Filed
Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
Registration No. 333-142370
PROSPECTUS
Wyndham
Worldwide Corporation
Offer to Exchange
$800,000,000 aggregate
principal amount of 6.00% Senior Notes due 2016
(CUSIP Nos. 98310W AA 6
and U98340 AA 7)
for
$800,000,000 aggregate
principal amount of 6.00% Senior Notes due 2016
(CUSIP
No. 98310W AB 4)
that have been registered under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended
The
exchange offer will expire at 5:00 p.m.,
New York City time, on
June 8, 2007, unless extended.
|
|
|
We hereby offer, upon the terms and subject to the conditions
set forth in this prospectus and the accompanying letter of
transmittal (which together constitute the exchange
offer), to exchange up to $800,000,000 aggregate principal
amount of our 6.00% Senior Notes due 2016 that have been
registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
Securities Act), which we refer to as the
exchange notes, for a like principal amount of our
outstanding 6.00% Senior Notes due 2016, which we refer to as
the original notes. The terms of the exchange offer
are summarized below and are more fully described in this
prospectus.
|
|
|
The terms of the exchange notes are substantially identical to
the terms of the original notes in all material respects, except
that the exchange notes are registered under the Securities Act
and the transfer restrictions, registration rights and
additional interest provisions applicable to the original notes
do not apply to the exchange notes.
|
|
|
We will accept for exchange any and all original notes validly
tendered and not withdrawn prior to 5:00 p.m., New York
City time, on June 8, 2007, unless extended.
|
|
|
You may withdraw tenders of original notes at any time prior to
the expiration of the exchange offer.
|
|
|
We will not receive any proceeds from the exchange offer.
|
|
|
The exchange of original notes for exchange notes generally will
not be a taxable event for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
|
|
|
The notes will not be listed on any securities exchange,
quotation system or PORTAL.
|
See Risk Factors beginning on page 12 to
read about important factors you should consider before
tendering your original notes.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or
complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
The date of this prospectus is May 9, 2007
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
This prospectus contains summaries of the material terms of
certain documents and refers you to certain documents that we
have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC). See Where You Can Find More
Information. Copies of these documents, except for certain
exhibits and schedules, will be made available to you without
charge upon written or oral request to:
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation
Seven Sylvan Way
Parsippany, NJ 07054
Attention: Investor Relations
Phone:
(973) 753-6000
In order to obtain timely delivery of such materials, you
must request information from us no later than five business
days prior to the expiration of the exchange offer.
NON-GAAP
FINANCIAL MEASURES
The financial measure EBITDA, as presented in this prospectus,
is a supplemental measure of our performance that is not a GAAP
measure, except for the presentation of EBITDA on a segment
basis. As presented in this prospectus, EBITDA is defined as net
income before interest expense (excluding interest on
securitized vacation ownership debt), income taxes, depreciation
and amortization, minority interest and cumulative effect of
accounting change, net of tax. A reconciliation of EBITDA to the
most directly comparable GAAP measure, income before income
taxes is presented under Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
We present EBITDA because we believe this measure provides
investors with important additional information to evaluate our
operating performance. We believe EBITDA is useful as a
supplemental measure in evaluating performance of our operating
businesses and provides greater transparency into our
consolidated and combined results of operations. EBITDA is one
of several measures used by our
i
management, including our chief operating decision maker, to
perform such evaluation, and it is a factor in measuring
compliance with debt covenants relating to certain of our
borrowing arrangements. EBITDA should not be considered in
isolation or as a substitute for net income or other income
statement data prepared in accordance with GAAP and our
presentation of EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled
measures used by other companies.
TRADEMARKS
AND SERVICE MARKS
We own or have rights to use the trademarks, service marks and
trade names that we use in conjunction with the operation of our
business. Some of the more important trademarks that we own or
have rights to use that appear in this prospectus include
Wyndham Hotels and Resorts, Ramada,
Days Inn, Super 8,
TripRewards, RCI, Landal
GreenParks, English Country Cottages,
Novasol, Wyndham Vacation Resorts
(formerly Fairfield Resorts) and WorldMark by
Wyndham (formerly Trendwest Resorts), which may be
registered in the United States and other jurisdictions. Each
trademark, trade name or service mark of any other company
appearing in this prospectus is owned by such company.
INDUSTRY
DATA
This prospectus includes industry and trade association data,
forecasts and information that we have prepared based, in part,
upon data, forecasts and information obtained from independent
trade associations, industry publications and surveys and other
information available to us. Some data also are based on our
good faith estimates, which are derived from managements
knowledge of the industry and independent sources. The primary
sources for third-party industry data and forecasts are Smith
Travel Research, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, World Travel and
Tourism Council, Travel Industry Association of America and
American Resort Development Association and other industry
reports and articles. These third-party publications and surveys
generally state that the information included therein has been
obtained from sources believed to be reliable and that the
publications and surveys can give no assurance as to the
accuracy or completeness of such information. We have not
independently verified any of the data from third-party sources
nor have we ascertained the underlying economic assumptions on
which such data are based. Similarly, we believe our internal
research is reliable, even though such research has not been
verified by any independent sources.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
Forward-looking statements in this prospectus are subject to
known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that
may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be
materially different from any future results, performance or
achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking
statements or other public statements. These forward-looking
statements are based on various facts and have been derived
utilizing numerous important assumptions and other important
factors, and changes in such facts, assumptions or factors could
cause actual results to differ materially from those in the
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include
the information concerning our future financial performance,
business strategy, projected plans and objectives. Statements
preceded by, followed by or that otherwise include the words
believes, expects,
anticipates, intends,
projects, estimates, plans,
may increase, may fluctuate and similar
expressions or future or conditional verbs such as
should, would, may and
could are generally forward looking in nature and
not historical facts. You should understand that the following
important factors could affect our future results and could
cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed
in such forward-looking statements:
|
|
|
|
l
|
terrorist attacks, such as the September 11, 2001 terrorist
attacks, that may negatively affect the travel industry, result
in a disruption in our business and adversely affect our
financial results;
|
|
|
l
|
adverse developments in general business, economic and political
conditions or any outbreak or escalation of hostilities on a
national, regional or international basis;
|
ii
|
|
|
|
l
|
competition in our existing and future lines of business, and
the financial resources of competitors;
|
|
|
l
|
our failure to comply with laws and regulations and any changes
in laws and regulations, including hospitality, vacation rental
and vacation ownership-related regulations, telemarketing
regulations, privacy policy regulations and state, federal and
international tax laws;
|
|
|
l
|
seasonal fluctuation in the travel business;
|
|
|
l
|
local and regional economic conditions that affect the travel
and tourism industry;
|
|
|
l
|
our failure to complete future acquisitions or to realize
anticipated benefits from completed acquisitions;
|
|
|
l
|
actions by our franchisees that could harm our business;
|
|
|
l
|
our inability to access the capital
and/or the
asset-backed markets on a favorable basis;
|
|
|
l
|
the loss of any of our senior management;
|
|
|
l
|
risks inherent in operating in foreign countries, including
exposure to local economic conditions, government regulation,
currency restrictions and other restraints, changes in and
application of tax laws, expropriation, political instability
and diminished ability to legally enforce our contractual rights;
|
|
|
l
|
our failure to provide fully integrated disaster recovery
technology solutions in the event of a disaster or other
business interruption;
|
|
|
l
|
the final resolutions or outcomes with respect to Cendant
Corporations (now known as Avis Budget Group, Inc.,
Avis Budget or Cendant) contingent and
other corporate liabilities and any related actions for
indemnification made pursuant to the Separation and Distribution
Agreement dated July 27, 2006 among us, Cendant, Realogy
Corporation (Realogy) and Travelport Inc.
(Travelport) regarding the principal transactions
relating to our separation from Cendant (the Separation
and Distribution Agreement) and the other agreements that
govern certain aspects of our relationship with Cendant, Realogy
and Travelport; and
|
|
|
l
|
the possibility that Cendants actual tax liability
resulting from the sale of Travelport exceeds the estimated
amount of such taxes that were retained by Cendant from the
proceeds of the sale of Travelport, or that there may be
post-closing adjustments to the purchase price received by
Cendant from the sale of Travelport, for which we may have
responsibility under the Separation and Distribution Agreement.
|
Other factors not identified above, including the risk factors
described in the Risk Factors section of this
prospectus, may also cause actual results to differ materially
from those projected by our forward-looking statements. Most of
these factors are difficult to anticipate and are generally
beyond our control.
You should consider the risks described above, as well as those
set forth under the heading Risk Factors, when
considering any forward-looking statements that may be made by
us and our businesses generally. Except for our ongoing
obligations to disclose material information under the federal
securities laws, we undertake no obligation to release any
revisions to any forward-looking statements, to report events or
to report the occurrence of unanticipated events unless we are
required to do so by law. For any forward-looking statements
contained in this prospectus, we claim the protection of the
safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in
Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act).
iii
SUMMARY
The following is a summary of the more detailed information
appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. It does not contain all
of the information that may be important to you. You should read
this prospectus in its entirety and the documents we have
referred you to, especially the risks of participating in the
exchange offer discussed under Risk Factors, before
participating in the exchange offer. Except as otherwise
indicated or unless the context otherwise requires,
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation, Wyndham
Worldwide, we, us, our
and our company refer to Wyndham Worldwide
Corporation and its subsidiaries. Unless otherwise indicated,
information is presented as of December 31, 2006.
Our
Company
As one of the worlds largest hospitality companies, we
offer individual consumers and
business-to-business
customers a broad suite of hospitality products and services
across various accommodation alternatives and price ranges
through our premier portfolio of world-renowned brands. With
more than 20 brands, which include Wyndham Hotels and Resorts,
Ramada, Days Inn, Super 8, TripRewards, RCI, Landal
GreenParks, English Country Cottages, Novasol, Wyndham Vacation
Resorts (formerly Fairfield Resorts) and WorldMark by Wyndham
(formerly Trendwest Resorts), we have built a significant
presence in most major hospitality markets in the United States
and throughout the rest of the world. For 2006, total spending
by domestic and international travelers in the United States was
expected to be $675 billion, an increase of approximately
5% from spending levels in 2005 and an increase of approximately
16% from spending levels in 2000, which witnessed the highest
ever levels of travel spending for any year prior to the
September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. Globally, travel
spending was expected to grow by 5% in 2006 to $4.5 trillion.
Historically, we have pursued what we believe to be
financially-attractive entrance points in the major global
hospitality markets to strengthen our portfolio of products and
services. Wyndham Worldwide is well positioned to compete in the
major hospitality segments of this large and growing industry.
We operate primarily in the lodging, vacation exchange and
rental, and vacation ownership segments of the hospitality
industry:
|
|
|
|
l
|
Through our lodging business, we franchise hotels in the
upscale, middle and economy segments of the lodging industry and
provide property management services to owners of upscale
branded hotels;
|
|
|
l
|
Through our vacation exchange and rentals business, we provide
vacation exchange products and services to owners of intervals
of vacation ownership interests, and we market vacation rental
properties primarily on behalf of independent owners; and
|
|
|
l
|
Through our vacation ownership business, we market and sell
vacation ownership interests to individual consumers, provide
consumer financing in connection with the sale of vacation
ownership interests and provide property management services at
resorts.
|
Each of our lodging, vacation exchange and rental and vacation
ownership businesses has a long operating history. Our lodging
business began operations in 1990 with the acquisition of the
Howard Johnson and Ramada brands, each of which opened its first
hotel in 1954. RCI, the best known brand in our vacation
exchange and rentals business, was established more than
30 years ago, and our vacation ownership brands, Wyndham
Vacation Resorts (formerly Fairfield Resorts) and WorldMark by
Wyndham (formerly Trendwest Resorts), which began vacation
ownership operations in 1980 and 1989, respectively.
We provide directly to individual consumers our high quality
products and services, including the various accommodations we
market, such as hotels, vacation resorts, villas and cottages,
and products we offer, such as vacation ownership interests. We
also provide valuable products and services to our
business-to-business
customers, such as franchisees, affiliated resort developers and
prospective developers. These products and services include
marketing and central reservation systems, back office services
and loyalty programs. We strive to provide value-added products
and services that are intended both to enhance the travel
experience of the individual consumer and to drive revenue to
our
business-to-business
customers. The depth and breadth of our businesses across
different segments of the hospitality industry provide us
1
with the opportunity to expand our relationships with our
existing individual consumers and
business-to-business
customers in one or more segments of our business by offering
them additional or alternative products and services from our
other segments.
The largest portion of our revenues comes from fees we receive
in exchange for providing products and services. We receive
fees, for example, as royalties for utilizing our brands and for
providing property management and vacation exchange and rentals
services. The remainder of our revenues comes from the proceeds
of sales of products, such as vacation ownership interests, and
related services. The fees we earn by providing products and
services and proceeds from sales of our products and services
provide us with strong and stable cash flows. For the year ended
December 31, 2006, we generated revenues of
$3,842 million and net income of $287 million,
respectively.
As of December 31, 2006, our total debt outstanding,
exclusive of debt outstanding under our vacation ownership
securitization program, was approximately $1,437 million.
At December 31, 2006, the weighted average interest rate on
our outstanding debt, exclusive of debt outstanding under our
vacation ownership securitization program, was approximately
6.0%.
Our
Business Segments
We operate our business in three segments: Wyndham Hotel Group,
our lodging business, RCI Global Vacation Network, our vacation
exchange and rentals business, and Wyndham Vacation Ownership,
our vacation ownership business. We believe that we are an
industry leader in each of our business segments.
Wyndham
Hotel Group
Wyndham Hotel Group, our lodging business, franchises hotels and
provides property management services to owners of luxury and
upscale branded hotels. Through steady organic growth and
acquisitions of established lodging franchise systems over the
past 16 years, our lodging business has become the
worlds largest lodging franchisor as measured by the
number of franchised hotels. Our lodging business has almost
6,500 franchised hotels, which represents over 543,000 rooms on
six continents. Our franchised hotels operate under one of our
10 lodging brands, which are Wyndham Hotels and Resorts, Wingate
Inn, Ramada, Baymont, Days Inn, Super 8, Howard Johnson,
AmeriHost Inn, Travelodge and Knights Inn. The breadth and
diversity of our lodging brands provide potential franchisees
with a range of options for affiliating their properties with
one or more of our brands. Our lodging business has a strong
presence across the middle and economy segments of the lodging
industry and a developing presence in the upscale segment, thus
providing individual consumers who are traveling for leisure or
business with options for hospitality products and services
across various price ranges.
In this prospectus, we use the term hotels to refer
to hotels, motels
and/or other
accommodations, as applicable. In addition, the term
franchise system refers to a system through which a
franchisor licenses a brand and provides services to hotels
whose independent owners pay to receive such license and
services from the franchisor under the specific terms of a
franchise agreement. The services provided through a franchise
system typically include reservations, sales leads, marketing
and advertising support, training, quality assurance
inspections, operational support and information, pre-opening
assistance, prototype construction plans, and national or
regional conferences.
Our lodging business franchises under two models. In North
America and the United Kingdom, we generally employ a direct
franchise model whereby we contract with and provide services
and assistance with reservations directly to owner-operators of
hotels. In other parts of the world, we employ either a direct
franchise model or a master franchise model whereby we contract
with a qualified, experienced third party to build a franchise
enterprise in such third partys country or region.
Under our direct franchise model, we principally market our
lodging brands to independent hotel and motel owners and to
hotel and motel owners who have the rights to terminate their
franchise affiliations with other lodging brands. We also market
franchises under our lodging brands to existing franchisees
because many own, or may own in the future, other hotels that
can be converted to one of our brands. Under our master
franchise model, we principally market our lodging brands to
third parties that assume the principal role of franchisor,
which entails selling individual franchise agreements and
providing quality assurance, marketing and reservations support
to franchisees. As part of our franchise development strategy,
2
we employ national and international sales forces that we
compensate in part through commissions. Because of the
importance of existing franchised hotels to our sales strategy,
a significant part of our franchise development efforts is to
ensure that our franchisees provide quality services to maintain
the satisfaction of customers.
Our standard franchise agreement grants a franchisee the right
to non-exclusive use of the applicable franchise system in the
operation of a single hotel at a specified location, typically
for a period of 15 to 20 years, and gives the franchisor
and franchisee certain rights to terminate the franchise
agreement before the conclusion of the term of the agreement
under certain circumstances, such as upon designated
anniversaries of the franchised hotels opening or the date
of the agreement. Early termination options in franchise
agreements give us flexibility to eliminate or re-brand
franchised hotels if such properties become weak performers,
even if there is no contractual failure by the franchisees. We
also have the right to terminate a franchise agreement for
failure by a franchisee to (i) bring its properties into
compliance with contractual or quality standards within
specified periods of time, (ii) pay required franchise fees
or (iii) comply with other requirements of its franchise
agreement.
Our franchised hotels represent approximately 10% of the
U.S. hotel room inventory. In 2006, our franchised hotels
sold 8.6%, or approximately 88.8 million, of the
approximately one billion hotel room nights sold in the United
States. In 2006, our franchised hotels sold approximately 19.4%
of all hotel room nights sold in the United States in the
economy and midscale segments. Our franchised hotels are
dispersed throughout North America, which reduces our exposure
to any one geographic region. Approximately 89% of the hotel
rooms in our franchised hotels are located throughout North
America, and approximately 11% of the hotel rooms are located
outside of North America. In addition, our lodging franchises
are dispersed among numerous franchisees, which reduces our
exposure to any one lodging franchisee. Of our approximately
5,200 lodging franchisees, no single franchisee accounts
for more than 2% of our franchised hotels.
Our lodging business provides our franchised hotels with a suite
of operational and administrative services, including access to
a central reservations system, advertising, promotional and
co-marketing programs, referrals, technology, training and
volume purchasing. We also provide our franchisees with the
TripRewards loyalty program, which is the worlds largest
hotel rewards program as measured by the number of participating
hotels.
Subsequent to our separation from Cendant, we acquired a 30%
equity interest in CHI Limited, a joint venture that provides
management services to luxury and upper upscale hotels in
Europe, the Middle East and Africa. As of December 31,
2006, we were providing property management services to 32
hotels associated with either the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts
brand or the CHI joint venture. Our property management business
offers owners of hotels professional oversight and comprehensive
operations support. We expect to expand our property management
business by strategically entering into property management
contracts with new and existing hotels.
Our lodging business derives the majority of its revenues from
franchising hotels and derives additional revenues from
providing property management services. The sources of revenues
from franchising hotels are initial franchise fees, which relate
to services provided to assist a franchised hotel to open for
business under one of our brands, and ongoing franchise fees,
which are comprised of royalty fees and other fees relating to
marketing and reservations. The sources of revenues from
property management are management fees, incentive fees, service
fees and reimbursement revenues. Revenues from our lodging
business represented approximately 17%, 15% and 15% of total
company net revenues during 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
RCI
Global Vacation Network
RCI Global Vacation Network, our vacation exchange and rentals
business, provides vacation exchange products and services to
developers, managers and owners of intervals of vacation
ownership interests, and markets vacation rental properties. We
are the worlds largest vacation exchange network and among
the
3
worlds largest global marketers of vacation rental
properties. Our vacation exchange and rentals business has
access for specified periods, in a majority of cases on an
exclusive basis, to over 60,000 vacation properties, which are
comprised of over 4,000 vacation ownership resorts around the
world and over 56,000 vacation rental properties that are
located principally in Europe, which we believe makes us one of
the worlds largest marketers of European vacation rental
properties as measured by the number of properties we market for
rental. Each year, our vacation exchange and rentals business
provides more than four million leisure-bound families with
vacation exchange and rentals products and services. The
properties available to leisure travelers through our vacation
exchange and rentals business include hotel rooms and suites,
villas, cottages, bungalows, campgrounds, vacation ownership
condominiums, city apartments, second homes, fractional private
residences, luxury destination clubs and boats. We offer leisure
travelers flexibility (subject to availability) as to time of
travel and a choice of lodging options in regions to which such
travelers may not typically have such ease of access, and we
offer property owners marketing services, quality control
services and property management services ranging from
key-holding to full property maintenance for such properties.
Our vacation exchange and rentals business has over
60 worldwide offices. We market our products and services
using seven primary brands and other related brands. Revenues
from our vacation exchange and rentals business represented
approximately 29%, 31% and 31% of total company net revenues
during 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
In this prospectus, we use the term inventory in the
context of our vacation exchange and rentals business to refer
to intervals of vacation ownership interests and primarily
independently owned properties, which include hotel rooms and
suites, villas, cottages, bungalows, campgrounds, vacation
ownership condominiums, city apartments, second homes,
fractional private residences, luxury destination clubs and
boats. In addition, in this prospectus, we refer to intervals of
vacation ownership interests as intervals and
individuals who purchase vacation rental products and services
from us as rental customers.
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation Exchange Business
|
Through our vacation exchange business, RCI, we have
relationships with over 4,000 vacation ownership resorts in
more than approximately 100 countries. Historically, our
vacation exchange business consisted of the operation of
worldwide exchange programs for owners of intervals. Today, our
vacation exchange business also provides property management
services and consulting services for the development of
tourism-oriented real estate, loyalty programs, in-house and
outsourced travel agency services, and third-party vacation club
services. We operate our vacation exchange business through
three worldwide exchange programs: RCI Weeks, an exchange
network of traditional, week-long intervals that is the
worlds largest vacation ownership exchange network; RCI
Points, a global points-based exchange network; and The Registry
Collection, a global exchange network of luxury accommodations.
Participants in these exchange programs pay annual membership
dues. For additional fees, such participants are entitled to
exchange intervals for intervals at other properties affiliated
with our vacation exchange business. In addition, certain
participants may exchange intervals for other leisure-related
products and services. We refer to participants in these three
exchange programs as members.
Our vacation exchange business derives a majority of its
revenues from annual membership dues and exchange fees for
transactions. Our vacation exchange business also derives
revenues from ancillary services, including travel agency
services and loyalty programs.
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation Rentals Business
|
The rental properties we market are principally privately-owned
villas, cottages and bungalows that generally belong to property
owners unaffiliated with us. In addition, we market inventory
from our vacation exchange business to developers of vacation
ownership properties and other sources. We market rental
properties under proprietary brands, such as Landal GreenParks,
English Country Cottages, Novasol, Cuendet and Canvas Holidays,
and through select private-label arrangements. Most of the
rental activity under our brands takes place in Europe, the
United States and Mexico, although we have the ability to source
and rent inventory in approximately 100 countries. Our vacation
rentals business currently has relationships with approximately
35,000 independent property
4
owners in 22 countries, including the United States,
United Kingdom, Mexico, France, Ireland, the Netherlands,
Belgium, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Denmark, Norway, Sweden,
Germany, Greece, Austria, Croatia and certain countries in
Eastern Europe and the Pacific Rim. We currently make over
1.3 million vacation rental bookings a year. Our vacation
rentals business also has the opportunity to market and provide
inventory to the over three million owners of intervals who
participate in our vacation exchange business. Our vacation
rentals business also has an ownership interest in, or capital
leases for, approximately 13% of the properties in our rental
portfolio.
Our vacation rentals business primarily derives its revenues
from fees, which generally average approximately 40% to 60% of
the gross bookings depending upon product mix or seasonality.
Our vacation rentals business also derives revenues from trip
protection sales in Europe, transportation fees, property
management fees and
on-site
revenue from ancillary services, including travel agency
services.
Wyndham
Vacation Ownership
Wyndham Vacation Ownership, our vacation ownership business,
includes marketing and sales of vacation ownership interests,
consumer financing in connection with the purchase by
individuals of vacation ownership interests, property management
services to property owners associations, and development
and acquisition of vacation ownership resorts. We operate our
vacation ownership business through our two primary brands,
Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham. We have the
largest vacation ownership business in the world as measured by
the numbers of vacation ownership resorts, vacation ownership
units and owners of vacation ownership interests. We have
developed or acquired approximately 150 vacation ownership
resorts in the United States, Canada, Mexico, the Caribbean and
the South Pacific that represent more than 20,000 individual
vacation ownership units and over 800,000 owners of vacation
ownership interests.
We pride ourselves on the quality of the resorts in which we
sell vacation ownership interests and on our customer service.
We believe the quality of the resorts and our customer service
result in a consistently high level of customer satisfaction as
evidenced by the percentage of owners of vacation ownership
interests who buy additional vacation ownership interests each
year.
Our portfolio of resorts includes a mix of destination resorts
and drive-to resorts. The majority of the resorts in which
Wyndham Vacation Resorts markets and sells vacation ownership
interests are destination resorts that are located at or near
attractions, such as the Walt Disney
World®
Resort in Florida; the Las Vegas Strip in Nevada; Myrtle Beach
in South Carolina; Colonial
Williamsburg®
in Virginia; and the Hawaiian Islands. Wyndham Vacation Resorts
resort properties are located primarily in the United States
and, as of December 31, 2006, consisted of 79 resorts that
represented approximately 15,000 units. The resorts in
which WorldMark by Wyndham markets and sells vacation credits
are primarily drive-to resorts that are located in closer
proximity to regions in which our owners and prospective owners
reside. WorldMark by Wyndham resorts are located primarily in
the Western United States, Canada, Mexico and the South Pacific
and, as of December 31, 2006, consisted of 75 resorts that
represented approximately 5,400 units.
Our primary vacation ownership brands, Wyndham Vacation Resorts
and WorldMark by Wyndham, operate vacation ownership programs
through which vacation ownership interests can be redeemed for
vacations through points-based internal reservation systems that
provide owners with flexibility (subject to availability) as to
resort location, length of stay, unit type and time of year. The
points-based reservation systems offer owners redemption
opportunities for other travel and leisure products that may be
offered from time to time, and the opportunity for owners to use
our products for one or more vacations per year based on level
of ownership. Our vacation ownership programs allow us to market
and sell our vacation ownership products in variable quantities
as opposed to the fixed quantity of the traditional, fixed-week
vacation ownership, which is primarily sold on a weekly interval
basis, and to offer to existing owners upgrade sales
to supplement such owners existing vacation ownership
interests. FairShare Plus, formed in
5
1991, is Wyndham Vacation Resorts points-based internal
reservation system. Our WorldMark by Wyndham brand operates two
points-based vacation ownership programs, WorldMark, the Club,
formed in 1989, and WorldMark South Pacific Club, formed in 2000.
Our vacation ownership business also provides consumer finance
and property management services. We offer financing to the
purchasers of vacation ownership interests. Providing consumer
financing reduces the initial cash required by customers to
purchase vacation ownership interests, thereby enabling us to
attract additional customers and generate substantial
incremental profits. Similar to other companies that provide
consumer financing, we securitize a majority of the receivables
originated in connection with selling products, which in our
case are vacation ownership interests. As of December 31,
2006, we serviced a portfolio of approximately 262,000 loans
that totaled $2,658 million in aggregate principal amount
outstanding. Our property management business generally provides
day-to-day
management for vacation ownership resorts, including oversight
of housekeeping services, maintenance and refurbishment of the
units, and provides certain accounting and administrative
services to property owners associations.
Our vacation ownership business derives a majority of its
revenues from sales of vacation ownership interests and derives
other revenues from consumer financing and property management.
Revenues from our vacation ownership business represented
approximately 54%, 54% and 55% of total company net revenues
during 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Industry
Overview
The hospitality industry is a major component of the travel
industry, which is the third-largest retail industry in the
United States after the automotive and food stores industries.
The general health of the hospitality industry is affected by
the performance of the U.S. economy. From 1981 to 2006, the
U.S. economy has performed solidly as evidenced by the
growth of the U.S. real Gross Domestic Product, or real
GDP, at a compound annual growth rate, or CAGR, of 3.2% over the
period. In 2006, the U.S. economy continued to perform
solidly and it is expected to continue to perform solidly in
2007 and 2008 with real GDP expected to grow by approximately
2.6% and 3.2%, respectively.
The hospitality industry includes the segments in which Wyndham
Worldwide operates lodging, vacation exchange and
rentals, and vacation ownership. In spite of the recent series
of unprecedented challenges faced by the hospitality industry,
including terrorism, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)
and natural disasters, the industry is growing. In 2005,
domestic and international travelers spent in the United States
an estimated $646 billion, which represents nearly an 8%
increase from the prior year. In 2006, it was expected that the
total spending by such travelers in the United States would
reach $675 billion, which would be an increase of nearly 5%
over 2005s spending. This level of expected spending in
2006 was 16% higher than the spending in 2000, the year prior to
the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
Lodging
Industry
The $134 billion domestic lodging industry is a growing
segment of the hospitality industry. Companies in the lodging
industry generally operate in one or more of the various lodging
segments, including luxury, upscale, middle and economy, and
generally operate under one or more business models, including
franchise, management
and/or
ownership. The lodging industry is an important component of the
U.S. hospitality industry. In 2006, the U.S. lodging
industry boasted approximately 49,000 properties, which
represented approximately 4.5 million guest rooms, which
are comprised of approximately 3.0 million rooms in
franchised hotels and approximately 1.5 million rooms in
independent hotels. According to PricewaterhouseCoopers
forecast, the U.S. lodging industry is expected to gross
$25.1 billion in pre-tax profits in 2006, which represents
an 11% increase from the prior year, followed by
$27.2 billion in 2007 and $29.6 billion in 2008.
6
Growth in demand in the lodging industry is driven by two main
factors: (i) the general health of the travel and tourism
industry and (ii) the propensity for corporate spending on
business travel. Demand for lodging grew by a 1.3% CAGR in the
United States from 2000 through 2006. During this seven year
period, the industry added approximately 639,000 rooms. Demand
for lodging has grown even faster in the past four years from
2003 to 2006 at a 3.3% CAGR. Even with the recent increase in
the number of hotel rooms, demand in the past few years has been
outpacing supply, which creates a favorable business environment
for lodging companies.
Performance in the lodging industry is measured by certain key
metrics, such as average daily rate, or ADR, average occupancy
rate and revenue per available room, or RevPAR, which is
calculated by multiplying the ADR by the average occupancy rate.
Over the past five years, the trends in these performance
metrics have generally indicated that the lodging industry is
growing. In 2006, the ADR in the United States was $97.24, which
is 7.0% higher than the rate in the prior year, the average
occupancy rate was 63.4%, which is 0.4% higher than the rate in
the prior year and RevPAR was $61.62, which is 7.4% higher than
RevPAR in the prior year. The following table demonstrates the
trends in the key performance metrics:
Trends in
Performance Metrics in the United States since 2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
Average Daily
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
Year
|
|
Rate
|
|
Rate
|
|
Rate (ADR)
|
|
in ADR
|
|
RevPAR
|
|
RevPAR
|
|
2001
|
|
|
59.7
|
%
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)%
|
|
$
|
83.96
|
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)%
|
|
$
|
50.16
|
|
|
|
(7.0
|
)%
|
2002
|
|
|
59.0
|
%
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)%
|
|
|
82.71
|
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)%
|
|
|
48.81
|
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)%
|
2003
|
|
|
59.2
|
%
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
82.82
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
49.02
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
2004
|
|
|
61.3
|
%
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
86.25
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
52.89
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
2005
|
|
|
63.1
|
%
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
|
90.89
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
|
57.35
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
2006
|
|
|
63.4
|
%
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
97.24
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
|
|
61.62
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
2007E
|
|
|
63.3
|
%
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
|
102.91
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
65.18
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
Sources: Smith Travel Research;
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Performance in the lodging industry is also measured by revenues
earned by companies in the industry and by the number of new
rooms added on a yearly basis. In 2006, the lodging industry
earned revenues of $134 billion and added 118,800 new
rooms. The following table demonstrates trends in revenues and
new rooms:
Trends in
Revenues and New Rooms in the United States since 2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Change in
|
|
New
|
|
Change in
|
Year
|
|
($bn)
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Rooms (000s)
|
|
New Rooms
|
|
2001
|
|
$
|
103.5
|
|
|
|
(7.7
|
)%
|
|
|
90.5
|
|
|
|
(24.8
|
)%
|
2002
|
|
|
102.5
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)%
|
|
|
68.4
|
|
|
|
(24.4
|
)%
|
2003
|
|
|
105.1
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
76.6
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
2004
|
|
|
114.0
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
80.7
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
2005
|
|
|
123.9
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
|
|
83.6
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
2006
|
|
|
133.9
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
|
|
118.8
|
|
|
|
42.1
|
%
|
2007E
|
|
|
144.0
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
|
|
124.7
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
Sources: Smith Travel Research;
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Vacation
Exchange and Rentals Industry
The estimated $39 billion global vacation exchange and
rentals industry is a growing segment of the hospitality
industry. Industry providers offer products and services to both
leisure travelers and vacation
7
property owners, including owners of second homes and vacation
ownership interests. The vacation exchange and rentals industry
offers leisure travelers access to a range of fully-furnished
vacation properties, which include privately-owned vacation
homes, apartments and condominiums, vacation ownership resorts,
inventory at hotels and resorts, villas, cottages, boats and
yachts. Providers offer leisure travelers flexibility (subject
to availability) as to time of travel and a choice of lodging
options in regions to which such travelers may not typically
have such ease of access. For vacation property owners,
affiliations with vacation exchange companies or vacation rental
companies allow such owners to transfer the ability to
facilitate exchanges of interests in vacation properties or
marketing and renting vacation properties, as applicable, and,
with respect to vacation properties for rental, to transfer the
responsibility of managing such properties.
The overall trend in the vacation exchange industry is growth in
the number of members of vacation exchange companies. We believe
that the vacation exchange industry will be favorably impacted
by the growth in the premium and luxury segments of the vacation
ownership industry through the increased sales of vacation
ownership interests at high-end luxury resorts and the continued
development of vacation ownership properties and products,
including condominium hotels and destination clubs. The vacation
exchange industry is expected to grow over the next few years
with respect to members and with respect to exchanges by
members. In 2005, there were more than five million members who
completed over 3.5 million exchanges.
We believe that the overall demand for vacation rentals has been
growing for the following reasons: (i) the continuing
growth of low-cost airline operations; (ii) the increased
use of the Internet as a tool for facilitating vacation rental
transactions; and (iii) the emergence of attractive,
low-cost destinations, such as Eastern Europe and the Middle
East. The demand per year for vacation rentals in Europe, the
United States, South Africa and Australia is approximately
49 million vacation weeks, 31 million of which are
rented by leisure travelers from Europe. Demand for vacation
rental properties is often regional in that leisure travelers
who rent properties often live relatively close to such
properties. Many leisure travelers, however, travel relatively
long distances from their homes to vacation properties in
domestic or international destinations.
We believe that the overall supply of vacation rental properties
has been growing as a result of the growth in ownership of
second homes. Growth in ownership of second homes, however,
could adversely affect demand for vacation rental properties to
the extent that owners of such homes no longer are as likely to
rent vacation properties as such owners were before they bought
second homes.
Vacation
Ownership Industry
The $13 billion global vacation ownership industry, which
is also referred to as the timeshare industry, is one of the
fastest-developing segments of the domestic and international
hospitality industry. The vacation ownership industry enables
customers to share ownership of fully-furnished vacation
accommodations. Typically, a vacation ownership purchaser
acquires either a fee simple interest in a property, which gives
the purchaser title to a fraction of a unit or group of units,
or a right to use a property, which gives the participant the
right to use a property for a specified period of time.
Generally, a vacation ownership purchasers fee simple
interest in or right to use a property is referred to as a
vacation ownership interest. For many vacation
ownership interest purchasers, vacation ownership is an
attractive vacation alternative to traditional lodging
accommodations at hotels or owning vacation properties. Owners
of vacation ownership interests are not subject to the variance
in room rates to which lodging customers are subject, and
vacation ownership units are, on average, more than twice the
size of traditional hotel rooms and typically have more
amenities, such as kitchens, than do traditional hotel rooms.
The vacation ownership concept originated in Europe during the
late 1960s and spread to the United States shortly
thereafter. The vacation ownership industry expanded slowly in
the United States until the mid-1980s; since then, the vacation
ownership industry has grown at a double-digit CAGR. The
American Resort Development Association, or ARDA, indicates that
sales of domestic vacation ownership interests grew in excess of
16% CAGR from 1995 to 2005. Based on ARDA research, domestic
sales of vacation ownership interests were approximately
$8,610 million in 2005 compared to $4,200 million in
2000
8
and $1,900 million in 1995. ARDA estimated that on
January 1, 2006, there were approximately 4.1 million
households that owned one or more vacation ownership interests
in the United States.
Based on published industry data, we believe that the following
factors have contributed to the substantial growth, particularly
in North America, of the vacation ownership industry over the
past two decades:
|
|
|
|
l
|
increased consumer confidence in the industry based on enhanced
consumer protection regulation of the industry;
|
|
|
l
|
entry of lodging and entertainment companies into the industry,
including Marriott International Inc., The Walt Disney Company,
Hilton Hotels Corporation, Hyatt Corporation, and Starwood
Hotels and Resorts Worldwide, Inc.;
|
|
|
l
|
increased flexibility for owners of vacation ownership interests
made possible through owners affiliations with vacation
ownership exchange companies and vacation ownership
companies internal exchange programs;
|
|
|
l
|
improvement in quality of resorts and resort management and
servicing; and
|
|
|
l
|
improved financing availability for purchasers of vacation
ownership interests.
|
Demographic factors explain, in part, the growth of the
industry. A 2006 study of vacation ownership purchasers revealed
that the average owner was 52 years of age and had a median
household income of $81,000. The average purchaser in the United
States, therefore, is a baby boomer who has disposable income
and interest in purchasing vacation products. We expect that
baby boomers will continue to have a positive influence on the
future growth of the vacation ownership industry.
Our
Strengths
We believe that the following competitive strengths
differentiate us in the hospitality industry:
|
|
|
|
l
|
Stable revenues and earnings from diverse sources, and
strong and stable cash flows
|
Our
fee-for-service
based businesses, lodging and vacation exchange and rentals, and
our vacation ownership business (which has a
fee-for-service
component) provide us with stable revenues and earnings from
diverse sources, and strong and stable cash flows. Our lodging
business derives revenues from franchise fees, including royalty
fees, and property management fees. Our vacation exchange and
rentals business derives revenues from annual membership dues
and exchange fees for transactions and from commissions and
rental fees in connection with vacation rentals. Our vacation
ownership business derives fee-based revenues from property
management fees. The stable revenues and earnings we derive from
these fee-based models provide us with strong and stable cash
flows. In addition, the sales of vacation ownership interests by
our vacation ownership business and the consumer financings of
such sales augment our revenues, earnings and cash flows from
fees.
|
|
|
|
l
|
Strong portfolio of global, well-recognized brands
|
We believe that our brands, which are some of the worlds
most well-recognized brands in the hospitality industry, serve
as the foundation for our industry-leading businesses. We
believe that the strong market presence and familiarity of our
brands attract customers to the products and services offered by
our businesses. For our lodging business, our brands include
Wyndham Hotels and Resorts, Ramada, Days Inn, Super 8 and
TripRewards. Hotels associated with our lodging brands operate
in the upscale, middle and economy segments of the lodging
industry and therefore provide leisure and business customers
with options for hospitality products and services across
various price ranges. For our vacation exchange and rentals
business, our brands include RCI, which is a vacation exchange
brand, and Landal GreenParks, English Country Cottages and
Novasol, which are some of Europes best known vacation
rental brands. For our vacation ownership business, our brands
include Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham, which
benefit from high levels of
9
customer satisfaction as evidenced by the volume of annual
revenues resulting from upgrade sales to our existing owners of
vacation ownership interests.
|
|
|
|
l
|
Industry-leading positions across our business
segments
|
We believe that our industry-leading positions across our
business segments help us to attract customers and position us
for continued growth. We are the worlds largest lodging
franchise business as measured by the number of franchised
hotels, vacation exchange company as measured by the numbers of
exchanges per year and members, and vacation ownership business
as measured by the numbers of vacation ownership resorts,
vacation ownership units and owners of vacation ownership
interests, and we are among the worlds largest global
marketers of vacation rental properties.
|
|
|
|
l
|
Diversity of inventory and customer base
|
We market a breadth of accommodations, including hotel rooms and
suites, vacation ownership interests, villas, cottages,
bungalows, campgrounds, vacation ownership condominiums, city
apartments, second homes, fractional private residences, luxury
destination clubs and boats. The diversity of our inventory
provides individual consumers options with respect to
accommodations, and our experience with such inventory has
enabled us to build extensive expertise across a variety of
accommodation categories. Individual consumers value having
options with respect to accommodations, and our
business-to-business
customers value our expertise with respect to our
accommodations. In addition to having a breadth of hospitality
accommodations, we have a diverse customer base across our
business segments. Our customers include our franchisees,
members, rental customers and owners of vacation ownership
interests, many of whom are potential purchasers of additional
products and services from our businesses. Our loyalty programs
encourage repeat business, which generally results in enhanced
margins, as compared to the margins associated with new customer
acquisitions. In addition, our franchisees and members, by the
nature of our business models, provide a level of annuity-like
revenue and earning streams.
|
|
|
|
l
|
Diversity and breadth help mitigate effects of economic
downturns, political unrest and natural disasters
|
We believe that our breadth of lodging inventory helps to
insulate us during periods of weakness in the overall travel
sector because our lodging inventory has a significant presence
in the economy and middle segments of the domestic lodging
market, which tend to display relative strength at times when
the broader travel sector experiences weakness and concurrent
decreases in airline travel. This relative strength can be
attributed in part to the drive-to nature of many of the
properties that operate in the economy and the middle segments
of the lodging industry. In addition, we believe that the
geographic diversity of our businesses mitigates the risk that
exogenous events, such as regional economic slowdowns, political
unrest or natural disasters, will have a material adverse effect
on our financial results.
We develop unique products and services to meet the needs of our
franchisees, members, rental customers and owners of vacation
ownership interests. We were one of the first vacation exchange
companies to introduce a points-based vacation exchange system
and one of the first vacation ownership companies to offer a
points-based vacation ownership system. Our loyalty programs,
including TripRewards and RCI Elite Rewards, are innovative in
both their breadth of benefits and their development of ways
participants can earn and use points. We believe that our
innovation enables us to respond more effectively to changes in
members and rental customers preferences for
accommodation and vacation experiences, and our responses to
these changing preferences help us to maintain and increase
revenues and earnings.
We believe that our size and general scale allow us to:
(i) provide individual consumers choice of destinations and
accommodation types across various price ranges on six
continents; (ii) offer our
10
business-to-business
customers, including our franchisees, value-added global
business solutions with respect to operations, services and
technology; (iii) reduce our operational risk; and
(iv) generate operating efficiencies, including purchasing
efficiencies, that enable us to provide products and services in
a cost-effective manner and to acquire new individual consumers
and
business-to-business
customers at a relatively low cost. The benefits of our size and
scale provide us with increased profit margins and access to
capital to execute our strategies to grow our business.
We believe that our strong management team will effectively
execute our growth strategies. Collectively, our chief executive
officer and the chief executive officers of our lodging,
vacation exchange and rental, and vacation ownership businesses
have 60 years of combined experience in the hospitality
industry, and our chief financial officer, general counsel and
chief human resources officer have 30, 16 and 18 years
of experience, respectively, in their respective fields. We
believe that having a strong management team with extensive
experience enables us to respond to changing market conditions
and evolving preferences of our customers and is essential to
our overall success and our future growth as a stand-alone
hospitality company.
Our
Strategy
Our company-wide business strategy includes generating new
customers and selling additional products and services to our
current customers by utilizing our unique range of inventory and
offering improved products and services that enhance the value
we provide to customers. We seek to generate new customers for
our products and services by, for example, attracting additional
leisure and business travelers in the upscale segment of the
lodging industry to new and existing hotels franchised under the
Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand. We seek to sell to our current
customers in one or more segments of the hospitality industry
additional products and services from other segments by, for
example, providing customers of our vacation exchange and
rentals business with access to inventory from our lodging
business and by improving our products and services, including
loyalty programs and property management services, to enhance
the value we provide to customers. In addition, we seek to
expand our international presence in the lodging and vacation
ownership segments.
We expect to increase profits and cash flows in each of our
three segments by successfully executing the following
strategies:
|
|
|
|
l
|
Wyndham Hotel Group. We intend to
continue to accelerate growth of our lodging business by
(i) expanding our strong presence in the domestic economy
segment to maintain our leadership position through room growth
and RevPAR growth; (ii) expanding the number of properties
in the domestic middle and upscale segments; and
(iii) expanding our international presence through
increasing the number of properties in our core brands.
|
|
|
l
|
RCI Global Vacation Network. We intend
to continue to grow the numbers of members and rental customers
of and transactions facilitated through our vacation exchange
and rentals business by (i) continually enhancing our core
vacation networks; (ii) developing new business models; and
(iii) expanding into new markets.
|
|
|
l
|
Wyndham Vacation Ownership. We intend
to grow our vacation ownership business by increasing sales of
vacation ownership interests to new owners and sales of upgrades
to existing owners by expanding our marketing and sales efforts,
strengthening our product offerings and further developing our
consumer financing activities. We plan to leverage the Wyndham
brand in our marketing efforts, add new resorts, expand our
marketing alliances and increase our
on-site
sales activities to existing owners.
|
11
Our
Risks
We face a number of risks and uncertainties relating to our
business and our recent separation from Cendant. Examples of the
risks and uncertainties that we face include:
|
|
|
|
l
|
The hospitality industry is highly competitive, and our
continued success depends, in large part, upon our ability to
compete effectively in markets that contain numerous
competitors, some of which may have significantly greater
financial, marketing and other resources than we have.
|
|
|
l
|
We may not be successful in achieving our objectives for
increasing the number of franchised and managed properties in
our lodging business, the number of vacation exchange members
acquired by our vacation exchange business, the number of rental
weeks sold by our vacation rentals business and the number of
tours generated and vacation ownership interests sold by our
vacation ownership business.
|
|
|
l
|
Our revenues and profits, and in turn our financial condition,
may be significantly adversely affected by exogenous events that
generally adversely affect the travel industry. Such events
include terrorist incidents and threats, acts of God, war, bird
flu and other pandemics, the financial instability of many of
the air carriers, airline job actions and strikes, and increases
in gas and other fuel prices. In addition, our businesses may be
adversely affected by a deterioration in general economic
conditions or a weakening of one or more of the industries in
which we operate.
|
|
|
l
|
Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, upon the
distribution of our common stock to Cendant stockholders, we
agreed to be responsible for 37.5% of certain Cendant contingent
and other corporate liabilities, including those related to tax
matters, litigation matters, other liabilities and guarantees
issued at the date of separation related to certain unresolved
contingent matters and certain others that could arise during
the guarantee period.
|
For further discussion of these risks and other risks and
uncertainties that we face, see Risk Factors and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.
Our
Separation from Cendant
In October 2005 the Board of Directors of Cendant preliminarily
approved a plan to separate Cendant into four separate
companies one for each of Cendants hospitality
services (including timeshare resorts), real estate services,
travel distribution services and vehicle rental businesses. In
furtherance of this plan, Cendant transferred all of the assets
and liabilities of its hospitality services (including timeshare
resorts) businesses to Wyndham Worldwide, and on July 31,
2006, Cendant distributed all of the shares of our common stock
held by it to the holders of record of Cendant common stock as
of the close of business on July 21, 2006, the record date
for the distribution. Pursuant to the separation plan, Cendant
also (i) distributed all of the shares of common stock of
Realogy, the Cendant subsidiary that directly or indirectly
holds the assets and liabilities associated with Cendants
real estate services businesses, on July 31, 2006 and
(ii) sold all of the common stock of Travelport, the
Cendant subsidiary that directly or indirectly holds the assets
and liabilities associated with Cendants travel
distribution services businesses, on August 23, 2006.
Wyndham Worldwide common stock commenced regular way
trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
WYN on August 1, 2006.
Before our separation from Cendant, we entered into a Separation
and Distribution Agreement and several other agreements with
Cendant and Cendants other businesses to effect the
separation and distribution and provide a framework for our
relationships with Cendant and Cendants other businesses
after the separation. These agreements govern the relationships
among us, Cendant, Realogy and Travelport subsequent to the
completion of the separation plan and provide for the allocation
among us, Cendant, Realogy and Travelport of Cendants
assets, liabilities and obligations attributable to periods
prior to our separation from Cendant. Under the Separation and
Distribution Agreement, in particular, we were assigned 37.5% of
certain contingent and other corporate assets, and assumed 37.5%
of certain contingent and other corporate liabilities, of
Cendant or its subsidiaries which are not primarily related to
our business or the
12
businesses of Realogy, Travelport or Cendants vehicle
rental business, and Realogy was assigned 62.5% of such
contingent and other corporate assets and assumed 62.5% of such
contingent and other corporate liabilities. The contingent
assets of Cendant or its subsidiaries include assets relating to
(i) certain minority investments of Cendant which do not
primarily relate to us, Realogy, Travelport or Cendant,
(ii) rights to receive payments under certain tax-related
agreements with former businesses of Cendant and
(iii) rights under a certain litigation claim. The
contingent and other corporate liabilities of Cendant or its
subsidiaries include liabilities relating to
(i) Cendants terminated or divested businesses,
(ii) liabilities relating to the Travelport sale, including
(subject to certain exceptions) liabilities for taxes of
Travelport for taxable periods through the date of the
Travelport sale, (iii) certain litigation matters,
(iv) generally any actions with respect to the separation
plan and (v) payments under certain identified contracts
(or portions thereof) that were not allocated to any specific
party in connection with the separation. Although our balance
sheet at separation included accruals for liabilities and
guarantees of approximately $520 million relating to the
contingent and other corporate liabilities of Cendant that we
assumed, we have not quantified the value of the contingent and
other corporate assets as these assets are subject to
contingency in their realization and GAAP does not allow us to
record any of the Cendant contingent assets on our balance
sheet. Realogy (and not us) will generally act as the managing
party and will manage and assume control of most legal matters
related to the contingent and other corporate liabilities of
Cendant. For a more detailed description of the Separation and
Distribution Agreement and treatment of certain historical
Cendant contingent and other corporate liabilities, see the
Information Statement we filed as an exhibit to the Current
Report on
Form 8-K
we filed with the SEC on July 19, 2006 (the
Information Statement), a copy of which is available
from us upon request. See Where You Can Find More
Information.
We hold directly or indirectly the assets and liabilities of
Cendants former hospitality services (including timeshare
resorts) businesses as a result of the separation. Our
headquarters are located at Seven Sylvan Way, Parsippany, New
Jersey 07054 and our general telephone number is
(973) 753-6000.
We maintain an Internet site at http://www.wyndhamworldwide.com.
Our website and the information contained on that site, or
connected to that site, are not incorporated into and are not
part of this prospectus.
Recent
Developments
Preferred
Stock Sale
On January 31, 2007, Affinion Group Holdings, Inc.
(Affinion) redeemed a portion of the preferred stock
investment owned by Avis Budget Group, of which the Company
owned a 37.5% interest pursuant to the Separation agreement. The
redemption resulted in approximately $40 million in
proceeds for the Company and a gain on sale of approximately
$12 million. As of December 31, 2006, the Company had
a $37 million receivable in non-current due from former
Parent and subsidiaries on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, which
represented the Companys right to receive proceeds from
the ultimate sale of Cendants preferred stock investment
in and warrants of Affinion. Subsequent to Affinions
redemption, such receivable was reduced to $10 million.
Repayment
of Debt and Cancellation of EURO Revolver
On January 31, 2007, the Company repaid the outstanding
borrowings of $73 million related to the its Landal
GreenParks business and cancelled a related undrawn EUR
15 million revolving credit facility. The borrowings were
paid off utilizing a portion of the proceeds from the
Companys $800 million 6.00% senior unsecured bond
issuance. These facilities will not be refinanced and cash flow
and/or corporate debt will be utilized for the additional
funding needs of Landal GreenParks in the future.
Premium
Yield Facility
On February 12, 2007, the Company closed a securitization
facility, Premium Yield Facility
2007-A, in
the amount of $155 million, which bears interest at LIBOR
plus 43 basis points and an additional bond
13
insurance fee and matures in February 2020. Proceeds from this
facility were used to pay down borrowings and for general
corporate purposes.
Share
Repurchase Program
On February 13, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors
authorized a new stock repurchase program that enables the
Company to purchase up to $400 million of its common stock.
The Board of Directors authorization included increased
repurchase capacity for proceeds received from stock option
exercises. The amount and timing of specific repurchases are
subject to market conditions, applicable legal requirements and
other factors. Repurchases may be conducted in the open market
or in privately negotiated transactions.
Acquisition
of Realogy by Apollo
On April 10, 2007, Realogy was acquired by an affiliate of
Apollo Management VI, L.P. and no longer trades as an
independent public company. The acquisition does not negate
Realogys obligation to satisfy 62.5% of the contingent and
other corporate liabilities of Cendant or its subsidiaries
pursuant to the terms of the separation agreement. As a result
of the acquisition, Realogy has greater debt obligations and its
ability to satisfy its portion of the liabilities may be
adversely impacted. In accordance with the terms of the
separation agreement, Realogy has posted a letter of credit to
cover its share of certain liabilities relating to the Cendant
Corporation plan of separation.
Dividend
Plan
On April 26, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors
approved a dividend plan and anticipates an initial quarterly
cash dividend of $0.04 per share, or $0.16 annually, beginning
in the third quarter of 2007. The actual declaration of
dividends and the establishment of record and payment dates are
subject to final determination by the Board of Directors.
14
Summary
of the Exchange Offer
On December 5, 2006, we completed the private placement
of $800,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 6.00% senior notes
due 2016. As part of that offering, we entered into a
registration rights agreement with the initial purchasers of the
original notes, dated as of December 5, 2006, in which we
agreed, among other things, to deliver this prospectus to you
and to complete an exchange offer for the original notes. Below
is a summary of the exchange offer.
|
|
|
Securities offered |
|
Up to $800,000,000 aggregate principal amount of new 6.00%
senior notes due 2016, that have been registered under the
Securities Act. The form and terms of these exchange notes are
identical in all material respects to those of the original
notes except that the exchange notes are registered under the
Securities Act and the transfer restrictions, registration
rights and additional interest provisions applicable to the
original notes do not apply to the exchange notes. |
|
The exchange offer |
|
We are offering to exchange up to $800,000,000 principal amount
of our 6.00% senior notes due 2016 that have been registered
under the Securities Act for a like principal amount of the
original notes outstanding. You may tender original notes only
in integral multiples of $1,000 principal amount. We will issue
exchange notes as soon as practicable after the expiration of
the exchange offer. In order to be exchanged, an original note
must be properly tendered and accepted. All original notes that
are validly tendered and not withdrawn will be exchanged. As of
the date of this prospectus, there is $800,000,000 aggregate
principal amount of original notes outstanding. The $800,000,000
aggregate principal amount of our original 6.00% senior notes
due 2016 were offered under an indenture dated December 5, 2006. |
|
Expiration date; Tenders |
|
The exchange offer will expire at 5:00 p.m., New York City time,
on June 8, 2007, unless we extend the exchange offer in our
sole and absolute discretion. By tendering your original notes,
you represent that: |
|
|
|
you are neither our
affiliate (as defined in Rule 405 under the
Securities Act) nor a broker-dealer tendering notes acquired
directly from us for our own account;
|
|
|
|
any exchange notes you receive in the
exchange offer are being acquired by you in the ordinary course
of business;
|
|
|
|
at the time of commencement of the
exchange offer, neither you nor, to your knowledge, anyone
receiving exchange notes from you, has any arrangement or
understanding with any person to participate in the
distribution, as defined in the Securities Act, of the original
notes or the exchange notes in violation of the Securities Act;
|
|
|
|
if you are not a participating
broker-dealer, you are not engaged in, and do not intend to
engage in, the distribution, as defined in the Securities Act,
of the original notes or the exchange notes; and
|
|
|
|
if you are a broker-dealer, you will
receive the exchange notes for your own account in exchange for
the original notes that you acquired as a result of your
market-making or other trading activities and you will deliver a
prospectus in connection with
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
any resale of the exchange notes that you receive. For further
information regarding resales of the exchange notes by
participating broker-dealers, see the discussion under the
caption Plan of Distribution. |
|
Accrued interest on the exchange notes and original notes |
|
The exchange notes will bear interest from the most recent date
to which interest has been paid on the original notes or, if no
such interest has been paid, from November 30, 2006. If
your original notes are accepted for exchange, you will receive
interest on the exchange notes and not on the original notes.
Any original notes not tendered will remain outstanding and
continue to accrue interest according to their terms. |
|
Conditions to the exchange offer |
|
The exchange offer is subject to customary conditions. We may
assert or waive these conditions in our sole discretion. If we
materially change the terms of the exchange offer, we will
resolicit tenders of the original notes. See The Exchange
Offer Conditions to the Exchange Offer for
more information regarding conditions to the exchange offer. |
|
Procedures for tendering original notes |
|
Except as described in the section titled The Exchange
Offer Guaranteed Delivery Procedures, a
tendering holder must, on or prior to the expiration date: |
|
|
|
transmit a properly completed and duly
executed letter of transmittal, including all other documents
required by the letter of transmittal, to the exchange agent at
the address listed in this prospectus; or
|
|
|
|
if original notes are tendered in
accordance with the book-entry procedures described in this
prospectus, the tendering holder must transmit an agents
message to the exchange agent at the address listed in this
prospectus. See The Exchange Offer Procedures
for Tendering.
|
|
Special procedures for beneficial holders |
|
If you are a beneficial holder of original notes that are
registered in the name of your broker, dealer, commercial bank,
trust company or other nominee, and you wish to tender in the
exchange offer, you should promptly contact the person in whose
name your original notes are registered and instruct that person
to tender on your behalf. See The Exchange
Offer Procedures for Tendering. |
|
Guaranteed delivery procedures |
|
If you wish to tender your original notes and you cannot deliver
your original notes, the letter of transmittal or any other
required documents to the exchange agent before the expiration
date, you may tender your original notes by following the
guaranteed delivery procedures under the heading The
Exchange Offer Guaranteed Delivery Procedures. |
|
Withdrawal rights |
|
Tenders may be withdrawn at any time before 5:00 p.m., New
York City time, on the expiration date. |
|
Acceptance of original notes and delivery of exchange notes |
|
Subject to the conditions stated in the section The
Exchange Offer Conditions to the Exchange
Offer of this prospectus, we |
16
|
|
|
|
|
will accept for exchange any and all original notes which are
properly tendered in the exchange offer before 5:00 p.m., New
York City time, on the expiration date. The exchange notes will
be delivered as soon as practicable after the expiration date.
See The Exchange Offer Terms of the Exchange
Offer. |
|
Material U.S. federal tax consequences |
|
Your exchange of original notes for exchange notes pursuant to
the exchange offer generally will not be a taxable event for
U.S. federal income tax purposes. |
|
Regulatory requirements |
|
Following the effectiveness of the registration statement
covering the exchange offer with the SEC, no other material
federal regulatory requirement must be complied with in
connection with this exchange offer. |
|
Exchange agent |
|
U.S. Bank National Association is serving as exchange agent in
connection with the exchange offer. The address and telephone
number of the exchange agent are listed under the heading
The Exchange Offer Exchange Agent. |
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We will not receive any proceeds from the issuance of exchange
notes in the exchange offer. We have agreed to pay all expenses
incidental to the exchange offer other than commissions and
concessions of any broker or dealer and certain transfer taxes
and will indemnify holders of the notes, including any
broker-dealers, against certain liabilities, including
liabilities under the Securities Act. |
|
Resales |
|
Based on interpretations by the staff of the SEC as detailed in
a series of no-action letters issued to third parties, we
believe that the exchange notes issued in the exchange offer may
be offered for resale, resold or otherwise transferred by you
without compliance with the registration and prospectus delivery
requirements of the Securities Act as long as: |
|
|
|
you are acquiring the exchange notes in
the ordinary course of your business;
|
|
|
|
you are not participating, do not intend
to participate and have no arrangement or understanding with any
person to participate, in a distribution of the exchange notes;
and
|
|
|
|
you are neither an affiliate of ours nor
a broker-dealer tendering notes acquired directly from us for
your own account.
|
|
|
|
If you are an affiliate of ours, are engaged in or intend to
engage in or have any arrangement or understanding with any
person to participate in the distribution of the exchange notes: |
|
|
|
you cannot rely on the applicable
interpretations of the staff of the SEC; and
|
|
|
|
you must comply with the registration
requirements of the Securities Act in connection with any resale
transaction.
|
|
|
|
Each broker or dealer that receives exchange notes for its own
account in exchange for original notes that were acquired as a
result of market-making or other trading activities must
acknowledge that it will comply with the registration and
prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act in
connection with |
17
|
|
|
|
|
any offer to resell, resale, or other transfer of the exchange
notes issued in the exchange offer, including the delivery of a
prospectus that contains information with respect to any selling
holder required by the Securities Act in connection with any
resale of the exchange notes. |
|
|
|
Furthermore, any broker-dealer that acquired any of its original
notes directly from us: |
|
|
|
may not rely on the applicable
interpretation of the staff of the SECs position contained
in Exxon Capital Holdings Corp., SEC no-action letter
(April 13, 1988), Morgan, Stanley & Co.
Inc., SEC no-action letter (June 5, 1991), and
Shearman & Sterling, SEC no-action letter
(July 2, 1993); and
|
|
|
|
must also be named as a selling holder
in connection with the registration and prospectus delivery
requirements of the Securities Act relating to any resale
transaction.
|
|
|
|
As a condition to participation in the exchange offer, each
holder will be required to represent that it is not our
affiliate or a broker-dealer that acquired the original notes
directly from us. |
|
Consequences of not exchanging original notes |
|
If you do not exchange your original notes in the exchange
offer, you will continue to be subject to the restrictions on
transfer described in the legend on your original notes. In
general, you may offer or sell your original notes only: |
|
|
|
if they are registered under the
Securities Act and applicable state securities laws;
|
|
|
|
if they are offered or sold under an
exemption from registration under the Securities Act and
applicable state securities laws; or
|
|
|
|
if they are offered or sold in a
transaction not subject to the Securities Act and applicable
state securities laws.
|
|
|
|
Although your original notes will continue to accrue interest,
they will retain no rights under the registration rights
agreement. |
|
|
|
We currently do not intend to register the original notes under
the Securities Act. Under some circumstances, holders of the
original notes, including holders who are not permitted to
participate in the exchange offer or who may not freely sell
exchange notes received in the exchange offer, however, may
require us to file, and to cause to become effective, a shelf
registration statement covering resales of the original notes by
these holders. For more information regarding the consequences
of not tendering your original notes and our obligations to file
a shelf registration statement, see The Exchange
Offer Consequences of Exchanging or Failing to
Exchange the Original Notes and The Exchange
Offer Registration Rights Agreement. |
|
Risk factors |
|
See Risk Factors and the other information in this
prospectus for a discussion of factors you should consider
carefully before deciding to participate in the exchange offer. |
18
Summary
of the Terms of the Exchange Notes
The following is a summary of the terms of the exchange
notes. The form and terms of the exchange notes are identical in
all material respects to those of the original notes except that
the exchange notes are registered under the Securities Act and
the transfer restrictions, registration rights and additional
interest provisions applicable to the original notes do not
apply to the exchange notes. The exchange notes will evidence
the same debt as the original notes and will be governed by the
same indenture. When we refer to the terms of note
or notes in this prospectus, we are referring to the
original notes and the exchange notes. Certain of the terms and
conditions described below are subject to important limitations
and exceptions. For a more detailed description of the terms and
conditions of the exchange notes, see the section of this
prospectus entitled Description of Notes.
|
|
|
Issuer |
|
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation, a Delaware corporation. |
|
Securities Offered |
|
$800,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 6.00% notes due
2016. |
|
Maturity |
|
The notes will mature on December 1, 2016. |
|
Interest Rate |
|
The notes will bear interest at the rate of 6.00% per year.
Interest on the notes will be payable semi-annually in arrears
on June 1 and December 1 of each year commencing
June 1, 2007. |
|
Ranking |
|
The notes will be senior unsecured obligations of ours and will
rank equally with all of our existing and future senior
unsecured obligations. As of December 31, 2006, we had
approximately $300 million of unsecured indebtedness
outstanding under our credit facilities. |
|
|
|
The notes will be structurally subordinated to all obligations
of our subsidiaries including claims with respect to trade
payables. As of December 31, 2006, our direct and indirect
subsidiaries had approximately $330 million of outstanding
debt, exclusive of debt outstanding under our vacation ownership
securitization program. |
|
Further Issues |
|
We may create and issue further notes ranking equally and
ratably in all respects with the notes being offered hereby, so
that such further notes will be consolidated and form a single
series with the notes being offered hereby and will have the
same terms as to status, CUSIP number or otherwise. See
Description of Notes Further Issues. |
|
Optional Redemption |
|
We may redeem some or all of the notes at any time and from time
to time at their principal amount, plus the applicable premium,
if any, and accrued interest. See Description of
Notes Optional Redemption. |
|
Certain Covenants |
|
The original notes were, and the exchange notes will be, issued
under an indenture that, among other things, limits our ability
to: |
|
|
|
l consolidate,
merge or sell all or substantially all of our assets;
|
|
|
|
l create
liens, except for those created in our securitization
facilities; and |
|
|
|
l enter
into sale and leaseback transactions. |
|
|
|
All of these limitations are subject to a number of important
qualifications and exceptions. See Description of
Notes. |
19
|
|
|
Mandatory Offer to Repurchase |
|
If we experience specific kinds of changes in control and the
ratings on the notes are below investment grade ratings on any
date within a specified period of time following the public
notice of an arrangement that could result in a change of
control, we will be required to offer to repurchase the notes at
101% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid
interest, if any, to the date of repurchase. See
Description of Notes Change of Control. |
|
Governing Law |
|
The notes and the indenture are governed by New York law. |
|
Listing |
|
The notes will not be listed on any securities exchange,
quotation system or PORTAL. |
20
Summary
Historical Condensed Consolidated and Combined Financial
Data
The following table presents our summary historical condensed
consolidated and combined financial data. The condensed
consolidated and combined statement of income data for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006
and the condensed consolidated and combined balance sheet data
as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 have been derived from our
audited consolidated and combined financial statements included
herein.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of or For the Year
|
|
|
|
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Statement of Income
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
3,842
|
|
|
$
|
3,471
|
|
|
$
|
3,014
|
|
Total
expenses(a)(b)
|
|
|
3,265
|
|
|
|
2,851
|
|
|
|
2,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes,
minority interest and cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
$
|
542
|
|
|
$
|
626
|
|
|
$
|
587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
$
|
431
|
|
|
$
|
349
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured
assets(c)
|
|
$
|
2,234
|
|
|
$
|
3,169
|
|
|
$
|
2,811
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
9,520
|
|
|
|
9,167
|
|
|
|
8,343
|
|
Secured debt
|
|
|
1,787
|
|
|
|
2,005
|
|
|
|
1,721
|
|
Other debt
|
|
|
1,113
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Total stockholders /
invested
equity(d)
|
|
|
3,559
|
|
|
|
5,033
|
|
|
|
4,679
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Does not include incremental
stand-alone costs that we would have incurred had we been a
separate stand-alone company since the beginning of each period.
Such estimated costs would have been $33 million during the
seven months prior to our separation date from Cendant
(July 31, 2006) in 2006 and $56 million during
each of the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
(b) |
|
The year ended December 31,
2006 includes $99 million of separation and related costs
associated with our spin-off from Cendant.
|
|
(c) |
|
Represents the portion of vacation
ownership contract receivables, other vacation ownership related
assets, and other vacation exchange and rental assets that
collateralize our debt.
|
|
(d) |
|
Represents Cendants net
investment (capital contributions and earnings from operations
less dividends) in Wyndham Worldwide and accumulated other
comprehensive income in 2004 and 2005 and Wyndham
Worldwides stand-alone stockholders equity in 2006.
|
21
RISK
FACTORS
You should carefully consider each of the following risk
factors and all of the other information set forth in this
prospectus before making any investment decision. The risk
factors generally have been separated into four groups:
(i) risks relating to our business; (ii) risks
relating to our separation from Cendant; (iii) risks
relating to the notes; and (iv) risks relating to the
exchange offer. Based on the information currently known to us,
we believe that the following information identifies the most
significant risk factors affecting our company and the exchange
offer. However, the risks and uncertainties are not limited to
those set forth in the risk factors described below. Additional
risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we
currently believe to be less significant than the following risk
factors may also adversely affect our business. In addition,
past financial performance may not be a reliable indicator of
future performance and historical trends should not be used to
anticipate results or trends in future periods. You should
carefully consider the following risk factors and all other
information contained in this prospectus before deciding to
participating in the exchange offer.
Risks
Relating to Our Business
The
hospitality industry is highly competitive, and we are subject
to risks relating to competition that may adversely affect our
performance.
We may lose business, which would adversely affect our
performance, if we cannot compete effectively in the highly
competitive hospitality industry. Our continued success depends,
in large part, upon our ability to compete effectively in
markets that contain numerous competitors, some of which may
have significantly greater financial, marketing and other
resources than we have.
Our businesses face the following competitive risks, and if such
risks materialize, the performance of our businesses may be
adversely affected:
|
|
|
|
l
|
Competition in the hospitality industry may put pressure
on our fees or prices and on our business
model. Competition may reduce fee structures,
potentially causing us to lower our fees or prices, which may
adversely impact our profits. New competition or existing
competition that uses a business model that is different from
our business model may put pressure on us to change our model so
that we can remain competitive.
|
|
|
l
|
Our competitors may offer contract terms that may result
in our having to agree to contract terms that are less favorable
to us than the terms under our current
contracts. If our competitors offer more
favorable terms than the terms that we currently offer under our
existing contracts (for example, with our franchisees, with
property owners for property management, with affiliates of our
vacation exchange business, with owners of intervals that are
exchanged through our vacation exchange business and with owners
of accommodations for our vacation rentals business), we cannot
assure you that new contracts entered into, renewed or
renegotiated in the future will be on terms that are as
favorable to us as the terms of our current contracts. The terms
of our new, renewed or renegotiated contracts will be influenced
by the terms that our competitors are offering at the time we
enter into such contracts.
|
The
weakening or unavailability of our intellectual property rights
could adversely affect our business.
The weakening or unavailability of our trademarks, trade dress
and other intellectual property rights could adversely affect
our business. Our intellectual property rights are fundamental
to the brands that we use in all of our businesses, and we
believe the strength of these brands gives us a competitive
advantage. We generate, maintain, utilize and enforce a
substantial portfolio of trademarks, trade dress and other
intellectual property rights. We use our intellectual property
rights to protect the goodwill of our brands, promote our brand
name recognition, protect our proprietary technology and
development activities, enhance our competitiveness and
otherwise support our business goals and objectives. However,
there can be no assurance that the steps we take to obtain,
maintain and protect our intellectual property rights will
22
be adequate. Our intellectual property rights may fail to
provide us with significant competitive advantages, particularly
in foreign jurisdictions that do not have, or do not enforce,
strong intellectual property rights.
We are
subject to operating or other risks common to the hospitality
industry.
In addition to the other risks relating to our business
identified in this Risk Factors section of this
prospectus, our business is subject to the following operating
or other risks common to the hospitality industry:
|
|
|
|
l
|
changes in operating costs, including energy, labor costs
(including minimum wage increases and unionization),
workers compensation and health-care related costs and
insurance;
|
|
|
l
|
changes in desirability of geographic regions of the hotels or
resorts in our business;
|
|
|
l
|
seasonality in our businesses may cause fluctuations in our
operating results;
|
|
|
l
|
geographic concentrations of our operations and customers;
|
|
|
l
|
increases in costs due to inflation that may not be fully offset
by price and fee increases in our business;
|
|
|
l
|
the quality of the services provided by franchisees, our
vacation exchange and rentals business, resorts with units that
are exchanged through our vacation exchange business
and/or
resorts in which we sell vacation ownership interests may
adversely affect our image and reputation;
|
|
|
l
|
our ability to generate sufficient cash to buy from third-party
suppliers the products that we need to provide to the
participants in our points programs who want to redeem points
for such products;
|
|
|
l
|
overbuilding in one or more segments of the hospitality industry
and/or in
one or more geographic regions;
|
|
|
l
|
changes in the number and occupancy rates of hotels operating
under franchise and management agreements;
|
|
|
l
|
changes in the relative mix of franchised hotels in the various
lodging industry price categories;
|
|
|
l
|
our ability to develop and maintain positive relations with
current and potential franchisees, hotel owners, resorts with
units that are exchanged through our vacation exchange business
and/or
owners of vacation properties that our vacation rentals business
markets for rental;
|
|
|
l
|
competition for desirable sites for the development of vacation
ownership properties and liability under state and local laws
with respect to any construction defects in the vacation
ownership properties we develop;
|
|
|
l
|
private resale of vacation ownership interests could adversely
affect our vacation ownership resorts and vacation exchange
businesses;
|
|
|
l
|
revenues from our lodging business are indirectly affected by
our franchisees pricing decisions;
|
|
|
l
|
taxation of guest loyalty program benefits that adversely
affects the cost or consumer acceptance of loyalty
programs; and
|
|
|
l
|
disruptions in relationships with third parties, including
marketing alliances and affiliations with
e-commerce
channels.
|
We may
not be able to achieve our objectives for growth in the number
of franchised and/or managed properties, vacation exchange
members acquired, rental weeks sold and vacation ownership
interests sold.
There can be no assurance that we will be successful in
achieving our objectives for increasing the number of franchised
and/or
managed properties in our lodging business, the number of
vacation exchange members acquired by our vacation exchange
business, the number of rental weeks sold by our vacation
rentals business and the number of tours generated and vacation
ownership interests sold by our vacation ownership business.
We may be unable to identify acquisition targets that complement
our businesses, and if we are able to identify suitable
acquisition targets, we may not be able to complete acquisitions
of such targets on
23
commercially reasonable terms. Our ability to complete
acquisitions depends on a variety of factors, including our
ability to obtain financing on acceptable terms and requisite
government approvals. If we are able to complete acquisitions,
there is no assurance that we will be able to achieve the
revenue and cost benefits that we expected in connection with
such acquisitions or to successfully integrate the acquired
businesses into our existing operations.
Disruptions
and other impairment of our information technologies and systems
could adversely affect our business.
Any disruption or other impairment in our technology
capabilities could harm our business. Our businesses depend upon
the use of sophisticated information technologies and systems,
including technologies and systems utilized for reservation
systems, vacation exchange systems, property management,
communications, procurement, member record databases, call
centers, operation of our loyalty programs and administrative
systems. The operation of these technologies and systems is
dependent upon third-party technologies, systems and services
for which there is no assurance of continued or uninterrupted
availability and operational and maintenance support by the
applicable third-party vendors on commercially reasonable terms.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to continue to operate
effectively and maintain our information technologies and
systems.
In addition, our information technologies and systems are
expected to require refinements and enhancements on an ongoing
basis, and we expect that advanced new technologies and systems
will continue to be introduced. There can be no assurance that
we will be able to replace existing technologies and systems or
obtain or introduce new technologies and systems as quickly as
our competitors or in a cost-effective manner. Also, there can
be no assurance that we will achieve the benefits anticipated or
required from any new technology or system that we may seek to
implement or that we will be able to devote financial resources
to new technologies and systems in the future. In addition, our
information technologies and systems are vulnerable to damage or
interruption from various causes, including: (i) acts of
God and other natural disasters, war and acts of terrorism;
(ii) power losses, computer systems failures, Internet and
telecommunications or data network failures, operator error,
losses of and corruption of data and similar events; and
(iii) computer viruses, penetration by individuals seeking
to disrupt operations or misappropriate information and other
physical or electronic breaches of security. We maintain certain
disaster recovery capabilities for critical functions in most of
our businesses. However, there can be no assurance that these
capabilities will successfully prevent a disruption to or
material adverse effect on our businesses or operations in the
event of a disaster or other business interruption. Any extended
interruption in our technologies or systems could significantly
curtail our ability to conduct our business and generate
revenue. Additionally, our business interruption insurance may
be insufficient to compensate us for losses that may occur.
