UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C.
20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
|
|
|
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006
OR
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE
|
|
|
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from
to
COMMISSION FILE
NO. 1-32876
WYNDHAM WORLDWIDE
CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
DELAWARE
|
|
20-0052541
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
|
|
|
SEVEN SYLVAN WAY
PARSIPPANY, NEW JERSEY
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
07054
(Zip Code)
|
973-753-6000
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE
ACT:
|
|
|
|
|
NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE
|
TITLE OF EACH CLASS
|
|
ON WHICH REGISTERED
|
WYN Common Stock, Par Value $.01
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE
ACT:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K(§229.405
of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be
contained, to the best of Registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by
reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
Large
accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer þ
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the Registrants common stock
held by non-affiliates of the Registrant on August 1, 2006,
the effective date of the Registrants Separation from the
Cendant Corporation, was $6,381,533,299. All executive officers
and directors of the registrant have been deemed, solely for the
purpose of the foregoing calculation, to be
affiliates of the registrant.
The number of shares outstanding of the Registrants common
stock was 188,895,025 as of January 31, 2007.
PART I
Overview
As one of the worlds largest hospitality companies, we
offer individual consumers and
business-to-business
customers a broad suite of hospitality products and services
across various accommodation alternatives and price ranges
through our premier portfolio of world-renowned brands. With
more than 20 brands, which include Wyndham Hotels and Resorts,
Ramada, Days Inn, Super 8, TripRewards, RCI, Landal
GreenParks, English Country Cottages, Novasol, Wyndham Vacation
Resorts (formerly Fairfield Resorts) and WorldMark by Wyndham
(formerly Trendwest Resorts), we have built a significant
presence in most major hospitality markets in the United States
and throughout the rest of the world. For 2006, total spending
by domestic and international travelers in the United States was
expected to be $675 billion, an increase of approximately
5% from spending levels in 2005 and of approximately 16% from
spending levels in 2000, which witnessed the highest ever levels
of travel spending for any year prior to the September 11,
2001 terrorist attacks. Globally, travel spending was expected
to grow by 5% in 2006 to $4.5 trillion. Historically, we have
pursued what we believe to be financially-attractive entrance
points in the major global hospitality markets to strengthen our
portfolio of products and services. Wyndham Worldwide is well
positioned to compete in the major hospitality segments of this
large and growing industry.
We operate primarily in the lodging, vacation exchange and
rentals, and vacation ownership segments of the hospitality
industry:
|
|
·
|
Through our lodging business, we franchise hotels in the
upscale, middle and economy segments of the lodging industry and
provide property management services to owners of luxury and
upscale hotels;
|
|
·
|
Through our vacation exchange and rentals business, we provide
vacation exchange products and services to owners of intervals
of vacation ownership interests, and we market vacation rental
properties primarily on behalf of independent owners; and
|
|
·
|
Through our vacation ownership business, we market and sell
vacation ownership interests to individual consumers, provide
consumer financing in connection with the sale of vacation
ownership interests and provide property management services at
resorts.
|
Each of our lodging, vacation exchange and rentals and vacation
ownership businesses has a long operating history. Our lodging
business began operations in 1990 with the acquisition of the
Howard Johnson and Ramada brands, each of which opened its first
hotel in 1954. RCI, the best known brand in our vacation
exchange and rentals business, was established more than
30 years ago, and our vacation ownership brands, Wyndham
Vacation Resorts and Wyndham Resort Development Corporation,
which operates as WorldMark by Wyndham, began vacation ownership
operations in 1980 and 1989, respectively.
We provide directly to individual consumers our high quality
products and services, including the various accommodations we
market, such as hotels, vacation resorts, villas and cottages,
and products we offer, such as vacation ownership interests. We
also provide valuable products and services to our
business-to-business
customers, such as franchisees, affiliated resort developers and
prospective developers. These products and services include
marketing and central reservation systems, back office services
and loyalty programs. We strive to provide value-added products
and services that are intended both to enhance the travel
experience of the individual consumer and to drive revenue to
our
business-to-business
customers. The depth and breadth of our businesses across
different segments of the hospitality industry provide us with
the opportunity to expand our relationships with our existing
individual consumers and
business-to-business
customers in one or more segments of our business by offering
them additional or alternative products and services from our
other segments.
The largest portion of our revenues comes from fees we receive
in exchange for providing products and services. We receive
fees, for example, as royalties for utilizing our brands and for
providing property management and vacation exchange and rentals
services. The remainder of our revenues comes from the proceeds
of sales of products, such as vacation ownership interests, and
related services. The fees we earn by providing products and
services and proceeds from sales of our products and services
provide us with strong and stable cash flows.
1
Global
Operations
Our lodging, vacation exchange and rentals and vacation
ownership businesses all have operations outside the United
States. In 2006, we derived 78% of our revenues in the United
States and 22% internationally while we had 79% of our
long-lived assets in the United States and 21% internationally.
The table below notes the more significant countries of
operations ($ in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
2,997
|
|
$
|
2,714
|
|
$
|
2,385
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
174
|
Australia
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
94
|
Netherlands
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
113
|
Other
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,842
|
|
$
|
3,471
|
|
$
|
3,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
3,690
|
|
$
|
3,478
|
|
$
|
3,283
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
304
|
Australia
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
30
|
Netherlands
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
422
|
Other
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,653
|
|
$
|
4,355
|
|
$
|
4,320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
History
and Development
Previously, we were a wholly owned subsidiary of Cendant
Corporation (which changed its name to Avis Budget Group in
September 2006). Cendant Corporation was created in December
1997 through the merger of CUC International, Inc., or CUC, and
HFS Incorporated, or HFS. Prior to the merger, HFS was a major
hospitality, real estate and car rental franchisor. At the time
of the merger, HFS franchised hotels worldwide through brands,
such as Ramada, Days Inn, Super 8, Howard Johnson and
Travelodge. Subsequent to the merger, Cendant took a number of
steps and completed a number of transactions to grow its
Hospitality Services business and to develop its Timeshare
Resorts business (which is the same business as our vacation
ownership business), including the following:
|
|
·
|
entry into the vacation ownership business with the acquisitions
of Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham in 2001 and
2002, respectively;
|
|
·
|
entry into the vacation rentals business through the acquisition
of various brands, including Cuendet and the Holiday Cottages
group of brands, which includes English Country Cottages, in
2001, Novasol in 2002, and Landal GreenParks and Canvas Holidays
in 2004;
|
|
·
|
commencement of the TripRewards loyalty program in 2003;
|
|
·
|
purchase of all remaining ownership rights to the Ramada brand
on a worldwide basis from Marriott International in 2004;
|
|
·
|
acquisition of the global Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand,
related vacation ownership development rights and selected hotel
property management contracts in 2005; and
|
|
·
|
acquisition of the Baymont brand in April 2006.
|
Prior to July 31, 2006, Cendant transferred to Wyndham
Worldwide all of the assets and liabilities, including the
entities holding substantially all of the assets and
liabilities, of Cendants Hospitality Services (including
Timeshare Resorts) businesses and, on July 31, 2006,
Cendant distributed all of the shares of Wyndham common stock to
the holders of Cendant common stock issued and outstanding on
July 21, 2006, the record date for the distribution. The
separation was effective on July 31, 2006. On
August 1, 2006, we commenced regular way
trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
WYN.
2
Subsequent to our separation from Cendant, we further expanded
our presence in the Lodging industry by acquiring a 30% equity
interest in CHI Limited, a joint venture that provides
management services to luxury and upper upscale hotels in
Europe, the Middle East and Africa. As of December 31,
2006, we were providing property management services to 17
hotels branded as Corinthia through this joint venture. We
expect 13 of these hotels to be branded or cobranded as Wyndham
or Ramada during 2007.
Industry
Overview
The hospitality industry is a major component of the travel
industry, which is the third-largest retail industry in the
United States after the automotive and food stores industries.
The general health of the hospitality industry is affected by
the performance of the U.S. economy. From
1981-2006,
the U.S. economy has performed solidly as evidenced by the
growth of the U.S. real Gross Domestic Product, or real
GDP, at a compound annual growth rate, or CAGR, of 3.2% over the
period. In 2006, the U.S. economy continued to perform
solidly and it is expected to continue to perform solidly in
2007 and 2008 with real GDP expected to grow by approximately
2.6% and 3.2%, respectively.
The hospitality industry includes the segments in which Wyndham
Worldwide operateslodging, vacation exchange and rentals,
and vacation ownership. In spite of the recent series of
unprecedented challenges faced by the hospitality industry,
including terrorism, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)
and natural disasters, the industry is growing. In 2005,
domestic and international travelers spent in the United States
an estimated $646 billion, which represents nearly an 8%
increase from the prior year. In 2006, it was expected that the
total spending by such travelers in the United States would
reach $675 billion, which would be an increase of nearly 5%
over 2005s spending. This level of expected spending in
2006 was 16% higher than the spending in 2000, the year prior to
the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
Lodging
Industry
The $134 billion domestic lodging industry is a growing
segment of the hospitality industry. Companies in the lodging
industry generally operate in one or more of the various lodging
segments, including luxury, upscale, middle and economy, and
generally operate under one or more business models, including
franchise, management
and/or
ownership. The lodging industry is an important component of the
U.S. hospitality industry. In 2006, the U.S. lodging
industry boasted approximately 49,000 properties, which
represented approximately 4.5 million guest rooms, which
are comprised of approximately 3.0 million rooms in
franchised hotels and approximately 1.5 million rooms in
independent hotels. According to PricewaterhouseCoopers
forecast, the U.S. lodging industry is expected to gross
$25.1 billion in pre-tax profits in 2006, which represents
an 11% increase from the prior year, followed by
$27.2 billion in 2007 and $29.6 billion in 2008.
Growth in demand in the lodging industry is driven by two main
factors: (i) the general health of the travel and tourism
industry and (ii) the propensity for corporate spending on
business travel. Demand for lodging grew by a 1.3% CAGR in the
United States from 2000 through 2006. During this seven year
period, the industry added approximately 639,000 rooms. Demand
for lodging has grown even faster in the past four years from
2003 to 2006 at a 3.3% CAGR. Even with the recent increase in
the number of hotel rooms, demand in the past few years has been
outpacing supply, which creates a favorable business environment
for lodging companies.
3
Performance in the lodging industry is measured by certain key
metrics, such as average daily rate, or ADR, average occupancy
rate and revenue per available room, or RevPAR, which is
calculated by multiplying the ADR by the average occupancy rate.
Over the past five years, the trends in these performance
metrics have generally indicated that the lodging industry is
growing. In 2006, the ADR in the United States was $97.24, which
is 7.0% higher than the rate in the prior year, the average
occupancy rate was 63.4%, which is 0.4% higher than the rate in
the prior year and RevPAR was $61.62, which is 7.4% higher than
RevPAR in the prior year. The following table demonstrates the
trends in the key performance metrics:
Trends in
Performance Metrics in the United States since 2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
Average Daily
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
Year
|
|
Rate
|
|
Rate
|
|
Rate (ADR)
|
|
in ADR
|
|
RevPAR
|
|
RevPAR
|
|
2001
|
|
|
59.7%
|
|
|
(5.6)%
|
|
$
|
83.96
|
|
|
(1.5)%
|
|
$
|
50.16
|
|
|
(7.0)%
|
2002
|
|
|
59.0%
|
|
|
(1.2)%
|
|
|
82.71
|
|
|
(1.5)%
|
|
|
48.81
|
|
|
(2.7)%
|
2003
|
|
|
59.2%
|
|
|
0.3 %
|
|
|
82.82
|
|
|
0.1 %
|
|
|
49.02
|
|
|
0.4 %
|
2004
|
|
|
61.3%
|
|
|
3.6 %
|
|
|
86.25
|
|
|
4.1 %
|
|
|
52.89
|
|
|
7.9 %
|
2005
|
|
|
63.1%
|
|
|
2.9 %
|
|
|
90.89
|
|
|
5.4 %
|
|
|
57.35
|
|
|
8.5 %
|
2006
|
|
|
63.4%
|
|
|
0.4 %
|
|
|
97.24
|
|
|
7.0 %
|
|
|
61.62
|
|
|
7.4 %
|
2007E
|
|
|
63.3%
|
|
|
(0.1)%
|
|
|
102.91
|
|
|
5.8 %
|
|
|
65.18
|
|
|
5.8 %
|
Sources: Smith
Travel Research; PricewaterhouseCoopers
Performance in the lodging industry is also measured by revenues
earned by companies in the industry and by the number of new
rooms added on a yearly basis. In 2006, the lodging industry
earned revenues of $134 billion and added 118,800 new
rooms. The following table demonstrates trends in revenues and
new rooms:
Trends in
Revenues and New Rooms in the United States since 2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Change in
|
|
New
|
|
Change in
|
Year
|
|
($bn)
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Rooms (000s)
|
|
New Rooms
|
|
2001
|
|
$
|
103.5
|
|
|
(7.7)%
|
|
|
90.5
|
|
|
(24.8)%
|
2002
|
|
|
102.5
|
|
|
(0.9)%
|
|
|
68.4
|
|
|
(24.4)%
|
2003
|
|
|
105.1
|
|
|
2.5 %
|
|
|
76.6
|
|
|
12.0 %
|
2004
|
|
|
114.0
|
|
|
8.5 %
|
|
|
80.7
|
|
|
5.3 %
|
2005
|
|
|
123.9
|
|
|
8.7 %
|
|
|
83.6
|
|
|
3.6 %
|
2006
|
|
|
133.9
|
|
|
8.1 %
|
|
|
118.8
|
|
|
42.1 %
|
2007E
|
|
|
144.0
|
|
|
7.5 %
|
|
|
124.7
|
|
|
5.0 %
|
Sources: Smith
Travel Research; PricewaterhouseCoopers
4
The lodging industry generally can be divided into four main
segments: (i) luxury; (ii) upscale, which also
includes upper upscale properties, (iii) midscale, which is
often further split into midscale with food and beverage and
midscale without food and beverage; and (iv) economy.
Luxury and upscale hotels typically offer a full range of
on-property amenities and services including restaurants, spas,
recreational facilities, business center, concierge, room
service and local transportation (shuttle service to airport,
local attractions and shopping). Midscale segment properties
typically offer limited breakfast service, vending, selected
business services, partial recreational facilities (either a
pool or fitness equipment) and limited transportation (airport
shuttle). Economy properties typically offer a swimming pool and
airport shuttle. The following table sets forth the information
on the ADR and on supply and demand for each segment and the
associated subsegments:
Lodging
Segments for Franchised Hotels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2006 Room
|
|
|
|
|
Average Daily
|
|
Rooms Sold
|
|
Change in
|
|
Supply
|
|
Change in
|
Segment (*)
|
|
Room Rate (ADR)
|
|
(Demand, 000s)
|
|
Demand
|
|
(000s)
|
|
Supply
|
|
Luxury
|
|
Greater than $180
|
|
|
55.0
|
|
|
5.4 %
|
|
|
77.0
|
|
|
3.0 %
|
Upper upscale
|
|
$115 to $180
|
|
|
386.6
|
|
|
1.6 %
|
|
|
542.8
|
|
|
1.2 %
|
Upscale
|
|
$85 to $115
|
|
|
281.0
|
|
|
1.5 %
|
|
|
400.3
|
|
|
1.7 %
|
Midscale with
food-and-beverage
|
|
$57 to $85
|
|
|
321.1
|
|
|
(1.8)%
|
|
|
539.6
|
|
|
(2.6)%
|
Midscale without
food-and-beverage
|
|
$57 to $85
|
|
|
445.8
|
|
|
3.2 %
|
|
|
672.1
|
|
|
2.1 %
|
Economy
|
|
Less than $57
|
|
|
421.8
|
|
|
(0.1)%
|
|
|
736.4
|
|
|
0.1 %
|
Sources: Smith
Travel Research; PricewaterhouseCoopers Hospitality Directions,
U.S. Edition, December 2006.
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
The economy segments
(upper economy, economy and lower economy) of our lodging
brands, while based on the Smith Travel Research chain-scale
segments represented in the table above, provide a greater
degree of differentiation to correspond with the price
sensitivities of our customers by brand. The middle
segment of our lodging brands encompasses both the Smith Travel
Research midscale without food and beverage and
midscale with food and beverage segments. See the
System Performance and Distribution Table below.
|
Typically, companies in the lodging industry operate under one
or more of the following three business models:
|
|
·
|
Franchise. Under the franchise model, a company,
which under this model is referred to as a franchisor, typically
grants the use of a brand name to owners of hotels that the
company neither owns nor manages in exchange for royalty fees
that are typically equal to a percentage of room sales. Owners
of independent hotels increasingly have been affiliating their
hotels with national lodging franchise brands as a means to
remain competitive. In 2006, the share of hotel rooms in the
United States affiliated with a national lodging chain was
approximately 67%.
|
|
·
|
Management. Under the management model, a company
provides property management services to lodging properties that
it owns
and/or
lodging properties owned by a third party in exchange for
management fees, which may include incentive fees based on the
financial performances of the properties.
|
|
·
|
Ownership. Under the ownership model, a company owns
properties and therefore benefits financially from hotel
revenues and any appreciation in the value of the properties.
|
Vacation
Exchange and Rentals Industry
The estimated $39 billion global vacation exchange and
rentals industry is a growing segment of the hospitality
industry. Industry providers offer products and services to both
leisure travelers and vacation property owners, including owners
of second homes and vacation ownership interests. The vacation
exchange and rentals industry offers leisure travelers access to
a range of fully-furnished vacation properties, which include
privately-owned vacation homes, apartments and condominiums,
vacation ownership resorts, inventory at hotels and resorts,
villas, cottages, boats and yachts. Providers offer leisure
travelers flexibility (subject to availability) as to time of
travel and a choice of lodging options in regions to which such
travelers may not typically have such ease of access. For
5
vacation property owners, affiliations with vacation exchange
companies or vacation rental companies allow such owners to
transfer the ability to facilitate exchanges of interests in
vacation properties or marketing and renting vacation
properties, as applicable, and, with respect to vacation
properties for rental, to transfer the responsibility of
managing such properties.
The vacation exchange industry provides to owners of intervals
flexibility with respect to vacations through vacation
exchanges. Companies that offer vacation exchange services
include, among others RCI (our global
vacation exchange business and the worlds largest vacation
exchange network), Interval International, Inc. (a third-party
exchange company), and companies that develop vacation ownership
resorts and market vacation ownership interests and offer
exchanges through internal networks of properties. To
participate in a vacation exchange, an owner generally
contributes intervals to an exchange companys network and
then indicates the particular resort or geographic area to which
the owner would like to travel, the size of the unit desired and
the period during which the owner would like to vacation. The
exchange company then rates the owners contributed
intervals based upon a number of factors, including the location
and size of the unit or units, the quality of the resort or
resorts and the time period or periods during which the
intervals entitle the owner to vacation. The exchange company
then generally offers the owner a vacation with a comparable
rating to the vacation that the owner contributed. Exchange
companies generally derive revenues from owners of intervals by
charging exchange fees for exchanges and through annual
membership dues. In 2005, over 70% of owners of intervals were
members of vacation exchange companies, and approximately
two-thirds of such owners exchanged their intervals through such
exchange companies.
The overall trend in the vacation exchange industry is growth in
the number of members of vacation exchange companies. We believe
that the vacation exchange industry will be favorably impacted
by the growth in the premium and luxury segments of the vacation
ownership industry through the increased sales of vacation
ownership interests at high-end luxury resorts and the continued
development of vacation ownership properties and products,
including condominium hotels and destination clubs. The vacation
exchange industry is expected to grow over the next few years
with respect to members and with respect to exchanges by
members. In 2005, there were more than five million members who
completed over 3.5 million exchanges.
The vacation rental industry offers vacation property owners the
opportunity to rent their properties to leisure travelers for
periods of time when the properties are unoccupied. The vacation
rental industry is not as organized as the lodging industry in
that the vacation rental industry, we believe, has no global
companies and no international reservation systems or global
brands. The global supply of vacation rental inventory is highly
fragmented with much of it being made available by individual
property owners (as contrasted with commercial hospitality
providers). Although these owners sometimes rent their
properties directly, with or without the assistance of property
managers and brokers, vacation rental companies often assist in
renting owners properties without the benefit of globally
recognized brands or international marketing and reservation
systems. Sales by vacation rental companies are growing more
rapidly than sales by other suppliers of inventory in the
vacation rental industry. Typically, vacation rental companies
collect rent in advance and, after deducting the applicable
commissions, remit the net amounts due to the property owners
and/or
property managers. In addition to commissions, vacation rental
companies earn revenues from rental customers through fees that
are incidental to the rental of the properties, such as fees for
travel services, local transportation,
on-site
services and insurance or similar type products.
We believe that as of December 31, 2006, there were
approximately 1.5 million and 1.1 million vacation
properties available for rental in the United States and Europe,
respectively. In the United States, the vacation properties
available for rental are primarily condominiums or stand-alone
houses. In Europe, the vacation properties available for rental
include individual homes and apartments, campsites and vacation
parks. Individual owners of vacation properties in the United
States and Europe principally own their properties as
investments and often only use such properties for portions of
the year.
We believe that the overall demand for vacation rentals has been
growing for the following reasons: (i) the continuing
growth of low-cost airline operations; (ii) the increased
use of the Internet as a tool for facilitating vacation rental
transactions; and (iii) the emergence of attractive,
low-cost destinations, such as Eastern Europe and the Middle
East. The demand per year for vacation rentals in Europe, the
United States, South Africa and Australia is approximately
49 million vacation weeks, 31 million of which are
rented by leisure travelers from Europe. Demand for vacation
rental properties is often regional in that leisure travelers
who rent properties often live relatively close to such
properties. Many leisure travelers, however, travel relatively
long distances from their homes to vacation properties in
domestic or international destinations.
6
The destinations where leisure travelers from Europe, the United
States, South Africa and Australia generally rent properties
vary by country of origin of the leisure travelers. Leisure
travelers from Europe generally rent properties in European
destinations, including Spain, France, Italy and Portugal, which
are the most popular destinations for European leisure
travelers. Demand from European leisure travelers has recently
been shifting beyond traditional Western Europe, based on
political stability across Europe, increased accessibility of
Eastern Europe, expansion of the European Union and expansion of
tourism in southern Mediterranean destinations. Demand by
leisure travelers from the United States is focused on rentals
in traditional destinations, such as Florida; Las Vegas, Nevada;
San Francisco, California; and New York City.
We believe that the overall supply of vacation rental properties
has been growing as a result of the growth in ownership of
second homes. Growth in ownership of second homes, however,
could adversely affect demand for vacation rental properties to
the extent that owners of such homes no longer are as likely to
rent vacation properties as such owners were before they bought
second homes.
The
Vacation Ownership Industry
The $13 billion global vacation ownership industry, which
is also referred to as the timeshare industry, is one of the
fastest-developing segments of the domestic and international
hospitality industry. The vacation ownership industry enables
customers to share ownership of a fully-furnished vacation
accommodation. Typically, a vacation ownership purchaser
acquires either a fee simple interest in a property, which gives
the purchaser title to a fraction of a unit, or a right to use a
property, which gives the purchaser the right to use a property
for a specified period of time. Generally, a vacation ownership
purchasers fee simple interest in or right to use a
property is referred to as a vacation ownership
interest. For many vacation ownership interest purchasers,
vacation ownership is an attractive vacation alternative to
traditional lodging accommodations at hotels or owning vacation
properties. Owners of vacation ownership interests are not
subject to the variance in room rates to which lodging customers
are subject, and vacation ownership units are, on average, more
than twice the size of traditional hotel rooms and typically
have more amenities, such as kitchens, than do traditional hotel
rooms.
The vacation ownership concept originated in Europe during the
late 1960s and spread to the United States shortly thereafter.
The vacation ownership industry expanded slowly in the United
States until the mid-1980s; since then, the vacation ownership
industry has grown at a double-digit CAGR. The American Resort
Development Association, or ARDA, indicates that sales of
vacation ownership interests grew in excess of 17% CAGR from
1995 to 2005. Based on ARDA research, domestic sales of vacation
ownership interests were approximately $8,610 million in
2005 compared to $4,200 million in 2000 and
$1,900 million in 1995. ARDA estimated that on
January 1, 2006, there were approximately 4.1 million
households that owned one or more vacation ownership interests
in the United States.
Based on published industry data, we believe that the following
factors have contributed to the substantial growth, particularly
in North America, of the vacation ownership industry over the
past two decades:
|
|
·
|
increased consumer confidence in the industry based on enhanced
consumer protection regulation of the industry;
|
|
·
|
entry of lodging and entertainment companies into the industry,
including Marriott International, Inc., The Walt Disney Company,
Hilton Hotels Corporation, Hyatt Corporation, and Starwood
Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc.;
|
|
·
|
increased flexibility for owners of vacation ownership interests
made possible through owners affiliations with vacation
ownership exchange companies and vacation ownership
companies internal exchange programs;
|
|
·
|
improvement in quality of resorts and resort management and
servicing; and
|
|
·
|
improved financing availability for purchasers of vacation
ownership interests.
|
7
Demographic factors explain, in part, the growth of the
industry. A 2006 study of vacation ownership purchasers revealed
that the average owner was 52 years of age and had a median
household income of $81,000. The average purchaser in the United
States, therefore, is a baby boomer who has disposable income
and interest in purchasing vacation products. We expect that
baby boomers will continue to have a positive influence on the
future growth of the vacation ownership industry.
According to the information compiled by the ARDA, the four
primary reasons consumers cite for purchasing vacation ownership
interests are: (i) flexibility with respect to different
locations, unit sizes and times of year, (ii) the certainty
of quality accommodations, (iii) credibility of the
timeshare company and (iv) the opportunity to exchange into
other resort locations. According to a 2006 ARDA study, nearly
80% of owners of vacation ownership interests indicated high
levels of satisfaction. With respect to exchange opportunities,
most owners of vacation ownership interests can exchange
vacation ownership interests through exchange companies and
through the applicable vacation ownership companys
internal network of properties.
WYNDHAM
HOTEL GROUP
Overview
Wyndham Hotel Group, our lodging business, franchises hotels and
provides property management services to owners of luxury and
upscale hotels. Through steady organic growth and acquisitions
of established lodging franchise systems over the past
16 years, our lodging business has become the worlds
largest lodging franchisor as measured by the number of
franchised hotels. Our lodging business has almost 6,500
franchised hotels, which represents over 543,000 rooms on six
continents. Our franchised hotels operate under one of our ten
lodging brands, which are Wyndham Hotels and Resorts, Wingate
Inn, Ramada, Baymont, Days Inn, Super 8, Howard Johnson,
AmeriHost Inn, Travelodge and Knights Inn. The breadth and
diversity of our lodging brands provide potential franchisees
with a range of options for affiliating their properties with
one or more of our brands. Our lodging business has a strong
presence across the middle and economy segments of the lodging
industry and a developing presence in the upscale segment, thus
providing individual consumers who are traveling for leisure or
business with options for hospitality products and services
across various price ranges. Throughout this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
we use the term hotels to apply to hotels, motels
and/or other
accommodations, as applicable. In addition, the term
franchise system refers to a system through which a
franchisor licenses a brand and provides services to hotels
whose independent owners pay to receive such license and
services from the franchisor under the specific terms of a
franchise agreement. The services provided through a franchise
system typically include reservations, sales leads, marketing
and advertising support, training, quality assurance
inspections, operational support and information, pre-opening
assistance, prototype construction plans, and national or
regional conferences.
Our franchised hotels represent approximately 10% of the
U.S. hotel room inventory. In 2006, our franchised hotels
sold 8.6%, or approximately 88.8 million, of the one
billion hotel room nights sold in the United States. In 2006,
our franchised hotels sold approximately 19.4% of all hotel room
nights sold in the United States in the economy and midscale
segments. Our franchised hotels are dispersed throughout North
America, which reduces our exposure to any one geographic
region. Approximately 89% of the hotel rooms, or approximately
485,000 rooms, in our franchised hotels are located throughout
North America, and approximately 11% of the hotel rooms, or
approximately 58,000 rooms, are located outside of North
America. In addition, our lodging franchises are dispersed
among numerous franchisees, which reduces our exposure to any one
lodging franchisee. Of our approximately 5,200 lodging
franchisees, no one franchisee accounts for more than 2% of our
franchised hotels. Our lodging business provides our franchised
hotels with a suite of operational and administrative services,
including access to a central reservations system, advertising,
promotional and co-marketing programs, referrals, technology,
training and volume purchasing. We also provide our franchisees
with the TripRewards loyalty program, which is the worlds
largest hotel rewards program as measured by the number of
participating hotels.
As of December 31, 2006, we were providing property
management services to 32 hotels associated with either the
Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand or the CHI joint venture. Our
property management business offers owners of hotels
professional oversight and comprehensive operations support. We
expect to expand our property management business by
strategically entering into property management contracts with
new and existing hotels.
Our lodging business derives the majority of its revenues from
franchising hotels and derives additional revenues from
providing property management services. The sources of revenues
from franchising hotels are initial franchise fees, which relate
to services provided to assist a franchised hotel to open for
business under one of our brands, and ongoing franchise fees,
which are comprised of royalty fees and other fees relating to
marketing and reservations. The royalty fees are intended to
cover the use of our trademarks and our operating expenses, such
as
8
expenses incurred for franchise services, including quality
assurance and administrative support, and to provide us with
operating profits. The fees relating to marketing and
reservations are intended to reimburse us for expenses
associated with providing certain other franchise services, such
as a central reservations system and advertising and marketing
programs. Because franchise fees generally are based on
percentages of the franchisees gross room revenues,
increasing RevPAR at franchised hotels is important to our
revenue growth. Expanding our portfolio of franchised hotels and
providing world-class service and support are also important to
our revenue growth. The sources of revenue from property
management are management fees, service fees and reimbursement
revenues. Our management fees are comprised of base fees, which
typically are calculated based upon a specified percentage of
gross revenues from hotel operations, and incentive management
fees, which typically are calculated based upon a specified
percentage of a hotels gross operating profit. Service
fees include fees derived from accounting, design, construction
and purchasing services and technical assistance provided to
managed hotels. Reimbursement revenues are intended to cover
expenses incurred by the property management business on behalf
of the managed hotels, primarily consisting of payroll costs for
operational employees who work at the hotels. Revenues from our
lodging business represented approximately 17%, 15% and 15% of
total company net revenues during 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. EBITDA from our lodging business represented
approximately 28%, 26% and 26% of total company EBITDA during
2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Our lodging business franchises under two models. In
North America and the United Kingdom, we generally employ a
direct franchise model whereby we contract with and provide
services and assistance with reservations directly to
independent owner-operators of hotels. In other parts of the
world, we employ either a direct franchise model or a master
franchise model whereby we contract with a qualified,
experienced third party to build a franchise enterprise in such
third partys country or region.
Lodging
Brands
We franchise ten widely-known lodging brands:
|
|
·
|
Wyndham Hotels and Resorts. The Wyndham Hotels and
Resorts brand was founded in 1981, and we acquired the brand in
2005. Wyndham Hotels and Resorts serves the upscale segment of
the lodging industry with over 80 hotels and approximately
23,000 rooms located in the United States, Canada, the Caribbean
and Mexico. Wyndham ByRequest program, which is a guest
recognition program that provides returning guests with
personalized accommodations, and Wyndham Hotels and Resorts
offers signature programs, which include: Wyndhams
Meetings ByRequest program, which is designed to help groups
plan meetings and features
24-hour
turnaround on all correspondence between the groups
meeting planner and Wyndhams meetings manager, 100% wired
or wireless Internet connectivity and catering options.
|
|
·
|
Wingate Inns International. We created and launched the
Wingate Inn brand in 1995 and opened the first hotel a year
later. The all-new-construction Wingate Inn brand serves the
upper middle segment of the lodging industry and franchises
approximately 150 hotels with approximately 14,100 rooms located
in the United States and Canada. Wingate Inn hotels currently
offer all-inclusive pricing that includes the price of the room;
complimentary wired and wireless high-speed Internet access,
faxes and photocopies, deluxe continental breakfast, local calls
and access for long-distance calls; and access to a
24-hour
self-service business center equipped with computers with
high-speed Internet access, a fax, a photocopier and a printer.
Each hotel features a boardroom and meeting rooms with
high-speed Internet access, a fitness room with a whirlpool and,
at most locations, a swimming pool. Wingate Inn hotels currently
do not offer food and beverage services.
|
|
·
|
Ramada Worldwide. The Ramada brand was founded in 1954.
We licensed the United States and Canadian trademark rights to
the Ramada brand prior to acquiring the rights in 2002 and
acquired the ownership rights to the brand on a worldwide basis
in 2004. In North America, we serve the middle segment through
Ramada, Ramada Hotel, Ramada Plaza and Ramada Limited, and
internationally we serve the middle and upscale segments of the
lodging industry through Ramada Resort, Ramada Hotel and Resort,
Ramada Hotel and Suites, Ramada Plaza and Ramada Encore. Ramada
Worldwide franchises approximately 870 hotels with approximately
106,000 rooms located in the United States, Canada, Costa Rica,
Mexico, United Kingdom, Ireland, France, Switzerland, Finland,
the Netherlands, Germany, Italy, Czech Republic, Hungary,
Lithuania, Romania, Turkey, Egypt, Bahrain, Morocco, Saudi
Arabia, Qatar, Oman, United Arab Emirates, Australia, Japan,
South Korea, Indonesia, China, Hong Kong, India, Kuwait,
Thailand and New Caledonia.
|
|
·
|
Baymont Franchise Systems. Founded in Wisconsin in 1976
under the Budgetel Inns brands, the system was converted in 1999
to the Baymont Inn & Suites brand. We acquired the
brand in April 2006. Baymont Franchise Systems primarily serves
the middle segment of the lodging industry and franchises
|
9
|
|
|
|
approximately 140 hotels with approximately 12,400 rooms located
in the United States. Following the closing of our acquisition
of the franchise business of Baymont Inn & Suites, we
announced our intent to consolidate the AmeriHost-branded
properties with our newly acquired Baymont-branded properties to
create a more significant midscale brand. We commenced the
integration in December 2006 and expect to be complete by fourth
quarter 2007. Baymont Inn & Suites rooms feature
oversized desks, ergonomic chairs and task lamps, voicemail,
free local calls, in-room coffee maker, iron and board, hair
dryer and shampoo, television with premium channels,
pay-per-view
movies
and/or
satellite movies and video games. Most locations feature
high-speed Internet access, a swimming pool, airport shuttle
service and a fitness center.
|
|
·
|
Days Inns Worldwide. The Days Inn brand was created by
Cecil B. Day in 1970, when the lodging industry consisted of
only a dozen national brands. We acquired the brand in 1992.
Days Inns Worldwide serves the upper economy segment of the
lodging industry with approximately 1,860 hotels with
approximately 151,400 rooms located in the United States,
Canada, Mexico, Argentina, Uruguay, Ireland, United Kingdom,
Italy, Egypt, Jordan, South Africa, Guam, China, India and the
Philippines. In the United States, we serve the upper economy segment of the lodging
industry through Days Inn, Days Hotel, Days Suites, DAYSTOP and
Days Inn Business Place, and in the United Kingdom we serve the
upper economy segment of the lodging industry through Days
Hotels, Days Inn and Days Serviced Apartments. Many properties
offer
on-site
restaurants, lounges, meeting rooms, banquet facilities,
exercise centers and a complimentary continental breakfast and
newspaper each morning. Each Days Suites room provides separate
living and sleeping areas, with a telephone and television in
each area. Each Days Inn Business Place room currently offers
high-intensity lighting, a large desk, a microwave/refrigerator
unit, a coffeemaker, an iron and ironing board, and snacks and
beverages.
|
|
|
·
|
Super 8 Motels. The first motel operating under the Super
8 brand opened in October 1974. We acquired the brand in 1993.
Super 8 Motels serves the economy segment of the lodging
industry. Super 8 Motels franchises approximately 2,050 hotels
with approximately 126,200 rooms located in the United States,
Canada and China. Super 8 motels currently provide complimentary
continental breakfast. Participating motels currently allow pets
and offer free local calls for free, fax and copy services,
microwaves, suites, guest laundry, exercise facilities, cribs,
rollaway beds and pools.
|
|
·
|
Howard Johnson International. The Howard Johnson brand
was founded in 1925 by entrepreneur Howard Dearing Johnson as an
ice cream stand within an apothecary shop in Quincy,
Massachusetts, and the first hotel operating under the brand
opened in 1954 in Savannah, Georgia. We acquired the brand in
1990. Howard Johnson serves the middle segment of the lodging
industry through Howard Johnson Plaza, Howard Johnson Inn and
Howard Johnson Hotel and the economy segment of the lodging
industry through Howard Johnson Express. Howard Johnson
franchises approximately 470 hotels with approximately 44,400
rooms located in the United States, Canada, Caribbean,
Guatemala, Mexico, Argentina, Brazil, Columbia, Ecuador,
Venezuela, Malta, Romania, Israel, United Arab Emirates, China
and India. Participating hotels offer standard business
amenities, a
25-inch
television and free access for long-distance calls.
|
|
·
|
AmeriHost Franchise Systems. The first AmeriHost Inn
hotel opened in Athens, Ohio in 1989. We acquired the brand in
2000. AmeriHost Franchise Systems serves the middle segment of
the lodging industry through AmeriHost Inn and AmeriHost
Inn & Suites. AmeriHost Franchise Systems franchises
approximately 100 hotels with approximately 6,700 rooms located
in the United States. AmeriHost Inn hotels do not offer food and
beverage services. In April 2006, following the closing of our
acquisition of the franchise business of Baymont Inn &
Suites, we announced our intent to consolidate the
AmeriHost-branded properties with our newly acquired
Baymont-branded properties to create a more significant midscale
brand. We commenced the integration in December 2006 and expect
to be complete by fourth quarter 2007.
|
|
·
|
Travelodge Hotels. In 1935, founder Scott King
established his first motor court operating under the Travelodge
brand in San Diego. We acquired the brand (in North America
only) in 1996. Travelodge Hotels franchises approximately 500
hotels with approximately 37,500 rooms located in the United
States, Canada and Mexico. Travelodge Hotels serves the upper
and lower economy segments of the lodging industry in the United
States through Travelodge, Travelodge Suites and Thriftlodge
hotels and serves the middle segment of the lodging industry in
Canada and Mexico through Travelodge and Thriftlodge hotels.
|
|
·
|
Knights Franchise Systems. The Knights Inn brand was
created in 1972, and the first hotel operating under the brand
opened in Columbus, Ohio. We acquired the brand in 1995. Knights
Franchise Systems serves the lower economy segment of the
lodging industry with 230 hotels with approximately 16,900 rooms
located in the United States and Canada.
|
10
System
Performance and Distribution
The following table provides operating statistics for our brands
and for managed, non-proprietary hotels. The table includes
information as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006.
We derived occupancy, ADR and RevPAR from information we have
received from our franchisees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue Per
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Average
|
|
Available
|
|
|
Primary
|
|
Rooms
|
|
# of
|
|
# of
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
Daily Rate
|
|
Room
|
Brand
|
|
Segment
Served (1)
|
|
Per Property
|
|
Properties
|
|
Rooms (2)
|
|
Rate
|
|
(ADR)
|
|
(RevPAR)
|
|
Wyndham Hotels and Resorts
|
|
Upscale
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
22,582
|
|
|
|
68.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
110.37
|
|
|
$
|
75.68
|
|
Wingate Inn
|
|
Upper Middle
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
14,146
|
|
|
|
64.7
|
%
|
|
|
83.99
|
|
|
|
54.33
|
|
Ramada
|
|
Upscale & Middle
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
871
|
|
|
|
105,986
|
|
|
|
53.7
|
%
|
|
|
72.34
|
|
|
|
38.85
|
|
Baymont
|
|
Middle
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
12,377
|
|
|
|
57.7
|
%
|
|
|
63.35
|
|
|
|
36.56
|
|
AmeriHost Inn
|
|
Middle
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
6,745
|
|
|
|
53.7
|
%
|
|
|
62.09
|
|
|
|
33.37
|
|
Days Inn
|
|
Upper Economy
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
1,859
|
|
|
|
151,438
|
|
|
|
52.0
|
%
|
|
|
60.37
|
|
|
|
31.41
|
|
Super 8
|
|
Economy
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
2,054
|
|
|
|
126,175
|
|
|
|
55.2
|
%
|
|
|
56.17
|
|
|
|
31.00
|
|
Howard Johnson
|
|
Middle & Economy
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
467
|
|
|
|
44,432
|
|
|
|
46.3
|
%
|
|
|
65.82
|
|
|
|
30.45
|
|
Travelodge
|
|
Upper & Lower Economy
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
37,468
|
|
|
|
50.7
|
%
|
|
|
63.05
|
|
|
|
31.95
|
|
Knights Inn
|
|
Lower Economy
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
16,892
|
|
|
|
42.3
|
%
|
|
|
40.11
|
|
|
|
16.98
|
|
Managed,
|
|
Luxury & Upper
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Proprietary
Hotels (3)
|
|
Upscale
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
4,993
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
6,473
|
|
|
|
543,234
|
|
|
|
53.4
|
%
|
|
|
65.44
|
|
|
|
34.95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The economy segments
discussed here, while based on the Smith Travel Research
chain-scale segments represented in the table on page 6 of
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
provide a greater degree of differentiation to correspond with
the price sensitivities of our customers by brand. The
middle segment discussed here encompasses both the
Smith Travel Research midscale without food and
beverage and midscale with food and beverage
segments.
|
|
(2) |
|
From time to time, as a result of
hurricanes, other adverse weather events and ordinary wear and
tear, some of the rooms at these hotels may be taken out of
service for repair and renovation and therefore may be
unavailable.
|
|
(3) |
|
Represents properties managed under
the CHI joint venture. As these properties are not branded,
certain operating statistics (such as average occupancy rate,
ADR and RevPAR) are not relevant. Thirteen of these properties
are scheduled to be branded or cobranded as either Wyndham or
Ramada during 2007.
|
The following table provides a summary description of our
properties (including managed non-proprietary hotels) by
geographic region as of and for the year ended December 31,
2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Average Revenue
|
|
|
# of
|
|
# of
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
Average Daily
|
|
Per Available
|
Region
|
|
Properties
|
|
Rooms (1)
|
|
Rate
|
|
Rate (ADR)
|
|
Room (RevPAR)
|
|
United States
|
|
|
5,636
|
|
|
|
450,126
|
|
|
|
53.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
63.20
|
|
|
$
|
33.69
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
423
|
|
|
|
34,845
|
|
|
|
55.9
|
%
|
|
|
79.40
|
|
|
|
44.37
|
|
Europe (2)
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
26,516
|
|
|
|
59.7
|
%
|
|
|
83.38
|
|
|
|
49.77
|
|
Asia/Pacific
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
19,741
|
|
|
|
57.5
|
%
|
|
|
59.14
|
|
|
|
34.03
|
|
Latin/South America
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
7,924
|
|
|
|
45.0
|
%
|
|
|
54.10
|
|
|
|
24.34
|
|
Middle
East/Africa (2)
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
4,082
|
|
|
|
62.1
|
%
|
|
|
83.51
|
|
|
|
51.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
6,473
|
|
|
|
543,234
|
|
|
|
53.4
|
%
|
|
|
65.44
|
|
|
|
34.95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
From time to time, as a result of
hurricanes, other adverse weather events and ordinary wear and
tear, some of the rooms at these hotels may be taken out of
service for repair and renovation and therefore may be
unavailable.
|
|
(2) |
|
Europe and Middle East include
properties and rooms managed under the CHI joint venture. As
these properties are not branded, certain operating statistics
(such as average occupancy rate, ADR and RevPAR) are not
relevant and therefore, have not been reflected in the table.
Thirteen of these properties are scheduled to be branded as
either Wyndham or Ramada during 2007.
|
Franchise
Development
Under our direct franchise model, we principally market our
lodging brands to independent hotel and motel owners and to
hotel and motel owners who have the rights to terminate their
franchise affiliations with other lodging brands. We also market
franchises under our lodging brands to existing franchisees
because many own, or may own in the future, other hotels that
can be converted to one of our brands. Under our master
franchise model, we principally market our lodging brands to
third parties that assume the principal role of franchisor,
which entails selling individual franchise agreements and
providing quality assurance, marketing and reservations support
to franchisees. As part of our franchise development strategy,
we employ national and international sales forces that we
11
compensate in part through commissions. Because of the
importance of existing franchised hotels to our sales strategy,
a significant part of our franchise development efforts is to
ensure that our franchisees provide quality services to maintain
the satisfaction of customers.
Franchise
Agreements
Our standard franchise agreement grants a franchisee the right
to non-exclusive use of the applicable franchise system in the
operation of a single hotel at a specified location, typically
for a period of 15 to 20 years, and gives the franchisor
and franchisee certain rights to terminate the franchise
agreement before the conclusion of the term of the agreement
under certain circumstances, such as upon designated
anniversaries of the franchised hotels opening or the date
of the agreement. Early termination options in franchise
agreements give us flexibility to eliminate or re-brand
franchised hotels if such properties become weak performers,
even if there is no contractual failure by the franchisees. We
also have the right to terminate a franchise agreement for
failure by a franchisee to (i) bring its properties into
compliance with contractual or quality standards within
specified periods of time, (ii) pay required franchise fees
or (iii) comply with other requirements of its franchise
agreement.
Master franchise agreements, which are individually negotiated
and vary among our different brands, typically contain
provisions that permit us to terminate the agreement if the
other party to the agreement fails to meet specified development
schedules. Our master franchise agreements generally are
competitive with the industry averages within industry segments.
Sales and
Marketing of Hotel Rooms
We use the marketing/reservation fees that our franchisees pay
to us to promote our brands through media advertising, direct
mail, direct sales, promotions and publicity. A portion of the
funds contributed by the franchisees of any one particular brand
is used to promote that brand, whereas the remainder of the
funds is allocated to support the cost of multibrand promotional
efforts and to our marketing and sales team, which includes,
among others, our worldwide sales, public relations, loyalty and
direct marketing teams.
In 2006, the efforts of our worldwide sales team contributed
approximately 12% of the annual hotel room nights sold at our
franchised hotels. To supplement the worldwide sales teams
efforts, our public relations team extends the reach and
frequency of our paid advertising by generating extensive,
unpaid exposure for our brands in trade and consumer media
including USA TODAY, The New York Times,
Financial Times, Frommers and other
widely-read publications.
In addition to the traditional sales efforts, we plan to develop
and market mixed-use hotel and vacation ownership properties in
conjunction with Wyndhams vacation ownership business. The
mixed-use properties would generate room revenues at the
franchised hotel and increased spend at the hotel restaurants
and facilities by visiting timeshare guests.
Central
Reservations
In 2006, we booked on behalf of our franchised and managed
hotels approximately 4.3 million rooms by telephone,
approximately 9.8 million rooms through the Internet and
approximately 1.9 million rooms through global distribution
systems, with a combined value of the bookings in excess of
$1 billion. Additionally, our worldwide sales team
generated leads for bookings from tour operators, travel agents,
government and military clients, and corporate and small
business accounts. We maintain contact centers in Saint John,
New Brunswick, Canada, Aberdeen, South Dakota, Dallas, Texas and
Manila, Philippines that handle bookings generated through our
toll-free brand numbers. We maintain numerous brand websites to
process online room reservations, and we utilize global
distribution systems to process reservations generated by travel
agents and third-party Internet booking sources, including
Orbitz.com, CheapTickets.com, Expedia.com and Travelocity.com.
To ensure we receive bookings by travel agents and third-party
Internet booking sources, we provide direct connections between
our central reservations system and most third-party Internet
booking sources. The majority of hotel room nights are sold by
our franchisees to guests who seek accommodations on a walk-in
basis or through calls made directly to hotels, which we believe
is attributable in part to the strength of our lodging brands.
Since 2001, bookings made directly by customers on our brand
websites have been increasing at a CAGR of approximately 31%,
and increased to 4.9 million room nights per year in 2006.
Since 2001, bookings made through third-party Internet booking
sources increased 20% while bookings made through global
distribution systems declined 11%.
12
Loyalty
Programs
The TripRewards program, which was introduced in 2003, has grown
steadily to become, we believe, the lodging industrys
largest loyalty program as measured by the number of
participating hotels. There are currently approximately 6,000
hotels that participate in the program. With more than 40
businesses participating in the program, TripRewards offers its
members numerous options to accumulate points. Members, for
example, may accumulate points by staying in hotels franchised
under one of our brands and purchasing everyday products and
services from the various businesses that participate in the
program. When staying at hotels franchised under one of our
brands, TripRewards members may elect to earn airline miles or
rail points instead of TripReward points. Businesses where
points can be earned generally pay a fee to participate in the
program; such fees are then used to support the programs
marketing and operating expenses. TripRewards members have
approximately 400 options to redeem their points. Members, for
example, may redeem their points for hotel stays, airline
tickets, resort vacations, electronics, sporting goods, movie
and theme park tickets, and gift certificates. As of
December 31, 2006, TripRewards had more than
5.2 million active members, which we define as any customer
who has enrolled in the TripRewards program or earned or
redeemed points in the program over the past 18 months, and
the program added approximately 240,000 active members per month
in 2006.
The Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand maintains a separate
loyalty program, the Wyndham ByRequest Program, which we expect
to integrate into the TripRewards program during 2007.
Property
Management
As of December 31, 2006, our lodging business was providing
hotel property management services to 32 properties associated
with the either the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand or the CHI
joint venture. Our property management business offers owners of
hotels professional oversight and comprehensive operations
support, including hiring, training, purchasing, revenue
management, sales and marketing, and food and beverage services;
financial management and analysis; and information systems
management and integration. Our management fee is generally
based on a percentage of each hotels gross revenue plus,
in the majority of properties, an incentive fee based on
operating performance. The terms of our management agreements
are for various periods and generally contain renewal options,
subject to certain termination rights. In general, under our
management agreements all operating and other expenses are paid
by the owner and we are reimbursed for our
out-of-pocket
expenses.
