period) of approximately 28%, and increased to over
6.9 million room nights per year in 2007. Since
12
2003, bookings made through third-party Internet booking sources
increased 27% while bookings made through global distribution
systems declined 3%.
Loyalty
Programs
The TripRewards program, which was introduced in 2003, has grown
steadily to become the lodging industrys largest loyalty
program as measured by the number of participating hotels. As of
December 31, 2007, there were over 6,500 hotels
participating in the program. With almost 40 other partners
participating in the program, TripRewards offers its members
several options to accumulate points. Members, for example, may
accumulate points by staying in hotels franchised under one of
our brands or by purchasing everyday products and services from
the various businesses that participate in the program. When
staying at hotels franchised under one of our brands,
TripRewards members may elect to earn airline miles or rail
points instead of TripReward points. Businesses where points can
be earned generally pay a fee to participate in the program;
such fees are then used to support the programs marketing
and operating expenses. TripRewards members have over 400
options to redeem their points. Members, for example, may redeem
their points for hotel stays, airline tickets, resort vacations,
electronics, sporting goods, movie and theme park tickets, and
gift certificates. As of December 31, 2007, TripRewards had
more than 6.8 million active members, which we define as
any customer who has enrolled in the TripRewards program or
earned or redeemed points in the program over the past
18 months, and the program added approximately 280,000
active members per month in 2007.
Hotel
Management Services
As of December 31, 2007, our lodging business was providing
hotel management services to 32 properties associated with the
either the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand or the CHI joint
venture. Our hotel management business offers owners of hotels
professional oversight and comprehensive operations support,
including hiring, training, purchasing, revenue management,
sales and marketing, and food and beverage services; financial
management and analysis; and information systems management and
integration. Our management fee is generally based on a
percentage of each hotels gross revenue plus, in the
majority of properties, an incentive fee based on operating
performance. The terms of our management agreements are for
various periods and generally contain renewal options, subject
to certain termination rights. In general, under our management
agreements, all operating and other expenses are paid by the
owner and we are reimbursed for our out-of-pocket expenses.
Strategies
We intend to continue to accelerate growth of our lodging
business by (i) maintaining our leadership position in the
economy segment through sales and retention efforts and RevPAR
growth; (ii) achieving room growth in the domestic midscale
and upscale segments; and (iii) expanding our international
presence through increasing the number of properties within the
Wyndham Hotels and Resorts, Ramada, Days Inn, Super 8 and Howard
Johnson brands. Our plans generally focus on pursuing these
strategies organically. In addition, in appropriate
circumstances, we will consider both domestic and international
acquisition opportunities.
Domestic
Our strategy for maintaining our leadership position in the
economy segment revolves around (i) enhancing our value to
franchisees by improving rate and inventory management
capabilities, investing in systems and training and growing the
TripRewards loyalty program, (ii) improving the
customers experience by developing and implementing brand
standard enhancements, (iii) optimizing system growth by
adding franchised hotels in markets where brands are
underrepresented and (iv) optimizing brand RevPAR
performance by helping franchisees manage their rates and
inventory, enrolling more TripRewards members and introducing
seasonal promotions.
Our approach for expanding our domestic midscale and upscale
presence is to (i) optimize system growth in the midscale
segment by adding franchised hotels in markets where brands are
underrepresented and by complementing Wingate by Wyndham product
quality with Wyndham brand recognition and (ii) utilize
hotel management services to attract developers in the upscale
segment and establish and implement the Wyndham master brand
plan with upscale products.
International
Our strategy for international growth is to expand the presence
of our Wyndham, Ramada, Days Inn, Super 8 and Howard Johnson
brands and selectively utilize direct/master franchising,
management agreements and joint venture models primarily in
Europe and Asia-Pacific.
13
In Europe, we intend to expand the Days Inn brand in the United
Kingdom and in new markets that exhibit strong growth for value
brands. We intend to expand the Ramada brand beyond its
established base of properties in the United Kingdom and Germany
into new markets that exhibit strong growth in the middle
market. We intend to expand the Wyndham brand in gateway and
destination cities in Europe that exhibit strong growth for
upscale and luxury product. We intend to pursue these
opportunities by increasing the number of franchised hotels
through our direct franchise model for our Days Inn and Wyndham
brands and through both models for our Ramada brand. In
addition, we intend to pursue growth in the number of managed
hotels through new agreements with hotels franchised under our
Ramada and Wyndham brands. We may also pursue growth in the
number of franchised and managed hotels through the use of joint
ventures.
In the Asia-Pacific region, our strategy is to expand the Super
8, Ramada, Days Inn and Howard Johnson brands primarily within
China, India and the Middle East. In the near future, we will
introduce the Wyndham brand to China. We intend to pursue these
opportunities by increasing the number of franchised hotels
through our direct franchise model for our Ramada and Wyndham
brands and through our master franchise model for our Super 8,
Days Inn and Howard Johnson brands. In addition, we intend to
pursue growth in the number of managed hotels through new
agreements with hotels franchised under our Ramada and Wyndham
brands. We may also pursue growth in the number of franchised
and managed hotels through the use of joint ventures.
To further augment our international presence, we also intend to
pursue growth in Latin America, particularly in Mexico and in
the Caribbean, by expanding the Ramada and Wyndham brands and
continuing to support hotels franchised under the Howard Johnson
brand. In Latin America, we intend to pursue growth in the
number of franchised hotels through our direct franchise model
for our Ramada and Wyndham brands and through our master
franchise model and master developer agreements for our Howard
Johnson brand.
Seasonality
Franchise and management fees are generally higher in the second
and third quarters than in the first or fourth quarters of any
calendar year. Because of increased leisure travel and the
related ability to charge higher ADRs during the spring and
summer months, hotels we franchise or manage typically generate
higher revenue during these months. Therefore, any occurrence
that disrupts travel patterns during the spring or summer could
have a greater adverse effect on our franchised hotels and
managed properties annual performances and consequently on
our annual performance than occurrences that disrupt travel
patterns in other seasons. We do not currently expect any change
to these seasonal trends.
Competition
Competition among the national lodging brand franchisors to grow
their franchise systems is robust. The lodging companies that we
compete with in the upscale and midscale segments include
Marriott International Inc., Hilton Hotels Corporation, Starwood
Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc., InterContinental
Hotels Group PLC and Global Hyatt Corporation. The lodging
companies that we compete with in the economy segment include
Choice Hotels International, Inc., InterContinental Hotels Group
PLC and Accor SA.
We believe that competition for the sales of franchises in the
lodging industry is based principally upon the perceived value
and quality of the brands and the services offered to
franchisees. We believe that the perceived value of a brand name
to prospective franchisees is, to some extent, a function of the
success of the existing hotels franchised under the brands. We
believe that prospective franchisees value a franchise based
upon their views of the relationship between the costs,
including costs of affiliation and conversion and future
charges, to the benefits, including potential for increased
revenue and profitability, and upon the reputation of the
franchisor.
The ability of an individual franchisee to compete may be
affected by the location and quality of its property, the number
of competing properties in the vicinity, community reputation
and other factors. A franchisees success may also be
affected by general, regional and local economic conditions. The
potential negative effect of these conditions on our results of
operations is substantially reduced by virtue of the diverse
geographical locations of our franchised hotels.
Trademarks
We own the trademarks Wyndham Hotels and Resorts,
Wingate by Wyndham, Ramada,
Baymont, Days Inn, Super 8,
Howard Johnson, AmeriHost Inn,
Travelodge (in North America only), Knights
Inn, TripRewards and related trademarks and
logos. Such trademarks and logos are material to the businesses
that are part of our lodging business. Our franchisees and our
subsidiaries actively use these marks, and all of the material
14
marks are registered (or have applications pending) with the
United States Patent and Trademark Office as well as with the
relevant authorities in major countries worldwide where these
businesses have significant operations.
GROUP
RCI
Overview
Group RCI, our vacation exchange and rentals business, provides
vacation exchange products and services to developers, managers
and owners of intervals of vacation ownership interests, and
markets vacation rental properties. We are the worlds
largest vacation exchange network and among the worlds
largest global marketers of vacation rental properties. Our
vacation exchange and rentals business has access for specified
periods, in a majority of cases on an exclusive basis, to over
67,000 vacation properties, which are comprised of over 4,000
vacation ownership resorts around the world through our vacation
exchange business and more than 63,000 vacation rental
properties that are located principally in Europe, which we
believe makes us one of the worlds largest marketers of
European vacation rental properties as measured by the number of
properties we market for rental. Each year, our vacation
exchange and rentals business provides more than four million
leisure-bound families with vacation exchange and rentals
products and services. The properties available to leisure
travelers through our vacation exchange and rentals business
include hotel rooms and suites, villas, cottages, bungalows,
campgrounds, vacation ownership condominiums, city apartments,
second homes, fractional private residences, luxury destination
clubs and yachts. We offer leisure travelers flexibility
(subject to availability) as to time of travel and a choice of
lodging options in regions that such travelers may not typically
have such ease of access, and we offer property owners marketing
services, quality control services and property management
services ranging from key-holding to full property maintenance
for such properties. Our vacation exchange and rentals business
has over 70 worldwide offices. We market our products and
services using eight primary consumer brands and other related
brands.
Throughout this document, we use the term inventory
in the context of our vacation exchange and rentals business to
refer to intervals of vacation ownership interests and primarily
independently owned properties, which include hotel rooms and
suites, villas, cottages, bungalows, campgrounds, vacation
ownership condominiums, city apartments, second homes,
fractional private residences, luxury destination clubs and
yachts. In addition, throughout this document, we refer to
intervals of vacation ownership interests as
intervals and individuals who purchase vacation
rental products and services from us as rental
customers.
Our vacation exchange and rentals business primarily derives its
revenues from fees. Our vacation exchange business, RCI, derives
a majority of its revenues from annual membership dues and
exchange fees for transactions. Our vacation exchange business
also derives revenues from ancillary services, including
additional services provided to transacting members, programs
with affiliates, club servicing, travel agency services and
loyalty programs. Our vacation rentals business primarily
derives its revenues from fees, which generally average between
45% and 65% of the gross booking fees depending upon product mix
or seasonality. Our vacation rentals business also derives
revenues from travel insurance sales in Europe, transportation
fees, property management fees and
on-site
revenue from ancillary services, including travel agency
services. Revenues from our vacation exchange and rentals
business represented approximately 28%, 29% and 31% of total
company net revenues during 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
EBITDA from our vacation exchange and rentals business
represented approximately 33%, 36% and 38% of total company
EBITDA during 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Please see
Note 19 to the Consolidated and Combined Financial
Statements for a discussion of our results of operations by
segment and geographic region. The revenues generated in our
vacation exchange and rentals business are substantially derived
from the direct customer relationships we have with our
3.6 million vacation exchange members, our more than 40,000
independent property owners and the affiliated developers of
more than 4,000 resorts. No one customer or developer accounts
for more than 2% of our vacation exchange and rentals revenues.
Vacation
Exchange
Through our vacation exchange business, RCI, we have
relationships with over 4,000 vacation ownership resorts in
approximately 100 countries. Historically, our vacation exchange
business consisted of the operation of worldwide exchange
programs for owners of intervals. Today, our vacation exchange
business also provides consulting services for the development
of tourism-oriented real estate, loyalty programs, in-house and
outsourced travel agency services, and third-party vacation club
services.
We operate our vacation exchange business, RCI, through three
worldwide exchange programs that have a member base of vacation
owners who are generally well-traveled and who want flexibility
and variety in their travel plans each year. Our vacation
exchange business three exchange programs, which serve
owners of intervals at affiliated resorts, are RCI Weeks, RCI
Points and The Registry Collection. Participants in these
exchange programs
15
pay annual membership dues. For additional fees, such
participants are entitled to exchange intervals for intervals at
other properties affiliated with our vacation exchange business.
In addition, certain participants may exchange intervals for
other leisure-related products and services. We refer to
participants in these three exchange programs as
members. In addition, the Endless
Vacation®
magazine is the official travel publication of our RCI Weeks and
RCI Points exchange programs, and certain members can obtain the
benefits of participation in our RCI Weeks and RCI Points
exchange programs only through a subscription to Endless
Vacation®
magazine. The use of the terms member or
membership with respect to either the RCI Weeks or
RCI Points exchange program is intended to denote subscription
to Endless
Vacation®
magazine.
The RCI Weeks exchange program is the worlds largest
vacation ownership exchange network and provides members with
flexibility to trade week-long intervals in units at their
resorts for week-long intervals in comparable units at the same
resorts or at comparable resorts.
The RCI Points exchange program is a global points-based
exchange network, which was developed and launched in 2000,
allocates points to intervals that members cede to the exchange
program. Under the RCI Points exchange program, members may
redeem their points for the use of vacation properties in the
exchange program or for other products, such as airfare, car
rentals, cruises, hotels and other accommodations. When points
are redeemed for these services, our vacation exchange business
has the right to recoup the expense of providing the services by
renting the use of vacation properties for which the members
could have redeemed their points.
We believe that The Registry Collection exchange program is the
industrys first global exchange network of luxury vacation
accommodations. The luxury vacation accommodations in The
Registry Collections network include higher-end vacation
ownership resorts, fractional ownership resorts, condo-hotels
and yachts. The Registry Collection allows members to exchange
their intervals for the use of other vacation properties within
the network or for other products, such as airfare, car rentals,
cruises, hotels and other accommodations. The members of The
Registry Collection exchange program often own greater than
two-week intervals at affiliated resorts.
We acquire substantially all members of our exchange programs
indirectly. In substantially all cases, an affiliated resort
developer buys the initial term of an RCI membership, generally
ranging from 1 2 years that entitles the
vacation ownership interval purchaser to receive periodicals and
directories published by RCI and to use the applicable exchange
program for an additional fee. The vacation ownership interval
purchaser generally pays for membership renewals and any
applicable exchange fees for transactions.
Our vacation exchange business also provides consulting services
for the development of tourism-related real estate, loyalty
programs, in-house and outsourced travel agency services, and
third-party vacation club services. Our third-party vacation
club business consists of private label exchange clubs that RCI
operates and manages for certain of its larger affiliates. Club
management is a growing trend in the vacation ownership industry
and a growing piece of our vacation exchange business.
Approximately 96% of the third-party vacation club members are
points-based.
Our vacation exchange business operates in North America,
Europe, Latin America, South Africa, the Asia Pacific region and
the Middle East and tailors its strategies and operating plans
for each of the geographical environments where RCI has or seeks
to develop a substantial member base.
Vacation
Rentals
The rental properties we market are principally privately-owned
villas, cottages, bungalows and apartments that generally belong
to property owners unaffiliated with us. In addition to these
properties, we market inventory from our vacation exchange
business to developers of vacation ownership properties and
other sources. We market rental properties under proprietary
brand names, such as Endless Vacation Rentals, Landal
GreenParks, Cottages 4 You, Novasol, Cuendet and Canvas
Holidays, and through select private-label arrangements. Most of
the rental activity under our brands takes place in Europe, the
United States and Mexico, although we have the ability to source
and rent inventory in approximately 100 countries. Our vacation
rentals business currently has relationships with approximately
41,000 independent property owners in 26 countries, including
the United States, United Kingdom, Mexico, France, Ireland, the
Netherlands, Belgium, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Denmark, Norway,
Sweden, Germany, Greece, Austria, Croatia, India and certain
countries in Eastern Europe and the Pacific Rim. We currently
make approximately 1.4 million vacation rental bookings a
year. Our vacation rentals business also has the opportunity to
provide inventory to our more than 3.6 million vacation
exchange members. Property owners typically enter into one year,
evergreen or multi-year contracts with our vacation rentals
subsidiaries to market the rental of their properties within our
rental portfolio. Our vacation rentals business also has an
ownership interest in, or capital leases for, approximately 11%
of the properties in our rental portfolio.
16
Customer
Development
In our vacation exchange business, we affiliate with vacation
ownership developers directly as a result of the efforts of our
in-house sales teams. Affiliated developers typically sign
long-term agreements with durations of five to ten years. Our
members are acquired primarily through our affiliated developers
as part of the vacation ownership purchase process. In our
vacation rentals business, we primarily acquire exclusive rental
agreements through direct interaction with owners of various
types of vacation rental inventory. We have also developed
specific branded websites such as EVrental.com to promote, sell
and inform new customers about vacation rentals. Given the
diversified nature of our rental brands, there is limited
dependence on a single customer group or business partner.
Loyalty
Program
Our vacation exchange business member loyalty program is
RCI Elite Rewards, which offers a branded credit card, the RCI
Elite Rewards credit card, that allows members to earn reward
points that can be redeemed for items related to our exchange
programs, including annual membership dues and exchange fees for
transactions and other products offered by our vacation exchange
business or certain third parties, including airlines and
retailers.
Member
and Rental Customer Initiatives
Our vacation exchange and rentals business strives to provide
superior service to members and rental customers through our
call centers and online distribution channels, to offer certain
members and rental customers in Canada, Europe, Latin America,
South Africa, and the Asia Pacific region one-stop shopping
through our retail travel agency business, and to target current
and prospective members and rental customers through our
marketing efforts.
Call
Centers
Our vacation exchange and rentals business services its members
and rental customers primarily through global call centers. The
requests that we receive at our global call centers are handled
by our vacation guides, who are highly skilled at fulfilling our
members and rental customers requests for vacation
exchanges and rentals. When our members and rental
customers primary choices are unavailable in periods of
high demand, our guides offer the next nearest match in order to
fulfill the members and rental customers needs. Call
centers are and are expected to continue to be a significant
distribution channel and therefore we invest resources and will
continue to do so to ensure that members and rental customers
continue to receive a high level of personalized customer
service through our call centers. We also continue to improve
our capabilities on the Internet as a means for members to
transact. See Internet below.
Internet
Given the interest of some of our members and rental customers
in doing transactions on the Internet, we invest and will
continue to invest in online technologies to ensure that our
members and rental customers receive the same salesmanship and
level of service online that we provide through our call
centers. As our online distribution channels improve, members
and rental customers may shift from transacting business through
our call centers to transacting business online. As transacting
business online becomes more popular, we expect to experience
cost savings at our call centers. By offering our members and
rental customers the opportunity to transact business either
through our call centers or online, we allow our members and
rental customers to use the distribution channel with which they
are most comfortable. Regardless of the distribution channel our
members and rental customers use, our goal is member and rental
customer satisfaction and retention.
Travel
Agency
We have an established retail travel agency business outside the
United States in such locations as, Europe, Latin America, South
Africa and Australia. In these regions, our travel agencies
provide certain members and rental customers of the vacation
exchange and rentals business with one-stop shopping for
planning vacations. As part of the one-stop shopping, the travel
agencies can arrange for our members and rental
customers transportation, such as flights, ferries and
rental cars. In the United States and Canada, we have entered
into outsourcing agreements, including one agreement with a
former affiliate, to provide our members and rental customers
with travel services.
Marketing
We market to our members and rental customers through the use of
brochures, magazines, direct marketing, such as direct mail and
e-mail,
third-party online distribution channels, tour operators and
travel agencies. Our
17
vacation exchange and rentals business has over 50 publications
involved in the marketing of the business. RCI publishes
Endless
Vacation®
magazine, a travel publication that has a circulation of over
1.7 million. Our vacation exchange and rentals business
also publishes resort directories and other periodicals related
to the vacation and vacation ownership industry and other
travel-related services. We acquire the rental customers through
our direct-to-consumer marketing, internet marketing and
third-party agent marketing programs. We use our publications
not only for marketing but also for member and rental customer
retention.
Strategies
We intend to grow our vacation exchange and rentals business by
focusing on three core strategies: (i) optimize and expand
our vacation exchange business; (ii) expand our rentals
business; and (iii) pursue new business models. Our plans
generally focus on pursuing these strategies organically.
However, in appropriate circumstances, we will consider
opportunities to acquire businesses, both domestic and
international.
Optimize
and Expand Exchange
Our strategy for optimizing and expanding our vacation exchange
business involves moving to more flexible offerings to maintain
our global leadership position in the marketplace. We intend to
accomplish this through enhancements to our base products,
including RCI Weeks and RCI Points, expanding our presence in
the growing luxury exchange segment via continued focus on The
Registry Collection, and leveraging our extensive member
database (currently over 3.6 million members) and
co-marketing partnerships to drive additional revenue. We also
plan to expand our online capabilities and maximize efficiencies
by driving more exchange transactions to the Internet. This will
improve overall member satisfaction and leverage our investment
in information technology to drive cost savings. In addition, we
intend to enhance our affiliate and member value propositions by
adding new affiliates to our current portfolio and expanding our
current affiliate relationships, and by improving marketing and
communication with our growing member base. Finally, in order to
provide member access to inventory to fuel transactions we plan
to improve inventory acquisition. We will work more closely with
our affiliates and members to secure a broad range of inventory
to meet our members needs.
Expand
Rentals
Our strategy for expanding our rentals business involves
leveraging our successful European business model and creating a
North American rentals platform outside of timeshare. We plan to
continue to build our European rentals business by growing in
existing geographies, expanding in high demand markets such as
Southern Europe, and effectively leveraging our large consumer
base. We will continue to grow our Novasol brand in its current
geographies (Scandinavia, South Germany and Croatia), expand the
Landal GreenParks model either organically or through strategic
acquisitions and grow our Holiday Cottages Group of brands
targeting the UK customer. We view Southern Europe as a key
growth area for both source and destination markets for our
rentals business. In addition, we will continue to improve our
strong Internet presence by creating a unified regional
ecommerce platform for all of our European rental brands.
In the U.S., we will leverage our European rental expertise to
establish the vacation rental category, which is currently
fragmented and unorganized. We will do this by building brand
awareness and leveraging our investment in LeisureLink, a
vacation rental distribution company. Our association with
LeisureLink allows us to increase the online presence of global
condominium and vacation rental inventory via new channels
including online travel agents such as Travelocity and Orbitz.
We will consider appropriate acquisition opportunities to help
us establish a leadership position in the U.S. vacation
rentals market.
Develop
New Business Models
We plan to selectively develop new business models by focusing
on opportunities that support or build on our existing core
vacation exchange and rentals businesses. One example of this is
R&E (Rental and Exchange), our newest business model, which
provides the whole ownership segment of the leisure real estate
industry with shared ownership exchange and rental benefits.
This enables owners of second homes to use their properties,
generate rental income and gain access to our leading exchange
network for travel around the globe.
Seasonality
Vacation exchange and rentals revenues are generally higher in
the first and third quarters than in the second or fourth
quarters. Vacation exchange transaction revenues are normally
highest in the first quarter, which is generally when members of
RCI plan and book their vacations for the year. Rental
transaction revenues earned from booking
18
vacation rentals to rental customers are usually highest in the
third quarter, when vacation rentals are highest. More than half
of our vacation rental customers book their reservations within
10 weeks of departure dates and more than 70% of our rental
customers book their reservations within 20 weeks of
departure dates, however, we cannot predict whether this booking
trend will continue in the future.
Competition
The vacation exchange and rentals business faces competition
throughout the world. Our vacation exchange business competes
with Interval International, Inc., which is a third-party
international exchange company, with regional and local vacation
exchange companies and with Internet-based business models. In
addition, certain developers offer exchanges through internal
networks of properties, which are operated by us or by the
developer, that offer owners of intervals access to exchanges
other than those offered by our vacation exchange business. Our
vacation rentals business faces competition from a broad variety
of marketers of vacation properties who use brokerage, direct
marketing and the Internet to market and rent vacation
properties.
Trademarks
We own the trademarks RCI, RCI Points,
The Registry Collection, Landal
GreenParks, Cottages 4 You,
Novasol, Cuendet, Canvas
Holidays, Endless Vacation and Endless
Vacation Rental as well as other various trademarks and
logos. Such trademarks and logos are material to the businesses
that are part of our vacation exchange and rentals business. Our
subsidiaries actively use these marks, and all of the material
marks are registered (or have applications pending) with the
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office as well as with the
relevant authorities in major countries worldwide where these
businesses have significant operations.
WYNDHAM
VACATION OWNERSHIP
Overview
Wyndham Vacation Ownership, our vacation ownership business,
includes marketing and sales of vacation ownership interests,
consumer financing in connection with the purchase by
individuals of vacation ownership interests, property management
services to property owners associations, and development
and acquisition of vacation ownership resorts. We operate our
vacation ownership business through our two primary brands,
Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham. We have the
largest vacation ownership business in the world as measured by
annual revenues associated with the sale of vacation ownership
interests, the numbers of vacation ownership resorts, vacation
ownership units and owners of vacation ownership interests.
During 2007, we recorded almost $2.0 billion in vacation
ownership interest sales. As of December 31, 2007, we have
developed or acquired approximately 145 vacation ownership
resorts in the United States, Canada, Mexico, the Caribbean and
the South Pacific that represent more than 18,000 individual
vacation ownership units and over 800,000 owners of vacation
ownership interests. During 2007, Wyndham Vacation Ownership
expanded its portfolio with the addition of five resorts in
Oceanside, California; San Diego, California; Panama City
Beach, Florida; San Antonio, Texas; and Wisconsin Dells,
Wisconsin, and added additional inventory at locations in
Florida, Tennessee and Hawaii.
Our primary vacation ownership brands, Wyndham Vacation Resorts
and WorldMark by Wyndham, operate vacation ownership programs
through which vacation ownership interests can be redeemed for
vacations through points-based internal reservation systems that
provide owners with flexibility (subject to availability) as to
resort location, length of stay, unit type and time of year. The
points-based reservation systems offer owners redemption
opportunities for other travel and leisure products that may be
offered from time to time, and the opportunity for owners to use
our products for one or more vacations per year based on level
of ownership. Our vacation ownership programs allow us to market
and sell our vacation ownership products in variable quantities
as opposed to the fixed quantity of the traditional, fixed-week
vacation ownership, which is primarily sold on a weekly interval
basis, and to offer to existing owners upgrade sales
to supplement such owners existing vacation ownership
interests. Although we operate Wyndham Vacation Resorts and
WorldMark by Wyndham as separate brands, we have integrated
substantially all of the business functions of Wyndham Vacation
Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham, including consumer finance,
information technology, certain staff functions, product
development and certain marketing activities.
Our vacation ownership business derives a majority of its
revenues from sales of vacation ownership interests and derives
other revenues from consumer financing and property management.
Because revenues from sales of vacation ownership interests and
consumer finance in connection with such sales depend on the
number of vacation ownership units in which we sell vacation
ownership interests, increasing the number of such units is
important to our revenue growth. Because revenues from property
management depend on the number of units we manage,
19
increasing the number of such units is also important to our
revenue growth. Revenues from our vacation ownership business
represented approximately 55%, 54% and 54% of total company net
revenues during 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. EBITDA from
our vacation ownership business represented approximately 42%,
45% and 38% of total company EBITDA during 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. Please see Note 19 to the Consolidated and
Combined Financial Statements for a discussion of our results of
operations by segment and geographic region.
Sales and
Marketing of Vacation Ownership Interests and Property
Management
Wyndham
Rebranding
As of December 31, 2007, we have largely completed the
consumer branding transition of our former Fairfield Resorts and
Trendwest vacation ownership businesses to Wyndham Vacation
Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham, respectively. This transition
has included the implementation of the Wyndham Vacation Resorts
and WorldMark by Wyndham brands throughout all sales and service
channels as appropriate, including the application of the
Wyndham brand at select resort properties as well as sales and
service centers throughout our system.
Wyndham
Vacation Resorts
Wyndham Vacation Resorts markets and sells vacation ownership
interests in Wyndham Vacation Resorts portfolio of resort
properties and uses a points-based reservation system called
FairShare Plus to provide owners with flexibility (subject to
availability) as to resort location, length of stay, unit type
and time of year. Wyndham Vacation Resorts is involved in the
development or acquisition of the resort properties in which
Wyndham Vacation Resorts markets and sells vacation ownership
interests. Wyndham Vacation Resorts also often acts as a
property manager of such resorts. From time to time, Wyndham
Vacation Resorts also sells home lots and other real estate
interests at its resort properties.
Vacation Ownership Interests, Portfolio of Resorts and
Maintenance Fees. The vacation ownership interests that
Wyndham Vacation Resorts markets and sells consist of fixed
weeks and undivided interests. A fixed week entitles an owner to
ownership and usage rights with respect to a unit for a specific
week of each year, whereas an undivided interest entitles an
owner to ownership and usage rights that are not restricted to a
particular week of the year. These vacation ownership interests
each constitute a deeded interest in real estate and on average
sold for approximately $18,600 in 2007. Of the more than 800,000
owners of vacation ownership interests in Wyndham Vacation
Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham resort properties as of
December 31, 2007, approximately 496,000 owners held
interests in Wyndham Vacation Resorts resort properties. Wyndham
Vacation Resorts resort properties are located primarily in the
United States and, as of December 31, 2007, consisted of 68
resorts that represented approximately 15,000 units.
The majority of the resorts in which Wyndham Vacation Resorts
markets and sells vacation ownership and other real estate
interests are destination resorts that are located at or near
attractions such as the Walt Disney
World®
Resort in Florida; the Las Vegas Strip in Nevada; Myrtle Beach
in South Carolina; Colonial
Williamsburg®
in Virginia; and the Hawaiian Islands. Most Wyndham Vacation
Resorts properties are affiliated with Wyndham Worldwides
vacation exchange subsidiary, RCI, which awards to the top 10%
of RCI affiliated vacation ownership resorts throughout the
world designations of an RCI Gold Crown Resort or an RCI Silver
Crown Resort for exceptional resort standards and service
levels. Among Wyndham Vacation Resorts 68 resort
properties, 53 have been awarded designations of an RCI Gold
Crown Resort or an RCI Silver Crown Resort.
Owners of vacation ownership interests pay annual maintenance
fees to the property owners associations responsible for
managing the applicable resorts. The annual maintenance fee
associated with the average vacation ownership interest
purchased ranges from approximately $400 to approximately $800.
These fees generally are used to renovate and replace
furnishings, pay operating, maintenance and cleaning costs, pay
management fees and expenses, and cover taxes (in some states),
insurance and other related costs. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, as
the owner of unsold inventory at resorts, also pays maintenance
fees to property owners associations in accordance with
the legal requirements of the states or jurisdictions in which
the resorts are located. In addition, at certain newly-developed
resorts, Wyndham Vacation Resorts enters into subsidy agreements
with the property owners associations to cover costs that
otherwise would be covered by annual maintenance fees payable
with respect to vacation ownership interests that have not yet
been sold.
FairShare Plus. Wyndham Vacation Resorts uses a
points-based internal reservation system called FairShare Plus
to provide owners with flexibility (subject to availability) as
to resort location, length of stay, unit type and time of year.
With the launch of FairShare Plus in 1991, Wyndham Vacation
Resorts became one of the first U.S. developers of vacation
ownership properties to move from traditional, fixed-week
vacation ownership to a
20
points-based program. Owners of vacation ownership interests in
Wyndham Vacation Resorts resort properties that are eligible to
participate in the program may elect, and with respect to
certain resorts are obligated, to participate in FairShare Plus.
Owners who participate in FairShare Plus assign their rights to
use fixed weeks and undivided interests, as applicable, to a
trust in exchange for the right to reserve in the internal
reservation system. The number of points that an owner receives
as a result of the assignment to the trust of the owners
right to use fixed weeks or undivided interests, and the number
of points required to take a particular vacation, is set forth
on a published schedule and varies depending on the resort
location, length of stay, unit type and time of year associated
with the interests assigned to the trust or requested by the
owner, as applicable. Participants in FairShare Plus may choose
(subject to availability) the Wyndham Vacation Resorts resort
properties, length of stay, unit types and times of year,
depending on the number of points to which they are entitled and
the number of points required to take the vacations of their
preference. Participants in the program may redeem their points
not only for resort stays, but also for other travel and leisure
products that may be offered from time to time. Wyndham Vacation
Resorts offers various programs that provide existing owners
with the opportunity to upgrade, or acquire
additional vacation ownership interests to increase the number
of points such owners can use in FairShare Plus.
Depending on the vacation ownership interest, Wyndham Vacation
Resorts not only offers owners the option to make reservations
through FairShare Plus, but also offers owners the opportunity
to exchange their vacation ownership interests through our
vacation exchange business, RCI, or through Interval
International, Inc., which is a third-party international
exchange.
Program and Property Management. In exchange for
management fees, Wyndham Vacation Resorts, itself or through a
Wyndham Vacation Resorts affiliate, manages FairShare Plus, the
majority of property owners associations at resorts in
which Wyndham Vacation Resorts markets and sells vacation
ownership interests, and property owners associations at
resorts developed by third parties. On behalf of FairShare Plus,
Wyndham Vacation Resorts or its affiliate manages the
reservation system for FairShare Plus and provides owner
services and billing and collections services. The term of the
trust agreement of FairShare Plus runs through December 31,
2025, and the term is renewable if FairShare Plus is extended by
a majority of the members of the program (including Wyndham
Vacation Resorts). The term of the management agreement, under
which Wyndham Vacation Resorts manages the FairShare Plus
program, is for five years and is automatically renewed annually
for successive terms of five years, provided the trustee under
the program does not serve notice of termination to Wyndham
Vacation Resorts at the end of any calendar year. On behalf of
property owners associations, Wyndham Vacation Resorts or
its affiliates generally provide day-to-day management for
vacation ownership resorts, including oversight of housekeeping
services, maintenance and refurbishment of the units, and
provides certain accounting and administrative services to
property owners associations. The terms of the property
management agreements with the property owners
associations at resorts in which Wyndham Vacation Resorts
markets and sells vacation ownership interests vary; however,
the vast majority of the agreements provide a mechanism for
automatic renewal upon expiration of the terms. At some
established sites, the property owners associations have
entered into property management agreements with professional
management companies other than Wyndham Vacation Resorts or its
affiliates.
WorldMark
by Wyndham
WorldMark by Wyndham markets and sells vacation ownership
interests, which are called vacation credits (holiday credits in
the South Pacific), in resorts owned by the vacation ownership
programs WorldMark, The Club and WorldMark South Pacific Club,
which we refer to collectively as the Clubs, which WorldMark by
Wyndham formed in 1989 and 2000, respectively. The Clubs provide
owners with flexibility (subject to availability) as to resort
location, length of stay, unit type, the day of the week and
time of year. WorldMark by Wyndham is usually involved in the
development of the resorts owned by the Clubs. In addition to
developing resorts and marketing and selling vacation credits,
WorldMark by Wyndham manages the Clubs and the majority of
resorts owned by the Clubs.
In October 1999, WorldMark by Wyndham formed Wyndham Vacation
Resorts Asia Pacific Pty. Ltd., a New South Wales corporation,
or Wyndham Asia Pacific, as its direct wholly owned subsidiary
for the purpose of conducting sales, marketing and resort
development activities in the South Pacific. Wyndham Asia
Pacific is currently the largest vacation ownership business in
Australia, with approximately 39,000 owners of vacation credits
as of December 31, 2007. Resorts in the South Pacific
typically are owned and operated through WorldMark South Pacific
Club, other than 66 units at Denarau Island, Fiji, which
are owned by WorldMark, The Club.
Vacation Credits, Portfolio of Resorts and Maintenance
Fees. Vacation credits in the Clubs entitle the owner of
the credits to reserve units at the resorts that are owned and
operated by the Clubs. WorldMark by Wyndham and Wyndham Asia
Pacific are the developers or acquirers of the resorts that the
Clubs own and operate. After
21
WorldMark by Wyndham or Wyndham Asia Pacific develops or
acquires resorts, it conveys the resorts to WorldMark, The Club
or WorldMark South Pacific Club, as applicable. In exchange for
the conveyances, WorldMark by Wyndham or Wyndham Asia Pacific
receives the exclusive rights to sell the vacation credits
associated with the conveyed resorts and to receive the proceeds
from the sales of the vacation credits. Although vacation
credits, unlike vacation ownership interests in Wyndham Vacation
Resorts resort properties, do not constitute deeded interests in
real estate, vacation credits are regulated in most
jurisdictions by the same agency that regulates vacation
ownership interests evidenced by deeded interests in real
estate. In 2007, the average purchase by a new owner of vacation
credits was approximately $12,000. Of the more than 800,000
owners of vacation ownership interests in Wyndham Vacation
Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham resorts as of December 31,
2007, over 309,000 owners held vacation credits in the Clubs.
WorldMark by Wyndham resorts are located primarily in the
Western United States, Canada, Mexico and the South Pacific and,
as of December 31, 2007, consisted of 81 resorts that
represented approximately 6,500 units. Of the WorldMark by
Wyndham resorts and units, Wyndham Asia Pacific has a total of
16 resorts with approximately 600 units. During 2007,
WorldMark by Wyndham expanded its portfolio of resorts to
include properties in San Diego, California; McCall, Idaho;
West Yellowstone, Montana; Red River, New Mexico; Canmore,
Alberta (Canada); Marcoola Beach (Australia), Perth (Australia)
and Lake Wanaka (New Zealand); and added additional inventory at
locations in California and Illinois.
The resorts in which WorldMark by Wyndham markets and sells
vacation credits are primarily drive-to resorts. Most WorldMark
by Wyndham resorts are affiliated with Wyndham Worldwides
vacation exchange subsidiary, RCI. Among WorldMark by
Wyndhams 81 resorts, 59 have been awarded designations of
an RCI Gold Crown Resort or an RCI Silver Crown Resort.
Owners of vacation credits pay annual maintenance fees to the
Clubs. The annual maintenance fee associated with the average
vacation credit purchased is approximately $500. The maintenance
fee that an owner pays is based on the number of the
owners vacation credits. These fees are intended to cover
the Clubs operating costs, including the dues to the
property owners associations, which are generally the
Clubs responsibility. Fees paid to property owners
associations are generally used to renovate and replace
furnishings, pay maintenance and cleaning costs, pay management
fees and expenses, and cover taxes (in some states), insurance
and other related costs. Maintenance of common areas and the
provision of amenities typically is the responsibility of the
property owners associations. WorldMark by Wyndham has a
minimal ownership interest in the Clubs that results from
WorldMark by Wyndhams ownership of unsold vacation credits
in the Clubs. As the owner of unsold vacation credits, WorldMark
by Wyndham pays maintenance fees to the Clubs.
WorldMark, The Club and WorldMark South Pacific
Club. The Clubs provide owners of vacation credits with
flexibility (subject to availability) as to resort location,
length of stay, unit type and time of year. Depending on how
many vacation credits an owner has purchased, the owner may use
the vacation credits for one or more vacations annually. The
number of vacation credits that are required for each days
stay at a unit is listed on a published schedule and varies
depending upon the resort location, unit type, time of year and
the day of the week. Owners may also redeem their credits for
other travel and leisure products that may be offered from time
to time.
Owners of vacation credits are able to carry over unused
vacation credits in one year to the next year and to borrow
vacation credits from the next year for use in the current year.
Owners of vacation credits are also able to purchase bonus time
from the Clubs for use when space is available. Bonus time gives
owners the opportunity to use available resorts on short notice
and at a reduced rate and to obtain usage beyond owners
allotments of vacation credits. In addition, WorldMark by
Wyndham offers owners the opportunity to upgrade, or
acquire additional vacation credits to increase the number of
credits such owners can use in the Clubs.
Owners of vacation credits can make reservations through the
Clubs, or may elect to join and exchange their vacation
ownership interests through our vacation exchange business, RCI,
or Interval International, Inc., which is a third-party exchange
company.
Club and Property Management. In exchange for
management fees, WorldMark by Wyndham, itself or through a
WorldMark by Wyndham affiliate, serves as the exclusive property
manager and servicing agent of the Clubs and all resort units
owned or operated by the Clubs. On behalf of the Clubs,
WorldMark by Wyndham or its affiliate provides day-to-day
management for vacation ownership resorts, including oversight
of housekeeping services, maintenance and refurbishment of the
units, and provides certain accounting and administrative
services. WorldMark by Wyndham or its affiliate also manages the
reservation system for the Clubs and provides owner services and
billing and collections services.
22
Sales and
Marketing
Wyndham Vacation Ownership employs a variety of marketing
channels as part of Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by
Wyndham marketing programs to encourage prospective owners of
vacation ownership interests to tour Wyndham Vacation Resorts
and WorldMark by Wyndham resort properties, as applicable, and
to attend sales presentations at resort locations and off-site
sales offices. These channels include direct mail,
e-commerce,
in-person solicitations, referral programs and inbound and
outbound telemarketing. The marketing offers we make through
these channels are local and travel-based offers. Our local
offers are designed to produce tour flow in regions where
prospective owners reside or are currently visiting, and our
travel-based offers are designed to solicit the purchase by
prospective owners of overnight vacation packages to
destinations in which Wyndham Vacation Ownership operates. We
believe that marketing through both local and travel-based
offers enhances our ability to market successfully to
prospective owners.
Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham offer a
variety of entry-level programs and products as part of their
sales strategies. One such program allows prospective owners to
acquire one-years worth of points or credits with no
further obligations; another such product is a biennial
interest, which prospective owners can buy, that provides for
vacations every other year. As part of their sales strategies,
Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham rely on their
points/credits-based programs, which provide prospective owners
with the flexibility to buy relatively small packages of points
or credits, which can be upgraded at a later date. To facilitate
upgrades among existing owners, Wyndham Vacation Resorts and
WorldMark by Wyndham market opportunities for owners to purchase
additional points or credits through periodic marketing
campaigns and promotions to owners while those owners vacation
at Wyndham Vacation Resorts or WorldMark by Wyndham resort
properties, as applicable.
The marketing and sales activities of Wyndham Vacation Resorts
and WorldMark by Wyndham are often facilitated through marketing
alliances with other travel, hospitality, entertainment, gaming
and retail companies that provide access to such companies
present and past customers through co-branded marketing offers,
in-bound call transfer programs, in-store promotions, on-line
advertising, sweepstakes programs and other highly integrated
marketing platforms.
Wyndham Vacation Resorts Sales and Marketing.
Wyndham Vacation Resorts sells its vacation ownership interests
and other real estate interests at 39 resort locations and nine
off-site sales centers.
On-site
sales accounted for approximately 90% of all new sales during
2007.
On-site
sales presentations typically follow a resort tour led by a
Wyndham Vacation Resorts salesperson. Wyndham Vacation Resorts
conducted approximately 668,000 and 623,000 tours in 2007 and
2006, respectively.
Wyndham Vacation Resorts
on-site
sales centers, which are located in popular travel destinations
throughout the United States, generate substantial tour flow
through providing travel-based offers. The sales centers sell
overnight vacation packages to popular travel destinations
throughout the United States and when the purchasers of such
packages redeem the packages, Wyndham Vacation Resorts sales
representatives provide the purchasers with tours of Wyndham
Vacation Resorts resort properties. Wyndham Vacation Resorts
utilizes direct mail, on-line campaigns and outbound and inbound
telemarketing to market for sale the overnight vacation packages
to prospective owners of vacation ownership interests, many of
whom are also past or prospective customers for our travel,
hospitality, entertainment and gaming marketing alliances.
Wyndham Vacation Resorts often co-brands the vacation packages
with third parties with whom it has marketing alliances and
features products or services provided by those third parties as
part of the vacation packages.
Wyndham Vacation Resorts resort-based sales centers also
generate substantial tour flow through providing local offers.
The sales centers enable Wyndham Vacation Resorts to market to
tourists already visiting destination areas. Wyndham Vacation
Resorts marketing agents, which often operate on the
premises of the hospitality, entertainment, gaming and retail
companies with which Wyndham Vacation Resorts has alliances
within these markets, solicit local tourists with offers
relating to activities and entertainment in exchange for the
tourists visiting the local resorts and attending sales
presentations. An example of a marketing alliance through which
Wyndham Vacation Resorts markets to tourists already visiting
destination areas is Wyndham Vacation Resorts current
arrangement with Harrahs Entertainment in Las Vegas,
Nevada, which enables Wyndham Vacation Resorts to operate
several concierge-style marketing kiosks throughout
Harrahs Casino that permit Wyndham Vacation Resorts to
solicit patrons to attend tours and sales presentations with
Harrahs-related rewards and entertainment offers, such as
gaming chips, show tickets and dining certificates. Wyndham
Vacation Resorts also operates its primary Las Vegas sales
center within Harrahs Casino and regularly shuttles
prospective owners targeted by such sales centers to and from
Wyndham Vacation Resorts nearby resort property. Wyndham
Vacation Resorts also has marketing alliances with Trump Casino
Resorts and Outrigger Hotels & Resorts.
23
Wyndham Vacation Resorts resort-based sales centers enable
Wyndham Vacation Resorts to actively solicit upgrade sales to
existing owners of vacation ownership interests while such
owners vacation at Wyndham Vacation Resorts resort properties.
Sales of vacation ownership interests relating to upgrades
represented approximately 48%, 46% and 42% of Wyndham Vacation
Resorts net sales of vacation ownership interests in 2007,
2006 and 2005, respectively.
WorldMark by Wyndham Sales and Marketing.
WorldMark by Wyndham sells its vacation credits in the United
States primarily at 73 sales offices, 33 of which are located
off-site in metropolitan areas. Wyndham Asia Pacific conducts
its international sales and marketing efforts through
on-site and
off-site sales offices, telemarketing and road shows. As of
December 31, 2007, Wyndham Asia Pacific had 10 sales
offices throughout the east coast of Australia, the North Island
of New Zealand and Fiji. Off-site sales offices generated
approximately 40% and 41% of WorldMark by Wyndhams sales
of new vacation credits in 2007 and 2006, respectively.
WorldMark by Wyndham conducted approximately 476,000 and 423,000
tours in 2007 and 2006, respectively.