Our
international operations are subject to risks not generally
experienced by our U.S. operations.
Our international operations are subject to risks not generally
experienced by our U.S. operations, and if such risks
materialize, our profitability may be adversely affected. Such
risks include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
|
l
|
exposure to local economic conditions;
|
|
|
l
|
potential adverse changes in the diplomatic relations of foreign
countries with the United States;
|
|
|
l
|
hostility from local populations;
|
|
|
l
|
restrictions on the withdrawal of foreign investment and
earnings;
|
|
|
l
|
government policies against businesses owned by foreigners;
|
|
|
l
|
investment restrictions or requirements;
|
|
|
l
|
diminished ability to legally enforce our contractual rights in
foreign countries;
|
|
|
l
|
greater regulation of the activities of our businesses;
|
|
|
l
|
foreign exchange restrictions;
|
|
|
l
|
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates;
|
|
|
l
|
withholding and other taxes on remittances and other payments by
subsidiaries; and
|
24
|
|
|
|
l
|
changes in foreign taxation structures.
|
We are subject to risks from laws of various international
jurisdictions that limit the right and ability of
non-U.S. entities
to pay dividends and remit earnings to affiliated companies,
unless specified conditions have been met. In addition, we may
incur substantial tax liabilities, which would adversely affect
our profitability, if we repatriate any of the cash generated by
our international operations back to the United States.
We are
subject to certain risks related to litigation filed by or
against us, and adverse results may harm our
business.
We cannot predict with certainty the cost of defense, the cost
of prosecution or the ultimate outcome of litigation and other
proceedings filed by or against us, including remedies or damage
awards, and adverse results in such litigation and other
proceedings may harm our business. Such litigation and other
proceedings may include, but are not limited to, actions
relating to intellectual property, commercial arrangements,
employment and labor law, personal injury, death, property
damage or other harm resulting from acts or omissions by
individuals or entities outside of our control, including
franchisees, property owners, resorts with units that are
exchanged through our vacation exchange business and resorts in
which we sell vacation ownership interests. In the case of
intellectual property litigation and proceedings, adverse
outcomes could include the cancellation, invalidation or other
loss of material intellectual property rights used in our
business and injunctions prohibiting our use of business
processes or technology that is subject to third-party patents
or other third-party intellectual property rights.
We generally are not liable for the actions of our franchisees,
property owners, resorts with units that are exchanged through
our vacation exchange business and resorts in which we sell
vacation ownership interests; however, there is no assurance
that we would be insulated from liability in all cases.
We are
subject to certain risks related to our indebtedness, our
securitization of assets, the extension of credit by us and the
cost and availability of capital.
We are a borrower of funds under our credit facilities, credit
lines, senior notes and securitization financings. We are a
lender of funds when we finance purchases of vacation ownership
interests. In connection with our debt obligations, the
securitization of certain of our assets and the extension of
credit by us, we are subject to numerous risks including:
|
|
|
|
l
|
our cash flows from operations or available lines of credit will
be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and
interest;
|
|
|
l
|
our leverage may adversely affect our ability to obtain
additional financing;
|
|
|
l
|
our leverage requires the dedication of a significant portion of
our cash flows to the payment of principal and interest thus
reducing the availability of cash flows to fund working capital,
capital expenditures or other operating needs;
|
|
|
l
|
increases in interest rates;
|
|
|
l
|
rating agency downgrades for our debt that could increase our
borrowing costs;
|
|
|
l
|
we may not be able to securitize our vacation ownership contract
receivables because of, among other factors, the performance of
the vacation ownership contract receivables, the market for
vacation ownership loan-backed notes and asset-backed notes in
general, the ability to insure the securitized vacation
ownership contract receivables, and the risk that the actual
amount of uncollectible accounts on our securitized vacation
ownership contract receivables and other credit we extend is
greater than our allowances for doubtful accounts;
|
|
|
l
|
prohibitive cost and inadequate availability of capital could
restrict the development or acquisition of vacation ownership
resorts by us, the financing of purchases of vacation ownership
interests and the renovation and maintenance of properties by
vacation ownership resorts;
|
|
|
l
|
if interest rates increase significantly, we may not be able to
increase the interest rate offered to finance purchases of
vacation ownership interests by the same amount of the increase;
and
|
25
|
|
|
|
l
|
purchasers of vacation ownership interests who finance a portion
of the purchase price may default on their loan and the value we
recover in a default is not, in all instances, sufficient to
cover the outstanding debt.
|
The financial results of our vacation ownership business may be
affected by the cost and availability of capital for the
development or acquisition of vacation ownership resorts by us,
for the financing of purchases of vacation ownership interests
and for the renovation and maintenance of properties by vacation
ownership resorts. The cost of capital affects the costs of
developing or acquiring new properties because we generally have
to borrow funds to develop or acquire new properties and the
cost of capital affects the costs of renovation because we or
property owners associations generally have to borrow
funds to renovate properties.
The
profitability of our vacation ownership business from our
financing of customers purchases of vacation ownership
interests may be adversely affected by interest rate risk and
risks associated with customer default.
In connection with our vacation ownership business, we generally
provide financing at a fixed interest rate for significant
portions of the aggregate purchase prices of vacation ownership
interests we sell to customers. If interest rates were to
increase significantly, we may not increase the interest rate
offered to finance purchases of vacation ownership interests by
the same amount of the interest rate increase. As a result, the
spread between our rate of borrowing and the interest rate we
charge our customers would decrease, and such decrease would
adversely affect our profitability from financing activities.
Conversely, if interest rates were to decrease and remain at
historically low levels for extended periods, the likelihood of
early prepayments would increase as customers may seek
alternative financing sources. If customers prepaid their loans
and refinanced at lower interest rates, our profitability from
financing activities would decrease.
Our principal source of funding cash requirements for the
vacation ownership business is borrowing against and selling the
vacation ownership contract receivables that arise from our
financing of customers purchases of vacation ownership
interests. When we finance the sale of a vacation ownership
interest, we receive contract receivables at a fixed interest
rate. We have revolving credit facilities under which we borrow
against the vacation ownership contract receivables until the
receivables qualify to be securitized. Once the vacation
ownership contract receivables qualify to be securitized, we
sell them to a wholly owned special purpose entity of Wyndham
Worldwide and use the proceeds of the sales to repay our
revolving credit facilities and, as a result of such repayment,
replenish our ability to borrow under the revolving credit
facilities to finance new vacation ownership contract
receivables.
Our revolving credit facilities are, and are expected to
continue to be, at variable interest rates. Any significant
increase in interest rates on our borrowing against vacation
ownership contract receivables or significant increase in
prepayment rates on the current vacation ownership contract
receivables could have a material adverse effect on the cost of
borrowing under our credit facilities. Any adverse change in the
securitization markets or significant declines in the credit
qualities of our vacation ownership contract receivables could
result in our having insufficient borrowing availability under
our credit facilities to maintain our operations at current
levels.
In addition, we face certain credit risks related to our
consumer financing of vacation ownership interests. Purchasers
of vacation ownership interests who finance a portion of the
purchase price present a risk of default.
The average expected cumulative gross default rate of our
portfolio of vacation ownership contract receivables was
approximately 16.5% as of December 31, 2006. The actual
rate of such defaults may exceed our average expected cumulative
gross default rate as a result of various factors, some of which
are beyond our control, including general economic conditions.
Consequently, the profitability of our vacation ownership
business may be adversely affected. Despite the risk of default
for purchasers of vacation ownership interests, we do not verify
all potential purchasers credit histories prior to
offering each potential purchaser the opportunity to finance a
portion of the purchase price of the vacation ownership
interests, but, in some instances, we obtain credits scores from
potential purchasers who wish to obtain financing on more
favorable terms. To reduce the potential adverse effect on
Wyndham Worldwide caused by purchasers of vacation ownership
interests who finance a portion of their purchases but
subsequently default, we obtain security
26
interests in the vacation ownership interests purchased by our
customers, but the value we recover from the secured vacation
ownership interests is not, in all instances, sufficient to
cover the outstanding debt.
Our
debt rating may suffer a downgrade, which may restrict our
access to capital markets.
Our senior unsecured debt ratings are BBB and Baa2 by
Standard & Poors and Moodys, respectively.
As a result of global economic and political events or natural
disasters, it is possible that the rating agencies may downgrade
the rating
and/or
outlook for many of the companies in the hospitality industry,
including our company, and a downgrade could increase our
borrowing costs and therefore could adversely affect our
financial results. In addition, it is possible that rating
agencies may downgrade our rating and the outlook for the
company based on our results of operations and financial
condition. A downgrade in our credit rating could, in
particular, increase our costs of capital under our credit
facilities and the amounts of collateral required by our letters
of credit. Pricing of any amounts drawn under our syndicated
bank credit facilities, for example, includes a spread to LIBOR
that increases as our ratings from Standard &
Poors and Moodys decrease. A security rating is not
a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities and is subject
to revision or withdrawal by the assigning rating organization.
Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other
rating.
We are
subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk.
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates and in international
monetary and tax policies could have a materially adverse effect
on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We are subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk and risks
associated with changes in international monetary and tax
policies in connection with doing business abroad, principally
in the United Kingdom, Western Continental Europe, South Africa,
Mexico, Venezuela and Singapore. We may seek to mitigate our
foreign exchange rate risk through strategic structuring of
international business entities, swap agreements and borrowings
denominated in foreign currencies, but we cannot assure that
these strategies will be successful.
Several
of our businesses are subject to extensive regulation, and the
cost of compliance or failure to comply with such regulations
may adversely affect our profitability.
The cost of compliance or failure to comply with the extensive
regulations to which several of our businesses are subject may
adversely affect our profitability. Our businesses are regulated
by the states or provinces (including local governments) and
countries in which our operations are conducted and in which our
franchised and managed properties, resorts with units that are
exchanged through our vacation exchange business, accommodations
for our vacation rentals business and resorts in which we sell
vacation ownership interests are, in each case, located,
marketed or sold. If we are not in substantial compliance with
applicable laws and regulations, we may be subject to regulatory
actions, fines, penalties and potential criminal prosecution. In
addition, a significant number of purchasers of vacation
ownership interests could have rescission rights, which could
require us to return all funds received from rescinding
purchasers in exchange for the return of their vacation
ownership interests to us.
Our businesses are subject, for example, to privacy laws and
regulations enacted in the United States and other jurisdictions
around the world that govern the collection and use of personal
data of our customers and our ability to contact our customers
and prospective customers, including through telephone or
facsimile. Our vacation ownership business, for example, is
subject to U.S. federal privacy regulation, including the
federal Telemarketing Sales Rule with its do not
call and do not fax provisions, and state
privacy regulations. Many states have laws and regulations
regarding the sale of vacation ownership properties, such as
real estate licensing laws, travel sale licensing laws,
anti-fraud laws, telemarketing laws, telephone solicitation
laws, including do not call and do not
fax regulations and restrictions on the use of predictive
dialers, prize, gift and sweepstakes laws, and labor laws.
Violations of certain provisions of these laws may limit the
ability of our vacation ownership business to market, sell and
finance vacation ownership interests. In addition, our vacation
ownership business could be subject to damages and
administrative enforcement actions. Any of these results could
adversely affect
27
the profitability of our vacation ownership business. The United
States and other jurisdictions are in the process of considering
passing additional laws and regulations to protect the privacy
of customers and prospective customers. In addition, our
vacation ownership business is subject to risks arising from the
requirement under Australian law that all persons conducting
vacation ownership sales and marketing and vacation ownership
club activities hold an Australian Financial Services License,
which subjects holders to several rules and regulations. In
light of these and any future laws and regulations, there can be
no assurance that we will be able to continue to market our
services efficiently and maintain our rate of sales growth.
Liability arising under environmental laws, ordinances and
regulations may adversely affect the results of our vacation
ownership business, and non-compliance with such laws,
ordinances and regulations may subject us to penalties for
environmental violations, and we would have to take steps
necessary to achieve compliance. We may incur costs in
connection with environmental
clean-up if
hazardous or toxic substances are found at resorts we own or
manage or resorts we previously owned or managed or may acquire
in the future. Under various federal, state and local laws,
ordinances and regulations, the current or previous owner,
manager or operator of real property may be liable for the costs
of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic
substances, including asbestos, located on or in, or emanating
from, such property, for related costs of investigation and
property damage or for the cost of removal of underground
storage tanks. Environmental laws, ordinances and regulations
often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or
operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of
hazardous or toxic substances.
Certain of our operations are subject to regulations with
respect to the licensing of casino operations. Gaming
regulators in the applicable jurisdictions may revoke, suspend,
condition or limit our gaming licenses, impose substantial fines
and take other actions.
For a more detailed description of the regulations to which we
are subject, see the section of this prospectus entitled
Regulation.
The
cost of compliance or failure to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act may adversely affect our business.
As a reporting company under the Exchange Act, we are subject to
certain provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which requires
compliance costs and may adversely affect our financial results
and our ability to attract and retain qualified members of our
Board of Directors or qualified executive officers. The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act affects corporate governance, securities
disclosure, compliance practices, internal audits, disclosure
controls and procedures and financial reporting and accounting
systems. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, for
example, requires companies subject to the reporting
requirements of the U.S. securities laws to do a
comprehensive evaluation of their and their consolidated
subsidiaries internal control over financial reporting.
The failure to comply with Section 404, when we are
required to comply, may result in investors losing
confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, which
may result in a decrease in the market value of our common
stock, prevent us from providing the required financial
information in a timely manner, which could materially and
adversely impact our business, our financial condition and the
market value of our common stock, prevent us from otherwise
complying with the standards applicable to us as a public
company and subject us to adverse regulatory consequences.
Seasonality
of our businesses may cause fluctuations in our gross revenues
and net earnings.
We experience seasonal fluctuations in our gross revenues and
net earnings from our franchise and management fees, exchange
fees for transactions, commission income earned from renting
vacation properties and sales of vacation ownership interests.
Revenues from franchise and management fees are generally higher
in the second and third quarters than in the first or fourth
quarters because of increased leisure travel during the summer
months. Vacation exchange transaction revenues are normally
highest in the first quarter, which is generally when members of
RCI plan and book their vacations for the year. Rental
transaction revenues earned from booking vacation rentals to
non-member customers is usually highest in the third quarter,
when vacation rentals are highest. Revenues from sales of
vacation ownership interests are generally higher in the second
and third quarters than in other quarters. The seasonality of
our business may cause fluctuations in our quarterly operating
results. As we expand into new markets and
28
geographical locations, we may experience increased or different
seasonality dynamics that create fluctuations in operating
results different from the fluctuations we have experienced in
the past.
Our
revenues are highly dependent on the travel industry and
declines in or disruptions to the travel industry, such as those
caused by terrorism, acts of God or war, may adversely affect
our financial condition and results of operation.
Declines in or disruptions to the travel industry may adversely
affect our financial condition and results of operations. Our
revenues and profits, and in turn our financial condition, may
be significantly adversely affected by exogenous events that
generally adversely affect the travel industry. Such events
include terrorist incidents and threats (and heightened travel
security measures instituted in response to such incidents and
threats), acts of God (such as earthquakes, hurricanes, fires,
floods and other natural disasters), war, bird flu and other
pandemics, the financial instability of many of the air
carriers, airline job actions and strikes, and increases in gas
and other fuel prices. The occurrence or worsening of any of
these types of events could result in a decrease in overall
travel and consequently in a decrease in travel by non-local
visitors to locations in which franchised and managed
properties, resorts with units that are exchanged through our
vacation exchange business, properties that are rented through
our vacation rentals businesses and resorts in which we sell
vacation ownership interests have a presence. These types of
events may also result in a general economic downturn, which may
reduce the amount of discretionary spending that our customers
have available for travel and vacations. In addition, from time
to time, hurricanes or other adverse weather events may reduce
the number of rooms available in our lodging business or the
number of units available in resorts in which we exchange and
sell intervals or interests, as applicable.
Our
businesses may be adversely affected by a deterioration in
general economic conditions or a weakening of one or more of the
industries in which we operate.
A prolonged economic slowdown, significant price increases,
adverse events relating to the travel and leisure industry and
local, regional and national economic conditions and factors,
such as unemployment, fuel prices, recession and macroeconomic
factors, could hurt our operations and therefore adversely
affect our results. The risks associated with our businesses are
more acute during periods of economic slowdown or recession
because such periods may be accompanied by decreased
discretionary consumer and corporate spending. A weakening of
one or more of the lodging, vacation exchange and rentals, and
vacation ownership industries could also hurt our operations and
therefore adversely affect our results.
We are
dependent on our senior management, and a loss of any of our
senior managers may adversely affect our business and results of
operations.
We believe that our future growth depends, in part, on the
continued services of our senior management team. Losing the
services of any member of our senior management team could
adversely affect our strategic and customer relationships and
impede our ability to execute our growth strategies. We do not
currently maintain key person life insurance policies for our
executive officers.
There
may be risks associated with completing future acquisitions that
we may decide to do.
If we pursue strategic acquisitions, there may be risks
associated with them. We may be unable to identify acquisition
targets that complement our businesses, and if we are able to
identify suitable acquisition targets, we may not be able to
complete acquisitions of such targets on commercially reasonable
terms. Our ability to complete acquisitions depends on a variety
of factors, including our ability to obtain financing on
acceptable terms and requisite government approvals. If we are
able to complete acquisitions, there is no assurance that we
will be able to achieve the revenue and cost benefits that we
expected in connection with such acquisitions or to successfully
integrate the acquired businesses into our existing operations.
29
We are
subject to risks relating to the concentration of a significant
portion of the resorts in which we sell vacation ownership
interests, our sales offices and the customers of our vacation
ownership business in certain vacation areas and areas where our
customers live, as applicable.
The concentration of a significant portion of the resorts in
which we sell vacation ownership interests and of our sales
offices in certain vacation areas and the concentration of a
significant number of the customers of our vacation ownership
business in certain geographic regions, in each case, may result
in our results of operations being more sensitive to local and
regional economic conditions and other factors, including
competition, natural disasters such as hurricanes, and economic
downturns, than our results of operations would be absent such
geographic concentrations. Many sales offices and resorts in
which we sell vacation ownership interests, for example, are
concentrated in the Southeastern United States, a region that is
prone to hurricanes. Local and regional economic conditions and
other factors may differ materially from prevailing conditions
in other parts of the world.
Florida, Nevada and California are examples of areas with
concentrations of sales offices. For the twelve months ending
December 31, 2005, approximately 14%, 14% and 12% of our
vacation ownership interest sales revenue was generated in sales
offices located in Florida, Nevada and California, respectively.
In addition, as of December 31, 2006, approximately 25% of
our outstanding vacation ownership contract receivables
portfolio related to customers who reside in California.
The
private resale of vacation ownership interests could adversely
affect our vacation ownership resorts and vacation exchange
businesses.
The private resale of vacation ownership interests could
adversely affect the sales and operations of our vacation
ownership business and new member acquisition by our vacation
exchange business. We sell vacation ownership interests to
buyers for purposes of leisure and not for investment. We
believe that the number of private resales of vacation ownership
interests by buyers is presently limited and that any sales of
vacation ownership interests are typically at prices
substantially below the original purchase price. The
availability of vacation ownership interests for resale may make
the purchase of vacation ownership interests from us less
attractive to prospective buyers.
Moreover, as the vacation ownership industry grows, the number
of private resales of vacation ownership interests may increase.
An increase in the supply of vacation ownership interests
available for resale may divert demand for or depress the market
price of vacation ownership interests we sell. In addition,
private resales of vacation ownership interests may adversely
impact our vacation exchange business new member
acquisition because purchases made through resales may not
result in enrollment in our vacation exchange programs.
Revenues
from our lodging business are indirectly affected by our
franchisees pricing decisions.
Revenues from our lodging business are dependent upon the
revenues of our franchisees and therefore on our
franchisees pricing decisions, which affect our
franchisees revenues. Pricing decisions on individual room
rates are made by each individual franchisee. Although we can
assist franchisees in understanding how best to take advantage
of opportunities in their respective markets, we have no power
to compel or command pricing decisions on the part of
franchisees. The ability of an individual franchisee to maintain
and increase room rates is a function of the franchisees
ability to market the hotel property locally and maintain the
property in a manner necessary for the franchised hotel to
compete for guests effectively.
Risks
Relating to Our Separation from Cendant
We
will be responsible for certain of Cendants contingent and
other corporate liabilities.
Under the Separation and Distribution Agreement and other
agreements, subject to certain exceptions contained in the Tax
Sharing Agreement, we and Realogy have each assumed and are
responsible for 37.5% and 62.5%, respectively, of certain of
Cendants contingent and other corporate liabilities
including those
30
relating to unresolved tax and legal matters and associated
costs and expenses. More specifically, we generally have assumed
and are responsible for the payment of our share of (i) all
taxes imposed on Cendant and certain other subsidiaries and
(ii) certain contingent and other corporate liabilities of
Cendant
and/or its
subsidiaries to the extent incurred on or prior to
August 23, 2006, the date of the separation of Travelport
from Cendant. These contingent and other corporate liabilities
include liabilities relating to (i) certain of
Cendants terminated or divested businesses, including,
among others, Cendants former PHH and Marketing Services
(Affinion) businesses, (ii) the Travelport sale, including,
in general (but subject to certain exceptions), liabilities for
taxes of Travelport for taxable periods through the date of the
Travelport sale, (iii) the Securities Action, the PRIDES
Action, the ABI Actions and the pending audit by the Internal
Revenue Service, or IRS, (for a further description of these
matters, see the Information Statement and our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006, copies of which are
available from us upon request), (iv) generally any actions
with respect to the separation plan or the distributions brought
by any third party and (v) payments under certain
identified contracts (or portions thereof) that were not
allocated to any specific party in connection with the
separation. However, in almost all cases, contingent and other
corporate liabilities do not include liabilities that are
specifically related to one of the four separated companies
which will be allocated 100% to the relevant company, including
any liabilities related to a separated companys
Form 10 filing or similar disclosure documents distributed
or filed in connection with the separation plan. At the time of
our separation, we recorded liabilities of $520 million
relating to our assumption of Cendants contingent and
other corporate liabilities, which amount is an estimate based
on currently available information and is subject to change.
If any party responsible for such liabilities were to default in
its payment, when due, of any such assumed obligations related
to any such contingent and other corporate liabilities, each
non-defaulting party (including Cendant) would be required to
pay an equal portion of the amounts in default. Accordingly, we
may, under certain circumstances, be obligated to pay amounts in
excess of our share of the assumed obligations related to such
contingent and other corporate liabilities including associated
costs and expenses. On April 10, 2007, Realogy was acquired
by an affiliate of Apollo Management VI, L.P. and no longer
trades as an independent public company. The acquisition does
not negate Realogys obligation to satisfy 62.5% of such
contingent and other corporate liabilities of Cendant or its
subsidiaries pursuant to the terms of the separation agreement.
As a result of the acquisition, Realogy has greater debt
obligations and its ability to satisfy its portion of these
liabilities may be adversely impacted. In accordance with the
terms of the separation agreement, Realogy is expected to post a
letter of credit to cover its share of certain liabilities
relating to the Cendant Corporation plan of separation.
Many lawsuits are currently outstanding against Cendant, some of
which relate to accounting irregularities arising from some of
the CUC International, Inc. business units acquired when HFS
Incorporated merged with CUC to form Cendant. While Cendant
has settled many of the principal lawsuits relating to the
accounting irregularities, these settlements do not encompass
all litigation associated with the accounting irregularities. We
do not believe that it is feasible to predict or determine the
final outcome or resolution of these unresolved proceedings.
Although we will share any costs and expenses arising out of
this litigation with Realogy, an adverse outcome from such
unresolved proceedings or liabilities or other proceedings for
which we have assumed partial liability under the Separation and
Distribution Agreement could be material with respect to our
earnings in any given reporting period.
For a more detailed description of the Separation and
Distribution Agreement and treatment of certain historical
Cendant contingent and other corporate liabilities, see the
Information Statement, a copy of which is available from us upon
request. See Where You Can Find More Information.
If the
distribution, together with certain related transactions, were
to fail to qualify as a reorganization for U.S. federal
income tax purposes under Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
Code), then our stockholders
and/or we
and Cendant might be required to pay U.S. federal income
taxes.
The distribution of our common stock to Cendant stockholders on
July 31, 2006 was conditioned upon Cendants receipt
of an opinion of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
LLP substantially to the effect
31
that the distribution, together with certain related
transactions, should qualify as a reorganization for
U.S. federal income tax purposes under
Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code. The opinion of
Skadden Arps was based on, among other things, certain
assumptions as well as on the accuracy of certain factual
representations and statements that we and Cendant made to
Skadden Arps. In rendering its opinion, Skadden Arps also relied
on certain covenants that we and Cendant entered into, including
the adherence by Cendant and us to certain restrictions on our
future actions. If any of the representations or statements that
we or Cendant made were, or become, inaccurate or incomplete, or
if we or Cendant breach any of our covenants, the distribution
and such related transactions might not qualify as a
reorganization for U.S. federal income tax purposes under
Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code. You should note
that Cendant did not and does not intend to seek a ruling from
the IRS as to the U.S. federal income tax treatment of the
distribution and such related transactions. The opinion of
Skadden Arps is not binding on the IRS or a court, and there can
be no assurance that the IRS will not challenge the validity of
the distribution and such related transactions as a
reorganization for U.S. federal income tax purposes under
Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code or that any such
challenge ultimately will not prevail.
If the distribution together with certain related transactions
were to fail to qualify as a reorganization for
U.S. federal income tax purposes under
Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code, then Cendant
would recognize gain in an amount equal to the excess of
(i) the fair market value of our common stock distributed
to the Cendant stockholders over (ii) Cendants tax
basis in such common stock. Under the terms of the Tax Sharing
Agreement, in the event the distribution of the stock of Wyndham
Worldwide or Realogy were to fail to qualify as a reorganization
and (i) such failure was not the result of actions taken
after the distribution by Cendant, us or Realogy, we and Realogy
would be responsible for 37.5% and 62.5%, respectively, of any
taxes imposed on Cendant as a result thereof and (ii) such
failure was the result of actions taken after the distribution
by us, Cendant or Realogy, the party responsible for such
failure would be responsible for all taxes imposed on Cendant as
a result thereof.
Risks
Related to the Notes
Our
level of indebtedness could limit cash flow available for our
operations and could adversely affect our ability to service our
debt or obtain additional financing, if necessary.
As of December 31, 2006, our total debt outstanding,
exclusive of debt outstanding under our vacation ownership
securitization program, was approximately $1,437 million.
Our level of indebtedness could restrict our operations and make
it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations under the
notes. For example, our level of indebtedness could, among other
things:
|
|
|
|
l
|
limit our ability to obtain additional financing for working
capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and general
corporate purposes or make such financing more costly;
|
|
|
l
|
require us to dedicate all or a substantial portion of our cash
flow to service our debt, which will reduce funds available for
other business purposes, such as capital expenditures, dividends
or acquisitions;
|
|
|
l
|
limit our flexibility in planning for or reacting to changes in
the markets in which we compete;
|
|
|
l
|
place us at a competitive disadvantage relative to our
competitors with less indebtedness;
|
|
|
l
|
render us more vulnerable to general adverse economic and
industry conditions; and
|
|
|
l
|
make it more difficult for us to satisfy our financial
obligations, including those relating to the notes.
|
In addition, the indenture governing the notes, our existing
credit facilities and the terms of the agreements governing our
other outstanding indebtedness contain or will contain financial
and other restrictive covenants that will limit our ability to
engage in activities that may be in our long-term best
interests. Our failure to comply with those covenants could
result in an event of default which, if not cured or waived,
could result in the acceleration of all of our debt, including
the notes.
32
Despite
current indebtedness levels, we and our subsidiaries may still
be able to incur substantially more debt. This could further
exacerbate the risks associated with our leverage.
We and our subsidiaries may be able to incur substantial
additional indebtedness in the future. The terms of the
indenture governing the notes and our existing indebtedness do
not prohibit us or our subsidiaries from doing so. Our credit
facilities will permit additional borrowing under such facility
and all of those borrowings would rank equally with the notes.
If new debt is added to our and our subsidiaries current
debt levels, the related risks that we and they now face could
intensify. See Description of Material Indebtedness.
The
notes are unsecured and rank behind any future secured creditors
to the extent of the value of the collateral securing their
claims.
Holders of any future secured indebtedness will have claims that
are prior to your claims as holders of the notes to the extent
of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness. In the
event of any distribution or payment of our assets in any
foreclosure, dissolution, winding-up, liquidation,
reorganization or other bankruptcy proceeding, holders of our
secured indebtedness will have prior claim to our assets that
constitute their collateral. Holders of the notes will
participate ratably with all holders of our unsecured
indebtedness that is deemed to be of the same class as the
notes. In that event, because the notes are not secured by any
of our assets, it is possible that our remaining assets might be
insufficient to satisfy your claims in full.
The
notes are structurally junior to the indebtedness and other
liabilities of our subsidiaries.
You will not have any claim as a creditor against our
subsidiaries and, therefore, all existing and future
indebtedness and other liabilities, including trade payables,
whether secured or unsecured, of those subsidiaries will be
structurally senior to the notes. In the event of
any bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization of any of our
subsidiaries, holders of the notes will have no direct claim to
participate in the assets of such subsidiary but may only
recover by virtue of our equity interest in our subsidiaries
(except to the extent we have a claim as a creditor of such
subsidiary). As a result, all existing and future liabilities of
our subsidiaries, including trade payables and claims of lessors
under leases, have the right to be satisfied in full prior to
our receipt of any payment as an equity owner of our
subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2006, our subsidiaries had
approximately $330 million of outstanding indebtedness,
excluding debt outstanding under our vacation ownership
securitization program. For a more detailed description of our
subsidiaries indebtedness, see Description of
Material Indebtedness Other Indebtedness.
In addition, the indenture permits these subsidiaries to incur
additional indebtedness and does not contain any limitation on
the amount of other liabilities, such as trade payables, that
may be incurred by these subsidiaries.
Our
ability to service our debt and meet our cash requirements
depends on many factors, some of which are beyond our
control.
Although there can be no assurances, we believe that the level
of borrowings available to us, combined with cash provided by
our operations, will be sufficient to provide for our cash
requirements for the foreseeable future. However, our ability to
satisfy our obligations will depend on our future operating
performance and financial results, which will be subject, in
part, to factors beyond our control, including interest rates
and general economic, financial and business conditions. If we
are unable to generate sufficient cash flow to service our debt,
we may be required to:
|
|
|
|
l
|
refinance all or a portion of our debt, including the exchange
notes;
|
|
|
l
|
obtain additional financing;
|
|
|
l
|
sell some of our assets or operations;
|
|
|
l
|
reduce or delay capital expenditures
and/or
acquisitions; or
|
|
|
l
|
revise or delay our strategic plans.
|
33
If we are required to take any of these actions, it could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations. In addition, we cannot assure you that we
would be able to take any of these actions, that these actions
would enable us to continue to satisfy our capital requirements
or that these actions would be permitted under the terms of our
various debt instruments, including our credit facilities and
the indenture.
Our
failure to meet the terms of covenants in our existing credit
facilities may result in an event of default.
Our existing credit facilities contain covenants customary for
credit facilities of this nature, including requiring us to meet
specified financial ratios and financial tests. Our ability to
borrow under our credit facilities will depend upon satisfaction
of these covenants. Events beyond our control can affect our
ability to meet those covenants.
These financial covenants consist of a minimum interest coverage
ratio of at least 3.0 times as of the measurement date and a
maximum leverage ratio not to exceed 3.5 times on the
measurement date. For definitions of these ratios, see
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations. Negative covenants in
the credit facility include limitations on indebtedness of
material subsidiaries; liens; mergers, consolidations,
liquidations, dissolutions and sales of substantially all
assets; and sale and leasebacks. Events of default in the credit
facility include nonpayment of principal when due; nonpayment of
interest, fees or other amounts; violation of covenants; cross
payment default and cross acceleration (in each case, with
respect to indebtedness (excluding securitization indebtedness)
in excess of $50 million); and a change of control.
If we are unable to meet the terms of our financial covenants,
or if we break any of these covenants, a default could occur
under one or more of these agreements. A default, if not waived
by our lenders, could result in the acceleration of our
outstanding indebtedness and cause our debt to become
immediately due and payable. If acceleration occurs, we would
not be able to repay our debt and it is unlikely that we would
be able to borrow sufficient funds to refinance our debt. Even
if new financing is offered to us, it may not be on terms
acceptable to us.
Some
of our debt, including a portion of our borrowings under our
credit facilities and securitization program, is based on
variable rates of interest, which could result in higher
interest expenses in the event of an increase in interest
rates.
As of December 31, 2006, $800 million, or 28% of our total
debt, was exposed to fluctuations in market interest rates. In
connection with this offering, we expect to issue fixed-rate
notes, which are not included in the amount listed in the
preceding sentence. The interest rates on future revolver
borrowings may vary depending on LIBOR. If LIBOR rises, the
interest rate on this debt may also increase. Therefore, an
increase in LIBOR may increase our interest payment obligations
and have a negative effect on our cash flow and financial
position.
We are
a holding company and are dependent on dividends and other
distributions from our subsidiaries.
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation is a holding company with limited
direct operations. Our principal assets are the equity interests
that we hold in our operating subsidiaries. As a result, we are
dependent on dividends and other distributions from our
subsidiaries to generate the funds necessary to meet our
financial obligations, including the payment of principal and
interest on our outstanding debt. Our subsidiaries are legally
distinct from us and have no obligation to pay amounts due on
our debt or to make funds available to us for such payment.
There
is currently no market for the notes, and an active trading
market may not develop for the notes.
The exchange notes are a new issue of securities for which there
is no established public market. We do not intend to have the
exchange notes listed on a national securities exchange or to
arrange for quotation on any automated dealer quotation systems.
The initial purchasers have advised us that they intend to make
a market in the exchange notes; however, the initial purchasers
are not obligated to make a market in the
34
notes or the exchange notes and they may discontinue their
market-making activities at any time without notice. An active
trading market for the notes or any notes issued in the exchange
offer may not develop or be sustained.
The liquidity of any market for the notes will depend on a
number of factors, including:
|
|
|
|
l
|
the number of holders of the notes;
|
|
|
l
|
our operating performance and financial condition;
|
|
|
l
|
the market for similar securities;
|
|
|
l
|
the interest of securities dealers in making a market in the
notes; and
|
|
|
l
|
prevailing interest rates.
|
Risks
Relating to the Exchange Offer
You
may have difficulty selling the original notes that you do not
exchange.
If you do not exchange your original notes for exchange notes
pursuant to the exchange offer, the original notes you hold will
continue to be subject to the existing transfer restrictions.
The original notes may not be offered, sold or otherwise
transferred, except in compliance with the registration
requirements of the Securities Act, pursuant to an exemption
from registration under the Securities Act or in a transaction
not subject to the registration requirements of the Securities
Act, and in compliance with applicable state securities laws. We
do not anticipate that we will register the original notes under
the Securities Act. After the exchange offer is consummated, the
trading market for the remaining untendered original notes may
be small and inactive. Consequently, you may find it difficult
to sell any original notes you continue to hold because there
will be fewer original notes of such series outstanding.
Some
noteholders may be required to comply with the registration and
prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities
Act.
If you exchange your original notes in the exchange offer for
the purpose of participating in a distribution of the exchange
notes, you may be deemed to have received restricted securities
and, if so, you will be required to comply with the registration
and prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act in
connection with any resale transaction.
In addition, a broker-dealer that purchased original notes for
its own account as part of market-making or trading activities
must deliver a prospectus when it sells the exchange notes it
received in the exchange offer. Our obligation to make this
prospectus available to broker-dealers is limited. We cannot
guarantee that a proper prospectus will be available to
broker-dealers wishing to resell their exchange notes.
Late
deliveries of original notes or any other failure to comply with
the exchange offer procedures could prevent a holder from
exchanging its old notes.
Noteholders are responsible for complying with all exchange
offer procedures. The issuance of exchange notes in exchange for
original notes will only occur upon completion of the procedures
described in this prospectus under The Exchange
Offer. Therefore, holders of original notes who wish to
exchange them for exchange notes should allow sufficient time
for timely completion of the exchange procedure. Neither we nor
the exchange agent are obligated to extend the offer or notify
you of any failure to follow the proper procedure.
35
THE
EXCHANGE OFFER
Purpose
of the Exchange Offer
When we completed the sale of the original notes on
December 5, 2006, we entered into a registration rights
agreement with the initial purchasers of the original notes.
Under the registration rights agreement, we agreed to file a
registration statement with the SEC relating to the exchange
offer. We also agreed to use our reasonable best efforts to
cause the registration statement to become effective with the
SEC and this exchange offer after the registration statement is
declared effective. The registration rights agreement provides
that we will be required to pay additional interest to the
holders of the original notes if the exchange offer has not been
consummated within 360 days of the issue date of the
original notes. See Registration Rights
Agreement below for more information on the additional
interest we will owe if we do not complete the exchange offer
within a specified timeline.
The exchange offer is not being made to holders of original
notes in any jurisdiction where the exchange would not comply
with the securities or blue sky laws of such jurisdiction. A
copy of the registration rights agreement has been filed as an
exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K we filed with the SEC
on February 1, 2007 and is available from us upon request.
See Where You Can Find More Information.
Terms of
the Exchange Offer
Upon the terms and conditions described in this prospectus and
in the accompanying letter of transmittal, which together
constitute the exchange offer, we will accept for exchange
original notes that are properly tendered on or before the
expiration date and not withdrawn as permitted below. As used in
this prospectus, the term expiration date means
5:00 p.m., New York City time, on June 8, 2007.
However, if we, in our sole discretion, have extended the period
of time for which the exchange offer is open, the term
expiration date means the latest time and date to
which we extend the exchange offer.
As of the date of this prospectus, $800,000,000 aggregate
principal amount of the original notes is outstanding. The
original notes were offered under an indenture dated
December 5, 2006. This prospectus, together with the letter
of transmittal, is first being sent on or about May 9, 2007
to all holders of original notes known to us. Our obligation to
accept original notes for exchange in the exchange offer is
subject to the conditions described below under
Conditions to the Exchange Offer.
We reserve the right to extend the period of time during which
the exchange offer is open. We would then delay acceptance for
exchange of any original notes by giving oral or written notice
of an extension to the holders of original notes as described
below. During any extension period, all original notes
previously tendered will remain subject to the exchange offer
and may be accepted for exchange by us. Any original notes not
accepted for exchange will be returned to the tendering holder
after the expiration or termination of the exchange offer.
Original notes tendered in the exchange offer must be in
denominations of principal amount of $1,000 and any integral
multiple of $1,000.
We reserve the right to amend or terminate the exchange offer,
and not to accept for exchange any original notes not previously
accepted for exchange, upon the occurrence of any of the
conditions of the exchange offer specified below under
Conditions to the Exchange Offer. We
will give oral or written notice of any extension, amendment,
non-acceptance or termination to the holders of the original
notes as promptly as practicable. Such notice, in the case of
any extension, will be issued by means of a press release or
other public announcement no later than 9:00 a.m., New York
City time, on the next business day after the previously
scheduled expiration date.
Our acceptance of the tender of original notes by a tendering
holder will form a binding agreement upon the terms and subject
to the conditions provided in this prospectus and the
accompanying letter of transmittal.
36
Procedures
for Tendering
Except as described below, a tendering holder must, on or prior
to the expiration date:
|
|
|
|
l
|
transmit a properly completed and duly executed letter of
transmittal, including all other documents required by the
letter of transmittal, to U.S. Bank National Association,
as the exchange agent, at the address listed below under the
heading Exchange Agent; or
|
|
|
l
|
if original notes are tendered in accordance with the book-entry
procedures listed below, the tendering holder must transmit an
agents message to the exchange agent at the address listed
below under the heading Exchange Agent.
|
In addition:
|
|
|
|
l
|
the exchange agent must receive, on or before the expiration
date, certificates for the original notes, if any;
|
|
|
l
|
a timely confirmation of book-entry transfer of the original
notes into the exchange agents account at the Depository
Trust Company, the book-entry transfer facility, along with the
letter of transmittal or an agents message; or
|
|
|
l
|
the holder must comply with the guaranteed delivery procedures
described below.
|
The term agents message means a message,
transmitted to The Depository Trust Company
(DTC) and received by the exchange agent and forming
a part of a book-entry transfer, that states that DTC has
received an express acknowledgment that the tendering holder
agrees to be bound by the letter of transmittal and that we may
enforce the letter of transmittal against this holder.
The method of delivery of original notes, letters of transmittal
and all other required documents is at your election and risk.
If the delivery is by mail, we recommend that you use registered
mail, properly insured, with return receipt requested. In all
cases, you should allow sufficient time to assure timely
delivery. You should not send letters of transmittal or original
notes to us.
If you are a beneficial owner whose original notes are
registered in the name of a broker, dealer, commercial bank,
trust company or other nominee, and wish to tender, you should
promptly instruct the registered holder to tender on your
behalf. Any registered holder that is a participant in
DTCs book-entry transfer facility system may make
book-entry delivery of the original notes by causing DTC to
transfer the original notes into the exchange agents
account.
Signatures on a letter of transmittal or a notice of withdrawal
must be guaranteed unless the original notes surrendered for
exchange are tendered:
|
|
|
|
l
|
by a registered holder of the original notes who has not
completed the box entitled Special Issuance
Instructions or Special Delivery Instructions
on the letter of transmittal, or
|
|
|
l
|
for the account of an eligible institution.
|
If signatures on a letter of transmittal or a notice of
withdrawal are required to be guaranteed, the guarantees must be
by an eligible institution. An eligible
institution is a financial institution, including most
banks, savings and loan associations and brokerage houses, that
is a participant in the Securities Transfer Agents Medallion
Program, the New York Stock Exchange Medallion Signature Program
or the Stock Exchanges Medallion Program.
We will determine in our sole discretion all questions as to the
validity, form and eligibility of original notes tendered for
exchange. This discretion extends to the determination of all
questions concerning the timing of receipts and acceptance of
tenders. These determinations will be final and binding.
We reserve the right to reject any particular original note not
properly tendered, or any acceptance that might, in our judgment
or our counsels judgment, be unlawful. We also reserve the
right to waive any conditions of the exchange offer as
applicable to all original notes prior to the expiration date.
We also reserve the right to waive any defects or irregularities
or conditions of the exchange offer as to any particular
37
original note prior to the expiration date. Our interpretation
of the terms and conditions of the exchange offer as to any
particular original note either before or after the expiration
date, including the letter of transmittal and the instructions
to the letter of transmittal, shall be final and binding on all
parties. Unless waived, any defects or irregularities in
connection with tenders of original notes must be cured within a
reasonable period of time. Neither we, the exchange agent nor
any other person will be under any duty to give notification of
any defect or irregularity in any tender of original notes. Nor
will we, the exchange agent or any other person incur any
liability for failing to give notification of any defect or
irregularity.
If the letter of transmittal is signed by a person other than
the registered holder of original notes, the letter of
transmittal must be accompanied by a written instrument of
transfer or exchange in satisfactory form duly executed by the
registered holder with the signature guaranteed by an eligible
institution. The original notes must be endorsed or accompanied
by appropriate powers of attorney. In either case, the original
notes must be signed exactly as the name of any registered
holder appears on the original notes.
If the letter of transmittal or any original notes or powers of
attorney are signed by trustees, executors, administrators,
guardians, attorneys-in-fact, officers of corporations or others
acting in a fiduciary or representative capacity, these persons
should so indicate when signing. Unless waived by us, proper
evidence satisfactory to us of their authority to so act must be
submitted.
By tendering, each holder will represent to us that, among other
things:
|
|
|
|
l
|
the holder is not an affiliate of ours (as defined in Rule 405
under the Securities Act) or a broker-dealer tendering notes
acquired directly from us for its own account;
|
|
|
l
|
the exchange notes are being acquired in the ordinary course of
business of the person receiving the exchange notes, whether or
not that person is the holder; and
|
|
|
l
|
neither the holder nor the other person has any arrangement or
understanding with any person to participate in the distribution
(within the meaning of the Securities Act) of the exchange notes.
|
In the case of a holder that is not a broker-dealer, that
holder, by tendering, will also represent to us that the holder
is not engaged in, and does not intend to engage in, a
distribution of the exchange notes.
However, any purchaser of original notes who is our
affiliate (within the meaning of the Securities Act)
who intends to participate in the exchange offer for the purpose
of distributing the exchange notes or a broker-dealer (within
the meaning of the Securities Act) that acquired original notes
in a transaction other than as part of its trading or
market-making activities and who has arranged or has an
understanding with any person to participate in the distribution
of the exchange notes: (1) will not be able to rely on the
interpretation by the staff of the SEC set forth in the
applicable no-action letters; (2) will not be able to
tender its original notes in the exchange offer; and
(3) must comply with the registration and prospectus
delivery requirements of the Securities Act in connection with
any sale or transfer of the notes unless such sale or transfer
is made pursuant to an exemption from such requirements.
Each broker or dealer that receives exchange notes for its own
account in exchange for original notes, where the original notes
were acquired by it as a result of market-making activities or
other trading activities, must acknowledge that it will deliver
a prospectus that meets the requirements of the Securities Act
in connection with any resale of the exchange notes. The letter
of transmittal states that by so acknowledging and by delivering
a prospectus, a broker-dealer will not be deemed to admit that
it is an underwriter within the meaning of the
Securities Act. However, a broker-dealer may be a statutory
underwriter. See Plan of Distribution.
Acceptance
of Original Notes for Exchange; Delivery of Exchange
Notes
Upon satisfaction or waiver of all of the conditions to the
exchange offer, we will accept, promptly after the expiration
date, all original notes properly tendered, unless we terminate
the exchange offer because of the non-satisfaction of
conditions. We will issue the exchange notes as soon as
practicable after acceptance of the original notes. See
Conditions to the Exchange Offer below.
For purposes of the exchange offer,
38
we will be deemed to have accepted properly tendered original
notes for exchange when, as and if we have given oral or written
notice to the exchange agent, with prompt written confirmation
of any oral notice.
For each original note accepted for exchange, the holder of the
original note will receive an exchange note having a principal
amount equal to that of the surrendered original note. The
exchange notes will bear interest from the most recent date to
which interest has been paid on the original notes. Accordingly,
registered holders of exchange notes on the relevant record date
for the first interest payment date following the completion of
the exchange offer will receive interest accruing from the most
recent date to which interest has been paid. Original notes
accepted for exchange will cease to accrue interest from and
after the date of completion of the exchange offer. Holders of
original notes whose original notes are accepted for exchange
will not receive any payment for accrued interest on the
original notes otherwise payable on any interest payment date,
the record date for which occurs on or after completion of the
exchange offer and will be deemed to have waived their rights to
receive the accrued interest on the original notes.
In all cases, issuance of exchange notes for original notes will
be made only after timely receipt by the exchange agent of:
|
|
|
|
l
|
certificates for the original notes, or a timely book-entry
confirmation of the original notes into the exchange
agents account at the book-entry transfer facility;
|
|
|
l
|
a properly completed and duly executed letter of transmittal; and
|
|
|
l
|
all other required documents.
|
Unaccepted or non-exchanged original notes will be returned
without expense to the tendering holder of the original notes.
In the case of original notes tendered by book-entry transfer in
accordance with the book-entry procedures described below, the
non-exchanged original notes will be returned or recredited
promptly.
Book-Entry
Transfer
The exchange agent will make a request to establish an account
for the original notes at DTC for purposes of the exchange offer
within two business days after the date of this prospectus. Any
financial institution that is a participant in DTCs
systems must make book-entry delivery of original notes by
causing DTC to transfer those original notes into the exchange
agents account at DTC in accordance with DTCs
procedure for transfer. This participant should transmit its
acceptance to DTC on or prior to the expiration date or comply
with the guaranteed delivery procedures described below. DTC
will verify this acceptance, execute a book-entry transfer of
the tendered original notes into the exchange agents
account at DTC and then send to the exchange agent confirmation
of this book-entry transfer. The confirmation of this book-entry
transfer will include an agents message confirming that
DTC has received an express acknowledgment from this participant
that this participant has received and agrees to be bound by the
letter of transmittal and that we may enforce the letter of
transmittal against this participant. Delivery of exchange notes
issued in the exchange offer may be effected through book-entry
transfer at DTC. However, the letter of transmittal or facsimile
of it or an agents message, with any required signature
guarantees and any other required documents, must:
|
|
|
|
l
|
be transmitted to and received by the exchange agent at the
address listed below under Exchange
Agent on or prior to the expiration date; or
|
|
|
l
|
comply with the guaranteed delivery procedures described below.
|
Exchanging
Book-Entry Notes
The exchange agent and the book-entry transfer facility have
confirmed that any financial institution that is a participant
in the book-entry transfer facility may utilize the book-entry
transfer facility Automated Tender Offer Program, or ATOP,
procedures to tender original notes. Any participant in the
book-entry transfer facility may make book-entry delivery of
original notes by causing the book-entry transfer facility to
transfer such original notes into the exchange agents
account in accordance with the book-entry transfer
39
facilitys ATOP procedures for transfer. However, the
exchange for the original notes so tendered will only be made
after a book-entry confirmation of the book-entry transfer of
original notes into the exchange agents account, and
timely receipt by the exchange agent of an agents message
and any other documents required by the letter of transmittal.
The term agents message means a message,
transmitted by the book-entry transfer facility and received by
the exchange agent and forming part of a book-entry
confirmation, which states that the book-entry transfer facility
has received an express acknowledgment from a participant
tendering original notes that are the subject of such book-entry
confirmation that such participant has received and agrees to be
bound by the terms of the letter of transmittal, and that we may
enforce such agreement against such participant.
Guaranteed
Delivery Procedures
If a registered holder of original notes desires to tender the
original notes, and the original notes are not immediately
available, or time will not permit the holders original
notes or other required documents to reach the exchange agent
before the expiration date, or the procedure for book-entry
transfer described above cannot be completed on a timely basis,
a tender may nonetheless be made if:
|
|
|
|
l
|
the tender is made through an eligible institution;
|
|
|
l
|
prior to the expiration date, the exchange agent received from
an eligible institution a properly completed and duly executed
letter of transmittal, or a facsimile of the letter of
transmittal, and notice of guaranteed delivery, substantially in
the form provided by us, by facsimile transmission, mail or hand
delivery;
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
stating the name and address of the holder of original notes and
the amount of original notes tendered;
|
|
|
(2)
|
stating that the tender is being made; and
|
|
|
(3)
|
guaranteeing that within three New York Stock Exchange trading
days after the expiration date, the certificates for all
physically tendered original notes, in proper form for transfer,
or a book-entry confirmation, as the case may be, and any other
documents required by the letter of transmittal will be
deposited by the eligible institution with the exchange agent;
and
|
|
|
|
|
l
|
the certificates for all physically tendered original notes, in
proper form for transfer, or a book-entry confirmation, as the
case may be, and all other documents required by the letter of
transmittal, are received by the exchange agent within three New
York Stock Exchange trading days after the expiration date.
|
Withdrawal
Rights
Tenders of original notes may be withdrawn at any time before
5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the expiration date.
For a withdrawal to be effective, the exchange agent must
receive a written notice of withdrawal at the address or, in the
case of eligible institutions, at the facsimile number,
indicated below under Exchange Agent
before 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the expiration
date. Any notice of withdrawal must:
|
|
|
|
l
|
specify the name of the person, referred to as the depositor,
having tendered the original notes to be withdrawn;
|
|
|
l
|
identify the original notes to be withdrawn, including the
certificate number or numbers and principal amount of the
original notes;
|
|
|
l
|
in the case of original notes tendered by book-entry transfer,
specify the number of the account at the book-entry transfer
facility from which the original notes were tendered and specify
the name and number of the account at the book-entry transfer
facility to be credited with the withdrawn original notes and
otherwise comply with the procedures of such facility;
|
40
|
|
|
|
l
|
contain a statement that the holder is withdrawing his election
to have the original notes exchanged;
|
|
|
l
|
be signed by the holder in the same manner as the original
signature on the letter of transmittal by which the original
notes were tendered, including any required signature
guarantees, or be accompanied by documents of transfer to have
the trustee with respect to the original notes register the
transfer of the original notes in the name of the person
withdrawing the tender; and
|
|
|
l
|
specify the name in which the original notes are registered, if
different from that of the depositor.
|
If certificates for original notes have been delivered or
otherwise identified to the exchange agent, then, prior to the
release of these certificates, the withdrawing holder must also
submit the serial numbers of the particular certificates to be
withdrawn and signed notice of withdrawal with signatures
guaranteed by an eligible institution unless this holder is an
eligible institution. We will determine all questions as to the
validity, form and eligibility, including time of receipt, of
notices of withdrawal. Any original notes so withdrawn will be
deemed not to have been validly tendered for exchange. No
exchange notes will be issued unless the original notes so
withdrawn are validly re-tendered. Any original notes that have
been tendered for exchange, but which are not exchanged for any
reason, will be returned to the tendering holder without cost to
the holder. In the case of original notes tendered by book-entry
transfer, the original notes will be credited to an account
maintained with the book-entry transfer facility for the
original notes. Properly withdrawn original notes may be
re-tendered by following the procedures described under
Procedures for Tendering above at any
time on or before 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the
expiration date.
Conditions
to the Exchange Offer
Notwithstanding any other provision of the exchange offer, we
shall not be required to accept for exchange, or to issue
exchange notes in exchange for, any original notes, and may
terminate or amend the exchange offer, if at any time prior to
the expiration date any of the following events occurs:
|
|
|
|
l
|
there is threatened, instituted or pending any action or
proceeding before, or any injunction, order or decree issued by,
any court or governmental agency or other governmental
regulatory or administrative agency or commission;
|
|
|
l
|
a change in applicable law prohibits the consummation of such
exchange offer; or
|
|
|
l
|
any change, or any development involving a prospective change,
has occurred or been threatened in our business, financial
condition, operations or prospects and those of our subsidiaries
taken as a whole that is or may be adverse to us, or we have
become aware of facts that have or may have an adverse impact on
the value of the original notes or the exchange notes, which in
our reasonable judgment in any case makes it inadvisable to
proceed with the exchange offer and about which change or
development we make a public announcement.
|
All conditions will be deemed satisfied or waived prior to the
expiration date, unless we assert them prior to the expiration
date. The foregoing conditions to the exchange offer are for our
sole benefit and we may prior to the expiration date assert them
regardless of the circumstances giving rise to any of these
conditions, or we may prior to the expiration date waive them in
whole or in part in our reasonable discretion. If we do so, the
exchange offer will remain open for at least 5 business days
following any waiver of the preceding conditions. Our failure at
any time to exercise any of the foregoing rights will not be
deemed a waiver of any right.
In addition, we will not accept for exchange any original notes
tendered, and no exchange notes will be issued in exchange for
any original notes, if at this time any stop order is threatened
or in effect relating to the registration statement of which
this prospectus constitutes a part. We are required to make
every reasonable effort to obtain the withdrawal of any order
suspending the effectiveness of a Registration Statement at the
earliest possible moment.
41
Exchange
Agent
We have appointed U.S. Bank National Association as the
exchange agent for the exchange offer. You should direct all
executed letters of transmittal to the exchange agent at the
address indicated below. You should direct questions and
requests for assistance, requests for additional copies of this
prospectus or of the letter of transmittal and requests for
notices of guaranteed delivery to the exchange agent addressed
as follows:
Delivery To:
U.S. Bank National Association
By Hand, Registered or Certified Mail, or Overnight
Courier:
U.S. Bank National Association
Corporate Trust Services
EP-MN-WS-2N
60 Livingston Avenue
St. Paul, MN 55107
Attn: Specialized Finance
For Information Call:
(800) 934-6802
By Facsimile Transmission
(for eligible Institutions only):
Attn: Specialized Finance
(651) 495-8158
Confirm by Telephone:
(800) 934-6802
All other questions should be addressed to Wyndham Worldwide
Corporation, Seven Sylvan Way, Parsippany, NJ 07054, Attention:
Investor Relations. If you deliver the letter of transmittal to
an address other than any address indicated above or transmit
instructions via facsimile other than to any facsimile number
indicated above, then your delivery or transmission will not
constitute a valid delivery of the letter of transmittal.
Fees and
Expenses
We will not make any payment to brokers, dealers or others
soliciting acceptances of the exchange offer. We have agreed to
pay all expenses incidental to the exchange offer other than
commissions and concessions of any broker or dealer and will
indemnify holders of the notes, including any broker-dealers,
against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the
Securities Act. The estimated cash expenses to be incurred in
connection with the exchange offer will be paid by us. We
estimate these expenses in the aggregate to be approximately
$5,000 and out of pocket expenses for the exchange agent.
Transfer
Taxes
Holders who tender their original notes for exchange shall pay
transfer taxes, if any, relating to the sale or disposition of
such holders securities, including pursuant to a shelf
registration statement.
Consequences
of Exchanging or Failing to Exchange the Original
Notes
Holders of original notes who do not exchange their original
notes for exchange notes in the exchange offer will continue to
be subject to the provisions in the indenture regarding transfer
and exchange of the original notes and the restrictions on
transfer of the original notes as described in the legend on the
original notes as a consequence of the issuance of the original
notes under exemptions from, or in transactions not
42
subject to, the registration requirements of the Securities Act
and applicable state securities laws. In general, the original
notes may not be offered or sold, unless registered under the
Securities Act, except under an exemption from, or in a
transaction not subject to, the Securities Act and applicable
state securities laws. Original note holders that do not
exchange original notes for exchange notes in the exchange offer
will no longer have any registration rights with respect to such
notes.
Under existing interpretations of the Securities Act by the
SECs staff contained in several no-action letters to third
parties, and subject to the immediately following sentence, we
believe that the exchange notes would generally be freely
transferable by holders after the exchange offer without further
registration under the Securities Act, subject to certain
representations required to be made by each holder of exchange
notes, as set forth below. However, any purchaser of exchange
notes who is one of our affiliates (as defined in
Rule 405 under the Securities Act) or who intends to
participate in the exchange offer for the purpose of
distributing the exchange notes:
|
|
|
|
l
|
will not be able to rely on the interpretation of the SECs
staff;
|
|
|
l
|
will not be able to tender its original notes in the exchange
offer; and
|
|
|
l
|
must comply with the registration and prospectus delivery
requirements of the Securities Act in connection with any sale
or transfer of the notes unless such sale or transfer is made
pursuant to an exemption from such requirements. See Plan
of Distribution.
|
We do not intend to seek our own interpretation regarding the
exchange offer and there can be no assurance that the SECs
staff would make a similar determination with respect to the
exchange notes as it has in other interpretations to other
parties, although we have no reason to believe otherwise.
Registration
Rights Agreement
On December 5, 2006, we entered into a registration rights
agreement with the initial purchasers of the original notes, in
which we agreed, among other things, to deliver this prospectus
to you and to complete this exchange offer. If applicable
interpretations of the staff of the SEC do not permit us to
effect the exchange offer, we agreed to use our reasonable best
efforts to cause to become effective a shelf registration
statement relating to resales of the original notes and to keep
that shelf registration statement (i) effective for two
years or such shorter period that will terminate when all
original notes covered by the shelf registration statement have
been sold pursuant to the shelf registration statement,
(ii) cease to be outstanding or (iii) become eligible
for resale under Rule 144 under the Securities Act without
volume restrictions.
If the exchange offer is not completed (or, if required, the
shelf registration statement is not declared effective) on or
before the date that is 360 days after the original issue
date of original notes, the annual interest rate borne by the
original notes will be increased by 0.25% per annum for the
first 90-day period immediately following such date and by an
additional 0.25% per annum for each subsequent 90-day period, up
to a maximum additional rate of 1.00% per annum, until the
exchange offer is completed or the shelf registration statement
is declared effective. The increased interest described above is
the sole and exclusive remedy available to noteholders due to a
registration default so long as we are acting in good faith
under the registration rights agreement, including with respect
to satisfying our obligations thereunder.
This summary of the provisions of the registration rights
agreement does not purport to be complete and is subject to, and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to, all the provisions
of the registration rights agreement. A copy of the registration
rights agreement has been filed as an exhibit to the Current
Report on
Form 8-K
we filed with the SEC on February 1, 2007 and is available
from us upon request. See Where You Can Find More
Information.
43
USE OF
PROCEEDS
We will not receive any proceeds from the exchange offer. In
consideration for issuing exchange notes, we will receive in
exchange original notes of like principal amount. The original
notes surrendered in exchange for exchange notes will be retired
and canceled.
COMPUTATION
OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
The table below sets forth our ratio of earnings to fixed
charges on a consolidated basis for each of the time periods
indicated. This ratio shows the extent to which our business
generates enough earnings after the payment of all expenses
other than interest to make required interest payments on our
debt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Earnings available to cover
fixed charges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes,
minority interest and cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
$
|
542
|
|
|
$
|
626
|
|
|
$
|
587
|
|
|
$
|
500
|
|
|
$
|
510
|
|
Plus: Fixed
charges
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Amortization
of capitalized interest
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Minority
interest in pre-tax income of
subsidiaries that have not incurred fixed
charges(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Capitalized
interest
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings available to cover fixed
charges
|
|
$
|
693
|
|
|
$
|
717
|
|
|
$
|
674
|
|
|
$
|
502
|
|
|
$
|
503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
charges:(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest, including amortization
of deferred financing costs
|
|
$
|
137
|
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Interest portion of rental payments
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed charges
|
|
$
|
159
|
|
|
$
|
93
|
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
|
|
|
4.36x
|
|
|
|
7.71x
|
|
|
|
7.84x
|
|
|
|
16.73x
|
|
|
|
38.69x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes minority interest, net of
tax related to the Companys venture with Marriott
International, Inc.
|
|
(b) |
|
Consists of interest expense on all
indebtedness (including amortization of deferred financing
costs) and the portion of operating lease rental expense that is
representative of the interest factor.
|
44
SELECTED
HISTORICAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following table presents our selected historical condensed
consolidated and combined financial data. The condensed
consolidated and combined statement of income data for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006
and the condensed consolidated and combined balance sheet data
as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 have been derived from our
audited consolidated and combined financial statements included
herein. The combined statement of income data for the years
ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the combined balance
sheet data as of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 have been
derived from the unaudited combined financial statements not
included elsewhere herein. The unaudited combined financial
statements have been prepared on the same basis as the audited
combined financial statements and, in the opinion of our
management, include all adjustments, consisting only of normal
recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the
information set forth herein.
The selected historical condensed consolidated and combined
financial data presented below should be read in conjunction
with our audited consolidated and combined financial statements
and accompanying notes and Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations included elsewhere herein. Amounts presented
below are in millions, except for Operating Statistics and
Earnings per Share data. Our audited consolidated and combined
financial information may not be indicative of our future
performance and does not necessarily reflect what our financial
position and results of operations would have been had we
operated as a separate, stand-alone entity during the periods
presented, including changes that will occur in our operations
and capitalization as a result of the separation from Cendant.
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of or For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
2002
|
|
Statement of Income
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
3,842
|
|
|
$
|
3,471
|
|
|
$
|
3,014
|
|
|
$
|
2,652
|
|
|
$
|
2,241
|
|
Expenses(a)
|
|
|
3,265
|
|
|
|
2,851
|
|
|
|
2,414
|
|
|
|
2,157
|
|
|
|
1,753
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
|
488
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and
minority interest
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
626
|
|
|
|
587
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
Minority interest, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
431
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
change, net of tax
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
$
|
431
|
|
|
$
|
349
|
|
|
$
|
299
|
|
|
$
|
308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per
Share(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
$
|
1.78
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
|
$
|
1.49
|
|
|
$
|
1.54
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
change, net of tax
|
|
|
(0.33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
|
$
|
1.49
|
|
|
$
|
1.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
|
$
|
1.49
|
|
|
$
|
1.54
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
change, net of tax
|
|
|
(0.33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1.44
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
|
$
|
1.49
|
|
|
$
|
1.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured
assets(c)
|
|
$
|
2,234
|
|
|
$
|
3,169
|
|
|
$
|
2,811
|
|
|
$
|
1,865
|
|
|
$
|
142
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
9,520
|
|
|
|
9,167
|
|
|
|
8,343
|
|
|
|
7,041
|
|
|
|
5,509
|
|
Secured debt
|
|
|
1,787
|
|
|
|
2,005
|
|
|
|
1,721
|
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
Other debt
|
|
|
1,113
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Total stockholders/invested
equity(d)
|
|
|
3,559
|
|
|
|
5,033
|
|
|
|
4,679
|
|
|
|
4,283
|
|
|
|
3,860
|
|
Operating Statistics:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging(e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
rooms(f)
|
|
|
527,700
|
|
|
|
519,000
|
|
|
|
508,200
|
|
|
|
524,700
|
|
|
|
543,300
|
|
Number of
properties(g)
|
|
|
6,470
|
|
|
|
6,350
|
|
|
|
6,400
|
|
|
|
6,400
|
|
|
|
6,500
|
|
RevPAR(h)
|
|
$
|
34.95
|
|
|
$
|
31.00
|
|
|
$
|
27.55
|
|
|
$
|
25.92
|
|
|
$
|
25.33
|
|
Royalty, marketing and reservation
revenue (in
000s)(i)
|
|
$
|
471,039
|
|
|
$
|
408,620
|
|
|
$
|
371,058
|
|
|
$
|
357,432
|
|
|
$
|
365,787
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of or For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
Vacation Exchange and
Rentals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of members
(in 000s)(j)
|
|
|
3,356
|
|
|
|
3,209
|
|
|
|
3,054
|
|
|
|
2,948
|
|
|
|
2,885
|
|
Annual dues and exchange revenue
per
member(k)
|
|
$
|
135.62
|
|
|
$
|
135.76
|
|
|
$
|
134.82
|
|
|
$
|
131.13
|
|
|
$
|
124.82
|
|
Vacation rental transactions
(in 000s)(l)
|
|
|
1,344
|
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
1,104
|
|
|
|
882
|
|
|
|
691
|
|
Average net price per vacation
rental(m)
|
|
$
|
370.93
|
|
|
$
|
359.27
|
|
|
$
|
328.77
|
|
|
$
|
248.65
|
|
|
$
|
205.82
|
|
Vacation
Ownership(n)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross vacation ownership interest
sales
(in
000s)(o)
|
|
$
|
1,743,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,396,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,254,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,146,000
|
|
|
$
|
932,000
|
|
Tours(p)
|
|
|
1,046,000
|
|
|
|
934,000
|
|
|
|
859,000
|
|
|
|
925,000
|
|
|
|
759,000
|
|
Volume Per Guest
(VPG)(q)
|
|
$
|
1,486
|
|
|
$
|
1,368
|
|
|
$
|
1,287
|
|
|
$
|
1,138
|
|
|
$
|
1,158
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes $99 million of
separation and related costs ($69 million, after-tax) and
$32 million of a net benefit from the resolution of certain
contingent liabilities ($30 million, after-tax).
|
|
(b) |
|
For all periods prior to our
separation date (July 31, 2006), weighted average shares
were calculated as one share of Wyndham common stock outstanding
for every five shares of Cendant common stock outstanding as of
July 21, 2006, the record date for the distribution of
Wyndham common stock. As such, during 2006, this calculation is
based on basic and diluted weighted average shares of 198 and
199, respectively. During 2002 through 2005, this calculation is
based on basic and diluted weighted average shares of 200.
|
|
(c) |
|
Represents the portion of vacation
ownership contract receivables, other vacation ownership related
assets and other vacation exchange and rentals assets that
collateralize our debt. Refer to Note 13 to the
Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements for further
information.
|
|
(d) |
|
Represents Wyndham Worldwides
stand-alone stockholders equity since August 1, 2006
and Cendants net investment (capital contributions and
earnings from operations less dividends) in Wyndham Worldwide
and accumulated other comprehensive income for 2002 through
July 31, 2006, our date of separation.
|
|
(e) |
|
Ramada International was acquired
on December 10, 2004, Wyndham Hotels and Resorts was
acquired on October 11, 2005 and Baymont Inn &
Suites was acquired on April 7, 2006. The results of
operations of these businesses have been included from their
acquisition dates forward.
|
|
(f) |
|
Represents the weighted average
number of hotels rooms available for rental for the year. The
amount in 2006 includes managed, non-proprietary hotels.
|
|
(g) |
|
Represents the number of lodging
properties operated under franchise
and/or
management agreements at the end of the year. The amount in 2006
includes managed, non-proprietary hotels.
|
|
(h) |
|
Represents revenue per available
room and is calculated by multiplying the percentage of
available rooms occupied for the year by the average rate
charged for renting a lodging room for one day.
|
|
(i) |
|
Royalty, marketing and reservation
revenue are typically based on a percentage of the gross room
revenues of each franchised hotel. Royalty revenue is generally
a fee charged to each franchised hotel for the use of one of our
trade names, while marketing and reservation revenue are fees
that we collect and are contractually obligated to spend to
support marketing and reservation activities.
|
|
(j) |
|
Represents members of our vacation
exchange programs who pay annual membership dues. For additional
fees, such participants are entitled to exchange intervals for
intervals at other properties affiliated with our vacation
exchange business. In addition, certain participants may
exchange intervals for other leisure-related products and
services.
|
|
(k) |
|
Represents total revenues from
annual membership dues and exchange fees generated for the year
divided by the average number of vacation exchange members
during the year.
|
|
(l) |
|
Represents the gross number of
transactions that are generated in connection with customers
booking their vacation rental stays through us. In our European
vacation rentals businesses, one rental transaction is recorded
each time a standard one-week rental is booked; however, in the
United States one rental transaction is recorded each time a
vacation rental stay is booked, regardless of whether it is less
than or more than one week.
|
|
(m) |
|
Represents the net rental price
generated from renting vacation properties to customers divided
by the number of rental transactions.
|
47
|
|
|
(n) |
|
Trendwest Resorts, Inc. was
acquired on April 30, 2002. The results of operations have
been included from the acquisition date forward.
|
|
(o) |
|
Represents gross sales of vacation
ownership interests (including tele-sales upgrades, which are a
component of upgrade sales) before deferred sales and loan loss
provisions.
|
|
(p) |
|
Represents the number of tours
taken by guests in our efforts to sell vacation ownership
interests.
|
|
(q) |
|
Represents revenue per guest and is
calculated by dividing the gross vacation ownership interest
sales, excluding tele-sales upgrades, which are a component of
upgrade sales, by the number of tours.
|
48
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
BUSINESS
AND OVERVIEW
We are a global provider of hospitality products and services
and operate our business in the following three segments:
|
|
|
|
l
|
Lodging franchises hotels in the
upscale, middle and economy segments of the lodging industry and
provides property management services to owners of luxury and
upscale hotels.
|
|
|
l
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals provides
vacation exchange products and services to owners of intervals
of vacation ownership interests, or VOIs, and markets vacation
rental properties primarily on behalf of independent owners.
|
|
|
l
|
Vacation Ownership markets and sells
VOIs to individual consumers, provides consumer financing in
connection with the sale of VOIs and provides property
management services at resorts.
|
Separation
from Cendant
On October 23, 2005, the Board of Directors of Cendant
Corporation (or former Parent) preliminarily
approved a plan to separate Cendant into four independent,
publicly traded companies one for each of
Cendants hospitality services (including timeshare
resorts) (now known as Wyndham Worldwide), real estate services
(now known as Realogy), travel distribution services (now known
as Travelport) and vehicle rental businesses (now known as Avis
Budget). On April 24, 2006, Cendant announced that as an
alternative to distributing shares of Travelport to Cendant
stockholders, Cendant was exploring the sale of Travelport. On
June 30, 2006, Cendant entered into a definitive agreement
to sell Travelport to an affiliate of the Blackstone Group for
$4,300 million in cash and on August 22, 2006, the
sale of Travelport closed. On July 13, 2006, the Board of
Directors of Cendant approved the distributions of all of the
shares of common stock of Wyndham and Realogy. In connection
with the distribution, we filed the Information Statement with
the SEC, which describes for stockholders the details of the
distribution and provides information on the business and
management of Wyndham. We mailed the Information Statement to
Cendant stockholders shortly after the July 21, 2006 record
date for the distribution. On July 31, 2006, Cendant
distributed all of the shares of our common stock to the holders
of Cendant common stock issued and outstanding on July 21,
2006, the record date for the distribution. On August 1,
2006, we commenced regular way trading on the New
York Stock Exchange under the symbol WYN.
Before our separation from Cendant, we entered into separation,
transition services and several other agreements with Cendant,
Realogy and Travelport to effect the separation and
distribution, govern the relationships among the parties after
the separation and allocate among the parties Cendants
assets, liabilities and obligations attributable to periods
prior to the separation. Under the Separation and Distribution
Agreement, we assumed 37.5% of certain contingent and other
corporate liabilities of Cendant or its subsidiaries which were
not primarily related to our business or the businesses of
Realogy, Travelport or Avis Budget, and Realogy assumed 62.5% of
these contingent and other corporate liabilities. These include
liabilities relating to Cendants terminated or divested
businesses, the Travelport sale, taxes of Travelport for taxable
periods through the date of the Travelport sale, certain
litigation matters, generally any actions relating to the
separation plan and payments under certain contracts that were
not allocated to any specific party in connection with the
separation.
On April 10, 2007, Realogy was acquired by an affiliate of
Apollo Management VI, L.P. and no longer trades as an
independent public company. The acquisition does not negate
Realogys obligation to satisfy 62.5% of the contingent and
other corporate liabilities of Cendant or its subsidiaries
pursuant to the terms of the separation agreement. As a result
of the acquisition, Realogy has greater debt obligations and its
ability to satisfy its portion of the liabilities may be
adversely impacted. In accordance with the terms of the
separation agreement, Realogy is expected to post a letter of
credit to cover its share of certain liabilities relating to the
Cendant Corporation plan of separation.
49
Because we now conduct our business as a separate, stand-alone
public company, our historical financial information does not
reflect what our results of operations, financial position or
cash flows would have been had we been a separate, stand-alone
public company during the periods presented. Therefore, the
historical financial information for such periods may not
necessarily be indicative of what our results of operations,
financial position or cash flows will be in the future and may
not be comparable to periods ending after July 31, 2006.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Lodging
We enter into agreements to franchise our lodging franchise
systems to independent hotel owners. Our standard franchise
agreement typically has a term of 15 to 20 years and
provides a franchisee with certain rights to terminate the
franchise agreement before the term of the agreement under
certain circumstances. The principal source of revenues from
franchising hotels is ongoing franchise fees, which are
comprised of royalty fees and other fees relating to marketing
and reservation services. Ongoing franchise fees typically are
based on a percentage of gross room revenues of each franchised
hotel and are accrued as earned and upon becoming due from the
franchisee. An estimate of uncollectible ongoing franchise fees
is charged to bad debt expense and included in operating
expenses on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income.
Lodging revenue also includes initial franchise fees, which are
recognized as revenue when all material services or conditions
have been substantially performed, which is either when a
franchised hotel opens for business or when a franchise
agreement is terminated as it has been determined that the
franchised hotel will not open.