Strategies
We intend to continue to accelerate growth of our lodging
business by (i) maintaining our leadership position in the
economy segment through sales and retention efforts and RevPAR
growth; (ii) room growth in the domestic middle and upscale
segments; and (iii) expanding our international presence
through increasing the number of properties within the Wyndham
Hotels and Resorts, Ramada, Days Inn and Super 8 brands. Our
plans generally focus on pursuing these strategies organically.
In addition, in appropriate circumstances, we will consider
opportunities to acquire businesses, both domestic and
international, including through the use of Wyndham Worldwide
common stock as currency.
Domestic
Our strategy for growing economy brands in North America faster
than the competitive set revolves around (i) enhancing our
value to franchisees by improving rate and inventory management
capabilities, investing in systems and training and growing the
TripRewards loyalty program, (ii) improving the
customers experience by developing and implementing brand
standard enhancements, (iii) optimizing system growth by
adding franchised hotels in markets where brands are
underrepresented and (iv) optimizing brand RevPAR
performance by helping franchisees manage their rates and
inventory, enrolling more TripRewards members and introducing
seasonal promotions. Our approach for expanding our domestic
middle and upscale presence is to fully utilize property
management services to attract developers; establish and
implement the Wyndham master brand plan with upper upscale,
upscale and select-service products; complement Wingate Inn
product quality with Wyndham brand recognition; and strengthen
our position in the middle segment through the consolidation of
AmeriHost-branded with our newly acquired Baymont-branded
properties, which is currently scheduled to be completed by
fourth quarter 2007.
13
International
Our strategy for international growth is to expand the presence
of our Wyndham, Ramada, Days Inn and Super 8 brands and
selectively utilize direct/master franchising, management
agreements and joint venture models primarily in Europe and
Asia-Pacific.
We intend to expand the Days Inn brand in the United Kingdom and
in new markets that exhibit strong growth in the economy
segment. We intend to expand the Ramada brand beyond its
established base of properties in the United Kingdom and Germany
into new markets that exhibit strong growth in the middle
segment. We intend to expand the Wyndham brand in gateway and
destination cities in Europe that exhibit strong growth in the
upscale segment. Our expansion strategy for the Wyndham brand in
European gateway and destination cities includes increasing the
number of franchised and managed hotels through acquisitions and
through conversions of existing non-affiliated hotels to the
Wyndham brand. In Europe, we intend to pursue growth in the
number of franchised hotels through our direct franchise model
for our Days Inn brand. In addition, we may pursue growth in the
number of franchised and managed hotels through joint ventures.
In China, the Middle East and India, our strategy is to expand
the Super 8 brand in the economy segment and the Ramada and Days
Inn brands in the middle and upscale segments. In the near
future, our strategy will include introducing the Wyndham brand
to these regions. We intend to pursue these opportunities by
increasing the number of franchised hotels through our direct
franchise model for our Ramada and Wyndham brands and through
our master franchise model for our Super 8 and Days Inn brands.
In addition, we intend to pursue growth in the number of managed
hotels through new agreements with hotels franchised under our
Ramada and Wyndham brands. We may also pursue growth in the
number of franchised and managed hotels through the use of joint
ventures.
To further augment our international presence, we also intend to
pursue growth in Latin America, particularly in Mexico and in
the Caribbean, by expanding the Ramada brand in the middle
segment, expanding the Wyndham brand in the upscale segment and
continuing to support hotels franchised under the Howard Johnson
brand. In Latin America, we intend to pursue growth in the
number of franchised hotels through our direct franchise model
for our Ramada brands and through our master franchise model for
our Days Inn and Howard Johnson brands and growth in the number
of managed hotels through new management agreements with hotels
franchised under our brands.
Seasonality
Franchise and management fees are generally higher in the second
and third quarters than in the first or fourth quarters of any
calendar year. Because of increased leisure travel and the
related ability to charge higher ADRs during the spring and
summer months, hotels we franchise or manage typically generate
higher revenue during these months. Therefore, any occurrence
that disrupts travel patterns during the spring or summer could
have a greater adverse effect on our franchised hotels and
managed properties annual performances and consequently on
our annual performance than occurrences that disrupt travel
patterns in other seasons. We do not currently expect any change
to these seasonal trends.
Competition
Competition among the national lodging brand franchisors to grow
their franchise systems is robust. The lodging companies that we
compete with in the upscale and upper middle segments include
Marriott International Inc., Hilton Hotels Corporation, Starwood
Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc., InterContinental
Hotels Group PLC and Hyatt Corporation. The lodging companies
that we compete with in the middle and economy segments include
Marriott International Inc., Choice Hotels International, Inc.
and Accor SA.
We believe that competition for the sales of franchises in the
lodging industry is based principally upon the perceived value
and quality of the brands and the services offered to
franchisees. We believe that the perceived value of a brand name
to prospective franchisees is, to some extent, a function of the
success of the existing hotels franchised under the brands. We
believe that prospective franchisees value a franchise based
upon their views of the relationship between the costs,
including costs of affiliation and conversion and future
charges, to the benefits, including potential for increased
revenue and profitability, and upon the reputation of the
franchisor.
The ability of an individual franchisee to compete may be
affected by the location and quality of its property, the number
of competing properties in the vicinity, community reputation
and other factors. A franchisees success may also be
affected by general, regional and local economic conditions. The
potential negative effect of these conditions on our results of
operations is substantially reduced by virtue of the diverse
geographical locations of our franchised hotels.
14
Trademarks
We own the trademarks Wyndham Hotels and Resorts,
Wingate Inn, Ramada,
Baymont, Days Inn, Super 8,
Howard Johnson, AmeriHost Inn,
Travelodge (in North America only), Knights
Inn, TripRewards and related trademarks and
logos. Such trademarks and logos are material to the businesses
that are part of our lodging business. Our franchisees and our
subsidiaries actively use these marks, and all of the material
marks are registered (or have applications pending) with the
United States Patent and Trademark Office as well as with the
relevant authorities in major countries worldwide where these
businesses have significant operations.
RCI
GLOBAL VACATION NETWORK
Overview
RCI Global Vacation Network, our vacation exchange and rentals
business, provides vacation exchange products and services to
developers, managers and owners of intervals of vacation
ownership interests, and markets vacation rental properties. We
are the worlds largest vacation exchange network and among
the worlds largest global marketers of vacation rental
properties. Our vacation exchange and rentals business has
access for specified periods, in a majority of cases on an
exclusive basis, to over 60,000 vacation properties, which are
comprised of over 4,000 vacation ownership resorts around the
world with units that are exchanged through our vacation
exchange business and over 56,000 vacation rental properties
that are located principally in Europe, which we believe makes
us one of the worlds largest marketers of European
vacation rental properties as measured by the number of
properties we market for rental. Each year, our vacation
exchange and rentals business provides more than four million
leisure-bound families with vacation exchange and rentals
products and services. The properties available to leisure
travelers through our vacation exchange and rentals business
include hotel rooms and suites, villas, cottages, bungalows,
campgrounds, vacation ownership condominiums, city apartments,
second homes, fractional private residences, luxury destination
clubs and boats. We offer leisure travelers flexibility (subject
to availability) as to time of travel and a choice of lodging
options in regions that such travelers may not typically have
such ease of access, and we offer property owners marketing
services, quality control services and property management
services ranging from key-holding to full property maintenance
for such properties. Our vacation exchange and rentals business
has over 60 worldwide offices. We market our products and
services using seven primary brands and other related brands.
Throughout this document, we use the term inventory
in the context of our vacation exchange and rentals business to
refer to intervals of vacation ownership interests and primarily
independently owned properties, which include hotel rooms and
suites, villas, cottages, bungalows, campgrounds, vacation
ownership condominiums, city apartments, second homes,
fractional private residences, luxury destination clubs and
boats. In addition, throughout this document, we refer to
intervals of vacation ownership interests as
intervals and individuals who purchase vacation
rental products and services from us as rental
customers.
Our vacation exchange and rentals business primarily derives its
revenues from fees. Our vacation exchange business, RCI, derives
a majority of its revenues from annual membership dues and
exchange fees for transactions. Our vacation exchange business
also derives revenues from ancillary services, including travel
agency services and loyalty programs. Our vacation rentals
business primarily derives its revenues from fees, which
generally average approximately 40% to 60% of the gross bookings
depending upon product mix or seasonality. Our vacation rentals
business also derives revenues from travel insurance sales in
Europe, transportation fees, property management fees and
on-site
revenue from ancillary services, including travel agency
services. Revenues from our vacation exchange and rentals
business represented approximately 29%, 31% and 31% of total
company net revenues during 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
EBITDA from our vacation exchange and rentals business
represented approximately 36%, 38% and 40% of total company
EBITDA during 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Through our vacation exchange business, RCI, we have
relationships with over 4,000 vacation ownership resorts in
approximately 100 countries. Historically, our vacation exchange
business consisted of the operation of worldwide exchange
programs for owners of intervals. Today, our vacation exchange
business also provides property management services and
consulting services for the development of tourism-oriented real
estate, loyalty programs, in-house and outsourced travel agency
services, and third-party vacation club services.
We operate our vacation exchange business, RCI, through three
worldwide exchange programs that have a member base of vacation
owners who are generally well-traveled and affluent and who want
flexibility and variety in their travel plans each year. Our
vacation exchange business three exchange programs, which
serve owners of intervals at affiliated resorts, are RCI Weeks,
RCI Points and The Registry Collection. Participants in these
exchange programs pay annual membership dues. For additional
fees, such participants are entitled to exchange intervals for
intervals at other properties affiliated with our vacation
exchange business. In addition, certain participants may
15
exchange intervals for other leisure-related products and
services. We refer to participants in these three exchange
programs as members. In addition, the Endless
Vacation®
magazine is the official publication of our RCI Weeks and RCI
Points exchange programs, and certain members can obtain the
benefits of participation in our RCI Weeks and RCI Points
exchange programs only through a subscription to Endless
Vacation®
magazine. The use of the terms member or
membership with respect to either the RCI Weeks or
RCI Points exchange program is intended to denote subscription
to Endless
Vacation®
magazine.
The RCI Weeks exchange program is the worlds largest
vacation ownership exchange network. We market this exchange
program under the RCI Weeks name. The RCI Weeks exchange program
provides members with flexibility to trade week-long intervals
in units at their resorts for week-long intervals in comparable
units at the same resorts or at comparable resorts.
The RCI Points exchange program is a global points-based
exchange network. We market this exchange program under the RCI
Points trademark. The RCI Points exchange program, which was
developed and launched in 2000, allocates points to intervals
that members cede to the exchange program. Under the RCI Points
exchange program, members may redeem their points for the use of
vacation properties in the exchange program or for other
products, such as airfare, car rentals, cruises, hotels and
other accommodations. When points are redeemed for these
services, our vacation exchange business has the right to recoup
the expense of providing the services by renting the use of
vacation properties for which the members could have redeemed
their points.
We believe that The Registry Collection exchange program is one
of the industrys first global exchange network of luxury
vacation accommodations. The luxury vacation accommodations in
The Registry Collections network include higher-end
vacation ownership resorts, fractional ownership resorts and
condo-hotels. The Registry Collection allows members to exchange
their intervals for the use of other vacation properties within
the network or for other products, such as airfare, car rentals,
cruises, hotels and other accommodations. The members of The
Registry Collection exchange program often own greater than
two-week intervals at affiliated resorts.
We acquire substantially all members of our exchange programs
indirectly. In substantially all cases, an affiliated resort
developer buys the initial term of an RCI membership, generally
ranging from 1 3 years that entitles the
vacation ownership interval purchaser to receive periodicals and
directories published by RCI and to use the applicable exchange
program for an additional fee. The vacation ownership interval
purchaser generally pays for membership renewals and any
applicable exchange fees for transactions.
Our vacation exchange business also provides property management
services and consulting services for the development of
tourism-related real estate, loyalty programs, in-house and
outsourced travel agency services, and third-party vacation club
services. Our third-party vacation club business consists of
private label exchange clubs that RCI operates and manages for
certain of its larger affiliates. Club management is a growing
trend in the vacation ownership industry and a growing piece of
our vacation exchange business. Approximately 95% of the
third-party vacation clubs are points-based.
Our vacation exchange business operates in North America,
Europe, Latin America, South Africa, Australia, the Pacific Rim,
the Middle East and China and tailors its strategies and
operating plans for each of the geographical environments where
RCI has or seeks to develop a substantial member base.
The rental properties we market are principally privately-owned
villas, cottages, bungalows and apartments that generally belong
to property owners unaffiliated with us. In addition to these
properties, we market inventory from our vacation exchange
business to developers of vacation ownership properties and
other sources. We market rental properties under proprietary
brand names, such as Landal GreenParks, English Country
Cottages, Novasol, Cuendet and Canvas Holidays, and through
select private-label arrangements. Most of the rental activity
under our brands takes place in Europe, the United States and
Mexico, although we have the ability to source and rent
inventory in approximately 100 countries. Our vacation rentals
business currently has relationships with approximately 35,000
independent property owners in 22 countries, including the
United States, United Kingdom, Mexico, France, Ireland, the
Netherlands, Belgium, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Denmark, Norway,
Sweden, Germany, Greece, Austria, Croatia and certain countries
in Eastern Europe and the Pacific Rim. We currently make over
1.3 million vacation rental bookings a year. Our vacation
rentals business also has the opportunity to market and provide
inventory to the over three million owners of intervals who
participate in our vacation exchange business. Property owners
typically enter into one year, evergreen or multi-year contracts
with our vacation rentals subsidiaries to market the rental of
their properties within our rental portfolio. Our vacation
rentals business also has an ownership interest in, or capital
leases for, approximately 13% of the properties in our rental
portfolio.
16
Customer
Development
In our vacation exchange business we affiliate with vacation
ownership developers directly as a result of the efforts of our
in-house sales teams. Affiliated developers typically sign
long-term agreements with durations of five to ten years. Our
members are acquired primarily through our affiliated developers
as part of the vacation ownership purchase process. In our
vacation rentals business, we primarily acquire exclusive rental
agreements through direct interaction with owners of various
types of vacation rental inventory.
Loyalty
Program
Our vacation exchange business member loyalty program is
RCI Elite Rewards, which offers a branded credit card, the RCI
Elite Rewards credit card, that allows members to earn points
that can be redeemed for items related to our exchange programs,
including annual membership dues and exchange fees for
transactions and other products offered by our vacation exchange
business or certain third parties, including airlines and
retailers.
Member
and Rental Customer Initiatives
Our vacation exchange and rentals business strives to provide
superior service to members and rental customers through our
call centers and online distribution channels, to offer certain
members and rental customers in Canada, Europe, Latin America,
South Africa and the Pacific Rim one-stop shopping through our
retail travel agency business, and to target current and
prospective members and rental customers through our marketing
efforts.
Call
Centers
Our vacation exchange and rentals business services its members
and rental customers primarily through global call centers. The
requests that we receive at our global call centers are handled
by our vacation guides, who are highly skilled at fulfilling our
members and rental customers requests for vacation
exchanges and rentals. When our members and rental
customers primary choices are unavailable in periods of
high demand, our guides offer the next nearest match in order to
fulfill the members and rental customers needs. Call
centers are and are expected to continue to be our primary
distribution channel and therefore we invest resources and will
continue to do so to ensure that members and rental customers
continue to receive a high level of personalized customer
service through our call centers.
Internet
Given the interest of some of our members and rental customers
in doing transactions on the Internet, we invest and will
continue to invest in online technologies to ensure that our
members and rental customers receive the same salesmanship and
level of service online that we provide through our call
centers. As our online distribution channels improve, members
and rental customers may shift from transacting business through
our call centers to transacting business online. As transacting
business online becomes more popular, we expect to experience
cost savings at our call centers. By offering our members and
rental customers the opportunity to transact business either
through our call centers or online, we allow our members and
rental customers to use the distribution channel with which they
are most comfortable. Regardless of the distribution channel our
members and rental customers use, our goal is member and rental
customer satisfaction and retention.
Travel
Agency
We have an established retail travel agency business outside the
United States in such locations as Canada, Europe, Latin
America, South Africa and the Pacific Rim. In these regions, our
travel agencies provide certain members and rental customers of
the vacation exchange and rentals business with one-stop
shopping for planning vacations. As part of the one-stop
shopping, the travel agencies can arrange for our members
and rental customers transportation, such as flights,
ferries and rental cars. In the United States, we have entered
into an outsourcing agreement with a former affiliate to provide
our members and rental customers with travel services.
Marketing
We market to our members and rental customers through the use of
brochures, magazines, direct marketing, such as direct mail and
e-mail,
third-party online distribution channels, tour operators and
travel agencies. Our vacation exchange and rentals business has
over 50 publications involved in the marketing of the business.
RCI publishes Endless
Vacation®
magazine, a travel publication that has a circulation of over
1.7 million. Our vacation exchange and rentals business
also publishes resort directories and other periodicals related
to the vacation and
17
vacation ownership industry and other travel-related services.
We acquire the rental customers through our
direct-to-consumer
marketing, internet marketing and third-party agent marketing
programs. We use our publications not only for marketing but
also for member and rental customer retention.
Strategies
We intend to continue to grow the number of members and rental
customers of and transactions facilitated through our vacation
exchange and rentals business by (i) continually enhancing
our core vacation networks; (ii) developing new business
models; and (iii) expanding into new markets. Our plans
generally focus on pursuing these strategies organically. In
addition, in appropriate circumstances, we will consider
opportunities to acquire businesses, both domestic and
international, including through the use of Wyndham Worldwide
common stock as currency.
Continually
Enhance Our Core Vacation Networks
We plan to expand the integration of our vacation exchange and
rentals networks to enhance the value of our products and
services to our members and rental customers, and the value of
vacation ownership for the resorts that affiliate with us. We
are already executing this plan by integrating our vacation
exchange and rentals networks to provide a larger variety and
greater availability of vacation accommodation choices to our
members and rental customers. Specifically, vacation rental
inventory has been made available to RCI exchange members to add
variety and depth to exchange options. Additionally, vacation
home proprietors and renters are expected to be offered RCI
designed membership programs to drive both rental customer
satisfaction and retention. We also plan to enhance the core
vacation network by offering different membership types to cater
to a wider range of rental customers. Further, we plan to take
advantage of a fragmented and unorganized global rental industry
by expanding our vacation rentals business into North America
and a select number of international markets.
Develop
New Business Models
We plan to continue to develop new business models that will
enhance the value and experience for our members, rental
customers and third-party developers who affiliate their resorts
with RCI. Our vacation exchange and rentals business
launch of RCI Points brought new value to RCI members and such
third-party developers by giving enhanced flexibility of
exchange options to RCI members. Today, it remains the only
global points-based vacation exchange network. Similarly, the
vacation exchange and rentals business is in the process of
expanding one of the industrys first luxury exchange
networks, The Registry Collection, to address the global, fast
growing luxury segment in shared ownership leisure real estate.
Additionally, we are developing new business models, such as
on-site
management and brand licensing/franchising to continue to expand
our vacation rentals business in Europe. We believe this will be
a successful addition to our vacation exchange and rentals
business model portfolio.
Expand
into New Markets
We plan to grow our overall vacation exchange and rentals
business by expanding into new geographic areas. We have begun
to, and plan to continue to, expand into new Asian and Middle
Eastern markets. New geographic markets provide us with the
opportunity to affiliate with new resorts and developers, to
acquire new vacation accommodation inventory types, and to
obtain new members and rental customers for our vacation
exchange and rentals business. Our expansion into new markets
will bring new entrants into the vacation real estate industry,
thereby fulfilling our goal to expand and capture additional
revenue within the global vacation exchange and rentals market.
Seasonality
Vacation exchange and rentals revenues are generally higher in
the first and third quarters than in the second or fourth
quarters. Vacation exchange transaction revenues are normally
highest in the first quarter, which is generally when members of
RCI plan and book their vacations for the year. Rental
transaction revenues earned from booking vacation rentals to
rental customers are usually highest in the third quarter, when
vacation rentals are highest. Most vacation rental customers
book their reservations 8 to 15 weeks in advance of their
departure dates, however, we cannot predict whether this booking
trend will continue in the future.
Competition
The vacation exchange and rentals business faces competition
throughout the world. Our vacation exchange business competes
with Interval International, Inc., which is a third-party
international exchange company, with
18
regional and local vacation exchange companies and with
Internet-based business models. In addition, certain developers
offer exchanges through internal networks of properties, which
are operated by us or by the developer, that offer owners of
intervals access to exchanges other than those offered by our
vacation exchange business. Our vacation rentals business faces
competition from a broad variety of marketers of vacation
properties who use brokerage, direct marketing and the Internet
to market and rent vacation properties.
Trademarks
We own the trademarks RCI, RCI Points,
The Registry Collection, Landal
GreenParks, English Country Cottages,
Novasol, Cuendet, Canvas
Holidays, and related and other trademarks and logos. Such
trademarks and logos are material to the businesses that are
part of our vacation exchange and rentals business. Our
subsidiaries actively use these marks, and all of the material
marks are registered (or have applications pending) with the
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office as well as with the
relevant authorities in major countries worldwide where these
businesses have significant operations.
WYNDHAM
VACATION OWNERSHIP
Overview
Wyndham Vacation Ownership, our vacation ownership business,
includes marketing and sales of vacation ownership interests,
consumer financing in connection with the purchase by
individuals of vacation ownership interests, property management
services to property owners associations, and development
and acquisition of vacation ownership resorts. We operate our
vacation ownership business through our two primary brands,
Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham. We have the
largest vacation ownership business in the world as measured by
the numbers of vacation ownership resorts, vacation ownership
units and owners of vacation ownership interests. We have
developed or acquired approximately 150 vacation ownership
resorts in the United States, Canada, Mexico, the Caribbean and
the South Pacific that represent more than 20,000 individual
vacation ownership units and over 800,000 owners of vacation
ownership interests.
Our primary vacation ownership brands, Wyndham Vacation Resorts
and WorldMark by Wyndham, operate vacation ownership programs
through which vacation ownership interests can be redeemed for
vacations through points-based internal reservation systems that
provide owners with flexibility (subject to availability) as to
resort location, length of stay, unit type and time of year. The
points-based reservation systems offer owners redemption
opportunities for other travel and leisure products that may be
offered from time to time, and the opportunity for owners to use
our products for one or more vacations per year based on level
of ownership. Our vacation ownership programs allow us to market
and sell our vacation ownership products in variable quantities
as opposed to the fixed quantity of the traditional, fixed-week
vacation ownership, which is primarily sold on a weekly interval
basis, and to offer to existing owners upgrade sales
to supplement such owners existing vacation ownership
interests. Although we operate Wyndham Vacation Resorts and
WorldMark by Wyndham as separate brands, we have integrated
substantially all of the business functions of Wyndham Vacation
Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham, including consumer finance,
information technology, certain staff functions, product
development and certain marketing activities.
Our vacation ownership business derives a majority of its
revenues from sales of vacation ownership interests and derives
other revenues from consumer financing and property management.
Because revenues from sales of vacation ownership interests and
consumer finance in connection with such sales depend on the
number of vacation ownership units in which we sell vacation
ownership interests, increasing the number of such units is
important to our revenue growth. Because revenues from property
management depend on the number of units we manage, increasing
the number of such units is also important to our revenue
growth. Revenues from our vacation ownership business
represented approximately 54%, 54% and 55% of total company net
revenues during 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. EBITDA from
our vacation ownership business represented approximately 45%,
38% and 37% of total company EBITDA during 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively.
Sales and
Marketing of Vacation Ownership Interests and Property
Management
Wyndham
Rebranding
As of December 31, 2006, our Fairfield Resorts and
Trendwest vacation ownership businesses have begun
to transition their consumer branding efforts to Wyndham
Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham, respectively. This
transition, which is expected to continue throughout 2007,
includes the implementation of the Wyndham Vacation Resorts and
WorldMark by Wyndham brands throughout all marketing, sales and
service
19
channels as appropriate, including the application of the
Wyndham brand at select resort properties as well as sales,
marketing and service centers throughout our system.
Wyndham
Vacation Resorts
Wyndham Vacation Resorts markets and sells vacation ownership
interests in Wyndham Vacation Resorts portfolio of resort
properties and uses a points-based reservation system called
FairShare Plus to provide owners with flexibility (subject to
availability) as to resort location, length of stay, unit type
and time of year. Wyndham Vacation Resorts is involved in the
development or acquisition of the resort properties in which
Wyndham Vacation Resorts markets and sells vacation ownership
interests. Wyndham Vacation Resorts also often acts as a
property manager of such resorts. From time to time, Wyndham
Vacation Resorts also sells home lots and other real estate
interests at its resort properties.
Vacation Ownership Interests, Portfolio of Resorts
and Maintenance Fees. The vacation ownership interests
that Wyndham Vacation Resorts markets and sells consist of fixed
weeks and undivided interests. A fixed week entitles an owner to
ownership and usage rights with respect to a unit for a specific
week of each year, whereas an undivided interest entitles an
owner to ownership and usage rights that are not restricted to a
particular week of the year. These vacation ownership interests
each constitute a deeded interest in real estate and on average
sold for approximately $17,600 in 2006. Of the more than 800,000
owners of vacation ownership interests in Wyndham Vacation
Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham resort properties as of
December 31, 2006, approximately 518,000 owners held
interests in Wyndham Vacation Resorts resort properties.
Wyndham Vacation Resorts resort properties are located primarily
in the United States and, as of December 31, 2006,
consisted of 79 resorts that represented approximately
15,000 units. In 2006, Wyndham Vacation Resorts expanded
its portfolio in Orlando, Florida, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina,
Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin, Fairfield Glade, Tennessee and
Sevierville (Smokey Mts.), Tennessee and added resort properties
in new locations, such as Honolulu, Hawaii and San Diego,
California.
The majority of the resorts in which Wyndham Vacation Resorts
markets and sells vacation ownership and other real estate
interests are destination resorts that are located at or near
attractions such as the Walt Disney
World®
Resort in Florida; the Las Vegas Strip in Nevada; Myrtle Beach
in South Carolina; Colonial
Williamsburg®
in Virginia; and the Hawaiian Islands. Most Wyndham Vacation
Resorts resort properties are affiliated with Wyndham
Worldwides vacation exchange subsidiary, RCI, which awards
to the top 10% of RCI affiliated vacation ownership resorts
throughout the world designations of an RCI Gold Crown Resort or
an RCI Silver Crown Resort for exceptional resort standards and
service levels. Among Wyndham Vacation Resorts 79 resort
properties, 55 have been awarded designations of an RCI Gold
Crown Resort or an RCI Silver Crown Resort.
Owners of vacation ownership interests pay annual maintenance
fees to the property owners associations responsible for
managing the applicable resorts. The annual maintenance fee
associated with the average vacation ownership interest
purchased ranges from approximately $300 to approximately $650.
These fees generally are used to renovate and replace
furnishings, pay operating, maintenance and cleaning costs, pay
management fees and expenses, and cover taxes (in some states),
insurance and other related costs. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, as
the owner of unsold inventory at resorts, also pays maintenance
fees to property owners associations in accordance with
the legal requirements of the states or jurisdictions in which
the resorts are located. In addition, at certain newly-developed
resorts, Wyndham Vacation Resorts enters into subsidy agreements
with the property owners associations to cover costs that
otherwise would be covered by annual maintenance fees payable
with respect to vacation ownership interests that have not yet
been sold.
FairShare Plus. Wyndham Vacation Resorts uses a
points-based internal reservation system called FairShare Plus
to provide owners with flexibility (subject to availability) as
to resort location, length of stay, unit type and time of year.
With the launch of FairShare Plus in 1991, Wyndham Vacation
Resorts became one of the first U.S. developers of vacation
ownership properties to move from traditional, fixed-week
vacation ownership to a points-based program. Owners of vacation
ownership interests in Wyndham Vacation Resorts resort
properties that are eligible to participate in the program may
elect, and with respect to certain resorts are obligated, to
participate in FairShare Plus.
Owners who participate in FairShare Plus assign their rights to
use fixed weeks and undivided interests, as applicable, to a
trust in exchange for the right to reserve in the internal
reservation system. The number of points that an owner receives
as a result of the assignment to the trust of the owners
right to use fixed weeks or undivided interests, and the number
of points required to take a particular vacation, is set forth
on a published schedule and
20
varies depending on the resort location, length of stay, unit
type and time of year associated with the interests assigned to
the trust or requested by the owner, as applicable. Participants
in FairShare Plus may choose (subject to availability) the
Wyndham Vacation Resorts resort properties, length of stay, unit
types and times of year, depending on the number of points to
which they are entitled and the number of points required to
take the vacations of their preference. Participants in the
program may redeem their points not only for resort stays, but
also for other travel and leisure products that may be offered
from time to time. Wyndham Vacation Resorts offers various
programs that provide existing owners with the opportunity to
upgrade, or acquire additional vacation ownership
interests to increase the number of points such owners can use
in FairShare Plus.
Depending on the vacation ownership interest, Wyndham Vacation
Resorts not only offers owners the option to make reservations
through FairShare Plus, but also offers owners the opportunity
to exchange their vacation ownership interests through our
vacation exchange business, RCI, or through Interval
International, Inc., which is a third-party international
exchange.
Program and Property Management. In exchange for
management fees, Wyndham Vacation Resorts, itself or through a
Wyndham Vacation Resorts affiliate, manages FairShare Plus, the
majority of property owners associations at resorts in
which Wyndham Vacation Resorts markets and sells vacation
ownership interests, and property owners associations at
resorts developed by third parties. On behalf of FairShare Plus,
Wyndham Vacation Resorts or its affiliate manages the
reservation system for FairShare Plus and provides owner
services and billing and collections services. The term of the
trust agreement of FairShare Plus runs through December 31,
2025, and the term is renewable if FairShare Plus is extended by
a majority of the members of the program (including Wyndham
Vacation Resorts). The term of the management agreement, under
which Wyndham Vacation Resorts manages the FairShare Plus
program, is for five years and is automatically renewed annually
for successive terms of five years, provided the trustee under
the program does not serve notice of termination to Wyndham
Vacation Resorts at the end of any calendar year. On behalf of
property owners associations, Wyndham Vacation Resorts or
its affiliates generally provide
day-to-day
management for vacation ownership resorts, including oversight
of housekeeping services, maintenance and refurbishment of the
units, and provides certain accounting and administrative
services to property owners associations. The terms of the
property management agreements with the property owners
associations at resorts in which Wyndham Vacation Resorts
markets and sells vacation ownership interests vary; however,
the vast majority of the agreements provide a mechanism for
automatic renewal upon expiration of the terms. At some
established sites, the property owners associations have
entered into property management agreements with professional
management companies other than Wyndham Vacation Resorts or its
affiliates.
WorldMark
by Wyndham
WorldMark by Wyndham markets and sells vacation ownership
interests, which are called vacation credits (holiday credits in
the South Pacific), in resorts owned by the vacation ownership
programs WorldMark, The Club and WorldMark South Pacific Club,
which we refer to collectively as the Clubs, which WorldMark by
Wyndham formed in 1989 and 2000, respectively. The Clubs provide
owners with flexibility (subject to availability) as to resort
location, length of stay, unit type, the day of the week and
time of year. WorldMark by Wyndham is usually involved in the
development of the resorts owned by the Clubs. In addition to
developing resorts and marketing and selling vacation credits,
WorldMark by Wyndham manages the Clubs and the majority of
resorts owned by the Clubs.
In October 1999, WorldMark by Wyndham formed Trendwest South
Pacific, Pty. Ltd., an Australian corporation, or Trendwest
South Pacific, as its direct wholly owned subsidiary for the
purpose of conducting sales, marketing and resort development
activities in the South Pacific. Trendwest South Pacific is
currently the largest vacation ownership business in Australia,
with approximately 35,000 owners of vacation credits as of
December 31, 2006. Resorts in the South Pacific typically
are owned and operated through WorldMark South Pacific Club,
other than 66 units at Denarau Island, Fiji, which are
owned by WorldMark, The Club.
Vacation Credits, Portfolio of Resorts and Maintenance
Fees. Vacation credits in the Clubs entitle the owner of
the credits to reserve units at the resorts that are owned and
operated by the Clubs. WorldMark by Wyndham and Trendwest South
Pacific are the developers or acquirers of the resorts that the
Clubs own and operate. After WorldMark by Wyndham or Trendwest
South Pacific develops or acquires resorts, it conveys the
resorts to WorldMark, The Club or WorldMark South Pacific Club,
as applicable. In exchange for the conveyances, WorldMark by
Wyndham or Trendwest South Pacific receives the exclusive rights
to sell the vacation credits associated with the conveyed
resorts and to receive the proceeds from the sales of the
vacation credits. Although vacation credits, unlike vacation
ownership interests in Wyndham Vacation Resorts resort
properties, do not constitute deeded interests in real estate,
vacation credits are regulated in most jurisdictions by the same
agency that regulates vacation ownership interests evidenced by
deeded interests in real estate. In 2006, the average purchase
by a new owner of vacation credits was approximately $11,700. Of
the more than 800,000 owners of vacation
21
ownership interests in Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham
resorts as of December 31, 2006, over 282,000 owners held
vacation credits in WorldMark by Wyndham resorts.
WorldMark by Wyndham resorts are located primarily in the
Western United States, Canada, Mexico and the South Pacific and,
as of December 31, 2006, consisted of 75 resorts that
represented approximately 5,400 units. Of the WorldMark by
Wyndham resorts and units, Trendwest South Pacific has a total
of 14 resorts with approximately 500 units. In 2006,
WorldMark by Wyndham expanded its portfolio of resorts to
include properties in Indio, California; San Diego,
California; and Midway, Utah.
The resorts in which WorldMark by Wyndham markets and sells
vacation credits are primarily drive-to resorts. Most WorldMark
by Wyndham resorts are affiliated with Wyndham Worldwides
vacation exchange subsidiary, RCI. Among WorldMark by
Wyndhams 75 resorts, 62 have been awarded designations of
an RCI Gold Crown Resort or an RCI Silver Crown Resort.
Owners of vacation credits pay annual maintenance fees to the
Clubs. The annual maintenance fee associated with the average
vacation credit purchased is approximately $480. The maintenance
fee that an owner pays is based on the number of the
owners vacation credits. These fees are intended to cover
the Clubs operating costs, including the dues to the
property owners associations, which are generally the
Clubs responsibility. Fees paid to property owners
associations are generally used to renovate and replace
furnishings, pay maintenance and cleaning costs, pay management
fees and expenses, and cover taxes (in some states), insurance
and other related costs. Maintenance of common areas and the
provision of amenities typically is the responsibility of the
property owners associations. WorldMark by Wyndham has a
minimal ownership interest in the Clubs that results from
WorldMark by Wyndhams ownership of unsold vacation credits
in the Clubs. As the owner of unsold vacation credits, WorldMark
by Wyndham pays maintenance fees to the Clubs.
WorldMark, The Club and WorldMark South Pacific
Club. The Clubs provide owners of vacation credits with
flexibility (subject to availability) as to resort location,
length of stay, unit type and time of year. Depending on how
many vacation credits an owner has purchased, the owner may use
the vacation credits for one or more vacations annually. The
number of vacation credits that are required for each days
stay at a unit is listed on a published schedule and varies
depending upon the resort location, unit type, time of year and
the day of the week. Owners may also redeem their credits for
other travel and leisure products that may be offered from time
to time.
Owners of vacation credits are able to carry over unused
vacation credits in one year to the next year and to borrow
vacation credits from the next year for use in the current year.
Owners of vacation credits are also able to purchase bonus time
from the Clubs for use when space is available. Bonus time gives
owners the opportunity to use available resorts on short notice
and at a reduced rate and to obtain usage beyond owners
allotments of vacation credits. In addition, WorldMark by
Wyndham offers owners the opportunity to upgrade, or
acquire additional vacation credits to increase the number of
credits such owners can use in the Clubs.
Owners of vacation credits can make reservations through the
Clubs, or may elect to join and exchange their vacation
ownership interests through our vacation exchange business, RCI,
or Interval International, Inc., which is a third-party exchange
company.
Club and Property Management. In exchange for
management fees, WorldMark by Wyndham, itself or through a
WorldMark by Wyndham affiliate, serves as the exclusive property
manager and servicing agent of the Clubs and all resort units
owned or operated by the Clubs. On behalf of the Clubs,
WorldMark by Wyndham or its affiliate provides
day-to-day
management for vacation ownership resorts, including oversight
of housekeeping services, maintenance and refurbishment of the
units, and provides certain accounting and administrative
services. WorldMark by Wyndham or its affiliate also manages the
reservation system for the Clubs and provides owner services and
billing and collections services. The management agreements of
WorldMark, The Club and WorldMark South Pacific Club provide for
automatic one-year and five-year renewals, respectively, unless
renewal is denied by a majority of the voting power of the
owners (excluding WorldMark by Wyndham and its affiliates.)
Sales and
Marketing
Wyndham Vacation Ownership employs a variety of marketing
channels as part of Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by
Wyndham marketing programs to encourage prospective owners of
vacation ownership interests to tour Wyndham Vacation Resorts
and WorldMark by Wyndham resort properties, as applicable, and
to attend sales presentations at resort locations and off-site
sales offices. These channels include direct mail,
e-commerce,
in-person solicitations, referral programs and inbound and
outbound telemarketing. The marketing offers we make through
these channels are local and travel-based offers. Our local
offers are designed to produce tour flow in regions where
22
prospective owners reside or are currently visiting, and our
travel-based offers are designed to solicit the purchase by
prospective owners of overnight vacation packages to
destinations in which Wyndham Vacation Ownership operates. We
believe that marketing through both local and travel-based
offers enhances our ability to market successfully to
prospective owners.
Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham offer a
variety of entry-level programs and products as part of their
sales strategies. One such program allows prospective owners to
acquire one-years worth of points or credits with no
further obligations, and one such product is a biennial
interest, which prospective owners can buy, that provides for
vacations every other year. As part of their sales strategies,
Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham rely on their
points/credits-based programs, which provide prospective owners
with the flexibility to buy relatively small packages of points
or credits, which can be upgraded at a later date. To facilitate
upgrades among existing owners, Wyndham Vacation Resorts and
WorldMark by Wyndham market opportunities for owners to purchase
additional points or credits through periodic marketing
campaigns and promotions to owners while such owners vacation at
Wyndham Vacation Resorts or WorldMark by Wyndham resort
properties, as applicable.
The marketing and sales activities of Wyndham Vacation Resorts
and WorldMark by Wyndham are often facilitated through marketing
alliances with other travel, hospitality, entertainment, gaming
and retail companies that provide access to such companies
present and past customers through co-branded marketing offers,
in-bound call transfer programs, in-store promotions, on-line
advertising, sweepstakes programs and other highly integrated
marketing platforms.
Wyndham Vacation Resorts Sales and Marketing.
Wyndham Vacation Resorts sells its vacation ownership interests
and other real estate interests at 38 resort locations and eight
off-site sales centers.
On-site
sales accounted for approximately 84% of all new sales during
2006.
On-site
sales presentations typically follow a resort tour led by a
Wyndham Vacation Resorts salesperson. Wyndham Vacation Resorts
conducted approximately 623,000 and 585,000 tours in 2006 and
2005, respectively.
Wyndham Vacation Resorts resort-based sales centers, which
are located in popular travel destinations throughout the United
States, generate substantial tour flow through providing
travel-based offers. The sales centers sell overnight vacation
packages to popular travel destinations throughout the United
States and when the purchasers of such packages redeem the
packages, Wyndham Vacation Resorts sales representatives provide
the purchasers with tours of Wyndham Vacation Resorts resort
properties. Wyndham Vacation Resorts utilizes direct mail,
on-line campaigns and outbound and inbound telemarketing to
market for sale the overnight vacation packages to prospective
owners of vacation ownership interests, many of whom are also
past or prospective customers for our travel, hospitality,
entertainment and gaming marketing alliances. Wyndham Vacation
Resorts often co-brands the vacation packages with third parties
with whom it has marketing alliances and features products or
services provided by those third parties as part of the vacation
packages.
Wyndham Vacation Resorts resort-based sales centers also
generate substantial tour flow through providing local offers.
The sales centers enable Wyndham Vacation Resorts to market to
tourists already visiting destination areas. Wyndham Vacation
Resorts marketing agents, which often operate on the
premises of the hospitality, entertainment, gaming and retail
companies with which Wyndham Vacation Resorts has alliances
within these markets, solicit local tourists with offers
relating to activities and entertainment in exchange for the
tourists visiting the local resorts and attending sales
presentations. An example of a marketing alliance through which
Wyndham Vacation Resorts markets to tourists already visiting
destination areas is Wyndham Vacation Resorts current
arrangement with Harrahs Entertainment in Las Vegas,
Nevada, which enables Wyndham Vacation Resorts to operate
several concierge-style marketing kiosks throughout
Harrahs Casino that permit Wyndham Vacation Resorts to
solicit patrons to attend tours and sales presentations with
Harrahs-related rewards and entertainment offers, such as
gaming chips, show tickets and dining certificates. Wyndham
Vacation Resorts also operates its primary Las Vegas sales
center within Harrahs Casino and regularly shuttles
prospective owners targeted by such sales centers to and from
Wyndham Vacation Resorts nearby resort property. Wyndham
Vacation Resorts also has marketing alliances with Trump Casino
Resorts and Outrigger Hotels & Resorts.
Wyndham Vacation Resorts resort-based sales centers enable
Wyndham Vacation Resorts to actively solicit upgrade sales to
existing owners of vacation ownership interests while such
owners vacation at Wyndham Vacation Resorts resort properties.
Sales of vacation ownership interests relating to upgrades
represented approximately 46%, 42% and 37% of Wyndham
Vacation Resorts net sales of vacation ownership interests
in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
23
WorldMark by Wyndham Sales and
Marketing. WorldMark by Wyndham sells its vacation
credits in the United States primarily at 62 sales
offices, 29 of which are located off-site in metropolitan areas.
Trendwest South Pacific conducts its international sales and
marketing efforts through
on-site and
off-site sales offices, telemarketing and road shows. As of
December 31, 2006, Trendwest South Pacific had
11 sales offices throughout the east coast of Australia,
the North Island of New Zealand and Fiji. Off-site sales
offices generated approximately 60% and 69% of WorldMark by
Wyndhams sales of new vacation credits in 2006 and 2005,
respectively. WorldMark by Wyndham conducted approximately
423,000 and 349,000 tours in 2006 and 2005, respectively.
WorldMark by Wyndhams off-site sales offices market
vacation credits through local offers to prospective owners in
areas where such purchasers reside. WorldMark by Wyndhams
off-site sales offices provide WorldMark by Wyndham with access
to large numbers of prospective owners and a convenient, local
venue at which to preview and sell vacation credits. WorldMark
by Wyndhams off-site sales offices provide WorldMark by
Wyndham with access to a wide group of qualified sales personnel
due to the locations of the sales offices in metropolitan areas.
WorldMark by Wyndham uses a variety of marketing programs to
attract prospective owners, including sponsored contests that
offer vacation packages or gifts, targeted mailings, outbound
and inbound telemarketing efforts, and various other promotional
programs. WorldMark by Wyndham also co-sponsors sweepstakes,
giveaways and other promotional programs with professional teams
at major sporting events and with other third parties at other
high-traffic consumer events. Where permissible under state law,
WorldMark by Wyndham offers existing owners cash awards or other
incentives for referrals of new owners.
WorldMark by Wyndham and Trendwest South Pacific periodically
encourage existing owners of vacation credits to acquire
additional vacation credits through various methods. Sales of
vacation credits relating to upgrades represented
approximately 35%, 31% and 33% of WorldMark by
Wyndhams net sales of vacation credits in 2006, 2005 and
2004, respectively. Sales of vacation credits relating to
upgrades represented approximately 16%, 13% and 11% of
Trendwest South Pacifics net sales of vacation credits in
2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Purchaser
Financing
Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham offer
financing to purchasers of vacation ownership interests. By
offering consumer financing, we are able to reduce the initial
cash required by customers to purchase vacation ownership
interests, thereby enabling us to attract additional customers
and generate substantial incremental revenues and profits.
Wyndham Vacation Ownership services loans extended by Wyndham
Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham through our consumer
financing subsidiary, Wyndham Consumer Finance (formerly known
as Cendant Timeshare Resort Group-Consumer Finance, Inc.), a
wholly owned subsidiary of Wyndham Vacation Resorts based in
Las Vegas, Nevada that performs loan servicing and other
administrative functions for Wyndham Vacation Resorts and
WorldMark by Wyndham. As of December 31, 2006, we serviced
a portfolio of approximately 262,000 loans that totaled
$2,658 million in aggregate principal amount outstanding,
with an average interest rate of approximately 13%.
Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham do not
currently conduct a credit investigation or other review or
inquiry into a purchasers credit history before offering
to finance a portion of the purchase price of the vacation
ownership interests. As of December 31, 2006, however, at
the majority of Wyndham Vacation Resorts sales offices,
purchasers are offered an enhanced financing option-the
opportunity to obtain financing on more favorable terms if they
agree to permit Wyndham Vacation Resorts to obtain their credit
scores. The interest rate offered to participating purchasers is
determined from automated underwriting based upon the
purchasers credit score, the amount of the down payment
and the size of purchase. WorldMark by Wyndham sales offices
currently do not offer an enhanced financing option and instead
offer financing with an interest rate based upon the size of the
purchase. However, WorldMark by Wyndham, through certain upgrade
sales programs, may offer existing owners of vacation credits
who purchase additional vacation credits financing on more
favorable terms based on such owners payment history with
WorldMark by Wyndham. Both Wyndham Vacation Resorts and
WorldMark by Wyndham offer purchasers an interest rate reduction
if they participate in their pre-authorized checking, or PAC,
programs, pursuant to which our consumer financing subsidiary
each month debits a purchasers bank account or major
credit card in the amount of the monthly payment by a
pre-authorized fund transfer on the payment date. As of
December 31, 2006, approximately 82% of purchaser financing
serviced by our consumer financing subsidiary participated in
the PAC program. In addition, in an effort to improve the
performance of their respective portfolios, Wyndham Vacation
Resorts plans to expand its enhanced financing option
initiative, and WorldMark by Wyndham plans to explore
implementing a similar enhanced financing option.
Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham generally
require a minimum down payment of 10% of the purchase price on
all sales of vacation ownership interests and offer consumer
financing for the remaining
24
balance for up to ten years. Both Wyndham Vacation Resorts and
WorldMark by Wyndham offer programs through which prospective
owners may accumulate the required 10% down payment over a
period of time not greater than six months. The prospective
owner is placed in pending status until the required
10% down payment amount is received.
Similar to other companies that provide consumer financing, we
securitize a majority of the receivables originated in
connection with the sales of our vacation ownership interests.
We initially place the financed contracts into a revolving
warehouse securitization facility generally within 30 to
90 days after origination. Many of the receivables are
subsequently transferred from the warehouse securitization
facility and placed into term securitization facilities. As of
December 31, 2006, the aggregate principal amount
outstanding of receivables in the warehouse securitization
facility and the term securitization facilities was
$733 million and $1,013 million, respectively.
Servicing
and Collection Procedures
Our consumer financing subsidiary is responsible for the
maintenance of accounts receivables files and all customer
service, billing and collection activities related to the
domestic loans we extend. Our consumer financing subsidiary also
services loans pledged in our warehouse and term securitization
facilities. As of December 31, 2006, our consumer financing
subsidiary had approximately 474 employees, the majority of
whom were in customer service and maintenance
(approximately 193) and loan collection and special
services (approximately 183).
Since April 2005, Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by
Wyndham have used a single computerized online data system to
maintain loan records and service the loans. This system permits
access to customer account inquiries and is supported by our
information technology department.
The collection methodologies for both brands are similar and
entail a combination of mailings and telephone calls which are
supported by an automated dialer. As of December 31, 2006,
the loan portfolios of both Wyndham Vacation Resorts and
WorldMark by Wyndham were approximately 94% current
(i.e., not more than 30 days past due).
We assess the performance of our loan portfolio by monitoring
certain metrics on a daily, weekly, monthly and annual basis.
These metrics include, but are not limited to, collections
rates, account roll rates, defaults by state residency of the
obligor and bankruptcies. We define defaults as accounts that
are 120 days or more past due plus bankrupt accounts. The
average expected cumulative gross default rate is
approximately 16.5%. At December 31, 2006, loans
originated in 2004 and 2005 had aggregate cumulative default
rates of approximately 14.5% and 10.7%, respectively.
Strategies
We intend to grow our vacation ownership business by increasing
sales of vacation ownership interests to new owners and sales of
upgrades to existing owners by expanding our marketing and sales
efforts, strengthening our product offerings and further
developing our consumer financing activities. We plan to
leverage the Wyndham brand in our marketing efforts, add new
resorts, expand our marketing alliances and increase our
on-site
sales activities to existing owners. Our plans generally focus
on pursuing these strategies organically. In addition, in
appropriate circumstances, we will consider opportunities to
acquire businesses, both domestic and international, including
through the use of Wyndham Worldwide common stock as currency.
Expand
our sales and marketing efforts
We plan to expand sales and marketing to new and existing
owners, including marketing and selling through in-person
solicitation, direct mail,
e-commerce,
referral programs, inbound and outbound telemarketing and
upgrade sale programs. We plan to leverage the Wyndham brand in
our marketing efforts to strengthen our position in the
higher-end segment of the vacation ownership industry, to
attract prospective new owners in higher income demographics
through Wyndham-branded marketing campaigns, and to increase
upgrade sales through the application of the Wyndham brand
within existing and new higher-end products and product features.
We plan to expand our marketing and sales distribution channels
through the pursuit of additional integrated marketing alliances
with lodging and entertainment companies. We currently have
alliances with Harrahs Entertainment in Las Vegas,
Nevada; Trump Casino Resorts in Atlantic City, New Jersey;
and Outrigger Hotels & Resorts throughout Hawaii, which
permit us to conduct marketing and sales activities at
properties owned by these companies. We will explore expanding
our existing alliances and entering into new alliances.