WorldMark by Wyndhams off-site sales offices market
vacation credits through local offers to prospective owners in
areas where such purchasers reside. WorldMark by Wyndhams
off-site sales offices provide WorldMark by Wyndham with access
to large numbers of prospective owners and a convenient, local
venue at which to preview and sell vacation credits. The
location of off-site sales offices in metropolitan areas
provides WorldMark by Wyndham with access to a wide group of
qualified sales personnel.
WorldMark by Wyndham uses a variety of marketing programs to
attract prospective owners, including sponsored contests that
offer vacation packages or gifts, targeted mailings, outbound
and inbound telemarketing efforts, and various other promotional
programs. WorldMark by Wyndham also co-sponsors sweepstakes,
giveaways and other promotional programs with professional teams
at major sporting events and with other third parties at other
high-traffic consumer events. Where permissible under state law,
WorldMark by Wyndham offers existing owners cash awards or other
incentives for referrals of new owners.
WorldMark by Wyndham and Wyndham Asia Pacific periodically
encourage existing owners of vacation credits to acquire
additional vacation credits through various methods. Sales of
vacation credits relating to upgrades represented approximately
38%, 35% and 31% of WorldMark by Wyndhams net sales of
vacation credits in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Sales of
vacation credits relating to upgrades represented approximately
20%, 16% and 13% of Wyndham Asia Pacifics net sales
of vacation credits in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Purchaser
Financing
Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham offer
financing to purchasers of vacation ownership interests. By
offering consumer financing, we are able to reduce the initial
cash required by customers to purchase vacation ownership
interests, thereby enabling us to attract additional customers
and generate substantial incremental revenues and profits.
Wyndham Vacation Ownership funds and services loans extended by
Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham through our
consumer financing subsidiary, Wyndham Consumer Finance, a
wholly owned subsidiary of Wyndham Vacation Resorts based in Las
Vegas, Nevada that performs loan financing, servicing and
related administrative functions. As of December 31, 2007,
we serviced a portfolio of approximately 277,000 loans that
totaled $3,264 million in aggregate principal amount
outstanding, with an average interest rate of 12.5%.
Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham do not require
a credit investigation or other review or inquiry into every
purchasers credit history before offering to finance a
portion of the purchase price of the vacation ownership
interests. However, Wyndham Vacation Resorts offers purchasers
an enhanced financing option whereby purchasers may obtain
financing on more favorable terms if they agree to permit
Wyndham Vacation Resorts to obtain their credit scores. The
interest rate offered to participating purchasers is determined
from automated underwriting based upon the purchasers
credit score, the amount of the down payment and the size of
purchase. As of December 31, 2007, this enhanced financing
option was in the process of being implemented at WorldMark by
Wyndham sales offices. In addition, WorldMark by Wyndham,
through certain upgrade sales programs, may offer existing
owners of vacation credits who purchase additional vacation
credits financing on more favorable terms based on such
owners payment history with WorldMark by Wyndham. Both
Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham offer
purchasers an interest rate reduction if they participate in
their pre-authorized checking, or PAC, programs, pursuant to
which our consumer financing subsidiary each month debits a
purchasers bank account or major credit card in the amount
of the monthly payment by a pre-authorized fund transfer on the
payment date. As of December 31, 2007, approximately 84% of
purchaser financing serviced by our consumer financing
subsidiary participated in the PAC program.
24
Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham generally
require a minimum down payment of 10% of the purchase price on
all sales of vacation ownership interests and offer consumer
financing for the remaining balance for up to ten years. The
vast majority of the receivables are paid in equal monthly
installments that fully amortize the principal due by the final
due date (i.e., no teaser rates, no interest rate adjustments,
no balloon payments). Both Wyndham Vacation Resorts and
WorldMark by Wyndham offer programs through which prospective
owners may accumulate the required 10% down payment over a
period of time not greater than six months. The prospective
owner is placed in pending status until the required
10% down payment amount is received.
Similar to other companies that provide consumer financing, we
securitize a majority of the receivables originated in
connection with the sales of our vacation ownership interests.
We initially place the financed contracts into a revolving
warehouse securitization facility generally within 30 to
90 days after origination. Many of the receivables are
subsequently transferred from the warehouse securitization
facility and placed into term securitization facilities. As of
December 31, 2007, the aggregate principal amount
outstanding of receivables in the warehouse securitization
facility and the term securitization facilities was
$970 million and $1,495 million, respectively.
Servicing
and Collection Procedures
Our consumer financing subsidiary is responsible for the
maintenance of accounts receivables files and all customer
service, billing and collection activities related to the
domestic loans we extend. Our consumer financing subsidiary also
places loans pledged in our warehouse and term securitization
facilities. As of December 31, 2007, our consumer financing
subsidiary had approximately 500 employees, the majority of
whom work in customer service, account placement and
maintenance, and loan collection functions.
Since April 2005, Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by
Wyndham have used a single computerized online data system to
maintain loan records and service the loans. This system permits
access to customer account inquiries and is supported by our
information technology department.
The collection methodologies for both brands are similar and
entail a combination of mailings and telephone calls which are
supported by an automated dialer. As of December 31, 2007,
the loan portfolios of both Wyndham Vacation Resorts and
WorldMark by Wyndham were approximately 95% current (i.e., not
more than 30 days past due).
We assess the performance of our loan portfolio by monitoring
certain metrics on a daily, weekly, monthly and annual basis.
These metrics include, but are not limited to, collections
rates, account roll rates, defaults by state residency of the
obligor and bankruptcies. We define defaults as accounts that
are 120 days or more past due plus bankrupt accounts. One
of the means of assessing defaults and portfolio performance is
through the application of static pool methodology that tracks
defaults based on the receivables year of origination.
There are various methods of calculating static pool defaults.
In previous years, we used the method of calculating defaults
that included originations with less than a full year of
history, which provided for an average expected cumulative gross
default rate of 17.0% and 16.5% as of December 31, 2007 and
2006, respectively. During 2007, we modified our method of
calculating static pool defaults that included originations for
which we have a full year of history, which provided for an
average expected cumulative gross default rate of 17.9% and
17.8% as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Strategies
We intend to grow our vacation ownership business by increasing
sales of vacation ownership interests to new owners and sales of
upgrades to existing owners by expanding our marketing and sales
efforts, strengthening our product offerings and further
developing our consumer financing activities. We plan to
leverage the Wyndham brand in our marketing efforts, add new
resorts, expand our marketing alliances and increase our
on-site
sales activities to existing owners. Our plans generally focus
on pursuing these strategies organically. In addition, in
appropriate circumstances, we will consider opportunities to
acquire businesses, both domestic and international.
Expand
our sales and marketing efforts
We plan to expand sales and marketing to new and existing
owners, including marketing and selling through in-person
solicitation, direct mail,
e-commerce,
referral programs, inbound and outbound telemarketing and
upgrade sales programs. We plan to continue to leverage the
Wyndham brand in our marketing efforts to strengthen our
position in the higher-end segment of the vacation ownership
industry, to attract prospective new owners in higher income
demographics through Wyndham-branded marketing campaigns, and to
increase upgrade sales through the application of the Wyndham
brand within existing and new higher-end products and product
features.
25
We plan to expand our marketing and sales distribution channels
through the pursuit of additional integrated marketing alliances
with lodging and entertainment companies. We currently have
alliances with Harrahs Entertainment in Las Vegas, Nevada;
Trump Casino Resorts in Atlantic City, New Jersey; and Outrigger
Hotels & Resorts throughout Hawaii, which permit us to
conduct marketing and sales activities at properties owned by
these companies. We will explore expanding our existing
alliances and entering into new alliances.
Strengthen
our product offerings
We plan to strengthen the products that we offer by adding new
resorts and resort locations and expanding our offering of
higher-end products and product features. We plan to develop
additional product in new domestic regions and in domestic
regions we currently serve that are experiencing strong demand
such as Orlando, Las Vegas, San Francisco, New Mexico, New
Orleans and Hawaii. We plan to develop additional resorts in
international regions in Canada, the Caribbean, Mexico,
Australia and Asia. In addition, we may also acquire additional
resorts that complement our current portfolio of resorts.
We are applying the Wyndham brand at new domestic and
international resorts, as well as at select locations within our
current portfolio of resorts. In addition, we plan to develop
and market mixed-use hotel and vacation ownership properties in
conjunction with the Wyndham brand. The mixed-use properties
would afford us access to both hotel clients in higher income
demographics for the purpose of marketing vacation ownership
interests and hotel inventory for use in our marketing programs.
We plan to expand upon existing and create new higher-end,
product offerings in conjunction with the Wyndham brand. We plan
to associate the Wyndham brand with our existing high-end
Presidential-style vacation ownership units, including new
offerings made available to our owners who have attained
enhanced membership status within our vacation ownership
programs as a result of achieving substantial ownership levels.
We are also exploring opportunities to apply the Wyndham brand
to future higher-end luxury products.
Enhance
our consumer financing activities
We plan to increase our revenue from vacation ownership interest
sales by enhancing our customers ability to purchase our
products. Our consumer financing activities increase our sales
of Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham vacation
ownership interests by offering financing to prospective
purchasers who might otherwise not purchase. Additionally,
offering financing permits prospective purchasers to acquire
larger vacation ownership interests than they might otherwise
acquire. To further increase the number and size of sales of our
vacation ownership interests, we plan to explore offering new
financing products and terms that are desirable to prospective
purchasers. We plan to increase our net interest income by
growing our portfolio of vacation ownership contract receivables.
Seasonality
We rely, in part, upon tour flow to generate sales of vacation
ownership interests; consequently, sales volume tends to
increase in the spring and summer months as a result of greater
tour flow from spring and summer travelers. Revenues from sales
of vacation ownership interests therefore are generally higher
in the second and third quarters than in other quarters. We
cannot predict whether these seasonal trends will continue in
the future.
Competition
The vacation ownership industry is highly competitive and is
comprised of a number of companies specializing primarily in
sales and marketing, consumer financing, property management and
development of vacation ownership properties. In addition, a
number of national hospitality chains develop and sell vacation
ownership interests to consumers. Some of the well-known players
in the industry include Disney Vacation Club, Hilton Grand
Vacations Company LLC, Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc. and
Starwood Vacation Ownership, Inc.
Trademarks
We own the trademarks Wyndham Vacation Ownership,
Wyndham Vacation Resorts, WorldMark by
Wyndham, and FairShare Plus and related
trademarks and logos, and such trademarks and logos are material
to the businesses that are part of our vacation ownership
business. Our subsidiaries actively use these marks, and all of
the material marks are registered (or have applications pending)
with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office as well as with
the relevant authorities in major countries worldwide where
these businesses have significant operations. We own the
WorldMark trademark pursuant to an assignment
agreement with WorldMark, The Club. Pursuant to the
26
assignment agreement, WorldMark, The Club may request that the
mark be reassigned to it only in the event of a termination of
the WorldMark vacation ownership programs.
Employees
At December 31, 2007, we had approximately
33,200 employees, including approximately
10,000 employees outside of the United States. At
December 31, 2007, our lodging business had approximately
5,700 employees, our vacation exchange and rentals business
had approximately 9,300 employees and our vacation
ownership business had approximately 17,700 employees.
Approximately 1% of our employees are subject to collective
bargaining agreements governing their employment with our
company. We believe that our relations with employees are good.
Government
Regulation
Our businesses are either subject to or affected by
international, federal, state and local laws, regulations and
policies, which are constantly subject to change. The
descriptions of the laws, regulations and policies that follow
are summaries and should be read in conjunction with the texts
of the laws and regulations described below. The descriptions do
not purport to cover all present and proposed laws, regulations
and policies that affect our businesses. We believe that we are
in material compliance with these laws, regulations and policies.
Regulations
Generally Applicable to Our Business
Our businesses are subject to, among others, laws and
regulations that affect privacy and data collection, marketing
regulation and the use of the Internet, as described below:
Privacy and Data Collection. The collection and
use of personal data of our customers and our ability to contact
our customers, including through telephone, email or facsimile,
as well as the sharing of our customer data with affiliates and
third parties, are governed by privacy laws and regulations
enacted in the United States and in other jurisdictions around
the world. Privacy regulations continue to evolve and on
occasion may be inconsistent from one jurisdiction to another.
Accordingly, we have implemented a best practices
approach to compliance with these numerous and sometimes
divergent laws. Many states have introduced legislation or
enacted laws and regulations that require compliance with
standards for data collection and protection of privacy and, in
some instances, provide for penalties for failure to notify
customers when the security of a companys
electronic/computer systems designed to protect such standards
are breached, even by third parties. The U.S. Federal Trade
Commission, or FTC, adopted do not call and do
not fax regulations in October 2003. Also do not
call legislation became effective in Australia in May
2007. In compliance with such regulations, our affected
businesses have developed and implemented plans to block phone
numbers listed on the do not call and do not
fax registries and have instituted new procedures for
preventing unsolicited or otherwise unauthorized telemarketing
calls. In response to do not call and do not
fax regulations, our affected businesses have reduced
their reliance on outbound telemarketing and also review any
outbound lists against the constantly updated do not
call list. In addition, our European businesses have
adopted policies and procedures to comply with the European
Union Directive on Data Protection. These policies and
procedures require that unless the use of data is
necessary for certain specified purposes, including,
for example, the performance of a contract with the individual
concerned, consent to use data other than in accordance with our
stipulated privacy policies, or to transfer the data outside of
the European Union, must be obtained.
Marketing Operations. The products and services
offered by our various businesses are marketed through a number
of distribution channels, including direct mail, telemarketing
and online. These channels are regulated at the federal, state
and local levels, and we believe that the effect of such
regulations on our marketing operations will increase over time.
Such regulations, which include anti-fraud laws, consumer
protection laws, privacy laws, identity theft laws, anti-spam
laws, telemarketing laws and telephone solicitation laws, may
limit our ability to solicit new customers or to market
additional products or services to existing customers. In
addition, some of our business units use sweepstakes and
contests as part of their marketing and promotional programs.
These activities are regulated primarily by state laws that
require certain disclosures and assurance that the prizes will
be available to the winners.
Internet. A number of laws and regulations have
been adopted to regulate the Internet. In addition, it is
possible that existing laws may be interpreted to apply to the
Internet in ways that the existing laws are not currently
applied, particularly with respect to the imposition of state
and local taxes on the use and reservation of accommodations
through the Internet. Regulatory and legal requirements are
particularly subject to change with respect to the Internet and
may become more restrictive, which will increase the difficulty
and expense of compliance or otherwise restrict our business
units abilities to conduct operations as such operations
are currently conducted.
27
We are also aware of, and are actively monitoring the status of,
recently enacted and certain proposed federal, state and
international legislation related to privacy, data security and
marketing with respect to the onsite marketplace and the use and
protection of customer data. It is unclear at this point what
effect, if any, such federal, state and international
legislation may have on our businesses. California, for example,
has enacted legislation that requires enhanced disclosure on
Internet web sites regarding consumer privacy and information
sharing among affiliated entities. Other states have enacted
similar laws or have legislation pending. We cannot predict with
certainty whether these laws will affect our practices with
respect to customer information and inhibit our ability to
market our products and services nor can we predict whether
additional states will enact similar laws. Because Internet
reservations are more cost-effective than reservations taken
over the phone, our costs may increase if Internet reservations
are adversely affected by regulations.
Travel Agency Services. The travel agency products
and services that our businesses provide are subject to various
federal, state and local regulations. We must comply with laws
and regulations that relate to our marketing and sales of such
products and services, including laws and regulations that
prohibit unfair and deceptive advertising or practices and laws
that require us to register as a seller of travel to
comply with disclosure requirements. In addition, we are
indirectly affected by the regulation of our travel suppliers,
many of which are heavily regulated by the United States and
other governments. We are also affected by the European Union
Directive applicable to the sale and provision of package
holidays because some of our European businesses operate such
that they are classified, for certain of their operations, as
organizers of package holidays. This European Union Directive
places liability for the package holiday sold with the organizer
and requires that the organizer has security in place in order
to refund to the consumer money paid by such consumer in the
event of insolvency of the organizer.
Immigration. Our domestic business is subject to
law and regulations regarding employment of immigrants, ensuring
that we employ only U.S. work authorized individuals. This
requires us to perform proper hiring procedures to confirm each
new employees identity and authorization to work in the
United States. Recent and anticipated changes in federal and
state laws require employers to verify social security numbers
as well, which will require us to devote additional resources to
conducting the verification process, communicating with
employees about verification issues, and, in some cases,
terminating the employment of those who are not able to timely
resolve verification issues, even if those employees are
otherwise authorized to work in the United States. Strict
compliance with the laws may result in complaints of
discrimination on the basis of national origin, however, failure
to comply with these laws may subject the company to significant
penalties, such as the loss of a license to do business in
certain states or municipalities, the imposition of fines, or
reputational damage.
Regulations
Applicable to the Lodging Business
Our lodging business is subject to, among others, laws,
regulations and policies that affect the sale of franchises,
access for persons with disabilities and immigration, as
described below:
Sale of Franchises. The FTC, various state laws
and regulations and the laws of jurisdictions outside the United
States regulate the offer and sale of franchises. The FTC
requires that franchisors make extensive written disclosure in a
prescribed format to prospective franchisees but does not
require registration. The FTC recently approved new franchise
regulations (the FTC Rule) that will affect sales
practices and procedures and the content of disclosure documents
that we use to sell franchises in the United States. The new FTC
Rule became effective as of July 1, 2007 but franchisors
may use their current FDD formats for one year from the
effective date. Accordingly, the FTC rule takes effect on a
mandatory basis on July 1, 2008. The state laws that affect
our franchise business regulate the offer and sale of
franchises, the termination, renewal and transfer of franchise
agreements, and the provision of loans to franchisees as part of
the sales of franchises. Currently, 14 states have laws
that require registration in connection with offers and sales of
franchises. In addition, 21 states currently have
franchise relationship laws that limit the ability
of franchisors to terminate franchise agreements or to withhold
consent to the renewal or transfer of the agreements. California
regulates the provision of loans to franchisees as part of the
sales of the franchises but we are currently exempt from such
law. The laws of jurisdictions outside the United States
regulate pre-sale disclosure and the commencement of
franchising. Three Canadian provinces and a number of foreign
jurisdictions have adopted general franchises and pre-sale
disclosure regulations.
Persons with Disabilities. The American with
Disabilities Act, or ADA, prohibits places of public
accommodation, such as lodging and restaurant facilities, from
discriminating against an individual on the basis of disability
as defined in the Act. The U.S. Department of Justice
published ADA Standards for Accessible Design and
ADA Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings and
Facilities, collectively referred to as ADAAG,
that, among other things, prescribe a specified number of
handicapped accessible rooms, assistive devices for hearing,
speech and visually impaired persons, and general standards of
design applicable to all areas of facilities subject to the law.
The ADAAG specifies the minimum room design and layout criteria
for handicapped accessible rooms. Any newly
28
constructed facility (given a certificate of occupancy after
January 26, 1993) must comply with ADAAG and be
readily accessible to and useable by persons with
disabilities. Owners, lessors, lessees and operators of public
accommodations and their contractors are responsible for ADA and
ADAAG compliance. States may impose additional laws that address
accommodations and services for individuals with disabilities.
Regulations
Applicable to the Vacation Exchange and Rentals
Business
Our vacation exchange business is subject to, among other laws
and regulations, statutes in certain jurisdictions that regulate
vacation exchange services, and we must prepare and file
annually disclosure guides with regulators in jurisdictions
where such filings are required. Although our vacation exchange
business is not generally subject to laws and regulations that
govern the development of vacation ownership properties and the
sale of vacation ownership interests, these laws and regulations
directly affect the members of our vacation exchange program and
resorts with units that participate in our vacation exchanges.
These laws and regulations, therefore, indirectly affect our
vacation exchange business. In addition, several states and
localities are attempting to enact or have enacted laws or
regulations that would impose or impose, as applicable, taxes on
members that complete exchanges, similar to local transient
occupancy taxes. Our vacation rentals business is subject to
state and local regulation, including applicable seller of
travel, travel club and real estate brokerage licensing statutes.
Regulations
Applicable to the Vacation Ownership Business
Our vacation ownership business is subject to, among others, the
laws and regulations that affect the marketing and sale of
vacation ownership interests, property management of vacation
ownership resorts, travel agency services and the conduct of
real estate brokers, described below:
Federal, State and International Regulation of Vacation
Ownership Business. Our vacation ownership business is
subject to federal legislation, including without limitation,
Housing and Urban Development Department regulations, such as
the Fair Housing Act; the
Truth-in-Lending
Act and Regulation Z promulgated thereunder, which require
certain disclosures to borrowers regarding the terms of
borrowers loans; the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
and Regulation X promulgated thereunder, which require
certain disclosures to borrowers regarding the settlement of
real estate transactions and servicing of loans; the Equal
Credit Opportunity Act and Regulation B promulgated
thereunder, which prohibit discrimination in the extension of
credit on the basis of age, race, color, sex, religion, marital
status, national origin, receipt of public assistance or the
exercise of any right under the Consumer Credit Protection Act;
the Telemarketing and Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act; the
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the Fair Credit Reporting Act and
other laws, which address privacy of consumer financial
information; and the Civil Rights Acts of 1964, 1968 and 1991.
Many states have laws that regulate our vacation ownership
business operations, including those relating to real
estate licensing, travel sales licensing, anti-fraud,
telemarketing, restrictions on the use of predictive dialers,
prize, gift and sweepstakes regulations, labor, and various
regulations governing access and use of our resorts by disabled
persons. In addition to regulation in the United States and
Australia, our vacation ownership business is subject to
regulation in other countries where we develop or manage resorts
and where we market or sell vacation ownership interests,
including Canada, Mexico, New Zealand and Fiji. The scope of
regulation of our vacation ownership business in Canada, where
we develop, market, sell and manage resorts, is similar to the
scope of regulation of our vacation ownership business in the
United States. In addition, in Australia, we are regulated by
the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, which
requires that all persons conducting vacation ownership sales
and marketing and vacation ownership club activities hold an
Australian Financial Services License and comply with the rules
and regulations of the Commission. Unlike in the United States,
where the vacation ownership industry is regulated primarily by
state law, the vacation ownership industry in Australia is
regulated under federal Australian securities law because
Australian law regards a vacation ownership interest as a
security. As we expand our vacation ownership business by
entering new markets, we will become subject to regulation in
additional countries.
The sale of vacation ownership interests is potentially subject
to federal and state securities laws. However, most federal and
state agencies generally do not regulate our sale of vacation
ownership interests as securities, in part because we offer our
vacation ownership interests for personal vacation use and
enjoyment and not for investment purposes with the expectation
of profit or in conjunction with a rental arrangement. In
addition, the vacation ownership interests that we market and
sell are real estate interests or are akin to real estate
interests and therefore our vacation ownership business is
extensively regulated by many states departments of
commerce
and/or real
estate. Because of such extensive regulation, additional
regulation of our vacation ownership products as securities
generally does not occur. Some states in which we market and
sell our vacation ownership interests regulate our products as
securities. In those states, we comply with such regulation by
either registering our vacation ownership interests for sale as
securities or qualifying for an exemption from registration and
by providing required disclosures to our purchasers. If federal
and additional state agencies elected to regulate our vacation
ownership
29
interest products as securities, we would comply with such
regulation by either registering our vacation ownership
interests for sale as securities or qualifying for an exemption
from registration and by providing required disclosures to our
purchasers.
State real estate foreclosure laws impact our vacation ownership
business. We secure loans made to purchasers of vacation
ownership interests that constitute real estate interests and
that are deeded prior to loan repayment by requiring purchasers
to grant a first priority mortgage lien in our favor, which is
recorded against title to the vacation ownership interest. In
the event of a purchasers default, the purchaser will
often voluntarily deed the vacation ownership interest to us, in
which event foreclosure is not necessary. If the purchaser does
not do so, we may commence a judicial or non-judicial
foreclosure proceeding. State real estate foreclosure laws
normally require that certain conditions be satisfied prior to
completing foreclosure, including providing to the purchaser
both a notice and an opportunity to redeem the purchasers
interest and conducting a foreclosure sale. While state real
estate foreclosure laws impose requirements and expenses on us,
we are able to comply with the requirements, bear the expenses
and complete foreclosures. Several states have enacted
anti-deficiency laws which generally prohibit a lender from
recovering the portion of an outstanding loan in excess of the
proceeds of a foreclosure sale of a borrowers primary
residence that secures repayment of the loan. Since purchasers
of vacation ownership interests do not occupy a resort unit as a
primary residence, state anti-deficiency laws generally do not
impact us. Our sale of vacation ownership interests that are
vacation credits is not impacted by state real estate
foreclosure and anti-deficiency laws, since vacation credits are
not direct real estate interests.
Marketing and Sale of Vacation Ownership
Interests. We are subject to extensive regulation by
states departments of commerce
and/or real
estate and international regulatory agencies, such as the
European Commission, in locations where our resorts in which we
sell vacation ownership interests are located or where we market
and sell vacation ownership interests. Many states regulate the
marketing and sale of vacation ownership interests, and the laws
of such states generally require a designated state authority to
approve a vacation ownership public report, which is a detailed
offering statement describing the resort operator and all
material aspects of the resort and the sale of vacation
ownership interests. In addition, the laws of most states in
which we sell vacation ownership interests grant the purchaser
of such an interest the right to rescind a contract of purchase
at any time within a statutory rescission period, which
generally ranges from three to 15 days, depending on the
state.
Property Management of Vacation Ownership Resorts.
Our vacation ownership business includes property management
operations that are subject to state condominium
and/or
vacation ownership management regulations and, in some states,
to professional licensing requirements.
Conduct of Real Estate Brokers. The marketing and
sales component of our vacation ownership business is subject to
numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations that
contain general standards for and prohibitions relating to the
conduct of real estate brokers and sales associates, including
laws and regulations that relate to the licensing of brokers and
sales associates, fiduciary and agency duties, administration of
trust funds, collection of commissions, and advertising and
consumer disclosures. The federal Real Estate Settlement
Procedures Act and state real estate brokerage laws also
restrict payments that real estate brokers and other parties may
receive or pay in connection with the sales of vacation
ownership interests and referral of prospective owners. Such
laws may, to some extent, restrict arrangements involving our
vacation ownership business.
Environmental Regulation. Because our vacation
ownership business acquires, develops and renovates vacation
ownership interest resorts, we are subject to various
environmental laws, ordinances, regulations and similar
requirements in the jurisdictions where our resorts are located.
The environmental laws to which our vacation ownership business
is subject regulate various matters, including pollution,
hazardous and toxic substances and wastes, asbestos, petroleum
and storage tanks.
Regulations
Applicable to the Management of Property Operations
Our business that relates to the management of property
operations, which includes components of our lodging, vacation
ownership and vacation rental businesses, is subject to, among
others, laws and regulations that relate to health and
sanitation, the sale of alcoholic beverages, facility operation
and fire safety, including as described below, covering both U.S
and non U.S jurisdictional requirements:
Health and Sanitation. Most jurisdictions have
regulations or statutes governing the lodging business or its
components, such as restaurants, swimming pools and health
facilities. Lodging and restaurant businesses often require
licensing by applicable authorities, and sometimes these
licenses are obtainable only after the business passes health
inspections to assure compliance with health and sanitation
codes. Health inspections are performed on a recurring basis.
Health-related laws affect the use of linens, towels, glassware
and automatic defibrillators. Other
30
laws govern swimming pool use and operation and require the
posting of notices, availability of certain rescue equipment and
limitations on the number of persons allowed to use the pool at
any time. These regulations typically impose civil fines or
penalties for violations, which may lead to operating
restrictions if uncorrected or in extreme cases of violations.
Sale of Alcoholic Beverages. Alcoholic beverage
service is subject to licensing and extensive regulations that
govern virtually all aspects of service. Compliance with these
regulations at managed locations may impose obligations on the
owners of managed hotels, Wyndham Hotel Management as the
property manager or both. Managed hotel operations may be
adversely affected by delays in transfers or issuances of
alcoholic beverage licenses necessary for food and beverage
services.
Facility Operation. The operation of lodging
facilities is subject to innkeepers laws that
(i) authorize the innkeeper to assert a lien against and
sell, after observing certain procedures, the possessions of a
guest who owes an unpaid bill for lodging or other services
provided by the innkeeper, (ii) affect or limit the
liability of an innkeeper who posts required notices or
disclaimers for guest valuables if a safe is provided, guest
property, checked or stored baggage, mail and parked vehicles,
(iii) require posting of house rules and room rates in each
guest room or near the registration area, (iv) may require
registration of guests, proof of identity at check-in and
retention of records for a specified period of time,
(v) limit the rights of an innkeeper to refuse lodging to
prospective guests except under certain narrowly defined
circumstances, and (vi) may limit the right of the
innkeeper to evict a guest who overstays the scheduled stay or
otherwise gives a reason to be evicted. Federal and state laws
applicable to places of public accommodation prohibit
discrimination in lodging services on the basis of the race,
creed, color or national origin of the guest. Some states
prohibit the practice of overbooking and require the
innkeeper to provide the reserved lodging or find alternate
accommodations if the guest has paid a deposit, or face a civil
fine. Some states and municipalities have also enacted laws and
regulations governing no-smoking areas and guest rooms that are
more stringent than our standards for no-smoking guest rooms.
Fire Safety. The federal Hotel and Motel Safety
Act of 1990 requires all places of public accommodation to
install hard wired, single station smoke detectors meeting
National Fire Protection Association Standard 74 in each guest
room and to install an automatic sprinkler system meeting
National Fire Protection Association Standard 13 or 13-R in
facilities taller than three stories, unless certain exceptions
are met, for such places to be approved for lodging and meetings
of federal employees. Travel directories published by the
federal government and lists maintained by state officials will
include only those facilities that comply with the Hotel and
Motel Safety Act of 1990. Other state and local fire and life
safety codes may require exit maps, lighting systems and other
safety measures unique to lodging facilities.
Occupational Safety. The federal Occupational
Safety and Health Act, or OSHA, requires that businesses comply
with industry-specific safety and health standards, which are
known collectively as OSHA standards, to provide a safe work
environment for all employees and prevent work-related injuries,
illnesses and deaths. Failure to comply with such OSHA standards
may subject the lodging business to fines from the Occupational
Safety and Health Administration.
Environmental Regulation. Our business that
relates to the management of property operations is subject to
various environmental laws, ordinances, regulations and similar
requirements in the jurisdictions where the properties we manage
are located. We must comply with environmental laws that
regulate pollution, hazardous and toxic substances and wastes,
asbestos, petroleum and storage tanks.
Where You
Can Find More Information
We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements
and other information with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Our SEC filings are available to the public over the
Internet at the SECs website at
http://www.sec.gov.
Our SEC filings are also available on our website at
http://www.wyndhamworldwide.com
as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed with or
furnished to the SEC. You may also read and copy any filed
document at the SECs public reference room in
Washington, D.C. at 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for further information about public reference rooms.
We maintain and Internet site at
http://www.wyndhamworldwide.com. Our website and the
information contained on or connected to that site are not
incorporated into this annual report.
31
Before you invest in our securities you should carefully
consider each of the following risk factors and all of the other
information provided in this report. We believe that the
following information identifies the most significant risk
factors affecting us. However, the risks and uncertainties we
face are not limited to those set forth in the risk factors
described below. Additional risks and uncertainties not
presently known to us or that we currently believe to be
immaterial may also adversely affect our business. In addition,
past financial performance may not be a reliable indicator of
future performance and historical trends should not be used to
anticipate results or trends in future periods.
If any of the following risks and uncertainties develops into
actual events, these events could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
In such case, the trading price of our common stock could
decline.
The
hospitality industry is highly competitive and we are subject to
risks relating to competition that may adversely affect our
performance.
We will be adversely impacted if we cannot compete effectively
in the highly competitive hospitality industry. Our continued
success depends upon our ability to compete effectively in
markets that contain numerous competitors, some of which may
have significantly greater financial, marketing and other
resources than we have. Competition may reduce fee structures,
potentially causing us to lower our fees or prices, which may
adversely impact our profits. New competition or existing
competition that uses a business model that is different from
our business model may put pressure on us to change our model so
that we can remain competitive.
Our
revenues are highly dependent on the travel industry and
declines in or disruptions to the travel industry, such as those
caused by economic slowdown, terrorism, acts of God and war, may
adversely affect us.
Declines in or disruptions to the travel industry may adversely
impact us. Risks affecting the travel industry include: economic
slowdown and recession, economic factors adversely impacting
consumers decisions to use and consume leisure travel
services and products, terrorist incidents and threats (and
associated heightened travel security measures), acts of God
(such as earthquakes, hurricanes, fires, floods and other
natural disasters), war, bird flu and other pandemics, financial
instability of air carriers, airline job actions and strikes,
and increases in gas and other fuel prices.
We are
subject to operating or other risks common to the hospitality
industry.
Our business is subject to numerous operating or other risks
common to the hospitality industry including:
|
|
|
changes in operating costs, including energy, labor costs
(including minimum wage increases and unionization),
workers compensation and health-care related costs and
insurance;
|
|
|
changes in desirability of geographic regions of the hotels or
resorts in our business;
|
|
|
changes in the supply and demand for hotel rooms, vacation
exchange and rental services and vacation ownership products and
services;
|
|
|
seasonality in our businesses may cause fluctuations in our
operating results;
|
|
|
geographic concentrations of our operations and customers;
|
|
|
increases in costs due to inflation that may not be fully offset
by price and fee increases in our business;
|
|
|
availability and cost of capital;
|
|
|
the risk that purchasers of vacation ownership interests who
finance a portion of the purchase price default on their loans
due to adverse macro or personal economic conditions or
otherwise; that if such defaults occur during the early part of
the loan amortization period we will not have recovered the
marketing, selling, administrative and other costs associated
with such vacation ownership interest; such costs will be
incurred again in connection with the resale of the repossessed
vacation ownership interest; and the value we recover in a
default is not, in all instances, sufficient to cover the
outstanding debt;
|
32
|
|
|
the quality of the services provided by franchisees, our
vacation exchange and rentals business, resorts with units that
are exchanged through our vacation exchange business
and/or
resorts in which we sell vacation ownership interests may
adversely affect our image and reputation;
|
|
|
our ability to generate sufficient cash to buy from third-party
suppliers the products that we need to provide to the
participants in our points programs who want to redeem points
for such products;
|
|
|
overbuilding in one or more segments of the hospitality industry
and/or in
one or more geographic regions;
|
|
|
changes in the number and occupancy rates of hotels operating
under franchise and management agreements;
|
|
|
changes in the relative mix of franchised hotels in the various
lodging industry price categories;
|
|
|
our ability to develop and maintain positive relations and
contractual arrangements with current and potential franchisees,
hotel owners, resorts with units that are exchanged through our
vacation exchange business
and/or
owners of vacation properties that our vacation rentals business
markets for rental;
|
|
|
the availability of and competition for desirable sites for the
development of vacation ownership properties, difficulties
associated with obtaining entitlements to develop vacation
ownership properties and liability under state and local laws
with respect to any construction defects in the vacation
ownership properties we develop and our ability to maintain our
pace of completion of resort development relative to the pace of
our sales of the underlying vacation ownership interests;
|
|
|
private resale of vacation ownership interests could adversely
affect our vacation ownership resorts and vacation exchange
businesses;
|
|
|
revenues from our lodging business are indirectly affected by
our franchisees pricing decisions;
|
|
|
organized labor activities and associated litigation;
|
|
|
maintenance, infringement or unavailability of our intellectual
property;
|
|
|
taxation of guest loyalty program benefits that adversely
affects the cost or consumer acceptance of loyalty programs; and
|
|
|
disruptions in relationships with third parties, including
marketing alliances and affiliations with
e-commerce
channels.
|
We may
not be able to achieve our growth objectives.
We may not be able to achieve our objectives for increasing the
number of franchised
and/or
managed properties in our lodging business, the number of
vacation exchange members acquired by our vacation exchange
business, the number of rental weeks sold by our vacation
rentals business and the number of tours generated and vacation
ownership interests sold by our vacation ownership business.
We may be unable to identify acquisition targets that complement
our businesses, and if we are able to identify suitable
acquisition targets, we may not be able to complete acquisitions
on commercially reasonable terms. Our ability to complete
acquisitions depends on a variety of factors, including our
ability to obtain financing on acceptable terms and requisite
government approvals. If we are able to complete acquisitions,
there is no assurance that we will be able to achieve the
revenue and cost benefits that we expected in connection with
such acquisitions or to successfully integrate the acquired
businesses into our existing operations.
Our
international operations are subject to risks not generally
applicable to our domestic operations.
Our international operations are subject to numerous risks
including: exposure to local economic conditions; potential
adverse changes in the diplomatic relations of foreign countries
with the United States; hostility from local populations;
restrictions and taxes on the withdrawal of foreign investment
and earnings; government policies against businesses owned by
foreigners; investment restrictions or requirements; diminished
ability to legally enforce our contractual rights in foreign
countries; foreign exchange restrictions; fluctuations in
foreign currency exchange rates;
33
local laws might conflict with U.S. laws; withholding and
other taxes on remittances and other payments by subsidiaries;
and changes in and application of foreign taxation structures
including value added taxes.
We are
subject to risks related to litigation filed by or against
us.
We are subject to a number of legal actions and the risk of
future litigation as described below under Legal
Proceedings. We cannot predict with certainty the ultimate
outcome and related damages and costs of litigation and other
proceedings filed by or against us. Adverse results in
litigation and other proceedings may harm our business.
We are
subject to certain risks related to our indebtedness, our
securitization of assets, the cost and availability of capital
and the extension of credit by us.
We are a borrower of funds under our credit facilities, credit
lines, senior notes and securitization financings. We are a
lender of funds when we finance purchases of vacation ownership
interests. In connection with our debt obligations, the
securitization of certain of our assets and the extension of
credit by us, we are subject to numerous risks including:
|
|
|
our cash flows from operations or available lines of credit may
be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and
interest;
|
|
|
our leverage may adversely affect our ability to obtain
additional financing;
|
|
|
our leverage requires the dedication of a significant portion of
our cash flows to the payment of principal and interest thus
reducing the availability of cash flows to fund working capital,
capital expenditures or other operating needs;
|
|
|
increases in interest rates;
|
|
|
rating agency downgrades for our debt that could increase our
borrowing costs;
|
|
|
we may not be able to securitize our vacation ownership contract
receivables because of, among other factors, the performance of
the vacation ownership contract receivables, adverse conditions
in the market for vacation ownership loan-backed notes and
asset-backed notes in general, the ability to insure the
securitized vacation ownership contract receivables, and the
risk that the actual amount of uncollectible accounts on our
securitized vacation ownership contract receivables and other
credit we extend is greater than our allowances for doubtful
accounts;
|
|
|
prohibitive cost and inadequate availability of capital could
restrict the development or acquisition of vacation ownership
resorts by us, the financing of purchases of vacation ownership
interests and the renovation and maintenance of properties by
vacation ownership resorts; and
|
|
|
if interest rates increase significantly, we may not be able to
increase the interest rate offered to finance purchases of
vacation ownership interests by the same amount of the increase.
|
Several
of our businesses are subject to extensive regulation and the
cost of compliance or failure to comply with such regulations
may adversely affect us.
Our businesses are heavily regulated by the states or provinces
(including local governments) and countries in which our
operations are conducted. In addition, domestic and foreign
federal, state and local regulators may enact new laws and
regulations that may reduce our revenues, cause our expenses to
increase
and/or
require us to modify substantially our business practices. If we
are not in substantial compliance with applicable laws and
regulations, including, among others, franchising, timeshare,
lending, privacy, marketing and sales, telemarketing, licensing,
labor, employment and immigration, gaming, environmental and
regulations applicable under the Office of Foreign Asset Control
and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, we may be subject to
regulatory actions, fines, penalties and potential criminal
prosecution.
Due to 2007 revisions to the rules of the Federal Trade
Commission relating to registration of franchisors and their
offering documents, certain of our hotel brands will be required
to obtain registration approvals for their franchise disclosure
documents in approximately 13 states. As a result of the
expected significant back log of state
34
regulatory review of these documents along with filings made by
other franchisors, we may be unable to market and sell new
franchises in these states for an extended period of time,
negatively impacting our franchise sales.
We are
dependent on our senior management.
We believe that our future growth depends, in part, on the
continued services of our senior management team. Losing the
services of any members of our senior management team could
adversely affect our strategic and customer relationships and
impede our ability to execute our growth strategies.
The
weakening or unavailability of our intellectual property could
adversely affect our business.
The weakening or unavailability of our trademarks, trade dress
and other intellectual property rights could adversely affect
our business. We generate, maintain, utilize and enforce a
substantial portfolio of trademarks, trade dress and other
intellectual property that are fundamental to the brands that we
use in all of our businesses. There can be no assurance that the
steps we take to protect our intellectual property will be
adequate.
Disruptions
and other impairment of our information technologies and systems
could adversely affect our business.
Any disaster, disruption or other impairment in our technology
capabilities could harm our business. Our businesses depend upon
the use of sophisticated information technologies and systems,
including technology and systems utilized for reservation
systems, vacation exchange systems, property management,
communications, procurement, member record databases, call
centers, operation of our loyalty programs and administrative
systems. The operation, maintenance and updating of these
technologies and systems is dependent upon third-party
technologies, systems and services for which there is no
assurance of uninterrupted availability.
The
market price of our shares may fluctuate.
The market price of our common stock may fluctuate depending
upon many factors some of which may be beyond our control,
including: our quarterly or annual earnings or those of other
companies in our industry; actual or anticipated fluctuations in
our operating results due to seasonality and other factors
related to our business; changes in accounting principles or
rules; announcements by us or our competitors of significant
acquisitions or dispositions; the failure of securities analysts
to cover our common stock; changes in earnings estimates by
securities analysts or our ability to meet those estimates; the
operating and stock price performance of other comparable
companies; overall market fluctuations; and general economic
conditions. Stock markets in general have experienced volatility
that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of a
particular company. These broad market fluctuations may
adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.
Your
percentage ownership in Wyndham Worldwide may be diluted in the
future.
Your percentage ownership in Wyndham Worldwide may be diluted in
the future because of equity awards that we expect will be
granted over time to our directors, officers and employees as
well as due to the exercise of options issued. In addition, our
Board may issue shares of common and preferred stock up to
certain regulatory thresholds without shareholder approval.
Provisions
in our certificate of incorporation, by-laws, stockholder rights
plan and under Delaware law may prevent or delay an acquisition
of our company, which could impact the trading price of our
common stock.
Our certificate of incorporation, by-laws, stockholder rights
plan and Delaware law contain provisions that are intended to
deter coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids
by making such practices or bids unacceptably expensive and to
encourage prospective acquirors to negotiate with our Board
rather than to attempt a hostile takeover. These provisions
include, among others: a Board of Directors that is divided into
three classes with staggered terms; elimination of the right of
our stockholders to act by written consent; rules regarding how
stockholders may present proposals or nominate directors for
election at stockholder meetings; the right of our Board to
issue preferred stock without stockholder approval; and
limitations on the right of stockholders to remove directors.
Under our stockholder rights plan, our Board may issue shares of
stock at a discount to market if a person or group attempts to
acquire us on terms not approved by our Board. Unless our Board
takes prior action, our stockholder rights plan will expire on
April 24, 2008. Delaware law also imposes some restrictions
on mergers and other business combinations between us and any
holder of 15% or more of our outstanding common stock.
35
We cannot
provide assurance that we will continue to pay
dividends.
There can be no assurance that we will have sufficient surplus
under Delaware law to be able to continue to pay dividends. This
may result from extraordinary cash expenses, actual expenses
exceeding contemplated costs, funding of capital expenditures,
or increases in reserves. If we do not pay dividends, the price
of our common stock must appreciate for you to receive a gain on
your investment in Wyndham Worldwide. This appreciation may not
occur.
We are
responsible for certain of Cendants contingent and other
corporate liabilities.
Under the separation agreements we executed with Cendant (now
Avis Budget Group) and former Cendant units, Realogy and
Travelport, we and Realogy are responsible for 37.5% and 62.5%,
respectively, of certain of Cendants contingent and other
corporate liabilities including those relating to unresolved tax
and legal matters and associated costs. We generally are
responsible for the payment of our share of all taxes imposed on
Cendant and certain other subsidiaries and certain contingent
and other corporate liabilities of Cendant
and/or its
subsidiaries to the extent incurred on or prior to
August 23, 2006, including liabilities relating to certain
of Cendants terminated or divested businesses, liabilities
relating to the Travelport sale, the Cendant litigation
described below under Cendant Litigation, generally
any actions with respect to the separation plan and payments
under certain contracts that were not allocated to any specific
party in connection with the separation.
If any party responsible for these liabilities were to default
on its obligations, each non-defaulting party (including Avis
Budget) would be required to pay an equal portion of the amounts
in default. Accordingly, we may, under certain circumstances, be
obligated to pay amounts in excess of our share of the assumed
obligations related to such contingent and other corporate
liabilities including associated costs. On or about
April 10, 2007, Realogy Corporation was acquired by
affiliates of Apollo Management VI, L.P. and no longer trades
its common stock as an independent public company. The
acquisition does not negate Realogys obligation to satisfy
62.5% of such contingent and other corporate liabilities of
Cendant or its subsidiaries pursuant to the terms of the
separation agreement. As a result of the acquisition, however,
Realogy has greater debt obligations and its ability to satisfy
its portion of these liabilities may be adversely impacted.
Not applicable.
36
Our corporate headquarters is located in a leased office at 7
Sylvan Way in Parsippany, New Jersey, which lease expires in
2011. We also lease other Parsippany-based offices, which leases
have varying expiration dates. We have a leased office in
Virginia Beach, Virginia for our Employee Service Center, which
lease expires in 2011.