Our franchise agreements require the payment of fees for certain
services, including marketing and reservations. With such fees,
we provide our franchised properties with a suite of operational
and administrative services, including access to (i) an
international, centralized, brand-specific reservation system,
(ii) advertising, (iii) promotional and co-marketing
programs, (iv) referrals, (v) technology,
(vi) training and (vii) volume purchasing. We are
contractually obligated to expend the marketing and reservation
fees we collect from franchisees in accordance with the
franchise agreements; as such, revenues earned in excess of
costs incurred are accrued as a liability for future marketing
or reservation costs. Costs incurred in excess of revenues are
expensed. In accordance with our franchise agreements, we
include an allocation of certain overhead costs required to
carry out marketing and reservation activities within marketing
and reservation expenses.
We also provide property management services for hotels under
management contracts. Our management fees are comprised of base
fees, which are typically calculated based upon a specified
percentage of gross revenues from hotel operations, and
incentive management fees, which are typically calculated based
upon a specified percentage of a hotels gross operating
profit. Management fee revenue is recognized when earned in
accordance with the terms of the contract. We incur certain
reimbursable costs on behalf of managed hotel properties and
report reimbursements received from managed properties as
revenue and the costs incurred on their behalf as expenses.
Management fee and reimbursable revenues are recorded as a
component of service fees and membership revenue on the
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income. The costs, which
principally relate to payroll costs for operational employees
who work at the managed hotels, are reflected as a component of
operating expenses on the Consolidated and Combined Statements
of Income. The reimbursements from hotel owners are based upon
the costs incurred with no added margin; as a result, these
reimbursable costs have little to no effect on our operating
income. Management fee revenue and revenue related to payroll
reimbursements was $4 million and $69 million,
respectively, during 2006 and $1 million and
$17 million, respectively, during the period
October 11, 2005 (date of Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand
acquisition, which includes management contracts) through
December 31, 2005.
Within our Lodging segment, we measure operating performance
using the following key operating statistics: (i) weighted
average rooms, which represents the weighted average number of
hotel rooms
50
available for rental for the year (ii) number of
properties, which represents the number of lodging properties
operated under franchise
and/or
management agreements at the end of the year and
(iii) RevPAR, which is calculated by multiplying the
percentage of available rooms occupied for the year by the
average rate charged for renting a lodging room for one day.
Vacation
Exchange and Rentals
As a provider of vacation exchange services, we enter into
affiliation agreements with developers of vacation ownership
properties to allow owners of intervals to trade their intervals
for certain other intervals within our vacation exchange
business and, for some members, for other leisure-related
products and services. Additionally, as a marketer of vacation
rental properties, generally we enter into contracts for
exclusive periods of time with property owners to market the
rental of such properties to rental customers. Our vacation
exchange business derives a majority of its revenues from annual
membership dues and exchange fees from members trading their
intervals. Annual dues revenue represents the annual membership
fees from members who participate in our vacation exchange
business and, for additional fees, have the right to exchange
their intervals for certain other intervals within our vacation
exchange business and, for certain members, for other
leisure-related products and services. We record revenue from
annual membership dues as deferred income on the Consolidated
and Combined Balance Sheets and recognize it on a straight-line
basis over the membership period during which delivery of
publications, if applicable, and other services are provided to
the members. Exchange fees are generated when members exchange
their intervals for equivalent values of rights and services,
which may include intervals at other properties within our
vacation exchange business or other leisure-related products and
services. Exchange fees are recognized as revenue when the
exchange requests have been confirmed to the member. Our
vacation rentals business derives its revenue principally from
fees, which generally range from approximately 40% to 60% of the
gross rent charged to rental customers. The majority of the
time, we act on behalf of the owners of the rental properties to
generate our fees. We provide reservation services to the
independent property owners and receive the
agreed-upon
fee for the service provided. We remit the gross rental fee
received from the renter to the independent property owner, net
of our
agreed-upon
fee. Revenue from such fees is recognized in the period that the
rental reservation is made, net of expected cancellations. Upon
confirmation of the rental reservation, the rental customer and
property owner generally have a direct relationship for
additional services to be performed. Cancellations for 2006 and
2005 each totaled less than 5% of rental transactions booked.
Our revenue is earned when evidence of an arrangement exists,
delivery has occurred or the services have been rendered, the
sellers price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and
collectibility is reasonably assured. We also earn rental fees
in connection with properties we own or lease under capital
leases and such fees are recognized when the rental
customers stay occurs, as this is the point at which the
service is rendered.
Within our Vacation Exchange and Rentals segment, we measure
operating performance using the following key operating
statistics: (i) average number of vacation exchange
members, which represents participants in our vacation exchange
programs who pay annual membership dues and are entitled, for
additional fees, to exchange their intervals for other intervals
within our vacation exchange business and, for certain members,
for other leisure-related products and services,
(ii) annual membership dues and exchange revenue per
member, which represents the total annual dues and exchange fees
generated for the year divided by the average number of vacation
exchange members during the year, (iii) vacation rental
transactions, which represents the gross number of transactions
that are generated in connection with customers booking their
vacation rental stays through us and (iv) average net price
per vacation rental, which represents the net rental price
generated from renting vacation properties to customers divided
by the number of rental transactions.
Vacation
Ownership
We market and sell VOIs to individual consumers, provide
property management services at resorts and provide consumer
financing in connection with the sale of VOIs. Our vacation
ownership business
51
derives the majority of its revenues from sales of VOIs and
derives other revenues from consumer financing and property
management. Our sales of VOIs are either cash sales or
seller-financed sales. In order for us to recognize revenues of
VOI sales under the full accrual method of accounting described
in SFAS No. 66, Accounting of Sales of Real
Estate for fully constructed inventory, a binding sales
contract must have been executed, the statutory rescission
period must have expired (after which time the purchasers are
not entitled to a refund except for nondelivery by us),
receivables must have been deemed collectible and the remainder
of our obligations must have been substantially completed. In
addition, before we recognize any revenues on VOI sales, the
purchaser of the VOI must have met the initial investment
criteria and, as applicable, the continuing investment criteria,
by executing a legally binding financing contract. A purchaser
has met the initial investment criteria when a minimum down
payment of 10% is received by us. As a result of the adoption of
SFAS No. 152 and
SOP 04-2
on January 1, 2006, we must also take into consideration
the fair value of certain incentives provided to the purchaser
when assessing the adequacy of the purchasers initial
investment. In those cases where financing is provided to the
purchaser by us, the purchaser is obligated to remit monthly
payments under financing contracts that represent the
purchasers continuing investment. The contractual terms of
seller-provided financing agreements require that the
contractual level of annual principal payments be sufficient to
amortize the loan over a customary period for the VOI being
financed, which is generally seven to ten years, and payments
under the financing contracts begin within 45 days of the
sale and receipt of the minimum down payment of 10%. If all of
the criteria for a VOI sale to qualify under the full accrual
method of accounting have been met, as discussed above, except
that construction of the VOI purchased is not complete, we
recognize revenues using the
percentage-of-completion
method of accounting provided that the preliminary construction
phase is complete and that a minimum sales level has been met
(to assure that the property will not revert to a rental
property). The preliminary stage of development is deemed to be
complete when the engineering and design work is complete, the
construction contracts have been executed, the site has been
cleared, prepared and excavated, and the building foundation is
complete. The completion percentage is determined by the
proportion of real estate inventory costs incurred to total
estimated costs. These estimated costs are based upon historical
experience and the related contractual terms. The remaining
revenue and related costs of sales, including commissions and
direct expenses, are deferred and recognized as the remaining
costs are incurred. Until a contract for sale qualifies for
revenue recognition, all payments received are accounted for as
restricted cash and deposits within other current assets and
deferred income, respectively, on the Consolidated and Combined
Balance Sheets. Commissions and other direct costs related to
the sale are deferred until the sale is recorded. If a contract
is cancelled before qualifying as a sale, non-recoverable
expenses are charged to operating expense in the current period
on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income.
We also offer consumer financing as an option to customers
purchasing VOIs, which are typically collateralized by the
underlying VOI. Generally, the financing terms are for seven to
ten years. An estimate of uncollectible amounts is recorded at
the time of the sale with a charge to the provision for loan
losses on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income.
Upon the adoption of SFAS No. 152 and
SOP 04-2
on January 1, 2006, the provision for loan losses is
classified as a reduction of vacation ownership interest sales
on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income. The
interest income earned from the financing arrangements is earned
on the principal balance outstanding over the life of the
arrangement.
We also provide
day-to-day-management
services, including oversight of housekeeping services,
maintenance and certain accounting and administrative services
for property owners associations and clubs. In some cases,
our employees serve as officers
and/or
directors of these associations and clubs in accordance with
their by-laws and associated regulations. Management fee revenue
is recognized when earned in accordance with the terms of the
contract and is recorded as a component of service fees and
membership on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of
Income. The costs, which principally relate to the payroll costs
for management of the associations, clubs and the resort
properties where we are the employer, are reflected as a
component of operating expenses on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income. Reimbursements are based upon the costs
incurred with no added margin and thus presentation of these
reimbursable costs has little to no effect on our operating
income. Management fee revenue and revenue related to
reimbursements was $112 million and $141 million
during 2006, respectively, $91 million and
$124 million during 2005, respectively, and
$95 million and $103 million during 2004,
respectively. During
52
2006, 2005, and 2004, one of the associations that we manage
paid RCI Global Vacation Network $13 million,
$11 million and $9 million, respectively, for exchange
services.
Within our Vacation Ownership segment, we measure operating
performance using the following key metrics: (i) gross VOI
sales (including tele-sales upgrades, which are a component of
upgrade sales) before deferred sales and loan loss provisions,
(ii) tours, which represents the number of tours taken by
guests in our efforts to sell VOIs and (iii) volume per
guest, or VPG, which represents revenue per guest and is
calculated by dividing the gross VOI sales, excluding tele-sales
upgrades, by the number of tours.
Other
Items
We record lodging-related marketing and reservation revenues, as
well as property management services revenues for both our
Lodging and Vacation Ownership segments, in accordance with
Emerging Issues Task Force Issue
99-19,
Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an
Agent, which requires that these revenues be recorded on a
gross basis.
Discussed below are our consolidated and combined results of
operations and the results of operations for each of our
reportable segments. The reportable segments presented below
represent our operating segments for which separate financial
information is available and which is utilized on a regular
basis by our chief operating decision maker to assess
performance and to allocate resources. In identifying our
reportable segments, we also consider the nature of services
provided by our operating segments. Management evaluates the
operating results of each of our reportable segments based upon
revenue and EBITDA, which is defined as net income
before depreciation and amortization, interest (excluding
interest on securitized vacation ownership debt), income taxes,
minority interest and cumulative effect of accounting change,
net of tax, each of which is presented on the Consolidated and
Combined Statements of Income. Our presentation of EBITDA may
not be comparable to similarly-titled measures used by other
companies.
EBITDA for periods prior to July 31, 2006 includes cost
allocations from Cendant representing our portion of general
corporate overhead. For the period January 1, 2006 to
July 31, 2006 and the years ended December 31, 2005
and 2004, Cendant allocated $20 million, $36 million
and $30 million, respectively, of general corporate
overhead. Cendant allocated such costs to us based on a
percentage of our forecasted revenues. General corporate expense
allocations include costs related to Cendants executive
management, tax, accounting, legal, treasury and cash
management, certain employee benefits and real estate usage for
common space. The allocations were not necessarily indicative of
the actual expenses that would have been incurred had we been
operating as a separate, stand-alone public company for the
periods presented.
53
OPERATING
STATISTICS
The following table presents our operating statistics for the
years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005. See Results of
Operations section for a discussion as to how these operating
statistics affected our business for the periods presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
% Change
|
|
Lodging(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average rooms
available(b)
|
|
|
527,700
|
|
|
|
519,000
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Number of
properties(c)
|
|
|
6,470
|
|
|
|
6,350
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
RevPAR(d)
|
|
$
|
34.95
|
|
|
$
|
31.00
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Royalty, marketing and reservation
revenue (in
000s)(e)
|
|
$
|
471,039
|
|
|
$
|
408,620
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Vacation Exchange and
Rentals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of members (in
000s)(f)
|
|
|
3,356
|
|
|
|
3,209
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Annual dues and exchange revenue
per
member(g)
|
|
$
|
135.62
|
|
|
$
|
135.76
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation rental transactions (in
000s)(h)
|
|
|
1,344
|
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Average net price per vacation
rental(i)
|
|
$
|
370.93
|
|
|
$
|
359.27
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross vacation ownership interest
sales (in
000s)(j)
|
|
$
|
1,743,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,396,000
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Tours(k)
|
|
|
1,046,000
|
|
|
|
934,000
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Volume Per Guest
(VPG)(l)
|
|
$
|
1,486
|
|
|
$
|
1,368
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes Wyndham Hotels and Resorts
brand and Baymont Inn & Suites brand, which were
acquired on October 11, 2005 and April 7, 2006,
respectively. Therefore, the operating statistics for 2006 are
not presented on a comparable basis to the 2005 operating
statistics. On a comparable basis (excluding the Wyndham Hotels
and Resorts brand from both the 2006 and 2005 amounts and the
Baymont brand from the 2006 amounts), RevPAR would have
increased 8%, weighted average rooms available would have
decreased 3% and the number of properties would have remained
relatively flat.
|
|
(b) |
|
Represents the weighted average
number of hotel rooms available for rental during the period.
The amount in 2006 includes managed, non-proprietary hotels.
|
|
(c) |
|
Represents the number of lodging
properties under franchise
and/or
management agreements at the end of the period. The amount in
2006 includes managed, non-proprietary hotels.
|
|
(d) |
|
Represents revenue per available
room and is calculated by multiplying the percentage of
available rooms occupied during the period by the average rate
charged for renting a lodging room for one day.
|
|
(e) |
|
Royalty, marketing and reservation
revenue are typically based on a percentage of the gross room
revenues of each franchised hotel. Royalty revenue is generally
a fee charged to each franchised hotel for the use of one of our
trade names, while marketing and reservation revenue are fees
that we collect and are contractually obligated to spend to
support marketing and reservation activities.
|
|
(f) |
|
Represents members in our vacation
exchange programs who pay annual membership dues. For additional
fees, such participants are entitled to exchange intervals for
intervals at other properties affiliated with our vacation
exchange business. In addition, certain participants may
exchange intervals for other leisure-related products and
services.
|
|
(g) |
|
Represents total revenues from
annual membership dues and exchange fees generated for the
period divided by the average number of vacation exchange
members during the year.
|
|
(h) |
|
Represents the gross number of
transactions that are generated in connection with customers
booking their vacation rental stays through us. In our European
vacation rentals businesses, one rental transaction is recorded
each time a standard one-week rental is booked; however, in the
United States, one rental transaction is recorded each time a
vacation rental stay is booked, regardless of whether it is less
than or more than one week.
|
|
(i) |
|
Represents the net rental price
generated from renting vacation properties to customers divided
by the number of rental transactions.
|
|
(j) |
|
Represents gross sales of vacation
ownership interests (including tele-sales upgrades, which are a
component of upgrade sales) before deferred sales and loan loss
provisions.
|
|
(k) |
|
Represents the number of tours
taken by guests in our efforts to sell vacation ownership
interests.
|
|
(l) |
|
Represents revenue per guest and is
calculated by dividing the gross vacation ownership interest
sales, excluding tele-sales upgrades, which are a component of
upgrade sales, by the number of tours.
|
54
Year
Ended December 31, 2006 vs. Year Ended December 31,
2005
Our consolidated and combined results comprised the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
Change
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
3,842
|
|
|
$
|
3,471
|
|
|
$
|
371
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
3,265
|
|
|
|
2,851
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
626
|
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
431
|
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
change
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
$
|
431
|
|
|
$
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2006, our net revenues increased $371 million (11%)
principally due to (i) a $341 million increase in net
sales of VOIs at our vacation ownership businesses primarily
reflecting higher tour flow and an increase in VPG;
(ii) $109 million of incremental revenue generated by
the acquisitions of the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts and Baymont
Inn & Suites brands; (iii) a $57 million
increase in net consumer financing revenues earned on vacation
ownership contract receivables due primarily to growth in the
portfolio; (iv) $41 million of incremental property
management fees primarily as a result of growth in the number of
units under management within our vacation ownership business;
(v) a $31 million increase in net revenues from rental
transactions primarily due to growth in rental transaction
volume, an increase in the average net price per rental and the
translation effects of foreign exchange movements, which
favorably impacted rental revenues by $5 million;
(vi) a $19 million increase in organic revenues in our
lodging business, primarily due to RevPAR growth, partially
offset by a decline in weighted average rooms; and (vii) a
$19 million increase in annual dues and exchange revenues
due to growth in the average number of members. These increases
were partially offset by a decrease in revenues of
$259 million as a result of the classification of the
provision for loan losses as a reduction of revenues during the
year ended December 31, 2006 in connection with the
adoption of SFAS No. 152.
Total expenses increased $414 million (15%) principally
reflecting (i) a $203 million increase in organic
operating and administrative expenses primarily related to
additional commission expense resulting from increased VOI
sales, increased volume-related expenses and staffing costs due
to growth in our vacation exchange and rentals call centers and
vacation ownership business, increased costs related to the
property management services that we provide at our vacation
ownership business and increased interest expense on our
securitized debt, which is included in operating expenses;
(ii) $103 million of incremental expenses generated by
the acquisitions of the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts and Baymont
Inn & Suites brands; (iii) $99 million of
costs related to our separation from Cendant; (iv) a
$79 million increase in organic marketing and reservation
expenses primarily resulting from increased marketing
initiatives across all our businesses; (v) a
$21 million charge recorded in the second quarter of 2006
related to local taxes payable to certain foreign jurisdictions
within our European vacation rentals business; and (vi) the
unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation on expenses
of $6 million. These increases were partially offset by a
decrease of (i) $128 million in provision for loan
losses as a result of the reclassification of the provision for
loan losses from expenses to net revenues required by the
adoption of SFAS No. 152, which includes
$12 million in 2005 to account for the impact of the
hurricanes experienced in the Gulf Coast region of the U.S., and
(ii) $24 million in cost of vacation ownership
interests which was comprised of $115 million reduction of
cost of sales of inventory as a result of our adoption of
SFAS No. 152, partially offset by $91 million of
increased cost of sales primarily associated with increased VOI
sales.
55
The increase in depreciation and amortization of
$17 million primarily resulted from an increase in
information technology capital investments made in 2005, a trend
that continued in 2006. Interest expense, net increased
$41 million in 2006 primarily as a result of interest paid
on our new borrowing arrangements resulting from our separation
from Cendant and interest on local taxes payable to certain
foreign jurisdictions, partially offset by increased capitalized
interest at our vacation ownership business due to increased
development of vacation ownership inventory. Our effective tax
rate increased to 35.1% in 2006 from 31.2% in 2005 primarily due
to the absence of an increase in the tax basis of certain
foreign assets during 2005, partially offset by a
$15 million benefit recognized in 2006 resulting from a
change in our 2005 state effective tax rates.
We recorded an after tax charge of $65 million during the
first quarter of 2006 as a cumulative effect of an accounting
change related to the adoption of SFAS No. 152. Such
charge consisted of (i) a pre-tax charge of
$105 million representing the deferral of revenue, costs
associated with sales of vacation ownership interests that were
recognized prior to January 1, 2006 and the recognition of
certain expenses that were previously deferred and (ii) an
associated tax benefit of $40 million.
As a result of these items, our net income decreased
$144 million (33%) during 2006 compared to 2005.
Following is a discussion of the results of each of our segments
and interest expense (income), net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
Change
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
Change
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
661
|
|
|
$
|
533
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
208
|
|
|
$
|
197
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
1,119
|
|
|
|
1,068
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
2,068
|
|
|
|
1,874
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Reportable Segments
|
|
|
3,848
|
|
|
|
3,475
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
798
|
|
|
|
764
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Corporate and
Other(a)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company
|
|
$
|
3,842
|
|
|
$
|
3,471
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
725
|
|
|
|
751
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
542
|
|
|
$
|
626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Not meaningful.
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes the elimination of
transactions between segments.
|
Lodging
Net revenues and EBITDA increased $128 million (24%) and
$11 million (6%), respectively, in 2006 compared with 2005
primarily reflecting the October 2005 acquisition of the
franchise and property management businesses of the Wyndham
Hotels and Resorts brand and strong RevPAR gains across our
legacy brands, which were partially offset by the absence of a
$7 million gain on the sale of an investment recognized in
2005. EBITDA comparisons also reflect our strategic decision to
intensify marketing campaigns, particularly for our Wyndham
brand.
The operating results of the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand
have been included in our results from October 11, 2005
forward and, therefore, were incremental to our results during
the period January 1, 2006 through October 10, 2006.
During this period, the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand
contributed incremental net revenues of $99 million, of
which $38 million was generated from the franchise business
and $61 million was generated from the property management
business. Included within the $61 million of revenue
generated from the property management business is
$55 million of revenue related to reimbursable
56
payroll costs that we incur and pay on behalf of property
owners. As the reimbursements are made based upon cost with no
added margin, the recorded revenue is offset by the associated
expense and there is little to no resultant impact on EBITDA.
Additionally, there was little to no EBITDA contribution from
the franchise business as substantially all of the fees received
were utilized to execute a key strategy of promoting the Wyndham
brand name and driving brand bookings through enhanced marketing
efforts.
The operating results of our lodging business also reflect the
acquisition of the Baymont Inn & Suites brand, which
was acquired in April 2006, and contributed incremental net
revenues and EBITDA of $10 million and $6 million,
respectively.
Excluding the impact of the acquisitions discussed above, net
revenues in our lodging business increased $19 million (4%)
in 2006. Such increase was primarily due to RevPAR growth of 8%,
partially offset by a 3% decline in weighted average rooms
available and a $7 million gain recognized in the first
quarter of 2005 on the sale of an investment no longer deemed
strategic. The RevPAR growth reflects increases in price and
occupancy principally attributable to the beneficial impact of
management initiatives implemented in prior periods, such as the
strategic assignment of personnel to field locations designed to
assist franchisees in improving their operating performance and
an overall improvement in the economy lodging segment. The
decline in rooms reflects (i) our termination of
underperforming properties primarily throughout 2005 that did
not meet our required quality standards or their financial
obligations to us and (ii) the expiration of franchise
agreements and certain franchisees exercising their right to
terminate their agreements. As of December 31, 2006, our
hotel development pipeline included approximately 845 hotels and
approximately 92,000 rooms, of which approximately 15% are
international and approximately 45% are new construction.
As previously discussed, a strategic growth initiative of our
lodging business is to increase brand awareness and drive brand
bookings. To this end, during 2006, we increased our marketing
spend by $13 million (6%), which is incremental to the
marketing spend for the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts and Baymont
brands. The $13 million of incremental marketing spend is
reflective of (i) additional fees received from our
franchisees (where we are contractually obligated to expend
these fees for marketing purposes), (ii) additional
campaigns in international regions that we have targeted for
growth and (iii) incremental investments in our TripRewards
loyalty program. In addition, expenses also increased
$2 million as a result of our separation from Cendant.
Vacation
Exchange and Rentals
Net revenues increased $51 million (5%) and EBITDA
decreased $19 million (7%) in 2006 compared with 2005,
primarily reflecting a $31 million increase in net revenues
from rental transactions and a $19 million increase in
annual dues and exchange revenues, more than offset in EBITDA by
a $70 million increase in expenses, as discussed below.
Revenue and expense increases include $5 million and
$6 million, respectively, from a stronger U.S. dollar
compared to other foreign currencies and the related currency
translation impact.
Net revenues generated from rental transactions and related
services increased $31 million (7%) during 2006 driven by a
3% increase in rental transaction volume and a 3% increase in
the average net price per rental. The growth in rental
transaction volume was primarily due to an increase of
approximately 36,000 rental transactions (12%) in arrivals
at our Landal GreenParks camping vacation site and increased
booking volumes of approximately 15,600 rental transactions
(7%) at our Novasol brand. The increase in net revenues from
rental transactions and the average net price per rental
includes the translation effects of foreign exchange movements,
which favorably impacted net rental revenues by $5 million
and accounted for 1% of the increase in the average net price
per rental.
Annual dues and exchange revenues increased $19 million
(4%) during 2006 as compared with 2005 due to a 5% increase in
the average number of members. Points-based transactions
represented 19% of the total exchange transactions during 2006
as compared with 17% during 2005. Exchange transactions per
member remained relatively constant
year-over-year;
however, there has been a shift to a greater amount of
57
points-based members and related points-based transactions from
the standard one-week for one-week exchange members and
transactions in our legacy RCI Weeks exchange program. This
shift resulted in an increase in our overall member base and
exchange transaction volume. Since points are exchangeable for
various travel-related products and services, as well as for
vacation stays for various lengths of time, points-based
exchange activity will generally result in higher transaction
volumes with lower average fees as compared with the RCI Weeks
exchange program. Ancillary revenues from various sources
collectively increased $1 million during 2006 compared to
2005. Ancillary revenue sources primarily included
$14 million of additional consulting fees, club servicing
fees and fees from our credit card loyalty program. Such
increases were offset by a $9 million reduction in travel
fee revenues primarily due to lower commission rates realized in
2006 relating to an outsourcing agreement to provide services to
third-party travel club members and the absence of a
$4 million recovery of local taxes paid to a foreign
jurisdiction realized during the fourth quarter of 2005.
EBITDA further reflects an increase in expenses of
$70 million (9%) primarily driven by (i) a
$27 million increase in volume-related expenses, which was
substantially comprised of higher reservation call center
staffing costs to support member growth and increased call
volumes, (ii) a $21 million charge in the second
quarter of 2006 related to local taxes payable to certain
foreign jurisdictions, (iii) $16 million of
incremental expenses incurred for product and geographic
expansion, including increased marketing campaigns, timing of
certain other marketing expenses, expansion of property
recruitment efforts and investment in our consulting and
international activities, (iv) $10 million of higher
cost of sales on rentals of vacation stay intervals,
(v) the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation
on expenses of $6 million, (vi) $4 million of
costs primarily related to higher corporate overhead allocations
and (vii) $3 million of costs related to our
separation from Cendant. These increases were partially offset
by (i) the absence of $14 million of costs incurred in
2005 to combine the operational infrastructures of our vacation
exchange and rentals business and (ii) $8 million of
cost savings due to efficiencies realized in 2006.
Vacation
Ownership
Net revenues and EBITDA increased $194 million (10%) and
$42 million (15%), respectively, in 2006 as compared with
2005. The operating results reflect growth in vacation ownership
sales and consumer finance income, as well as the impact of the
adoption of SFAS No. 152. The impact of
SFAS No. 152 on our results for 2006 was a reduction
to net revenues of $208 million and an increase to EBITDA
of $10 million, respectively.
We made operational changes during 2006 that resulted in the
recognition of revenues that would have otherwise been deferred
under the provisions of SFAS No. 152. As a result,
included within the impact of SFAS No. 152, are
benefits to net revenues and EBITDA of $67 million and
$34 million, respectively. These benefits would have
otherwise been offset by 2006 deferrals had the operational
changes not been made. Excluding such benefits, the impact of
SFAS No. 152 would have been a reduction to net
revenues and EBITDA of $275 million and $24 million,
respectively, during 2006.
Exclusive of the impact of SFAS No. 152, gross sales
of VOIs at our vacation ownership business increased
$311 million (22%) in 2006 principally driven by a 12%
increase in tour flow and a 9% increase in VPG. Tour flow was
positively impacted by the continued development of our in-house
sales programs. VPG benefited from a favorable tour flow mix and
higher pricing.
In addition, net revenues and EBITDA increased $57 million
and $33 million, respectively, in 2006 due to incremental
net interest income earned on contract receivables primarily
resulting from growth in the portfolio. Such growth was
partially offset in EBITDA by higher interest costs in 2006.
During 2006, we paid interest expense on our securitized debt of
$70 million at a weighted average rate of 5.1% compared to
$46 million at a weighted average rate of 4.1% in 2005.
Revenue and EBITDA comparisons were also negatively impacted by
the absence of $11 million of income recorded in the second
quarter of 2005 in connection with the disposal of a parcel of
land that was no longer consistent with our development plans.
58
During 2006, property management fees increased $41 million
primarily as a result of growth in the number of units under
management.
EBITDA further reflects an increase of approximately
$349 million (22%) in operating, marketing and
administrative expenses, exclusive of the impact of
SFAS No. 152 and the
percentage-of-completion
method of accounting, primarily resulting from
(i) $85 million of increased cost of sales primarily
associated with increased VOI sales, (ii) $67 million
of additional commission expense associated with increased VOI
sales, (iii) $50 million of incremental marketing
expenses to support sales efforts, (iv) $48 million of
incremental costs primarily incurred to fund additional staffing
needs to support continued growth in the business,
(v) $37 million of increased costs related to the
property management services discussed above,
(vi) $25 million of additional contract receivable
provisions primarily associated with increased VOI sales,
(vii) $18 million of costs related to our separation
from Cendant, $11 million of which related to an impairment
charge due to a rebranding initiative for our Fairfield and
Trendwest trademarks (see Note 2 of our Consolidated and
Combined Financial Statements) and (viii) $4 million
of increased costs associated with the repair of a completed VOI
resort. Such increases were partially offset by the absence of
$13 million of expenses during 2005 associated with the
impact of the hurricanes experienced in the Gulf Coast during
September 2005, which continued to affect us in 2006 due to
sales offices damaged by the hurricanes which have yet to reopen.
Our active development pipeline consists of approximately
3,900 units in 15 U.S. states, the Virgin Islands and
three foreign countries. We expect the pipeline to support both
new purchases of vacation ownership and upgrade sales to
existing owners.
Corporate
and Other
Corporate and Other expenses increased $58 million in 2006
compared with 2005. Such increase includes
(i) $76 million of costs incurred as a result of the
execution of our separation from Cendant on July 31, 2006
primarily related to the acceleration of vesting of Cendant
equity awards and related equitable adjustments of such awards
and (ii) $20 million of incremental stand-alone,
corporate costs incurred from the date of separation to
December 31, 2006. Such amounts were partially offset by a
$32 million net benefit from the resolution of certain
contingent liabilities.
Interest
Expense (Income), Net
Interest expense (income), net increased $41 million during
2006 compared to 2005 primarily as a result of
(i) $36 million of increased interest expense on
borrowings primarily due to increased average borrowings on
existing debt and interest paid on new debt arrangements entered
into in July 2006, (ii) $11 million of interest on
local taxes payable to certain foreign jurisdictions and
(iii) a $9 million decrease in net interest income
earned on advances between us and our former Parent due to
twelve months of activity during 2005 compared to seven months
of activity during 2006. Such amounts were partially offset by
(i) a $9 million increase in capitalized interest at
our vacation ownership business due to the increased development
of vacation ownership inventory and (ii) a $2 million
increase in interest income earned on invested cash balances as
a result of a decrease in average cash available for investment.
All such amounts are recorded within interest expense (income),
net on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income.
59
Year
Ended December 31, 2005 vs. Year Ended December 31,
2004
Our combined results comprised the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
Change
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
3,471
|
|
|
$
|
3,014
|
|
|
$
|
457
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
2,851
|
|
|
|
2,414
|
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and
minority interest
|
|
|
626
|
|
|
|
587
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
Minority interest, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
431
|
|
|
$
|
349
|
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2005, our net revenues increased $457 million (15%)
principally due to (i) a $134 million increase in net
sales of VOIs at our vacation ownership businesses due to higher
tour flow and an increase in VPG; (ii) $114 million of
incremental revenue generated by the acquisitions of the Wyndham
Hotels and Resorts brand, Ramada International, Landal
GreenParks and Canvas Holidays Limited, the results of which are
included from their respective acquisition dates forward;
(iii) $76 million of incremental organic revenue
earned by our vacation exchange and rentals business principally
reflecting increased rental and exchange transaction volume and
a higher average number of members; (iv) a $58 million
increase in net consumer financing revenues earned on vacation
ownership contract receivables; (v) a $47 million
increase in organic revenues at our lodging business, reflecting
a favorable increase in RevPAR; and (vi) $17 million
of incremental resort management fees as a result of increased
rental revenues on unoccupied units, as well as growth in the
number of units under management.
Total expenses increased $437 million (18%) principally
reflecting (i) a $160 million increase in organic
operating expenses primarily related to additional commission
expense resulting from increased VOI sales and commission rates,
increased costs related to the property management services that
we provide at our vacation ownership business and increased
fulfillment costs incurred in connection with our RCI Elite
Rewards program and increased staffing costs in our contact
centers; (ii) $110 million of expenses generated by
the acquisitions discussed above; (iii) a $32 million
increase in organic marketing and reservation expenses primarily
resulting from increased marketing initiatives across all our
businesses; (iv) a $30 million increase in provision
for loan losses principally related to growth in vacation
ownership contract receivables at our vacation ownership
business; (v) a $30 million increase in organic
general and administrative expense principally due to growth in
our vacation exchange and rentals and vacation ownership
businesses; (vi) $25 million of increased cost of
sales primarily associated with increased VOI sales;
(vii) the absence of a favorable $15 million
settlement recorded by our lodging business in 2004 related to a
franchisee receivable; (viii) $14 million of costs
incurred to combine the operations of our vacation exchange and
rentals business; (ix) $13 million of expenses
associated with the 2005 Gulf Coast hurricanes, which primarily
reflects a provision for estimated vacation ownership contract
receivable losses; and (x) $12 million of marketing
and related expenses incurred in connection with our TripRewards
loyalty program.
The increase in depreciation and amortization of
$12 million primarily resulted from an increase in
information technology capital investments made in 2005.
Interest expense (income), net decreased $19 million in
2005 primarily as a result of (i) the absence of interest
expense incurred in 2004 related to the Two Flags Joint Venture
LLC, (ii) favorable interest rate hedge activity year over
year, and (iii) a reduction in financing cost amortization.
Our effective tax rate decreased to 31.2% in 2005 from 39.9% in
2004 primarily due to a one-time tax benefit related to changes
in tax basis differences in assets of foreign subsidiaries. As a
result of these items, our net income increased $82 million
(23%).
60
Following is a discussion of the results of each of our
reportable segments and interest expense (income), net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
Change
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
Change
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
533
|
|
|
$
|
443
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
$
|
197
|
|
|
$
|
189
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
1,068
|
|
|
|
921
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
1,874
|
|
|
|
1,661
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Reportable Segments
|
|
|
3,475
|
|
|
|
3,025
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
764
|
|
|
|
740
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Corporate and
Other(a)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company
|
|
$
|
3,471
|
|
|
$
|
3,014
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
751
|
|
|
|
719
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and
minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
626
|
|
|
$
|
587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Not meaningful.
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes the elimination of
transactions between segments.
|
Lodging
Net revenues and EBITDA increased $90 million (20%) and
$8 million (4%), respectively, in 2005 compared with 2004
reflecting revenue growth from acquisitions and increased
RevPAR; however, the EBITDA comparison was negatively impacted
by a favorable settlement recorded in second quarter 2004
related to a lodging franchisee receivable and increased
marketing-related expenses associated with our TripRewards
loyalty program and initiatives to promote our brands (all of
which are discussed in greater detail below).
The operating results of our lodging business reflect the
acquisitions of the franchise and property management businesses
of the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand in October 2005 and
Ramada International in December 2004. The operating results of
Wyndham Hotels and Resorts have been included in our results for
three of the twelve months of 2005, but none of 2004. The
operating results of Ramada International have been included in
our results for the entire twelve months of 2005, but only for
one month of 2004. Accordingly, Wyndham Hotels and Resorts and
Ramada International contributed incremental net revenues of
$29 million and $14 million, respectively, and EBITDA
of $2 million each to 2005 results. Included within the
$29 million of revenue generated by Wyndham Hotels and
Resorts is approximately $25 million related to
reimbursable expenses, which has no impact on EBITDA. These
acquisitions also added approximately 32,000 rooms, which is
approximately 6% of the total weighted average rooms available
within our lodging franchise system during 2005.
Apart from these acquisitions, net revenues in our lodging
business increased $47 million (11%). Such increase
principally represents (i) $16 million (4%) of higher
royalty, marketing and reservation fund revenues,
(ii) $16 million of incremental net revenues generated
by our TripRewards loyalty program during 2005, (iii) an
$8 million increase in ancillary revenues and (iv) a
$7 million gain recognized on the sale of a lodging-related
investment during 2005. The $16 million increase in
royalty, marketing and reservation fund revenues primarily
resulted from an 8% increase in RevPAR, partially offset by a 4%
decrease in weighted average rooms available. The RevPAR
increase reflects (i) increases in both price and occupancy
rates principally attributable to an overall improvement in the
economy lodging segment in which our hotel brands primarily
operate, (ii) the termination of underperforming properties
throughout 2004 that did not meet our required quality standards
or their financial obligations to us and (iii) the
strategic assignment of personnel to field locations designed to
assist franchisees in improving their hotel operating
performance.
61
The decrease in weighted average rooms available reflects our
termination of underperforming properties, as discussed above,
the expiration of franchise agreements and certain franchisees
exercising their right to terminate their agreements. During
2005, there were terminations of 509 properties, as compared to
terminations of 517 properties during 2004.
EBITDA further reflects an increase of $43 million (17%) in
operating, marketing and administrative expenses (excluding the
impact of the acquisitions discussed above) principally
resulting from (i) $20 million of higher bad debt
expense, primarily due to the absence of a favorable
$15 million settlement recorded in 2004 related to a
lodging franchisee receivable; (ii) $12 million of
marketing and related expenses incurred in connection with our
TripRewards loyalty program; and (iii) $9 million of
marketing-related expenses primarily related to marketing
initiatives to promote our brands.
Vacation
Exchange and Rentals
Net revenues increased $147 million (16%), while EBITDA
declined $2 million (1%) in 2005 compared to 2004,
reflecting incremental revenues and expenses from vacation
rental acquisitions during 2004 and the negative impact on
EBITDA from $14 million of costs incurred during 2005 to
combine the operational infrastructures of our vacation exchange
and rentals business (discussed in greater detail below).
We acquired Landal GreenParks and Canvas Holidays Limited, which
are both European vacation rentals businesses, in May 2004 and
October 2004, respectively. The operating results of Landal
GreenParks and Canvas Holidays have been included in our results
for the entire twelve months in 2005 but for only eight months
in 2004 for Landal GreenParks and only three months in 2004 for
Canvas Holidays. Accordingly, Landal GreenParks contributed
incremental net revenues and EBITDA of $41 million and
$2 million, respectively, and Canvas Holidays contributed
incremental net revenues and EBITDA of $30 million and
$10 million, respectively, during 2005. The incremental
results of Landal GreenParks in 2005 are reflective of the first
four months of the year, which is when their operations are
seasonally weakest.
Apart from these acquisitions, net revenues increased
$76 million (8%), which includes (i) a
$34 million (9%) increase in rental transaction revenues,
(ii) a $24 million (6%) increase in annual dues and
exchange revenues and (iii) a $22 million increase in
revenues generated from our RCI Elite Rewards program, a credit
card marketing program that we implemented in fourth quarter
2004. Our RCI Elite Rewards program generates revenues based on
the volumes of cardholders and credit card spending and incurs
related fulfillment costs.
The $34 million increase in rental transaction revenues
primarily resulted from a 7% increase in total rental
transactions and a $12 million increase due to the
conversion of a franchised park to a managed park in January
2005. Prior to the conversion, we received only a franchise fee,
whereas subsequent to the conversion, we recognized all of the
revenues generated by this park.
The $24 million increase in annual dues and exchange
revenues was driven by a 5% increase in the average number of
members. Transactions related to our points-based exchange
program, RCI Points, represented 17% of the total exchange
transactions in 2005 compared with 14% in 2004, representing a
continued shift in 2005 to more points-based exchanges. Since
points are exchangeable for various other travel-related
products and services in addition to vacation stays,
points-based exchange activity will generally result in higher
transaction volumes with lower average fees as compared to the
standard one-week for one-week exchange activity in our RCI
Weeks exchange program. Vacation exchange volume and price are
derived from (i) a mix of domestic and international
exchanges and (ii) a mix of standard one-week for one-week
exchanges and exchanges through our RCI Points exchange program,
which includes transactions for various lengths of stay and
other leisure-related products.
Apart from the aforementioned EBITDA impact of the acquisitions
of Landal GreenParks and Canvas Holidays, EBITDA further
reflects a
year-over-year
increase in expenses of $90 million (14%) primarily driven
by (i) $20 million of incremental fulfillment costs in
connection with our RCI Elite Rewards program as discussed
above; (ii) $14 million of costs incurred to combine
the operational infrastructures of
62
our vacation exchange and rentals business principally in
Europe; (iii) higher cost of sales in 2005 of
$13 million on the rentals of vacation properties;
(iv) $11 million of incremental expenses associated
with the conversion of a franchised park to a managed park, as
discussed above; (v) $8 million of higher marketing
expenses, principally related to increased campaigns and
publications; and (vi) $5 million of restructuring
costs incurred as a result of the consolidation of certain call
centers and back-office functions within our vacation exchange
business. The remaining $19 million increase in expenses
primarily relates to higher staffing costs and other volume
driven expense increases in our call centers and certain
infrastructure enhancements.
Vacation
Ownership
Net revenues and EBITDA increased $213 million (13%) and
$18 million (7%), respectively, in 2005 compared with 2004.
The EBITDA comparison was negatively impacted by
$13 million of expenses incurred during 2005 related to the
estimated impact of the hurricanes experienced along the Gulf
Coast. Net revenues and EBITDA, exclusive of the impact of the
Gulf Coast hurricanes, reflect organic growth in vacation
ownership sales, a gain on the sale of land and increased
consumer finance income.
Net sales of VOIs increased $134 million (11%) in 2005
despite the Gulf Coast hurricanes. Such increase was driven
principally by a 9% increase in tour flow and a 6% increase in
VPG. This revenue increase includes a $27 million decrease
in higher margin upgrade sales at our WorldMark by Wyndham
resort properties due to special upgrade promotions conducted
during 2004 undertaken to mitigate the negative impact on tour
flow from the do not call and do not fax
regulations. Tour flow, as well as volume per transaction,
benefited in 2005 from our expanded presence in premium
destinations such as Hawaii, Las Vegas and Orlando. Tour flow
was also positively impacted by the opening of new sales
offices, our strategic focus on new marketing alliances and
increased local marketing efforts.
Revenues and related expenses increased $57 million and
$8 million, respectively, in 2005 as a result of
incremental net interest income earned on our vacation ownership
contract receivables primarily due to growth in the consolidated
portfolio.
Additionally, we receive management fees for property management
services that we provide at certain resorts pursuant to
contractual arrangements with property owners
associations. During 2005, we recognized $17 million of
incremental resort management fees as a result of increased
rental revenues on units, as well as growth in the number of
units under management.
Net revenue and EBITDA comparisons also benefited from an
$11 million gain recorded in 2005 in connection with the
disposal of a parcel of land that was no longer consistent with
our development plans, partially offset by the absence of a
$4 million gain recognized in first quarter 2004 in
connection with the sale of a provider of third-party vacation
ownership financing and $3 million of revenue generated by
such operations in 2004 prior to the sale date.
EBITDA further reflects an increase of $187 million (14%)
in operating, marketing and administrative expenses primarily
resulting from (i) $43 million of additional
commission expense associated with increased VOI sales and
increased commission rates; (ii) $31 million of
additional vacation ownership contract receivable provisions
recorded in 2005; (iii) $29 million of increased costs
related to the resort management services discussed above;
(iv) $25 million of increased cost of sales primarily
associated with increased VOI sales; (v) $18 million
of incremental costs incurred primarily to fund additional
staffing needs to support continued growth in the business,
improve existing properties and integrate the Worldmark by
Wyndham and Fairfield contract servicing operations;
(vi) $14 million of incremental marketing spent to
support sales efforts; and (vii) $13 million of
expenses associated with the 2005 Gulf Coast hurricanes, which
primarily reflects a provision for estimated vacation ownership
contract receivable losses.
Interest
Expense (Income), Net
Interest expense (income), net decreased $19 million during
2005 compared to 2004 principally as a result of (i) a
$13 million decrease in interest expense at our vacation
ownership business primarily due to
63
refinanced borrowings with more favorable financing terms and
(ii) a $9 million decrease in interest expense at our
lodging business due to the repayment of a note payable in
September 2004. Such decreases were partially offset by a
$3 million increase at our vacation exchange and rentals
business primarily due to increased average borrowings. All such
amounts are recorded within interest expense (income), net on
the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income.
FINANCIAL
CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Financial
Condition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
9,520
|
|
$
|
9,167
|
|
$
|
353
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
5,961
|
|
|
4,134
|
|
|
1,827
|
|
Total stockholders/invested
equity
|
|
|
3,559
|
|
|
5,033
|
|
|
(1,474
|
)
|
Total assets increased $353 million from December 31,
2005 to December 31, 2006 primarily due to (i) a
$318 million increase in inventory primarily related to
vacation ownership inventories associated with increased
property development activity, as well as an increase of
$171 million associated with our adoption of
SFAS No. 152, a new accounting pronouncement related
to vacation ownership interest transactions, (ii) a
$306 million increase in vacation ownership contract
receivables, net due to increased VOI sales, partially offset by
the reclassification in accordance with SFAS No. 152,
as discussed above, (iii) a $198 million increase in
property and equipment principally within our vacation ownership
business associated with building and reclassifications as a
result of our adoption of SFAS No. 152 and within our
vacation exchange and rentals businesses increased development
at Landal GreenParks, (iv) a $170 million increase in
cash and cash equivalents which is discussed in further detail
in Liquidity and Capital Resources-Cash Flows,
(v) a $130 million increase in other current assets
primarily due to the adoption of SFAS No. 152, which
resulted in the deferral of direct selling costs at
December 31, 2006 compared to December 31, 2005 and
increased restricted cash within our vacation ownership business
relating to proceeds held for a new VOI resort still in
development, (vi) a $73 million increase in prepaid
expenses at our vacation ownership business primarily related to
increased revenue deferrals as a result of the adoption of
SFAS No. 152 and increased prepaid marketing fees in
our vacation exchange and rentals business primarily due to
increased prepaid directory fees as a result of timing,
(vii) a $65 million increase in due from former Parent
and subsidiaries relating to a refund of excess funding paid to
our former Parent resulting from the Separation and income tax
refunds, (viii) increased trade receivables of
$58 million at our vacation exchange and rentals and
vacation ownership businesses primarily due to favorable
performance in the fourth quarter of 2006, (ix) a
$54 million increase in goodwill primarily related to the
acquisition of a vacation ownership marketing and development
business and foreign exchange translation adjustments within our
vacation and exchange and rentals business, partially offset by
the settlement of the ultimate tax basis of acquired assets with
the tax authority within our vacation ownership business,
(x) a $41 million increase in trademarks primarily
related to the acquisition of Baymont Inn & Suites in
April 2006, partially offset by an $11 million non-cash
impairment charge recorded within our vacation ownership
business during the fourth quarter of 2006 relating to
rebranding initiatives carried out as a result of our separation
from Cendant and (xi) a $37 million receivable in
non-current due from former Parent and subsidiaries, which
represents our right to receive proceeds from the ultimate sale
of Cendants preferred stock investment in and warrants of
Affinion Group Holdings, Inc. Such increases were partially
offset by a $1,125 million decrease in the net intercompany
funding to former Parent, which reflects the elimination of
amounts due from Cendant upon our separation from them.
Total liabilities increased $1,827 million primarily due to
(i) $858 million of additional net borrowings
primarily due to approximately $796 million of
6.00% senior unsecured notes issued in December 2006,
$328 million of greater securitization of vacation
ownership contract receivables and a $300 million term loan
entered into in July 2006 as part of our overall debt structure,
partially offset by the elimination by our former Parent of
$600 million of borrowings outstanding under our former
Parents asset-linked facility
64
relating to certain of our assets (which balance was
$550 million at December 31, 2005 and was previously
reflected as long-term debt on our Consolidated and Combined
Balance Sheet), (ii) a $421 million increase in due to
former Parent and subsidiaries as a result of the assumption of
certain contingent and other corporate liabilities of our former
Parent or its subsidiaries upon our separation (see
Separation Adjustments and Transactions with Former Parent
and Subsidiaries), (iii) a $281 million increase
in deferred income primarily due to increased activity within
our vacation ownership business, the adoption of
SFAS No. 152, as discussed above, and increased
deferred revenue within our vacation exchange and rentals
business and (iv) a $145 million increase in accrued
expenses and other current liabilities primarily due to
increased marketing expenses to promote growth in our businesses
and local taxes payable to certain foreign jurisdictions and the
related interest payable on such accrual within our vacation
exchange and rentals business.
Total stockholders equity decreased $1,474 million
principally due to (i) the elimination of net intercompany
funding to former Parent of $1,125 million, (ii) the
transfer of proceeds from our new borrowing arrangements to our
former Parent of $1,360 million, (iii) the assumption
of $434 million of contingent liabilities as a result of
our separation and (iv) $349 million of treasury stock
purchased through our stock repurchase program. Such decreases
were partially offset by (i) $760 million of proceeds
contributed to us by our former Parent upon the sale of
Travelport, (ii) the elimination by our former Parent of
$600 million of borrowings outstanding under our former
Parents asset-linked facility relating to certain of our
assets and (iii) $287 million of net income generated
during the year ended December 31, 2006.
Liquidity
And Capital Resources
Currently, our financing needs are supported by cash generated
from operations and borrowings under our revolving credit
facility. In addition, certain funding requirements of our
vacation ownership business are met through the issuance of
securitized and other debt to finance vacation ownership
contract receivables. With the completion of the new financings
related to our separation and the issuance of our
6.00% senior unsecured notes, our liquidity has been
further augmented through available capacity under our new
revolving credit facility. We believe that access to this
facility and our current liquidity vehicles will be sufficient
to meet our ongoing needs for the foreseeable future.
Cash
Flows
During 2006 and 2005, we had a net change in cash and cash
equivalents of $170 million and $5 million,
respectively. The following table summarizes such changes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
Change
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
activities
|
|
$
|
165
|
|
|
$
|
492
|
|
|
$
|
(327
|
)
|
Investing
activities
|
|
|
(471
|
)
|
|
|
(696
|
)
|
|
|
225
|
|
Financing
activities
|
|
|
473
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
Effects of changes in exchange
rate on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
$
|
170
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2006 vs. Year Ended December 31,
2005
Operating
Activities
During 2006, we generated $327 million less cash from
operating activities as compared to 2005. Such change
principally reflects a net decrease relating to higher
investments in inventory and vacation ownership
65
contract receivables as well as increased prepaid expense,
partially offset by favorable timing of accounts payable and
accrued expenses.
Investing
Activities
During 2006, we used $225 million less cash for investing
activities as compared to 2005. The decrease in cash outflows
primarily relates to (i) a $255 million decrease in
intercompany funding provided to former Parent, which was
eliminated due to our separation from Cendant and
(ii) lower acquisition related payments of $49 million
primarily due to fewer acquisitions made in 2006 (in 2005, we
used $149 million to acquire the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts
brand and a few non-significant businesses primarily within our
Vacation Ownership segment, whereas in 2006, we used
$103 million to acquire the Baymont brand and a vacation
ownership and resort management business). Such decreases in
cash outflows were partially offset by (i) an increase of
$57 million in capital expenditures primarily due to
additions within vacation ownership and corporate infrastructure
costs associated with the separation and (ii) a reduction
of $12 million in restricted cash, which we are required to
set aside in connection with certain borrowing arrangements and
business activities of our vacation ownership business.
Financing
Activities
During 2006, we generated $252 million more cash from
financing activities as compared to 2005, which principally
reflects incremental cash inflows from
(i) $2,414 million of additional borrowings from
various facilities, (ii) $796 million of proceeds from
the issuance of 6.00% senior unsecured notes and
(iii) the receipt of a capital contribution from our former
Parent for approximately $760 million resulting from the
sale of Travelport (see Financial Obligations for a
detailed discussion). Such increases were partially offset by
(i) an increase in our dividend to former Parent of
approximately $1,301 million, (ii) $2,122 million
of increased principal payments on existing borrowings and
(iii) $329 million of common stock repurchases.
We intend to continue to invest in capital improvements,
technological improvements in our lodging business and the
development of our vacation ownership, vacation rental and
mixed-use properties. In addition, we may seek to acquire
additional franchise agreements, property management contracts
and ownership interests in hotel or vacation rental properties
on a strategic and selective basis, either directly or through
investments in joint ventures. We spent $191 million on
capital expenditures in 2006 (excluding vacation ownership
development projects). Capital expenditures in 2006 included
(i) $82 million to improve technology and maintain
technological advantages, (ii) $80 million on routine
improvements and (iii) $29 million for information
technology infrastructure enhancements resulting from our
separation from Cendant. We also spent $542 million
relating to vacation ownership development projects in 2006. The
majority of the expenditures required to complete our capital
spending programs and vacation ownership development projects
were financed through cash flow generated through operations.
Additional expenditures were financed through general unsecured
corporate borrowings. Our unused borrowing capacity of
$870 million under our $900 million revolving credit
facility is available to finance our capital spending programs.
On August 24, 2006, we announced our intention to commence
a stock repurchase program of up to $400 million. Through
December 31, 2006, we had repurchased 11.9 million
shares at an average price of $29.35. During January 2007, we
repurchased an additional 1.6 million shares, completing
the program with 13.5 million shares purchased at an
average price of $29.72. As of February 13, 2007, our Board
of Directors has authorized a new stock repurchase program that
enables us to purchase up to $400 million of our common
stock. The Board of Directors authorization included
increased repurchase capacity for proceeds received from stock
option exercises. The amount and timing of specific repurchases
are subject to market conditions, applicable legal requirements
and other factors. Repurchases may be conducted in the open
market or in privately negotiated transactions.
During the fourth quarter of 2006, Cendant and the Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) settled the IRS examination
for Cendants taxable years 1998 through 2002 during which
we were included in Cendants
66
tax returns. Accordingly, we reduced our contingent liabilities
by $15 million to reflect Cendants settlement with
the IRS. Such reduction was recorded in general and
administrative expenses on the Consolidated Statement of Income
during the year ended December 31, 2006. We were adequately
reserved for this audit cycle and have reflected the results of
that examination in our Consolidated and Combined Financial
Statements. The IRS has opened an examination for Cendants
taxable years 2003 through 2006 during which we were included in
Cendants tax returns. Although we and Cendant believe
there is appropriate support for the positions taken on its tax
returns, we and Cendant have recorded liabilities representing
the best estimates of the probable loss on certain positions. We
and Cendant believe that the accruals for tax liabilities are
adequate for all open years, based on assessment of many factors
including past experience and interpretations of tax law applied
to the facts of each matter. Although we and Cendant believe the
recorded assets and liabilities are reasonable, tax regulations
are subject to interpretation and tax litigation is inherently
uncertain; therefore, our and Cendants assessments can
involve both a series of complex judgments about future events
and rely heavily on estimates and assumptions. While we and
Cendant believe that the estimates and assumptions supporting
the assessments are reasonable, the final determination of tax
audits and any other related litigation could be materially
different than that which is reflected in historical income tax
provisions and recorded assets and liabilities. Based on the
results of an audit or litigation, a material effect on our
income tax provision, net income, or cash flows in the period or
periods for which that determination is made could result. The
effect is the result of our obligations under the Separation and
Distribution Agreement, as discussed in Note 20
Separation Adjustments and Transactions with Former Parent and
Subsidiaries.
We believe that our accruals for tax liabilities outlined in the
Separation and Distribution Agreement are adequate for all
remaining open years, based on our assessment of many factors
including past experience and interpretations of tax law applied
to the facts of each matter. Although we believe our recorded
assets and liabilities are reasonable, tax regulations are
subject to interpretation and tax litigation is inherently
uncertain; therefore, our assessments can involve a series of
complex judgments about future events and rely heavily on
estimates and assumptions. While we believe that the estimates
and assumptions supporting our assessments are reasonable, the
final determination of tax audits and any related litigation
could be materially different than that which is reflected in
historical income tax provisions and recorded assets and
liabilities. Based on the results of an audit or litigation, a
material effect on our income tax provision, net income, or cash
flows in the period or periods for which that determination is
made could result.
67
Financial
Obligations
Our indebtedness consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Securitized vacation ownership
debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes
|
|
$
|
838
|
|
|
$
|
740
|
|
Bank conduit
facility(a)
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securitized vacation
ownership debt
|
|
$
|
1,463
|
|
|
$
|
1,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00% senior unsecured notes
(due December
2016)(b)
|
|
$
|
796
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Term loan (due July 2011)
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility (due
July
2011)(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interim loan facility (due July
2007)(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation ownership asset-linked
debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
Bank borrowings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation ownership
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
Vacation rentals
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
Vacation rentals capital leases
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
Other
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
1,437
|
|
|
$
|
907
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents a
364-day
vacation ownership bank conduit facility which we renewed and
upsized to $1,000 million on November 13, 2006. The
borrowings under this bank conduit facility have a maturity date
of December 2009.
|
|
(b) |
|
These notes represent
$800 million aggregate principal less $4 million of
original issue discount.
|
|
(c) |
|
We entered into this
$800 million facility in July 2006. The outstanding
borrowings under this facility of $350 million were repaid
in December 2006 with a portion of the borrowings from our
issuance of 6.00% senior unsecured notes.
|
68
As of December 31, 2006, available capacity under our
borrowing arrangements was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
|
Capacity
|
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
Capacity
|
|
|
Securitized vacation ownership debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes
|
|
$
|
838
|
|
|
$
|
838
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Bank conduit
facility(a)
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securitized vacation
ownership debt
|
|
$
|
1,838
|
|
|
$
|
1,463
|
|
|
$
|
375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00% senior unsecured notes
(due December 2016)
|
|
$
|
796
|
|
|
$
|
796
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Term loan (due July 2011)
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility (due
July
2011)(b)
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
900
|
|
Bank borrowings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation ownership
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Vacation rentals
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Vacation rentals capital
leases(c)
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
2,412
|
|
|
$
|
1,437
|
|
|
|
975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Issuance of letters of
credit(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Capacity is subject to maintaining
sufficient assets to collateralize debt.
|
|
(b) |
|
The capacity under our revolving
credit facility includes availability for letters of credit. As
of December 31, 2006, the total capacity of
$900 million was reduced by $30 million for the
issuance of letters of credit.
|
|
(c) |
|
These leases are recorded as
capital lease obligations with corresponding assets classified
within property and equipment on the Consolidated and Combined
Balance Sheets.
|
Securitized
Vacation Ownership Debt
A significant portion of our debt as of December 31, 2006
was issued through the securitization of vacation ownership
contract receivables. Such debt includes fixed and floating rate
term notes for which the weighted average interest rate was
4.7%, 4.0% and 3.3% during the years ended December 31,
2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and access to a
$1,000 million bank conduit facility, which bears interest
at variable rates and had a weighted average interest rate of
5.7%, 4.3% and 1.4% during the years ended December 31,
2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. As of December 31, 2006,
our securitized vacation ownership debt is collateralized by
$1,844 million of underlying vacation ownership contract
receivables and related assets.
Interest expense incurred in connection with our securitized
vacation ownership debt amounted to $70 million,
$46 million and $36 million during the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Such
interest expense is recorded within the operating expenses on
the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income as we earn
consumer finance income on the related securitized vacation
ownership contract receivables.
Other
Our 6.00% notes, with face value of $800 million, were
issued in December 2006 for net proceeds of $796 million.
The notes are redeemable at our option at any time, in whole or
in part, at the appropriate redemption prices plus accrued
interest through the redemption date. These notes rank equally
in right of payment with all of our other senior unsecured
indebtedness.
69
On July 7, 2006, we entered into a five-year
$300 million term loan facility which bears interest at a
fixed rate of 6.00%. As of December 31, 2006, we had
$300 million outstanding borrowings under this facility.
We entered into a five-year $900 million revolving credit
facility which currently bears interest at LIBOR plus 45 to
55 basis points. The pricing of this facility is dependent
on our credit ratings and the outstanding balance of borrowings
on this facility. As of December 31, 2006, we had zero
outstanding borrowings under this facility.
Prior to our Separation from Cendant, we previously borrowed
under a $600 million asset-linked facility through Cendant
to support the creation of certain vacation ownership-related
assets and the acquisition and development of vacation ownership
properties. In connection with the Separation, Cendant
eliminated the outstanding borrowings under this facility of
$600 million on July 27, 2006. The weighted average
interest rate on these borrowings was 5.5% during the period
January 1, 2006 through July 27, 2006 and 5.1% and
2.6% during the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004,
respectively.
We had outstanding bank borrowings of $103 million as of
December 31, 2006 principally under a foreign credit
facility used to support vacation ownership operations in the
South Pacific. This facility bears interest at Australian Dollar
LIBOR plus 55 basis points and had a weighted average
interest rate of 6.5%, 6.3% and 3.3% during 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. As of December 31, 2006, these secured
borrowings are collateralized by $158 million of underlying
vacation ownership contract receivables and related assets.
As of December 31, 2006, we had bank debt outstanding of
$73 million related to our Landal GreenParks business. As
of December 31, 2006, the bank debt was collateralized by
$130 million of land and related vacation rental assets and
had a weighted average interest rate of 3.7% during 2006 and
3.0% during both 2005 and 2004. On January 31, 2007, we
repaid the outstanding borrowings on this facility.
We lease vacation homes located in European holiday parks as
part of our vacation exchange and rentals business. These leases
are recorded as capital lease obligations with corresponding
assets classified within property, plant and equipment on the
Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheets. The vacation exchange
and rentals capital lease obligations had a weighted average
interest rate of 7.5% during 2006, 2005 and 2004.
We also maintain other debt facilities which arise through the
ordinary course of operations. As of December 31, 2006,
this debt primarily reflects $11 million of mortgage
borrowings related to an office building.
Interest expense incurred in connection with the above debt
(excluding our securitized vacation ownership debt) amounted to
$72 million, $36 million and $38 million during
2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Such interest expense is
recorded within the interest expense on the Consolidated and
Combined Statements of Income.
The revolving credit facility and unsecured term loan include
covenants, including the maintenance of specific financial
ratios. These financial covenants consist of a minimum interest
coverage ratio of at least 3.0 times as of the measurement date
and a maximum leverage ratio not to exceed 3.5 times on the
measurement date. The interest coverage ratio is calculated by
dividing EBITDA (as defined in the credit agreement and
Note 19 to the Consolidated and Combined Financial
Statements) by Interest Expense (as defined in the credit
agreement), excluding interest expense on any Securitized
Indebtedness and on Non-Recourse Indebtedness (as the two terms
are defined in the credit agreement), both as measured on a
trailing 12 month basis preceding the measurement date. The
leverage ratio is calculated by dividing Consolidated Total
Indebtedness (as defined in the credit agreement) excluding any
Securitization Indebtedness and any Non-Recourse Secured debt as
of the measurement date by EBITDA as measured on a trailing
12 month basis preceding the measurement date. Covenants in
these credit facilities also include limitations on indebtedness
of material subsidiaries; liens; mergers, consolidations,
liquidations, dissolutions and sales of all or substantially all
assets; and sale and leasebacks. Events of default in these
credit facilities include nonpayment of principal when due;
nonpayment of interest, fees or other amounts;
70
violation of covenants; cross payment default and cross
acceleration (in each case, to indebtedness (excluding
securitization indebtedness) in excess of $50 million); and
a change of control (the definition of which permitted our
separation from Cendant).
The 6.00% senior unsecured notes contain various covenants
including limitations on liens, limitations on sale and
leasebacks, and change of control restrictions. In addition,
there are limitations on mergers, consolidations and sales of
all or substantially all assets. Events of default in the notes
include nonpayment of interest, nonpayment of principal, breach
of a covenant or warranty, cross acceleration of debt in excess
of $50 million, and bankruptcy related matters.
As of December 31, 2006, we were in compliance with all of
the covenants described above including the required financial
ratios.
Liquidity
Risk
Our liquidity position may be negatively affected by unfavorable
conditions in the markets in which we operate. Our liquidity as
it relates to our vacation ownership financings could be
adversely affected if we were to fail to renew any of the
facilities on their renewal dates or if we were to fail to meet
certain ratios, which may occur in certain instances if the
credit quality of the underlying vacation ownership contract
receivables deteriorates. Our ability to sell vacation ownership
contract receivables depends on the continued ability of the
capital markets to provide financing to the entities that buy
the vacation ownership contract receivables.
Our senior unsecured debt is rated BBB and Baa2 by
Standard & Poors and Moodys, respectively.
A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold
securities and is subject to revision or withdrawal by the
assigning rating organization. Each rating should be evaluated
independently of any other rating.
Seasonality
We experience seasonal fluctuations in our net revenues and net
income from our franchise and management fees, commission income
earned from renting vacation properties, annual subscription
fees or annual membership dues, as applicable, and exchange
transaction fees and sales of VOIs. Revenues from franchise and
management fees are generally higher in the second and third
quarters than in the first or fourth quarters, because of
increased leisure travel during the spring and summer months.
Revenues from rental income earned from booking vacation rentals
are generally highest in the third quarter, when vacation
rentals are highest. Revenues from vacation exchange transaction
fees are generally highest in the first quarter, which is
generally when members of our vacation exchange business plan
and book their vacations for the year. Revenues from sales of
VOIs are generally higher in the third and fourth quarters than
in other quarters. The seasonality of our business may cause
fluctuations in our quarterly operating results. As we expand
into new markets and geographical locations, we may experience
increased or different seasonality dynamics that create
fluctuations in operating results different from the
fluctuations we have experienced in the past.
Separation
Adjustments And Transactions With Former Parent And
Subsidiaries
Transfer
of Cendant Corporate Liabilities and Issuance of Guarantees to
Cendant and Affiliates
Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, upon the
distribution of our common stock to Cendant shareholders, we
entered into certain guarantee commitments with Cendant
(pursuant to the assumption of certain liabilities and the
obligation to indemnify Cendant, Realogy and Travelport for such
liabilities) and guarantee commitments related to deferred
compensation arrangements with each of Cendant and Realogy.
These guarantee arrangements primarily relate to certain
contingent litigation liabilities, contingent tax liabilities,
and Cendant contingent and other corporate liabilities, of which
we assumed and are responsible for 37.5% of these Cendant
liabilities. The amount of liabilities which we assumed in
connection with the Separation approximated $434 million at
December 31, 2006, reduced from
71
approximately $524 million as measured at the date of
separation (July 31, 2006). This amount was comprised of
certain Cendant corporate liabilities which were recorded on the
books of Cendant as well as additional liabilities which were
established for guarantees issued at the date of Separation
related to certain unresolved contingent matters and certain
others that could arise during the guarantee period. Regarding
the guarantees, if any of the companies responsible for all or a
portion of such liabilities were to default in its payment of
costs or expenses related to any such liability, we would be
responsible for a portion of the defaulting party or
parties obligation. We also provided a default guarantee
related to certain deferred compensation arrangements related to
certain current and former senior officers and directors of
Cendant, Realogy and Travelport. These arrangements, which are
discussed in more detail below, were valued upon our separation
from Cendant with the assistance of third-party experts in
accordance with Financial Interpretation No. 45
(FIN 45) Guarantors Accounting and
Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect
Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others, and recorded as
liabilities on the balance sheet. To the extent such recorded
liabilities are not adequate to cover the ultimate payment
amounts, such excess will be reflected as an expense to the
results of operations in future periods.
The $434 million is comprised of (i) $40 million
for litigation matters, (ii) $229 million for tax
liabilities, (iii) $134 million for other contingent
and corporate liabilities including liabilities of previously
sold businesses of Cendant and (iv) $31 million of
liabilities where the calculated FIN 45 guarantee amount
exceeded the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 5 Accounting for Contingencies liability
assumed at the date of Separation (of which $29 million of
the $31 million pertain to litigation liabilities). Of the
$434 million, $187 million is recorded in current Due
to former Parent and subsidiaries and $234 million are
recorded in long-term Due to former Parent and subsidiaries at
December 31, 2006 on the Consolidated and Combined Balance
Sheet. We are indemnifying Cendant for these contingent
liabilities and therefore any payments would be made to the
third party through the former Parent. The $31 million
relating to the FIN 45 guarantees is recorded in other
current liabilities at December 31, 2006 on the
Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheet. In addition, we have a
$65 million receivable due from former Parent relating to a
refund of excess funding paid to our former Parent resulting
from the Separation and income tax refunds, which is recorded in
current due from former Parent and subsidiaries on the
Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheet. We have also recorded a
$37 million receivable in non-current due from former
Parent and subsidiaries on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, which
represents our right to receive proceeds from the ultimate sale
of Cendants preferred stock investment in and warrants of
Affinion Group Holdings, Inc.
Following is a discussion of the liabilities on which we issued
guarantees:
|
|
|
|
l
|
Contingent litigation liabilities We
have assumed 37.5% of liabilities for certain litigation
relating to, arising out of or resulting from certain lawsuits
in which Cendant is named as the defendant. The indemnification
obligation will continue until the underlying lawsuits are
resolved. We will indemnify Cendant to the extent that Cendant
is required to make payments related to any of the underlying
lawsuits. As the guarantee relates to matters in various stages
of litigation, the maximum exposure cannot be quantified. Due to
the inherent nature of the litigation process, the timing of
payments related to these liabilities cannot be reasonably
predicted, but is expected to occur over several years.
|
|
|
l
|
Contingent tax liabilities We are
liable for 37.5% of certain contingent tax liabilities and will
pay to Cendant the amount of taxes allocated pursuant to the Tax
Sharing Agreement for the payment of certain taxes. This
liability will remain outstanding until tax audits related to
the 2006 tax year are completed or the statutes of limitations
governing the 2006 tax year have passed. Our maximum exposure
cannot be quantified as tax regulations are subject to
interpretation and the outcome of tax audits or litigation is
inherently uncertain. Additionally, the timing of payments
related to these liabilities cannot be reasonably predicted, but
is likely to occur over several years.
|
|
|
l
|
Cendant contingent and other corporate
liabilities We have assumed 37.5% of
corporate liabilities of Cendant including liabilities relating
to (i) Cendants terminated or divested businesses,
(ii) liabilities relating to the Travelport sale, if any,
and (iii) generally any actions with respect to the
separation plan or the distributions brought by any third party.
Our maximum exposure to loss
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
cannot be quantified as this guarantee relates primarily to
future claims that may be made against Cendant, that have not
yet occurred. We assessed the probability and amount of
potential liability related to this guarantee based on the
extent and nature of historical experience.
|
|
|
|
|
l
|
Guarantee related to deferred compensation
arrangements In the event that Cendant,
Realogy
and/or
Travelport are not able to meet certain deferred compensation
obligations under specified plans for certain current and former
officers and directors because of bankruptcy or insolvency, we
have guaranteed such obligations (to the extent relating to
amounts deferred in respect of 2005 and earlier). This guarantee
will remain outstanding until such deferred compensation
balances are distributed to the respective officers and
directors. The maximum exposure cannot be quantified as the
guarantee, in part, is related to the value of deferred
investments as of the date of the requested distribution.
Additionally, the timing of payment, if any, related to these
liabilities cannot be reasonably predicted because the
distribution dates are not fixed.
|
Transactions
with Avis Budget Group, Realogy and Travelport
Prior to our Separation from Cendant, we entered into a
Transition Services Agreement (TSA) with Avis Budget
Group, Realogy and Travelport to provide for an orderly
transition to becoming an independent company. Under the TSA,
each of the companies agreed to provide us with various
services, including services relating to human resources and
employee benefits, payroll, financial systems management,
treasury and cash management, accounts payable services,
telecommunications services and information technology services.
In certain cases, services provided under the TSA may be
provided by one of the separated companies following the date of
such companys separation from Cendant. During 2006, we
recorded $8 million of expenses and less than
$1 million in other income in the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income related to these agreements.
Separation
and Related Costs
During 2006, we incurred costs of $99 million in connection
with executing the Separation. Such costs consisted primarily of
(i) the acceleration of vesting of Cendant equity awards
and the related equitable adjustments of such awards (see
Note 16 to our Consolidated and Combined Financial
Statements), (ii) an impairment charge due to a rebranding
initiative for our Fairfield and Trendwest trademarks (see
Note 2 to our Consolidated and Combined Financial
Statements) and (iii) consulting and payroll-related
services.
Contractual
Obligations
The following table summarizes our future contractual
obligations for the twelve month periods beginning on
January 1st of each of the years set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Securitized
debt(a)
|
|
$
|
178
|
|
|
$
|
255
|
|
|
$
|
537
|
|
|
$
|
93
|
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
|
$
|
315
|
|
|
$
|
1,463
|
|
Long-term
debt(b)
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
901
|
|
|
|
1,437
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
Other purchase
commitments(c)
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
729
|
|
|
$
|
349
|
|
|
$
|
616
|
|
|
$
|
169
|
|
|
$
|
506
|
|
|
$
|
1,239
|
|
|
$
|
3,608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Amounts exclude interest expense,
as the amounts ultimately paid will depend on amounts
outstanding under our secured obligations and interest rates in
effect during each period.
|
|
(b) |
|
Excludes future cash payments
related to interest expense on our 6.00% senior unsecured
notes and term loan of $66 million during each year from
2007 through 2010, $59 million during 2011 and
$239 million thereafter.
|
|
(c) |
|
Primarily represents commitments
for the development of vacation ownership properties.
|
73
In addition to the above and in connection with our separation
from Cendant, we entered into certain guarantee commitments with
Cendant (pursuant to our assumption of certain liabilities and
our obligation to indemnify Cendant, Realogy and Travelport for
such liabilities) and guarantee commitments related to deferred
compensation arrangements with each of Cendant and Realogy.
These guarantee arrangements primarily relate to certain
contingent litigation liabilities, contingent tax liabilities,
and Cendant contingent and other corporate liabilities, of which
we assumed and are responsible for 37.5% of these Cendant
liabilities. Additionally, if any of the companies responsible
for all or a portion of such liabilities were to default in its
payment of costs or expenses related to any such liability, we
are responsible for a portion of the defaulting party or
parties obligation. We also provide a default guarantee
related to certain deferred compensation arrangements related to
certain current and former senior officers and directors of
Cendant and Realogy. These arrangements were valued upon our
separation from Cendant with the assistance of third- party
experts in accordance with Financial Interpretation No. 45
Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements
for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of
Others and recorded as liabilities on our balance sheet.
To the extent such recorded liabilities are not adequate to
cover the ultimate payment amounts, such excess will be
reflected as an expense to our results of operations in future
periods. See Separation Adjustments and Transactions with former
Parent and Subsidiaries discussion for details of guaranteed
liabilities.
Other
Commercial Commitments And Off-balance Sheet
Arrangements
Purchase Commitments. In the normal course of
business, we make various commitments to purchase goods or
services from specific suppliers, including those related to
vacation ownership resort development and other capital
expenditures. None of the purchase commitments made by us as of
December 31, 2006 (aggregating approximately
$531 million) were individually significant; the majority
relate to commitments for the development of vacation ownership
properties (aggregating $323 million, all of which relates
to 2007).
Standard Guarantees/Indemnifications. In the
ordinary course of business, we enter into numerous agreements
that contain standard guarantees and indemnities whereby we
indemnify another party for breaches of representations and
warranties. In addition, many of these parties are also
indemnified against any third-party claim resulting from the
transaction that is contemplated in the underlying agreement.