25
Strengthen
our product offerings
We plan to strengthen the products that we offer by adding new
resorts and resort locations and expanding our offering of
higher-end products and product features. We plan to develop
additional resorts in new domestic regions and in domestic
regions we currently serve that are experiencing strong demand
such as Orlando, Myrtle Beach, San Antonio, Las Vegas,
San Diego and Hawaii. We plan to develop additional resorts
in international regions in Canada, the Caribbean, Mexico,
Australia and Asia. In addition, we may also acquire additional
resorts that complement our current portfolio of resorts.
We are applying the Wyndham brand at new domestic and
international resorts, as well as at select locations within our
current portfolio of resorts. In addition, we plan to develop
and market mixed-use hotel and vacation ownership properties in
conjunction with the Wyndham brand. The mixed-use properties
would afford us access to both hotel clients in higher income
demographics for the purpose of marketing vacation ownership
interests and hotel inventory for use in our marketing programs.
We plan to expand upon existing and create new higher-end
product offerings in conjunction with the Wyndham brand. We are
exploring associating the Wyndham brand with our existing
high-end Presidential-style vacation ownership units in our
current inventory and may further apply the Wyndham brand to
current and future product features and services available to
our owners who have attained enhanced membership status within
our vacation ownership programs as a result of achieving
substantial ownership levels.
Enhance
our consumer financing activities
We plan to increase our revenue from vacation ownership interest
sales by enhancing our customers ability to purchase our
products. Our consumer financing activities increase our sales
of Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham vacation
ownership interests by offering financing to prospective
purchasers who might otherwise not purchase. Additionally,
offering financing permits prospective purchasers to acquire
larger vacation ownership interests than they might otherwise
acquire. To further increase the number and size of sales of our
vacation ownership interests, we plan to explore offering new
financing products and terms that are desirable to prospective
purchasers.
We plan to increase our net interest income by improving the
performance of our portfolio of vacation ownership contract
receivables. To improve the performance of our portfolio, we
plan to expand our enhanced financing option initiative. In
addition, we plan to continue improving our collection
activities to reduce the volume and duration of delinquencies
and defaults, thereby improving the performance of our
portfolio. We also plan to continue reducing our loan servicing
costs.
Seasonality
We rely, in part, upon tour flow to generate sales of vacation
ownership interests; consequently, sales volume tends to
increase in the spring and summer months as a result of greater
tour flow from spring and summer travelers. Revenues from sales
of vacation ownership interests therefore are generally higher
in the second and third quarters than in other quarters. We
cannot predict whether these seasonal trends will continue in
the future.
Competition
The vacation ownership industry is highly competitive and is
comprised of a number of companies specializing primarily in
sales and marketing, consumer financing, property management and
development of vacation ownership properties. In addition, a
number of national hospitality chains develop and sell vacation
ownership interests to consumers. Some of the well-known players
in the industry include Disney Vacation Club, Hilton Grand
Vacations Company LLC, Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc. and
Starwood Vacation Ownership, Inc.
Trademarks
We own the trademarks Wyndham Vacation Ownership,
Wyndham Vacation Resorts, WorldMark by
Wyndham, Fairfield, Trendwest and
FairShare Plus and related trademarks and logos, and
such trademarks and logos are material to the businesses that
are part of our vacation ownership business. Our subsidiaries
actively use these marks, and all of the material marks are
registered (or have applications pending) with the
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office as well as with the
relevant authorities in major countries worldwide where these
businesses have significant operations. We own the
WorldMark trademark pursuant to an assignment
agreement with WorldMark, The Club. Pursuant to the assignment
agreement, WorldMark, The Club may request that the mark be
reassigned to
26
it only in the event of a termination of the WorldMark vacation
ownership programs. During the fourth quarter of 2006, we
announced that we will be changing our Fairfield Resorts and
Trendwest branding to Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by
Wyndham, respectively. As such, we will
discontinue use of the Fairfield and Trendwest trademark names
over the next 12 months.
Employees
At December 31, 2006, we had approximately
30,100 employees, including approximately
10,000 employees outside of the United States. At
December 31, 2006, our lodging business had approximately
4,500 employees, our vacation exchange and rentals business
had approximately 9,100 employees and our vacation
ownership business had approximately 16,200 employees.
Approximately 1% of our employees are subject to collective
bargaining agreements governing their employment with our
company. We believe that our relations with employees are good.
Government
Regulation
Our businesses are either subject to or affected by
international, federal, state and local laws, regulations and
policies, which are constantly subject to change. The
descriptions of the laws, regulations and policies that follow
are summaries and should be read in conjunction with the texts
of the laws and regulations described below. The descriptions do
not purport to cover all present and proposed laws, regulations
and policies that affect our businesses.
We believe that we are in material compliance with these laws,
regulations and policies. Although we cannot predict the effect
of changes to the existing laws, regulations and policies or to
the proposed laws, regulations and policies that are described
below, we are not currently aware of proposed changes or
proposed new laws, regulations and policies that will have a
material adverse effect on our business.
Regulations
Generally Applicable to Our Business
Our businesses are subject to, among others, laws and
regulations that affect privacy and data collection, marketing
regulation and the use of the Internet, as described below:
Privacy and Data Collection. The collection
and use of personal data of our customers and our ability to
contact our customers, including through telephone or facsimile,
are governed by privacy laws and regulations enacted in the
United States and in other jurisdictions around the world.
Privacy regulations continue to evolve and on occasion may be
inconsistent from one jurisdiction to another. Many states have
introduced legislation or enacted laws and regulations that
require strict compliance with standards for data collection and
protection of privacy and provide for penalties for failure to
notify customers when such standards are breached, even by third
parties. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission, or FTC, adopted
do not call and do not fax regulations
in October 2003. In compliance with such regulations, our
affected businesses have developed and implemented plans to
block phone numbers listed on the do not call and
do not fax registries and have instituted new
procedures for preventing unsolicited telemarketing calls. In
response to do not call and do not fax
regulations, our affected businesses have reduced their reliance
on outbound telemarketing. In addition, our European businesses
have adopted policies and procedures to comply with the European
Union Directive on Data Protection. These policies and
procedures require that unless the use of data is
necessary for certain specified purposes, including,
for example, the performance of a contract with the individual
concerned, consent to use data must be obtained. Australia, in
2006, adopted do not call legislation and
promulgated do not call regulations. Such
regulations will become effective May 2007 and we are
instituting new procedures to comply with such regulations.
Marketing Operations. The products and
services offered by our various businesses are marketed through
a number of distribution channels, including direct mail,
telemarketing and online. These channels are regulated at the
state and federal levels, and we believe that the effect of such
regulations on our marketing operations will increase over time.
Such regulations, which include anti-fraud laws, consumer
protection laws, privacy laws, identity theft laws, anti-spam
laws, telemarketing laws and telephone solicitation laws, may
limit our ability to solicit new customers or to market
additional products or services to existing customers. In
addition, some of our business units use sweepstakes and
contests as part of their marketing and promotional programs.
These activities are regulated primarily by state laws that
require certain disclosures and assurance that the prizes will
be available to the winners.
Internet. Although our business units
operations on the Internet are not currently regulated by any
government agency in the United States, it is likely that a
number of laws and regulations may be adopted to regulate the
Internet. In addition, it is possible that existing laws may be
interpreted to apply to the Internet in ways that the
27
existing laws are not currently applied, particularly with
respect to the imposition of state and local taxes on the use
and reservation of accommodations through the Internet.
Regulatory and legal requirements are particularly subject to
change with respect to the Internet and may become more
restrictive, which will increase the difficulty and expense of
compliance or otherwise restrict our business units
abilities to conduct operations as such operations are currently
conducted.
We are also aware of, and are actively monitoring the status of,
certain proposed United States state and international
legislation related to privacy and
e-mail
marketing that may be enacted in the future. It is unclear at
this point what effect, if any, such state and international
legislation may have on our businesses. California, for example,
has enacted legislation that requires enhanced disclosure on
Internet web sites regarding consumer privacy and information
sharing among affiliated entities. We cannot predict with
certainty whether these laws will affect our practices with
respect to customer information and inhibit our ability to
market our products and services nor can we predict whether
other states will enact similar laws. Because Internet
reservations are more cost-effective than reservations taken
over the phone, our costs may increase if Internet reservations
are adversely affected by regulations.
Travel Agency Services. The travel agency
products and services that our businesses provide are subject to
various federal, state and local regulations. We must comply
with laws and regulations that relate to our marketing and sales
of such products and services, including laws and regulations
that prohibit unfair and deceptive advertising or practices and
laws that require us to register as a seller of
travel to comply with disclosure requirements. In
addition, we are indirectly affected by the regulation of our
travel suppliers, many of which are heavily regulated by the
United States and other governments. We are also affected
by the European Union Directive applicable to the sale and
provision of package holidays because some of our European
businesses operate such that they are classified, for certain of
their operations, as organizers of package holidays. This
European Union Directive places liability for the package
holiday sold with the organizer and requires that the organizer
has security in place in order to refund to the consumer money
paid by such consumer in the event of insolvency of the
organizer.
Regulations
Applicable to the Lodging Business
Our lodging business is subject to, among others, laws,
regulations and policies that affect the sale of franchises and
access for persons with disabilities, as described below:
Sale of Franchises. The FTC, various state
laws and regulations and the laws of jurisdictions outside the
United States regulate the offer and sale of franchises.
The FTC requires that franchisors make extensive written
disclosure in a prescribed format to prospective franchisees but
does not require registration. The FTC recently approved new
franchise regulations (the FTC Rule) that will
affect sales practices and procedures and the content of
disclosure documents that we use to sell franchises in the
United States. The new FTC Rule will become effective
as of July 1, 2007 but franchisors may use their current
UFOC formats for one year from the effective date. We believe
that the new FTC Rule will have no material adverse impact
on the offer and sale of our hotel franchises. The state laws
that affect our franchise business regulate the offer and sale
of franchises, the termination, renewal and transfer of
franchise agreements, and the provision of loans to franchisees
as part of the sales of franchises. Currently, 19 states
have laws that require registration or disclosure in connection
with offers and sales of franchises. In addition, 20 states
currently have franchise relationship laws that
limit the ability of franchisors to terminate franchise
agreements or to withhold consent to the renewal or transfer of
the agreements. California regulates the provision of loans to
franchisees as part of the sales of the franchises but we are
currently exempt from such law. The laws of jurisdictions
outside the United States regulate pre-sale disclosure and
the commencement of franchising. Three Canadian provinces and a
number of foreign jurisdictions have adopted pre-sale disclosure
regulations. China has enacted regulations that, among other
things, require an organization to operate properties in at
least two locations in the area where the organization wants to
franchise brands before China will permit the organization to
commence acting as a franchisor. We have received legal advice
that such regulations do not prevent us from continuing to
franchise brands that we had franchised in China before the
effective date of the regulations and any direct franchises will
be established in accordance with applicable law.
Persons with Disabilities. The Americans with
Disabilities Act, or ADA, requires public accommodations, such
as lodging and restaurant facilities, to (i) offer
facilities without discriminating against persons with
disabilities, (ii) offer auxiliary aids and services to
persons with hearing, vision or speech disabilities who would
benefit from such services without fundamentally altering the
nature of the goods or services offered and (iii) remove
barriers to mobility or communication to the extent readily
achievable. The U.S. Department of Justice published
Standards for Accessible Design and
Accessibility Guidelines, collectively referred to
as ADAAG, that, among other things, prescribe a specified number
of handicapped accessible rooms, assistive devices for hearing,
speech and visually impaired persons, and general standards of
design applicable to all areas of facilities subject to the law,
including
28
hotels. The ADAAG specifies the minimum room design and layout
criteria for handicapped accessible rooms. Any newly constructed
facility (first occupied after January 26, 1993) must
comply with ADAAG and be readily accessible to and useable by
persons with disabilities. The owner of each facility and its
contractors are responsible for ADA and ADAAG compliance.
Regulations
Applicable to the Vacation Exchange and Rentals
Business
Our vacation exchange business is subject to, among other laws
and regulations, statutes in certain states that regulate
vacation exchange services, and we must prepare and file
annually disclosure guides with regulators in states where such
filings are required. Although our vacation exchange business is
not generally subject to state statutes that govern the
development of vacation ownership properties and the sale of
vacation ownership interests, these statutes directly affect the
members of our vacation exchange program and resorts with units
that participate in our vacation exchanges. These statutes,
therefore, indirectly affect our vacation exchange business. In
addition, several states and localities are attempting to enact
or have enacted laws or regulations that would impose or impose,
as applicable, taxes on members that complete exchanges, similar
to local transient occupancy taxes. Our vacation rentals
business is subject to state and local regulation, including
applicable seller of travel, travel club and real estate
brokerage licensing statutes.
Regulations
Applicable to the Vacation Ownership Business
Our vacation ownership business is subject to, among others, the
laws and regulations that affect the marketing and sale of
vacation ownership interests, property management of vacation
ownership resorts, travel agency services and the conduct of
real estate brokers, described below:
Federal, State and International Regulation of Vacation
Ownership Business. Our vacation ownership business is
subject to federal legislation, including without limitation,
Housing and Urban Development Department regulations, such as
the Fair Housing Act; the
Truth-in-Lending
Act and Regulation Z promulgated thereunder, which require
certain disclosures to borrowers regarding the terms of
borrowers loans; the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
and Regulation X promulgated thereunder, which require
certain disclosures to borrowers regarding the settlement of
real estate transactions and servicing of loans; the Equal
Credit Opportunity Act and Regulation B promulgated
thereunder, which prohibit discrimination in the extension of
credit on the basis of age, race, color, sex, religion, marital
status, national origin, receipt of public assistance or the
exercise of any right under the Consumer Credit Protection Act;
the Telemarketing and Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act; the
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the Fair Credit Reporting Act and
other laws, which address privacy of consumer financial
information; and the Civil Rights Acts of 1964, 1968 and 1991.
Many states have laws that regulate our vacation ownership
business operations, including those relating to real
estate licensing, travel sales licensing, anti-fraud,
telemarketing, restrictions on the use of predictive dialers,
prize, gift and sweepstakes regulations, labor, and various
regulations governing access and use of our resorts by disabled
persons. In addition to regulation in the United States and
Australia, our vacation ownership business is subject to
regulation in other countries where we develop or manage resorts
and where we market or sell vacation ownership interests,
including Canada, Mexico, New Zealand and Fiji. The scope
of regulation of our vacation ownership business in Canada,
where we develop, market, sell and manage resorts, is similar to
the scope of regulation of our vacation ownership business in
the United States. In addition, in Australia, we are
regulated by the Australian Securities and Investments
Commission, which requires that all persons conducting vacation
ownership sales and marketing and vacation ownership club
activities hold an Australian Financial Services License and
comply with the rules and regulations of the Commission. Unlike
in the United States, where the vacation ownership industry
is regulated primarily by state law, the vacation ownership
industry in Australia is regulated under federal Australian
securities law because Australian law regards a vacation
ownership interest as a security. As we expand our vacation
ownership business by entering new markets, we will become
subject to regulation in additional countries.
The sale of vacation ownership interests is potentially subject
to federal and state securities laws. However, most federal and
state agencies generally do not regulate our sale of vacation
ownership interests as securities, in part because we offer our
vacation ownership interests for personal vacation use and
enjoyment and not for investment purposes with the expectation
of profit or in conjunction with a rental arrangement. In
addition, the vacation ownership interests that we market and
sell are real estate interests or are akin to real estate
interests and therefore our vacation ownership business is
extensively regulated by many states departments of
commerce
and/or real
estate. Because of such extensive regulation, additional
regulation of our vacation ownership products as securities
generally does not occur. Some states in which we market and
sell our vacation ownership interests regulate our products as
securities. In those states, we comply with such regulation by
either registering our vacation ownership interests for sale as
securities or qualifying for an exemption from registration and
by providing required disclosures to our purchasers. If federal
and additional state agencies elected to regulate our vacation
ownership
29
interest products as securities, we would comply with such
regulation by either registering our vacation ownership
interests for sale as securities or qualifying for an exemption
from registration and by providing required disclosures to our
purchasers.
State real estate foreclosure laws impact our vacation ownership
business. We secure loans made to purchasers of vacation
ownership interests that constitute real estate interests and
that are deeded prior to loan repayment by requiring purchasers
to grant a first priority mortgage lien in our favor, which is
recorded against title to the vacation ownership interest. In
the event of a purchasers default, the purchaser will
often voluntarily deed the vacation ownership interest to us, in
which event foreclosure is not necessary. If the purchaser does
not do so, we may commence a judicial or non-judicial
foreclosure proceeding. State real estate foreclosure laws
normally require that certain conditions be satisfied prior to
completing foreclosure, including providing to the purchaser
both a notice and an opportunity to redeem the purchasers
interest and conducting a foreclosure sale. While state real
estate foreclosure laws impose requirements and expenses on us,
we are able to comply with the requirements, bear the expenses
and complete foreclosures. Several states have enacted
anti-deficiency laws which generally prohibit a lender from
recovering the portion of an outstanding loan in excess of the
proceeds of a foreclosure sale of a borrowers primary
residence that secures repayment of the loan. Since purchasers
of vacation ownership interests do not occupy a resort unit as a
primary residence, state anti-deficiency laws generally do not
impact us. Our sale of vacation ownership interests that are
vacation credits is not impacted by state real estate
foreclosure and anti-deficiency laws, since vacation credits are
not direct real estate interests.
Marketing and Sale of Vacation
Ownership Interests. We are subject to
extensive regulation by states departments of commerce
and/or real
estate and international regulatory agencies, such as the
European Commission, in locations where our resorts in which we
sell vacation ownership interests are located or where we market
and sell vacation ownership interests. Many states regulate the
marketing and sale of vacation ownership interests, and the laws
of such states generally require a designated state authority to
approve a vacation ownership public report, which is a detailed
offering statement describing the resort operator and all
material aspects of the resort and the sale of vacation
ownership interests. In addition, the laws of most states in
which we sell vacation ownership interests grant the purchaser
of such an interest the right to rescind a contract of purchase
at any time within a statutory rescission period, which
generally ranges from three to 15 days, depending on the
state.
Property Management of Vacation Ownership
Resorts. Our vacation ownership business includes
property management operations that are subject to state
condominium
and/or
vacation ownership management regulations and, in some states,
to professional licensing requirements.
Conduct of Real Estate Brokers. The marketing
and sales component of our vacation ownership business is
subject to numerous federal, state and local laws and
regulations that contain general standards for and prohibitions
relating to the conduct of real estate brokers and sales
associates, including laws and regulations that relate to the
licensing of brokers and sales associates, fiduciary and agency
duties, administration of trust funds, collection of
commissions, and advertising and consumer disclosures. The
federal Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and state real
estate brokerage laws also restrict payments that real estate
brokers and other parties may receive or pay in connection with
the sales of vacation ownership interests and referral of
prospective owners. Such laws may, to some extent, restrict
arrangements involving our vacation ownership business.
Environmental Regulation. Because our
vacation ownership business acquires, develops and renovates
vacation ownership interest resorts, we are subject to various
environmental laws, ordinances, regulations and similar
requirements in the jurisdictions where our resorts are located.
The environmental laws to which our vacation ownership business
is subject regulate various matters, including pollution,
hazardous and toxic substances and wastes, asbestos, petroleum
and storage tanks.
Regulations
Applicable to the Management of Property Operations
Our business that relates to the management of property
operations, which includes components of our lodging and
vacation ownership businesses, is subject to, among others, laws
and regulations that relate to health and sanitation, the sale
of alcoholic beverages, facility operation and fire safety,
including as described below:
Health and Sanitation. Most states have
regulations or statutes governing the lodging business or its
components, such as restaurants, swimming pools and health
facilities. Lodging and restaurant businesses often require
licensing by state and local authorities, and sometimes these
licenses are obtainable only after the business passes health
inspections to assure compliance with health and sanitation
codes. Health inspections are performed on a recurring basis.
Health-related laws affect the use of linens, towels and
glassware. Other laws govern swimming pool use and operation and
require the posting of notices, availability of certain rescue
equipment and limitations on
30
the number of persons allowed to use the pool at any time. These
regulations typically impose civil fines or penalties for
violations, which may lead to operating restrictions if
uncorrected or in extreme cases of violations.
Sale of Alcoholic Beverages. Alcoholic
beverage service is subject to licensing and extensive
regulations that govern virtually all aspects of service.
Compliance with these regulations at managed locations may
impose obligations on the owners of managed hotels, Wyndham
Hotel Management as the property manager or both. Managed hotel
operations may be adversely affected by delays in transfers or
issuances of alcoholic beverage licenses necessary for food and
beverage services.
Facility Operation. The operation of lodging
facilities is subject to innkeepers laws that
(i) authorize the innkeeper to assert a lien against and
sell, after observing certain procedures, the possessions of a
guest who owes an unpaid bill for lodging or other services
provided by the innkeeper, (ii) affect or limit the
liability of an innkeeper who posts required notices or
disclaimers for guest valuables if a safe is provided, guest
property, checked or stored baggage, mail and parked vehicles,
(iii) require posting of house rules and room rates in each
guest room or near the registration area, (iv) may require
registration of guests, proof of identity at check-in and
retention of records for a specified period of time,
(v) limit the rights of an innkeeper to refuse lodging to
prospective guests except under certain narrowly defined
circumstances, and (vi) may limit the right of the
innkeeper to evict a guest who overstays the scheduled stay or
otherwise gives a reason to be evicted. Federal and state laws
applicable to places of public accommodation prohibit
discrimination in lodging services on the basis of the race,
creed, color or national origin of the guest. Some states
prohibit the practice of overbooking and require the
innkeeper to provide the reserved lodging or find alternate
accommodations if the guest has paid a deposit, or face a civil
fine. Some states and municipalities have also enacted laws and
regulations governing no-smoking areas and guest rooms that are
more stringent than our standards for no-smoking guest rooms.
Fire Safety. The federal Hotel and Motel
Safety Act of 1990 requires all places of public accommodation
to install hard wired, single station smoke detectors meeting
National Fire Protection Association Standard 74 in each
guest room and to install an automatic sprinkler system meeting
National Fire Protection Association Standard 13 or
13-R in
facilities taller than three stories, unless certain exceptions
are met, for such places to be approved for lodging and meetings
of federal employees. Travel directories published by the
federal government and lists maintained by state officials will
include only those facilities that comply with the Hotel and
Motel Safety Act of 1990. Other state and local fire and life
safety codes may require exit maps, lighting systems and other
safety measures unique to lodging facilities.
Occupational Safety. The federal Occupational
Safety and Health Act, or OSHA, requires that businesses comply
with industry-specific safety and health standards, which are
known collectively as OSHA standards, to provide a safe work
environment for all employees and prevent work-related injuries,
illnesses and deaths. Failure to comply with such OSHA standards
may subject the lodging business to fines from the Occupational
Safety and Health Administration.
Environmental Regulation. Our business that
relates to the management of property operations is subject to
various environmental laws, ordinances, regulations and similar
requirements in the jurisdictions where the properties we manage
are located. We must comply with environmental laws that
regulate pollution, hazardous and toxic substances and wastes,
asbestos, petroleum and storage tanks.
Where You
Can Find More Information
We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements
and other information with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Our SEC filings are available to the public over the
Internet at the SECs website at http://www.sec.gov. Our
SEC filings are also available on our website at
http://www.wyndhamworldwide.com as soon as reasonably
practicable after they are filed with or furnished to the SEC.
You may also read and copy any filed document at the SECs
public reference room in Washington, D.C. at 100 F Street,
N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for further information about its public reference rooms.
We maintain an Internet site at http://www.wyndhamworldwide.com.
Our website and the information contained on or connected to
that site are not incorporated into this annual report.
You should carefully consider each of the following risk factors
and all of the other information set forth in this report. We
believe that the following information identifies the most
significant risk factors affecting us. However, the risks and
uncertainties we face are not limited to those set forth in the
risk factors described below. Additional
31
risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we
currently believe to be immaterial may also adversely affect our
business. In addition, past financial performance may not be a
reliable indicator of future performance and historical trends
should not be used to anticipate results or trends in future
periods.
If any of the following risks and uncertainties develops into
actual events, these events could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
In such case, the trading price of our common stock could
decline.
We are
responsible for certain of Cendants contingent and other
corporate liabilities.
Under the separation agreements we executed with Cendant and
former Cendant units, Realogy and Travelport, we and Realogy are
responsible for 37.5% and 62.5%, respectively, of certain of
Cendants contingent and other corporate liabilities
including those relating to unresolved tax and legal matters and
associated costs. We generally are responsible for the payment
of our share of all taxes imposed on Cendant and certain other
subsidiaries and certain contingent and other corporate
liabilities of Cendant
and/or its
subsidiaries to the extent incurred on or prior to
August 23, 2006, including liabilities relating to certain
of Cendants terminated or divested businesses, liabilities
relating to the Travelport sale, the Cendant litigation
described below under Cendant Litigation, generally
any actions with respect to the separation plan and payments
under certain contracts that were not allocated to any specific
party in connection with the separation.
If any party responsible for these liabilities were to default
on its obligations, each non-defaulting party (including Avis
Budget) would be required to pay an equal portion of the amounts
in default. Accordingly, we may, under certain circumstances, be
obligated to pay amounts in excess of our share of the assumed
obligations related to such contingent and other corporate
liabilities including associated costs. On December 15,
2006, Realogy entered into an agreement and plan of merger with
an affiliate of Apollo Management VI, L.P. pursuant to which
Realogy will be acquired by Apollo and no longer trade as an
independent public company. The proposed merger does not negate
Realogys obligation to satisfy 62.5% of such contingent
and other corporate liabilities of Cendant or its subsidiaries
pursuant to the terms of the separation agreement. Following
closing of the proposed merger, however, Realogy is expected to
have greater debt obligations and its ability to satisfy its
portion of these liabilities may be adversely impacted.
The
hospitality industry is highly competitive and we are subject to
risks relating to competition that may adversely affect our
performance.
We will be adversely impacted if we cannot compete effectively
in the highly competitive hospitality industry. Our continued
success depends upon our ability to compete effectively in
markets that contain numerous competitors, some of which may
have significantly greater financial, marketing and other
resources than we have. Competition may reduce fee structures,
potentially causing us to lower our fees or prices, which may
adversely impact our profits. New competition or existing
competition that uses a business model that is different from
our business model may put pressure on us to change our model so
that we can remain competitive.
Our
revenues are highly dependent on the travel industry and
declines in or disruptions to the travel industry, such as those
caused by economic slowdown, terrorism, acts of God and war, may
adversely affect us.
Declines in or disruptions to the travel industry may adversely
impact us. Risks affecting the travel industry include: economic
slowdown, terrorist incidents and threats (and associated
heightened travel security measures), acts of God (such as
earthquakes, hurricanes, fires, floods and other natural
disasters), war, bird flu and other pandemics, financial
instability of air carriers, airline job actions and strikes,
and increases in gas and other fuel prices.
We are
subject to operating or other risks common to the hospitality
industry.
Our business is subject to numerous operating or other risks
common to the hospitality industry including:
|
|
·
|
changes in operating costs, including energy, labor costs
(including minimum wage increases and unionization),
workers compensation and health-care related costs and
insurance;
|
|
·
|
changes in desirability of geographic regions of the hotels or
resorts in our business;
|
|
·
|
seasonality in our businesses may cause fluctuations in our
operating results;
|
|
·
|
geographic concentrations of our operations and customers;
|
32
|
|
·
|
increases in costs due to inflation that may not be fully offset
by price and fee increases in our business;
|
|
·
|
the quality of the services provided by franchisees, our
vacation exchange and rentals business, resorts with units that
are exchanged through our vacation exchange business
and/or
resorts in which we sell vacation ownership interests may
adversely affect our image and reputation;
|
|
·
|
our ability to generate sufficient cash to buy from third-party
suppliers the products that we need to provide to the
participants in our points programs who want to redeem points
for such products;
|
|
·
|
overbuilding in one or more segments of the hospitality industry
and/or in
one or more geographic regions;
|
|
·
|
changes in the number and occupancy rates of hotels operating
under franchise and management agreements;
|
|
·
|
changes in the relative mix of franchised hotels in the various
lodging industry price categories;
|
|
·
|
our ability to develop and maintain positive relations with
current and potential franchisees, hotel owners, resorts with
units that are exchanged through our vacation exchange business
and/or
owners of vacation properties that our vacation rentals business
markets for rental;
|
|
·
|
competition for desirable sites for the development of vacation
ownership properties and liability under state and local laws
with respect to any construction defects in the vacation
ownership properties we develop;
|
|
·
|
private resale of vacation ownership interests could adversely
affect our vacation ownership resorts and vacation exchange
businesses;
|
|
·
|
revenues from our lodging business are indirectly affected by
our franchisees pricing decisions;
|
|
·
|
taxation of guest loyalty program benefits that adversely
affects the cost or consumer acceptance of loyalty programs; and
|
|
·
|
disruptions in relationships with third parties, including
marketing alliances and affiliations with
e-commerce
channels.
|
We may
not be able to achieve our growth objectives.
There can be no assurance that we will be successful in
achieving our objectives for increasing the number of franchised
and/or
managed properties in our lodging business, the number of
vacation exchange members acquired by our vacation exchange
business, the number of rental weeks sold by our vacation
rentals business and the number of tours generated and vacation
ownership interests sold by our vacation ownership business.
We may be unable to identify acquisition targets that complement
our businesses, and if we are able to identify suitable
acquisition targets, we may not be able to complete acquisitions
of such targets on commercially reasonable terms. Our ability to
complete acquisitions depends on a variety of factors, including
our ability to obtain financing on acceptable terms and
requisite government approvals. If we are able to complete
acquisitions, there is no assurance that we will be able to
achieve the revenue and cost benefits that we expected in
connection with such acquisitions or to successfully integrate
the acquired businesses into our existing operations.
Our
international operations are subject to risks not generally
applicable to our domestic operations.
Our international operations are subject to numerous risks
including: exposure to local economic conditions; potential
adverse changes in the diplomatic relations of foreign countries
with the United States; hostility from local populations;
restrictions and taxes on the withdrawal of foreign investment
and earnings; government policies against businesses owned by
foreigners; investment restrictions or requirements; diminished
ability to legally enforce our contractual rights in foreign
countries; foreign exchange restrictions; fluctuations in
foreign currency exchange rates; withholding and other taxes on
remittances and other payments by subsidiaries; and changes in
and application of foreign taxation structures including value
added taxes.
We are
subject to risks related to litigation filed by or against
us.
We are subject to a number of legal actions and the risk of
future litigation as described below under Legal
Proceedings. We cannot predict with certainty the ultimate
outcome and related damages and costs of litigation and other
proceedings filed by or against us. Adverse results in
litigation and other proceedings may harm our business.
33
We are
subject to certain risks related to our indebtedness, our
securitization of assets, the cost and availability of capital
and the extension of credit by us.
We are a borrower of funds under our credit facilities, credit
lines, senior notes and securitization financings. We are a
lender of funds when we finance purchases of vacation ownership
interests. In connection with our debt obligations, the
securitization of certain of our assets and the extension of
credit by us, we are subject to numerous risks including:
|
|
·
|
our cash flows from operations or available lines of credit will
be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and
interest;
|
|
·
|
our leverage may adversely affect our ability to obtain
additional financing;
|
|
·
|
our leverage requires the dedication of a significant portion of
our cash flows to the payment of principal and interest thus
reducing the availability of cash flows to fund working capital,
capital expenditures or other operating needs;
|
|
·
|
increases in interest rates;
|
|
·
|
rating agency downgrades for our debt that could increase our
borrowing costs;
|
|
·
|
we may not be able to securitize our vacation ownership contract
receivables because of, among other factors, the performance of
the vacation ownership contract receivables, the market for
vacation ownership loan-backed notes and asset-backed notes in
general, the ability to insure the securitized vacation
ownership contract receivables, and the risk that the actual
amount of uncollectible accounts on our securitized vacation
ownership contract receivables and other credit we extend is
greater than our allowances for doubtful accounts;
|
|
·
|
prohibitive cost and inadequate availability of capital could
restrict the development or acquisition of vacation ownership
resorts by us, the financing of purchases of vacation ownership
interests and the renovation and maintenance of properties by
vacation ownership resorts;
|
|
·
|
if interest rates increase significantly, we may not be able to
increase the interest rate offered to finance purchases of
vacation ownership interests by the same amount of the increase;
and
|
|
·
|
purchasers of vacation ownership interests who finance a portion
of the purchase price may default on their loan and the value we
recover in a default is not, in all instances, sufficient to
cover the outstanding debt.
|
Several
of our businesses are subject to extensive regulation and the
cost of compliance or failure to comply with such regulations
may adversely affect us.
Our businesses are heavily regulated by the states or provinces
(including local governments) and countries in which our
operations are conducted. If we are not in substantial
compliance with applicable laws and regulations, including,
among others, privacy, telemarketing, licensing, labor and
environmental laws, we may be subject to regulatory actions,
fines, penalties and potential criminal prosecution.
We are
dependent on our senior management.
We believe that our future growth depends, in part, on the
continued services of our senior management team. Losing the
services of any members of our senior management team could
adversely affect our strategic and customer relationships and
impede our ability to execute our growth strategies.
The
weakening or unavailability of our intellectual property could
adversely affect our business.
The weakening or unavailability of our trademarks, trade dress
and other intellectual property rights could adversely affect
our business. We generate, maintain, utilize and enforce a
substantial portfolio of trademarks, trade dress and other
intellectual property that are fundamental to the brands that we
use in all of our businesses. There can be no assurance that the
steps we take to protect our intellectual property will be
adequate.
34
Disruptions
and other impairment of our information technologies and systems
could adversely affect our business.
Any disaster, disruption or other impairment in our technology
capabilities could harm our business. Our businesses depend upon
the use of sophisticated information technologies and systems,
including technology and systems utilized for reservation
systems, vacation exchange systems, property management,
communications, procurement, member record databases, call
centers, operation of our loyalty programs and administrative
systems. The operation, maintenance and updating of these
technologies and systems is dependent upon third-party
technologies, systems and services for which there is no
assurance of uninterrupted availability.
The
market price of our shares may fluctuate.
The market price of our common stock may fluctuate depending
upon many factors some of which may be beyond our control,
including: our quarterly or annual earnings or those of other
companies in our industry; actual or anticipated fluctuations in
our operating results due to seasonality and other factors
related to our business; changes in accounting principles or
rules; announcements by us or our competitors of significant
acquisitions or dispositions; the failure of securities analysts
to cover our common stock; changes in earnings estimates by
securities analysts or our ability to meet those estimates; the
operating and stock price performance of other comparable
companies; overall market fluctuations; and general economic
conditions. Stock markets in general have experienced volatility
that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of a
particular company. These broad market fluctuations may
adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.
Your
percentage ownership in Wyndham Worldwide may be diluted in the
future.
Your percentage ownership in Wyndham Worldwide may be diluted in
the future because of equity awards that we expect will be
granted over time to our directors, officers and employees as
well as due to the exercise of options issued in connection with
the spin-off. In addition, our Board may issue shares of common
and preferred stock up to certain regulatory thresholds without
shareholder approval.
Provisions
in our certificate of incorporation, by-laws, stockholder rights
plan and under Delaware law may prevent or delay an acquisition
of our company, which could impact the trading price of our
common stock.
Our certificate of incorporation, by-laws, stockholder rights
plan and Delaware law contain provisions that are intended to
deter coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids
by making such practices or bids unacceptably expensive and to
encourage prospective acquirors to negotiate with our Board
rather than to attempt a hostile takeover. These provisions
include, among others: a Board of Directors that is divided into
three classes with staggered terms; elimination of the right of
our stockholders to act by written consent; rules regarding how
stockholders may present proposals or nominate directors for
election at stockholder meetings; the right of our Board to
issue preferred stock without stockholder approval; and
limitations on the right of stockholders to remove directors.
Under our stockholder rights plan, our Board may issue shares of
stock at a discount to market if a person or group attempts to
acquire us on terms not approved by our Board. Delaware law also
imposes some restrictions on mergers and other business
combinations between us and any holder of 15% or more of our
outstanding common stock.
We cannot
provide assurance that we will pay any dividends.
There can be no assurance that we will have sufficient surplus
under Delaware law to be able to pay any dividends. This may
result from extraordinary cash expenses, actual expenses
exceeding contemplated costs, funding of capital expenditures,
or increases in reserves. If we do not pay dividends, the price
of our common stock must appreciate for you to receive a gain on
your investment in Wyndham Worldwide. This appreciation may not
occur.
|
|
ITEM 1B.
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
Not applicable.
35
Our corporate headquarters is located in a leased office at
7 Sylvan Way in Parsippany, New Jersey. The lease
expires in 2011. We have a leased office in Virginia Beach,
VA for our Employee Service Center that expires in 2011.
Wyndham
Hotel Group
Our lodging business has its main corporate operations at a
leased office at 1 Sylvan Way in Parsippany,
New Jersey, pursuant to a lease that expires in 2008. Our
lodging business also leases space for its reservations centers
and/or data
warehouse in Aberdeen, South Dakota; Phoenix, Arizona; and
Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada pursuant to leases
that expire in 2010, 2010 and 2013, respectively. In addition,
our lodging business leases office space in Atlanta, Georgia
expiring in 2011; Dallas, Texas expiring in 2007;
Mission Viejo, CA expiring in 2013; and Hammersmith,
United Kingdom expiring in 2012. Our lodging business also
leases two vacant properties in Phoenix, Arizona and Knoxville,
Tennessee pursuant to leases that expire in 2007.
RCI
Global Vacation Network
Our vacation exchange business has its main corporate operations
at a leased office in Parsippany, New Jersey. Our vacation
exchange business also owns five properties located in the
following cities: Carmel, Indiana; Cork, Ireland; Kettering,
United Kingdom; Mexico City, Mexico; and Albufeira, Portugal.
Our vacation exchange business also has three leased offices
located within the United States pursuant to leases that expire
generally between 3 - 5 years and
48 additional leased spaces in various countries outside
the United States pursuant to leases that expire generally
between 2 - 3 years except for 3 leases that
expire between 2011 - 2019. Our vacation rentals
business operations are managed in seven owned locations
(Earby, United Kingdom; Kettering, United Kingdom; Albufeira,
Portugal; Monterrigioni, Italy; Saarburg, Germany; Romo,
Denmark; and Cork, Ireland); Bignor, United Kingdom (vacant
property being sold); Kettering, United Kingdom; and Cork,
Ireland are combined operations that include exchange and rental
business operations; three main leased locations (Leidschendam,
Netherlands; Dunfermline, United Kingdom; and Hellerup, Denmark)
and approximately 15 smaller leased offices throughout
Europe. Our main leased locations operate pursuant to leases
that expire in 2015, 2012, and 2010, respectively. The vacation
exchange and rentals business also occupies space in
Hammersmith, United Kingdom pursuant to a lease that expires in
2012.
Wyndham
Vacation Ownership
Our vacation ownership business has its main corporate
operations in Orlando, Florida pursuant to five leases that
expire in 2007, 2008 and 2012. Our vacation ownership business
also owns a facility in Redmond, Washington and leases space for call center and
administrative functions in Bellevue, Washington expiring in
2013, Las Vegas, Nevada expiring in 2012 and Margate, Florida
expiring in 2010. In addition, the vacation ownership business
leases marketing and sales offices of approximately 121
throughout the United States with various expiration dates,
14 offices in Australia expiring within approximately two
years, one office in New Zealand expiring in 2010 and one in
Canada expiring in 2010.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
Wyndham
Worldwide Litigation
Wendell and Sandra Grimes, et al. v. Fairfield
Resorts, Inc., FairShare Vacation Owners Association,
et al. This class action complaint was filed on
July 19, 2005 in the U.S. District Court for the
Middle District of Florida. It alleges, under a variety of legal
theories, that the defendants violated their duties to the
members of FairShare Plus through self-serving changes to the
reservation and availability policies (including an affiliation
with RCI), which diminished the value of the vacation ownership
interests purchased by the members and rendered it more
difficult for members to obtain reservations at their home
resort. The complaint does not seek monetary damages in a
specified amount, nor does it specify the form of injunctive or
declaratory relief sought. Plaintiffs filed their motion for
class certification on October 18, 2005, and defendants
submitted their opposition on January 18, 2006. On
April 26, 2006, the court heard oral argument but did not
rule on the plaintiffs motion for class certification. On
April 27, 2006, the court denied the plaintiffs
motion for class certification. On May 11, 2006, plaintiffs
filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh
Circuit a petition for an interlocutory review of the District
Courts April 27 order denying class certification. On
May 15, 2006, the District Court ordered plaintiffs to file
not later than May 31, 2006, an amended complaint which
omits class action allegations. On or about May 31, 2006,
plaintiffs filed an amended complaint omitting the class action
allegations. On June 7, 2006, defendants moved to
36
dismiss the amended complaint for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction. On June 21, 2006, the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied the plaintiffs
petition for an interlocutory review of the District
Courts April 27 order. On July 14th, 2006, the
U.S. District Court granted defendants motion to
dismiss the amended complaint for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction. On August 8th, 2006, plaintiffs filed a
notice of final appeal before the Eleventh Circuit Court of
Appeals. Plaintiffs filed their appellate brief on
September 25, 2006. Defendants filed opposition to
plaintiffs appeal on October 23, 2006. Plaintiffs
filed their reply to defendants opposition on
November 6, 2006. On January 30, 2007, the Court of
Appeals affirmed the ruling of the District Court denying class
certification and not permitting plaintiffs to file a second
amended complaint to redefine the proposed class.
In Re: Resort Condominiums International, LLC and RCI
Canada, Inc. On August 4, 2004 companion
complaints were filed against Resort Condominium International,
LLC and RCI Canada, Inc. (the RCI Parties) in
three Alberta jurisdictions alleging that the RCI Points
program is an unlicensed travel club and the unregistered sales
of memberships in the program is a regulatory violation of the
Alberta Fair Trading Act. The complaints seek statutory
penalties. The RCI Parties defense is premised upon the
fact that the RCI Points program simply provides a system to use
accommodations currently owned by the vacation ownership
consumer and is not a travel club, as defined in the statute, as
it does not involve the future purchase of accommodations. The
matters have been consolidated for trial commencing
April 16, 2007 in Calgary. Settlement talks between the
Government and the co-defendant developer reached an impasse.
The Government indicated during a status hearing on
January 17, 2007 that it does not intend to pursue its
claims against the RCI Parties. The RCI Parties are awaiting the
Governments formal application withdrawing the claims.
Source v. Cendant Corporation. Source, Inc.,
which we refer to as Source, filed suit against Cendant on
July 28, 2005 in the U.S. District Court for the
Eastern District of Texas. Source alleges infringement of four
patents related to Sources centralized consumer cash
value accumulation system for multiple merchants. Source
alleges that Wyndham Hotel Groups TripRewards program
infringes upon Sources guest loyalty system. Source seeks
monetary damages and injunctive relief. While the parties have
discussed a nuisance value settlement, Cendant has filed an
answer and motion to stay the litigation pending reexamination
of two of the patents by the Patent and Trademark Office. The
motion for stay was granted, and the matter was stayed until
April 2006. We applied for an extension of that stay, which
Source opposed. The Court has lifted the stay. The parties have
filed a joint motion to dismiss the matter without prejudice and
have committed to exploring possible business solutions to the
dispute. The dismissal order was signed by the Court on
August 10, 2006.
In addition, we are involved in claims and legal actions arising
in the ordinary course of our business including but not limited
to: for our lodging businessbreach of contract, fraud and
bad faith claims between franchisors and franchisees in
connection with franchise agreements and with owners in
connection with management contracts and negligence claims
asserted in connection with acts or occurrences at franchised or
managed properties; for our vacation exchange and rentals
businessbreach of contract claims by both affiliates and
members in connection with their respective agreements, bad
faith, and consumer protection claims asserted by members and
negligence claims by guests for alleged injuries sustained at
resorts; for our vacation ownership businessbreach of
contract, conflict of interest, fraud and consumer protection
act claims by property owners associations, owners and
prospective owners in connection with the sale of vacation
ownership interests, land or the management of vacation
ownership resorts, construction defect claims relating to
vacation ownership units or resorts and negligence claims by
guests for alleged injuries sustained at vacation ownership
units or resorts; and for each of our businesses, bankruptcy
proceedings involving efforts to collect receivables from a
debtor in bankruptcy, employment matters involving claims of
discrimination and wage and hour claims, claims of infringement
upon third parties intellectual property rights and
environmental claims.
Cendant
Litigation
Under the separation agreement, we agreed to be responsible for
37.5% of certain of Cendants contingent and other
corporate liabilities and associated costs related to the
Cendant litigation described below.
After the April 15, 1998 announcement of the discovery of
accounting irregularities in the former CUC business units, and
prior to the issuance of the Information Statement,
approximately 70 lawsuits claiming to be class actions and
other proceedings were commenced against Cendant and other
defendants, of which a number of lawsuits have been settled.
Approximately four lawsuits remain unresolved in addition
to the matters described below.
In Re: Cendant Corporation Litigation, which we
refer to as the Securities Action, is a consolidated class
action in the U.S. District Court for the District of New
Jersey brought on behalf of all persons who acquired securities
of Cendant and CUC, except the PRIDES securities, between
May 31, 1995 and August 28, 1998. Named as defendants
37
are Cendant; 28 former officers and directors of Cendant, CUC
and HFS Incorporated; and Ernst & Young LLP, CUCs
former independent accounting firm.
The Amended and Consolidated Class Action Complaint in the
Securities Action alleges that, among other things, the lead
plaintiffs and members of the class were damaged when they
acquired securities of Cendant and CUC because, as a result of
accounting irregularities, Cendants and CUCs
previously issued financial statements were materially false and
misleading, and the allegedly false and misleading financial
statements caused the prices of Cendants and CUCs
securities to be inflated artificially.
On December 7, 1999, Cendant announced that it had reached
an agreement to settle claims made by class members in the
Securities Action for approximately $2,850 million in cash
plus 50% of any net recovery Cendant receives from
Ernst & Young as a result of Cendants
cross-claims against Ernst & Young as described below.
This settlement received all necessary court approvals and was
fully funded by Cendant on May 24, 2002.
On January 25, 1999, Cendant asserted cross-claims against
Ernst & Young that alleged that Ernst & Young
failed to follow professional standards to discover, and
recklessly disregarded, the accounting irregularities and is
therefore liable to Cendant for damages in unspecified amounts.
The cross-claims assert claims for breaches of Ernst &
Youngs audit agreements with Cendant, negligence, breaches
of fiduciary duty, fraud and contribution. On July 18,
2000, Cendant filed amended cross-claims against
Ernst & Young asserting the same claims. On
March 26, 1999, Ernst & Young filed cross-claims
against Cendant and certain of Cendants present and former
officers and directors that alleged that any failure by
Ernst & Young to discover the accounting irregularities
was caused by misrepresentations and omissions made to
Ernst & Young in the course of its audits and other
reviews of Cendants financial statements. Ernst &
Youngs cross-claims assert claims for breach of contract,
fraud, fraudulent inducement, negligent misrepresentation and
contribution. Damages in unspecified amounts are sought for the
costs to Ernst & Young associated with defending the
various shareholder lawsuits, lost business it claims is
attributable to Ernst & Youngs association with
Cendant and for harm to Ernst & Youngs
reputation. On June 4, 2001, Ernst & Young filed
amended cross-claims against Cendant asserting the same claims.
Cendant Tax Audit. During the fourth quarter of
2006, Cendant and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
settled the IRS examination for Cendants taxable years
1998 through 2002 during which we were included in
Cendants tax returns. Accordingly, we reduced our
contingent liabilities by $15 million to reflect
Cendants settlement with the IRS. Such reduction was
recorded in general and administrative expenses on the
Consolidated Statement of Income during the year ended
December 31, 2006. We were adequately reserved for this
audit cycle and have reflected the results of that examination
in our 2006 financial statements. The IRS has opened an
examination for Cendants taxable years 2003 through 2006
during which we were included in Cendants tax returns.
Although we and Cendant believe there is appropriate support for
the positions taken on its tax returns, we and Cendant have
recorded liabilities representing the best estimates of the
probable loss on certain positions. We and Cendant believe that
the accruals for tax liabilities are adequate for all open
years, based on assessment of many factors including past
experience and interpretations of tax law applied to the facts
of each matter. Although we and Cendant believe the recorded
assets and liabilities are reasonable, tax regulations are
subject to interpretation and tax litigation is inherently
uncertain; therefore, our and Cendants assessments can
involve both a series of complex judgments about future events
and rely heavily on estimates and assumptions. While we and
Cendant believe that the estimates and assumptions supporting
the assessments are reasonable, the final determination of tax
audits and any other related litigation could be materially
different than that which is reflected in historical income tax
provisions and recorded assets and liabilities. Based on the
results of an audit or litigation, a material effect on our
income tax provision, net income, or cash flows in the period or
periods for which that determination is made could result.
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
|
Not applicable.
38
PART II
|
|
ITEM 5.
|
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Market
Price of Common Stock
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange
(NYSE) under the symbol WYN. At
January 31, 2007, the number of stockholders of record was
approximately 6,284. The following table sets forth the
quarterly high and low sales prices per share of WYN common
stock as reported by the NYSE for since July 31, 2006, the
date of the Separation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
34.41
|
|
|
$
|
26.07
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
33.25
|
|
|
|
27.68
|
|
Dividend
Policy
Historically, we have never declared or paid a dividend. The
declaration and payment of future dividends to holders of our
common stock will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors
and will depend upon many factors, including our financial
condition, earnings, capital requirements of our business,
covenants associated with certain debt obligations, legal
requirements, regulatory constraints, industry practice and
other factors that our Board deems relevant. There can be no
assurance that a payment of a dividend will or will not occur in
the future.