A new lease for corporate headquarters was signed in 2007, will
commence in late 2008 or early 2009 and expires in 2024. Our
intention, to the extent possible, is to relocate a portion of
our corporate and Lodging personnel into the new site and allow
certain of our existing Parsippany-based leases to expire.
Wyndham
Hotel Group
Our lodging business has its main corporate operations at a
leased office in Parsippany, New Jersey, pursuant to a lease
that expires at the end of 2008. Our lodging business also
leases space for its reservations centers
and/or data
warehouse in Aberdeen, South Dakota; Phoenix, Arizona;
Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada and Saint John, New
Brunswick, Canada pursuant to leases that expire in 2010, 2010,
2012 and 2013, respectively. In addition, our lodging business
leases office space in Rosemont, Illinois expiring in 2008;
Atlanta, Georgia expiring in 2011; Dallas, Texas expiring in
2012; Mission Viejo, CA expiring in 2013; Hong Kong, China
expiring in 2010; Hammersmith, United Kingdom expiring in 2012
and Shanghai, China expiring in 2010.
Group
RCI
Our vacation exchange business has its main corporate operations
at a leased office in Parsippany, New Jersey. Our vacation
exchange business also owns five properties located in the
following cities: Carmel, Indiana; Cork, Ireland; Kettering,
United Kingdom; Mexico City, Mexico; and Albufeira, Portugal.
Our vacation exchange business also has three leased offices
located within the United States pursuant to leases that expire
generally between 2 - 4 years and
48 additional leased spaces in various countries outside
the United States pursuant to leases that expire generally
between 1 - 3 years except for 8 leases that
expire between 2011 - 2019. Our vacation rentals
business operations are managed in seven owned locations
(Earby, United Kingdom; Kettering, United Kingdom (co-located
with our vacation exchange business above); Albufeira, Portugal;
Monterrigioni, Italy; Saarburg, Germany; Romo and Aarhus,
Denmark; and Cork, Ireland); three main leased locations
(Leidschendam, Netherlands; Dunfermline, United Kingdom; and
Hellerup, Denmark) and 17 smaller leased offices throughout
Europe. Our main leased locations operate pursuant to leases
that expire in 2015, 2012, and 2010, respectively. The vacation
exchange and rentals business also occupies space in London,
United Kingdom pursuant to a lease that expires in 2012.
Wyndham
Vacation Ownership
Our vacation ownership business has its main corporate
operations in Orlando, Florida pursuant to several leases, which
expire beginning 2012. Our vacation ownership business also owns
a facility in Redmond, Washington and leases space for call
center and administrative functions in Redmond, Washington
expiring in 2013, Las Vegas, Nevada expiring in 2012 and
Margate, Florida expiring in 2010. In addition, the vacation
ownership business leases approximately 145 marketing and sales
offices, of which approximately 125 are throughout the United
States with various expiration dates, 19 offices are in
Australia expiring within approximately two years, one office in
New Zealand expiring in 2009 and one in Canada expiring in 2010.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
Wyndham
Worldwide Litigation
We are involved in claims and legal actions arising in the
ordinary course of our business including but not limited to:
for our lodging businessbreach of contract, fraud and bad
faith claims between franchisors and franchisees in connection
with franchise agreements and with owners in connection with
management contracts, as well as consumer protection claims and
other statutory claims and negligence claims asserted in
connection with alleged acts or occurrences at franchised or
managed properties; for our vacation exchange and rentals
businessbreach of contract claims by both affiliates and
members in connection with their respective agreements, bad
faith, and consumer protection claims asserted by members and
negligence claims by guests for alleged injuries sustained at
resorts; for our vacation ownership businessbreach of
contract, bad faith, conflict of interest, fraud, consumer
protection claims and other statutory claims by property
owners associations, owners and prospective owners in
connection with the sale or use of vacation ownership interests,
land or the management of vacation ownership resorts,
construction defect claims relating to vacation ownership units
or resorts and negligence claims by guests for alleged injuries
sustained at vacation ownership units or resorts; and for each
of our businesses, bankruptcy
37
proceedings involving efforts to collect receivables from a
debtor in bankruptcy, employment matters involving claims of
discrimination and wage and hour claims, claims of infringement
upon third parties intellectual property rights and
environmental claims.
Cendant
Litigation
On December 21, 2007, Cendant Corporation (known as Avis
Budget Group Inc. since August 29, 2006) and other
parties entered into a settlement agreement with
Ernst & Young LLP to settle all claims between the
parties arising out of In Re Cendant Corporation Litigation,
Master File
No. 98-1664
(WHW) (D.N.J.) (the Securities Action). Under
the settlement agreement, Ernst & Young agreed to pay
an aggregate of $298.5 million to settle all claims among
the parties.
After satisfying obligations to various parties, including the
plaintiff class members in the Securities Action and in the
PRIDES securities class action and certain officers and
directors of HFS Incorporated, Cendant received approximately
$128 million of net proceeds under the settlement
agreement. On December 28, 2007, Cendant distributed all of
those net proceeds to Realogy and us in the following respective
amounts: approximately $80 million pre-tax (or 62.5% of
such net amount) and approximately $48 million pre-tax
($29 million net after tax) (or 37.5% of such net amount),
in accordance with the terms of the Separation Agreement.
Pursuant to the Separation Agreement, Realogy and we approved
the terms of, and authorized Cendant to execute, the settlement
agreement.
Under the Separation Agreement, we agreed to be responsible for
37.5% of certain of Cendants contingent and other
corporate liabilities and associated costs. There is only one
remaining lawsuit related to the acquisition of CUC
International Inc. Such lawsuit is discussed in Note 20 to
the financial statements and in our Current Report on a
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on September 14, 2007.
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
|
Not applicable.
38
PART II
|
|
ITEM 5.
|
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Market
Price of Common Stock
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange
(NYSE) under the symbol WYN. At
January 31, 2008, the number of stockholders of record was
approximately 5,980. The following table sets forth the
quarterly high and low sales prices per share of WYN common
stock as reported by the NYSE for the year ended
December 31, 2007 and the period from July 31, 2006,
the date of Separation, to December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
35.48
|
|
|
$
|
29.95
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
38.04
|
|
|
|
34.40
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
38.69
|
|
|
|
28.32
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
33.46
|
|
|
|
23.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
34.41
|
|
|
$
|
26.07
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
33.25
|
|
|
|
27.68
|
|
Dividend
Policy
We initiated a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share on each
share of Common Stock issued and outstanding during the third
quarter of 2007. The declaration and payment of future dividends
to holders of our common stock will be at the discretion of our
Board of Directors and will depend upon many factors, including
our financial condition, earnings, capital requirements of our
business, covenants associated with certain debt obligations,
legal requirements, regulatory constraints, industry practice
and other factors that our Board deems relevant. There can be no
assurance that a payment of a dividend will or will not occur in
the future.
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
Below is the summary of our Wyndham common stock repurchases by
month for the quarter ended December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
|
Value of Shares that
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as
|
|
|
|
May Yet Be
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly
|
|
|
|
Purchased Under
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
|
Paid per Share
|
|
|
|
Announced Plan
|
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
October 1 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
234,800
|
|
|
|
$
|
32.69
|
|
|
|
|
234,800
|
|
|
|
$
|
179,197,518
|
|
|
November 1 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
358,500
|
|
|
|
$
|
27.72
|
|
|
|
|
358,500
|
|
|
|
$
|
169,275,646
|
|
|
December 1 31,
2007 (*)
|
|
|
|
377,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
25.13
|
|
|
|
|
377,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
163,388,205
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
970,300
|
|
|
|
$
|
27.92
|
|
|
|
|
970,300
|
|
|
|
$
|
163,388,205
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes 62,700 shares
purchased for which the trade date occurred during December 2007
while settlement occurred in January 2008.
|
On August 20, 2007, our Board of Directors authorized a
stock repurchase program that enables us to purchase up to
$200 million of our common stock. From the inception of the
program through December 31, 2007, we repurchased
1.5 million shares at an average price of $29.07. In
addition, we completed previous stock repurchase programs during
2007 by repurchasing 13 million shares at an average price
of $34.92. The Board of Directors 2007 authorization
included increased repurchase capacity for proceeds received
from stock option exercises. From the inception of the program
through December 31, 2007, repurchase capacity increased
$5 million from proceeds received from stock option
exercises. During the period January 1, 2008 through
February 28, 2008, we repurchased an additional
472,800 shares at an average price of $22.19. As of
February 28, 2008, we have $155 million remaining
availability in our program. The amount and timing of specific
repurchases are subject to market conditions, applicable legal
requirements and other factors. Repurchases may be conducted in
the open market or in privately negotiated transactions.
39
Performance
Graph
The Performance Graph is not deemed filed with the SEC and
shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any of our
prior or future filings made with the Commission.
The following graph covers the period from August 1, 2006
to December 31, 2007 and assumes that $100 was invested on
August 1, 2006 in each of our common stock, the S&P
500 Index, the S&P 500 Hotels, Resorts & Cruise
Lines Index (consisting of Carnival plc, Marriott International
Inc., Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. and
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation) and a peer issuer index
(consisting of Marriott International Inc., Choice Hotels
International, Inc. and Starwood Hotels & Resorts
Worldwide, Inc.). The graph assumes that all dividends were
reinvested on the date of payment without payment of any
commissions.
For 2006, the S&P 500 Index and the S&P 500 Hotels,
Resorts & Cruise Lines Index included Hilton Hotels
Corporation. Due to the fact that Hilton Hotels ceased to trade
as a public company in 2007, it is not included in these indices
for 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Total Return
|
|
|
08/01/06
|
|
12/29/06
|
|
12/31/07
|
Wyndham Worldwide
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
100.53
|
|
|
$
|
74.17
|
|
S&P 500 Index
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
112.05
|
|
|
$
|
118.21
|
|
S&P 500 Hotels, Resorts & Cruise Lines Index
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
126.79
|
|
|
$
|
111.05
|
|
Peer Issuer Index
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
125.49
|
|
|
$
|
91.19
|
|
40
ITEM 6. SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of or For The Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
Statement of Income Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
4,360
|
|
|
$
|
3,842
|
|
|
$
|
3,471
|
|
|
$
|
3,014
|
|
|
$
|
2,652
|
|
Expenses (a)
|
|
|
3,650
|
|
|
|
3,265
|
|
|
|
2,851
|
|
|
|
2,414
|
|
|
|
2,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
626
|
|
|
|
587
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
Minority interest, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
431
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
403
|
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
$
|
431
|
|
|
$
|
349
|
|
|
$
|
299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per
Share (b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
|
|
$
|
1.78
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
|
$
|
1.49
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
|
$
|
1.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
$
|
2.20
|
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
|
$
|
1.49
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
2.20
|
|
|
$
|
1.44
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
|
$
|
1.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized
assets (c)
|
|
$
|
2,596
|
|
|
$
|
1,844
|
|
|
$
|
1,515
|
|
|
$
|
1,159
|
|
|
$
|
958
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
10,459
|
|
|
|
9,520
|
|
|
|
9,167
|
|
|
|
8,343
|
|
|
|
7,041
|
|
Securitized debt
|
|
|
2,081
|
|
|
|
1,463
|
|
|
|
1,135
|
|
|
|
909
|
|
|
|
774
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,526
|
|
|
|
1,437
|
|
|
|
907
|
|
|
|
859
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
Total stockholders/invested
equity (d)
|
|
|
3,516
|
|
|
|
3,559
|
|
|
|
5,033
|
|
|
|
4,679
|
|
|
|
4,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Statistics:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging (e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
rooms (f)
|
|
|
550,600
|
|
|
|
543,200
|
|
|
|
532,700
|
|
|
|
521,200
|
|
|
|
518,700
|
|
Weighted average rooms
available (g)
|
|
|
532,300
|
|
|
|
527,700
|
|
|
|
519,000
|
|
|
|
508,200
|
|
|
|
524,700
|
|
RevPAR (h)
|
|
$
|
36.48
|
|
|
$
|
34.95
|
|
|
$
|
31.00
|
|
|
$
|
27.55
|
|
|
$
|
25.92
|
|
Royalty, marketing and reservation revenue
(in
000s) (i)
|
|
$
|
489,041
|
|
|
$
|
471,039
|
|
|
$
|
408,620
|
|
|
$
|
371,058
|
|
|
$
|
357,432
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of members (in
000s) (j)
|
|
|
3,526
|
|
|
|
3,356
|
|
|
|
3,209
|
|
|
|
3,054
|
|
|
|
2,948
|
|
Annual dues and exchange revenues per
member (k)
|
|
$
|
135.85
|
|
|
$
|
135.62
|
|
|
$
|
135.76
|
|
|
$
|
134.82
|
|
|
$
|
131.13
|
|
Vacation rental transactions (in
000s) (l)
|
|
|
1,376
|
|
|
|
1,344
|
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
1,104
|
|
|
|
882
|
|
Average net price per vacation
rental (m)
|
|
$
|
422.83
|
|
|
$
|
370.93
|
|
|
$
|
359.27
|
|
|
$
|
328.77
|
|
|
$
|
248.65
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross vacation ownership interest (VOI) sales
(in
000s) (n)
|
|
$
|
1,993,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,743,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,396,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,254,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,146,000
|
|
Tours (o)
|
|
|
1,144,000
|
|
|
|
1,046,000
|
|
|
|
934,000
|
|
|
|
859,000
|
|
|
|
925,000
|
|
Volume Per Guest
(VPG) (p)
|
|
$
|
1,606
|
|
|
$
|
1,486
|
|
|
$
|
1,368
|
|
|
$
|
1,287
|
|
|
$
|
1,138
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes $16 million and
$99 million of separation and related costs
($10 million and $69 million, after-tax) and
$46 million and $32 million of a net benefit from the
resolution of and adjustment to certain contingent liabilities
and assets ($26 million and $30 million, after-tax)
during 2007 and 2006, respectively.
|
(b) |
|
During 2007, this calculation is
based on basic and diluted weighted average shares of
181 million and 183 million, respectively. For all
periods prior to our date of Separation (July 31, 2006),
weighted average shares were calculated as one share of Wyndham
common stock outstanding for every five shares of Cendant common
stock outstanding as of July 21, 2006, the record date for
the distribution of Wyndham common stock. As such, during 2006,
this calculation is based on basic and diluted weighted average
shares of 198 million and 199 million, respectively.
During 2003 through 2005, this calculation is based on basic and
diluted weighted average shares of 200.
|
(c) |
|
Represents the portion of vacation
ownership contract receivables and other vacation ownership
related assets that collateralize our debt. Refer to
Note 13 to the Consolidated and Combined Financial
Statements for further information.
|
(d) |
|
Represents Wyndham Worldwides
stand-alone stockholders equity since August 1, 2006
and Cendants net investment (capital contributions and
earnings from operations less dividends) in Wyndham Worldwide
and accumulated other comprehensive income for 2003 through
July 31, 2006, our date of Separation.
|
(e) |
|
Ramada International was acquired
on December 10, 2004, Wyndham Hotels and Resorts was
acquired on October 11, 2005 and Baymont Inn &
Suites was acquired on April 7, 2006. The results of
operations of these businesses have been included from their
acquisition dates forward.
|
(f) |
|
Represents the number of rooms at
lodging properties at the end of the year which are either
(i) under franchise and/or management agreements,
(ii) properties affiliated with the Wyndham Hotels and
Resorts brand for which we receive a fee for reservation and/or
other services provided and (iii) properties managed under
the CHI Limited joint venture. The amounts in 2007 and 2006
include 6,856 and 4,993 affiliated rooms, respectively.
|
41
|
|
|
(g) |
|
Represents the weighted average
number of hotels rooms available for rental during the year.
|
(h) |
|
Represents revenue per available
room and is calculated by multiplying the percentage of
available rooms occupied for the year by the average rate
charged for renting a lodging room for one day.
|
(i) |
|
Royalty, marketing and reservation
revenue are typically based on a percentage of the gross room
revenues of each franchised hotel. Royalty revenue is generally
a fee charged to each franchised hotel for the use of one of our
trade names, while marketing and reservation revenues are fees
that we collect and are contractually obligated to spend to
support marketing and reservation activities.
|
(j) |
|
Represents members in our vacation
exchange programs who pay annual membership dues. For additional
fees, such members are entitled to exchange intervals for
intervals at other properties affiliated with our vacation
exchange business. In addition, certain members may exchange
intervals for other leisure-related products and services.
|
(k) |
|
Represents total revenues from
annual membership dues and exchange fees generated during the
year divided by the average number of vacation exchange members
during the year.
|
(l) |
|
Represents the gross number of
transactions that are generated in connection with customers
booking their vacation rental stays through us. In our European
vacation rentals businesses, one rental transaction is recorded
each time a standard one-week rental is booked; however, in the
United States one rental transaction is recorded each time a
vacation rental stay is booked, regardless of whether it is less
than or more than one week.
|
(m) |
|
Represents the net rental price
generated from renting vacation properties to customers divided
by the number of rental transactions.
|
(n) |
|
Represents gross sales of VOIs
(including tele-sales upgrades, which are a component of upgrade
sales) before deferred sales and loan loss provisions.
|
(o) |
|
Represents the number of tours
taken by guests in our efforts to sell VOIs.
|
(p) |
|
Represents revenue per guest and is
calculated by dividing the gross VOI sales, excluding
tele-sales upgrades, which are a component of upgrade sales, by
the number of tours.
|
In presenting the financial data above in conformity with
general accepted accounting principles, we are required to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of OperationsFinancial Condition,
Liquidity and Capital ResourcesCritical Accounting
Policies, for a detailed discussion of the accounting
policies that we believe require subjective and complex
judgments that could potentially affect reported results.
Between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2007, we
completed a number of acquisitions, the results of operations
and financial position of which have been included beginning
from the relevant acquisition dates. During this period, our
acquisitions included the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts and Baymont
Inn & Suites brands, a vacation ownership and resort
management business, Two Flags Joint Venture LLC, Ramada
International, Landal GreenParks, Canvas Holidays Limited and
FFD Development Company, LLC. See Note 4 to the
Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements for a more
detailed discussion of the acquisitions completed during 2005,
2006 and 2007.
During first quarter 2006, we recorded a non-cash charge of
$65 million, after tax, to reflect the cumulative effect of
accounting changes as a result of our adoption of Statement of
Financial Standards (SFAS) No. 152,
Accounting for Real Estate Time-Sharing Transactions
(SFAS No. 152) and Statement of Position
No. 04-2,
Accounting for Real Estate Time-Sharing Transactions
(SOP 04-2)
on January 1, 2006. See Note 2 to the Consolidated and
Combined Financial Statements for further details.
42
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
Forward-Looking
Statements
This report includes forward-looking statements, as
that term is defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission
in its rules, regulations and releases. Forward-looking
statements are any statements other than statements of
historical fact, including statements regarding our
expectations, beliefs, hopes, intentions or strategies regarding
the future. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be
identified by the use of words such as may,
expects, should, believes,
plans, anticipates,
estimates, predicts,
potential, continue, or other words of
similar meaning. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks
and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those discussed in, or implied by, the
forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a
difference include, but are not limited to, general economic
conditions, our financial and business prospects, our capital
requirements, our financing prospects, our relationships with
associates, and those disclosed as risks under Risk
Factors in Part I, Item 1A, above. We caution
readers that any such statements are based on currently
available operational, financial and competitive information,
and they should not place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements, which reflect managements
opinion only as of the date on which they were made. Except as
required by law, we disclaim any obligation to review or update
these forward-looking statements to reflect events or
circumstances as they occur.
BUSINESS
AND OVERVIEW
We are a global provider of hospitality products and services
and operate our business in the following three segments:
|
|
|
|
|
Lodgingfranchises hotels in the upscale,
middle and economy segments of the lodging industry and provides
property management services to owners of luxury, upscale and
midscale hotels.
|
|
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentalsprovides
vacation exchange products and services to owners of intervals
of vacation ownership interests, or VOIs, and markets vacation
rental properties primarily on behalf of independent owners.
|
|
|
|
Vacation Ownershipmarkets and sells VOIs to
individual consumers, provides consumer financing in connection
with the sale of VOIs and provides property management services
at resorts.
|
Separation
from Cendant
On July 31, 2006, Cendant Corporation (or former
Parent) distributed all of the shares of Wyndham common
stock to the holders of Cendant common stock issued and
outstanding on July 21, 2006, the record date for the
distribution. On August 1, 2006, we commenced regular
way trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the
symbol WYN.
Before our separation from Cendant, we entered into separation,
transition services and several other agreements with Cendant,
Realogy and Travelport to effect the separation and
distribution, govern the relationships among the parties after
the separation and allocate among the parties Cendants
assets, liabilities and obligations attributable to periods
prior to the separation. Under the Separation and Distribution
Agreement, we assumed 37.5% of certain contingent and other
corporate liabilities of Cendant or its subsidiaries which were
not primarily related to our business or the businesses of
Realogy, Travelport or Avis Budget, and Realogy assumed 62.5% of
these contingent and other corporate liabilities. These include
liabilities relating to Cendants terminated or divested
businesses, the Travelport sale on August 22, 2006, taxes
of Travelport for taxable periods through the date of the
Travelport sale, certain litigation matters, generally any
actions relating to the separation plan and payments under
certain contracts that were not allocated to any specific party
in connection with the separation.
On December 15, 2006, Realogy entered into an agreement and
plan of merger with an affiliate of Apollo Management VI, L.P.
(Apollo) and, on April 10, 2007, Realogy
announced that affiliates of Apollo had completed the merger.
Although Realogy no longer trades its common stock as an
independent public company, the merger does not negate
Realogys obligation to satisfy 62.5% of certain contingent
and other corporate liabilities of Cendant or its subsidiaries
pursuant to the terms of the separation agreement. As a result
of the sale, Realogys senior debt credit rating was
downgraded to below investment grade. Under the Separation
Agreement, if Realogy experienced such a change of control and
suffered such a ratings downgrade, it was required to post a
letter of credit in an amount acceptable to us and Avis Budget
Group to satisfy the fair value of Realogys
indemnification obligations for
43
the Cendant legacy contingent liabilities in the event Realogy
does not otherwise satisfy such obligations to the extent they
become due. On April 26, 2007, Realogy posted a
$500 million irrevocable standby letter of credit from a
major commercial bank in favor of Avis Budget Group and upon
which demand may be made if Realogy does not otherwise satisfy
its obligations for its share of the Cendant legacy contingent
liabilities. The letter of credit can be adjusted from time to
time based upon the outstanding contingent liabilities. The
issuance of this letter of credit does not relieve or limit
Realogys obligations for these liabilities.
Because we now conduct our business as a separate stand-alone
public company, our historical financial information does not
reflect what our results of operations, financial position or
cash flows would have been had we been a separate stand-alone
public company during the periods presented. Therefore, the
historical financial information for such periods may not
necessarily be indicative of what our results of operations,
financial position or cash flows will be in the future and may
not be comparable to periods ending after July 31, 2006.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Lodging
We enter into agreements to franchise our lodging franchise
systems to independent hotel owners. Our standard franchise
agreement typically has a term of 15 to 20 years and
provides a franchisee with certain rights to terminate the
franchise agreement before the term of the agreement under
certain circumstances. The principal source of revenues from
franchising hotels is ongoing franchise fees, which are
comprised of royalty fees and other fees relating to marketing
and reservation services. Ongoing franchise fees typically are
based on a percentage of gross room revenues of each franchised
hotel and are accrued as earned and upon becoming due from the
franchisee. An estimate of uncollectible ongoing franchise fees
is charged to bad debt expense and included in operating
expenses on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income.
Lodging revenue also includes initial franchise fees, which are
recognized as revenue when all material services or conditions
have been substantially performed, which is either when a
franchised hotel opens for business or when a franchise
agreement is terminated as it has been determined that the
franchised hotel will not open.
Our franchise agreements also require the payment of fees for
certain services, including marketing and reservations. With
such fees, we provide our franchised properties with a suite of
operational and administrative services, including access to
(i) an international, centralized, brand-specific
reservations system, (ii) advertising,
(iii) promotional and co-marketing programs,
(iv) referrals, (v) technology, (vi) training and
(vii) volume purchasing. We are contractually obligated to
expend the marketing and reservation fees we collect from
franchisees in accordance with the franchise agreements; as
such, revenues earned in excess of costs incurred are accrued as
a liability for future marketing or reservation costs. Costs
incurred in excess of revenues are expensed. In accordance with
our franchise agreements, we include an allocation of costs
required to carry out marketing and reservation activities
within marketing and reservation expenses.
We also provide property management services for hotels under
management contracts. Our standard management agreement
typically has a term of up to 20 years. Our management fees
are comprised of base fees, which are typically calculated based
upon a specified percentage of gross revenues from hotel
operations, and incentive fees, which are typically calculated
based upon a specified percentage of a hotels gross
operating profit. Management fee revenue is recognized when
earned in accordance with the terms of the contract. We incur
certain reimbursable costs on behalf of managed hotel properties
and report reimbursements received from managed properties as
revenue and the costs incurred on their behalf as expenses.
Management fee revenues are recorded as a component of franchise
fee revenues and reimbursable revenues are recorded as a
component of service fees and membership revenue on the
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income. The costs, which
principally relate to payroll costs for operational employees
who work at the managed hotels, are reflected as a component of
operating expenses on the Consolidated and Combined Statements
of Income. The reimbursements from hotel owners are based upon
the costs incurred with no added margin; as a result, these
reimbursable costs have little to no effect on our operating
income. Management fee revenue and revenue related to payroll
reimbursements was $6 million and $92 million,
respectively, during 2007, $4 million and $69 million,
respectively, during 2006 and $1 million and
$17 million, respectively, during the period
October 11, 2005 (date of Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand
acquisition, which includes management contracts) through
December 31, 2005.
We also earn revenue from administering the TripRewards loyalty
program. When a member stays at a participating hotel, we charge
our franchisee/managed property owner a fee based upon a
percentage of room revenue generated from such stay. This fee is
accrued as earned and upon becoming due from the franchisee.
44
Within our Lodging segment, we measure operating performance
using the following key operating statistics: (i) number of
rooms, which represents the number of rooms at lodging
properties at the end of the year, (ii) weighted average
rooms, which represents the weighted average number of hotel
rooms available for rental for the year, (iii) RevPAR,
which is calculated by multiplying the percentage of available
rooms occupied for the year by the average rate charged for
renting a lodging room for one day and (iv) royalty,
marketing and reservation revenues, which are typically based on
a percentage of the gross room revenues of each franchised hotel.
Vacation
Exchange and Rentals
As a provider of vacation exchange services, we enter into
affiliation agreements with developers of vacation ownership
properties to allow owners of intervals to trade their intervals
for certain other intervals within our vacation exchange
business and, for some members, for other leisure-related
products and services. Additionally, as a marketer of vacation
rental properties, generally we enter into contracts for
exclusive periods of time with property owners to market the
rental of such properties to rental customers. Our vacation
exchange business derives a majority of its revenues from annual
membership dues and exchange fees from members trading their
intervals. Annual dues revenue represents the annual membership
fees from members who participate in our vacation exchange
business and, for additional fees, have the right to exchange
their intervals for certain other intervals within our vacation
exchange business and, for certain members, for other
leisure-related products and services. We record revenue from
annual membership dues as deferred income on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets and recognize it on a straight-line basis over
the membership period during which delivery of publications, if
applicable, and other services are provided to the members.
Exchange fees are generated when members exchange their
intervals for equivalent values of rights and services, which
may include intervals at other properties within our vacation
exchange business or other leisure-related products and
services. Exchange fees are recognized as revenue when the
exchange requests have been confirmed to the member. Our
vacation rentals business derives its revenue principally from
fees, which generally range from approximately 45% to 65% of the
gross rent charged to rental customers. The majority of the
time, we act on behalf of the owners of the rental properties to
generate our fees. We provide reservation services to the
independent property owners and receive the
agreed-upon
fee for the service provided. We remit the gross rental fee
received from the renter to the independent property owner, net
of our
agreed-upon
fee. Revenue from such fees is recognized in the period that the
rental reservation is made, net of expected cancellations. Upon
confirmation of the rental reservation, the rental customer and
property owner generally have a direct relationship for
additional services to be performed. Cancellations for 2007,
2006 and 2005 each totaled less than 5% of rental transactions
booked. Our revenue is earned when evidence of an arrangement
exists, delivery has occurred or the services have been
rendered, the sellers price to the buyer is fixed or
determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. We also
earn rental fees in connection with properties we own or lease
under capital leases and such fees are recognized when the
rental customers stay occurs, as this is the point at
which the service is rendered.
Within our Vacation Exchange and Rentals segment, we measure
operating performance using the following key operating
statistics: (i) average number of vacation exchange
members, which represents members in our vacation exchange
programs who pay annual membership dues and are entitled, for
additional fees, to exchange their intervals for intervals at
other properties affiliated within our vacation exchange
business and, for certain members, for other leisure-related
products and services, (ii) annual membership dues and
exchange revenue per member, which represents the total annual
dues and exchange fees generated for the year divided by the
average number of vacation exchange members during the year,
(iii) vacation rental transactions, which represents the
gross number of transactions that are generated in connection
with customers booking their vacation rental stays through us
and (iv) average net price per vacation rental, which
represents the net rental price generated from renting vacation
properties to customers divided by the number of rental
transactions.
Vacation
Ownership
We market and sell VOIs to individual consumers, provide
property management services at resorts and provide consumer
financing in connection with the sale of VOIs. Our vacation
ownership business derives the majority of its revenues from
sales of VOIs and derives other revenues from consumer financing
and property management. Our sales of VOIs are either cash sales
or seller-financed sales. In order for us to recognize revenues
of VOI sales under the full accrual method of accounting
described in SFAS No. 66, Accounting of Sales of
Real Estate for fully constructed inventory, a binding
sales contract must have been executed, the statutory rescission
period must have expired (after which time the purchasers are
not entitled to a refund except for nondelivery by us),
receivables must have been deemed collectible and the remainder
of our obligations must have been substantially completed. In
addition, before we recognize any revenues on VOI sales, the
purchaser of the VOI must have met the initial investment
criteria and, as applicable, the continuing investment criteria,
by executing a legally binding financing contract. A purchaser
has met the initial investment criteria when a minimum down
payment of 10% is received by us. As a result of the adoption of
SFAS No. 152 and
SOP 04-2
on January 1, 2006, we must also take into
45
consideration the fair value of certain incentives provided to
the purchaser when assessing the adequacy of the
purchasers initial investment. In those cases where
financing is provided to the purchaser by us, the purchaser is
obligated to remit monthly payments under financing contracts
that represent the purchasers continuing investment. The
contractual terms of seller-provided financing agreements
require that the contractual level of annual principal payments
be sufficient to amortize the loan over a customary period for
the VOI being financed, which is generally seven to ten years,
and payments under the financing contracts begin within
45 days of the sale and receipt of the minimum down payment
of 10%. If all of the criteria for a VOI sale to qualify under
the full accrual method of accounting have been met, as
discussed above, except that construction of the VOI purchased
is not complete, we recognize revenues using the
percentage-of-completion method of accounting provided that the
preliminary construction phase is complete and that a minimum
sales level has been met (to assure that the property will not
revert to a rental property). The preliminary stage of
development is deemed to be complete when the engineering and
design work is complete, the construction contracts have been
executed, the site has been cleared, prepared and excavated, and
the building foundation is complete. The completion percentage
is determined by the proportion of real estate inventory costs
incurred to total estimated costs. These estimated costs are
based upon historical experience and the related contractual
terms. The remaining revenue and related costs of sales,
including commissions and direct expenses, are deferred and
recognized as the remaining costs are incurred. Until a contract
for sale qualifies for revenue recognition, all payments
received are accounted for as restricted cash and deposits
within other current assets and deferred income, respectively,
on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Commissions and other direct
costs related to the sale are deferred until the sale is
recorded. If a contract is cancelled before qualifying as a
sale, non-recoverable expenses are charged to operating expense
in the current period on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income.
We also offer consumer financing as an option to customers
purchasing VOIs, which are typically collateralized by the
underlying VOI. Generally, the financing terms are for seven to
ten years. An estimate of uncollectible amounts is recorded at
the time of the sale with a charge to the provision for loan
losses on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income.
Upon the adoption of SFAS No. 152 and
SOP 04-2
on January 1, 2006, the provision for loan losses is
classified as a reduction of vacation ownership interest sales
on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income. The
interest income earned from the financing arrangements is earned
on the principal balance outstanding over the life of the
arrangement.
We also provide day-to-day-management services, including
oversight of housekeeping services, maintenance and certain
accounting and administrative services for property owners
associations and clubs. In some cases, our employees serve as
officers
and/or
directors of these associations and clubs in accordance with
their by-laws and associated regulations. Management fee revenue
is recognized when earned in accordance with the terms of the
contract and is recorded as a component of service fees and
membership on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of
Income. The costs, which principally relate to the payroll costs
for management of the associations, clubs and the resort
properties where we are the employer, are reflected as a
component of operating expenses on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income. Reimbursements are based upon the costs
incurred with no added margin and thus presentation of these
reimbursable costs has little to no effect on our operating
income. Management fee revenue and revenue related to
reimbursements was $146 million and $164 million,
respectively, during 2007, $112 million and
$141 million, respectively, during 2006 and
$91 million and $124 million, respectively, during
2005. During 2007, 2006 and 2005, one of the associations that
we manage paid Group RCI $15 million, $13 million and
$11 million, respectively, for exchange services.
During 2007, 2006 and 2005, gross sales of VOIs were reduced by
$22 million, $22 million and $17 million,
respectively, of revenue that is deferred under the percentage
of completion method of accounting. Under the percentage of
completion method of accounting, a portion of the total revenue
from a vacation ownership contract sale is not recognized if the
construction of the vacation resort has not yet been fully
completed. Such revenue will be recognized in future periods in
proportion to the costs incurred as compared to the total
expected costs for completion of construction of the vacation
resort.
Within our Vacation Ownership segment, we measure operating
performance using the following key metrics:
(i) gross VOI sales (including tele-sales upgrades,
which are a component of upgrade sales) before deferred sales
and loan loss provisions, (ii) tours, which represents the
number of tours taken by guests in our efforts to sell VOIs and
(iii) volume per guest, or VPG, which represents revenue
per guest and is calculated by dividing the gross VOI
sales, excluding tele-sales upgrades, which are a component of
upgrade sales, by the number of tours.
Other
Items
We record lodging-related marketing and reservation revenues,
TripRewards revenues, as well as property management services
revenues for both our Lodging and Vacation Ownership segments,
in accordance with
46
Emerging Issues Task Force Issue
99-19,
Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an
Agent, which requires that these revenues be recorded on a
gross basis.
Discussed below are our consolidated and combined results of
operations and the results of operations for each of our
reportable segments. The reportable segments presented below
represent our operating segments for which separate financial
information is available and which is utilized on a regular
basis by our chief operating decision maker to assess
performance and to allocate resources. In identifying our
reportable segments, we also consider the nature of services
provided by our operating segments. Management evaluates the
operating results of each of our reportable segments based upon
revenue and EBITDA, which is defined as net income
before depreciation and amortization, interest (excluding
interest on securitized vacation ownership debt), income taxes,
minority interest and cumulative effect of accounting change,
net of tax, each of which is presented on the Consolidated and
Combined Statements of Income. Our presentation of EBITDA may
not be comparable to similarly-titled measures used by other
companies.
EBITDA for periods prior to July 31, 2006 includes cost
allocations from Cendant representing our portion of general
corporate overhead. For the period January 1, 2006 to
July 31, 2006 and the year ended December 31, 2005,
Cendant allocated $20 million and $36 million,
respectively, of general corporate overhead. Cendant allocated
such costs to us based on a percentage of our forecasted
revenues. General corporate expense allocations include costs
related to Cendants executive management, tax, accounting,
legal, treasury and cash management, certain employee benefits
and real estate usage for common space. The allocations were not
necessarily indicative of the actual expenses that would have
been incurred had we been operating as a separate, stand-alone
public company for the periods presented.
OPERATING
STATISTICS
The following table presents our operating statistics for the
years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. See Results of
Operations section for a discussion as to how these operating
statistics affected our business for the periods presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
% Change
|
|
Lodging
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
rooms (a)
|
|
|
550,600
|
|
|
|
543,200
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Weighted average rooms
available (b)
|
|
|
532,300
|
|
|
|
527,700
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
RevPAR (c)
|
|
$
|
36.48
|
|
|
$
|
34.95
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Royalty, marketing and reservation revenue (in
000s) (d)
|
|
$
|
489,041
|
|
|
$
|
471,039
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of members (in
000s) (e)
|
|
|
3,526
|
|
|
|
3,356
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Annual dues and exchange revenues per
member (f)
|
|
$
|
135.85
|
|
|
$
|
135.62
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation rental transactions (in
000s) (g)
|
|
|
1,376
|
|
|
|
1,344
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Average net price per vacation
rental (h)
|
|
$
|
422.83
|
|
|
$
|
370.93
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross VOI sales (in
000s) (i)
|
|
$
|
1,993,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,743,000
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Tours (j)
|
|
|
1,144,000
|
|
|
|
1,046,000
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Volume Per Guest
(VPG) (k)
|
|
$
|
1,606
|
|
|
$
|
1,486
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents the number of rooms at
lodging properties at the end of the year which are either
(i) under franchise and/or management agreements,
(ii) properties affiliated with the Wyndham Hotels and
Resorts brand for which we receive a fee for reservation and
other services provided and (iii) properties managed under
the CHI Limited joint venture. The amounts in 2007 and 2006
include 6,856 and 4,993 affiliated rooms, respectively.
|
(b) |
|
Represents the weighted average
number of hotel rooms available for rental during the year.
|
(c) |
|
Represents revenue per available
room and is calculated by multiplying the percentage of
available rooms occupied during the year by the average rate
charged for renting a lodging room for one day.
|
(d) |
|
Royalty, marketing and reservation
revenue are typically based on a percentage of the gross room
revenues of each franchised hotel. Royalty revenue is generally
a fee charged to each franchised hotel for the use of one of our
trade names, while marketing and reservation revenues are fees
that we collect and are contractually obligated to spend to
support marketing and reservation activities.
|
(e) |
|
Represents members in our vacation
exchange programs who pay annual membership dues. For additional
fees, such participants are entitled to exchange intervals for
intervals at other properties affiliated with our vacation
exchange business. In addition, certain members may exchange
intervals for other leisure-related products and services.
|
(f) |
|
Represents total revenues from
annual membership dues and exchange fees generated for the year
divided by the average number of vacation exchange members
during the year.
|
(g) |
|
Represents the gross number of
transactions that are generated in connection with customers
booking their vacation rental stays through us. In our European
vacation rentals businesses, one rental transaction is recorded
each time a standard one-week rental is booked; however, in the
United States, one rental transaction is recorded each time a
vacation rental stay is booked, regardless of whether it is less
than or more than one week.
|
47
|
|
|
(h) |
|
Represents the net rental price
generated from renting vacation properties to customers divided
by the number of rental transactions. On a comparable basis
(excluding the impact of foreign exchange movements), such
increase was 6%.
|
(i) |
|
Represents gross sales of VOIs
(including tele-sales upgrades, which are a component of upgrade
sales) before deferred sales and loan loss provisions.
|
(j) |
|
Represents the number of tours
taken by guests in our efforts to sell VOIs.
|
(k) |
|
Represents revenue per guest and is
calculated by dividing the gross VOI sales, excluding
tele-sales upgrades, which are a component of upgrade sales, by
the number of tours.
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2007 vs. Year Ended December 31,
2006
Our consolidated and combined results comprised the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
4,360
|
|
|
$
|
3,842
|
|
|
$
|
518
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
3,650
|
|
|
|
3,265
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
403
|
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2007, our net revenues increased $518 million (13%)
principally due to (i) a $205 million increase in net
sales of VOIs at our vacation ownership businesses due to higher
tour flow and an increase in VPG; (ii) an $83 million
increase in net revenues from rental transactions primarily due
to growth in rental transaction volume, an increase in the
average net price per rental and the conversion of two of our
Landal parks from franchised to managed; (iii) a
$67 million increase in net consumer financing revenues
earned on vacation ownership contract receivables due primarily
to growth in the portfolio; (iv) a $64 million
increase in net revenues in our lodging business, primarily due
to RevPAR growth, incremental reimbursable revenues and
incremental net revenues generated by our TripRewards loyalty
program; (v) $57 million of incremental property
management fees within our vacation ownership business primarily
as a result of growth in the number of units under management;
(vi) a $24 million increase in annual dues and
exchange revenues due to growth in the average number of members
and favorable transaction pricing, partially offset by a decline
in exchange transactions per member and
(vii) $13 million of incremental ancillary revenues
from our vacation ownership and vacation exchange and rentals
businesses. The net revenue increase at our vacation exchange
and rentals business includes the favorable impact of foreign
currency translation of $49 million.
Total expenses increased $385 million (12%) principally
reflecting (i) a $336 million increase in operating
and administrative expenses primarily related to incremental
corporate costs incurred as a stand-alone public company,
additional commission expense resulting from increased VOI
sales, increased volume-related expenses and staffing costs due
to growth in our vacation exchange and rentals and vacation
ownership businesses, increased costs related to the property
management services that we provide at our vacation ownership
business, increased interest expense on our securitized debt,
which is included in operating expenses, increased payroll costs
paid on behalf of property owners in our lodging business, for
which we are reimbursed by the property owners, increased costs
related to sales incentives awarded to owners at our vacation
ownership business, increased resort services expenses at our
vacation exchange and rentals business as a result of converting
two of our Landal parks from franchised to managed and increased
expenses at our lodging business primarily related to higher
information technology costs, expanding our international
operations and providing ancillary services to our franchisees;
(ii) an $87 million increase in marketing and
reservation expenses primarily resulting from increased
marketing initiatives across our lodging and vacation ownership
businesses; (iii) $59 million of increased cost of
sales primarily associated with increased VOI sales; and
(iv) the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation
on expenses at our vacation exchange and rentals business of
$39 million. These increases were partially offset by
(i) $83 million of decreased costs related to our
separation from Cendant; (ii) $46 million of a net
benefit related to the resolution of and adjustment to certain
contingent liabilities and assets; and (iii) the absence of
a $21 million charge recorded at our vacation exchange and
rentals business during the second quarter of 2006 related to
local taxes payable to certain foreign jurisdictions.
48
The increase in depreciation and amortization of
$18 million primarily resulted from technology and fixed
asset investments placed into service during 2007. Other income,
net primarily reflects an $8 million pre-tax gain on the
sale of certain vacation ownership properties and related assets
during 2007 that were no longer consistent with our development
plans. Interest expense increased $6 million and interest
income decreased $21 million during 2007 primarily due to
our current capital structure as a result of our separation from
Cendant. Our effective tax rate increased to 38.5% in 2007 from
35.1% in 2006 primarily due to an increase in nondeductible
items and the absence of a state tax benefit recognized in 2006.
We recorded an after tax charge of $65 million during the
first quarter of 2006 as a cumulative effect of an accounting
change related to the adoption of SFAS No. 152. Such
charge consisted of (i) a pre-tax charge of
$105 million representing the deferral of revenue, costs
associated with sales of VOIs that were recognized prior to
January 1, 2006 and the recognition of certain expenses
that were previously deferred and (ii) an associated tax
benefit of $40 million.
As a result of these items, our net income increased
$116 (40%) million during 2007 as compared to 2006.
Following is a discussion of the results of each of our
segments, interest expense/income and other income net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
725
|
|
|
$
|
661
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
|
$
|
208
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
1,218
|
|
|
|
1,119
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
2,425
|
|
|
|
2,068
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Reportable Segments
|
|
|
4,368
|
|
|
|
3,848
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
894
|
|
|
|
798
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Corporate and
Other (a)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company
|
|
$
|
4,360
|
|
|
$
|
3,842
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
|
725
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
655
|
|
|
$
|
542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes the elimination of
transactions between segments.
|
Lodging
Net revenues and EBITDA increased $64 million (10%) and
$15 million (7%), respectively, during 2007 compared with
2006 primarily reflecting strong RevPAR gains across the
majority of our brands, the success of our TripRewards loyalty
program and incremental property management reimbursable
revenues. Such increases were partially offset in EBITDA by
increased expenses, particularly for marketing activities.
The increase in net revenues includes (i) $23 million
of incremental reimbursable revenues earned by our property
management business, (ii) an $18 million (4%) increase
in royalty, marketing and reservation revenues, which was
primarily due to RevPAR growth of 4%,
(iii) $12 million of incremental revenue generated by
our TripRewards loyalty program primarily due to increased
member stays and (iv) an $11 million increase in other
revenue primarily due to fees generated upon execution of
franchise contracts and ancillary services that we provide to
our franchisees. The $23 million of incremental
reimbursable revenues earned by our property management business
primarily relates to payroll costs that we incur and pay on
behalf of property owners, for which we are reimbursed by the
property owner. As the reimbursements are made based upon cost
with no added margin, the recorded revenue is offset by the
associated expense and there is no resultant impact on EBITDA.
The $18 million increase in royalty, marketing and
reservation revenues was substantially driven by price
increases, as well as occupancy increases, reflecting the
beneficial impact of management and marketing initiatives and an
increased focus on quality enhancements, including strengthening
our brand standards, as well as an overall improvement in the
economy and midscale lodging segments, which are the segments
where we primarily compete.