Such guarantees and indemnifications are granted under various
agreements, including those governing (i) purchases, sales
or outsourcing of assets or businesses, (ii) leases of real
estate, (iii) licensing of trademarks,
(iv) development of vacation ownership properties,
(v) access to credit facilities and use of derivatives and
(vi) issuances of debt securities. The guarantees and
indemnifications issued are for the benefit of the
(i) buyers in sale agreements and sellers in purchase
agreements, (ii) landlords in lease contracts,
(iii) franchisees in licensing agreements,
(iv) developers in vacation ownership development
agreements, (v) financial institutions in credit facility
arrangements and derivative contracts and (vi) underwriters
in debt security issuances. While some of these guarantees and
indemnifications extend only for the duration of the underlying
agreement, many survive the expiration of the term of the
agreement or extend into perpetuity (unless subject to a legal
statute of limitations). There are no specific limitations on
the maximum potential amount of future payments that we could be
required to make under these guarantees and indemnifications,
nor are we able to develop an estimate of the maximum potential
amount of future payments to be made under these guarantees and
indemnifications as the triggering events are not subject to
predictability. With respect to certain of the aforementioned
guarantees and indemnifications, such as indemnifications of
landlords against third-party claims for the use of real estate
property leased by us, we maintain insurance coverage that
mitigates any potential payments to be made.
Other Guarantees/Indemnifications. In the
normal course of business, our vacation ownership business
provides guarantees to certain property owners
associations for funds required to operate and maintain vacation
ownership properties in excess of assessments collected from
owners of the vacation ownership interests. We may be required
to fund such excess as a result of our unsold owned vacation
ownership interests or failure by owners to pay such
assessments. These guarantees extend for the duration of the
underlying subsidy agreements (which generally approximate one
year and are renewable on an
74
annual basis) or until a stipulated percentage (typically 80% or
higher) of related vacation ownership interests are sold. The
maximum potential future payments that we could be required to
make under these guarantees was approximately $230 million
as of December 31, 2006. We would only be required to pay
this maximum amount if none of the owners assessed paid their
assessments. Any assessments collected from the owners of the
vacation ownership interests would reduce the maximum potential
amount of future payments to be made by us. Additionally, should
we be required to fund the deficit through the payment of any
owners assessments under these guarantees, we would be
permitted access to the property for our own use and may use
that property to engage in revenue-producing activities, such as
marketing or rental. Historically, we have not been required to
make material payments under these guarantees, as the fees
collected from owners of vacation ownership interests have been
sufficient to support the operation and maintenance of the
vacation ownership properties. As of December 31, 2006, we
recorded a liability in connection with these guarantees of
$14 million.
Securitizations. We pool qualifying vacation
ownership contract receivables and sell them to
bankruptcy-remote entities. Prior to September 1, 2003,
sales of vacation ownership contract receivables were treated as
off-balance sheet sales as the entities utilized were structured
as bankruptcy-remote QSPEs pursuant to SFAS No. 140
Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets
and Extinguishments of Liabilities. Subsequent to
September 1, 2003, newly originated as well as certain
legacy vacation ownership contract receivables are securitized
through bankruptcy-remote SPEs that are consolidated within our
financial statements.
Letters of Credit. As of December 31,
2006, we had $30 million of irrevocable standby letters of
credit outstanding, which mainly relate to support for
development activity at our vacation ownership business.
Critical
Accounting Policies
In presenting our financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles, we are required to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported
therein. Several of the estimates and assumptions we are
required to make relate to matters that are inherently uncertain
as they pertain to future events. However, events that are
outside of our control cannot be predicted and, as such, they
cannot be contemplated in evaluating such estimates and
assumptions. If there is a significant unfavorable change to
current conditions, it could result in a material adverse impact
to our consolidated and combined results of operations,
financial position and liquidity. We believe that the estimates
and assumptions we used when preparing our financial statements
were the most appropriate at that time. Presented below are
those accounting policies that we believe require subjective and
complex judgments that could potentially affect reported
results. However, the majority of our businesses operate in
environments where we are paid a fee for a service performed,
and therefore the results of the majority of our recurring
operations are recorded in our financial statements using
accounting policies that are not particularly subjective, nor
complex.
Vacation Ownership Revenue Recognition. Our
sales of VOIs are either cash sales or seller-financed sales. In
order for us to recognize revenues of VOI sales under the full
accrual method of accounting described in SFAS No. 66,
Accounting of Sales of Real Estate for fully
constructed inventory, a binding sales contract must have been
executed, the statutory rescission period must have expired
(after which time the purchasers are not entitled to a refund
except for non-delivery by us), receivables must have been
deemed collectible and the remainder of our obligations must
have been substantially completed. In addition, before we
recognize any revenues on VOI sales, the purchaser of the VOI
must have met the initial investment criteria and, as
applicable, the continuing investment criteria, by executing a
legally binding financing contract. A purchaser has met the
initial investment criteria when a minimum down payment of 10%
is received by us. As a result of the adoption of
SFAS No. 152 and
SOP 04-2
on January 1, 2006, we must also take into consideration
the fair value of certain incentives provided to the purchaser
when assessing the adequacy of the purchasers initial
investment. In those cases where financing is provided to the
purchaser by us, the purchaser is obligated to remit monthly
payments under financing contracts that
75
represent the purchasers continuing investment. The
contractual terms of seller-provided financing arrangements
require that the contractual level of annual principal payments
be sufficient to amortize the loan over a customary period for
the VOI being financed, which is generally seven to ten years,
and payments under the financing contracts begin within
45 days of the sale and receipt of the minimum down payment
of 10%. We use a methodology to estimate and record a provision
for loan losses on our vacation ownership contract receivables,
which include consideration of such factors as economic
conditions, defaults, past due aging and historical write-offs
of contracts. Prior to 2006, our provision for loan losses was
presented as expenses on the Combined Statements of Income. Upon
the adoption of SFAS No. 152 and
SOP 04-2
on January 1, 2006, the provision for loan losses is now
classified as a reduction of vacation ownership interest sales
on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income (see
Allowance for Loan Losses discussed below).
If all of the criteria for a VOI sale to qualify under the full
accrual method of accounting have been met, as discussed above,
except that construction of the VOI purchased is not complete,
we recognize revenues using the
percentage-of-completion
method of accounting provided that the preliminary construction
phase is complete and that a minimum sales level has been met
(to assure that the property will not revert to a rental
property). The preliminary stage of development is deemed to be
complete when the engineering and design work is complete, the
construction contracts have been executed, the site has been
cleared, prepared and excavated, and the building foundation is
complete. The completion percentage is determined by the
proportion of real estate inventory costs incurred to total
estimated costs. These estimated costs are based upon historical
experience and the related contractual terms. The remaining
revenue and related costs of sales, including commissions and
direct expenses, are deferred and recognized as the remaining
costs are incurred. Until a contract for sale qualifies for
revenue recognition, all payments received are accounted for as
restricted cash and deposits within other current assets and
deferred income, respectively, on the Consolidated and Combined
Balance Sheets. Commissions and other direct costs related to
the sale are deferred until the sale is recorded. If a contract
is cancelled before qualifying as a sale, non-recoverable
expenses are charged to the current period as part of operating
expenses on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income.
Changes in costs could lead to adjustments to the percentage of
completion status of a project, which may result in difference
in the timing and amount of revenue recognized from the
construction of vacation ownership properties. This policy
changed upon our adoption of SFAS No. 152 and
SOP 04-2,
which is discussed in greater detail in Note 1 and
Note 2 to the Consolidated and Combined Financial
Statements.
Allowance for Loan Losses. In our Vacation
Ownership segment, we provide for estimated vacation ownership
contract receivable cancellations at the time of VOI sales by
recording a provision for loan losses on the Consolidated and
Combined Statements of Income. We consider factors such as
economic conditions, defaults, past-due aging and historical
write-offs of vacation ownership contract receivables to
evaluate the adequacy of the allowance. Upon the adoption of
SFAS No. 152 and
SOP 04-2
on January 1, 2006, the provision for loan losses is
classified as a reduction to revenue with no change made to
prior periods presented.
Business Combinations. A component of our
growth strategy has been to acquire and integrate businesses
that complement our existing operations. We account for business
combinations in accordance with SFAS No. 141,
Business Combinations and related literature.
Accordingly, we allocate the purchase price of acquired
companies to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and
liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair values at
the date of purchase. The difference between the purchase price
and the fair value of the net assets acquired is recorded as
goodwill.
In determining the fair values of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in a business combination, we use various
recognized valuation methods including present value modeling
and referenced market values (where available). Further, we make
assumptions within certain valuation techniques including
discount rates and timing of future cash flows. Valuations are
performed by management or independent valuation specialists
under managements supervision, where appropriate. We
believe that the estimated fair values assigned to the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed are based on reasonable
assumptions that marketplace participants would use. However,
such assumptions are inherently uncertain and actual results
could differ from those estimates.
76
With regard to the goodwill and other indefinite-lived
intangible assets recorded in connection with business
combinations, we annually or, more frequently if circumstances
indicate impairment may have occurred, review their carrying
values as required by SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets. In performing this review, we are
required to make an assessment of fair value for our goodwill
and other indefinite-lived intangible assets. When determining
fair value, we utilize various assumptions, including
projections of future cash flows. A change in these underlying
assumptions could cause a change in the results of the tests
and, as such, could cause the fair value to be less than the
respective carrying amount. In such event, we would then be
required to record a charge, which would impact earnings.
The aggregate carrying values of our goodwill and other
indefinite-lived intangible assets were $2,699 million and
$619 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2006
and $2,645 million and $580 million, respectively, as
of December 31, 2005. Our goodwill and other
indefinite-lived intangible assets are allocated among our three
reporting segments.
Income Taxes. We recognize deferred tax assets
and liabilities based on the differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and
liabilities. We regularly review our deferred tax assets to
assess their potential realization and establish a valuation
allowance for portions of such assets that we believe will not
be ultimately realized. In performing this review, we make
estimates and assumptions regarding projected future taxable
income, the expected timing of the reversals of existing
temporary differences and the implementation of tax planning
strategies. A change in these assumptions could cause an
increase or decrease to our valuation allowance resulting in an
increase or decrease in our effective tax rate, which could
materially impact our results of operations.
Changes
in Accounting Policies
During 2006, we adopted the following standards as a result of
the issuance of new accounting pronouncements:
|
|
|
|
l
|
SFAS No. 152, Accounting for Real Estate
Time-Sharing Transactions and Statement of Position
No. 04-2,
Accounting for Real Estate Time-Sharing Transactions
|
|
|
l
|
SFAS No. 123(R), Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation
|
|
|
l
|
SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error
Corrections a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20
and FASB Statement No. 3
|
|
|
l
|
SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans an amendment of SFAS No. 87, 88, 106
and 132
®
|
|
|
l
|
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, Considering
the Effect of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying
Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements.
|
We will adopt the following recently issued standards as
required:
|
|
|
|
l
|
SFAS No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of
Financial Assets an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 140
|
|
|
l
|
FASB Staff Position
FIN 46R-6,
Determining the Variability to be considered in Applying
FASB Interpretation No. 46R
|
|
|
l
|
FASB Interpretation No 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109
|
|
|
l
|
SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
|
For detailed information regarding these pronouncements and the
impact thereof on our business, see Note 2 to our
Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements.
77
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We use various financial instruments, particularly swap
contracts and interest rate caps to manage and reduce the
interest rate risk related to our debt. Foreign currency
forwards are also used to manage and reduce the foreign currency
exchange rate risk associated with our foreign currency
denominated receivables and forecasted royalties, forecasted
earnings of foreign subsidiaries and other transactions.
We are exclusively an end user of these instruments, which are
commonly referred to as derivatives. We do not engage in
trading, market making or other speculative activities in the
derivatives markets. More detailed information about these
financial instruments is provided in Note 18 to the
Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements. Our principal
market exposures are interest and foreign currency rate risks.
|
|
|
|
l
|
Interest rate movements in one country, as well as relative
interest rate movements between countries can materially impact
our profitability. Our primary interest rate exposure as of
December 31, 2006 was to interest rate fluctuations in the
United States, specifically LIBOR and commercial paper interest
rates due to their impact on variable rate borrowings and other
interest rate sensitive liabilities. We anticipate that LIBOR
and commercial paper rates will remain a primary market risk
exposure for the foreseeable future.
|
|
|
l
|
We have foreign currency rate exposure to exchange rate
fluctuations worldwide and particularly with respect to the
British pound, Euro and Canadian dollar. We anticipate that such
foreign currency exchange rate risk will remain a market risk
exposure for the foreseeable future.
|
We assess our market risk based on changes in interest and
foreign currency exchange rates utilizing a sensitivity
analysis. The sensitivity analysis measures the potential impact
in earnings, fair values and cash flows based on a hypothetical
10% change (increase and decrease) in interest and currency
rates.
The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables,
accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current
liabilities approximate carrying values due to the short-term
nature of these assets. We use a discounted cash flow model in
determining the fair values of vacation ownership contract
receivables and our retained interests in securitized assets.
The primary assumptions used in determining fair value are
prepayment speeds, estimated loss rates and discount rates. We
use a duration-based model in determining the impact of interest
rate shifts on our debt and interest rate derivatives. The
primary assumption used in these models is that a 10% increase
or decrease in the benchmark interest rate produces a parallel
shift in the yield curve across all maturities.
We use a current market pricing model to assess the changes in
the value of the U.S. dollar on foreign currency
denominated monetary assets and liabilities and derivatives. The
primary assumption used in these models is a hypothetical 10%
weakening or strengthening of the U.S. dollar against all
our currency exposures as of December 31, 2006, 2005 and
2004.
Our total market risk is influenced by a wide variety of factors
including the volatility present within the markets and the
liquidity of the markets. There are certain limitations inherent
in the sensitivity analyses presented. While probably the most
meaningful analysis, these shock tests are
constrained by several factors, including the necessity to
conduct the analysis based on a single point in time and the
inability to include the complex market reactions that normally
would arise from the market shifts modeled.
We used December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 market rates on
outstanding financial instruments to perform the sensitivity
analyses separately for each of our market risk
exposures interest and currency rate instruments.
The estimates are based on the market risk sensitive portfolios
described in the preceding paragraphs and assume instantaneous,
parallel shifts in interest rate yield curves and exchange rates.
We have determined that the impact of a 10% change in interest
and foreign currency exchange rates and prices on our earnings,
fair values and cash flows would not be material at
December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005. While these
results may be used as benchmarks, they should not be viewed as
forecasts.
78
BUSINESS
Overview
As one of the worlds largest hospitality companies, we
offer individual consumers and
business-to-business
customers a broad suite of hospitality products and services
across various accommodation alternatives and price ranges
through our premier portfolio of world-renowned brands. With
more than 20 brands, which include Wyndham Hotels and Resorts,
Ramada, Days Inn, Super 8, TripRewards, RCI, Landal
GreenParks, English Country Cottages, Novasol, Wyndham Vacation
Resorts (formerly Fairfield Resorts) and WorldMark by Wyndham
(formerly Trendwest Resorts), we have built a significant
presence in most major hospitality markets in the United States
and throughout the rest of the world. For 2006, total spending
by domestic and international travelers in the United States was
expected to be $675 billion, an increase of approximately
5% from spending levels in 2005 and of approximately 16% from
spending levels in 2000, which witnessed the highest ever levels
of travel spending for any year prior to the September 11,
2001 terrorist attacks. Globally, travel spending was expected
to grow by 5% in 2006 to $4.5 trillion. Historically, we have
pursued what we believe to be financially-attractive entrance
points in the major global hospitality markets to strengthen our
portfolio of products and services. Wyndham Worldwide is well
positioned to compete in the major hospitality segments of this
large and growing industry.
We operate primarily in the lodging, vacation exchange and
rentals, and vacation ownership segments of the hospitality
industry:
|
|
|
|
l
|
Through our lodging business, we franchise hotels in the
upscale, middle and economy segments of the lodging industry and
provide property management services to owners of luxury and
upscale hotels;
|
|
|
l
|
Through our vacation exchange and rentals business, we provide
vacation exchange products and services to owners of intervals
of vacation ownership interests, and we market vacation rental
properties primarily on behalf of independent owners; and
|
|
|
l
|
Through our vacation ownership business, we market and sell
vacation ownership interests to individual consumers, provide
consumer financing in connection with the sale of vacation
ownership interests and provide property management services at
resorts.
|
Each of our lodging, vacation exchange and rentals and vacation
ownership businesses has a long operating history. Our lodging
business began operations in 1990 with the acquisition of the
Howard Johnson and Ramada brands, each of which opened its first
hotel in 1954. RCI, the best known brand in our vacation
exchange and rentals business, was established more than
30 years ago, and our vacation ownership brands, Wyndham
Vacation Resorts and Wyndham Resort Development Corporation,
which operates as WorldMark by Wyndham, began vacation ownership
operations in 1980 and 1989, respectively.
We provide directly to individual consumers our high quality
products and services, including the various accommodations we
market, such as hotels, vacation resorts, villas and cottages,
and products we offer, such as vacation ownership interests. We
also provide valuable products and services to our
business-to-business
customers, such as franchisees, affiliated resort developers and
prospective developers. These products and services include
marketing and central reservation systems, back office services
and loyalty programs. We strive to provide value-added products
and services that are intended both to enhance the travel
experience of the individual consumer and to drive revenue to
our
business-to-business
customers. The depth and breadth of our businesses across
different segments of the hospitality industry provide us with
the opportunity to expand our relationships with our existing
individual consumers and
business-to-business
customers in one or more segments of our business by offering
them additional or alternative products and services from our
other segments.
79
The largest portion of our revenues comes from fees we receive
in exchange for providing products and services. We receive
fees, for example, as royalties for utilizing our brands and for
providing property management and vacation exchange and rentals
services. The remainder of our revenues comes from the proceeds
of sales of products, such as vacation ownership interests, and
related services. The fees we earn by providing products and
services and proceeds from sales of our products and services
provide us with strong and stable cash flows.
Global
Operations
Our lodging, vacation exchange and rentals and vacation
ownership businesses all have operations outside the United
States. In 2006, we derived 78% of our revenues in the United
States and 22% internationally while we had 79% of our
long-lived assets in the United States and 21% internationally.
The table below notes the more significant countries of
operations ($ in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
2,997
|
|
|
$
|
2,714
|
|
|
$
|
2,385
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
Netherlands
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
Other
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,842
|
|
|
$
|
3,471
|
|
|
$
|
3,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
3,690
|
|
|
$
|
3,478
|
|
|
$
|
3,283
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Netherlands
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
422
|
|
Other
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,653
|
|
|
$
|
4,355
|
|
|
$
|
4,320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
History
and Development
Previously, we were a wholly owned subsidiary of Cendant
Corporation (which changed its name to Avis Budget Group in
September 2006). Cendant Corporation was created in December
1997 through the merger of CUC International, Inc., or CUC, and
HFS Incorporated, or HFS. Prior to the merger, HFS was a major
hospitality, real estate and car rental franchisor. At the time
of the merger, HFS franchised hotels worldwide through brands,
such as Ramada, Days Inn, Super 8, Howard Johnson and
Travelodge. Subsequent to the merger, Cendant took a number of
steps and completed a number of transactions to grow its
Hospitality Services business and to develop its Timeshare
Resorts business (which is the same business as our vacation
ownership business), including the following:
|
|
|
|
l
|
entry into the vacation ownership business with the acquisitions
of Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham in 2001 and
2002, respectively;
|
|
|
l
|
entry into the vacation rentals business through the acquisition
of various brands, including Cuendet and the Holiday Cottages
group of brands, which includes English Country Cottages, in
2001, Novasol in 2002, and Landal GreenParks and Canvas Holidays
in 2004;
|
|
|
l
|
commencement of the TripRewards loyalty program in 2003;
|
80
|
|
|
|
l
|
purchase of all remaining ownership rights to the Ramada brand
on a worldwide basis from Marriott International in 2004;
|
|
|
l
|
acquisition of the global Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand,
related vacation ownership development rights and selected hotel
property management contracts in 2005; and
|
|
|
l
|
acquisition of the Baymont brand in April 2006
|
Prior to July 31, 2006, Cendant transferred to Wyndham
Worldwide all of the assets and liabilities, including the
entities holding substantially all of the assets and
liabilities, of Cendants Hospitality Services (including
Timeshare Resorts) businesses and, on July 31, 2006,
Cendant distributed all of the shares of Wyndham common stock to
the holders of Cendant common stock issued and outstanding on
July 21, 2006, the record date for the distribution. The
separation was effective on July 31, 2006. On
August 1, 2006, we commenced regular way
trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
WYN.
Subsequent to our separation from Cendant, we further expanded
our presence in the Lodging industry by acquiring a 30% equity
interest in CHI Limited, a joint venture that provides
management services to luxury and upper upscale hotels in
Europe, the Middle East and Africa. As of December 31,
2006, we were providing property management services to 17
hotels branded as Corinthia through this joint venture. We
expect 13 of these hotels to be branded or cobranded as Wyndham
or Ramada during 2007.
Industry
Overview
The hospitality industry is a major component of the travel
industry, which is the third-largest retail industry in the
United States after the automotive and food stores industries.
The general health of the hospitality industry is affected by
the performance of the U.S. economy. From
1981-2006,
the U.S. economy has performed solidly as evidenced by the
growth of the U.S. real Gross Domestic Product, or real
GDP, at a compound annual growth rate, or CAGR, of 3.2% over the
period. In 2006, the U.S. economy continued to perform
solidly and it is expected to continue to perform solidly in
2007 and 2008 with real GDP expected to grow by approximately
2.6% and 3.2%, respectively.
The hospitality industry includes the segments in which Wyndham
Worldwide operates lodging, vacation exchange and
rentals, and vacation ownership. In spite of the recent series
of unprecedented challenges faced by the hospitality industry,
including terrorism, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)
and natural disasters, the industry is growing. In 2005,
domestic and international travelers spent in the United States
an estimated $646 billion, which represents nearly an 8%
increase from the prior year. In 2006, it was expected that the
total spending by such travelers in the United States would
reach $675 billion, which would be an increase of nearly 5%
over 2005s spending. This level of expected spending in
2006 was 16% higher than the spending in 2000, the year prior to
the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
Lodging
Industry
The $134 billion domestic lodging industry is a growing
segment of the hospitality industry. Companies in the lodging
industry generally operate in one or more of the various lodging
segments, including luxury, upscale, middle and economy, and
generally operate under one or more business models, including
franchise, management
and/or
ownership. The lodging industry is an important component of the
U.S. hospitality industry. In 2006, the U.S. lodging
industry boasted approximately 49,000 properties, which
represented approximately 4.5 million guest rooms, which
are comprised of approximately 3.0 million rooms in
franchised hotels and approximately 1.5 million rooms in
independent hotels. According to PricewaterhouseCoopers
forecast, the U.S. lodging industry is expected to gross
$25.1 billion in pre-tax profits in 2006, which represents
an 11% increase from the prior year, followed by
$27.2 billion in 2007 and $29.6 billion in 2008.
Growth in demand in the lodging industry is driven by two main
factors: (i) the general health of the travel and tourism
industry and (ii) the propensity for corporate spending on
business travel. Demand for
81
lodging grew by a 1.3% CAGR in the United States from 2000
through 2006. During this seven year period, the industry added
approximately 639,000 rooms. Demand for lodging has grown even
faster in the past four years from 2003 to 2006 at a 3.3% CAGR.
Even with the recent increase in the number of hotel rooms,
demand in the past few years has been outpacing supply, which
creates a favorable business environment for lodging companies.
Performance in the lodging industry is measured by certain key
metrics, such as average daily rate, or ADR, average occupancy
rate and revenue per available room, or RevPAR, which is
calculated by multiplying the ADR by the average occupancy rate.
Over the past five years, the trends in these performance
metrics have generally indicated that the lodging industry is
growing. In 2006, the ADR in the United States was $97.24, which
is 7.0% higher than the rate in the prior year, the average
occupancy rate was 63.4%, which is 0.4% higher than the rate in
the prior year and RevPAR was $61.62, which is 7.4% higher than
RevPAR in the prior year. The following table demonstrates the
trends in the key performance metrics:
Trends in
Performance Metrics in the United States since 2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
Average Daily
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
Year
|
|
Rate
|
|
Rate
|
|
Rate (ADR)
|
|
in ADR
|
|
RevPAR
|
|
RevPAR
|
|
2001
|
|
|
59.7
|
%
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)%
|
|
$
|
83.96
|
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)%
|
|
$
|
50.16
|
|
|
|
(7.0
|
)%
|
2002
|
|
|
59.0
|
%
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)%
|
|
|
82.71
|
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)%
|
|
|
48.81
|
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)%
|
2003
|
|
|
59.2
|
%
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
82.82
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
49.02
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
2004
|
|
|
61.3
|
%
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
86.25
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
52.89
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
2005
|
|
|
63.1
|
%
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
|
90.89
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
|
57.35
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
2006
|
|
|
63.4
|
%
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
97.24
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
|
|
61.62
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
2007E
|
|
|
63.3
|
%
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
|
102.91
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
65.18
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
Sources: Smith Travel Research;
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Performance in the lodging industry is also measured by revenues
earned by companies in the industry and by the number of new
rooms added on a yearly basis. In 2006, the lodging industry
earned revenues of $134 billion and added 118,800 new
rooms. The following table demonstrates trends in revenues and
new rooms:
Trends in
Revenues and New Rooms in the United States since 2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Change in
|
|
New
|
|
Change in
|
Year
|
|
($bn)
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Rooms (000s)
|
|
New Rooms
|
|
2001
|
|
$
|
103.5
|
|
|
|
(7.7
|
)%
|
|
|
90.5
|
|
|
|
(24.8
|
)%
|
2002
|
|
|
102.5
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)%
|
|
|
68.4
|
|
|
|
(24.4
|
)%
|
2003
|
|
|
105.1
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
76.6
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
2004
|
|
|
114.0
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
80.7
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
2005
|
|
|
123.9
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
|
|
83.6
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
2006
|
|
|
133.9
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
|
|
118.8
|
|
|
|
42.1
|
%
|
2007E
|
|
|
144.0
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
|
|
124.7
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
Sources: Smith Travel Research;
PricewaterhouseCoopers
The lodging industry generally can be divided into four main
segments: (i) luxury; (ii) upscale, which also
includes upper upscale properties, (iii) midscale, which is
often further split into midscale with food and beverage and
midscale without food and beverage; and (iv) economy.
Luxury and upscale hotels typically offer a full range of
on-property amenities and services including restaurants, spas,
recreational facilities, business center, concierge, room
service and local transportation (shuttle service to airport,
local
82
attractions and shopping). Midscale segment properties typically
offer limited breakfast service, vending, selected business
services, partial recreational facilities (either a pool or
fitness equipment) and limited transportation (airport shuttle).
Economy properties typically offer a swimming pool and airport
shuttle. The following table sets forth the information on the
ADR and on supply and demand for each segment and the associated
subsegments:
Lodging
Segments for Franchised Hotels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2006 Room
|
|
|
|
|
Average Daily
|
|
Rooms Sold
|
|
Change in
|
|
Supply
|
|
Change in
|
Segment (*)
|
|
Room Rate (ADR)
|
|
(Demand, 000s)
|
|
Demand
|
|
(000s)
|
|
Supply
|
|
Luxury
|
|
Greater than $180
|
|
|
55.0
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
|
77.0
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
Upper upscale
|
|
$115 to $180
|
|
|
386.6
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
542.8
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
Upscale
|
|
$85 to $115
|
|
|
281.0
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
400.3
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
Midscale with
food-and-beverage
|
|
$57 to $85
|
|
|
321.1
|
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)%
|
|
|
539.6
|
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)%
|
Midscale without
food-and-beverage
|
|
$57 to $85
|
|
|
445.8
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
672.1
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
Economy
|
|
Less than $57
|
|
|
421.8
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
|
736.4
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
Sources: Smith Travel Research;
PricewaterhouseCoopers Hospitality Directions,
U.S. Edition, December 2006.
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
The economy segments
(upper economy, economy and lower economy) of our lodging
brands, while based on the Smith Travel Research chain-scale
segments represented in the table above, provide a greater
degree of differentiation to correspond with the price
sensitivities of our customers by brand. The middle
segment of our lodging brands encompasses both the Smith Travel
Research midscale without food and beverage and
midscale with food and beverage segments. See the
System Performance and Distribution Table below.
|
Typically, companies in the lodging industry operate under one
or more of the following three business models:
|
|
|
|
l
|
Franchise. Under the franchise model, a
company, which under this model is referred to as a franchisor,
typically grants the use of a brand name to owners of hotels
that the company neither owns nor manages in exchange for
royalty fees that are typically equal to a percentage of room
sales. Owners of independent hotels increasingly have been
affiliating their hotels with national lodging franchise brands
as a means to remain competitive. In 2006, the share of hotel
rooms in the United States affiliated with a national lodging
chain was approximately 67%.
|
|
|
l
|
Management. Under the management model,
a company provides property management services to lodging
properties that it owns
and/or
lodging properties owned by a third party in exchange for
management fees, which may include incentive fees based on the
financial performances of the properties.
|
|
|
l
|
Ownership. Under the ownership model, a
company owns properties and therefore benefits financially from
hotel revenues and any appreciation in the value of the
properties.
|
Vacation
Exchange and Rentals Industry
The estimated $39 billion global vacation exchange and
rentals industry is a growing segment of the hospitality
industry. Industry providers offer products and services to both
leisure travelers and vacation property owners, including owners
of second homes and vacation ownership interests. The vacation
exchange and rentals industry offers leisure travelers access to
a range of fully-furnished vacation properties, which include
privately-owned vacation homes, apartments and condominiums,
vacation ownership resorts, inventory at hotels and resorts,
villas, cottages, boats and yachts. Providers offer leisure
travelers flexibility (subject to availability) as to time of
travel and a choice of lodging options in regions to which such
travelers may not typically have such ease of access. For
vacation property owners, affiliations with vacation exchange
companies or vacation rental companies allow such owners to
transfer the ability to facilitate
83
exchanges of interests in vacation properties or marketing and
renting vacation properties, as applicable, and, with respect to
vacation properties for rental, to transfer the responsibility
of managing such properties.
The vacation exchange industry provides to owners of intervals
flexibility with respect to vacations through vacation
exchanges. Companies that offer vacation exchange services
include, among others RCI (our global vacation exchange business
and the worlds largest vacation exchange network),
Interval International, Inc. (a third-party exchange company),
and companies that develop vacation ownership resorts and market
vacation ownership interests and offer exchanges through
internal networks of properties. To participate in a vacation
exchange, an owner generally contributes intervals to an
exchange companys network and then indicates the
particular resort or geographic area to which the owner would
like to travel, the size of the unit desired and the period
during which the owner would like to vacation. The exchange
company then rates the owners contributed intervals based
upon a number of factors, including the location and size of the
unit or units, the quality of the resort or resorts and the time
period or periods during which the intervals entitle the owner
to vacation. The exchange company then generally offers the
owner a vacation with a comparable rating to the vacation that
the owner contributed. Exchange companies generally derive
revenues from owners of intervals by charging exchange fees for
exchanges and through annual membership dues. In 2005, over 70%
of owners of intervals were members of vacation exchange
companies, and approximately two-thirds of such owners exchanged
their intervals through such exchange companies.
The overall trend in the vacation exchange industry is growth in
the number of members of vacation exchange companies. We believe
that the vacation exchange industry will be favorably impacted
by the growth in the premium and luxury segments of the vacation
ownership industry through the increased sales of vacation
ownership interests at high-end luxury resorts and the continued
development of vacation ownership properties and products,
including condominium hotels and destination clubs. The vacation
exchange industry is expected to grow over the next few years
with respect to members and with respect to exchanges by
members. In 2005, there were more than five million members who
completed over 3.5 million exchanges.
The vacation rental industry offers vacation property owners the
opportunity to rent their properties to leisure travelers for
periods of time when the properties are unoccupied. The vacation
rental industry is not as organized as the lodging industry in
that the vacation rental industry, we believe, has no global
companies and no international reservation systems or global
brands. The global supply of vacation rental inventory is highly
fragmented with much of it being made available by individual
property owners (as contrasted with commercial hospitality
providers). Although these owners sometimes rent their
properties directly, with or without the assistance of property
managers and brokers, vacation rental companies often assist in
renting owners properties without the benefit of globally
recognized brands or international marketing and reservation
systems. Sales by vacation rental companies are growing more
rapidly than sales by other suppliers of inventory in the
vacation rental industry. Typically, vacation rental companies
collect rent in advance and, after deducting the applicable
commissions, remit the net amounts due to the property owners
and/or
property managers. In addition to commissions, vacation rental
companies earn revenues from rental customers through fees that
are incidental to the rental of the properties, such as fees for
travel services, local transportation,
on-site
services and insurance or similar type products.
We believe that as of December 31, 2006, there were
approximately 1.5 million and 1.1 million vacation
properties available for rental in the United States and Europe,
respectively. In the United States, the vacation properties
available for rental are primarily condominiums or stand-alone
houses. In Europe, the vacation properties available for rental
include individual homes and apartments, campsites and vacation
parks. Individual owners of vacation properties in the United
States and Europe principally own their properties as
investments and often only use such properties for portions of
the year.
We believe that the overall demand for vacation rentals has been
growing for the following reasons: (i) the continuing
growth of low-cost airline operations; (ii) the increased
use of the Internet as a tool for facilitating vacation rental
transactions; and (iii) the emergence of attractive,
low-cost destinations, such as Eastern Europe and the Middle
East. The demand per year for vacation rentals in Europe, the
United
84
States, South Africa and Australia is approximately
49 million vacation weeks, 31 million of which are
rented by leisure travelers from Europe. Demand for vacation
rental properties is often regional in that leisure travelers
who rent properties often live relatively close to such
properties. Many leisure travelers, however, travel relatively
long distances from their homes to vacation properties in
domestic or international destinations.
The destinations where leisure travelers from Europe, the United
States, South Africa and Australia generally rent properties
vary by country of origin of the leisure travelers. Leisure
travelers from Europe generally rent properties in European
destinations, including Spain, France, Italy and Portugal, which
are the most popular destinations for European leisure
travelers. Demand from European leisure travelers has recently
been shifting beyond traditional Western Europe, based on
political stability across Europe, increased accessibility of
Eastern Europe, expansion of the European Union and expansion of
tourism in southern Mediterranean destinations. Demand by
leisure travelers from the United States is focused on rentals
in traditional destinations, such as Florida; Las Vegas, Nevada;
San Francisco, California; and New York City.
We believe that the overall supply of vacation rental properties
has been growing as a result of the growth in ownership of
second homes. Growth in ownership of second homes, however,
could adversely affect demand for vacation rental properties to
the extent that owners of such homes no longer are as likely to
rent vacation properties as such owners were before they bought
second homes.
The
Vacation Ownership Industry
The $13 billion global vacation ownership industry, which
is also referred to as the timeshare industry, is one of the
fastest-developing segments of the domestic and international
hospitality industry. The vacation ownership industry enables
customers to share ownership of a fully-furnished vacation
accommodation. Typically, a vacation ownership purchaser
acquires either a fee simple interest in a property, which gives
the purchaser title to a fraction of a unit, or a right to use a
property, which gives the purchaser the right to use a property
for a specified period of time. Generally, a vacation ownership
purchasers fee simple interest in or right to use a
property is referred to as a vacation ownership
interest. For many vacation ownership interest purchasers,
vacation ownership is an attractive vacation alternative to
traditional lodging accommodations at hotels or owning vacation
properties. Owners of vacation ownership interests are not
subject to the variance in room rates to which lodging customers
are subject, and vacation ownership units are, on average, more
than twice the size of traditional hotel rooms and typically
have more amenities, such as kitchens, than do traditional hotel
rooms.
The vacation ownership concept originated in Europe during the
late 1960s and spread to the United States shortly thereafter.
The vacation ownership industry expanded slowly in the United
States until the mid-1980s; since then, the vacation ownership
industry has grown at a double-digit CAGR. The American Resort
Development Association, or ARDA, indicates that sales of
vacation ownership interests grew in excess of 17% CAGR from
1995 to 2005. Based on ARDA research, domestic sales of vacation
ownership interests were approximately $8,610 million in
2005 compared to $4,200 million in 2000 and
$1,900 million in 1995. ARDA estimated that on
January 1, 2006, there were approximately 4.1 million
households that owned one or more vacation ownership interests
in the United States.
Based on published industry data, we believe that the following
factors have contributed to the substantial growth, particularly
in North America, of the vacation ownership industry over the
past two decades:
|
|
|
|
l
|
increased consumer confidence in the industry based on enhanced
consumer protection regulation of the industry;
|
|
|
l
|
entry of lodging and entertainment companies into the industry,
including Marriott International, Inc., The Walt Disney Company,
Hilton Hotels Corporation, Hyatt Corporation, and Starwood
Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc.;
|
85
|
|
|
|
l
|
increased flexibility for owners of vacation ownership interests
made possible through owners affiliations with vacation
ownership exchange companies and vacation ownership
companies internal exchange programs;
|
|
|
l
|
improvement in quality of resorts and resort management and
servicing; and
|
|
|
l
|
improved financing availability for purchasers of vacation
ownership interests.
|
Demographic factors explain, in part, the growth of the
industry. A 2006 study of vacation ownership purchasers revealed
that the average owner was 52 years of age and had a median
household income of $81,000. The average purchaser in the United
States, therefore, is a baby boomer who has disposable income
and interest in purchasing vacation products. We expect that
baby boomers will continue to have a positive influence on the
future growth of the vacation ownership industry.
According to the information compiled by the ARDA, the four
primary reasons consumers cite for purchasing vacation ownership
interests are: (i) flexibility with respect to different
locations, unit sizes and times of year, (ii) the certainty
of quality accommodations, (iii) credibility of the
timeshare company and (iv) the opportunity to exchange into
other resort locations. According to a 2006 ARDA study, nearly
80% of owners of vacation ownership interests indicated high
levels of satisfaction. With respect to exchange opportunities,
most owners of vacation ownership interests can exchange
vacation ownership interests through exchange companies and
through the applicable vacation ownership companys
internal network of properties.
WYNDHAM
HOTEL GROUP
Overview
Wyndham Hotel Group, our lodging business, franchises hotels and
provides property management services to owners of luxury and
upscale hotels. Through steady organic growth and acquisitions
of established lodging franchise systems over the past
16 years, our lodging business has become the worlds
largest lodging franchisor as measured by the number of
franchised hotels. Our lodging business has almost 6,500
franchised hotels, which represents over 543,000 rooms on six
continents. Our franchised hotels operate under one of our ten
lodging brands, which are Wyndham Hotels and Resorts, Wingate
Inn, Ramada, Baymont, Days Inn, Super 8, Howard Johnson,
AmeriHost Inn, Travelodge and Knights Inn. The breadth and
diversity of our lodging brands provide potential franchisees
with a range of options for affiliating their properties with
one or more of our brands. Our lodging business has a strong
presence across the middle and economy segments of the lodging
industry and a developing presence in the upscale segment, thus
providing individual consumers who are traveling for leisure or
business with options for hospitality products and services
across various price ranges. Throughout this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
we use the term hotels to apply to hotels, motels
and/or other
accommodations, as applicable. In addition, the term
franchise system refers to a system through which a
franchisor licenses a brand and provides services to hotels
whose independent owners pay to receive such license and
services from the franchisor under the specific terms of a
franchise agreement. The services provided through a franchise
system typically include reservations, sales leads, marketing
and advertising support, training, quality assurance
inspections, operational support and information, pre-opening
assistance, prototype construction plans, and national or
regional conferences.
Our franchised hotels represent approximately 10% of the
U.S. hotel room inventory. In 2006, our franchised hotels
sold 8.6%, or approximately 88.8 million, of the one
billion hotel room nights sold in the United States. In 2006,
our franchised hotels sold approximately 19.4% of all hotel room
nights sold in the United States in the economy and midscale
segments. Our franchised hotels are dispersed throughout North
America, which reduces our exposure to any one geographic
region. Approximately 89% of the hotel rooms, or approximately
485,000 rooms, in our franchised hotels are located throughout
North America, and approximately 11% of the hotel rooms, or
approximately 58,000 rooms, are located outside of North
America. In addition, our lodging franchises are dispersed among
numerous franchisees, which reduces our
86
exposure to any one lodging franchisee. Of our approximately
5,200 lodging franchisees, no one franchisee accounts for
more than 2% of our franchised hotels. Our lodging business
provides our franchised hotels with a suite of operational and
administrative services, including access to a central
reservations system, advertising, promotional and co-marketing
programs, referrals, technology, training and volume purchasing.
We also provide our franchisees with the TripRewards loyalty
program, which is the worlds largest hotel rewards program
as measured by the number of participating hotels.
As of December 31, 2006, we were providing property
management services to 32 hotels associated with either the
Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand or the CHI joint venture. Our
property management business offers owners of hotels
professional oversight and comprehensive operations support. We
expect to expand our property management business by
strategically entering into property management contracts with
new and existing hotels.
Our lodging business derives the majority of its revenues from
franchising hotels and derives additional revenues from
providing property management services. The sources of revenues
from franchising hotels are initial franchise fees, which relate
to services provided to assist a franchised hotel to open for
business under one of our brands, and ongoing franchise fees,
which are comprised of royalty fees and other fees relating to
marketing and reservations. The royalty fees are intended to
cover the use of our trademarks and our operating expenses, such
as expenses incurred for franchise services, including quality
assurance and administrative support, and to provide us with
operating profits. The fees relating to marketing and
reservations are intended to reimburse us for expenses
associated with providing certain other franchise services, such
as a central reservations system and advertising and marketing
programs. Because franchise fees generally are based on
percentages of the franchisees gross room revenues,
increasing RevPAR at franchised hotels is important to our
revenue growth. Expanding our portfolio of franchised hotels and
providing world-class service and support are also important to
our revenue growth. The sources of revenue from property
management are management fees, service fees and reimbursement
revenues. Our management fees are comprised of base fees, which
typically are calculated based upon a specified percentage of
gross revenues from hotel operations, and incentive management
fees, which typically are calculated based upon a specified
percentage of a hotels gross operating profit. Service
fees include fees derived from accounting, design, construction
and purchasing services and technical assistance provided to
managed hotels. Reimbursement revenues are intended to cover
expenses incurred by the property management business on behalf
of the managed hotels, primarily consisting of payroll costs for
operational employees who work at the hotels. Revenues from our
lodging business represented approximately 17%, 15% and 15% of
total company net revenues during 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively.
Our lodging business franchises under two
models. In North America and the United Kingdom,
we generally employ a direct franchise model whereby we contract
with and provide services and assistance with reservations
directly to independent owner-operators of hotels. In other
parts of the world, we employ either a direct franchise model or
a master franchise model whereby we contract with a qualified,
experienced third party to build a franchise enterprise in such
third partys country or region.
Lodging
Brands
We franchise ten widely-known lodging brands:
|
|
|
|
l
|
Wyndham Hotels and Resorts. The Wyndham
Hotels and Resorts brand was founded in 1981, and we acquired
the brand in 2005. Wyndham Hotels and Resorts serves the upscale
segment of the lodging industry with over 80 hotels and
approximately 23,000 rooms located in the United States, Canada,
the Caribbean and Mexico. Wyndham ByRequest program, which is a
guest recognition program that provides returning guests with
personalized accommodations, and Wyndham Hotels and Resorts
offers signature programs, which include: Wyndhams
Meetings ByRequest program, which is designed to help groups
plan meetings and features
24-hour
turnaround on all correspondence between the groups
meeting planner and Wyndhams meetings manager, 100% wired
or wireless Internet connectivity and catering options.
|
87
|
|
|
|
l
|
Wingate Inns International. We created
and launched the Wingate Inn brand in 1995 and opened the first
hotel a year later. The all-new-construction Wingate Inn brand
serves the upper middle segment of the lodging industry and
franchises approximately 150 hotels with approximately 14,100
rooms located in the United States and Canada. Wingate Inn
hotels currently offer all-inclusive pricing that includes the
price of the room; complimentary wired and wireless high-speed
Internet access, faxes and photocopies, deluxe continental
breakfast, local calls and access for long-distance calls; and
access to a
24-hour
self-service business center equipped with computers with
high-speed Internet access, a fax, a photocopier and a printer.
Each hotel features a boardroom and meeting rooms with
high-speed Internet access, a fitness room with a whirlpool and,
at most locations, a swimming pool. Wingate Inn hotels currently
do not offer food and beverage services.
|
|
|
l
|
Ramada Worldwide. The Ramada brand was
founded in 1954. We licensed the United States and Canadian
trademark rights to the Ramada brand prior to acquiring the
rights in 2002 and acquired the ownership rights to the brand on
a worldwide basis in 2004. In North America, we serve the middle
segment through Ramada, Ramada Hotel, Ramada Plaza and Ramada
Limited, and internationally we serve the middle and upscale
segments of the lodging industry through Ramada Resort, Ramada
Hotel and Resort, Ramada Hotel and Suites, Ramada Plaza and
Ramada Encore. Ramada Worldwide franchises approximately 870
hotels with approximately 106,000 rooms located in the United
States, Canada, Costa Rica, Mexico, United Kingdom, Ireland,
France, Switzerland, Finland, the Netherlands, Germany, Italy,
Czech Republic, Hungary, Lithuania, Romania, Turkey, Egypt,
Bahrain, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Oman, United Arab
Emirates, Australia, Japan, South Korea, Indonesia, China, Hong
Kong, India, Kuwait, Thailand and New Caledonia.
|
|
|
l
|
Baymont Franchise Systems. Founded in
Wisconsin in 1976 under the Budgetel Inns brands, the system was
converted in 1999 to the Baymont Inn & Suites brand. We
acquired the brand in April 2006. Baymont Franchise Systems
primarily serves the middle segment of the lodging industry and
franchises approximately 140 hotels with approximately 12,400
rooms located in the United States. Following the closing of our
acquisition of the franchise business of Baymont Inn &
Suites, we announced our intent to consolidate the
AmeriHost-branded properties with our newly acquired
Baymont-branded properties to create a more significant midscale
brand. We commenced the integration in December 2006 and expect
to be complete by fourth quarter 2007. Baymont Inn &
Suites rooms feature oversized desks, ergonomic chairs and task
lamps, voicemail, free local calls, in-room coffee maker, iron
and board, hair dryer and shampoo, television with premium
channels,
pay-per-view
movies
and/or
satellite movies and video games. Most locations feature
high-speed Internet access, a swimming pool, airport shuttle
service and a fitness center.
|
|
|
l
|
Days Inns Worldwide. The Days Inn brand
was created by Cecil B. Day in 1970, when the lodging industry
consisted of only a dozen national brands. We acquired the brand
in 1992. Days Inns Worldwide serves the upper economy segment of
the lodging industry with approximately 1,860 hotels with
approximately 151,400 rooms located in the United States,
Canada, Mexico, Argentina, Uruguay, Ireland, United Kingdom,
Italy, Egypt, Jordan, South Africa, Guam, China, India and the
Philippines. In the United States, we serve the upper economy
segment of the lodging industry through Days Inn, Days Hotel,
Days Suites, DAYSTOP and Days Inn Business Place, and in the
United Kingdom we serve the upper economy segment of the lodging
industry through Days Hotels, Days Inn and Days Serviced
Apartments. Many properties offer
on-site
restaurants, lounges, meeting rooms, banquet facilities,
exercise centers and a complimentary continental breakfast and
newspaper each morning. Each Days Suites room provides separate
living and sleeping areas, with a telephone and television in
each area. Each Days Inn Business Place room currently offers
high-intensity lighting, a large desk, a microwave/refrigerator
unit, a coffeemaker, an iron and ironing board, and snacks and
beverages.
|
|
|
l
|
Super 8 Motels. The first motel
operating under the Super 8 brand opened in October 1974. We
acquired the brand in 1993. Super 8 Motels serves the economy
segment of the lodging industry. Super 8 Motels franchises
approximately 2,050 hotels with approximately 126,200 rooms
located in the United States, Canada and China. Super 8 motels
currently provide complimentary continental
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
breakfast. Participating motels currently allow pets and offer
free local calls for free, fax and copy services, microwaves,
suites, guest laundry, exercise facilities, cribs, rollaway beds
and pools.
|
|
|
|
|
l
|
Howard Johnson International. The
Howard Johnson brand was founded in 1925 by entrepreneur Howard
Dearing Johnson as an ice cream stand within an apothecary shop
in Quincy, Massachusetts, and the first hotel operating under
the brand opened in 1954 in Savannah, Georgia. We acquired the
brand in 1990. Howard Johnson serves the middle segment of the
lodging industry through Howard Johnson Plaza, Howard Johnson
Inn and Howard Johnson Hotel and the economy segment of the
lodging industry through Howard Johnson Express. Howard Johnson
franchises approximately 470 hotels with approximately 44,400
rooms located in the United States, Canada, Caribbean,
Guatemala, Mexico, Argentina, Brazil, Columbia, Ecuador,
Venezuela, Malta, Romania, Israel, United Arab Emirates, China
and India. Participating hotels offer standard business
amenities, a
25-inch
television and free access for long-distance calls.
|
|
|
l
|
AmeriHost Franchise Systems. The first
AmeriHost Inn hotel opened in Athens, Ohio in 1989. We acquired
the brand in 2000. AmeriHost Franchise Systems serves the middle
segment of the lodging industry through AmeriHost Inn and
AmeriHost Inn & Suites. AmeriHost Franchise Systems
franchises approximately 100 hotels with approximately 6,700
rooms located in the United States. AmeriHost Inn hotels do not
offer food and beverage services. In April 2006, following the
closing of our acquisition of the franchise business of Baymont
Inn & Suites, we announced our intent to consolidate
the AmeriHost-branded properties with our newly acquired
Baymont-branded properties to create a more significant midscale
brand. We commenced the integration in December 2006 and expect
to be complete by fourth quarter 2007.
|
|
|
l
|
Travelodge Hotels. In 1935, founder
Scott King established his first motor court operating under the
Travelodge brand in San Diego. We acquired the brand (in
North America only) in 1996. Travelodge Hotels franchises
approximately 500 hotels with approximately 37,500 rooms located
in the United States, Canada and Mexico. Travelodge Hotels
serves the upper and lower economy segments of the lodging
industry in the United States through Travelodge, Travelodge
Suites and Thriftlodge hotels and serves the middle segment of
the lodging industry in Canada and Mexico through Travelodge and
Thriftlodge hotels.
|
|
|
l
|
Knights Franchise Systems. The Knights
Inn brand was created in 1972, and the first hotel operating
under the brand opened in Columbus, Ohio. We acquired the brand
in 1995. Knights Franchise Systems serves the lower economy
segment of the lodging industry with 230 hotels with
approximately 16,900 rooms located in the United States and
Canada.
|
89
System
Performance and Distribution
The following table provides operating statistics for our brands
and for managed, non-proprietary hotels. The table includes
information as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006.
We derived occupancy, ADR and RevPAR from information we have
received from our franchisees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue Per
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Average
|
|
Available
|
|
|
|
|
Primary
|
|
Rooms
|
|
# of
|
|
# of
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
Daily Rate
|
|
Room
|
|
|
Brand
|
|
Segment
Served(1)
|
|
Per Property
|
|
Properties
|
|
Rooms(2)
|
|
Rate
|
|
(ADR)
|
|
(RevPAR)
|
|
|
|
Wyndham Hotels and Resorts
|
|
|
Upscale
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
22,582
|
|
|
|
68.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
110.37
|
|
|
$
|
75.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wingate Inn
|
|
|
Upper Middle
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
14,146
|
|
|
|
64.7
|
%
|
|
|
83.99
|
|
|
|
54.33
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ramada
|
|
|
Upscale & Middle
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
871
|
|
|
|
105,986
|
|
|
|
53.7
|
%
|
|
|
72.34
|
|
|
|
38.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baymont
|
|
|
Middle
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
12,377
|
|
|
|
57.7
|
%
|
|
|
63.35
|
|
|
|
36.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
AmeriHost Inn
|
|
|
Middle
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
6,745
|
|
|
|
53.7
|
%
|
|
|
62.09
|
|
|
|
33.37
|
|
|
|
|
|
Days Inn
|
|
|
Upper Economy
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
1,859
|
|
|
|
151,438
|
|
|
|
52.0
|
%
|
|
|
60.37
|
|
|
|
31.41
|
|
|
|
|
|
Super 8
|
|
|
Economy
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
2,054
|
|
|
|
126,175
|
|
|
|
55.2
|
%
|
|
|
56.17
|
|
|
|
31.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
Howard Johnson
|
|
|
Middle & Economy
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
467
|
|
|
|
44,432
|
|
|
|
46.3
|
%
|
|
|
65.82
|
|
|
|
30.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
Travelodge
|
|
|
Upper & Lower Economy
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
37,468
|
|
|
|
50.7
|
%
|
|
|
63.05
|
|
|
|
31.95
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knights Inn
|
|
|
Lower Economy
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
16,892
|
|
|
|
42.3
|
%
|
|
|
40.11
|
|
|
|
16.98
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed,
|
|
|
Luxury & Upper
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Proprietary
Hotels(3)
|
|
|
Upscale
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
4,993
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
6,473
|
|
|
|
543,234
|
|
|
|
53.4
|
%
|
|
|
65.44
|
|
|
|
34.95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The economy segments
discussed here, while based on the Smith Travel Research
chain-scale segments represented in the table on page 6 of
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
provide a greater degree of differentiation to correspond with
the price sensitivities of our customers by brand. The
middle segment discussed here encompasses both the
Smith Travel Research midscale without food and
beverage and midscale with food and beverage
segments.
|
|
(2) |
|
From time to time, as a result of
hurricanes, other adverse weather events and ordinary wear and
tear, some of the rooms at these hotels may be taken out of
service for repair and renovation and therefore may be
unavailable.
|
|
(3) |
|
Represents properties managed under
the CHI joint venture. As these properties are not branded,
certain operating statistics (such as average occupancy rate,
ADR and RevPAR) are not relevant. Thirteen of these properties
are scheduled to be branded or cobranded as either Wyndham or
Ramada during 2007.
|
The following table provides a summary description of our
properties (including managed non-proprietary hotels) by
geographic region as of and for the year ended December 31,
2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Average Revenue
|
|
|
# of
|
|
# of
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
Average Daily
|
|
Per Available
|
Region
|
|
Properties
|
|
Rooms(1)
|
|
Rate
|
|
Rate (ADR)
|
|
Room (RevPAR)
|
|
United States
|
|
|
5,636
|
|
|
|
450,126
|
|
|
|
53.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
63.20
|
|
|
$
|
33.69
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
423
|
|
|
|
34,845
|
|
|
|
55.9
|
%
|
|
|
79.40
|
|
|
|
44.37
|
|
Europe(2)
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
26,516
|
|
|
|
59.7
|
%
|
|
|
83.38
|
|
|
|
49.77
|
|
Asia/Pacific
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
19,741
|
|
|
|
57.5
|
%
|
|
|
59.14
|
|
|
|
34.03
|
|
Latin/South America
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
7,924
|
|
|
|
45.0
|
%
|
|
|
54.10
|
|
|
|
24.34
|
|
Middle
East/Africa(2)
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
4,082
|
|
|
|
62.1
|
%
|
|
|
83.51
|
|
|
|
51.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
6,473
|
|
|
|
543,234
|
|
|
|
53.4
|
%
|
|
|
65.44
|
|
|
|
34.95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
From time to time, as a result of
hurricanes, other adverse weather events and ordinary wear and
tear, some of the rooms at these hotels may be taken out of
service for repair and renovation and therefore may be
unavailable.
|
|
(2) |
|
Europe and Middle East include
properties and rooms managed under the CHI joint venture. As
these properties are not branded, certain operating statistics
(such as average occupancy rate, ADR and RevPAR) are not
relevant and therefore, have not been reflected in the table.
Thirteen of these properties are scheduled to be branded as
either Wyndham or Ramada during 2007.
|
90
Franchise
Development
Under our direct franchise model, we principally market our
lodging brands to independent hotel and motel owners and to
hotel and motel owners who have the rights to terminate their
franchise affiliations with other lodging brands. We also market
franchises under our lodging brands to existing franchisees
because many own, or may own in the future, other hotels that
can be converted to one of our brands. Under our master
franchise model, we principally market our lodging brands to
third parties that assume the principal role of franchisor,
which entails selling individual franchise agreements and
providing quality assurance, marketing and reservations support
to franchisees. As part of our franchise development strategy,
we employ national and international sales forces that we
compensate in part through commissions. Because of the
importance of existing franchised hotels to our sales strategy,
a significant part of our franchise development efforts is to
ensure that our franchisees provide quality services to maintain
the satisfaction of customers.
Franchise
Agreements
Our standard franchise agreement grants a franchisee the right
to non-exclusive use of the applicable franchise system in the
operation of a single hotel at a specified location, typically
for a period of 15 to 20 years, and gives the franchisor
and franchisee certain rights to terminate the franchise
agreement before the conclusion of the term of the agreement
under certain circumstances, such as upon designated
anniversaries of the franchised hotels opening or the date
of the agreement. Early termination options in franchise
agreements give us flexibility to eliminate or re-brand
franchised hotels if such properties become weak performers,
even if there is no contractual failure by the franchisees. We
also have the right to terminate a franchise agreement for
failure by a franchisee to (i) bring its properties into
compliance with contractual or quality standards within
specified periods of time, (ii) pay required franchise fees
or (iii) comply with other requirements of its franchise
agreement.
Master franchise agreements, which are individually negotiated
and vary among our different brands, typically contain
provisions that permit us to terminate the agreement if the
other party to the agreement fails to meet specified development
schedules. Our master franchise agreements generally are
competitive with the industry averages within industry segments.
Sales and
Marketing of Hotel Rooms
We use the marketing/reservation fees that our franchisees pay
to us to promote our brands through media advertising, direct
mail, direct sales, promotions and publicity. A portion of the
funds contributed by the franchisees of any one particular brand
is used to promote that brand, whereas the remainder of the
funds is allocated to support the cost of multibrand promotional
efforts and to our marketing and sales team, which includes,
among others, our worldwide sales, public relations, loyalty and
direct marketing teams.
In 2006, the efforts of our worldwide sales team contributed
approximately 12% of the annual hotel room nights sold at our
franchised hotels. To supplement the worldwide sales teams
efforts, our public relations team extends the reach and
frequency of our paid advertising by generating extensive,
unpaid exposure for our brands in trade and consumer media
including USA TODAY, The New York Times,
Financial Times, Frommers and other
widely-read publications.
In addition to the traditional sales efforts, we plan to develop
and market mixed-use hotel and vacation ownership properties in
conjunction with Wyndhams vacation ownership business. The
mixed-use properties would generate room revenues at the
franchised hotel and increased spend at the hotel restaurants
and facilities by visiting timeshare guests.
91
Central
Reservations
In 2006, we booked on behalf of our franchised and managed
hotels approximately 4.3 million rooms by telephone,
approximately 9.8 million rooms through the Internet and
approximately 1.9 million rooms through global distribution
systems, with a combined value of the bookings in excess of
$1 billion. Additionally, our worldwide sales team
generated leads for bookings from tour operators, travel agents,
government and military clients, and corporate and small
business accounts. We maintain contact centers in Saint John,
New Brunswick, Canada, Aberdeen, South Dakota, Dallas, Texas and
Manila, Philippines that handle bookings generated through our
toll-free brand numbers. We maintain numerous brand websites to
process online room reservations, and we utilize global
distribution systems to process reservations generated by travel
agents and third-party Internet booking sources, including
Orbitz.com, CheapTickets.com, Expedia.com and Travelocity.com.
To ensure we receive bookings by travel agents and third-party
Internet booking sources, we provide direct connections between
our central reservations system and most third-party Internet
booking sources. The majority of hotel room nights are sold by
our franchisees to guests who seek accommodations on a walk-in
basis or through calls made directly to hotels, which we believe
is attributable in part to the strength of our lodging brands.
Since 2001, bookings made directly by customers on our brand
websites have been increasing at a CAGR of approximately 31%,
and increased to 4.9 million room nights per year in 2006.
Since 2001, bookings made through third-party Internet booking
sources increased 20% while bookings made through global
distribution systems declined 11%.
Loyalty
Programs
The TripRewards program, which was introduced in 2003, has grown
steadily to become, we believe, the lodging industrys
largest loyalty program as measured by the number of
participating hotels. There are currently approximately 6,000
hotels that participate in the program. With more than 40
businesses participating in the program, TripRewards offers its
members numerous options to accumulate points. Members, for
example, may accumulate points by staying in hotels franchised
under one of our brands and purchasing everyday products and
services from the various businesses that participate in the
program. When staying at hotels franchised under one of our
brands, TripRewards members may elect to earn airline miles or
rail points instead of TripReward points. Businesses where
points can be earned generally pay a fee to participate in the
program; such fees are then used to support the programs
marketing and operating expenses. TripRewards members have
approximately 400 options to redeem their points. Members, for
example, may redeem their points for hotel stays, airline
tickets, resort vacations, electronics, sporting goods, movie
and theme park tickets, and gift certificates. As of
December 31, 2006, TripRewards had more than
5.2 million active members, which we define as any customer
who has enrolled in the TripRewards program or earned or
redeemed points in the program over the past 18 months, and
the program added approximately 240,000 active members per month
in 2006.
The Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand maintains a separate
loyalty program, the Wyndham ByRequest Program, which we expect
to integrate into the TripRewards program during 2007.
Property
Management
As of December 31, 2006, our lodging business was providing
hotel property management services to 32 properties associated
with the either the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand or the CHI
joint venture. Our property management business offers owners of
hotels professional oversight and comprehensive operations
support, including hiring, training, purchasing, revenue
management, sales and marketing, and food and beverage services;
financial management and analysis; and information systems
management and integration. Our management fee is generally
based on a percentage of each hotels gross revenue plus,
in the majority of properties, an incentive fee based on
operating performance. The terms of our management agreements
are for various periods and generally contain renewal options,
subject to certain termination
92
rights. In general, under our management agreements all
operating and other expenses are paid by the owner and we are
reimbursed for our
out-of-pocket
expenses.
Strategies
We intend to continue to accelerate growth of our lodging
business by (i) maintaining our leadership position in the
economy segment through sales and retention efforts and RevPAR
growth; (ii) room growth in the domestic middle and upscale
segments; and (iii) expanding our international presence
through increasing the number of properties within the Wyndham
Hotels and Resorts, Ramada, Days Inn and Super 8 brands. Our
plans generally focus on pursuing these strategies organically.
In addition, in appropriate circumstances, we will consider
opportunities to acquire businesses, both domestic and
international, including through the use of Wyndham Worldwide
common stock as currency.
Domestic
Our strategy for growing economy brands in North America faster
than the competitive set revolves around (i) enhancing our
value to franchisees by improving rate and inventory management
capabilities, investing in systems and training and growing the
TripRewards loyalty program, (ii) improving the
customers experience by developing and implementing brand
standard enhancements, (iii) optimizing system growth by
adding franchised hotels in markets where brands are
underrepresented and (iv) optimizing brand RevPAR
performance by helping franchisees manage their rates and
inventory, enrolling more TripRewards members and introducing
seasonal promotions. Our approach for expanding our domestic
middle and upscale presence is to fully utilize property
management services to attract developers; establish and
implement the Wyndham master brand plan with upper upscale,
upscale and select-service products; complement Wingate Inn
product quality with Wyndham brand recognition; and strengthen
our position in the middle segment through the consolidation of
AmeriHost-branded with our newly acquired Baymont-branded
properties, which is currently scheduled to be completed by
fourth quarter 2007.
International
Our strategy for international growth is to expand the presence
of our Wyndham, Ramada, Days Inn and Super 8 brands and
selectively utilize direct/master franchising, management
agreements and joint venture models primarily in Europe and
Asia-Pacific.
We intend to expand the Days Inn brand in the United Kingdom and
in new markets that exhibit strong growth in the economy
segment. We intend to expand the Ramada brand beyond its
established base of properties in the United Kingdom and Germany
into new markets that exhibit strong growth in the middle
segment. We intend to expand the Wyndham brand in gateway and
destination cities in Europe that exhibit strong growth in the
upscale segment. Our expansion strategy for the Wyndham brand in
European gateway and destination cities includes increasing the
number of franchised and managed hotels through acquisitions and
through conversions of existing non-affiliated hotels to the
Wyndham brand. In Europe, we intend to pursue growth in the
number of franchised hotels through our direct franchise model
for our Days Inn brand. In addition, we may pursue growth in the
number of franchised and managed hotels through joint ventures.
In China, the Middle East and India, our strategy is to expand
the Super 8 brand in the economy segment and the Ramada and Days
Inn brands in the middle and upscale segments. In the near
future, our strategy will include introducing the Wyndham brand
to these regions. We intend to pursue these opportunities by
increasing the number of franchised hotels through our direct
franchise model for our Ramada and Wyndham brands and through
our master franchise model for our Super 8 and Days Inn brands.
In addition, we intend to pursue growth in the number of managed
hotels through new agreements with hotels franchised under our
Ramada and Wyndham brands. We may also pursue growth in the
number of franchised and managed hotels through the use of joint
ventures.
93
To further augment our international presence, we also intend to
pursue growth in Latin America, particularly in Mexico and in
the Caribbean, by expanding the Ramada brand in the middle
segment, expanding the Wyndham brand in the upscale segment and
continuing to support hotels franchised under the Howard Johnson
brand. In Latin America, we intend to pursue growth in the
number of franchised hotels through our direct franchise model
for our Ramada brands and through our master franchise model for
our Days Inn and Howard Johnson brands and growth in the number
of managed hotels through new management agreements with hotels
franchised under our brands.
Seasonality
Franchise and management fees are generally higher in the second
and third quarters than in the first or fourth quarters of any
calendar year. Because of increased leisure travel and the
related ability to charge higher ADRs during the spring and
summer months, hotels we franchise or manage typically generate
higher revenue during these months. Therefore, any occurrence
that disrupts travel patterns during the spring or summer could
have a greater adverse effect on our franchised hotels and
managed properties annual performances and consequently on
our annual performance than occurrences that disrupt travel
patterns in other seasons. We do not currently expect any change
to these seasonal trends.
Competition
Competition among the national lodging brand franchisors to grow
their franchise systems is robust. The lodging companies that we
compete with in the upscale and upper middle segments include
Marriott International Inc., Hilton Hotels Corporation, Starwood
Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc., InterContinental
Hotels Group PLC and Hyatt Corporation. The lodging companies
that we compete with in the middle and economy segments include
Marriott International Inc., Choice Hotels International, Inc.
and Accor SA.
We believe that competition for the sales of franchises in the
lodging industry is based principally upon the perceived value
and quality of the brands and the services offered to
franchisees. We believe that the perceived value of a brand name
to prospective franchisees is, to some extent, a function of the
success of the existing hotels franchised under the brands. We
believe that prospective franchisees value a franchise based
upon their views of the relationship between the costs,
including costs of affiliation and conversion and future
charges, to the benefits, including potential for increased
revenue and profitability, and upon the reputation of the
franchisor.
The ability of an individual franchisee to compete may be
affected by the location and quality of its property, the number
of competing properties in the vicinity, community reputation
and other factors. A franchisees success may also be
affected by general, regional and local economic conditions. The
potential negative effect of these conditions on our results of
operations is substantially reduced by virtue of the diverse
geographical locations of our franchised hotels.
Trademarks
We own the trademarks Wyndham Hotels and Resorts,
Wingate Inn, Ramada,
Baymont, Days Inn, Super 8,
Howard Johnson, AmeriHost Inn,
Travelodge (in North America only), Knights
Inn, TripRewards and related trademarks and
logos. Such trademarks and logos are material to the businesses
that are part of our lodging business. Our franchisees and our
subsidiaries actively use these marks, and all of the material
marks are registered (or have applications pending) with the
United States Patent and Trademark Office as well as with the
relevant authorities in major countries worldwide where these
businesses have significant operations.
94
RCI
GLOBAL VACATION NETWORK
Overview
RCI Global Vacation Network, our vacation exchange and rentals
business, provides vacation exchange products and services to
developers, managers and owners of intervals of vacation
ownership interests, and markets vacation rental properties. We
are the worlds largest vacation exchange network and among
the worlds largest global marketers of vacation rental
properties. Our vacation exchange and rentals business has
access for specified periods, in a majority of cases on an
exclusive basis, to over 60,000 vacation properties, which are
comprised of over 4,000 vacation ownership resorts around the
world with units that are exchanged through our vacation
exchange business and over 56,000 vacation rental properties
that are located principally in Europe, which we believe makes
us one of the worlds largest marketers of European
vacation rental properties as measured by the number of
properties we market for rental. Each year, our vacation
exchange and rentals business provides more than four million
leisure-bound families with vacation exchange and rentals
products and services. The properties available to leisure
travelers through our vacation exchange and rentals business
include hotel rooms and suites, villas, cottages, bungalows,
campgrounds, vacation ownership condominiums, city apartments,
second homes, fractional private residences, luxury destination
clubs and boats. We offer leisure travelers flexibility (subject
to availability) as to time of travel and a choice of lodging
options in regions that such travelers may not typically have
such ease of access, and we offer property owners marketing
services, quality control services and property management
services ranging from key-holding to full property maintenance
for such properties. Our vacation exchange and rentals business
has over 60 worldwide offices. We market our products and
services using seven primary brands and other related brands.
Throughout this document, we use the term inventory
in the context of our vacation exchange and rentals business to
refer to intervals of vacation ownership interests and primarily
independently owned properties, which include hotel rooms and
suites, villas, cottages, bungalows, campgrounds, vacation
ownership condominiums, city apartments, second homes,
fractional private residences, luxury destination clubs and
boats. In addition, throughout this document, we refer to
intervals of vacation ownership interests as
intervals and individuals who purchase vacation
rental products and services from us as rental
customers.
Our vacation exchange and rentals business primarily derives its
revenues from fees. Our vacation exchange business, RCI, derives
a majority of its revenues from annual membership dues and
exchange fees for transactions. Our vacation exchange business
also derives revenues from ancillary services, including travel
agency services and loyalty programs. Our vacation rentals
business primarily derives its revenues from fees, which
generally average approximately 40% to 60% of the gross bookings
depending upon product mix or seasonality. Our vacation rentals
business also derives revenues from trip protection sales in
Europe, transportation fees, property management fees and
on-site
revenue from ancillary services, including travel agency
services. Revenues from our vacation exchange and rentals
business represented approximately 29%, 31% and 31% of total
company net revenues during 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Through our vacation exchange business, RCI, we have
relationships with over 4,000 vacation ownership resorts in
approximately 100 countries. Historically, our vacation exchange
business consisted of the operation of worldwide exchange
programs for owners of intervals. Today, our vacation exchange
business also provides property management services and
consulting services for the development of tourism-oriented real
estate, loyalty programs, in-house and outsourced travel agency
services, and third-party vacation club services.
We operate our vacation exchange business, RCI, through three
worldwide exchange programs that have a member base of vacation
owners who are generally well-traveled and affluent and who want
flexibility and variety in their travel plans each year. Our
vacation exchange business three exchange programs, which
serve owners of intervals at affiliated resorts, are RCI Weeks,
RCI Points and The Registry Collection. Participants in these
exchange programs pay annual membership dues. For additional
fees, such participants are entitled to exchange intervals for
intervals at other properties affiliated with our
95
vacation exchange business. In addition, certain participants
may exchange intervals for other leisure-related products and
services. We refer to participants in these three exchange
programs as members. In addition, the Endless
Vacation®
magazine is the official publication of our RCI Weeks and RCI
Points exchange programs, and certain members can obtain the
benefits of participation in our RCI Weeks and RCI Points
exchange programs only through a subscription to Endless
Vacation®
magazine. The use of the terms member or
membership with respect to either the RCI Weeks or
RCI Points exchange program is intended to denote subscription
to Endless
Vacation®
magazine.
The RCI Weeks exchange program is the worlds largest
vacation ownership exchange network. We market this exchange
program under the RCI Weeks name. The RCI Weeks exchange program
provides members with flexibility to trade week-long intervals
in units at their resorts for week-long intervals in comparable
units at the same resorts or at comparable resorts.
The RCI Points exchange program is a global points-based
exchange network. We market this exchange program under the RCI
Points trademark. The RCI Points exchange program, which was
developed and launched in 2000, allocates points to intervals
that members cede to the exchange program. Under the RCI Points
exchange program, members may redeem their points for the use of
vacation properties in the exchange program or for other
products, such as airfare, car rentals, cruises, hotels and
other accommodations. When points are redeemed for these
services, our vacation exchange business has the right to recoup
the expense of providing the services by renting the use of
vacation properties for which the members could have redeemed
their points.
We believe that The Registry Collection exchange program is one
of the industrys first global exchange network of luxury
vacation accommodations. The luxury vacation accommodations in
The Registry Collections network include higher-end
vacation ownership resorts, fractional ownership resorts and
condo-hotels. The Registry Collection allows members to exchange
their intervals for the use of other vacation properties within
the network or for other products, such as airfare, car rentals,
cruises, hotels and other accommodations. The members of The
Registry Collection exchange program often own greater than
two-week intervals at affiliated resorts.
We acquire substantially all members of our exchange programs
indirectly. In substantially all cases, an affiliated resort
developer buys the initial term of an RCI membership, generally
ranging from 1 3 years that entitles the
vacation ownership interval purchaser to receive periodicals and
directories published by RCI and to use the applicable exchange
program for an additional fee. The vacation ownership interval
purchaser generally pays for membership renewals and any
applicable exchange fees for transactions.
Our vacation exchange business also provides property management
services and consulting services for the development of
tourism-related real estate, loyalty programs, in-house and
outsourced travel agency services, and third-party vacation club
services. Our third-party vacation club business consists of
private label exchange clubs that RCI operates and manages for
certain of its larger affiliates. Club management is a growing
trend in the vacation ownership industry and a growing piece of
our vacation exchange business. Approximately 95% of the
third-party vacation clubs are points-based.
Our vacation exchange business operates in North America,
Europe, Latin America, South Africa, Australia, the Pacific Rim,
the Middle East and China and tailors its strategies and
operating plans for each of the geographical environments where
RCI has or seeks to develop a substantial member base.
The rental properties we market are principally privately-owned
villas, cottages, bungalows and apartments that generally belong
to property owners unaffiliated with us. In addition to these
properties, we market inventory from our vacation exchange
business to developers of vacation ownership properties and
other sources. We market rental properties under proprietary
brands, such as Landal GreenParks, English Country Cottages,
Novasol, Cuendet and Canvas Holidays, and through select
private-label arrangements. Most of the rental activity under
our brands takes place in Europe, the United States and Mexico,
although we have the ability to source and rent inventory in
approximately 100 countries. Our vacation rentals business
currently has relationships with approximately 35,000
independent property owners in 22 countries, including the
United States, United Kingdom, Mexico, France, Ireland, the
Netherlands, Belgium, Italy,
96
Spain, Portugal, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Germany, Greece,
Austria, Croatia and certain countries in Eastern Europe and the
Pacific Rim. We currently make over 1.3 million vacation
rental bookings a year. Our vacation rentals business also has
the opportunity to market and provide inventory to the over
three million owners of intervals who participate in our
vacation exchange business. Property owners typically enter into
one year, evergreen or multi-year contracts with our vacation
rentals subsidiaries to market the rental of their properties
within our rental portfolio. Our vacation rentals business also
has an ownership interest in, or capital leases for,
approximately 13% of the properties in our rental portfolio.
Customer
Development
In our vacation exchange business we affiliate with vacation
ownership developers directly as a result of the efforts of our
in-house sales teams. Affiliated developers typically sign
long-term agreements with durations of five to ten years. Our
members are acquired primarily through our affiliated developers
as part of the vacation ownership purchase process. In our
vacation rentals business, we primarily acquire exclusive rental
agreements through direct interaction with owners of various
types of vacation rental inventory.