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
Below is the summary of our Wyndham common stock repurchases by
month for the quarter ended December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Value of Shares that
|
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as
|
|
|
May Yet Be
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
Part of Publicly
|
|
|
Purchased Under
|
Period
|
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
Paid per Share
|
|
|
Announced Plan
|
|
|
Plan
|
October
1 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
5,003,700
|
|
|
|
$
|
29.11
|
|
|
|
|
5,003,700
|
|
|
|
$
|
122,684,495
|
|
November
1 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
490,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
29.90
|
|
|
|
|
490,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
108,035,457
|
|
December 1 31,
2006(*)
|
|
|
|
1,749,500
|
|
|
|
$
|
32.41
|
|
|
|
|
1,749,500
|
|
|
|
$
|
51,333,943
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
7,243,200
|
|
|
|
$
|
29.96
|
|
|
|
|
7,243,200
|
|
|
|
$
|
51,333,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) Includes
600,000 shares purchased for which the trade date occurred
during December 2006 while settlement occurred in January
2007.
On August 17, 2006, we announced that our Board of
Directors authorized a stock repurchase program to purchase up
to $400 million of our common stock. From the inception of
the program through December 31, 2006, we repurchased
11.9 million shares at an average price of $29.35. During
January 2007, we repurchased an additional 1.6 million
shares, completing the program with 13.5 million shares
purchased at an average price of $29.72. No shares were
purchased outside our share repurchase program during the
periods set forth in the table above. On February 13, 2007,
we announced that our Board of Directors has authorized a new
stock repurchase program that enables us to purchase up to
$400 million of our common stock. The Board of
Directors authorization included increased repurchase
capacity for proceeds received from stock option exercises. The
amount and timing of specific repurchases are subject to market
conditions, applicable legal requirements and other factors.
Repurchases may be conducted in the open market or in privately
negotiated transactions.
39
Performance
Graph
The Performance Graph is not deemed filed with the SEC and
shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any of our
prior or future filings made with the SEC.
The following graph covers the period from August 1, 2006
to December 29, 2006 and assumes that $100 was invested on
August 1, 2006 in each of our common stock, the S&P 500
Index, the S&P 500 Hotels, Resorts & Cruise Lines
Index (consisting of Carnival plc, Hilton Hotels Corporation,
Marriott International Inc., Starwood Hotels & Resorts
Worldwide, Inc. and Wyndham Worldwide Corporation) and a peer
issuer index (consisting of Hilton Hotels Corporation, Marriott
International Inc., Choice Hotels International, Inc. and
Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc.). The graph
assumes that all dividends were reinvested on the date of
payment without payment of any commissions. No cash dividends
have been declared on our common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Total Return
|
|
|
08/01/06
|
|
09/29/06
|
|
12/29/06
|
Wyndham Worldwide
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
87.82
|
|
|
$
|
100.53
|
|
S&P 500 Index
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
105.11
|
|
|
$
|
111.60
|
|
S&P 500 Hotels,
Resorts & Cruise Lines Index
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
111.81
|
|
|
$
|
127.27
|
|
Peer Issuer Index
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
107.33
|
|
|
$
|
124.30
|
|
40
ITEM 6. SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of or For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
Statement of Income
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
3,842
|
|
|
$
|
3,471
|
|
|
$
|
3,014
|
|
|
$
|
2,652
|
|
|
$
|
2,241
|
|
Expenses (a)
|
|
|
3,265
|
|
|
|
2,851
|
|
|
|
2,414
|
|
|
|
2,157
|
|
|
|
1,753
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
|
488
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and
minority interest
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
626
|
|
|
|
587
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
Minority interest, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
431
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
change, net of tax
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
$
|
431
|
|
|
$
|
349
|
|
|
$
|
299
|
|
|
$
|
308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per
Share (b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
$
|
1.78
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
|
$
|
1.49
|
|
|
$
|
1.54
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
change, net of tax
|
|
|
(0.33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
|
$
|
1.49
|
|
|
$
|
1.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
|
$
|
1.49
|
|
|
$
|
1.54
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
change, net of tax
|
|
|
(0.33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1.44
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
|
$
|
1.49
|
|
|
$
|
1.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured
assets (c)
|
|
$
|
2,234
|
|
|
$
|
3,169
|
|
|
$
|
2,811
|
|
|
$
|
1,865
|
|
|
$
|
142
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
9,520
|
|
|
|
9,167
|
|
|
|
8,343
|
|
|
|
7,041
|
|
|
|
5,509
|
|
Secured debt
|
|
|
1,787
|
|
|
|
2,005
|
|
|
|
1,721
|
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
Other debt
|
|
|
1,113
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Total stockholders/invested
equity (d)
|
|
|
3,559
|
|
|
|
5,033
|
|
|
|
4,679
|
|
|
|
4,283
|
|
|
|
3,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Statistics:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging (e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
rooms (f)
|
|
|
527,700
|
|
|
|
519,000
|
|
|
|
508,200
|
|
|
|
524,700
|
|
|
|
543,300
|
|
Number of
properties (g)
|
|
|
6,470
|
|
|
|
6,350
|
|
|
|
6,400
|
|
|
|
6,400
|
|
|
|
6,500
|
|
RevPAR (h)
|
|
$
|
34.95
|
|
|
$
|
31.00
|
|
|
$
|
27.55
|
|
|
$
|
25.92
|
|
|
$
|
25.33
|
|
Royalty, marketing and reservation
revenue (in
000s) (i)
|
|
$
|
471,039
|
|
|
$
|
408,620
|
|
|
$
|
371,058
|
|
|
$
|
357,432
|
|
|
$
|
365,787
|
|
Vacation Exchange and
Rentals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of members (in
000s) (j)
|
|
|
3,356
|
|
|
|
3,209
|
|
|
|
3,054
|
|
|
|
2,948
|
|
|
|
2,885
|
|
Annual dues and exchange revenue
per
member (k)
|
|
$
|
135.62
|
|
|
$
|
135.76
|
|
|
$
|
134.82
|
|
|
$
|
131.13
|
|
|
$
|
124.82
|
|
Vacation rental transactions (in
000s) (l)
|
|
|
1,344
|
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
1,104
|
|
|
|
882
|
|
|
|
691
|
|
Average net price per vacation
rental (m)
|
|
$
|
370.93
|
|
|
$
|
359.27
|
|
|
$
|
328.77
|
|
|
$
|
248.65
|
|
|
$
|
205.82
|
|
Vacation
Ownership (n)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross vacation ownership interest
sales (in
000s) (o)
|
|
$
|
1,743,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,396,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,254,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,146,000
|
|
|
$
|
932,000
|
|
Tours (p)
|
|
|
1,046,000
|
|
|
|
934,000
|
|
|
|
859,000
|
|
|
|
925,000
|
|
|
|
759,000
|
|
Volume Per Guest
(VPG) (q)
|
|
$
|
1,486
|
|
|
$
|
1,368
|
|
|
$
|
1,287
|
|
|
$
|
1,138
|
|
|
$
|
1,158
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Includes $99 million of
separation and related costs ($69 million, after-tax) and
$32 million of a net benefit from the resolution of certain
contingent liabilities ($30 million, after-tax).
|
|
(b)
|
|
For all periods prior to our
separation date (July 31, 2006), weighted average shares
were calculated as one share of Wyndham common stock outstanding
for every five shares of Cendant common stock outstanding as of
July 21, 2006, the record date for the distribution of
Wyndham common stock. As such, during 2006, this calculation is
based on basic and diluted weighted average shares of 198 and
199, respectively. During 2002 through 2005, this calculation is
based on basic and diluted weighted average shares of 200.
|
|
(c)
|
|
Represents the portion of vacation
ownership contract receivables, other vacation ownership related
assets and other vacation exchange and rentals assets that
collateralize our debt. Refer to Note 13 to the
Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements for further
information.
|
|
(d)
|
|
Represents Wyndham Worldwides
stand-alone stockholders equity since August 1, 2006
and Cendants net investment (capital contributions and
earnings from operations less dividends) in Wyndham Worldwide
and accumulated other comprehensive income for 2002 through
July 31, 2006, our date of separation.
|
|
(e)
|
|
Ramada International was acquired
on December 10, 2004, Wyndham Hotels and Resorts was
acquired on October 11, 2005 and Baymont Inn &
Suites was acquired on April 7, 2006. The results of
operations of these businesses have been included from their
acquisition dates forward.
|
|
(f)
|
|
Represents the weighted average
number of hotels rooms available for rental for the year. The
amount in 2006 includes managed, non-proprietary hotels.
|
|
(g)
|
|
Represents the number of lodging
properties operated under franchise
and/or
management agreements at the end of the year. The amount in 2006
includes managed, non-proprietary hotels.
|
|
(h)
|
|
Represents revenue per available
room and is calculated by multiplying the percentage of
available rooms occupied for the year by the average rate
charged for renting a lodging room for one day.
|
41
|
|
|
(i)
|
|
Royalty, marketing and reservation
revenue are typically based on a percentage of the gross room
revenues of each franchised hotel. Royalty revenue is generally
a fee charged to each franchised hotel for the use of one of our
trade names, while marketing and reservation revenue are fees
that we collect and are contractually obligated to spend to
support marketing and reservation activities.
|
|
(j)
|
|
Represents members of our vacation
exchange programs who pay annual membership dues. For additional
fees, such participants are entitled to exchange intervals for
intervals at other properties affiliated with our vacation
exchange business. In addition, certain participants may
exchange intervals for other leisure-related products and
services.
|
|
(k)
|
|
Represents total revenues from
annual membership dues and exchange fees generated for the year
divided by the average number of vacation exchange members
during the year.
|
|
(l)
|
|
Represents the gross number of
transactions that are generated in connection with customers
booking their vacation rental stays through us. In our European
vacation rentals businesses, one rental transaction is recorded
each time a standard one-week rental is booked; however, in the
United States one rental transaction is recorded each time a
vacation rental stay is booked, regardless of whether it is less
than or more than one week.
|
|
(m)
|
|
Represents the net rental price
generated from renting vacation properties to customers divided
by the number of rental transactions.
|
|
(n)
|
|
Trendwest Resorts, Inc. was
acquired on April 30, 2002. The results of operations have
been included from the acquisition date forward.
|
|
(o)
|
|
Represents gross sales of vacation
ownership interests (including tele-sales upgrades, which are a
component of upgrade sales) before deferred sales and loan loss
provisions.
|
|
(p)
|
|
Represents the number of tours
taken by guests in our efforts to sell vacation ownership
interests.
|
|
(q)
|
|
Represents revenue per guest and is
calculated by dividing the gross vacation ownership interest
sales, excluding tele-sales upgrades, which are a component of
upgrade sales, by the number of tours.
|
In presenting the financial data above in conformity with
general accepted accounting principles, we are required to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of OperationsFinancial Condition,
Liquidity and Capital ResourcesCritical Accounting
Policies, for a detailed discussion of the accounting
policies that we believe require subjective and complex
judgments that could potentially affect reported results.
Between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2006, we
completed a number of acquisitions, the results of operations
and financial position of which have been included beginning
from the relevant acquisition dates. During this period, our
acquisitions included the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts and Baymont
Inn & Suites brands, a vacation ownership and resort
management business, Two Flags Joint Venture LLC, Ramada
International, Landal GreenParks and Canvas Holidays Limited.
See Note 4 to the Consolidated and Combined Financial
Statements for a more detailed discussion of these acquisitions.
In 2003, we acquired FFD Development Company, LLC, the primary
developer of vacation ownership properties for Fairfield
Resorts, Inc., for $27 million, which resulted in
$16 million of goodwill. In 2002, we acquired Trendwest
Resorts, Inc., a marketer and seller of vacation ownership
interests for $849 million, which resulted in
$687 million of goodwill.
We incurred charges of $14 million in 2005 as a result of
our commitment to various strategic initiatives targeted
principally at reducing costs, enhancing organizational
efficiency and consolidating and rationalizing existing
processes and facilities within our vacation exchange and
rentals business.
During first quarter 2006, we recorded a non-cash charge of
$65 million, after tax, to reflect the cumulative effect of
accounting changes as a result of our adoption of Statement of
Financial Standards (SFAS) No. 152,
Accounting for Real Estate Time-Sharing Transactions
(SFAS No. 152) and Statement of Position
No. 04-2,
Accounting for Real Estate Time-Sharing Transactions
(SOP 04-2)
on January 1, 2006. See Note 2 to the Consolidated and
Combined Financial Statements for further details.
42
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
Forward-Looking
Statements
This report includes forward-looking statements, as
that term is defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission
in its rules, regulations and releases. Forward-looking
statements are any statements other than statements of
historical fact, including statements regarding our
expectations, beliefs, hopes, intentions or strategies regarding
the future. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be
identified by the use of words such as may,
will, expects, should,
believes, plans,
anticipates, estimates,
predicts, potential,
continue, or other words of similar meaning.
Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those discussed in, or implied by, the
forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a
difference include, but are not limited to, general economic
conditions, our financial and business prospects, our capital
requirements, our financing prospects, our relationships with
associates, and those disclosed as risks under Risk
Factors in Part I, Item 1A, above. We caution
readers that any such statements are based on currently
available operational, financial and competitive information,
and they should not place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements, which reflect managements
opinion only as of the date on which they were made. Except as
required by law, we disclaim any obligation to review or update
these forward-looking statements to reflect events or
circumstances as they occur.
BUSINESS
AND OVERVIEW
We are a global provider of hospitality products and services
and operate our business in the following three segments:
|
|
|
|
·
|
Lodgingfranchises hotels in the upscale,
middle and economy segments of the lodging industry and provides
property management services to owners of luxury and upscale
hotels.
|
|
|
·
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentalsprovides
vacation exchange products and services to owners of intervals
of vacation ownership interests, or VOIs, and markets vacation
rental properties primarily on behalf of independent owners.
|
|
|
·
|
Vacation Ownershipmarkets and sells VOIs to
individual consumers, provides consumer financing in connection
with the sale of VOIs and provides property management services
at resorts.
|
Separation
from Cendant
On October 23, 2005, the Board of Directors of Cendant
Corporation (or former Parent) preliminarily
approved a plan to separate Cendant into four independent,
publicly traded companiesone for each of Cendants
hospitality services (including timeshare resorts) (now known as
Wyndham Worldwide), real estate services (now known as Realogy),
travel distribution services (now known as Travelport) and
vehicle rental businesses (now known as Avis Budget). On
April 24, 2006, Cendant announced that as an alternative to
distributing shares of Travelport to Cendant stockholders,
Cendant was exploring the sale of Travelport. On June 30,
2006, Cendant entered into a definitive agreement to sell
Travelport to an affiliate of the Blackstone Group for
$4,300 million in cash and on August 22, 2006, the
sale of Travelport closed. On July 13, 2006, the Board of
Directors of Cendant approved the distributions of all of the
shares of common stock of Wyndham and Realogy. In connection
with the distribution, we filed with the SEC an Information
Statement, dated July 13, 2006 (the Information
Statement), which describes for stockholders the details
of the distribution and provides information on the business and
management of Wyndham. We mailed the Information Statement to
Cendant stockholders shortly after the July 21, 2006 record
date for the distribution. On July 31, 2006, Cendant
distributed all of the shares of our common stock to the holders
of Cendant common stock issued and outstanding on July 21,
2006, the record date for the distribution. On August 1,
2006, we commenced regular way trading on the New
York Stock Exchange under the symbol WYN.
Before our separation from Cendant, we entered into separation,
transition services and several other agreements with Cendant,
Realogy and Travelport to effect the separation and
distribution, govern the relationships among the parties after
the separation and allocate among the parties Cendants
assets, liabilities and obligations attributable to periods
prior to the separation. Under the Separation and Distribution
Agreement, we assumed 37.5% of certain contingent and other
corporate liabilities of Cendant or its subsidiaries which were
not primarily related to our business or the businesses of
Realogy, Travelport or Avis Budget, and Realogy assumed 62.5% of
these contingent and other corporate liabilities. These include
liabilities relating to Cendants terminated or divested
businesses, the Travelport sale, taxes of Travelport for taxable
periods through the date of the Travelport sale, certain
43
litigation matters, generally any actions relating to the
separation plan and payments under certain contracts that were
not allocated to any specific party in connection with the
separation.
On December 15, 2006, Realogy entered into an agreement and
plan of merger with an affiliate of Apollo Management VI, L.P.
pursuant to which Realogy will be acquired by Apollo and no
longer trade as an independent public company. The proposed
merger does not negate Realogys obligation to satisfy
62.5% of certain contingent and other corporate liabilities of
Cendant or its subsidiaries pursuant to the terms of the
separation agreement..
Because we now conduct our business as a separate, stand-alone
public company, our historical financial information does not
reflect what our results of operations, financial position or
cash flows would have been had we been a separate, stand-alone
public company during the periods presented. Therefore, the
historical financial information for such periods may not
necessarily be indicative of what our results of operations,
financial position or cash flows will be in the future and may
not be comparable to periods ending after July 31, 2006.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Lodging
We enter into agreements to franchise our lodging franchise
systems to independent hotel owners. Our standard franchise
agreement typically has a term of 15 to 20 years and
provides a franchisee with certain rights to terminate the
franchise agreement before the term of the agreement under
certain circumstances. The principal source of revenues from
franchising hotels is ongoing franchise fees, which are
comprised of royalty fees and other fees relating to marketing
and reservation services. Ongoing franchise fees typically are
based on a percentage of gross room revenues of each franchised
hotel and are accrued as earned and upon becoming due from the
franchisee. An estimate of uncollectible ongoing franchise fees
is charged to bad debt expense and included in operating
expenses on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income.
Lodging revenue also includes initial franchise fees, which are
recognized as revenue when all material services or conditions
have been substantially performed, which is either when a
franchised hotel opens for business or when a franchise
agreement is terminated as it has been determined that the
franchised hotel will not open.
Our franchise agreements require the payment of fees for certain
services, including marketing and reservations. With such fees,
we provide our franchised properties with a suite of operational
and administrative services, including access to (i) an
international, centralized, brand-specific reservation system,
(ii) advertising, (iii) promotional and co-marketing
programs, (iv) referrals, (v) technology,
(vi) training and (vii) volume purchasing. We are
contractually obligated to expend the marketing and reservation
fees we collect from franchisees in accordance with the
franchise agreements; as such, revenues earned in excess of
costs incurred are accrued as a liability for future marketing
or reservation costs. Costs incurred in excess of revenues are
expensed. In accordance with our franchise agreements, we
include an allocation of certain overhead costs required to
carry out marketing and reservation activities within marketing
and reservation expenses.
We also provide property management services for hotels under
management contracts. Our management fees are comprised of base
fees, which are typically calculated based upon a specified
percentage of gross revenues from hotel operations, and
incentive management fees, which are typically calculated based
upon a specified percentage of a hotels gross operating
profit. Management fee revenue is recognized when earned in
accordance with the terms of the contract. We incur certain
reimbursable costs on behalf of managed hotel properties and
report reimbursements received from managed properties as
revenue and the costs incurred on their behalf as expenses.
Management fee and reimbursable revenues are recorded as a
component of service fees and membership revenue on the
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income. The costs, which
principally relate to payroll costs for operational employees
who work at the managed hotels, are reflected as a component of
operating expenses on the Consolidated and Combined Statements
of Income. The reimbursements from hotel owners are based upon
the costs incurred with no added margin; as a result, these
reimbursable costs have little to no effect on our operating
income. Management fee revenue and revenue related to payroll
reimbursements was $4 million and $69 million,
respectively, during 2006 and $1 million and
$17 million, respectively, during the period
October 11, 2005 (date of Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand
acquisition, which includes management contracts) through
December 31, 2005.
Within our Lodging segment, we measure operating performance
using the following key operating statistics: (i) weighted
average rooms, which represents the weighted average number of
hotel rooms available for rental for the year (ii) number
of properties, which represents the number of lodging properties
operated under franchise
and/or
management agreements at the end of the year and
(iii) RevPAR, which is calculated by multiplying the
44
percentage of available rooms occupied for the year by the
average rate charged for renting a lodging room for one day.
Vacation
Exchange and Rentals
As a provider of vacation exchange services, we enter into
affiliation agreements with developers of vacation ownership
properties to allow owners of intervals to trade their intervals
for certain other intervals within our vacation exchange
business and, for some members, for other leisure-related
products and services. Additionally, as a marketer of vacation
rental properties, generally we enter into contracts for
exclusive periods of time with property owners to market the
rental of such properties to rental customers. Our vacation
exchange business derives a majority of its revenues from annual
membership dues and exchange fees from members trading their
intervals. Annual dues revenue represents the annual membership
fees from members who participate in our vacation exchange
business and, for additional fees, have the right to exchange
their intervals for certain other intervals within our vacation
exchange business and, for certain members, for other
leisure-related products and services. We record revenue from
annual membership dues as deferred income on the Consolidated
and Combined Balance Sheets and recognize it on a straight-line
basis over the membership period during which delivery of
publications, if applicable, and other services are provided to
the members. Exchange fees are generated when members exchange
their intervals for equivalent values of rights and services,
which may include intervals at other properties within our
vacation exchange business or other leisure-related products and
services. Exchange fees are recognized as revenue when the
exchange requests have been confirmed to the member. Our
vacation rentals business derives its revenue principally from
fees, which generally range from approximately 40% to 60% of the
gross rent charged to rental customers. The majority of the
time, we act on behalf of the owners of the rental properties to
generate our fees. We provide reservation services to the
independent property owners and receive the
agreed-upon
fee for the service provided. We remit the gross rental fee
received from the renter to the independent property owner, net
of our
agreed-upon
fee. Revenue from such fees is recognized in the period that the
rental reservation is made, net of expected cancellations. Upon
confirmation of the rental reservation, the rental customer and
property owner generally have a direct relationship for
additional services to be performed. Cancellations for 2006 and
2005 each totaled less than 5% of rental transactions booked.
Our revenue is earned when evidence of an arrangement exists,
delivery has occurred or the services have been rendered, the
sellers price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and
collectibility is reasonably assured. We also earn rental fees
in connection with properties we own or lease under capital
leases and such fees are recognized when the rental
customers stay occurs, as this is the point at which the
service is rendered.
Within our Vacation Exchange and Rentals segment, we measure
operating performance using the following key operating
statistics: (i) average number of vacation exchange
members, which represents participants in our vacation exchange
programs who pay annual membership dues and are entitled, for
additional fees, to exchange their intervals for other intervals
within our vacation exchange business and, for certain members,
for other leisure-related products and services,
(ii) annual membership dues and exchange revenue per
member, which represents the total annual dues and exchange fees
generated for the year divided by the average number of vacation
exchange members during the year, (iii) vacation rental
transactions, which represents the gross number of transactions
that are generated in connection with customers booking their
vacation rental stays through us and (iv) average net price
per vacation rental, which represents the net rental price
generated from renting vacation properties to customers divided
by the number of rental transactions.
Vacation
Ownership
We market and sell VOIs to individual consumers, provide
property management services at resorts and provide consumer
financing in connection with the sale of VOIs. Our vacation
ownership business derives the majority of its revenues from
sales of VOIs and derives other revenues from consumer financing
and property management. Our sales of VOIs are either cash sales
or seller-financed sales. In order for us to recognize revenues
of VOI sales under the full accrual method of accounting
described in SFAS No. 66, Accounting of Sales of
Real Estate for fully constructed inventory, a binding
sales contract must have been executed, the statutory rescission
period must have expired (after which time the purchasers are
not entitled to a refund except for nondelivery by us),
receivables must have been deemed collectible and the remainder
of our obligations must have been substantially completed. In
addition, before we recognize any revenues on VOI sales, the
purchaser of the VOI must have met the initial investment
criteria and, as applicable, the continuing investment criteria,
by executing a legally binding financing contract. A purchaser
has met the initial investment criteria when a minimum down
payment of 10% is received by us. As a result of the adoption of
SFAS No. 152 and
SOP 04-2
on January 1, 2006, we must also take into consideration
the fair value of certain incentives provided to the purchaser
when assessing the adequacy of the purchasers initial
investment. In those cases where financing is provided to the
purchaser by us, the purchaser is
45
obligated to remit monthly payments under financing contracts
that represent the purchasers continuing investment. The
contractual terms of seller-provided financing agreements
require that the contractual level of annual principal payments
be sufficient to amortize the loan over a customary period for
the VOI being financed, which is generally seven to ten years,
and payments under the financing contracts begin within
45 days of the sale and receipt of the minimum down payment
of 10%. If all of the criteria for a VOI sale to qualify under
the full accrual method of accounting have been met, as
discussed above, except that construction of the VOI purchased
is not complete, we recognize revenues using the
percentage-of-completion
method of accounting provided that the preliminary construction
phase is complete and that a minimum sales level has been met
(to assure that the property will not revert to a rental
property). The preliminary stage of development is deemed to be
complete when the engineering and design work is complete, the
construction contracts have been executed, the site has been
cleared, prepared and excavated, and the building foundation is
complete. The completion percentage is determined by the
proportion of real estate inventory costs incurred to total
estimated costs. These estimated costs are based upon historical
experience and the related contractual terms. The remaining
revenue and related costs of sales, including commissions and
direct expenses, are deferred and recognized as the remaining
costs are incurred. Until a contract for sale qualifies for
revenue recognition, all payments received are accounted for as
restricted cash and deposits within other current assets and
deferred income, respectively, on the Consolidated and Combined
Balance Sheets. Commissions and other direct costs related to
the sale are deferred until the sale is recorded. If a contract
is cancelled before qualifying as a sale, non-recoverable
expenses are charged to operating expense in the current period
on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income.
We also offer consumer financing as an option to customers
purchasing VOIs, which are typically collateralized by the
underlying VOI. Generally, the financing terms are for seven to
ten years. An estimate of uncollectible amounts is recorded at
the time of the sale with a charge to the provision for loan
losses on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income.
Upon the adoption of SFAS No. 152 and
SOP 04-2
on January 1, 2006, the provision for loan losses is
classified as a reduction of vacation ownership interest sales
on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income. The
interest income earned from the financing arrangements is earned
on the principal balance outstanding over the life of the
arrangement.
We also provide
day-to-day-management
services, including oversight of housekeeping services,
maintenance and certain accounting and administrative services
for property owners associations and clubs. In some cases,
our employees serve as officers
and/or
directors of these associations and clubs in accordance with
their by-laws and associated regulations. Management fee revenue
is recognized when earned in accordance with the terms of the
contract and is recorded as a component of service fees and
membership on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of
Income. The costs, which principally relate to the payroll costs
for management of the associations, clubs and the resort
properties where we are the employer, are reflected as a
component of operating expenses on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income. Reimbursements are based upon the costs
incurred with no added margin and thus presentation of these
reimbursable costs has little to no effect on our operating
income. Management fee revenue and revenue related to
reimbursements was $112 million and $141 million
during 2006, respectively, $91 million and
$124 million during 2005, respectively, and
$95 million and $103 million during 2004,
respectively. During 2006, 2005, and 2004, one of the
associations that we manage paid RCI Global Vacation Network
$13 million, $11 million and $9 million,
respectively, for exchange services.
Within our Vacation Ownership segment, we measure operating
performance using the following key metrics: (i) gross VOI
sales (including tele-sales upgrades, which are a component of
upgrade sales) before deferred sales and loan loss provisions,
(ii) tours, which represents the number of tours taken by
guests in our efforts to sell VOIs and (iii) volume per
guest, or VPG, which represents revenue per guest and is
calculated by dividing the gross VOI sales, excluding tele-sales
upgrades, by the number of tours.
Other
Items
We record lodging-related marketing and reservation revenues, as
well as property management services revenues for both our
Lodging and Vacation Ownership segments, in accordance with
Emerging Issues Task Force Issue
99-19,
Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an
Agent, which requires that these revenues be recorded on a
gross basis.
Discussed below are our consolidated and combined results of
operations and the results of operations for each of our
reportable segments. The reportable segments presented below
represent our operating segments for which separate financial
information is available and which is utilized on a regular
basis by our chief operating decision maker to assess
performance and to allocate resources. In identifying our
reportable segments, we also consider the nature of services
provided by our operating segments. Management evaluates the
operating results of each of our reportable segments based upon
revenue and EBITDA, which is defined as net income
before depreciation and
46
amortization, interest (excluding interest on securitized
vacation ownership debt), income taxes, minority interest and
cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax, each of
which is presented on the Consolidated and Combined Statements
of Income. Our presentation of EBITDA may not be comparable to
similarly-titled measures used by other companies.
EBITDA for periods prior to July 31, 2006 includes cost
allocations from Cendant representing our portion of general
corporate overhead. For the period January 1, 2006 to
July 31, 2006 and the years ended December 31, 2005
and 2004, Cendant allocated $20 million, $36 million
and $30 million, respectively, of general corporate
overhead. Cendant allocated such costs to us based on a
percentage of our forecasted revenues. General corporate expense
allocations include costs related to Cendants executive
management, tax, accounting, legal, treasury and cash
management, certain employee benefits and real estate usage for
common space. The allocations were not necessarily indicative of
the actual expenses that would have been incurred had we been
operating as a separate, stand-alone public company for the
periods presented.
OPERATING
STATISTICS
The following table presents our operating statistics for the
years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005. See Results of
Operations section for a discussion as to how these operating
statistics affected our business for the periods presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Lodging (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average rooms
available (b)
|
|
|
527,700
|
|
|
|
519,000
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Number of
properties (c)
|
|
|
6,470
|
|
|
|
6,350
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
RevPAR (d)
|
|
$
|
34.95
|
|
|
$
|
31.00
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Royalty, marketing and reservation
revenue (in
000s) (e)
|
|
$
|
471,039
|
|
|
$
|
408,620
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Vacation Exchange and
Rentals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of members (in
000s) (f)
|
|
|
3,356
|
|
|
|
3,209
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Annual dues and exchange revenue
per
member (g)
|
|
$
|
135.62
|
|
|
$
|
135.76
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation rental transactions (in
000s) (h)
|
|
|
1,344
|
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Average net price per vacation
rental (i)
|
|
$
|
370.93
|
|
|
$
|
359.27
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross vacation ownership interest
sales (in
000s) (j)
|
|
$
|
1,743,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,396,000
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Tours (k)
|
|
|
1,046,000
|
|
|
|
934,000
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Volume Per Guest
(VPG) (l)
|
|
$
|
1,486
|
|
|
$
|
1,368
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Includes Wyndham Hotels and Resorts
brand and Baymont Inn & Suites brand, which were
acquired on October 11, 2005 and April 7, 2006,
respectively. Therefore, the operating statistics for 2006 are
not presented on a comparable basis to the 2005 operating
statistics. On a comparable basis (excluding the Wyndham Hotels
and Resorts brand from both the 2006 and 2005 amounts and the
Baymont brand from the 2006 amounts), RevPAR would have
increased 8%, weighted average rooms available would have
decreased 3% and the number of properties would have remained
relatively flat.
|
|
(b)
|
|
Represents the weighted average
number of hotel rooms available for rental during the period.
The amount in 2006 includes managed, non-proprietary hotels.
|
|
(c)
|
|
Represents the number of lodging
properties under franchise
and/or
management agreements at the end of the period. The amount in
2006 includes managed, non-proprietary hotels.
|
|
(d)
|
|
Represents revenue per available
room and is calculated by multiplying the percentage of
available rooms occupied during the period by the average rate
charged for renting a lodging room for one day.
|
|
(e)
|
|
Royalty, marketing and reservation
revenue are typically based on a percentage of the gross room
revenues of each franchised hotel. Royalty revenue is generally
a fee charged to each franchised hotel for the use of one of our
trade names, while marketing and reservation revenue are fees
that we collect and are contractually obligated to spend to
support marketing and reservation activities.
|
|
(f)
|
|
Represents members in our vacation
exchange programs who pay annual membership dues. For additional
fees, such participants are entitled to exchange intervals for
intervals at other properties affiliated with our vacation
exchange business. In addition, certain participants may
exchange intervals for other leisure-related products and
services.
|
|
(g)
|
|
Represents total revenues from
annual membership dues and exchange fees generated for the
period divided by the average number of vacation exchange
members during the year.
|
|
(h)
|
|
Represents the gross number of
transactions that are generated in connection with customers
booking their vacation rental stays through us. In our European
vacation rentals businesses, one rental transaction is recorded
each time a standard one-week rental is booked; however, in the
United States, one rental transaction is recorded each time a
vacation rental stay is booked, regardless of whether it is less
than or more than one week.
|
|
(i)
|
|
Represents the net rental price
generated from renting vacation properties to customers divided
by the number of rental transactions.
|
47
|
|
|
(j)
|
|
Represents gross sales of vacation
ownership interests (including tele-sales upgrades, which are a
component of upgrade sales) before deferred sales and loan loss
provisions.
|
|
(k)
|
|
Represents the number of tours
taken by guests in our efforts to sell vacation ownership
interests.
|
|
(l)
|
|
Represents revenue per guest and is
calculated by dividing the gross vacation ownership interest
sales, excluding tele-sales upgrades, which are a component of
upgrade sales, by the number of tours.
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2006 vs. Year Ended December 31,
2005
Our consolidated and combined results comprised the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
3,842
|
|
|
$
|
3,471
|
|
|
$
|
371
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
3,265
|
|
|
|
2,851
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
626
|
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
431
|
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
change
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
$
|
431
|
|
|
$
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2006, our net revenues increased $371 million (11%)
principally due to (i) a $341 million increase in net
sales of VOIs at our vacation ownership businesses primarily
reflecting higher tour flow and an increase in VPG;
(ii) $109 million of incremental revenue generated by
the acquisitions of the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts and Baymont
Inn & Suites brands; (iii) a $57 million
increase in net consumer financing revenues earned on vacation
ownership contract receivables due primarily to growth in the
portfolio; (iv) $41 million of incremental property
management fees primarily as a result of growth in the number of
units under management within our vacation ownership business;
(v) a $31 million increase in net revenues from rental
transactions primarily due to growth in rental transaction
volume, an increase in the average net price per rental and the
translation effects of foreign exchange movements, which
favorably impacted rental revenues by $5 million;
(vi) a $19 million increase in organic revenues in our
lodging business, primarily due to RevPAR growth, partially
offset by a decline in weighted average rooms; and (vii) a
$19 million increase in annual dues and exchange revenues
due to growth in the average number of members. These increases
were partially offset by a decrease in revenues of
$259 million as a result of the classification of the
provision for loan losses as a reduction of revenues during the
year ended December 31, 2006 in connection with the
adoption of SFAS No. 152.
Total expenses increased $414 million (15%) principally
reflecting (i) a $203 million increase in organic
operating and administrative expenses primarily related to
additional commission expense resulting from increased VOI
sales, increased volume-related expenses and staffing costs due
to growth in our vacation exchange and rentals call centers and
vacation ownership business, increased costs related to the
property management services that we provide at our vacation
ownership business and increased interest expense on our
securitized debt, which is included in operating expenses;
(ii) $103 million of incremental expenses generated by
the acquisitions of the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts and Baymont
Inn & Suites brands; (iii) $99 million of
costs related to our separation from Cendant; (iv) a
$79 million increase in organic marketing and reservation
expenses primarily resulting from increased marketing
initiatives across all our businesses; (v) a
$21 million charge recorded in the second quarter of 2006
related to local taxes payable to certain foreign jurisdictions
within our European vacation rentals business; and (vi) the
unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation on expenses
of $6 million. These increases were partially offset by a
decrease of (i) $128 million in provision for loan
losses as a result of the reclassification of the provision for
loan losses from expenses to net revenues required by the
adoption of SFAS No. 152, which includes
$12 million in 2005 to account for the impact of the
hurricanes experienced in the Gulf Coast region of the U.S., and
(ii) $24 million in cost of vacation ownership
interests which was comprised of $115 million reduction of
cost of sales of inventory as a result of our adoption of
SFAS No. 152, partially offset by $91 million of
increased cost of sales primarily associated with increased VOI
sales.
The increase in depreciation and amortization of
$17 million primarily resulted from an increase in
information technology capital investments made in 2005, a trend
that continued in 2006. Interest expense, net increased
48
$41 million in 2006 primarily as a result of interest paid
on our new borrowing arrangements resulting from our separation
from Cendant and interest on local taxes payable to certain
foreign jurisdictions, partially offset by increased capitalized
interest at our vacation ownership business due to increased
development of vacation ownership inventory. Our effective tax
rate increased to 35.1% in 2006 from 31.2% in 2005 primarily due
to the absence of an increase in the tax basis of certain
foreign assets during 2005, partially offset by a
$15 million benefit recognized in 2006 resulting from a
change in our 2005 state effective tax rates.
We recorded an after tax charge of $65 million during the
first quarter of 2006 as a cumulative effect of an accounting
change related to the adoption of SFAS No. 152. Such
charge consisted of (i) a pre-tax charge of
$105 million representing the deferral of revenue, costs
associated with sales of vacation ownership interests that were
recognized prior to January 1, 2006 and the recognition of
certain expenses that were previously deferred and (ii) an
associated tax benefit of $40 million.
As a result of these items, our net income decreased
$144 million (33%) during 2006 compared to 2005.
Following is a discussion of the results of each of our segments
and interest expense (income), net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
661
|
|
|
$
|
533
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
208
|
|
|
$
|
197
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
1,119
|
|
|
|
1,068
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
2,068
|
|
|
|
1,874
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Reportable Segments
|
|
|
3,848
|
|
|
|
3,475
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
798
|
|
|
|
764
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Corporate and
Other (a)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company
|
|
$
|
3,842
|
|
|
$
|
3,471
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
725
|
|
|
|
751
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
542
|
|
|
$
|
626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Not meaningful.
|
|
(a)
|
|
Includes the elimination of
transactions between segments.
|
Lodging
Net revenues and EBITDA increased $128 million (24%) and
$11 million (6%), respectively, in 2006 compared with 2005
primarily reflecting the October 2005 acquisition of the
franchise and property management businesses of the Wyndham
Hotels and Resorts brand and strong RevPAR gains across our
legacy brands, which were partially offset by the absence of a
$7 million gain on the sale of an investment recognized in
2005. EBITDA comparisons also reflect our strategic decision to
intensify marketing campaigns, particularly for our Wyndham
brand.
The operating results of the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand
have been included in our results from October 11, 2005
forward and, therefore, were incremental to our results during
the period January 1, 2006 through October 10, 2006.
During this period, the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand
contributed incremental net revenues of $99 million, of which
$38 million was generated from the franchise business and
$61 million was generated from the property management
business. Included within the $61 million of revenue
generated from the property management business is
$55 million of revenue related to reimbursable payroll
costs that we incur and pay on behalf of property owners. As the
reimbursements are made based upon cost with no added margin,
the recorded revenue is offset by the associated expense and
there is little to no resultant impact on EBITDA. Additionally,
there was little to no EBITDA contribution from the franchise
business as substantially all of the fees received were utilized
to execute a key strategy of promoting the Wyndham brand name
and driving brand bookings through enhanced marketing efforts.
49
The operating results of our lodging business also reflect the
acquisition of the Baymont Inn & Suites brand, which
was acquired in April 2006, and contributed incremental net revenues
and EBITDA of $10 million and $6 million, respectively.
Excluding the impact of the acquisitions discussed above,
net revenues in our lodging business increased $19 million (4%)
in 2006. Such increase was primarily due to RevPAR growth of 8%,
partially offset by a 3% decline in weighted average rooms
available and a $7 million gain recognized in the first
quarter of 2005 on the sale of an investment no longer deemed
strategic. The RevPAR growth reflects increases in price and
occupancy principally attributable to the beneficial impact of
management initiatives implemented in prior periods, such as the
strategic assignment of personnel to field locations designed to
assist franchisees in improving their operating performance and
an overall improvement in the economy lodging segment. The
decline in rooms reflects (i) our termination of
underperforming properties primarily throughout 2005 that did
not meet our required quality standards or their financial
obligations to us and (ii) the expiration of franchise
agreements and certain franchisees exercising their right to
terminate their agreements. As of December 31, 2006, our
hotel development pipeline included approximately 845 hotels and
approximately 92,000 rooms, of which approximately 15% are
international and approximately 45% are new construction.
As previously discussed, a strategic growth initiative of our
lodging business is to increase brand awareness and drive brand
bookings. To this end, during 2006, we increased our marketing
spend by $13 million (6%), which is incremental to the
marketing spend for the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts and Baymont
brands. The $13 million of incremental marketing spend is
reflective of (i) additional fees received from our
franchisees (where we are contractually obligated to expend
these fees for marketing purposes), (ii) additional
campaigns in international regions that we have targeted for
growth and (iii) incremental investments in our TripRewards
loyalty program. In addition, expenses also increased
$2 million as a result of our separation from Cendant.
Vacation
Exchange and Rentals
Net revenues increased $51 million (5%) and EBITDA decreased
$19 million (7%) in 2006 compared with 2005, primarily
reflecting a $31 million increase in net revenues from
rental transactions and a $19 million increase in annual
dues and exchange revenues, more than offset in EBITDA by a
$70 million increase in expenses, as discussed below.
Revenue and expense increases include $5 million and
$6 million, respectively, from a stronger U.S. dollar
compared to other foreign currencies and the related currency
translation impact.
Net revenues generated from rental transactions and related
services increased $31 million (7%) during 2006 driven by a
3% increase in rental transaction volume and a 3% increase in
the average net price per rental. The growth in rental
transaction volume was primarily due to an increase of
approximately 36,000 rental transactions (12%) in arrivals
at our Landal GreenParks camping vacation site and increased
booking volumes of approximately 15,600 rental transactions
(7%) at our Novasol brand. The increase in net revenues from
rental transactions and the average net price per rental
includes the translation effects of foreign exchange movements,
which favorably impacted net rental revenues by $5 million and
accounted for 1% of the increase in the average net price per
rental.
Annual dues and exchange revenues increased $19 million
(4%) during 2006 as compared with 2005 due to a 5% increase in
the average number of members. Points-based transactions
represented 19% of the total exchange transactions during 2006
as compared with 17% during 2005. Exchange transactions per
member remained relatively constant
year-over-year;
however, there has been a shift to a greater amount of
points-based members and related points-based transactions from
the standard one-week for one-week exchange members and
transactions in our legacy RCI Weeks exchange program. This
shift resulted in an increase in our overall member base and
exchange transaction volume. Since points are exchangeable for
various travel-related products and services, as well as for
vacation stays for various lengths of time, points-based
exchange activity will generally result in higher transaction
volumes with lower average fees as compared with the RCI Weeks
exchange program. Ancillary revenues from various sources
collectively increased $1 million during 2006 compared to
2005. Ancillary revenue sources primarily included
$14 million of additional consulting fees, club servicing
fees and fees from our credit card loyalty program. Such
increases were offset by a $9 million reduction in travel
fee revenues primarily due to lower commission rates realized in
2006 relating to an outsourcing agreement to provide services to
third-party travel club members and the absence of a
$4 million recovery of local taxes paid to a foreign
jurisdiction realized during the fourth quarter of 2005.
EBITDA further reflects an increase in expenses of
$70 million (9%) primarily driven by (i) a
$27 million increase in volume-related expenses, which was
substantially comprised of higher reservation call center
staffing costs to support member growth and increased call
volumes, (ii) a $21 million charge in the second
quarter of 2006 related to local taxes payable to certain
foreign jurisdictions, (iii) $16 million of
incremental expenses incurred for
50
product and geographic expansion, including increased marketing
campaigns, timing of certain other marketing expenses, expansion
of property recruitment efforts and investment in our consulting
and international activities, (iv) $10 million of
higher cost of sales on rentals of vacation stay intervals,
(v) the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation
on expenses of $6 million, (vi) $4 million of
costs primarily related to higher corporate overhead allocations
and (vii) $3 million of costs related to our
separation from Cendant. These increases were partially offset
by (i) the absence of $14 million of costs incurred in
2005 to combine the operational infrastructures of our vacation
exchange and rentals business and (ii) $8 million of
cost savings due to efficiencies realized in 2006.
Vacation
Ownership
Net revenues and EBITDA increased $194 million (10%) and
$42 million (15%), respectively, in 2006 as compared with
2005. The operating results reflect growth in vacation ownership
sales and consumer finance income, as well as the impact of the
adoption of SFAS No. 152. The impact of
SFAS No. 152 on our results for 2006 was a reduction
to net revenues of $208 million and an increase to EBITDA of
$10 million, respectively.
We made operational changes during 2006 that resulted in the
recognition of revenues that would have otherwise been deferred
under the provisions of SFAS No. 152. As a result,
included within the impact of SFAS No. 152, are
benefits to net revenues and EBITDA of $67 million and
$34 million, respectively. These benefits would have
otherwise been offset by 2006 deferrals had the operational
changes not been made. Excluding such benefits, the impact of
SFAS No. 152 would have been a reduction to net revenues
and EBITDA of $275 million and $24 million,
respectively, during 2006.
Exclusive of the impact of SFAS No. 152, gross sales
of VOIs at our vacation ownership business increased
$311 million (22%) in 2006 principally driven by a 12%
increase in tour flow and a 9% increase in VPG. Tour flow was
positively impacted by the continued development of our in-house
sales programs. VPG benefited from a favorable tour flow mix and
higher pricing.
In addition, net revenues and EBITDA increased $57 million and
$33 million, respectively, in 2006 due to incremental net
interest income earned on contract receivables primarily
resulting from growth in the portfolio. Such growth was
partially offset in EBITDA by higher interest costs in 2006.
During 2006, we paid interest expense on our securitized debt of
$70 million at a weighted average rate of 5.1% compared to
$46 million at a weighted average rate of 4.1% in 2005.
Revenue and EBITDA comparisons were also negatively impacted by
the absence of $11 million of income recorded in the second
quarter of 2005 in connection with the disposal of a parcel of
land that was no longer consistent with our development plans.
During 2006, property management fees increased $41 million
primarily as a result of growth in the number of units under
management.
EBITDA further reflects an increase of approximately
$349 million (22%) in operating, marketing and
administrative expenses, exclusive of the impact of
SFAS No. 152 and the
percentage-of-completion
method of accounting, primarily resulting from
(i) $85 million of increased cost of sales primarily
associated with increased VOI sales, (ii) $67 million
of additional commission expense associated with increased VOI
sales, (iii) $50 million of incremental marketing
expenses to support sales efforts, (iv) $48 million of
incremental costs primarily incurred to fund additional staffing
needs to support continued growth in the business,
(v) $37 million of increased costs related to the
property management services discussed above,
(vi) $25 million of additional contract receivable
provisions primarily associated with increased VOI sales,
(vii) $18 million of costs related to our separation
from Cendant, $11 million of which related to an impairment
charge due to a rebranding initiative for our Fairfield and
Trendwest trademarks (see Note 2 of our Consolidated and
Combined Financial Statements) and (viii) $4 million
of increased costs associated with the repair of a completed VOI
resort. Such increases were partially offset by the absence of
$13 million of expenses during 2005 associated with the
impact of the hurricanes experienced in the Gulf Coast during
September 2005, which continued to affect us in 2006 due to
sales offices damaged by the hurricanes which have yet to reopen.
Our active development pipeline consists of approximately
3,900 units in 15 U.S. states, the Virgin Islands and
three foreign countries. We expect the pipeline to support both
new purchases of vacation ownership and upgrade sales to
existing owners.
Corporate
and Other
Corporate and Other expenses increased $58 million in 2006
compared with 2005. Such increase includes
(i) $76 million of costs incurred as a result of the
execution of our separation from Cendant on July 31, 2006
51
primarily related to the acceleration of vesting of Cendant
equity awards and related equitable adjustments of such awards
and (ii) $20 million of incremental stand-alone,
corporate costs incurred from the date of separation to
December 31, 2006. Such amounts were partially offset by a
$32 million net benefit from the resolution of certain
contingent liabilities.
Interest
Expense (Income), Net
Interest expense (income), net increased $41 million during
2006 compared to 2005 primarily as a result of
(i) $36 million of increased interest expense on
borrowings primarily due to increased average borrowings on
existing debt and interest paid on new debt arrangements entered
into in July 2006, (ii) $11 million of interest on
local taxes payable to certain foreign jurisdictions and
(iii) a $9 million decrease in net interest income
earned on advances between us and our former Parent due to
twelve months of activity during 2005 compared to seven months
of activity during 2006. Such amounts were partially offset by
(i) a $9 million increase in capitalized interest at
our vacation ownership business due to the increased development
of vacation ownership inventory and (ii) a $2 million
increase in interest income earned on invested cash balances as
a result of a decrease in average cash available for investment.
All such amounts are recorded within interest expense (income),
net on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income.
Year
Ended December 31, 2005 vs. Year Ended December 31,
2004
Our combined results comprised the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
3,471
|
|
|
$
|
3,014
|
|
|
|
$457
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
2,851
|
|
|
|
2,414
|
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and
minority interest
|
|
|
626
|
|
|
|
587
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
Minority interest, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
431
|
|
|
$
|
349
|
|
|
|
$ 82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2005, our net revenues increased $457 million (15%)
principally due to (i) a $134 million increase in net
sales of VOIs at our vacation ownership businesses due to higher
tour flow and an increase in VPG; (ii) $114 million of
incremental revenue generated by the acquisitions of the Wyndham
Hotels and Resorts brand, Ramada International, Landal
GreenParks and Canvas Holidays Limited, the results of which are
included from their respective acquisition dates forward;
(iii) $76 million of incremental organic revenue
earned by our vacation exchange and rentals business principally
reflecting increased rental and exchange transaction volume and
a higher average number of members; (iv) a $58 million
increase in net consumer financing revenues earned on vacation
ownership contract receivables; (v) a $47 million
increase in organic revenues at our lodging business, reflecting
a favorable increase in RevPAR; and (vi) $17 million
of incremental resort management fees as a result of increased
rental revenues on unoccupied units, as well as growth in the
number of units under management.