49
EBITDA further reflects (i) $15 million of higher
expenses primarily resulting from incremental revenues received
from our franchisees, as discussed above,
(ii) $5 million of increased information technology
costs related to developing a more robust infrastructure to
support current and future global growth and (iii) an
increase of $6 million in other expenses primarily related
to expanding our international operations and providing
ancillary services to our franchisees. The $15 million of
increased marketing spend is reflective of (i) incremental
expenditures in our TripRewards loyalty program,
(ii) higher fees received from our franchisees (where we
are contractually obligated to expend these fees for marketing
purposes) and (iii) additional campaigns in international
regions that we have targeted for growth.
As of December 31, 2007, we had approximately 6,540
properties and approximately 550,600 rooms in our system.
Additionally, our hotel development pipeline included
approximately 930 hotels and approximately 105,000 rooms, of
which approximately 32% were international and approximately 44%
were new construction as of December 31, 2007.
Vacation
Exchange and Rentals
Net revenues and EBITDA increased $99 million (9%) and
$28 million (11%), respectively, during 2007 compared with
2006. The increase in net revenues primarily reflects an
$83 million increase in net revenues from rental
transactions, a $24 million increase in annual dues and
exchange revenues, partially offset by an $8 million
decrease in ancillary revenues. The increase in EBITDA also
includes an increase in expenses, partially offset by the
absence of a $21 million charge recorded in second quarter
2006 related to local taxes payable to certain foreign
jurisdictions. Net revenue and expense increases include
$49 million and $39 million, respectively, of currency
translation from a weaker U.S. dollar compared to other
foreign currencies.
Net revenues generated from rental transactions and related
services increased $83 million (17%) during 2007 driven by
(i) a 2% increase in rental transaction volume, (ii) a
10% increase in the average net price per rental (or 3%,
excluding the favorable impact of foreign exchange movements)
and (iii) the conversion of two of our Landal parks from
franchised to managed, which contributed an incremental
$16 million to revenues or 4% to average net price per
rental. Excluding the favorable impact of foreign exchange
movements and the conversion of two of our Landal parks from
franchised to managed, the 3% increase in average net price per
rental was primarily a result of mix shift of rental activity to
higher premium destinations. The growth in rental transaction
volume was driven by increased rentals at our Landal and Novasol
European vacation rental businesses, which primarily resulted
from (i) enhanced marketing programs initiated to support
an expansion strategy to provide consumers with broader
inventories and more destinations and (ii) improved local
economies. The growth in rental transactions was also the result
of increased rentals in Latin America due to increased marketing
efforts and broader distribution channels. Such growth was
partially offset by a decline in RCI member rentals in Europe,
decreased cottage rentals in the domestic United Kingdom cottage
market primarily due to severe weather conditions during 2007
and a decline in cottage and apartment rentals at French
destinations. The increase in net revenues from rental
transactions includes the translation effects of foreign
exchange movements, which favorably impacted net rental revenues
by $38 million.
Annual dues and exchange revenues increased $24 million
(5%) during 2007 as compared with 2006 primarily due to a 5%
increase in the average number of members. Annual dues and
exchange revenue per member was relatively flat during 2007 as
compared to 2006 as a result of favorable transaction pricing,
which was offset by a decline in exchange transactions per
average member. The timing of intervals and points deposits and
the mix of intervals and points to be utilized during 2007
compared with 2006 contributed to the decline in exchange
transactions per average member. In addition, we believe that
trends among timeshare vacation ownership developers are
(i) to sell multiyear products, whereby the members have
access to the product every second or third year and
(ii) to enroll members in private label clubs, whereby the
members have the option to exchange within the club or through
other RCI channels. Such trends have a positive impact on the
average number of members but an offsetting effect on the number
of exchange transactions per average member. Ancillary revenues
decreased due to the absence of $6 million of consulting
revenues in our Asia Pacific region recorded during 2006 but not
repeated during 2007 and a $5 million adjustment recorded
during the second quarter of 2007 relating to previously
recorded consulting revenues in our Asia Pacific region. Such
decreases were partially offset by $3 million of increased
revenues during 2007 from various sources, which include fees
from additional services provided to transacting members, club
servicing revenues, fees from our credit card loyalty program
and fees generated from programs with affiliates. The increase
in annual dues and exchange revenues and ancillary revenues
includes the translation effects of foreign exchange movements,
which favorably impacted revenues by $11 million.
EBITDA further reflects an increase in expenses of
$71 million (8%) primarily driven by (i) the
unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation on expenses
of $39 million, (ii) a $37 million increase in
volume-related expenses, which was substantially comprised of
incremental costs to support growth in rental transaction
volume, as
50
discussed above, increased staffing costs to support member
growth and increased call volumes as well as incremental
investments in our information technology infrastructure,
(iii) $15 million of increased resort services
expenses as a result of converting two of our Landal parks from
franchised to managed, as discussed above,
(iv) $5 million of incremental employee incentive
program expenses during 2007 and (v) $4 million of
incremental severance related expenses recorded during 2007.
These increases were partially offset by (i) the absence of
a $21 million charge recorded during the second quarter of
2006 related to local taxes payable to certain foreign
jurisdictions, (ii) the absence of $3 million of costs
related to our separation from Cendant recorded during 2006 and
(iii) the absence of $2 million of costs incurred
during 2006 to close offices and consolidate certain call center
operations.
Vacation
Ownership
Net revenues and EBITDA increased $357 million (17%) and
$53 million (16%), respectively, during 2007 compared with
2006. The operating results reflect growth in vacation ownership
sales, consumer finance income and property management fees, as
well as the impact of operational changes made during 2006 that
resulted in the recognition of revenues that would have
otherwise been deferred until a later date under the provisions
of SFAS No. 152. The impact of these operational
changes in 2006 resulted in higher net revenues and EBITDA of
$67 million and $34 million, respectively, that were
not replicated during 2007. Such growth was partially offset by
incremental expenses during 2007 as compared to 2006.
Gross sales of VOIs at our vacation ownership business increased
$250 million (14%) during 2007, driven principally by a 9%
increase in tour flow and an 8% increase in VPG. Tour flow was
positively impacted by the continued development of our in-house
sales programs and the opening of new sales locations. VPG
benefited from a favorable tour mix, improved efficiency in our
upgrade program and higher pricing. Net revenues were impacted
during 2007 by (i) $57 million of incremental property
management fees primarily as a result of growth in the number of
units under management and (ii) $21 million of
increased ancillary revenues resulting from higher VOI sales.
Such revenue increases were partially offset by an increase of
$46 million in our provision for loan losses primarily due
to higher financed VOI sales during 2007 as compared to 2006.
During both 2007 and 2006, gross sales of VOIs were reduced by
$22 million of revenue that is deferred under the
percentage of completion method of accounting. Under the
percentage of completion method of accounting, a portion of the
total revenue from a vacation ownership contract sale is not
recognized if the construction of the vacation resort has not
yet been fully completed. Such revenue will be recognized in
future periods in proportion to the costs incurred as compared
to the total expected costs for completion of construction of
the vacation resort. Due to the strong sales pace and the timing
of product construction, we anticipate an increase in deferred
revenue of approximately $40 $100 million
during 2008. This deferred revenue is expected to be realized
during future periods and there is no impact to our Consolidated
Statement of Cash Flows.
In addition, net revenues and EBITDA increased $67 million
and $27 million, respectively, during 2007 due to net
interest income of $248 million earned on contract
receivables during 2007 as compared to $221 million during
2006. Such increase was primarily due to growth in the
portfolio, partially offset in EBITDA by higher interest costs
during 2007. We incurred interest expense of $110 million
on our securitized debt at a weighted average rate of 5.4%
during 2007 compared to $70 million at a weighted average
rate of 5.1% during 2006. Our net interest income margin
decreased from 76% during 2006 to 69% during 2007 due to
increased securitizations completed in 2007, a 36 basis
point increase in interest rates, as described above, and
approximately $32 million of increased average borrowings
on our other securitized debt facilities during 2007 as compared
to 2006. Our securitized debt increased by $618 million
from December 31, 2006 to December 31, 2007, while our
vacation ownership contract receivables increased by
$564 million during the same periods. We were able to
securitize a higher percentage of our vacation ownership
contract receivables during 2007 as compared with 2006. Such
improved borrowing efficiency against vacation ownership
receivables shifted $13 million of what would have been
interest expense below EBITDA into interest expense reflected
within EBITDA, which decreased our net interest income margin.
See Liquidity Risk for a description of the anticipated impact
on our securitizations from the adverse conditions suffered by
the United States asset-backed securities and commercial paper
markets.
EBITDA further reflects an increase of approximately
$306 million (18%) in operating, marketing and
administrative expenses, exclusive of incremental interest
expense on our securitized debt and the impact of the
operational changes made in 2006 in conjunction with the
adoption of SFAS No. 152, primarily resulting from
(i) $78 million of increased cost of sales primarily
associated with increased VOI sales, (ii) $72 million
of incremental marketing expenses to support sales efforts,
(iii) $48 million of additional commission expense
associated with increased VOI sales, (iv) $44 million
of increased costs related to the property management services,
as discussed above, (v) $35 million of incremental
costs primarily incurred to fund additional staffing needs to
support continued growth in the business and
(vi) $19 million of costs related to sales incentives
awarded to owners.
51
Such increases were partially offset by a $9 million
decrease in costs related to our separation from Cendant,
primarily related to the absence of an impairment charge
recorded during the fourth quarter of 2006 due to a rebranding
initiative for our Fairfield and Trendwest trademarks. In
addition, we recorded two items during the second quarter of
2007 related to a prior acquisition: an additional litigation
settlement reserve of $7 million, partially offset by the
reversal of a $5 million reserve due to the resolution of a
vendor-related tax liability resulting from such acquisition.
EBITDA also benefited from an $8 million pre-tax gain on
the sale of certain vacation ownership properties and related
assets during 2007 that were no longer consistent with our
development plans. Such gain was recorded within other income,
net on the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Our active development pipeline consists of approximately
4,000 units in 12 U.S. states, Washington D.C., Puerto
Rico and four foreign countries. We expect the pipeline to
support both new purchases of vacation ownership and upgrade
sales to existing owners.
Corporate
and Other
Corporate and Other expenses decreased $64 million in 2007
compared with 2006. Such decrease primarily includes (i) a
$69 million decrease in separation and related costs due to
the acceleration of vesting of Cendant equity awards and related
equitable adjustments of such awards during the third quarter of
2006 and (ii) $46 million of a net benefit related to
the resolution of and adjustment to certain liabilities and
assets. Such amounts were partially offset by $55 million
of incremental stand-alone, corporate costs, including personnel
related and public company costs, incurred during 2007.
Interest
Expense/Interest Income
Interest expense increased $6 million during 2007 compared
with the same period during 2006 primarily as a result of
$42 million of incremental interest on the new borrowing
arrangements that we entered into during July 2006 and December
2006, partially offset by (i) a decline of $18 million
of interest on our vacation ownership asset-linked debt due to
its elimination by our former Parent in July 2006, (ii) the
absence of $11 million of interest on local taxes payable
to certain foreign jurisdictions recorded during the second
quarter of 2006 and (iii) a $7 million increase in
capitalized interest at our vacation ownership business due to
the increased development of vacation ownership inventory.
Interest income decreased $21 million during 2007 compared
with 2006 primarily as a result of a $24 million decrease
in net interest income earned on advances between us and our
former Parent, since those advances were eliminated upon our
separation from Cendant, partially offset by a $5 million
increase in interest income earned on invested cash balances as
a result of an increase in cash available for investment.
Other
Income, Net
Other income, net includes the $8 million pre-tax gain on
the sale of certain vacation ownership properties and related
assets, as discussed above, partially offset by $1 million
primarily related to net losses from equity investments. All
such amounts are included within our segment EBITDA results.
Year
Ended December 31, 2006 vs. Year Ended December 31,
2005
Our consolidated and combined results comprised the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
3,842
|
|
|
$
|
3,471
|
|
|
$
|
371
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
3,265
|
|
|
|
2,851
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
626
|
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
431
|
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
$
|
431
|
|
|
$
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2006, our net revenues increased $371 million (11%)
principally due to (i) a $341 million increase in net
sales of VOIs at our vacation ownership businesses primarily
reflecting higher tour flow and an increase in VPG;
52
(ii) $109 million of incremental revenue generated by
the acquisitions of the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts and Baymont
Inn & Suites brands; (iii) a $57 million
increase in net consumer financing revenues earned on vacation
ownership contract receivables due primarily to growth in the
portfolio; (iv) $41 million of incremental property
management fees primarily as a result of growth in the number of
units under management within our vacation ownership business;
(v) a $31 million increase in net revenues from rental
transactions primarily due to growth in rental transaction
volume, an increase in the average net price per rental and the
translation effects of foreign exchange movements, which
favorably impacted rental revenues by $5 million;
(vi) a $19 million increase in organic revenues in our
lodging business, primarily due to RevPAR growth, partially
offset by a decline in weighted average rooms; and (vii) a
$19 million increase in annual dues and exchange revenues
due to growth in the average number of members. These increases
were partially offset by a decrease in revenues of
$259 million as a result of the classification of the
provision for loan losses as a reduction of revenues during the
year ended December 31, 2006 in connection with the
adoption of SFAS No. 152.
Total expenses increased $414 million (15%) principally
reflecting (i) a $203 million increase in organic
operating and administrative expenses primarily related to
additional commission expense resulting from increased VOI
sales, increased volume-related expenses and staffing costs due
to growth in our vacation exchange and rentals call centers and
vacation ownership business, increased costs related to the
property management services that we provide at our vacation
ownership business and increased interest expense on our
securitized debt, which is included in operating expenses;
(ii) $103 million of incremental expenses generated by
the acquisitions of the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts and Baymont
Inn & Suites brands; (iii) $99 million of
costs related to our separation from Cendant; (iv) a
$79 million increase in organic marketing and reservation
expenses primarily resulting from increased marketing
initiatives across all our businesses; (v) a
$21 million charge recorded in the second quarter of 2006
related to local taxes payable to certain foreign jurisdictions
within our European vacation rentals business; and (vi) the
unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation on expenses
of $6 million. These increases were partially offset by a
decrease of (i) $128 million in provision for loan
losses as a result of the reclassification of the provision for
loan losses from expenses to net revenues required by the
adoption of SFAS No. 152, which includes
$12 million in 2005 to account for the impact of the
hurricanes experienced in the Gulf Coast region of the U.S., and
(ii) $24 million in cost of vacation ownership
interests which was comprised of $115 million reduction of
cost of sales of inventory as a result of our adoption of
SFAS No. 152, partially offset by $91 million of
increased cost of sales primarily associated with increased VOI
sales.
The increase in depreciation and amortization of
$17 million primarily resulted from an increase in
information technology capital investments made in 2005, a trend
that continued in 2006. Interest expense, net increased
$41 million in 2006 primarily as a result of interest paid
on our new borrowing arrangements resulting from our separation
from Cendant and interest on local taxes payable to certain
foreign jurisdictions, partially offset by increased capitalized
interest at our vacation ownership business due to increased
development of vacation ownership inventory. Our effective tax
rate increased to 35.1% in 2006 from 31.2% in 2005 primarily due
to the absence of an increase in the tax basis of certain
foreign assets during 2005, partially offset by a
$15 million benefit recognized in 2006 resulting from a
change in our 2005 state effective tax rates.
We recorded an after tax charge of $65 million during the
first quarter of 2006 as a cumulative effect of an accounting
change related to the adoption of SFAS No. 152. Such
charge consisted of (i) a pre-tax charge of
$105 million representing the deferral of revenue, costs
associated with sales of vacation ownership interests that were
recognized prior to January 1, 2006 and the recognition of
certain expenses that were previously deferred and (ii) an
associated tax benefit of $40 million.
As a result of these items, our net income decreased
$144 million (33%) during 2006 compared to 2005.
53
Following is a discussion of the results of each of our segments
and interest expense (income), net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
661
|
|
|
$
|
533
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
208
|
|
|
$
|
197
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
1,119
|
|
|
|
1,068
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
2,068
|
|
|
|
1,874
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Reportable Segments
|
|
|
3,848
|
|
|
|
3,475
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
798
|
|
|
|
764
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Corporate and
Other (a)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company
|
|
$
|
3,842
|
|
|
$
|
3,471
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
725
|
|
|
|
751
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
542
|
|
|
$
|
626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Not meaningful.
|
(a) |
|
Includes the elimination of
transactions between segments.
|
Lodging
Net revenues and EBITDA increased $128 million (24%) and
$11 million (6%), respectively, in 2006 compared with 2005
primarily reflecting the October 2005 acquisition of the
franchise and property management businesses of the Wyndham
Hotels and Resorts brand and strong RevPAR gains across our
legacy brands, which were partially offset by the absence of a
$7 million gain on the sale of an investment recognized in
2005. EBITDA comparisons also reflect our strategic decision to
intensify marketing campaigns, particularly for our Wyndham
brand.
The operating results of the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand
have been included in our results from October 11, 2005
forward and, therefore, were incremental to our results during
the period January 1, 2006 through October 10, 2006.
During this period, the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand
contributed incremental net revenues of $99 million, of
which $38 million was generated from the franchise business
and $61 million was generated from the property management
business. Included within the $61 million of revenue
generated from the property management business is
$55 million of revenue related to reimbursable payroll
costs that we incur and pay on behalf of property owners. As the
reimbursements are made based upon cost with no added margin,
the recorded revenue is offset by the associated expense and
there is little to no resultant impact on EBITDA. Additionally,
there was little to no EBITDA contribution from the franchise
business as substantially all of the fees received were utilized
to execute a key strategy of promoting the Wyndham brand name
and driving brand bookings through enhanced marketing efforts.
The operating results of our lodging business also reflect the
acquisition of the Baymont Inn & Suites brand, which
was acquired in April 2006, and contributed incremental net
revenues and EBITDA of $10 million and $6 million,
respectively.
Excluding the impact of the acquisitions discussed above, net
revenues in our lodging business increased $19 million (4%)
in 2006. Such increase was primarily due to RevPAR growth of 8%,
partially offset by a 3% decline in weighted average rooms
available and a $7 million gain recognized in the first
quarter of 2005 on the sale of an investment no longer deemed
strategic. The RevPAR growth reflects increases in price and
occupancy principally attributable to the beneficial impact of
management initiatives implemented in prior periods, such as the
strategic assignment of personnel to field locations designed to
assist franchisees in improving their operating performance and
an overall improvement in the economy lodging segment. The
decline in rooms reflects (i) our termination of
underperforming properties primarily throughout 2005 that did
not meet our required quality standards or their financial
obligations to us and (ii) the expiration of franchise
agreements and certain franchisees exercising their right to
terminate their agreements. As of December 31, 2006, our
hotel development pipeline included approximately 845 hotels and
approximately 92,000 rooms, of which approximately 15% are
international and approximately 45% are new construction.
As previously discussed, a strategic growth initiative of our
lodging business is to increase brand awareness and drive brand
bookings. To this end, during 2006, we increased our marketing
spend by $13 million (6%), which is incremental to the
marketing spend for the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts and Baymont
brands. The $13 million of
54
incremental marketing spend is reflective of (i) additional
fees received from our franchisees (where we are contractually
obligated to expend these fees for marketing purposes),
(ii) additional campaigns in international regions that we
have targeted for growth and (iii) incremental investments
in our TripRewards loyalty program. In addition, expenses also
increased $2 million as a result of our separation from
Cendant.
Vacation
Exchange and Rentals
Net revenues increased $51 million (5%) and EBITDA
decreased $19 million (7%) in 2006 compared with 2005,
primarily reflecting a $31 million increase in net revenues
from rental transactions and a $19 million increase in
annual dues and exchange revenues, more than offset in EBITDA by
a $70 million increase in expenses, as discussed below.
Revenue and expense increases include $5 million and
$6 million, respectively, from a weaker U.S. dollar
compared to other foreign currencies and the related currency
translation impact.
Net revenues generated from rental transactions and related
services increased $31 million (7%) during 2006 driven by a
3% increase in rental transaction volume and a 3% increase in
the average net price per rental. The growth in rental
transaction volume was primarily due to an increase of
approximately 36,000 rental transactions (12%) in arrivals
at our Landal GreenParks camping vacation site and increased
booking volumes of approximately 15,600 rental transactions
(7%) at our Novasol brand. The increase in net revenues from
rental transactions and the average net price per rental
includes the translation effects of foreign exchange movements,
which favorably impacted net rental revenues by $5 million
and accounted for 1% of the increase in the average net price
per rental.
Annual dues and exchange revenues increased $19 million
(4%) during 2006 as compared with 2005 due to a 5% increase in
the average number of members. Points-based transactions
represented 19% of the total exchange transactions during 2006
as compared with 17% during 2005. Exchange transactions per
member remained relatively constant year-over-year; however,
there has been a shift to a greater amount of points-based
members and related points-based transactions from the standard
one-week for one-week exchange members and transactions in our
legacy RCI Weeks exchange program. This shift resulted in an
increase in our overall member base and exchange transaction
volume. Since points are exchangeable for various travel-related
products and services, as well as for vacation stays for various
lengths of time, points-based exchange activity will generally
result in higher transaction volumes with lower average fees as
compared with the RCI Weeks exchange program. Ancillary revenues
from various sources collectively increased $1 million
during 2006 compared to 2005. Ancillary revenue sources
primarily included $14 million of additional consulting
fees, club servicing fees and fees from our credit card loyalty
program. Such increases were offset by a $9 million
reduction in travel fee revenues primarily due to lower
commission rates realized in 2006 relating to an outsourcing
agreement to provide services to third-party travel club members
and the absence of a $4 million recovery of local taxes
paid to a foreign jurisdiction realized during the fourth
quarter of 2005.
EBITDA further reflects an increase in expenses of
$70 million (9%) primarily driven by (i) a
$27 million increase in volume-related expenses, which was
substantially comprised of higher reservation call center
staffing costs to support member growth and increased call
volumes, (ii) a $21 million charge in the second
quarter of 2006 related to local taxes payable to certain
foreign jurisdictions, (iii) $16 million of
incremental expenses incurred for product and geographic
expansion, including increased marketing campaigns, timing of
certain other marketing expenses, expansion of property
recruitment efforts and investment in our consulting and
international activities, (iv) $10 million of higher
cost of sales on rentals of vacation stay intervals,
(v) the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation
on expenses of $6 million, (vi) $4 million of costs
primarily related to higher corporate overhead allocations and
(vii) $3 million of costs related to our separation
from Cendant. These increases were partially offset by
(i) the absence of $14 million of costs incurred in
2005 to combine the operational infrastructures of our vacation
exchange and rentals business and (ii) $8 million of
cost savings due to efficiencies realized in 2006.
Vacation
Ownership
Net revenues and EBITDA increased $194 million (10%) and
$42 million (15%), respectively, in 2006 as compared with
2005. The operating results reflect growth in vacation ownership
sales and consumer finance income, as well as the impact of the
adoption of SFAS No. 152. The impact of
SFAS No. 152 on our results for 2006 was a reduction
to net revenues of $208 million and an increase to EBITDA
of $10 million.
We made operating changes during 2006 that resulted in the
recognition of revenues that would have otherwise been deferred
under the provisions of SFAS No. 152. As a result,
included within the impact of SFAS No. 152, are
benefits to net revenues and EBITDA of $67 million and
$34 million, respectively. These benefits would have
otherwise been offset by 2006 deferrals had the operational
changes not been made. Excluding such benefits, the
55
impact of SFAS No. 152 would have been a reduction to
net revenues and EBITDA of $275 million and
$24 million, respectively, during 2006.
Exclusive of the impact of SFAS No. 152, gross sales
of VOIs at our vacation ownership business increased
$311 million (22%) in 2006 principally driven by a 12%
increase in tour flow and a 9% increase in VPG. Tour flow was
positively impacted by the continued development of our in-house
sales programs. VPG benefited from a favorable tour flow mix and
higher pricing.
In addition, net revenues and EBITDA increased $57 million
and $33 million, respectively, in 2006 due to incremental
net interest income earned on contract receivables primarily
resulting from growth in the portfolio. Such growth was
partially offset in EBITDA by higher interest costs in 2006.
During 2006, we paid interest expense on our securitized debt of
$70 million at a weighted average rate of 5.1% compared to
$46 million at a weighted average rate of 4.1% in 2005.
Revenue and EBITDA comparisons were also negatively impacted by
the absence of $11 million of income recorded in the second
quarter of 2005 in connection with the disposal of a parcel of
land that was no longer consistent with our development plans.
During 2006, property management fees increased $41 million
primarily as a result of growth in the number of units under
management.
EBITDA further reflects an increase of approximately
$349 million (22%) in operating, marketing and
administrative expenses, exclusive of the impact of
SFAS No. 152, the percentage-of-completion method of
accounting and incremental interest expense on our securitized
debt, primarily resulting from (i) $85 million of
increased cost of sales primarily associated with increased VOI
sales, (ii) $67 million of additional commission
expense associated with increased VOI sales,
(iii) $50 million of incremental marketing expenses to
support sales efforts, (iv) $48 million of incremental
costs primarily incurred to fund additional staffing needs to
support continued growth in the business,
(v) $37 million of increased costs related to the
property management services discussed above,
(vi) $25 million of additional contract receivable
provisions primarily associated with increased VOI sales,
(vii) $18 million of costs related to our separation
from Cendant, $11 million of which related to an impairment
charge due to a rebranding initiative for our Fairfield and
Trendwest trademarks (see Note 2 of our Consolidated and
Combined Financial Statements) and (viii) $4 million
of increased costs associated with the repair of a completed VOI
resort. Such increases were partially offset by the absence of
$13 million of expenses during 2005 associated with the
impact of the hurricanes experienced in the Gulf Coast during
September 2005, which continued to affect us in 2006 due to
sales offices damaged by the hurricanes which have yet to reopen.
As of December 31, 2006, our development pipeline consisted
of approximately 3,900 units in 15 U.S. states,
the Virgin Islands and three foreign countries.
Corporate
and Other
Corporate and Other expenses increased $58 million in 2006
compared with 2005. Such increase includes
(i) $76 million of costs incurred as a result of the
execution of our separation from Cendant on July 31, 2006
primarily related to the acceleration of vesting of Cendant
equity awards and related equitable adjustments of such awards
and (ii) $20 million of incremental stand-alone,
corporate costs incurred from the date of separation to
December 31, 2006. Such amounts were partially offset by a
$32 million net benefit from the resolution of certain
contingent liabilities.
Interest
Expense/Interest Income
Interest expense increased $38 million during 2006 compared
to 2005 primarily as a result of (i) $36 million of
increased interest expense on borrowings primarily due to
increased average borrowings on existing debt and interest paid
on new debt arrangements entered into in July 2006 and
(ii) $11 million of interest on local taxes payable to
certain foreign jurisdictions, partially offset by a
$9 million increase in capitalized interest at our vacation
ownership business due to the increased development of vacation
ownership inventory. Interest income decreased $3 million
during 2006 compared to 2005 primarily as a result of a
$6 million decrease in net interest income earned on
advances between us and our former Parent due to twelve months
of activity during 2005 compared to seven months of activity
during 2006, partially offset by a $2 million increase in
interest income earned on invested cash balances as a result of
an increase in average cash available for investment.
56
FINANCIAL
CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Financial
Condition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
10,459
|
|
|
$
|
9,520
|
|
|
$
|
939
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
6,943
|
|
|
|
5,961
|
|
|
|
982
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
3,516
|
|
|
|
3,559
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
Total assets increased $939 million from December 31,
2006 to December 31, 2007 primarily due to (i) a
$564 million increase in vacation ownership contract
receivables, net resulting from increased VOI sales, (ii) a
$281 million increase in inventory primarily related to
vacation ownership inventories associated with increased
property development activity, (iii) a $111 million
increase in other non-current assets primarily due to increased
restricted cash, investments made within our lodging and
vacation exchange and rentals businesses primarily to acquire
minority equity interests, development advances made at our
lodging business and increased development deposits on vacation
ownership resorts at our vacation ownership business and
(iv) a $93 million increase in property and equipment
primarily due to building and furniture, fixtures and equipment
within our vacation ownership business, the impact of currency
translation on land and building at our vacation exchange and
rentals business and additions related to shared technology
systems at corporate resulting from our separation from Cendant.
Such increases were partially offset by (i) an
$84 million decrease in due from former Parent and
subsidiaries related to payments made from Cendant to reimburse
us for monies they collected on our behalf principally relating
to the separation and (ii) a decrease of $59 million
in cash and cash equivalents primarily related to the
utilization of excess cash (see Liquidity and Capital
Resources Cash Flows for further detail).
Total liabilities increased $982 million primarily due to
(i) $707 million of additional net borrowings
reflecting net changes of $618 million in our securitized
vacation ownership debt and $89 million in our other
long-term debt, (ii) a $145 million increase in
deferred income taxes primarily attributable to higher VOI
sales, (iii) a $91 million increase in accrued
expenses and other current liabilities primarily due to
increased employee compensation related expenses across our
businesses, increased accrued developer dues at our vacation
ownership business due to timing and at our vacation exchange
and rentals business due to required refurbishments at two of
our Landal parks, increased accrued legal settlements at our
vacation ownership business and increased accrued marketing
expenses to promote growth in our vacation ownership business,
partially offset by a decrease in our FIN 45 liability due
to payments made during 2007 and a lower treasury share
repurchase liability for the last four days of trading during
each year, (iv) a $60 million increase in deferred
income primarily due to increased sales of vacation ownership
properties under development and cash received in advance on
arrival-based bookings and increased deferred revenue resulting
from new enrollments and renewals within our vacation exchange
and rentals business and (v) a $44 million increase in
other non-current liabilities primarily due to the establishment
of a $20 million liability for unrecognized tax benefits in
connection with our adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, increased
points liability at our lodging business due to growth in our
TripRewards loyalty program and increased contingent tax
liabilities at corporate. Such increases were partially offset
by a $68 million decrease in due to former Parent and
subsidiaries primarily as a result of our payment of or other
reductions in certain contingent and other corporate liabilities
of our former Parent or its subsidiaries which were created upon
our separation.
Total stockholders equity decreased $43 million
principally due to (i) $508 million of treasury stock
purchased through our stock repurchase program, (ii) a
reduction in retained earnings of $20 million related to
the establishment of a liability for unrecognized tax benefits
in connection with our adoption of FIN 48,
(iii) $19 million of unrealized losses on cash flow
hedges and (iv) the payment of $14 million in
dividends. Such decrease was partially offset by
(i) $403 million of net income generated during 2007,
(ii) $26 million of currency translation adjustments
during 2007, (iii) $25 million as a result of the
exercise of stock options during 2007,
(iv) $23 million of deferred equity compensation,
(v) $16 million of tax adjustments recorded from
former Parent, (vi) $15 million of cash transferred
from former Parent related to excess proceeds withheld on the
sale of Travelport and (vii) a $7 million increase to
our APIC Pool due to the exercise and vesting of equity awards.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Currently, our financing needs are supported by cash generated
from operations and borrowings under our revolving credit
facility. In addition, certain funding requirements of our
vacation ownership business are met through the issuance of
securitized and other debt to finance vacation ownership
contract receivables. We believe that access to our revolving
credit facility and our current liquidity vehicles will be
sufficient to meet our ongoing
57
needs for the foreseeable future. See Liquidity Risk for a
description of the anticipated impact on our securitizations
from the adverse conditions suffered by the United States
asset-backed securities and commercial paper markets.
Cash
Flows
During 2007 and 2006, we had a net change in cash and cash
equivalents of $59 million and $170 million,
respectively. The following table summarizes such changes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
165
|
|
|
$
|
(155
|
)
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(255
|
)
|
|
|
(471
|
)
|
|
|
216
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
473
|
|
|
|
(296
|
)
|
Effects of changes in exchange rate on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
(59
|
)
|
|
$
|
170
|
|
|
$
|
(229
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2007 vs. Year Ended December 31,
2006
Operating
Activities
During 2007, we generated $155 million less cash from
operating activities as compared to 2006, which principally
reflects (i) higher investments in vacation ownership
contract receivables and inventory, (ii) timing of payments
of accounts payable and accrued expenses and
(iii) increased income tax payments. Such changes were
partially offset by (i) increased deferred income taxes
attributable to higher VOI sales, (ii) lower prepaid
activity primarily due to completed marketing programs at our
vacation exchange and rentals business, as well as lower prepaid
sales commissions within our vacation ownership business,
(iii) higher income before cumulative effect of accounting
change and (iv) a decrease within other current assets
primarily due to the timing of collections on non-trade
receivables. Vacation ownership contract receivables are
expected to continue to increase during 2008 due to growth in
VOI sales. The growth in vacation ownership receivables will be
partially funded by net proceeds received from secured
borrowings.
Investing
Activities
During 2007, we used $216 million less cash for investing
activities as compared with 2006. The decrease in cash outflows
primarily relates to (i) the absence of $143 million
of intercompany funding to former Parent due to our separation
from Cendant, (ii) lower acquisition-related payments of
$89 million primarily due to the acquisition of the Baymont
brand for approximately $60 million in cash and the
acquisition of a vacation ownership and resort management
business for $43 million in cash during 2006, partially
offset by the acquisition of four individually non-significant
businesses within our vacation ownership and vacation exchange
and rentals businesses for aggregate net consideration of
$15 million in cash during 2007 and
(iii) $26 million of proceeds received in connection
with the sale of certain vacation ownership properties and
related assets during the third quarter of 2007. Such decreases
in cash outflows were partially offset by (i) an increase
of $26 million in investments and development advances
within our lodging business and investments made within our
vacation exchange and rentals business and (ii) decreased
restricted cash of $21 million primarily related to cash we
are required to set aside in connection with additional vacation
ownership contract receivables securitizations, partially offset
by the release of escrow amounts as a result of the completion
of the deeding process for certain VOI sales.
Financing
Activities
During 2007, we generated $296 million less cash from
financing activities as compared with 2006, which principally
reflects (i) $465 million of lower net proceeds
related to changes made in our capital structure during 2006,
(ii) $197 million higher spend on our stock repurchase
program and (iii) $23 million of incremental net
payments made on other long-term borrowings. Such cash outflows
were partially offset by (i) $290 million of higher
net proceeds from securitized vacation ownership debt during
2007 due to our ability to securitize vacation ownership
contract receivables at a higher efficiency rate than during
2006 and (ii) $97 million of net proceeds from
corporate borrowings.
58
We intend to continue to invest in capital improvements and
technological improvements in our lodging, vacation ownership
and vacation exchange and rentals businesses. In addition, we
may seek to acquire additional franchise agreements, property
management contracts, ownership interests in hotel as part of
our mixed-use properties strategy, and exclusive agreements for
vacation rental properties on a strategic and selective basis,
either directly or through investments in joint ventures. We
spent $194 million on capital expenditures during 2007
including the improvement of technology and maintenance of
technological advantages, routine improvements and information
technology infrastructure enhancements resulting from our
separation from Cendant. We anticipate spending approximately
$210 to $230 million on capital expenditures during 2008.
We spent $50 million for equity investments in joint
ventures and development advances to secure franchise and
management agreements for our lodging business. In addition, we
spent $686 million relating to vacation ownership
development projects during 2007 compared to $542 million
during 2006. We anticipate spending approximately $650 to
$750 million relating to vacation ownership development
projects during 2008. The majority of the expenditures required
to complete our capital spending programs, strategic investments
and vacation ownership development projects were financed with
cash flow generated through operations. Additional expenditures
were financed with general unsecured corporate borrowings,
including through the use of available capacity under our
$900 million revolving credit facility.
On August 20, 2007, our Board of Directors authorized a
stock repurchase program that enables us to purchase up to
$200 million of our common stock. From the inception of the
program through December 31, 2007, we repurchased
1.5 million shares at an average price of $29.07. In
addition, we completed previous stock repurchase programs during
2007 by repurchasing 13 million shares at an average price
of $34.92. The Board of Directors 2007 authorization
included increased repurchase capacity for proceeds received
from stock option exercises. From the inception of the program
through December 31, 2007, repurchase capacity increased
$5 million from proceeds received from stock option
exercises. During the period January 1, 2008 through
February 28, 2008, we repurchased an additional
472,800 shares at an average price of $22.19. We currently
have $155 million remaining availability in our program.
The amount and timing of specific repurchases are subject to
market conditions, applicable legal requirements and other
factors. Repurchases may be conducted in the open market or in
privately negotiated transactions.
The IRS has opened an examination for Cendants taxable
years 2003 through 2006 during which we were included in
Cendants tax returns. Although we and Cendant believe
there is appropriate support for the positions taken on its tax
returns, we have recorded liabilities representing the best
estimates of the probable loss on certain positions. We believe
that the accruals for tax liabilities are adequate for all open
years, based on assessment of many factors including past
experience and interpretations of tax law applied to the facts
of each matter. Although we believe the recorded assets and
liabilities are reasonable, tax regulations are subject to
interpretation and tax litigation is inherently uncertain;
therefore, our and Cendants assessments can involve both a
series of complex judgments about future events and rely heavily
on estimates and assumptions. While we believe that the
estimates and assumptions supporting the assessments are
reasonable, the final determination of tax audits and any other
related litigation could be materially different than that which
is reflected in historical income tax provisions and recorded
assets and liabilities. Based on the results of an audit or
litigation, a material effect on our income tax provision, net
income, or cash flows in the period or periods for which that
determination is made could result. The effect is the result of
our obligations under the Separation and Distribution Agreement,
as discussed in Note 20 Separation Adjustments
and Transactions with Former Parent and Subsidiaries. We
recorded $239 million of tax liabilities pursuant to the
Separation and Distribution Agreement at December 31, 2007.
Such amount is recorded within due to former Parent and
subsidiaries on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. We expect the
payment on a majority of these liabilities to occur during 2010.
We expect to make such payment from cash flow generated through
operations and the use of available capacity under our
$900 million revolving credit facility.
59
Financial
Obligations
Our indebtedness consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Securitized vacation ownership debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes
|
|
$
|
1,435
|
|
|
$
|
838
|
|
Bank conduit
facility (a)
|
|
|
646
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securitized vacation ownership debt
|
|
$
|
2,081
|
|
|
$
|
1,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00% senior unsecured notes (due December
2016) (b)
|
|
$
|
797
|
|
|
$
|
796
|
|
Term loan (due July 2011)
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
Revolving credit facility (due July
2011) (c)
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank borrowings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation ownership
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
Vacation
rentals (d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
Vacation rentals capital leases
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
Other
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
1,526
|
|
|
$
|
1,437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents a
364-day
vacation ownership bank conduit facility which we renewed
through October 2008 and upsized to $1,200 million on
October 30, 2007. The capacity is subject to our ability to
provide additional assets to collateralize the facility.
|
(b) |
|
The balance at December 31,
2007 represents $800 million aggregate principal less
$3 million of unamortized discount.
|
(c) |
|
The revolving credit facility has a
total capacity of $900 million, which includes availability
for letters of credit. As of December 31, 2007, we had
$53 million of letters of credit outstanding and, as such,
the total available capacity of the revolving credit facility
was $750 million.
|
(d) |
|
The borrowings under this facility
were repaid on January 31, 2007.
|
As of December 31, 2007, available capacity under our
borrowing arrangements was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
|
Capacity
|
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
Capacity
|
|
|
Securitized vacation ownership debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes
|
|
$
|
1,435
|
|
|
$
|
1,435
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Bank conduit facility
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
646
|
|
|
|
554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securitized vacation ownership debt
|
|
$
|
2,635
|
|
|
$
|
2,081
|
|
|
$
|
554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00% senior unsecured notes (due December 2016)
|
|
$
|
797
|
|
|
$
|
797
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Term loan (due July 2011)
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility (due July
2011) (a)
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
803
|
|
Bank borrowings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation ownership bank borrowings
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Vacation rentals capital
leases (b)
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
2,362
|
|
|
$
|
1,526
|
|
|
|
836
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Issuance of letters of
credit (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
783
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The capacity under our revolving
credit facility includes availability for letters of credit. As
of December 31, 2007, the total capacity of
$900 million was reduced by $53 million for the
issuance of letters of credit.
|
(b) |
|
These leases are recorded as
capital lease obligations with corresponding assets classified
within property and equipment on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
|
Securitized
Vacation Ownership Debt
A significant portion of our debt as of December 31, 2007
was issued through the securitization of vacation ownership
contract receivables. On February 12, 2007, we closed a
securitization facility, Premium Yield Facility
2007-A, in
the amount of $155 million, which matures in February 2020.
As of December 31, 2007, we had
60
$155 million of outstanding borrowings under this facility.
On May 23, 2007, we closed an additional series of term
notes payable, Sierra Timeshare
2007-1
Receivables Funding, LLC, secured by vacation ownership contract
receivables in the initial principal amount of
$600 million. The payment of principal and interest on
these notes is insured under the terms of a financial guaranty
insurance policy. The proceeds from these notes were used to
reduce the balance outstanding under the bank conduit facility
referenced above and the remaining proceeds were used for
general corporate purposes. As of December 31, 2007, we had
$396 million of outstanding borrowings under these term
notes. On November 1, 2007, we closed an additional series
of term notes payable, Sierra Timeshare
2007-2
Receivables Funding, LLC, in the initial principal amount of
$455 million, secured by vacation ownership contract
receivables. The payment of principal and interest on these
notes is insured under the terms of a financial guaranty
insurance policy. The proceeds from these notes were used
primarily to reduce the balance outstanding under the bank
conduit facility. As of December 31, 2007, we had
$410 million of outstanding borrowings under these term
notes. Such securitized debt includes fixed and floating rate
term notes for which the weighted average interest rate was
5.2%, 4.7% and 4.0% during the years ended December 31,
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
On October 30, 2007, we renewed our
364-day
securitized vacation ownership bank conduit facility through
October 2008. This facility bears interest at variable rates
based on LIBOR and usage and its capacity was increased from
$1.0 billion to $1.2 billion in connection with its
renewal. Such facility had a weighted average interest rate of
5.9%, 5.7% and 4.3% during the years ended December 31,
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
As of December 31, 2007, our securitized vacation ownership
debt is collateralized by $2,596 million of underlying
vacation ownership contract receivables and related assets.
Additional usage of the capacity of our bank conduit facility is
subject to our ability to provide additional qualifying assets
to collateralize such facility. The combined weighted average
interest rate on our total securitized vacation ownership debt
was 5.4%, 5.1% and 4.1% during 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Interest expense incurred in connection with our securitized
vacation ownership debt amounted to $110 million,
$70 million and $46 million during the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. All such
amounts are recorded within operating expenses on the
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income as we earn
consumer finance income on the related securitized vacation
ownership contract receivables and record such income within
revenues on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income.
Other
Our 6.00% notes, with face value of $800 million, were
issued in December 2006 for net proceeds of $796 million.
The notes are redeemable at our option at any time, in whole or
in part, at the appropriate redemption prices plus accrued
interest through the redemption date. These notes rank equally
in right of payment with all of our other senior unsecured
indebtedness. As of December 31, 2007, the notes had a
carrying value of $797 million.
During July 2006, we entered into a five-year $300 million
term loan facility which bears interest at LIBOR plus
55 basis points. Subsequent to the inception of this term
loan facility, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement
and, as such, the interest rate is fixed at 6.00%. As of
December 31, 2007, we had $300 million outstanding
under this term loan facility.
We maintain a five-year $900 million revolving credit
facility which currently bears interest at LIBOR plus 45 to
55 basis points. The interest rate of this facility is
dependent on our credit ratings and the outstanding balance of
borrowings on this facility. As of December 31, 2007, we
had $97 million outstanding borrowings under this facility.
Prior to our separation from Cendant, we previously borrowed
under a $600 million asset-linked facility through Cendant
to support the creation of certain vacation ownership-related
assets and the acquisition and development of vacation ownership
properties. In connection with our separation from Cendant,
Cendant eliminated the outstanding borrowings under this
facility of $600 million on July 27, 2006. The
weighted average interest rate on these borrowings was 5.5%
during the period January 1, 2006 through July 27,
2006 and 5.1% during the year ended December 31, 2005.
We had outstanding bank borrowings of $164 million as of
December 31, 2007 under a foreign credit facility used to
support vacation ownership operations in the South Pacific. This
facility bears interest at Australian BBSY plus 55 basis
points and had a weighted average interest rate of 7.2%, 6.5%
and 6.3% during 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. As of
December 31, 2007, these secured borrowings are
collateralized by $208 million of underlying vacation
ownership contract receivables and related assets. The capacity
of this facility is subject to maintaining sufficient assets to
collateralize these secured obligations.
61
On January 31, 2007, we repaid $73 million of
outstanding bank debt borrowings related to our Landal
GreenParks business. The bank debt was collateralized by
$130 million of land and related vacation rental assets and
had a weighted average interest rate of 3.7% and 3.0% during
2006 and 2005, respectively.
We lease some vacation homes located in European holiday parks
as part of our vacation exchange and rentals business. The
majority of these leases are recorded as capital lease
obligations under generally accepted accounting principles with
corresponding assets classified within property, plant and
equipment on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The vacation
rentals capital lease obligations had a weighted average
interest rate of 4.5% during 2007, 2006 and 2005.
We also maintain other debt facilities which arise through the
ordinary course of operations. As of December 31, 2007,
this debt primarily reflects $11 million of mortgage
borrowings related to an office building.
Interest expense incurred in connection with the above debt
(excluding our securitized vacation ownership debt) amounted to
$96 million, $72 million and $36 million during
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. In addition, we recorded
$11 million of interest expense related to interest on
local taxes payable to certain foreign jurisdictions during
2006. All such amounts are recorded within the interest expense
line item on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income.