Loyalty
Program
Our vacation exchange business member loyalty program is
RCI Elite Rewards, which offers a branded credit card, the RCI
Elite Rewards credit card, that allows members to earn points
that can be redeemed for items related to our exchange programs,
including annual membership dues and exchange fees for
transactions and other products offered by our vacation exchange
business or certain third parties, including airlines and
retailers.
Member
and Rental Customer Initiatives
Our vacation exchange and rentals business strives to provide
superior service to members and rental customers through our
call centers and online distribution channels, to offer certain
members and rental customers in Canada, Europe, Latin America,
South Africa and the Pacific Rim one-stop shopping through our
retail travel agency business, and to target current and
prospective members and rental customers through our marketing
efforts.
Call
Centers
Our vacation exchange and rentals business services its members
and rental customers primarily through global call centers. The
requests that we receive at our global call centers are handled
by our vacation guides, who are highly skilled at fulfilling our
members and rental customers requests for vacation
exchanges and rentals. When our members and rental
customers primary choices are unavailable in periods of
high demand, our guides offer the next nearest match in order to
fulfill the members and rental customers needs. Call
centers are and are expected to continue to be our primary
distribution channel and therefore we invest resources and will
continue to do so to ensure that members and rental customers
continue to receive a high level of personalized customer
service through our call centers.
Internet
Given the interest of some of our members and rental customers
in doing transactions on the Internet, we invest and will
continue to invest in online technologies to ensure that our
members and rental customers receive the same salesmanship and
level of service online that we provide through our call
centers. As our online distribution channels improve, members
and rental customers may shift from transacting business through
our call centers to transacting business online. As transacting
business online becomes more popular, we expect to experience
cost savings at our call centers. By offering our members and
rental customers the opportunity to transact business either
through our call centers or online, we allow our members and
rental customers to use the distribution channel with which they
are most comfortable.
97
Regardless of the distribution channel our members and rental
customers use, our goal is member and rental customer
satisfaction and retention.
Travel
Agency
We have an established retail travel agency business outside the
United States in such locations as Canada, Europe, Latin
America, South Africa and the Pacific Rim. In these regions, our
travel agencies provide certain members and rental customers of
the vacation exchange and rentals business with one-stop
shopping for planning vacations. As part of the one-stop
shopping, the travel agencies can arrange for our members
and rental customers transportation, such as flights,
ferries and rental cars. In the United States, we have entered
into an outsourcing agreement with a former affiliate to provide
our members and rental customers with travel services.
Marketing
We market to our members and rental customers through the use of
brochures, magazines, direct marketing, such as direct mail and
e-mail,
third-party online distribution channels, tour operators and
travel agencies. Our vacation exchange and rentals business has
over 50 publications involved in the marketing of the business.
RCI publishes Endless
Vacation®
magazine, a travel publication that has a circulation of over
1.7 million. Our vacation exchange and rentals business
also publishes resort directories and other periodicals related
to the vacation and vacation ownership industry and other
travel-related services. We acquire the rental customers through
our
direct-to-consumer
marketing, internet marketing and third-party agent marketing
programs. We use our publications not only for marketing but
also for member and rental customer retention.
Strategies
We intend to continue to grow the number of members and rental
customers of and transactions facilitated through our vacation
exchange and rentals business by (i) continually enhancing
our core vacation networks; (ii) developing new business
models; and (iii) expanding into new markets. Our plans
generally focus on pursuing these strategies organically. In
addition, in appropriate circumstances, we will consider
opportunities to acquire businesses, both domestic and
international, including through the use of Wyndham Worldwide
common stock as currency.
Continually
Enhance Our Core Vacation Networks
We plan to expand the integration of our vacation exchange and
rentals networks to enhance the value of our products and
services to our members and rental customers, and the value of
vacation ownership for the resorts that affiliate with us. We
are already executing this plan by integrating our vacation
exchange and rentals networks to provide a larger variety and
greater availability of vacation accommodation choices to our
members and rental customers. Specifically, vacation rental
inventory has been made available to RCI exchange members to add
variety and depth to exchange options. Additionally, vacation
home proprietors and renters are expected to be offered RCI
designed membership programs to drive both rental customer
satisfaction and retention. We also plan to enhance the core
vacation network by offering different membership types to cater
to a wider range of rental customers. Further, we plan to take
advantage of a fragmented and unorganized global rental industry
by expanding our vacation rentals business into North America
and a select number of international markets.
Develop
New Business Models
We plan to continue to develop new business models that will
enhance the value and experience for our members, rental
customers and third-party developers who affiliate their resorts
with RCI. Our vacation exchange and rentals business
launch of RCI Points brought new value to RCI members and such
third-
98
party developers by giving enhanced flexibility of exchange
options to RCI members. Today, it remains the only global
points-based vacation exchange network. Similarly, the vacation
exchange and rentals business is in the process of expanding one
of the industrys first luxury exchange networks, The
Registry Collection, to address the global, fast growing luxury
segment in shared ownership leisure real estate. Additionally,
we are developing new business models, such as
on-site
management and brand licensing/franchising to continue to expand
our vacation rentals business in Europe. We believe this will be
a successful addition to our vacation exchange and rentals
business model portfolio.
Expand
into New Markets
We plan to grow our overall vacation exchange and rentals
business by expanding into new geographic areas. We have begun
to, and plan to continue to, expand into new Asian and Middle
Eastern markets. New geographic markets provide us with the
opportunity to affiliate with new resorts and developers, to
acquire new vacation accommodation inventory types, and to
obtain new members and rental customers for our vacation
exchange and rentals business. Our expansion into new markets
will bring new entrants into the vacation real estate industry,
thereby fulfilling our goal to expand and capture additional
revenue within the global vacation exchange and rentals market.
Seasonality
Vacation exchange and rentals revenues are generally higher in
the first and third quarters than in the second or fourth
quarters. Vacation exchange transaction revenues are normally
highest in the first quarter, which is generally when members of
RCI plan and book their vacations for the year. Rental
transaction revenues earned from booking vacation rentals to
rental customers are usually highest in the third quarter, when
vacation rentals are highest. Most vacation rental customers
book their reservations 8 to 15 weeks in advance of their
departure dates, however, we cannot predict whether this booking
trend will continue in the future.
Competition
The vacation exchange and rentals business faces competition
throughout the world. Our vacation exchange business competes
with Interval International, Inc., which is a third-party
international exchange company, with regional and local vacation
exchange companies and with Internet-based business models. In
addition, certain developers offer exchanges through internal
networks of properties, which are operated by us or by the
developer, that offer owners of intervals access to exchanges
other than those offered by our vacation exchange business. Our
vacation rentals business faces competition from a broad variety
of marketers of vacation properties who use brokerage, direct
marketing and the Internet to market and rent vacation
properties.
Trademarks
We own the trademarks RCI, RCI Points,
The Registry Collection, Landal
GreenParks, English Country Cottages,
Novasol, Cuendet, Canvas
Holidays, and related and other trademarks and logos. Such
trademarks and logos are material to the businesses that are
part of our vacation exchange and rentals business. Our
subsidiaries actively use these marks, and all of the material
marks are registered (or have applications pending) with the
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office as well as with the
relevant authorities in major countries worldwide where these
businesses have significant operations.
99
WYNDHAM
VACATION OWNERSHIP
Overview
Wyndham Vacation Ownership, our vacation ownership business,
includes marketing and sales of vacation ownership interests,
consumer financing in connection with the purchase by
individuals of vacation ownership interests, property management
services to property owners associations, and development
and acquisition of vacation ownership resorts. We operate our
vacation ownership business through our two primary brands,
Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham. We have the
largest vacation ownership business in the world as measured by
the numbers of vacation ownership resorts, vacation ownership
units and owners of vacation ownership interests. We have
developed or acquired approximately 150 vacation ownership
resorts in the United States, Canada, Mexico, the Caribbean and
the South Pacific that represent more than 20,000 individual
vacation ownership units and over 800,000 owners of vacation
ownership interests.
Our primary vacation ownership brands, Wyndham Vacation Resorts
and WorldMark by Wyndham, operate vacation ownership programs
through which vacation ownership interests can be redeemed for
vacations through points-based internal reservation systems that
provide owners with flexibility (subject to availability) as to
resort location, length of stay, unit type and time of year. The
points-based reservation systems offer owners redemption
opportunities for other travel and leisure products that may be
offered from time to time, and the opportunity for owners to use
our products for one or more vacations per year based on level
of ownership. Our vacation ownership programs allow us to market
and sell our vacation ownership products in variable quantities
as opposed to the fixed quantity of the traditional, fixed-week
vacation ownership, which is primarily sold on a weekly interval
basis, and to offer to existing owners upgrade sales
to supplement such owners existing vacation ownership
interests. Although we operate Wyndham Vacation Resorts and
WorldMark by Wyndham as separate brands, we have integrated
substantially all of the business functions of Wyndham Vacation
Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham, including consumer finance,
information technology, certain staff functions, product
development and certain marketing activities.
Our vacation ownership business derives a majority of its
revenues from sales of vacation ownership interests and derives
other revenues from consumer financing and property management.
Because revenues from sales of vacation ownership interests and
consumer finance in connection with such sales depend on the
number of vacation ownership units in which we sell vacation
ownership interests, increasing the number of such units is
important to our revenue growth. Because revenues from property
management depend on the number of units we manage, increasing
the number of such units is also important to our revenue
growth. Revenues from our vacation ownership business
represented approximately 54%, 54% and 55% of total company net
revenues during 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Sales and
Marketing of Vacation Ownership Interests and Property
Management
Wyndham
Rebranding
As of December 31, 2006, our Fairfield Resorts and
Trendwest vacation ownership businesses have begun to transition
their consumer branding efforts to Wyndham Vacation Resorts and
WorldMark by Wyndham, respectively. This transition, which is
expected to continue throughout 2007, includes the
implementation of the Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by
Wyndham brands throughout all marketing, sales and service
channels as appropriate, including the application of the
Wyndham brand at select resort properties as well as sales,
marketing and service centers throughout our system.
Wyndham
Vacation Resorts
Wyndham Vacation Resorts markets and sells vacation ownership
interests in Wyndham Vacation Resorts portfolio of resort
properties and uses a points-based reservation system called
FairShare Plus to
100
provide owners with flexibility (subject to availability) as to
resort location, length of stay, unit type and time of year.
Wyndham Vacation Resorts is involved in the development or
acquisition of the resort properties in which Wyndham Vacation
Resorts markets and sells vacation ownership interests. Wyndham
Vacation Resorts also often acts as a property manager of such
resorts. From time to time, Wyndham Vacation Resorts also sells
home lots and other real estate interests at its resort
properties.
Vacation Ownership Interests, Portfolio of Resorts
and Maintenance Fees. The vacation ownership interests
that Wyndham Vacation Resorts markets and sells consist of fixed
weeks and undivided interests. A fixed week entitles an owner to
ownership and usage rights with respect to a unit for a specific
week of each year, whereas an undivided interest entitles an
owner to ownership and usage rights that are not restricted to a
particular week of the year. These vacation ownership interests
each constitute a deeded interest in real estate and on average
sold for approximately $17,600 in 2006. Of the more than
800,000 owners of vacation ownership interests in Wyndham
Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham resort properties as
of December 31, 2006, approximately 518,000 owners
held interests in Wyndham Vacation Resorts resort properties.
Wyndham Vacation Resorts resort properties are located primarily
in the United States and, as of December 31, 2006,
consisted of 79 resorts that represented approximately
15,000 units. In 2006, Wyndham Vacation Resorts expanded
its portfolio in Orlando, Florida, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina,
Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin, Fairfield Glade, Tennessee and
Sevierville (Smokey Mts.), Tennessee and added resort properties
in new locations, such as Honolulu, Hawaii and San Diego,
California.
The majority of the resorts in which Wyndham Vacation Resorts
markets and sells vacation ownership and other real estate
interests are destination resorts that are located at or near
attractions such as the Walt Disney
World®
Resort in Florida; the Las Vegas Strip in Nevada; Myrtle Beach
in South Carolina; Colonial
Williamsburg®
in Virginia; and the Hawaiian Islands. Most Wyndham Vacation
Resorts resort properties are affiliated with Wyndham
Worldwides vacation exchange subsidiary, RCI, which awards
to the top 10% of RCI affiliated vacation ownership resorts
throughout the world designations of an RCI Gold Crown Resort or
an RCI Silver Crown Resort for exceptional resort standards and
service levels. Among Wyndham Vacation Resorts 79 resort
properties, 55 have been awarded designations of an RCI Gold
Crown Resort or an RCI Silver Crown Resort.
Owners of vacation ownership interests pay annual maintenance
fees to the property owners associations responsible for
managing the applicable resorts. The annual maintenance fee
associated with the average vacation ownership interest
purchased ranges from approximately $300 to approximately $650.
These fees generally are used to renovate and replace
furnishings, pay operating, maintenance and cleaning costs, pay
management fees and expenses, and cover taxes (in some states),
insurance and other related costs. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, as
the owner of unsold inventory at resorts, also pays maintenance
fees to property owners associations in accordance with
the legal requirements of the states or jurisdictions in which
the resorts are located. In addition, at certain newly-developed
resorts, Wyndham Vacation Resorts enters into subsidy agreements
with the property owners associations to cover costs that
otherwise would be covered by annual maintenance fees payable
with respect to vacation ownership interests that have not yet
been sold.
FairShare Plus. Wyndham Vacation
Resorts uses a points-based internal reservation system called
FairShare Plus to provide owners with flexibility (subject to
availability) as to resort location, length of stay, unit type
and time of year. With the launch of FairShare Plus in 1991,
Wyndham Vacation Resorts became one of the first
U.S. developers of vacation ownership properties to move
from traditional, fixed-week vacation ownership to a
points-based program. Owners of vacation ownership interests in
Wyndham Vacation Resorts resort properties that are eligible to
participate in the program may elect, and with respect to
certain resorts are obligated, to participate in FairShare Plus.
Owners who participate in FairShare Plus assign their rights to
use fixed weeks and undivided interests, as applicable, to a
trust in exchange for the right to reserve in the internal
reservation system. The number of points that an owner receives
as a result of the assignment to the trust of the owners
right to use fixed weeks or undivided interests, and the number
of points required to take a particular vacation, is set forth
on
101
a published schedule and varies depending on the resort
location, length of stay, unit type and time of year associated
with the interests assigned to the trust or requested by the
owner, as applicable. Participants in FairShare Plus may choose
(subject to availability) the Wyndham Vacation Resorts resort
properties, length of stay, unit types and times of year,
depending on the number of points to which they are entitled and
the number of points required to take the vacations of their
preference. Participants in the program may redeem their points
not only for resort stays, but also for other travel and leisure
products that may be offered from time to time. Wyndham Vacation
Resorts offers various programs that provide existing owners
with the opportunity to upgrade, or acquire
additional vacation ownership interests to increase the number
of points such owners can use in FairShare Plus.
Depending on the vacation ownership interest, Wyndham Vacation
Resorts not only offers owners the option to make reservations
through FairShare Plus, but also offers owners the opportunity
to exchange their vacation ownership interests through our
vacation exchange business, RCI, or through Interval
International, Inc., which is a third-party international
exchange.
Program and Property Management. In
exchange for management fees, Wyndham Vacation Resorts, itself
or through a Wyndham Vacation Resorts affiliate, manages
FairShare Plus, the majority of property owners
associations at resorts in which Wyndham Vacation Resorts
markets and sells vacation ownership interests, and property
owners associations at resorts developed by third parties.
On behalf of FairShare Plus, Wyndham Vacation Resorts or its
affiliate manages the reservation system for FairShare Plus and
provides owner services and billing and collections services.
The term of the trust agreement of FairShare Plus runs through
December 31, 2025, and the term is renewable if FairShare
Plus is extended by a majority of the members of the program
(including Wyndham Vacation Resorts). The term of the management
agreement, under which Wyndham Vacation Resorts manages the
FairShare Plus program, is for five years and is automatically
renewed annually for successive terms of five years, provided
the trustee under the program does not serve notice of
termination to Wyndham Vacation Resorts at the end of any
calendar year. On behalf of property owners associations,
Wyndham Vacation Resorts or its affiliates generally provide
day-to-day
management for vacation ownership resorts, including oversight
of housekeeping services, maintenance and refurbishment of the
units, and provides certain accounting and administrative
services to property owners associations. The terms of the
property management agreements with the property owners
associations at resorts in which Wyndham Vacation Resorts
markets and sells vacation ownership interests vary; however,
the vast majority of the agreements provide a mechanism for
automatic renewal upon expiration of the terms. At some
established sites, the property owners associations have
entered into property management agreements with professional
management companies other than Wyndham Vacation Resorts or its
affiliates.
WorldMark
by Wyndham
WorldMark by Wyndham markets and sells vacation ownership
interests, which are called vacation credits (holiday credits in
the South Pacific), in resorts owned by the vacation ownership
programs WorldMark, The Club and WorldMark South Pacific Club,
which we refer to collectively as the Clubs, which WorldMark by
Wyndham formed in 1989 and 2000, respectively. The Clubs provide
owners with flexibility (subject to availability) as to resort
location, length of stay, unit type, the day of the week and
time of year. WorldMark by Wyndham is usually involved in the
development of the resorts owned by the Clubs. In addition to
developing resorts and marketing and selling vacation credits,
WorldMark by Wyndham manages the Clubs and the majority of
resorts owned by the Clubs.
In October 1999, WorldMark by Wyndham formed Trendwest South
Pacific, Pty. Ltd., an Australian corporation, or Trendwest
South Pacific, as its direct wholly owned subsidiary for the
purpose of conducting sales, marketing and resort development
activities in the South Pacific. Trendwest South Pacific is
currently the largest vacation ownership business in Australia,
with approximately 35,000 owners of vacation credits as of
December 31, 2006. Resorts in the South Pacific typically
are owned and operated through WorldMark South Pacific Club,
other than 66 units at Denarau Island, Fiji, which are
owned by WorldMark, The Club.
102
Vacation Credits, Portfolio of Resorts and Maintenance
Fees. Vacation credits in the Clubs entitle
the owner of the credits to reserve units at the resorts that
are owned and operated by the Clubs. WorldMark by Wyndham and
Trendwest South Pacific are the developers or acquirers of the
resorts that the Clubs own and operate. After WorldMark by
Wyndham or Trendwest South Pacific develops or acquires resorts,
it conveys the resorts to WorldMark, The Club or WorldMark South
Pacific Club, as applicable. In exchange for the conveyances,
WorldMark by Wyndham or Trendwest South Pacific receives the
exclusive rights to sell the vacation credits associated with
the conveyed resorts and to receive the proceeds from the sales
of the vacation credits. Although vacation credits, unlike
vacation ownership interests in Wyndham Vacation Resorts resort
properties, do not constitute deeded interests in real estate,
vacation credits are regulated in most jurisdictions by the same
agency that regulates vacation ownership interests evidenced by
deeded interests in real estate. In 2006, the average purchase
by a new owner of vacation credits was approximately $11,700. Of
the more than 800,000 owners of vacation ownership interests in
Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham resorts as of
December 31, 2006, over 282,000 owners held vacation
credits in WorldMark by Wyndham resorts.
WorldMark by Wyndham resorts are located primarily in the
Western United States, Canada, Mexico and the South Pacific and,
as of December 31, 2006, consisted of 75 resorts that
represented approximately 5,400 units. Of the WorldMark by
Wyndham resorts and units, Trendwest South Pacific has a total
of 14 resorts with approximately 500 units. In 2006,
WorldMark by Wyndham expanded its portfolio of resorts to
include properties in Indio, California; San Diego,
California; and Midway, Utah.
The resorts in which WorldMark by Wyndham markets and sells
vacation credits are primarily drive-to resorts. Most WorldMark
by Wyndham resorts are affiliated with Wyndham Worldwides
vacation exchange subsidiary, RCI. Among WorldMark by
Wyndhams 75 resorts, 62 have been awarded designations of
an RCI Gold Crown Resort or an RCI Silver Crown Resort.
Owners of vacation credits pay annual maintenance fees to the
Clubs. The annual maintenance fee associated with the average
vacation credit purchased is approximately $480. The maintenance
fee that an owner pays is based on the number of the
owners vacation credits. These fees are intended to cover
the Clubs operating costs, including the dues to the
property owners associations, which are generally the
Clubs responsibility. Fees paid to property owners
associations are generally used to renovate and replace
furnishings, pay maintenance and cleaning costs, pay management
fees and expenses, and cover taxes (in some states), insurance
and other related costs. Maintenance of common areas and the
provision of amenities typically is the responsibility of the
property owners associations. WorldMark by Wyndham has a
minimal ownership interest in the Clubs that results from
WorldMark by Wyndhams ownership of unsold vacation credits
in the Clubs. As the owner of unsold vacation credits, WorldMark
by Wyndham pays maintenance fees to the Clubs.
WorldMark, The Club and WorldMark South Pacific
Club. The Clubs provide owners of vacation
credits with flexibility (subject to availability) as to resort
location, length of stay, unit type and time of year. Depending
on how many vacation credits an owner has purchased, the owner
may use the vacation credits for one or more vacations annually.
The number of vacation credits that are required for each
days stay at a unit is listed on a published schedule and
varies depending upon the resort location, unit type, time of
year and the day of the week. Owners may also redeem their
credits for other travel and leisure products that may be
offered from time to time.
Owners of vacation credits are able to carry over unused
vacation credits in one year to the next year and to borrow
vacation credits from the next year for use in the current year.
Owners of vacation credits are also able to purchase bonus time
from the Clubs for use when space is available. Bonus time gives
owners the opportunity to use available resorts on short notice
and at a reduced rate and to obtain usage beyond owners
allotments of vacation credits. In addition, WorldMark by
Wyndham offers owners the opportunity to upgrade, or
acquire additional vacation credits to increase the number of
credits such owners can use in the Clubs.
103
Owners of vacation credits can make reservations through the
Clubs, or may elect to join and exchange their vacation
ownership interests through our vacation exchange business, RCI,
or Interval International, Inc., which is a third-party exchange
company.
Club and Property Management. In
exchange for management fees, WorldMark by Wyndham, itself or
through a WorldMark by Wyndham affiliate, serves as the
exclusive property manager and servicing agent of the Clubs and
all resort units owned or operated by the Clubs. On behalf of
the Clubs, WorldMark by Wyndham or its affiliate provides
day-to-day
management for vacation ownership resorts, including oversight
of housekeeping services, maintenance and refurbishment of the
units, and provides certain accounting and administrative
services. WorldMark by Wyndham or its affiliate also manages the
reservation system for the Clubs and provides owner services and
billing and collections services. The management agreements of
WorldMark, The Club and WorldMark South Pacific Club provide for
automatic one-year and five-year renewals, respectively, unless
renewal is denied by a majority of the voting power of the
owners (excluding WorldMark by Wyndham and its affiliates.)
Sales
and Marketing
Wyndham Vacation Ownership employs a variety of marketing
channels as part of Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by
Wyndham marketing programs to encourage prospective owners of
vacation ownership interests to tour Wyndham Vacation Resorts
and WorldMark by Wyndham resort properties, as applicable, and
to attend sales presentations at resort locations and off-site
sales offices. These channels include direct mail,
e-commerce,
in-person solicitations, referral programs and inbound and
outbound telemarketing. The marketing offers we make through
these channels are local and travel-based offers. Our local
offers are designed to produce tour flow in regions where
prospective owners reside or are currently visiting, and our
travel-based offers are designed to solicit the purchase by
prospective owners of overnight vacation packages to
destinations in which Wyndham Vacation Ownership operates. We
believe that marketing through both local and travel-based
offers enhances our ability to market successfully to
prospective owners.
Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham offer a
variety of entry-level programs and products as part of their
sales strategies. One such program allows prospective owners to
acquire one-years worth of points or credits with no
further obligations, and one such product is a biennial
interest, which prospective owners can buy, that provides for
vacations every other year. As part of their sales strategies,
Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham rely on their
points/credits-based programs, which provide prospective owners
with the flexibility to buy relatively small packages of points
or credits, which can be upgraded at a later date. To facilitate
upgrades among existing owners, Wyndham Vacation Resorts and
WorldMark by Wyndham market opportunities for owners to purchase
additional points or credits through periodic marketing
campaigns and promotions to owners while such owners vacation at
Wyndham Vacation Resorts or WorldMark by Wyndham resort
properties, as applicable.
The marketing and sales activities of Wyndham Vacation Resorts
and WorldMark by Wyndham are often facilitated through marketing
alliances with other travel, hospitality, entertainment, gaming
and retail companies that provide access to such companies
present and past customers through co-branded marketing offers,
in-bound call transfer programs, in-store promotions, on-line
advertising, sweepstakes programs and other highly integrated
marketing platforms.
Wyndham Vacation Resorts Sales and
Marketing. Wyndham Vacation Resorts sells its
vacation ownership interests and other real estate interests at
38 resort locations and eight off-site sales centers.
On-site
sales accounted for approximately 84% of all new sales during
2006.
On-site
sales presentations typically follow a resort tour led by a
Wyndham Vacation Resorts salesperson. Wyndham Vacation Resorts
conducted approximately 623,000 and 585,000 tours in 2006 and
2005, respectively.
Wyndham Vacation Resorts resort-based sales centers, which
are located in popular travel destinations throughout the United
States, generate substantial tour flow through providing
travel-based offers. The sales centers sell overnight vacation
packages to popular travel destinations throughout the United
States and
104
when the purchasers of such packages redeem the packages,
Wyndham Vacation Resorts sales representatives provide the
purchasers with tours of Wyndham Vacation Resorts resort
properties. Wyndham Vacation Resorts utilizes direct mail,
on-line campaigns and outbound and inbound telemarketing to
market for sale the overnight vacation packages to prospective
owners of vacation ownership interests, many of whom are also
past or prospective customers for our travel, hospitality,
entertainment and gaming marketing alliances. Wyndham Vacation
Resorts often co-brands the vacation packages with third parties
with whom it has marketing alliances and features products or
services provided by those third parties as part of the vacation
packages.
Wyndham Vacation Resorts resort-based sales centers also
generate substantial tour flow through providing local offers.
The sales centers enable Wyndham Vacation Resorts to market to
tourists already visiting destination areas. Wyndham Vacation
Resorts marketing agents, which often operate on the
premises of the hospitality, entertainment, gaming and retail
companies with which Wyndham Vacation Resorts has alliances
within these markets, solicit local tourists with offers
relating to activities and entertainment in exchange for the
tourists visiting the local resorts and attending sales
presentations. An example of a marketing alliance through which
Wyndham Vacation Resorts markets to tourists already visiting
destination areas is Wyndham Vacation Resorts current
arrangement with Harrahs Entertainment in Las Vegas,
Nevada, which enables Wyndham Vacation Resorts to operate
several concierge-style marketing kiosks throughout
Harrahs Casino that permit Wyndham Vacation Resorts to
solicit patrons to attend tours and sales presentations with
Harrahs-related rewards and entertainment offers, such as
gaming chips, show tickets and dining certificates. Wyndham
Vacation Resorts also operates its primary Las Vegas sales
center within Harrahs Casino and regularly shuttles
prospective owners targeted by such sales centers to and from
Wyndham Vacation Resorts nearby resort property. Wyndham
Vacation Resorts also has marketing alliances with Trump Casino
Resorts and Outrigger Hotels & Resorts.
Wyndham Vacation Resorts resort-based sales centers enable
Wyndham Vacation Resorts to actively solicit upgrade sales to
existing owners of vacation ownership interests while such
owners vacation at Wyndham Vacation Resorts resort properties.
Sales of vacation ownership interests relating to upgrades
represented approximately 46%, 42% and 37% of Wyndham Vacation
Resorts net sales of vacation ownership interests in 2006,
2005 and 2004, respectively.
WorldMark by Wyndham Sales and
Marketing. WorldMark by Wyndham sells its
vacation credits in the United States primarily at 62 sales
offices, 29 of which are located off-site in metropolitan areas.
Trendwest South Pacific conducts its international sales and
marketing efforts through
on-site and
off-site sales offices, telemarketing and road shows. As of
December 31, 2006, Trendwest South Pacific had 11 sales
offices throughout the east coast of Australia, the North Island
of New Zealand and Fiji. Off-site sales offices generated
approximately 60% and 69% of WorldMark by Wyndhams sales
of new vacation credits in 2006 and 2005, respectively.
WorldMark by Wyndham conducted approximately 423,000 and 349,000
tours in 2006 and 2005, respectively.
WorldMark by Wyndhams off-site sales offices market
vacation credits through local offers to prospective owners in
areas where such purchasers reside. WorldMark by Wyndhams
off-site sales offices provide WorldMark by Wyndham with access
to large numbers of prospective owners and a convenient, local
venue at which to preview and sell vacation credits. WorldMark
by Wyndhams off-site sales offices provide WorldMark by
Wyndham with access to a wide group of qualified sales personnel
due to the locations of the sales offices in metropolitan areas.
WorldMark by Wyndham uses a variety of marketing programs to
attract prospective owners, including sponsored contests that
offer vacation packages or gifts, targeted mailings, outbound
and inbound telemarketing efforts, and various other promotional
programs. WorldMark by Wyndham also co-sponsors sweepstakes,
giveaways and other promotional programs with professional teams
at major sporting events and with other third parties at other
high-traffic consumer events. Where permissible under state law,
WorldMark by Wyndham offers existing owners cash awards or other
incentives for referrals of new owners.
WorldMark by Wyndham and Trendwest South Pacific periodically
encourage existing owners of vacation credits to acquire
additional vacation credits through various methods. Sales of
vacation credits
105
relating to upgrades represented approximately 35%, 31% and 33%
of WorldMark by Wyndhams net sales of vacation credits in
2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Sales of vacation credits
relating to upgrades represented approximately 16%, 13% and 11%
of Trendwest South Pacifics net sales of vacation credits
in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Purchaser
Financing
Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham offer
financing to purchasers of vacation ownership interests. By
offering consumer financing, we are able to reduce the initial
cash required by customers to purchase vacation ownership
interests, thereby enabling us to attract additional customers
and generate substantial incremental revenues and profits.
Wyndham Vacation Ownership services loans extended by Wyndham
Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham through our consumer
financing subsidiary, Wyndham Consumer Finance (formerly known
as Cendant Timeshare Resort Group-Consumer Finance, Inc.), a
wholly owned subsidiary of Wyndham Vacation Resorts based in Las
Vegas, Nevada that performs loan servicing and other
administrative functions for Wyndham Vacation Resorts and
WorldMark by Wyndham. As of December 31, 2006, we serviced
a portfolio of approximately 262,000 loans that totaled
$2,658 million in aggregate principal amount outstanding,
with an average interest rate of approximately 13%.
Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham do not
currently conduct a credit investigation or other review or
inquiry into a purchasers credit history before offering
to finance a portion of the purchase price of the vacation
ownership interests. As of December 31, 2006, however, at
the majority of Wyndham Vacation Resorts sales offices,
purchasers are offered an enhanced financing option
the opportunity to obtain financing on more favorable terms if
they agree to permit Wyndham Vacation Resorts to obtain their
credit scores. The interest rate offered to participating
purchasers is determined from automated underwriting based upon
the purchasers credit score, the amount of the down
payment and the size of purchase. WorldMark by Wyndham sales
offices currently do not offer an enhanced financing option and
instead offer financing with an interest rate based upon the
size of the purchase. However, WorldMark by Wyndham, through
certain upgrade sales programs, may offer existing owners of
vacation credits who purchase additional vacation credits
financing on more favorable terms based on such owners
payment history with WorldMark by Wyndham. Both Wyndham Vacation
Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham offer purchasers an interest
rate reduction if they participate in their pre-authorized
checking, or PAC, programs, pursuant to which our consumer
financing subsidiary each month debits a purchasers bank
account or major credit card in the amount of the monthly
payment by a pre-authorized fund transfer on the payment date.
As of December 31, 2006, approximately 82% of purchaser
financing serviced by our consumer financing subsidiary
participated in the PAC program. In addition, in an effort to
improve the performance of their respective portfolios, Wyndham
Vacation Resorts plans to expand its enhanced financing option
initiative, and WorldMark by Wyndham plans to explore
implementing a similar enhanced financing option.
Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham generally
require a minimum down payment of 10% of the purchase price on
all sales of vacation ownership interests and offer consumer
financing for the remaining balance for up to ten years. Both
Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham offer programs
through which prospective owners may accumulate the required 10%
down payment over a period of time not greater than six months.
The prospective owner is placed in pending status
until the required 10% down payment amount is received.
Similar to other companies that provide consumer financing, we
securitize a majority of the receivables originated in
connection with the sales of our vacation ownership interests.
We initially place the financed contracts into a revolving
warehouse securitization facility generally within 30 to
90 days after origination. Many of the receivables are
subsequently transferred from the warehouse securitization
facility and placed into term securitization facilities. As of
December 31, 2006, the aggregate principal amount
outstanding of receivables in the warehouse securitization
facility and the term securitization facilities was
$733 million and $1,013 million, respectively.
106
Servicing
and Collection Procedures
Our consumer financing subsidiary is responsible for the
maintenance of accounts receivables files and all customer
service, billing and collection activities related to the
domestic loans we extend. Our consumer financing subsidiary also
services loans pledged in our warehouse and term securitization
facilities. As of December 31, 2006, our consumer financing
subsidiary had approximately 474 employees, the majority of whom
were in customer service and maintenance (approximately
193) and loan collection and special services
(approximately 183).
Since April 2005, Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by
Wyndham have used a single computerized online data system to
maintain loan records and service the loans. This system permits
access to customer account inquiries and is supported by our
information technology department.
The collection methodologies for both brands are similar and
entail a combination of mailings and telephone calls which are
supported by an automated dialer. As of December 31, 2006,
the loan portfolios of both Wyndham Vacation Resorts and
WorldMark by Wyndham were approximately 94% current (i.e., not
more than 30 days past due).
We assess the performance of our loan portfolio by monitoring
certain metrics on a daily, weekly, monthly and annual basis.
These metrics include, but are not limited to, collections
rates, account roll rates, defaults by state residency of the
obligor and bankruptcies. We define defaults as accounts that
are 120 days or more past due plus bankrupt accounts. The
average expected cumulative gross default rate is approximately
16.5%. At December 31, 2006, loans originated in 2004 and
2005 had aggregate cumulative default rates of approximately
14.5% and 10.7%, respectively.
Strategies
We intend to grow our vacation ownership business by increasing
sales of vacation ownership interests to new owners and sales of
upgrades to existing owners by expanding our marketing and sales
efforts, strengthening our product offerings and further
developing our consumer financing activities. We plan to
leverage the Wyndham brand in our marketing efforts, add new
resorts, expand our marketing alliances and increase our
on-site
sales activities to existing owners. Our plans generally focus
on pursuing these strategies organically. In addition, in
appropriate circumstances, we will consider opportunities to
acquire businesses, both domestic and international, including
through the use of Wyndham Worldwide common stock as currency.
Expand
our sales and marketing efforts
We plan to expand sales and marketing to new and existing
owners, including marketing and selling through in-person
solicitation, direct mail,
e-commerce,
referral programs, inbound and outbound telemarketing and
upgrade sale programs. We plan to leverage the Wyndham brand in
our marketing efforts to strengthen our position in the
higher-end segment of the vacation ownership industry, to
attract prospective new owners in higher income demographics
through Wyndham-branded marketing campaigns, and to increase
upgrade sales through the application of the Wyndham brand
within existing and new higher-end products and product features.
We plan to expand our marketing and sales distribution channels
through the pursuit of additional integrated marketing alliances
with lodging and entertainment companies. We currently have
alliances with Harrahs Entertainment in Las Vegas, Nevada;
Trump Casino Resorts in Atlantic City, New Jersey; and Outrigger
Hotels & Resorts throughout Hawaii, which permit us to
conduct marketing and sales activities at properties owned by
these companies. We will explore expanding our existing
alliances and entering into new alliances.
107
Strengthen
our product offerings
We plan to strengthen the products that we offer by adding new
resorts and resort locations and expanding our offering of
higher-end products and product features. We plan to develop
additional resorts in new domestic regions and in domestic
regions we currently serve that are experiencing strong demand
such as Orlando, Myrtle Beach, San Antonio, Las Vegas,
San Diego and Hawaii. We plan to develop additional resorts
in international regions in Canada, the Caribbean, Mexico,
Australia and Asia. In addition, we may also acquire additional
resorts that complement our current portfolio of resorts.
We are applying the Wyndham brand at new domestic and
international resorts, as well as at select locations within our
current portfolio of resorts. In addition, we plan to develop
and market mixed-use hotel and vacation ownership properties in
conjunction with the Wyndham brand. The mixed-use properties
would afford us access to both hotel clients in higher income
demographics for the purpose of marketing vacation ownership
interests and hotel inventory for use in our marketing programs.
We plan to expand upon existing and create new higher-end
product offerings in conjunction with the Wyndham brand. We are
exploring associating the Wyndham brand with our existing
high-end Presidential-style vacation ownership units in our
current inventory and may further apply the Wyndham brand to
current and future product features and services available to
our owners who have attained enhanced membership status within
our vacation ownership programs as a result of achieving
substantial ownership levels.
Enhance
our consumer financing activities
We plan to increase our revenue from vacation ownership interest
sales by enhancing our customers ability to purchase our
products. Our consumer financing activities increase our sales
of Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham vacation
ownership interests by offering financing to prospective
purchasers who might otherwise not purchase. Additionally,
offering financing permits prospective purchasers to acquire
larger vacation ownership interests than they might otherwise
acquire. To further increase the number and size of sales of our
vacation ownership interests, we plan to explore offering new
financing products and terms that are desirable to prospective
purchasers.
We plan to increase our net interest income by improving the
performance of our portfolio of vacation ownership contract
receivables. To improve the performance of our portfolio, we
plan to expand our enhanced financing option initiative. In
addition, we plan to continue improving our collection
activities to reduce the volume and duration of delinquencies
and defaults, thereby improving the performance of our
portfolio. We also plan to continue reducing our loan servicing
costs.
Seasonality
We rely, in part, upon tour flow to generate sales of vacation
ownership interests; consequently, sales volume tends to
increase in the spring and summer months as a result of greater
tour flow from spring and summer travelers. Revenues from sales
of vacation ownership interests therefore are generally higher
in the second and third quarters than in other quarters. We
cannot predict whether these seasonal trends will continue in
the future.
Competition
The vacation ownership industry is highly competitive and is
comprised of a number of companies specializing primarily in
sales and marketing, consumer financing, property management and
development of vacation ownership properties. In addition, a
number of national hospitality chains develop and sell vacation
ownership interests to consumers. Some of the well-known players
in the industry include Disney Vacation Club, Hilton Grand
Vacations Company LLC, Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc. and
Starwood Vacation Ownership, Inc.
108
Trademarks
We own the trademarks Wyndham Vacation Ownership,
Wyndham Vacation Resorts, WorldMark by
Wyndham, Fairfield, Trendwest and
FairShare Plus and related trademarks and logos, and
such trademarks and logos are material to the businesses that
are part of our vacation ownership business. Our subsidiaries
actively use these marks, and all of the material marks are
registered (or have applications pending) with the
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office as well as with the
relevant authorities in major countries worldwide where these
businesses have significant operations. We own the
WorldMark trademark pursuant to an assignment
agreement with WorldMark, The Club. Pursuant to the assignment
agreement, WorldMark, The Club may request that the mark be
reassigned to it only in the event of a termination of the
WorldMark vacation ownership programs. During the fourth quarter
of 2006, we announced that we will be changing our Fairfield
Resorts and Trendwest branding to Wyndham Vacation Resorts and
WorldMark by Wyndham, respectively. As such, we will discontinue
use of the Fairfield and Trendwest trademark names over the next
12 months.
Employees
At December 31, 2006, we had approximately 30,100
employees, including approximately 10,000 employees outside of
the United States. At December 31, 2006, our lodging
business had approximately 4,500 employees, our vacation
exchange and rentals business had approximately 9,100 employees
and our vacation ownership business had approximately 16,200
employees. Approximately 1% of our employees are subject to
collective bargaining agreements governing their employment with
our company. We believe that our relations with employees are
good.
109
REGULATION
Our businesses are either subject to or affected by
international, federal, state and local laws, regulations and
policies, which are constantly subject to change. The
descriptions of the laws, regulations and policies that follow
are summaries and should be read in conjunction with the texts
of the laws and regulations described below. The descriptions do
not purport to cover all present and proposed laws, regulations
and policies that affect our businesses.
We believe that we are in material compliance with these laws,
regulations and policies. Although we cannot predict the effect
of changes to the existing laws, regulations and policies or to
the proposed laws, regulations and policies that are described
below, we are not currently aware of proposed changes or
proposed new laws, regulations and policies that will have a
material adverse effect on our business.
Regulations
Generally Applicable to Our Business
Our businesses are subject to, among others, laws and
regulations that affect privacy and data collection, marketing
regulation and the use of the Internet, as described below:
Privacy and Data Collection. The
collection and use of personal data of our customers and our
ability to contact our customers, including through telephone or
facsimile, are governed by privacy laws and regulations enacted
in the United States and in other jurisdictions around the
world. Privacy regulations continue to evolve and on occasion
may be inconsistent from one jurisdiction to another. Many
states have introduced legislation or enacted laws and
regulations that require strict compliance with standards for
data collection and protection of privacy and provide for
penalties for failure to notify customers when such standards
are breached, even by third parties. The U.S. Federal Trade
Commission, or FTC, adopted do not call and do
not fax regulations in October 2003. In compliance with
such regulations, our affected businesses have developed and
implemented plans to block phone numbers listed on the do
not call and do not fax registries and have
instituted new procedures for preventing unsolicited
telemarketing calls. In response to do not call and
do not fax regulations, our affected businesses have
reduced their reliance on outbound telemarketing. In addition,
our European businesses have adopted policies and procedures to
comply with the European Union Directive on Data Protection.
These policies and procedures require that unless the use of
data is necessary for certain specified purposes,
including, for example, the performance of a contract with the
individual concerned, consent to use data must be obtained.
Australia, in 2006, adopted do not call legislation
and promulgated do not call regulations. Such
regulations will become effective May 2007 and we are
instituting new procedures to comply with such regulations.
Marketing Operations. The products and
services offered by our various businesses are marketed through
a number of distribution channels, including direct mail,
telemarketing and online. These channels are regulated at the
state and federal levels, and we believe that the effect of such
regulations on our marketing operations will increase over time.
Such regulations, which include anti-fraud laws, consumer
protection laws, privacy laws, identity theft laws, anti-spam
laws, telemarketing laws and telephone solicitation laws, may
limit our ability to solicit new customers or to market
additional products or services to existing customers. In
addition, some of our business units use sweepstakes and
contests as part of their marketing and promotional programs.
These activities are regulated primarily by state laws that
require certain disclosures and assurance that the prizes will
be available to the winners.
Internet. Although our business
units operations on the Internet are not currently
regulated by any government agency in the United States, it is
likely that a number of laws and regulations may be adopted to
regulate the Internet. In addition, it is possible that existing
laws may be interpreted to apply to the Internet in ways that
the existing laws are not currently applied, particularly with
respect to the imposition of state and local taxes on the use
and reservation of accommodations through the Internet.
Regulatory and legal requirements are particularly subject to
change with respect to the Internet and may become more
restrictive, which will increase the difficulty and expense of
compliance or otherwise restrict our business units
abilities to conduct operations as such operations are currently
conducted.
110
We are also aware of, and are actively monitoring the status of,
certain proposed United States state and international
legislation related to privacy and
e-mail
marketing that may be enacted in the future. It is unclear at
this point what effect, if any, such state and international
legislation may have on our businesses. California, for example,
has enacted legislation that requires enhanced disclosure on
Internet web sites regarding consumer privacy and information
sharing among affiliated entities. We cannot predict with
certainty whether these laws will affect our practices with
respect to customer information and inhibit our ability to
market our products and services nor can we predict whether
other states will enact similar laws. Because Internet
reservations are more cost-effective than reservations taken
over the phone, our costs may increase if Internet reservations
are adversely affected by regulations.
Travel Agency Services. The travel
agency products and services that our businesses provide are
subject to various federal, state and local regulations. We must
comply with laws and regulations that relate to our marketing
and sales of such products and services, including laws and
regulations that prohibit unfair and deceptive advertising or
practices and laws that require us to register as a seller
of travel to comply with disclosure requirements. In
addition, we are indirectly affected by the regulation of our
travel suppliers, many of which are heavily regulated by the
United States and other governments. We are also affected by the
European Union Directive applicable to the sale and provision of
package holidays because some of our European businesses operate
such that they are classified, for certain of their operations,
as organizers of package holidays. This European Union Directive
places liability for the package holiday sold with the organizer
and requires that the organizer has security in place in order
to refund to the consumer money paid by such consumer in the
event of insolvency of the organizer.
Regulations
Applicable to the Lodging Business
Our lodging business is subject to, among others, laws,
regulations and policies that affect the sale of franchises and
access for persons with disabilities, as described below:
Sale of Franchises. The FTC, various
state laws and regulations and the laws of jurisdictions outside
the United States regulate the offer and sale of franchises. The
FTC requires that franchisors make extensive written disclosure
in a prescribed format to prospective franchisees but does not
require registration. The FTC recently approved new franchise
regulations (the FTC Rule) that will affect sales
practices and procedures and the content of disclosure documents
that we use to sell franchises in the United States. The new FTC
Rule will become effective as of July 1, 2007 but
franchisors may use their current UFOC formats for one year from
the effective date. We believe that the new FTC Rule will have
no material adverse impact on the offer and sale of our hotel
franchises. The state laws that affect our franchise business
regulate the offer and sale of franchises, the termination,
renewal and transfer of franchise agreements, and the provision
of loans to franchisees as part of the sales of franchises.
Currently, 19 states have laws that require registration or
disclosure in connection with offers and sales of franchises. In
addition, 20 states currently have franchise
relationship laws that limit the ability of franchisors to
terminate franchise agreements or to withhold consent to the
renewal or transfer of the agreements. California regulates the
provision of loans to franchisees as part of the sales of the
franchises but we are currently exempt from such law. The laws
of jurisdictions outside the United States regulate pre-sale
disclosure and the commencement of franchising. Three Canadian
provinces and a number of foreign jurisdictions have adopted
pre-sale disclosure regulations. China has enacted regulations
that, among other things, require an organization to operate
properties in at least two locations in the area where the
organization wants to franchise brands before China will permit
the organization to commence acting as a franchisor. We have
received legal advice that such regulations do not prevent us
from continuing to franchise brands that we had franchised in
China before the effective date of the regulations and any
direct franchises will be established in accordance with
applicable law.
Persons with Disabilities. The
Americans with Disabilities Act, or ADA, requires public
accommodations, such as lodging and restaurant facilities, to
(i) offer facilities without discriminating against persons
with disabilities, (ii) offer auxiliary aids and services
to persons with hearing, vision or speech disabilities who would
benefit from such services without fundamentally altering the
nature of the goods or services
111
offered and (iii) remove barriers to mobility or
communication to the extent readily achievable. The
U.S. Department of Justice published Standards for
Accessible Design and Accessibility
Guidelines, collectively referred to as ADAAG, that, among
other things, prescribe a specified number of handicapped
accessible rooms, assistive devices for hearing, speech and
visually impaired persons, and general standards of design
applicable to all areas of facilities subject to the law,
including hotels. The ADAAG specifies the minimum room design
and layout criteria for handicapped accessible rooms. Any newly
constructed facility (first occupied after January 26,
1993) must comply with ADAAG and be readily accessible to
and useable by persons with disabilities. The owner of each
facility and its contractors are responsible for ADA and ADAAG
compliance.
Regulations
Applicable to the Vacation Exchange and Rentals
Business
Our vacation exchange business is subject to, among other laws
and regulations, statutes in certain states that regulate
vacation exchange services, and we must prepare and file
annually disclosure guides with regulators in states where such
filings are required. Although our vacation exchange business is
not generally subject to state statutes that govern the
development of vacation ownership properties and the sale of
vacation ownership interests, these statutes directly affect the
members of our vacation exchange program and resorts with units
that participate in our vacation exchanges. These statutes,
therefore, indirectly affect our vacation exchange business. In
addition, several states and localities are attempting to enact
or have enacted laws or regulations that would impose or impose,
as applicable, taxes on members that complete exchanges, similar
to local transient occupancy taxes. Our vacation rentals
business is subject to state and local regulation, including
applicable seller of travel, travel club and real estate
brokerage licensing statutes.
Regulations
Applicable to the Vacation Ownership Business
Our vacation ownership business is subject to, among others, the
laws and regulations that affect the marketing and sale of
vacation ownership interests, property management of vacation
ownership resorts, travel agency services and the conduct of
real estate brokers, described below:
Federal, State and International Regulation of Vacation
Ownership Business. Our vacation ownership
business is subject to federal legislation, including without
limitation, Housing and Urban Development Department
regulations, such as the Fair Housing Act; the
Truth-in-Lending
Act and Regulation Z promulgated thereunder, which require
certain disclosures to borrowers regarding the terms of
borrowers loans; the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
and Regulation X promulgated thereunder, which require
certain disclosures to borrowers regarding the settlement of
real estate transactions and servicing of loans; the Equal
Credit Opportunity Act and Regulation B promulgated
thereunder, which prohibit discrimination in the extension of
credit on the basis of age, race, color, sex, religion, marital
status, national origin, receipt of public assistance or the
exercise of any right under the Consumer Credit Protection Act;
the Telemarketing and Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act; the
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the Fair Credit Reporting Act and
other laws, which address privacy of consumer financial
information; and the Civil Rights Acts of 1964, 1968 and 1991.
Many states have laws that regulate our vacation ownership
business operations, including those relating to real
estate licensing, travel sales licensing, anti-fraud,
telemarketing, restrictions on the use of predictive dialers,
prize, gift and sweepstakes regulations, labor, and various
regulations governing access and use of our resorts by disabled
persons. In addition to regulation in the United States and
Australia, our vacation ownership business is subject to
regulation in other countries where we develop or manage resorts
and where we market or sell vacation ownership interests,
including Canada, Mexico, New Zealand and Fiji. The scope of
regulation of our vacation ownership business in Canada, where
we develop, market, sell and manage resorts, is similar to the
scope of regulation of our vacation ownership business in the
United States. In addition, in Australia, we are regulated by
the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, which
requires that all persons conducting vacation ownership sales
and marketing and vacation ownership club activities hold an
Australian Financial Services License and comply with the rules
and regulations of the Commission. Unlike in the United States,
where the vacation ownership industry is regulated primarily by
state law, the vacation ownership industry in Australia is
regulated under
112
federal Australian securities law because Australian law regards
a vacation ownership interest as a security. As we expand our
vacation ownership business by entering new markets, we will
become subject to regulation in additional countries.
The sale of vacation ownership interests is potentially subject
to federal and state securities laws. However, most federal and
state agencies generally do not regulate our sale of vacation
ownership interests as securities, in part because we offer our
vacation ownership interests for personal vacation use and
enjoyment and not for investment purposes with the expectation
of profit or in conjunction with a rental arrangement. In
addition, the vacation ownership interests that we market and
sell are real estate interests or are akin to real estate
interests and therefore our vacation ownership business is
extensively regulated by many states departments of
commerce
and/or real
estate. Because of such extensive regulation, additional
regulation of our vacation ownership products as securities
generally does not occur. Some states in which we market and
sell our vacation ownership interests regulate our products as
securities. In those states, we comply with such regulation by
either registering our vacation ownership interests for sale as
securities or qualifying for an exemption from registration and
by providing required disclosures to our purchasers. If federal
and additional state agencies elected to regulate our vacation
ownership interest products as securities, we would comply with
such regulation by either registering our vacation ownership
interests for sale as securities or qualifying for an exemption
from registration and by providing required disclosures to our
purchasers.
State real estate foreclosure laws impact our vacation ownership
business. We secure loans made to purchasers of vacation
ownership interests that constitute real estate interests and
that are deeded prior to loan repayment by requiring purchasers
to grant a first priority mortgage lien in our favor, which is
recorded against title to the vacation ownership interest. In
the event of a purchasers default, the purchaser will
often voluntarily deed the vacation ownership interest to us, in
which event foreclosure is not necessary. If the purchaser does
not do so, we may commence a judicial or non-judicial
foreclosure proceeding. State real estate foreclosure laws
normally require that certain conditions be satisfied prior to
completing foreclosure, including providing to the purchaser
both a notice and an opportunity to redeem the purchasers
interest and conducting a foreclosure sale. While state real
estate foreclosure laws impose requirements and expenses on us,
we are able to comply with the requirements, bear the expenses
and complete foreclosures. Several states have enacted
anti-deficiency laws which generally prohibit a lender from
recovering the portion of an outstanding loan in excess of the
proceeds of a foreclosure sale of a borrowers primary
residence that secures repayment of the loan. Since purchasers
of vacation ownership interests do not occupy a resort unit as a
primary residence, state anti-deficiency laws generally do not
impact us. Our sale of vacation ownership interests that are
vacation credits is not impacted by state real estate
foreclosure and anti-deficiency laws, since vacation credits are
not direct real estate interests.
Marketing and Sale of Vacation
Ownership Interests. We are subject to
extensive regulation by states departments of commerce
and/or real
estate and international regulatory agencies, such as the
European Commission, in locations where our resorts in which we
sell vacation ownership interests are located or where we market
and sell vacation ownership interests. Many states regulate the
marketing and sale of vacation ownership interests, and the laws
of such states generally require a designated state authority to
approve a vacation ownership public report, which is a detailed
offering statement describing the resort operator and all
material aspects of the resort and the sale of vacation
ownership interests. In addition, the laws of most states in
which we sell vacation ownership interests grant the purchaser
of such an interest the right to rescind a contract of purchase
at any time within a statutory rescission period, which
generally ranges from three to 15 days, depending on the
state.
Property Management of Vacation Ownership
Resorts. Our vacation ownership business
includes property management operations that are subject to
state condominium
and/or
vacation ownership management regulations and, in some states,
to professional licensing requirements.
Conduct of Real Estate Brokers. The
marketing and sales component of our vacation ownership business
is subject to numerous federal, state and local laws and
regulations that contain general standards for and prohibitions
relating to the conduct of real estate brokers and sales
associates, including laws and
113
regulations that relate to the licensing of brokers and sales
associates, fiduciary and agency duties, administration of trust
funds, collection of commissions, and advertising and consumer
disclosures. The federal Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
and state real estate brokerage laws also restrict payments that
real estate brokers and other parties may receive or pay in
connection with the sales of vacation ownership interests and
referral of prospective owners. Such laws may, to some extent,
restrict arrangements involving our vacation ownership business.
Environmental Regulation. Because our
vacation ownership business acquires, develops and renovates
vacation ownership interest resorts, we are subject to various
environmental laws, ordinances, regulations and similar
requirements in the jurisdictions where our resorts are located.
The environmental laws to which our vacation ownership business
is subject regulate various matters, including pollution,
hazardous and toxic substances and wastes, asbestos, petroleum
and storage tanks.
Regulations
Applicable to the Management of Property Operations
Our business that relates to the management of property
operations, which includes components of our lodging and
vacation ownership businesses, is subject to, among others, laws
and regulations that relate to health and sanitation, the sale
of alcoholic beverages, facility operation and fire safety,
including as described below:
Health and Sanitation. Most states have
regulations or statutes governing the lodging business or its
components, such as restaurants, swimming pools and health
facilities. Lodging and restaurant businesses often require
licensing by state and local authorities, and sometimes these
licenses are obtainable only after the business passes health
inspections to assure compliance with health and sanitation
codes. Health inspections are performed on a recurring basis.
Health-related laws affect the use of linens, towels and
glassware. Other laws govern swimming pool use and operation and
require the posting of notices, availability of certain rescue
equipment and limitations on the number of persons allowed to
use the pool at any time. These regulations typically impose
civil fines or penalties for violations, which may lead to
operating restrictions if uncorrected or in extreme cases of
violations.
Sale of Alcoholic Beverages. Alcoholic
beverage service is subject to licensing and extensive
regulations that govern virtually all aspects of service.
Compliance with these regulations at managed locations may
impose obligations on the owners of managed hotels, Wyndham
Hotel Management as the property manager or both. Managed hotel
operations may be adversely affected by delays in transfers or
issuances of alcoholic beverage licenses necessary for food and
beverage services.
Facility Operation. The operation of
lodging facilities is subject to innkeepers laws that
(i) authorize the innkeeper to assert a lien against and
sell, after observing certain procedures, the possessions of a
guest who owes an unpaid bill for lodging or other services
provided by the innkeeper, (ii) affect or limit the
liability of an innkeeper who posts required notices or
disclaimers for guest valuables if a safe is provided, guest
property, checked or stored baggage, mail and parked vehicles,
(iii) require posting of house rules and room rates in each
guest room or near the registration area, (iv) may require
registration of guests, proof of identity at check-in and
retention of records for a specified period of time,
(v) limit the rights of an innkeeper to refuse lodging to
prospective guests except under certain narrowly defined
circumstances, and (vi) may limit the right of the
innkeeper to evict a guest who overstays the scheduled stay or
otherwise gives a reason to be evicted. Federal and state laws
applicable to places of public accommodation prohibit
discrimination in lodging services on the basis of the race,
creed, color or national origin of the guest. Some states
prohibit the practice of overbooking and require the
innkeeper to provide the reserved lodging or find alternate
accommodations if the guest has paid a deposit, or face a civil
fine. Some states and municipalities have also enacted laws and
regulations governing no-smoking areas and guest rooms that are
more stringent than our standards for no-smoking guest rooms.
Fire Safety. The federal Hotel and
Motel Safety Act of 1990 requires all places of public
accommodation to install hard wired, single station smoke
detectors meeting National Fire Protection Association Standard
74 in each guest room and to install an automatic sprinkler
system meeting National Fire
114
Protection Association Standard 13 or 13-R in facilities
taller than three stories, unless certain exceptions are met,
for such places to be approved for lodging and meetings of
federal employees. Travel directories published by the federal
government and lists maintained by state officials will include
only those facilities that comply with the Hotel and Motel
Safety Act of 1990. Other state and local fire and life safety
codes may require exit maps, lighting systems and other safety
measures unique to lodging facilities.
Occupational Safety. The federal
Occupational Safety and Health Act, or OSHA, requires that
businesses comply with industry-specific safety and health
standards, which are known collectively as OSHA standards, to
provide a safe work environment for all employees and prevent
work-related injuries, illnesses and deaths. Failure to comply
with such OSHA standards may subject the lodging business to
fines from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
Environmental Regulation. Our business
that relates to the management of property operations is subject
to various environmental laws, ordinances, regulations and
similar requirements in the jurisdictions where the properties
we manage are located. We must comply with environmental laws
that regulate pollution, hazardous and toxic substances and
wastes, asbestos, petroleum and storage tanks.
115
MANAGEMENT
Executive
Officers
The following table sets forth information, as of March 7,
2007, regarding individuals who are our executive officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Stephen P. Holmes
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer
|
Franz S. Hanning
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive
Officer, Wyndham Vacation Ownership
|
Kenneth N. May
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive
Officer, RCI Global Vacation Network
|
Steven A. Rudnitsky
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive
Officer, Wyndham Hotel Group
|
Virginia M. Wilson
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
|
Scott G. McLester
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and
General Counsel
|
Mary R. Falvey
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief
Human Resources Officer
|
Thomas F. Anderson
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief
Real Estate Development Officer
|
Nicola Rossi
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief
Accounting Officer
|
Stephen P. Holmes has served as the Chairman of
our Board of Directors and as our Chief Executive Officer since
our separation from Cendant in July 2006. Mr. Holmes was a
director since May 2003 of the already existing, wholly owned
subsidiary of Cendant that held the assets and liabilities of
Cendants hospitality services (including timeshare
resorts) businesses before our separation from Cendant and has
served as a director of Wyndham Worldwide since the separation
in July 2006. Mr. Holmes was Vice Chairman and Director of
Cendant and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Cendants Travel Content Division from December 1997 until
our separation from Cendant in July 2006. Mr. Holmes was
Vice Chairman of HFS Incorporated, from September 1996 until
December 1997 and was a director of HFS from June 1994 until
December 1997. From July 1990 through September 1996,
Mr. Holmes served as Executive Vice President, Treasurer
and Chief Financial Officer of HFS.
Franz S. Hanning has served as President and Chief
Executive Officer, Wyndham Vacation Ownership since our
separation from Cendant in July 2006. Mr. Hanning was the
Chief Executive Officer of Cendants Timeshare Resort Group
from March 2005 until our separation from Cendant in July 2006.
Mr. Hanning served as President and Chief Executive Officer
of Fairfield Resorts, Inc. (which has been renamed Wyndham
Vacation Resorts, Inc.) from April 2001, when Cendant acquired
Fairfield, to March 2005 and as President and Chief Executive
Officer of Trendwest Resorts, Inc. (which has been renamed
WorldMark by Wyndham) from August 2004 to March 2005.
Mr. Hanning joined Fairfield in 1982 and held several key
leadership positions with Fairfield, including Regional Vice
President, Executive Vice President of Sales and Chief Operating
Officer.
Kenneth N. May has served as President and Chief
Executive Officer, RCI Global Vacation Network since our
separation from Cendant in July 2006. Mr. May was the Chief
Executive Officer of Cendants Vacation Network Group from
March 2005 until our separation from Cendant in July 2006. From
February 1999 to March 2005, Mr. May was Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of RCI. Prior to joining Cendant, Mr. May
held positions as General Manager with Citibank North America
Credit Cards, Senior Vice President and General Manager with
Disney Vacation Club and various other leadership positions for
PepsiCo, Inc. and Colgate-Palmolive Company.
116
Steven A. Rudnitsky has served as our President
and Chief Executive Officer, Wyndham Hotel Group since our
separation from Cendant in July 2006. Mr. Rudnitsky was the
Chief Executive Officer of Cendants Hotel Group from March
2002 until our separation from Cendant in July 2006. Prior to
joining Cendant, from December 2000 to March 2002,
Mr. Rudnitsky was President of Kraft Foodservice and
Executive Vice President of Kraft Foods, Inc. Mr. Rudnitsky
was appointed to these positions with Kraft in December 2000
upon Krafts acquisition of Nabisco Foods Company, where he
served as President from 1999 until December 2000. From 1996 to
1999, Mr. Rudnitsky was Vice President and General Manager,
food service, for Pillsbury Bakeries & Foodservice.
From 1984 to 1996, Mr. Rudnitsky held positions of
increasing responsibility at PepsiCo, Inc.
Virginia M. Wilson has served as our Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since our separation
from Cendant in July 2006. Ms. Wilson was Executive Vice
President and Chief Accounting Officer of Cendant from September
2003 until our separation from Cendant in July 2006. From
October 1999 until August 2003, Ms. Wilson served as Senior
Vice President and Controller for MetLife, Inc., a provider of
insurance and other financial services. From 1996 until 1999,
Ms. Wilson served as Senior Vice President and Controller
for Transamerica Life Companies, an insurance and financial
services company. Prior to Transamerica, Ms. Wilson was an
Audit Partner of Deloitte & Touche LLP.
Scott G. McLester has served as our Executive Vice
President and General Counsel since our separation from Cendant
in July 2006. Mr. McLester was Senior Vice President, Legal
for Cendant from April 2004 until our separation from Cendant in
July 2006. Mr. McLester was Group Vice President, Legal for
Cendant from March 2002 to April 2004, Vice President, Legal for
Cendant from February 2001 to March 2002 and Senior Counsel for
Cendant from June 2000 to February 2001. Prior to joining
Cendant, Mr. McLester was a Vice President in the Law
Department of Merrill Lynch in New York and a partner with the
law firm of Carpenter, Bennett and Morrissey in Newark, New
Jersey.
Mary R. Falvey has served as our Executive Vice
President and Chief Human Resources Officer since our separation
from Cendant in July 2006. Ms. Falvey was Executive Vice
President, Global Human Resources for Cendants Vacation
Network Group from April 2005 until our separation from Cendant
in July 2006. From March 2000 to April 2005, Ms. Falvey
served as Executive Vice President, Human Resources for RCI.
From January 1998 to March 2000, Ms. Falvey was Vice
President of Human Resources for Cendants Hotel Division
and Corporate Contact Center group. Prior to joining Cendant,
Ms. Falvey held various leadership positions in the human
resources division of Nabisco Foods Company.
Thomas F. Anderson has served as our Executive
Vice President and Chief Real Estate Development Officer since
our separation from Cendant in July 2006. From April 2003 until
July 2006, Mr. Anderson was Executive Vice President,
Strategic Acquisitions and Development of Cendants
Timeshare Resort Group. From January 2000 until February 2003,
Mr. Anderson was Senior Vice President, Corporate Real
Estate for Cendant Corporation. From November 1998 until
December 1999, Mr. Anderson was Vice President of Real
Estate Services, Coldwell Banker Commercial. From March 1995 to
October 1998, Mr. Anderson was General Manager of American
Asset Corporation, a full service real estate developer based in
Charlotte, North Carolina. From June 1990 until February 1995,
Mr. Anderson was Vice President of Commercial Lending for
BB&T Corporation in Charlotte, North Carolina.
Nicola Rossi has served as our Senior Vice
President and Chief Accounting Officer since our separation from
Cendant in July 2006. Mr. Rossi was Vice President and
Controller of Cendants Hotel Group from June 2004 until
our separation from Cendant in July 2006. From April 2002 to
June 2004, Mr. Rossi served as Vice President, Corporate
Finance for Cendant. From April 2000 to April 2002,
Mr. Rossi was Corporate Controller of Jacuzzi Brands, Inc.,
a bath and plumbing products company, and was Assistant
Corporate Controller from June 1999 to March 2000. From November
1995 to May 1999, Mr. Rossi was Director of Corporate
Accounting of The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company,
Inc. From 1988 to 1995, Mr. Rossi held various positions,
from staff accountant to manager, with Deloitte &
Touche LLP.
117
Board of
Directors
The following sets forth, as of March 13, 2007, information
with respect to those persons who serve on our Board of
Directors. See Executive Officers for
Stephen P. Holmess biographical information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Stephen P. Holmes
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
Myra J. Biblowit
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
Director
|
James E. Buckman
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
Director
|
George Herrera
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Director
|
The Right Honourable Brian Mulroney
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
Director
|
Pauline D.E. Richards
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
Director
|
Michael H. Wargotz
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Director
|
Myra J. Biblowit has served as a director since
our separation from Cendant in July 2006. Ms. Biblowit was
a Cendant director from April 2000 until the completion of
Cendants separation plan in August 2006. Since April 2001,
Ms. Biblowit has been President of The Breast Cancer
Research Foundation. From July 1997 until March 2001, she served
as Vice Dean for External Affairs for the New York University
School of Medicine and Senior Vice President of the Mount
Sinai-NYU Health System. From June 1991 to June 1997,
Ms. Biblowit was Senior Vice President and Executive
Director of the Capital Campaign for the American Museum of
Natural History.
James E. Buckman was a director since May 2003 of
the already-existing, wholly owned subsidiary of Cendant that
held the assets and liabilities of Cendants hospitality
services (including timeshare resorts) businesses before our
separation from Cendant and has served as a director of Wyndham
Worldwide since our separation from Cendant in July 2006. Since
January 22, 2007, Mr. Buckman has been serving as a
consultant to York Capital Management, a hedge fund management
company headquartered in New York City. Mr. Buckman was
General Counsel and a director of Cendant from December 1997
until the completion of Cendants separation plan in August
2006. Mr. Buckman was a Vice Chairman of Cendant from
November 1998 until the completion of Cendants separation
plan in August 2006. Mr. Buckman was a Senior Executive
Vice President of Cendant from December 1997 until November
1998. Mr. Buckman was Senior Executive Vice President,
General Counsel and Assistant Secretary of HFS from May 1997 to
December 1997, a director of HFS from June 1994 to December 1997
and Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Assistant
Secretary of HFS from February 1992 to May 1997.
George Herrera has served as a director since our
separation from Cendant in July 2006. Mr. Herrera was a
Cendant director from January 2004 until the completion of
Cendants separation plan in August 2006. Since December
2003, Mr. Herrera has served as President and Chief
Executive Officer of Herrera-Cristina Group, Ltd., a
Hispanic-owned multidisciplinary management firm. From August
1998 to January 2004, Mr. Herrera served as President and
Chief Executive Officer of the U.S. Hispanic Chamber of
Commerce. Mr. Herrera served as President of David J.
Burgos & Associates, Inc. from December 1979 until July
1998.
The Right Honourable Brian Mulroney has served as
a director since our separation from Cendant in July 2006.
Mr. Mulroney was a Cendant director from December 1997
until the completion of Cendants separation plan in August
2006. Mr. Mulroney was Prime Minister of Canada from 1984
to 1993 and is currently Senior Partner in the Montreal-based
law firm, Ogilvy Renault. Mr. Mulroney is a director of the
following public companies: Archer Daniels Midland Company Inc.,
Barrick Gold Corporation, Independent News and Media, PLC and
Quebecor, Inc. (including its subsidiary, Quebecor World Inc.).
Mr. Mulroney was a director of HFS from April 1997 until
December 1997.
Pauline D.E. Richards has served as a director
since our separation from Cendant in July 2006.
Ms. Richards was a Cendant director from March 2003 until
the completion of Cendants separation plan in August 2006.
Since November 2003, Ms. Richards has been Director of
Development at the Saltus Grammar School, the largest private
school in Bermuda. From January 2001 until March 2003,
Ms. Richards served as Chief Financial Officer of Lombard
Odier Darier Hentsch (Bermuda) Limited in
118
Bermuda, a trust company business. From January 1999 until
December 2000, she was Treasurer of Gulfstream Financial
Limited, a stock brokerage company. From January 1999 to June
1999, Ms. Richards served as a consultant to Aon Group of
Companies, Bermuda, an insurance brokerage company, after
serving in different positions from 1988 through 1998. These
positions included Controller, Senior Vice President and Group
Financial Controller and Chief Financial Officer.
Ms. Richards was chairman of Cendants audit committee
from October 2004 until the completion of Cendants
separation plan in August 2006.
Michael H. Wargotz has served as a director since
our separation from Cendant in July 2006. Since December 2006,
Mr. Wargotz has been the Chief Financial Advisor of NetJets
Inc., a leading provider of private aviation services. From June
2004 until November 2006, he was the Vice President of NetJets.
Since January 2001, Mr. Wargotz has been a founding partner
of Axcess Solutions, LLC, a strategic alliance, brand
development and partnership marketing consulting firm. From
January 2000 to December 2000, Mr. Wargotz pursued personal
interests. From January 1998 to December 1999, Mr. Wargotz
served in various leadership positions with Cendant, including
President and Chief Executive Officer of its Lifestyle Division,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of its
Alliance Marketing Segment and Senior Vice President, Business
Development. Mr. Wargotz was a Senior Vice President with
HFS from July 1994 to December 1997.
119
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Compensation
Committee Matters
Separation from Cendant. During 2005
and 2006, Cendants compensation committee met on numerous
occasions to, among other things, determine and approve the
employment agreement for our CEO. We subsequently entered into
employment agreements with our other named executive officers.
Wyndham Worldwide Compensation
Committee. Our Compensation Committee is
responsible for establishing executive compensation policies and
programs consistent with corporate objectives and shareholder
interests. The Compensation Committee operates under a written
charter adopted by the Board. The charter is reviewed on an
annual basis and revised as appropriate. The Committees
membership is determined by the Board and is composed entirely
of independent directors. The Compensation Committee Chair
reports on Compensation Committee actions and recommendations at
our Board meetings.
Ratification of Prior Actions. In
October 2006, our Compensation Committee reviewed the actions of
Cendants compensation committee as they applied to our CEO
and ratified the employment agreements of our other named
executive officers.
Managements Role. Management
plays a significant role in the compensation-setting process.
The most significant aspects of managements role are
evaluating employee performance, establishing business
performance targets and objectives, and recommending salary
levels and equity awards. Our CEO works with the Compensation
Committee in establishing the agenda for committee meetings.
Management also prepares meeting information for each
Compensation Committee meeting. Our CEO also participates in
Compensation Committee meetings at the committees request
to provide background information regarding our strategic
objectives, his evaluation of the performance of the senior
executive officers and compensation recommendations as to senior
executive officers (other than himself). The CEO is not involved
in setting his own compensation. CEO compensation is exclusive
responsibility of the Compensation Committee.
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
Overview
In July 2006, we separated from Cendant Corporation (now Avis
Budget Group) in a spin-off and became a stand-alone public
company. Compensation elements and target levels for our named
executive officers for 2006 were determined by Cendant. These
determinations were made largely in the context of the spin-off.
In summary, the compensation decisions relevant to our named
executive officers for 2006 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
l
|
We adopted and Cendant approved our 2006 Equity and Incentive
Plan, Health and Welfare Plan and Officer Deferred Compensation
Plan.
|
|
|
l
|
We adopted our Executive Total Compensation Strategy as
described below.
|
|
|
l
|
We entered into employment agreements with each of our named
executive officers. The employment agreements were negotiated
individually with each named executive officer. Base salaries,
target annual incentive compensation and long-term incentive
awards were set consistent with historical compensation, peer
group executives and peer executives for Cendant and
Cendants other business units that were spun-off or sold,
Realogy and Travelport. These agreements are described below
under Agreements with Named Executive Officers.
|
|
|
l
|
The base salaries paid to our named executive officers in 2006
are listed in the Summary Compensation Table below.
|
|
|
l
|
We paid our named executive officers annual incentive
compensation based on adjusted EBIT results of the company and
business units as applicable. The amounts we paid are listed in
the Summary Compensation Table below.
|
120
|
|
|
|
l
|
We made grants of stock settled stock appreciation rights and
restricted stock units to our named executive officers. The
grants are listed in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table below.
|
|
|
l
|
We provided our named executives perquisites consistent with
Cendants historical practices. The perquisites are listed
in the All Other Compensation Table below.
|
Executive
Total Compensation Strategy
In February 2007, we adopted our Executive Total Compensation
Strategy with the following principles and objectives as they
apply to our named executive officers:
|
|
|
|
l
|
Attract and retain superior senior management talent. We believe
that attracting and retaining superior senior managers is
integral to our ongoing success. Our named executive officers
possess extensive experience in our business and the hospitality
segments in which we compete and demonstrate the leadership
skills and commitment to excellence that we believe are critical
for our company. Accordingly, our compensation strategy is
designed in part to promote a long-term commitment from our
named executive officers.
|
|
|
l
|
Provide our executives with those compensation elements that are
consistent with those provided by comparable hospitality and
other service companies as well as general industry.
Accordingly, our elements of compensation are base salary,
annual incentive compensation, long-term incentive compensation,
retirement, health and welfare benefits and perquisites.
|
|
|
l
|
Support a high-performance environment by linking compensation
with performance. Our key goals are to grow our business and
increase shareholder value. Consistent with these goals, we
believe a significant portion of our executive compensation
should be contingent on actual results so executives earn
incentives only when and to the extent that we create value for
our shareholders. Accordingly, incentive awards should be driven
by corporate and segment performance with individual performance
influencing the size of the award.
|
|
|
l
|
Support a long-term focus for our executives that aligns their
interests with the interests of our shareholders. Long-term
awards should appropriately balance an alignment with
shareholder interests against our goal of retaining our key
personnel.
|
|
|
l
|
Provide our named executive officers with competitive base
salaries, bonuses and long-term incentives that may approach the
75th percentile of our peer group based on meeting company,
business unit and individual goals. When determining a
competitive level, we look to comparable hospitality and other
service companies as well as general industry.
|
Determining
Executive Compensation
An important aspect of the Compensation Committees annual
work relates to the determination of compensation for our senior
executives.