Total expenses increased $437 million (18%) principally
reflecting (i) a $160 million increase in organic
operating expenses primarily related to additional commission
expense resulting from increased VOI sales and commission rates,
increased costs related to the property management services that
we provide at our vacation ownership business and increased
fulfillment costs incurred in connection with our RCI Elite
Rewards program and increased staffing costs in our contact
centers; (ii) $110 million of expenses generated by
the acquisitions discussed above; (iii) a $32 million
increase in organic marketing and reservation expenses primarily
resulting from increased marketing initiatives across all our
businesses; (iv) a $30 million increase in provision
for loan losses principally related to growth in vacation
ownership contract receivables at our vacation ownership
business; (v) a $30 million increase in organic
general and administrative expense principally due to growth in
our vacation exchange and rentals and vacation ownership
businesses; (vi) $25 million of increased cost of
sales primarily associated with increased VOI sales;
(vii) the absence of a favorable $15 million
settlement recorded by our lodging business in 2004 related to a
franchisee receivable; (viii) $14 million of costs
incurred to combine the operations of our vacation exchange and
rentals business; (ix) $13 million of expenses
associated with the 2005 Gulf Coast hurricanes, which
52
primarily reflects a provision for estimated vacation ownership
contract receivable losses; and (x) $12 million of
marketing and related expenses incurred in connection with our
TripRewards loyalty program.
The increase in depreciation and amortization of
$12 million primarily resulted from an increase in
information technology capital investments made in 2005.
Interest expense (income), net decreased $19 million in
2005 primarily as a result of (i) the absence of interest
expense incurred in 2004 related to the Two Flags Joint Venture
LLC, (ii) favorable interest rate hedge activity year over
year, and (iii) a reduction in financing cost amortization.
Our effective tax rate decreased to 31.2% in 2005 from 39.9% in
2004 primarily due to a one-time tax benefit related to changes
in tax basis differences in assets of foreign subsidiaries. As a
result of these items, our net income increased $82 million
(23%).
Following is a discussion of the results of each of our
reportable segments and interest expense (income), net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
533
|
|
|
$
|
443
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
197
|
|
|
$
|
189
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
1,068
|
|
|
|
921
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
1,874
|
|
|
|
1,661
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Reportable Segments
|
|
|
3,475
|
|
|
|
3,025
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
764
|
|
|
|
740
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Corporate and
Other (a)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company
|
|
$
|
3,471
|
|
|
$
|
3,014
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
751
|
|
|
|
719
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and
minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
626
|
|
|
$
|
587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
Not meaningful.
|
|
(a)
|
|
Includes the elimination of
transactions between segments.
|
Lodging
Net revenues and EBITDA increased $90 million (20%) and
$8 million (4%), respectively, in 2005 compared with 2004
reflecting revenue growth from acquisitions and increased
RevPAR; however, the EBITDA comparison was negatively impacted
by a favorable settlement recorded in second quarter 2004
related to a lodging franchisee receivable and increased
marketing-related expenses associated with our TripRewards
loyalty program and initiatives to promote our brands (all of
which are discussed in greater detail below).
The operating results of our lodging business reflect the
acquisitions of the franchise and property management businesses
of the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand in October 2005 and
Ramada International in December 2004. The operating results of
Wyndham Hotels and Resorts have been included in our results for
three of the twelve months of 2005, but none of 2004. The
operating results of Ramada International have been included in
our results for the entire twelve months of 2005, but only for
one month of 2004. Accordingly, Wyndham Hotels and Resorts and
Ramada International contributed incremental net revenues of
$29 million and $14 million, respectively, and EBITDA
of $2 million each to 2005 results. Included within the
$29 million of revenue generated by Wyndham Hotels and
Resorts is approximately $25 million related to
reimbursable expenses, which has no impact on EBITDA. These
acquisitions also added approximately 32,000 rooms, which is
approximately 6% of the total weighted average rooms available
within our lodging franchise system during 2005.
Apart from these acquisitions, net revenues in our lodging business
increased $47 million (11%). Such increase principally
represents (i) $16 million (4%) of higher royalty,
marketing and reservation fund revenues,
(ii) $16 million of incremental net revenues generated by
our TripRewards loyalty program during 2005, (iii) an
$8 million increase in ancillary revenues and (iv) a
$7 million gain recognized on the sale of a lodging-related
investment during 2005. The $16 million increase in
royalty, marketing and reservation fund revenues primarily
resulted from an 8% increase in RevPAR, partially offset by a 4%
decrease in weighted average rooms available. The RevPAR
increase reflects (i) increases in both price and occupancy
rates principally attributable to an overall improvement in the
economy lodging segment in which our hotel brands primarily
operate, (ii) the termination of underperforming properties
throughout 2004 that did not meet our required quality standards
or their financial obligations to us and (iii) the
strategic assignment of personnel to field locations designed to
assist franchisees in improving their hotel operating
53
performance. The decrease in weighted average rooms available
reflects our termination of underperforming properties, as
discussed above, the expiration of franchise agreements and
certain franchisees exercising their right to terminate their
agreements. During 2005, there were terminations of 509
properties, as compared to terminations of 517 properties during
2004.
EBITDA further reflects an increase of $43 million (17%) in
operating, marketing and administrative expenses (excluding the
impact of the acquisitions discussed above) principally
resulting from (i) $20 million of higher bad debt
expense, primarily due to the absence of a favorable
$15 million settlement recorded in 2004 related to a
lodging franchisee receivable; (ii) $12 million of
marketing and related expenses incurred in connection with our
TripRewards loyalty program; and (iii) $9 million of
marketing-related expenses primarily related to marketing
initiatives to promote our brands.
Vacation
Exchange and Rentals
Net revenues increased $147 million (16%), while EBITDA
declined $2 million (1%) in 2005 compared to 2004,
reflecting incremental revenues and expenses from vacation
rental acquisitions during 2004 and the negative impact on
EBITDA from $14 million of costs incurred during 2005 to
combine the operational infrastructures of our vacation exchange
and rentals business (discussed in greater detail below).
We acquired Landal GreenParks and Canvas Holidays Limited, which
are both European vacation rentals businesses, in May 2004 and
October 2004, respectively. The operating results of Landal
GreenParks and Canvas Holidays have been included in our results
for the entire twelve months in 2005 but for only eight months
in 2004 for Landal GreenParks and only three months in 2004 for
Canvas Holidays. Accordingly, Landal GreenParks contributed
incremental net revenues and EBITDA of $41 million and
$2 million, respectively, and Canvas Holidays contributed
incremental net revenues and EBITDA of $30 million and
$10 million, respectively, during 2005. The incremental
results of Landal GreenParks in 2005 are reflective of the first
four months of the year, which is when their operations are
seasonally weakest.
Apart from these acquisitions, net revenues increased
$76 million (8%), which includes (i) a
$34 million (9%) increase in rental transaction revenues,
(ii) a $24 million (6%) increase in annual dues and
exchange revenues and (iii) a $22 million increase in
revenues generated from our RCI Elite Rewards program, a credit
card marketing program that we implemented in fourth quarter
2004. Our RCI Elite Rewards program generates revenues based on
the volumes of cardholders and credit card spending and incurs
related fulfillment costs.
The $34 million increase in rental transaction revenues
primarily resulted from a 7% increase in total rental
transactions and a $12 million increase due to the
conversion of a franchised park to a managed park in January
2005. Prior to the conversion, we received only a franchise fee,
whereas subsequent to the conversion, we recognized all of the
revenues generated by this park.
The $24 million increase in annual dues and exchange
revenues was driven by a 5% increase in the average number of
members. Transactions related to our points-based exchange
program, RCI Points, represented 17% of the total exchange
transactions in 2005 compared with 14% in 2004, representing a
continued shift in 2005 to more points-based exchanges. Since
points are exchangeable for various other travel-related
products and services in addition to vacation stays,
points-based exchange activity will generally result in higher
transaction volumes with lower average fees as compared to the
standard one-week for one-week exchange activity in our RCI
Weeks exchange program. Vacation exchange volume and price are
derived from (i) a mix of domestic and international
exchanges and (ii) a mix of standard one-week for one-week
exchanges and exchanges through our RCI Points exchange program,
which includes transactions for various lengths of stay and
other leisure-related products.
Apart from the aforementioned EBITDA impact of the acquisitions
of Landal GreenParks and Canvas Holidays, EBITDA further
reflects a
year-over-year
increase in expenses of $90 million (14%) primarily driven
by (i) $20 million of incremental fulfillment costs in
connection with our RCI Elite Rewards program as discussed
above; (ii) $14 million of costs incurred to combine
the operational infrastructures of our vacation exchange and
rentals business principally in Europe; (iii) higher cost
of sales in 2005 of $13 million on the rentals of vacation
properties; (iv) $11 million of incremental expenses
associated with the conversion of a franchised park to a managed
park, as discussed above; (v) $8 million of higher
marketing expenses, principally related to increased campaigns
and publications; and (vi) $5 million of restructuring
costs incurred as a result of the consolidation of certain call
centers and back-office functions within our vacation exchange
business. The remaining $19 million increase in expenses
primarily relates to higher staffing costs and other volume
driven expense increases in our call centers and certain
infrastructure enhancements.
54
Vacation
Ownership
Net revenues and EBITDA increased $213 million (13%) and
$18 million (7%), respectively, in 2005 compared with 2004.
The EBITDA comparison was negatively impacted by
$13 million of expenses incurred during 2005 related to the
estimated impact of the hurricanes experienced along the Gulf
Coast. Net revenues and EBITDA, exclusive of the impact of the Gulf
Coast hurricanes, reflect organic growth in vacation ownership
sales, a gain on the sale of land and increased consumer finance
income.
Net sales of VOIs increased $134 million (11%) in 2005
despite the Gulf Coast hurricanes. Such increase was driven
principally by a 9% increase in tour flow and a 6% increase in
VPG. This revenue increase includes a $27 million decrease
in higher margin upgrade sales at our Trendwest resort
properties due to special upgrade promotions conducted during
2004 undertaken to mitigate the negative impact on tour flow
from the do not call and do not fax
regulations. Tour flow, as well as volume per transaction,
benefited in 2005 from our expanded presence in premium
destinations such as Hawaii, Las Vegas and Orlando. Tour flow
was also positively impacted by the opening of new sales
offices, our strategic focus on new marketing alliances and
increased local marketing efforts.
Revenues and related expenses increased $57 million and
$8 million, respectively, in 2005 as a result of
incremental net interest income earned on our vacation ownership
contract receivables primarily due to growth in the consolidated
portfolio.
Additionally, we receive management fees for property management
services that we provide at certain resorts pursuant to
contractual arrangements with property owners
associations. During 2005, we recognized $17 million of
incremental resort management fees as a result of increased
rental revenues on units, as well as growth in the number of
units under management.
Net revenue and EBITDA comparisons also benefited from an
$11 million gain recorded in 2005 in connection with the
disposal of a parcel of land that was no longer consistent with
our development plans, partially offset by the absence of a
$4 million gain recognized in first quarter 2004 in
connection with the sale of a provider of third-party vacation
ownership financing and $3 million of revenue generated by
such operations in 2004 prior to the sale date.
EBITDA further reflects an increase of $187 million (14%)
in operating, marketing and administrative expenses primarily
resulting from (i) $43 million of additional
commission expense associated with increased VOI sales and
increased commission rates; (ii) $31 million of
additional vacation ownership contract receivable provisions
recorded in 2005; (iii) $29 million of increased costs
related to the resort management services discussed above;
(iv) $25 million of increased cost of sales primarily
associated with increased VOI sales; (v) $18 million
of incremental costs incurred primarily to fund additional
staffing needs to support continued growth in the business,
improve existing properties and integrate the Trendwest and
Fairfield contract servicing operations;
(vi) $14 million of incremental marketing spent to
support sales efforts; and (vii) $13 million of
expenses associated with the 2005 Gulf Coast hurricanes, which
primarily reflects a provision for estimated vacation ownership
contract receivable losses.
Interest
Expense (Income), Net
Interest expense (income), net decreased $19 million during
2005 compared to 2004 principally as a result of (i) a
$13 million decrease in interest expense at our vacation
ownership business primarily due to refinanced borrowings with
more favorable financing terms and (ii) a $9 million
decrease in interest expense at our lodging business due to the
repayment of a note payable in September 2004. Such decreases
were partially offset by a $3 million increase at our
vacation exchange and rentals business primarily due to
increased average borrowings. All such amounts are recorded
within interest expense (income), net on the Consolidated and
Combined Statements of Income.
FINANCIAL
CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Financial
Condition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
9,520
|
|
|
$
|
9,167
|
|
|
$
|
353
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
5,961
|
|
|
|
4,134
|
|
|
|
1,827
|
|
Total stockholders/invested
equity
|
|
|
3,559
|
|
|
|
5,033
|
|
|
|
(1,474
|
)
|
55
Total assets increased $353 million from December 31,
2005 to December 31, 2006 primarily due to (i) a
$318 million increase in inventory primarily related to
vacation ownership inventories associated with increased
property development activity, as well as an increase of $171 million
associated with our adoption of SFAS No. 152, a new
accounting pronouncement related to vacation ownership interest
transactions, (ii) a $306 million increase in vacation
ownership contract receivables, net due to increased VOI sales,
partially offset by the reclassification in accordance with
SFAS No. 152, as discussed above, (iii) a
$198 million increase in property and equipment principally
within our vacation ownership business associated with building
and reclassifications as a result of our adoption of
SFAS No. 152 and within our vacation exchange and
rentals businesses increased development at Landal GreenParks,
(iv) a $170 million increase in cash and cash
equivalents which is discussed in further detail in
Liquidity and Capital Resources-Cash Flows,
(v) a $130 million increase in other current assets
primarily due to the adoption of SFAS No. 152, which
resulted in the deferral of direct selling costs at
December 31, 2006 compared to December 31, 2005 and
increased restricted cash within our vacation ownership business
relating to proceeds held for a new VOI resort still in
development, (vi) a $73 million increase in prepaid
expenses at our vacation ownership business primarily related to
increased revenue deferrals as a result of the adoption of
SFAS No. 152 and increased prepaid marketing fees in
our vacation exchange and rentals business primarily due to
increased prepaid directory fees as a result of timing,
(vii) a $65 million increase in due from former Parent
and subsidiaries relating to a refund of excess funding paid to
our former Parent resulting from the Separation and income tax
refunds, (viii) increased trade receivables of
$58 million at our vacation exchange and rentals and
vacation ownership businesses primarily due to favorable
performance in the fourth quarter of 2006, (ix) a
$54 million increase in goodwill primarily related to the
acquisition of a vacation ownership marketing and development
business and foreign exchange translation adjustments within our
vacation and exchange and rental business, partially offset by
the settlement of the ultimate tax basis of acquired assets with
the tax authority within our vacation ownership business,
(x) a $41 million increase in trademarks primarily
related to the acquisition of Baymont Inn & Suites in
April 2006, partially offset by an $11 million non-cash
impairment charge recorded within our vacation ownership
business during the fourth quarter of 2006 relating to
rebranding initiatives carried out as a result of our separation
from Cendant and (xi) a $37 million receivable in
non-current due from former Parent and subsidiaries, which
represents our right to receive proceeds from the ultimate sale
of Cendants preferred stock investment in and warrants of
Affinion Group Holdings, Inc. Such increases were partially
offset by a $1,125 million decrease in the net intercompany
funding to former Parent, which reflects the elimination of
amounts due from Cendant upon our separation from them.
Total liabilities increased $1,827 million primarily due to
(i) $858 million of additional net borrowings
primarily due to approximately $796 million of 6.00% senior
unsecured notes issued in December 2006, $328 million of
greater securitization of vacation ownership contract
receivables and a $300 million term loan entered into in
July 2006 as part of our overall debt structure, partially
offset by the elimination by our former Parent of
$600 million of borrowings outstanding under our former
Parents asset-linked facility relating to certain of our
assets (which balance was $550 million at December 31,
2005 and was previously reflected as long-term debt on our
Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheet), (ii) a
$421 million increase in due to former Parent and
subsidiaries as a result of the assumption of certain contingent
and other corporate liabilities of our former Parent or its
subsidiaries upon our separation (see Separation
Adjustments and Transactions with Former Parent and
Subsidiaries), (iii) a $281 million increase in
deferred income primarily due to increased activity within our
vacation ownership business, the adoption of
SFAS No. 152, as discussed above, and increased
deferred revenue within our vacation exchange and rentals
business and (iv) a $145 million increase in accrued
expenses and other current liabilities primarily due to
increased marketing expenses to promote growth in our businesses
and local taxes payable to certain foreign jurisdictions and the
related interest payable on such accrual within our vacation
exchange and rentals business.
Total stockholders equity decreased $1,474 million
principally due to (i) the elimination of net intercompany
funding to former Parent of $1,125 million, (ii) the
transfer of proceeds from our new borrowing arrangements to our
former Parent of $1,360 million, (iii) the assumption
of $434 million of contingent liabilities as a result of
our separation and (iv) $349 million of treasury stock
purchased through our stock repurchase program. Such decreases
were partially offset by (i) $760 million of proceeds
contributed to us by our former Parent upon the sale of
Travelport, (ii) the elimination by our former Parent of
$600 million of borrowings outstanding under our former
Parents asset-linked facility relating to certain of our
assets and (iii) $287 million of net income generated
during the year ended December 31, 2006.
Liquidity
And Capital Resources
Currently, our financing needs are supported by cash generated
from operations and borrowings under our revolving credit
facility. In addition, certain funding requirements of our
vacation ownership business are met through the issuance of
securitized and other debt to finance vacation ownership
contract receivables. With the completion of the new financings
related to our separation and the issuance of our
6.00% senior unsecured notes, our liquidity has been
further augmented through available capacity under our new
revolving credit facility. We
56
believe that access to this facility and our current liquidity
vehicles will be sufficient to meet our ongoing needs for the
foreseeable future.
Cash
Flows
During 2006 and 2005, we had a net change in cash and cash
equivalents of $170 million and $5 million,
respectively. The following table summarizes such changes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
Cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
165
|
|
|
$
|
492
|
|
|
$
|
(327
|
)
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(471
|
)
|
|
|
(696
|
)
|
|
|
225
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
473
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
Effects of changes in exchange
rate on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
$
|
170
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2006 vs. Year Ended December 31,
2005
Operating
Activities
During 2006, we generated $327 million less cash from
operating activities as compared to 2005. Such change
principally reflects a net decrease relating to higher
investments in inventory and vacation ownership contract
receivables as well as increased prepaid expense, partially
offset by favorable timing of accounts payable and accrued
expenses.
Investing
Activities
During 2006, we used $225 million less cash for investing
activities as compared to 2005. The decrease in cash outflows
primarily relates to (i) a $255 million decrease in
intercompany funding provided to former Parent, which was
eliminated due to our separation from Cendant and
(ii) lower acquisition related payments of $49 million
primarily due to fewer acquisitions made in 2006 (in 2005, we
used $149 million to acquire the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts
brand and a few non-significant businesses primarily within our
Vacation Ownership segment, whereas in 2006, we used
$103 million to acquire the Baymont brand and a vacation
ownership and resort management business). Such decreases in
cash outflows were partially offset by (i) an increase of
$57 million in capital expenditures primarily due to
additions within vacation ownership and corporate infrastructure
costs associated with the separation and (ii) a reduction
of $12 million in restricted cash, which we are required to
set aside in connection with certain borrowing arrangements and
business activities of our vacation ownership business.
Financing
Activities
During 2006, we generated $252 million more cash from
financing activities as compared to 2005, which principally
reflects incremental cash inflows from
(i) $2,414 million of additional borrowings from
various facilities, (ii) $796 million of proceeds from
the issuance of 6.00% senior unsecured notes and
(iii) the receipt of a capital contribution from our former
Parent for approximately $760 million resulting from the
sale of Travelport (see Financial Obligations for a
detailed discussion). Such increases were partially offset by
(i) an increase in our dividend to former Parent of approximately
$1,301 million, (ii) $2,122 million of increased
principal payments on existing borrowings and
(iii) $329 million of common stock repurchases.
We intend to continue to invest in capital improvements,
technological improvements in our lodging business and the
development of our vacation ownership, vacation rental and
mixed-use properties. In addition, we may seek to acquire
additional franchise agreements, property management contracts
and ownership interests in hotel or vacation rental properties
on a strategic and selective basis, either directly or through
investments in joint ventures. We spent $191 million on
capital expenditures in 2006 (excluding vacation ownership
development projects). Capital expenditures in 2006 included
(i) $82 million to improve technology and maintain
technological advantages, (ii) $80 million on routine
improvements and (iii) $29 million for information
technology infrastructure enhancements resulting from our
separation from Cendant. We also spent $542 million
relating to vacation ownership development projects in 2006. The
majority of the expenditures required to complete our capital
spending programs and vacation ownership development projects
were financed through cash flow generated through operations.
57
Additional expenditures were financed through general unsecured
corporate borrowings. Our unused borrowing capacity of
$870 million under our $900 million revolving credit
facility is available to finance our capital spending programs.
On August 24, 2006, we announced our intention to commence
a stock repurchase program of up to $400 million. Through
December 31, 2006, we had repurchased 11.9 million
shares at an average price of $29.35. During January 2007, we
repurchased an additional 1.6 million shares, completing
the program with 13.5 million shares purchased at an
average price of $29.72. As of February 13, 2007, our Board
of Directors has authorized a new stock repurchase program that
enables us to purchase up to $400 million of our common
stock. The Board of Directors authorization included
increased repurchase capacity for proceeds received from stock
option exercises. The amount and timing of specific repurchases
are subject to market conditions, applicable legal requirements
and other factors. Repurchases may be conducted in the open
market or in privately negotiated transactions.
During the fourth quarter of 2006, Cendant and the Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) settled the IRS examination
for Cendants taxable years 1998 through 2002 during which
we were included in Cendants tax returns. Accordingly, we
reduced our contingent liabilities by $15 million to
reflect Cendants settlement with the IRS. Such reduction
was recorded in general and administrative expenses on the
Consolidated Statement of Income during the year ended
December 31, 2006. We were adequately reserved for this
audit cycle and have reflected the results of that examination
in our Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements. The IRS
has opened an examination for Cendants taxable years 2003
through 2006 during which we were included in Cendants tax
returns. Although we and Cendant believe there is appropriate
support for the positions taken on its tax returns, we and
Cendant have recorded liabilities representing the best
estimates of the probable loss on certain positions. We and
Cendant believe that the accruals for tax liabilities are
adequate for all open years, based on assessment of many factors
including past experience and interpretations of tax law applied
to the facts of each matter. Although we and Cendant believe the
recorded assets and liabilities are reasonable, tax regulations
are subject to interpretation and tax litigation is inherently
uncertain; therefore, our and Cendants assessments can
involve both a series of complex judgments about future events
and rely heavily on estimates and assumptions. While we and
Cendant believe that the estimates and assumptions supporting
the assessments are reasonable, the final determination of tax
audits and any other related litigation could be materially
different than that which is reflected in historical income tax
provisions and recorded assets and liabilities. Based on the
results of an audit or litigation, a material effect on our
income tax provision, net income, or cash flows in the period or
periods for which that determination is made could result. The
effect is the result of our obligations under the Separation and
Distribution Agreement, as discussed in
Note 20Separation Adjustments and Transactions with
Former Parent and Subsidiaries.
We believe that our accruals for tax liabilities outlined in the
Separation and Distribution Agreement are adequate for all
remaining open years, based on our assessment of many factors
including past experience and interpretations of tax law applied
to the facts of each matter. Although we believe our recorded
assets and liabilities are reasonable, tax regulations are
subject to interpretation and tax litigation is inherently
uncertain; therefore, our assessments can involve a series of
complex judgments about future events and rely heavily on
estimates and assumptions. While we believe that the estimates
and assumptions supporting our assessments are reasonable, the
final determination of tax audits and any related litigation
could be materially different than that which is reflected in
historical income tax provisions and recorded assets and
liabilities. Based on the results of an audit or litigation, a
material effect on our income tax provision, net income, or cash
flows in the period or periods for which that determination is
made could result.
58
Financial
Obligations
Our indebtedness consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Securitized vacation ownership
debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes
|
|
$
|
838
|
|
|
$
|
740
|
|
Bank conduit
facility (a)
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securitized vacation
ownership debt
|
|
$
|
1,463
|
|
|
$
|
1,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00% senior unsecured notes
(due December
2016) (b)
|
|
$
|
796
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Term loan (due July 2011)
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility (due
July
2011) (c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interim loan facility (due July
2007) (c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation ownership asset-linked
debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
Bank borrowings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation ownership
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
Vacation rentals
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
Vacation rentals capital leases
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
Other
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
1,437
|
|
|
$
|
907
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents a
364-day
vacation ownership bank conduit facility which we renewed and
upsized to $1,000 million on November 13, 2006. The
borrowings under this bank conduit facility have a maturity date
of December 2009.
|
|
(b) |
|
These notes represent
$800 million aggregate principal less $4 million of
original issue discount.
|
|
(c) |
|
We entered into this
$800 million facility in July 2006. The outstanding
borrowings under this facility of $350 million were repaid
in December 2006 with a portion of the borrowings from our
issuance of 6.00% senior unsecured notes.
|
As of December 31, 2006, available capacity under our
borrowing arrangements was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
|
Capacity
|
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
Capacity
|
|
Securitized vacation ownership debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes
|
|
$
|
838
|
|
|
$
|
838
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Bank conduit
facility (a)
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securitized vacation
ownership debt
|
|
$
|
1,838
|
|
|
$
|
1,463
|
|
|
$
|
375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00% senior unsecured notes
(due December 2016)
|
|
$
|
796
|
|
|
$
|
796
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Term loan (due July 2011)
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility (due
July
2011) (b)
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
900
|
|
Bank borrowings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation ownership
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Vacation rentals
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Vacation rentals capital
leases (c)
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
2,412
|
|
|
$
|
1,437
|
|
|
|
975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Issuance of letters of
credit (b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Capacity is subject to maintaining
sufficient assets to collateralize debt.
|
|
(b) |
|
The capacity under our revolving
credit facility includes availability for letters of credit. As
of December 31, 2006, the total capacity of
$900 million was reduced by $30 million for the
issuance of letters of credit.
|
|
(c) |
|
These leases are recorded as
capital lease obligations with corresponding assets classified
within property and equipment on the Consolidated and Combined
Balance Sheets.
|
59
Securitized
Vacation Ownership Debt
A significant portion of our debt as of December 31, 2006
was issued through the securitization of vacation ownership
contract receivables. Such debt includes fixed and floating rate
term notes for which the weighted average interest rate was
4.7%, 4.0% and 3.3% during the years ended December 31,
2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and access to a
$1,000 million bank conduit facility, which bears interest
at variable rates and had a weighted average interest rate of
5.7%, 4.3% and 1.4% during the years ended December 31,
2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. As of December 31, 2006,
our securitized vacation ownership debt is collateralized by
$1,844 million of underlying vacation ownership contract
receivables and related assets.
Interest expense incurred in connection with our securitized
vacation ownership debt amounted to $70 million,
$46 million and $36 million during the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Such
interest expense is recorded within the operating expenses on
the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income as we earn
consumer finance income on the related securitized vacation
ownership contract receivables.
Other
Our 6.00% notes, with face value of $800 million, were
issued in December 2006 for net proceeds of $796 million.
The notes are redeemable at our option at any time, in whole or
in part, at the appropriate redemption prices plus accrued
interest through the redemption date. These notes rank equally
in right of payment with all of our other senior unsecured
indebtedness.
On July 7, 2006, we entered into a five-year
$300 million term loan facility which bears interest at a
fixed rate of 6.00%. As of December 31, 2006, we had
$300 million outstanding borrowings under this facility.
We entered into a five-year $900 million revolving credit
facility which currently bears interest at LIBOR plus 45 to
55 basis points. The pricing of this facility is dependent
on our credit ratings and the outstanding balance of borrowings
on this facility. As of December 31, 2006, we had zero
outstanding borrowings under this facility.
Prior to our Separation from Cendant, we previously borrowed
under a $600 million asset-linked facility through Cendant
to support the creation of certain vacation ownership-related
assets and the acquisition and development of vacation ownership
properties. In connection with the Separation, Cendant
eliminated the outstanding borrowings under this facility of
$600 million on July 27, 2006. The weighted average
interest rate on these borrowings was 5.5% during the period
January 1, 2006 through July 27, 2006 and 5.1% and
2.6% during the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004,
respectively.
We had outstanding bank borrowings of $103 million as of
December 31, 2006 principally under a foreign credit
facility used to support vacation ownership operations in the
South Pacific. This facility bears interest at Australian Dollar
LIBOR plus 55 basis points and had a weighted average
interest rate of 6.5%, 6.3% and 3.3% during 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. As of December 31, 2006, these secured
borrowings are collateralized by $158 million of underlying
vacation ownership contract receivables and related assets.
As of December 31, 2006, we had bank debt outstanding of
$73 million related to our Landal GreenParks business. As
of December 31, 2006, the bank debt was collateralized by
$130 million of land and related vacation rental assets and
had a weighted average interest rate of 3.7% during 2006 and
3.0% during both 2005 and 2004. On January 31, 2007, we
repaid the outstanding borrowings on this facility.
We lease vacation homes located in European holiday parks as
part of our vacation exchange and rentals business. These leases
are recorded as capital lease obligations with corresponding
assets classified within property, plant and equipment on the
Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheets. The vacation exchange
and rentals capital lease obligations had a weighted average
interest rate of 7.5% during 2006, 2005 and 2004.
We also maintain other debt facilities which arise through the
ordinary course of operations. As of December 31, 2006,
this debt primarily reflects $11 million of mortgage
borrowings related to an office building.
Interest expense incurred in connection with the above debt
(excluding our securitized vacation ownership debt) amounted to
$72 million, $36 million and $38 million during
2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Such interest expense is
recorded within the interest expense on the Consolidated and
Combined Statements of Income.
The revolving credit facility and unsecured term loan include
covenants, including the maintenance of specific financial
ratios. These financial covenants consist of a minimum interest
coverage ratio of at least 3.0 times as of
60
the measurement date and a maximum leverage ratio not to exceed
3.5 times on the measurement date. The interest coverage ratio
is calculated by dividing EBITDA (as defined in the credit
agreement and Note 19 to the Consolidated and Combined
Financial Statements) by Interest Expense (as defined in the
credit agreement), excluding interest expense on any Securitized
Indebtedness and on Non-Recourse Indebtedness (as the two terms
are defined in the credit agreement), both as measured on a
trailing 12 month basis preceding the measurement date. The
leverage ratio is calculated by dividing Consolidated Total
Indebtedness (as defined in the credit agreement) excluding any
Securitization Indebtedness and any Non-Recourse Secured debt as
of the measurement date by EBITDA as measured on a trailing
12 month basis preceding the measurement date. Covenants in
these credit facilities also include limitations on indebtedness
of material subsidiaries; liens; mergers, consolidations,
liquidations, dissolutions and sales of all or substantially all
assets; and sale and leasebacks. Events of default in these
credit facilities include nonpayment of principal when due;
nonpayment of interest, fees or other amounts; violation of
covenants; cross payment default and cross acceleration (in each
case, to indebtedness (excluding securitization indebtedness) in
excess of $50 million); and a change of control (the
definition of which permitted our separation from Cendant).
The 6.00% senior unsecured notes contain various covenants
including limitations on liens, limitations on sale and
leasebacks, and change of control restrictions. In addition,
there are limitations on mergers, consolidations and sales of
all or substantially all assets. Events of default in the notes
include nonpayment of interest, nonpayment of principal, breach
of a covenant or warranty, cross acceleration of debt in excess
of $50 million, and bankruptcy related matters.
As of December 31, 2006, we were in compliance with all of
the covenants described above including the required financial
ratios.
Liquidity
Risk
Our liquidity position may be negatively affected by unfavorable
conditions in the markets in which we operate. Our liquidity as
it relates to our vacation ownership financings could be
adversely affected if we were to fail to renew any of the
facilities on their renewal dates or if we were to fail to meet
certain ratios, which may occur in certain instances if the
credit quality of the underlying vacation ownership contract
receivables deteriorates. Our ability to sell vacation ownership
contract receivables depends on the continued ability of the
capital markets to provide financing to the entities that buy
the vacation ownership contract receivables.
Our senior unsecured debt is rated BBB and Baa2 by
Standard & Poors and Moodys, respectively.
A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold
securities and is subject to revision or withdrawal by the
assigning rating organization. Each rating should be evaluated
independently of any other rating.
Seasonality
We experience seasonal fluctuations in our net revenues and net
income from our franchise and management fees, commission income
earned from renting vacation properties, annual subscription
fees or annual membership dues, as applicable, and exchange
transaction fees and sales of VOIs. Revenues from franchise and
management fees are generally higher in the second and third
quarters than in the first or fourth quarters, because of
increased leisure travel during the spring and summer months.
Revenues from rental income earned from booking vacation rentals
are generally highest in the third quarter, when vacation
rentals are highest. Revenues from vacation exchange transaction
fees are generally highest in the first quarter, which is
generally when members of our vacation exchange business plan
and book their vacations for the year. Revenues from sales of
VOIs are generally higher in the third and fourth quarters than
in other quarters. The seasonality of our business may cause
fluctuations in our quarterly operating results. As we expand
into new markets and geographical locations, we may experience
increased or different seasonality dynamics that create
fluctuations in operating results different from the
fluctuations we have experienced in the past.
Separation
Adjustments And Transactions With Former Parent And
Subsidiaries
Transfer
of Cendant Corporate Liabilities and Issuance of Guarantees to
Cendant and Affiliates
Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, upon the
distribution of our common stock to Cendant shareholders, we
entered into certain guarantee commitments with Cendant
(pursuant to the assumption of certain liabilities and the
obligation to indemnify Cendant, Realogy and Travelport for such
liabilities) and guarantee commitments related to deferred
compensation arrangements with each of Cendant and Realogy.
These guarantee arrangements primarily relate to certain
contingent litigation liabilities, contingent tax liabilities,
and Cendant
61
contingent and other corporate liabilities, of which we assumed
and are responsible for 37.5% of these Cendant liabilities. The
amount of liabilities which we assumed in connection with the
Separation approximated $434 million at December 31,
2006, reduced from approximately $524 million as measured
at the date of separation (July 31, 2006). This amount was
comprised of certain Cendant corporate liabilities which were
recorded on the books of Cendant as well as additional
liabilities which were established for guarantees issued at the
date of Separation related to certain unresolved contingent
matters and certain others that could arise during the guarantee
period. Regarding the guarantees, if any of the companies
responsible for all or a portion of such liabilities were to
default in its payment of costs or expenses related to any such
liability, we would be responsible for a portion of the
defaulting party or parties obligation. We also provided a
default guarantee related to certain deferred compensation
arrangements related to certain current and former senior
officers and directors of Cendant, Realogy and Travelport. These
arrangements, which are discussed in more detail below, were
valued upon our separation from Cendant with the assistance of
third-party experts in accordance with Financial Interpretation
No. 45 (FIN 45) Guarantors
Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including
Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others, and
recorded as liabilities on the balance sheet. To the extent such
recorded liabilities are not adequate to cover the ultimate
payment amounts, such excess will be reflected as an expense to
the results of operations in future periods.
The $434 million is comprised of (i) $40 million
for litigation matters, (ii) $229 million for tax
liabilities, (iii) $134 million for other contingent
and corporate liabilities including liabilities of previously
sold businesses of Cendant and (iv) $31 million of
liabilities where the calculated FIN 45 guarantee amount
exceeded the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 5 Accounting for Contingencies liability
assumed at the date of Separation (of which $29 million of
the $31 million pertain to litigation liabilities). Of the
$434 million, $187 million is recorded in current Due
to former Parent and subsidiaries and $234 million are
recorded in long-term Due to former Parent and subsidiaries at
December 31, 2006 on the Consolidated and Combined Balance
Sheet. We are indemnifying Cendant for these contingent
liabilities and therefore any payments would be made to the
third party through the former Parent. The $31 million
relating to the FIN 45 guarantees is recorded in other
current liabilities at December 31, 2006 on the
Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheet. In addition, we have a
$65 million receivable due from former Parent relating to a
refund of excess funding paid to our former Parent resulting
from the Separation and income tax refunds, which is recorded in
current due from former Parent and subsidiaries on the
Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheet. We have also recorded a
$37 million receivable in non-current due from former
Parent and subsidiaries on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, which
represents our right to receive proceeds from the ultimate sale
of Cendants preferred stock investment in and warrants of
Affinion Group Holdings, Inc.
Following is a discussion of the liabilities on which we issued
guarantees:
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent litigation liabilities - We have assumed
37.5% of liabilities for certain litigation relating to, arising
out of or resulting from certain lawsuits in which Cendant is
named as the defendant. The indemnification obligation will
continue until the underlying lawsuits are resolved. We will
indemnify Cendant to the extent that Cendant is required to make
payments related to any of the underlying lawsuits. As the
guarantee relates to matters in various stages of litigation,
the maximum exposure cannot be quantified. Due to the inherent
nature of the litigation process, the timing of payments related
to these liabilities cannot be reasonably predicted, but is
expected to occur over several years.
|
|
|
|
Contingent tax liabilities - We are liable for 37.5%
of certain contingent tax liabilities and will pay to Cendant
the amount of taxes allocated pursuant to the Tax Sharing
Agreement for the payment of certain taxes. This liability will
remain outstanding until tax audits related to the 2006 tax year
are completed or the statutes of limitations governing the 2006
tax year have passed. Our maximum exposure cannot be quantified
as tax regulations are subject to interpretation and the outcome
of tax audits or litigation is inherently uncertain.
Additionally, the timing of payments related to these
liabilities cannot be reasonably predicted, but is likely to
occur over several years.
|
|
|
|
Cendant contingent and other corporate liabilities -
We have assumed 37.5% of corporate liabilities of Cendant
including liabilities relating to (i) Cendants
terminated or divested businesses, (ii) liabilities
relating to the Travelport sale, if any, and
(iii) generally any actions with respect to the separation
plan or the distributions brought by any third party. Our
maximum exposure to loss cannot be quantified as this guarantee
relates primarily to future claims that may be made against
Cendant, that have not yet occurred. We assessed the probability
and amount of potential liability related to this guarantee
based on the extent and nature of historical experience.
|
|
|
|
Guarantee related to deferred compensation
arrangements - In the event that Cendant, Realogy
and/or
Travelport are not able to meet certain deferred compensation
obligations under specified plans for certain current and former
officers and directors because of bankruptcy or insolvency, we
have guaranteed such
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
obligations (to the extent relating to amounts deferred in
respect of 2005 and earlier). This guarantee will remain
outstanding until such deferred compensation balances are
distributed to the respective officers and directors. The
maximum exposure cannot be quantified as the guarantee, in part,
is related to the value of deferred investments as of the date
of the requested distribution. Additionally, the timing of
payment, if any, related to these liabilities cannot be
reasonably predicted because the distribution dates are not
fixed.
|
Transactions
with Avis Budget Group, Realogy and Travelport
Prior to our Separation from Cendant, we entered into a
Transition Services Agreement (TSA) with Avis Budget
Group, Realogy and Travelport to provide for an orderly
transition to becoming an independent company. Under the TSA,
each of the companies agreed to provide us with various
services, including services relating to human resources and
employee benefits, payroll, financial systems management,
treasury and cash management, accounts payable services,
telecommunications services and information technology services.
In certain cases, services provided under the TSA may be
provided by one of the separated companies following the date of
such companys separation from Cendant. During 2006, we
recorded $8 million of expenses and less than
$1 million in other income in the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income related to these agreements.
Separation
and Related Costs
During 2006, we incurred costs of $99 million in connection
with executing the Separation. Such costs consisted primarily of
(i) the acceleration of vesting of Cendant equity awards
and the related equitable adjustments of such awards (see
Note 16 to our Consolidated and Combined Financial
Statements), (ii) an impairment charge due to a rebranding
initiative for our Fairfield and Trendwest trademarks (see
Note 2 to our Consolidated and Combined Financial
Statements) and (iii) consulting and payroll-related
services.
Contractual
Obligations
The following table summarizes our future contractual
obligations for the twelve month periods beginning on
January 1st of each of the years set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Securitized
debt (a)
|
|
$
|
178
|
|
|
$
|
255
|
|
|
$
|
537
|
|
|
$
|
93
|
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
|
$
|
315
|
|
|
$
|
1,463
|
|
Long-term debt (b)
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
901
|
|
|
|
1,437
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
Other purchase
commitments (c)
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
729
|
|
|
$
|
349
|
|
|
$
|
616
|
|
|
$
|
169
|
|
|
$
|
506
|
|
|
$
|
1,239
|
|
|
$
|
3,608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Amounts exclude interest expense,
as the amounts ultimately paid will depend on amounts
outstanding under our secured obligations and interest rates in
effect during each period.
|
|
(b) |
|
Excludes future cash payments
related to interest expense on our 6.00% senior unsecured notes
and term loan of $66 million during each year from 2007
through 2010, $59 million during 2011 and $239 million
thereafter.
|
|
(c) |
|
Primarily represents commitments
for the development of vacation ownership properties.
|
In addition to the above and in connection with our separation
from Cendant, we entered into certain guarantee commitments with
Cendant (pursuant to our assumption of certain liabilities and
our obligation to indemnify Cendant, Realogy and Travelport for
such liabilities) and guarantee commitments related to deferred
compensation arrangements with each of Cendant and Realogy.
These guarantee arrangements primarily relate to certain
contingent litigation liabilities, contingent tax liabilities,
and Cendant contingent and other corporate liabilities, of which
we assumed and are responsible for 37.5% of these Cendant
liabilities. Additionally, if any of the companies responsible
for all or a portion of such liabilities were to default in its
payment of costs or expenses related to any such liability, we
are responsible for a portion of the defaulting party or
parties obligation. We also provide a default guarantee
related to certain deferred compensation arrangements related to
certain current and former senior officers and directors of
Cendant and Realogy. These arrangements were valued upon our
separation from Cendant with the assistance of third- party
experts in accordance with Financial Interpretation No. 45
Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements
for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of
Others and recorded as liabilities on our balance sheet.
To the extent such recorded liabilities are not adequate to
cover the ultimate payment amounts, such excess will be
reflected as an expense to our results of operations in future
periods. See Separation Adjustments and Transactions with former
Parent and Subsidiaries discussion for details of guaranteed
liabilities.
63
Other
Commercial Commitments And Off-balance Sheet
Arrangements
Purchase Commitments. In the normal course of business,
we make various commitments to purchase goods or services from
specific suppliers, including those related to vacation
ownership resort development and other capital expenditures.
None of the purchase commitments made by us as of
December 31, 2006 (aggregating approximately
$531 million) were individually significant; the majority
relate to commitments for the development of vacation ownership
properties (aggregating $323 million, all of which relates
to 2007).
Standard Guarantees/Indemnifications. In the ordinary
course of business, we enter into numerous agreements that
contain standard guarantees and indemnities whereby we indemnify
another party for breaches of representations and warranties. In
addition, many of these parties are also indemnified against any
third-party claim resulting from the transaction that is
contemplated in the underlying agreement. Such guarantees and
indemnifications are granted under various agreements, including
those governing (i) purchases, sales or outsourcing of
assets or businesses, (ii) leases of real estate,
(iii) licensing of trademarks, (iv) development of
vacation ownership properties, (v) access to credit
facilities and use of derivatives and (vi) issuances of
debt securities. The guarantees and indemnifications issued are
for the benefit of the (i) buyers in sale agreements and
sellers in purchase agreements, (ii) landlords in lease
contracts, (iii) franchisees in licensing agreements,
(iv) developers in vacation ownership development
agreements, (v) financial institutions in credit facility
arrangements and derivative contracts and (vi) underwriters
in debt security issuances. While some of these guarantees and
indemnifications extend only for the duration of the underlying
agreement, many survive the expiration of the term of the
agreement or extend into perpetuity (unless subject to a legal
statute of limitations). There are no specific limitations on
the maximum potential amount of future payments that we could be
required to make under these guarantees and indemnifications,
nor are we able to develop an estimate of the maximum potential
amount of future payments to be made under these guarantees and
indemnifications as the triggering events are not subject to
predictability. With respect to certain of the aforementioned
guarantees and indemnifications, such as indemnifications of
landlords against third-party claims for the use of real estate
property leased by us, we maintain insurance coverage that
mitigates any potential payments to be made.
Other Guarantees/Indemnifications. In the normal course
of business, our vacation ownership business provides guarantees
to certain property owners associations for funds required
to operate and maintain vacation ownership properties in excess
of assessments collected from owners of the vacation ownership
interests. We may be required to fund such excess as a result of
our unsold owned vacation ownership interests or failure by
owners to pay such assessments. These guarantees extend for the
duration of the underlying subsidy agreements (which generally
approximate one year and are renewable on an annual basis) or
until a stipulated percentage (typically 80% or higher) of
related vacation ownership interests are sold. The maximum
potential future payments that we could be required to make
under these guarantees was approximately $230 million as of
December 31, 2006. We would only be required to pay this
maximum amount if none of the owners assessed paid their
assessments. Any assessments collected from the owners of the
vacation ownership interests would reduce the maximum potential
amount of future payments to be made by us. Additionally, should
we be required to fund the deficit through the payment of any
owners assessments under these guarantees, we would be
permitted access to the property for our own use and may use
that property to engage in revenue-producing activities, such as
marketing or rental. Historically, we have not been required to
make material payments under these guarantees, as the fees
collected from owners of vacation ownership interests have been
sufficient to support the operation and maintenance of the
vacation ownership properties. As of December 31, 2006, we
recorded a liability in connection with these guarantees of
$14 million.
Securitizations. We pool qualifying vacation ownership
contract receivables and sell them to bankruptcy-remote
entities. Prior to September 1, 2003, sales of vacation
ownership contract receivables were treated as off-balance sheet
sales as the entities utilized were structured as
bankruptcy-remote QSPEs pursuant to SFAS No. 140
Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets
and Extinguishments of Liabilities. Subsequent to
September 1, 2003, newly originated as well as certain
legacy vacation ownership contract receivables are securitized
through bankruptcy-remote SPEs that are consolidated within our
financial statements.
Letters of Credit. As of December 31, 2006, we had
$30 million of irrevocable standby letters of credit
outstanding, which mainly relate to support for development
activity at our vacation ownership business.
Critical
Accounting Policies
In presenting our financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles, we are required to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported
therein. Several of the estimates and assumptions we are
required to make relate to matters that are inherently uncertain
as they pertain to future events. However, events that are
outside of our control cannot be predicted and, as such, they
cannot be contemplated in
64
evaluating such estimates and assumptions. If there is a
significant unfavorable change to current conditions, it could
result in a material adverse impact to our consolidated and
combined results of operations, financial position and
liquidity. We believe that the estimates and assumptions we used
when preparing our financial statements were the most
appropriate at that time. Presented below are those accounting
policies that we believe require subjective and complex
judgments that could potentially affect reported results.
However, the majority of our businesses operate in environments
where we are paid a fee for a service performed, and therefore
the results of the majority of our recurring operations are
recorded in our financial statements using accounting policies
that are not particularly subjective, nor complex.
Vacation Ownership Revenue Recognition. Our sales of VOIs
are either cash sales or seller-financed sales. In order for us
to recognize revenues of VOI sales under the full accrual method
of accounting described in SFAS No. 66,
Accounting of Sales of Real Estate for fully
constructed inventory, a binding sales contract must have been
executed, the statutory rescission period must have expired
(after which time the purchasers are not entitled to a refund
except for non-delivery by us), receivables must have been
deemed collectible and the remainder of our obligations must
have been substantially completed. In addition, before we
recognize any revenues on VOI sales, the purchaser of the VOI
must have met the initial investment criteria and, as
applicable, the continuing investment criteria, by executing a
legally binding financing contract. A purchaser has met the
initial investment criteria when a minimum down payment of 10%
is received by us. As a result of the adoption of
SFAS No. 152 and
SOP 04-2
on January 1, 2006, we must also take into consideration
the fair value of certain incentives provided to the purchaser
when assessing the adequacy of the purchasers initial
investment. In those cases where financing is provided to the
purchaser by us, the purchaser is obligated to remit monthly
payments under financing contracts that represent the
purchasers continuing investment. The contractual terms of
seller-provided financing arrangements require that the
contractual level of annual principal payments be sufficient to
amortize the loan over a customary period for the VOI being
financed, which is generally seven to ten years, and payments
under the financing contracts begin within 45 days of the
sale and receipt of the minimum down payment of 10%. We use a
methodology to estimate and record a provision for loan losses
on our vacation ownership contract receivables, which include
consideration of such factors as economic conditions, defaults,
past due aging and historical write-offs of contracts. Prior to
2006, our provision for loan losses was presented as expenses on
the Combined Statements of Income. Upon the adoption of
SFAS No. 152 and
SOP 04-2
on January 1, 2006, the provision for loan losses is now
classified as a reduction of vacation ownership interest sales
on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income (see
Allowance for Loan Losses discussed below).
If all of the criteria for a VOI sale to qualify under the full
accrual method of accounting have been met, as discussed above,
except that construction of the VOI purchased is not complete,
we recognize revenues using the
percentage-of-completion
method of accounting provided that the preliminary construction
phase is complete and that a minimum sales level has been met
(to assure that the property will not revert to a rental
property). The preliminary stage of development is deemed to be
complete when the engineering and design work is complete, the
construction contracts have been executed, the site has been
cleared, prepared and excavated, and the building foundation is
complete. The completion percentage is determined by the
proportion of real estate inventory costs incurred to total
estimated costs. These estimated costs are based upon historical
experience and the related contractual terms. The remaining
revenue and related costs of sales, including commissions and
direct expenses, are deferred and recognized as the remaining
costs are incurred. Until a contract for sale qualifies for
revenue recognition, all payments received are accounted for as
restricted cash and deposits within other current assets and
deferred income, respectively, on the Consolidated and Combined
Balance Sheets. Commissions and other direct costs related to
the sale are deferred until the sale is recorded. If a contract
is cancelled before qualifying as a sale, non-recoverable
expenses are charged to the current period as part of operating
expenses on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income.
Changes in costs could lead to adjustments to the percentage of
completion status of a project, which may result in difference
in the timing and amount of revenue recognized from the
construction of vacation ownership properties. This policy
changed upon our adoption of SFAS No. 152 and
SOP 04-2,
which is discussed in greater detail in Note 1 and
Note 2 to the Consolidated and Combined Financial
Statements.