Interest expense is partially offset on the Consolidated and
Combined Statements of Income by capitalized interest of
$23 million, $16 million and $7 million during
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
The revolving credit facility and unsecured term loan include
covenants, including the maintenance of specific financial
ratios. These financial covenants consist of a minimum interest
coverage ratio of at least 3.0 times as of the measurement date
and a maximum leverage ratio not to exceed 3.5 times on the
measurement date. The interest coverage ratio is calculated by
dividing EBITDA (as defined in the credit agreement and
Note 19 to the Consolidated and Combined Financial
Statements) by Interest Expense (as defined in the credit
agreement), excluding interest expense on any Securitized
Indebtedness and on Non-Recourse Indebtedness (as the two terms
are defined in the credit agreement), both as measured on a
trailing 12 month basis preceding the measurement date. The
leverage ratio is calculated by dividing Consolidated Total
Indebtedness (as defined in the credit agreement) excluding any
Securitization Indebtedness and any Non-Recourse Secured debt as
of the measurement date by EBITDA as measured on a trailing
12 month basis preceding the measurement date. Covenants in
these credit facilities also include limitations on indebtedness
of material subsidiaries; liens; mergers, consolidations,
liquidations, dissolutions and sales of all or substantially all
assets; and sale and leasebacks. Events of default in these
credit facilities include nonpayment of principal when due;
nonpayment of interest, fees or other amounts; violation of
covenants; cross payment default and cross acceleration (in each
case, to indebtedness (excluding securitization indebtedness) in
excess of $50 million); and a change of control (the
definition of which permitted our separation from Cendant).
The 6.00% senior unsecured notes contain various covenants
including limitations on liens, limitations on sale and
leasebacks, and change of control restrictions. In addition,
there are limitations on mergers, consolidations and sales of
all or substantially all assets. Events of default in the notes
include nonpayment of interest, nonpayment of principal, breach
of a covenant or warranty, cross acceleration of debt in excess
of $50 million, and bankruptcy related matters.
As of December 31, 2007, we were in compliance with all of
the covenants described above including the required financial
ratios.
Liquidity
Risk
Our vacation ownership business finances certain of its
receivables through (i) an asset-backed commercial paper
facility and (ii) periodically accessing the capital
markets by issuing asset-backed securities. None of the
currently outstanding asset-backed securities contain any
recourse provisions to us other than interest rate risk related
to swap counterparties (solely to the extent that the amount
outstanding on our notes differs from the forecasted
amortization schedule at the time of issuance).
Certain of these asset-backed securities are insured by monoline
insurers. Currently, the monoline insurers that we have used in
the past and other guarantee insurance providers are under
ratings pressure and seeking capital to maintain their credit
ratings. Since certain monoline insurers may not be positioned
to write new policies, there is a substantial likelihood that
the cost of such insurance may increase or that the insurance
may become difficult or impossible to obtain due to
(i) decreased competition in that business, including a
reduced number of monolines that may issue new policies due to
either (a) loss of AAA/Aaa ratings from the rating agencies
or (b) lack of confidence of
62
market participants in the value of such insurance and
(ii) the increased spreads paid to subordinate bond
investors. It is still possible to issue asset-backed securities
without insurance. Our last issuance without insurance was in
2003.
During the third and fourth quarters of 2007, the asset-backed
securities market and commercial paper markets in the United
States suffered adverse conditions and consequently, our cost of
securitized borrowings increased due to (i) increased
spreads over relevant benchmarks and (ii) increased
monoline insurance costs. We expect to access the term
securitization market and renew our asset-backed conduit (which
is supported by commercial paper) in 2008. To the extent that
the recent increases in funding costs in the securitization and
commercial paper markets persist, it will negatively impact the
cost of such borrowings. A long-term disruption to the
asset-backed or commercial paper markets could jeopardize our
ability to obtain such financings. While benchmark rates (such
as LIBOR and U.S. Treasuries) have declined in recent
months, there can be no assurance that such declines will
persist, or that credit spreads over those benchmarks will not
widen.
Our liquidity position may also be negatively affected by
unfavorable conditions in the markets in which we operate. Our
liquidity as it relates to our vacation ownership financings
could be adversely affected if we were to fail to renew any of
the facilities on their renewal dates or if we were to fail to
meet certain ratios, which may occur in certain instances if the
credit quality of the underlying vacation ownership contract
receivables deteriorates. Our ability to sell securities backed
by our vacation ownership contract receivables depends on the
continued ability and willingness of capital market participants
to invest in such securities.
As a result of the sale of Realogy on April 10, 2007,
Realogys senior debt credit rating was downgraded to below
investment grade. Under the Separation Agreement, if Realogy
experienced such a change of control and suffered such a ratings
downgrade, it was required to post a letter of credit in an
amount acceptable to us and Avis Budget Group to satisfy the
fair value of Realogys indemnification obligations for the
Cendant legacy contingent liabilities in the event Realogy does
not otherwise satisfy such obligations to the extent they become
due. On April 26, 2007, Realogy posted a $500 million
irrevocable standby letter of credit from a major commercial
bank in favor of Avis Budget Group and upon which demand may be
made if Realogy does not otherwise satisfy its obligations for
its share of the Cendant legacy contingent liabilities. The
letter of credit can be adjusted from time to time based upon
the outstanding contingent liabilities. The issuance of this
letter of credit does not relieve or limit Realogys
obligations for these liabilities.
Our senior unsecured debt is rated BBB and Baa2 by
Standard & Poors and Moodys Investors
Service, respectively. During August 2007, Standard &
Poors assigned a negative outlook to our
senior unsecured debt. A security rating is not a recommendation
to buy, sell or hold securities and is subject to revision or
withdrawal by the assigning rating organization. Each rating
should be evaluated independently of any other rating.
Seasonality
We experience seasonal fluctuations in our net revenues and net
income from our franchise and management fees, commission income
earned from renting vacation properties, annual subscription
fees or annual membership dues, as applicable, and exchange
transaction fees and sales of VOIs. Revenues from franchise and
management fees are generally higher in the second and third
quarters than in the first or fourth quarters, because of
increased leisure travel during the summer months. Revenues from
rental income earned from booking vacation rentals are generally
highest in the third quarter, when vacation rentals are highest.
Revenues from vacation exchange transaction fees are generally
highest in the first quarter, which is generally when members of
our vacation exchange business plan and book their vacations for
the year. Revenues from sales of VOIs are generally higher in
the second and third quarters than in other quarters. The
seasonality of our business may cause fluctuations in our
quarterly operating results. As we expand into new markets and
geographical locations, we may experience increased or different
seasonality dynamics that create fluctuations in operating
results different from the fluctuations we have experienced in
the past.
Separation
Adjustments and Transactions with Former Parent and
Subsidiaries
Transfer
of Cendant Corporate Liabilities and Issuance of Guarantees to
Cendant and Affiliates
Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, upon the
distribution of our common stock to Cendant shareholders, we
entered into certain guarantee commitments with Cendant
(pursuant to the assumption of certain liabilities and the
obligation to indemnify Cendant, Realogy and Travelport for such
liabilities) and guarantee commitments related to deferred
compensation arrangements with each of Cendant and Realogy.
These guarantee arrangements primarily relate to certain
contingent litigation liabilities, contingent tax liabilities,
and Cendant contingent and other corporate liabilities, of which
we assumed and are responsible for 37.5% of these Cendant
liabilities. The amount of liabilities which we assumed in
connection with our separation from Cendant approximated
$349 million and $434 million at December 31,
2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. These amounts
were comprised of certain Cendant corporate liabilities which
were recorded on the books of Cendant as well as
63
additional liabilities which were established for guarantees
issued at the date of separation related to certain unresolved
contingent matters and certain others that could arise during
the guarantee period. Regarding the guarantees, if any of the
companies responsible for all or a portion of such liabilities
were to default in its payment of costs or expenses related to
any such liability, we would be responsible for a portion of the
defaulting party or parties obligation. We also provided a
default guarantee related to certain deferred compensation
arrangements related to certain current and former senior
officers and directors of Cendant, Realogy and Travelport. These
arrangements, which are discussed in more detail below, have
been valued upon our separation from Cendant with the assistance
of third-party experts in accordance with Financial
Interpretation No. 45 (FIN 45)
Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements
for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of
Others and recorded as liabilities on the balance sheet.
To the extent such recorded liabilities are not adequate to
cover the ultimate payment amounts, such excess will be
reflected as an expense to the results of operations in future
periods.
The $349 million is comprised of $36 million for
litigation matters, $239 million for tax liabilities,
$41 million for liabilities of previously sold businesses
of Cendant, $18 million for other contingent and corporate
liabilities and $15 million of liabilities where the
calculated FIN 45 guarantee amount exceeded the Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5 Accounting
for Contingencies liability assumed at the date of
separation (of which $12 million of the $15 million
pertain to litigation liabilities). In connection with these
liabilities, $110 million are recorded in current due to
former Parent and subsidiaries and $243 million are
recorded in long-term due to former Parent and subsidiaries at
December 31, 2007 on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. We are
indemnifying Cendant for these contingent liabilities and
therefore any payments would be made to the third party through
the former Parent. The $15 million relating to the
FIN 45 guarantees is recorded in other current liabilities
at December 31, 2007 on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. In
addition, we have a $18 million receivable primarily due
from former Parent relating to income tax refunds, which is
recorded in current due from former Parent and subsidiaries on
the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Such receivable totaled
$65 million at December 31, 2006, related to a refund
of excess funding paid to our former Parent resulting from the
Separation and income tax refunds.
At December 31, 2006, we had recorded a $37 million
receivable in non-current due from former Parent and
subsidiaries on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, which
represented our right, pursuant to the Separation Agreement, to
receive 37.5% of any proceeds from the ultimate sale of
Cendants preferred stock investment in and warrants of
Affinion Group Holdings, Inc. (Affinion). On
January 31, 2007, Affinion redeemed a portion of the
preferred stock investment owned by Avis Budget Group, of which
we owned a 37.5% interest pursuant to the Separation Agreement.
Upon our receipt of our share of the proceeds resulting from
Affinions redemption, such receivable was reduced to
$10 million. The receivable was reclassified to other
non-current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of
March 31, 2007 as the investment had been legally
transferred to us from Avis Budget Group. Accordingly, as of
December 31, 2007, we own $11 million of preferred
stock investment and warrants in Affinion and account for them
in accordance with SFAS No. 115, Accounting for
Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.
Following is a discussion of the liabilities on which we issued
guarantees:
|
|
|
Contingent litigation liabilities - We have
assumed 37.5% of liabilities for certain litigation relating to,
arising out of or resulting from certain lawsuits in which
Cendant is named as the defendant. The indemnification
obligation will continue until the underlying lawsuits are
resolved. We will indemnify Cendant to the extent that Cendant
is required to make payments related to any of the underlying
lawsuits. As the guarantee relates to matters in various stages
of litigation, the maximum exposure cannot be quantified. Due to
the inherent nature of the litigation process, the timing of
payments related to these liabilities cannot be reasonably
predicted, but is expected to occur over several years. During
2007, Cendant settled a number of these lawsuits and we assumed
a portion of the related indemnification obligations. As
discussed above, for each settlement, we paid 37.5% of the
aggregate settlement amount to Cendant. Our payment obligations
under the settlements were greater or less than our accruals,
depending on the matter. During 2007, Cendant received an
adverse order in a litigation matter for which we retain a 37.5%
indemnification obligation. As a result, we increased our
contingent litigation accrual for this matter by
$27 million. As a result of these settlements and payments
to Cendant, as well as other reductions and accruals for
developments in active litigation matters, our aggregate accrual
for outstanding Cendant contingent litigation liabilities was
decreased from $40 million at December 31, 2006 to
$36 million at December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
Contingent tax liabilities - We are liable for
37.5% of certain contingent tax liabilities and will pay to
Cendant the amount of taxes allocated pursuant to the Tax
Sharing Agreement for the payment of certain taxes. This
liability will remain outstanding until tax audits related to
the 2006 tax year are completed or the statutes of limitations
governing the 2006 tax year have passed. Our maximum exposure
cannot be quantified as tax regulations are subject to
interpretation and the outcome of tax audits or litigation is
inherently uncertain. Additionally, the timing of payments
related to these liabilities cannot be reasonably predicted, but
we expect a majority to occur during 2010.
|
64
|
|
|
Cendant contingent and other corporate
liabilities - We have has assumed 37.5% of
corporate liabilities of Cendant including liabilities relating
to (i) Cendants terminated or divested businesses,
(ii) liabilities relating to the Travelport sale, if any,
and (iii) generally any actions with respect to the
separation plan or the distributions brought by any third party.
Our maximum exposure to loss cannot be quantified as this
guarantee relates primarily to future claims that may be made
against Cendant, that have not yet occurred. We assessed the
probability and amount of potential liability related to this
guarantee based on the extent and nature of historical
experience.
|
|
|
Guarantee related to deferred compensation
arrangements - In the event that Cendant, Realogy
and/or
Travelport are not able to meet certain deferred compensation
obligations under specified plans for certain current and former
officers and directors because of bankruptcy or insolvency, we
have guaranteed such obligations (to the extent relating to
amounts deferred in respect of 2005 and earlier). This guarantee
will remain outstanding until such deferred compensation
balances are distributed to the respective officers and
directors. The maximum exposure cannot be quantified as the
guarantee, in part, is related to the value of deferred
investments as of the date of the requested distribution.
Additionally, the timing of payment, if any, related to these
liabilities cannot be reasonably predicted because the
distribution dates are not fixed.
|
Transactions
with Avis Budget Group, Realogy and Travelport
Prior to our separation from Cendant, we entered into a
Transition Services Agreement (TSA) with Avis Budget
Group, Realogy and Travelport to provide for an orderly
transition to becoming an independent company. Under the TSA,
Cendant agrees to provide us with various services, including
services relating to human resources and employee benefits,
payroll, financial systems management, treasury and cash
management, accounts payable services, telecommunications
services and information technology services. In certain cases,
services provided by Cendant under the TSA may be provided by
one of the separated companies following the date of such
companys separation from Cendant. We recorded
$13 million of expenses during 2007 and $8 million of
expenses and less than $1 million in other revenues during
2006 in the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income
related to these agreements.
Separation
and Related Costs
During 2007, we incurred costs of $16 million in connection
with executing our separation from Cendant. Such costs consisted
primarily of expenses related to the rebranding initiative at
our vacation ownership business and certain transitional
expenses. During 2006, we incurred costs of $99 million in
connection with executing our separation from Cendant,
consisting primarily of (i) the acceleration of vesting of
certain employee incentive awards and the related equitable
adjustments of such awards, (ii) an impairment charge due
to a rebranding initiative for our Fairfield and Trendwest
trademarks and (iii) consulting and payroll-related
services. We do not expect to incur separation and related costs
subsequent to December 31, 2007.
Contractual
Obligations
The following table summarizes our future contractual
obligations for the twelve month periods beginning on
January 1st of each of the years set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Securitized
debt (a)
|
|
$
|
237
|
|
|
$
|
324
|
|
|
$
|
561
|
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
$
|
148
|
|
|
$
|
671
|
|
|
$
|
2,081
|
|
Long-term
debt (b)
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
902
|
|
|
|
1,526
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
430
|
|
Other purchase
commitments (c)
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
Contingent
liabilities (d)
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (e)
|
|
$
|
893
|
|
|
$
|
603
|
|
|
$
|
902
|
|
|
$
|
617
|
|
|
$
|
203
|
|
|
$
|
1,738
|
|
|
$
|
4,956
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Amounts exclude interest expense,
as the amounts ultimately paid will depend on amounts
outstanding under our secured obligations and interest rates in
effect during each period.
|
(b) |
|
Excludes future cash payments
related to interest expense on our 6.00% senior unsecured
notes and term loan of $66 million during each year from
2008 through 2010, $59 million during 2011,
$48 million during 2012 and $191 million thereafter.
|
(c) |
|
Primarily represents commitments
for the development of vacation ownership properties.
|
(d) |
|
Primarily represents certain
contingent litigation liabilities, contingent tax liabilities
and 37.5% of Cendant contingent and other corporate liabilities,
which we assumed and are responsible for pursuant to our
separation from Cendant.
|
(e) |
|
Excludes $21 million of our
liability for unrecognized tax benefits associated with
FIN 48 since it is not reasonably estimatable to determine
the periods in which such liability would be settled with the
respective tax authorities.
|
65
In addition to the above and in connection with our separation
from Cendant, we entered into certain guarantee commitments with
Cendant (pursuant to our assumption of certain liabilities and
our obligation to indemnify Cendant, Realogy and Travelport for
such liabilities) and guarantee commitments related to deferred
compensation arrangements with each of Cendant and Realogy.
These guarantee arrangements primarily relate to certain
contingent litigation liabilities, contingent tax liabilities,
and Cendant contingent and other corporate liabilities, of which
we assumed and are responsible for 37.5% of these Cendant
liabilities. Additionally, if any of the companies responsible
for all or a portion of such liabilities were to default in its
payment of costs or expenses related to any such liability, we
are responsible for a portion of the defaulting party or
parties obligation. We also provide a default guarantee
related to certain deferred compensation arrangements related to
certain current and former senior officers and directors of
Cendant and Realogy. These arrangements were valued upon our
separation from Cendant with the assistance of third- party
experts in accordance with Financial Interpretation No. 45
Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements
for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of
Others and recorded as liabilities on our balance sheet.
To the extent such recorded liabilities are not adequate to
cover the ultimate payment amounts, such excess will be
reflected as an expense to our results of operations in future
periods. See Separation Adjustments and Transactions with former
Parent and Subsidiaries discussion for details of guaranteed
liabilities.
Other
Commercial Commitments and Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements
Purchase Commitments. In the normal course of business,
we make various commitments to purchase goods or services from
specific suppliers, including those related to vacation
ownership resort development and other capital expenditures.
Purchase commitments made by us as of December 31, 2007
aggregated $570 million. Individually, such commitments
range as high as $73 million related to the development of
a vacation ownership resort. The majority of the commitments
relate to the development of vacation ownership properties
(aggregating $331 million; $218 million of which
relates to 2008 and $113 million of which relates to 2009).
Standard Guarantees/Indemnifications. In the ordinary
course of business, we enter into numerous agreements that
contain standard guarantees and indemnities whereby we indemnify
another party for breaches of representations and warranties. In
addition, many of these parties are also indemnified against any
third-party claim resulting from the transaction that is
contemplated in the underlying agreement. Such guarantees and
indemnifications are granted under various agreements, including
those governing (i) purchases, sales or outsourcing of
assets or businesses, (ii) leases of real estate,
(iii) licensing of trademarks, (iv) development of
vacation ownership properties, (v) access to credit
facilities and use of derivatives and (vi) issuances of
debt securities. The guarantees and indemnifications issued are
for the benefit of the (i) buyers in sale agreements and
sellers in purchase agreements, (ii) landlords in lease
contracts, (iii) franchisees in licensing agreements,
(iv) developers in vacation ownership development
agreements, (v) financial institutions in credit facility
arrangements and derivative contracts and (vi) underwriters
in debt security issuances. While some of these guarantees and
indemnifications extend only for the duration of the underlying
agreement, many survive the expiration of the term of the
agreement or extend into perpetuity (unless subject to a legal
statute of limitations). There are no specific limitations on
the maximum potential amount of future payments that we could be
required to make under these guarantees and indemnifications,
nor are we able to develop an estimate of the maximum potential
amount of future payments to be made under these guarantees and
indemnifications as the triggering events are not subject to
predictability. With respect to certain of the aforementioned
guarantees and indemnifications, such as indemnifications of
landlords against third-party claims for the use of real estate
property leased by us, we maintain insurance coverage that
mitigates any potential payments to be made.
Other Guarantees/Indemnifications. In the normal course
of business, our vacation ownership business provides guarantees
to certain property owners associations for funds required
to operate and maintain vacation ownership properties in excess
of assessments collected from owners of the vacation ownership
interests. We may be required to fund such excess as a result of
our unsold owned vacation ownership interests or failure by
owners to pay such assessments. These guarantees extend for the
duration of the underlying subsidy agreements (which generally
approximate one year and are renewable on an annual basis) or
until a stipulated percentage (typically 80% or higher) of
related vacation ownership interests are sold. The maximum
potential future payments that we could be required to make
under these guarantees was $257 million as of
December 31, 2007. We would only be required to pay this
maximum amount if none of the owners assessed paid their
assessments. Any assessments collected from the owners of the
vacation ownership interests would reduce the maximum potential
amount of future payments to be made by us. Additionally, should
we be required to fund the deficit through the payment of any
owners assessments under these guarantees, we would be
permitted access to the property for our own use and may use
that property to engage in revenue-producing activities, such as
marketing or rental. During 2007, 2006 and 2005, we made
payments related to these guarantees of $5 million,
$6 million and $4 million, respectively. As of
December 31, 2007, we recorded a liability in connection
with these guarantees of $30 million.
66
In the ordinary course of business, we enter into hotel
management agreements which may provide a guarantee by us of
minimum returns to the hotel owner. Under such guarantees, we
are required to compensate for any shortfall over the life of
the management agreement up to a specified aggregate amount. Our
exposure under these guarantees is partially mitigated by our
ability to terminate any such management agreement if certain
targeted operating results are not met. Additionally, we are
able to recapture a portion or all of the shortfall payments and
any waived fees in the event that future operating results
exceed targets. The maximum potential amount of future payments
to be made under these guarantees is $20 million. The
underlying agreement would not require payment until 2010 or
thereafter. As of December 31, 2007, we recorded a
liability in connection with these guarantees of less than
$1 million on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Securitizations. We pool qualifying vacation ownership
contract receivables and sell them to bankruptcy-remote entities
all of which are consolidated into the accompanying Consolidated
Balance Sheet at December 31, 2007.
Letters of Credit. As of December 31, 2007, we had
$53 million of irrevocable standby letters of credit
outstanding, which mainly relate to support for development
activity at our vacation ownership business.
Critical
Accounting Policies
In presenting our financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles, we are required to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported
therein. Several of the estimates and assumptions we are
required to make relate to matters that are inherently uncertain
as they pertain to future events. However, events that are
outside of our control cannot be predicted and, as such, they
cannot be contemplated in evaluating such estimates and
assumptions. If there is a significant unfavorable change to
current conditions, it could result in a material adverse impact
to our consolidated and combined results of operations,
financial position and liquidity. We believe that the estimates
and assumptions we used when preparing our financial statements
were the most appropriate at that time. Presented below are
those accounting policies that we believe require subjective and
complex judgments that could potentially affect reported
results. However, the majority of our businesses operate in
environments where we are paid a fee for a service performed,
and therefore the results of the majority of our recurring
operations are recorded in our financial statements using
accounting policies that are not particularly subjective, nor
complex.
Vacation Ownership Revenue Recognition. Our sales of VOIs
are either cash sales or seller-financed sales. In order for us
to recognize revenues of VOI sales under the full accrual method
of accounting described in SFAS No. 66,
Accounting of Sales of Real Estate for fully
constructed inventory, a binding sales contract must have been
executed, the statutory rescission period must have expired
(after which time the purchasers are not entitled to a refund
except for non-delivery by us), receivables must have been
deemed collectible and the remainder of our obligations must
have been substantially completed. In addition, before we
recognize any revenues on VOI sales, the purchaser of the VOI
must have met the initial investment criteria and, as
applicable, the continuing investment criteria, by executing a
legally binding financing contract. A purchaser has met the
initial investment criteria when a minimum down payment of 10%
is received by us. As a result of the adoption of
SFAS No. 152 and
SOP 04-2
on January 1, 2006, we must also take into consideration
the fair value of certain incentives provided to the purchaser
when assessing the adequacy of the purchasers initial
investment. In those cases where financing is provided to the
purchaser by us, the purchaser is obligated to remit monthly
payments under financing contracts that represent the
purchasers continuing investment. The contractual terms of
seller-provided financing arrangements require that the
contractual level of annual principal payments be sufficient to
amortize the loan over a customary period for the VOI being
financed, which is generally seven to ten years, and payments
under the financing contracts begin within 45 days of the
sale and receipt of the minimum down payment of 10%. Prior to
2006, our provision for loan losses was presented as expenses on
the Combined Statements of Income. Upon the adoption of
SFAS No. 152 and
SOP 04-2
on January 1, 2006, the provision for loan losses is now
classified as a reduction of vacation ownership interest sales
on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income (see
Allowance for Loan Losses discussed below).
If all of the criteria for a VOI sale to qualify under the full
accrual method of accounting have been met, as discussed above,
except that construction of the VOI purchased is not complete,
we recognize revenues using the percentage-of-completion method
of accounting provided that the preliminary construction phase
is complete and that a minimum sales level has been met (to
assure that the property will not revert to a rental property).
The preliminary stage of development is deemed to be complete
when the engineering and design work is complete, the
construction contracts have been executed, the site has been
cleared, prepared and excavated, and the building foundation is
complete. The completion percentage is determined by the
proportion of real estate inventory costs incurred to total
estimated costs. These estimated costs are based upon historical
experience and the related contractual terms. The remaining
revenue and related costs of sales, including commissions and
direct expenses, are
67
deferred and recognized as the remaining costs are incurred.
Until a contract for sale qualifies for revenue recognition, all
payments received are accounted for as restricted cash and
deposits within other current assets and deferred income,
respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Commissions
and other direct costs related to the sale are deferred until
the sale is recorded. If a contract is cancelled before
qualifying as a sale, non-recoverable expenses are charged to
the current period as part of operating expenses on the
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income. Changes in costs
could lead to adjustments to the percentage of completion status
of a project, which may result in difference in the timing and
amount of revenue recognized from the construction of vacation
ownership properties. This policy changed upon our adoption of
SFAS No. 152 and
SOP 04-2,
which is discussed in greater detail in Note 2 to the
Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements.
Allowance for Loan Losses. In our Vacation Ownership
segment, we provide for estimated vacation ownership contract
receivable cancellations at the time of VOI sales by recording a
provision for loan losses on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income. We assess the adequacy of the allowance
for loan losses based on the historical performance of similar
vacation ownership contract receivables. We use a technique
referred to as static pool analysis, which tracks defaults for
each years sales over the entire life of those contract
receivables. We consider current defaults, past due aging,
historical write-offs of contracts, consumer credit scores (FICO
scores) in the assessment of borrowers credit strength and
expected loan performance. We also consider whether the
historical economic conditions are comparable to current
economic conditions. If current conditions differ from the
conditions in effect when the historical experience was
generated, we adjust the allowance for loan losses to reflect
the expected effects of the current environment on
uncollectibility. Upon the adoption of SFAS No. 152
and
SOP 04-2
on January 1, 2006, the provision for loan losses is
classified as a reduction to revenue with no change made to
prior periods presented.
Business Combinations. A component of our growth strategy
has been to acquire and integrate businesses that complement our
existing operations. We account for business combinations in
accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business
Combinations and related literature. Accordingly, we
allocate the purchase price of acquired companies to the
tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed
based upon their estimated fair values at the date of purchase.
The difference between the purchase price and the fair value of
the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill.
In determining the fair values of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in a business combination, we use various
recognized valuation methods including present value modeling
and referenced market values (where available). Further, we make
assumptions within certain valuation techniques including
discount rates and timing of future cash flows. Valuations are
performed by management or independent valuation specialists
under managements supervision, where appropriate. We
believe that the estimated fair values assigned to the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed are based on reasonable
assumptions that marketplace participants would use. However,
such assumptions are inherently uncertain and actual results
could differ from those estimates.
With regard to the goodwill and other indefinite-lived
intangible assets recorded in connection with business
combinations, we annually (during the fourth quarter of each
year subsequent to completing our annual forecasting process)
or, more frequently if circumstances indicate impairment may
have occurred, review their carrying values as required by
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets. In performing this review, we are required to make
an assessment of fair value for our goodwill and other
indefinite-lived intangible assets. When determining fair value,
we utilize various assumptions, including projections of future
cash flows. A change in these underlying assumptions could cause
a change in the results of the tests and, as such, could cause
the fair value to be less than the respective carrying amount.
In such event, we would then be required to record a charge,
which would impact earnings.
The aggregate carrying values of our goodwill and other
indefinite-lived intangible assets were $2,723 million and
$620 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2007
and $2,699 million and $619 million, respectively, as
of December 31, 2006. Our goodwill and other
indefinite-lived intangible assets are allocated among our three
reportable segments.
Income Taxes. We recognize deferred tax assets and
liabilities based on the differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and
liabilities. We regularly review our deferred tax assets to
assess their potential realization and establish a valuation
allowance for portions of such assets that we believe will not
be ultimately realized. In performing this review, we make
estimates and assumptions regarding projected future taxable
income, the expected timing of the reversals of existing
temporary differences and the implementation of tax planning
strategies. A change in these assumptions could cause an
increase or decrease to our valuation allowance resulting in an
increase or decrease in our effective tax rate, which could
materially impact our results of operations.
68
Changes
in Accounting Policies
During 2007, we adopted the following standards as a result of
the issuance of new accounting pronouncements:
|
|
|
|
|
SFAS No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of
Financial Assets an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 140
|
|
|
FASB Interpretation No 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109
|
We will adopt the following recently issued standards as
required:
|
|
|
|
|
SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
|
|
|
SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
|
|
|
SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations
|
|
|
SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements an Amendment of
ARB No. 51
|
|
|
SAB 110, Use of a Simplified Method in
Developing an Estimate of Expected Term of Plain
Vanilla Share Options
|
For detailed information regarding these pronouncements and the
impact thereof on our financial statements, see Note 2 to
our Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements.
69
|
|
ITEM 7A.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
We use various financial instruments, particularly swap
contracts and interest rate caps to manage and reduce the
interest rate risk related to our debt. Foreign currency
forwards and options are also used to manage and reduce the
foreign currency exchange rate risk associated with our foreign
currency denominated receivables, payables and forecasted
royalties, forecasted earnings and cash flows of foreign
subsidiaries and other transactions.
We are exclusively an end user of these instruments, which are
commonly referred to as derivatives. We do not engage in
trading, market making or other speculative activities in the
derivatives markets. More detailed information about these
financial instruments is provided in Note 18 to the
Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements. Our principal
market exposures are interest and foreign currency rate risks.
|
|
|
|
|
Our primary interest rate exposure as of December 31, 2007
was to interest rate fluctuations in the United States,
specifically LIBOR and commercial paper interest rates due to
their impact on variable rate borrowings and other interest rate
sensitive liabilities. In addition, interest rate movements in
one country, as well as relative interest rate movements between
countries can impact us. We anticipate that LIBOR and commercial
paper rates will remain a primary market risk exposure for the
foreseeable future.
|
|
|
|
We have foreign currency rate exposure to exchange rate
fluctuations worldwide and particularly with respect to the
British pound, Euro and Canadian dollar. We anticipate that such
foreign currency exchange rate risk will remain a market risk
exposure for the foreseeable future.
|
We assess our market risk based on changes in interest rates
utilizing a sensitivity analysis. The sensitivity analysis
measures the potential impact in earnings, fair values and cash
flows based on a hypothetical 10% change (increase and decrease)
in interest rates. We have approximately $3.6 billion of
debt outstanding as of December 31, 2007. Of that total,
$900 million was issued as variable rate debt and has not
been synthetically converted to fixed rate debt via an interest
rate swap. A hypothetical 10% change in our effective weighted
average interest rate would increase or decrease interest
expense by $4 million.
The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables,
accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current
liabilities approximate carrying values due to the short-term
nature of these assets. We use a discounted cash flow model in
determining the fair values of vacation ownership contract
receivables. The primary assumptions used in determining fair
value are prepayment speeds, estimated loss rates and discount
rates. We use a duration-based model in determining the impact
of interest rate shifts on our debt and interest rate
derivatives. The primary assumption used in these models is that
a 10% increase or decrease in the benchmark interest rate
produces a parallel shift in the yield curve across all
maturities.
We use a current market pricing model to assess the changes in
the value of the U.S. dollar on foreign currency
denominated monetary assets and liabilities and derivatives. The
primary assumption used in these models is a hypothetical 10%
weakening or strengthening of the U.S. dollar against all
our currency exposures as of December 31, 2007. The gains
and losses on the hedging instruments are largely offset by the
gains and losses on the underlying assets, liabilities or
expected cash flows. At December 31, 2007, the absolute
notional amount of our outstanding hedging instruments is
$500 million. A hypothetical 10% change in the foreign
currency exchange rates would result in an increase or decrease
of $25 million in the fair value of the hedging instrument
at December 31, 2007. Such a change would be largely offset
by an opposite effect on the underlying assets, liabilities and
expected cash flows.
Our total market risk is influenced by a wide variety of factors
including the volatility present within the markets and the
liquidity of the markets. There are certain limitations inherent
in the sensitivity analyses presented. While probably the most
meaningful analysis, these shock tests are
constrained by several factors, including the necessity to
conduct the analysis based on a single point in time and the
inability to include the complex market reactions that normally
would arise from the market shifts modeled.
We used December 31, 2007 market rates on outstanding
financial instruments to perform the sensitivity analysis
separately for each of our market risk exposuresinterest
and currency rate instruments. The estimates are based on the
market risk sensitive portfolios described in the preceding
paragraphs and assume instantaneous, parallel shifts in interest
rate yield curves and exchange rates.
|
|
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
See Financial Statements and Financial Statement Index
commencing on
page F-1
hereof.
70
|
|
ITEM 9.
|
CHANGE
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
Not applicable
|
|
ITEM 9A.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our management, with
the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered
by this report. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of
the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures
are effective in alerting them in a timely manner to material
information required to be included in our reports filed with
the Commission.
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting. Our management is responsible for
establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting, as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Our
management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007. In making
this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO) in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework.
Based on this assessment, our management believes that, as
of December 31, 2007, our internal control over financial
reporting is effective. Our independent registered public
accountants have issued an attestation report on the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting,
which is included within their audit opinion on page F-2.
|
PART III
|
|
ITEM 10.
|
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
Identification
of Directors.
Information required by this item is included in the Proxy
Statement under the caption Election of Directors
and is incorporated by reference in this report.
Identification
of Executive Officers.
The following provides information for each of our executive
officers.
Stephen P. Holmes, 51, has served as the Chairman of our Board
of Directors and as our Chief Executive Officer since our
separation from Cendant in July 2006. Mr. Holmes was a
director since May 2003 of the already-existing, wholly owned
subsidiary of Cendant that held the assets and liabilities of
Cendants hospitality services (including timeshare
resorts) businesses before our separation from Cendant and has
served as a director of Wyndham Worldwide since the separation
in July 2006. Mr. Holmes was Vice Chairman and Director of
Cendant and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Cendants Travel Content Division from December 1997 until
our separation from Cendant in July 2006. Mr. Holmes was
Vice Chairman of HFS Incorporated, from September 1996 until
December 1997 and was a director of HFS from June 1994 until
December 1997. From July 1990 through September 1996,
Mr. Holmes served as Executive Vice President, Treasurer
and Chief Financial Officer of HFS.
Franz S. Hanning, 54, has served as President and Chief
Executive Officer, Wyndham Vacation Ownership since our
separation from Cendant in July 2006. Mr. Hanning was the
Chief Executive Officer of Cendants Timeshare Resort Group
from March 2005 until our separation from Cendant in July 2006.
Mr. Hanning served as President and Chief Executive Officer
of Fairfield Resorts, Inc. (which has been renamed Wyndham
Vacation Resorts, Inc.) from April 2001, when Cendant acquired
Fairfield, to March 2005 and as President and Chief Executive
Officer of Trendwest Resorts, Inc. (which has been renamed
WorldMark by Wyndham) from August 2004 to March 2005.
Mr. Hanning joined Fairfield in 1982 and held several key
leadership positions with Fairfield, including Regional Vice
President, Executive Vice President of Sales and Chief Operating
Officer.
Steven A. Rudnitsky, 49, has served as President and Chief
Executive Officer, Wyndham Hotel Group since our separation from
Cendant in July 2006. Mr. Rudnitsky was the Chief Executive
Officer of Cendants Hotel Group from March 2002 until our
separation from Cendant in July 2006. Prior to joining Cendant,
from December 2000 to
71
March 2002, Mr. Rudnitsky was President of Kraft
Foodservice and Executive Vice President of Kraft Foods, Inc.
Mr. Rudnitsky was appointed to these positions with Kraft
in December 2000 upon Krafts acquisition of Nabisco Foods
Company, where he served as President from 1999 until December
2000. From 1996 to 1999, Mr. Rudnitsky was Vice President
and General Manager, food service, for Pillsbury
Bakeries & Foodservice. From 1984 to 1996,
Mr. Rudnitsky held positions of increasing responsibility
at PepsiCo, Inc.
Virginia M. Wilson, 53, has served as our Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer since our separation from
Cendant in July 2006. Ms. Wilson was Executive Vice
President and Chief Accounting Officer of Cendant from September
2003 until our separation from Cendant in July 2006. From
October 1999 until August 2003, Ms. Wilson served as Senior
Vice President and Controller for MetLife, Inc., a provider of
insurance and other financial services. From 1996 until 1999,
Ms. Wilson served as Senior Vice President and Controller
for Transamerica Life Companies, an insurance and financial
services company. Prior to Transamerica, Ms. Wilson was an
Audit Partner of Deloitte & Touche LLP.
Scott G. McLester, 45, has served as our Executive Vice
President and General Counsel since our separation from Cendant
in July 2006. Mr. McLester was Senior Vice President, Legal
for Cendant from April 2004 until our separation from Cendant in
July 2006. Mr. McLester was Group Vice President, Legal for
Cendant from March 2002 to April 2004, Vice President, Legal for
Cendant from February 2001 to March 2002 and Senior Counsel for
Cendant from June 2000 to February 2001. Prior to joining
Cendant, Mr. McLester was a Vice President in the Law
Department of Merrill Lynch in New York and a partner with the
law firm of Carpenter, Bennett and Morrissey in Newark, New
Jersey.
Mary R. Falvey, 47, has served as our Executive Vice President
and Chief Human Resources Officer since our separation from
Cendant in July 2006. Ms. Falvey was Executive Vice
President, Global Human Resources for Cendants Vacation
Network Group from April 2005 until our separation from Cendant
in July 2006. From March 2000 to April 2005, Ms. Falvey
served as Executive Vice President, Human Resources for RCI.
From January 1998 to March 2000, Ms. Falvey was Vice
President of Human Resources for Cendants Hotel Division
and Corporate Contact Center group. Prior to joining Cendant,
Ms. Falvey held various leadership positions in the human
resources division of Nabisco Foods Company.
Thomas F. Anderson, 43, has served as our Executive Vice
President and Chief Real Estate Development Officer since our
separation from Cendant in July 2006. From April 2003 until July
2006, Mr. Anderson was Executive Vice President, Strategic
Acquisitions and Development of Cendants Timeshare Resort
Group. From January 2000 until February 2003, Mr. Anderson
was Senior Vice President, Corporate Real Estate for Cendant
Corporation. From November 1998 until December 1999,
Mr. Anderson was Vice President of Real Estate Services,
Coldwell Banker Commercial. From March 1995 to October 1998,
Mr. Anderson was General Manager of American Asset
Corporation, a full service real estate developer based in
Charlotte, North Carolina. From June 1990 until February 1995,
Mr. Anderson was Vice President of Commercial Lending for
BB&T Corporation in Charlotte, North Carolina.
Nicola Rossi, 41, has served as our Senior Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer since our separation from Cendant in
July 2006. Mr. Rossi was Vice President and Controller of
Cendants Hotel Group from June 2004 until our separation
from Cendant in July 2006. From April 2002 to June 2004,
Mr. Rossi served as Vice President, Corporate Finance for
Cendant. From April 2000 to April 2002, Mr. Rossi was
Corporate Controller of Jacuzzi Brands, Inc., a bath and
plumbing products company, and was Assistant Corporate
Controller from June 1999 to March 2000.
Compliance
with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.
The information required by this item is included in the Proxy
Statement under the caption Section 16(a) Beneficial
Ownership Reporting Compliance and is incorporated by
reference in this report.
Code of
Ethics.
The information required by this item is included in the Proxy
Statement under the caption Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics and is incorporated by reference in this report.
Corporate
Governance.
The information required by this item is included in the Proxy
Statement under the caption Governance of the
Company and is incorporated by reference in this report.
72
Certifications.
We have filed as exhibits to this report the certifications
required by
Rule 13a-14
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
We submitted the CEO certification to the NYSE pursuant to NYSE
Rule 303A.12(a) following the 2007 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders.
|
|
ITEM 11.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
The information required by this item is included in the Proxy
Statement under the captions Executive Compensation
and Committees of the Board and is incorporated by
reference in this report.
|
|
ITEM 12.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
The information required by this item is included in the Proxy
Statement under the captions Ownership of Company
Stock and Equity Compensation Plan Information
and is incorporated by reference in this report.
|
|
ITEM 13.
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
|
The information required by this item is included in the Proxy
Statement under the captions Related Party
Transactions and Governance of the Company and
is incorporated by reference in this report.
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
|
The information required by this item is included in the Proxy
Statement under the captions Disclosure About Fees
and Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services and
is incorporated by reference in this report.
PART IV
|
|
ITEM 15.
|
EXHIBITS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
ITEM 15(A)(1) FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
See Financial Statements and Financial Statements Index
commencing on
page F-1
hereof.
ITEM 15(A)(3) EXHIBITS
See Exhibit Index commencing on
page G-1
hereof.
73
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
WYNDHAM WORLDWIDE CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ STEPHEN
P. HOLMES
|
Stephen P. Holmes
Chief Executive Officer
Date: February 29, 2008
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
/s/ STEPHEN
P. HOLMES
Stephen
P. Holmes
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
February 29, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ VIRGINIA
M. WILSON
Virginia
M. Wilson
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
February 29, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ NICOLA
ROSSI
Nicola
Rossi
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
February 29, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ MYRA
J. BIBLOWIT
Myra
J. Biblowit
|
|
Director
|
|
February 29, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ JAMES
E. BUCKMAN
James
E. Buckman
|
|
Director
|
|
February 29, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ GEORGE
HERRERA
George
Herrera
|
|
Director
|
|
February 29, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ THE
RIGHT HONOURABLE
BRIAN MULRONEY
The
Right Honourable Brian Mulroney
|
|
Director
|
|
February 29, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ PAULINE
D.E. RICHARDS
Pauline
D.E. Richards
|
|
Director
|
|
February 29, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ MICHAEL
H. WARGOTZ
Michael
H. Wargotz
|
|
Director
|
|
February 29, 2008
|
74
INDEX TO
ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
F-1
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Wyndham Worldwide Corporation Board of Directors and
Shareholders
Parsippany, New Jersey
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation and subsidiaries (the
Company) as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and
the related consolidated and combined statements of income,
stockholders/invested equity, and cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007. We
also have audited the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on
criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission. The Companys management is
responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on these financial statements and an opinion on the
Companys internal control over financial reporting based
on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement and whether effective internal
control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audits of the financial statements included
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial
reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a
material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the
assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed by, or under the supervision of, the
companys principal executive and principal financial
officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected
by the companys board of directors, management, and other
personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over
financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or
improper management override of controls, material misstatements
due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a
timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the
effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting
to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
In our opinion, the consolidated and combined financial
statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of Wyndham Worldwide
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and
2006, and the results of their operations and their cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2007, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our
opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects,
effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2007, based on the criteria established in
Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated and combined
financial statements, prior to its separation from Cendant
Corporation (Cendant; known as Avis Budget Group
since August 29, 2006), the Company was comprised of the
assets and liabilities used in managing and operating the
lodging, vacation exchange and rental and vacation ownership
businesses of Cendant. Included in Notes 20 and 21 of the
consolidated and combined financial statements is a summary of
transactions with related parties. As discussed in Note 14
to the consolidated and combined financial statements, in
connection with its separation from Cendant, the Company entered
into certain guarantee commitments with Cendant and has recorded
the fair value of these guarantees as of July 31, 2006. As
discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated and combined
financial statements, as of January 1, 2006, the Company
adopted the provisions for accounting for real estate
time-sharing transactions. Also, as discussed in Note 2 to
the consolidated and combined financial statements, the Company
adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation
No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxesan
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 on January 1,
2007.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Parsippany, New Jersey
February 29, 2008
F-2
WYNDHAM
WORLDWIDE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In millions, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation ownership interest sales
|
|
$
|
1,666
|
|
|
$
|
1,461
|
|
|
$
|
1,379
|
|
Service fees and membership
|
|
|
1,619
|
|
|
|
1,437
|
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
Franchise fees
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
501
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
Consumer financing
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
Other
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
4,360
|
|
|
|
3,842
|
|
|
|
3,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
1,742
|
|
|
|
1,474
|
|
|
|
1,199
|
|
Cost of vacation ownership interests
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
341
|
|
Marketing and reservation
|
|
|
831
|
|
|
|
734
|
|
|
|
628
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
519
|
|
|
|
493
|
|
|
|
424
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
Separation and related costs
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,650
|
|
|
|
3,265
|
|
|
|
2,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
620
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Interest income (including intercompany of $0, $24 and $30)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
626
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
431
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
403
|
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
$
|
431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
|
|
$
|
1.78
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
2.22
|
|
|
|
1.45
|
|
|
|
2.15
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
$
|
2.20
|
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
1.44
|
|
|
|
2.15
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements.