Annual Evaluation. The Compensation
Committee will meet each year to evaluate the performance of the
named executive officers, to consider and review their base
salaries for potential annual increases and to consider and
approve any grants to them of long-term incentive compensation.
Performance Compensation and
Objectives. Performance-based compensation
for our named executive officers generally includes cash annual
incentive compensation for achievement of specified performance
objectives and stock-based compensation whose value is dependent
upon long-term appreciation in stock price. The Non-Equity
Incentive Plan column of the Summary Compensation Table
below lists the annual incentive compensation we paid our named
executive officers for 2006.
Performance objectives for 2006 annual incentive compensation
paid in 2007 were established on the basis of corporate
and/or
business unit Earnings Before Interest and Taxes (EBIT), a
measure of our profitability. The EBIT targets for 2006 were
adjusted for separation and related costs and other special
121
items. The 2006 adjusted EBIT targets and funding models for the
corporation and business units were set by management based on
approved operating budgets and represented a specified growth
rate over the prior years EBIT consistent with our
strategic plan. We used these operating budgets to set the
ranges for our published 2006 earnings guidance.
An executives annual incentive compensation may be higher
or lower than the target payment (down to zero) depending on
corporate and business unit performance. For example, the annual
incentive payment could be as high as 125% of the target if the
operating unit results exceed 106% of the 2006 adjusted EBIT
target or as low as zero if the operating unit results are less
than 95% of the 2006 adjusted EBIT target.
For our CEO and CFO, the 2006 annual incentive payment was based
on a corporate target. For our business unit chief executives
other than Mr. Hanning, the 2006 annual incentive payment
was weighted 50% for the corporate target and 50% for the
business unit target. For Mr. Hanning, the 2006 annual
incentive payment was weighted 100% for the business unit target.
We link performance to our long-term incentives by basing the
size of the aggregate pool of shares available for grant on
business unit and corporate performance and, for individual
grants, on individual performance assessment and future
potential. The long-term incentive awards we made to our named
executive officers in 2006 are described below in the Grants of
Plan-Based Awards Table.
Targeted Compensation Levels. We
believe that information regarding compensation practices at
other companies is useful in evaluating compensation of our
named executive officers. We recognize that our compensation
practices must be competitive in the market. In addition, this
market information is a key factor that we consider in assessing
the reasonableness of compensation. Accordingly, we review
compensation levels for our CEO against compensation levels at
the companies in the peer group deemed appropriate by our
Compensation Committee for benchmarking purposes.
At the request of Cendants Compensation Committee,
Cendants compensation consultant provided Cendant with
information regarding CEO compensation levels at the
50th and 75th percentiles among a group of
representative hospitality, travel and gaming companies.
For our 2007 compensation arrangements, our compensation
consultant provided our Compensation Committee CEO compensation
levels of base salary, annual incentive awards and long-term
incentive awards at the 50th and 75th percentile among
those companies that we consider to be our most directly
comparable peer hospitality companies.
The Compensation Committee also reviewed general industry market
survey data from the 2006 Hewitt Associates Total Compensation
Measurement (TCM) database. The general industry peer group
consists of 54 companies with revenues between $2.5 and
$5 billion with a median of $3.3 billion.
We and Cendant used the comparable data to determine
compensation levels for our CEO, and in turn, our other named
executive officers as described below.
Policies and Practices for Pricing and Timing of Equity
Grants. We expect to make equity grants to
our named executive officers in May of each year. We expect to
observe the following relating to the timing of equity grants:
|
|
|
|
l
|
except for inducement grants for new executives, we determine
all equity awards at a Compensation Committee meeting held
during May each year;
|
|
|
l
|
the grant date for all awards is made after we have released
earnings and all other relevant nonpublic information for our
first quarter;
|
|
|
l
|
our executives do not have any role in selecting the grant date;
|
|
|
l
|
the grant date for all equity awards is always the date of
approval of the grants (or a specified later date if for any
reason the grant is approved during a time when we are in
possession of material, non-public information); and
|
122
|
|
|
|
l
|
the exercise or base price of any equity grant is the closing
price of the underlying common stock on the grant date.
|
2006
Executive Compensation Elements and Decisions
Base Salary. Base salary is a critical
element of executive compensation because it provides executives
with a base level of monthly income needed to be market
competitive. We set base salaries at a level designed to attract
and retain superior managers. Base salaries for our executives
are established based on the scope of their responsibilities,
taking into account historical compensation, competitive market
compensation paid by other companies for similar positions as
well as salaries paid to the executives peers within the
company.
The base salaries we (and Cendant) paid to our named executive
officers in 2006 are listed in the Summary Compensation Table
below. These amounts include compensation paid by Cendant prior
to the spin-off.
Mr. Holmes base salary was targeted to the
75th percentile of the peer group selected by
Cendants compensation consultant. The base salaries of our
other named executive officers were set relative to
Mr. Holmes base salary and each other.
Annual Incentive Compensation. We pay
annual incentive compensation to incent and reward superior
performance for the year. Annual incentive compensation is paid
in cash in the first quarter for the prior years
performance. Annual incentive awards are granted under our 2006
Equity and Incentive Plan. Consistent with their employment
agreements, we paid our named executive officers the annual
incentive compensation listed in the Summary Compensation Table
below.
Mr. Holmes target annual incentive compensation was
set by Cendant to the 75th percentile of the peer group
used by Cendants compensation consultant and consistent
with his historical compensation. The target annual incentive
compensation eligible paid to our other named executive officers
were set relative to their base salaries and each other. The
possible threshold, target and maximum annual incentive
compensation payouts payable to the named executive officers for
2006 are described below in the Grants of Plan Based Awards
Table.
The annual incentive compensation paid to Mr. Holmes and
Ms. Wilson for 2006 was weighted 100% on a corporate
adjusted EBIT target. We achieved at least 102.3% of the
corporate adjusted EBIT target which resulted in an annual
incentive payment of 105% of target for Mr. Holmes and
Ms. Wilson under the established corporate funding models.
The annual incentive compensation paid to Mr. May and
Mr. Rudnitsky for 2006 was weighted 50% for the corporate
target and 50% for the business unit target. Each of these
executives received 105% of 50% of his target annual incentive
compensation based on the corporate results as described above.
Mr. Mays business unit, RCI Global Vacation Network,
did not achieve at least 97% of the adjusted EBIT target which
resulted in him receiving 0% of 50% of his target annual
incentive compensation under the established business unit
funding models. Mr. Rudnitskys business unit, Wyndham
Hotel Group, achieved at least 103.2% of the adjusted EBIT
target which resulted in him receiving 105% of 50% of his target
annual incentive compensation under the established business
unit funding models.
The annual incentive compensation paid to Mr. Hanning for
2006 was weighted 100% for the business unit target.
Mr. Hannings business unit, Wyndham Vacation
Ownership, achieved at least 110.3% of the adjusted EBIT target
which resulted in him receiving 125% of his target annual
incentive compensation under the established business unit
funding models.
Long-Term Incentive Compensation. The
purpose of long-term incentives for our named executive officers
is to align their interests with shareholders through meaningful
equity participation and long-term ownership. Long-term
incentives should help balance a short-term performance focus
and encourage retention. Long-term incentive awards are granted
under our 2006 Equity and Incentive Plan.
123
At the CEO level, long-term incentives are heavily weighted
toward stock settled stock appreciation rights to provide
maximum leverage and to drive long-term share price
appreciation. A stock settled stock appreciation right is
similar to a stock option and gives the executive the right to
receive an amount in shares of common stock equal to the excess
of the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the
date of exercise over the exercise price of the stock
appreciation right. For our other named executive officers,
long-term incentives are weighted between stock settled stock
appreciation rights and restricted stock units to encourage
retention. A restricted stock unit represents the right to
receive a share of our common stock on a set vesting date.
We granted the stock settled stock appreciation rights and
restricted stock units to our named executive officers as
described in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table below. The
grant made to our CEO was designed to equal 200% of his prior
year award intended to provide increased retention incentive and
consistent with the CEOs of the other companies being separated
from Cendant. The grants made to our other named executive
officers were set relative to Mr. Holmes grant and
each other.
Officer Deferred Compensation Plan. We
adopted an officer deferred compensation plan that permits named
executive officers to defer salary and bonus compensation. We
match executive contributions to the plan up to 6% of salary and
bonus. The executive may elect a single lump-sum payment of his
or her account or may elect payments over time subject to
5-year
vesting. The participants entire account balance will vest
and be paid in a single lump sum following a
change-in-control
or in the event that the executives employment terminates.
401(k) Plan. We provide employees,
including our named executive officers, with a 401(k) plan. We
provide named executive officers and other participants a
company match of salary contributed up to 6% of salary. If an
executive elects to participate in both the Officer Deferred
Compensation Plan and the 401(k) plan, the executive must elect
to defer salary in one or the other of the plans but not both.
Savings Restoration Plan. We adopted a
savings restoration plan, which allows executives to defer
compensation in excess of the amounts permitted by the Internal
Revenue Code under our 401(k) plan, but there are no matching
contributions for these deferrals.
Perquisites. We provide our senior
executive officers with perquisites that we believe are
reasonable, competitive and consistent with our overall
executive compensation program. We believe that our perquisites
help us to retain the best managers and allow them to operate
more effectively.
In 2006 we provided our named executives perquisites consistent
with Cendants historical practices including a leased
automobile and financial planning services. For each of these
perquisites the executive receives a tax
gross-up
payment, which means the executive receives additional
compensation to reimburse them for the amount of taxes owed on
the compensation imputed for the perquisite. We also provided
our CEO with limited personal use of company aircraft for which
we imputed income for our incremental costs without a tax
gross-up.
Perquisites provided in 2006 are described in the All Other
Compensation Table below.
Severance Arrangements. The employment
agreements of our named executive officers provide for payments
related to base salary and bonus as well as accelerated equity
vesting if the executives employment is terminated without
cause or for a constructive discharge. The payments and terms
vary in certain respects between the individual executives.
These payments and terms are discussed below under Agreements
with Named Executive Officers.
Change-in-Control
Arrangements. Mr. Holmes
employment agreement provides for payments related to base
salary and bonus as well as accelerated equity vesting in the
event of a
change-in-control.
The employment agreements of our other named executive officers
provide for accelerated equity vesting based on certain vesting
schedules in the event of a
change-in-control.
The payments and terms vary in certain respects between the
individual executives. These payments and terms are discussed
below under Agreements with Named Executive Officers. In
addition, equity grants made to all employees, including the
named executive officers, under our 2006 Equity and Incentive
Plan fully vest on a
change-in-control.
124
2007
Executive Compensation Decisions
Base Salary. In the first quarter of
2007 our Compensation Committee approved the 2006 annual
incentive compensation payments discussed above and the 2007
base salaries for each of our named executive officers.
Consistent with the executives employment agreements, 2007
base salaries are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Base Salary
|
Name
|
|
($)
|
|
Mr. Holmes
|
|
|
1,040,000
|
|
Mr. Hanning
|
|
|
577,500
|
|
Mr. May
|
|
|
550,000
|
|
Mr. Rudnitsky
|
|
|
520,000
|
|
Ms. Wilson
|
|
|
494,000
|
|
Merit increases in base salary reward successful performance and
seek to create incentives for retention. We based the 2007 merit
increases on a review of the 2006 performance of the named
executive officers and their applicable function or business
unit.
Annual Incentive
Compensation. Consistent with the
executives employment agreements, and based on the 2007
base salaries described above, the possible threshold, target
and maximum annual incentive compensation payouts payable to the
named executive officers for 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
Target
|
|
Maximum
|
Name
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
Mr. Holmes
|
|
|
520,000
|
|
|
|
2,080,000
|
|
|
|
2,600,000
|
|
Mr. Hanning
|
|
|
165,000
|
|
|
|
660,000
|
|
|
|
825,000
|
|
Mr. May
|
|
|
198,550
|
|
|
|
550,000
|
|
|
|
687,500
|
|
Mr. Rudnitsky
|
|
|
166,660
|
|
|
|
520,000
|
|
|
|
650,000
|
|
Ms. Wilson
|
|
|
123,500
|
|
|
|
494,000
|
|
|
|
617,500
|
|
Management provided our Compensation Committee with the
financial criteria and targets that will be used to determine
the level of annual incentive compensation payouts and
managements rationale as to why these targets are
appropriate. Performance objectives for 2007 annual incentive
compensation were established on the basis of corporate
and/or
business unit EBIT. The EBIT targets for both corporate and the
business units will be adjusted for separation, related costs
and special items if appropriate.
The 2007 adjusted EBIT targets and funding models for the
corporation and business units were set by management based on
approved operating budgets and represented a specified growth
rate over the prior years EBIT consistent with our
strategic plan. We used these operating budgets to set the
ranges for our published 2007 earnings guidance.
For our CEO and CFO, the 2007 annual incentive payment will be
weighted 100% on the corporate target. For our business unit
chief executives, the 2007 annual incentive payment will be
weighted 25% for the corporate target and 75% for the business
unit target.
The Compensation Committee reviewed the criteria and targets
with our compensation consultant and management and approved the
threshold, target and maximum levels of financial performance
under the plan and the potential payouts at those levels of
performance. The Compensation Committee and we believe these
financial targets are rigorous but reasonably attainable.
125
Section 162(m)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986
The federal tax laws impose requirements in order for
compensation payable to the CEO and certain executive officers
to be fully deductible and generally provide that compensation
in excess of a certain amount is deductible only if it is
performance-based compensation and meets certain requirements.
In 2007, we expect to claim an income tax deduction for 2006
compensation paid to our CEO and executive officers to the
extent permitted by this section of the Internal Revenue Code.
2006
Summary Compensation Table
The following table describes compensation paid to our named
executive officers for 2006. The amounts reported include
compensation attributable to employment with Cendant prior to
the spin-off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Option
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
Awards
|
|
Awards
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Total
|
Name & Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
($)
|
|
($)(a)
|
|
($)(a)
|
|
($)(b)
|
|
($)(c)
|
|
($)
|
|
Stephen P. Holmes
Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
862,066
|
|
|
|
4,412,765
|
|
|
|
2,188,283
|
|
|
|
2,100,000
|
|
|
|
1,919,510
|
|
|
|
11,482,624
|
|
Franz S. Hanning
President and Chief Executive Officer, Wyndham Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
520,961
|
|
|
|
1,556,871
|
|
|
|
580,393
|
|
|
|
825,000
|
|
|
|
805,619
|
|
|
|
4,288,844
|
|
Kenneth N. May
President and Chief Executive Officer, RCI Global Vacation
Network
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
552,577
|
|
|
|
1,540,480
|
|
|
|
554,404
|
|
|
|
288,750
|
|
|
|
85,905
|
|
|
|
3,022,116
|
|
Steven A. Rudnitsky
President and Chief Executive Officer, Wyndham Hotel Group
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
1,517,988
|
|
|
|
504,456
|
|
|
|
525,000
|
|
|
|
275,064
|
|
|
|
3,322,508
|
|
Virginia M. Wilson
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
444,644
|
|
|
|
1,272,928
|
|
|
|
240,479
|
|
|
|
498,750
|
|
|
|
616,748
|
|
|
|
3,073,549
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Dollar values of awards equal
compensation cost to us (and Cendant) that we (and Cendant) are
required to report in 2006 under SFAS No. 123R. The
SFAS No. 123R amounts differ from the grant date fair
value for grants made in 2006 as the SFAS No. 123R
amounts generally reflect costs associated with grants made in
previous years. A discussion of the assumptions used in
calculating these values may be found in Note 16 to our
2006 audited financial statements of our annual report on
Form 10-K.
|
|
(b) |
|
Represents annual incentive
compensation for 2006 paid in 2007.
|
|
(c) |
|
See All Other Compensation Table
below for a description of compensation included in this column.
|
126
2006 All
Other Compensation Table
The All Other Compensation in the Summary Compensation Table
above includes the following components. The total compensation
amounts for the table are provided in the All Other
Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table
above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Holmes
|
|
Mr. Hanning
|
|
Mr. May
|
|
Mr. Rudnitsky
|
|
Ms. Wilson
|
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
Personal use of company aircraft
|
|
|
30,751
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
(a)(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company automobile
|
|
|
18,767
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
17,996
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
Financial planning services
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
401(K) Company match
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation company match
|
|
|
177,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,510
|
|
|
|
56,603
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
|
(b)(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends(e)
|
|
|
137,913
|
|
|
|
49,813
|
|
|
|
48,246
|
|
|
|
48,920
|
|
|
|
31,884
|
|
Retention
payment(f)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
700,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
Contract termination payment
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
(g)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive medical
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
Corporate
gift(h)
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
Charitable contributions
match(i)
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cendant option payment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,399
|
(j)
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate tax
gross-up(k)
|
|
|
19,383
|
|
|
|
7,600
|
|
|
|
18,771
|
|
|
|
5,453
|
|
|
|
5,513
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Aggregate incremental cost to us
(and/or Cendant) for personal use of company aircraft. These
costs are calculated using a standard rate per mile flown plus
terminal charges. Mr. Hannings 2006 personal use of
company aircraft was in connection with his Cendant employment.
|
|
(b) |
|
Aggregate incremental cost to us
(and/or Cendant) of the benefit(s) was less than $25,000 and 10%
of the total value of all perquisites provided to the named
executive officer.
|
|
(c) |
|
Aggregate incremental cost to us of
automobile benefit calculated as follows: Mr. Holmes,
company payment of $20,740 minus executive contribution of
$1,973 (amount does not include tax
gross-up
described below); and Mr. May, company payment of $28,431
minus executive contribution of $10,435 (amount does not include
tax-gross up
described below). The amounts for company payment include
insurance payments and other charges related to the benefit.
|
|
(d) |
|
Mr. Holmes is insured by a
term life insurance policy owned by us with a $1 million
death benefit payable to us. The premiums for this policy are
not imputed as income.
|
|
(e) |
|
Dividends paid on vesting of
Cendant restricted stock units.
|
|
(f) |
|
Mr. Hannings retention
payment was made under his employment agreement.
Ms. Wilsons retention payment was made by us in
September 2006 as contemplated by Cendants retention
program.
|
|
(g) |
|
Paid by Cendant in connection with
termination of employment agreement.
|
|
(h) |
|
Nominal gift received at Cendant
senior management conference (amount does not include tax
gross-up
described below). Wyndham Worldwide does not provide a tax
gross-up on nominal corporate gifts provided to its executives.
|
|
(i) |
|
Represents discretionary matching
contributions made by Cendants charitable foundation on
behalf of the named executive officer.
|
|
(j) |
|
Represents $130,399 payment made by
Cendant to Mr. Rudnitsky in connection with the spin-off
for Cendant options not eligible for
3-year
extended exercisability. The amount was calculated using a
modified Black-Scholes valuation formula.
|
|
(k) |
|
Aggregate tax
gross-ups
for 2006 consisted of the following: Mr. Holmes,
automobile, $12,999, financial planning, $6,279 and gift, $105;
Mr. Hanning, automobile, $6,199, financial planning, $1,326
and gift, $75; Mr. May, automobile, $18,705 and gift, $66;
Mr. Rudnitsky, automobile, $3,753, financial planning,
$1,619 and gift, $81; and Ms. Wilson, automobile, $4,102,
financial planning, $1,336 and gift, $75.
|
127
2006
Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table
The following table summarizes grants of plan-based awards made
to named executive officers in 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
Awards:
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Date Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Number of
|
|
or Base
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Possible Payouts Under
|
|
Shares of
|
|
Securities
|
|
Price of
|
|
Stock and
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
|
|
Stock or
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Option
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
Threshold
|
|
Target
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Units
|
|
Options
|
|
Awards
|
|
Awards
|
Name
|
|
Date
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
(#)
|
|
(#)
|
|
($/Sh)
|
|
($)
|
|
Mr. Holmes
|
|
08/01/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,493
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.85
|
|
|
|
2.5 million
|
|
|
|
08/01/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179,726
|
(b)(c)
|
|
|
31.85
|
|
|
|
2.5 million
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Hanning
|
|
08/01/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,794
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.85
|
|
|
|
2 million
|
|
|
|
08/01/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,890
|
(c)(e)
|
|
|
31.85
|
|
|
|
1 million
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
165,000
|
|
|
|
660,000
|
|
|
|
825,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. May
|
|
08/01/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,794
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.85
|
|
|
|
2 million
|
|
|
|
08/01/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,890
|
(c)(e)
|
|
|
31.85
|
|
|
|
1 million
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
163,900
|
|
|
|
550,000
|
|
|
|
687,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Rudnitsky
|
|
08/01/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,794
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.85
|
|
|
|
2 million
|
|
|
|
08/01/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,890
|
(c)(e)
|
|
|
31.85
|
|
|
|
1 million
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
157,000
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
625,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ms. Wilson
|
|
08/01/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,095
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.85
|
|
|
|
1.5 million
|
|
|
|
08/01/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,890
|
(c)(e)
|
|
|
31.85
|
|
|
|
1 million
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
118,750
|
|
|
|
475,000
|
|
|
|
593,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Grant of restricted stock units,
which vest equally over four years on each anniversary of
May 2, 2006.
|
|
(b) |
|
Grant of stock settled stock
appreciation rights, which vest equally over four years on each
anniversary of May 2, 2006.
|
|
(c) |
|
Calculated using the Black Scholes
value for our common stock on the date of grant.
|
|
(d) |
|
Represents potential threshold,
target and maximum annual incentive compensation for 2006.
Amounts actually paid for 2006 are described in the
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the
Summary Compensation Table above.
|
|
(e) |
|
Grant of stock settled stock
appreciation rights, which vest equally over three years on each
anniversary of May 2, 2006.
|
Under our 2006 Equity and Incentive Plan, all grants set forth
in the table fully-vest on a change-in-control. In the event
dividends are paid on our common stock, dividends are credited
for unvested restricted stock units and are paid in cash on
vesting.
128
Outstanding
Equity Awards at 2006 Fiscal Year-End Table
The following table summarizes the number of securities
underlying outstanding plan awards for the named executive
officers as of December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
Number of
|
|
Market Value
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
of Shares Of
|
|
|
Underlying Unexercised
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
Stock That
|
|
Stock That
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Option
|
|
Have Not
|
|
Have Not
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
Price
|
|
Expiration
|
|
Vested
|
|
Vested
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
($)
|
|
Date
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)(a)
|
|
Mr.
Holmes(b)
|
|
|
70,271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.61890
|
|
|
|
12/17/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42.02574
|
|
|
|
10/14/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42.02574
|
|
|
|
12/17/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.61890
|
|
|
|
04/30/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.56050
|
|
|
|
04/21/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46.43844
|
|
|
|
01/13/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208,498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.77837
|
|
|
|
01/03/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40.02951
|
|
|
|
01/22/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40.02951
|
|
|
|
01/22/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179,726
|
|
|
|
31.85000
|
|
|
|
08/01/16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,493
|
|
|
|
2,513,346
|
|
Mr. Hanning
|
|
|
31,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.18687
|
|
|
|
04/03/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.00154
|
|
|
|
10/18/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40.02951
|
|
|
|
01/22/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,890
|
|
|
|
31.85000
|
|
|
|
08/01/16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,794
|
|
|
|
2,010,664
|
|
Mr. May
|
|
|
77,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.39346
|
|
|
|
02/28/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40.02951
|
|
|
|
01/22/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,890
|
|
|
|
31.85000
|
|
|
|
08/01/16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,794
|
|
|
|
2,010,664
|
|
Mr. Rudnitsky
|
|
|
57,337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.58340
|
|
|
|
03/01/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.58340
|
|
|
|
03/01/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,890
|
|
|
|
31.85000
|
|
|
|
08/01/16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,794
|
|
|
|
2,010,664
|
|
Ms. Wilson
|
|
|
7,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.83177
|
|
|
|
09/04/13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.83177
|
|
|
|
09/04/13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,890
|
|
|
|
31.85000
|
|
|
|
08/01/16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,095
|
|
|
|
1,507,982
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Calculated using closing price of
our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on
December 29, 2006 of $32.02.
|
|
(b) |
|
Table excludes our obligation to
issue 36,852 shares of common stock to Mr. Holmes in
2009. The amount is deferred and held in a separate account.
|
129
Equity
Compensation Plan Information as of December 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Future Issuance
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
under Equity
|
|
|
to be Issued Upon
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
Compensation Plans
|
|
|
Exercise of
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
(Excluding Securities
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
Reflected in the
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
First Column)
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved
by security holders
|
|
24.7 million(a)
|
|
$39.70(b)
|
|
16.8 million(c)
|
Equity compensation plans not
approved by security holders
|
|
None
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Consists of shares issuable upon
exercise of outstanding stock options and restricted stock units
under the 2006 Equity and Incentive Plan.
|
|
(b) |
|
Consists of weighted-average
exercise price of outstanding stock options and stock settled
stock appreciation rights.
|
|
(c) |
|
Consists of shares available for
future grants under the 2006 Equity and Incentive Plan.
|
2006
Wyndham Worldwide Option Exercises and Stock Vested
Table
The following table summarizes the Wyndham Worldwide stock
option exercises and vesting of restricted stock by named
executive officers in 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Acquired
|
|
Realized
|
|
|
|
Shares Acquired
|
|
Realized
|
|
|
|
|
on Exercise
|
|
on Exercise
|
|
|
|
on Vesting
|
|
on Vesting
|
Name
|
|
Date
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)
|
|
Date
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)(a)
|
|
Mr. Holmes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08/15/06
|
|
|
43,357
|
(b)
|
|
|
1,235,674
|
(b)
|
Mr. Hanning
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08/15/06
|
|
|
15,006
|
|
|
|
427,671
|
|
Mr. May
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08/15/06
|
|
|
14,814
|
|
|
|
422,199
|
|
Mr. Rudnitsky
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08/15/06
|
|
|
14,525
|
|
|
|
413,962
|
|
Ms. Wilson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08/15/06
|
|
|
10,737
|
|
|
|
306,004
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Calculated using closing price a
share of our common stock on vesting date.
|
|
(b) |
|
Includes 18,395 restricted stock
units with value of $524,257 deferred under our Officer Deferred
Compensation Plan.
|
130
The following Cendant, Realogy and Avis Budget Option Exercises
and Stock Vested Tables are presented to describe the 2006
option exercises and vesting of awards denominated in stock of
those entities. In connection with the separation of Cendant
into three separate companies, Cendant equity awards were
equitably adjusted to become awards for each of the companies.
We do not expect to provide this data for future periods.
2006
Cendant Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
Realized
|
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
Realized
|
|
|
|
|
on Exercise
|
|
on Exercise
|
|
|
|
on Vesting
|
|
on Vesting
|
Name
|
|
Date
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)
|
|
Date
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)(a)
|
|
Mr. Holmes
|
|
03/22/06
|
|
250,520(b)
|
|
2,003,516
|
|
04/22/06
|
|
|
24,002
|
(c)
|
|
|
404,433
|
|
Mr. Hanning
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
04/22/06
|
|
|
9,601
|
|
|
|
161,776
|
|
Mr. May
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
04/22/06
|
|
|
8,641
|
|
|
|
145,600
|
|
Mr. Rudnitsky
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
04/22/06
|
|
|
9,697
|
|
|
|
163,394
|
|
Ms. Wilson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
04/22/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Calculated using closing price of a
share of Cendant common stock on vesting date.
|
|
(b) |
|
October 14, 1998 grant of
Cendant stock options with an exercise price of $9.41257 with
shares sold for $17.41 per share.
|
|
(c) |
|
Includes 24,002 restricted stock
units with a value of $404,453 deferred under our Officer
Deferred Compensation Plan.
|
2006
Realogy Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
Realized
|
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
Realized
|
|
|
|
|
on Exercise
|
|
on Exercise
|
|
|
|
on Vesting
|
|
on Vesting
|
Name
|
|
Date
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)
|
|
Date
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)(a)
|
|
Mr. Holmes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08/15/06
|
|
|
54,197
|
(b)
|
|
|
1,167,403
|
|
Mr. Hanning
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08/15/06
|
|
|
18,757
|
|
|
|
404,025
|
|
Mr. May
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08/15/06
|
|
|
18,517
|
|
|
|
398,856
|
|
Mr. Rudnitsky
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08/15/06
|
|
|
18,157
|
|
|
|
391,101
|
|
Ms. Wilson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08/15/06
|
|
|
13,421
|
|
|
|
289,088
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Calculated using closing price of a
share of Realogy common stock on vesting date.
|
|
(b) |
|
Includes 22,994 restricted stock
units with a value of $495,290 deferred under our Officer
Deferred Compensation Plan.
|
131
2006 Avis
Budget Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
Realized
|
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
Realized
|
|
|
|
|
on Exercise
|
|
on Exercise
|
|
|
|
on Vesting
|
|
on Vesting
|
Name
|
|
Date
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)
|
|
Date
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)(a)
|
|
Mr. Holmes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08/15/06
|
|
|
216,793
|
(b)
|
|
|
403,234
|
|
Mr. Hanning
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08/15/06
|
|
|
75,033
|
|
|
|
139,561
|
|
Mr. May
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08/15/06
|
|
|
74,072
|
|
|
|
137,773
|
|
Mr. Rudnitsky
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08/15/06
|
|
|
72,632
|
|
|
|
135,095
|
|
Ms. Wilson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08/15/06
|
|
|
53,693
|
|
|
|
99,868
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Calculated using closing price of a
share of Avis Budget common stock on vesting date.
|
|
(b) |
|
Includes 91,980 restricted stock
units with a value of $171,082 deferred under our Officer
Deferred Compensation Plan.
|
2006
Deferred Compensation Table
The following table provides information regarding 2006
nonqualified deferred compensation for our named executive
officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive
|
|
Company
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Contributions
|
|
Contributions
|
|
Earnings in
|
|
Withdrawals/
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
in 2006
|
|
in 2006
|
|
2006
|
|
Distributions
|
|
12/31/06
|
Name
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)(a)
|
|
($)(b)
|
|
($)(b)
|
|
Mr. Holmes
|
|
|
177,724
|
|
|
|
177,724
|
|
|
|
144,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,507,985
|
|
Mr. Hanning
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,694
|
|
Mr. May
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,440
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196,378
|
|
Mr. Rudnitsky
|
|
|
61,510
|
|
|
|
61,510
|
|
|
|
78,867
|
|
|
|
289,025
|
|
|
|
859,469
|
|
Ms. Wilson
|
|
|
56,603
|
|
|
|
56,603
|
|
|
|
42,741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
729,200
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents gains or losses in 2006
on investment of aggregate balance.
|
|
(b) |
|
Includes compensation deferred in
prior periods which was previously disclosed as required.
|
Our Officer Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan is
described above under 2006 Executive Compensation Elements and
Decisions. The aggregate balances of the named executive
officers are invested based on the executives election
made at the time of enrollment. Executives may change their
elections during the year. For 2007 we offer a choice of 21
investment options including our common stock. Investment
options include money market, debt, equity and real estate
mutual funds.
132
Agreements
with Named Executive Officers
The following describes our employment, termination,
change-in-control
and related arrangements with our named executive officers.
Mr. Holmes
Employment Agreement. We entered into
an employment agreement with Mr. Holmes with a term
expiring in July 2009. The term automatically extends for an
additional year unless we or Mr. Holmes provide notice of
non-renewal. The agreement provides for a minimum base salary of
$1 million, an annual incentive award with a target amount
equal to 200% of his base salary subject to meeting performance
goals, employee benefits generally available to our executive
officers and grants of long-term incentive awards on terms as
determined by our Board or Compensation Committee. Under the
agreement, we granted Mr. Holmes equity incentive awards
with a grant date value of $5 million as described above in
the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table. These grants vest fully
on a
change-in-control.
The agreement provides Mr. Holmes and his dependents with
medical benefits through his age 75. The agreement provides
for customary restrictive covenants including non-competition
and non-solicitation covenants effective during the period of
employment and for two years after termination of employment.
Mr. Holmes agreement provides that upon a
change-in-control
or if his employment with us is terminated by us without cause
or due to a constructive discharge he will be entitled to a lump
sum payment equal to 299% of the sum of his then-current base
salary plus his then-current target annual bonus and all of his
then-outstanding equity awards will fully vest and remain
exercisable for varying periods as described in the agreement.
If the payments we make to Mr. Holmes for termination on a
change-in-control
give rise to excise tax on golden parachute payments, then we
will pay Mr. Holmes a
gross-up
payment to cover the tax.
Mr. Hanning
Employment Agreement. We entered into
an employment agreement with Mr. Hanning with a term
expiring in July 2009. The agreement provides for a minimum base
salary of $550,000, a retention bonus of $700,000, an annual
incentive award with a target amount equal to $660,000, subject
to meeting performance goals and participation in benefit plans
generally available to our executive officers.
Mr. Hannings agreement provides that he will be
granted an equity incentive award with a grant date value of
$3 million, two-thirds of which will vest in equal
installments on each of the first four anniversaries of
May 2, 2006, subject to continued employment through each
vesting date, and one-third of which will vest (or not vest) on
May 2, 2009, subject to continued employment with us
through the vesting date. Mr. Hannings actual 2006
equity incentive award was granted with terms and vesting
schedules consistent with the other named executive officers and
is described above in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table.
Under Mr. Hannings agreement and our 2006 Equity and
Incentive Plan, these grants fully vest on a
change-in-control.
Mr. Hanning will receive a long term cash bonus not to
exceed $2 million for the three year period from
January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2008 for meeting goals
relating to Wyndham Vacation Ownerships financial
performance. The bonus is payable within 60 days of
December 31, 2008. In consideration of the long term bonus
and the employment agreement, we and Mr. Hanning agreed to
terminate all bonuses, commission, incentive and cash payment
opportunities owed to Mr. Hanning by Cendant. The agreement
provides for customary restrictive covenants including
non-competition and non-solicitation covenants effective during
the period of employment and for one year after termination of
employment.
Mr. Hannings agreement provides that if his
employment is terminated by us without cause or due to a
constructive discharge, he will be entitled to a lump sum
payment equal to 100% of the sum of his then-current base salary
plus his then-current target annual bonus, accelerated vesting
and payment of the long term bonus, and payment of COBRA
premiums less the contribution payable by active employees until
133
Mr. Hanning commences new or self employment. If the
payments we make to Mr. Hanning for termination without
cause or for a constructive discharge give rise to a golden
parachute excise tax then we will pay Mr. Hanning a
gross-up
payment to cover the tax.
Mr. May
Employment Agreement. We entered into
an employment agreement with Mr. May with a term expiring
in July 2009. The agreement provides for a minimum base salary
of $550,000, an annual incentive award with a target amount
equal to 100% of his base salary, subject to meeting performance
goals, participation in employee benefit plans generally
available to our executive officers and grants of long-term
incentive awards upon terms determined by us. Under the
agreement we granted Mr. May equity incentive awards with a
grant date value of $3 million described above in the
Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table. Under our 2006 Equity and
Incentive Plan, these grants fully vest on a
change-in-control.
The agreement provides for customary restrictive covenants
including non-competition and non-solicitation covenants
effective during the period of employment and for one year
following termination if his employment terminates after the
expiration of his employment agreement and for two years
following termination if his employment terminates before the
expiration of his employment agreement.
Mr. Mays agreement provides that if his employment is
terminated by us without cause or due to a constructive
discharge, he will receive a lump sum payment equal to 200% of
his then-current base salary and target annual bonus. In this
event, all of Mr. Mays then-outstanding equity awards
that would otherwise vest within one year following termination
will vest. Any award granted on or after July 31, 2006 will
remain exercisable until the earlier of two years following his
termination of employment and the original expiration date of
the awards.
Mr. Rudnitsky
Employment Agreement. We entered into
an employment agreement with Mr. Rudnitsky with a term
expiring in July 2009. The agreement provides for a minimum base
salary of $500,000, an annual incentive award with a target
amount equal to 100% of his base salary, subject to meeting
performance goals, participation in employee benefit plans
generally available to our executive officers and grants of
long-term incentive awards upon terms determined by us. Under
the agreement we granted Mr. Rudnitsky equity incentive
awards with a grant date value of $3 million as described
above in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table. Under our 2006
Equity and Incentive Plan, these grants fully vest on a
change-in-control.
The agreement provides for customary restrictive covenants
including non-competition and non-solicitation covenants
effective during the period of employment and for one year
following termination if his employment terminates after the
expiration of his employment agreement and for two years
following termination if his employment terminates before the
expiration of his employment agreement.
Mr. Rudnitskys agreement provides that if his
employment is terminated by us without cause or due to a
constructive discharge, he will receive a lump sum payment equal
to 200% of his then-current base salary and target annual bonus.
In this event, all of Mr. Rudnitskys then-outstanding
equity awards that would otherwise vest within one year
following termination will vest, subject to meeting applicable
performance goals. Any award granted on or after July 31,
2006 will remain exercisable until the earlier of two years
following termination and the original expiration date of the
awards.
Ms. Wilson
Employment Agreement. We entered into
an agreement with Ms. Wilson with a term expiring in July
2009. The agreement provides for a minimum base salary of
$475,000, an annual incentive award with a target amount equal
to 100% of her base salary, subject to meeting performance
goals, participation in employee benefit plans generally
available to our executive officers and grants of long-term
incentive awards upon terms determined by us. Under the
agreement we granted Ms. Wilson equity incentive awards
with a grant date value of $2.5 million as described above
in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table. Under our
134
2006 Equity and Incentive Plan, these grants fully vest on a
change-in-control.
The agreement provides for customary restrictive covenants
including non-competition and non-solicitation covenants
effective during the period of employment and for one year
following termination if her employment terminates after the
expiration of her employment agreement and for two years
following termination if her employment terminates before the
expiration of her employment agreement.
Ms. Wilsons agreement provides that if her employment
is terminated by us without cause or due to a constructive
discharge, she will be entitled to a lump sum payment equal to
200% her then-current base salary and target annual bonus. In
this event, all of Ms. Wilsons then-outstanding
equity awards that would otherwise vest within one year
following termination will vest, subject to meeting applicable
performance goals. Any award granted on or after July 31,
2006 will remain exercisable until the earlier of two years
following termination and the original expiration date of the
awards.
135
Potential
Payments on Termination or
Change-In-Control
The following table describes the potential payments and
benefits under our compensation and benefit plans and
arrangements to which the named executive officers would be
entitled upon termination of employment. The payments described
in the table are based on the assumption that the termination of
employment or
change-in-control
occurred on December 31, 2006.
Potential
Payments Upon Termination of Employment Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuation
|
|
Acceleration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Medical
|
|
of Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
and Cash
|
|
Excise
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
(present
|
|
Incentive
|
|
Tax
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
value)
|
|
Awards
|
|
Gross-Up
|
|
Payments
|
Name
|
|
Termination Event
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)(a)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
Mr. Holmes
|
|
Voluntary Retirement, Resignation
or Involuntary Termination
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
256,650
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
256,650
|
|
|
|
Death or Disability
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
256,650
|
|
|
|
2,543,898
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,800,548
|
|
|
|
Termination without Cause,
Constructive Discharge or
Non-Renewal of Contract
|
|
|
9,300,000
|
|
|
|
256,650
|
|
|
|
2,543,898
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
12,100,548
|
|
|
|
Change-in-Control
|
|
|
9,300,000
|
|
|
|
256,650
|
|
|
|
2,543,898
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
12,100,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Hanning
|
|
Voluntary Retirement, Resignation
or Involuntary Termination
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Death or Disability
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,689,550
|
(b)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,689,550
|
|
|
|
Termination without Cause
or Constructive Discharge
|
|
|
1,309,000
|
|
|
|
19,538
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
(b)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3,328,538
|
|
|
|
Change-in-Control
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,022,884
|
|
|
|
2,565,712
|
|
|
|
4,588,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. May
|
|
Voluntary Retirement, Resignation
or Involuntary Termination
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Death or Disability
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,022,884
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,022,884
|
|
|
|
Termination without Cause or
Constructive Discharge
|
|
|
1,677,500
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
506,738
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,184,238
|
|
|
|
Change-in-Control
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,022,884
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,022,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Rudnitsky
|
|
Voluntary Retirement, Resignation
or Involuntary Termination
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Death or Disability
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,022,884
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,022,884
|
|
|
|
Termination without Cause or
Constructive Discharge
|
|
|
2,050,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
506,738
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,556,738
|
|
|
|
Change-in-Control
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,022,884
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,022,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ms. Wilson
|
|
Voluntary Retirement, Resignation
or Involuntary Termination
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Death or Disability
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,520,202
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,520,202
|
|
|
|
Termination without Cause or
Constructive Discharge
|
|
|
1,927,500
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
381,068
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,308,568
|
|
|
|
Change-in-Control
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,520,202
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,520,202
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Calculated using closing price of
our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on
December 29, 2006 of $32.02.
|
|
(b) |
|
Assumes all applicable performance
measures were met.
|
Accrued Pay. The amounts shown in the
table above do not include payments and benefits, including
accrued salary and bonus, to the extent they are provided on a
non-discriminatory basis to salaried employees generally upon
termination of employment.
136
Deferred Compensation. The amounts
shown in the table do not include distributions of aggregate
balances under the Officer Deferred Compensation Plan. Those
amounts are shown in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
Table above.
Covered Terminations. The table assumes
a termination of employment that is eligible for severance or
other benefits under the terms of the named executive
officers employment agreement and our 2006 Equity and
Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
l
|
A termination of an executive officer is for cause if it is for
any of the following reasons: the executives willful
failure to substantially perform his duties as our employee or
any subsidiary (other than any such failure resulting from
incapacity due to physical or mental illness); any act of fraud,
misappropriation, dishonesty, embezzlement or similar conduct
against us or any subsidiary; the executives conviction of
a felony or any crime involving moral turpitude (which
conviction, due to the passage of time or otherwise, is not
subject to further appeal); or the executives gross
negligence in the performance of his or her duties or the
executive purposefully or negligently makes (or has been found
to have made) a false certification to us pertaining to our
financial statements.
|
|
|
l
|
An executive suffers a constructive discharge if any of the
following occur: any material failure by us to fulfill our
obligations under the executives employment agreement
(including any reduction of base salary or other element of
compensation) or any material diminution to the executives
duties and responsibilities relating to service as an executive
officer; the executives principal office is relocated to a
location more than a specified distance from its original
location; or the executive experiences a reduction in title or
reporting responsibilities. For Mr. Holmes,
constructive discharge also includes our decision
not to renew his employment agreement, a
change-in-control
or if he is no longer a member of our Board. For
Mr. Hanning, constructive discharge also
includes if Mr. Holmes is no longer our CEO.
|
Continuation of Medical
Benefits. Mr. Holmes agreement
provides Mr. Holmes and his dependents with medical
benefits through his age 75 regardless of the termination
event. Mr. Hannings agreement provides that if his
employment is terminated by us without cause or due to a
constructive discharge, he will be entitled to the payment of
COBRA premiums less the contribution payable by active employees
until Mr. Hanning commences new or self employment.
The actuarial assumptions used to calculate continued medical
benefits for Mr. Holmes include a discount rate of 5.9%; no
mortality assumptions for Mr. Holmes, his spouse or
children; and standard pre-retirement and post-retirement per
capita costs for Mr. Holmes and his spouse and standard per
capita costs for Mr. Holmes children. Continuation of
medical benefits for Mr. Hanning were calculated using a
standard COBRA payment less the contribution payable by active
employees, for a period of eighteen months using a discount rate
of 5.9%.
Acceleration of Equity and Cash Incentive
Awards. Equity grants made to all employees,
including the named executive officers, under our 2006 Equity
and Incentive Plan, fully vest on a
change-in-control.
Since any Cendant legacy equity awards fully vested in
connection with the spin-off, the amounts described in the table
for a
change-in-control
include only the value of the named executive officers
2006 equity grants based on a year-end stock price of $32.02.
Under Mr. Hannings employment agreement, on his death
or disability his long-term cash bonus is vested to the extent
earned and unpaid. If Mr. Hannings employment is
terminated without cause or for constructive discharge, his
long-term cash bonus fully vests and is payable.
Excise Tax
Gross-Up. Upon
a
change-in-control,
executives may be subject to certain excise taxes under
Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code. We have agreed
to reimburse Mr. Holmes and Mr. Hanning for any excise
taxes as well as any income and excise taxes payable by them as
a result of any reimbursements for the 280G excise taxes. The
amounts in the table are based on a 280G excise tax rate of
20 percent, a statutory 35% percent federal income tax
rate, a 1.45% percent Medicare tax rate and a 0% percent state
income tax rate for Mr. Hanning based on his current
residency in Florida. In the event that a
137
change-in-control
occurred as of December 31, 2006, Mr. Holmes would not
have been subject to excise tax that would have given rise to a
gross-up
payment.
Payments Upon
Change-in-Control
Alone. For our named executive officers other
than Mr. Holmes, severance payments in connection with a
change-in-control
are double triggered, meaning the payments following
a
change-in-control
are made only if the executive suffers a covered termination of
employment. The table does not assume that the employment of
these executives was terminated on a
change-in-control.
Equity grants made under our 2006 Equity and Incentive Plan
fully vest on a
change-in-control
whether or not the executives employment is terminated.
138
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table describes the beneficial ownership of our
common stock for the following persons as of January 31,
2007: each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation
Table, who we refer to as named executive officers, (see
Executive Compensation), each person who to our
knowledge owns in excess of 5% of our common stock; and all of
our directors and executive officers as a group. The percentage
values are based on 188,895,025 shares of our common stock
outstanding as of January 31, 2007. The principal address
for each director, nominee and executive officer of Wyndham
Worldwide is Seven Sylvan Way, Parsippany, New Jersey 07054.
Under SEC rules, beneficial ownership includes
shares for which the individual, directly or indirectly, has or
shares voting or investment power, whether or not the shares are
held for the individuals benefit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
% of Class
|
|
Barclays Global Investors,
N.A.
|
|
|
12,071,055
|
(a)
|
|
|
6.39
|
%
|
Myra J. Biblowit
|
|
|
32,500
|
(b)(c)
|
|
|
|
*
|
James E. Buckman
|
|
|
749,313
|
(b)(c)(d)
|
|
|
|
*
|
Franz S. Hanning
|
|
|
86,387
|
(c)(e)
|
|
|
|
*
|
George Herrera
|
|
|
6,965
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
*
|
Stephen P. Holmes
|
|
|
791,399
|
(c)(e)(f)
|
|
|
|
*
|
Kenneth N. May
|
|
|
118,032
|
(c)(e)(g)
|
|
|
|
*
|
The Right Honourable Brian Mulroney
|
|
|
86,439
|
(b)(c)
|
|
|
|
*
|
Pauline D.E. Richards
|
|
|
7,709
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
*
|
Steven A. Rudnitsky
|
|
|
97,638
|
(c)(e)
|
|
|
|
*
|
Michael H. Wargotz
|
|
|
4,606
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
*
|
Virginia M. Wilson
|
|
|
18,771
|
(c)(e)
|
|
|
|
*
|
All directors and executive
officers as a group (15 persons)
|
|
|
2,090,233
|
(h)
|
|
|
1.11
|
%
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Amount represents less than 1% of
outstanding common stock.
|
|
(a) |
|
Derived solely from information
reported in a Schedule 13G under the Securities Exchange
Act filed by Barclays Global Investors and certain affiliates
with the SEC on January 23, 2007. Such Schedule 13G
indicates that Barclays beneficially owns 12,071,055 shares
of our common stock with sole voting power over
10,587,244 shares and sole dispositive power over
12,071,055 shares. The principal business address for
Barclays Global Investors is 45 Fremont Street,
San Francisco, California 94015.
|
|
(b) |
|
Includes shares of our common stock
issuable for deferred stock units as of January 31, 2007 as
follows: Ms. Biblowit, 9,568; Mr. Buckman, 3,712;
Mr. Herrera, 6,965; Mr. Mulroney, 11,352;
Ms. Richards, 7,709; and Mr. Wargotz, 3,884.
|
|
(c) |
|
Includes shares of our common stock
which the directors and named executive officers have the right
to acquire through the exercise of stock options within
60 days of January 31, 2007 as follows:
Ms. Biblowit, 22,932; Mr. Buckman, 699,852;
Mr. Holmes, 674,503; Mr. Mulroney, 75,087;
Mr. Hanning, 72,806; Mr. May, 102,163;
Mr. Rudnitsky, 88,611; and Ms. Wilson, 9,808. Excludes
shares of our common stock which the named executive officers
did not have the right to acquire through the exercise of stock
settled stock appreciation rights within 60 days of
January 31, 2007 as follows: Mr. Holmes, 179,726;
Mr. Hanning, 71,890; Mr. May, 71,890;
Mr. Rudnitsky, 71,890; and Ms. Wilson, 71,890.
|
|
(d) |
|
Includes 3,220 shares held in
Mr. Buckmans IRA account. Includes our obligation to
issue 27,069 shares of common stock to Mr. Buckman in
2009. The amount is deferred and held in a separate account.
|
|
(e) |
|
Excludes shares of our common stock
issuable upon vesting of restricted stock units after
60 days from January 31, 2007 as follows:
Mr. Holmes, 78,493; Mr. Hanning, 62,794; Mr. May,
62,794; Mr. Rudnitsky, 62,794; and Ms. Wilson, 47,095.
|
|
(f) |
|
Includes 3,394 shares held by
Mr. Holmes children and 22,000 shares held in
charitable trust. Includes our obligation to issue
36,852 shares of common stock to Mr. Holmes in 2009.
The amount is deferred and held in a separate account.
|
|
(g) |
|
Includes 137 shares held in
Mr. Mays 401(k) account and 1,599 shares held in
a non-qualified deferred compensation plan.
|
|
(h) |
|
Includes or excludes, as the case
may be, shares of common stock as indicated in the preceding
footnotes.
|
139
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In connection with our spin-off from Cendant (now Avis Budget
Group), we entered into customary separation, tax sharing,
transition services and related agreements with Cendant and
former Cendant units, Realogy and Travelport, to effect the
separation and allocate Cendants assets and liabilities.
Under the Separation and Distribution Agreement, among other
things, we assumed 37.5% of certain contingent and other
liabilities of Cendant which were not primarily related to our
business or the businesses of Realogy, Travelport or Avis
Budget, and Realogy assumed 62.5% of these liabilities.
Under the Transition Services Agreement, in 2006 Avis Budget,
Realogy and Travelport provided us with various services
relating to, among other things, human resources and employee
benefits, payroll, financial systems management, treasury
and cash management, accounts payable, telecommunications and
information technology. In 2006, cash paid to Avis Budget,
Realogy and Travelport under the Transition Services Agreement
was approximately $7.3 million, $868,000 and $158,000,
respectively. In 2006, we received no cash from under the
Transition Services Agreement. Cash received from Travelport
under a sublease was approximately $403,000.
For additional information on the spin-off, the Separation and
Distribution Agreement and related matters, see our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
filed with the SEC on March 7, 2007 and the Information
Statement. See Where You Can Find More Information.
In addition, in connection with the spin-off, we entered into
various commercial arrangements with Realogy, Travelport and
Avis Budget. Activities covered by these agreements include:
provision of access to our hotel accommodation and vacation
exchange and rentals inventory to be distributed through
Travelport; utilization of Realogys employee relocation
services, including relocation policy management, household
goods moving services and departure and destination real estate
related services; utilization of Realogys commercial real
estate brokerage services, such as transaction management,
acquisition and disposition services, broker price opinions,
renewal due diligence and portfolio review; utilization of
corporate travel management services of Travelport; and
designation of Avis Budgets car rental brands, as the
exclusive primary and secondary suppliers, respectively, of car
rental services for our employees. In 2006, cash paid to Avis
Budget, Realogy and Travelport with respect to these
arrangements was approximately $2.7 million;
$1.2 million and $17 million, respectively, and cash
received from Avis Budget, Realogy and Travelport with respect
to these commercial arrangements was approximately $178,000,
$3.2 million and $1.9 million, respectively.
Certain affiliates of Barclays Global Investors, N.A., which
owns approximately 6.39% of our common stock, have performed,
and may in the future perform, various commercial banking,
investment banking and other financial advisory services for us
and our subsidiaries for which they have received, and will
receive, customary fees and expenses. We estimate the fees paid
to Barclays by us in 2006 were less than $1.5 million.
A member of Mr. Hannings family is a member of a law
firm which has provided and continues to provide services to our
vacation ownership business. Fees and expenses paid for such
services were approximately $220,000 in 2006 based on the
firms customary rates.
Another member of Mr. Hannings family currently
serves as a Senior Vice President, Sales of our vacation
ownership business. This individual was hired in 1981, prior to
Mr. Hannings employment. In 2006, he received total
cash compensation consisting of base salary, commission and
bonuses of $689,943 and was granted 13,343 restricted stock
units. All compensation and incentive awards were paid and
awarded on a basis consistent with that applied to our other
employees.
140
DESCRIPTION
OF MATERIAL INDEBTEDNESS
Existing
Corporate Borrowing Facilities
On July 7, 2006, we entered into borrowing arrangements for
a total of $2,000 million, comprised of a $300 million
term loan facility, an $800 million interim loan facility
and a $900 million revolving credit facility. Prior to our
separation, we drew $1,360 million against these facilities
and issued approximately $50 million in letters of credit,
leaving approximately $590 million available to provide
liquidity for additional letters of credit and for working
capital and ongoing corporate needs. All of the approximately
$1,360 million of debt we incurred was transferred to
Cendant to eliminate a portion of Cendants corporate debt
(including its existing asset-linked facility relating to
certain of the assets of Cendants hospitality services
(including timeshare resorts) businesses). Our interest rate
under these facilities is based on a spread over LIBOR, tied to
our credit ratings as determined by Standard &
Poors and Moodys. Based on our recently issued
ratings of BBB and Baa2 by Standard & Poors and
Moodys, respectively, that rate is at LIBOR plus 45 to
55 basis points, depending on the facility and the amount
outstanding under such facility, although through a derivative
instrument, we have fixed the interest rate on our term loan at
6.00%.
The facilities include affirmative covenants, including the
maintenance of specific financial ratios. These financial
covenants consist of a minimum interest coverage ratio of at
least 3.0 times as of the measurement date and a maximum
leverage ratio not to exceed 3.5 times on the measurement date.
The interest coverage ratio is calculated by dividing
Consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the credit agreement) by
Consolidated Interest Expense (as defined in the credit
agreement), excluding interest expense on any Securitization
Indebtedness, on Non-Recourse Indebtedness and on the Landal
Facilities (as the three terms are defined in the credit
agreement), both as measured on a trailing
12-month
basis preceding the measurement date. The leverage ratio is
calculated by dividing Consolidated Total Indebtedness (as
defined in the credit agreement) excluding, among other things,
any Securitization Indebtedness, any Non-Recourse Indebtedness
and indebtedness under the Landal Facilities as of the
measurement date by Consolidated EBITDA as measured on a
trailing
12-month
basis preceding the measurement date. Negative covenants in the
credit facilities include limitations on indebtedness of
material subsidiaries; liens; mergers, consolidations,
liquidations, dissolutions and sales of substantially all
assets; and sale and leasebacks. Events of default in the credit
facilities include nonpayment of principal when due; nonpayment
of interest, fees or other amounts; violation of covenants;
cross payment default and cross acceleration (in each case, with
respect to indebtedness (excluding securitization indebtedness)
in excess of $50 million); and a change of control (the
definition of which permitted our separation from Cendant).
Historically, Cendant borrowed under its existing asset-linked
facility relating to certain of the assets of Cendants
hospitality services (including timeshare resorts) businesses,
which borrowings amounted to $600 million and
$550 million at June 30, 2006 and December 31,
2005, respectively. These Cendant borrowings have been reflected
in our accompanying historical combined financial statements.
Cendant has eliminated the then-outstanding balance of these
borrowings at the time of our separation with a portion of our
initial borrowings of $1,360 million.
Following the completion of the sale of Travelport, we used a
portion of the proceeds contributed to us from such sale to pay
down $450 million under the interim loan facility. The
remainder of the proceeds from the sale of Travelport was used
to repay in full the $310 million balance then outstanding
under our revolving credit facility. We used the net proceeds
from the sale of the notes to repay all outstanding borrowings
under the interim loan facility, which was subsequently
terminated, and our revolving credit facility.
As of December 31, 2006, our total debt outstanding,
exclusive of debt outstanding under our vacation ownership
securitization program described in detail below, was
approximately $1,437 million, including zero under the
revolving credit facility, $300 million under the term loan
facility and zero under the interim loan facility. For a
detailed description of our subsidiaries indebtedness, see
Other Indebtedness.
141
Vacation
Ownership Securitization Program
In connection with our vacation ownership business, Wyndham
Vacation Resorts, Wyndham Resort Development and their
respective subsidiaries provide financing to purchasers of
vacation ownership interests. A significant portion of the
funding for such financing is provided through the sale of the
vacation ownership loans and related assets into a
securitization program.
Under the securitization program, we transfer loans originated
in connection with our sale of vacation ownership interests to
Sierra Deposit Company, LLC, a special purpose, wholly owned
subsidiary. Pursuant to loan purchase agreements with Sierra
Deposit Company, we transfer the loans to Sierra Deposit Company
from Wyndham Consumer Finance, Inc., our consumer financing
subsidiary, and from Wyndham Resort Development, which are
collectively referred to as the Sellers.
Generally, loans purchased from the Sellers by Sierra Deposit
Company are sold into a facility funded by the issuance of
variable funding notes to a group of commercial paper conduits.
From time to time, Sierra Deposit Company creates a new special
purpose entity to issue a new series of term notes. The proceeds
of the term notes are used, indirectly, to pay amounts owing on
the variable funding notes, resulting in the release of loans
which are then sold to the new special purpose entity and used
to secure and pay the new series of term notes.
With respect to each outstanding series of notes, our consumer
financing subsidiary acts as the servicer of the loans. Wyndham
Worldwide has, with respect to each outstanding series of notes,
provided a performance guarantee to the respective note
trustees. Each performance guarantee guarantees the performance
by the Sellers of their obligations under the loan purchase
agreements and the servicers performance under the
respective note indentures. Our performance guarantees became
effective on the date of our separation from Cendant. In
addition, for each of the series of term notes listed below,
except for
Series 2006-1,
Cendant provided a performance guarantee prior to our separation
and such guarantees remain in effect; however, with respect to
those series for which the Cendant guarantee remains in effect,
the trustees have been instructed to look first to the
performance guarantee provided by Wyndham Worldwide before
seeking to enforce the performance guarantee provided by Cendant.
Currently, there are six outstanding series of notes payable
from vacation ownership loans sold by Sierra Deposit Company. As
of December 31, 2006, approximately $1,463 million was
outstanding under these programs, which was secured by
$1,844 million in assets.
|
|
|
|
l
|
Series 2002-1,
which are the variable funding notes issued to a group of
commercial paper conduits. Effective November 13, 2006, the
facility limit for this series was increased from
$800 million to $1,000 million. The liquidity facility
related to this series is subject to annual termination and, if
not renewed, will result in an amortization of the variable
funding notes and termination of the facility. The documents
governing the
Series 2002-1
also describe numerous other events, many tied to the
performance of the loans, that may result in the occurrence of
an amortization of the notes or an event of default and
termination of the facility. At December 31, 2006, the
outstanding principal amount under such series was
$625 million.
|
|
|
l
|
Series 2003-1,
which were issued in March 2003 in four classes aggregating
$303 million in initial principal amount. At
December 31, 2006, the outstanding principal amount under
such series was $41 million.
|
|
|
l
|
Series 2003-2,
which were issued in December 2003 in four classes aggregating
$375 million in initial principal amount. At
December 31, 2006, the outstanding principal amount under
such series was $71 million.
|
|
|
l
|
Series 2004-1,
which were issued in May 2004 as a single class in the initial
principal amount of $336 million. The payment of principal
and interest on the
Series 2004-1
notes is insured under the terms of a financial guaranty
insurance policy. At December 31, 2006, the outstanding
principal amount under such series was $82 million.
|
142
|
|
|
|
l
|
Series 2005-1,
which were issued in August 2005 as a single class in initial
principal amount of $525 million. The payment of principal
and interest on the
Series 2005-1
notes is insured under the terms of a financial guaranty
insurance policy. At December 31, 2006, the outstanding
principal amount under such series was $239 million.
|
|
|
l
|
Series 2006-1,
which were issued in July 2006 as a single class in initial
principal amount of $550 million. The payment of principal
and interest on the
Series 2006-1
notes is insured under the terms of a financial guaranty
insurance policy. Approximately $500 million of the
proceeds from these notes was used to reduce the principal and
interest outstanding under the
Series 2002-1
variable funding notes referenced above and the remaining
proceeds will be used for general corporate purposes. At
December 31, 2006, the outstanding principal amount under
such series was $405 million.
|
Other
Indebtedness
From time to time, our subsidiaries enter into bank borrowings
in connection with our operations in order to, among other
things, fund working capital. For example, to support our
vacation ownership operations in the South Pacific, we currently
have AUD $200 million, or $158 million, available
under foreign credit facilities, portions of which are secured,
that are collateralized by our vacation ownership contract
receivables and related assets in that location. As of
December 31, 2006, we had $103 million of secured
borrowings outstanding under these facilities, collateralized by
$158 million of underlying vacation ownership contract
receivables and related assets. In addition, we lease vacation
homes located in European holiday parks as part of our vacation
exchange and rentals business. As of December 31, 2006, we
had $148 million of vacation rentals capital lease
obligations. We also maintain other unsecured debt facilities
which arise through the ordinary course of operations.
143
DESCRIPTION
OF NOTES
The exchange notes will be issued under the indenture, dated as
of December 5, 2006, between us and U.S. Bank National
Association, as trustee (the Trustee). The indenture
contains provisions that define your rights under the exchange
notes and governs our obligations under the exchange notes. The
indenture provides for the issuance of the exchange notes and
sets forth the duties of the Trustee. The following description
is only a summary of certain provisions of the indenture and the
exchange notes, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
the provisions of the indenture and the exchange notes,
including the definitions therein of certain terms. A copy of
the indenture has been filed as an exhibit to the Current Report
on
Form 8-K
we filed with the SEC on February 1, 2007 and is available
from us upon request. See Where You Can Find More
Information.
You can find the definitions of certain terms used in this
description under the subheading Certain
Definitions. The terms of the exchange notes will include
those stated in the indenture and those made part of the
indenture by reference to the Trust Indenture Act of 1939,
as amended.
The following description is a summary of the material
provisions of the indenture. It does not restate this agreement
in its entirety. We urge you to read the indenture because it,
and not this description, defines your rights as a holder of
exchange notes. Copies of the indenture are available as set
forth below under Additional
Information. Certain defined terms used in this
description but not defined below under
Certain Definitions have the meanings assigned to them in
the indenture.
The registered holder of an exchange note will be treated as the
owner of it for all purposes. Only registered holders will have
rights under the indenture.
General
The exchange notes:
|
|
|
|
l
|
will be senior unsecured obligations of ours;
|
|
|
l
|
will rank equally with all of our other senior unsecured
indebtedness from time to time outstanding;
|
|
|
l
|
will be structurally subordinated to all existing and future
obligations of our subsidiaries including claims with respect to
trade payables;
|
|
|
l
|
will initially be limited to $800 million aggregate
principal amount; and
|
|
|
l
|
will be issued in minimum denominations of $1,000 and integral
multiples of $1,000 in excess thereof.
|
The exchange notes are subject in all cases to any tax, fiscal
or other law or regulation or administrative or judicial
interpretation applicable thereto. We are not required to make
any payment to a holder with respect to any tax, assessment or
other governmental charge imposed (by withholding or otherwise)
by any government or a political subdivision or taxing authority
thereof or therein due and owing with respect to the exchange
notes.
Principal,
Maturity and Interest
Each exchange note will bear interest at a rate of
6.00% per year. Interest will be payable semi-annually in
arrears on June 1 and December 1 of each year,
beginning on June 1, 2007, and will be computed on the
basis of a
360-day year
of twelve
30-day
months. Interest on the exchange notes will accrue from and
including the settlement date and will be paid to holders of
record on the May 15 and November 15 immediately
before the respective interest payment date.
The exchange notes will mature on December 1, 2016. On the
maturity date of the exchange notes, the holders will be
entitled to receive 100% of the principal amount of the notes.
The exchange notes do not have the benefit of any sinking fund.
144
If any interest payment date falls on a day that is not a
business day, then payment of interest may be made on the next
succeeding business day and no interest will accrue because of
such delayed payment. With respect to the exchange notes, when
we use the term business day we mean any day except
a Saturday, a Sunday or a day on which banking institutions in
the applicable place of payment are authorized or required by
law, regulation or executive order to close.
Ranking
The exchange notes will be senior unsecured obligations of ours
and will rank equally with all of our existing and future senior
unsecured obligations. As of December 31, 2006, we had
approximately $300 million of indebtedness outstanding
under our credit facilities.
We conduct our operations through Subsidiaries. As a result,
distributions or advances from our Subsidiaries are a major
source of funds necessary to meet our debt service and other
obligations. Contractual provisions, laws or regulations, as
well as our Subsidiaries financial condition and operating
requirements, may limit our ability to obtain cash required to
pay our debt service obligations, including payments on the
notes. The exchange notes will be structurally
subordinated to all obligations of our Subsidiaries including
claims with respect to trade payables. This means that in the
event of bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization of any of our
subsidiaries, holders of exchange notes will have no direct
claim to participate in the assets of such subsidiary but may
only recover by virtue of our equity interest in our
subsidiaries (except to the extent we have a claim as a creditor
of such subsidiary). As a result all existing and future
liabilities of our subsidiaries, including trade payables and
claims of lessors under leases, have the right to be satisfied
in full prior to our receipt of any payment as any equity owner
of our subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2006, our
Subsidiaries had approximately $330 million of indebtedness
outstanding, excluding debt outstanding under our vacation
ownership securitization program.
Further
Issues
The indenture provides that we may issue debt securities (the
debt securities) thereunder from time to time in one
or more series and permits us to establish the terms of each
series of debt securities at the time of issuance. The indenture
does not limit the aggregate amount of debt securities that may
be issued under the indenture.
The notes constitute a separate series of debt securities under
the indenture, initially limited to $800 million. Under the
indenture, we may, without the consent of the holders of the
notes, reopen the series and issue additional notes
from time to time in the future. This means that, in
circumstances where the indenture provides for the holders of
debt securities of any series to vote or take any action, any of
the outstanding notes as well as any additional notes that we
may issue by reopening the series, will vote or take action as a
single class.
Optional
Redemption
Prior to maturity, we may redeem some or all of the exchange
notes, at any time and from time to time, at our option, on not
less than 30 nor more than 60 days prior notice, at a
redemption price equal to the sum of: (1) 100% of the
aggregate principal amount of the exchange notes being redeemed;
(2) the Make-Whole Amount, if any, described below; and
(3) any accrued and unpaid interest on the exchange notes
to the date of redemption. Holders of record on a record date
that is on or prior to a redemption date will be entitled to
receive interest due on the interest payment date.
The term Make-Whole Amount means the excess, if any,
of (i) the aggregate present value as of the date of the
redemption of the principal being redeemed and the amount of
interest (exclusive of interest accrued to the date of
redemption) that would have been payable if redemption had not
been made, determined by discounting, on a semi-annual basis,
the remaining principal and interest at the Reinvestment Rate
described below (determined on the third business day preceding
the date fixed for redemption) from
145
the dates on which the principal and interest would have been
payable if the redemption had not been made, to the date of
redemption, over (ii) the aggregate principal amount of
such exchange notes.
The term Reinvestment Rate means (i) the
arithmetic mean of the yields under the heading Week
Ending published in the most recent Federal Reserve
Statistical Release H.15 under the caption Treasury
Constant Maturities for the maturity (rounded to the
nearest month) corresponding to the remaining life to maturity,
as of the payment date of the principal being redeemed or paid,
plus (ii) 0.25%. If no maturity exactly corresponds to the
maturity, yields for the two published maturities most closely
corresponding to the maturity would be so calculated and the
Reinvestment Rate would be interpolated or extrapolated on a
straight-line basis, rounding to the nearest month. The most
recent Federal Reserve Statistical Release H.15 published prior
to the date of determination of the Make-Whole Amount will be
used for purposes of calculating the Reinvestment Rate.
The Make-Whole Amount will be calculated by an independent
investment banking institution of national standing appointed by
us. If we fail to make the appointment at least 30 business days
prior to the date of redemption, or if the institution is
unwilling or unable to make the calculation, the calculation
will be made by an independent investment banking institution of
national standing appointed by the Company.
If the Reinvestment Rate is not available as described above,
the Reinvestment Rate will be calculated by interpolation or
extrapolation of comparable rates selected by the independent
investment banking institution.
In the case of any partial redemption, selection of the exchange
notes for redemption will be made by the Trustee in compliance
with the requirements of the principal U.S. national
securities exchange, if any, on which the exchange notes are
listed or, if they are not listed on a U.S. national
securities exchange, by lot or by such other method as the
Trustee in its sole discretion deems to be fair and appropriate.
Notice of any redemption will be mailed to each holder of
exchange notes to be redeemed by first-class mail at least 30
and not more than 60 days prior to the date fixed for
redemption. Any notice to holders of notes of such a redemption
shall include the redemption price or the appropriate
calculation of the redemption price.
The
Trustee and Transfer and Paying Agent
U.S. Bank National Association, acting through its
corporate trust office at 100 Wall Street, 16th Floor, New
York, New York 10005 is the Trustee for the exchange notes and
is the transfer and paying agent for the exchange notes.
Principal and interest will be payable, and the exchange notes
will be transferable, at the office of the paying agent. We may,
however, pay interest by check mailed to registered holders of
the exchange notes. At the maturity of the exchange notes, the
principal, together with accrued interest thereon, will be
payable in immediately available funds upon surrender of such
exchange notes at the office of the Trustee.
No service charge will be made for any transfer or exchange of
the exchange notes, but we may, except in specific cases not
involving any transfer, require payment of a sufficient amount
to cover any tax or other governmental charge payable in
connection with the transfer or exchange.
Payments of principal of, any premium on, and any interest on
individual exchange notes represented by a global security
registered in the name of a depositary or its nominee will be
made to the depositary or its nominee as the registered owner of
the global security representing the exchange notes. Neither we,
the Trustee, any paying agent, nor the transfer agent for the
exchange notes will have any responsibility or liability for the
records relating to or payments made on account of beneficial
ownership interests of the global security for the exchange
notes or for maintaining, supervising or reviewing any records
relating to the beneficial ownership interests.
We expect that the depositary for the exchange notes or its
nominee, upon receipt of any payment of principal, premium or
interest in respect of a permanent global security representing
the exchange notes, will immediately credit participants
accounts with payments in amounts proportionate to their
beneficial
146
interests in the principal amount of the global security for the
exchange notes as shown on the records of the depositary or its
nominee. We also expect that payments by participants to owners
of beneficial interests in the global security held through the
participants will be governed by standing instructions and
customary practices, as is now the case with securities held for
the accounts of customers in bearer form or registered in
street name. The payments will be the responsibility
of those participants.
In specific instances, we or the holders of a majority of the
then outstanding principal amount of the exchange notes may
remove the Trustee and appoint a successor Trustee. The Trustee
may become the owner or pledgee of the exchange notes with the
same rights, subject to conflict of interest restrictions, it
would have if it were not the Trustee. The Trustee and any
successor trustee must be eligible to act as trustee under
Section 310(a)(1) of the Trust Indenture Act of 1939 and
shall have a combined capital and surplus of at least
$50,000,000 and be subject to examination by federal or state
authority. Subject to applicable law relating to conflicts of
interest, the Trustee may also serve as trustee under other
indentures relating to securities issued by us or our affiliated
companies and may engage in commercial transactions with us and
our affiliated companies.
Change of
Control
If a Change of Control Triggering Event occurs, unless we have
exercised our right to redeem the exchange notes as described
above, you will have the right to require us to repurchase all
or any part (equal to $1,000 or an integral multiple of $1,000
in excess thereof) of your exchange notes pursuant to the offer
described below (the Change of Control Offer) on the
terms set forth in the indenture. In the Change of Control
Offer, we will offer payment in cash equal to 101% of the
aggregate principal amount of exchange notes repurchased plus
accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on the exchange notes
repurchased, to the date of purchase (the Change of
Control Payment). Within 30 days following any Change
of Control Triggering Event, we will mail a notice to you
describing the transaction or transactions that constitute the
Change of Control Triggering Event and offering to repurchase
the exchange notes on the date specified in the notice, which
date will be no earlier than 30 days and no later than
60 days from the date such notice is mailed (the
Change of Control Payment Date), pursuant to the
procedures required by the indenture and described in such
notice. We will comply with the requirements of
Rule 14e-1
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act) and any other securities laws and
regulations thereunder to the extent those laws and regulations
are applicable in connection with the repurchase of the exchange
notes as a result of a Change of Control Triggering Event. To
the extent that the provisions of any securities laws or
regulations conflict with the Change of Control provisions of
the indenture, we will comply with the applicable securities
laws and regulations and will not be deemed to have breached our
obligations under the Change of Control provisions of the
indenture by virtue of such conflicts.
On the Change of Control Payment Date, we will, to the extent
lawful:
|
|
|
|
l
|
accept for payment all exchange notes or portions of exchange
notes properly tendered pursuant to the Change of Control Offer;
|
|
|
l
|
deposit with the paying agent an amount equal to the Change of
Control Payment in respect of all notes or portions of exchange
notes properly tendered; and
|
|
|
l
|
deliver or cause to be delivered to the trustee the exchange
notes properly accepted together with an officers
certificate stating the aggregate principal amount of exchange
notes or portions of exchange notes being purchased by us and
the amount to be paid by the paying agent.
|
For purposes of the foregoing discussion of a repurchase at the
option of holders, the following definitions are applicable:
Below Investment Grade Rating Event means the notes
are rated below an Investment Grade Rating by each of the Rating
Agencies on any date from the date of the public notice of an
arrangement that could result in a Change of Control until the
end of the
60-day
period following public notice of the occurrence of the Change
of Control (which
60-day
period shall be extended so long as the rating of the notes is
under publicly announced consideration for possible downgrade by
any of the Rating Agencies).
147
Change of Control means the occurrence of any of the
following: (1) the direct or indirect sale, transfer,
conveyance or other disposition (other than by way of merger or
consolidation), in one or a series of related transactions, of
all or substantially all of the properties or assets of us and
our subsidiaries taken as a whole to any person (as
that term is used in Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act)
other than us or one of our subsidiaries; (2) the adoption
of a plan relating to our liquidation or dissolution;
(3) the consummation of any transaction (including, without
limitation, any merger or consolidation) the result of which is
that any person (as defined above) becomes the
beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of 50% or more of the
total voting power of all shares of our capital stock entitled
to vote generally in elections of directors; or (4) the
first day on which a majority of the members of our board of
directors are not Continuing Directors.
Change of Control Triggering Event means the
occurrence of both a Change of Control and a Below Investment
Grade Rating Event.
Continuing Directors means, as of any date of
determination, any member of the Board of Directors of the
Company who (1) was a member of such Board of Directors on
the date of the indenture; or (2) was nominated for
election or elected to such Board of Directors with the approval
of a majority of the Continuing Directors who were members of
such Board of Directors at the time of such nomination or
election.
Investment Grade Rating means a rating equal to or
higher than Baa3 (or the equivalent) by Moodys and
BBB− (or the equivalent) by S&P.
Moodys means Moodys Investors Service,
Inc., and its successors.
Rating Agencies means (1) each of Moodys
and S&P; and (2) if either of Moodys or S&P
ceases to rate the notes or fails to make a rating of the notes
publicly available for reasons outside of our control, a
nationally recognized statistical rating
organization within the meaning of
Rule 15c3-1(c)(2)(vi)(F)
under the Exchange Act, as amended, selected by us (as certified
by a resolution of our board of directors) as a replacement
agency for Moodys or S&P, or both, as the case may be.