Allowance for Loan Losses. In our Vacation Ownership
segment, we provide for estimated vacation ownership contract
receivable cancellations at the time of VOI sales by recording a
provision for loan losses on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income. We consider factors such as economic
conditions, defaults, past-due aging and historical write-offs
of vacation ownership contract receivables to evaluate the
adequacy of the allowance. Upon the adoption of
SFAS No. 152 and
SOP 04-2
on January 1, 2006, the provision for loan losses is
classified as a reduction to revenue with no change made to
prior periods presented.
Business Combinations. A component of our growth strategy
has been to acquire and integrate businesses that complement our
existing operations. We account for business combinations in
accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business
Combinations and related literature. Accordingly, we
allocate the purchase price of acquired companies
65
to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities
assumed based upon their estimated fair values at the date of
purchase. The difference between the purchase price and the fair
value of the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill.
In determining the fair values of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in a business combination, we use various
recognized valuation methods including present value modeling
and referenced market values (where available). Further, we make
assumptions within certain valuation techniques including
discount rates and timing of future cash flows. Valuations are
performed by management or independent valuation specialists
under managements supervision, where appropriate. We
believe that the estimated fair values assigned to the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed are based on reasonable
assumptions that marketplace participants would use. However,
such assumptions are inherently uncertain and actual results
could differ from those estimates.
With regard to the goodwill and other indefinite-lived
intangible assets recorded in connection with business
combinations, we annually or, more frequently if circumstances
indicate impairment may have occurred, review their carrying
values as required by SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets. In performing this review, we are
required to make an assessment of fair value for our goodwill
and other indefinite-lived intangible assets. When determining
fair value, we utilize various assumptions, including
projections of future cash flows. A change in these underlying
assumptions could cause a change in the results of the tests
and, as such, could cause the fair value to be less than the
respective carrying amount. In such event, we would then be
required to record a charge, which would impact earnings.
The aggregate carrying values of our goodwill and other
indefinite-lived intangible assets were $2,699 million and
$619 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2006
and $2,645 million and $580 million, respectively, as
of December 31, 2005. Our goodwill and other
indefinite-lived intangible assets are allocated among our three
reporting segments.
Income Taxes. We recognize deferred tax assets and
liabilities based on the differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and
liabilities. We regularly review our deferred tax assets to
assess their potential realization and establish a valuation
allowance for portions of such assets that we believe will not
be ultimately realized. In performing this review, we make
estimates and assumptions regarding projected future taxable
income, the expected timing of the reversals of existing
temporary differences and the implementation of tax planning
strategies. A change in these assumptions could cause an
increase or decrease to our valuation allowance resulting in an
increase or decrease in our effective tax rate, which could
materially impact our results of operations.
Changes
in Accounting Policies
During 2006, we adopted the following standards as a result of
the issuance of new accounting pronouncements:
|
|
|
|
|
SFAS No. 152, Accounting for Real Estate
Time-Sharing Transactions and Statement of Position
No. 04-2,
Accounting for Real Estate Time-Sharing Transactions
|
|
|
SFAS No. 123(R), Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation
|
|
|
SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error
Correctionsa replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and
FASB Statement No. 3
|
|
|
SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plansan
amendment of SFAS No. 87, 88, 106 and
132®
|
|
|
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, Considering
the Effect of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying
Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements.
|
We will adopt the following recently issued standards as
required:
|
|
|
|
|
SFAS No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of
Financial Assetsan amendment of FASB Statement
No. 140
|
|
|
FASB Staff Position
FIN 46R-6,
Determining the Variability to be considered in Applying
FASB Interpretation No. 46R
|
|
|
FASB Interpretation No 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxesan Interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109
|
|
|
SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
|
For detailed information regarding these pronouncements and the
impact thereof on our business, see Note 2 to our
Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements.
66
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We use various financial instruments, particularly swap
contracts and interest rate caps to manage and reduce the
interest rate risk related to our debt. Foreign currency
forwards are also used to manage and reduce the foreign currency
exchange rate risk associated with our foreign currency
denominated receivables and forecasted royalties, forecasted
earnings of foreign subsidiaries and other transactions.
We are exclusively an end user of these instruments, which are
commonly referred to as derivatives. We do not engage in
trading, market making or other speculative activities in the
derivatives markets. More detailed information about these
financial instruments is provided in Note 18 to the
Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements. Our principal
market exposures are interest and foreign currency rate risks.
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate movements in one country, as well as relative
interest rate movements between countries can materially impact
our profitability. Our primary interest rate exposure as of
December 31, 2006 was to interest rate fluctuations in the
United States, specifically LIBOR and commercial paper interest
rates due to their impact on variable rate borrowings and other
interest rate sensitive liabilities. We anticipate that LIBOR
and commercial paper rates will remain a primary market risk
exposure for the foreseeable future.
|
|
|
|
We have foreign currency rate exposure to exchange rate
fluctuations worldwide and particularly with respect to the
British pound, Euro and Canadian dollar. We anticipate that such
foreign currency exchange rate risk will remain a market risk
exposure for the foreseeable future.
|
We assess our market risk based on changes in interest and
foreign currency exchange rates utilizing a sensitivity
analysis. The sensitivity analysis measures the potential impact
in earnings, fair values and cash flows based on a hypothetical
10% change (increase and decrease) in interest and currency
rates.
The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables,
accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current
liabilities approximate carrying values due to the short-term
nature of these assets. We use a discounted cash flow model in
determining the fair values of vacation ownership contract
receivables and our retained interests in securitized assets.
The primary assumptions used in determining fair value are
prepayment speeds, estimated loss rates and discount rates. We
use a duration-based model in determining the impact of interest
rate shifts on our debt and interest rate derivatives. The
primary assumption used in these models is that a 10% increase
or decrease in the benchmark interest rate produces a parallel
shift in the yield curve across all maturities.
We use a current market pricing model to assess the changes in
the value of the U.S. dollar on foreign currency
denominated monetary assets and liabilities and derivatives. The
primary assumption used in these models is a hypothetical 10%
weakening or strengthening of the U.S. dollar against all
our currency exposures as of December 31, 2006, 2005 and
2004.
Our total market risk is influenced by a wide variety of factors
including the volatility present within the markets and the
liquidity of the markets. There are certain limitations inherent
in the sensitivity analyses presented. While probably the most
meaningful analysis, these shock tests are
constrained by several factors, including the necessity to
conduct the analysis based on a single point in time and the
inability to include the complex market reactions that normally
would arise from the market shifts modeled.
We used December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 market rates on
outstanding financial instruments to perform the sensitivity
analyses separately for each of our market risk
exposures interest and currency rate instruments.
The estimates are based on the market risk sensitive portfolios
described in the preceding paragraphs and assume instantaneous,
parallel shifts in interest rate yield curves and exchange rates.
We have determined that the impact of a 10% change in interest
and foreign currency exchange rates and prices on our earnings,
fair values and cash flows would not be material at
December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005. While these
results may be used as benchmarks, they should not be viewed as
forecasts.
|
|
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
See Financial Statements and Financial Statement Index
commencing on
page F-1
hereof.
67
|
|
ITEM 9.
|
CHANGE IN
AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
|
Not applicable
|
|
ITEM 9A.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our management, with
the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered
by this report. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of
the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures
are effective.
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting. There have
been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting
(as such term is defined in
rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
under the Exchange Act) during the fourth quarter of 2006 that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting. This
annual report does not include a report of managements
assessment regarding internal control over financial reporting
or an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting
firm due to a transition period established by the rules of the
SEC for newly public companies.
|
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Identification
of Directors.
Information required by this item is included in the Proxy
Statement under the caption Election of Directors
and is incorporated by reference in this report.
Identification
of Executive Officers.
The following provides information for each of our executive
officers.
Stephen P. Holmes, 50, has served as the Chairman of our Board
of Directors and as our Chief Executive Officer since our
separation from Cendant in July 2006. Mr. Holmes was a
director since May 2003 of the already-existing, wholly owned
subsidiary of Cendant that held the assets and liabilities of
Cendants hospitality services (including timeshare
resorts) businesses before our separation from Cendant and has
served as a director of Wyndham Worldwide since the separation
in July 2006. Mr. Holmes was Vice Chairman and Director of
Cendant and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Cendants Travel Content Division from December 1997 until
our separation from Cendant in July 2006. Mr. Holmes was
Vice Chairman of HFS Incorporated, from September 1996 until
December 1997 and was a director of HFS from June 1994 until
December 1997. From July 1990 through September 1996,
Mr. Holmes served as Executive Vice President, Treasurer
and Chief Financial Officer of HFS.
Franz S. Hanning, 53, has served as President and Chief
Executive Officer, Wyndham Vacation Ownership since our
separation from Cendant in July 2006. Mr. Hanning was the
Chief Executive Officer of Cendants Timeshare Resort Group
from March 2005 until our separation from Cendant in July 2006.
Mr. Hanning served as President and Chief Executive Officer
of Fairfield Resorts, Inc. (which has been renamed Wyndham
Vacation Resorts, Inc.) from April 2001, when Cendant acquired
Fairfield, to March 2005 and as President and Chief Executive
Officer of Trendwest Resorts, Inc. (which has been renamed
WorldMark by Wyndham) from August 2004 to March 2005.
Mr. Hanning joined Fairfield in 1982 and held several key
leadership positions with Fairfield, including Regional Vice
President, Executive Vice President of Sales and Chief Operating
Officer.
Kenneth N. May, 56, has served as President and Chief Executive
Officer, RCI Global Vacation Network since our separation from
Cendant in July 2006. Mr. May was the Chief Executive
Officer of Cendants Vacation Network Group from March 2005
until our separation from Cendant in July 2006. From February
1999 to March 2005, Mr. May was Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of RCI. Prior to joining Cendant, Mr. May
held positions as General Manager with Citibank North America
Credit Cards, Senior Vice President and General Manager with
Disney Vacation Club and various other leadership positions for
PepsiCo, Inc. and Colgate-Palmolive Company.
68
Steven A. Rudnitsky, 48, has served as President and Chief
Executive Officer, Wyndham Hotel Group since our separation from
Cendant in July 2006. Mr. Rudnitsky was the Chief Executive
Officer of Cendants Hotel Group from March 2002 until our
separation from Cendant in July 2006. Prior to joining Cendant,
from December 2000 to March 2002, Mr. Rudnitsky was
President of Kraft Foodservice and Executive Vice President of
Kraft Foods, Inc. Mr. Rudnitsky was appointed to these
positions with Kraft in December 2000 upon Krafts
acquisition of Nabisco Foods Company, where he served as
President from 1999 until December 2000. From 1996 to 1999,
Mr. Rudnitsky was Vice President and General Manager, food
service, for Pillsbury Bakeries & Foodservice. From
1984 to 1996, Mr. Rudnitsky held positions of increasing
responsibility at PepsiCo, Inc.
Virginia M. Wilson, 52, has served as our Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer since our separation from
Cendant in July 2006. Ms. Wilson was Executive Vice
President and Chief Accounting Officer of Cendant from September
2003 until our separation from Cendant in July 2006. From
October 1999 until August 2003, Ms. Wilson served as Senior
Vice President and Controller for MetLife, Inc., a provider of
insurance and other financial services. From 1996 until 1999,
Ms. Wilson served as Senior Vice President and Controller
for Transamerica Life Companies, an insurance and financial
services company. Prior to Transamerica, Ms. Wilson was an
Audit Partner of Deloitte & Touche LLP.
Scott G. McLester, 44, has served as our Executive Vice
President and General Counsel since our separation from Cendant
in July 2006. Mr. McLester was Senior Vice President, Legal
for Cendant from April 2004 until our separation from Cendant in
July 2006. Mr. McLester was Group Vice President, Legal for
Cendant from March 2002 to April 2004, Vice President, Legal for
Cendant from February 2001 to March 2002 and Senior Counsel for
Cendant from June 2000 to February 2001. Prior to joining
Cendant, Mr. McLester was a Vice President in the Law
Department of Merrill Lynch in New York and a partner with the
law firm of Carpenter, Bennett and Morrissey in Newark, New
Jersey.
Mary R. Falvey, 46, has served as our Executive Vice President
and Chief Human Resources Officer since our separation from
Cendant in July 2006. Ms. Falvey was Executive Vice
President, Global Human Resources for Cendants Vacation
Network Group from April 2005 until our separation from Cendant
in July 2006. From March 2000 to April 2005, Ms. Falvey
served as Executive Vice President, Human Resources for RCI.
From January 1998 to March 2000, Ms. Falvey was Vice
President of Human Resources for Cendants Hotel Division
and Corporate Contact Center group. Prior to joining Cendant,
Ms. Falvey held various leadership positions in the human
resources division of Nabisco Foods Company.
Thomas F. Anderson, 42, has served as our Executive Vice
President and Chief Real Estate Development Officer since our
separation from Cendant in July 2006. From April 2003 until July
2006, Mr. Anderson was Executive Vice President, Strategic
Acquisitions and Development of Cendants Timeshare Resort
Group. From January 2000 until February 2003, Mr. Anderson
was Senior Vice President, Corporate Real Estate for Cendant
Corporation. From November 1998 until December 1999,
Mr. Anderson was Vice President of Real Estate Services,
Coldwell Banker Commercial. From March 1995 to October 1998,
Mr. Anderson was General Manager of American Asset
Corporation, a full service real estate developer based in
Charlotte, North Carolina. From June 1990 until February 1995,
Mr. Anderson was Vice President of Commercial Lending for
BB&T Corporation in Charlotte, North Carolina.
Nicola Rossi, 40, has served as our Senior Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer since our separation from Cendant in
July 2006. Mr. Rossi was Vice President and Controller of
Cendants Hotel Group from June 2004 until our separation
from Cendant in July 2006. From April 2002 to June 2004,
Mr. Rossi served as Vice President, Corporate Finance for
Cendant. From April 2000 to April 2002, Mr. Rossi was
Corporate Controller of Jacuzzi Brands, Inc., a bath and
plumbing products company, and was Assistant Corporate
Controller from June 1999 to March 2000. From November 1995 to
May 1999, Mr. Rossi was Director of Corporate Accounting of
The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. From
1988 to 1995, Mr. Rossi held various positions, from staff
accountant to manager, with Deloitte & Touche LLP.
Compliance
with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.
The information required by this item is included in the Proxy
Statement under the caption Section 16(a) Beneficial
Ownership Reporting Compliance.
Code of
Ethics.
The information required by this item is included in the Proxy
Statement under the caption Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics.
69
Corporate
Governance.
The information required by this item is included in the Proxy
Statement under the caption Governance of the
Company.
Certifications.
We have filed as exhibits to this report the certifications
required by
Rule 13a-14
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
The information required by this item is included in the Proxy
Statement under the captions Executive Compensation
and Committees of the Board and is incorporated by
reference in this report.
|
|
ITEM 12.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
The information required by this item is included in the Proxy
Statement under the captions Ownership of Company
Stock and Equity Compensation Plan Information
and is incorporated by reference in this report.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
The information required by this item is included in the Proxy
Statement under the captions Related Party
Transactions and Governance of the Company and
is incorporated by reference in this report.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this item is included in the Proxy
Statement under the caption Disclosure About Fees
and Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services and
is incorporated by reference in this report.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
ITEM 15(A)(1) FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
See Financial Statements and Financial Statements Index
commencing on
page F-1
hereof.
ITEM 15(A)(3) EXHIBITS
See Exhibit Index commencing on
page G-1
hereof.
70
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
WYNDHAM WORLDWIDE CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ STEPHEN
P. HOLMES
|
Stephen P. Holmes
Chief Executive Officer
Date: March 7, 2007
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ STEPHEN
P. HOLMES
Stephen
P. Holmes
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
March 7, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ VIRGINIA
M. WILSON
Virginia
M. Wilson
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
March 7, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ NICOLA
ROSSI
Nicola
Rossi
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
March 7, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ MYRA
J. BIBLOWIT
Myra
J. Biblowit
|
|
Director
|
|
March 7, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ JAMES
E. BUCKMAN
James
E. Buckman
|
|
Director
|
|
March 7, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ GEORGE
HERRERA
George
Herrera
|
|
Director
|
|
March 7, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ THE
RIGHT
HONOURABLE
BRIAN MULRONEY
The
Right Honourable Brian Mulroney
|
|
Director
|
|
March 7, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ PAULINE
D.E.
RICHARDS
Pauline
D.E. Richards
|
|
Director
|
|
March 7, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ MICHAEL
H. WARGOTZ
Michael
H. Wargotz
|
|
Director
|
|
March 7, 2007
|
71
INDEX TO
ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated and Combined Balance
Sheets as of December 31, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31,
2006, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Stockholders/Invested Equity for the years
ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated and Combined
Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
F-1
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Wyndham Worldwide Corporation Board of Directors and
Shareholders
Parsippany, New Jersey
We have audited the accompanying consolidated and combined
balance sheets of Wyndham Worldwide Corporation and subsidiaries
(the Company) as of December 31, 2006 and 2005,
and the related consolidated and combined statements of income,
stockholders/invested equity, and cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal
control over financial reporting. Our audits included
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated and combined financial
statements present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position of Wyndham Worldwide Corporation and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2006, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated and combined
financial statements, prior to its separation from Cendant
Corporation (Cendant; known as Avis Budget Group
since August 29, 2006), the Company was comprised of the
assets and liabilities used in managing and operating the
lodging, vacation exchange and rental and vacation ownership
businesses of Cendant. Included in Notes 20 and 21 of the
consolidated and combined financial statements is a summary of
transactions with related parties. As discussed in Note 20
to the consolidated and combined financial statements, in
connection with its separation from Cendant, the Company entered
into certain guarantee commitments with Cendant and has recorded
the fair value of these guarantees as of July 31, 2006.
Also as discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated and
combined financial statements, as of January 1, 2006, the
Company adopted the provisions for accounting for real estate
time-sharing transactions.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Parsippany, New Jersey
March 7, 2007
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation ownership interest sales
|
|
$
|
1,461
|
|
|
$
|
1,379
|
|
|
$
|
1,245
|
|
Service fees and membership
|
|
|
1,437
|
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
|
|
1,105
|
|
Franchise fees
|
|
|
501
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
Consumer financing
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
Other
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
3,842
|
|
|
|
3,471
|
|
|
|
3,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
1,474
|
|
|
|
1,199
|
|
|
|
932
|
|
Cost of vacation ownership
interests
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
Marketing and reservation
|
|
|
734
|
|
|
|
628
|
|
|
|
576
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
493
|
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
Separation and related costs
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,265
|
|
|
|
2,851
|
|
|
|
2,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Interest income (including
intercompany of $21, $30 and $16)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and
minority interest
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
626
|
|
|
|
587
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
Minority interest, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect
of accounting change
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
431
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
change, net of tax
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
$
|
431
|
|
|
$
|
349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
$
|
1.78
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
1.45
|
|
|
|
2.15
|
|
|
|
1.74
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
1.44
|
|
|
|
2.15
|
|
|
|
1.74
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements.
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
269
|
|
|
$
|
99
|
|
Trade receivables (net of
allowance for doubtful accounts of $99 and $96)
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
Vacation ownership contract
receivables, net
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
446
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
Net intercompany funding to former
Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,125
|
|
Due from former Parent and
subsidiaries
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
2,052
|
|
|
|
2,568
|
|
Long-term vacation ownership
contract receivables, net
|
|
|
2,123
|
|
|
|
1,835
|
|
Non-current inventory
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
916
|
|
|
|
718
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
2,699
|
|
|
|
2,645
|
|
Trademarks, net
|
|
|
621
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
Franchise agreements and other
intangibles, net
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
Due from former Parent and
subsidiaries
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
9,520
|
|
|
$
|
9,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized vacation ownership debt
|
|
$
|
178
|
|
|
$
|
154
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
377
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
Due to former Parent and
subsidiaries
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current
liabilities
|
|
|
575
|
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,977
|
|
|
|
1,295
|
|
Long-term securitized vacation
ownership debt
|
|
|
1,285
|
|
|
|
981
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,322
|
|
|
|
706
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
782
|
|
|
|
823
|
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
Due to former Parent and
subsidiaries
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
5,961
|
|
|
|
4,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
(Note 14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par
value, authorized 6,000,000 shares, none issued and
outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value,
authorized 600,000,000 shares, issued 202,294,898 in 2006
and zero shares in 2005
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
3,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent companys net
investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,925
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
Treasury stock, at
cost11,877,600 in 2006 and zero shares in 2005
|
|
|
(349
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
3,559
|
|
|
|
5,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
9,520
|
|
|
$
|
9,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements.
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
$
|
431
|
|
|
$
|
349
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
change, net of tax
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
431
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile income
before cumulative effect of accounting change to net cash
provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Impairment of intangible assets
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in assets and
liabilities, excluding the impact of acquisitions and
dispositions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
Vacation ownership contract
receivables
|
|
|
(594
|
)
|
|
|
(462
|
)
|
|
|
(496
|
)
|
Inventory
|
|
|
(280
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses
and other current liabilities
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Due to former Parent and
subsidiaries
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
492
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment additions
|
|
|
(191
|
)
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
Net assets acquired, net of cash
acquired, and acquisition-related payments
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
(154
|
)
|
|
|
(181
|
)
|
Net intercompany funding to former
Parent and subsidiaries
|
|
|
(143
|
)
|
|
|
(398
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
Investments and development
advances
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Proceeds received from disposition
of businesses, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Increase in restricted cash
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
|
(471
|
)
|
|
|
(696
|
)
|
|
|
(326
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from secured borrowings
|
|
|
1,531
|
|
|
|
1,296
|
|
|
|
1,440
|
|
Principal payments on secured
borrowings
|
|
|
(1,223
|
)
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
|
|
(1,032
|
)
|
Proceeds from unsecured borrowings
|
|
|
2,179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Principal payments on unsecured
borrowings
|
|
|
(1,910
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
Proceeds from bond issuance
|
|
|
796
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid to former Parent
|
|
|
(1,360
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contribution from former
Parent
|
|
|
795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(329
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing
activities
|
|
|
473
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of changes in exchange
rates on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents,
beginning of period
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end
of period
|
|
$
|
269
|
|
|
$
|
99
|
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash
Flow Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
payments (a)
|
|
$
|
99
|
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
Income tax payments,
net (b)
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Excludes interest paid on the
Companys securitized debt of $64 million,
$40 million, and $32 million, intercompany interest
paid to former Parent and subsidiaries of $18 million,
$20 million and $6 million and capitalized interest
related to the development of vacation ownership inventory
during 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
|
|
(b)
|
|
Excludes income tax related
payments made to former Parent.
|
See Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements.
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paidin
|
|
|
Companys
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Net Investment
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1,
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,103
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,283
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment,
net of tax of $33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on cash flow
hedges, net of tax of $1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
Capital contribution from former
Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31,
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,679
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment,
net of tax benefit of $19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on cash flow
hedges, net of tax of $2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification for gains on cash
flow hedges, net of tax benefit of $2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
Dividends paid to former Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
Capital contribution from former
Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,033
|
|
Comprehensive income from
January 1, 2006 to July 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment,
net of tax benefit of $27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on cash flow
hedges, net of tax benefit of $1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income from
January 1, 2006 to July 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
Assumption of former Parent
corporate assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
Return of excess funding from
former Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Tax receivables due from former
Parent and subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Deferred tax assets on contingent
liabilities and guarantees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Guarantees under FIN 45
related to the Separation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
Contingent liabilitiesdue to
former Parent and subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(483
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(483
|
)
|
Cash transfer to former Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,360
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,360
|
)
|
Elimination of assetlinked
facility obligation by former Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
Capital contribution from former
Parent proceeds from Travelport sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
760
|
|
Elimination of intercompany balance
due to former Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,157
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,157
|
)
|
Transfer of net investment to
additional paidin capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,569
|
|
|
|
(3,569
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income from
August 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment,
net of tax of $16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on cash flow
hedges, net of tax benefit of $4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income from
August 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock
units
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
Additional capital contribution
from former Parentproceeds from Travelport sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Adjustments to contingent
liabilities due to former Parent and subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Repurchases of WYN common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(349
|
)
|
|
|
(349
|
)
|
Equitable adjustment of stock based
compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Adjustment to deferred tax assets
assumed from former Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Excess deferred tax assets of
expense awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2006
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
3,566
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
156
|
|
|
$
|
184
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(349
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements.
F-6
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation (Wyndham or the
Company), a Delaware corporation, was incorporated on
May 30, 2003 as Cendant Hotel Group. In connection with a
plan by Cendant Corporation (Cendant or former
Parent; known as Avis Budget Group since August 29,
2006) to separate into four independent, publicly traded
companiesone each for Cendants former hospitality
services (including timeshare resorts), real estate services
(Realogy), travel distribution services
(Travelport) and vehicle rental services (Avis
Budget Group) businesses (Separation), on
July 13, 2006, Cendant Hotel Group changed its name to
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation. On April 24, 2006, Cendant
modified its previously announced Separation plan to explore the
possible sale of Travelport. On June 30, 2006, Cendant
entered into a definitive agreement to sell Travelport to an
affiliate of the Blackstone Group for $4,300 million in
cash and on August 22, 2006, the sale of Travelport closed.
Pursuant to the plan of Separation, the Company received
approximately $760 million of the proceeds from such sale,
which could be subject to post-closing adjustments.
On July 13, 2006, Cendants Board of Directors
approved the distribution of all of the shares of common stock
of Wyndham. In connection with the distribution, the Company
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC) an Information Statement, dated July 13,
2006 (the Information Statement), which describes
for stockholders the details of the distribution and provides
information on the business and management of Wyndham. The
Company mailed the Information Statement to Cendant stockholders
shortly after the July 21, 2006 record date for the
distribution. Prior to July 31, 2006, Cendant transferred
to Wyndham all of the assets and liabilities primarily related
to the hospitality services (including timeshare resorts)
businesses of Cendant and, on July 31, 2006, Cendant
distributed all of the shares of Wyndham common stock to the
holders of Cendant common stock issued and outstanding on
July 21, 2006, the record date for the distribution. The
Separation was effective on July 31, 2006. On
August 1, 2006, the Company commenced regular
way trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the
symbol WYN.
The Companys consolidated and combined results of
operations, financial position and cash flows may not be
indicative of its future performance and do not necessarily
reflect what its consolidated results of operations, financial
position and cash flows would have been had the Company operated
as a separate, stand-alone entity during the periods presented
prior to August 1, 2006, including changes in its
operations and capitalization as a result of the Separation and
distribution from Cendant.
Certain corporate and general and administrative expenses,
including those related to executive management, tax,
accounting, payroll, legal and treasury services, certain
employee benefits and real estate usage for common space were
allocated by Cendant to the Company through July 31, 2006
based on forecasted revenues or usage. Management believes such
allocations were reasonable. However, the associated expenses
recorded by the Company in the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income may not be indicative of the actual
expenses that would have been incurred had the Company been
operating as a separate, stand-alone public company for the
periods presented prior to August 1, 2006. Following the
Separation and distribution from Cendant, the Company began
performing these functions using internal resources or purchased
services, certain of which are provided by Cendant or one of the
separated companies during a transitional period pursuant to the
Transition Services Agreement. Refer to
Note 21Related Party Transactions for a detailed
description of the Companys transactions with Cendant and
its former subsidiaries.
In managements opinion, the Consolidated and Combined
Financial Statements contain all normal recurring adjustments
necessary for a fair presentation of annual results reported.
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts
to conform to the current period presentation.
Business
Description
The Company operates in the following business segments:
|
|
|
|
|
Lodgingfranchises hotels in the upscale,
middle and economy segments of the lodging industry and provides
property management services to owners of luxury and upscale
hotels.
|
F-7
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentalsprovides
vacation exchange products and services to owners of intervals
of vacation ownership interests and markets vacation rental
properties primarily on behalf of independent owners.
|
|
|
|
Vacation Ownershipmarkets and sells vacation
ownership interests (VOIs) to individual consumers,
provides consumer financing in connection with the sale of VOIs
and provides property management services at resorts.
|
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Principles
of Consolidation
The Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements include the
accounts and transactions of Wyndham, as well as entities in
which Wyndham directly or indirectly has a controlling financial
interest and various entities in which Wyndham has investments
recorded under the equity method of accounting. The Consolidated
and Combined Financial Statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. All intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated in the Consolidated and
Combined Financial Statements.
In connection with Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Interpretation No. 46 (Revised 2003),
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
(FIN 46), when evaluating an entity for
consolidation, the Company first determines whether an entity is
within the scope of FIN 46 and if it is deemed to be a
variable interest entity (VIE). If the entity is
considered to be a VIE, the Company determines whether it would
be considered the entitys primary beneficiary. The Company
consolidates those VIEs for which it has determined that it is
the primary beneficiary. The Company will consolidate an entity
not deemed either a VIE or qualifying special purpose entity
(QSPE) upon a determination that its ownership,
direct or indirect, exceeds 50% of the outstanding voting shares
of an entity
and/or that
it has the ability to control the financial or operating
policies through its voting rights, board representation or
other similar rights. For entities where the Company does not
have a controlling interest (financial or operating), the
investments in such entities are classified as
available-for-sale
securities or accounted for using the equity or cost method, as
appropriate. The Company applies the equity method of accounting
when it has the ability to exercise significant influence over
operating and financial policies of an investee in accordance
with Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion
No. 18, The Equity Method of Accounting for
Investments in Common Stock.
Revenue
Recognition
Lodging
The Company enters into agreements to franchise its lodging
franchise systems to independent hotel owners. The
Companys standard franchise agreement typically has a term
of 15 to 20 years and provides a franchisee with certain
rights to terminate the franchise agreement before the term of
the agreement under certain circumstances. The principal source
of revenues from franchising hotels is ongoing franchise fees,
which are comprised of royalty fees and other fees relating to
marketing and reservation services. Ongoing franchise fees
typically are based on a percentage of gross room revenues of
each franchised hotel and are accrued as earned and upon
becoming due from the franchisee. An estimate of uncollectible
ongoing franchise fees is charged to bad debt expense and
included in operating expenses on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income. Lodging revenues also include initial
franchise fees, which are recognized as revenue when all
material services or conditions have been substantially
performed, which is either when a franchised hotel opens for
business or when a franchise agreement is terminated as it has
been determined that the franchised hotel will not open.
The Companys franchise agreements also require payment of
fees for other services, including marketing and reservations.
With such fees, the Company provides its franchised properties
with a suite of operational and administrative services,
including access to an international, centralized,
brand-specific reservations system, advertising, promotional and
co-marketing programs, referrals, technology, training and
volume purchasing. The Company is contractually obligated to
expend the marketing and reservation fees it collects from
franchisees in accordance with the franchise agreements; as
such, revenues earned in excess of costs incurred are accrued as
a liability for future marketing or reservation costs. Costs
incurred in excess of revenues are expensed. In accordance with
the Companys franchise agreements, the Company includes an
allocation of certain overhead costs required to carry out
marketing and reservation activities within marketing and
reservation expenses.
The Company also provides property management services for
hotels under management contracts. The Companys management
fees are comprised of base fees, which are typically calculated
based upon a specified
F-8
percentage of gross revenues from hotel operations, and
incentive management fees, which are typically calculated based
upon a specified percentage of a hotels gross operating
profit. Management fee revenue is recognized when earned in
accordance with the terms of the contract. The Company incurs
certain reimbursable costs on behalf of managed hotel properties
and report reimbursements received from managed properties as
revenue and the costs incurred on their behalf as expenses.
Management fees and reimbursement revenue are recorded as a
component of service fees and membership revenue on the
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income. The costs, which
principally relate to payroll costs for operational employees
who work at the managed hotels, are reflected as a component of
operating expenses on the Consolidated and Combined Statements
of Income. The reimbursements from hotel owners are based upon
the costs incurred with no added margin; as a result, these
reimbursable costs have little to no effect on the
Companys operating income. Management fee revenue and
revenue related to payroll reimbursements were $4 million
and $69 million, in 2006, respectively, and $1 million
and $17 million, respectively, for the period
October 11, 2005 (date of Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand
acquisition, which includes management contracts) through
December 31, 2005.
Vacation
Exchange and Rentals
As a provider of vacation exchange services, the Company enters
into affiliation agreements with developers of vacation
ownership properties to allow owners of intervals to trade their
intervals for certain other intervals within the Companys
vacation exchange business and, for some members, for other
leisure-related products and services. Additionally, as a
marketer of vacation rental properties, generally the Company
enters into contracts for exclusive periods of time with
property owners to market the rental of such properties to
rental customers. The Companys vacation exchange business
derives a majority of its revenues from annual membership dues
and exchange fees from members trading their intervals. Annual
dues revenue represents the annual membership fees from members
who participate in the Companys vacation exchange
business. For additional fees, such participants are entitled to
exchange intervals for intervals at other properties affiliated
with the Companys vacation exchange business. In addition,
certain participants may exchange intervals for other
leisure-related products and services. The Company records
revenue from annual membership dues as deferred income on the
Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheets and recognizes it on a
straight-line basis over the membership period during which
delivery of publications, if applicable, and other services are
provided to the members. Exchange fees are generated when
members exchange their intervals for equivalent values of rights
and services, which may include intervals at other properties
within the Companys vacation exchange business or other
leisure-related products and services. Exchange fees are
recognized as revenue when the exchange requests have been
confirmed to the member. The Companys vacation rentals
business derives its revenue principally from fees, which
generally range from approximately 40% to 60% of the gross rent
charged to rental customers. The majority of the time, the
Company acts on behalf of the owners of the rental properties to
generate the Companys fees. The Company provides
reservation services to the independent property owners and
receives the
agreed-upon
fee for the service provided. The Company remits the gross
rental fee received from the renter to the independent property
owner, net of the Companys
agreed-upon
fee. Revenue from such fees is recognized in the period that the
rental reservation is made, net of expected cancellations. Upon
confirmation of the rental reservation, the rental customer and
property owner generally have a direct relationship for
additional services to be performed. Cancellations for 2006 and
2005 each totaled less than 5% of rental transactions booked.
The Companys revenue is earned when evidence of an
arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or the services have
been rendered, the sellers price to the buyer is fixed or
determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. The
Company also earns rental fees in connection with properties it
owns or leases under capital leases and such fees are recognized
when the rental customers stay occurs, as this is the
point at which the service is rendered.
Vacation
Ownership
The Company markets and sells VOIs to individual consumers,
provides consumer financing in connection with the sale of VOIs
and provides property management services at resorts. The
Companys vacation ownership business derives the majority
of its revenues from sales of VOIs and derives other revenues
from consumer financing and resort management. The
Companys sales of VOIs are either cash sales or
Company-financed sales. In order for the Company to recognize
revenues of VOI sales under the full accrual method of
accounting described in Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 66 Accounting of
Sales of Real Estate for fully constructed inventory, a
binding sales contract must have been executed, the statutory
rescission period must have expired (after which time the
purchasers are not entitled to a refund except for non-delivery
by the Company), receivables must have been deemed collectible
and the remainder of the Companys obligations must have
been substantially completed. In addition, before the Company
recognizes any revenues on VOI sales, the purchaser of the VOI
must have met the initial investment criteria and, as
applicable, the continuing investment criteria, by executing a
legally binding financing contract. A purchaser has met the
initial investment criteria when a minimum down payment of 10%
is received by the Company. As a result of the adoption of
SFAS No. 152, Accounting for Real Estate Time-
F-9
Sharing Transactions (SFAS No. 152)
and Statement of Position
No. 04-2,
Accounting for Real Estate Time-Sharing Transactions
(SOP 04-2)
on January 1, 2006, the Company must also take into
consideration the fair value of certain incentives provided to
the purchaser when assessing the adequacy of the
purchasers initial investment. In those cases where
financing is provided to the purchaser by the Company, the
purchaser is obligated to remit monthly payments under financing
contracts that represent the purchasers continuing
investment. The contractual terms of Company-provided financing
arrangements require that the contractual level of annual
principal payments be sufficient to amortize the loan over a
customary period for the VOI being financed, which is generally
seven to ten years, and payments under the financing contracts
begin within 45 days of the sale and receipt of the minimum
down payment of 10%. If all of the criteria for a VOI sale to
qualify under the full accrual method of accounting have been
met, as discussed above, except that construction of the VOI
purchased is not complete, the Company recognizes revenues using
the
percentage-of-completion
method of accounting provided that the preliminary construction
phase is complete and that a minimum sales level has been met
(to assure that the property will not revert to a rental
property). The preliminary stage of development is deemed to be
complete when the engineering and design work is complete, the
construction contracts have been executed, the site has been
cleared, prepared and excavated, and the building foundation is
complete. The completion percentage is determined by the
proportion of real estate inventory costs incurred to total
estimated costs. These estimated costs are based upon historical
experience and the related contractual terms. The remaining
revenue and related costs of sales, including commissions and
direct expenses, are deferred and recognized as the remaining
costs are incurred. Until a contract for sale qualifies for
revenue recognition, all payments received are accounted for as
restricted cash and deposits within other current assets and
deferred income, respectively, on the Consolidated and Combined
Balance Sheets. Commissions and other direct costs related to
the sale are deferred until the sale is recorded. If a contract
is cancelled before qualifying as a sale, non-recoverable
expenses are charged to operating expense in the current period
on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income.
The Company also offers consumer financing as an option to
customers purchasing VOIs, which are typically collateralized by
the underlying VOI. Generally, the financing terms are for seven
to ten years. Prior to 2006, the provision for loan losses was
presented as expense on the Combined Statements of Income. Upon
the adoption of SFAS No. 152 and
SOP 04-2
on January 1, 2006, the provision for loan losses is now
classified as a reduction of vacation ownership interest sales
on the Consolidated Statement of Income. The interest income
earned from the financing arrangements is earned on the
principal balance outstanding over the life of the arrangement.
The Company also provides
day-to-day-management
services, including oversight of housekeeping services,
maintenance and certain accounting and administrative services
for property owners associations and clubs. In some cases,
the Companys employees serve as officers
and/or
directors of these associations and clubs in accordance with
their by-laws and associated regulations. Management fee revenue
is recognized when earned in accordance with the terms of the
contract and is recorded as a component of service fees and
membership on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of
Income. The costs, which principally relate to the payroll costs
for management of the associations, clubs and the resort
properties where the Company is the employer, are reflected as a
component of operating expenses on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income. Reimbursements are based upon the costs
incurred with no added margin and thus presentation of these
reimbursable costs has little to no effect on the Companys
operating income. Management fee revenue and revenue related to
reimbursements were $112 million and $141 million in
2006, respectively, $91 million and $124 million in
2005, respectively, and $95 million and $103 million
in 2004, respectively. In 2006, 2005 and 2004, one of the
associations that the Company manages paid RCI Global Vacation
Network (vacation exchange and rentals) $13 million,
$11 million and $9 million, respectively, for exchange
services.
The Company records lodging-related marketing and reservation
revenues, as well as property management services revenues for
the Companys Lodging and Vacation Ownership segments, in
accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue
99-19,
Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an
Agent, which requires that these revenues be recorded on a
gross basis.
Income
Taxes
The Companys operations were included in the consolidated
federal tax return of Cendant up to the date of the Separation.
In addition, the Company has filed consolidated and unitary
state income tax returns with Cendant in jurisdictions where
required or permitted. The income taxes associated with the
Companys inclusion in Cendants consolidated federal
and state income tax returns are included in the due from former
Parent and subsidiaries line item on the accompanying
Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheets. The provision for
income taxes is computed as if the Company filed its federal and
state income tax returns on a stand-alone basis and, therefore,
determined using the asset and liability method, under which
deferred tax assets and liabilities are calculated based upon
the temporary differences between the financial statement and
income tax bases of assets and liabilities using currently
F-10
enacted tax rates. These differences are based upon estimated
differences between the book and tax basis of the assets and
liabilities for the Company as of December 31, 2006 and
2005. The Companys tax assets and liabilities may be
adjusted in connection with the finalization of Cendants
prior years income tax returns.
The Companys deferred tax assets are recorded net of a
valuation allowance when, based on the weight of available
evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of
the recorded deferred tax assets will not be realized in future
periods. Decreases to the valuation allowance are recorded as
reductions to the Companys provision for income taxes and
increases to the valuation allowance result in additional
provision for income taxes. However, if the valuation allowance
is adjusted in connection with an acquisition, such adjustment
is recorded through goodwill rather than the provision for
income taxes. The realization of the Companys deferred tax
assets, net of the valuation allowance, is primarily dependent
on estimated future taxable income. A change in the
Companys estimate of future taxable income may require an
addition to or reduction from the valuation allowance.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers highly-liquid investments purchased with
an original maturity of three months or less to be cash
equivalents.
Restricted
Cash
Restricted cash consists of deposits received on sales of VOIs
that are held in escrow until a certificate of occupancy is
obtained, the legal rescission period has expired and the deed
of trust has been recorded in governmental property ownership
records, as well as separately held amounts based upon the terms
of the securitizations. Such amounts were $147 million and
$143 million as of December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively, of which $57 million and $42 million,
respectively, are recorded within other current assets and
$90 million and $101 million, respectively, are
recorded within other non-current assets on the Consolidated and
Combined Balance Sheets.
Receivable
Valuation
Trade
receivables
The Companys vacation exchange and rentals and lodging
businesses provide for estimated bad debts based on their
assessment of the ultimate realizability of receivables,
considering historical collection experience, the economic
environment and specific customer information. When the Company
determines that an account is not collectible, the account is
written-off to the allowance for doubtful accounts. Such
write-offs amounted to $57 million, $34 million and
$36 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Bad debt
expense is recorded in operating or marketing and reservation
expenses on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income
and amounted to $58 million, $51 million and
$43 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Vacation
ownership contract receivables
Within the Companys vacation ownership business, the
Company provides for estimated vacation ownership contract
receivable cancellations and defaults at the time the VOI sales
are recorded, by reducing VOI sales with a charge to the
provision for loan losses on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income. Prior to 2006, the provision for loan
losses was presented as expense on the Combined Statements of
Income. Upon the adoption of SFAS No. 152 and
SOP 04-2
on January 1, 2006, the provision for loan losses is now
classified as a reduction of vacation ownership interest sales
on the Consolidated Statement of Income. The Company considers
factors including economic conditions, defaults, past due aging
and historical write-offs of vacation ownership contract
receivables to evaluate the adequacy of the allowance. The
Company charges vacation ownership contract receivables to the
loan loss allowance when they become
90, 120 or 150 days contractually past due depending on the
percentage of the contract price already paid or are deemed uncollectible.
Loyalty
Programs
The Company operates the TripRewards and RCI Elite Rewards
loyalty programs. Members of both programs accumulate points by
purchasing everyday products and services from the various
businesses that participate in the program. TripRewards members
also accumulate points by staying in hotels franchised under one
of the Companys lodging brands (excluding Wyndham Hotels
and Resorts).
F-11
Members may redeem their points for hotel stays, airline
tickets, rental cars, resort vacation, electronics, sporting
goods, movie and theme park tickets and gift certificates. The
points cannot be redeemed for cash. The Company earns revenue
from the TripRewards program when a member stays at a
participating hotel, from a fee charged by the Company to the
franchisee, which is based upon a percentage of room revenue
generated from such stay. This fee is incremental to the
standard franchise, marketing and reservation fees charged by
the Company. The Company earns revenue from the RCI Elite
Rewards program based upon a percentage of the members
spending on the credit cards and such revenue is paid to the
Company by a third-party issuing bank. The Company also incurs
costs to support these programs, which primarily relate to
marketing expenses to promote the programs, costs to administer
the programs and costs of members redemptions.
As members earn points through the Companys loyalty
programs, the Company records a liability of the estimated
future redemption costs, which is calculated based on (i) a
cost per point and (ii) an estimated redemption rate of the
overall points earned, which is determined through historical
experience, current trends and the use of an independent
third-party valuation firm. Revenues relating to the loyalty
programs are recorded in other revenue in the Consolidated and
Combined Statements of Income and amounted to $71 million,
$56 million and $23 million while total expenses
amounted to $56 million, $49 million and
$23 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The
points liability as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 amounted
to $43 million and $39 million, respectively, and is
included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities and
other non-current liabilities in the Consolidated and Combined
Balance Sheets.
Inventory
Inventory primarily consists of real estate and development
costs of completed VOIs, VOIs under construction, land held for
future VOI development, vacation ownership properties and
vacation credits. Inventory is stated at the lower of cost,
including capitalized interest, property taxes and certain other
carrying costs incurred during the construction process, or net
realizable value. Capitalized interest was $16 million,
$7 million and $5 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively.
Advertising
Expense
Advertising costs are generally expensed in the period incurred.
Advertising expenses, recorded primarily within marketing and
reservation expenses on the Consolidated and Combined Statements
of Income, were $90 million, $66 million and
$61 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Use
of Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of the Consolidated and Combined Financial
Statements requires the Company to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities in the Consolidated and
Combined Financial Statements and accompanying notes. Although
these estimates and assumptions are based on the Companys
knowledge of current events and actions the Company may
undertake in the future, actual results may ultimately differ
from estimates and assumptions.
Derivative
Instruments
The Company uses derivative instruments as part of its overall
strategy to manage its exposure to market risks primarily
associated with fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates
and interest rates. As a matter of policy, the Company does not
use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. All
derivatives are recorded at fair value either as assets or
liabilities. Changes in fair value of derivatives not designated
as hedging instruments and of derivatives designated as fair
value hedging instruments are recognized currently in earnings
and included either as a component of other revenues or interest
expense, based upon the nature of the hedged item, in the
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income. The effective
portion of changes in fair value of derivatives designated as
cash flow hedging instruments is recorded as a component of
other comprehensive income. The ineffective portion is reported
currently in earnings as a component of revenues or net interest
expense, based upon the nature of the hedged item. Amounts
included in other comprehensive income are reclassified into
earnings in the same period during which the hedged item affects
earnings.
Certain derivative instruments used to manage interest rate
risks of the Company prior to the Separation were entered into
on behalf of the Company by Cendant. The fair value of the
instruments was recorded on Cendants Consolidated Balance
Sheets and passed to the Company through the related party
accounts, which are presented on the Consolidated and Combined
Balance Sheets within the due from former Parent and
subsidiaries line item. The
F-12
derivatives that were designated as cash flow hedging
instruments by Cendant did not qualify for hedge accounting
treatment on the Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements
as the derivative remained on Cendants balance sheet and
the underlying debt instrument resides on the Consolidated and
Combined Financial Statements. Therefore, any changes in fair
value of these instruments were recognized in the Consolidated
and Combined Statements of Income.
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment (including leasehold improvements) are
recorded at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and
amortization. Depreciation, recorded as a component of
depreciation and amortization on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income, is computed utilizing the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets.
Amortization of leasehold improvements, also recorded as a
component of depreciation and amortization, is computed
utilizing the straight-line method over the estimated benefit
period of the related assets or the lease term, if shorter.
Useful lives are generally 30 years for buildings, up to
15 years for leasehold improvements, from 20 to
30 years for vacation rental properties and from three to
seven years for furniture, fixtures and equipment.
The Company capitalizes the costs of software developed for
internal use in accordance with Statement of Position
No. 98-1,
Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or
Obtained for Internal Use. Capitalization of software
developed for internal use commences during the development
phase of the project. The Company amortizes software developed
or obtained for internal use on a straight-line basis, from
three to five years, commencing when such software is
substantially ready for use. The net carrying value of software
developed or obtained for internal use was $82 million and
$56 million as of December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
In connection with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets (SFAS No. 142), the
Company is required to assess goodwill and other
indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually, or
more frequently if circumstances indicate impairment may have
occurred. The Company assesses goodwill for such impairment by
comparing the carrying value of its reporting units to their
fair values. Each of the Companys reportable segments
represents a reporting unit. The Company determines the fair
value of its reporting units utilizing discounted cash flows and
incorporates assumptions that it believes marketplace
participants would utilize. When available and as appropriate,
the Company uses comparative market multiples and other factors
to corroborate the discounted cash flow results. Other
indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment and
written down to fair value, if necessary, as required by SFAS
No. 142. The Company performs its annual impairment testing
in the fourth quarter of each year subsequent to completing its
annual forecasting process. In performing this test, the Company
determines fair value using the present value of expected future
cash flows.
The Company evaluates the recoverability of its other long-lived
assets, including amortizable intangible assets, if
circumstances indicate an impairment may have occurred pursuant
to SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. This analysis is performed
by comparing the respective carrying values of the assets to the
current and expected future cash flows, on an undiscounted
basis, to be generated from such assets. Property and equipment
is evaluated separately within each business. If such analysis
indicates that the carrying value of these assets is not
recoverable, the carrying value of such assets is reduced to
fair value through a charge to the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income.
During the fourth quarter of 2006, the Company announced that it
would change its Fairfield Resorts and Trendwest branding to
Wyndham Vacation Resorts and WorldMark by Wyndham, respectively.
As a result, the Company recorded an impairment charge of
$11 million in its Vacation Ownership Segment
relating to the rebranding initiatives. A third party valuation
analysis was performed utilizing future cash flows of the
underlying trademarks to arrive at the trademarks fair
value. The resulting impairment charge was recorded as a
component of separation and related costs within the
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income. In addition, the
remaining trademark value of $2 million will be amortized
over the next 12 months. There were no impairments relating
to intangible assets or other long-lived assets during 2005 or
2004.
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consists of
accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments,
accumulated unrealized gains and losses on derivative
instruments designated as cash flow hedges and pension related
costs. Foreign currency translation adjustments exclude income
taxes related to indefinite investments in foreign subsidiaries.
Assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries having
non-U.S.-dollar
functional
F-13
currencies are translated at exchange rates at the Consolidated
and Combined Balance Sheet dates. Revenues and expenses are
translated at average exchange rates during the periods
presented. The gains or losses resulting from translating
foreign currency financial statements into U.S. dollars,
net of hedging gains or losses and taxes, are included in
accumulated other comprehensive income on the Consolidated and
Combined Balance Sheets. Gains or losses resulting from foreign
currency transactions are included in the Consolidated and
Combined Statements of Income.