F-3
WYNDHAM
WORLDWIDE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
210
|
|
|
$
|
269
|
|
Trade receivables, net
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
429
|
|
Vacation ownership contract receivables, net
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
586
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
Due from former Parent and subsidiaries
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
2,056
|
|
|
|
2,052
|
|
Long-term vacation ownership contract receivables, net
|
|
|
2,654
|
|
|
|
2,123
|
|
Non-current inventory
|
|
|
649
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
|
|
916
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
2,723
|
|
|
|
2,699
|
|
Trademarks, net
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
621
|
|
Franchise agreements and other intangibles, net
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
Due from former Parent and subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
10,459
|
|
|
$
|
9,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized vacation ownership debt
|
|
$
|
237
|
|
|
$
|
178
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
|
377
|
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
612
|
|
|
|
545
|
|
Due to former Parent and subsidiaries
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
666
|
|
|
|
575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
2,180
|
|
|
|
1,977
|
|
Long-term securitized vacation ownership debt
|
|
|
1,844
|
|
|
|
1,285
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,351
|
|
|
|
1,322
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
927
|
|
|
|
782
|
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
Due to former Parent and subsidiaries
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
6,943
|
|
|
|
5,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, authorized
6,000,000 shares, none issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value, authorized
600,000,000 shares, issued 203,874,101 shares in 2007
and 202,294,898 shares in 2006
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
3,652
|
|
|
|
3,566
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost26,656,804 shares in 2007 and
11,877,600 shares in 2006
|
|
|
(857
|
)
|
|
|
(349
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
3,516
|
|
|
|
3,559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
10,459
|
|
|
$
|
9,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements.
F-4
WYNDHAM
WORLDWIDE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
403
|
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
$
|
431
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
431
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile income before cumulative effect of
accounting change to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of intangible assets
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in assets and liabilities, excluding the impact of
acquisitions and dispositions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
Vacation ownership contract receivables
|
|
|
(835
|
)
|
|
|
(594
|
)
|
|
|
(462
|
)
|
Inventory
|
|
|
(322
|
)
|
|
|
(280
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
Due to former Parent and subsidiaries
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment additions
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
|
|
(191
|
)
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
Net assets acquired, net of cash acquired, and
acquisition-related payments
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
(154
|
)
|
Net intercompany funding to former Parent and subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(143
|
)
|
|
|
(398
|
)
|
Equity investments and development advances
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Proceeds received from asset sales
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in restricted cash
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(255
|
)
|
|
|
(471
|
)
|
|
|
(696
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from securitized borrowings
|
|
|
2,636
|
|
|
|
1,531
|
|
|
|
1,163
|
|
Principal payments on securitized borrowings
|
|
|
(2,018
|
)
|
|
|
(1,203
|
)
|
|
|
(931
|
)
|
Proceeds from non-securitized borrowings
|
|
|
1,403
|
|
|
|
2,186
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
Principal payments on non-securitized borrowings
|
|
|
(1,339
|
)
|
|
|
(1,937
|
)
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
Proceeds from bond issuance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
796
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend to shareholders
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid to former Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,360
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
Capital contribution from former Parent
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
795
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(526
|
)
|
|
|
(329
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock option exercises
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
473
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of changes in exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
210
|
|
|
$
|
269
|
|
|
$
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements.
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Companys
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Net Investment
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,465
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,679
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax benefit of $19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on cash flow hedges, net of tax of $2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification for gains on cash flow hedges, net of tax
benefit of $2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
Dividends paid to former Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
Capital contribution from former Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,033
|
|
Comprehensive income from January 1, 2006 to
July 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax benefit of $27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on cash flow hedges, net of
tax benefit of $1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income from January 1, 2006 to
July 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
Assumption of former Parent corporate assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
Return of excess funding from former Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Tax receivables due from former Parent and subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Deferred tax assets on contingent liabilities and guarantees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Guarantees under FIN 45 related to the Separation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
Contingent liabilitiesdue to former Parent and subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(483
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(483
|
)
|
Cash transfer to former Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,360
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,360
|
)
|
Elimination of asset-linked facility obligation by former Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
Capital contribution from former Parentproceeds from
Travelport sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
760
|
|
Elimination of intercompany balance due to former Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,157
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,157
|
)
|
Transfer of net investment to additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,569
|
|
|
|
(3,569
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income from August 1, 2006 to
December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax of $16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on cash flow hedges, net of
tax benefit of $4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income from August 1, 2006 to
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock units
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
Additional capital contribution from former Parentproceeds
from Travelport sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Adjustments to contingent liabilities due to former Parent and
subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(349
|
)
|
|
|
(349
|
)
|
Equitable adjustment of stock based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Adjustment to deferred tax assets assumed from former Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Excess deferred tax assets from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
3,566
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
156
|
|
|
$
|
184
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(349
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,559
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax of $15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on cash flow hedges, net of
tax benefit of $12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax of $1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
413
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Issuance of shares for vesting of restricted stock units
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Cumulative effect, adoption of FASB Interpretation
No. 48Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(508
|
)
|
|
|
(508
|
)
|
Cash transfer from former Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Tax adjustment from former Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Payment of dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
3,652
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
525
|
|
|
$
|
194
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(857
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements.
F-6
WYNDHAM
WORLDWIDE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise noted, all amounts are in millions,
except per share amounts)
Prior to July 31, 2006, Cendant Corporation
(Cendant or former Parent; known as Avis
Budget Group Inc. since August 29, 2006) transferred
to Wyndham Worldwide Corporation (Wyndham or
the Company), a Delaware corporation, all of the
assets and liabilities primarily related to the hospitality
services (including timeshare resorts) businesses of Cendant. On
July 31, 2006, Cendant distributed all of the shares of
Wyndham common stock to the holders of Cendant common stock
issued and outstanding on July 21, 2006, the record date
for the distribution. The separation of Wyndham from Cendant
(Separation) was effective on July 31, 2006. On
August 1, 2006, the Company commenced regular
way trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the
symbol WYN.
The accompanying Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements
include the accounts and transactions of Wyndham, as well as the
entities in which Wyndham directly or indirectly has a
controlling financial interest. The accompanying Consolidated
and Combined Financial Statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. All intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated in the Consolidated and
Combined Financial Statements.
The Companys consolidated and combined results of
operations, financial position and cash flows may not be
indicative of its future performance and do not necessarily
reflect what its consolidated results of operations, financial
position and cash flows would have been had the Company operated
as a separate, stand-alone entity during the periods presented
prior to August 1, 2006, including changes in its
operations and capitalization as a result of the Separation and
distribution from Cendant.
Certain corporate and general and administrative expenses,
including those related to executive management, tax,
accounting, payroll, legal and treasury services, certain
employee benefits and real estate usage for common space were
allocated by Cendant to the Company through July 31, 2006
based on forecasted revenues or usage. Management believes such
allocations were reasonable. However, the associated expenses
recorded by the Company in the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income may not be indicative of the actual
expenses that would have been incurred had the Company been
operating as a separate, stand-alone public company for the
periods presented prior to August 1, 2006. Following the
Separation and distribution from Cendant, the Company began
performing these functions using internal resources or purchased
services, certain of which have been provided by Cendant or one
of the separated companies during a transitional period pursuant
to the Transition Services Agreement. Refer to
Note 21Related Party Transactions for a detailed
description of the Companys transactions with Cendant and
its former subsidiaries.
In presenting the Consolidated and Combined Financial
Statements, management makes estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported and related disclosures. Estimates,
by their nature, are based on judgment and available
information. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those
estimates. In managements opinion, the Consolidated and
Combined Financial Statements contain all normal recurring
adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of annual results
reported.
The Company applies the equity method of accounting when it has
the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and
financial policies of an investee in accordance with Accounting
Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 18,
The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common
Stock. The Company recorded $1 million of net losses
from such investments during 2007 in other income, net on the
Consolidated Statement of Income. In addition, the Company sold
certain vacation ownership properties and related assets during
2007 that were no longer consistent with the Companys
development plans for $26 million in proceeds. The Company
recorded a pre-tax gain related to such sale of $8 million
in other income, net on the Consolidated Statement of Income.
Business
Description
The Company operates in the following business segments:
|
|
|
|
|
Lodgingfranchises hotels in the upscale,
middle and economy segments of the lodging industry and provides
property management services to owners of luxury, upscale and
midscale hotels.
|
F-7
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentalsprovides
vacation exchange products and services to owners of intervals
of vacation ownership interests (VOIs) and markets
vacation rental properties primarily on behalf of independent
owners.
|
|
|
|
Vacation Ownershipmarkets and sells VOIs to
individual consumers, provides consumer financing in connection
with the sale of VOIs and provides property management services
at resorts.
|
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Principles
of Consolidation
In connection with Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Interpretation No. 46 (Revised 2003),
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
(FIN 46), when evaluating an entity for
consolidation, the Company first determines whether an entity is
within the scope of FIN 46 and if it is deemed to be a
variable interest entity (VIE). If the entity is
considered to be a VIE, the Company determines whether it would
be considered the entitys primary beneficiary. The Company
consolidates those VIEs for which it has determined that it is
the primary beneficiary. The Company will consolidate an entity
not deemed either a VIE or qualifying special purpose entity
(QSPE) upon a determination that its ownership,
direct or indirect, exceeds 50% of the outstanding voting shares
of an entity
and/or that
it has the ability to control the financial or operating
policies through its voting rights, board representation or
other similar rights. For entities where the Company does not
have a controlling interest (financial or operating), the
investments in such entities are classified as
available-for-sale securities or accounted for using the equity
or cost method, as appropriate.
Revenue
Recognition
Lodging
The Company enters into agreements to franchise its lodging
franchise systems to independent hotel owners. The
Companys standard franchise agreement typically has a term
of 15 to 20 years and provides a franchisee with certain
rights to terminate the franchise agreement before the term of
the agreement under certain circumstances. The principal source
of revenues from franchising hotels is ongoing franchise fees,
which are comprised of royalty fees and other fees relating to
marketing and reservation services. Ongoing franchise fees
typically are based on a percentage of gross room revenues of
each franchised hotel and are accrued as earned and upon
becoming due from the franchisee. An estimate of uncollectible
ongoing franchise fees is charged to bad debt expense and
included in operating expenses on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income. Lodging revenues also include initial
franchise fees, which are recognized as revenue when all
material services or conditions have been substantially
performed, which is either when a franchised hotel opens for
business or when a franchise agreement is terminated as it has
been determined that the franchised hotel will not open.
The Companys franchise agreements also require the payment
of fees for certain services, including marketing and
reservations. With such fees, the Company provides its
franchised properties with a suite of operational and
administrative services, including access to (i) an
international, centralized, brand-specific reservations system,
(ii) advertising, (iii) promotional and co-marketing
programs, (iv) referrals, (v) technology,
(vi) training and (vii) volume purchasing. The Company
is contractually obligated to expend the marketing and
reservation fees it collects from franchisees in accordance with
the franchise agreements; as such, revenues earned in excess of
costs incurred are accrued as a liability for future marketing
or reservation costs. Costs incurred in excess of revenues are
expensed. In accordance with the Companys franchise
agreements, the Company includes an allocation of costs required
to carry out marketing and reservation activities within
marketing and reservation expenses.
The Company also provides property management services for
hotels under management contracts. The Companys standard
management agreement typically has a term of up to
20 years. The Companys management fees are comprised
of base fees, which are typically calculated based upon a
specified percentage of gross revenues from hotel operations,
and incentive fees, which are typically calculated based upon a
specified percentage of a hotels gross operating profit.
Management fee revenue is recognized when earned in accordance
with the terms of the contract. The Company incurs certain
reimbursable costs on behalf of managed hotel properties and
report reimbursements received from managed properties as
revenue and the costs incurred on their behalf as expenses.
Management fee revenues are recorded as a component of franchise
fee revenues and reimbursable revenues are recorded as a
component of service fees and membership revenue on the
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income. The costs, which
principally relate to payroll costs for operational employees
who work at the managed hotels, are reflected as a component of
operating expenses on the Consolidated and Combined Statements
of Income. The reimbursements from hotel owners are based upon
the costs incurred with no added margin; as a result,
F-8
these reimbursable costs have little to no effect on the
Companys operating income. Management fee revenue and
revenue related to payroll reimbursements were $6 million
and $92 million, respectively, during 2007, $4 million
and $69 million, respectively, during 2006 and
$1 million and $17 million, respectively, during the
period October 11, 2005 (date of Wyndham Hotels and Resorts
brand acquisition, which includes management contracts) through
December 31, 2005.
The Company also earns revenue from administering its
TripRewards loyalty program. When a member stays at a
participating hotel, the Company charges its franchisee/managed
property owner a fee based upon a percentage of room revenue
generated from such stay. This fee is accrued as earned and upon
becoming due from the franchisee.
Vacation
Exchange and Rentals
As a provider of vacation exchange services, the Company enters
into affiliation agreements with developers of vacation
ownership properties to allow owners of intervals to trade their
intervals for certain other intervals within the Companys
vacation exchange business and, for some members, for other
leisure-related products and services. Additionally, as a
marketer of vacation rental properties, generally the Company
enters into contracts for exclusive periods of time with
property owners to market the rental of such properties to
rental customers. The Companys vacation exchange business
derives a majority of its revenues from annual membership dues
and exchange fees from members trading their intervals. Annual
dues revenue represents the annual membership fees from members
who participate in the Companys vacation exchange business
and, for additional fees, have the right to exchange their
intervals for certain other intervals within the Companys
vacation exchange business and, for certain members, for other
leisure-related products and services. The Company records
revenue from annual membership dues as deferred income on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets and recognizes it on a straight-line
basis over the membership period during which delivery of
publications, if applicable, and other services are provided to
the members. Exchange fees are generated when members exchange
their intervals for equivalent values of rights and services,
which may include intervals at other properties within the
Companys vacation exchange business or other
leisure-related products and services. Exchange fees are
recognized as revenue when the exchange requests have been
confirmed to the member. The Companys vacation rentals
business derives its revenue principally from fees, which
generally range from approximately 45% to 65% of the gross rent
charged to rental customers. The majority of the time, the
Company acts on behalf of the owners of the rental properties to
generate the Companys fees. The Company provides
reservation services to the independent property owners and
receives the
agreed-upon
fee for the service provided. The Company remits the gross
rental fee received from the renter to the independent property
owner, net of the Companys
agreed-upon
fee. Revenue from such fees is recognized in the period that the
rental reservation is made, net of expected cancellations. Upon
confirmation of the rental reservation, the rental customer and
property owner generally have a direct relationship for
additional services to be performed. Cancellations for 2007,
2006 and 2005 each totaled less than 5% of rental transactions
booked. The Companys revenue is earned when evidence of an
arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or the services have
been rendered, the sellers price to the buyer is fixed or
determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. The
Company also earns rental fees in connection with properties it
owns or leases under capital leases and such fees are recognized
when the rental customers stay occurs, as this is the
point at which the service is rendered.
Vacation
Ownership
The Company markets and sells VOIs to individual consumers,
provides property management services at resorts and provides
consumer financing in connection with the sale of VOIs. The
Companys vacation ownership business derives the majority
of its revenues from sales of VOIs and derives other revenues
from consumer financing and property management. The
Companys sales of VOIs are either cash sales or
Company-financed sales. In order for the Company to recognize
revenues of VOI sales under the full accrual method of
accounting described in Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 66 Accounting of
Sales of Real Estate for fully constructed inventory, a
binding sales contract must have been executed, the statutory
rescission period must have expired (after which time the
purchasers are not entitled to a refund except for non-delivery
by the Company), receivables must have been deemed collectible
and the remainder of the Companys obligations must have
been substantially completed. In addition, before the Company
recognizes any revenues on VOI sales, the purchaser of the VOI
must have met the initial investment criteria and, as
applicable, the continuing investment criteria, by executing a
legally binding financing contract. A purchaser has met the
initial investment criteria when a minimum down payment of 10%
is received by the Company. As a result of the adoption of
SFAS No. 152, Accounting for Real Estate
Time-Sharing Transactions
(SFAS No. 152) and Statement of Position
No. 04-2,
Accounting for Real Estate Time-Sharing Transactions
(SOP 04-2)
on January 1, 2006, the Company must also take into
consideration the fair value of certain incentives provided to
the purchaser when assessing the adequacy of the
purchasers initial investment. In those cases where
financing is provided to the purchaser by the Company, the
purchaser is obligated
F-9
to remit monthly payments under financing contracts that
represent the purchasers continuing investment. The
contractual terms of Company-provided financing agreements
require that the contractual level of annual principal payments
be sufficient to amortize the loan over a customary period for
the VOI being financed, which is generally seven to ten years,
and payments under the financing contracts begin within
45 days of the sale and receipt of the minimum down payment
of 10%. If all of the criteria for a VOI sale to qualify under
the full accrual method of accounting have been met, as
discussed above, except that construction of the VOI purchased
is not complete, the Company recognizes revenues using the
percentage-of-completion method of accounting provided that the
preliminary construction phase is complete and that a minimum
sales level has been met (to assure that the property will not
revert to a rental property). The preliminary stage of
development is deemed to be complete when the engineering and
design work is complete, the construction contracts have been
executed, the site has been cleared, prepared and excavated, and
the building foundation is complete. The completion percentage
is determined by the proportion of real estate inventory costs
incurred to total estimated costs. These estimated costs are
based upon historical experience and the related contractual
terms. The remaining revenue and related costs of sales,
including commissions and direct expenses, are deferred and
recognized as the remaining costs are incurred. Until a contract
for sale qualifies for revenue recognition, all payments
received are accounted for as restricted cash and deposits
within other current assets and deferred income, respectively,
on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Commissions and other direct
costs related to the sale are deferred until the sale is
recorded. If a contract is cancelled before qualifying as a
sale, non-recoverable expenses are charged to operating expense
in the current period on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income.
The Company also offers consumer financing as an option to
customers purchasing VOIs, which are typically collateralized by
the underlying VOI. Generally, the financing terms are for seven
to ten years. An estimate of uncollectible amounts is recorded
at the time of the sale with a charge to the provision for loan
losses on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income.
Upon the adoption of SFAS No. 152 and
SOP 04-2
on January 1, 2006, the provision for loan losses is now
classified as a reduction of vacation ownership interest sales
on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income. The
interest income earned from the financing arrangements is earned
on the principal balance outstanding over the life of the
arrangement.
The Company also provides day-to-day-management services,
including oversight of housekeeping services, maintenance and
certain accounting and administrative services for property
owners associations and clubs. In some cases, the
Companys employees serve as officers
and/or
directors of these associations and clubs in accordance with
their by-laws and associated regulations. Management fee revenue
is recognized when earned in accordance with the terms of the
contract and is recorded as a component of service fees and
membership on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of
Income. The costs, which principally relate to the payroll costs
for management of the associations, clubs and the resort
properties where the Company is the employer, are reflected as a
component of operating expenses on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income. Reimbursements are based upon the costs
incurred with no added margin and thus presentation of these
reimbursable costs has little to no effect on the Companys
operating income. Management fee revenue and revenue related to
reimbursements were $146 million and $164 million,
respectively, during 2007, $112 million and
$141 million, respectively, during 2006 and
$91 million and $124 million, respectively, during
2005. During 2007, 2006 and 2005, one of the associations that
the Company manages paid Group RCI $15 million,
$13 million and $11 million, respectively, for
exchange services.
During 2007, 2006 and 2005, gross sales of VOIs were reduced by
$22 million, $22 million and $17 million,
respectively, of revenue that is deferred under the percentage
of completion method of accounting. Under the percentage of
completion method of accounting, a portion of the total revenue
from a vacation ownership contract sale is not recognized if the
construction of the vacation resort has not yet been fully
completed. Such revenue will be recognized in future periods in
proportion to the costs incurred as compared to the total
expected costs for completion of construction of the vacation
resort.
The Company records lodging-related marketing and reservation
revenues, TripRewards revenues, as well as property management
services revenues for the Companys Lodging and Vacation
Ownership segments, in accordance with Emerging Issues Task
Force Issue
99-19,
Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an
Agent, which requires that these revenues be recorded on a
gross basis.
Income
Taxes
The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities using
the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets
and liabilities are calculated based upon the temporary
differences between the financial statement and income tax bases
of assets and liabilities using currently enacted tax rates.
These differences are based
F-10
upon estimated differences between the book and tax basis of the
assets and liabilities for the Company as of December 31,
2007 and 2006.
The Companys deferred tax assets are recorded net of a
valuation allowance when, based on the weight of available
evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of
the recorded deferred tax assets will not be realized in future
periods. Decreases to the valuation allowance are recorded as
reductions to the Companys provision for income taxes and
increases to the valuation allowance result in additional
provision for income taxes. However, if the valuation allowance
is adjusted in connection with an acquisition, such adjustment
is recorded through goodwill rather than the provision for
income taxes. The realization of the Companys deferred tax
assets, net of the valuation allowance, is primarily dependent
on estimated future taxable income. A change in the
Companys estimate of future taxable income may require an
addition to or reduction from the valuation allowance.
Cash
And Cash Equivalents
The Company considers highly-liquid investments purchased with
an original maturity of three months or less to be cash
equivalents.
Restricted
Cash
Restricted cash primarily consists of deposits received on sales
of VOIs that are held in escrow until a certificate of occupancy
is obtained, the legal rescission period has expired and the
deed of trust has been recorded in governmental property
ownership records, as well as separately held amounts based upon
the terms of the securitizations. Such amounts were
$191 million and $147 million as of December 31,
2007 and 2006, respectively, of which $66 million and
$57 million, respectively, are recorded within other
current assets and $125 million and $90 million,
respectively, are recorded within other non-current assets on
the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Receivable
Valuation
Trade
receivables
The Company provides for estimated bad debts based on their
assessment of the ultimate realizability of receivables,
considering historical collection experience, the economic
environment and specific customer information. When the Company
determines that an account is not collectible, the account is
written-off to the allowance for doubtful accounts. The
following table illustrates the Companys allowance for
doubtful accounts activity during 2007, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
99
|
|
|
$
|
96
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
Bad debt expense
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Write-offs
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
Translation and other adjustments
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
112
|
|
|
$
|
99
|
|
|
$
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation
ownership contract receivables
Within the Companys vacation ownership business, the
Company provides for estimated vacation ownership contract
receivable cancellations and defaults at the time the VOI sales
are recorded, by reducing VOI sales with a charge to the
provision for loan losses on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income. Prior to 2006, the provision for loan
losses was presented as expense on the Combined Statements of
Income. Upon the adoption of SFAS No. 152 and
SOP 04-2
on January 1, 2006, the provision for loan losses is now
classified as a reduction of vacation ownership interest sales
on the Consolidated Statement of Income. The Company assesses
the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses based on the
historical performance of similar vacation ownership contract
receivables. The Company uses a technique referred to as static
pool analysis, which tracks defaults for each years sales
over the entire life of those contract receivables. The Company
considers current defaults, past due aging, historical
write-offs of contracts, consumer credit scores (FICO scores) in
the assessment of borrowers credit strength and expected
loan performance. The Company also considers whether the
historical economic conditions are comparable to current
economic conditions. If current conditions differ from the
conditions in effect when the historical experience was
generated, the Company adjusts the allowance for loan losses to
reflect the expected effects of the current
F-11
environment on uncollectibility. The Company charges vacation
ownership contract receivables to the loan loss allowance when
they become 91, 120 or 150 days contractually past due
depending on the percentage of the contract price already paid
or are deemed uncollectible.
Loyalty
Programs
The Company operates a number of loyalty programs including
TripRewards, RCI Elite Rewards and other programs. TripRewards
and RCI Elite Rewards members accumulate points by purchasing
everyday products and services from the various businesses that
participate in the program. TripRewards members primarily
accumulate points by staying in hotels franchised under one of
the Companys lodging brands.
Members may redeem their points for hotel stays, airline
tickets, rental cars, resort vacation, electronics, sporting
goods, movie and theme park tickets and gift certificates. The
points cannot be redeemed for cash. The Company earns revenue
from these programs (i) when a member stays at a
participating hotel, from a fee charged by the Company to the
franchisee, which is based upon a percentage of room revenue
generated from such stay or (ii) based upon a percentage of
the members spending on the credit cards and such revenue
is paid to the Company by a third-party issuing bank. The
Company also incurs costs to support these programs, which
primarily relate to marketing expenses to promote the programs,
costs to administer the programs and costs of members
redemptions.
As members earn points through the Companys loyalty
programs, the Company records a liability of the estimated
future redemption costs, which is calculated based on (i) a
cost per point and (ii) an estimated redemption rate of the
overall points earned, which is determined through historical
experience, current trends and the use of an independent
third-party valuation firm. Revenues relating to the
Companys loyalty programs are recorded in other revenue in
the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income and amounted
to $87 million, $73 million and $57 million while
total expenses amounted to $71 million, $59 million
and $49 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The
points liability as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 amounted
to $48 million and $43 million, respectively, and is
included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities and
other non-current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Inventory
Inventory primarily consists of real estate and development
costs of completed VOIs, VOIs under construction, land held for
future VOI development, vacation ownership properties and
vacation credits. Inventory is stated at the lower of cost,
including capitalized interest, property taxes and certain other
carrying costs incurred during the construction process, or net
realizable value. Capitalized interest was $23 million,
$16 million and $7 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
Advertising
Expense
Advertising costs are generally expensed in the period incurred.
Advertising expenses, recorded primarily within marketing and
reservation expenses on the Consolidated and Combined Statements
of Income, were $104 million, $90 million and
$66 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Use
of Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of the Consolidated and Combined Financial
Statements requires the Company to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities in the Consolidated and
Combined Financial Statements and accompanying notes. Although
these estimates and assumptions are based on the Companys
knowledge of current events and actions the Company may
undertake in the future, actual results may ultimately differ
from estimates and assumptions.
Derivative
Instruments
The Company uses derivative instruments as part of its overall
strategy to manage its exposure to market risks primarily
associated with fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates
and interest rates. As a matter of policy, the Company does not
use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. All
derivatives are recorded at fair value either as assets or
liabilities. Changes in fair value of derivatives not designated
as hedging instruments and of derivatives designated as fair
value hedging instruments are recognized currently in earnings
and included either as a
F-12
component of other revenues or interest expense, based upon the
nature of the hedged item, in the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income. The effective portion of changes in fair
value of derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments
is recorded as a component of other comprehensive income. The
ineffective portion is reported currently in earnings as a
component of revenues or net interest expense, based upon the
nature of the hedged item. Amounts included in other
comprehensive income are reclassified into earnings in the same
period during which the hedged item affects earnings.
Certain derivative instruments used to manage interest rate
risks of the Company prior to the Separation were entered into
on behalf of the Company by Cendant. The fair value of the
instruments was recorded on Cendants Consolidated Balance
Sheets and passed to the Company through the related party
accounts, which are presented on the Consolidated Balance Sheets
within the due from former Parent and subsidiaries line item.
The derivatives that were designated as cash flow hedging
instruments by Cendant did not qualify for hedge accounting
treatment on the Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements
as the derivative remained on Cendants balance sheet and
the underlying debt instrument resides on the Consolidated and
Combined Financial Statements. Therefore, any changes in fair
value of these instruments were recognized in the Consolidated
and Combined Statements of Income.
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment (including leasehold improvements) are
recorded at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and
amortization. Depreciation, recorded as a component of
depreciation and amortization on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income, is computed utilizing the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets.
Amortization of leasehold improvements, also recorded as a
component of depreciation and amortization, is computed
utilizing the straight-line method over the estimated benefit
period of the related assets or the lease term, if shorter.
Useful lives are generally 30 years for buildings, up to
15 years for leasehold improvements, from 20 to
30 years for vacation rental properties and from three to
seven years for furniture, fixtures and equipment.
The Company capitalizes the costs of software developed for
internal use in accordance with Statement of Position
No. 98-1,
Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or
Obtained for Internal Use. Capitalization of software
developed for internal use commences during the development
phase of the project. The Company amortizes software developed
or obtained for internal use on a straight-line basis, from
three to five years, commencing when such software is
substantially ready for use. The net carrying value of software
developed or obtained for internal use was $99 million and
$82 million as of December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
Impairment
of Long-lived Assets
In connection with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets, (
SFAS No. 142), the Company is required to
assess goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets for
impairment annually, or more frequently if circumstances
indicate impairment may have occurred. The Company assesses
goodwill for such impairment by comparing the carrying value of
its reporting units to their fair values. Each of the
Companys reportable segments represents a reporting unit.
The Company determines the fair value of its reporting units
utilizing discounted cash flows and incorporates assumptions
that it believes marketplace participants would utilize. When
available and as appropriate, the Company uses comparative
market multiples and other factors to corroborate the discounted
cash flow results. Other indefinite-lived intangible assets are
tested for impairment and written down to fair value, if
necessary, as required by SFAS No. 142. The Company
performs its annual impairment testing in the fourth quarter of
each year subsequent to completing its annual forecasting
process or more frequently if circumstances indicate impairment
may have occurred. In performing this test, the Company
determines fair value using the present value of expected future
cash flows.
The Company evaluates the recoverability of its other long-lived
assets, including amortizable intangible assets, if
circumstances indicate an impairment may have occurred pursuant
to SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment
or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. This analysis is
performed by comparing the respective carrying values of the
assets to the current and expected future cash flows, on an
undiscounted basis, to be generated from such assets. Property
and equipment is evaluated separately within each business. If
such analysis indicates that the carrying value of these assets
is not recoverable, the carrying value of such assets is reduced
to fair value through a charge to the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income.
During the fourth quarter of 2006, the Company announced that it
would change its Fairfield Resorts and Trendwest branding to
Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham, respectively.
As a result, the Company recorded an impairment charge of
$11 million in its Vacation Ownership Segment relating to
the rebranding initiatives. A third party valuation analysis was
performed utilizing future cash flows of the underlying
F-13
trademarks to arrive at the trademarks fair value. The
resulting impairment charge was recorded during 2006 as a
component of separation and related costs within the
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income. In addition, the
remaining trademark value of $2 million was fully amortized
during 2007. There were no significant impairments relating to
intangible assets or other long-lived assets during 2007 or 2005.
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consists of
accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments,
accumulated unrealized gains and losses on derivative
instruments designated as cash flow hedges and pension related
costs. Foreign currency translation adjustments exclude income
taxes related to indefinite investments in foreign subsidiaries.
Assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries having
non-U.S.-dollar
functional currencies are translated at exchange rates at the
Consolidated Balance Sheet dates. Revenues and expenses are
translated at average exchange rates during the periods
presented. The gains or losses resulting from translating
foreign currency financial statements into U.S. dollars,
net of hedging gains or losses and taxes, are included in
accumulated other comprehensive income on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets. Gains or losses resulting from foreign currency
transactions are included in the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income.
Stock-Based
Compensation
On January 1, 2003, Cendant adopted the fair value method
of accounting for stock-based compensation provisions of
SFAS No. 123. Cendant and the Company also adopted
SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based
CompensationTransition and Disclosure, in its
entirety as of January 1, 2003, which amended
SFAS No. 123 to provide alternative methods of
transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method
of accounting provisions. As a result, all employee stock awards
have been expensed over their vesting periods based upon the
fair value of the award on the date of grant. As Cendant elected
to use the prospective transition method, Cendant allocated
expense to the Company only for employee stock awards that were
granted subsequent to December 31, 2002.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123
(revised 2004), Share-Based Payment
(SFAS No. 123(R)), which eliminates the
alternative to measure stock-based compensation awards using the
intrinsic value approach permitted by APB Opinion No. 25
and by SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation. The Company adopted
SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006, which
required the Company to measure all employee stock-based
compensation awards using a fair value method and record the
related expense in the financial statements. The Company elected
to use the modified prospective transition method, which
requires that compensation cost be recognized in the financial
statements for all awards granted after the date of adoption as
well as for existing awards for which the requisite service has
not been rendered as of the date of adoption and requires that
prior periods not be restated. Because the Company was allocated
stock-based compensation expense for all outstanding employee
stock awards prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R),
the adoption of such standard did not have a material impact on
the Companys results of operations.
In October 2005, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
(FSP)
No. 123R-2,
Practical Accommodation to the Application of Grant Date as
Defined in FASB Statement No. 123(R)
(FSP 123R-2), to provide guidance on
determining the grant date for an award as defined in
SFAS No. 123(R). FSP 123R-2 stipulates that,
assuming all other criteria in the grant date definition are
met, a mutual understanding of the key terms and conditions of
an award to an individual employee is presumed to exist upon the
awards approval in accordance with the relevant corporate
governance requirements, provided that the key terms and
conditions of an award (i) cannot be negotiated by the
recipient with the employer because the award is a unilateral
grant and (ii) are expected to be communicated to an
individual recipient within a relatively short time period from
the date of approval. The Company has applied the principles set
forth in FSP 123R-2 in connection with its adoption of
SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006.
Paragraph 81 of SFAS No. 123(R) requires an
entity to calculate the pool of excess tax benefits available to
absorb tax deficiencies recognized subsequent to adopting
SFAS No. 123(R) (APIC Pool). In November
2005, the FASB issued FSP
No. 123R-3,
Transition Election Related to Accounting for the Tax Effects
of Share-Based Payment Awards (FSP 123R-3),
to provide an alternative transition election related to
accounting for the tax effects of share-based payment awards to
employees to the guidance provided in Paragraph 81 of
SFAS No. 123(R). The Company elected to adopt the
transition method described in FSP 123R-3. Utilizing the
calculation method described in FSP 123R-3, the Company
calculated its APIC Pool as of January 1, 2006 associated
with stock options that were fully vested as of
December 31, 2005. The impact on the APIC Pool for stock
options that are partially vested at, or granted subsequent to,
December 31, 2005 is being determined in accordance with
SFAS No. 123(R).
F-14
In connection with the distribution of the shares of common
stock of Wyndham to Cendant stockholders, on July 31, 2006,
the Compensation Committee of Cendants Board of Directors
approved the full vesting of all Cendant equity awards
(including Wyndham awards granted as an adjustment to such
Cendant equity awards) on August 15, 2006. As a result of
the acceleration of the vesting of these awards, the Company
recorded non-cash compensation expense of $45 million
during the third quarter of 2006. In connection with the
acceleration of the equity awards, an APIC Pool detriment of
$9 million was created as the tax deduction of the equity
awards was lower than the deferred tax asset recognized. As of
January 1, 2006, the Company had no APIC Pool. During 2006,
the Company created an APIC Pool of approximately
$2 million through other vesting activities. As a result of
the write off of the $9 million excess deferred tax asset,
the Company recorded a tax provision of $7 million on its
Consolidated and Combined Statement of Income during the year
ended December 31, 2006 and a reduction to additional
paid-in capital of $2 million on its Consolidated Balance
Sheet as of December 31, 2006. During 2007, the
Companys APIC Pool increased by $7 million due to the
exercise and vesting of equity awards. As a result of such
increase, the Company recorded a corresponding increase to
additional paid-in capital of $7 million on its
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2007.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Vacation Ownership Transactions. In December 2004, the
FASB issued SFAS No. 152 in connection with the
issuance of the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants
SOP 04-2.
SFAS No. 152 provides guidance on revenue recognition
for vacation ownership transactions, accounting and presentation
for the uncollectibility of vacation ownership contract
receivables, accounting for costs of sales of vacation ownership
interests and related costs, accounting for operations during
holding periods and other transactions associated with vacation
ownership operations.
The Companys revenue recognition policy for vacation
ownership transactions has historically required a 10% minimum
down payment (initial investment) as a prerequisite to
recognizing revenue on the sale of a vacation ownership
interest. SFAS No. 152 requires that the Company
consider the fair value of certain incentives provided to the
buyer when assessing whether such threshold has been achieved.
If the buyers investment has not met the minimum
investment criteria of SFAS No. 152, the revenue
associated with the sale of the vacation ownership interest and
the related cost of sales and direct costs are deferred until
the buyers commitment satisfies the requirements of
SFAS No. 152. In addition, certain costs previously
included in the Companys percentage-of-completion
calculation prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 152 are
now expensed as incurred rather than deferred until the
corresponding revenue is recognized.
SFAS No. 152 requires the Company to record the
estimate of uncollectible vacation ownership contract
receivables, without consideration of estimated inventory
recoveries, at the time a vacation ownership transaction is
consummated as a reduction of net revenue. Prior to the adoption
of SFAS No. 152, the Company recorded such provisions
within operating expense on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income. SFAS No. 152 also requires a
change in accounting for inventory and cost of sales such that
cost of sales is allocated based on a relative sales value
method, under which cost of sales is calculated as an estimated
percentage of net sales.
SFAS No. 152 also requires that revenue in excess of
costs associated with the rental of unsold units be accounted
for as a reduction to the carrying value of vacation ownership
inventory (which reduces the cost of such inventory when it is
sold) and that costs in excess of revenues associated with the
rental of unsold units be charged to expense as incurred. Prior
to the adoption of SFAS No. 152, rental revenues and
expenses were separately recorded in the Consolidated and
Combined Statements of Income.
The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 152
effective January 1, 2006, as required, and recorded an
after tax charge of $65 million during the first quarter of
2006 as a cumulative effect of an accounting change, which
consisted of (i) a pre-tax charge of $105 million
representing the deferral of revenue, costs associated with
sales of vacation ownership interests that were recognized prior
to January 1, 2006 and the recognition of certain expenses
that were previously deferred and (ii) an associated tax
benefit of $40 million. Excluding the impact of the
cumulative effect of an accounting change, the impact of
SFAS No. 152 on the Companys 2006 results was a
reduction of revenues of $208 million and an increase to
net income of $6 million ($0.03 increase in diluted
earnings per share). There was no impact to cash flows from the
adoption of SFAS No. 152.
Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets. In March
2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, Accounting
for Servicing of Financial Assetsan amendment of FASB
Statement No. 140
(SFAS No. 156). SFAS No. 156
requires an entity to recognize a servicing asset or servicing
liability each time it undertakes an obligation to service a
financial asset by entering into a servicing contract and
requires all separately recognized servicing assets and
servicing liabilities to be initially measured at fair value, if
practicable. The Company adopted SFAS No. 156 on
F-15
January 1, 2007, as required. There was no impact on the
Companys Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements
resulting from the adoption.
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. In June 2006,
the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxesan
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(FIN 48), which is an interpretation of
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes.
FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement
attribute for the financial statement recognition and
measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a
tax return. For those benefits to be recognized, a tax position
must be more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination by
taxing authorities. The amount recognized is measured as the
largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent
likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company
adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007,
as required, which resulted in a decrease to stockholders
equity as of January 1, 2007 of $20 million. See
Note 7Income Taxes for a further explanation of the
impact of the adoption.
Fair Value Measurements. In September 2006, the FASB
issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS No. 157).
SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about
fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 explains the
definition of fair value as the price that would be received to
sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
SFAS No. 157 clarifies the principle that fair value
should be based on the assumptions market participants would use
when pricing the asset or liability and establishes a fair value
hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those
assumptions. SFAS No. 157 will become effective for
the Company on January 1, 2008. The Company believes the
adoption of SFAS No. 157 will not have a material
impact on its Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements.
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities. In February 2007, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, including an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 115
(SFAS No. 159). SFAS No. 159
permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments
at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at
fair value. It also establishes presentation and disclosure
requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities
that choose different measurement attributes for similar types
of assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 159 will become
effective for the Company on January 1, 2008. The Company
believes the adoption of SFAS No. 159 will not have a
material impact on its Consolidated and Combined Financial
Statements.
Business Combinations. In December 2007, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations
(SFAS No. 141(R)), replacing
SFAS No. 141. SFAS No. 141(R) establishes
principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business
recognizes and measures in its financial statements the
identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree.
SFAS No. 141(R) also provides guidance for recognizing
and measuring the goodwill acquired in the business combination
and determines what information to disclose to enable users of
the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial
effects of the business combination. This Statement applies
prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition
date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting
period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company
is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of
SFAS No. 141(R) on its Consolidated and Combined
Financial Statements.
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statementsan amendment of ARB No. 51. In December
2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statementsan amendment of ARB No. 51
(SFAS No. 160). SFAS No. 160
amends ARB No. 51 to establish accounting and
reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a
subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It
clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an
ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be
reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. In
addition to the amendments to ARB No. 51,
SFAS No. 160 amends SFAS No. 128;
such that earnings per share data will continue to be
calculated the same way those data were calculated before this
Statement was issued. SFAS No. 160 is effective for
fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years,
beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of
SFAS No. 160 on its Consolidated and Combined
Financial Statements.
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 110. In December
2007, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 110
(SAB 110). SAB 110 expresses the views of
the SEC regarding the use of a simplified method, as
discussed in SAB 107, Share-Based Payment, in
developing an estimate of the expected term of plain
vanilla share options in accordance with
SFAS No. 123(R). SAB 110 will become effective
for the Company on January 1, 2008. The Company believes
the adoption of SAB 110 will not have material impact on
its Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements.
F-16
The computation of basic and diluted earnings per share
(EPS) is based on the Companys net income (and
other comparable earnings measures) divided by the basic
weighted average number of common shares and diluted weighted
average number of common shares, respectively. On July 31,
2006, the Separation from Cendant was completed in a tax-free
distribution to the Companys stockholders of one share of
Wyndham common stock for every five shares of Cendant common
stock held on July 21, 2006. As a result, on July 31,
2006, the Company had 200,362,113 shares of common stock
outstanding. This share amount has been utilized for the
calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share for all
periods presented prior to the date of Separation.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and
diluted EPS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
$
|
403
|
|
|
$
|
352
|
|
|
$
|
431
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
403
|
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
$
|
431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
Stock options and restricted stock units
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
|
|
$
|
1.78
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
$
|
2.20
|
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
2.20
|
|
|
$
|
1.44
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The computations of diluted net income per common share
available to common stockholders for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006 do not include approximately
11 million and 16 million of stock options and
stock-settled stock appreciation rights (SSARs),
respectively, as the effect of their inclusion would have been
anti-dilutive to earnings per share.
On July 31, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors
declared a dividend of $0.04 per share payable September 4,
2007 to shareholders of record as of August 13, 2007. On
September 4, 2007, the Company paid cash dividends of $0.04
per share ($7 million).
On October 25, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors
declared a dividend of $0.04 per share payable December 4,
2007 to shareholders of record as of November 13, 2007. On
December 4, 2007, the Company paid cash dividends of $0.04
per share ($7 million).
Assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations
were recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of the
respective acquisition dates based upon their estimated fair
values at such dates. The results of operations of businesses
acquired by the Company have been included in the Consolidated
and Combined Statements of Income since their respective dates
of acquisition. The excess of the purchase price over the
estimated fair values of the underlying assets acquired and
liabilities assumed was allocated to goodwill. In certain
circumstances, the allocations of the excess purchase price are
based upon preliminary estimates and assumptions. Accordingly,
the allocations may be subject to revision when the Company
receives final information, including appraisals and other
analyses. Any revisions to the fair values during the allocation
period, which may be significant, will be recorded by the
Company as further adjustments to the purchase price
allocations. The Company is also in the process of integrating
the operations of its acquired businesses and expects to incur
costs relating to such integrations. These costs may result from
integrating operating systems, relocating employees, closing
facilities, reducing duplicative efforts and exiting and
consolidating other activities. These costs will be recorded on
the Consolidated Balance Sheets as adjustments to the purchase
price or on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income
as expenses, as appropriate.
F-17
2007
Acquisitions
During 2007, the Company acquired four individually
non-significant businesses for aggregate consideration of
$15 million in cash, net of cash acquired of
$5 million. The goodwill resulting from the allocation of
the purchase prices of these acquisitions aggregated
$5 million, all of which is expected to be deductible for
tax purposes. The goodwill was allocated to the Vacation
Ownership segment. These acquisitions also resulted in
$14 million of other intangible assets.
2006
Acquisitions
Baymont. On April 7, 2006, the Company completed the
acquisition of the Baymont Inn & Suites brand
(Baymont), a system of 115 independently-owned
franchised properties, for approximately $60 million in
cash. The purchase price resulted in the recognition of
$47 million of trademarks and $14 million of franchise
agreements, both of which were assigned to the Companys
Lodging segment. Management believes this acquisition solidifies
the Companys presence in the growing midscale lodging
segment.
Other. On July 20, 2006, the Company acquired a
vacation ownership and resort management business for aggregate
consideration of $43 million in cash. The goodwill
resulting from the allocation of the purchase price for this
acquisition aggregated $34 million, none of which is
expected to be deductible for tax purposes. Such goodwill was
allocated to the Companys Vacation Ownership segment. This
acquisition also resulted in $12 million of other
amortizable intangible assets (primarily customer lists).
2005
Acquisitions
Wyndham. On October 11, 2005, the Company acquired
the franchise and property management business associated with
the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand for $113 million in
cash. The acquisition includes franchise agreements, management
contracts and the worldwide rights to the Wyndham brand. This
acquisition resulted in goodwill of $24 million, all of
which is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. Such
goodwill was allocated to the Companys Lodging segment.
This acquisition also resulted in $85 million of other
intangible assets, such as trademarks and franchise agreements.
This acquisition added an upscale brand to the Companys
lodging portfolio and also represented the Companys entry
into hotel property management services.
Other. During 2005, the Company also acquired three other
individually non-significant businesses for aggregate
consideration of $33 million in cash, net of cash acquired
of $3 million. The goodwill resulting from the allocation
of the purchase prices of these acquisitions aggregated
$21 million, $1 million of which is expected to be
deductible for tax purposes. The goodwill was allocated to the
Vacation Exchange and Rentals ($4 million) and Vacation
Ownership ($17 million) segments. These acquisitions also
resulted in $1 million of other intangible assets.