S&P means Standard & Poors
Ratings Services, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.,
and its successors.
Merger,
Consolidation or Sale of Assets
Under the terms of the indenture, we are permitted to
consolidate or merge with another entity or to sell all or
substantially all of our assets to another entity, subject to
our meeting all of the following conditions:
|
|
|
|
l
|
the resulting entity (if other than us) must agree through a
supplemental indenture to be legally responsible for the notes;
|
|
|
l
|
immediately following the consolidation, merger, sale or
conveyance, no Event of Default (as defined below) shall have
occurred and be continuing;
|
|
|
l
|
the surviving entity to the transaction must be a corporation
organized under the laws of the United States or a state of the
United States; and
|
|
|
l
|
we must deliver certain certificates and documents to the
Trustee.
|
In the event that we consolidate or merge with another entity or
sell all or substantially all of our assets to another entity,
the surviving entity will be substituted for us under the
indenture, and we will be discharged from all of our obligations
under the indenture.
Although there is a limited body of case law interpreting the
phrase all or substantially all, there is no precise
established definition of the phrase under applicable law.
Accordingly, in certain circumstances there may be a degree of
uncertainty as to whether a particular transaction would involve
a disposition of all or substantially all of our
assets. As a result, it may be unclear as to whether the merger,
consolidation
148
or sale of assets covenant would apply to a particular
transaction as described above absent a decision by a court of
competent jurisdiction.
Limitations
on Liens
We have agreed under the indenture that we will not, and will
not permit any Restricted Subsidiary to, directly or indirectly,
incur, assume or guarantee any Indebtedness secured by a Lien on
any of our or any of our Subsidiaries capital stock,
properties or assets, unless we secure the notes at least
equally and ratably to the Indebtedness secured by such Lien,
for so long as such Indebtedness is so secured. The restrictions
do not apply to Indebtedness that is secured by:
|
|
|
|
l
|
Liens existing on the date the original notes were first issued
(the initial issuance date);
|
|
|
l
|
Liens on any property or any Indebtedness of a person existing
at the time the person becomes a Subsidiary (whether by
acquisition, merger or consolidation) which were not incurred in
anticipation thereof;
|
|
|
l
|
Liens in favor of us or our Subsidiaries;
|
|
|
l
|
Liens existing at the time of acquisition of the assets
encumbered thereby which were not incurred in anticipation of
such acquisition;
|
|
|
l
|
purchase money Liens which secure Indebtedness that does not
exceed the cost of the purchased property; and
|
|
|
l
|
Liens on real property acquired after the initial issuance date
which secure Indebtedness incurred to acquire such real property
or improve such real property so long as (i) such
Indebtedness is incurred on the date of acquisition of such real
property or within 180 days of the acquisition of such real
property; (ii) such Liens secure Indebtedness in an amount
no greater than the purchase price or improvement price, as the
case may be, of such real property so acquired; and
(iii) such Liens do not extend to or cover any property of
ours or any Restricted Subsidiary other than the real property
so acquired.
|
The restrictions do not apply to extensions, renewals or
replacements of any Indebtedness secured by the foregoing types
of Liens; so long as the principal amount of Indebtedness
secured thereby shall not exceed the amount of Indebtedness
existing at the time of such extension, renewal or replacement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing restrictions, without securing the
exchange notes as described above, we and the Restricted
Subsidiaries may, directly or indirectly, incur, assume or
guarantee any Indebtedness secured by Liens that this covenant
would otherwise restrict if the sum of (i) the aggregate of
all Indebtedness secured by such Liens and (ii) any
Attributable Debt (as defined below) related to any permitted
sale and leaseback arrangement, See
Limitations on Sale and Leaseback
Transactions, does not exceed the greater of (i) 25%
of our total Consolidated Net Worth (as defined below) and
(ii) $300 million.
Limitations
on Sale and Leaseback Transactions
We have agreed under the indenture that neither we nor any
Restricted Subsidiary will enter into any arrangement with any
person to lease a Principal Property (except for any
arrangements that exist on the date the notes are issued or that
exist at the time any person that owns a Principal Property
becomes a Restricted Subsidiary) which has been or is to be sold
by us or the Restricted Subsidiary to the person unless:
|
|
|
|
l
|
the sale and leaseback arrangement involves a lease for a term
of not more than three years;
|
|
|
l
|
the sale and leaseback arrangement is entered into between us
and any Subsidiary or between our Subsidiaries;
|
|
|
l
|
we or the Restricted Subsidiary would be entitled to incur
Indebtedness secured by a Lien on the Principal Property at
least equal in amount to the Attributable Debt permitted
pursuant to the last
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
paragraph under Limitations on Liens
without having to secure equally and ratably the exchange notes;
|
|
|
|
|
l
|
the proceeds of the sale and leaseback arrangement are at least
equal to the fair market value (as determined by our Board of
Directors in good faith) of the property and we apply within
180 days after the sale an amount equal to the greater of
the net proceeds of the sale or the Attributable Debt associated
with the property to (i) the retirement of long-term debt
for borrowed money that is not subordinated to the notes and
that is not debt to us or a Subsidiary, or (ii) the
purchase or development of other comparable property; or
|
|
|
l
|
the sale and leaseback arrangement is entered into within
180 days after the initial acquisition of the Principal
Property subject to the sale and leaseback arrangement.
|
Attributable Debt means, with regard to a sale and
leaseback arrangement of a Principal Property, an amount equal
to the lesser of: (a) the fair market value of the property
(as determined in good faith by our Board of Directors); or
(b) the present value of the total net amount of rent
payments to be made under the lease during its remaining term,
discounted at the rate of interest set forth or implicit in the
terms of the lease, compounded semi-annually. The calculation of
the present value of the total net amount of rent payments is
subject to adjustments to be specified in the indenture.
Consolidated Net Worth means, as of any date of
determination, all items which in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles would be included under
stockholders equity on the consolidated balance sheet of
us and our Subsidiaries at such date.
Principal Property means an asset or assets owned by
us or any Restricted Subsidiary having a gross book value in
excess of $50,000,000.
SEC
Reports
At any time that we are subject to the reporting requirements of
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, so long as any
notes are outstanding, we will furnish to the Trustee and make
available on our website copies of such annual reports and such
information, documents and other reports as are specified in
Sections 13 and 15(d) of the Exchange Act and applicable to
a U.S. corporation (and not a foreign private issuer)
subject to such Sections, within 15 days after the date
specified for the filing with the SEC of such information,
documents and reports under such Sections.
Defaults
and Remedies
Holders of debt securities of any series issued under the
indenture have specified rights if an Event of Default (as
defined below) occurs in respect of such debt securities, as
described below.
The term Event of Default in respect of the debt
securities of any series means any of the following:
|
|
|
|
l
|
We do not pay interest on any of the debt securities of that
series within 30 days of its due date;
|
|
|
l
|
We do not pay the principal of or any premium on any of the debt
securities of that series when due and payable, at maturity, or
upon acceleration or redemption;
|
|
|
l
|
We remain in breach of a covenant or warranty in respect of the
indenture or any debt securities of that series (other than a
covenant included in the indenture solely for the benefit of
debt securities of another series) for 60 days after we
receive a written notice of default; the notice must be sent by
either the Trustee or holders of at least 25% in principal
amount of the outstanding notes;
|
|
|
l
|
Indebtedness of ours or any of our Subsidiaries of at least
$50,000,000 in aggregate principal amount is accelerated which
acceleration has not been rescinded or annulled after
30 days notice thereof;
|
|
|
l
|
We file for bankruptcy, or other events of bankruptcy,
insolvency or reorganization specified in the indenture
occur; or
|
|
|
l
|
any other Event of Default for the debt securities of that
series.
|
150
An Event of Default with respect to a series of debt securities
does not necessarily constitute an Event of Default with respect
to any other series of debt securities. If an Event of Default
with respect to the debt securities of any series has occurred,
the Trustee or the holders of at least 25% in principal amount
of the debt securities of that series may declare the entire
unpaid principal amount of (and premium, if any), and all the
accrued interest on, such debt securities to be due and
immediately payable. This is called a declaration of
acceleration of maturity. There is no action on the part of the
Trustee or any holder of the notes required for such declaration
if the Event of Default is a specified event of bankruptcy,
insolvency or reorganization. Holders of a majority in principal
amount of the debt securities of any series may also waive
certain past defaults under the indenture with respect to the
debt securities of such series on behalf of all of the holders
of debt securities of that series. A declaration of acceleration
of maturity may be canceled, under specified circumstances, by
the holders of at least a majority in principal amount of the
notes and the Trustee.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent elected by us, the
sole remedy for an Event of Default relating to the failure to
comply with the reporting obligations in the indenture, which
are described above under SEC
Reports, and for any failure to comply with the
requirements of Section 314(a)(1) of the
Trust Indenture Act of 1939, will for the first
60 days after the occurrence of such an Event of Default
consist exclusively of the right to receive additional interest
on the notes at an annual rate equal to 0.25% of the principal
amount of the notes. This additional interest will be in
addition to any additional interest that may accrue as a result
of a registration default as described in the section entitled
The Exchange Offer Registration Rights
Agreement and will be payable in the same manner as
additional interest accruing as a result of a registration
default. The additional interest will accrue on all outstanding
notes from and including the date on which an Event of Default
relating to a failure to comply with the reporting obligations
in the indenture first occurs to but not including the 60th day
thereafter (or such earlier date on which the Event of Default
relating to the reporting obligations shall have been cured or
waived). On such 60th day (or earlier, if the Event of Default
relating to the reporting obligations is cured or waived prior
to such 60th day), such additional interest will cease to accrue
and, if the Event of Default relating to the reporting
obligations has not been cured or waived prior to such 60th day,
the notes will be subject to an acceleration of maturity as
provided above. The provisions of this paragraph will not affect
the rights of holders of notes in the event of the occurrence of
any other Event of Default and will have no effect on the rights
of holders of notes under the registration rights agreement;
provided, however, that in no event will the rate of additional
interest accruing pursuant to this paragraph and the
registration rights agreement at any time exceed 1.00% per
annum, in the aggregate. In the event we do not elect to pay
additional interest upon an Event of Default in accordance with
this paragraph, the notes will be subject to an acceleration of
maturity as provided above.
If we elect to pay additional interest as the sole remedy for
an Event of Default relating to the failure to comply with the
reporting obligations in the indenture, which are described
above under SEC Reports, and for
any failure to comply with the requirements of
Section 314(a)(1) of the Trust Indenture Act of 1939
in accordance with the immediately preceding paragraph, we will
notify all holders of notes and the Trustee and paying agent of
such election on or before the close of business on the date on
which such Event of Default first occurs.
Except in cases of default, where the Trustee has special
duties, the Trustee is not required to take any action under the
indenture at the request of holders unless the holders offer the
Trustee protection from expenses and liability satisfactory to
the Trustee. If an indemnity satisfactory to the Trustee is
provided, the holders of a majority in principal amount of debt
securities of any series may direct the time, method and place
of conducting any lawsuit or other formal legal action seeking
any remedy available to the Trustee. The Trustee may refuse to
follow those directions in certain circumstances specified in
the indenture. No delay or omission in exercising any right or
remedy will be treated as a waiver of the right, remedy or Event
of Default.
151
Before holders are allowed to bypass the Trustee and bring a
lawsuit or other formal legal action or take other steps to
enforce their rights or protect their interests relating to
their debt securities, the following must occur:
|
|
|
|
l
|
such holders must give the Trustee written notice that an Event
of Default has occurred and remains uncured;
|
|
|
l
|
holders of at least 25% in principal amount of the debt
securities of the series the holders of which have made the
written request must make a written request that the Trustee
take action because of the default and must offer the Trustee
indemnity satisfactory to the Trustee against the cost and other
liabilities of taking that action;
|
|
|
l
|
the Trustee must have failed to take action for 60 days
after receipt of the notice and offer of indemnity; and
|
|
|
l
|
holders of a majority in principal amount of the debt securities
of that series must not have given the Trustee a direction
inconsistent with the above notice for a period of 60 days
after the Trustee has received the notice.
|
Holders are, however, entitled at any time to bring a lawsuit
for the payment of money due on the notes on or after the due
date.
Modification
of the Indenture
The indenture will provide that we and the Trustee may, without
the consent of any holders of the debt securities, enter into
supplemental indentures for the purposes, among other things, of:
|
|
|
|
l
|
adding to our covenants;
|
|
|
l
|
adding additional events of default;
|
|
|
l
|
changing or eliminating any provisions of the indenture so long
as there are no holders entitled to the benefit of the
provisions;
|
|
|
l
|
establishing the form or terms of any series of securities; or
|
|
|
l
|
curing ambiguities or inconsistencies in the indenture or making
any other provisions with respect to matters or questions
arising under the indenture.
|
With specific exceptions, the indenture or the rights of the
holders of the debt securities may be modified by us and the
Trustee with the consent of the holders of a majority in
aggregate principal amount of the debt securities of each
series, but no modification may be made without the consent of
the holder of each outstanding note that would:
|
|
|
|
l
|
change the maturity of any payment of principal of, or any
premium on, or any installment of interest on any debt
securities;
|
|
|
l
|
reduce the principal amount of any debt security, or the
interest thereon, or any premium on any debt security upon
redemption or upon repayment at the option of the holder;
|
|
|
l
|
change our obligation to pay additional amounts;
|
|
|
l
|
change any place of payment where, or the currency in which, any
debt security or any premium or interest is payable;
|
|
|
l
|
impair the right to sue for the enforcement of any payment on or
with respect to any debt security; or
|
|
|
l
|
reduce the percentage in principal amount of outstanding notes
required to consent to any supplemental indenture, any waiver of
compliance with provisions of the indenture or specific defaults
and their consequences provided for in the indenture, or
otherwise modify the sections in the indenture relating to these
consents.
|
152
Defeasance
and Covenant Defeasance
We may elect either (i) to defease and be discharged from
any and all obligations with respect to the debt securities of
any series (except as otherwise provided in the indenture)
(defeasance) or (ii) to be released from our
obligations with respect to certain covenants that are described
in the indenture (covenant defeasance), upon the
deposit with the Trustee, in trust for such purpose, of money
and/or
government obligations that through the payment of principal and
interest in accordance with their terms will provide money in an
amount sufficient, without reinvestment, to pay the principal
of, premium, if any, and interest on the notes to maturity or
redemption, as the case may be, and any mandatory sinking fund
or analogous senior payments thereon. As a condition to
defeasance or covenant defeasance, we must deliver to the
Trustee an opinion of counsel to the effect that the holders of
the notes will not recognize income, gain or loss for United
States federal income tax purposes as a result of such
defeasance or covenant defeasance and will be subject to United
States federal income tax on the same amounts, in the same
manner and at the same times as would have been the case if such
defeasance or covenant defeasance had not occurred. Such opinion
of counsel, in the case of defeasance under clause (i)
above, must refer to and be based upon a ruling of the Internal
Revenue Service or a change in applicable United States federal
income tax law occurring after the date of the indenture.
We may exercise our defeasance option with respect to debt
securities notwithstanding our prior exercise of our covenant
defeasance option. If we exercise our defeasance option, payment
of the notes may not be accelerated because of an Event of
Default. If we exercise our covenant defeasance option, payment
of the notes may not be accelerated by reference to any covenant
from which we are released as described under clause (ii)
of the immediately preceding paragraph. However, if acceleration
were to occur for other reasons, the realizable value at the
acceleration date of the money and government obligations in the
defeasance trust could be less than the principal and interest
then due on the notes, in that the required deposit in the
defeasance trust is based upon scheduled cash flows rather than
market value, which will vary depending upon interest rates and
other factors.
Notices
Notices to holders of debt securities will be given by mail to
the addresses of such holders as they appear in the security
register.
Title
We, the Trustee and any agent of ours may treat the registered
owner of any debt security as the absolute owner thereof
(whether or not the debt security shall be overdue and
notwithstanding any notice to the contrary) for the purpose of
making payment and for all other purposes.
Replacement
of Notes
We will replace any mutilated note at the expense of the holders
upon surrender to the Trustee. We will replace notes that become
destroyed, lost or stolen at the expense of the holder upon
delivery to the Trustee of satisfactory evidence of the
destruction, loss or theft thereof. In the event of a destroyed,
lost or stolen note, an indemnity or security satisfactory to us
and the Trustee may be required at the expense of the holder of
the note before a replacement exchange note will be issued.
Governing
Law
The indenture is, and the notes exchange will be, governed by,
and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New
York.
153
Book
Entry, Delivery and Form
The exchange notes will be issued in the form of one or more
fully registered global securities (each a Global
Security) which will be deposited with, or on behalf of,
The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York (the
Depositary) and registered in the name of
Cede & Co., the Depositarys nominee. We will not
issue notes in certificated form except in certain
circumstances. Beneficial interests in the Global Securities
will be represented through book-entry accounts of financial
institutions acting on behalf of beneficial owners as direct and
indirect participants in the Depositary (the Depositary
Participants). Investors may elect to hold interests in
the Global Securities through either the Depositary (in the
United States), or Clearstream Luxembourg or Euroclear (in
Europe) if they are participants in those systems, or indirectly
through organizations that are participants in those systems.
Clearstream Luxembourg and Euroclear will hold interests on
behalf of their participants through customers securities
accounts in Clearstream Luxembourgs and Euroclears
names on the books of their respective depositaries, which in
turn will hold such interests in customers securities
accounts in the depositaries names on the books of the
Depositary. At the present time, Citibank, N.A. acts as
U.S. depositary for Clearstream Luxembourg and JPMorgan
Chase Bank acts as U.S. depositary for Euroclear (the
U.S. Depositaries). Beneficial interests in the
Global Securities will be held in minimum denominations of
$1,000 and integral multiples of $1,000 in excess thereof.
Except as set forth below, the Global Securities may be
transferred, in whole but not in part, only to another nominee
of the Depositary or to a successor of the Depositary or its
nominee.
The Depositary has advised us that it is a limited-purpose trust
company organized under the New York Banking Law, a
banking organization within the meaning of the New
York Banking Law, a member of the Federal Reserve System, a
clearing corporation within the meaning of the New
York Uniform Commercial Code, and a clearing agency
registered pursuant to the provisions of Section 17A of the
Exchange Act. The Depositary holds securities that its
participants (Direct Participants) deposit with the
Depositary. The Depositary also facilitates the settlement among
Direct Participants of securities transactions, such as
transfers and pledges, in deposited securities through
electronic computerized book-entry changes in Direct
Participants accounts, thereby eliminating the need for
physical movement of securities certificates. Direct
Participants include securities brokers and dealers (which may
include the initial purchasers), banks, trust companies,
clearing corporations and certain other organizations. The
Depositary is owned by a number of its Direct Participants and
by the New York Stock Exchange, Inc., the American Stock
Exchange LLC and the National Association of Securities Dealers,
Inc. Access to the Depositarys book-entry system is also
available to others such as securities brokers and dealers,
banks and trust companies that clear through or maintain a
custodial relationship with a Direct Participant, either
directly or indirectly (Indirect Participants). The
rules applicable to the Depositary and its Direct and Indirect
Participants are on file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Clearstream Luxembourg has advised us that it is incorporated
under the laws of Luxembourg as a professional depositary.
Clearstream Luxembourg holds securities for its participating
organizations, known as Clearstream Luxembourg participants, and
facilitates the clearance and settlement of securities
transactions between Clearstream Luxembourg participants through
electronic book-entry changes in accounts of Clearstream
Luxembourg participants, thereby eliminating the need for
physical movement of certificates. Clearstream Luxembourg
provides to Clearstream Luxembourg participants, among other
things, services for safekeeping, administration, clearance and
settlement of internationally traded securities and securities
lending and borrowing. Clearstream Luxembourg interfaces with
domestic markets in several countries. As a professional
depositary, Clearstream Luxembourg is subject to regulation by
the Luxembourg Commission for the Supervision of the Financial
Sector, also known as the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur
Financier. Clearstream Luxembourg participants are recognized
financial institutions around the world, including underwriters,
securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies, clearing
corporations and certain other organizations. Indirect access to
Clearstream Luxembourg is also available to others, such as
banks, brokers, dealers and trust companies that clear through,
or maintain a custodial relationship with, a Clearstream
Luxembourg participant either directly or indirectly.
154
Distributions with respect to the exchange notes held
beneficially through Clearstream Luxembourg will be credited to
the cash accounts of Clearstream Luxembourg participants in
accordance with its rules and procedures, to the extent received
by the U.S. Depositary for Clearstream Luxembourg.
Euroclear has advised us that it was created in 1968 to hold
securities for its participants, known as Euroclear
participants, and to clear and settle transactions between
Euroclear participants and between Euroclear participants and
participants of certain other securities intermediaries through
simultaneous electronic book-entry delivery against payment,
eliminating the need for physical movement of certificates and
any risk from lack of simultaneous transfers of securities and
cash. Euroclear is owned by Euroclear Clearance System Public
Limited Company and operated through a license agreement by
Euroclear Bank S.A./N.V., known as the Euroclear operator. The
Euroclear operator provides Euroclear participants, among other
things, with safekeeping, administration, clearance and
settlement, securities lending and borrowing and related
services. Euroclear participants include banks (including
central banks), securities brokers and dealers and other
professional financial intermediaries and may include the
initial purchasers.
Indirect access to Euroclear is also available to others that
clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with a
Euroclear participant, either directly or indirectly.
The Euroclear operator is regulated and examined by the Belgian
Banking and Finance Commission.
Securities clearance accounts and cash accounts with the
Euroclear operator are governed by the Terms and Conditions
Governing Use of Euroclear and the related Operating Procedures
of the Euroclear System, and applicable Belgian law,
collectively referred to as the terms and conditions. The terms
and conditions govern transfers of securities and cash within
Euroclear, withdrawals of securities and cash from Euroclear,
and receipts of payments with respect to securities in
Euroclear. All securities in Euroclear are held on a fungible
basis without attribution of specific certificates to specific
securities clearance accounts. The Euroclear operator acts under
the terms and conditions only on behalf of Euroclear
participants, and has no record of or relationship with persons
holding through Euroclear participants.
Distributions with respect to exchange notes held beneficially
through Euroclear will be credited to the cash accounts of
Euroclear participants in accordance with the terms and
conditions, to the extent received by the U.S. Depositary
for Euroclear.
If the Depositary is at any time unwilling or unable to continue
as depositary and a successor depositary is not appointed by us
within 90 days, we will issue the exchange notes in
definitive form in exchange for the entire Global Security
representing such exchange notes. In addition, we may at any
time, and in our sole discretion, determine not to have the
exchange notes represented by the Global Security and, in such
event, will issue exchange notes in definitive form in exchange
for the Global Security representing such exchange notes. In any
such instance, an owner of a beneficial interest in the Global
Security will be entitled to physical delivery in definitive
form of notes represented by such Global Security equal in
principal amount to such beneficial interest and to have such
notes registered in its name.
Title to book-entry interests in the exchange notes will pass by
book-entry registration of the transfer within the records of
Clearstream Luxembourg, Euroclear or the Depositary, as the case
may be, in accordance with their respective procedures.
Book-entry interests in the exchange notes may be transferred
within Clearstream Luxembourg and within Euroclear and between
Clearstream Luxembourg and Euroclear in accordance with
procedures established for these purposes by Clearstream
Luxembourg and Euroclear. Book-entry interests in the exchange
notes may be transferred within the Depositary in accordance
with procedures established for this purpose by the Depositary.
Transfers of book-entry interests in the exchange notes among
Clearstream Luxembourg and Euroclear and the Depositary may be
effected in accordance with procedures established for this
purpose by Clearstream Luxembourg, Euroclear and the Depositary.
Global
Clearance and Settlement Procedures
Initial settlement for the exchange notes will be made in
immediately available funds. Secondary market trading between
Depositary Participants will occur in the ordinary way in
accordance with the
155
Depositarys rules and will be settled in immediately
available funds using the Depositarys
Same-Day
Funds Settlement System. Secondary market trading between
Clearstream Luxembourg participants and Euroclear participants
will occur in the ordinary way in accordance with the applicable
rules and operating procedures of Clearstream Luxembourg and
Euroclear and will be settled using the procedures applicable to
conventional eurobonds in immediately available funds.
Cross-market transfers between persons holding directly or
indirectly through the Depositary, on the one hand, and directly
or indirectly through Clearstream Luxembourg or Euroclear
participants, on the other, will be effected through the
Depositary in accordance with the Depositarys rules on
behalf of the relevant European international clearing system by
its U.S. Depositary; however, such cross-market
transactions will require delivery of instructions to the
relevant European international clearing system by the
counterparty in such system in accordance with its rules and
procedures and within its established deadlines (European time).
The relevant European international clearing system will, if the
transaction meets its settlement requirements, deliver
instructions to its U.S. Depositary to take action to
effect final settlement on its behalf by delivering or receiving
the exchange notes in the Depositary, and making or receiving
payment in accordance with normal procedures for
same-day
funds settlement applicable to the Depositary. Clearstream
Luxembourg participants and Euroclear participants may not
deliver instructions directly to their respective
U.S. Depositaries.
Because of time-zone differences, credits of the notes received
in Clearstream Luxembourg or Euroclear as a result of a
transaction with a Depositary Participant will be made during
subsequent securities settlement processing and dated the
business day following the Depositary settlement date. Such
credits, or any transactions in the exchange notes settled
during such processing, will be reported to the relevant
Euroclear participants or Clearstream Luxembourg participants on
that business day. Cash received in Clearstream Luxembourg or
Euroclear as a result of sales of exchange notes by or through a
Clearstream Luxembourg participant or a Euroclear participant to
a Depositary Participant will be received with value on the
business day of settlement in the Depositary but will be
available in the relevant Clearstream Luxembourg or Euroclear
cash account only as of the business day following settlement in
the Depositary.
Although the Depositary, Clearstream Luxembourg and Euroclear
have agreed to the foregoing procedures in order to facilitate
transfers of securities among participants of the Depositary,
Clearstream Luxembourg and Euroclear, they are under no
obligation to perform or continue to perform such procedures and
they may discontinue the procedures at any time.
Certain
Definitions
The following definitions are applicable to the indenture:
Indebtedness of any person means, without
duplication, (i) any obligation of such person for money
borrowed, (ii) any obligation of such person evidenced by
bonds, debentures, notes or other similar instruments and
(iii) any reimbursement obligation of such person in
respect of letters of credit or other similar instruments which
support financial obligations which would otherwise become
Indebtedness.
Lien means any pledge, mortgage, lien, encumbrance
or other security interest.
Restricted Subsidiary means a Subsidiary of ours
(other than a Securitization Entity) which (i) is owned,
directly or indirectly, by us or by one or more of our
Subsidiaries, or by us and one or more of our Subsidiaries,
(ii) is incorporated under the laws of the United States or
a state thereof and (iii) owns a Principal Property.
Securitization Entity means any Subsidiary or other
person that is engaged solely in the business of effecting asset
securitization transactions and related activities.
Subsidiary of any person means (i) a
corporation a majority of the outstanding voting stock of which
is at the time, directly or indirectly, owned by such person, by
one or more Subsidiaries of such person, or
156
by such person and one or more Subsidiaries thereof or
(ii) any other person (other than a corporation),
including, without limitation, a partnership or joint venture,
in which such person, one or more Subsidiaries thereof, or such
person and one or more Subsidiaries thereof, directly or
indirectly, at the date of determination thereof, has at least
majority ownership interest entitled to vote in the election of
directors, managers or trustees thereof (or other persons
performing similar functions).
157
MATERIAL
U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The following is a summary of the material U.S. federal income
tax considerations to a holder of original notes relating to the
exchange of original notes for exchange notes pursuant to the
exchange offer. This summary is based upon existing U.S. federal
income tax law, which is subject to change, possibly with
retroactive effect. This summary does not discuss all aspects of
U.S. federal income taxation which may be important to
particular investors in light of their individual investment
circumstances, such as original notes held by investors subject
to special tax rules (e.g., financial institutions, insurance
companies, broker-dealers, tax-exempt organizations (including
private foundations) and partnerships and their partners), or to
persons that hold the original notes as part of a straddle,
hedge, conversion, constructive sale, or other integrated
security transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes or
that have a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar, all
of whom may be subject to tax rules that differ significantly
from those summarized below. In addition, this summary does not
address any state, local, or non-U.S. tax considerations, Each
prospective investor is urged to consult his tax advisor
regarding the U.S. federal, state, local, and non-U.S. income
and other tax considerations of the acquisition, ownership, and
disposition of the exchange notes.
Exchange
of Original Notes for Exchange Notes
An exchange of original notes for exchange notes pursuant to the
exchange offer will generally not be a taxable event for U.S.
federal income tax purposes. Consequently, a holder of original
notes will not recognize gain or loss, for U.S. federal income
tax purposes, as a result of exchanging original notes for
exchange notes pursuant to the exchange offer. The holding
period of the exchange notes will be the same as the holding
period of the original notes and the tax basis in the exchange
notes will be the same as the adjusted tax basis in the original
notes as determined immediately before the exchange.
158
PLAN OF
DISTRIBUTION
Each broker-dealer that receives exchange notes for its own
account under the exchange offer must acknowledge that it will
deliver a prospectus in connection with any resale of those
notes. This prospectus, as it may be amended or supplemented
from time to time, may be used by a broker-dealer for resales of
exchange notes received in exchange for original notes that had
been acquired as a result of market-making or other trading
activities. We have agreed that, for a period of 180 days
after the expiration date of the exchange offer, we will make
this prospectus, as it may be amended or supplemented, available
to any broker-dealer for use in connection with any such resale.
Any broker-dealers required to use this prospectus and any
amendments or supplements to this prospectus for resales of the
exchange notes must notify us of this fact by checking the box
on the letter of transmittal requesting additional copies of
these documents.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, we are entitled under the
registration rights agreement to suspend the use of this
prospectus by broker-dealers under specified circumstances. For
example, we may suspend the use of this prospectus if:
|
|
|
|
|
the SEC or any state securities authority requests an amendment
or supplement to this prospectus or the related registration
statement or additional information;
|
|
|
|
the SEC or any state securities authority issues any stop order
suspending the effectiveness of the registration statement or
initiates proceedings for that purpose;
|
|
|
|
we receive notification of the suspension of the qualification
of the new notes for sale in any jurisdiction or the initiation
or threatening of any proceeding for that purpose;
|
|
|
|
the suspension is required by law; or
|
|
|
|
an event occurs which makes any statement in this prospectus
untrue in any material respect or which constitutes an omission
to state a material fact in this prospectus.
|
If we suspend the use of this prospectus, the
180-day
period referred to above will be extended by a number of days
equal to the period of the suspension.
We will not receive any proceeds from any sale of exchange notes
by broker-dealers. Exchange notes received by broker-dealers for
their own account under the exchange offer may be sold from time
to time in one or more transactions in the
over-the-counter
market, in negotiated transactions, through the writing of
options on those notes or a combination of those methods, at
market prices prevailing at the time of resale, at prices
related to prevailing market prices or at negotiated prices. Any
resales may be made directly to purchasers or to or through
brokers or dealers who may receive compensation in the form of
commissions or concessions from the selling broker-dealer or the
purchasers of the new notes. Any broker-dealer that resells
exchange notes received by it for its own account under the
exchange offer and any broker or dealer that participates in a
distribution of the exchange notes may be deemed to be an
underwriter within the meaning of the Securities Act
and any profit on any resale of exchange notes and any
commissions or concessions received by these persons may be
deemed to be underwriting compensation under the Securities Act.
The letter of transmittal states that, by acknowledging that it
will deliver and by delivering a prospectus, a broker-dealer
will not be deemed to admit that it is an
underwriter within the meaning of the Securities Act.
We will not receive any proceeds from the issuance of exchange
notes in the exchange offer. We have agreed to pay all expenses
incidental to the exchange offer other than commissions and
concessions of any broker or dealer and certain transfer taxes
and will indemnify holders of the notes, including any
broker-dealers, against certain liabilities, including
liabilities under the Securities Act.
LEGAL
MATTERS
The validity of the exchange notes offered by this prospectus
and certain legal matters in connection with the exchange offer
will be passed upon for us by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher
& Flom LLP, New York, New York.
159
EXPERTS
The financial statements included in this prospectus have been
audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent
registered public accounting firm, as stated in their reports
appearing herein and elsewhere in the registration statement
(which report expresses an unqualified opinion on the financial
statements and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the
fact that, prior to its separation from Cendant Corporation
(Cendant; known as Avis Budget Group since
August 29, 2006), the Company was comprised of the assets
and liabilities used in managing and operating the lodging,
vacation exchange and rental and vacation ownership businesses
of Cendant; included in Notes 20 and 21 of the consolidated
and combined financial statements is a summary of transactions
with related parties; as discussed in Note 20 to the
consolidated and combined financial statements, in connection
with its separation from Cendant, the Company entered into
certain guarantee commitments with Cendant and has recorded the
fair value of these guarantees as of July 31, 2006; and the
Company adopted the provisions for accounting for real estate
time-sharing transactions, and have been so included in reliance
upon the reports of such firm given upon their authority as
experts in accounting and auditing.
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We are subject to the informational filing requirements of the
Exchange Act, and, accordingly, are obligated to file reports,
statements and other information with the SEC relating to our
business, financial condition and other matters. Any such
filings with the SEC are available to the public over the
Internet on the SECs website at http://www.sec.gov. You
may read and copy any filed document at the SECs public
reference rooms in Washington, D.C. at 100 F Street, N.E.,
Judiciary Plaza, Washington, D.C. 20549 and at the
SECs regional offices in New York at 233 Broadway,
New York, New York 10279 and in Chicago at Citicorp Center, 500
W. Madison Street, Suite 1400, Chicago, Illinois 60661.
Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for further information about the public reference rooms.
We maintain an Internet site at http://www.wyndhamworldwide.com.
Our website and the information contained on that site, or
connected to that site, are not incorporated into and are not a
part of this prospectus.
This prospectus contains summaries of the material terms of
certain documents and refers you to certain documents that we
have filed with the SEC. Copies of these documents, except for
certain exhibits and schedules, will be made available to you
without charge upon written or oral request to:
Wyndham
Worldwide Corporation
Seven Sylvan Way
Parsippany, NJ 07054
Attention: Investor Relations
Phone:
(973) 753-6000
In order to obtain timely delivery of such materials, you
must request information from us no later than five business
days prior to the expiration of the exchange offer.
160
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Wyndham Worldwide Corporation Board of Directors and
Shareholders
We have audited the accompanying consolidated and combined
balance sheets of Wyndham Worldwide Corporation and subsidiaries
(the Company) as of December 31, 2006 and 2005,
and the related consolidated and combined statements of income,
stockholders/invested equity, and cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal
control over financial reporting. Our audits included
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated and combined financial
statements present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position of Wyndham Worldwide Corporation and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2006, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated and combined
financial statements, prior to its separation from Cendant
Corporation (Cendant; known as Avis Budget Group
since August 29, 2006), the Company was comprised of the
assets and liabilities used in managing and operating the
lodging, vacation exchange and rental and vacation ownership
businesses of Cendant. Included in Notes 20 and 21 of the
consolidated and combined financial statements is a summary of
transactions with related parties. As discussed in Note 20
to the consolidated and combined financial statements, in
connection with its separation from Cendant, the Company entered
into certain guarantee commitments with Cendant and has recorded
the fair value of these guarantees as of July 31, 2006.
Also as discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated and
combined financial statements, as of January 1, 2006, the
Company adopted the provisions for accounting for real estate
time-sharing transactions.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Parsippany, New Jersey
March 7, 2007
F-2
WYNDHAM
WORLDWIDE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In millions, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation ownership interest sales
|
|
$
|
1,461
|
|
|
$
|
1,379
|
|
|
$
|
1,245
|
|
Service fees and membership
|
|
|
1,437
|
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
|
|
1,105
|
|
Franchise fees
|
|
|
501
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
Consumer financing
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
Other
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
3,842
|
|
|
|
3,471
|
|
|
|
3,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
1,474
|
|
|
|
1,199
|
|
|
|
932
|
|
Cost of vacation ownership
interests
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
Marketing and reservation
|
|
|
734
|
|
|
|
628
|
|
|
|
576
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
493
|
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
Separation and related costs
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,265
|
|
|
|
2,851
|
|
|
|
2,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Interest income (including
intercompany of $21, $30 and $16)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and
minority interest
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
626
|
|
|
|
587
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
Minority interest, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect
of accounting change
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
431
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
change, net of tax
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
$
|
431
|
|
|
$
|
349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
$
|
1.78
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
1.45
|
|
|
|
2.15
|
|
|
|
1.74
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
1.44
|
|
|
|
2.15
|
|
|
|
1.74
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements.
F-3
WYNDHAM
WORLDWIDE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
269
|
|
|
$
|
99
|
|
Trade receivables (net of allowance
for doubtful accounts of $99 and $96)
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
Vacation ownership contract
receivables, net
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
446
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
Net intercompany funding to former
Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,125
|
|
Due from former Parent and
subsidiaries
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
2,052
|
|
|
|
2,568
|
|
Long-term vacation ownership
contract receivables, net
|
|
|
2,123
|
|
|
|
1,835
|
|
Non-current inventory
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
916
|
|
|
|
718
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
2,699
|
|
|
|
2,645
|
|
Trademarks, net
|
|
|
621
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
Franchise agreements and other
intangibles, net
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
Due from former Parent and
subsidiaries
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
9,520
|
|
|
$
|
9,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized vacation ownership debt
|
|
$
|
178
|
|
|
$
|
154
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
377
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
Due to former Parent and
subsidiaries
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current
liabilities
|
|
|
575
|
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,977
|
|
|
|
1,295
|
|
Long-term securitized vacation
ownership debt
|
|
|
1,285
|
|
|
|
981
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,322
|
|
|
|
706
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
782
|
|
|
|
823
|
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
Due to former Parent and
subsidiaries
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
5,961
|
|
|
|
4,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
(Note 14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par
value, authorized 6,000,000 shares, none issued and
outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value,
authorized 600,000,000 shares, issued 202,294,898 in 2006
and zero shares in 2005
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
3,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent companys net investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,925
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost
11,877,600 in 2006 and zero shares in 2005
|
|
|
(349
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
3,559
|
|
|
|
5,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
9,520
|
|
|
$
|
9,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements.
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
$
|
431
|
|
|
$
|
349
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
change, net of tax
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
431
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile income
before cumulative effect of accounting change to net cash
provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Impairment of intangible assets
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in assets and
liabilities, excluding the impact of acquisitions and
dispositions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
Vacation ownership contract
receivables
|
|
|
(594
|
)
|
|
|
(462
|
)
|
|
|
(496
|
)
|
Inventory
|
|
|
(280
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses
and other current liabilities
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Due to former Parent and
subsidiaries
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
492
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment additions
|
|
|
(191
|
)
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
Net assets acquired, net of cash
acquired, and acquisition-related payments
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
(154
|
)
|
|
|
(181
|
)
|
Net intercompany funding to former
Parent and subsidiaries
|
|
|
(143
|
)
|
|
|
(398
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
Investments and development advances
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Proceeds received from disposition
of businesses, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Increase in restricted cash
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
|
(471
|
)
|
|
|
(696
|
)
|
|
|
(326
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from secured borrowings
|
|
|
1,531
|
|
|
|
1,296
|
|
|
|
1,440
|
|
Principal payments on secured
borrowings
|
|
|
(1,223
|
)
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
|
|
(1,032
|
)
|
Proceeds from unsecured borrowings
|
|
|
2,179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Principal payments on unsecured
borrowings
|
|
|
(1,910
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
Proceeds from bond issuance
|
|
|
796
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid to former Parent
|
|
|
(1,360
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contribution from former
Parent
|
|
|
795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(329
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing
activities
|
|
|
473
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of changes in exchange rates
on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents,
beginning of period
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end
of period
|
|
$
|
269
|
|
|
$
|
99
|
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash
Flow Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
payments(a)
|
|
$
|
99
|
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
Income tax payments,
net(b)
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Excludes interest paid on the
Companys securitized debt of $64 million,
$40 million, and $32 million, intercompany interest
paid to former Parent and subsidiaries of $18 million,
$20 million and $6 million and capitalized interest
related to the development of vacation ownership inventory
during 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
|
|
(b) |
|
Excludes income tax related
payments made to former Parent.
|
See Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements.
F-5
WYNDHAM
WORLDWIDE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENT OF
STOCKHOLDERS/INVESTED EQUITY
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Companys
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Net Investment
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1,
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,103
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,283
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment,
net of tax of $33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on cash flow
hedges, net of tax of $1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
Capital contribution from former
Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31,
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,679
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment,
net of tax benefit of $19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on cash flow
hedges, net of tax of $2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification for gains on cash
flow hedges, net of tax benefit of $2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
Dividends paid to former Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
Capital contribution from former
Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,033
|
|
Comprehensive income from
January 1, 2006 to July 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment,
net of tax benefit of $27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on cash flow
hedges, net of tax benefit of
$1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income from
January 1, 2006 to July 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
Assumption of former Parent
corporate assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
Return of excess funding from
former Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Tax receivables due from former
Parent and subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Deferred tax assets on contingent
liabilities and guarantees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Guarantees under FIN 45
related to the Separation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
Contingent liabilities
due to former Parent and subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(483
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(483
|
)
|
Cash transfer to former Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,360
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,360
|
)
|
Elimination of asset
linked facility obligation by former Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
Capital contribution from former
Parent proceeds from Travelport sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
760
|
|
Elimination of intercompany balance
due to former Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,157
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,157
|
)
|
Transfer of net investment to
additional paid in capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,569
|
|
|
|
(3,569
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income from
August 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment,
net of tax of $16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on cash flow
hedges, net of tax benefit of $4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income from
August 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock units
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
Additional capital contribution
from former Parent proceeds from Travelport sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Adjustments to contingent
liabilities due to former Parent and subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Repurchases of WYN common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(349
|
)
|
|
|
(349
|
)
|
Equitable adjustment of stock based
compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Adjustment to deferred tax assets
assumed from former Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Excess deferred tax assets of
expense awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2006
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
3,566
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
156
|
|
|
$
|
184
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(349
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements.
F-6
WYNDHAM
WORLDWIDE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise noted, all amounts are in millions, except
per share amounts)
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation (Wyndham or the
Company), a Delaware corporation, was incorporated on
May 30, 2003 as Cendant Hotel Group. In connection with a
plan by Cendant Corporation (Cendant or former
Parent; known as Avis Budget Group since August 29,
2006) to separate into four independent, publicly traded
companies one each for Cendants former
hospitality services (including timeshare resorts), real estate
services (Realogy), travel distribution services
(Travelport) and vehicle rental services (Avis
Budget Group) businesses (Separation), on
July 13, 2006, Cendant Hotel Group changed its name to
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation. On April 24, 2006, Cendant
modified its previously announced Separation plan to explore the
possible sale of Travelport. On June 30, 2006, Cendant
entered into a definitive agreement to sell Travelport to an
affiliate of the Blackstone Group for $4,300 million in
cash and on August 22, 2006, the sale of Travelport closed.
Pursuant to the plan of Separation, the Company received
approximately $760 million of the proceeds from such sale,
which could be subject to post-closing adjustments.
On July 13, 2006, Cendants Board of Directors
approved the distribution of all of the shares of common stock
of Wyndham. In connection with the distribution, the Company
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC) an Information Statement, dated July 13,
2006 (the Information Statement), which describes
for stockholders the details of the distribution and provides
information on the business and management of Wyndham. The
Company mailed the Information Statement to Cendant stockholders
shortly after the July 21, 2006 record date for the
distribution. Prior to July 31, 2006, Cendant transferred
to Wyndham all of the assets and liabilities primarily related
to the hospitality services (including timeshare resorts)
businesses of Cendant and, on July 31, 2006, Cendant
distributed all of the shares of Wyndham common stock to the
holders of Cendant common stock issued and outstanding on
July 21, 2006, the record date for the distribution. The
Separation was effective on July 31, 2006. On
August 1, 2006, the Company commenced regular
way trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the
symbol WYN.
The Companys consolidated and combined results of
operations, financial position and cash flows may not be
indicative of its future performance and do not necessarily
reflect what its consolidated results of operations, financial
position and cash flows would have been had the Company operated
as a separate, stand-alone entity during the periods presented
prior to August 1, 2006, including changes in its
operations and capitalization as a result of the Separation and
distribution from Cendant.
Certain corporate and general and administrative expenses,
including those related to executive management, tax,
accounting, payroll, legal and treasury services, certain
employee benefits and real estate usage for common space were
allocated by Cendant to the Company through July 31, 2006
based on forecasted revenues or usage. Management believes such
allocations were reasonable. However, the associated expenses
recorded by the Company in the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income may not be indicative of the actual
expenses that would have been incurred had the Company been
operating as a separate, stand-alone public company for the
periods presented prior to August 1, 2006. Following the
Separation and distribution from Cendant, the Company began
performing these functions using internal resources or purchased
services, certain of which are provided by Cendant or one of the
separated companies during a transitional period pursuant to the
Transition Services Agreement. Refer to Note 21
Related Party Transactions for a detailed description of the
Companys transactions with Cendant and its former
subsidiaries.
In managements opinion, the Consolidated and Combined
Financial Statements contain all normal recurring adjustments
necessary for a fair presentation of annual results reported.
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts
to conform to the current period presentation.
F-7
Business
Description
The Company operates in the following business segments:
|
|
|
|
l
|
Lodging franchises hotels in the
upscale, middle and economy segments of the lodging industry and
provides property management services to owners of luxury and
upscale hotels.
|
|
|
l
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals provides
vacation exchange products and services to owners of intervals
of vacation ownership interests and markets vacation rental
properties primarily on behalf of independent owners.
|
|
|
l
|
Vacation Ownership markets and sells
vacation ownership interests (VOIs) to individual
consumers, provides consumer financing in connection with the
sale of VOIs and provides property management services at
resorts.
|
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Principles
of Consolidation
The Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements include the
accounts and transactions of Wyndham, as well as entities in
which Wyndham directly or indirectly has a controlling financial
interest and various entities in which Wyndham has investments
recorded under the equity method of accounting. The Consolidated
and Combined Financial Statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. All intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated in the Consolidated and
Combined Financial Statements.
In connection with Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Interpretation No. 46 (Revised 2003),
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
(FIN 46), when evaluating an entity for
consolidation, the Company first determines whether an entity is
within the scope of FIN 46 and if it is deemed to be a
variable interest entity (VIE). If the entity is
considered to be a VIE, the Company determines whether it would
be considered the entitys primary beneficiary. The Company
consolidates those VIEs for which it has determined that it is
the primary beneficiary. The Company will consolidate an entity
not deemed either a VIE or qualifying special purpose entity
(QSPE) upon a determination that its ownership,
direct or indirect, exceeds 50% of the outstanding voting shares
of an entity
and/or that
it has the ability to control the financial or operating
policies through its voting rights, board representation or
other similar rights. For entities where the Company does not
have a controlling interest (financial or operating), the
investments in such entities are classified as
available-for-sale
securities or accounted for using the equity or cost method, as
appropriate. The Company applies the equity method of accounting
when it has the ability to exercise significant influence over
operating and financial policies of an investee in accordance
with Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion
No. 18, The Equity Method of Accounting for
Investments in Common Stock.
Revenue
Recognition
Lodging
The Company enters into agreements to franchise its lodging
franchise systems to independent hotel owners. The
Companys standard franchise agreement typically has a term
of 15 to 20 years and provides a franchisee with certain
rights to terminate the franchise agreement before the term of
the agreement under certain circumstances. The principal source
of revenues from franchising hotels is ongoing franchise fees,
which are comprised of royalty fees and other fees relating to
marketing and reservation services. Ongoing franchise fees
typically are based on a percentage of gross room revenues of
each franchised hotel and are accrued as earned and upon
becoming due from the franchisee. An estimate of uncollectible
ongoing franchise fees is charged to bad debt expense and
included in operating expenses on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income. Lodging revenues also include initial
franchise fees, which are recognized
F-8
as revenue when all material services or conditions have been
substantially performed, which is either when a franchised hotel
opens for business or when a franchise agreement is terminated
as it has been determined that the franchised hotel will not
open.
The Companys franchise agreements also require payment of
fees for other services, including marketing and reservations.
With such fees, the Company provides its franchised properties
with a suite of operational and administrative services,
including access to an international, centralized,
brand-specific reservations system, advertising, promotional and
co-marketing programs, referrals, technology, training and
volume purchasing. The Company is contractually obligated to
expend the marketing and reservation fees it collects from
franchisees in accordance with the franchise agreements; as
such, revenues earned in excess of costs incurred are accrued as
a liability for future marketing or reservation costs. Costs
incurred in excess of revenues are expensed. In accordance with
the Companys franchise agreements, the Company includes an
allocation of certain overhead costs required to carry out
marketing and reservation activities within marketing and
reservation expenses.
The Company also provides property management services for
hotels under management contracts. The Companys management
fees are comprised of base fees, which are typically calculated
based upon a specified percentage of gross revenues from hotel
operations, and incentive management fees, which are typically
calculated based upon a specified percentage of a hotels
gross operating profit. Management fee revenue is recognized
when earned in accordance with the terms of the contract. The
Company incurs certain reimbursable costs on behalf of managed
hotel properties and report reimbursements received from managed
properties as revenue and the costs incurred on their behalf as
expenses. Management fees and reimbursement revenue are recorded
as a component of service fees and membership revenue on the
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income. The costs, which
principally relate to payroll costs for operational employees
who work at the managed hotels, are reflected as a component of
operating expenses on the Consolidated and Combined Statements
of Income. The reimbursements from hotel owners are based upon
the costs incurred with no added margin; as a result, these
reimbursable costs have little to no effect on the
Companys operating income. Management fee revenue and
revenue related to payroll reimbursements were $4 million
and $69 million, in 2006, respectively, and $1 million
and $17 million, respectively, for the period
October 11, 2005 (date of Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand
acquisition, which includes management contracts) through
December 31, 2005.
Vacation
Exchange and Rentals
As a provider of vacation exchange services, the Company enters
into affiliation agreements with developers of vacation
ownership properties to allow owners of intervals to trade their
intervals for certain other intervals within the Companys
vacation exchange business and, for some members, for other
leisure-related products and services. Additionally, as a
marketer of vacation rental properties, generally the Company
enters into contracts for exclusive periods of time with
property owners to market the rental of such properties to
rental customers. The Companys vacation exchange business
derives a majority of its revenues from annual membership dues
and exchange fees from members trading their intervals. Annual
dues revenue represents the annual membership fees from members
who participate in the Companys vacation exchange
business. For additional fees, such participants are entitled to
exchange intervals for intervals at other properties affiliated
with the Companys vacation exchange business. In addition,
certain participants may exchange intervals for other
leisure-related products and services. The Company records
revenue from annual membership dues as deferred income on the
Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheets and recognizes it on a
straight-line basis over the membership period during which
delivery of publications, if applicable, and other services are
provided to the members. Exchange fees are generated when
members exchange their intervals for equivalent values of rights
and services, which may include intervals at other properties
within the Companys vacation exchange business or other
leisure-related products and services. Exchange fees are
recognized as revenue when the exchange requests have been
confirmed to the member. The Companys vacation rentals
business derives its revenue principally from fees, which
generally range from approximately 40% to 60% of the gross rent
charged to rental customers. The majority of the time, the
Company acts on behalf of the owners of the rental properties to
generate the
F-9
Companys fees. The Company provides reservation services
to the independent property owners and receives the
agreed-upon
fee for the service provided. The Company remits the gross
rental fee received from the renter to the independent property
owner, net of the Companys
agreed-upon
fee. Revenue from such fees is recognized in the period that the
rental reservation is made, net of expected cancellations. Upon
confirmation of the rental reservation, the rental customer and
property owner generally have a direct relationship for
additional services to be performed. Cancellations for 2006 and
2005 each totaled less than 5% of rental transactions booked.
The Companys revenue is earned when evidence of an
arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or the services have
been rendered, the sellers price to the buyer is fixed or
determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. The
Company also earns rental fees in connection with properties it
owns or leases under capital leases and such fees are recognized
when the rental customers stay occurs, as this is the
point at which the service is rendered.
Vacation
Ownership
The Company markets and sells VOIs to individual consumers,
provides consumer financing in connection with the sale of VOIs
and provides property management services at resorts. The
Companys vacation ownership business derives the majority
of its revenues from sales of VOIs and derives other revenues
from consumer financing and resort management. The
Companys sales of VOIs are either cash sales or
Company-financed sales. In order for the Company to recognize
revenues of VOI sales under the full accrual method of
accounting described in Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 66 Accounting of
Sales of Real Estate for fully constructed inventory, a
binding sales contract must have been executed, the statutory
rescission period must have expired (after which time the
purchasers are not entitled to a refund except for non-delivery
by the Company), receivables must have been deemed collectible
and the remainder of the Companys obligations must have
been substantially completed. In addition, before the Company
recognizes any revenues on VOI sales, the purchaser of the VOI
must have met the initial investment criteria and, as
applicable, the continuing investment criteria, by executing a
legally binding financing contract. A purchaser has met the
initial investment criteria when a minimum down payment of 10%
is received by the Company. As a result of the adoption of
SFAS No. 152, Accounting for Real Estate
Time-Sharing Transactions
(SFAS No. 152) and Statement of Position
No. 04-2,
Accounting for Real Estate Time-Sharing Transactions
(SOP 04-2)
on January 1, 2006, the Company must also take into
consideration the fair value of certain incentives provided to
the purchaser when assessing the adequacy of the
purchasers initial investment. In those cases where
financing is provided to the purchaser by the Company, the
purchaser is obligated to remit monthly payments under financing
contracts that represent the purchasers continuing
investment. The contractual terms of Company-provided financing
arrangements require that the contractual level of annual
principal payments be sufficient to amortize the loan over a
customary period for the VOI being financed, which is generally
seven to ten years, and payments under the financing contracts
begin within 45 days of the sale and receipt of the minimum
down payment of 10%. If all of the criteria for a VOI sale to
qualify under the full accrual method of accounting have been
met, as discussed above, except that construction of the VOI
purchased is not complete, the Company recognizes revenues using
the
percentage-of-completion
method of accounting provided that the preliminary construction
phase is complete and that a minimum sales level has been met
(to assure that the property will not revert to a rental
property). The preliminary stage of development is deemed to be
complete when the engineering and design work is complete, the
construction contracts have been executed, the site has been
cleared, prepared and excavated, and the building foundation is
complete. The completion percentage is determined by the
proportion of real estate inventory costs incurred to total
estimated costs. These estimated costs are based upon historical
experience and the related contractual terms. The remaining
revenue and related costs of sales, including commissions and
direct expenses, are deferred and recognized as the remaining
costs are incurred. Until a contract for sale qualifies for
revenue recognition, all payments received are accounted for as
restricted cash and deposits within other current assets and
deferred income, respectively, on the Consolidated and Combined
Balance Sheets. Commissions and other direct costs related to
the sale are deferred until the sale is recorded. If a contract
is cancelled before qualifying as a sale, non-recoverable
expenses are charged to operating expense in the current period
on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income.
F-10
The Company also offers consumer financing as an option to
customers purchasing VOIs, which are typically collateralized by
the underlying VOI. Generally, the financing terms are for seven
to ten years. Prior to 2006, the provision for loan losses was
presented as expense on the Combined Statements of Income. Upon
the adoption of SFAS No. 152 and
SOP 04-2
on January 1, 2006, the provision for loan losses is now
classified as a reduction of vacation ownership interest sales
on the Consolidated Statement of Income. The interest income
earned from the financing arrangements is earned on the
principal balance outstanding over the life of the arrangement.
The Company also provides
day-to-day-management
services, including oversight of housekeeping services,
maintenance and certain accounting and administrative services
for property owners associations and clubs. In some cases,
the Companys employees serve as officers
and/or
directors of these associations and clubs in accordance with
their by-laws and associated regulations. Management fee revenue
is recognized when earned in accordance with the terms of the
contract and is recorded as a component of service fees and
membership on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of
Income. The costs, which principally relate to the payroll costs
for management of the associations, clubs and the resort
properties where the Company is the employer, are reflected as a
component of operating expenses on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income. Reimbursements are based upon the costs
incurred with no added margin and thus presentation of these
reimbursable costs has little to no effect on the Companys
operating income. Management fee revenue and revenue related to
reimbursements were $112 million and $141 million in
2006, respectively, $91 million and $124 million in
2005, respectively, and $95 million and $103 million
in 2004, respectively. In 2006, 2005 and 2004, one of the
associations that the Company manages paid RCI Global Vacation
Network (vacation exchange and rentals) $13 million,
$11 million and $9 million, respectively, for exchange
services.
The Company records lodging-related marketing and reservation
revenues, as well as property management services revenues for
the Companys Lodging and Vacation Ownership segments, in
accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue
99-19,
Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an
Agent, which requires that these revenues be recorded on a
gross basis.
Income
Taxes
The Companys operations were included in the consolidated
federal tax return of Cendant up to the date of the Separation.
In addition, the Company has filed consolidated and unitary
state income tax returns with Cendant in jurisdictions where
required or permitted. The income taxes associated with the
Companys inclusion in Cendants consolidated federal
and state income tax returns are included in the due from former
Parent and subsidiaries line item on the accompanying
Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheets. The provision for
income taxes is computed as if the Company filed its federal and
state income tax returns on a stand-alone basis and, therefore,
determined using the asset and liability method, under which
deferred tax assets and liabilities are calculated based upon
the temporary differences between the financial statement and
income tax bases of assets and liabilities using currently
enacted tax rates. These differences are based upon estimated
differences between the book and tax basis of the assets and
liabilities for the Company as of December 31, 2006 and
2005. The Companys tax assets and liabilities may be
adjusted in connection with the finalization of Cendants
prior years income tax returns.
The Companys deferred tax assets are recorded net of a
valuation allowance when, based on the weight of available
evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of
the recorded deferred tax assets will not be realized in future
periods. Decreases to the valuation allowance are recorded as
reductions to the Companys provision for income taxes and
increases to the valuation allowance result in additional
provision for income taxes. However, if the valuation allowance
is adjusted in connection with an acquisition, such adjustment
is recorded through goodwill rather than the provision for
income taxes. The realization of the Companys deferred tax
assets, net of the valuation allowance, is primarily dependent
on estimated future taxable income. A change in the
Companys estimate of future taxable income may require an
addition to or reduction from the valuation allowance.
F-11
Cash and
Cash Equivalents
The Company considers highly-liquid investments purchased with
an original maturity of three months or less to be cash
equivalents.
Restricted
Cash
Restricted cash consists of deposits received on sales of VOIs
that are held in escrow until a certificate of occupancy is
obtained, the legal rescission period has expired and the deed
of trust has been recorded in governmental property ownership
records, as well as separately held amounts based upon the terms
of the securitizations. Such amounts were $147 million and
$143 million as of December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively, of which $57 million and $42 million,
respectively, are recorded within other current assets and
$90 million and $101 million, respectively, are
recorded within other non-current assets on the Consolidated and
Combined Balance Sheets.
Receivable
Valuation
Trade
receivables
The Companys vacation exchange and rentals and lodging
businesses provide for estimated bad debts based on their
assessment of the ultimate realizability of receivables,
considering historical collection experience, the economic
environment and specific customer information. When the Company
determines that an account is not collectible, the account is
written-off to the allowance for doubtful accounts. Such
write-offs amounted to $57 million, $34 million and
$36 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Bad debt
expense is recorded in operating or marketing and reservation
expenses on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income
and amounted to $58 million, $51 million and
$43 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Vacation
ownership contract receivables
Within the Companys vacation ownership business, the
Company provides for estimated vacation ownership contract
receivable cancellations and defaults at the time the VOI sales
are recorded, by reducing VOI sales with a charge to the
provision for loan losses on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income. Prior to 2006, the provision for loan
losses was presented as expense on the Combined Statements of
Income. Upon the adoption of SFAS No. 152 and
SOP 04-2
on January 1, 2006, the provision for loan losses is now
classified as a reduction of vacation ownership interest sales
on the Consolidated Statement of Income. The Company considers
factors including economic conditions, defaults, past due aging
and historical write-offs of vacation ownership contract
receivables to evaluate the adequacy of the allowance. The
Company charges vacation ownership contract receivables to the
loan loss allowance when they become 90, 120 or 150 days
contractually past due depending on the percentage of the
contract price already paid or are deemed uncollectible.
Loyalty
Programs
The Company operates the TripRewards and RCI Elite Rewards
loyalty programs. Members of both programs accumulate points by
purchasing everyday products and services from the various
businesses that participate in the program. TripRewards members
also accumulate points by staying in hotels franchised under one
of the Companys lodging brands (excluding Wyndham Hotels
and Resorts).
Members may redeem their points for hotel stays, airline
tickets, rental cars, resort vacation, electronics, sporting
goods, movie and theme park tickets and gift certificates. The
points cannot be redeemed for cash. The Company earns revenue
from the TripRewards program when a member stays at a
participating hotel, from a fee charged by the Company to the
franchisee, which is based upon a percentage
F-12
of room revenue generated from such stay. This fee is
incremental to the standard franchise, marketing and reservation
fees charged by the Company. The Company earns revenue from the
RCI Elite Rewards program based upon a percentage of the
members spending on the credit cards and such revenue is
paid to the Company by a third-party issuing bank. The Company
also incurs costs to support these programs, which primarily
relate to marketing expenses to promote the programs, costs to
administer the programs and costs of members redemptions.
As members earn points through the Companys loyalty
programs, the Company records a liability of the estimated
future redemption costs, which is calculated based on (i) a
cost per point and (ii) an estimated redemption rate of the
overall points earned, which is determined through historical
experience, current trends and the use of an independent
third-party valuation firm. Revenues relating to the loyalty
programs are recorded in other revenue in the Consolidated and
Combined Statements of Income and amounted to $71 million,
$56 million and $23 million while total expenses
amounted to $56 million, $49 million and
$23 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The
points liability as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 amounted
to $43 million and $39 million, respectively, and is
included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities and
other non-current liabilities in the Consolidated and Combined
Balance Sheets.
Inventory
Inventory primarily consists of real estate and development
costs of completed VOIs, VOIs under construction, land held for
future VOI development, vacation ownership properties and
vacation credits. Inventory is stated at the lower of cost,
including capitalized interest, property taxes and certain other
carrying costs incurred during the construction process, or net
realizable value. Capitalized interest was $16 million,
$7 million and $5 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively.
Advertising
Expense
Advertising costs are generally expensed in the period incurred.
Advertising expenses, recorded primarily within marketing and
reservation expenses on the Consolidated and Combined Statements
of Income, were $90 million, $66 million and
$61 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Use of
Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of the Consolidated and Combined Financial
Statements requires the Company to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities in the Consolidated and
Combined Financial Statements and accompanying notes. Although
these estimates and assumptions are based on the Companys
knowledge of current events and actions the Company may
undertake in the future, actual results may ultimately differ
from estimates and assumptions.
Derivative
Instruments
The Company uses derivative instruments as part of its overall
strategy to manage its exposure to market risks primarily
associated with fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates
and interest rates. As a matter of policy, the Company does not
use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. All
derivatives are recorded at fair value either as assets or
liabilities. Changes in fair value of derivatives not designated
as hedging instruments and of derivatives designated as fair
value hedging instruments are recognized currently in earnings
and included either as a component of other revenues or interest
expense, based upon the nature of the hedged item, in the
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income. The effective
portion of changes in fair value of derivatives designated as
cash flow hedging instruments is recorded as a component of
other comprehensive income. The ineffective portion is reported
currently in earnings as a component of revenues or net interest
expense, based upon the nature of the hedged item. Amounts
included in other
F-13
comprehensive income are reclassified into earnings in the same
period during which the hedged item affects earnings.
Certain derivative instruments used to manage interest rate
risks of the Company prior to the Separation were entered into
on behalf of the Company by Cendant. The fair value of the
instruments was recorded on Cendants Consolidated Balance
Sheets and passed to the Company through the related party
accounts, which are presented on the Consolidated and Combined
Balance Sheets within the due from former Parent and
subsidiaries line item. The derivatives that were designated as
cash flow hedging instruments by Cendant did not qualify for
hedge accounting treatment on the Consolidated and Combined
Financial Statements as the derivative remained on
Cendants balance sheet and the underlying debt instrument
resides on the Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements.
Therefore, any changes in fair value of these instruments were
recognized in the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income.
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment (including leasehold improvements) are
recorded at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and
amortization. Depreciation, recorded as a component of
depreciation and amortization on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income, is computed utilizing the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets.
Amortization of leasehold improvements, also recorded as a
component of depreciation and amortization, is computed
utilizing the straight-line method over the estimated benefit
period of the related assets or the lease term, if shorter.
Useful lives are generally 30 years for buildings, up to
15 years for leasehold improvements, from 20 to
30 years for vacation rental properties and from three to
seven years for furniture, fixtures and equipment.
The Company capitalizes the costs of software developed for
internal use in accordance with Statement of Position
No. 98-1,
Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or
Obtained for Internal Use. Capitalization of software
developed for internal use commences during the development
phase of the project. The Company amortizes software developed
or obtained for internal use on a straight-line basis, from
three to five years, commencing when such software is
substantially ready for use. The net carrying value of software
developed or obtained for internal use was $82 million and
$56 million as of December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
In connection with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets
(SFAS No. 142), the Company is required to
assess goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets for
impairment annually, or more frequently if circumstances
indicate impairment may have occurred. The Company assesses
goodwill for such impairment by comparing the carrying value of
its reporting units to their fair values. Each of the
Companys reportable segments represents a reporting unit.
The Company determines the fair value of its reporting units
utilizing discounted cash flows and incorporates assumptions
that it believes marketplace participants would utilize. When
available and as appropriate, the Company uses comparative
market multiples and other factors to corroborate the discounted
cash flow results. Other indefinite-lived intangible assets are
tested for impairment and written down to fair value, if
necessary, as required by SFAS No. 142. The Company
performs its annual impairment testing in the fourth quarter of
each year subsequent to completing its annual forecasting
process. In performing this test, the Company determines fair
value using the present value of expected future cash flows.
The Company evaluates the recoverability of its other long-lived
assets, including amortizable intangible assets, if
circumstances indicate an impairment may have occurred pursuant
to SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment
or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. This analysis is
performed by comparing the respective carrying values of the
assets to the current and expected future cash flows, on an
undiscounted basis, to be generated from such assets. Property
and equipment is evaluated separately within each business. If
such analysis indicates that the carrying value of these assets
is not recoverable, the
F-14
carrying value of such assets is reduced to fair value through a
charge to the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income.
During the fourth quarter of 2006, the Company announced that it
would change its Fairfield Resorts and Trendwest branding to
Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham, respectively.
As a result, the Company recorded an impairment charge of
$11 million in its Vacation Ownership Segment relating to
the rebranding initiatives. A third party valuation analysis was
performed utilizing future cash flows of the underlying
trademarks to arrive at the trademarks fair value. The
resulting impairment charge was recorded as a component of
separation and related costs within the Consolidated and
Combined Statements of Income. In addition, the remaining
trademark value of $2 million will be amortized over the
next 12 months. There were no impairments relating to
intangible assets or other long-lived assets during 2005 or 2004.
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consists of
accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments,
accumulated unrealized gains and losses on derivative
instruments designated as cash flow hedges and pension related
costs. Foreign currency translation adjustments exclude income
taxes related to indefinite investments in foreign subsidiaries.
Assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries having
non-U.S.-dollar
functional currencies are translated at exchange rates at the
Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheet dates. Revenues and
expenses are translated at average exchange rates during the
periods presented. The gains or losses resulting from
translating foreign currency financial statements into
U.S. dollars, net of hedging gains or losses and taxes, are
included in accumulated other comprehensive income on the
Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheets. Gains or losses
resulting from foreign currency transactions are included in the
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income.
Stock-Based
Compensation
On January 1, 2003, Cendant adopted the fair value method
of accounting for stock-based compensation provisions of
SFAS No. 123. Cendant and the Company also adopted
SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation Transition and Disclosure, in its
entirety as of January 1, 2003, which amended
SFAS No. 123 to provide alternative methods of
transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method
of accounting provisions. As a result, all employee stock awards
have been expensed over their vesting periods based upon the
fair value of the award on the date of grant. As Cendant elected
to use the prospective transition method, Cendant allocated
expense to the Company only for employee stock awards that were
granted subsequent to December 31, 2002. See
Note 16 Stock-Based Compensation for more
information.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123
(revised 2004), Share-Based Payment
(SFAS No. 123(R)), which eliminates the
alternative to measure stock-based compensation awards using the
intrinsic value approach permitted by APB Opinion No. 25
and by SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation. The Company adopted
SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006, which
required the Company to measure all employee stock-based
compensation awards using a fair value method and record the
related expense in the financial statements. The Company elected
to use the modified prospective transition method, which
requires that compensation cost be recognized in the financial
statements for all awards granted after the date of adoption as
well as for existing awards for which the requisite service has
not been rendered as of the date of adoption and requires that
prior periods not be restated. Because the Company was allocated
stock-based compensation expense for all outstanding employee
stock awards prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R),
the adoption of such standard did not have a material impact on
the Companys results of operations.
In October 2005, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
(FSP)
No. 123R-2,
Practical Accommodation to the Application of Grant Date as
Defined in FASB Statement No. 123R (FSP
123R-2), to provide guidance on determining the grant date
for an award as defined in SFAS No. 123(R). FSP 123R-2
F-15
stipulates that, assuming all other criteria in the grant date
definition are met, a mutual understanding of the key terms and
conditions of an award to an individual employee is presumed to
exist upon the awards approval in accordance with the
relevant corporate governance requirements, provided that the
key terms and conditions of an award (i) cannot be
negotiated by the recipient with the employer because the award
is a unilateral grant and (ii) are expected to be
communicated to an individual recipient within a relatively
short time period from the date of approval. The Company has
applied the principles set forth in FSP 123R-2 in connection
with its adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) on
January 1, 2006.
Paragraph 81 of SFAS No. 123(R) requires an
entity to calculate the pool of excess tax benefits available to
absorb tax deficiencies recognized subsequent to adopting
SFAS No. 123(R) (APIC Pool). In November
2005, the FASB issued FSP
No. 123R-3,
Transition Election Related to Accounting for the Tax Effects
of Share-Based Payment Awards (FSP 123R-3), to
provide an alternative transition election related to accounting
for the tax effects of share-based payment awards to employees
to the guidance provided in Paragraph 81 of
SFAS No. 123(R). The Company elected to adopt the
transition method described in FSP 123R-3. Utilizing the
calculation method described in FSP 123R-3, the Company
calculated its APIC Pool as of January 1, 2006 associated
with stock options that were fully vested as of
December 31, 2005. The impact on the APIC Pool for stock
options that are partially vested at, or granted subsequent to,
December 31, 2005 is being determined in accordance with
SFAS No. 123(R).
In connection with the distribution of the shares of common
stock of Wyndham to Cendant stockholders, on July 31, 2006,
the Compensation Committee of Cendants Board of Directors
approved the full vesting of all Cendant equity awards
(including Wyndham awards granted as an adjustment to such
Cendant equity awards) on August 15, 2006. As a result of
the acceleration of the vesting of these awards, the Company
recorded non-cash compensation expense of $45 million
during the third quarter of 2006. In connection with the
acceleration of the equity awards, an APIC Pool detriment of
$9 million was created as the tax deduction of the equity
awards was lower than the deferred tax asset recognized. As of
January 1, 2006, the Company had no APIC Pool. During 2006,
the Company created an APIC Pool of approximately
$2 million through other vesting activities. As a result of
the write off of the $9 million excess deferred tax asset,
the Company recorded a tax provision of $7 million on its
Consolidated Statement of Income during the year ended
December 31, 2006 and a reduction to additional paid-in
capital of $2 million on its Consolidated Balance Sheet as
of December 31, 2006.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Vacation Ownership Transactions. In December
2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 152 in connection with
the issuance of the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants
SOP 04-2.
SFAS No. 152 provides guidance on revenue recognition
for vacation ownership transactions, accounting and presentation
for the uncollectibility of vacation ownership contract
receivables, accounting for costs of sales of vacation ownership
interests and related costs, accounting for operations during
holding periods and other transactions associated with vacation
ownership operations.
The Companys revenue recognition policy for vacation
ownership transactions has historically required a 10% minimum
down payment (initial investment) as a prerequisite to
recognizing revenue on the sale of a vacation ownership
interest. SFAS No. 152 requires that the Company
consider the fair value of certain incentives provided to the
buyer when assessing whether such threshold has been achieved.
If the buyers investment has not met the minimum
investment criteria of SFAS No. 152, the revenue
associated with the sale of the vacation ownership interest and
the related cost of sales and direct costs are deferred until
the buyers commitment satisfies the requirements of
SFAS No. 152. In addition, certain costs previously
included in the Companys
percentage-of-completion
calculation prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 152 are
now expensed as incurred rather than deferred until the
corresponding revenue is recognized.
SFAS No. 152 requires the Company to record the
estimate of uncollectible vacation ownership contract
receivables, without consideration of estimated inventory
recoveries, at the time a vacation ownership transaction is
consummated as a reduction of net revenue. Prior to the adoption
of SFAS No. 152, the Company recorded such provisions
within operating expense on the Consolidated and Combined
F-16
Statements of Income. SFAS No. 152 also requires a
change in accounting for inventory and cost of sales such that
cost of sales is allocated based on a relative sales value
method, under which cost of sales is calculated as an estimated
percentage of net sales.
SFAS No. 152 also requires that revenue in excess of
costs associated with the rental of unsold units be accounted
for as a reduction to the carrying value of vacation ownership
inventory (which reduces the cost of such inventory when it is
sold) and that costs in excess of revenues associated with the
rental of unsold units be charged to expense as incurred. Prior
to the adoption of SFAS No. 152, rental revenues and
expenses were separately recorded in the Consolidated and
Combined Statements of Income.
The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 152
effective January 1, 2006, as required, and recorded an
after tax charge of $65 million during the first quarter of
2006 as a cumulative effect of an accounting change, which
consisted of (i) a pre-tax charge of $105 million
representing the deferral of revenue, costs associated with
sales of vacation ownership interests that were recognized prior
to January 1, 2006 and the recognition of certain expenses
that were previously deferred and (ii) an associated tax
benefit of $40 million. Excluding the impact of the
cumulative effect of an accounting change, the impact of
SFAS No. 152 on the Companys 2006 results was a
reduction of revenues of $208 million and an increase to
net income of $6 million ($0.03 increase in diluted
earnings per share). There was no impact to cash flows from the
adoption of SFAS No. 152.
Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. In
May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154,
Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, a replacement of
APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3
(SFAS No. 154). SFAS No. 154
requires retrospective application to prior periods
financial statements of a voluntary change in accounting
principle unless it is impracticable. APB Opinion No. 20,
Accounting Changes, previously required that most
voluntary changes in accounting principle be recognized by
including in net income of the period of the change the
cumulative effect of changing to the new accounting principle.
SFAS No. 154 became effective for the Company on
January 1, 2006. There was no impact to the Consolidated
and Combined Financial Statements from the adoption of
SFAS No. 154.
Accounting for Servicing of Financial
Assets. In March 2006, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of
Financial Assets an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 140 (SFAS No. 156).