Stock-Based
Compensation
On January 1, 2003, Cendant adopted the fair value method
of accounting for stock-based compensation provisions of
SFAS No. 123. Cendant and the Company also adopted
SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based
CompensationTransition and Disclosure, in its
entirety as of January 1, 2003, which amended
SFAS No. 123 to provide alternative methods of
transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method
of accounting provisions. As a result, all employee stock awards
have been expensed over their vesting periods based upon the
fair value of the award on the date of grant. As Cendant elected
to use the prospective transition method, Cendant allocated
expense to the Company only for employee stock awards that were
granted subsequent to December 31, 2002. See
Note 16Stock-Based Compensation for more information.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123
(revised 2004), Share-Based Payment
(SFAS No. 123(R)), which eliminates the
alternative to measure stock-based compensation awards using the
intrinsic value approach permitted by APB Opinion No. 25
and by SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation. The Company adopted
SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006, which
required the Company to measure all employee stock-based
compensation awards using a fair value method and record the
related expense in the financial statements. The Company elected
to use the modified prospective transition method, which
requires that compensation cost be recognized in the financial
statements for all awards granted after the date of adoption as
well as for existing awards for which the requisite service has
not been rendered as of the date of adoption and requires that
prior periods not be restated. Because the Company was allocated
stock-based compensation expense for all outstanding employee
stock awards prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R),
the adoption of such standard did not have a material impact on
the Companys results of operations.
In October 2005, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
(FSP)
No. 123R-2,
Practical Accommodation to the Application of Grant Date as
Defined in FASB Statement No. 123R (FSP
123R-2), to provide guidance on determining the grant date
for an award as defined in SFAS No. 123(R). FSP 123R-2
stipulates that, assuming all other criteria in the grant date
definition are met, a mutual understanding of the key terms and
conditions of an award to an individual employee is presumed to
exist upon the awards approval in accordance with the
relevant corporate governance requirements, provided that the
key terms and conditions of an award (i) cannot be
negotiated by the recipient with the employer because the award
is a unilateral grant and (ii) are expected to be
communicated to an individual recipient within a relatively
short time period from the date of approval. The Company has
applied the principles set forth in FSP 123R-2 in connection
with its adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) on
January 1, 2006.
Paragraph 81 of SFAS No. 123(R) requires an
entity to calculate the pool of excess tax benefits available to
absorb tax deficiencies recognized subsequent to adopting
SFAS No. 123(R) (APIC Pool). In November
2005, the FASB issued FSP
No. 123R-3,
Transition Election Related to Accounting for the Tax Effects
of Share-Based Payment Awards (FSP 123R-3), to
provide an alternative transition election related to accounting
for the tax effects of share-based payment awards to employees
to the guidance provided in Paragraph 81 of
SFAS No. 123(R). The Company elected to adopt the
transition method described in FSP 123R-3. Utilizing the
calculation method described in FSP 123R-3, the Company
calculated its APIC Pool as of January 1, 2006 associated
with stock options that were fully vested as of
December 31, 2005. The impact on the APIC Pool for stock
options that are partially vested at, or granted subsequent to,
December 31, 2005 is being determined in accordance with
SFAS No. 123(R).
In connection with the distribution of the shares of common
stock of Wyndham to Cendant stockholders, on July 31, 2006,
the Compensation Committee of Cendants Board of Directors
approved the full vesting of all Cendant equity awards
(including Wyndham awards granted as an adjustment to such
Cendant equity awards) on August 15, 2006. As a result of
the acceleration of the vesting of these awards, the Company
recorded non-cash compensation expense of $45 million
during the third quarter of 2006. In connection with the
acceleration of the equity awards, an APIC Pool detriment of
$9 million was created as the tax deduction of the equity
awards was lower than the deferred tax asset recognized. As of
January 1, 2006, the Company had no APIC Pool. During 2006,
the Company created an APIC Pool of approximately
$2 million through other vesting activities. As a result of
the write off of the $9 million excess deferred tax asset,
the Company recorded a tax provision of $7 million on its
Consolidated Statement of Income during the year ended
December 31, 2006 and a reduction to additional paid-in
capital of $2 million on its Consolidated Balance Sheet as
of December 31, 2006.
F-14
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Vacation Ownership Transactions. In December 2004, the
FASB issued SFAS No. 152 in connection with the
issuance of the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants
SOP 04-2.
SFAS No. 152 provides guidance on revenue recognition
for vacation ownership transactions, accounting and presentation
for the uncollectibility of vacation ownership contract
receivables, accounting for costs of sales of vacation ownership
interests and related costs, accounting for operations during
holding periods and other transactions associated with vacation
ownership operations.
The Companys revenue recognition policy for vacation
ownership transactions has historically required a 10% minimum
down payment (initial investment) as a prerequisite to
recognizing revenue on the sale of a vacation ownership
interest. SFAS No. 152 requires that the Company
consider the fair value of certain incentives provided to the
buyer when assessing whether such threshold has been achieved.
If the buyers investment has not met the minimum
investment criteria of SFAS No. 152, the revenue
associated with the sale of the vacation ownership interest and
the related cost of sales and direct costs are deferred until
the buyers commitment satisfies the requirements of
SFAS No. 152. In addition, certain costs previously
included in the Companys
percentage-of-completion
calculation prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 152 are
now expensed as incurred rather than deferred until the
corresponding revenue is recognized.
SFAS No. 152 requires the Company to record the
estimate of uncollectible vacation ownership contract
receivables, without consideration of estimated inventory
recoveries, at the time a vacation ownership transaction is
consummated as a reduction of net revenue. Prior to the adoption
of SFAS No. 152, the Company recorded such provisions
within operating expense on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income. SFAS No. 152 also requires a
change in accounting for inventory and cost of sales such that
cost of sales is allocated based on a relative sales value
method, under which cost of sales is calculated as an estimated
percentage of net sales.
SFAS No. 152 also requires that revenue in excess of
costs associated with the rental of unsold units be accounted
for as a reduction to the carrying value of vacation ownership
inventory (which reduces the cost of such inventory when it is
sold) and that costs in excess of revenues associated with the
rental of unsold units be charged to expense as incurred. Prior
to the adoption of SFAS No. 152, rental revenues and
expenses were separately recorded in the Consolidated and
Combined Statements of Income.
The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 152
effective January 1, 2006, as required, and recorded an
after tax charge of $65 million during the first quarter of
2006 as a cumulative effect of an accounting change, which
consisted of (i) a pre-tax charge of $105 million
representing the deferral of revenue, costs associated with
sales of vacation ownership interests that were recognized prior
to January 1, 2006 and the recognition of certain expenses
that were previously deferred and (ii) an associated tax
benefit of $40 million. Excluding the impact of the
cumulative effect of an accounting change, the impact of
SFAS No. 152 on the Companys 2006 results was a
reduction of revenues of $208 million and an increase to
net income of $6 million ($0.03 increase in diluted
earnings per share). There was no impact to cash flows from the
adoption of SFAS No. 152.
Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. In May 2005,
the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes
and Error Corrections, a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20
and FASB Statement No. 3
(SFAS No. 154). SFAS No. 154
requires retrospective application to prior periods
financial statements of a voluntary change in accounting
principle unless it is impracticable. APB Opinion No. 20,
Accounting Changes, previously required that most
voluntary changes in accounting principle be recognized by
including in net income of the period of the change the
cumulative effect of changing to the new accounting principle.
SFAS No. 154 became effective for the Company on
January 1, 2006. There was no impact to the Consolidated
and Combined Financial Statements from the adoption of
SFAS No. 154.
Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets. In March
2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, Accounting
for Servicing of Financial Assetsan amendment of FASB
Statement No. 140
(SFAS No. 156). SFAS No. 156
requires an entity to recognize a servicing asset or servicing
liability each time it undertakes an obligation to service a
financial asset by entering into a servicing contract and
requires all separately recognized servicing assets and
servicing liabilities to be initially measured at fair value, if
practicable. SFAS No. 156 will become effective for
the Company on January 1, 2007. The Company believes that
the adoption of SFAS No. 156 will not have a material
impact on its Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements.
Variability to Be Considered in Applying FASB Interpretation
No. 46(R). In April 2006, the FASB issued FASB Staff
Position (FSP)
FIN 46R-6,
Determining the Variability to Be Considered in Applying
FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)
(FIN 46R-6).
FIN 46R-6
addresses certain implementation issues related to FASB
Interpretation No. 46
F-15
(revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities (FIN 46R).
Specifically,
FIN 46R-6
addresses how a reporting enterprise should determine the
variability to be considered in applying FIN 46R. The
variability that is considered in applying FIN 46R affects
the determination of (i) whether an entity is a VIE,
(ii) which interests are variable interests in
the entity, and (iii) which party, if any, is the primary
beneficiary of the VIE. Such variability affects any calculation
of expected losses and expected residual returns, if such a
calculation is necessary. The Company is required to apply the
guidance in
FIN 46R-6
prospectively to all entities (including newly created entities)
and to all entities previously required to be analyzed under
FIN 46R when a reconsideration event has
occurred, beginning on July 1, 2006. The application of
such guidance had no impact on the Consolidated and Combined
Financial Statements.
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. In June 2006,
the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxesan
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(FIN 48), which is an interpretation of
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes.
FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement
attribute for the financial statement recognition and
measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a
tax return. For those benefits to be recognized, a tax position
must be more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination by
taxing authorities. The amount recognized is measured as the
largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent
likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company
will adopt the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1,
2007, as required. The Companys adoption of FIN 48 is
expected to result in a decrease to stockholders equity as
of January 1, 2007 of between $15 million to
$25 million.
Fair Value Measurements. In September 2006, the FASB
issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS No. 157).
SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about
fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 explains the
definition of fair value as the price that would be received to
sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
SFAS No. 157 clarifies the principle that fair value
should be based on the assumptions market participants would use
when pricing the asset or liability and establishes a fair value
hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those
assumptions. The Company plans to adopt SFAS No. 157
on January 1, 2007, as required, and is currently assessing
the impact of such adoption on its Consolidated and Combined
Financial Statements.
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
Other Postretirement Plans. In September 2006, the FASB
issued SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting
for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plansan amendment of SFAS No. 87, 88, 106 and
132(R) (SFAS No. 158).
SFAS No. 158 requires the Company to recognize the
overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit
postretirement plan as an asset or liability in its statement of
financial position and recognize changes in the funded status in
the year in which the changes occur. The Company adopted
SFAS No. 158 effective December 31, 2006, as
required. The impact of such standard was immaterial on pension
liabilities or accumulated other comprehensive income.
Effects of Prior Year Misstatements. In September 2006,
the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of
Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in
Current Year Financial Statements
(SAB 108). SAB 108 was issued in order to
eliminate the diversity of practice in how public companies
quantify misstatements of financial statements, including
misstatements that were not material to prior years
financial statements. The Company adopted the provisions of
SAB 108 effective December 31, 2006, as required. The
adoption of such provisions did not impact the Consolidated and
Combined Financial Statements.
The computation of basic and diluted earnings per share
(EPS) is based on the Companys net income (and
other comparable earnings measures) divided by the basic
weighted average number of common shares and diluted weighted
average number of common shares, respectively. On July 31,
2006, the Separation from Cendant was completed in a tax-free
distribution to the Companys stockholders of one share of
Wyndham common stock for every five shares of Cendant common
stock held on July 21, 2006. As a result, on July 31,
2006, the Company had 200,362,113 shares of common stock
outstanding. This share amount has been utilized for the
calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share for all
periods presented prior to the date of Separation.
F-16
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and
diluted EPS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
$
|
352
|
|
|
$
|
431
|
|
|
$
|
349
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
change, net of tax
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
$
|
431
|
|
|
$
|
349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares
outstanding
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
Stock options and restricted stock
units
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares
outstanding
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per
share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
$
|
1.78
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
change, net of tax
|
|
|
(0.33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per
share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
change, net of tax
|
|
|
(0.33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1.44
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The computations of diluted net income per common share
available to common stockholders for the year ended
December 31, 2006 do not include approximately
16 million stock options and stock-settled stock
appreciation rights (SSARs), as the effect of their
inclusion would have been anti-dilutive to earnings per share.
Assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations
were recorded on the Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheets as
of the respective acquisition dates based upon their estimated
fair values at such dates. The results of operations of
businesses acquired by the Company have been included in the
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income since their
respective dates of acquisition. The excess of the purchase
price over the estimated fair values of the underlying assets
acquired and liabilities assumed was allocated to goodwill. In
certain circumstances, the allocations of the excess purchase
price are based upon preliminary estimates and assumptions.
Accordingly, the allocations may be subject to revision when the
Company receives final information, including appraisals and
other analyses. Any revisions to the fair values during the
allocation period, which may be significant, will be recorded by
the Company as further adjustments to the purchase price
allocations. The Company is also in the process of integrating
the operations of its acquired businesses and expects to incur
costs relating to such integrations. These costs may result from
integrating operating systems, relocating employees, closing
facilities, reducing duplicative efforts and exiting and
consolidating other activities. These costs will be recorded on
the Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheets as adjustments to
the purchase price or on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income as expenses, as appropriate.
2006
Acquisitions
Baymont. On April 7, 2006, the Company completed the
acquisition of the Baymont Inn & Suites brand
(Baymont), a system of 115 independently-owned
franchised properties, for approximately $60 million in
cash. The purchase price resulted in the recognition of
$47 million of trademarks and $14 million of franchise
agreements, both of which were assigned to the Companys
Lodging segment. Management believes this acquisition solidifies
the Companys presence in the growing midscale lodging
segment.
Other. On July 20, 2006, the Company acquired a
vacation ownership and resort management business for aggregate
consideration of $43 million in cash. The goodwill
resulting from the preliminary allocation of the purchase price
for this acquisition aggregated $34 million, none of which
is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. Such goodwill was
allocated to the Companys Vacation Ownership segment. This
acquisition also resulted in $12 million of other
amortizable intangible assets (primarily customer lists).
F-17
2005
Acquisitions
Wyndham. On October 11, 2005, the Company acquired
the franchise and property management business associated with
the Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand for $113 million in
cash. The acquisition includes franchise agreements, management
contracts and the worldwide rights to the Wyndham brand. This
acquisition resulted in goodwill of $24 million, all of
which is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. Such
goodwill was allocated to the Companys Lodging segment.
This acquisition also resulted in $85 million of other
intangible assets, such as trademarks and franchise agreements.
This acquisition added an upscale brand to the Companys
lodging portfolio and also represented the Companys entry
into hotel property management services.
Other. During 2005, the Company also acquired three other
individually non-significant businesses for aggregate
consideration of $36 million in cash. The goodwill
resulting from the allocation of the purchase prices of these
acquisitions aggregated $21 million, $1 million of
which is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. The
goodwill was allocated to the Vacation Exchange and Rentals
($4 million) and Vacation Ownership ($17 million)
segments. These acquisitions also resulted in $1 million of
other intangible assets.
2004
Acquisitions
Two Flags Joint Venture LLC. In 2002, the Company formed
Two Flags Joint Venture LLC (Two Flags) through the
contribution of its domestic Days Inn trademark and related
license agreements. The Company did not contribute any other
assets to Two Flags. The Company then sold 49.9999% of Two Flags
to Marriott in exchange for the contribution to Two Flags of the
domestic Ramada trademark and related license agreements. The
Company retained a 50.0001% controlling equity interest in Two
Flags. Both Marriott and the Company had the right, but were not
obligated, to cause the sale of Marriotts interest at any
time after March 1, 2004 for approximately
$200 million, which represented the projected fair market
value of Marriotts interest at such time. On April 1,
2004, the Company exercised its right to purchase
Marriotts interest in Two Flags for approximately
$200 million. In connection with such transaction, the
Company assumed a note payable of approximately
$200 million, bearing interest at 10%, which was paid in
September 2004. As a result, the Company now owns 100% of Two
Flags and has exclusive rights to the domestic Ramada and Days
Inn trademarks and the related license agreements. This
acquisition added a well-known middle market brand to the
Companys lodging portfolio.
Pursuant to the terms of the venture, the Company and Marriott
shared income from Two Flags on a substantially equal basis. For
the period January 1, 2004 through April 1, 2004 (the
date on which the Company purchased Marriotts interest)
the Company recorded pre-tax minority interest expense of
$6 million in connection with Two Flags.
Ramada International. On December 10, 2004, the
Company acquired Ramada International, which included the
international franchise rights of the Ramada hotel chain for
$38 million in cash. The allocation of the purchase price
resulted in goodwill of $2 million, all of which is
expected to be deductible for tax purposes. Such goodwill was
allocated to the Companys Lodging segment. This
acquisition also resulted in $33 million of other
intangible assets. As a result of this acquisition, the Company
obtained the worldwide rights to the Ramada trademark and a
platform to expand direct franchising internationally.
Landal GreenParks. On May 5, 2004, the Company
acquired Landal GreenParks, a Dutch vacation rental company that
specializes in the rental of privately-owned vacation homes
located in European holiday parks, for $81 million in cash,
net of cash acquired of $22 million. As part of this
acquisition, the Company also assumed $78 million of debt.
The allocation of the purchase price resulted in goodwill of
$56 million, of which $7 million is expected to be
deductible for tax purposes. Such goodwill was allocated to the
Companys Vacation Exchange and Rentals segment. This
acquisition also resulted in $41 million of other
intangible assets. Management believed that this acquisition
offered the Company increased access to both the Dutch and
German consumer markets, as well as rental properties in high
demand locations.
Canvas Holidays Limited. On October 8, 2004, the
Company acquired Canvas Holidays Limited, a tour operator based
in Scotland, for $51 million in cash. This acquisition
resulted in goodwill of $25 million, none of which is
expected to be deductible for tax purposes. Such goodwill was
allocated to the Companys Vacation Exchange and Rentals
segment. This acquisition also resulted in $8 million of
other intangible assets. Management believed that this
acquisition broadened the Companys product depth in the
European vacation market.
Other. During 2004, the Company also acquired one other
non-significant business for $8 million in cash. The
goodwill resulting from the allocation of the purchase price of
this acquisition was $4 million, none of which is
F-18
expected to be deductible for tax purposes, and was allocated to
the Vacation Exchange and Rentals segment. This acquisition also
resulted in $1 million of other intangible assets.
Intangible assets consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Unamortized Intangible
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
2,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks (a)
|
|
$
|
619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized Intangible
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchise
agreements (b)
|
|
$
|
596
|
|
|
$
|
238
|
|
|
$
|
358
|
|
|
$
|
573
|
|
|
$
|
220
|
|
|
$
|
353
|
|
Other (c)
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
678
|
|
|
$
|
259
|
|
|
$
|
419
|
|
|
$
|
734
|
|
|
$
|
322
|
|
|
$
|
412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Comprised of various trade names
(including the worldwide Wyndham Hotels and Resorts, Ramada,
Days Inn, RCI, Landal GreenParks, Fairfield, Trendwest, and
Baymont Inn & Suites trade names) that the Company has
acquired and which distinguishes the Companys consumer
services. These trade names are expected to generate future cash
flows for an indefinite period of time.
|
|
(b)
|
|
Generally amortized over a period
ranging from 20 to 40 years with a weighted average life of
35 years.
|
|
(c)
|
|
Includes customer lists and
business contracts, generally amortized over a period ranging
from 10 to 30 years with a weighted average life of
19 years, and trademarks, amortized over the next
12 months. During 2006, the Company wrote off
$100 million of fully amortized customer lists at the
Companys Vacation Exchange and Rentals business.
|
During the fourth quarter of 2006, the Company recorded an
$11 million impairment charge due to a rebranding
initiative for its Fairfield and Trendwest trademarks (see
Note 2Summary of Significant Accounting
PoliciesImpairment of Long-Lived Assets for more
information). The remaining $2 million of trademarks for
Fairfield and Trendwest have been reclassified into Other
Amortized Intangible Assets.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
to Goodwill
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Balance as of
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
during 2006
|
|
|
during 2005
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
241
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
(b)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
245
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
1,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
(c)
|
|
|
1,116
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
1,322
|
|
|
|
34
|
(a)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)(d)
|
|
|
1,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company
|
|
$
|
2,645
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
2,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Relates to the acquisition of a
vacation ownership and resort management business (see
Note 4Acquisitions).
|
|
(b)
|
|
Relates to the acquisition of the
Wyndham Hotels and Resorts brand (see
Note 4Acquisitions).
|
|
(c)
|
|
Primarily relates to foreign
exchange translation adjustments.
|
|
(d)
|
|
Relates to the settlement of the
ultimate tax basis of acquired assets with the tax authority.
|
F-19
Amortization expense relating to all intangible assets was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Franchise agreements
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
Other
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (*)
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
Included as a component of
depreciation and amortization on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income.
|
Based on the Companys amortizable intangible assets as of
December 31, 2006, the Company expects related amortization
expense for the five succeeding fiscal years to approximate
$24 million, $23 million and $22 million during
2007, 2008, and 2009, respectively, and $21 million during
both 2010 and 2011.
|
|
6.
|
Franchising
and Marketing/Reservation Activities
|
Franchise fee revenue of $501 million, $434 million
and $393 million on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income for 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively,
includes initial franchise fees of $7 million,
$7 million and $6 million, respectively.
As part of the ongoing franchise fees, the Company receives
marketing and reservation fees from its lodging franchisees,
which generally are calculated based on a specified percentage
of gross room revenues. Such fees totaled $223 million,
$189 million and $171 million during 2006, 2005 and
2004, respectively, and are recorded within the franchise fees
line item on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income.
As provided for in the franchise agreements, all of these fees
are to be expended for marketing purposes or the operation of an
international, centralized, brand-specific reservation system
for the respective franchisees. Additionally, the Company is
required to provide certain services to its franchisees,
including access to an international, centralized,
brand-specific reservation system, advertising, promotional and
co-marketing programs, referrals, technology, training and
volume purchasing.
The number of franchised lodging outlets in operation by market
sector is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Upscale (a)
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middle (b)
|
|
|
1,727
|
|
|
|
1,634
|
|
|
|
1,719
|
|
Economy (c)
|
|
|
4,647
|
|
|
|
4,613
|
|
|
|
4,680
|
|
Managed, Non-Proprietary
Hotels (d)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,473
|
|
|
|
6,348
|
|
|
|
6,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Comprised of the Wyndham Hotels and
Resorts lodging brand.
|
|
(b)
|
|
Comprised of the Wingate Inn,
Ramada Worldwide, Howard Johnson, Baymont Inn & Suites
and AmeriHost Inn lodging brands.
|
|
(c)
|
|
Comprised of the Days Inn,
Super 8, Travelodge and Knights Inn lodging brands.
|
|
(d)
|
|
Includes properties managed under a
joint venture agreement with CHI Limited; thirteen of these
properties are scheduled to be rebranded or cobranded either as
Wyndham Hotels and Resorts or Ramada during 2007.
|
The number of franchised lodging outlets changed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
|
6,348
|
|
|
|
6,399
|
|
|
|
6,402
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
Terminations
|
|
|
(443
|
)
|
|
|
(509
|
)
|
|
|
(517
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
|
6,473
|
|
|
|
6,348
|
|
|
|
6,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-20
In order to assist franchisees in converting to one of the
Companys brands or in franchise expansion, the Company may
also, at its discretion, provide development advances (over the
period of the franchise agreement typically ranging from 15 to
20 years) to franchisees who are either new or who are
expanding their operations. Provided the franchisee is in
compliance with the terms of the franchise agreement, all or a
portion of the amount of the development advance may be forgiven
by the Company. Otherwise, the related principal is due and
payable to the Company. In certain instances, the Company may
earn interest on unpaid franchisee development advances, which
was not significant during 2006, 2005 or 2004. The amount of
such development advances recorded on the Consolidated and
Combined Balance Sheets was $23 million and
$21 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. These amounts are classified within the other
non-current assets line item on the Consolidated and Combined
Balance Sheets. During 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company recorded
$3 million, $2 million and $3 million,
respectively, of expense related to the forgiveness of these
advances. Such amounts are recorded within the operating expense
line item on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income.
The income tax provision consists of the following for the year
ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
|
$
|
154
|
|
State
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
State
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income
taxes
|
|
$
|
190
|
|
|
$
|
195
|
|
|
$
|
234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to the Separation, the Company was part of a consolidated
group and was included in the Cendant consolidated tax returns.
The utilization of the Companys net operating loss
carryforwards by other Cendant companies is reflected in the
2006 and 2005 current provision.
Pre-tax income for domestic and foreign operations consisted of
the following for the year ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
493
|
|
|
$
|
543
|
|
|
$
|
493
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax income
|
|
$
|
542
|
|
|
$
|
626
|
|
|
$
|
587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-21
Current and non-current deferred income tax assets and
liabilities, as of December 31, are comprised of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Current deferred income tax
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities and deferred
income
|
|
$
|
110
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
and vacation ownership contract receivables
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Valuation
allowance (*)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred income tax
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Unamortized servicing rights
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Installment sales of vacation
ownership interests
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
Other
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred income tax
liabilities
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current net deferred income tax
asset
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred income tax
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
Alternative minimum tax credit
carryforward
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
Tax basis differences in assets of
foreign subsidiaries
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
Accrued liabilities and deferred
income
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation
allowance (*)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred income tax
assets
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred income tax
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
464
|
|
Installment sales of vacation
ownership interests
|
|
|
618
|
|
|
|
475
|
|
Other
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred income tax
liabilities
|
|
|
1,096
|
|
|
|
1,036
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current net deferred income
tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
782
|
|
|
$
|
823
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
The valuation allowance of $18 million as of
December 31, 2006 primarily relates to state net operating
loss carryforwards. The valuation allowance will be reduced when
and if the Company determines that the deferred income tax
assets are more likely than not to be realized. If determined to
be realizable, $1 million of the valuation allowance would
reduce goodwill.
|
As of December 31, 2006, the Company had federal net
operating loss carryforwards of $50 million, which
primarily expire in 2026. No provision has been made for
U.S. federal deferred income taxes on $134 million of
accumulated and undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2006 since it is the present intention
of management to reinvest the undistributed earnings
indefinitely in those foreign operations. The determination of
the amount of unrecognized U.S. federal deferred income tax
liability for unremitted earnings is not practicable.
F-22
The Companys effective income tax rate differs from the
U.S. federal statutory rate as follows for the year ended
December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Federal statutory rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State and local income taxes, net
of federal tax benefits
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
Changes in tax basis differences
in assets of foreign subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes on foreign operations at
rates different than U.S. federal statutory rates
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
Taxes on repatriated foreign
income, net of tax credits
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
Adjustment of estimated income tax
accruals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Release of guarantee liability
related to income taxes
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.1
|
%
|
|
|
31.2
|
%
|
|
|
39.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in the 2006 effective tax rate is primarily the
result of the absence of an increase in the tax basis of certain
foreign assets during 2005, partially offset by a
$15 million benefit recognized in 2006 resulting from a
change in the Companys 2005 state effective tax
rates. In March 2005, the Company entered into a foreign tax
restructuring where certain of its foreign subsidiaries were
considered liquidated for United States tax purposes. This
liquidation resulted in a taxable transaction which resulted in
an increase in the tax basis of the assets held by these
subsidiaries to their fair market value. This resulted in the
creation of a deferred tax asset and recognition of a deferred
tax benefit during 2005.
The Company believes that its accruals for tax liabilities
outlined in the Separation and Distribution Agreement are
adequate for all remaining open years, based on its assessment
of many factors including past experience and interpretations of
tax law applied to the facts of each matter. Although the
Company believes its recorded assets and liabilities are
reasonable, tax regulations are subject to interpretation and
tax litigation is inherently uncertain; therefore, the
Companys assessments can involve a series of complex
judgments about future events and rely heavily on estimates and
assumptions. While the Company believes that the estimates and
assumptions supporting its assessments are reasonable, the final
determination of tax audits and any related litigation could be
materially different than that which is reflected in historical
income tax provisions and recorded assets and liabilities. Based
on the results of an audit or litigation, a material effect on
the Companys income tax provision, net income, or cash
flows in the period or periods for which that determination is
made could result.
The Company is subject to income taxes in the United States and
several foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required
in determining the worldwide provision for income taxes and
recording related assets and liabilities. In the ordinary course
of business, there are many transactions and calculations where
the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. The Company is
regularly under audit by tax authorities whereby the outcome of
the audits is uncertain. Accruals for tax contingencies are
provided for in accordance with the requirements of
SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies
and are currently maintained on the Consolidated and Combined
Balance Sheets.
During the fourth quarter of 2006, Cendant and the Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) settled the IRS examination
for Cendants taxable years 1998 through 2002 during which
the Company was included in Cendants tax returns.
Accordingly, the Company reduced its contingent liabilities by
$15 million to reflect Cendants settlement with the
IRS. Such reduction was recorded in general and administrative
expenses on the Consolidated Statement of Income during the year
ended December 31, 2006. The IRS has opened an examination
for Cendants taxable years 2003 through 2006 during which
the Company was included in Cendants tax returns. Although
the Company and Cendant believe there is appropriate support for
the positions taken on its tax returns, the Company and Cendant
have recorded liabilities representing the best estimates of the
probable loss on certain positions. The Company and Cendant
believe that the accruals for tax liabilities are adequate for
all open years, based on assessment of many factors including
past experience and interpretations of tax law applied to the
facts of each matter. Although the Company and Cendant believe
the recorded assets and liabilities are reasonable, tax
regulations are subject to interpretation and tax litigation is
inherently uncertain; therefore, the Companys and
Cendants assessments can involve both a series of complex
judgments about future events and rely heavily on estimates and
assumptions. While the Company and Cendant believe that the
estimates and assumptions supporting the assessments are
reasonable, the final determination of tax audits and any other
related litigation could be materially different than that which
is reflected in historical income tax provisions and recorded
assets and liabilities. Based on the results of an audit or
litigation, a material effect on the Companys income tax
provision, net income, or cash flows in the period or periods
for which that determination is made could result.
F-23
|
|
8.
|
Vacation
Ownership Contract Receivables
|
The Company generates vacation ownership contract receivables by
extending financing to the purchasers of VOIs. Current and
long-term vacation ownership contract receivables, net as of
December 31, consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Current vacation ownership
contract receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized
|
|
$
|
201
|
|
|
$
|
180
|
|
Other
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current vacation ownership
contract receivables, net
|
|
$
|
257
|
|
|
$
|
239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term vacation ownership
contract receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized
|
|
$
|
1,545
|
|
|
$
|
1,198
|
|
Other
|
|
|
826
|
|
|
|
758
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,371
|
|
|
|
1,956
|
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(248
|
)
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term vacation ownership
contract receivables, net
|
|
$
|
2,123
|
|
|
$
|
1,835
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments that are contractually due on the
Companys vacation ownership contract receivables during
the next twelve months are classified as current on the
Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheets. Principal payments due
on the Companys vacation ownership contract receivables
during each of the five years subsequent to December 31,
2006 and thereafter are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
201
|
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
2008
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
298
|
|
2009
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
298
|
|
2010
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
2011
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
765
|
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
1,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,746
|
|
|
$
|
912
|
|
|
$
|
2,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The average interest rate on outstanding vacation ownership
contract receivables was 12.7% and 13.1% as of December 31,
2006 and 2005, respectively.
The activity in the allowance for loan losses related to
vacation ownership contract receivables is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses as of
January 1, 2004
|
|
$
|
(77
|
)
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
Contract receivables written-off,
net
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses as of
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(128
|
) (*)
|
Contract receivables written-off,
net
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses as of
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
Increase due to adoption of
SFAS No. 152
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted allowance for loan losses
as of January 1, 2006
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(259
|
)
|
Contract receivables written-off,
net
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses as of
December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
(278
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Includes
a $12 million provision associated with estimated losses
resulting from the 2005 Gulf Coast hurricanes.
|
F-24
The provision for loan losses during 2006 is not comparable to
such provision during 2005 or 2004 as a result of the adoption
of SFAS No. 152 as of January 1, 2006.
SFAS 152 requires the Company to reflect the provision for
loan losses on a gross basis including or excluding estimated
recoveries. During 2005 and 2004, estimated recoveries were
reflected as a reduction of the provision for loan losses.
Accordingly, the provision for loan losses during 2006 included
$115 million of estimated recoveries, which is now
reflected as an increase to VOI inventory.
Securitizations
The Company pools qualifying vacation ownership contract
receivables and sells them to bankruptcy-remote entities.
Vacation ownership contract receivables qualify for
securitization based primarily on the credit strength of the VOI
purchaser to whom financing has been extended. Prior to
September 1, 2003, sales of vacation ownership contract
receivables were treated as off-balance sheet sales as the
entities utilized were structured as bankruptcy-remote QSPEs
pursuant to SFAS No. 140 Accounting for
Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments
of Liabilities. Subsequent to September 1, 2003,
newly originated as well as certain legacy vacation ownership
contract receivables are securitized through bankruptcy-remote
SPEs that are consolidated within the Consolidated and Combined
Financial Statements.
On Balance Sheet. Vacation ownership contract receivables
securitized through the on-balance sheet, bankruptcy-remote SPEs
are consolidated within the Consolidated and Combined Financial
Statements (see Note 13Long-Term Debt and Borrowing
Arrangements). The Company continues to service the securitized
vacation ownership contract receivables pursuant to servicing
agreements negotiated on an arms-length basis based on market
conditions. The activities of these bankruptcy-remote SPEs are
limited to (i) purchasing vacation ownership contract
receivables from the Companys vacation ownership
subsidiaries, (ii) issuing debt securities
and/or
borrowing under a conduit facility to affect such purchases and
(iii) entering into derivatives to hedge interest rate
exposure. The securitized assets of these bankruptcy-remote SPEs
are not available to pay the general obligations of the Company.
Additionally, the creditors of these SPEs have no recourse to
the Companys general credit. The Company has made
representations and warranties customary for securitization
transactions, including eligibility characteristics of the
receivables and servicing responsibilities, in connection with
the securitization of these assets (see
Note 14Commitments and Contingencies). The Company
does not recognize gains or losses resulting from these
securitizations at the time of sale to the on-balance sheet,
bankruptcy-remote SPE. Income is recognized when earned over the
contractual life of the vacation ownership contract receivables.
Off-Balance Sheet. Certain structures used by the Company
to securitize vacation ownership contract receivables prior to
September 1, 2003 were treated as off-balance sheet sales,
with the Company retaining the servicing rights and a
subordinated interest. These transactions did not qualify for
inclusion in the Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements.
As these securitization facilities are precluded from
consolidation pursuant to generally accepted accounting
principles, the debt issued by these entities and the
collateralizing assets, which are serviced by the Company, are
not reflected on the Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheets.
However, the retained interest, amounting to $3 million and
$13 million as of December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively, was recorded within other non-current assets on
the Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheets. The Company
continues to service the securitized vacation ownership contract
receivables pursuant to servicing agreements negotiated on an
arms-length basis based on market conditions. The assets of
these QSPEs are not available to pay the general obligations of
the Company. Additionally, the creditors of these QSPEs have no
recourse to the Companys general credit. However, the
Company has made representations and warranties customary for
securitization transactions, including eligibility
characteristics of the receivables and servicing
responsibilities, in connection with the securitization of these
assets (see Note 14Commitments and Contingencies).
Presented below is detailed information as of December 31,
2006 for these QSPEs (to which vacation ownership contract
receivables were sold prior to the establishment of the
on-balance sheet, bankruptcy-remote SPEs):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
Funding
|
|
Debt
|
|
Available
|
|
|
Serviced (a)
|
|
Capacity
|
|
Issued (b)
|
|
Capacity (c)
|
|
Vacation Ownership QSPEs
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents the balance of vacation ownership contract
receivables as of December 31, 2006, of which
$1 million is 60 days or more past due and which had
an average balance of $31 million during 2006. There are no
credit losses on securitized vacation ownership contract
receivables, since the Company typically has repurchased such
receivables from the QSPEs prior to delinquency, although it is
not obligated to do so.
|
|
(b) |
|
Represents term notes.
|
|
(c) |
|
Subject to maintaining sufficient assets to collateralize debt.
|
F-25
The cash flow activity presented below covers the full year
activity between the Company and securitization entities that
were off-balance sheet during the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Servicing fees received
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
Other cash flows received on
retained
interests (a)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Purchase of delinquent or
foreclosed
loans (b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Cash received upon release of
reserve account
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Purchases of upgraded/defective
contracts (c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(a)
|
Represents cash flows received on retained interests other than
servicing fees.
|
|
(b)
|
The purchase of delinquent or foreclosed vacation ownership
contract receivables is primarily at the Companys option
and not based on a contractual relationship with the
securitization entities.
|
|
(c)
|
Represents the purchase of contracts that no longer meet the
securitization criteria, primarily due to modifications to the
original contract as a result of an upgrade by a current owner.
|
Inventory, as of December 31, consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Land held for VOI development
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
|
$
|
88
|
|
VOI construction in process
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
Completed inventory and vacation
credits
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventory
|
|
|
954
|
|
|
|
636
|
|
Less: Current portion
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current inventory
|
|
$
|
434
|
|
|
$
|
190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory that the Company expects to sell within the next
twelve months is classified as current on the Consolidated and
Combined Balance Sheets.
The inventory balance as of December 31, 2006 is not
comparable to the balance at December 31, 2005 as a result
of adopting SFAS No. 152 as of January 1, 2006.
Such change had the effect of increasing the Companys
inventory by $171 million for 2006 as compared to the prior
inventory costing method applied prior to the adoption of the
SFAS No. 152. In addition, changes in estimates
related to relative sales value resulted in a reduction of cost
of vacation ownership interests of $14 million during 2006.
|
|
10.
|
Property
and Equipment, net
|
Property and equipment, net, as of December 31, consisted
of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
153
|
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
Building and leasehold improvements
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
Capitalized software
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
Vacation rental property capital
leases
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
|
|
1,098
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation and
amortization
|
|
|
(503
|
)
|
|
|
(380
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
916
|
|
|
$
|
718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company recorded depreciation
and amortization expense of $113 million, $99 million
and $88 million, respectively, related to property and
equipment.
F-26
Other current assets, as of December 31, consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Non-trade receivables, net
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Other
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
239
|
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.
|
Accrued
Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities, as of
December 31, consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Accrued payroll and related
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
Accrued advertising and marketing
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
Accrued other
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
575
|
|
|
$
|
430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.
|
Long-Term
Debt and Borrowing Arrangements
|
Securitized and long-term debt as of December 31 consisted
of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Securitized vacation ownership
debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes
|
|
$
|
838
|
|
|
$
|
740
|
|
Bank conduit
facility (a)
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securitized vacation
ownership debt
|
|
|
1,463
|
|
|
|
1,135
|
|
Less: Current portion of
securitized vacation ownership debt
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term securitized vacation
ownership debt
|
|
$
|
1,285
|
|
|
$
|
981
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00% senior unsecured notes
(due December
2016) (b)
|
|
$
|
796
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Term loan (due July 2011)
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility (due
July
2011) (c)(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interim loan facility (due July
2007) (d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation ownership asset-linked
debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
Bank borrowings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation ownership
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
Vacation rentals
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
Vacation rentals capital leases
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
Other
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
1,437
|
|
|
|
907
|
|
Less: Current portion of long-term
debt
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
1,322
|
|
|
$
|
706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Represents a
364-day
vacation ownership bank conduit facility, which the Company
renewed and upsized to $1,000 million on November 13,
2006. The borrowings under this bank conduit facility have a
maturity date of December 2009.
|
|
(b)
|
|
These notes represent
$800 million aggregate principal less $4 million of
original issue discount.
|
|
(c)
|
|
The revolving credit facility has a
total capacity of $900 million, which includes availability
for letters of credit. As of December 31, 2006, the Company
had $30 million of letters of credit outstanding and as
such, the total available capacity of the revolving credit
facility was $870 million.
|
|
(d)
|
|
The Company entered into this
$800 million facility in July 2006. The outstanding
borrowings under this facility of $350 million were repaid
in December 2006 with a portion of the borrowings from the
Companys issuance of 6.00% senior unsecured notes.
|
F-27
The Companys outstanding debt as of December 31, 2006
matures as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
178
|
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
|
$
|
293
|
|
2008
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
2009
|
|
|
537
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
546
|
|
2010
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
2011
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
467
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
901
|
|
|
|
1,216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,463
|
|
|
$
|
1,437
|
|
|
$
|
2,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As debt maturities are based on the contractual payment terms of
the underlying vacation ownership contract receivables, actual
maturities may differ as a result of prepayments by the vacation
ownership contract receivable obligors.
The Companys revolving credit facility and unsecured term
loan contain various combinations of restrictive covenants,
including performance triggers and advance rates linked to the
quality of the underlying assets, financial reporting
requirements, restrictions on dividends, mergers and changes of
control and a requirement that the Company generate at least
$400 million of net income before depreciation and
amortization, interest expense (other than interest expense
relating to securitized vacation ownership borrowings), income
taxes and minority interest, determined quarterly for the
preceding twelve month period. The 6.00% senior unsecured
notes contain various covenants including limitations on liens,
limitations on sale and leasebacks, and change of control
restrictions. In addition, there are limitations on mergers,
consolidations and sales of all or substantially all assets.
Events of default in the notes include nonpayment of interest,
nonpayment of principal, breach of a covenant or warranty, cross
acceleration of debt in excess of $50 million, and
bankruptcy related matters. As of December 31, 2006, the
Company was in compliance with all financial covenants of its
borrowing arrangements.
As of December 31, 2006, available capacity under the
Companys borrowing arrangements was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
|
Capacity
|
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
Capacity
|
|
|
Securitized vacation ownership
debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes
|
|
$
|
838
|
|
|
$
|
838
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Bank conduit
facility (a)
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securitized vacation
ownership debt
|
|
$
|
1,838
|
|
|
$
|
1,463
|
|
|
$
|
375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00% senior unsecured notes
(due December 2016)
|
|
|
796
|
|
|
|
796
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan (due July 2011)
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility (due
July
2011) (b)
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
900
|
|
Bank borrowings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation ownership
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Vacation rentals
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Vacation rentals capital
leases (c)
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
2,412
|
|
|
$
|
1,437
|
|
|
|
975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Issuance of letters of
credit (b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Capacity is subject to maintaining
sufficient assets to collateralize debt.
|
|
(b)
|
|
The capacity under the
Companys revolving credit facility includes availability
for letters of credit. As of December 31, 2006, the total
capacity of $900 million was reduced by $30 million
for the issuance of letters of credit.
|
|
(c)
|
|
These leases are recorded as
capital lease obligations with corresponding assets classified
within property and equipment on the Consolidated and Combined
Balance Sheets.
|
F-28
Securitized
Vacation Ownership Debt
As previously discussed in Note 8Vacation Ownership
Contract Receivables, the Company issues debt through the
securitization of vacation ownership contract receivables. The
debt issued through these securitizations includes fixed rate
and floating rate term notes for which the weighted average
interest rate was 4.7%, 4.0% and 3.3% for 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively, and access to a $1,000 million bank conduit
facility, which is also used to securitize vacation ownership
contract receivables. This conduit facility bears interest at
variable rates and had a weighted average interest rate of 5.7%,
4.3% and 1.4% during 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. As of
December 31, 2006, the Companys securitized vacation
ownership debt is collateralized by $1,844 million of
underlying vacation ownership contract receivables and related
assets.
Interest expense incurred in connection with the Companys
securitized vacation ownership debt amounted to
$70 million, $46 million and $36 million during
2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and is recorded within the
operating expenses line item on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income as the Company earns consumer finance
income on the related securitized vacation ownership contract
receivables.
Other
6.00% Senior Unsecured Notes. The Companys
6.00% notes, with face value of $800 million, were
issued in December 2006 for net proceeds of $796 million.
The notes are redeemable at the Companys option at any
time, in whole or in part, at the appropriate redemption prices
plus accrued interest through the redemption date. These notes
rank equally in right of payment with all of the Companys
other senior unsecured indebtedness.
Term Loan. On July 7, 2006, the Company entered into
a five-year $300 million term loan facility which bears
interest at a fixed rate of 6.00%. At December 31, 2006,
the Company had $300 million outstanding under this term
loan facility.
Revolving Credit Facility. The Company entered into a
five-year $900 million revolving credit facility which
currently bears interest at LIBOR plus 45 to 55 basis
points. The pricing of this facility is dependent on the
Companys credit ratings and the outstanding balance of
borrowings on this facility. As of December 31, 2006, the
Company had zero outstanding borrowings under this facility.
Vacation Ownership Asset-Linked Debt. The Company
previously borrowed under a $600 million asset-linked
facility through Cendant to support the creation of certain
vacation ownership-related assets and the acquisition and
development of vacation ownership properties. In connection with
the Separation, Cendant eliminated the outstanding borrowings
under this facility of $600 million on July 27, 2006.
The weighted average interest rate on these borrowings was 5.5%
during the period January 1, 2006 through July 27,
2006 and 5.1% and 2.6% during the years ended December 31,
2005 and 2004, respectively.
Vacation Ownership Bank Borrowings. The Company had
outstanding bank borrowings of $103 million as of
December 31, 2006 principally under a foreign credit
facility used to support the Companys vacation ownership
operations in the South Pacific. This facility bears interest at
Australian Dollar LIBOR plus 55 basis points and had a
weighted average interest rate of 6.5%, 6.3% and 3.3% during
2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. These secured borrowings are
collateralized by $158 million of underlying vacation
ownership contract receivables and related assets.
Vacation Rental Bank Borrowings. As of December 31,
2006, the Company had bank debt outstanding of $73 million
related to the Companys Landal GreenParks business. The
bank debt is collateralized by $130 million of land and
related vacation rental assets and had a weighted average
interest rate of 3.7% during 2006 and 3.0% during both 2005 and
2004.
Vacation Rental Capital Leases. The Company leases
vacation homes located in European holiday parks as part of its
vacation exchange and rentals business. These leases are
recorded as capital lease obligations under generally accepted
accounting principles with corresponding assets classified
within property, plant and equipment on the Consolidated and
Combined Balance Sheets. The vacation rental capital lease
obligations had a weighted average interest rate of 7.5% during
2006, 2005 and 2004.
Other. The Company also maintains other debt facilities
which arise through the ordinary course of operations. This debt
principally reflects $11 million of mortgage borrowings
related to an office building.
F-29
Interest expense incurred in connection with the Companys
long-term debt (excluding securitized vacation ownership debt)
amounted to $72 million, $36 million and
$38 million during 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and
is recorded within the interest expense line item on the
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income.
|
|
14.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Commitments
Leases
The Company is committed to making rental payments under
noncancelable operating leases covering various facilities and
equipment. Future minimum lease payments required under
noncancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2006 are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncancelable
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
Year
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
2008
|
|
|
39
|
|
2009
|
|
|
30
|
|
2010
|
|
|
25
|
|
2011
|
|
|
20
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company incurred total rental
expense of $65 million, $55 million and
$48 million, respectively.
Purchase
Commitments
In the normal course of business, the Company makes various
commitments to purchase goods or services from specific
suppliers, including those related to vacation ownership resort
development and other capital expenditures. None of the purchase
commitments made by the Company as of December 31, 2006
(aggregating $531 million) were individually significant;
the majority relate to commitments for the development of
vacation ownership properties (aggregating $323 million,
all of which relates to 2007).
Letters
of Credit
As of December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the
Company had $30 million and $44 million, respectively,
of irrevocable letters of credit outstanding, which mainly
support development activity at the Companys vacation
ownership business.
Litigation
The Company is involved in claims, legal proceedings and
governmental inquiries related to contract disputes, business
practices, intellectual property and other matters relating to
the Companys business, including, without limitation,
commercial, employment, tax and environmental matters. Such
matters include, but are not limited to, allegations that
(i) the Companys vacation ownership business violated
alleged duties to members of its internal vacation exchange
program through changes made to its reservations and
availability policies, which changes diminished the value of
vacation ownership interests purchased by members; (ii) its
TripRewards loyalty program infringes on third-party patents;
(iii) the Companys RCI Points exchange program, a
global points-based exchange network that allows members to
redeem points, is an unlicensed travel club and the unregistered
sales of memberships in that program violate the Alberta Fair
Trading Act and (iv) the Companys vacation ownership
business alleged failure to perform its duties arising under its
management agreements, as well as for construction defects and
inadequate maintenance, which claims are made by property
owners associations from time to time. See
Note 20Separation Adjustments and Transactions with
Former Parent and Subsidiaries regarding contingent litigation
liabilities resulting from the Separation.
The Company believes that it has adequately accrued for such
matters with a reserve of approximately $24 million, or,
for matters not requiring accrual, believes that such matters
will not have a material adverse effect
F-30
on its results of operations, financial position or cash flows
based on information currently available. However, litigation is
inherently unpredictable and, although the Company believes that
its accruals are adequate
and/or that
it has valid defenses in these matters, unfavorable resolutions
could occur. As such, an adverse outcome from such unresolved
proceedings for which claims are awarded in excess of the
amounts accrued, if any, could be material to the Company with
respect to earnings or cash flows in any given reporting period.
However, the Company does not believe that the impact of such
unresolved litigation should result in a material liability to
the Company in relation to its consolidated and combined
financial position or liquidity.
Guarantees/Indemnifications
Standard
Guarantees/Indemnifications
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into
numerous agreements that contain standard guarantees and
indemnities whereby the Company indemnifies another party for
breaches of representations and warranties. In addition, many of
these parties are also indemnified against any third-party claim
resulting from the transaction that is contemplated in the
underlying agreement. Such guarantees and indemnifications are
granted under various agreements, including those governing
(i) purchases, sales or outsourcing of assets or
businesses, (ii) leases of real estate,
(iii) licensing of trademarks, (iv) development of
vacation ownership properties, (v) access to credit
facilities and use of derivatives and (vi) issuances of
debt securities. The guarantees and indemnifications issued are
for the benefit of the (i) buyers in sale agreements and
sellers in purchase agreements, (ii) landlords in lease
contracts, (iii) franchisees in licensing agreements,
(iv) developers in vacation ownership development
agreements, (v) financial institutions in credit facility
arrangements and derivative contracts and (vi) underwriters
in debt security issuances. While some of these guarantees and
indemnifications extend only for the duration of the underlying
agreement, many survive the expiration of the term of the
agreement or extend into perpetuity (unless subject to a legal
statute of limitations). There are no specific limitations on
the maximum potential amount of future payments that the Company
could be required to make under these guarantees and
indemnifications, nor is the Company able to develop an estimate
of the maximum potential amount of future payments to be made
under these guarantees and indemnifications as the triggering
events are not subject to predictability. With respect to
certain of the aforementioned guarantees and indemnifications,
such as indemnifications of landlords against third-party claims
for the use of real estate property leased by the Company, the
Company maintains insurance coverage that mitigates any
potential payments to be made.