Intangible assets consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Unamortized Intangible Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
2,723
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks (a)
|
|
$
|
620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized Intangible Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchise
agreements (b)
|
|
$
|
597
|
|
|
$
|
257
|
|
|
$
|
340
|
|
|
$
|
596
|
|
|
$
|
238
|
|
|
$
|
358
|
|
Other (c)
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
696
|
|
|
$
|
280
|
|
|
$
|
416
|
|
|
$
|
678
|
|
|
$
|
259
|
|
|
$
|
419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Comprised of various trade names
(including the worldwide Wyndham Hotels and Resorts, Ramada,
Days Inn, RCI, Landal GreenParks, Canvas Holidays, Baymont
Inn & Suites, FairShare Plus and WorldMark trade
names) that the Company has acquired and which distinguishes the
Companys consumer services. These trade names are expected
to generate future cash flows for an indefinite period of time.
|
(b) |
|
Generally amortized over a period
ranging from 20 to 40 years with a weighted average life of
35 years.
|
(c) |
|
Includes customer lists and
business contracts, generally amortized over a period ranging
from 5 to 20 years with a weighted average life of
15 years. Also includes $2 million of trademarks as of
December 31, 2006. During 2007, the Company wrote off such
trademarks as they were fully amortized.
|
F-18
During the fourth quarter of 2006, the Company recorded an
$11 million impairment charge due to a rebranding
initiative for its Fairfield and Trendwest trademarks (see
Note 2Summary of Significant Accounting
PoliciesImpairment of Long-Lived Assets for more
information). The remaining $2 million of trademarks for
Fairfield and Trendwest was reclassified into Other Amortized
Intangible Assets as of December 31, 2006. As of
December 31, 2007, the remaining $2 million of
trademarks were fully amortized and written off.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
to Goodwill
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Balance as of
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
during 2007
|
|
|
during 2006
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
245
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
245
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
1,116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
(b)
|
|
|
1,136
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
1,338
|
|
|
|
5
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company
|
|
$
|
2,699
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
2,723
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Relates to the acquisition of a
vacation ownership sales and marketing business (see
Note 4Acquisitions).
|
(b) |
|
Relates to foreign exchange
translation adjustments.
|
Amortization expense relating to all intangible assets was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Franchise agreements
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
Other
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
(*)
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Included as a component of
depreciation and amortization on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income.
|
Based on the Companys amortizable intangible assets as of
December 31, 2007, the Company expects related amortization
expense for the five succeeding fiscal years to approximate
$25 million during 2008 and 2009, $24 million during
2010 and 2011 and $23 million during 2012.
|
|
6.
|
Franchising
and Marketing/Reservation Activities
|
Franchise fee revenue of $523 million, $501 million
and $434 million on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income for 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively,
includes initial franchise fees of $8 million,
$7 million and $7 million, respectively.
As part of the ongoing franchise fees, the Company receives
marketing and reservation fees from its lodging franchisees,
which generally are calculated based on a specified percentage
of gross room revenues. Such fees totaled $227 million,
$223 million and $189 million during 2007, 2006 and
2005, respectively, and are recorded within the franchise fees
line item on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income.
As provided for in the franchise agreements, all of these fees
are to be expended for marketing purposes or the operation of an
international, centralized, brand-specific reservation system
for the respective franchisees. Additionally, the Company is
required to provide certain services to its franchisees,
including access to an international, centralized,
brand-specific reservations system, advertising, promotional and
co-marketing programs, referrals, technology, training and
volume purchasing.
F-19
The number of lodging outlets in operation by market sector is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Upscale
(a)
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
Midscale
(b)
|
|
|
1,718
|
|
|
|
1,727
|
|
|
|
1,634
|
|
Economy
(c)
|
|
|
4,726
|
|
|
|
4,647
|
|
|
|
4,613
|
|
Unmanaged, Affiliated and Managed, Non-Proprietary Hotels
(d)
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,544
|
|
|
|
6,473
|
|
|
|
6,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Comprised of the Wyndham Hotels and
Resorts lodging brand.
|
(b) |
|
Comprised of the Wingate by
Wyndham, Ramada Worldwide, Howard Johnson, Baymont
Inn & Suites and AmeriHost Inn lodging brands.
|
(c) |
|
Comprised of the Days Inn, Super 8,
Travelodge and Knights Inn lodging brands.
|
(d) |
|
Represents properties affiliated
with the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand for which the Company
receives a fee for reservation and/or other services provided
and properties managed under the CHI Limited joint venture.
These properties are not branded; however, eight of the managed
properties are scheduled to be rebranded as a Wyndham brand
during 2008.
|
The number of lodging outlets changed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
|
6,473
|
|
|
|
6,348
|
|
|
|
6,399
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
Terminations
|
|
|
(403
|
)
|
|
|
(443
|
)
|
|
|
(509
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
|
6,544
|
|
|
|
6,473
|
|
|
|
6,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company may, at its discretion, provide development advances
to certain of its franchisees or property owners in its managed
business in order to assist such franchisees/property owners in
converting to one of the Companys brands, building a new
hotel to be flagged under one of the Companys brands or in
assisting in other franchisee expansion efforts. Provided the
franchisee/property owner is in compliance with the terms of the
franchise/management agreement, all or a portion of the
development advance may be forgiven by the Company over the
period of the franchise/management agreement, which typically
ranges from 10 to 20 years. Otherwise, the related
principal is due and payable to the Company. In certain
instances, the Company may earn interest on unpaid franchisee
development advances, which was not significant during 2007,
2006 or 2005. The amount of such development advances recorded
on the Consolidated Balance Sheets was $42 million and
$23 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. These amounts are classified within the other
non-current assets line item on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
During 2007, 2006 and 2005, the Company recorded
$3 million, $3 million and $2 million,
respectively, related to the forgiveness of these advances. Such
amounts are recorded as a reduction of franchise fees on the
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income.
F-20
The income tax provision consists of the following for the year
ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
State
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
52
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
252
|
|
|
$
|
190
|
|
|
$
|
195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to the Separation, the Company was included in the Cendant
consolidated tax returns. The utilization of the Companys
net operating loss carryforwards by other Cendant companies is
reflected in the 2006 and 2005 current provision.
Pre-tax income for domestic and foreign operations consisted of
the following for the year ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
567
|
|
|
$
|
493
|
|
|
$
|
543
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax income
|
|
$
|
655
|
|
|
$
|
542
|
|
|
$
|
626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-21
Current and non-current deferred income tax assets
and liabilities, as of December 31, are comprised of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Current deferred income tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities and deferred income
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
|
$
|
110
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts and vacation ownership contract
receivables
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Valuation
allowance (*)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred income tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Unamortized servicing rights
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Installment sales of vacation ownership interests
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
Other
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current net deferred income tax asset
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred income tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
Foreign tax credit carryforward
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alternative minimum tax credit carryforward
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
Tax basis differences in assets of foreign subsidiaries
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Accrued liabilities and deferred income
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Valuation
allowance (*)
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred income tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
384
|
|
Installment sales of vacation ownership interests
|
|
|
770
|
|
|
|
618
|
|
Other
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
1,231
|
|
|
|
1,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current net deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
927
|
|
|
$
|
782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
The valuation allowance of
$84 million as of December 31, 2007 primarily relates
to foreign tax credits and state net operating loss
carryforwards. The valuation allowance will be reduced when and
if the Company determines that the deferred income tax assets
are more likely than not to be realized.
|
As of December 31, 2007, the Company had federal net
operating loss carryforwards of $78 million, which
primarily expire in 2026. No provision has been made for
U.S. federal deferred income taxes on $208 million of
accumulated and undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2007 since it is the present intention
of management to reinvest the undistributed earnings
indefinitely in those foreign operations. The determination of
the amount of unrecognized U.S. federal deferred income tax
liability for unremitted earnings is not practicable.
F-22
The Companys effective income tax rate differs from the
U.S. federal statutory rate as follows for the year ended
December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Federal statutory rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State and local income taxes, net of federal tax benefits
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
Changes in tax basis differences in assets of foreign
subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.0
|
)
|
Taxes on foreign operations at rates different than U.S. federal
statutory rates
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
Taxes on repatriated foreign income, net of tax credits
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
Adjustment of estimated income tax accruals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
Release of guarantee liability related to income taxes
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.5
|
%
|
|
|
35.1
|
%
|
|
|
31.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in the 2007 effective tax rate is primarily the
result of an increase in nondeductible items and the absence of
a $15 million benefit recognized in 2006 resulting from a
change in the Companys 2005 state effective tax
rates. In March 2005, the Company entered into a foreign tax
restructuring where certain of its foreign subsidiaries were
considered liquidated for United States tax purposes. This
liquidation resulted in a taxable transaction which resulted in
an increase in the tax basis of the assets held by these
subsidiaries to their fair market value. This resulted in the
creation of a deferred tax asset and recognition of a deferred
tax benefit during 2005.
The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on
January 1, 2007. As a result of the implementation of
FIN 48, the Company established a liability for
unrecognized tax benefits of $20 million, which was
accounted for as a reduction of retained earnings on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet at January 1, 2007.
The following table summarizes the activity related to the
Companys unrecognized tax benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
Increases related to tax positions taken during a prior period
|
|
|
8
|
|
Expiration of the statute of limitations for the assessment of
taxes
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The gross amount of the unrecognized tax benefits at
December 31, 2007 that, if recognized, would affect the
Companys effective tax rate is $21 million. The
Company recorded both accrued interest and penalties related to
unrecognized tax benefits as a component of provision for income
taxes on the Consolidated Statement of Income. Prior to
January 1, 2007, accrued interest and penalties were
recorded as a component of operating expenses and interest
expense on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income.
The Company also accrued potential penalties and interest of
$1 million related to these unrecognized tax benefits
during 2007, and in total, as of December 31, 2007, the
Company has recorded a liability for potential penalties and
interest of $2 million and $3 million, respectively,
on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company unrecognized tax
benefits were offset by $4 million of net operating loss
carryforwards. The Company does not expect the unrecognized tax
benefits to change significantly over the next 12 months.
The Company files U.S., state, and foreign income tax returns in
jurisdictions with varying statutes of limitations. The 2006 and
2007 tax years generally remain subject to examination by
federal tax authorities. The 2004 through 2007 tax years
generally remain subject to examination by many state tax
authorities. In significant foreign jurisdictions, the 2001
through 2007 tax years generally remain subject to examination
by their respective tax authorities. The statute of limitations
is scheduled to expire within 12 months of the reporting
date in certain taxing jurisdictions and the Company believes
that it is reasonably possible that the total amount of its
unrecognized tax benefits could decrease by $0 to
$5 million.
The Company made cash income tax payments, net of refunds, of
$83 million, $62 million and $32 million during
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Such payments exclude income
tax related payments made to or refunded by former Parent.
During 2007, the Company recorded an increase to
stockholders equity of $16 million which was
primarily the result of deferred income tax adjustments arising
from the filing of pre-separation income tax returns. Such
pre-separation adjustments included $69 million of foreign
tax credits with a full valuation allowance of $69 million.
F-23
The foreign tax credits primarily expire in 2015 and the
valuation allowance on these credits will be reduced when and if
the Company determines that these credits are more likely than
not to be realized.
The Company believes that its accruals for tax liabilities
outlined in the Separation and Distribution Agreement are
adequate for all remaining open years, based on its assessment
of many factors including past experience and interpretations of
tax law applied to the facts of each matter. Although the
Company believes its recorded assets and liabilities are
reasonable, tax regulations are subject to interpretation and
tax litigation is inherently uncertain; therefore, the
Companys assessments can involve a series of complex
judgments about future events and rely heavily on estimates and
assumptions. While the Company believes that the estimates and
assumptions supporting its assessments are reasonable, the final
determination of tax audits and any related litigation could be
materially different than that which is reflected in historical
income tax provisions and recorded assets and liabilities. Based
on the results of an audit or litigation, a material effect on
the Companys income tax provision, net income, or cash
flows in the period or periods for which that determination is
made could result.
The IRS has opened an examination for Cendants taxable
years 2003 through 2006 during which the Company was included in
Cendants tax returns. Although the Company and Cendant
believe there is appropriate support for the positions taken on
its tax returns, the Company has recorded liabilities
representing the best estimates of the probable loss on certain
positions. The Company believes that the accruals for tax
liabilities are adequate for all open years, based on assessment
of many factors including past experience and interpretations of
tax law applied to the facts of each matter. Although the
Company believes the recorded assets and liabilities are
reasonable, tax regulations are subject to interpretation and
tax litigation is inherently uncertain; therefore, the Company
and Cendants assessments can involve both a series of
complex judgments about future events and rely heavily on
estimates and assumptions. While the Company believes that the
estimates and assumptions supporting the assessments are
reasonable, the final determination of tax audits and any other
related litigation could be materially different than that which
is reflected in historical income tax provisions and recorded
assets and liabilities. Based on the results of an audit or
litigation, a material effect on the Companys income tax
provision, net income, or cash flows in the period or periods
for which that determination is made could result.
|
|
8.
|
Vacation
Ownership Contract Receivables
|
The Company generates vacation ownership contract receivables by
extending financing to the purchasers of VOIs. Current and
long-term vacation ownership contract receivables, net as of
December 31, consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Current vacation ownership contract receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
|
$
|
201
|
|
Other
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current vacation ownership contract receivables, net
|
|
$
|
290
|
|
|
$
|
257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term vacation ownership contract receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized
|
|
$
|
2,218
|
|
|
$
|
1,545
|
|
Other
|
|
|
725
|
|
|
|
826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,943
|
|
|
|
2,371
|
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(289
|
)
|
|
|
(248
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term vacation ownership contract receivables, net
|
|
$
|
2,654
|
|
|
$
|
2,123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-24
Principal payments that are contractually due on the
Companys vacation ownership contract receivables during
the next twelve months are classified as current on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets. Principal payments due on the
Companys vacation ownership contract receivables during
each of the five years subsequent to December 31, 2007 and
thereafter are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
|
$
|
321
|
|
2009
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
2010
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
2011
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
339
|
|
2012
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
359
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,175
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
1,584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,466
|
|
|
$
|
798
|
|
|
$
|
3,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2007, 2006 and 2005, the Company originated vacation
ownership receivables of $1,608 million,
$1,289 million and $1,097 million, respectively, and
received principal collections of $773 million,
$695 million and $635 million, respectively. Interest
rates offered on vacation ownership contract receivables range
from 9.0% to 18.0%. The weighted average interest rate on
outstanding vacation ownership contract receivables was 12.5%,
12.7% and 13.1% as of December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
The activity in the allowance for loan losses related to
vacation ownership contract receivables is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses as of January 1, 2005
|
|
$
|
(119
|
)
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(128
|
) (*)
|
Contract receivables written-off, net
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses as of December 31, 2005
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
Increase due to adoption of SFAS No. 152
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted allowance for loan losses as of January 1, 2006
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(259
|
)
|
Contract receivables written-off, net
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses as of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(305
|
)
|
Contract receivables written off, net
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses as of December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
(320
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Includes a $12 million
provision associated with estimated losses resulting from the
2005 Gulf Coast hurricanes.
|
The provision for loan losses during 2007 or 2006 is not
comparable to such provision during 2005 as a result of the
adoption of SFAS No. 152 as of January 1, 2006.
SFAS 152 requires the Company to reflect the provision for
loan losses on a gross basis excluding estimated recoveries.
During 2005, estimated recoveries were reflected as a reduction
of the provision for loan losses. Accordingly, the provision for
loan losses during 2007 and 2006 included $128 million and
$115 million, respectively, of estimated recoveries, which
is now reflected as an increase to VOI inventory.
Securitizations
The Company pools qualifying vacation ownership contract
receivables and sells them to bankruptcy-remote entities.
Vacation ownership contract receivables qualify for
securitization based primarily on the credit strength of the VOI
purchaser to whom financing has been extended. Prior to
September 1, 2003, sales of vacation ownership contract
receivables were treated as off-balance sheet sales as the
entities utilized were structured as bankruptcy-remote QSPEs
pursuant to SFAS No. 140 Accounting for
Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments
of Liabilities. Subsequent to September 1, 2003,
newly originated as well as certain legacy vacation ownership
contract receivables are securitized through bankruptcy-remote
SPEs that are consolidated within the Consolidated and Combined
Financial Statements.
On Balance Sheet. Vacation ownership contract
receivables securitized through the on-balance sheet,
bankruptcy-remote SPEs are consolidated within the Consolidated
and Combined Financial Statements (see
F-25
Note 13Long-Term Debt and Borrowing Arrangements).
The Company continues to service the securitized vacation
ownership contract receivables pursuant to servicing agreements
negotiated on an arms-length basis based on market conditions.
The activities of these bankruptcy-remote SPEs are limited to
(i) purchasing vacation ownership contract receivables from
the Companys vacation ownership subsidiaries,
(ii) issuing debt securities
and/or
borrowing under a conduit facility to affect such purchases and
(iii) entering into derivatives to hedge interest rate
exposure. The securitized assets of these bankruptcy-remote SPEs
are not available to pay the general obligations of the Company.
Additionally, the creditors of these SPEs have no recourse to
the Companys general credit. The Company has made
representations and warranties customary for securitization
transactions, including eligibility characteristics of the
receivables and servicing responsibilities, in connection with
the securitization of these assets (see
Note 14Commitments and Contingencies). The Company
does not recognize gains or losses resulting from these
securitizations at the time of sale to the on-balance sheet,
bankruptcy-remote SPE. Income is recognized when earned over the
contractual life of the vacation ownership contract receivables.
Off-Balance Sheet. Certain structures used by
the Company to securitize vacation ownership contract
receivables prior to September 1, 2003 were treated as
off-balance sheet sales, with the Company retaining the
servicing rights and a subordinated interest. These transactions
did not qualify for inclusion in the Consolidated and Combined
Financial Statements. As these securitization facilities were
precluded from consolidation pursuant to generally accepted
accounting principles, the debt issued by these entities and the
collateralizing assets, which were serviced by the Company, are
not reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company
completed such structures during 2007 and, therefore, no
retained interest was recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet
as of December 31, 2007. As of December 31, 2006, the
retained interest of $3 million was recorded within other
non-current assets on the Combined Balance Sheet.
Inventory, as of December 31, consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Land held for VOI development
|
|
$
|
170
|
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
VOI construction in process
|
|
|
562
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
Completed inventory and vacation
credits (*)
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventory
|
|
|
1,235
|
|
|
|
954
|
|
Less: Current portion
|
|
|
586
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current inventory
|
|
$
|
649
|
|
|
$
|
434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Includes estimated recoveries of
$128 million and $115 million at December 31,
2007 and 2006, respectively.
|
Inventory that the Company expects to sell within the next
twelve months is classified as current on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets.
|
|
10.
|
Property
and Equipment, net
|
Property and equipment, net, as of December 31, consisted
of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
172
|
|
|
$
|
153
|
|
Building and leasehold improvements
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
Capitalized software
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
|
|
|
472
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
Vacation rental property capital leases
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,604
|
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(595
|
)
|
|
|
(503
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,009
|
|
|
$
|
916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2007, 2006 and 2005, the Company recorded depreciation
and amortization expense of $139 million, $113 million
and $99 million, respectively, related to property and
equipment.
F-26
Other current assets, as of December 31, consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Non-trade receivables, net
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
Deferred vacation ownership development costs
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
Other
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
232
|
|
|
$
|
239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.
|
Accrued
Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities, as of
December 31, consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Accrued payroll and related
|
|
$
|
194
|
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
Accrued advertising and marketing
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
Accrued other
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
666
|
|
|
$
|
575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.
|
Long-Term
Debt and Borrowing Arrangements
|
Securitized and long-term debt as of December 31 consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Securitized vacation ownership debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes
|
|
$
|
1,435
|
|
|
$
|
838
|
|
Bank conduit
facility (a)
|
|
|
646
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securitized vacation ownership debt
|
|
|
2,081
|
|
|
|
1,463
|
|
Less: Current portion of securitized vacation ownership debt
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term securitized vacation ownership debt
|
|
$
|
1,844
|
|
|
$
|
1,285
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00% senior unsecured notes (due December
2016) (b)
|
|
$
|
797
|
|
|
$
|
796
|
|
Term loan (due July 2011)
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
Revolving credit facility (due July
2011) (c)
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank borrowings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation ownership
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
Vacation
rentals (d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
Vacation rentals capital leases
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
Other
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
1,526
|
|
|
|
1,437
|
|
Less: Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
1,351
|
|
|
$
|
1,322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents a
364-day
vacation ownership bank conduit facility, which the Company
renewed through October 2008 and upsized to $1,200 million
on October 30, 2007. The capacity is subject to the
Companys ability to provide additional assets to
collateralize the facility.
|
|
(b) |
|
The balance at December 31,
2007 represents $800 million aggregate principal less
$3 million of unamortized discount.
|
|
(c) |
|
The revolving credit facility has a
total capacity of $900 million, which includes availability
for letters of credit. As of December 31, 2007, the Company
had $53 million of letters of credit outstanding and, as
such, the total available capacity of the revolving credit
facility was $750 million.
|
|
(d) |
|
The borrowings under this facility
were repaid on January 31, 2007.
|
F-27
The Companys outstanding debt as of December 31, 2007
matures as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
237
|
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
|
$
|
412
|
|
2009
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
334
|
|
2010
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
2011
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
547
|
|
2012
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
671
|
|
|
|
902
|
|
|
|
1,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,081
|
|
|
$
|
1,526
|
|
|
$
|
3,607
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As debt maturities of the securitized vacation ownership debt
are based on the contractual payment terms of the underlying
vacation ownership contract receivables, actual maturities may
differ as a result of prepayments by the vacation ownership
contract receivable obligors.
The revolving credit facility and unsecured term loan include
covenants, including the maintenance of specific financial
ratios. These financial covenants consist of a minimum interest
coverage ratio of at least 3.0 times as of the measurement date
and a maximum leverage ratio not to exceed 3.5 times on the
measurement date. The interest coverage ratio is calculated by
dividing EBITDA (as defined in the credit agreement and
Note 19 to the Consolidated and Combined Financial
Statements) by Interest Expense (as defined in the credit
agreement), excluding interest expense on any Securitization
Indebtedness and on Non-Recourse Indebtedness (as the two terms
are defined in the credit agreement), both as measured on a
trailing 12 month basis preceding the measurement date. The
leverage ratio is calculated by dividing Consolidated Total
Indebtedness (as defined in the credit agreement) excluding any
Securitization Indebtedness and any Non-Recourse Secured debt as
of the measurement date by EBITDA as measured on a trailing
12 month basis preceding the measurement date. Covenants in
these credit facilities also include limitations on indebtedness
of material subsidiaries; liens; mergers, consolidations,
liquidations, dissolutions and sales of all or substantially all
assets; and sale and leasebacks. Events of default in these
credit facilities include nonpayment of principal when due;
nonpayment of interest, fees or other amounts; violation of
covenants; cross payment default and cross acceleration (in each
case, to indebtedness (excluding securitization indebtedness) in
excess of $50 million); and a change of control (the
definition of which permitted the Companys Separation from
Cendant).
The 6.00% senior unsecured notes contain various covenants
including limitations on liens, limitations on sale and
leasebacks, and change of control restrictions. In addition,
there are limitations on mergers, consolidations and sales of
all or substantially all assets. Events of default in the notes
include nonpayment of interest, nonpayment of principal, breach
of a covenant or warranty, cross acceleration of debt in excess
of $50 million, and bankruptcy related matters.
As of December 31, 2007, the Company was in compliance with
all of the covenants described above including the required
financial ratios.
F-28
As of December 31, 2007, available capacity under the
Companys borrowing arrangements was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
|
Capacity
|
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
Capacity
|
|
|
Securitized vacation ownership debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes
|
|
$
|
1,435
|
|
|
$
|
1,435
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Bank conduit
facility (a)
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
646
|
|
|
|
554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securitized vacation ownership debt
|
|
$
|
2,635
|
|
|
$
|
2,081
|
|
|
$
|
554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00% senior unsecured notes (due December 2016)
|
|
|
797
|
|
|
|
797
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan (due July 2011)
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility (due July
2011) (b)
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
803
|
|
Bank borrowings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation ownership
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Vacation rentals capital
leases (c)
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
2,362
|
|
|
$
|
1,526
|
|
|
|
836
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Issuance of letters of
credit (b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
783
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Capacity is subject to maintaining
sufficient assets to collateralize debt.
|
|
(b) |
|
The capacity under the
Companys revolving credit facility includes availability
for letters of credit. As of December 31, 2007, the total
capacity of $900 million was reduced by $53 million
for the issuance of letters of credit.
|
|
(c) |
|
These leases are recorded as
capital lease obligations with corresponding assets classified
within property and equipment on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
|
Securitized
Vacation Ownership Debt
As previously discussed in Note 8Vacation Ownership
Contract Receivables, the Company issues debt through the
securitization of vacation ownership contract receivables. On
February 12, 2007, the Company closed a securitization
facility, Premium Yield Facility
2007-A, in
the amount of $155 million, which matures in February 2020.
As of December 31, 2007, the Company had $155 million
of outstanding borrowings under this facility. On May 23,
2007, the Company closed an additional series of term notes
payable, Sierra Timeshare
2007-1
Receivables Funding, LLC, secured by vacation ownership contract
receivables in the initial principal amount of
$600 million. The payment of principal and interest on
these notes is insured under the terms of a financial guaranty
insurance policy. The proceeds from these notes were used to
reduce the balance outstanding under the bank conduit facility
referenced below and the remaining proceeds were used for
general corporate purposes. As of December 31, 2007, the
Company had $396 million of outstanding borrowings under
these term notes. On November 1, 2007, the Company closed
an additional series of term notes payable, Sierra Timeshare
2007-2
Receivables Funding, LLC, in the initial principal amount of
$455 million, secured by vacation ownership contract
receivables. The payment of principal and interest on these
notes is insured under the terms of a financial guaranty
insurance policy. The proceeds from these notes were also used
primarily to reduce the balance outstanding under the bank
conduit facility. As of December 31, 2007, the Company had
$410 million of outstanding borrowings under these term
notes. Such securitized debt includes fixed and floating rate
term notes for which the weighted average interest rate was
5.2%, 4.7% and 4.0% during the years ended December 31,
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
On October 30, 2007, the Company renewed its
364-day
securitized vacation ownership bank conduit facility through
October 2008. This facility bears interest at variable rates
based on LIBOR and usage and its capacity was increased from
$1.0 billion to $1.2 billion in connection with its
renewal. Such facility had a weighted average interest rate of
5.9%, 5.7% and 4.3% during the years ended December 31,
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
As of December 31, 2007, the Companys securitized
vacation ownership debt is collateralized by $2,596 million
of underlying vacation ownership contract receivables and
related assets. Additional usage of the capacity of the
Companys bank conduit facility is subject to the
Companys ability to provide additional assets to
collateralize such facility. The combined weighted average
interest rate on the Companys total securitized vacation
ownership debt was 5.4%, 5.1% and 4.1% during 2007, 2006 and
2005, respectively.
Interest expense incurred in connection with the Companys
securitized vacation ownership debt amounted to
$110 million, $70 million and $46 million during
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and is recorded within
F-29
operating expenses on the Consolidated and Combined Statements
of Income as the Company earns consumer finance income on the
related securitized vacation ownership contract receivables and
record such income within revenues on the Consolidated and
Combined Statements of Income. Cash paid related to such
interest expense was $95 million, $59 million and
$36 million during 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively.
Other
6.00% Senior Unsecured Notes. The Companys
6.00% notes, with face value of $800 million, were
issued in December 2006 for net proceeds of $796 million.
The notes are redeemable at the Companys option at any
time, in whole or in part, at the appropriate redemption prices
plus accrued interest through the redemption date. These notes
rank equally in right of payment with all of the Companys
other senior unsecured indebtedness. As of December 31,
2007, the notes had a carrying value of $797 million.
Term Loan. During July 2006, the Company entered into a
five-year $300 million term loan facility which bears
interest at LIBOR plus 55 basis points. Subsequent to the
inception of this term loan facility, the Company entered into
an interest rate swap agreement and, as such, the interest rate
is fixed at 6.00%. At December 31, 2007, the Company had
$300 million outstanding under this term loan facility.
Revolving Credit Facility. The Company maintains a
five-year $900 million revolving credit facility which
currently bears interest at LIBOR plus 45 to 55 basis
points. The interest rate of this facility is dependent on the
Companys credit ratings and the outstanding balance of
borrowings on this facility. As of December 31, 2007, the
Company had $97 million of outstanding borrowings under
this facility.
Vacation Ownership Asset-linked Debt. Prior to the
Companys Separation from Cendant, the Company previously
borrowed under a $600 million asset-linked facility through
Cendant to support the creation of certain vacation
ownership-related assets and the acquisition and development of
vacation ownership properties. In connection with the
Separation, Cendant eliminated the outstanding borrowings under
this facility of $600 million on July 27, 2006. The
weighted average interest rate on these borrowings was 5.5%
during the period January 1, 2006 through July 27,
2006 and 5.1% during the year ended December 31, 2005.
Vacation Ownership Bank Borrowings. The Company had
outstanding bank borrowings of $164 million as of
December 31, 2007 under a foreign credit facility used to
support the Companys vacation ownership operations in the
South Pacific. This facility bears interest at Australian BBSY
plus 55 basis points and had a weighted average interest
rate of 7.2%, 6.5% and 6.3% during 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. These secured borrowings are collateralized by
$208 million of underlying vacation ownership contract
receivables and related assets as of December 31, 2007. The
capacity of this facility is subject to maintaining sufficient
assets to collateralize these secured obligations.
Vacation Rental Bank Borrowings. As of December 31,
2006, the Company had bank debt outstanding of $73 million
related to the Companys Landal GreenParks business. The
bank debt was collateralized by $130 million of land and
related vacation rental assets and had a weighted average
interest rate of 3.7% and 3.0% during 2006 and 2005,
respectively. The $73 million of outstanding borrowings
were repaid on January 31, 2007.
Vacation Rental Capital Leases. The Company leases
vacation homes located in European holiday parks as part of its
vacation exchange and rentals business. The majority of these
leases are recorded as capital lease obligations under generally
accepted accounting principles with corresponding assets
classified within property, plant and equipment on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets. The vacation rentals capital lease
obligations had a weighted average interest rate of 4.5% during
2007, 2006 and 2005.
Other. The Company also maintains other debt facilities
which arise through the ordinary course of operations. This debt
principally reflects $11 million of mortgage borrowings
related to an office building.
Interest expense incurred in connection with the Companys
long-term debt (excluding securitized vacation ownership debt)
amounted to $96 million, $72 million and
$36 million during 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. In
addition, the Company recorded $11 million of interest
expense related to interest on local taxes payable to certain
foreign jurisdictions during 2006. All such amounts are recorded
within the interest expense line item on the Consolidated and
Combined Statements of Income. Cash paid related to such
interest expense was $89 million, $60 million and
$36 million during 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively.
Interest expense is partially offset on the Consolidated and
Combined Statements of Income by capitalized interest of
$23 million, $16 million and $7 million during
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
F-30
|
|
14.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Commitments
Leases
The Company is committed to making rental payments under
noncancelable operating leases covering various facilities and
equipment. Future minimum lease payments required under
noncancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2007 are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncancelable
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
Year
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
2009
|
|
|
62
|
|
2010
|
|
|
57
|
|
2011
|
|
|
47
|
|
2012
|
|
|
35
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2007, 2006 and 2005, the Company incurred total rental
expense of $79 million, $65 million and
$55 million, respectively.
Purchase
Commitments
In the normal course of business, the Company makes various
commitments to purchase goods or services from specific
suppliers, including those related to vacation ownership resort
development and other capital expenditures. Purchase commitments
made by the Company as of December 31, 2007 aggregated
$570 million. Individually, such commitments range as high
as $73 million related to the development of a vacation
ownership resort. The majority of the commitments relate to the
development of vacation ownership properties (aggregating
$331 million; $218 million of which relates to 2008
and $113 million of which relates to 2009).
Letters
of Credit
As of December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the
Company had $53 million and $30 million, respectively,
of irrevocable letters of credit outstanding, which mainly
support development activity at the Companys vacation
ownership business.
Litigation
The Company is involved in claims, legal proceedings and
governmental inquiries related to contract disputes, business
practices, intellectual property and other matters relating to
the Companys business, including, without limitation,
commercial, employment, tax and environmental matters. Such
matters include, but are not limited to: (i) for the
Companys vacation ownership business, alleged failure to
perform duties arising under management agreements, and claims
for construction defects and inadequate maintenance (which are
made by property owners associations from time to time);
and (ii) for the Companys vacation exchange and
rentals business, breach of contract claims by both affiliates
and members in connection with their respective agreements and
bad faith and consumer protection claims asserted by members.
See Note 20Separation Adjustments and Transactions
with Former Parent and Subsidiaries regarding contingent
litigation liabilities resulting from the Separation.
The Company believes that it has adequately accrued for such
matters with reserves of approximately $33 million at
December 31, 2007, or, for matters not requiring accrual,
believes that such matters will not have a material adverse
effect on its results of operations, financial position or cash
flows based on information currently available. However,
litigation is inherently unpredictable and, although the Company
believes that its accruals are adequate
and/or that
it has valid defenses in these matters, unfavorable resolutions
could occur. As such, an adverse outcome from such unresolved
proceedings for which claims are awarded in excess of the
amounts accrued, if any, could be material to the Company with
respect to earnings or cash flows in any given reporting period.
However, the Company does not believe that the impact of such
unresolved litigation should result in a material liability to
the Company in relation to its consolidated financial position
or liquidity.
F-31
Guarantees/Indemnifications
Standard
Guarantees/Indemnifications
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into
numerous agreements that contain standard guarantees and
indemnities whereby the Company indemnifies another party for
breaches of representations and warranties. In addition, many of
these parties are also indemnified against any third-party claim
resulting from the transaction that is contemplated in the
underlying agreement. Such guarantees and indemnifications are
granted under various agreements, including those governing
(i) purchases, sales or outsourcing of assets or
businesses, (ii) leases of real estate,
(iii) licensing of trademarks, (iv) development of
vacation ownership properties, (v) access to credit
facilities and use of derivatives and (vi) issuances of
debt securities. The guarantees and indemnifications issued are
for the benefit of the (i) buyers in sale agreements and
sellers in purchase agreements, (ii) landlords in lease
contracts, (iii) franchisees in licensing agreements,
(iv) developers in vacation ownership development
agreements, (v) financial institutions in credit facility
arrangements and derivative contracts and (vi) underwriters
in debt security issuances. While some of these guarantees and
indemnifications extend only for the duration of the underlying
agreement, many survive the expiration of the term of the
agreement or extend into perpetuity (unless subject to a legal
statute of limitations). There are no specific limitations on
the maximum potential amount of future payments that the Company
could be required to make under these guarantees and
indemnifications, nor is the Company able to develop an estimate
of the maximum potential amount of future payments to be made
under these guarantees and indemnifications as the triggering
events are not subject to predictability. With respect to
certain of the aforementioned guarantees and indemnifications,
such as indemnifications of landlords against third-party claims
for the use of real estate property leased by the Company, the
Company maintains insurance coverage that mitigates any
potential payments to be made.
Other
Guarantees/Indemnifications
In the normal course of business, the Companys vacation
ownership business provides guarantees to certain owners
associations for funds required to operate and maintain vacation
ownership properties in excess of assessments collected from
owners of the vacation ownership interests. The Company may be
required to fund such excess as a result of unsold Company-owned
vacation ownership interests or failure by owners to pay such
assessments. These guarantees extend for the duration of the
underlying subsidy agreements (which generally approximate one
year and are renewable on an annual basis) or until a stipulated
percentage (typically 80% or higher) of related vacation
ownership interests are sold. The maximum potential future
payments that the Company could be required to make under these
guarantees was $257 million as of December 31, 2007.
The Company would only be required to pay this maximum amount if
none of the owners assessed paid their assessments. Any
assessments collected from the owners of the vacation ownership
interests would reduce the maximum potential amount of future
payments to be made by the Company. Additionally, should the
Company be required to fund the deficit through the payment of
any owners assessments under these guarantees, the Company
would be permitted access to the property for its own use and
may use that property to engage in revenue-producing activities,
such as marketing or rental. During 2007, 2006 and 2005, the
Company made payments related to these guarantees of
$5 million, $6 million and $4 million,
respectively. As of December 31, 2007, the Company recorded
a liability in connection with these guarantees of
$30 million on its Consolidated Balance Sheet.
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into
hotel management agreements which may provide a guarantee by the
Company of minimum returns to the hotel owner. Under such
guarantees, the Company is required to compensate for any
shortfall over the life of the management agreement up to a
specified aggregate amount. The Companys exposure under
these guarantees is partially mitigated by the Companys
ability to terminate any such management agreement if certain
targeted operating results are not met. Additionally, the
Company is able to recapture a portion or all of the shortfall
payments and any waived fees in the event that future operating
results exceed targets. The maximum potential amount of future
payments to be made under these guarantees is $20 million.
The underlying agreements would not require payment until 2010
or thereafter. As of December 31, 2007, the Company
recorded a liability in connection with these guarantees of less
than $1 million on its Consolidated Balance Sheet.
See Note 20Separation Adjustments and Transactions
with Former Parent and Subsidiaries for contingent liabilities
related to the Companys Separation.
F-32
|
|
15.
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income
|
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Gains/(Losses)
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
on Cash Flow
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Hedges, Net
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Income/(Loss)
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2005, net of tax of $39
|
|
$
|
213
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
214
|
|
Current period change
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2005, net of tax of $58
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
Current period change
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006, net of tax of $43
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
Current period change
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007, net of tax of $47
|
|
$
|
217
|
|
|
$
|
(26
|
)
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
The Company has a stock-based compensation plan available to
grant non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options,
SSARs, restricted stock, restricted stock units
(RSUs) and other stock or cash-based awards to key
employees, non-employee directors, advisors and consultants.
Under the Wyndham Worldwide Corporation 2006 Equity and
Incentive Plan, which was approved by Cendant, the sole
shareholder, and became effective on July 12, 2006, a
maximum of 43.5 million shares of common stock may be
awarded. As of December 31, 2007, approximately
22.8 million shares of availability remained.
Incentive
Equity Awards Conversion
Prior to August 1, 2006, all employee stock awards (stock
options and RSUs) were granted by Cendant. At the time of
Separation, a portion of Cendants outstanding equity
awards were converted into equity awards of the Company at a
ratio of one share of Companys common stock for every five
shares of Cendants common stock. As a result, the Company
issued approximately 2 million RSUs and approximately
24 million stock options upon completion of the conversion
of existing Cendant equity awards into Wyndham equity awards.
In connection with the distribution of the shares of common
stock of Wyndham to Cendant stockholders, on July 31, 2006,
the Compensation Committee of Cendants Board of Directors
approved a change to the date on which all Cendant equity awards
(including Wyndham awards granted as an adjustment to such
Cendant equity awards) would become fully vested. These equity
awards vested on August 15, 2006 rather than
August 30, 2006 (which was the previous date upon which
such equity awards were to vest). As such, there were zero
converted RSUs outstanding on December 31, 2007.
As a result of the acceleration of the vesting of all employee
stock awards granted by Cendant, the Company recorded non-cash
compensation expense of $45 million during the third
quarter of 2006. In addition, the Company recorded a non-cash
expense of $9 million related to equitable adjustments to
the accelerated awards in the third quarter of 2006. The
$54 million of expense is recorded within separation and
related costs on the Consolidated and Combined Statement of
Income.
The activity related to the converted stock options for the year
ended December 31, 2007 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
of Options
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2007
|
|
|
22.0
|
|
|
$
|
39.87
|
|
Exercised (a)
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
22.32
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(6.6
|
)
|
|
|
51.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2007 (b)
|
|
|
13.6
|
(c)
|
|
$
|
36.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Stock options exercised had an
intrinsic value of $21 million and $4 million during
the year ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
|
|
(b) |
|
As of December 31, 2007, the
Companys outstanding in the money stock
options had aggregate intrinsic value of $11 million. All
14 million options outstanding are exercisable as of
December 31, 2007.
|
|
(c) |
|
Options outstanding and exercisable
as of December 31, 2007 have a weighted average remaining
contractual life of 2.6 years.
|
F-33
The following table summarizes information as of
December 31, 2007 regarding the Companys outstanding
and exercisable stock options converted from Cendant stock
options:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Range of Exercise Prices
|
|
of Options
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
$10.00 $19.99
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
$
|
19.74
|
|
$20.00 $29.99
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
25.74
|
|
$30.00 $39.99
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
37.49
|
|
$40.00 $49.99
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
43.17
|
|
$50.00 & above
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
72.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Options
|
|
|
13.6
|
|
|
$
|
36.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
Equity Awards Granted by the Company
On May 2, 2007, the Company approved the grant of incentive
awards of approximately $53 million to the key employees
and senior officers of Wyndham in the form of RSUs and SSARs.
The awards will vest ratably over a period of four years.
On May 2, 2006, Cendant approved the grant of incentive
awards of approximately $79 million to the key employees
and senior officers of Wyndham in the form of restricted cash
units, which were replaced by RSUs and SSARs on August 1,
2006. The awards have a grant date of May 2, 2006 and vest
ratably over a period of four years, with the exception of a
portion of the SSARs which vest ratably over a period of three
years.
The activity related to the Companys incentive equity
awards for the year ended December 31, 2007 consisted of
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSUs
|
|
|
SSARs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
of RSUs
|
|
|
Grant Price
|
|
|
of SSARs
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2007
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
$
|
31.81
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
$
|
31.85
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
36.48
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
36.70
|
|
Vested/exercised
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
36.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
33.09
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
) (c)
|
|
|
34.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2007 (a)
|
|
|
2.6
|
(b)
|
|
$
|
34.09
|
(b)
|
|
|
0.9
|
(d)
|
|
$
|
34.27
|
(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Aggregate unrecognized compensation
expense related to SSARs and RSUs was $86 million as of
December 31, 2007 which is expected to be recognized over a
weighted average period of 2.9 years.
|
|
(b) |
|
Approximately 2.4 million RSUs
outstanding at December 31, 2007 are expected to vest.
|
|
(c) |
|
Approximately 50,000 SSARs were
canceled in November 2007 in connection with the resignation of
the Chief Executive Officer of the Companys vacation
exchange and rentals business.
|
|
(d) |
|
175,000 of the approximately
900,000 SSARs are exercisable at December 31, 2007 at a
weighted average exercise price of $32.11; however, since the
remaining SSARs were issued to the Companys top four
officers, the Company assumes that all are expected to vest.
SSARs outstanding at December 31, 2007 had no intrinsic
value and have a weighted average remaining contractual life of
6.4 years.
|
The fair value of SSARs granted by the Company on May 2,
2007 and August 1, 2006 was estimated on the date of grant
using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the weighted
average assumptions outlined in the table below. Expected
volatility is based on both historical and implied volatilities
of (i) the Companys stock (utilized in the May 2007
grant) and (ii) the stock of comparable companies (utilized
in both the May 2007 and August 2006 grants) over the estimated
expected life of the SSARs. The expected life represents the
period of time the SSARs are expected to be outstanding and is
based on the simplified method, as defined in
SAB 107, Share-Based Payments. The risk free
interest rate is based on yields on U.S. Treasury strips
with a maturity similar to the estimated expected life of the
SSARs. The expected dividend yield (utilized in the May 2007
grant) was based on the anticipated annual dividend (announced
by the Companys Board of Directors on May 1,
2007) divided by the closing price of the Companys
stock on the date of the grant.
F-34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SSARs Issued on
|
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
August 1,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Grant date fair value
|
|
$
|
9.86
|
|
|
$
|
13.91
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
24.7%
|
|
|
|
34.4%
|
|
Expected life
|
|
|
4.25 yrs.
|
|
|
|
6.25 yrs.
|
|
Risk free interest rate
|
|
|
4.5%
|
|
|
|
4.9%
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0.44%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of
$26 million and $13 million during 2007 and 2006,
respectively, related to the incentive equity awards granted by
the Company. During 2007 and 2006, the Company recognized
$10 million of tax benefit and $2 million of tax
expense, respectively, for share based compensation arrangements
on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income.
During 2006 (through the date of Separation) and 2005, Cendant
allocated pre-tax stock-based compensation expense of
$12 million and $16 million, respectively, to the
Company. Such compensation expense relates only to the options
and RSUs that were granted to Cendants employees
subsequent to January 1, 2003. The total income tax benefit
recognized in the income statement for share based compensation
arrangements was $5 million and $6 million during 2006
(through the date of Separation) and 2005. The allocation was
based on the estimated number of options and RSUs Cendant
believed it would ultimately provide and the underlying vesting
period of the awards. As Cendant measured its stock-based
compensation expense using intrinsic value method during the
periods prior to January 1, 2003, Cendant did not recognize
compensation expense upon the issuance of equity awards to its
employees.
|
|
17.
|
Employee
Benefit Plans
|
Defined
Contribution Benefit Plans
Wyndham sponsors a domestic defined contribution savings plan
and a domestic deferred compensation plan that provide certain
eligible employees of the Company an opportunity to accumulate
funds for retirement. The Company matches the contributions of
participating employees on the basis specified by each plan. The
Companys cost for these plans was $23 million,
$20 million and $17 million during 2007, 2006 and
2005, respectively.