SFAS No. 156 requires an entity to recognize a
servicing asset or servicing liability each time it undertakes
an obligation to service a financial asset by entering into a
servicing contract and requires all separately recognized
servicing assets and servicing liabilities to be initially
measured at fair value, if practicable. SFAS No. 156
will become effective for the Company on January 1, 2007.
The Company believes that the adoption of SFAS No. 156
will not have a material impact on its Consolidated and Combined
Financial Statements.
Variability to Be Considered in Applying FASB Interpretation
No. 46(R). In April 2006, the FASB issued
FASB Staff Position (FSP)
FIN 46R-6,
Determining the Variability to Be Considered in Applying
FASB Interpretation
No. 46(R)(FIN 46R-6).
FIN 46R-6
addresses certain implementation issues related to FASB
Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003),
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
(FIN 46R). Specifically,
FIN 46R-6
addresses how a reporting enterprise should determine the
variability to be considered in applying FIN 46R. The
variability that is considered in applying FIN 46R affects
the determination of (i) whether an entity is a VIE,
(ii) which interests are variable interests in
the entity, and (iii) which party, if any, is the primary
beneficiary of the VIE. Such variability affects any calculation
of expected losses and expected residual returns, if such a
calculation is necessary. The Company is required to apply the
guidance in
FIN 46R-6
prospectively to all entities (including newly created entities)
and to all entities previously required to be analyzed under
FIN 46R when a reconsideration event has
occurred, beginning on July 1, 2006. The application of
such guidance had no impact on the Consolidated and Combined
Financial Statements.
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. In
June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(FIN 48), which is an interpretation of
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes.
FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement
attribute for the financial statement recognition and
F-17
measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a
tax return. For those benefits to be recognized, a tax position
must be more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination by
taxing authorities. The amount recognized is measured as the
largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent
likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company
will adopt the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1,
2007, as required. The Companys adoption of FIN 48 is
expected to result in a decrease to stockholders equity as
of January 1, 2007 of between $15 million to
$25 million.
Fair Value Measurements. In September 2006,
the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS No. 157).
SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about
fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 explains the
definition of fair value as the price that would be received to
sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
SFAS No. 157 clarifies the principle that fair value
should be based on the assumptions market participants would use
when pricing the asset or liability and establishes a fair value
hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those
assumptions. The Company plans to adopt SFAS No. 157
on January 1, 2008, as required, and is currently assessing
the impact of such adoption on its Consolidated and Combined
Financial Statements.
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
Other Postretirement Plans. In September 2006,
the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans an amendment of SFAS No. 87, 88, 106
and 132(R) (SFAS No. 158).
SFAS No. 158 requires the Company to recognize the
overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit
postretirement plan as an asset or liability in its statement of
financial position and recognize changes in the funded status in
the year in which the changes occur. The Company adopted
SFAS No. 158 effective December 31, 2006, as
required. The impact of such standard was immaterial on pension
liabilities or accumulated other comprehensive income.
Effects of Prior Year Misstatements. In
September 2006, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of
Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in
Current Year Financial Statements
(SAB 108). SAB 108 was issued in order to
eliminate the diversity of practice in how public companies
quantify misstatements of financial statements, including
misstatements that were not material to prior years
financial statements. The Company adopted the provisions of
SAB 108 effective December 31, 2006, as required. The
adoption of such provisions did not impact the Consolidated and
Combined Financial Statements.
The computation of basic and diluted earnings per share
(EPS) is based on the Companys net income (and
other comparable earnings measures) divided by the basic
weighted average number of common shares and diluted weighted
average number of common shares, respectively. On July 31,
2006, the Separation from Cendant was completed in a tax-free
distribution to the Companys stockholders of one share of
Wyndham common stock for every five shares of Cendant common
stock held on July 21, 2006. As a result, on July 31,
2006, the Company had 200,362,113 shares of common stock
outstanding. This share amount has been utilized for the
calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share for all
periods presented prior to the date of Separation.
F-18
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and
diluted EPS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
$
|
352
|
|
|
$
|
431
|
|
|
$
|
349
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
change, net of tax
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
$
|
431
|
|
|
$
|
349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares
outstanding
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
Stock options and restricted stock
units
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares
outstanding
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per
share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
$
|
1.78
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
change, net of tax
|
|
|
(0.33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per
share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
change, net of tax
|
|
|
(0.33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1.44
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The computations of diluted net income per common share
available to common stockholders for the year ended
December 31, 2006 do not include approximately
16 million stock options and stock-settled stock
appreciation rights (SSARs), as the effect of their
inclusion would have been anti-dilutive to earnings per share.
Assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations
were recorded on the Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheets as
of the respective acquisition dates based upon their estimated
fair values at such dates. The results of operations of
businesses acquired by the Company have been included in the
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income since their
respective dates of acquisition. The excess of the purchase
price over the estimated fair values of the underlying assets
acquired and liabilities assumed was allocated to goodwill. In
certain circumstances, the allocations of the excess purchase
price are based upon preliminary estimates and assumptions.
Accordingly, the allocations may be subject to revision when the
Company receives final information, including appraisals and
other analyses. Any revisions to the fair values during the
allocation period, which may be significant, will be recorded by
the Company as further adjustments to the purchase price
allocations. The Company is also in the process of integrating
the operations of its acquired businesses and expects to incur
costs relating to such integrations. These costs may result from
integrating operating systems, relocating employees, closing
facilities, reducing duplicative efforts and exiting and
consolidating other activities. These costs will be recorded on
the Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheets as adjustments to
the purchase price or on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income as expenses, as appropriate.
2006
Acquisitions
Baymont. On April 7, 2006, the Company
completed the acquisition of the Baymont Inn & Suites
brand (Baymont), a system of 115 independently-owned
franchised properties, for approximately $60 million in
cash. The purchase price resulted in the recognition of
$47 million of trademarks and $14 million of franchise
agreements, both of which were assigned to the Companys
Lodging segment. Management believes this acquisition solidifies
the Companys presence in the growing midscale lodging
segment.
F-19
Other. On July 20, 2006, the Company
acquired a vacation ownership and resort management business for
aggregate consideration of $43 million in cash. The
goodwill resulting from the preliminary allocation of the
purchase price for this acquisition aggregated $34 million,
none of which is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
Such goodwill was allocated to the Companys Vacation
Ownership segment. This acquisition also resulted in
$12 million of other amortizable intangible assets
(primarily customer lists).
2005
Acquisitions
Wyndham. On October 11, 2005, the Company
acquired the franchise and property management business
associated with the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand for
$113 million in cash. The acquisition includes franchise
agreements, management contracts and the worldwide rights to the
Wyndham brand. This acquisition resulted in goodwill of
$24 million, all of which is expected to be deductible for
tax purposes. Such goodwill was allocated to the Companys
Lodging segment. This acquisition also resulted in
$85 million of other intangible assets, such as trademarks
and franchise agreements. This acquisition added an upscale
brand to the Companys lodging portfolio and also
represented the Companys entry into hotel property
management services.
Other. During 2005, the Company also acquired
three other individually non-significant businesses for
aggregate consideration of $36 million in cash. The
goodwill resulting from the allocation of the purchase prices of
these acquisitions aggregated $21 million, $1 million
of which is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. The
goodwill was allocated to the Vacation Exchange and Rentals
($4 million) and Vacation Ownership ($17 million)
segments. These acquisitions also resulted in $1 million of
other intangible assets.
2004
Acquisitions
Two Flags Joint Venture LLC. In 2002, the
Company formed Two Flags Joint Venture LLC (Two
Flags) through the contribution of its domestic Days Inn
trademark and related license agreements. The Company did not
contribute any other assets to Two Flags. The Company then sold
49.9999% of Two Flags to Marriott in exchange for the
contribution to Two Flags of the domestic Ramada trademark and
related license agreements. The Company retained a 50.0001%
controlling equity interest in Two Flags. Both Marriott and the
Company had the right, but were not obligated, to cause the sale
of Marriotts interest at any time after March 1, 2004
for approximately $200 million, which represented the
projected fair market value of Marriotts interest at such
time. On April 1, 2004, the Company exercised its right to
purchase Marriotts interest in Two Flags for approximately
$200 million. In connection with such transaction, the
Company assumed a note payable of approximately
$200 million, bearing interest at 10%, which was paid in
September 2004. As a result, the Company now owns 100% of Two
Flags and has exclusive rights to the domestic Ramada and Days
Inn trademarks and the related license agreements. This
acquisition added a well-known middle market brand to the
Companys lodging portfolio.
Pursuant to the terms of the venture, the Company and Marriott
shared income from Two Flags on a substantially equal basis. For
the period January 1, 2004 through April 1, 2004 (the
date on which the Company purchased Marriotts interest)
the Company recorded pre-tax minority interest expense of
$6 million in connection with Two Flags.
Ramada International. On December 10,
2004, the Company acquired Ramada International, which included
the international franchise rights of the Ramada hotel chain for
$38 million in cash. The allocation of the purchase price
resulted in goodwill of $2 million, all of which is
expected to be deductible for tax purposes. Such goodwill was
allocated to the Companys Lodging segment. This
acquisition also resulted in $33 million of other
intangible assets. As a result of this acquisition, the Company
obtained the worldwide rights to the Ramada trademark and a
platform to expand direct franchising internationally.
Landal GreenParks. On May 5, 2004, the
Company acquired Landal GreenParks, a Dutch vacation rental
company that specializes in the rental of privately-owned
vacation homes located in European holiday parks, for
$81 million in cash, net of cash acquired of
$22 million. As part of this acquisition, the Company
F-20
also assumed $78 million of debt. The allocation of the
purchase price resulted in goodwill of $56 million, of
which $7 million is expected to be deductible for tax
purposes. Such goodwill was allocated to the Companys
Vacation Exchange and Rentals segment. This acquisition also
resulted in $41 million of other intangible assets.
Management believed that this acquisition offered the Company
increased access to both the Dutch and German consumer markets,
as well as rental properties in high demand locations.
Canvas Holidays Limited. On October 8,
2004, the Company acquired Canvas Holidays Limited, a tour
operator based in Scotland, for $51 million in cash. This
acquisition resulted in goodwill of $25 million, none of
which is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. Such
goodwill was allocated to the Companys Vacation Exchange
and Rentals segment. This acquisition also resulted in
$8 million of other intangible assets. Management believed
that this acquisition broadened the Companys product depth
in the European vacation market.
Other. During 2004, the Company also acquired
one other non-significant business for $8 million in cash.
The goodwill resulting from the allocation of the purchase price
of this acquisition was $4 million, none of which is
expected to be deductible for tax purposes, and was allocated to
the Vacation Exchange and Rentals segment. This acquisition also
resulted in $1 million of other intangible assets.
Intangible assets consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Unamortized
Intangible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
2,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks(a)
|
|
$
|
619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized Intangible
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchise
agreements(b)
|
|
$
|
596
|
|
|
$
|
238
|
|
|
$
|
358
|
|
|
$
|
573
|
|
|
$
|
220
|
|
|
$
|
353
|
|
Other(c)
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
678
|
|
|
$
|
259
|
|
|
$
|
419
|
|
|
$
|
734
|
|
|
$
|
322
|
|
|
$
|
412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Comprised of various trade names
(including the worldwide Wyndham Hotels and Resorts, Ramada,
Days Inn, RCI, Landal GreenParks, Fairfield, Trendwest, and
Baymont Inn & Suites trade names) that the Company has
acquired and which distinguishes the Companys consumer
services. These trade names are expected to generate future cash
flows for an indefinite period of time.
|
|
(b) |
|
Generally amortized over a period
ranging from 20 to 40 years with a weighted average life of
35 years.
|
|
(c) |
|
Includes customer lists and
business contracts, generally amortized over a period ranging
from 10 to 30 years with a weighted average life of
19 years, and trademarks, amortized over the next
12 months. During 2006, the Company wrote off
$100 million of fully amortized customer lists at the
Companys Vacation Exchange and Rentals business.
|
During the fourth quarter of 2006, the Company recorded an
$11 million impairment charge due to a rebranding
initiative for its Fairfield and Trendwest trademarks (see
Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies Impairment of Long-Lived Assets for more
information). The remaining $2 million of trademarks for
Fairfield and Trendwest have been reclassified into Other
Amortized Intangible Assets.
F-21
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
to Goodwill
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Balance as of
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
during 2006
|
|
|
during 2005
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
241
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
(b)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
245
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
1,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
(c)
|
|
|
1,116
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
1,322
|
|
|
|
34
|
(a)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)(d)
|
|
|
1,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company
|
|
$
|
2,645
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
2,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Relates to the acquisition of a
vacation ownership and resort management business (see
Note 4 Acquisitions).
|
|
(b) |
|
Relates to the acquisition of the
Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand (see Note 4
Acquisitions).
|
|
(c) |
|
Primarily relates to foreign
exchange translation adjustments.
|
|
(d) |
|
Relates to the settlement of the
ultimate tax basis of acquired assets with the tax authority.
|
Amortization expense relating to all intangible assets was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Franchise agreements
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
Other
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total(*)
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
Included as a component of
depreciation and amortization on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income.
|
Based on the Companys amortizable intangible assets as of
December 31, 2006, the Company expects related amortization
expense for the five succeeding fiscal years to approximate
$24 million, $23 million and $22 million during
2007, 2008, and 2009, respectively, and $21 million during
both 2010 and 2011.
|
|
6.
|
Franchising
and Marketing/Reservation Activities
|
Franchise fee revenue of $501 million, $434 million
and $393 million on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income for 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively,
includes initial franchise fees of $7 million,
$7 million and $6 million, respectively.
As part of the ongoing franchise fees, the Company receives
marketing and reservation fees from its lodging franchisees,
which generally are calculated based on a specified percentage
of gross room revenues. Such fees totaled $223 million,
$189 million and $171 million during 2006, 2005 and
2004, respectively, and are recorded within the franchise fees
line item on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income.
As provided for in the franchise agreements, all of these fees
are to be expended for marketing purposes or the operation of an
international, centralized, brand-specific reservation system
for the respective franchisees. Additionally, the Company is
required to provide certain services to its franchisees,
including access to an international, centralized,
brand-specific reservation system, advertising, promotional and
co-marketing programs, referrals, technology, training and
volume purchasing.
F-22
The number of franchised lodging outlets in operation by market
sector is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
Upscale(a)
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middle(b)
|
|
|
1,727
|
|
|
|
1,634
|
|
|
|
1,719
|
|
Economy(c)
|
|
|
4,647
|
|
|
|
4,613
|
|
|
|
4,680
|
|
Managed, Non-Proprietary Hotels(d)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,473
|
|
|
|
6,348
|
|
|
|
6,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Comprised of the Wyndham Hotels and
Resorts lodging brand.
|
|
(b) |
|
Comprised of the Wingate Inn,
Ramada Worldwide, Howard Johnson, Baymont Inn & Suites
and AmeriHost Inn lodging brands.
|
|
(c) |
|
Comprised of the Days Inn,
Super 8, Travelodge and Knights Inn lodging brands.
|
|
(d) |
|
Includes properties managed under a
joint venture agreement with CHI Limited; thirteen of these
properties are scheduled to be rebranded or cobranded either as
Wyndham Hotels and Resorts or Ramada during 2007.
|
The number of franchised lodging outlets changed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
|
6,348
|
|
|
|
6,399
|
|
|
|
6,402
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
Terminations
|
|
|
(443
|
)
|
|
|
(509
|
)
|
|
|
(517
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
|
6,473
|
|
|
|
6,348
|
|
|
|
6,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to assist franchisees in converting to one of the
Companys brands or in franchise expansion, the Company may
also, at its discretion, provide development advances (over the
period of the franchise agreement typically ranging from 15 to
20 years) to franchisees who are either new or who are
expanding their operations. Provided the franchisee is in
compliance with the terms of the franchise agreement, all or a
portion of the amount of the development advance may be forgiven
by the Company. Otherwise, the related principal is due and
payable to the Company. In certain instances, the Company may
earn interest on unpaid franchisee development advances, which
was not significant during 2006, 2005 or 2004. The amount of
such development advances recorded on the Consolidated and
Combined Balance Sheets was $23 million and
$21 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. These amounts are classified within the other
non-current assets line item on the Consolidated and Combined
Balance Sheets. During 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company recorded
$3 million, $2 million and $3 million,
respectively, of expense related to the forgiveness of these
advances. Such amounts are recorded within the operating expense
line item on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income.
F-23
The income tax provision consists of the following for the year
ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
|
$
|
154
|
|
State
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
State
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income
taxes
|
|
$
|
190
|
|
|
$
|
195
|
|
|
$
|
234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to the Separation, the Company was part of a consolidated
group and was included in the Cendant consolidated tax returns.
The utilization of the Companys net operating loss
carryforwards by other Cendant companies is reflected in the
2006 and 2005 current provision.
Pre-tax income for domestic and foreign operations consisted of
the following for the year ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
493
|
|
|
$
|
543
|
|
|
$
|
493
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax income
|
|
$
|
542
|
|
|
$
|
626
|
|
|
$
|
587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-24
Current and non-current deferred income tax assets and
liabilities, as of December 31, are comprised of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
Current deferred income tax
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities and deferred
income
|
|
$
|
110
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
and vacation ownership contract receivables
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Valuation
allowance(*)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred income tax
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Unamortized servicing rights
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Installment sales of vacation
ownership interests
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
Other
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred income tax
liabilities
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current net deferred income tax
asset
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred income tax
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
Alternative minimum tax credit
carryforward
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
Tax basis differences in assets of
foreign subsidiaries
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
Accrued liabilities and deferred
income
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation
allowance(*)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred income tax
assets
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred income tax
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
464
|
|
Installment sales of vacation
ownership interests
|
|
|
618
|
|
|
|
475
|
|
Other
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred income tax
liabilities
|
|
|
1,096
|
|
|
|
1,036
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current net deferred income
tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
782
|
|
|
$
|
823
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
The valuation allowance of
$18 million as of December 31, 2006 primarily relates
to state net operating loss carryforwards. The valuation
allowance will be reduced when and if the Company determines
that the deferred income tax assets are more likely than not to
be realized. If determined to be realizable, $1 million of
the valuation allowance would reduce goodwill.
|
As of December 31, 2006, the Company had federal net
operating loss carryforwards of $50 million, which
primarily expire in 2026. No provision has been made for
U.S. federal deferred income taxes on $134 million of
accumulated and undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2006 since it is the present intention
of management to reinvest the undistributed earnings
indefinitely in those foreign operations. The determination of
the amount of unrecognized U.S. federal deferred income tax
liability for unremitted earnings is not practicable.
F-25
The Companys effective income tax rate differs from the
U.S. federal statutory rate as follows for the year ended
December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
Federal statutory rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State and local income taxes, net
of federal tax benefits
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
Changes in tax basis differences
in assets of foreign subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes on foreign operations at
rates different than U.S. federal statutory rates
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
Taxes on repatriated foreign
income, net of tax credits
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
Adjustment of estimated income tax
accruals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Release of guarantee liability
related to income taxes
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.1
|
%
|
|
|
31.2
|
%
|
|
|
39.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in the 2006 effective tax rate is primarily the
result of the absence of an increase in the tax basis of certain
foreign assets during 2005, partially offset by a
$15 million benefit recognized in 2006 resulting from a
change in the Companys 2005 state effective tax
rates. In March 2005, the Company entered into a foreign tax
restructuring where certain of its foreign subsidiaries were
considered liquidated for United States tax purposes. This
liquidation resulted in a taxable transaction which resulted in
an increase in the tax basis of the assets held by these
subsidiaries to their fair market value. This resulted in the
creation of a deferred tax asset and recognition of a deferred
tax benefit during 2005.
The Company believes that its accruals for tax liabilities
outlined in the Separation and Distribution Agreement are
adequate for all remaining open years, based on its assessment
of many factors including past experience and interpretations of
tax law applied to the facts of each matter. Although the
Company believes its recorded assets and liabilities are
reasonable, tax regulations are subject to interpretation and
tax litigation is inherently uncertain; therefore, the
Companys assessments can involve a series of complex
judgments about future events and rely heavily on estimates and
assumptions. While the Company believes that the estimates and
assumptions supporting its assessments are reasonable, the final
determination of tax audits and any related litigation could be
materially different than that which is reflected in historical
income tax provisions and recorded assets and liabilities. Based
on the results of an audit or litigation, a material effect on
the Companys income tax provision, net income, or cash
flows in the period or periods for which that determination is
made could result.
The Company is subject to income taxes in the United States and
several foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required
in determining the worldwide provision for income taxes and
recording related assets and liabilities. In the ordinary course
of business, there are many transactions and calculations where
the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. The Company is
regularly under audit by tax authorities whereby the outcome of
the audits is uncertain. Accruals for tax contingencies are
provided for in accordance with the requirements of
SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies
and are currently maintained on the Consolidated and Combined
Balance Sheets.
During the fourth quarter of 2006, Cendant and the Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) settled the IRS examination
for Cendants taxable years 1998 through 2002 during which
the Company was included in Cendants tax returns.
Accordingly, the Company reduced its contingent liabilities by
$15 million to reflect Cendants settlement with the
IRS. Such reduction was recorded in general and administrative
expenses on the Consolidated Statement of Income during the year
ended December 31, 2006. The IRS has opened an examination
for Cendants taxable years 2003 through 2006 during which
the Company was included in Cendants tax returns. Although
the Company and Cendant believe there is appropriate support for
the positions taken on its tax returns, the Company and Cendant
have recorded liabilities representing the best estimates of the
probable loss on certain positions. The Company and Cendant
believe that the accruals for tax liabilities are adequate for
all open years, based on assessment of many factors including
past experience and interpretations of tax law applied to the
facts of each matter. Although the Company and Cendant
F-26
believe the recorded assets and liabilities are reasonable, tax
regulations are subject to interpretation and tax litigation is
inherently uncertain; therefore, the Companys and
Cendants assessments can involve both a series of complex
judgments about future events and rely heavily on estimates and
assumptions. While the Company and Cendant believe that the
estimates and assumptions supporting the assessments are
reasonable, the final determination of tax audits and any other
related litigation could be materially different than that which
is reflected in historical income tax provisions and recorded
assets and liabilities. Based on the results of an audit or
litigation, a material effect on the Companys income tax
provision, net income, or cash flows in the period or periods
for which that determination is made could result.
|
|
8.
|
Vacation
Ownership Contract Receivables
|
The Company generates vacation ownership contract receivables by
extending financing to the purchasers of VOIs. Current and
long-term vacation ownership contract receivables, net as of
December 31, consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Current vacation ownership
contract receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized
|
|
$
|
201
|
|
|
$
|
180
|
|
Other
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current vacation ownership
contract receivables, net
|
|
$
|
257
|
|
|
$
|
239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term vacation ownership
contract receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized
|
|
$
|
1,545
|
|
|
$
|
1,198
|
|
Other
|
|
|
826
|
|
|
|
758
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,371
|
|
|
|
1,956
|
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(248
|
)
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term vacation ownership
contract receivables, net
|
|
$
|
2,123
|
|
|
$
|
1,835
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments that are contractually due on the
Companys vacation ownership contract receivables during
the next twelve months are classified as current on the
Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheets. Principal payments due
on the Companys vacation ownership contract receivables
during each of the five years subsequent to December 31,
2006 and thereafter are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
201
|
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
2008
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
298
|
|
2009
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
298
|
|
2010
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
2011
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
765
|
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
1,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,746
|
|
|
$
|
912
|
|
|
$
|
2,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The average interest rate on outstanding vacation ownership
contract receivables was 12.7% and 13.1% as of December 31,
2006 and 2005, respectively.
F-27
The activity in the allowance for loan losses related to
vacation ownership contract receivables is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses as of
January 1, 2004
|
|
$
|
(77
|
)
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
Contract receivables written-off,
net
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses as of
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(128
|
)(*)
|
Contract receivables written-off,
net
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses as of
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
Increase due to adoption of
SFAS No. 152
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted allowance for loan losses
as of January 1, 2006
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(259
|
)
|
Contract receivables written-off,
net
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses as of
December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
(278
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
Includes a $12 million
provision associated with estimated losses resulting from the
2005 Gulf Coast hurricanes.
|
The provision for loan losses during 2006 is not comparable to
such provision during 2005 or 2004 as a result of the adoption
of SFAS No. 152 as of January 1, 2006.
SFAS 152 requires the Company to reflect the provision for
loan losses on a gross basis including or excluding estimated
recoveries. During 2005 and 2004, estimated recoveries were
reflected as a reduction of the provision for loan losses.
Accordingly, the provision for loan losses during 2006 included
$115 million of estimated recoveries, which is now
reflected as an increase to VOI inventory.
Securitizations
The Company pools qualifying vacation ownership contract
receivables and sells them to bankruptcy-remote entities.
Vacation ownership contract receivables qualify for
securitization based primarily on the credit strength of the VOI
purchaser to whom financing has been extended. Prior to
September 1, 2003, sales of vacation ownership contract
receivables were treated as off-balance sheet sales as the
entities utilized were structured as bankruptcy-remote QSPEs
pursuant to SFAS No. 140 Accounting for
Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments
of Liabilities. Subsequent to September 1, 2003,
newly originated as well as certain legacy vacation ownership
contract receivables are securitized through bankruptcy-remote
SPEs that are consolidated within the Consolidated and Combined
Financial Statements.
On Balance Sheet. Vacation ownership contract
receivables securitized through the on-balance sheet,
bankruptcy-remote SPEs are consolidated within the Consolidated
and Combined Financial Statements (see Note 13
Long-Term Debt and Borrowing Arrangements). The Company
continues to service the securitized vacation ownership contract
receivables pursuant to servicing agreements negotiated on an
arms-length basis based on market conditions. The activities of
these bankruptcy-remote SPEs are limited to (i) purchasing
vacation ownership contract receivables from the Companys
vacation ownership subsidiaries, (ii) issuing debt
securities
and/or
borrowing under a conduit facility to affect such purchases and
(iii) entering into derivatives to hedge interest rate
exposure. The securitized assets of these bankruptcy-remote SPEs
are not available to pay the general obligations of the Company.
Additionally, the creditors of these SPEs have no recourse to
the Companys general credit. The Company has made
representations and warranties customary for securitization
transactions, including eligibility characteristics of the
receivables and servicing responsibilities, in connection with
the securitization of these assets (see Note 14
Commitments and Contingencies). The Company does not recognize
gains or losses resulting from these
F-28
securitizations at the time of sale to the on-balance sheet,
bankruptcy-remote SPE. Income is recognized when earned over the
contractual life of the vacation ownership contract receivables.
Off-Balance Sheet. Certain structures used by
the Company to securitize vacation ownership contract
receivables prior to September 1, 2003 were treated as
off-balance sheet sales, with the Company retaining the
servicing rights and a subordinated interest. These transactions
did not qualify for inclusion in the Consolidated and Combined
Financial Statements. As these securitization facilities are
precluded from consolidation pursuant to generally accepted
accounting principles, the debt issued by these entities and the
collateralizing assets, which are serviced by the Company, are
not reflected on the Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheets.
However, the retained interest, amounting to $3 million and
$13 million as of December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively, was recorded within other non-current assets on
the Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheets. The Company
continues to service the securitized vacation ownership contract
receivables pursuant to servicing agreements negotiated on an
arms-length basis based on market conditions. The assets of
these QSPEs are not available to pay the general obligations of
the Company. Additionally, the creditors of these QSPEs have no
recourse to the Companys general credit. However, the
Company has made representations and warranties customary for
securitization transactions, including eligibility
characteristics of the receivables and servicing
responsibilities, in connection with the securitization of these
assets (see Note 14 Commitments and
Contingencies). Presented below is detailed information as of
December 31, 2006 for these QSPEs (to which vacation
ownership contract receivables were sold prior to the
establishment of the on-balance sheet, bankruptcy-remote SPEs):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
Funding
|
|
Debt
|
|
Available
|
|
|
Serviced(a)
|
|
Capacity
|
|
Issued(b)
|
|
Capacity(c)
|
|
Vacation Ownership QSPEs
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents the balance of vacation
ownership contract receivables as of December 31, 2006, of
which $1 million is 60 days or more past due and which
had an average balance of $31 million during 2006. There
are no credit losses on securitized vacation ownership contract
receivables, since the Company typically has repurchased such
receivables from the QSPEs prior to delinquency, although it is
not obligated to do so.
|
|
(b) |
|
Represents term notes.
|
|
(c) |
|
Subject to maintaining sufficient
assets to collateralize debt.
|
The cash flow activity presented below covers the full year
activity between the Company and securitization entities that
were off-balance sheet during the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
Servicing fees received
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
Other cash flows received on
retained
interests(a)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Purchase of delinquent or
foreclosed
loans(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Cash received upon release of
reserve account
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Purchases of upgraded/defective
contracts(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents cash flows received on
retained interests other than servicing fees.
|
|
(b) |
|
The purchase of delinquent or
foreclosed vacation ownership contract receivables is primarily
at the Companys option and not based on a contractual
relationship with the securitization entities.
|
|
(c) |
|
Represents the purchase of
contracts that no longer meet the securitization criteria,
primarily due to modifications to the original contract as a
result of an upgrade by a current owner.
|
F-29
Inventory, as of December 31, consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Land held for VOI development
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
|
$
|
88
|
|
VOI construction in process
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
Completed inventory and vacation
credits
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventory
|
|
|
954
|
|
|
|
636
|
|
Less: Current portion
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current inventory
|
|
$
|
434
|
|
|
$
|
190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory that the Company expects to sell within the next
twelve months is classified as current on the Consolidated and
Combined Balance Sheets.
The inventory balance as of December 31, 2006 is not
comparable to the balance at December 31, 2005 as a result
of adopting SFAS No. 152 as of January 1, 2006.
Such change had the effect of increasing the Companys
inventory by $171 million for 2006 as compared to the prior
inventory costing method applied prior to the adoption of the
SFAS No. 152. In addition, changes in estimates
related to relative sales value resulted in a reduction of cost
of vacation ownership interests of $14 million during 2006.
|
|
10.
|
Property
and Equipment, net
|
Property and equipment, net, as of December 31, consisted
of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
153
|
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
Building and leasehold improvements
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
Capitalized software
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
Vacation rental property capital
leases
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
|
|
1,098
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation and
amortization
|
|
|
(503
|
)
|
|
|
(380
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
916
|
|
|
$
|
718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company recorded depreciation
and amortization expense of $113 million, $99 million
and $88 million, respectively, related to property and
equipment.
Other current assets, as of December 31, consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Non-trade receivables, net
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Other
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
239
|
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-30
|
|
12.
|
Accrued
Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities, as of
December 31, consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Accrued payroll and related
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
Accrued advertising and marketing
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
Accrued other
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
575
|
|
|
$
|
430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.
|
Long-Term
Debt and Borrowing Arrangements
|
Securitized and long-term debt as of December 31 consisted
of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Securitized vacation ownership
debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes
|
|
$
|
838
|
|
|
$
|
740
|
|
Bank conduit
facility(a)
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securitized vacation
ownership debt
|
|
|
1,463
|
|
|
|
1,135
|
|
Less: Current portion of
securitized vacation ownership debt
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term securitized vacation
ownership debt
|
|
$
|
1,285
|
|
|
$
|
981
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00% senior unsecured notes
(due December
2016)(b)
|
|
$
|
796
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Term loan (due July 2011)
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility (due
July
2011)(c)(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interim loan facility (due July
2007)(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation ownership asset-linked
debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
Bank borrowings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation ownership
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
Vacation rentals
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
Vacation rentals capital leases
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
Other
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
1,437
|
|
|
|
907
|
|
Less: Current portion of long-term
debt
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
1,322
|
|
|
$
|
706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents a
364-day
vacation ownership bank conduit facility, which the Company
renewed and upsized to $1,000 million on November 13,
2006. The borrowings under this bank conduit facility have a
maturity date of December 2009.
|
|
(b) |
|
These notes represent
$800 million aggregate principal less $4 million of
original issue discount.
|
|
(c) |
|
The revolving credit facility has a
total capacity of $900 million, which includes availability
for letters of credit. As of December 31, 2006, the Company
had $30 million of letters of credit outstanding and as
such, the total available capacity of the revolving credit
facility was $870 million.
|
|
(d) |
|
The Company entered into this
$800 million facility in July 2006. The outstanding
borrowings under this facility of $350 million were repaid
in December 2006 with a portion of the borrowings from the
Companys issuance of 6.00% senior unsecured notes.
|
F-31
The Companys outstanding debt as of December 31, 2006
matures as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
178
|
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
|
$
|
293
|
|
2008
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
2009
|
|
|
537
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
546
|
|
2010
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
2011
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
467
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
901
|
|
|
|
1,216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,463
|
|
|
$
|
1,437
|
|
|
$
|
2,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As debt maturities are based on the contractual payment terms of
the underlying vacation ownership contract receivables, actual
maturities may differ as a result of prepayments by the vacation
ownership contract receivable obligors.
The Companys revolving credit facility and unsecured term
loan contain various combinations of restrictive covenants,
including performance triggers and advance rates linked to the
quality of the underlying assets, financial reporting
requirements, restrictions on dividends, mergers and changes of
control and a requirement that the Company generate at least
$400 million of net income before depreciation and
amortization, interest expense (other than interest expense
relating to securitized vacation ownership borrowings), income
taxes and minority interest, determined quarterly for the
preceding twelve month period. The 6.00% senior unsecured
notes contain various covenants including limitations on liens,
limitations on sale and leasebacks, and change of control
restrictions. In addition, there are limitations on mergers,
consolidations and sales of all or substantially all assets.
Events of default in the notes include nonpayment of interest,
nonpayment of principal, breach of a covenant or warranty, cross
acceleration of debt in excess of $50 million, and
bankruptcy related matters. As of December 31, 2006, the
Company was in compliance with all financial covenants of its
borrowing arrangements.
F-32
As of December 31, 2006, available capacity under the
Companys borrowing arrangements was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
|
Capacity
|
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
Capacity
|
|
|
Securitized vacation ownership
debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes
|
|
$
|
838
|
|
|
$
|
838
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Bank conduit
facility(a)
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securitized vacation
ownership debt
|
|
$
|
1,838
|
|
|
$
|
1,463
|
|
|
$
|
375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00% senior unsecured notes
(due December 2016)
|
|
|
796
|
|
|
|
796
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan (due July 2011)
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility (due
July
2011)(b)
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
900
|
|
Bank borrowings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation ownership
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Vacation rentals
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Vacation rentals capital
leases(c)
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
2,412
|
|
|
$
|
1,437
|
|
|
|
975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Issuance of letters of
credit(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Capacity is subject to maintaining
sufficient assets to collateralize debt.
|
|
(b) |
|
The capacity under the
Companys revolving credit facility includes availability
for letters of credit. As of December 31, 2006, the total
capacity of $900 million was reduced by $30 million
for the issuance of letters of credit.
|
|
(c) |
|
These leases are recorded as
capital lease obligations with corresponding assets classified
within property and equipment on the Consolidated and Combined
Balance Sheets.
|
Securitized
Vacation Ownership Debt
As previously discussed in Note 8 Vacation
Ownership Contract Receivables, the Company issues debt through
the securitization of vacation ownership contract receivables.
The debt issued through these securitizations includes fixed
rate and floating rate term notes for which the weighted average
interest rate was 4.7%, 4.0% and 3.3% for 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively, and access to a $1,000 million bank conduit
facility, which is also used to securitize vacation ownership
contract receivables. This conduit facility bears interest at
variable rates and had a weighted average interest rate of 5.7%,
4.3% and 1.4% during 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. As of
December 31, 2006, the Companys securitized vacation
ownership debt is collateralized by $1,844 million of
underlying vacation ownership contract receivables and related
assets.
Interest expense incurred in connection with the Companys
securitized vacation ownership debt amounted to
$70 million, $46 million and $36 million during
2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and is recorded within the
operating expenses line item on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income as the Company earns consumer finance
income on the related securitized vacation ownership contract
receivables.
Other
6.00% Senior Unsecured Notes. The
Companys 6.00% notes, with face value of
$800 million, were issued in December 2006 for net proceeds
of $796 million. The notes are redeemable at the
Companys option at any time, in whole or in part, at the
appropriate redemption prices plus accrued interest through
F-33
the redemption date. These notes rank equally in right of
payment with all of the Companys other senior unsecured
indebtedness.
Term Loan. On July 7, 2006, the Company
entered into a five-year $300 million term loan facility
which bears interest at a fixed rate of 6.00%. At
December 31, 2006, the Company had $300 million
outstanding under this term loan facility.
Revolving Credit Facility. The Company entered
into a five-year $900 million revolving credit facility
which currently bears interest at LIBOR plus 45 to 55 basis
points. The pricing of this facility is dependent on the
Companys credit ratings and the outstanding balance of
borrowings on this facility. As of December 31, 2006, the
Company had zero outstanding borrowings under this facility.
Vacation Ownership Asset-Linked Debt. The
Company previously borrowed under a $600 million
asset-linked facility through Cendant to support the creation of
certain vacation ownership-related assets and the acquisition
and development of vacation ownership properties. In connection
with the Separation, Cendant eliminated the outstanding
borrowings under this facility of $600 million on
July 27, 2006. The weighted average interest rate on these
borrowings was 5.5% during the period January 1, 2006
through July 27, 2006 and 5.1% and 2.6% during the years
ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Vacation Ownership Bank Borrowings. The
Company had outstanding bank borrowings of $103 million as
of December 31, 2006 principally under a foreign credit
facility used to support the Companys vacation ownership
operations in the South Pacific. This facility bears interest at
Australian Dollar LIBOR plus 55 basis points and had a
weighted average interest rate of 6.5%, 6.3% and 3.3% during
2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. These secured borrowings are
collateralized by $158 million of underlying vacation
ownership contract receivables and related assets.
Vacation Rental Bank Borrowings. As of
December 31, 2006, the Company had bank debt outstanding of
$73 million related to the Companys Landal GreenParks
business. The bank debt is collateralized by $130 million
of land and related vacation rental assets and had a weighted
average interest rate of 3.7% during 2006 and 3.0% during both
2005 and 2004.
Vacation Rental Capital Leases. The Company
leases vacation homes located in European holiday parks as part
of its vacation exchange and rentals business. These leases are
recorded as capital lease obligations under generally accepted
accounting principles with corresponding assets classified
within property, plant and equipment on the Consolidated and
Combined Balance Sheets. The vacation rental capital lease
obligations had a weighted average interest rate of 7.5% during
2006, 2005 and 2004.
Other. The Company also maintains other debt
facilities which arise through the ordinary course of
operations. This debt principally reflects $11 million of
mortgage borrowings related to an office building.
Interest expense incurred in connection with the Companys
long-term debt (excluding securitized vacation ownership debt)
amounted to $72 million, $36 million and
$38 million during 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and
is recorded within the interest expense line item on the
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income.
F-34
|
|
14.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Commitments
Leases
The Company is committed to making rental payments under
noncancelable operating leases covering various facilities and
equipment. Future minimum lease payments required under
noncancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2006 are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncancelable
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
Year
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
2008
|
|
|
39
|
|
2009
|
|
|
30
|
|
2010
|
|
|
25
|
|
2011
|
|
|
20
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company incurred total rental
expense of $65 million, $55 million and
$48 million, respectively.
Purchase
Commitments
In the normal course of business, the Company makes various
commitments to purchase goods or services from specific
suppliers, including those related to vacation ownership resort
development and other capital expenditures. None of the purchase
commitments made by the Company as of December 31, 2006
(aggregating $531 million) were individually significant;
the majority relate to commitments for the development of
vacation ownership properties (aggregating $323 million,
all of which relates to 2007).
Letters
of Credit
As of December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the
Company had $30 million and $44 million, respectively,
of irrevocable letters of credit outstanding, which mainly
support development activity at the Companys vacation
ownership business.
Litigation
The Company is involved in claims, legal proceedings and
governmental inquiries related to contract disputes, business
practices, intellectual property and other matters relating to
the Companys business, including, without limitation,
commercial, employment, tax and environmental matters. Such
matters include, but are not limited to, allegations that
(i) the Companys vacation ownership business violated
alleged duties to members of its internal vacation exchange
program through changes made to its reservations and
availability policies, which changes diminished the value of
vacation ownership interests purchased by members; (ii) its
TripRewards loyalty program infringes on third-party patents;
(iii) the Companys RCI Points exchange program, a
global points-based exchange network that allows members to
redeem points, is an unlicensed travel club and the unregistered
sales of memberships in that program violate the Alberta Fair
Trading Act and (iv) the Companys vacation ownership
business alleged failure to perform its duties arising under its
management agreements, as well as for construction defects and
inadequate maintenance, which claims are made by property
owners associations from time to time. See
F-35
Note 20 Separation Adjustments and Transactions
with Former Parent and Subsidiaries regarding contingent
litigation liabilities resulting from the Separation.
The Company believes that it has adequately accrued for such
matters with a reserve of approximately $24 million, or,
for matters not requiring accrual, believes that such matters
will not have a material adverse effect on its results of
operations, financial position or cash flows based on
information currently available. However, litigation is
inherently unpredictable and, although the Company believes that
its accruals are adequate
and/or that
it has valid defenses in these matters, unfavorable resolutions
could occur. As such, an adverse outcome from such unresolved
proceedings for which claims are awarded in excess of the
amounts accrued, if any, could be material to the Company with
respect to earnings or cash flows in any given reporting period.
However, the Company does not believe that the impact of such
unresolved litigation should result in a material liability to
the Company in relation to its consolidated and combined
financial position or liquidity.
Guarantees/Indemnifications
Standard
Guarantees/Indemnifications
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into
numerous agreements that contain standard guarantees and
indemnities whereby the Company indemnifies another party for
breaches of representations and warranties. In addition, many of
these parties are also indemnified against any third-party claim
resulting from the transaction that is contemplated in the
underlying agreement. Such guarantees and indemnifications are
granted under various agreements, including those governing
(i) purchases, sales or outsourcing of assets or
businesses, (ii) leases of real estate,
(iii) licensing of trademarks, (iv) development of
vacation ownership properties, (v) access to credit
facilities and use of derivatives and (vi) issuances of
debt securities. The guarantees and indemnifications issued are
for the benefit of the (i) buyers in sale agreements and
sellers in purchase agreements, (ii) landlords in lease
contracts, (iii) franchisees in licensing agreements,
(iv) developers in vacation ownership development
agreements, (v) financial institutions in credit facility
arrangements and derivative contracts and (vi) underwriters
in debt security issuances. While some of these guarantees and
indemnifications extend only for the duration of the underlying
agreement, many survive the expiration of the term of the
agreement or extend into perpetuity (unless subject to a legal
statute of limitations). There are no specific limitations on
the maximum potential amount of future payments that the Company
could be required to make under these guarantees and
indemnifications, nor is the Company able to develop an estimate
of the maximum potential amount of future payments to be made
under these guarantees and indemnifications as the triggering
events are not subject to predictability. With respect to
certain of the aforementioned guarantees and indemnifications,
such as indemnifications of landlords against third-party claims
for the use of real estate property leased by the Company, the
Company maintains insurance coverage that mitigates any
potential payments to be made.
Other
Guarantees/Indemnifications
In the normal course of business, the Companys vacation
ownership business provides guarantees to certain owners
associations for funds required to operate and maintain vacation
ownership properties in excess of assessments collected from
owners of the vacation ownership interests. The Company may be
required to fund such excess as a result of unsold Company-owned
vacation ownership interests or failure by owners to pay such
assessments. These guarantees extend for the duration of the
underlying subsidy agreements (which generally approximate one
year and are renewable on an annual basis) or until a stipulated
percentage (typically 80% or higher) of related vacation
ownership interests are sold. The maximum potential future
payments that the Company could be required to make under these
guarantees was approximately $230 million as of
December 31, 2006. The Company would only be required to
pay this maximum amount if none of the owners assessed paid
their assessments. Any assessments collected from the owners of
the vacation ownership interests would reduce the maximum
potential amount of future
F-36
payments to be made by the Company. Additionally, should the
Company be required to fund the deficit through the payment of
any owners assessments under these guarantees, the Company
would be permitted access to the property for its own use and
may use that property to engage in revenue-producing activities,
such as marketing or rental. Historically, the Company has not
been required to make material payments under these guarantees,
as the fees collected from owners of vacation ownership
interests have been sufficient to support the operation and
maintenance of the vacation ownership properties. As of
December 31, 2006, the liability recorded by the Company in
connection with these guarantees was $14 million.
|
|
15.
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income
|
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
Gains on
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
Cash Flow
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
Hedges, Net
|
|
Income/(Loss)
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2004, net
of tax of $5
|
|
$
|
180
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
180
|
|
Current period change
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2004,
net of tax of $39
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
Current period change
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2005,
net of tax of $58
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
Current period change
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006,
net of tax of $43
|
|
$
|
191
|
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
The Company has a stock-based compensation plan available to
grant non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options,
SSARs, restricted stock, restricted stock units
(RSUs) and other stock or cash-based awards to key
employees, non-employee directors, advisors and consultants.
Under the Wyndham Worldwide Corporation 2006 Equity and
Incentive Plan, which was approved by Cendant, the sole
shareholder, and became effective on July 12, 2006, a
maximum of 43.5 million shares of common stock may be
awarded. As of December 31, 2006, approximately
17 million shares of availability remained.
Incentive
Equity Awards Conversion
Prior to August 1, 2006, all employee stock awards (stock
options and RSUs) were granted by Cendant. At the time of
Separation, a portion of Cendants outstanding equity
awards were converted into equity awards of the Company at a
ratio of one share of Companys common stock for every five
shares of Cendants common stock. As a result, the Company
issued approximately 2 million RSUs and approximately
24 million stock options upon completion of the conversion
of existing Cendant equity awards into Wyndham equity awards.
In connection with the distribution of the shares of common
stock of Wyndham to Cendant stockholders, on July 31, 2006,
the Compensation Committee of Cendants Board of Directors
approved a change to the date on which all Cendant equity awards
(including Wyndham awards granted as an adjustment to such
Cendant equity awards) would become fully vested. These equity
awards vested on August 15, 2006 rather than
August 30, 2006 (which was the previous date upon which
such equity awards were to vest). As such, there were zero
converted RSUs outstanding on December 31, 2006.
As a result of the acceleration of the vesting of all employee
stock awards granted by Cendant, the Company recorded non-cash
compensation expense of $45 million during the third
quarter of 2006. In addition, the Company recorded a non-cash
expense of $9 million related to equitable adjustments to
the
F-37
accelerated awards in the third quarter of 2006. The
$54 million of expense is recorded within separation and
related costs on the Consolidated and Combined Statement of
Income.
The activity related to the converted stock options from the
date of Separation to December 31, 2006 consisted of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
of
Options(c)
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Balance at August 1, 2006
|
|
|
23.7
|
|
|
$
|
39.84
|
|
Exercised(a)
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
30.70
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
46.84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2006(b)
|
|
|
22.0
|
|
|
$
|
39.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Stock options exercised during the
five months ended December 31, 2006 had an intrinsic value
of approximately $4 million.
|
|
(b) |
|
As of December 31, 2006, the
Companys outstanding in the money stock
options had aggregate intrinsic value of $60 million. All
22.0 million options outstanding are exercisable as of
December 31, 2006.
|
|
(c) |
|
Options outstanding and exercisable
as of December 31, 2006 have a weighted average remaining
contractual life of 2.3 years.
|
The following table summarizes information as of
December 31, 2006 regarding the Companys outstanding
and exercisable stock options converted from Cendant stock
options:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Range of Exercise Prices
|
|
of Options
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
$10.00 - $19.99
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
$
|
19.72
|
|
$20.00 - $29.99
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
23.85
|
|
$30.00 - $39.99
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
37.42
|
|
$40.00 - $49.99
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
42.87
|
|
$50.00 & above
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
64.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Options
|
|
|
22.0
|
|
|
$
|
39.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
Equity Awards Granted by the Company
On May 2, 2006, Cendant approved the grant of incentive
awards of approximately $79 million to the key employees
and senior officers of Wyndham in the form of RSUs and SSARs,
which were converted into equity awards relating to
Wyndhams common stock on the day of the Separation from
Cendant. The awards have a grant date of May 2, 2006 and
vest ratably over a period of four years, with the exception of
a portion of the SSARs which vest ratably over a period of three
years. The number RSUs and SSARs granted were approximately
2.3 million and 500,000, respectively.
F-38
The activity related to the Companys incentive equity
awards from the date of Separation through December 31,
2006 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSUs
|
|
|
SSARs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
of RSUs
|
|
|
Grant Price
|
|
|
of SSARs
|
|
|
Grant Price
|
|
|
Balance at August 1, 2006
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
$
|
31.85
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
$
|
31.85
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested/exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
31.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2006(a)
|
|
|
2.2
|
(b)
|
|
$
|
31.81
|
(b)
|
|
|
0.5
|
(c)
|
|
$
|
31.85
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Aggregate unrecognized compensation
expense related to SSARs and RSUs amounted to $68 million
as of December 31, 2006. None of the 500,000 SSARs are
exercisable as of December 31, 2006.
|
|
(b) |
|
Amounts include approximately
37,000 RSUs granted in October 2006 at a price of $29.50, which
is not included in the table due to rounding. Approximately
2.1 million RSUs outstanding at December 31, 2006 are
expected to vest.
|
|
(c) |
|
None of the approximately 500,000
SSARs are exercisable at December 31, 2006; however, since
the SSARs were issued to the Companys top five officers,
the Company assumes that all are expected to vest. SSARs
outstanding at December 31, 2006 had an intrinsic value of
approximately $80,000 and have a weighted average remaining
contractual life of 9.4 years.
|
The grant date fair value of SSARs was $13.91. Such fair value
was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model with the following assumptions:
(i) expected volatility of 34.4%, (ii) expected life
of 6.25 years and (iii) risk free interest rate of
4.9%.
Stock-Based
Compensation
During 2006 (through the date of separation), 2005 and 2004,
Cendant allocated pre-tax stock-based compensation expense of
$12 million, $16 million and $11 million
($7 million, $10 million and $7 million, after
tax), respectively, to the Company. Such compensation expense
relates only to the options and RSUs that were granted to
Cendants employees subsequent to January 1, 2003. The
allocation was based on the estimated number of options and RSUs
Cendant believed it would ultimately provide and the underlying
vesting period of the awards. As Cendant measured its
stock-based compensation expense using intrinsic value method
during the periods prior to January 1, 2003, Cendant did
not recognize compensation expense upon the issuance of equity
awards to its employees.
During 2006, the Company also recorded stock-based compensation
expense of $13 million ($8 million, after tax),
related to the incentive equity awards granted by the Company.
|
|
17.
|
Employee
Benefit Plans
|
Defined
Contribution Benefit Plans
Wyndham sponsors a domestic defined contribution savings plan
that provides certain eligible employees of the Company an
opportunity to accumulate funds for retirement (similar to the
plan previously sponsored by Cendant). The Company matches the
contributions of participating employees on the basis specified
by the plan. The Companys cost for these plans was
approximately $20 million, $17 million and
$15 million during 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
In addition, the Company contributes to several foreign employee
benefit contributory plans, which were acquired with certain
businesses within vacation exchange and rentals, which provide
eligible employees within the vacation exchange and rentals
business an opportunity to accumulate funds for retirement. The
Companys contributory cost for these plans was
approximately $7 million, $6 million and
$5 million during 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
F-39
Defined
Benefit Pension Plans
The Company sponsors defined benefit pension plans for certain
foreign subsidiaries. Under these plans, benefits are based on
an employees years of credited service and a percentage of
final average compensation or as otherwise described by the
plan. As of December 31, 2006, the Companys net
pension liability is fully recognized as other non-current
liabilities, which approximated $8 million ($7 million
as of December 31, 2005). On December 31, 2006, the
amounts recorded within accumulated other comprehensive income
as an unrecognized prior service credit and unrecognized loss
were $2 million and $1 million, respectively, as
required by SFAS No. 158.
The Companys policy is to contribute amounts sufficient to
meet minimum funding requirements as set forth in employee
benefit and tax laws plus such additional amounts that the
Company determines to be appropriate. During 2006, 2005 and
2004, the Companys recorded pension expense was
approximately $1 million, $2 million and
$1 million, respectively.
|
|
18.
|
Financial
Instruments
|
Risk
Management
Following is a description of the Companys risk management
policies:
Foreign
Currency Risk
The Company uses foreign currency forward contracts to manage
its exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates
associated with its foreign currency denominated receivables,
forecasted earnings of foreign subsidiaries and forecasted
foreign currency denominated vendor costs. The Company primarily
hedges its foreign currency exposure to the British pound, Euro
and Canadian dollar. The majority of forward contracts utilized
by the Company does not qualify for hedge accounting treatment
under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities. The fluctuations in
the value of these forward contracts do, however, largely offset
the impact of changes in the value of the underlying risk that
they are intended to economically hedge. Forward contracts that
are used to hedge certain forecasted disbursements and receipts
up to 18 months are designated and do qualify as cash flow
hedges. The amount of gains or losses reclassified from other
comprehensive income to earnings resulting from ineffectiveness
or from excluding a component of the forward contracts
gain or loss from the effectiveness calculation for cash flow
hedges during 2006, 2005 and 2004 was not material. The impact
of these forward contracts was not material to the
Companys results of operations or financial position, nor
is the amount of gains or losses the Company expects to
reclassify from other comprehensive income to earnings over the
next 12 months.
Interest
Rate Risk
The debt used to finance much of the Companys operations
is also exposed to interest rate fluctuations. The Company uses
various hedging strategies and derivative financial instruments
to create a desired mix of fixed and floating rate assets and
liabilities. Derivative instruments currently used in these
hedging strategies include swaps and interest rate caps.
The derivatives used to manage the risk associated with the
Companys floating rate debt include freestanding
derivatives and derivatives designated as cash flow hedges. In
connection with its qualifying cash flow hedges, the Company
recorded net a pre-tax loss of $13 million during 2006 and
net pre-tax gains of $5 million and $2 million during
2005 and 2004, respectively, to other comprehensive income. The
pre-tax amount of gains reclassified from other comprehensive
income to earnings resulting from ineffectiveness or from
excluding a component of the derivatives gain or loss from
the effectiveness calculation for cash flow hedges was
insignificant during 2006, $5 million during 2005 and
insignificant during 2004. The amount of losses the Company
expects to reclassify from other comprehensive income to
earnings during
F-40
the next 12 months is not material. These freestanding
derivatives had a nominal impact on the Companys results
of operations in 2006, 2005 and 2004.
Credit
Risk and Exposure
The Company is exposed to counterparty credit risk in the event
of nonperformance by counterparties to various agreements and
sales transactions. The Company manages such risk by evaluating
the financial position and creditworthiness of such
counterparties and by requiring collateral in instances in which
financing is provided. The Company mitigates counterparty credit
risk associated with its derivative contracts by monitoring the
amounts at risk with each counterparty to such contracts,
periodically evaluating counterparty creditworthiness and
financial position, and where possible, dispersing its risk
among multiple counterparties.
As of December 31, 2006, there were no significant
concentrations of credit risk with any individual counterparty
or groups of counterparties. However, approximately 25% of the
Companys outstanding vacation ownership contract
receivables portfolio relates to customers who reside in
California. With the exception of the financing provided to
customers of its vacation ownership businesses, the Company does
not normally require collateral or other security to support
credit sales.
Market
Risk
The Company is subject to risks relating to the geographic
concentrations of (i) areas in which the Company is
currently developing and selling vacation ownership properties,
(ii) sales offices in certain vacation areas and
(iii) customers of the Companys vacation ownership
business; which in each case, may result in the Companys
results of operations being more sensitive to local and regional
economic conditions and other factors, including competition,
natural disasters and economic downturns, than the
Companys results of operations would be absent such
geographic concentrations. Local and regional economic
conditions and other factors may differ materially from
prevailing conditions in other parts of the world. Florida,
Nevada and California are examples of areas with concentrations
of sales offices. For the twelve months ended December 31,
2006, approximately 16%, 13% and 13% of the Companys VOI
sales revenue was generated in sales offices located in Florida,
Nevada and California, respectively.
Included within the Consolidated and Combined Statements of
Income is approximately 12%, 10% and 11% of net revenue
generated from transactions in the state of Florida in 2006,
2005 and 2004, respectively, and approximately 10%, 8%, and 8%
of net revenue generated from transactions in the state of
California in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Fair
Value
The fair value of financial instruments is generally determined
by reference to market values resulting from trading on a
national securities exchange or in an
over-the-counter
market. In cases where quoted market prices are not available,
fair value is based on estimates using present value or other
valuation techniques, as appropriate. The carrying amounts of
cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, trade receivables,
accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current
liabilities approximate fair value due
F-41
to the short-term maturities of these assets and liabilities.
The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of all other
financial instruments as of December 31 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Fair
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Value
|
|
Amount
|
|
Value
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation ownership contract
receivables, net
|
|
$
|
2,380
|
|
|
$
|
2,380
|
|
|
$
|
2,074
|
|
|
$
|
2,074
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
2,900
|
|
|
|
2,889
|
|
|
|
2,042
|
|
|
|
2,036
|
|
Derivatives(*)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forwards
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Interest rate swaps and caps
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Derivative instruments are in loss
positions as of December 31, 2006 and gain positions as of
December 31, 2005.
|
The reportable segments presented below represent the
Companys operating segments for which separate financial
information is available and which are utilized on a regular
basis by its chief operating decision maker to assess
performance and to allocate resources. In identifying its
reportable segments, the Company also considers the nature of
services provided by its operating segments. Management
evaluates the operating results of each of its reportable
segments based upon revenue and EBITDA, which is
defined as net income before depreciation and amortization,
interest (excluding interest on securitized vacation ownership
debt), income taxes, minority interest and cumulative effect of
accounting change, net of tax, each of which is presented on the
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income. The
Companys presentation of EBITDA may not be comparable to
similarly-titled measures used by other companies.
Year
Ended or At December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
Vacation
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
and Rentals
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Other(b)
|
|
Total
|
|
Net
revenues(a)
|
|
$
|
661
|
|
|
$
|
1,119
|
|
|
$
|
2,068
|
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,842
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
(73
|
)(c)
|
|
|
725
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
Segment assets
|
|
|
1,362
|
|
|
|
2,375
|
|
|
|
5,590
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
9,520
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
Year
Ended or At December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
Vacation
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
and Rentals
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Other(b)
|
|
Total
|
|
Net
revenues(a)
|
|
$
|
533
|
|
|
$
|
1,068
|
|
|
$
|
1,874
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,471
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
751
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
Segment assets
|
|
|
1,797
|
|
|
|
2,365
|
|
|
|
5,026
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
9,167
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
F-42
Year
Ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
Vacation
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
and Rentals
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Other(b)
|
|
Total
|
|
Net
revenues(a)
|
|
$
|
443
|
|
|
$
|
921
|
|
|
$
|
1,661
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,014
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
719
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Transactions between segments are
recorded at fair value and eliminated in consolidation.
Inter-segment net revenues were not significant to the net
revenues of any one segment.
|
|
(b) |
|
Includes the elimination of
transactions between segments.
|
|
(c) |
|
Includes $99 million of
separation and related costs and $32 million of a net
benefit from the resolution of certain contingent liabilities.
|
Provided below is a reconciliation of EBITDA to income before
income taxes and minority interest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
725
|
|
|
$
|
751
|
|
|
$
|
719
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and
minority interest
|
|
$
|
542
|
|
|
$
|
626
|
|
|
$
|
587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The geographic segment information provided below is classified
based on the geographic location of the Companys
subsidiaries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
|
|
United
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
States
|
|
Kingdom
|
|
Countries
|
|
Total
|
|
Year Ended or At
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
2,997
|
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
|
$
|
622
|
|
|
$
|
3,842
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
7,770
|
|
|
|
554
|
|
|
|
1,196
|
|
|
|
9,520
|
|
Net property and equipment
|
|
|
478
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
916
|
|
Year Ended or At
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
2,714
|
|
|
$
|
211
|
|
|
$
|
546
|
|
|
$
|
3,471
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
7,413
|
|
|
|
1,103
|
|
|
|
651
|
|
|
|
9,167
|
|
Net property and equipment
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
718
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
2,385
|
|
|
$
|
174
|
|
|
$
|
455
|
|
|
$
|
3,014
|
|
|
|
20.
|
Separation
Adjustments and Transactions with Former Parent and
Subsidiaries
|
Transfer
of Cendant Corporate Liabilities and Issuance of Guarantees to
Cendant and Affiliates
Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, upon the
distribution of the Companys common stock to Cendant
shareholders, the Company entered into certain guarantee
commitments with Cendant (pursuant to the assumption of certain
liabilities and the obligation to indemnify Cendant, Realogy and
Travelport for such liabilities) and guarantee commitments
related to deferred compensation arrangements with each of
Cendant and Realogy. These guarantee arrangements primarily
relate to certain
F-43
contingent litigation liabilities, contingent tax liabilities,
and Cendant contingent and other corporate liabilities, of which
the Company assumed and is responsible for 37.5% of these
Cendant liabilities. The amount of liabilities which were
assumed by the Company in connection with the Separation
approximated $434 million at December 31, 2006,
reduced from approximately $524 million as measured at the
date of separation (July 31, 2006). This amount was
comprised of certain Cendant Corporate liabilities which were
recorded on the books of Cendant as well as additional
liabilities which were established for guarantees issued at the
date of Separation related to certain unresolved contingent
matters and certain others that could arise during the guarantee
period. Regarding the guarantees, if any of the companies
responsible for all or a portion of such liabilities were to
default in its payment of costs or expenses related to any such
liability, the Company would be responsible for a portion of the
defaulting party or parties obligation. The Company also
provided a default guarantee related to certain deferred
compensation arrangements related to certain current and former
senior officers and directors of Cendant, Realogy and
Travelport. These arrangements, which are discussed in more
detail below, have been valued upon the Companys
separation from Cendant with the assistance of third-party
experts in accordance with Financial Interpretation No. 45
(FIN 45) Guarantors Accounting and
Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect
Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others and recorded as
liabilities on the balance sheet. To the extent such recorded
liabilities are not adequate to cover the ultimate payment
amounts, such excess will be reflected as an expense to the
results of operations in future periods.
The December 31, 2006 balance of $434 million is
comprised of (i) $40 million for litigation matters,
(ii) $229 million for tax liabilities,
(iii) $134 million for other contingent and corporate
liabilities including liabilities of previously sold businesses
of Cendant and (iv) $31 million of liabilities where
the calculated FIN 45 guarantee amount exceeded the
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5
Accounting for Contingencies liability assumed at
the date of Separation (of which $29 million of the
$31 million pertain to litigation liabilities). Of the
$434 million, $187 million of these liabilities is
recorded in current due to former Parent and subsidiaries and
$234 million are recorded in long-term Due to former Parent
and subsidiaries at December 31, 2006 on the Consolidated
Balance Sheet. The Company is indemnifying Cendant for these
contingent liabilities and therefore any payments would be made
to the third party through the former Parent. The
$31 million relating to the FIN 45 guarantees is
recorded in other current liabilities at December 31, 2006
on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. In addition, the Company has
a $65 million receivable due from former Parent relating to
a refund of excess funding paid to the Companys former
Parent resulting from the Separation and income tax refunds,
which is recorded in current due from former Parent and
subsidiaries on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company has
also recorded a $37 million receivable in non-current due
from former Parent and subsidiaries on the Consolidated Balance
Sheet, which represents the Companys right to receive
proceeds from the ultimate sale of Cendants preferred
stock investment in and warrants of Affinion Group Holdings,
Inc. (see Note 23 Subsequent Events).
Following is a discussion of the liabilities on which the
Company issued guarantees:
|
|
|
|
l
|
Contingent litigation liabilities The Company has
assumed 37.5% of liabilities for certain litigation relating to,
arising out of or resulting from certain lawsuits in which
Cendant is named as the defendant. The indemnification
obligation will continue until the underlying lawsuits are
resolved. The Company will indemnify Cendant to the extent that
Cendant is required to make payments related to any of the
underlying lawsuits. As the guarantee relates to matters in
various stages of litigation, the maximum exposure cannot be
quantified. Due to the inherent nature of the litigation
process, the timing of payments related to these liabilities
cannot be reasonably predicted, but is expected to occur over
several years.
|
|
|
l
|
Contingent tax liabilities The Company is liable
for 37.5% of certain contingent tax liabilities and will pay to
Cendant the amount of taxes allocated pursuant to the Tax
Sharing Agreement for the payment of certain taxes. This
liability will remain outstanding until tax audits related to
the 2006 tax year are completed or the statutes of limitations
governing the 2006 tax year have passed. The Companys
maximum exposure cannot be quantified as tax regulations are
subject to interpretation and the
|
F-44
|
|
|
|
|
outcome of tax audits or litigation is inherently uncertain.
Additionally, the timing of payments related to these
liabilities cannot be reasonably predicted, but is likely to
occur over several years.
|
|
|
|
|
l
|
Cendant contingent and other corporate liabilities
The Company has assumed 37.5% of certain corporate
liabilities of Cendant including liabilities relating to
(i) Cendants terminated or divested businesses,
(ii) liabilities relating to the Travelport sale, if any,
and (iii) generally any actions with respect to the
separation plan or the distributions brought by any third party.
The Companys maximum exposure to loss cannot be quantified
as this guarantee relates primarily to future claims that may be
made against Cendant, that have not yet occurred. The Company
assessed the probability and amount of potential liability
related to this guarantee based on the extent and nature of
historical experience.
|
|
|
l
|
Guarantee related to deferred compensation arrangements
In the event that Cendant, Realogy
and/or
Travelport are not able to meet certain deferred compensation
obligations under specified plans for certain current and former
officers and directors because of bankruptcy or insolvency, the
Company has guaranteed such obligations (to the extent relating
to amounts deferred in respect of 2005 and earlier). This
guarantee will remain outstanding until such deferred
compensation balances are distributed to the respective officers
and directors. The maximum exposure cannot be quantified as the
guarantee, in part, is related to the value of deferred
investments as of the date of the requested distribution.
Additionally, the timing of payment, if any, related to these
liabilities cannot be reasonably predicted because the
distribution dates are not fixed.
|
Transactions
with Avis Budget Group, Realogy and Travelport
Prior to the Companys Separation from Cendant, it entered
into a Transition Services Agreement (TSA) with Avis
Budget Group, Realogy and Travelport to provide for an orderly
transition to becoming an independent company. Under the TSA,
each of the companies agreed to provide the Company with various
services, including services relating to human resources and
employee benefits, payroll, financial systems management,
treasury and cash management, accounts payable services,
telecommunications services and information technology services.
In certain cases, services provided under the TSA may be
provided by one of the separated companies following the date of
such companys separation from Cendant. During 2006, the
Company recorded $8 million of expenses and less than
$1 million in other income in the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income related to these agreements.
Separation
and Related Costs
During 2006, the Company incurred costs of $99 million in
connection with executing the Separation. Such costs consisted
primarily of (i) the acceleration of vesting of Cendant
equity awards and the related equitable adjustments of such
awards (see Note 16 Stock-Based Compensation),
(ii) an impairment charge due to a rebranding initiative
for the Companys Fairfield and Trendwest trademarks (see
Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies Impairment of Long-Lived Assets) and
(iii) consulting and payroll-related services.
F-45
|
|
21.
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
Net
Intercompany Funding to Former Parent
The following table summarizes related party transactions
occurring between the Company and Cendant:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Net intercompany funding to former
Parent, beginning balance
|
|
$
|
1,125
|
|
|
$
|
661
|
|
|
$
|
577
|
|
Corporate-related functions
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
Income taxes, net
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
(181
|
)
|
Net interest earned on net
intercompany funding to former Parent
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Advances to former Parent, net
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
Acceleration of restricted stock
units
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elimination of intercompany
balance due to former Parent
|
|
|
(1,157
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net intercompany funding to former
Parent, ending balance
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,125
|
|
|
$
|
661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate-Related
Functions
Prior to the date of Separation, the Company was allocated
general corporate overhead expenses from Cendant for
corporate-related functions based on a percentage of the
Companys forecasted revenues. General corporate overhead
expense allocations included executive management, tax,
accounting, payroll, financial systems management, legal,
treasury and cash management, certain employee benefits and real
estate usage for common space. During 2006, 2005, and 2004, the
Company was allocated $20 million, $36 million and
$30 million, respectively, of general corporate expenses
from Cendant, which are included within general and
administrative expenses on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income. The 2006 amount includes allocations only
from January 1, 2006 through the date of Separation
(July 31, 2006).
Prior to the date of Separation, Cendant also incurred certain
expenses on behalf of the Company. These expenses, which
directly benefited the Company, were allocated to the Company
based upon the Companys actual utilization of the
services. Direct allocations included costs associated with
insurance, information technology, revenue franchise audit
(during 2005 only), telecommunications and real estate usage for
Company-specific space for some but not all of the periods
presented. During 2006, 2005, and 2004, the Company was
allocated $36 million, $52 million and
$49 million, respectively, of expenses directly benefiting
the Company, which are included within general and
administrative and operating expenses on the Consolidated and
Combined Statements of Income. The 2006 amount includes
allocations from January 1, 2006 through the date of
Separation (July 31, 2006).
The Company believes the assumptions and methodologies
underlying the allocations of general corporate overhead and
direct expenses from Cendant were reasonable. However, such
expenses were not indicative of, nor is it practical or
meaningful for the Company to estimate for all historical
periods presented, the actual level of expenses that would have
been incurred had the Company been operating as a separate,
stand-alone public company.
Income
Taxes, net
Prior to the Separation, the Company was included in the
consolidated federal and state income tax returns of Cendant and
will be so included through the Separation date for the 2006
period then ended. Balances due to Cendant for this short period
return and related tax attributes were estimated as of
December 31, 2006 and will be adjusted in connection with
the eventual filing of the short period tax return and the
settlement of the related tax audits of these periods. The net
income tax payable to Cendant, which
F-46
was $703 million as of December 31, 2005 and was
recorded as a component of net intercompany funding to former
Parent on the Combined Balance Sheet, was eliminated at the
Separation date.
Net
Interest Earned on Net Intercompany Funding to Former
Parent
Prior to the Separation, Cendant swept cash from the
Companys bank accounts while the Company maintained
certain balances due to or from Cendant. Inclusive of unpaid
corporate allocations, the Company had net amounts due from
Cendant, exclusive of income taxes, of $1,828 million as of
December 31, 2005, which was eliminated at the date of
Separation. Prior to the Separation, certain of the advances
between the Company and Cendant were interest-bearing. In
connection with the interest-bearing balances, the Company
recorded and net interest income of $21 million,
$30 million and $16 million during 2006, 2005 and
2004, respectively.
Related
Party Agreements
Prior to the Separation, the Company conducted the following
business activities, among others, with Cendants other
business units or newly separated companies, as applicable:
(i) provision of access to hotel accommodation and vacation
exchange and rentals inventory to be distributed through
Travelport; (ii) utilization of employee relocation
services, including relocation policy management, household
goods moving services and departure and destination real estate
related services; (iii) utilization of commercial real
estate brokerage services, such as transaction management,
acquisition and disposition services, broker price opinions,
renewal due diligence and portfolio review;
(iv) utilization of corporate travel management services of
Travelport; and (v) designation of Cendants car
rental brands, Avis and Budget, as the exclusive primary and
secondary suppliers, respectively, of car rental services for
the Companys employees. The majority of the related party
agreement transactions were settled in cash. The majority of
these commercial relationships have continued since the
Separation under agreements formalized in connection with the
Separation.
F-47
|
|
22.
|
Selected
Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)
|
Provided below is selected unaudited quarterly financial data
for 2006 and 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
144
|
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
|
$
|
189
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
554
|
|
Corporate and
Other(a)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
870
|
|
|
$
|
955
|
|
|
$
|
1,047
|
|
|
$
|
970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
Corporate and
Other(a)(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
Less: Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and
minority interest
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
change, net of tax
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share
information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
$
|
0.46
|
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
|
$
|
0.46
|
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
change, net of tax
|
|
|
(0.32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
|
$
|
0.46
|
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
shares(c)
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
$
|
0.46
|
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
change, net of tax
|
|
|
(0.32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
shares(c)
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
F-48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
112
|
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
|
$
|
148
|
|
|
$
|
144
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
473
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
Corporate and
Other(a)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
795
|
|
|
$
|
867
|
|
|
$
|
948
|
|
|
$
|
861
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
Corporate and
Other(a)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
Less: Depreciation and
amortization
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and
minority interest
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income(d)
|
|
$
|
130
|
|
|
$
|
89
|
|
|
$
|
121
|
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share
information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.65
|
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.65
|
|
|
|
0.44
|
|
|
|
0.60
|
|
|
|
0.45
|
|
Weighted average
shares(c)
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes the elimination of
transactions between segments.
|
|
(b) |
|
Includes separation and related
costs of $3 million, $5 million, $68 million and
$23 million during the first, second, third and fourth
quarter, respectively, and $32 million of a net benefit
from the resolution of certain contingent liabilities during the
fourth quarter.
|
|
(c) |
|
For all periods prior to the
Companys separation date (July 31, 2006), weighted
average shares were calculated as one share of Wyndham common
stock outstanding for every five shares of Cendant common stock
outstanding as of July 21, 2006, the record date for the
distribution of Wyndham common stock.
|
|
(d) |
|
Net income for the fourth quarter
includes costs incurred to combine the operations of the
Companys vacation exchange and rentals business of
$14 million.
|
Preferred
Stock Sale
On January 31, 2007, Affinion Group Holdings, Inc.
(Affinion) redeemed a portion of the preferred stock
investment owned by Avis Budget Group, of which the Company
owned a 37.5% interest pursuant to the Separation agreement. The
redemption resulted in approximately $40 million in
proceeds for the Company and a gain on sale of approximately
$12 million. As of December 31, 2006, the Company had
a $37 million receivable in non-current due from former
Parent and subsidiaries on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, which
represented the Companys right to receive proceeds from
the ultimate sale of Cendants preferred stock investment
in and warrants of Affinion. Subsequent to Affinions
redemption, such receivable was reduced to $10 million.
F-49
Repayment
of Debt and Cancellation of EURO Revolver
On January 31, 2007, the Company repaid the outstanding
borrowings of $73 million related to the its Landal
GreenParks business and cancelled a related undrawn
EUR 15 million revolving credit facility. The
borrowings were paid off utilizing a portion of the proceeds
from the Companys $800 million 6.00% senior unsecured
bond issuance. These facilities will not be refinanced and cash
flow and/or
corporate debt will be utilized for the additional funding needs
of Landal GreenParks in the future.
Premium
Yield Facility
On February 12, 2007, the Company closed a securitization
facility, Premium Yield Facility
2007-A, in
the amount of $155 million, which bears interest at LIBOR
plus 43 basis points and an additional bond insurance fee
and matures in February 2020. Proceeds from this facility were
used to pay down borrowings and for general corporate purposes.
Share
Repurchase Program
On February 13, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors
authorized a new stock repurchase program that enables the
Company to purchase up to $400 million of its common stock.
The Board of Directors authorization included increased
repurchase capacity for proceeds received from stock option
exercises. The amount and timing of specific repurchases are
subject to market conditions, applicable legal requirements and
other factors. Repurchases may be conducted in the open market
or in privately negotiated transactions.
F-50
Wyndham
Worldwide Corporation
Offer to Exchange
$800,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 6.00% Senior Notes
due 2016
(CUSIP Nos. 98310W AA 6 and
U98340 AA 7)
for
$800,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 6.00% Senior Notes
due 2016
(CUSIP No. 98310W AB 4)
that have been registered under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended
PROSPECTUS
May 9, 2007