Other
Guarantees/Indemnifications
In the normal course of business, the Companys vacation
ownership business provides guarantees to certain owners
associations for funds required to operate and maintain vacation
ownership properties in excess of assessments collected from
owners of the vacation ownership interests. The Company may be
required to fund such excess as a result of unsold Company-owned
vacation ownership interests or failure by owners to pay such
assessments. These guarantees extend for the duration of the
underlying subsidy agreements (which generally approximate one
year and are renewable on an annual basis) or until a stipulated
percentage (typically 80% or higher) of related vacation
ownership interests are sold. The maximum potential future
payments that the Company could be required to make under these
guarantees was approximately $230 million as of
December 31, 2006. The Company would only be required to
pay this maximum amount if none of the owners assessed paid
their assessments. Any assessments collected from the owners of
the vacation ownership interests would reduce the maximum
potential amount of future payments to be made by the Company.
Additionally, should the Company be required to fund the deficit
through the payment of any owners assessments under these
guarantees, the Company would be permitted access to the
property for its own use and may use that property to engage in
revenue-producing activities, such as marketing or rental.
Historically, the Company has not been required to make material
payments under these guarantees, as the fees collected from
owners of vacation ownership interests have been sufficient to
support the operation and maintenance of the vacation ownership
properties. As of December 31, 2006, the liability recorded
by the Company in connection with these guarantees was
$14 million.
F-31
|
|
15.
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income
|
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Gains on
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
Cash Flow
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Hedges, Net
|
|
|
Income/(Loss)
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2004, net
of tax of $5
|
|
$
|
180
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
180
|
|
Current period change
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2004,
net of tax of $39
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
Current period change
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2005,
net of tax of $58
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
Current period change
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006,
net of tax of $43
|
|
$
|
191
|
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
The Company has a stock-based compensation plan available to
grant non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options,
SSARs, restricted stock, restricted stock units
(RSUs) and other stock or cash-based awards to key
employees, non-employee directors, advisors and consultants.
Under the Wyndham Worldwide Corporation 2006 Equity and
Incentive Plan, which was approved by Cendant, the sole
shareholder, and became effective on July 12, 2006, a
maximum of 43.5 million shares of common stock may be
awarded. As of December 31, 2006, approximately
17 million shares of availability remained.
Incentive
Equity Awards Conversion
Prior to August 1, 2006, all employee stock awards (stock
options and RSUs) were granted by Cendant. At the time of
Separation, a portion of Cendants outstanding equity
awards were converted into equity awards of the Company at a
ratio of one share of Companys common stock for every five
shares of Cendants common stock. As a result, the Company
issued approximately 2 million RSUs and approximately
24 million stock options upon completion of the conversion
of existing Cendant equity awards into Wyndham equity awards.
In connection with the distribution of the shares of common
stock of Wyndham to Cendant stockholders, on July 31, 2006,
the Compensation Committee of Cendants Board of Directors
approved a change to the date on which all Cendant equity awards
(including Wyndham awards granted as an adjustment to such
Cendant equity awards) would become fully vested. These equity
awards vested on August 15, 2006 rather than
August 30, 2006 (which was the previous date upon which
such equity awards were to vest). As such, there were zero
converted RSUs outstanding on December 31, 2006.
As a result of the acceleration of the vesting of all employee
stock awards granted by Cendant, the Company recorded non-cash
compensation expense of $45 million during the third
quarter of 2006. In addition, the Company recorded a non-cash
expense of $9 million related to equitable adjustments to
the accelerated awards in the third quarter of 2006. The
$54 million of expense is recorded within separation and
related costs on the Consolidated and Combined Statement of
Income.
The activity related to the converted stock options from the
date of Separation to December 31, 2006 consisted of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
of
Options (c)
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Balance at August 1, 2006
|
|
|
23.7
|
|
|
$
|
39.84
|
|
Exercised (a)
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
30.70
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
46.84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2006 (b)
|
|
|
22.0
|
|
|
$
|
39.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-32
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Stock options exercised during the
five months ended December 31, 2006 had an intrinsic value
of approximately $4 million.
|
|
(b) |
|
As of December 31, 2006, the
Companys outstanding in the money stock
options had aggregate intrinsic value of $60 million. All
22.0 million options outstanding are exercisable as of
December 31, 2006.
|
|
(c) |
|
Options outstanding and exercisable
as of December 31, 2006 have a weighted average remaining
contractual life of 2.3 years.
|
The following table summarizes information as of
December 31, 2006 regarding the Companys outstanding
and exercisable stock options converted from Cendant stock
options:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Range of Exercise Prices
|
|
of Options
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
$10.00 $19.99
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
$
|
19.72
|
|
$20.00 $29.99
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
23.85
|
|
$30.00 $39.99
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
37.42
|
|
$40.00 $49.99
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
42.87
|
|
$50.00 & above
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
64.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Options
|
|
|
22.0
|
|
|
$
|
39.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
Equity Awards Granted by the Company
On May 2, 2006, Cendant approved the grant of incentive
awards of approximately $79 million to the key employees
and senior officers of Wyndham in the form of RSUs and SSARs,
which were converted into equity awards relating to
Wyndhams common stock on the day of the Separation from
Cendant. The awards have a grant date of May 2, 2006 and
vest ratably over a period of four years, with the exception of
a portion of the SSARs which vest ratably over a period of three
years. The number RSUs and SSARs granted were approximately
2.3 million and 500,000, respectively.
The activity related to the Companys incentive equity
awards from the date of Separation through December 31,
2006 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSUs
|
|
|
SSARs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
of RSUs
|
|
|
Grant Price
|
|
|
of SSARs
|
|
|
Grant Price
|
|
|
Balance at August 1, 2006
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
$
|
31.85
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
$
|
31.85
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested/exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
31.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2006 (a)
|
|
|
2.2
|
(b)
|
|
$
|
31.81
|
(b)
|
|
|
0.5
|
(c)
|
|
$
|
31.85
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Aggregate unrecognized compensation
expense related to SSARs and RSUs amounted to $68 million
as of December 31, 2006. None of the 500,000 SSARs are
exercisable as of December 31, 2006.
|
|
(b) |
|
Amounts include approximately
37,000 RSUs granted in October 2006 at a price of $29.50, which
is not included in the table due to rounding. Approximately
2.1 million RSUs outstanding at December 31, 2006 are
expected to vest.
|
|
(c) |
|
None of the approximately 500,000
SSARs are exercisable at December 31, 2006; however, since
the SSARs were issued to the Companys top five officers, the Company assumes that all are expected to vest. SSARs outstanding at December 31,
2006 had an intrinsic value of approximately $80,000 and have a
weighted average remaining contractual life of 9.4 years.
|
The grant date fair value of SSARs was $13.91. Such fair value
was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model with the following assumptions:
(i) expected volatility of 34.4%, (ii) expected life
of 6.25 years and (iii) risk free interest rate of
4.9%.
Stock-Based
Compensation
During 2006 (through the date of Separation), 2005 and 2004,
Cendant allocated pre-tax stock-based compensation expense of
$12 million, $16 million and $11 million
($7 million, $10 million and $7 million, after
tax), respectively, to the Company. Such compensation expense
relates only to the options and RSUs that were granted to
Cendants employees subsequent to January 1, 2003. The
allocation was based on the estimated number of options and RSUs
Cendant believed it would ultimately provide and the underlying
vesting period of the awards. As Cendant measured its
stock-based compensation expense using intrinsic value method
during the periods prior to January 1, 2003, Cendant did
not recognize compensation expense upon the issuance of equity
awards to its employees.
F-33
During 2006 (through the date of separation), the Company also
recorded stock-based compensation expense of $13 million
($8 million, after tax), related to the incentive equity
awards granted by the Company.
|
|
17.
|
Employee
Benefit Plans
|
Defined
Contribution Benefit Plans
Wyndham sponsors a domestic defined contribution savings plan
that provides certain eligible employees of the Company an
opportunity to accumulate funds for retirement (similar to the
plan previously sponsored by Cendant). The Company matches the
contributions of participating employees on the basis specified
by the plan. The Companys cost for these plans was
approximately $20 million, $17 million and
$15 million during 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
In addition, the Company contributes to several foreign employee
benefit contributory plans, which were acquired with certain
businesses within vacation exchange and rentals, which provide
eligible employees within the vacation exchange and rentals
business an opportunity to accumulate funds for retirement. The
Companys contributory cost for these plans was
approximately $7 million, $6 million and
$5 million during 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Defined
Benefit Pension Plans
The Company sponsors defined benefit pension plans for certain
foreign subsidiaries. Under these plans, benefits are based on
an employees years of credited service and a percentage of
final average compensation or as otherwise described by the
plan. As of December 31, 2006, the Companys net
pension liability is fully recognized as other non-current
liabilities, which approximated $8 million ($7 million
as of December 31, 2005). On December 31, 2006, the
amounts recorded within accumulated other comprehensive income
as an unrecognized prior service credit and unrecognized loss
were $2 million and $1 million, respectively, as
required by SFAS No. 158.
The Companys policy is to contribute amounts sufficient to
meet minimum funding requirements as set forth in employee
benefit and tax laws plus such additional amounts that the Company
determines to be appropriate. During 2006, 2005 and 2004, the
Companys recorded pension expense was approximately
$1 million, $2 million and $1 million,
respectively.
|
|
18.
|
Financial
Instruments
|
Risk
Management
Following is a description of the Companys risk management
policies:
Foreign
Currency Risk
The Company uses foreign currency forward contracts to manage
its exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates
associated with its foreign currency denominated receivables,
forecasted earnings of foreign subsidiaries and forecasted
foreign currency denominated vendor costs. The Company primarily
hedges its foreign currency exposure to the British pound, Euro
and Canadian dollar. The majority of forward contracts utilized
by the Company does not qualify for hedge accounting treatment
under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities. The fluctuations in
the value of these forward contracts do, however, largely offset
the impact of changes in the value of the underlying risk that
they are intended to economically hedge. Forward contracts that
are used to hedge certain forecasted disbursements and receipts
up to 18 months are designated and do qualify as cash flow
hedges. The amount of gains or losses reclassified from other
comprehensive income to earnings resulting from ineffectiveness
or from excluding a component of the forward contracts
gain or loss from the effectiveness calculation for cash flow
hedges during 2006, 2005 and 2004 was not material. The impact
of these forward contracts was not material to the
Companys results of operations or financial position, nor
is the amount of gains or losses the Company expects to
reclassify from other comprehensive income to earnings over the
next 12 months.
Interest
Rate Risk
The debt used to finance much of the Companys operations
is also exposed to interest rate fluctuations. The Company uses
various hedging strategies and derivative financial instruments
to create a desired mix of fixed and
F-34
floating rate assets and liabilities. Derivative instruments
currently used in these hedging strategies include swaps and
interest rate caps.
The derivatives used to manage the risk associated with the
Companys floating rate debt include freestanding
derivatives and derivatives designated as cash flow hedges. In
connection with its qualifying cash flow hedges, the Company
recorded net a pre-tax loss of $13 million during 2006 and
net pre-tax gains of $5 million and $2 million during
2005 and 2004, respectively, to other comprehensive income. The
pre-tax amount of gains reclassified from other comprehensive
income to earnings resulting from ineffectiveness or from
excluding a component of the derivatives gain or loss from
the effectiveness calculation for cash flow hedges was
insignificant during 2006, $5 million during 2005 and
insignificant during 2004. The amount of losses the Company
expects to reclassify from other comprehensive income to
earnings during the next 12 months is not material. These
freestanding derivatives had a nominal impact on the
Companys results of operations in 2006, 2005 and 2004.
Credit
Risk and Exposure
The Company is exposed to counterparty credit risk in the event
of nonperformance by counterparties to various agreements and
sales transactions. The Company manages such risk by evaluating
the financial position and creditworthiness of such
counterparties and by requiring collateral in instances in which
financing is provided. The Company mitigates counterparty credit
risk associated with its derivative contracts by monitoring the
amounts at risk with each counterparty to such contracts,
periodically evaluating counterparty creditworthiness and
financial position, and where possible, dispersing its risk
among multiple counterparties.
As of December 31, 2006, there were no significant
concentrations of credit risk with any individual counterparty
or groups of counterparties. However, approximately 25% of the
Companys outstanding vacation ownership contract
receivables portfolio relates to customers who reside in
California. With the exception of the financing provided to
customers of its vacation ownership businesses, the Company does
not normally require collateral or other security to support
credit sales.
Market
Risk
The Company is subject to risks relating to the geographic
concentrations of (i) areas in which the Company is
currently developing and selling vacation ownership properties,
(ii) sales offices in certain vacation areas and
(iii) customers of the Companys vacation ownership
business; which in each case, may result in the Companys
results of operations being more sensitive to local and regional
economic conditions and other factors, including competition,
natural disasters and economic downturns, than the
Companys results of operations would be absent such
geographic concentrations. Local and regional economic
conditions and other factors may differ materially from
prevailing conditions in other parts of the world. Florida,
Nevada and California are examples of areas with concentrations
of sales offices. For the twelve months ended December 31,
2006, approximately 16%, 13% and 13% of the Companys VOI
sales revenue was generated in sales offices located in Florida,
Nevada and California, respectively.
Included within the Consolidated and Combined Statements of
Income is approximately 12%, 10% and 11% of net revenue
generated from transactions in the state of Florida in 2006,
2005 and 2004, respectively, and approximately 10%, 8%, and 8%
of net revenue generated from transactions in the state of
California in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
F-35
Fair
Value
The fair value of financial instruments is generally determined
by reference to market values resulting from trading on a
national securities exchange or in an
over-the-counter
market. In cases where quoted market prices are not available,
fair value is based on estimates using present value or other
valuation techniques, as appropriate. The carrying amounts of
cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, trade receivables,
accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current
liabilities approximate fair value due to the short-term
maturities of these assets and liabilities. The carrying amounts
and estimated fair values of all other financial instruments as
of December 31 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation ownership contract
receivables, net
|
|
$
|
2,380
|
|
|
$
|
2,380
|
|
|
$
|
2,074
|
|
|
$
|
2,074
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
2,900
|
|
|
|
2,889
|
|
|
|
2,042
|
|
|
|
2,036
|
|
Derivatives (*)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forwards
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Interest rate swaps and caps
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
Derivative instruments are in loss
positions as of December 31, 2006 and gain positions as of
December 31, 2005.
|
The reportable segments presented below represent the
Companys operating segments for which separate financial
information is available and which are utilized on a regular
basis by its chief operating decision maker to assess
performance and to allocate resources. In identifying its
reportable segments, the Company also considers the nature of
services provided by its operating segments. Management
evaluates the operating results of each of its reportable
segments based upon revenue and EBITDA, which is
defined as net income before depreciation and amortization,
interest (excluding interest on securitized vacation ownership
debt), income taxes, minority interest and cumulative effect of
accounting change, net of tax, each of which is presented on the
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income. The
Companys presentation of EBITDA may not be comparable to
similarly-titled measures used by other companies.
Year
Ended or At December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
Vacation
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
|
and Rentals
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Other (b)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net
revenues (a)
|
|
$
|
661
|
|
|
$
|
1,119
|
|
|
$
|
2,068
|
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,842
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
(73
|
) (c)
|
|
|
725
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
Segment assets
|
|
|
1,362
|
|
|
|
2,375
|
|
|
|
5,590
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
9,520
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
Year
Ended or At December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
Vacation
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
|
and Rentals
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Other (b)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net
revenues (a)
|
|
$
|
533
|
|
|
$
|
1,068
|
|
|
$
|
1,874
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,471
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
751
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
Segment assets
|
|
|
1,797
|
|
|
|
2,365
|
|
|
|
5,026
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
9,167
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
F-36
Year
Ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
Vacation
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
|
and Rentals
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Other (b)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net
revenues (a)
|
|
$
|
443
|
|
|
$
|
921
|
|
|
$
|
1,661
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,014
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
719
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Transactions between segments are
recorded at fair value and eliminated in consolidation.
Inter-segment net revenues were not significant to the net
revenues of any one segment.
|
|
(b)
|
|
Includes the elimination of
transactions between segments.
|
|
(c)
|
|
Includes $99 million of
separation and related costs and $32 million of a net
benefit from the resolution of certain contingent liabilities.
|
Provided below is a reconciliation of EBITDA to income before
income taxes and minority interest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
725
|
|
|
$
|
751
|
|
|
$
|
719
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and
minority interest
|
|
$
|
542
|
|
|
$
|
626
|
|
|
$
|
587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The geographic segment information provided below is classified
based on the geographic location of the Companys
subsidiaries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
|
|
|
United
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States
|
|
|
Kingdom
|
|
|
Countries
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Year Ended or At
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
2,997
|
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
|
$
|
622
|
|
|
$
|
3,842
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
7,770
|
|
|
|
554
|
|
|
|
1,196
|
|
|
|
9,520
|
|
Net property and equipment
|
|
|
478
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended or At
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
2,714
|
|
|
$
|
211
|
|
|
$
|
546
|
|
|
$
|
3,471
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
7,413
|
|
|
|
1,103
|
|
|
|
651
|
|
|
|
9,167
|
|
Net property and equipment
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
2,385
|
|
|
$
|
174
|
|
|
$
|
455
|
|
|
$
|
3,014
|
|
|
|
20.
|
Separation
Adjustments and Transactions with Former Parent and
Subsidiaries
|
Transfer
of Cendant Corporate Liabilities and Issuance of Guarantees to
Cendant and Affiliates
Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, upon the
distribution of the Companys common stock to Cendant
shareholders, the Company entered into certain guarantee
commitments with Cendant (pursuant to the assumption of certain
liabilities and the obligation to indemnify Cendant, Realogy and
Travelport for such liabilities) and guarantee commitments
related to deferred compensation arrangements with each of
Cendant and Realogy. These guarantee arrangements primarily
relate to certain contingent litigation liabilities, contingent
tax liabilities, and Cendant contingent and other corporate
liabilities, of which the Company assumed and is responsible for
37.5% of these Cendant liabilities. The amount of liabilities
which were assumed by the Company in connection with the
Separation approximated $434 million at December 31,
2006, reduced from approximately $524 million as measured
at the date of separation (July 31, 2006). This amount was
comprised of certain Cendant Corporate liabilities which were
recorded on the books of Cendant as well as additional
liabilities which were established for guarantees issued at the
date of Separation related to certain unresolved contingent
matters and certain others that could arise during the guarantee
period. Regarding the guarantees, if any of the companies
responsible for all or a portion of such liabilities were to
default in its payment of costs or expenses related to any such
liability, the Company would be
F-37
responsible for a portion of the defaulting party or
parties obligation. The Company also provided a default
guarantee related to certain deferred compensation arrangements
related to certain current and former senior officers and
directors of Cendant, Realogy and Travelport. These
arrangements, which are discussed in more detail below, have
been valued upon the Companys separation from Cendant with
the assistance of third-party experts in accordance with
Financial Interpretation No. 45 (FIN 45)
Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements
for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of
Others and recorded as liabilities on the balance sheet.
To the extent such recorded liabilities are not adequate to
cover the ultimate payment amounts, such excess will be
reflected as an expense to the results of operations in future
periods.
The December 31, 2006 balance of $434 million is
comprised of (i) $40 million for litigation matters,
(ii) $229 million for tax liabilities,
(iii) $134 million for other contingent and corporate
liabilities including liabilities of previously sold businesses
of Cendant and (iv) $31 million of liabilities where
the calculated FIN 45 guarantee amount exceeded the
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5
Accounting for Contingencies liability assumed at
the date of Separation (of which $29 million of the
$31 million pertain to litigation liabilities). Of the
$434 million, $187 million of these liabilities is
recorded in current due to former Parent and subsidiaries and
$234 million are recorded in long-term Due to former Parent
and subsidiaries at December 31, 2006 on the Consolidated
Balance Sheet. The Company is indemnifying Cendant for these
contingent liabilities and therefore any payments would be made
to the third party through the former Parent. The
$31 million relating to the FIN 45 guarantees is
recorded in other current liabilities at December 31, 2006
on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. In addition, the Company has
a $65 million receivable due from former Parent relating to
a refund of excess funding paid to the Companys former
Parent resulting from the Separation and income tax refunds,
which is recorded in current due from former Parent and
subsidiaries on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company has
also recorded a $37 million receivable in non-current due
from former Parent and subsidiaries on the Consolidated Balance
Sheet, which represents the Companys right to receive
proceeds from the ultimate sale of Cendants preferred
stock investment in and warrants of Affinion Group Holdings,
Inc. (see Note 23Subsequent Events).
Following is a discussion of the liabilities on which the
Company issued guarantees:
Contingent litigation liabilities The Company
has assumed 37.5% of liabilities for certain litigation relating
to, arising out of or resulting from certain lawsuits in which
Cendant is named as the defendant. The indemnification
obligation will continue until the underlying lawsuits are
resolved. The Company will indemnify Cendant to the extent that
Cendant is required to make payments related to any of the
underlying lawsuits. As the guarantee relates to matters in
various stages of litigation, the maximum exposure cannot be
quantified. Due to the inherent nature of the litigation
process, the timing of payments related to these liabilities
cannot be reasonably predicted, but is expected to occur over
several years.
Contingent tax liabilities The Company is
liable for 37.5% of certain contingent tax liabilities and will
pay to Cendant the amount of taxes allocated pursuant to the Tax
Sharing Agreement for the payment of certain taxes. This
liability will remain outstanding until tax audits related to
the 2006 tax year are completed or the statutes of limitations
governing the 2006 tax year have passed. The Companys
maximum exposure cannot be quantified as tax regulations are
subject to interpretation and the outcome of tax audits or
litigation is inherently uncertain. Additionally, the timing of
payments related to these liabilities cannot be reasonably
predicted, but is likely to occur over several years.
Cendant contingent and other corporate
liabilities The Company has assumed 37.5% of certain
corporate liabilities of Cendant including liabilities relating
to (i) Cendants terminated or divested businesses,
(ii) liabilities relating to the Travelport sale, if any,
and (iii) generally any actions with respect to the
separation plan or the distributions brought by any third party.
The Companys maximum exposure to loss cannot be quantified
as this guarantee relates primarily to future claims that may be
made against Cendant, that have not yet occurred. The Company
assessed the probability and amount of potential liability
related to this guarantee based on the extent and nature of
historical experience.
Guarantee related to deferred compensation
arrangements In the event that Cendant, Realogy
and/or
Travelport are not able to meet certain deferred compensation
obligations under specified plans for certain current and former
officers and directors because of bankruptcy or insolvency, the
Company has guaranteed such obligations (to the extent relating
to amounts deferred in respect of 2005 and earlier). This
guarantee will remain outstanding until such deferred
compensation balances are distributed to the respective officers
and directors. The maximum exposure cannot be quantified as the
guarantee, in part, is related to the value of deferred
investments as of the date of the requested distribution.
Additionally, the timing of payment, if any, related to these
liabilities cannot be reasonably predicted because the
distribution dates are not fixed.
F-38
Transactions
with Avis Budget Group, Realogy and Travelport
Prior to the Companys Separation from Cendant, it entered
into a Transition Services Agreement (TSA) with Avis
Budget Group, Realogy and Travelport to provide for an orderly
transition to becoming an independent company. Under the TSA,
each of the companies agreed to provide the Company with various
services, including services relating to human resources and
employee benefits, payroll, financial systems management,
treasury and cash management, accounts payable services,
telecommunications services and information technology services.
In certain cases, services provided under the TSA may be
provided by one of the separated companies following the date of
such companys separation from Cendant. During 2006, the
Company recorded $8 million of expenses and less than
$1 million in other income in the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income related to these agreements.
Separation
and Related Costs
During 2006, the Company incurred costs of $99 million in
connection with executing the Separation. Such costs consisted
primarily of (i) the acceleration of vesting of Cendant
equity awards and the related equitable adjustments of such
awards (see Note 16Stock-Based Compensation),
(ii) an impairment charge due to a rebranding initiative
for the Companys Fairfield and Trendwest trademarks (see
Note 2Summary of Significant Accounting
PoliciesImpairment of Long-Lived Assets) and
(iii) consulting and payroll-related services.
|
|
21.
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
Net
Intercompany Funding to Former Parent
The following table summarizes related party transactions
occurring between the Company and Cendant:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Net intercompany funding to former
Parent, beginning balance
|
|
$
|
1,125
|
|
|
$
|
661
|
|
|
$
|
577
|
|
Corporate-related functions
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
Income taxes, net
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
(181
|
)
|
Net interest earned on net
intercompany funding to former Parent
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Advances to former Parent, net
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
Acceleration of restricted stock
units
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elimination of intercompany
balance due to former Parent
|
|
|
(1,157
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net intercompany funding to former
Parent, ending balance
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,125
|
|
|
$
|
661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate-Related
Functions
Prior to the date of Separation, the Company was allocated
general corporate overhead expenses from Cendant for
corporate-related functions based on a percentage of the
Companys forecasted revenues. General corporate overhead
expense allocations included executive management, tax,
accounting, payroll, financial systems management, legal,
treasury and cash management, certain employee benefits and real
estate usage for common space. During 2006, 2005, and 2004, the
Company was allocated $20 million, $36 million and
$30 million, respectively, of general corporate expenses
from Cendant, which are included within general and
administrative expenses on the Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Income. The 2006 amount includes allocations only
from January 1, 2006 through the date of Separation
(July 31, 2006).
Prior to the date of Separation, Cendant also incurred certain
expenses on behalf of the Company. These expenses, which
directly benefited the Company, were allocated to the Company
based upon the Companys actual utilization of the
services. Direct allocations included costs associated with
insurance, information technology, revenue franchise audit
(during 2005 only), telecommunications and real estate usage for
Company-specific space for some but not all of the periods
presented. During 2006, 2005, and 2004, the Company was
allocated $36 million, $52 million and
$49 million, respectively, of expenses directly benefiting
the Company, which are included within general and
administrative and operating expenses on the Consolidated and
Combined Statements of Income. The 2006 amount includes
allocations from January 1, 2006 through the date of
Separation (July 31, 2006).
F-39
The Company believes the assumptions and methodologies
underlying the allocations of general corporate overhead and
direct expenses from Cendant were reasonable. However, such
expenses were not indicative of, nor is it practical or
meaningful for the Company to estimate for all historical
periods presented, the actual level of expenses that would have
been incurred had the Company been operating as a separate,
stand-alone public company.
Income
Taxes, net
Prior to the Separation, the Company was included in the
consolidated federal and state income tax returns of Cendant and
will be so included through the Separation date for the 2006
period then ended. Balances due to Cendant for this short period
return and related tax attributes were estimated as of
December 31, 2006 and will be adjusted in connection with
the eventual filing of the short period tax return and the
settlement of the related tax audits of these periods. The net
income tax payable to Cendant, which was $703 million as of
December 31, 2005 and was recorded as a component of net
intercompany funding to former Parent on the Combined Balance
Sheet, was eliminated at the Separation date.
Net
Interest Earned on Net Intercompany Funding to Former
Parent
Prior to the Separation, Cendant swept cash from the
Companys bank accounts while the Company maintained
certain balances due to or from Cendant. Inclusive of unpaid
corporate allocations, the Company had net amounts due from
Cendant, exclusive of income taxes, of $1,828 million as of
December 31, 2005, which was eliminated at the date of
Separation. Prior to the Separation, certain of the advances
between the Company and Cendant were interest-bearing. In
connection with the interest-bearing balances, the Company
recorded and net interest income of $21 million,
$30 million and $16 million during 2006, 2005 and
2004, respectively.
Related
Party Agreements
Prior to the Separation, the Company conducted the following
business activities, among others, with Cendants other
business units or newly separated companies, as applicable:
(i) provision of access to hotel accommodation and vacation
exchange and rentals inventory to be distributed through
Travelport; (ii) utilization of employee relocation
services, including relocation policy management, household
goods moving services and departure and destination real estate
related services; (iii) utilization of commercial real
estate brokerage services, such as transaction management,
acquisition and disposition services, broker price opinions,
renewal due diligence and portfolio review;
(iv) utilization of corporate travel management services of
Travelport; and (v) designation of Cendants car
rental brands, Avis and Budget, as the exclusive primary and
secondary suppliers, respectively, of car rental services for
the Companys employees. The majority of the related party
agreement transactions were settled in cash. The majority of
these commercial relationships have continued since the
Separation under agreements formalized in connection with the
Separation.
F-40
|
|
22.
|
Selected
Quarterly Financial Data(unaudited)
|
Provided below is selected unaudited quarterly financial data
for 2006 and 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
144
|
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
|
$
|
189
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
554
|
|
Corporate and
Other (a)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
870
|
|
|
$
|
955
|
|
|
$
|
1,047
|
|
|
$
|
970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
Corporate and
Other (a)(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
Less: Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and
minority interest
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
change, net of tax
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax |
|
|
( 0.32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares (c) |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax |
|
|
( 0.32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares (c) |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
112
|
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
|
$
|
148
|
|
|
$
|
144
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
473
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
Corporate and
Other (a)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
795
|
|
|
$
|
867
|
|
|
$
|
948
|
|
|
$
|
861
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
Vacation Exchange and Rentals
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Vacation Ownership
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
Corporate and
Other (a)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and
minority interest
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (d)
|
|
$
|
130
|
|
|
$
|
89
|
|
|
$
|
121
|
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
0.65 |
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
|
0.60 |
|
|
|
0.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares (c) |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Includes the elimination of
transactions between segments.
|
|
(b)
|
|
Includes separation and related
costs of $3 million, $5 million, $68 million and
$23 million during the first, second, third and fourth
quarter, respectively, and $32 million of a net benefit
from the resolution of certain contingent liabilities during the
fourth quarter.
|
|
(c)
|
|
For all periods prior to the Companys separation date (July 31, 2006),
weighted average shares were calculated as one share of Wyndham common stock outstanding for
every five shares of Cendant common stock outstanding as of July 21, 2006, the record date for
the distribution of Wyndham common stock. |
|
(d)
|
|
Net income for the fourth quarter
includes costs incurred to combine the operations of the
Companys vacation exchange and rentals business of
$14 million.
|
F-41
Preferred
Stock Sale
On January 31, 2007, Affinion Group Holdings, Inc.
(Affinion) redeemed a portion of the preferred stock
investment owned by Avis Budget Group, of which the Company
owned a 37.5% interest pursuant to the Separation agreement. The
redemption resulted in approximately $40 million in
proceeds for the Company and a gain on sale of approximately
$12 million. As of December 31, 2006, the Company had
a $37 million receivable in non-current due from former
Parent and subsidiaries on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, which
represented the Companys right to receive proceeds from
the ultimate sale of Cendants preferred stock investment
in and warrants of Affinion. Subsequent to Affinions
redemption, such receivable was reduced to $10 million.
Repayment
of Debt and Cancellation of EURO Revolver
On January 31, 2007, the Company repaid the outstanding
borrowings of $73 million related to the its Landal
GreenParks business and cancelled a related undrawn
EUR 15 million revolving credit facility. The
borrowings were paid off utilizing a portion of the proceeds
from the Companys $800 million 6.00% senior unsecured
bond issuance. These facilities will not be refinanced and cash
flow and/or
corporate debt will be utilized for the additional funding needs
of Landal GreenParks in the future.
Premium
Yield Facility
On February 12, 2007, the Company closed a securitization
facility, Premium Yield Facility
2007-A, in
the amount of $155 million, which bears interest at LIBOR
plus 43 basis points and an additional bond insurance fee
and matures in February 2020. Proceeds from this facility were
used to pay down borrowings and for general corporate purposes.
Share
Repurchase Program
On February 13, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors
authorized a new stock repurchase program that enables the
Company to purchase up to $400 million of its common stock.
The Board of Directors authorization included increased
repurchase capacity for proceeds received from stock option
exercises. The amount and timing of specific repurchases are
subject to market conditions, applicable legal requirements and
other factors. Repurchases may be conducted in the open market
or in privately negotiated transactions.
F-42
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
2.1
|
|
Separation and Distribution
Agreement by and among Cendant Corporation, Realogy Corporation,
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation and Travelport Inc., dated as of
July 27, 2006 (incorporated by reference to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 31, 2006)
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Separation
and Distribution Agreement by and among Cendant Corporation,
Realogy Corporation, Wyndham Worldwide Corporation and
Travelport Inc., dated as of August 17, 2006 (incorporated
by reference to the Registrants
Form 10-Q
filed November 14, 2006)
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws
(incorporated by reference to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Certificate of Designations of
Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (incorporated
by reference to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Rights Agreement, dated as of
July 13, 2006, by and between Wyndham Worldwide Corporation
and Mellon Investor Services, LLC, as Rights Agent, including
the form of Rights Certificate as Exhibit B thereto and the
form of Summary of Rights as Exhibit C thereto
(incorporated by reference to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Indenture, dated December 5,
2006, between Wyndham Worldwide Corporation and U.S. Bank
National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed February 1, 2007)
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Form of 6.00% Senior Notes
due 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed February 1, 2007)
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement,
dated December 5, 2006, among Wyndham Worldwide, Citigroup
Global Markets Inc. and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., as
initial purchasers and as representatives of the other initial
purchasers named therein (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed February 1, 2007)
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as
of September 13, 2005, by and among Cendant Corporation, as
Buyer, and Wyndham Management Corporation, GH-Galveston, Inc,
W-Isla, LLC, Performance Hospitality Management Company, Wyndham
(Bermuda) Management Company, Ltd., Wyndham Hotels &
Resorts (Aruba) N.V., WHC Franchise Corporation, Wyndham
International Inc., Wyndham IP Corporation, Wyndham
58th Street, L.L.C., Grand Bay Management Company and
Wyndham International Operating Partnership, L.P., as Sellers
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the
Registrants
Form 10-12B
filed May 11, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Amendment Agreement, dated as of
October 11, 2005, amending the Asset Purchase Agreement,
dated as of September 13, 2005, by and among Cendant
Corporation, as Buyer, and Wyndham Management Corporation,
GH-Galveston, Inc, W-Isla, LLC, Performance Hospitality
Management Company, Wyndham (Bermuda) Management Company, Ltd.,
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts (Aruba) N.V., WHC Franchise
Corporation, Wyndham International Inc., Wyndham IP Corporation,
Wyndham 58th Street, L.L.C., Grand Bay Management Company
and Wyndham International Operating Partnership, L.P., as
Sellers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the
Registrants
Form 10-12B
filed May 11, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Amended and Restated FairShare
Vacation Plan Use Management Trust Agreement, dated as of
January 1, 1996, by and among Fairshare Vacation Owners
Association, Fairfield Communities, Inc., Fairfield Myrtle
Beach, Inc., such other subsidiaries of Fairfield Communities,
Inc. and such other unrelated third parties as may from time to
time desire to subject property to this Trust Agreement
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the
Registrants
Form 10-12B
filed May 11, 2006)
|
G-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
First Amendment to the Amended and
Restated FairShare Vacation Plan Use Management
Trust Agreement, dated as of February 29, 2000, by and
between the Fairshare Vacation Owners Association and Fairfield
Communities, Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.23 to the Registrants
Form 10-12B
filed May 11, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Second Amendment to the Amended
and Restated FairShare Vacation Plan Use Management
Trust Agreement, dated as of February 19, 2003, by and
between the Fairshare Vacation Owners Association and Fairfield
Resorts, Inc., formerly known as Fairfield Communities, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the
Registrants
Form 10-12B
filed May 11, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Management Agreement, dated as of
January 1, 1996, by and between Fairshare Vacation Owners
Association and Fairfield Communities, Inc. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Registrants
Form 10-12B
filed May 11, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Form of Declaration of Vacation
Owner Program of WorldMark, the Club (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.26 to the Registrants
Form 10-12B
filed May 11, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
First Supplement to Indenture and
Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 16, 2006, by and
among Sierra
2003-1
Receivables Funding Company, LLC, as Issuer, Wyndham Consumer
Finance, Inc., as Servicer, U.S. Bank, National
Association, as Trustee, and U.S. Bank, National
Association, as Collateral Agent, to the Indenture and Servicing
Agreement dated as of March 31, 2003 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.16(a) to the Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed June 26, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Indenture and Servicing Agreement
dated as of March 31, 2003, by and among Sierra
2003-1
Receivables Funding Company, LLC, as Issuer, and Fairfield
Acceptance CorporationNevada (nka Wyndham Consumer
Finance, Inc.), and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as
Trustee, and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Collateral
Agent (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Cendant
Corporations Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 dated
May 9, 2003)
|
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
First Supplement to Indenture and
Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 16, 2006, by and
among Sierra
2003-2
Receivables Funding Company, LLC, as Issuer, Wyndham Consumer
Finance, Inc., as Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association,
as Trustee, and U.S. Bank National Association, as
Collateral Agent, to the Indenture and Servicing Agreement dated
as of December 5, 2003 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.17(a) to the Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed June 26, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
Indenture and Servicing Agreement
dated as of December 5, 2003, by and among Sierra
2003-2
Receivables Funding Company, LLC, as Issuer, and Fairfield
Acceptance CorporationNevada (nka Wyndham Consumer
Finance, Inc.), as Servicer, and Wachovia Bank, National
Association, as Trustee, and Wachovia Bank, National
Association, as Collateral Agent (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.70 to Cendant Corporations Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2003 dated March 1,
2004)
|
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
First Supplement to Indenture and
Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 16, 2006, by and
among Sierra Timeshare
2004-1
Receivables Funding, LLC, as Issuer, Wyndham Consumer Finance,
Inc., as Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as
Trustee, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Collateral
Agent, to the Indenture and Servicing Agreement dated as of
May 27, 2004 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.18(a) to the Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed June 26, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
Indenture and Servicing Agreement,
dated as of May 27, 2004, by and among Cendant Timeshare
2004-1
Receivables Funding, LLC (nka Sierra Timeshare
2004-1
Receivables Funding, LLC), as Issuer, and Fairfield Acceptance
CorporationNevada (nka Wyndham Consumer Finance,
Inc.), as Servicer, and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as
Trustee, and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Collateral
Agent (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Cendant
Corporations Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 dated
August 2, 2004)
|
G-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
First Supplement to Indenture and
Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 16, 2006, by and
among Sierra Timeshare
2005-1
Receivables Funding, LLC, as Issuer, Wyndham Consumer Finance,
Inc., as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank National Association, as
Trustee, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Collateral
Agent, to the Indenture and Servicing Agreement dated as of
August 11, 2005 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.19(a) to the Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed June 26, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Indenture and Servicing Agreement,
dated as of August 11, 2005, by and among Cendant Timeshare
2005-1
Receivables Funding, LLC (nka Sierra Timeshare
2005-1
Receivables Funding, LLC), as Issuer, Cendant Timeshare Resort
Group-Consumer Finance, Inc. (nka Wyndham Consumer Finance,
Inc.), as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
Trustee, and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Collateral
Agent (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Cendant
Corporations Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated August 17, 2005)
|
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
Performance Guaranty, dated as of
June 16, 2006, by Wyndham Worldwide Corporation in favor of
Sierra
2003-1
Receivables Funding Company, LLC, as Issuer, Sierra Deposit
Company, LLC, as Depositor, and U.S. Bank National
Association, as Trustee and Collateral Agent (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed June 26, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
Performance Guaranty, dated as of
June 16, 2006, by Wyndham Worldwide Corporation in favor of
Sierra
2003-2
Receivables Funding Company, LLC, as Issuer, Sierra Deposit
Company, LLC, as Depositor, and U.S. Bank National
Association, as Trustee and Collateral Agent (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.28 to the Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed June 26, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
Performance Guaranty, dated as of
June 16, 2006, by Wyndham Worldwide Corporation in favor of
Sierra Timeshare
2004-1
Receivables Funding, LLC, as Issuer, Sierra Deposit Company,
LLC, as Depositor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as
Trustee and Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.29 to the Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed June 26, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
Performance Guaranty, dated as of
June 16, 2006, by Wyndham Worldwide Corporation in favor of
Sierra Timeshare
2005-1
Receivables Funding, LLC, as Issuer, Sierra Deposit Company,
LLC, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank National Association, as
Trustee, and U.S. Bank, National Association, as Collateral
Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to the
Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed June 26, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
Employment Agreement with Stephen
P. Holmes (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the
Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed July 7, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
Master Indenture and Servicing
Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2002 and Amended and
Restated as of July 7, 2006, by and among Sierra Timeshare
Conduit Receivables Funding, LLC, as Issuer, Wyndham Consumer
Finance, Inc., as Master Servicer, and U.S. Bank National
Association, as successor to Wachovia Bank, National
Association, as Trustee and Collateral Agent (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed July 12, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
Series 2002-1
Supplement, dated as of August 29, 2002 and Amended and
Restated as of July 7, 2006, to Master Indenture and
Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2002 and
Amended and Restated as of July 7, 2006 by and among Sierra
Timeshare Conduit Receivables Funding, LLC, as Issuer, Wyndham
Consumer Finance, Inc., as Master Servicer, and U.S. Bank
National Association, successor to Wachovia Bank, National
Association, as Trustee and Collateral Agent (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed July 12, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
Master Loan Purchase Agreement,
dated as of August 29, 2002 and Amended and Restated as of
July 7, 2006, by and between Wyndham Consumer Finance,
Inc., as Seller, Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc., as
Co-Originator, and Fairfield Myrtle Beach, Inc., as
Co-Originator and Kona Hawaiian Vacation Ownership, LLC, as an
Originator, and Shawnee Development, Inc., as an Originator, and
Sea Gardens Beach and Tennis Resort, Inc., Vacation Break
Resorts, Inc., Vacation Break Resorts at Star Island, Inc., Palm
Vacation Group and Ocean Ranch Vacation Group, each as a VB
Subsidiary, and Palm Vacation Group and Ocean Ranch Vacation
Group, each as a VB Partnership and Sierra Deposit Company, LLC,
as Purchaser (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to
the Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed July 12, 2006)
|
G-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.24
|
|
Series 2002-1
Supplement, dated as of August 29, 2002 and Amended and
Restated as of July 7, 2006, to Master Loan Purchase
Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2002, and Amended and
Restated as of July 7, 2006 by and between Wyndham Consumer
Finance, Inc., as Seller, Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc., as
Co-Originator, Fairfield Myrtle Beach, Inc., as Co-Originator,
Kona Hawaiian Vacation Ownership, LLC, as an Originator, Shawnee
Development, Inc., as an Originator, Sea Gardens Beach and
Tennis Resort, Inc., Vacation Break Resorts, Inc., Vacation
Break Resorts at Star Island, Inc., Palm Vacation Group and
Ocean Ranch Vacation Group, each as a VB subsidiary, and Palm
Vacation Group and Ocean Ranch Vacation Group, each as a VB
Partnership, and Sierra Deposit Company, LLC, as Purchaser
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the
Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed July 12, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.25
|
|
Master Loan Purchase Agreement,
dated as of August 29, 2002, and Amended and Restated as of
July 7, 2006, by and between Wyndham Resort Development
Corporation, as Seller, and Sierra Deposit Company, LLC, as
Purchaser (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to
the Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed July 12, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.26
|
|
Series 2002-1
Supplement, dated as of August 29, 2002 and Amended as of
July 7, 2006 to the Master Loan Purchase Agreement dated as
of August 29, 2002, and Amended and Restated as of
July 7, 2006 by and between Wyndham Resort Development
Corporation, as Seller, and Sierra Deposit Company, LLC, as
Purchaser (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to
the Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed July 12, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.27
|
|
Master Pool Purchase Agreement,
dated as of August 29, 2002 and Amended and Restated as of
July 7, 2006, by and between Sierra Deposit Company, LLC,
as Depositor, and Sierra Timeshare Conduit Receivables Funding,
LLC, as Issuer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15
to the Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed July 12, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of
July 7, 2006, among Wyndham Worldwide Corporation, as
Borrower, certain financial institutions as lenders, JPMorgan
Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Citicorp USA, Inc.,
as Syndication Agent, Bank of America, N.A., The Bank of Nova
Scotia and The Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, as Documentation
Agents, and Credit Suisse, Cayman Islands Branch, as
Co-Documentation Agent (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.31 to the Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed July 12, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.29
|
|
Performance Guaranty, dated as of
July 7, 2006, by Wyndham Worldwide Corporation in favor of
Sierra Deposit Company, LLC, as Depositor, Sierra Timeshare
Conduit Receivables Funding Company, LLC, as Issuer, and
U.S. Bank National Association, as successor to Wachovia
Bank, National Association, as Trustee and Collateral Agent
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the
Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed July 12, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.30
|
|
Indenture and Servicing Agreement,
dated as of July 11, 2006, by and among Sierra Timeshare
2006-1
Receivables Funding, LLC, as Issuer, Wyndham Consumer Finance,
Inc., as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
Trustee, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Collateral
Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to the
Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed July 12, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.31
|
|
Performance Guarantee, dated as of
July 11, 2006, by Cendant Corporation and Wyndham Worldwide
Corporation in favor of Sierra Timeshare
2006-1
Receivables Funding, LLC, as issuer, Sierra Deposit Company,
LLC, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
Trustee, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Collateral
Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to the
Registrants
Form 10-12B/A
filed July 12, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.32
|
|
Employment Agreement with Franz S.
Hanning (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.33
|
|
Employment Agreement with Kenneth
N. May (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.34
|
|
Employment Agreement with Steven
A. Rudnitsky (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to
the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
G-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.35
|
|
Employment Agreement with Virginia
M. Wilson (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.36
|
|
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation 2006
Equity and Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.37
|
|
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation
Non-Employee Directors Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.38
|
|
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation
Savings Restoration Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.39
|
|
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation
Officer Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 19, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.40
|
|
Transition Services Agreement
among Cendant Corporation, Realogy Corporation, Wyndham
Worldwide Corporation and Travelport Inc., dated as of
July 27, 2006 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 31, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.41
|
|
Tax Sharing Agreement among
Cendant Corporation, Realogy Corporation, Wyndham Worldwide
Corporation and Travelport Inc., dated as of July 28, 2006
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 31, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.42
|
|
Form of Award
AgreementRestricted Stock Units (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 31, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.43
|
|
Form of Award AgreementStock
Appreciation Rights (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed July 31, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.44
|
|
First Amendment, dated as of
November 13, 2006, to the
Series 2002-1
Supplement, dated as of August 29, 2002 and Amended and
Restated as of July 7, 2006, to Master Indenture and
Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2002 and
Amended and Restated as of July 7, 2006, by and among
Sierra Timeshare Conduit Receivables Funding, LLC, as Issuer,
Wyndham Consumer Finance, Inc., as Master Servicer, and
U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee and Collateral
Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10(a) to the
Registrants
Form 10-Q
filed November 14, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.45
|
|
First Amendment, dated as of
November 13, 2006, to the Master Loan Purchase Agreement,
dated as of August 29, 2002 and Amended and Restated as of
July 7, 2006, by and between Wyndham Consumer Finance,
Inc., as Seller, Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc., as
Co-Originator, and Fairfield Myrtle Beach, Inc., as
Co-Originator and Kona Hawaiian Vacation Ownership, LLC, as an
Originator, and Shawnee Development, Inc., as an Originator, and
Sea Gardens Beach and Tennis Resort, Inc., Vacation Break
Resorts, Inc., Vacation Break Resorts at Star Island, Inc., Palm
Vacation Group and Ocean Ranch Vacation Group, each as a VB
Subsidiary, and Palm Vacation Group and Ocean Ranch Vacation
Group, each as a VB Partnership and Sierra Deposit Company, LLC
as Purchaser (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11(a)
to the Registrants
Form 10-Q
filed November 14, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.46
|
|
First Amendment, dated as of
November 13, 2006, to the
Series 2002-1
Supplement, dated as of August 20, 2002 and Amended and
Restated as of July 7, 2006, to the Master Loan Purchase
Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2002 and Amended and
Restated as of July 7, 2006, by and between Wyndham
Consumer Finance, Inc., as Seller, Wyndham Vacation Resorts,
Inc., as Co-Originator, and Fairfield Myrtle Beach, Inc., as
Co-Originator and Kona Hawaiian Vacation Ownership, LLC, as an
Originator, and Shawnee Development, Inc., as an Originator, and
Sea Gardens Beach and Tennis Resort, Inc., Vacation Break
Resorts, Inc., Vacation Break Resorts at Star Island, Inc., Palm
Vacation Group and Ocean Ranch Vacation Group, each as a VB
Subsidiary, and Palm Vacation Group and Ocean Ranch Vacation
Group, each as a VB Partnership and Sierra Deposit Company, LLC
as Purchaser (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12(a)
to the Registrants
Form 10-Q
filed November 14, 2006)
|
G-5
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.47
|
|
First Amendment, dated as of
November 13, 2006, to the
Series 2002-1
Supplement, dated as of August 29, 2002 and Amended and
Restated as of November 13, 2006, to the Master Loan
Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2002 and Amended
and Restated as of July 7, 2006, by and between Wyndham
Resort Development Corporation, as Seller, and Sierra Deposit
Company, LLC, as Purchaser (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.14(a) to the Registrants
Form 10-Q
filed November 14, 2006)
|
|
|
|
10.48*
|
|
First Amendment to Wyndham
Worldwide Corporation
Non-Employee
Directors Deferred Compensation Plan
|
|
|
|
21.1*
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
|
|
|
|
23.1*
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
|
31.1*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer Pursuant to
Rules 13(a)-14(a)
and 15(d)-14(a) Promulgated Under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended
|
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial
Officer Pursuant to
Rules 13(a)-14(a)
and 15(d)-14(a) Promulgated Under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended
|
|
|
|
32*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
G-6