In addition, the Company contributes to several foreign employee
benefit contributory plans which also provide eligible employees
with an opportunity to accumulate funds for retirement. The
Companys contributory cost for these plans was
$11 million, $7 million and $6 million during
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Defined
Benefit Pension Plans
The Company sponsors defined benefit pension plans for certain
foreign subsidiaries. Under these plans, benefits are based on
an employees years of credited service and a percentage of
final average compensation or as otherwise described by the
plan. As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Companys
net pension liability of $8 million and $8 million,
respectively, is fully recognized as other non-current
liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. As of
December 31, 2007, the Company recorded $1 million and
$3 million, respectively, within accumulated other
comprehensive income on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as an
unrecognized prior service credit and unrecognized gain. As of
December 31, 2006, the Company recorded $2 million and
$1 million, respectively, within accumulated other
comprehensive income on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as an
unrecognized prior service credit and unrecognized loss.
The Companys policy is to contribute amounts sufficient to
meet minimum funding requirements as set forth in employee
benefit and tax laws plus such additional amounts that the
Company determines to be appropriate. During 2007, 2006 and
2005, the Company recorded pension expense of $2 million,
$1 million and $2 million, respectively, within
general and administrative expenses on the Consolidated and
Combined Statements of Income.
F-35
|
|
18.
|
Financial
Instruments
|
Risk
Management
Following is a description of the Companys risk management
policies:
Foreign
Currency Risk
The Company uses foreign currency forward contracts to manage
its exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates
associated with its foreign currency denominated receivables,
forecasted earnings of foreign subsidiaries and forecasted
foreign currency denominated vendor costs. The Company primarily
hedges its foreign currency exposure to the British pound, Euro
and Canadian dollar. The majority of forward contracts utilized
by the Company does not qualify for hedge accounting treatment
under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities. The fluctuations in
the value of these forward contracts do, however, largely offset
the impact of changes in the value of the underlying risk that
they are intended to economically hedge. Forward contracts that
are used to hedge certain forecasted disbursements and receipts
up to 18 months are designated and do qualify as cash flow
hedges. The amount of gains or losses reclassified from other
comprehensive income to earnings resulting from ineffectiveness
or from excluding a component of the forward contracts
gain or loss from the effectiveness calculation for cash flow
hedges during 2007, 2006 and 2005 was not material. The impact
of these forward contracts was not material to the
Companys results of operations or financial position
during 2007, 2006 and 2005. The amount of gains or losses the
Company expects to reclassify from other comprehensive income to
earnings over the next 12 months is not material.
Interest
Rate Risk
The debt used to finance much of the Companys operations
is also exposed to interest rate fluctuations. The Company uses
various hedging strategies and derivative financial instruments
to create a desired mix of fixed and floating rate assets and
liabilities. Derivative instruments currently used in these
hedging strategies include swaps and interest rate caps.
The derivatives used to manage the risk associated with the
Companys floating rate debt include freestanding
derivatives and derivatives designated as cash flow hedges. In
connection with its qualifying cash flow hedges, the Company
recorded a net pre-tax loss of $22 million during 2007, a
net pre-tax loss of $13 million during 2006 and a net
pre-tax gain of $5 million during 2005 to other
comprehensive income. The pre-tax amount of gains reclassified
from other comprehensive income to earnings resulting from
ineffectiveness or from excluding a component of the
derivatives gain or loss from the effectiveness
calculation for cash flow hedges was insignificant during both
2007 and 2006 and $5 million during 2005. The amount of
losses that the Company expects to reclassify from other
comprehensive income to earnings during the next 12 months
is not material. These freestanding derivatives had a nominal
impact on the Companys results of operations in 2007, 2006
and 2005.
Credit
Risk and Exposure
The Company is exposed to counterparty credit risk in the event
of nonperformance by counterparties to various agreements and
sales transactions. The Company manages such risk by evaluating
the financial position and creditworthiness of such
counterparties and by requiring collateral in instances in which
financing is provided. The Company mitigates counterparty credit
risk associated with its derivative contracts by monitoring the
amounts at risk with each counterparty to such contracts,
periodically evaluating counterparty creditworthiness and
financial position, and where possible, dispersing its risk
among multiple counterparties.
As of December 31, 2007, there were no significant
concentrations of credit risk with any individual counterparty
or groups of counterparties. However, approximately 22% of the
Companys outstanding vacation ownership contract
receivables portfolio relates to customers who reside in
California. With the exception of the financing provided to
customers of its vacation ownership businesses, the Company does
not normally require collateral or other security to support
credit sales.
Market
Risk
The Company is subject to risks relating to the geographic
concentrations of (i) areas in which the Company is
currently developing and selling vacation ownership properties,
(ii) sales offices in certain vacation areas and
(iii) customers of the Companys vacation ownership
business; which in each case, may result in the Companys
results of operations being more sensitive to local and regional
economic conditions and other factors, including
F-36
competition, natural disasters and economic downturns, than the
Companys results of operations would be absent such
geographic concentrations. Local and regional economic
conditions and other factors may differ materially from
prevailing conditions in other parts of the world. Florida,
Nevada and California are examples of areas with concentrations
of sales offices. For the twelve months ended December 31,
2007, approximately 15%, 13% and 13% of the Companys VOI
sales revenue was generated in sales offices located in Florida,
Nevada and California, respectively.
Included within the Consolidated and Combined Statements of
Income is approximately 11%, 12% and 10% of net revenue
generated from transactions in the state of Florida in 2007,
2006 and 2005, respectively, and approximately 10%, 10% and 8%
of net revenue generated from transactions in the state of
California in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Fair
Value
The fair value of financial instruments is generally determined
by reference to market values resulting from trading on a
national securities exchange or in an over-the-counter market.
In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair
value is based on estimates using present value or other
valuation techniques, as appropriate. The carrying amounts of
cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, trade receivables,
accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current
liabilities approximate fair value due to the short-term
maturities of these assets and liabilities. The carrying amounts
and estimated fair values of all other financial instruments as
of December 31 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation ownership contract receivables, net
|
|
$
|
2,944
|
|
|
$
|
2,944
|
|
|
$
|
2,380
|
|
|
$
|
2,380
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
3,607
|
|
|
|
3,341
|
|
|
|
2,900
|
|
|
|
2,889
|
|
Derivatives (*)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forwards
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps and caps
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Derivative instruments are in loss
positions as of December 31, 2007 and 2006.
|
The weighted average interest rate on outstanding vacation
ownership contract receivables was 12.5%, 12.7% and 13.1% as of
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
The reportable segments presented below represent the
Companys operating segments for which separate financial
information is available and which are utilized on a regular
basis by its chief operating decision maker to assess
performance and to allocate resources. In identifying its
reportable segments, the Company also considers the nature of
services provided by its operating segments. Management
evaluates the operating results of each of its reportable
segments based upon revenue and EBITDA, which is
defined as net income before depreciation and amortization,
interest (excluding interest on securitized vacation ownership
debt), income taxes, minority interest and cumulative effect of
accounting change, net of tax, each of which is presented on the
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income. The
Companys presentation of EBITDA may not be comparable to
similarly-titled measures used by other companies.
F-37
Year
Ended or at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
Vacation
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
|
and Rentals
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Other (b)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net
revenues (a)
|
|
$
|
725
|
|
|
$
|
1,218
|
|
|
$
|
2,425
|
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,360
|
|
EBITDA (c)
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
(11
|
) (d)
|
|
|
883
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
Segment assets
|
|
|
1,396
|
|
|
|
2,471
|
|
|
|
6,431
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
10,459
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
Year
Ended or at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
Vacation
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
|
and Rentals
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Other (b)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net
revenues (a)
|
|
$
|
661
|
|
|
$
|
1,119
|
|
|
$
|
2,068
|
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,842
|
|
EBITDA (e)
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
(73
|
) (f)
|
|
|
725
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
Segment assets
|
|
|
1,362
|
|
|
|
2,375
|
|
|
|
5,590
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
9,520
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
Vacation
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
|
and Rentals
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Other (b)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net
revenues (a)
|
|
$
|
533
|
|
|
$
|
1,068
|
|
|
$
|
1,874
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,471
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
751
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Transactions between segments are
recorded at fair value and eliminated in consolidation.
Inter-segment net revenues were not significant to the net
revenues of any one segment.
|
|
(b) |
|
Includes the elimination of
transactions between segments.
|
|
(c) |
|
Includes separation and related
costs of $9 million and $7 million for Vacation
Ownership and Corporate and Other, respectively.
|
|
(d) |
|
Includes $55 million of
corporate costs, partially offset by $46 million of a net
benefit related to the resolution of and adjustment to certain
contingent liabilities and assets.
|
|
(e) |
|
Includes separation and related
costs of $2 million, $3 million, $18 million and
$76 million for Lodging, Vacation Exchange and Rentals,
Vacation Ownership and Corporate and Other, respectively.
|
|
(f) |
|
Includes $99 million of
corporate costs, partially offset by $32 million of a net
benefit related to the resolution of and adjustment to certain
contingent liabilities and assets.
|
Provided below is a reconciliation of EBITDA to income before
income taxes and minority interest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
883
|
|
|
$
|
725
|
|
|
$
|
751
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
$
|
655
|
|
|
$
|
542
|
|
|
$
|
626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-38
The geographic segment information provided below is classified
based on the geographic location of the Companys
subsidiaries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States
|
|
|
Netherlands
|
|
|
Kingdom
|
|
|
Countries
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Year Ended or At December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
3,390
|
|
|
$
|
228
|
|
|
$
|
206
|
|
|
$
|
536
|
|
|
$
|
4,360
|
|
Net long-lived assets
|
|
|
3,721
|
|
|
|
402
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
4,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended or At December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
2,997
|
|
|
$
|
167
|
|
|
$
|
197
|
|
|
$
|
481
|
|
|
$
|
3,842
|
|
Net long-lived assets
|
|
|
3,690
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
4,653
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
2,714
|
|
|
$
|
145
|
|
|
$
|
215
|
|
|
$
|
397
|
|
|
$
|
3,471
|
|
|
|
20.
|
Separation
Adjustments and Transactions with Former Parent and
Subsidiaries
|
Transfer
of Cendant Corporate Liabilities and Issuance of Guarantees to
Cendant and Affiliates
Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, upon the
distribution of the Companys common stock to Cendant
shareholders, the Company entered into certain guarantee
commitments with Cendant (pursuant to the assumption of certain
liabilities and the obligation to indemnify Cendant and
Cendants former real estate services (Realogy)
and travel distribution services (Travelport) for
such liabilities) and guarantee commitments related to deferred
compensation arrangements with each of Cendant and Realogy.
These guarantee arrangements primarily relate to certain
contingent litigation liabilities, contingent tax liabilities,
and Cendant contingent and other corporate liabilities, of which
the Company assumed and is responsible for 37.5% of these
Cendant liabilities. The amount of liabilities which were
assumed by the Company in connection with the Separation
approximated $349 million and $434 million at
December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.
These amounts were comprised of certain Cendant corporate
liabilities which were recorded on the books of Cendant as well
as additional liabilities which were established for guarantees
issued at the date of Separation related to certain unresolved
contingent matters and certain others that could arise during
the guarantee period. Regarding the guarantees, if any of the
companies responsible for all or a portion of such liabilities
were to default in its payment of costs or expenses related to
any such liability, the Company would be responsible for a
portion of the defaulting party or parties obligation. The
Company also provided a default guarantee related to certain
deferred compensation arrangements related to certain current
and former senior officers and directors of Cendant, Realogy and
Travelport. These arrangements, which are discussed in more
detail below, have been valued upon the Companys
Separation from Cendant with the assistance of third-party
experts in accordance with Financial Interpretation No. 45
(FIN 45) Guarantors Accounting and
Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect
Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others and recorded as
liabilities on the balance sheet. To the extent such recorded
liabilities are not adequate to cover the ultimate payment
amounts, such excess will be reflected as an expense to the
results of operations in future periods.
As a result of the sale of Realogy on April 10, 2007,
Realogys senior debt credit rating was downgraded to below
investment grade. Under the Separation Agreement, if Realogy
experienced such a change of control and suffered such a ratings
downgrade, it was required to post a letter of credit in an
amount acceptable to the Company and Avis Budget Group to
satisfy the fair value of Realogys indemnification
obligations for the Cendant legacy contingent liabilities in the
event Realogy does not otherwise satisfy such obligations to the
extent they become due. On April 26, 2007, Realogy posted a
$500 million irrevocable standby letter of credit from a
major commercial bank in favor of Avis Budget Group and upon
which demand may be made if Realogy does not otherwise satisfy
its obligations for its share of the Cendant legacy contingent
liabilities. The letter of credit can be adjusted from time to
time based upon the outstanding contingent liabilities. The
issuance of this letter of credit does not relieve or limit
Realogys obligations for these liabilities.
The $349 million is comprised of $36 million for
litigation matters, $239 million for tax liabilities,
$41 million for liabilities of previously sold businesses
of Cendant, $18 million for other contingent and corporate
liabilities and $15 million of liabilities where the
calculated FIN 45 guarantee amount exceeded the
SFAS No. 5 Accounting for Contingencies
liability assumed at the date of Separation (of which
$12 million of the $15 million pertain to litigation
liabilities). In connection with these liabilities,
$110 million are recorded in current due to former Parent
and subsidiaries and $243 million are recorded in long-term
due to former Parent and subsidiaries at December 31, 2007
on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company is indemnifying
Cendant for these contingent liabilities and therefore any
payments would be made to the third party through the former
Parent. The $15 million relating to the
F-39
FIN 45 guarantees is recorded in other current liabilities
at December 31, 2007 on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. In
addition, at December 31, 2007, the Company has a
$18 million receivable primarily due from former Parent
relating to income tax refunds, which is recorded in current due
from former Parent and subsidiaries on the Consolidated Balance
Sheet. Such receivable totaled $65 million at
December 31, 2006, related to a refund of excess funding
paid to the Companys former Parent resulting from the
Separation and income tax refunds.
At December 31, 2006, the Company had recorded a
$37 million receivable in non-current due from former
Parent and subsidiaries on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, which
represented the Companys right, pursuant to the Separation
agreement, to receive 37.5% of any proceeds from the ultimate
sale of Cendants preferred stock investment in and
warrants of Affinion Group Holdings, Inc.
(Affinion). On January 31, 2007, Affinion
redeemed a portion of the preferred stock investment owned by
Avis Budget Group, of which the Company owned a 37.5% interest
pursuant to the Separation agreement. Upon the Companys
receipt of its share of the proceeds resulting from
Affinions redemption, such receivable was reduced to
$10 million. The receivable was reclassified to other
non-current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of
March 31, 2007 as the investment had been legally
transferred to the Company from Avis Budget Group. Accordingly,
as of December 31, 2007, the Company owns $11 million
of preferred stock investment and warrants in Affinion and
accounts for them in accordance with SFAS No. 115,
Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity
Securities.
Following is a discussion of the liabilities on which the
Company issued guarantees:
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent litigation liabilities The Company has assumed
37.5% of liabilities for certain litigation relating to, arising
out of or resulting from certain lawsuits in which Cendant is
named as the defendant. The indemnification obligation will
continue until the underlying lawsuits are resolved. The Company
will indemnify Cendant to the extent that Cendant is required to
make payments related to any of the underlying lawsuits. As the
guarantee relates to matters in various stages of litigation,
the maximum exposure cannot be quantified. Due to the inherent
nature of the litigation process, the timing of payments related
to these liabilities cannot be reasonably predicted, but is
expected to occur over several years. During 2007, Cendant
settled a number of these lawsuits and the Company assumed a
portion of the related indemnification obligations. As discussed
above, for each settlement, the Company paid 37.5% of the
aggregate settlement amount to Cendant. The Companys
payment obligations under the settlements were greater or less
than the Companys accruals, depending on the matter.
During 2007, Cendant received an adverse order in a litigation
matter for which the Company retains a 37.5% indemnification
obligation. As a result, the Company increased its contingent
litigation accrual for this matter by $27 million. As a
result of these settlements and payments to Cendant, as well as
other reductions and accruals for developments in active
litigation matters, the Companys aggregate accrual for
outstanding Cendant contingent litigation liabilities was
decreased from $40 million at December 31, 2006 to
$36 million at December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
Contingent tax liabilities The Company is liable for
37.5% of certain contingent tax liabilities and will pay to
Cendant the amount of taxes allocated pursuant to the Tax
Sharing Agreement for the payment of certain taxes. This
liability will remain outstanding until tax audits related to
the 2006 tax year are completed or the statutes of limitations
governing the 2006 tax year have passed. The Companys
maximum exposure cannot be quantified as tax regulations are
subject to interpretation and the outcome of tax audits or
litigation is inherently uncertain. Additionally, the timing of
payments related to these liabilities cannot be reasonably
predicted, but the Company expects a majority to occur during
2010.
|
|
|
|
Cendant contingent and other corporate liabilities The
Company has assumed 37.5% of corporate liabilities of Cendant
including liabilities relating to (i) Cendants
terminated or divested businesses, (ii) liabilities
relating to the Travelport sale, if any, and
(iii) generally any actions with respect to the Separation
plan or the distributions brought by any third party. The
Companys maximum exposure to loss cannot be quantified as
this guarantee relates primarily to future claims that may be
made against Cendant, that have not yet occurred. The Company
assessed the probability and amount of potential liability
related to this guarantee based on the extent and nature of
historical experience.
|
|
|
|
Guarantee related to deferred compensation arrangements
In the event that Cendant, Realogy
and/or
Travelport are not able to meet certain deferred compensation
obligations under specified plans for certain current and former
officers and directors because of bankruptcy or insolvency, the
Company has guaranteed such obligations (to the extent relating
to amounts deferred in respect of 2005 and earlier). This
guarantee will remain outstanding until such deferred
compensation balances are distributed to the respective officers
and directors. The maximum exposure cannot be quantified as the
guarantee, in part, is related to the value of deferred
investments as of the date of the requested distribution.
Additionally, the timing of payment, if any, related to these
liabilities cannot be reasonably predicted because the
distribution dates are not fixed.
|
F-40
Transactions
with Avis Budget Group, Realogy and Travelport
Prior to the Companys Separation from Cendant, it entered
into a Transition Services Agreement (TSA) with Avis
Budget Group, Realogy and Travelport to provide for an orderly
transition to becoming an independent company. Under the TSA,
Cendant agrees to provide the Company with various services,
including services relating to human resources and employee
benefits, payroll, financial systems management, treasury and
cash management, accounts payable services, telecommunications
services and information technology services. In certain cases,
services provided by Cendant under the TSA may be provided by
one of the separated companies following the date of such
companys Separation from Cendant. The Company recorded
$13 million of expenses during 2007 and $8 million of
expenses and less than $1 million in other revenues during
2006 in the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income
related to these agreements.
Separation
and Related Costs
During 2007, the Company incurred costs of $16 million in
connection with executing the Separation, consisting primarily
of expenses related to the rebranding initiative at the
Companys vacation ownership business and certain
transitional expenses. During 2006, the Company incurred costs
of $99 million in connection with executing the Separation,
consisting primarily of (i) the acceleration of vesting of
certain employee incentive awards and the related equitable
adjustments of such awards, (ii) an impairment charge due
to a rebranding initiative for the Companys Fairfield and
Trendwest trademarks and (iii) consulting and
payroll-related services.
|
|
21.
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
Net
Intercompany Funding to Former Parent
The following table summarizes related party transactions
occurring between the Company and Cendant:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net intercompany funding to former Parent, beginning balance
|
|
$
|
1,125
|
|
|
$
|
661
|
|
Corporate-related functions
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
Income taxes, net
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
63
|
|
Net interest earned on net intercompany funding to former Parent
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Advances to former Parent, net
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
Acceleration of restricted stock units
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Elimination of intercompany balance due to former Parent
|
|
|
(1,157
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net intercompany funding to former Parent, ending balance
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate-Related
Functions
Prior to the date of Separation, the Company was allocated
general corporate overhead expenses from Cendant for
corporate-related functions based on a percentage of the
Companys forecasted revenues. General corporate overhead
expense allocations included executive management, tax,
accounting, payroll, financial systems management, legal,
treasury and cash management, certain employee benefits and real
estate usage for common space. During 2006 and 2005, the Company
was allocated $20 million and $36 million,
respectively, of general corporate expenses from Cendant, which
are included within general and administrative expenses on the
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income. The 2006 amount
includes allocations only from January 1, 2006 through the
date of Separation (July 31, 2006).
Prior to the date of Separation, Cendant also incurred certain
expenses on behalf of the Company. These expenses, which
directly benefited the Company, were allocated to the Company
based upon the Companys actual utilization of the
services. Direct allocations included costs associated with
insurance, information technology, revenue franchise audit
(during 2005 only), telecommunications and real estate usage for
Company-specific space for some but not all of the periods
presented. During 2006 and 2005, the Company was allocated
$36 million and $52 million, respectively, of expenses
directly benefiting the Company, which are included within
general and administrative and operating expenses on the
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income. The 2006 amount
includes allocations from January 1, 2006 through the date
of Separation (July 31, 2006).
The Company believes the assumptions and methodologies
underlying the allocations of general corporate overhead and
direct expenses from Cendant were reasonable. However, such
expenses were not indicative of, nor is
F-41
it practical or meaningful for the Company to estimate for all
historical periods presented, the actual level of expenses that
would have been incurred had the Company been operating as a
separate, stand-alone public company.
Income
Taxes, net
Prior to the Separation, the Company was included in the
consolidated federal and state income tax returns of Cendant
through the Separation date for the 2006 period then ended.
Balances due to Cendant for these pre-Separation tax returns and
related tax attributes were estimated as of December 31,
2006 and have since been adjusted in connection with the filing
of the pre-Separation tax returns. These balances will again be
adjusted after the ultimate settlement of the related tax audits
for these periods.
Net
Interest Earned on Net Intercompany Funding to Former
Parent
Prior to the Separation, Cendant swept cash from the
Companys bank accounts while the Company maintained
certain balances due to or from Cendant. Inclusive of unpaid
corporate allocations, the Company had net amounts due from
Cendant, exclusive of income taxes, of $1,828 million as of
December 31, 2005, which was eliminated at the date of
Separation. Prior to the Separation, certain of the advances
between the Company and Cendant were interest-bearing. In
connection with the interest-bearing balances, the Company
recorded net interest income of $24 million and
$30 million during 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Related
Party Agreements
Prior to the Separation, the Company conducted the following
business activities, among others, with Cendants other
business units or newly separated companies, as applicable:
(i) provision of access to hotel accommodation and vacation
exchange and rentals inventory to be distributed through
Travelport; (ii) utilization of employee relocation
services, including relocation policy management, household
goods moving services and departure and destination real estate
related services; (iii) utilization of commercial real
estate brokerage services, such as transaction management,
acquisition and disposition services, broker price opinions,
renewal due diligence and portfolio review;
(iv) utilization of corporate travel management services of
Travelport; and (v) designation of Cendants car
rental brands, Avis and Budget, as the exclusive primary and
secondary suppliers, respectively, of car rental services for
the Companys employees. The majority of the related party
agreement transactions were settled in cash. The majority of
these commercial relationships have continued since the
Separation under agreements formalized in connection with the
Separation.
F-42
|
|
22.
|
Selected
Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)
|
Provided below is selected unaudited quarterly financial data
for 2007 and 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
|
$
|
211
|
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
|
629
|
|
|
|
671
|
|
|
|
576
|
|
Corporate and
Other (a)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,012
|
|
|
$
|
1,100
|
|
|
$
|
1,216
|
|
|
$
|
1,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA (b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
Corporate and
Other (a)(c)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
Less: Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
$
|
96
|
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
|
$
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.46
|
|
|
$
|
0.53
|
|
|
$
|
0.65
|
|
|
$
|
0.59
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.45
|
|
|
|
0.52
|
|
|
|
0.65
|
|
|
|
0.58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted shares
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Includes the elimination of
transactions between segments.
|
|
(b)
|
|
Includes separation and related
costs of (i) $3 million and $3 million for
Vacation Ownership and Corporate and Other, respectively, during
the first quarter, (ii) $5 million and $2 million
for Vacation Ownership and Corporate and Other, respectively,
during the second quarter and (iii) $1 million and
$2 million for Vacation Ownership and Corporate and Other,
respectively, during the third quarter.
|
|
(c)
|
|
Includes a net benefit (expense)
related to the resolution of and adjustment to certain
contingent liabilities and assets of $13 million,
$17 million, $(25) million and $41 million during
the first, second, third, and fourth quarter, respectively.
|
F-43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
144
|
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
|
$
|
189
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
554
|
|
Corporate and
Other (d)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
870
|
|
|
$
|
955
|
|
|
$
|
1,047
|
|
|
$
|
970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA (e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
Corporate and
Other (d)(f)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
Less: Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
$
|
0.46
|
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
|
$
|
0.46
|
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
|
|
|
(0.32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
|
$
|
0.46
|
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
shares (g)
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
$
|
0.46
|
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
|
|
|
(0.32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted
shares (g)
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
Includes the elimination of
transactions between segments.
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
Includes separation and related
costs of (i) $3 million for the Corporate and Other
during the first quarter, (ii) $1 million,
$2 million and $2 million for Vacation Exchange and
Rentals, Vacation Ownership and Corporate and Other,
respectively, during the second quarter,
(iii) $1 million, $1 million, $1 million and
$65 million for Lodging, Vacation Exchange and Rentals,
Vacation Ownership and Corporate and Other, respectively, during
the third quarter and (iv) $1 million,
$15 million and $7 million for Lodging, Vacation
Ownership and Corporate and Other, respectively, during the
fourth quarter.
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
Includes $32 million of a net
benefit from the resolution of certain contingent liabilities
during the fourth quarter.
|
|
|
(g)
|
|
For all periods prior to the
Companys date of Separation (July 31, 2006), weighted
average shares were calculated as one share of Wyndham common
stock outstanding for every five shares of Cendant common stock
outstanding as of July 21, 2006, the record date for the
distribution of Wyndham common stock.
|
Dividend
Declaration
On February 29, 2008, the Companys Board of Directors
declared a dividend of $0.04 per share payable March 13,
2008 to shareholders of record as of March 6, 2008.
Incentive
Award Grant
On February 29, 2008, the Company approved the annual grant
of incentive awards of $57 million to key employees and
senior officers of Wyndham in the form of RSUs and SSARs. These
awards will vest ratably over a period of four years.
F-44
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Separation and Distribution Agreement by and among Cendant
Corporation, Realogy Corporation, Wyndham Worldwide Corporation
and Travelport Inc., dated as of July 27, 2006
(incorporated by reference to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 31, 2006)
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Separation and Distribution Agreement by
and among Cendant Corporation, Realogy Corporation, Wyndham
Worldwide Corporation and Travelport Inc., dated as of
August 17, 2006 (incorporated by reference to the
Registrants
Form 10-Q
filed November 14, 2006)
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated
by reference to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws (incorporated by reference to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior Participating
Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Rights Agreement, dated as of July 13, 2006, by and between
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation and Mellon Investor Services, LLC,
as Rights Agent, including the form of Rights Certificate as
Exhibit B thereto and the form of Summary of Rights as
Exhibit C thereto (incorporated by reference to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Indenture, dated December 5, 2006, between Wyndham
Worldwide Corporation and U.S. Bank National Association,
as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed February 1, 2007)
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Form of 6.00% Senior Notes due 2016 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed February 1, 2007)
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated December 5, 2006,
among Wyndham Worldwide, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., as initial purchasers and as
representatives of the other initial purchasers named therein
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed February 1, 2007)
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 13, 2005,
by and among Cendant Corporation, as Buyer, and Wyndham
Management Corporation, GH-Galveston, Inc, W-Isla, LLC,
Performance Hospitality Management Company, Wyndham (Bermuda)
Management Company, Ltd., Wyndham Hotels & Resorts
(Aruba) N.V., WHC Franchise Corporation, Wyndham International
Inc., Wyndham IP Corporation, Wyndham 58th Street, L.L.C.,
Grand Bay Management Company and Wyndham International Operating
Partnership, L.P., as Sellers (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.20 to the Registrants
Form 10-12B
filed May 11, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Amendment Agreement, dated as of October 11, 2005, amending
the Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 13,
2005, by and among Cendant Corporation, as Buyer, and Wyndham
Management Corporation, GH-Galveston, Inc, W-Isla, LLC,
Performance Hospitality Management Company, Wyndham (Bermuda)
Management Company, Ltd., Wyndham Hotels & Resorts
(Aruba) N.V., WHC Franchise Corporation, Wyndham International
Inc., Wyndham IP Corporation, Wyndham 58th Street, L.L.C.,
Grand Bay Management Company and Wyndham International Operating
Partnership, L.P., as Sellers (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.21 to the Registrants
Form 10-12B
filed May 11, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Amended and Restated FairShare Vacation Plan Use Management
Trust Agreement, dated as of January 1, 1996, by and among
Fairshare Vacation Owners Association, Fairfield Communities,
Inc., Fairfield Myrtle Beach, Inc., such other subsidiaries of
Fairfield Communities, Inc. and such other unrelated third
parties as may from time to time desire to subject property to
this Trust Agreement (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.22 to the Registrants
Form 10-12B
filed May 11, 2006)
|
G-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
First Amendment to the Amended and Restated FairShare Vacation
Plan Use Management Trust Agreement, dated as of
February 29, 2000, by and between the Fairshare Vacation
Owners Association and Fairfield Communities, Inc. (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Registrants
Form 10-12B
filed May 11, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated FairShare Vacation
Plan Use Management Trust Agreement, dated as of
February 19, 2003, by and between the Fairshare Vacation
Owners Association and Fairfield Resorts, Inc., formerly known
as Fairfield Communities, Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.24 to the Registrants
Form 10-12B
filed May 11, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Management Agreement, dated as of January 1, 1996, by and
between Fairshare Vacation Owners Association and Fairfield
Communities, Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.25 to the Registrants
Form 10-12B
filed May 11, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Form of Declaration of Vacation Owner Program of WorldMark, the
Club (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the
Registrants
Form 10-12B
filed May 11, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
First Supplement to Indenture and Servicing Agreement, dated as
of June 16, 2006, by and among Sierra
2003-2
Receivables Funding Company, LLC, as Issuer, Wyndham Consumer
Finance, Inc., as Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association,
as Trustee, and U.S. Bank National Association, as
Collateral Agent, to the Indenture and Servicing Agreement dated
as of December 5, 2003 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.17(a) to the Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed June 26, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Indenture and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 5,
2003, by and among Sierra
2003-2
Receivables Funding Company, LLC, as Issuer, and Fairfield
Acceptance CorporationNevada (nka Wyndham Consumer
Finance, Inc.), as Servicer, and Wachovia Bank, National
Association, as Trustee, and Wachovia Bank, National
Association, as Collateral Agent (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.70 to Cendant Corporations Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2003 dated March 1,
2004)
|
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
First Supplement to Indenture and Servicing Agreement, dated as
of June 16, 2006, by and among Sierra Timeshare
2004-1
Receivables Funding, LLC, as Issuer, Wyndham Consumer Finance,
Inc., as Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as
Trustee, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Collateral
Agent, to the Indenture and Servicing Agreement dated as of
May 27, 2004 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.18(a) to the Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed June 26, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
Indenture and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 27,
2004, by and among Cendant Timeshare
2004-1
Receivables Funding, LLC (nka Sierra Timeshare
2004-1
Receivables Funding, LLC), as Issuer, and Fairfield Acceptance
CorporationNevada (nka Wyndham Consumer Finance, Inc.), as
Servicer, and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Trustee,
and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Collateral Agent
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Cendant
Corporations Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 dated
August 2, 2004)
|
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
First Supplement to Indenture and Servicing Agreement, dated as
of June 16, 2006, by and among Sierra Timeshare
2005-1
Receivables Funding, LLC, as Issuer, Wyndham Consumer Finance,
Inc., as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank National Association, as
Trustee, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Collateral
Agent, to the Indenture and Servicing Agreement dated as of
August 11, 2005 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.19(a) to the Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed June 26, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
Indenture and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 11,
2005, by and among Cendant Timeshare
2005-1
Receivables Funding, LLC (nka Sierra Timeshare
2005-1
Receivables Funding, LLC), as Issuer, Cendant Timeshare Resort
Group-Consumer Finance, Inc. (nka Wyndham Consumer Finance,
Inc.), as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
Trustee, and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Collateral
Agent (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Cendant
Corporations Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated August 17, 2005)
|
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
Performance Guaranty, dated as of June 16, 2006, by Wyndham
Worldwide Corporation in favor of Sierra
2003-2
Receivables Funding Company, LLC, as Issuer, Sierra Deposit
Company, LLC, as Depositor, and U.S. Bank National
Association, as Trustee and Collateral Agent (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.28 to the Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed June 26, 2006)
|
G-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Performance Guaranty, dated as of June 16, 2006, by Wyndham
Worldwide Corporation in favor of Sierra Timeshare 2004-1
Receivables Funding, LLC, as Issuer, Sierra Deposit Company,
LLC, as Depositor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as
Trustee and Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.29 to the Registrants Form 10-12B/A filed June
26, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
Performance Guaranty, dated as of June 16, 2006, by Wyndham
Worldwide Corporation in favor of Sierra Timeshare 2005-1
Receivables Funding, LLC, as Issuer, Sierra Deposit Company,
LLC, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank National Association, as
Trustee, and U.S. Bank, National Association, as Collateral
Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to the
Registrants Form 10-12B/A filed June 26, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
Employment Agreement with Stephen P. Holmes (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrants Form 10-12B/A
filed July 7, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
Master Indenture and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 29,
2002 and Amended and Restated as of July 7, 2006, by and
among Sierra Timeshare Conduit Receivables Funding, LLC, as
Issuer, Wyndham Consumer Finance, Inc., as Master Servicer, and
U.S. Bank National Association, as successor to Wachovia
Bank, National Association, as Trustee and Collateral Agent
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the
Registrants Form 10-12B/A filed July 12, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
Series 2002-1 Supplement, dated as of August 29, 2002 and
Amended and Restated as of July 7, 2006, to Master
Indenture and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2002
and Amended and Restated as of July 7, 2006 by and among
Sierra Timeshare Conduit Receivables Funding, LLC, as Issuer,
Wyndham Consumer Finance, Inc., as Master Servicer, and
U.S. Bank National Association, successor to Wachovia Bank,
National Association, as Trustee and Collateral Agent
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the
Registrants Form 10-12B/A filed July 12, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
Master Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2002 and
Amended and Restated as of July 7, 2006, by and between
Wyndham Consumer Finance, Inc., as Seller, Wyndham Vacation
Resorts, Inc., as Co-Originator, and Fairfield Myrtle Beach,
Inc., as Co-Originator and Kona Hawaiian Vacation Ownership,
LLC, as an Originator, and Shawnee Development, Inc., as an
Originator, and Sea Gardens Beach and Tennis Resort, Inc.,
Vacation Break Resorts, Inc., Vacation Break Resorts at Star
Island, Inc., Palm Vacation Group and Ocean Ranch Vacation
Group, each as a VB Subsidiary, and Palm Vacation Group and
Ocean Ranch Vacation Group, each as a VB Partnership and Sierra
Deposit Company, LLC, as Purchaser (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.11 to the Registrants Form 10-12B/A filed
July 12, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
Series 2002-1 Supplement, dated as of August 29, 2002 and
Amended and Restated as of July 7, 2006, to Master Loan
Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2002, and Amended and
Restated as of July 7, 2006 by and between Wyndham Consumer
Finance, Inc., as Seller, Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc., as
Co-Originator, Fairfield Myrtle Beach, Inc., as Co-Originator,
Kona Hawaiian Vacation Ownership, LLC, as an Originator, Shawnee
Development, Inc., as an Originator, Sea Gardens Beach and
Tennis Resort, Inc., Vacation Break Resorts, Inc., Vacation
Break Resorts at Star Island, Inc., Palm Vacation Group and
Ocean Ranch Vacation Group, each as a VB subsidiary, and Palm
Vacation Group and Ocean Ranch Vacation Group, each as a VB
Partnership, and Sierra Deposit Company, LLC, as Purchaser
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the
Registrants Form 10-12B/A filed July 12, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
Master Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2002, and
Amended and Restated as of July 7, 2006, by and between
Wyndham Resort Development Corporation, as Seller, and Sierra
Deposit Company, LLC, as Purchaser (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.13 to the Registrants Form 10-12B/A filed
July 12, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
Series 2002-1 Supplement, dated as of August 29, 2002 and
Amended as of July 7, 2006 to the Master Loan Purchase
Agreement dated as of August 29, 2002, and Amended and Restated
as of July 7, 2006 by and between Wyndham Resort
Development Corporation, as Seller, and Sierra Deposit Company,
LLC, as Purchaser (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to
the Registrants Form 10-12B/A filed July 12, 2006)
|
G-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.24
|
|
Master Pool Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2002
and Amended and Restated as of July 7, 2006, by and between
Sierra Deposit Company, LLC, as Depositor, and Sierra Timeshare
Conduit Receivables Funding, LLC, as Issuer (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed July 12, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.25
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of July 7, 2006, among Wyndham
Worldwide Corporation, as Borrower, certain financial
institutions as lenders, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as
Administrative Agent, Citicorp USA, Inc., as Syndication Agent,
Bank of America, N.A., The Bank of Nova Scotia and The Royal
Bank of Scotland PLC, as Documentation Agents, and Credit
Suisse, Cayman Islands Branch, as Co-Documentation Agent
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to the
Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed July 12, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.26
|
|
Performance Guaranty, dated as of July 7, 2006, by Wyndham
Worldwide Corporation in favor of Sierra Deposit Company, LLC,
as Depositor, Sierra Timeshare Conduit Receivables Funding
Company, LLC, as Issuer, and U.S. Bank National
Association, as successor to Wachovia Bank, National
Association, as Trustee and Collateral Agent (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed July 12, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.27
|
|
Indenture and Servicing Agreement, dated as of July 11,
2006, by and among Sierra Timeshare
2006-1
Receivables Funding, LLC, as Issuer, Wyndham Consumer Finance,
Inc., as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
Trustee, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Collateral
Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to the
Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed July 12, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
Performance Guarantee, dated as of July 11, 2006, by
Cendant Corporation and Wyndham Worldwide Corporation in favor
of Sierra Timeshare
2006-1 Receivables
Funding, LLC, as issuer, Sierra Deposit Company, LLC, as
Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee,
and U.S. Bank National Association, as Collateral Agent
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to the
Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed July 12, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.29
|
|
Employment Agreement with Franz S. Hanning (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.30
|
|
Employment Agreement with Kenneth N. May (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.31
|
|
Employment Agreement with Steven A. Rudnitsky (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.32
|
|
Employment Agreement with Virginia M. Wilson (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.33
|
|
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation 2006 Equity and Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.34
|
|
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation Non-Employee Directors Deferred
Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.35
|
|
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation Savings Restoration Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.36
|
|
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation Officer Deferred Compensation Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.37
|
|
Transition Services Agreement among Cendant Corporation, Realogy
Corporation, Wyndham Worldwide Corporation and Travelport Inc.,
dated as of July 27, 2006 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 31, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.38
|
|
Tax Sharing Agreement among Cendant Corporation, Realogy
Corporation, Wyndham Worldwide Corporation and Travelport Inc.,
dated as of July 28, 2006 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 31, 2006)
|
G-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.39
|
|
First Amendment, dated as of November 13, 2006, to the Series
2002-1 Supplement, dated as of August 29, 2002 and Amended and
Restated as of July 7, 2006, to Master Indenture and
Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2002 and Amended and
Restated as of July 7, 2006, by and among Sierra Timeshare
Conduit Receivables Funding, LLC, as Issuer, Wyndham Consumer
Finance, Inc., as Master Servicer, and U.S. Bank National
Association, as Trustee and Collateral Agent (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.10(a) to the Registrants Form 10-Q
filed November 14, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.40
|
|
First Amendment, dated as of November 13, 2006, to the Master
Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2002 and Amended
and Restated as of July 7, 2006, by and between Wyndham
Consumer Finance, Inc., as Seller, Wyndham Vacation Resorts,
Inc., as Co-Originator, and Fairfield Myrtle Beach, Inc., as
Co-Originator and Kona Hawaiian Vacation Ownership, LLC, as an
Originator, and Shawnee Development, Inc., as an Originator, and
Sea Gardens Beach and Tennis Resort, Inc., Vacation Break
Resorts, Inc., Vacation Break Resorts at Star Island, Inc., Palm
Vacation Group and Ocean Ranch Vacation Group, each as a VB
Subsidiary, and Palm Vacation Group and Ocean Ranch Vacation
Group, each as a VB Partnership and Sierra Deposit Company, LLC
as Purchaser (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11(a) to
the Registrants Form 10-Q filed November 14, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.41
|
|
First Amendment, dated as of November 13, 2006, to the Series
2002-1 Supplement, dated as of August 20, 2002 and Amended and
Restated as of July 7, 2006, to the Master Loan Purchase
Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2002 and Amended and Restated
as of July 7, 2006, by and between Wyndham Consumer
Finance, Inc., as Seller, Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc., as
Co-Originator, and Fairfield Myrtle Beach, Inc., as
Co-Originator and Kona Hawaiian Vacation Ownership, LLC, as an
Originator, and Shawnee Development, Inc., as an Originator, and
Sea Gardens Beach and Tennis Resort, Inc., Vacation Break
Resorts, Inc., Vacation Break Resorts at Star Island, Inc., Palm
Vacation Group and Ocean Ranch Vacation Group, each as a VB
Subsidiary, and Palm Vacation Group and Ocean Ranch Vacation
Group, each as a VB Partnership and Sierra Deposit Company, LLC
as Purchaser (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12(a) to
the Registrants Form 10-Q filed November 14, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.42
|
|
First Amendment, dated as of November 13, 2006, to the Series
2002-1 Supplement, dated as of August 29, 2002 and Amended and
Restated as of November 13, 2006, to the Master Loan Purchase
Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2002 and Amended and Restated
as of July 7, 2006, by and between Wyndham Resort
Development Corporation, as Seller, and Sierra Deposit Company,
LLC, as Purchaser (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.14(a) to the Registrants Form 10-Q filed November 14,
2006)
|
|
|
|
10.43
|
|
First Amendment to Wyndham Worldwide Corporation Non-Employee
Directors Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.48 to the Registrants Form 10-K filed March
7, 2007)
|
|
|
|
10.44
|
|
Indenture and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 23, 2007, by
and among Sierra Timeshare 2007-1 Receivables Funding, LLC, as
Issuer, Wyndham Consumer Finance, Inc., as Servicer,
U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee and as
Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
the Registrants Form 8-K filed May 25, 2007)
|
|
|
|
10.45
|
|
Indenture and Servicing Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2007,
by and among Sierra Timeshare 2007-2 Receivables Funding, LLC,
as Issuer, Wyndham Consumer Finance, Inc., as Servicer,
U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee and Collateral
Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrants Form 8-K filed November 6, 2007)
|
|
|
|
10.46
|
|
First Amendment, dated as of October 30, 2007, to the Amended
and Restated Master Indenture and Servicing Agreement, dated as
of August 29, 2002 and amended and restated as of July 7,
2006, by and among Sierra Timeshare Conduit Receivables Funding,
LLC, Wyndham Consumer Finance Inc., as Master Servicer,
U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee and Collateral
Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Registrants Form 8-K filed November 6, 2007)
|
G-5
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.47
|
|
Second Amendment, dated as of October 30, 2007, to the
Series
2002-1 Supplement
to Master Indenture and Servicing Agreement, dated as of
August, 29, 2002 and amended and restated as of
July 7, 2006 as amended on November 13, 2006, by and
among Sierra Timeshare Conduit Receivables Funding, LLC, as
Issuer, Wyndham Consumer Finance, Inc., as Master Servicer,
U.S. Bank National Association, as Collateral Agent and
Wells Fargo Bank National Association, as Trustee (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed November 6, 2007)
|
|
|
|
10.48
|
|
Amended and Restated Master Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of
August 29, 2002, as amended and restated as of
October 30, 2007, by and among Wyndham Consumer Finance,
Inc., as a Seller, Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc., as an
originator, Wyndham Resort Development Corporation, as an
originator, and the originators named therein, and Sierra
Deposit Company, LLC, as Purchaser (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed November 6, 2007)
|
|
|
|
10.49
|
|
Amended and Restated Series
2002-1 Supplement
to Master Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 29,
2002, as amended and restated as of October 30, 2007, by
and among Wyndham Consumer Finance, Inc., as seller, Wyndham
Vacation Resorts, Inc. as an originator, Wyndham Resort
Development Corporation, as an originator, and the originators
named therein, and Sierra Deposit Company, LLC, as Purchaser
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed November 6, 2007)
|
|
|
|
10.50*
|
|
Performance Guaranty, dated as of May 23, 2007, by Wyndham
Worldwide Corporation in favor of Sierra Timeshare
2007-1 Receivables
Funding, LLC, as issuer, Sierra Deposit Company, LLC, as
Depositor, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee and
as Collateral Agent
|
|
|
|
10.51*
|
|
Performance Guaranty, dated as of November 1, 2007, by
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation in favor of Sierra Timeshare
2007-2 Receivables
Funding, LLC, as issuer, Sierra Deposit Company, LLC, as
Depositor, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee and
as Collateral Agent
|
|
|
|
10.52*
|
|
Termination Agreement with Kenneth N. May
|
|
|
|
10.53*
|
|
Employment Letter with Thomas F. Anderson
|
|
|
|
10.54*
|
|
Form of Award AgreementRestricted Stock Units
|
|
|
|
10.55*
|
|
Form of Award AgreementStock Appreciation Rights
|
|
|
|
12*
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
|
|
|
|
21.1*
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
|
|
|
|
23.1*
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
|
31.1*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Rules 13(a)-14(a)
and
15(d)-14(a)
Promulgated Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
|
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Rules 13(a)-14(a)
and
15(d)-14(a)
Promulgated Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
|
|
|
|
32*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
* Filed herewith
G-6